Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Childhood and adolescent nutrition outcomes among girls exposed to gender-based violence: A rapid evidence assessment of quantitative research

  • Luissa Vahedi ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    l.vahedi@wustl.edu

    Affiliation Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America

  • Manuela Orjuela-Grimm,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States of America

  • Silvia Bhatt-Carreno,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States of America

  • Sarah Rachel Meyer

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Background

An emerging evidence base has explored the nutritional consequences of gender-based violence (GBV) perpetrated against girls during childhood/adolescence. We conducted a rapid evidence assessment of quantitative studies describing associations between GBV and girls’ nutrition.

Methods

We adapted systematic review methods and included empirical, peer-reviewed studies, published after 2000 (until November, 2022), that were written in Spanish or English and reported quantitative associations between girls’ exposure to GBV and nutrition outcomes. A variety of GBV forms were considered: childhood sexual abuse (CSA), child marriage, preferential feeding of boys, sexual IPV and dating violence. Nutrition outcomes included anemia, underweight, overweight, stunting, micronutrient deficiencies, meal frequency, and dietary diversity.

Results

In total, 18 studies were included, 13 of which were conducted in high-income countries. Most sources utilized longitudinal or cross-sectional data to quantify associations between CSA, sexual assault, and intimate partner/dating violence and elevated BMI/overweight/obesity/adiposity. Findings suggest that CSA perpetrated by parents/caregivers is associated with elevated BMI/overweight/obesity/adiposity via cortisol reactivity and depression; this relationship may be compounded by additional intimate partner/dating violence in adolescence. The effects of sexual violence on BMI are likely to emerge during a sensitive period of development between late adolescence and young adulthood. Emerging evidence was found regarding the relationship between child marriage (and the related exposure: age at first pregnancy) and undernutrition. The association between sexual abuse and reduced height and leg length was inconclusive.

Conclusion

Given that only 18 studies were included, the relationship between girls’ direct exposure to GBV and malnutrition has received little empirical attention, especially with respect to studies conducted in LMIC and fragile settings. Most studies focused on CSA and overweight/obesity, where significant associations were found. Future research should test the moderation and mediation effects of intermediary variables (depression, PTSD, cortisol reactivity, impulsivity, emotional eating) and consider sensitive periods of development. Research should also explore the nutritional consequences of child marriage.

Introduction

Childhood (defined as the time between infancy to the onset of puberty) and adolescence (between childhood and culturally/socially defined adulthood) are sensitive periods of growth and development that lay the foundation for later health status and health behaviors [13]. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events that occur during childhood and adolescence and undermine a child’s physical, social, and emotional development, learning, and the sense of safety and stability [4]. ACEs can have a profound effect on later development. Examples of ACEs include witnessing or experiencing abuse or violence (such as childhood sexual abuse [CSA]), the incarceration of a parent/guardian, and having parents/guardians with substance use or mental health problems [5]. Exposure to ACEs can contribute to harmful levels of stress hormones that can negatively affect brain development and immune responses [68]. In particular, ACEs have been studied as primary exposures contributing to adult morbidity and mortality [4]. A rich body of longitudinal research has investigated relationship between ACEs and adult health. ACEs are directly associated with a greater likelihood of chronic diseases (type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease), mental health outcomes (depression and attempted suicide), sexually transmitted infections, and substance abuse ranging from nicotine to intravenous drugs [917].

Interpersonal violence is the intentional use of physical force or power against another person to enact physical, sexual, psychological harm, including neglect or deprivation [18]. Recent estimates indicate that interpersonal violence is the fifth leading cause of death among youth 10–24 years old, representing 3.5% of disability adjusted life years globally [19]. However, the distribution of interpersonal violence and its forms is not random. In particular, girls are disproportionately affected by gender-based violence (GBV) [20], such as dating violence/intimate partner violence (IPV) (inclusive of physical, emotional, sexual, economic and controlling behaviors); GBV is defined as the intentional or threatened use of power or physical force, against another person or group of people based on their perceived gender or gender identity [20].

In addition to dating violence/IPV, GBV also includes CSA, child marriage, female genital cutting, and marital rape [21]. GBV can be perpetrated by intimate partners, family members, peers, and authority figures, and is underscored by a gender power hierarchy, wherein “masculinity” is privileged over “femininity” and cis-gender identities are presumed to be natural and superior in comparison to trans-identities [22]. Globally, 10% of females under the age of 20 have been forced to perform sexual acts [23], while 25% of young women who have been in relationships experience IPV by their mid-twenties [24, 25]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of child marriage (defined as informal unions/marriages between a child under the age of 18 and another child or adult) is estimated to be 54.0%, ranging from 16.5% to 81.7% [26].

GBV perpetrated against females during childhood and adolescence is a specific ACE subtype (although not the only form of ACE) that can affect growth, development, and health [27]. Studies of ACEs have improved the knowledge base concerning the health impacts of GBV exposure during childhood. However, ACE studies don’t disentangle GBV from other ACEs and sometimes lack sex disaggregation. Further, the majority of research exploring the health sequala of GBV focuses on violence against women specifically and examines adult morbidity specifically [2830] rather than focusing on exposures and outcomes that can be measured during childhood and adolescence. Further, even when CSA is the primary interest variable, health outcomes are often measured in adulthood. Overall, there is less research exploring the childhood and adolescent health consequences of GBV perpetrated against females during childhood and adolescence.

Nutrition, a critical contributor to health and wellbeing, is defined as the process of taking in food for growth, metabolism, and repair [31]. Moreover, childhood nutritional status can impact health outcomes across the life course, with micro nutrient insufficiencies such as iron or calcium contributing to cognitive impairments and osteopenia later in life [32]. Research examining the link between GBV exposure and nutrition has predominantly focused on forms of GBV perpetrated against adult women during and immediately after pregnancy [3335]. For example, IPV victimization during pregnancy and lactation negatively affects breastfeeding practices and has been linked to premature birth and labor and low birth weight, known risk factors for later childhood low height and weight for age [36]. The evidence base exploring the impact of GBV on childhood nutrition outcomes has focused on GBV perpetrated against mothers and nutrition outcomes among their children [3638] (Authors, under review). Less understood are the childhood and adolescent nutritional consequences of GBV among girls who have themselves experienced GBV during childhood and adolescence.

Emerging research indicates that some nutrition-related disorders of adulthood may begin to manifest during childhood and adolescence and that exposure to GBV may contribute to the development of these disorders. Research has postulated that exposure to GBV can result in trauma and stress-related physiological processes that can affect metabolism and appetite, the development of eating disorders, coping mechanisms that influence nutrition and eating behaviors, and weight gain [3942]. Specifically, evidence indicates that disordered eating patterns and overweight/obesity among survivors of CSA and IPV/dating violence emerge in adolescence and have enduring effects in adulthood [43, 44]. Also, forms of GBV affecting girls, such as child marriage, the preferential feeding of men and boys, and controlling behaviors, may directly and indirectly impact determinants of nutrition—namely, access to nutrient-rich foods and nutrition-related services—potentially contributing to malnutrition in adolescence [4548]. That we are aware, there is no existing evidence synthesis focused on summarizing the current body of knowledge surrounding the childhood and adolescence nutritional consequences of GBV.

Purpose

The purpose of the present research is to review and synthesize peer-reviewed, quantitative evidence describing the associations between GBV against girls and indicators of girls’ nutrition outcomes during childhood and adolescence. We focus on GBV perpetrated against girls given the burden of GBV among girls and to delineate sex-specific mechanisms reported among girls. We conducted a rapid evidence assessment (REA) to describe the existing evidence-base, delineate potential causal mechanisms and pathways in the available data, and identify key methodological considerations for future empirical and theoretical research endeavors.

Methods

The present review is part of a larger REA commissioned by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The larger REA had two research objectives: (1) Review and synthesize quantitative evidence describing the associations between GBV against girls and indicators of girls’ nutrition outcomes (Direct GBV exposure) and (2) Review and synthesize the quantitative evidence describing the associations between IPV against a maternal caregiver and children’s nutrition outcomes, with a particular focus on humanitarian contexts (Indirect GBV exposure). The present paper is focused specifically on the first objective of the larger REA, pertaining to the direct pathway. A separate publication details the indirect pathway (Authors, under review). There is no published review protocol. However, the protocol for the larger REA is presented in Appendix B of S2 Appendix.

We adapted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis standards (PRISMA) [49] for the purposes of conducting a REA. REAs adapt systematic review methodology to synthesize a body of literature, ensuring rapid completion of the review and applicability to policy and programmatic needs in a short timeframe [50]. The following changes to systematic review methodology were made: (i) title/ abstract screening was conducted by one of three reviewers and (ii) data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by a one or two team members per article, depending on whether the article warranted discussion. Furthermore, while inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined a-priori, the team iteratively refined the criteria based on the volume of sources and the overall research goal. We conducted the REA in 7 stages, which we describe below: (1) Preliminary scoping of the literature to clarify the research question and search strategy, (2) Search strategy execution, (3) Title and abstract screening, (4) Full text review, (5) Quality Assessment, (6) Data extraction, and (7) Synthesis.

As a preliminary step, we conducted a preliminary scoping of existing reviews and literature on the associations between girls’ direct exposure to GBV during childhood and nutrition outcomes. We searched Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews and PubMed for reviews concerning direct childhood exposures to GBV and subsequent nutrition-related outcomes. Selected reviews and literature were examined to elucidate specific direct pathways, select forms of GBV to include in the review, and to help operationalize database search terms.

Our preliminary scoping review indicated a general lack of robust research synthesis detailing the effect of girls’ exposure to GBV on adverse nutrition outcomes during childhood and adolescence. In our preliminary scoping review, we identified the following forms of GBV experienced during childhood that are potentially related to later nutrition deficits among females: preferential feeding of boys, gendered child abuse (i.e., CSA), child marriage, and IPV/dating violence.

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility criteria were defined a-priori and then were iteratively refined to better reflect the existing body of literature and address the research question. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are displayed in Table 1. Two adjustments to the a-priori eligibility criteria were made. First, we originally wanted to focus on empirical evidence conducted in humanitarian settings. However, due to the limited number studies detailing girls’ direct exposure to GBV and nutrition related outcomes in humanitarian settings, we expanded the eligibility criteria to include studies conducted in any setting or country.

Second, we originally conceptualized the population of interest to be females up to the age of 18. However, we noted that sensitive periods of overweight development following sexual abuse or IPV occur between adolescence and young adulthood. In our title and abstract screening of the direct pathway studies, we found several longitudinal studies also measured nutrition outcomes into adulthood. In an effort not to erroneously exclude samples of children followed into adulthood, and to be consistent with the WHO definition of adolescence which extends through age 19 years, we included nutrition outcomes also measured among girls who were up to 20 years old. Although many sources recruited samples that contained both males and females, all sources included in this REA provided sex-stratified measures of association. We used these to elucidate the association between exposure to gender-based violence and nutrition indicators in females during later childhood and adolescence.

Search protocol and study selection

We conducted a structured database search in Medline, Embase, and Global Health using the Ovid Medline platform in July 2021 and in November 2022 (to capture newly published research). Boolean operators were used to best account for keyword and MeSH term variations. No filters, limits, or restrictions were applied to the search. Sources were exported to Covidence, a web-based software platform designed to streamline screening and full text review for systematic reviews. The S1 Appendix presents the full search strategy for each database.

Screening occurred in two stages: (i) title and abstract; and (ii) full text review. Titles/abstracts were each screened by one reviewer. Prior to conducting single screening, the team practiced screening on a sub-sample of titles/abstracts (n = 400) to ascertain and resolve any differences in interpretation regarding how to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the title/abstract screening phase, when reviewers were uncertain on how to apply the inclusion/exclusion criteria in relation to a particular source, the team discussed and reached consensus. During the full text screening, sources were assessed vis-à-vis the inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Discordance between the reviewers was adjudicated by a third, independent reviewer and when necessary, further discussed with the wider team to reach consensus.

Quality assessment and data extraction

Given the diverse quantitative study designs included, no single quality assessment tool was deemed appropriate. Accordingly, the team combined relevant quality assessment questions from the following quality assessment tools: National Institutes of Health (NIH) [51], Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) [52], Appraisal Tool for Cross Sectional Studies (AXIS) [53], Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [54], and the National Institutes of Health assessment tool for observational cohort and cross sectional studies [55]. The items included in the quality assessment are presented in Table 2.

The team designed a data extraction template in accordance with the research goals. Specifically, data were extracted according to general study characteristics, elements of the study design and sampling, violence exposure measurement, nutrition outcome measurement, and summary of results. The data extraction template was pilot tested for further refinement. Team members extracted information independently and extraction was reviewed by a senior member of the research team.

Synthesis

Once data extraction and the quality assessment were completed, the team reviewed the evidence base for patterns. Overarching patterns and findings with respect to study design and sampling, GBV and nutrition indicator measurement methods, overall direction of findings, and mechanisms/pathways connecting exposure to outcome were described and summarized into tables. In particular, we grouped studies by mechanism/pathway studied and synthesized overall results according to mechanism/pathway. Quality assessment measures were summarized using aggregate descriptive statistics (count frequencies and percentages). See S2 Appendix for disaggregated quality assessment results.

Results

The PRISMA flow diagram is presented in Fig 1. After executing the database search strategies, 6493 sources were imported to Covidence and 1516 duplicates were removed, yielding 4977 citations for screening. During title and abstract screening, 4461 sources were excluded, and 468 full texts were assessed for eligibility. During full text review, 450 sources were excluded for various reasons outlined in Fig 1. In total, only 18 represent the direct pathway and are included in this paper.

Study characteristics

Table 3 displays general characteristics for the 18 studies examining pathways between girls’ GBV exposure and indicators of nutrition outcomes during childhood and adolescence. Although more than half of studies were conducted in high-income settings, several studies reported outcomes in low-and-middle income countries. The specific countries included were Ethiopia (n = 1), Nepal (n = 1), Brazil (n = 2), Mexico (n = 1), as well as United States (n = 8), England (n = 2), and the Netherlands (n = 2), with one study combining data from the United Kingdom and Brazil (n = 1).

Most sources sought to quantify associations between specific forms of sexual violence affecting children, including girls, and indicators of subsequent nutrition status in childhood and adolescence. Some studies conducted analyses that permit more nuanced understandings of causal mechanisms including use of community-based comparator groups [5659]; moderation by cortisol reactivity [57]; moderation by HPA axis attenuation [41]; interaction of caregiver abuse and IPV/dating violence [60]; interaction of child marriage and age at first pregnancy [61]; and stratification by age [62] and developmental period [56].

Quality assessment

In Table 4 we present the quality assessment results. Key gaps in quality were due to high attrition/non-response, poor measurement of GBV, and limited external validity/generalizability due to the sampling of selected groups. All studies (100%) had clearly stated research questions and objectives. Studies varied in terms of external validity and representativeness, with 55.6% of studies being truly representative of the target population and 38.9% representing a selected group, for example, cases of child abuse reported to Child Protective Services. Less than half of studies (38.9%) achieved satisfactory response rates (meaning less than 10% attrition/non-response) and/or comparability between respondents and non-respondents. The measurement of girls’ exposure to gender-based violence was deemed rigorous in half of the included studies (50.0%) and the measurement of childhood nutrition-related outcomes was appropriately rigorous in 83.3% of the included studies. Rigorous measurement of GBV and nutrition was assessed using a variety of indicators including, whether the variables were clearly defined, accurately measured and applied consistently, measurements were justified and appropriate for answering the research question, measurements reflected what they are supposed to measure, measures were collected using validated and reliability tested tools/instruments/questions, variables were measured using ‘gold standard’ tools, and questionnaires were pre-tested prior to data collection. Two thirds (66.7%) of studies adequately controlled for confounding variables. Lastly, 22.2% of studies did not properly conduct or report on their statistical analysis.

Sampling

Table 5 presents participant recruitment and sample details. Gender-stratified samples ranged from under 100 females [56] to over 26,000 [63]. The range of sample sizes is a reflection of the study designs utilized; studies with smaller sample sizes focused on newly reported cases of CSA obtained from Child Protective Services [41, 5659], or other similar organizations such as a clinic for victims of child abuse [64], and larger sample sizes pertained to secondary data analyses of nationally representative and/or longitudinal datasets of child and adolescent health [60, 62, 63, 6571]. Sampling of CSA cases from Child Protective Services is a valid method for capturing this form of GBV given that cases of genital contact and/or perpetration by family members are investigated and substantiated according to national laws. In such studies, the survivor children and a non-abusing caregiver(s) are referred to the study within a specific time frame (i.e., 6 months) of the initial abuse disclosure. However, sampling of CSA cases from Child Protective Services may not represent the entire population of CSA cases given that only a proportion of children who experience this form of abuse formally enter the child protection system. Socio-economic status and racialization experiences (as well as other social determinants of health) may differ between CSA cases that formally enter protection systems and cases that are unreported, thereby potentially introducing sampling bias and limiting generalizability.

The majority of studies included samples of adolescent participants or samples in which participants were adolescents/young adults at final data collection; although Martin-Martin et al. [64] specifically focused on children ages 0–11 years. Participant recruitment strategies varied across the sources and included both probability (n = 11) and non-probability samples (n = 7). Two predominant study designs were utilized: (i) longitudinal—including panel, prospective cohort, and cross cohort comparison designs—(n = 12) and (ii) cross sectional (n = 6). Thirteen studies conducted secondary analysis on existing datasets.

Violence exposures

The following forms of GBV were measured: child marriage [61, 68], sexual assault and rape [63, 65, 66], CSA perpetrated by parents/caregivers [41, 5659, 62, 64, 67, 6971], and dating violence/IPV [60] (Table 6). Some studies did not use validated survey instruments to measure GBV [63, 6567, 70, 71], and in some cases relied on a single question to assess girls’ GBV exposure [63, 66, 67]. Clark et al., (2014) [60] employed the Conflict and Tactics Scale, which is a widely used and validated instrument. Martin-Martin et al., (2010) [64] used clinical records to document exposure to sexual abuse.

Nutrition indicators

Nutrition indicators relied on anthropometric measures that were either observed or self-reported (Table 7). Body mass index (BMI) was the most used nutrition indicator included in the studies of older children and adolescents. In addition, other nutrition indicators that were assessed included height for age, weight for height, height for younger children, leg length, waist circumference, fat mass index, android fat percentage, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and anemia among the older children and adolescents. Height and weight were assessed using either anthropometric measurements [41, 5661, 64, 66, 67, 6971] or self-reported height and weight (which may be affected by recall error or bias based on context dependent body ideals) [63, 69, 72]. Either weight for height or BMI were calculated as appropriate according to participants’ ages and operationalized for analysis using different methods [73, 74].

Height and leg length were assessed longitudinally throughout childhood and adolescence in Denholm et al., [62]. Multiple measures of adiposity were measured by Soares, et al., [67] using anthropometric measurements and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans in adolescents. ‘Anemia’ during adolescence was measured in only one study using a point of care diagnostic lab test for hemoglobin and operationalized using WHO defined thresholds and presuming iron deficiency without documenting iron/ferritin levels [68].

Synthesis of findings

The 18 included studies addressed three pathways describing associations and potential mechanisms between exposure to GBV during childhood/adolescence and nutrition indicators. Study results are displayed in Table 8. Overall, findings indicate that sexual abuse (for example, CSA, IPV, dating violence) experienced during childhood and adolescence was positively and significantly associated with elevated BMI, overweight, obesity, and adiposity, particularly when studied longitudinally. We found more limited evidence with respect to the relationship between child marriage and undernutrition (anemia, BMI, MUAC, and chronic energy deficiency). We outline the three pathways below, with a focus on summarizing results and describing important methodological implications.

Pathway 1: Exposure to sexual abuse during childhood and adolescence and later elevated BMI (i.e., overweight, obesity) or increased adiposity

Pathway 1a: Exposure to sexual abuse by trusted adults during childhood and adolescence and later elevated BMI (i.e., overweight, obesity) or increased adiposity.

Overall, the evidence suggests that CSA perpetrated by parental/caregiver figures is associated with later increases in BMI, including overweight/obesity in late adolescence and early adulthood. Ten studies specifically explored this pathway, five of which were conducted in children referred for maltreatment in the U.S. [5659], with three reporting on the same longitudinal study cohort of maltreated children in Los Angeles [L.A.] [5759]. In this longitudinal cohort study, there was no increase in BMI associated with exposure to sexual abuse during childhood and early adolescence [58], but rather increased BMI trajectory was apparent only during middle to late adolescence when compared with girls exposed to no violence or physical violence only [59]. Another U.S. based study of children referred for maltreatment similarly found that by young adulthood, females who had experienced sexual abuse in childhood were more likely to be obese, compared with those not abused [56]. Further, Peckins et al.’s (2019) [57] analysis on the L.A. cohort suggests that response to stress measured through cortisol reactivity may act as an intermediary between exposure to CSA and later increases in BMI trajectories (in girls but not boys). Using longitudinal data, Li et al., (2021) tested whether HPA axis attenuation (high values of initial basal cortisol levels and diminished cortisol increases) accounts for the elevated risk of obesity among girls who experienced CSA, compared to unexposed girls [41]. When holding history of depression, disordered eating, and use of oral contraception (among other commonly controlled for covariates) constant, results indicated that attenuated cortisol growth rate mediated effect of CSA on elevated BMI accumulation and elevated adult obesity. Further considering mediators, Elsenburg et al., (2022) tested whether major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GDD) mediated the relationship between CSA and BMI among male and female young adults [71]. Among females, CSA was positively related to BMI at wave 5 only and CSA was positively related to MDD and GAD, which in turn were positively related to BMI at wave 4. Among males, there was no relationship between CSA and BMI or the mental health mediators and BMI. Together these studies suggest that the effects of sexual abuse on elevated BMI emerge during late adolescence and young adulthood for females. Further, low cortisol reactivity could be a risk profile for greater BMI in late adolescence among girls exposed to child sexual abuse, compared to those unexposed and those exposed to physical abuse. When longitudinal BMI data was analyzed cross sectionally, insignificant associations between CSA and BMI were noted [67, 69, 70] and when cross sectional data were used relationships indicating CSA has a protective effect on elevated BMI [58].

Pathway 1b: Exposure to intimate partner/dating violence and sexual violence during adolescence and later elevated BMI.

There is some evidence highlighting the risk of elevated BMI following exposure to sexual violence (perpetrated by any perpetrator, not specific to trusted adults such as parents/caregivers) and intimate partner/dating violence. In total, five studies examined the pathway between exposure to intimate partner/dating violence and sexual assault/rape perpetrated by intimate and non-intimate partners and elevated BMI among girls. The strongest evidence emerged from Clark et al., (2014) [60] who explored the pathway between exposure to dating violence/IPV (physical and sexual combined) and elevated BMI, finding that exposure to intimate partner/dating violence was positively associated with increasing BMI. Exposure to CSA and adolescent exposure to intimate partner/dating violence was further positively associated with elevated BMI. Marques et al. (2021) examined the relationship between exposure to rape and overweight/obesity among female adolescents over 13 years in Brazil, concluding that rape was positively and significantly associated with overweight and obesity among girls [66]. Veldwijk et al., (2012) [63] analyzed the relationship between sexual assault perpetrated by adults or peers and the presence of underweight, overweight, and obesity among adolescents between 13 and 16 years in the Netherlands. The only significant association found indicated that exposure to sexual abuse lowered the odds of being underweight. Using cross-sectional data from Brazil, Souza Marques et al., (2022) reported that for adolescent girls (attending school), forced sexual intercourse was positively related to overweight/obesity versus normal BMI and for adolescent males, forced sexual intercourse increased the odds of underweight versus normal BMI [66]. The only null result came from Anderson et al.’s (2015) [75] study; these results stemmed from a simple bivariate analysis between forced sex and overweight.

Pathway 2: Exposure to child marriage and undernutrition

Only two studies examined child marriage and measures of undernutrition (anemia, MUAC, BMI, chronic energy malnutrition [BMI < 18.5kg/m2]) [61, 68]. We found one study reporting an association between girl child marriage and anemia. This study analyzed the Ethiopian national Demographic and Health Survey data, finding that a history of child marriage among girls was significantly and positively associated with anemia (low hemoglobin) in adolescence [68]. The study did not examine history of childbirth. A second study using data from Nepal, investigated the relationship between age at marriage and age at first pregnancy and the outcomes of BMI, MUAC, and chronic energy deficiency [61]. The interaction between age at marriage and age at first pregnancy was significant in the BMI outcome model and marginally significant in the MUAC outcome model. For women who first became pregnant at age 15 or less, marriage at earlier ages resulted in significantly lower BMI at endpoint, compared to those who were married later. For women whose first pregnancy occurred at age 19 or higher, earlier marriage was associated with higher BMI. Pregnancy at age 15 or lower was positively associated with chronic energy deficiency, compared to pregnancy at 19 years or older.

Pathway 3: Exposure to childhood abuse (including sexual) and reduced height and leg length

One study investigated the relationship between child abuse (including sexual abuse) perpetrated by parents/caregivers and reduced height and leg length among girls [62]. The study found that leg length at age 16 was not associated with number of abuse types experienced, witnessing violence, or with overall maltreatment scores among females. Further, sexual abuse was not significantly associated with adult height.

Discussion

We conducted a REA to synthesize quantitative evidence describing associations between girls’ exposure to GBV and indicators of nutrition status during childhood and adolescence. Overall, the evidence base is limited: only 18 studies met our inclusion criteria and most studies examined either CSA or IPV/dating violence with later overweight/obesity/measures of adiposity. Our review indicates the lack of studies investigating the potential impacts of exposure to GBV on indicators of childhood and adolescence nutrition status among females; in particular, nutrition outcomes beyond those calculable with measures total body height and weight, indicators of key nutrient levels (including iron deficiency), or more sensitive indicators of growth during specific developmental periods. Beyond CSA, dating violence/IPV, and child marriage, no other forms of GBV were studied in relation to girls’ nutrition indicators. Another form of GBV that warrants empirical attention is the preferential feeding of boys which could be relevant in humanitarian/fragile settings where there may be high levels of food insecurity [46, 7678]. Expansion of this evidence base in LMIC is also needed, with appropriate study designs and analytical procedures that account for high baseline levels of malnutrition and multi-level risk factors for malnutrition.

Our synthesis elucidated three potential pathways linking exposure to GBV and indicators of subsequent childhood and adolescence nutrition status among females:

  1. Exposure to sexual abuse by a) parents/caregivers during childhood (CSA) and later elevated BMI (i.e., overweight, obesity) or increased adiposity, b) IPV/sexual violence during adolescence and later elevated BMI (i.e., overweight, obesity) or increased adiposity. The evidence base most clearly and consistently supported this pathway, given most studies analyzed sexual violence and BMI/obesity/overweight/increased adiposity outcomes.
  2. Exposure to child marriage and undernutrition (amenia, chronic energy deficiency, and MUAC). There is emerging evidence supporting this pathway. However, additional research is needed to replicate the findings of the two studies investigating child marriage and undernutrition. Importantly, age at first pregnancy appears to be a consequence of girl child marriage or an impetus for girl child marriage that has negative nutritional consequences for adolescent females.
  3. Exposure to childhood abuse (including sexual) and reduced height and leg length. The evidence base is inconclusive regarding this pathway, given only one study with insignificant results was found.

Among the included studies, the strongest and most consistent evidence supports the relationship between elevated BMI in late adolescence and early adulthood and exposure to sexual abuse during childhood (CSA) or adolescence (intimate partner violence/sexual assault/rape). Childhood and adolescent exposure to sexual violence, perpetrated by parents/caregivers and intimate partners, is an important predictor of nutrition status indicators in childhood and adolescence among females. Understanding the biological mechanisms that underlie this association may help guide further research regarding the consideration of intermediary variables, timing of causal effects, prevention efforts, and actionable periods of intervention.

CSA and exposure to IPV in adolescence are examples of ACEs, however health impacts are largely measured in adulthood and nutrition outcomes are less considered compared to chronic disease, mental health, and substance use. This is an important research gap given that findings from this REA indicate nutrition outcomes such as adolescent obesity are associated CSA, IPV, and sexual assault/rape exposure during childhood and adolescence. To further understand mechanisms that link GBV exposure in childhood/adolescence and the early emergence of nutrition disorders, additional research that considers childhood and adolescence nutrition outcomes is needed.

Our findings highlight that sexual violence, either perpetrated by parents/caregivers during early or middle childhood or by intimate partners or strangers later on in adolescence, is a stress-inducing form of trauma which engenders nutrition-related consequences in childhood and adolescence (as seen in this review), and into adulthood [15]. Previous studies have linked ACEs, including CSA and sexual violence, to stress response dysregulation [41, 7981]. Like other ACEs, the biological mechanism linking sexual violence to elevated BMI likely involves the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis (although, other pathways may also be involved). The HPA axis modulates the stress response by regulating the secretion of cortisol in response to environmental conditions perceived as being stressful and beyond an individual’s capacity to cope [7, 82, 83]. Exposure to sexual violence in early childhood and adolescence can serve to activate the HPA-axis in a manner that can negatively affect health outcomes related to nutrition, mental health, and immunity [79]. Long term or chronic activation of the HPA-axis from exposure to GBV and other adversities results in an attenuated diurnal decrease in cortisol or dampened/attenuated cortisol reactivity [57, 82], thus chronic exposures to GBV may be especially harmful.

Higher values of initial cortisol levels followed by a lowered rate of cortisol increase is characteristic of HPA axis dysregulation. Dampened or attenuated cortisol reactivity occurs when the HPA axis adapts to prolonged stress-induced cortisol secretion. The downregulation of basal cortisol secretion is a protective mechanism to mitigate the negative consequences of elevated cortisol. For adolescent girls, cortisol dampening/attenuation can negatively interact with normal pubertal physiological maturation, increasing the risk of developing overweight/obesity and adiposity. Biochemical pathways (metabolic disturbances, altered insulin signaling, inflammation induced damage to leptin and insulin receptors), behavioral pathways (increased impulsivity and related overeating), and/or the interaction between biochemical and behavioral pathways may explain how cortisol attenuation/dampening is related to overweight/obesity and adiposity [41, 8486]. We did not locate any studies that considered eating patterns as intermediary variables between GBV and elevated BMI/overweight/obesity/adiposity, limiting a nuanced understanding of the behavioral pathway and its connection to the biochemical pathway.

Research focusing on childhood GBV has demonstrated that among girls who have experienced CSA, while initial cortisol levels following sexual abuse exposure may be high, there is a developmental transition to lower levels of cortisol in early adulthood via cortisol attenuation [87]. More recently, research supports associations between cortisol attenuation and CSA exposure in later childhood and early to mid-adolescence (ages 6–16) among females, wherein serum basal cortisol levels further decreased longitudinally into adulthood [41]. Cortisol attenuation over time (from childhood to adulthood) was also associated with an accelerated rate of BMI accumulation across development (late childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood) and completely mediated the effect of CSA on accelerated BMI accumulation over development [41]. In the articles we reviewed, exposure to sexual abuse in school aged girls was associated with elevated BMI in late childhood, peri-puberty (ages 6–11), and late adolescence into early adulthood. Importantly, we noted that in Martin and Martin, (2010) [64], Peckins et al., (2019) [57], Elsenburg et al., (2022) [71], and Souza Marques et al., (2022) [66], such relationships were only noted among girls, thereby suggesting the importance of conducting a sex-stratified analysis. Other studies have also examined the nutritional impact of adverse childhood life events, including one systematic review focused on the relationship between ACEs more generally and childhood obesity among both boys and girls, which highlighted that sexual abuse appears to have a greater effect on childhood obesity than other ACEs and particularly among girls [43].

The currently synthesized evidence base and the wider literature presents mixed results for sex and/or gender differences in HPA axis attenuation following exposure to chronic stressors and nutrition outcomes involving elevated BMI/obesity/overweight/adiposity. Additionally, there is paucity of tested biological and social mechanisms that account for any sex/gender differences noted. Compared to males, females may be more susceptible to stress-related disorders that impact eating behaviors [88]. Adolescent females also have estrogen-related elevated central adiposity due to hormonally regulated differences in fat distribution, with females developing higher subcutaneous and gluteofemoral fat [89]. In addition, GBV exposure distribution may differ by gender: girls are at greater risk for poly-victimization (cumulative exposure to CSA, sexual IPV/dating violence, and non-partner rape across childhood and adolescence) compared to boys, thereby translating to a dysfunctional stress responses characterized by cortisol attenuation and internalized mental health sequela [90, 91].

Future research investigating the relationship between exposure to CSA and IPV or dating violence among females could consider the inclusion of theoretically relevant intermediary variables. Other potential mechanisms beyond dampened/attenuated cortisol reactivity may also include mental health mediators, given that CSA can lead to mental health disorders and negative affect. For example, ‘emotional overeating’ at age 10 has been associated with exposure to adverse events in younger children [92]. Gaining weight by overeating may also be perceived as a means of deterring unwanted sexual attention/advances among girls previously exposed to CSA [41, 93]. It is important to also consider the role of eating disorders, PTSD and depression as mediator or effect modification variables. Only Elsenburg et al., (2022) considered the mediating role of major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder on the relationship between CSA and BMI among young adults, reporting that CSA is positively associated with major depressive disorder which is in turn positively related to BMI for females but not males [71]. Other research has shown that among survivors of sexual violence, a transition from acute cortisol hyper-reactivity to prolonged hypo-reactivity is characteristic of post-traumatic stress disorder among females (PTSD) [79]. Depression is also of relevance: in a meta-analysis, Danese and Tan (2014) established that when estimates were adjusted for current depression, the relationship between childhood maltreatment (including sexual abuse) and obesity became insignificant [9]. Thus, studies can consider depression as a potential intermediary variable given it is likely a consequence of GBV and can affect nutrition outcomes. Lastly, research could also consider protective factors among children exposed to ACEs, including GBV, and how protective factors such as, quality education, presence of role models, and school/extracurricular engagement, and mental health supports [94, 95], can moderate the development of adverse nutrition outcomes.

We also noted that the effect of childhood exposures to sexual violence on elevated BMI, overweight/obesity/adiposity manifests during sensitive periods of adolescent development into early adulthood. Scholarship has focused mainly on elucidating at what developmental periods childhood maltreatment generally impacts elevated BMI and obesity, with late adolescence/early adulthood emerging as a sensitive period [9, 96]. For example, Sokol et al., (2018) [97] tested childhood exposures to physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and found that these yielded different BMI growth trajectories between the ages of 13 to 28 years for males and females. Importantly neither of these studies included examination of pre-pubertal growth trajectories, thus potential earlier impacts are unknown. In particular, girls’ exposure to sexual abuse between 13 and 17 years was positively associated with BMI in late adolescence to early adulthood, from 19 to 24.5 years of age [96]. A meta-analysis of over 40 studies reported a higher risk of obesity in adulthood, following exposure to child maltreatment, not childhood/adolescence [9]. However, the meta-analysis included few studies that examined exposure to sexual abuse with nutritional indicators measured during childhood and adolescence, as the majority of studies examined nutritional status measured in adulthood [9]. Thus, further research examining exposure to sexual violence with nutrition indicators measured during earlier developmental periods (including prior to and through adolescence into early adulthood) is needed.

Overall, we recommend further clarifying the linkage between GBV and nutrition during childhood and adolescence in females. There is a research-related gap in theorizing and empirically testing mechanisms that aim to explain how and why GBV against girls negatively impacts their nutritional status during later childhood and adolescence. The present REA found evidence to support associations between exposure to sexual violence during childhood and adolescence and elevated BMI/overweight and obesity later in childhood and adolescence. However, nuanced understandings of the causal mechanism underlying this pathway are limited. Given that adolescence represents a period of potential growth catch up and can coincide with pregnancy and child rearing [98], it is important that future studies consider measuring nutritional status among adolescent girls.

From a methodological standpoint, future research should specifically examine exposure to sexual violence when examining nutrition indicators in younger children. Sexual violence exposure can be disaggregated from other ACEs and measured by timing of exposure [infancy, early childhood, middle childhood, or adolescence; or by pubertal stage] and perpetrator type [family member/relative/caregiver, intimate partner, peer, stranger]). Important mediator variables include measures of behavioral changes (internalizing [emotional eating, low self esteem] and externalizing [aggression]), mental health symptoms and disorders (depression, PTSD, eating disorders), impulsivity, and dampened/attenuated cortisol reactivity. Further research can elucidate sensitive periods for anthropometric measures vis-à-vis exposure to sexual violence. Prospective longitudinal collection of informative biomarkers beginning early in childhood among potential at-risk populations will be key for improving our understanding of the relationship between exposure to sexual violence, a dysregulated stress response (including measures of behavior and mental health), and later elevated BMI. Research aiming to investigate the effect of exposure to sexual violence during childhood and adolescence on elevated BMI should consider longitudinal study designs that measure BMI into early adulthood to include sensitive periods of development. Sex-stratification of data could also elucidate sex and gender specific mechanisms, particularly given the sex-based differences in timing of developmental stages. Greater attention should be given to the temporal sequence of variables. For example, measuring mental health symptoms/disorders in parallel with nutrition outcomes can obscure the correct temporal sequence between mental health intermediaries and nutrition outcomes. Accurately capturing cortisol dampening/attenuation requires that investigators measure diurnal serum cortisol variation according to the circadian rhythm.

Our findings should be interpreted in light of some limitations. We conducted single screening of titles and abstracts (a single reviewer determined whether to include or exclude). Although in line with guidance on how to adapt systematic review methodology for an REA [99], single screening of titles and abstracts may have excluded relevant studies. Further, disparate use of outcome measures may mean that results from specific studies are not directly comparable. Lastly, we excluded articles in languages other than English and Spanish due to resources and time-constraints.

Conclusion

This REA identified a small evidence base of 18 quantitative studies investigating the association between GBV perpetrated against girls and subsequent child and adolescent nutrition outcomes. Only two studies investigated the relationship between child marriage and undernutrition, indicating the need for greater attention paid to the nutritional consequences of child marriage on girl brides and the importance of considering age at first pregnancy within the context of girl child marriage. Most included studies investigated the relationship between the outcomes of overweight/obesity/increased adiposity and the exposures of CSA, IPV, and dating violence. We recommend consideration of relevant intermediary variables and timing of effects, pertaining to the biologic mechanisms underlying the relationship between childhood GBV exposure and overweight/obesity. Future research is needed to not only better understand the mechanisms that underlie the relationship between childhood sexual violence exposure and overweight/obesity, but also consider other GBV exposures such as child marriage, the preferential feeding of boys on nutrition outcomes beyond overweight/obesity, and additional research in LMIC, resource poor and humanitarian settings.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Appendix A: Search domains and terms for all databases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281961.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Appendix B: Rapid evidence assessment protocol.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281961.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281961.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support received by the project’s research assistant: Luna Johnstone.

References

  1. 1. Fuhrmann D, Knoll LJ, Blakemore SJ. Adolescence as a Sensitive Period of Brain Development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Oct;19(10):558–66.
  2. 2. Monjardino T, Amaro J, Fonseca MJ, Rodrigues T, Santos AC, Lucas R. Early childhood as a sensitive period for the effect of growth on childhood bone mass: Evidence from Generation XXI birth cohort. Bone. 2019;127(February):287–95. pmid:31279094
  3. 3. Dietz WH. Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 May;59(5):955–9. pmid:8172099
  4. 4. Felitti VJ. The Relation Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Adult Health: Turning Gold into Lead. Perm J. 2002;6(1):44–7. pmid:30313011
  5. 5. CDC. Fast Facts: Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences. 2022.
  6. 6. Dempster KS, O’Leary DD, MacNeil AJ, Hodges GJ, Wade TJ. Linking the hemodynamic consequences of adverse childhood experiences to an altered HPA axis and acute stress response. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;93(July 2020):254–63.
  7. 7. Mcewen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. 2006;367–81.
  8. 8. Shonkoff JP, Garner AS, Siegel BS, Dobbins MI, Earls MF, McGuinn L, et al. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1).
  9. 9. Danese A, Tan M. Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2014 May;19(5):544–54. pmid:23689533
  10. 10. Marie-Mitchell A, O’Connor TG. Adverse childhood experiences: Translating knowledge into identification of children at risk for poor outcomes. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(1):14–9. pmid:23312855
  11. 11. Choi NG, DiNitto DM, Marti CN, Segal SP. Adverse childhood experiences and suicide attempts among those with mental and substance use disorders. Child Abus Negl. 2017; pmid:28500922
  12. 12. Aquilina SR, Shrubsole MJ, Butt J, Sanderson M, Schlundt DG, Cook MC, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and adult diet quality. J Nutr Sci. 2021;10:e95. pmid:34804516
  13. 13. Royer MF, Ojinnaka CO, Zhang X, Thornton AG, Blackhorse K. Food insecurity and adverse childhood experiences: a systematic review. 2022;00(0):1–11.
  14. 14. Kappel RH, Livingston MD, Patel SN, Villaveces A, Massetti GM. Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and associated health risks and risk behaviors among young women and men in Honduras. Child Abus Negl. 2021;115(January). pmid:33611130
  15. 15. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Heal. 2017; pmid:29253477
  16. 16. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245–58.
  17. 17. Report MW, Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, Guinn AS, Chen J, et al. Vital Signs: Estimated Proportion of Adult Health Problems Attributable to Adverse Childhood Experiences and Implications for Prevention—25 States, 2015–2017. 2019;68(44):2015–7.
  18. 18. Mercy JA, Hillis SD, Butchart A et al. Interpersonal Violence: Global Impact and Paths to Prevention. In: Mock CN, Nugent R, Kobusingye O et al., editor. Injury Prevention and Environmental Health. 3rd editio. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017.
  19. 19. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct;396(10258):1204–22. pmid:33069326
  20. 20. UNFPA. What is gender-based violence (GBV)?.
  21. 21. IASC. The Inter-Agency Minimum Standards for Gender-Based Violence in Emergencies Programming. Gender-Based Violence Area of Responsibility. 2019.
  22. 22. hooks bell. The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. Beyond Words/Atria Books; 2004.
  23. 23. UNICEF. Sexual violence against children. 2022.
  24. 24. WHO. Devastatingly pervasive: 1 in 3 women globally experience violence. 2021.
  25. 25. Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C. Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, IPV against women in 2018. Lancet. 2022;399(10327):803–13.
  26. 26. Yaya S, Odusina EK, Bishwajit G. Prevalence of child marriage and its impact on fertility outcomes in 34 sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2019;19(1):1–11.
  27. 27. Trickett PK, Noll JG, Putnam FW. The impact of sexual abuse on female development: Lessons from a multigenerational, longitudinal research study. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23(2):453–76. pmid:23786689
  28. 28. Grose RG, Chen JS, Roof KA, Rachel S, Yount KM. Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes of Violence Against Women and Girls in Lower-Income Countries: A Review of Reviews. J Sex Res. 2020;00(00):1–20. pmid:31902238
  29. 29. Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottmoeller M. A global overview of gender-based violence. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002 Sep;78:S5–14. pmid:12429433
  30. 30. Meinhart M, Seff I, Troy K, McNelly S, Vahedi L, Poulton C, et al. Identifying the Impact of IPV in Humanitarian Settings: Using an Ecological Framework to Review 15 Years of Evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun;18(13):6963.
  31. 31. WHO. Nutrition.
  32. 32. Herman DR, Taylor Baer M, Adams E, Cunningham-Sabo L, Duran N, Johnson DB, et al. Life course perspective: Evidence for the role of nutrition. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(2):450–61. pmid:23780476
  33. 33. Hill A, Pallitto C, McCleary-Sills J, Garcia-Moreno C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of IPV during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;133(3):269–76.
  34. 34. Rico E, Fenn B, Abramsky T, Watts C. Associations between maternal experiences of IPV and child nutrition and mortality: Findings from demographic and health surveys in Egypt, Honduras, Kenya, Malawi and Rwanda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(4):360–7.
  35. 35. Alhusen JL, Ray E, Sharps P, Bullock L. IPV during pregnancy: Maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Women’s Heal. 2015;24(1):100–6.
  36. 36. Yount KM, Digirolamo AM, Ramakrishnan U. Impacts of domestic violence on child growth and nutrition: A conceptual review of the pathways of influence. 2011;
  37. 37. Efevbera Y, Bhabha J, Farmer PE, Fink G. Girl child marriage as a risk factor for early childhood development and stunting. Soc Sci Med. 2017;185:91–101. pmid:28570927
  38. 38. Tsedal DM, Yitayal M, Abebe Z, Tsegaye AT. Effect of IPV of women on minimum acceptable diet of children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: Evidence from 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Nutr. 2020;6(1):1–11.
  39. 39. Sabri B, Granger DA. Gender-based violence and trauma in marginalized populations of women: Role of biological embedding and toxic stress. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(9):1038–55. pmid:30906110
  40. 40. Wiss DA, Brewerton TD, Tomiyama AJ. Limitations of the protective measure theory in explaining the role of childhood sexual abuse in eating disorders, addictions, and obesity: an updated model with emphasis on biological embedding. Eat Weight Disord—Stud Anorexia, Bulim Obes. 2022;27(4):1249–67. pmid:34476763
  41. 41. Li JC, Hall MA, Shalev I, Schreier HMC, Zarzar TG, Marcovici I, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis attenuation and obesity risk in sexually abused females. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021;129(April). pmid:34022589
  42. 42. Silverman JG. Dating Violence Against Adolescent Girls and Associated Substance Use, Unhealthy Weight Control, Sexual Risk Behavior, Pregnancy, and Suicidality. JAMA. 2001 Aug;286(5):572. pmid:11476659
  43. 43. Schroeder K, Schuler BR, Kobulsky JM, Sarwer DB. The association between adverse childhood experiences and childhood obesity: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2021;22(7). pmid:33506595
  44. 44. Keeshin BR, Luebbe AM, Strawn JR, Saldaña SN, Wehry AM, Delbello MP. Sexual abuse is associated with obese children and adolescents admitted for psychiatric hospitalization. J Pediatr. 2013;163(1). pmid:23414663
  45. 45. Mishra V, Roy TK, Retherford RD. Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care, and nutritional status in India. Popul Dev Rev. 2004;30(2):269–95.
  46. 46. Messer E. Intra-household allocation of food and health care: Current findings and understandings—Introduction. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(11):1675–84. pmid:9178411
  47. 47. Borooah VK. Gender bias among children in India in their diet and immunisation against disease. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(9):1719–31. pmid:14990373
  48. 48. Bott A et al. Towards adulthood: exploring the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in South Asia. Dep Reprod Heal Res World Heal Organ. 2003;244.
  49. 49. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar;59(Supplement):n71.
  50. 50. Varker T, Forbes D, Dell L, Weston A, Merlin T, Hodson S, et al. Rapid evidence assessment: Increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(6):1199–204. pmid:26123092
  51. 51. Cantrell A, Croot E, Johnson M, Wong R, Chambers D, Baxter SK, et al. Appendix 11, Quality appraisal of included studies. In: Cantrell A, Croot E, Johnson M, et al Access to primary and community health-care services for people 16 years and over with intellectual disabilities: a mapping and targeted systematic review [Internet]. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2020 [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553267/
  52. 52. Hong Q, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), Version 2018. User guide. McGill. 2018;1–11.
  53. 53. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):1–7. pmid:27932337
  54. 54. Welles G, O’Connell D, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2015.
  55. 55. NIH. Study Quality Assessment Tools.
  56. 56. Noll JG, Zeller MH, Trickett PK, Putnam FW. Obesity risk for female victims of childhood sexual abuse: A prospective study. Pediatrics. 2007;120(1). pmid:17606550
  57. 57. Peckins MK, Negriff S, Schneiderman JU, Gordis EB, Susman EJ. The Moderating Role of Cortisol Reactivity on the Link Between Maltreatment and Body Mass Index Trajectory Across Adolescence. J Adolesc Heal. 2019 Aug;65(2):239–47. pmid:31043344
  58. 58. Schneiderman JU, Mennen FE, Negriff S, Trickett PK. Overweight and obesity among maltreated young adolescents. Child Abus Negl. 2012;36(4):370–8. pmid:22571911
  59. 59. Schneiderman JU, Negriff S, Peckins M, Mennen FE, Trickett PK. Body mass index trajectory throughout adolescence: A comparison of maltreated adolescents by maltreatment type to a community sample. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(4):296–304. pmid:25170967
  60. 60. Clark CJ, Spencer RA, Everson-Rose SA, Brady SS, Mason SM, Connett JE, et al. Dating Violence, Childhood Maltreatment, and BMI From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):678–85. pmid:25201793
  61. 61. Wells JCK, Marphatia AA, Manandhar DS, Cortina-Borja M, Reid AM, Saville NS. Associations of age at marriage and first pregnancy with maternal nutritional status in Nepal. Evol Med Public Heal. 2022;10(1):325–38. pmid:35935708
  62. 62. Denholm R, Power C, Li L. Adverse childhood experiences and child-to-adult height trajectories in the 1958 British birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1399–409. pmid:24019423
  63. 63. Veldwijk J, Proper KI, Hoeven-Mulder HB, Bemelmans WJE. The prevalence of physical, sexual and mental abuse among adolescents and the association with BMI status. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:840. pmid:23033819
  64. 64. Martín-Martín V, Loredo-Abdalá A. Estado de nutrición en niños víctimas de abuso físico y de abuso sexual. Rev Investig Clin. 2010;62(6):524–31.
  65. 65. Anderson LM, Hayden BM, Tomasula JL. Sexual assault, overweight, and suicide attempts in U.S. adolescents. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 2015;45(5):529–40. pmid:25530176
  66. 66. Marques ES, Hasselmann MH, de Barros Vianna GV, de Paula Mendonça E, Azeredo CM. Association Between Interpersonal Violence With Inadequate Nutritional Status Among Brazilian Adolescents. J Interpers Violence [Internet]. 2022;37(13–14):NP12066–85. Available from: pmid:33666109
  67. 67. Soares ALG, Matijasevich A, Menezes AMB, Assunção MC, Wehrmeister FC, Howe LD, et al. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Adiposity in Adolescents: A Cross-Cohort Comparison. Obesity. 2018;26(1):150–9. pmid:29135081
  68. 68. Tiruneh FN, Tenagashaw MW, Asres DT, Cherie HA. Associations of early marriage and early childbearing with anemia among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of nationwide survey. Arch Public Heal. 2021;79(1):1–10.
  69. 69. Schiff M, Helton J, Fu J. Adverse childhood experiences and obesity over time. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(11):3205–9. pmid:33896440
  70. 70. Soares AG, Zimmerman A, Zammit S, Karl A, Halligan SL, Fraser A. Abuse in Childhood and Cardiometabolic Health in Early Adulthood: Evidence From the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24).
  71. 71. Elsenburg LK, Liefbroer AC, van Eeden AE, Hoek HW, Oldehinkel AJ, Smidt N. Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Body Mass Index in Young Adulthood: Mediated by Depression and Anxiety? Child Maltreat. 2022;0(0):1–11. pmid:35655122
  72. 72. Ng CD. Biases in self-reported height and weight measurements and their effects on modeling health outcomes. SSM—Popul Heal [Internet]. 2019 Apr 1 [cited 2022 Dec 20];7. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6527819/ pmid:31193386
  73. 73. WHO. Weight-for-age.
  74. 74. CDC. Clinical Growth Charts. 2017.
  75. 75. Rosa A da S, Brêtas ACP. A violência na vida de mulheres em situação de rua na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Interface Commun Heal Educ. 2015;19(53):275–85.
  76. 76. Aurino E. Do boys eat better than girls in India? Longitudinal evidence on dietary diversity and food consumption disparities among children and adolescents. Econ Hum Biol. 2017;25:99–111. pmid:27810442
  77. 77. Hadley C, Lindstrom D, Tessema F, Belachew T. Gender bias in the food insecurity experience of Ethiopian adolescents. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(2):427–38. pmid:17931763
  78. 78. Harris-Fry H, Shrestha N, Costello A, Saville NM. Determinants of intra-household food allocation between adults in South Asia—A systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):1–21.
  79. 79. Morris MC, Bailey B, Hellman N, Williams A, Lannon EW, Kutcher ME, et al. Dynamics and determinants of cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to repeated stressors in recent interpersonal trauma survivors. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;122(April):104899. pmid:33070022
  80. 80. Anderson KM, Ghosh M, Karris MY, Capozzi E, Granger DA, Stockman JK. The biobehavioral impacts of sexual violence: Findings from an acute repeat survivor of vaginal rape. Women’s Heal. 2021;17. pmid:34253106
  81. 81. Orta OR, Huang T, Kubzansky LD, Terry KL, Coull BA, Williams MA, et al. The association between abuse history in childhood and salivary rhythms of cortisol and DHEA in postmenopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 Feb;112:104515. pmid:31784054
  82. 82. Bunea IM, Szentágotai-Tătar A, Miu AC. Early-life adversity and cortisol response to social stress: a meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;7(12):1274. pmid:29225338
  83. 83. Glymour M, Avendano M, Kawachi I. Social Epidemiology Second Edition. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, Glymour M, editors. Social Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford; 2014. p. 17–63.
  84. 84. Brown S, Mitchell TB, Fite PJ, Bortolato M. Impulsivity as a moderator of the associations between child maltreatment types and body mass index. Child Abus Negl. 2017;67:137–46. pmid:28262605
  85. 85. Hillman JB, Dorn LD, Loucks TL, Berga SL. Obesity and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adolescent girls. Metabolism. 2012;61(3):341–8. pmid:21944263
  86. 86. Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Biological Pathways Linking Social Conditions and Health: Plausible Mechanisms and Emerging Puzzles. In: Social Epidemiology [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Academic; 2014 [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/24997
  87. 87. Trickett PK, Noll JG, Susman EJ, Shenk CE, Putnam FW. Attenuation of cortisol across development for victims of sexual abuse. Dev Psychopathol. 2010 Feb;22(1):165–75. pmid:20102654
  88. 88. Anversa RG, Muthmainah M, Sketriene D, Gogos A, Sumithran P, Brown RM. A review of sex differences in the mechanisms and drivers of overeating. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2021 Oct 1;63. pmid:34454955
  89. 89. Incollingo Rodriguez AC, Epel ES, White ML, Standen EC, Seckl JR, Tomiyama AJ. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation and cortisol activity in obesity: A systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Dec 1;62:301–18. pmid:26356039
  90. 90. Yakubovich AR, Heron J, Feder G, Fraser A, Humphreys DK. IPV victimisation in early adulthood: Psychometric properties of a new measure and gender differences in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):7–9.
  91. 91. Cyranowski JM, Frank E, Young E, Shear MK. Adolescent onset of the gender difference in lifetime rates of major depression. A theoretical model. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(1):21–7.
  92. 92. Thomas R, Siliquini R, Hillegers MH, Jansen PW. The association of adverse life events with children’s emotional overeating and restrained eating in a population-based cohort. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(10):1709–18. pmid:32702148
  93. 93. Ross CA. Psychodynamics of eating disorder behavior in sexual abuse survivors. Am J Psychother [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 Dec 20];63(3):211–26. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19845087/
  94. 94. Javier JR, Hoffman LR, Shah SI. Making the case for ACEs: adverse childhood experiences, obesity, and long-term health. Pediatr Res. 2019;86(4):420–2. pmid:31330528
  95. 95. Parks MJ, Roesler J, Menanteau B, Raguet M, Eisenberg ME. The Intersection of Depressive Symptoms, Adverse Childhood Experiences, and Protective Factors Among Adolescents: Epidemiological Evidence from Minnesota, 2016 and 2019. Advers Resil Sci. 2022;3(1):21–36. pmid:35098150
  96. 96. Sokol RL, Gottfredson NC, Poti JM, Shanahan ME, Halpern CT, Fisher EB, et al. Sensitive Periods for the Association Between Childhood Maltreatment and BMI. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):495–502. pmid:31542127
  97. 97. Sokol RL, Gottfredson NC, Shanahan ME, Halpern CT. Relationship between child maltreatment and adolescent body mass index trajectories. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;93(April):196–202. pmid:30745712
  98. 98. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013 Aug;382(9890):427–51. pmid:23746772
  99. 99. Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-streit B, King VJ. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. 2020;(January).