Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Antibacterial potential of Luidia clathrata (sea star) tissue extracts against selected pathogenic bacteria

  • Kusum Parajuli,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Nahian Fahim,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Sinthia Mumu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Rebecca Palu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Ahmed Mustafa

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    mustafaa@pfw.edu

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

As resistance to traditional antibiotics has become a major issue, it is essential to explore natural sources for new antimicrobial agents. The marine environment offers a variety of natural bioactive compounds. In this study, we examined the antibacterial potential of Luidia clathrata, a tropical sea star species. The experiment was conducted against both gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Mycobacterium smegmatis) and gram-negative (Proteus mirabilis, Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria using disk diffusion method. Specifically, we extracted the body wall and gonad using methanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane. Our findings show that the body wall extract using ethyl acetate (1.78μg/ml) was particularly effective against all tested pathogens, while the gonad extract (0.107μg/ml) showed activity against six out of ten selected pathogens. This is a crucial and new discovery that suggests L. clathrata may be a useful source for discovering antibiotics and more research is required to pinpoint and comprehend the active ingredients.

Citation: Parajuli K, Fahim N, Mumu S, Palu R, Mustafa A (2023) Antibacterial potential of Luidia clathrata (sea star) tissue extracts against selected pathogenic bacteria. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0281889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281889

Editor: Estibaliz Sansinenea, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla: Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, MEXICO

Received: November 4, 2022; Accepted: February 1, 2023; Published: March 2, 2023

Copyright: © 2023 Parajuli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All the data are available within the paper and the Supporting Information file.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction

Multi-drug resistance (MDR) pathogens that have arisen over the past decade are a considerable threat to patients’ health [1,2]. These MDR microorganisms evolve through mutation and gene transfer in response to the prolonged use and misuse of certain drugs [1–3]. Numerous adverse side effects possessed by conventional antibiotics are another problem related to health [1,4,5]. It is crucial to develop a sustainable solution to mitigate the limitations of existing antibiotics. Exploration of nutraceuticals in natural sources could serve as an effective way to develop such a solution [3,6–8]. Marine environments are one potentially overlooked resource for nutraceuticals [9].

The oceans, which cover almost 70% of the earth’s surface, offer a myriad of organisms rich in secondary metabolites that can be exploited for pharmaceutical purposes [9,10]. Secondary metabolites are organic compounds produced by plants and animals which are not essential for their survival and growth but are utilized in defense responses [11–13]. These compounds include but are not limited to echinochrome A, complement-like protein, antimicrobial peptides (AMP), steroidal glycosides, asterosaponin, and sulfated steroidal compounds [14–19]. All have been previously isolated from the echinoderms and studied for their medicinal importance [14–19]. The results from those studies imply that such compounds have diverse medicinal properties including anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer effects [14–20].

The sea star is a keystone predator in marine ecosystems full of bioactivities and nutraceutical properties, but they have been poorly studied compared to other echinoderms such as sea cucumber, sea urchins, and brittle stars [21,22]. This benthic free-living creature is well documented for its distinctive defensive mechanism to mitigate the disadvantage and ecological cost associated with other commensal or parasitic surface associated organism. [17,23]. The surface microtopography of some tropical sea stars has demonstrated the presence of a unique cuticle overlying the epidermis. This cuticle is rich in highly extended glycocalyx and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, which are pericellular glycoproteins that cover the cell and act as a physical barrier [17]. These surface-associated bioactive compounds provide good protection from pathogens by modulating the adhesive properties of the surface [17,24]. Although existing research has well documented the bioactivity and pharmaceutical potential of various sea star species, Luidia clathrata, a tropical slender armed sea star, has been barely studied for its antibacterial potential.

In this experiment, we investigated the antimicrobial potential of L. clathrata. We analyzed the inhibitory properties of different body tissues (body wall and gonad) with respect to diverse pathogenic bacteria. We used three different solvents (methanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane) exhibiting different properties to extract different bioactive compounds from these tissues. We used the Kirby Bauer Disk Diffusion method to assess the inhibitory potential of extracted tissues [25]. The results showed that the body wall extracted with ethyl acetate possesses inhibitory properties across all tested pathogens, while gonad extract only inhibits the activity of a few pathogens. Methanol and hexane extracts did not produce any activity. Methanol extract of the body wall demonstrated hemolytic activity on red blood cells. This encouraging finding implies that the body wall and gonad of L. clathrata could serve as an important source of antibiotics for pathogenic bacteria.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Species acquisition and maintenance

24 Healthy sand sifting sea star adults (24.41±1.50gm) were procured from a certified animal vendor (Gulf Specimen Marine Lab, Panacea, Florida, USA). Upon arrival, the species were maintained in optimal water conditions (temperature: 68–70°F, salinity: 28±1ppt, ammonia: 0–0.25mg/L, pH:7.8–8.0) in the invertebrate lab. The specimens were thoroughly cleaned with de-ionized water to remove any adherent sediments and contaminants before dissection. 24 sea stars were dissected to collect the body wall, and gonad. The different components were then pooled separately. Due to their fragility, the gonads were homogenized using a tissue homogenizer, while the body wall tissues were finely ground using a coffee grinder (Hamilton Beach® Fresh Grind™).

2.2. Preparation of extract

The extraction procedure was carried out by following the methods described by Shuchizadeh et al. with some modifications [26]. The gonad (5gm), and body wall (84.3gm) were submerged in reagent grade (99%) methanol, hexane, and ethyl acetate (PRA grade, ≤ 99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich) in 1:3 (w/v) ratio and constantly agitated on orbit shaker (Lab-line Orbit Shaker, Model 3520) for 96 hours at room temperature. The flasks were covered with aluminium foil to avoid photolysis and thermal degradation of secondary metabolites prior to extraction. The extract was then decanted and filtered with Whatman® Grade 3 Filter Paper (diameter 12.5cm). The resulting filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator (BU-R134 Rotary Vap System, Switzerland) at reduced pressure and temperature (40–45°C). The concentrated crude residues were stored at 4°C for the subsequent investigations.

2.3. Determination of crude extract concentration

The volume of concentrated crude extract was measured and transferred to the previously weighted empty dish. The total weight of the crude extract with the dish was taken. The concentration was calculated using the following formula [27]:

2.4. Test microorganism and culture medium

Five gram-positive bacteria [Bacillus subtilisX, Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 27659), Bacillus cereusx and Mycobacterium smegmatisx) and five gram-negative [(Proteus mirabilisx, Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028), Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883)] were examined in this experiment (x denotes that ATCC number is not available). All the bacteria, except E. faecalis were sub-cultured on Tryptic soy agar (TSA) media at 37°C for 24hours. E. faecalis was grown on 5% sheep blood agar media. These subcultures were kept at 4°C to guarantee bacterial viability and purity.

2.5. Antibacterial assay

Antibacterial activity was assessed by the disk diffusion method [25]. Petri plates (100mm and 150mm) were prepared by pouring 20ml and 60ml of Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) respectively. The plates were swabbed aseptically with fresh bacterial suspension prepared from the subculture maintained at 4°C and standardized with 0.5 McFarland standard. A sterile filter paper disk (6mm) was impregnated with the extracted samples and placed on the agar surface along with positive and negative controls at an appropriate distance and incubated for 24hours at 37°C. The extraction solvents were employed as negative controls, whereas antibiotics appropriate to the organism (gentamicin, vancomycin, penicillin, streptomycin, and SXT) were utilized as positive controls. The zone of inhibition was characterized by the formation of a clear zone around the disk. For the haemolytic activity, 5% sheep blood agar plate inoculated with E. faecalis was used. The zone of haemolysis was interpreted as a clear zone formed by destruction of red blood cells around the disk. The diameter of zone of inhibition and haemolysis were measured in millimetres.

2.6. Statistical analysis

The assays were maintained in triplicates and data obtained are presented as means± standard error of the mean (SEM). The assumption of normality was met. Comparison between negative control and sample extracted was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA, p<0.05) followed by Bonferroni correction.

3. Results

3.1. Ethyl acetate extracts exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial activity

The antimicrobial activity of ethyl acetate extract of L. clathrata body wall (1.78μg/ml) and gonad tissues (0.107μg/ml) is summarised in Table 1. Ethyl acetate extract of the body wall exhibited significant antibacterial activity against all tested pathogens. Gonad extracted with ethyl acetate exhibited inhibitory activity against six out of the ten selected pathogens. Activity was not observed for the gonad extract against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus, and Mycobacterium smegmatis. Overall antibacterial activity was also lower than that observed in the body wall extract. We did not observe the zone of haemolysis for any of the tissues extracted with ethyl acetate Table 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Antibacterial activity demonstrated by the ethyl acetate extracts of Luidia clathrata tissues (body wall and gonad) on selective pathogenic bacteria achieved by the disk diffusion method.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281889.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Haemolysis activity of L. clathrata extract of body wall (1.78μg/ml) and gonad tissues (0.107μg/ml) extracted with different solvent by disk diffusion method.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281889.t002

3.2. Methanol and hexane extracts do not exhibit antibacterial activity

Methanol extract (1.78μg/ml) of any of the tissues exhibited no inhibitory activity against the selected pathogens. We did observe significant (p<0.05) beta-haemolysis, a complete destruction of red blood cells by the methanol extract of body wall Table 2. Because beta haemolysis was not observed in ethyl acetate extract, the responsible compound must be specifically soluble in methanol. Hexane extract of any of the tissues exhibited no inhibition against the selected pathogens. Because of the nonpolar nature of the hexane, any polar bioactive compounds would not be extracted [28]. Haemolytic activity was also not observed with the tissues extracted with hexane.

4. Discussion

The emergence of antibiotic resistant organisms has made treating the diseases they cause difficult [1]. Discovery of new therapeutic agents from natural sources could provide a potential solution. In this experiment, we aimed to determine the antibacterial activity of L. clathrata against selected pathogenic bacteria [2,3].

Existing literature has shown the wide range of bioactivity from a variety of marine invertebrates, but little information is available about the sea star antibacterial activity [11,14,23]. In our study, ethyl acetate extract of body wall showed a significant (p<0.05) zone of inhibition in all tested pathogens compared to the negative control. The zone of inhibition was highest against M. smegmatis (44.66±2.90mm) and smallest against E. faecalis (18.66±0.33mm). Our finding is supported by Bryan et al. [29]. They discovered body wall extract of L. clathrata that potentially inhibited the attachment of a marine bacteria Luteo violaceato from the wells of microtiter plates, indicating the defence mechanism of the body wall which could potentially be antibacterial in nature. However, they did not explain in detail the antimicrobial potential of the body wall [29]. Similarly, ethanolic extract of whole-body tissue from L. maculatata partially purified using liquid partition and column chromatography exhibited antimicrobial activity against five bacterial and five fungal pathogens [30]. Kanagaraj et al. studied the antibacterial activity of Astropecten indicus and found that crude methanol and ethyl acetate tissue extract exhibited high inhibitory activity against the tested pathogens including P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and moderate activity against species like Streptococcus and E. coli [31]. In our case high activity was observed on all the tested pathogens. Previous research primarily focused on whole body tissues and the body wall [29,30]. In the present study, we have explored the antibacterial potential of the gonad as well for the first time along with the body wall. Gonad extracted in ethyl acetate was able to inhibit some of the tested pathogens. It is likely that the ethyl acetate extract of body wall was more effective than the gonad extract because of discrepancies in concentration. The concentration of body wall extract is about 16X higher than gonad extract. Another possibility could be due to the difference in the chemical nature of compounds present in two tissue type. This also explains the fact that gonad is likely more effective against the gram-negative pathogens compared to the gram-positive ones. Out of six pathogens being inhibited by gonad extract, four of them are gram-negative and two are gram-positive. The greater inhibitory activity against gram-negative pathogens could be because they have an extra lipopolysaccharides layer. Fatty compounds from gonads may dissolve the lipopolysaccharides and thus likely destroy gram-negative pathogens more readily than gram-positive [32].

The methanol extract of none of the tissues showed activity against tested pathogen. This is interesting because methanol is a widely used polar solvent due to its ability to extract a diverse range of compounds and proven to have good extraction yield [33,34]. However, we noticed beta-haemolytic activity of body wall extracted with methanol on 5% sheep blood agar. The haemolytic activity by methanolic extract of body wall observed in the present experiment could be due to the presence of saponin in body wall [35,36].

Saponin, a polar secondary metabolite mostly found in plants and lower invertebrates is well characterized by its ability to breakdown red blood cells. This property is used as a screening test to determine whether saponin is present in natural substances [35,36].

In this experiment, the complete destruction of erythrocytes by the methanol extract of body wall suggests that body wall of L. clathrata is rich in saponin. The hexane extracts did not show any positive activity because hexane, as a non-polar solvent, is not able to extract the polar compounds present in the sample [37]. Since the ethyl acetate extract produced the majority of the positive results in the present studies, we anticipate that ethyl acetate is the proper solvent to extract the bioactive compounds with antibacterial nature from L. clathrata. Our results are in line with Darya et al., who reported the ethyl acetate extract of different body parts of Holothuria leucospilota and had more antibacterial activity than n-hexane, and methanol extract [38]. The present result of our study suggests that the antimicrobial compound(s) found in the body wall and gonad of L. clathrata is likely polar or partially polar.

5. Conclusion

In this research, we analyzed the antibacterial potential of L. clathrata tissues using diverse types of extracts of different polarities on selected pathogens. We found that ethyl acetate extracts of body wall and gonad tissues exhibit significant inhibitory activity. This indicates the studied species, L. clathrata, could be an excellent source for discovering antibiotics to treat various types of diseases. This work can be expanded through the isolation, characterization and purification of the specific compounds responsible for the antibacterial potential.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contribution of Arlis LaMaster, Laboratory Technician, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA for her help during the experiment. Additionally, we appreciate Dr. Jaiyanth Daniel, Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences for his supervision during extraction.

References

  1. 1. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012;18(3):268–281. pmid:21793988
  2. 2. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(3):318–327. pmid:29276051
  3. 3. Yoneyama H, Katsumata R. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria and Its Future for Novel Antibiotic Development. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 2006;70:1060–75. pmid:16717405
  4. 4. Cunha BA. ANTIBIOTIC SIDE EFFECTS. Medical Clinics of North America. 2001;85(1):149–185. pmid:11190350
  5. 5. Iredell J, Brown J, Tagg K. Antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: mechanisms and clinical implications. BMJ. 2016;352. pmid:26858245
  6. 6. Andersson DI. Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Current opinion in microbiology. 2003;6(5):452–456. pmid:14572536
  7. 7. Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C. Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: A Challenge for the Food Industry. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2013;53:11–48. pmid:23035919
  8. 8. World Health Organization. Antibiotic resistance: Multi-country public awareness survey.2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/194460.
  9. 9. Choudhary A, Naughton LM, Montánchez I, Dobson AD, Rai DK. Current status and future prospects of marine natural products (MNPs) as antimicrobials. Marine drugs. 2017;15(9):272. pmid:28846659
  10. 10. Moloney MG. Natural products as a source for novel antibiotics. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2016;37(8):689–701. pmid:27267698
  11. 11. Pereira R, Sudatti D, Moreira T, Renato C, Ventura R. Chemical defense in developmental stages and adult of the sea star Echinaster (Othilia) brasiliensis. PeerJ. 2021;9. pmid:34178443
  12. 12. Pagare S, Bhatia M, Tripathi N, Pagare S, Bansal Y. Secondary metabolites of plants and their role: Overview. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 2015;9(3):293–304.
  13. 13. Manivasagan P, Venkatesan J, Sivakumar K, Kim SK. Pharmaceutically active secondary metabolites of marine actinobacteria. Microbiological research. 2014 Apr 1;169(4):262–78. pmid:23958059
  14. 14. Reinisch CL, Bang FB. Cell recognition: Reactions of the sea star (Asterias vulgaris) to the injection of amebocytes of sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata). Cellular Immunology. 1971;2(5):496–503. pmid:5119844
  15. 15. Leonard LA, Strandberg JD, Winkelstein JA. Complement-like activity in the sea star, Asterias forbesi. Developmental Comparative Immunology. 1990;14(1):19–30. pmid:2338154
  16. 16. Hennebert E, Leroy B, Wattiez R, Ladurner P. An integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of sea star epidermal secretions identifies proteins involved in defense and adhesion. Journal of Proteomics. 2015;128:83–91. pmid:26171724
  17. 17. Guenther J, Walker-Smith G, Warén A, Nys RD. Fouling-resistant surfaces of tropical sea stars. Biofouling. 2007;23(6):413–418. pmid:17882628
  18. 18. Diehl WJ, Lawrence JM. The effect of salinity on coelomic fluid osmolyte concentration and intracellular water content in Luidia clathrata (Say)b(Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology. 1984;79(1):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(84)90718-7.
  19. 19. Kim CH, Go HJ, Oh HY, Park JB, Lee TK, Seo JK, et al. Identification of a novel antimicrobial peptide from the sea star Patiria pectinifera. Developmental Comparative Immunology. 2018;86:203–213. pmid:29733880
  20. 20. Venkatesan GK, Kuppusamy A, Devarajan S, Kumar A. Review on medicinal potential of alkaloids and saponins. Pharamacologyonline. 2019;1:1–20.
  21. 21. Sumitha R, Banu N, Parvathi VD. Novel natural products from marine sea stars. Current Trends in Biomedical Engineering & Biosciences. 2017;2(4):59–63.
  22. 22. Popov RS, Ivanchina NV, Dmitrenok PS. Application of MS-based metabolomics approaches in analysis of starfish and sea cucumber bioactive compounds. Marine Drugs. 2022;20(5):320. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20050320.
  23. 23. Li C, Blencke HM, Haug T, Stensvåg K. Antimicrobial peptides in echinoderm host defense. Developmental Comparative Immunology. 2015;49(1):190–197. pmid:25445901
  24. 24. Sumitha R, Dharshana M, Banu N, Vijayalakshmi S. In vitro Antimicrobial Evaluation of an Isolated Compound from Sea Star Stellaster equisteris. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal. 2022;15(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(95)00124-7.
  25. 25. Jorgensen JH, Turnidge JD. Susceptibility test methods: dilution and disk diffusion methods. Manual of clinical microbiology. 2015 May 15:1253–73. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817381.ch71.
  26. 26. Shushizadeh MR, Beigi Nasiri M, Ameri A, Rajabzadeh Ghatrami E, Tavakoli S. Preparation of the Persian Gulf Echinometra mathaei Organic Extracts and Investigation of Their Antibacterial Activity. Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products. 2019;14(4):e57093.
  27. 27. Walag AM, Kharwar R. Assessment of Crude Extract Yield and In-vitro Antioxidant Activity of Sea Star from the Philippines. 2021;42(22):68–76. https://www.mbimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/2567.
  28. 28. Uli H, Noor A, Mandey FW, Sapar A. Isolation, Identification and Bioactivity Test of Non Polar Compounds on N-hexane Extract of Haliclona (Reniera) Fascigera From Samalona Island-spermonde Archipelago. Marina Chimica Acta. 2016;17(2).
  29. 29. Bryan PJ, Rittschof D, McClintock JB. Bioactivity of echinoderm ethanolic body-wall extracts: an assessment of marine bacterial attachment and macroinvertebrate larval settlement. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1996;196(1):79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(95)00124-7.
  30. 30. Suguna A, Bragadeeswaran S, Natarajan E, Mohanraj M. Studies on antioxidant properties of starfish Luidia maculata (Muller & Troschel, 1842) off Parangipettai, Southeast coast of India. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine. 2014;2(9):694–8.
  31. 31. Chamundeeswari K, Saranya S, Rajagopal S. Exploration of potential antimicrobial activity of sea star astropecten indicus. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2012 Jul 30;2(7):125–8.
  32. 32. Costerton JW, Ingram JM, Cheng KJ. Structure and function of the cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria. Bacteriological reviews. 1974 Mar;38(1):87–110. pmid:4601163
  33. 33. Dhawan D, Gupta J. Research article comparison of different solvents for phytochemical extraction potential from datura metel plant leaves. Int J Biol Chem. 2017;11(1):17–22.
  34. 34. Bimakr M, Rahman RA, Taip FS, Ganjloo A, Salleh LM, Selamat J, et al. Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of major bioactive flavonoid compounds from spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) leaves. Food andbioproducts processing. 2011;89(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.03.002.
  35. 35. Southeeswaran S, Kenchington W. Hemolysis test for saponins: A caution. Journal of Chemical Education. 1989;66(12):1058. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p1058.
  36. 36. Segaran A, Chua LS. Saponins Rich Fractions From Eurycoma longifolia Extract. In: Third International Conference on Separation Technology 2020 (ICoST 2020). Atlantis Press; 2020. p. 57–61. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201229.008.
    • 37. Malekzadeh M, Najafabadi HA, Hakim M, Feilizadeh M, Vossoughi M, Rashtchian D. Experimental study and thermodynamic modeling for determining the effect of non-polar solvent (hexane)/polar solvent (methanol) ratio and moisture content on the lipid extraction efficiency from Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresource Technology. 2016;201:304–311. pmid:26687490
    • 38. Darya M, Sajjadi MM, Yousefzadi M, Sourinejad I, Zarei M. Antifouling and antibacterial activities of bioactive extracts from different organs of the sea cucumber Holothuria leucospilota. Helgoland Marine Research. 2020;74. November 3, 2022 9/9.