Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Decoding type 2 diabetes mellitus genetic risk variants in Pakistani Pashtun ethnic population using the nascent whole exome sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping: A case-control association study

  • Asif Jan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Asif Jan, Zakiullah

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Zakiullah@uop.edu.pk (ZU); Asif.research1@gmail.com (AJ)

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Zakiullah ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Asif Jan, Zakiullah

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Software

    Zakiullah@uop.edu.pk (ZU); Asif.research1@gmail.com (AJ)

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Sajid Ali ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Biotechnology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

  • Basir Muhammad ,

    Roles Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital, Swat Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology & Radiotherapy, Swat, Pakistan

  • Amina Arshad ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Rashid Latif College of Pharmacy, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Yasar Shah ,

    Roles Data curation, Software, Validation, Visualization

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

  • Haji Bahadur ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Hamayun Khan ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Fazli Khuda ,

    Roles Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Rani Akbar ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

  • Kiran Ijaz

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation

    ‡ SA, BM, AA, YS, HB, HK, FK, RA and KI also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have greatly increased the number of T2DM associated risk variants but most of them have focused on populations of European origin. There is scarcity of such studies in developing countries including Pakistan. High prevalence of T2DM in Pakistani population prompted us to design this study. We have devised a two stage (the discovery stage and validation stage) case-control study in Pashtun ethnic population in which 500 T2DM cases and controls each have been recruited to investigate T2DM genetic risk variants. In discovery stage Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was used to identify and suggest T2DM pathogenic SNPs, based on SIFT and Polyphen scores; whereas in validation stage the selected variants were confirmed for T2DM association using MassARRAY genotyping and appropriate statistical tests. Results of the study showed the target positive association of rs1801282/PPARG (OR = 1.24, 95%Cl = 1.20–1.46, P = 0.010), rs745975/HNF4A (OR = 1.30, 95%Cl = 1.06–1.38, P = 0.004), rs806052/GLIS3 (OR = 1.32, 95%Cl = 1.07–1.66, P = 0.016), rs8192552/MTNR1B (OR = 1.53, 95%Cl = 0.56–1.95, P = 0.012) and rs1805097/IRS-2 (OR = 1.27, 95%Cl = 1.36–1.92, P = 0.045), with T2DM; whereas rs6415788/GLIS3, rs61788900/NOTCH2, rs61788901/NOTCH2 and rs11810554/NOTCH2 (P>0.05) showed no significant association. Identification of genetic risk factors/variants can be used in defining high risk subjects assessment, and disease prevention.

Introduction

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) characterized by persistent hyperglycaemia is the most frequent subtype of diabetes accounting for around 90–95% of all diabetes cases [1, 2]. It arises from the combination of in-sufficient insulin secretion and excessive secretion of glucagon in a context of insulin resistance. These abnormalities results from alteration in number and/or function of β- and α-cells of pancreas [3, 4]. Loss of pancreatic β-cells in T2DM is believed to occur via apoptosis [5] and autophagy [6]. In addition to the common theme of beta cells failure and peripheral insulin resistance, complex interplay of genetic and non-genetic factors also contribute to the underlying pathophysiology of T2DM [79]. Molecular biology investigations have linked genetic variants in number of genes with T2DM. Some of these include PPARG [10], HNF4A [11], GLIS3 [12], MTNR1B [13], IRS-2 [14], NOTCH2 [15], WFS-1 [16], GCK [17], GCKR [18], NEUROD1 [19], HHEX [20], SLC30A8 [21], VEGFA [22] and CAP10 [23]. Other major players involved in the progression of T2DM includes obesity [24], sedentary lifestyle [25], poor diet [26] the metabolic [27] and environmental [28] factors. Identification of these risk factors greatly helps in diabetes assessment and prevention.

The global burden of diabetes has significantly increased and will continue to soar in next few decades [29]. According to International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th Edition; in the year 2021 approximately 537 million adults (of age 20–79 years) were estimated to have diabetes. This number is predicated to increase to 643 million by 2030 and 784 million by 2045. A high proportion (81.6%, 432 million) of peoples with diabetes live in low and middle income countries [30]. Prevalence of diabetes is not uniform; South Asian (people residing in China, India, Pakistan Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Nepal, and Maldives) are at high risk compared to other ancestral groups [31, 32]. In the year 2019 number of diabetic patients in Pakistan were 19.4 million in future it is predicated to rise to 34.4 million by 2030 and 37.1 million by 2045 [33]. Pakistan ranked 3rd in diabetes prevalence race following China and India [30]. The main factors for marked increase in the incidence of diabetes in Pakistan includes high degree of urbanization and rapid transition in lifestyle [34, 35].

Recent genome wide association studies (GWAS) have greatly increased the number of T2DM associated risk variants but most of these studies have focused disproportionately individuals of European origin. There is scarcity of genomic research in developing countries including Pakistan. Increased prevalence of T2DM among Pakistanis and lack of genetic studies prompted us to design this case-control study. The study aimed to investigate Pashtun ethnic population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for T2DM risk variants using nascent technology of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and MassARRAY genotyping.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

A two stage (i.e. the discovery stage & the validation stage) case-control study have been designed. First Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was performed to identify and suggest T2DM pathogenic variants in the target population. In the second stage the WES suggested pathogenic variants were confirmed for its association with T2DM using massARRAY genotyping. A total of 1000 individuals (healthy volunteers = 500 and T2DM cases = 500) of Pashtun ethnicity were recruited from seven districts (Peshawar, Mardan, Charsadda, Bannu, Kohat, Dir and swat) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan for analysis. The cases were matched up with age, gender and ethnicity. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. For illiterate/un-educated patient’s understanding the informed consent form was read and explained in local Pashtu language and after patient’s agreement signed on his/her behalf by any of his/her relative/attendant. Patient’s detailed demographics and clinical parameter were noted on carefully designed proforma. The inclusion criteria for case group were (i) Diabetes diagnosed according to Internal Diabetes Federation (IDF) standard protocols, i.e., Fasting Blood Glucose (FBS) level greater than 126 mg/dL and random blood glucose (RBS) level greater than 200 mg/dL; (ii) Age between 30–80 years and (iii) Belonging from Pakistani Pashtun population. Exclusion criteria for case group were (i) Patients with chronic illness (presence of malignancies), recent severe infection (Hepatitis/Corona virus infection); and (ii) Patients of age not in range of 30–80 years. Whereas Controls were healthy volunteers from general population; age and gender wise matched with case group and fasting blood sugar level less than 100 mg/dL.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the ethical committee Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar (Approval No. 907/PHAR). All the procedures were carried out in light of Helsinki declaration (1975).

Blood sampling

Three millilitre whole blood was collected by a trained nurse following aseptic procedures from the median cubital vein of study individuals in EDTA tubes (properly labelled), and was stored at -10°C.

DNA extraction and quantification

DNA was extracted from 200 micro litre (μl) whole blood samples of type 2 diabetes patients using Wiz-Prep DNA extraction kit (Wiz-Prep no. W54100) following manufacturer’s guidelines. Quantification was done using Invitrogen Qubit™3 and the final DNA concentration was adjusted to 5 ng/μL.

DNA samples pooling

DNA samples were pooled according to previously described protocol [36, 37]. Two DNA pools one of 500 T2DM cases and second of 500 control subjects were constructed. Each pool containing an equimolar amount of DNA (10ng) from each individual. DNA pooling simplifies sequencing process and reduces cost and time.

Whole exome sequencing

Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was carried out at Genomic lab, Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Hayatabad, Peshawar. Paired end libraries of pool samples were prepared using Illumina Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit. Quantified DNA libraries were sequenced using HiSeq2500 sequencing machine (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

Bioinformatics analysis of WES data

We employed a custom-built in-house next generation sequencing bioinformatics pipeline to move from raw sequencing data to final variant call. FASTQ files produced by the Illumina HiSeq2500 were filtered to separate low quality reads (Q-score>30) using Trimmomatic software tool [38]. Filtered reads were then aligned to the reference genome (hg19/GRCh37) using a novel logarithmic tool the RAMICS [39]. Variant calling was performed using Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) and SAM tools [40, 41]. ANNOVAR was used for variants annotation [42]. The resulting annotated variant list generated by ANNOVAR was stored as Comma-Separated Values (CSV-file) having separate column for each annotation. The resultant CVS file was loaded/copied into an excel file for easy filtering, viewing and interpretation of data.

Filtration of WES data

WES generates huge data (>600 GB of data) handling of which is challenging and time consuming. To narrow down the list of variants of our interest the data was filtered as follows. Briefly the annotated file was first manually curated to shortlist putative variants. Non-synonymous, missense variants in exonic and splicing sites were retained, whereas Salient/synonymous variants were discarded (S1 Table). The resultant file was then filtered for selected genes previously reported for T2DM association (S2 Table). Next from list of selected T2DM associated genes we chose PPARG, HNF4A, GLIS3, MTNR1B, IRS-2, and NOTCH2 to be further investigated for T2DM susceptibility in the target population.

Confirmation of WES findings

WES suggested pathogenic variants were cross confirmed for its association with T2DM using Sequenom MassARRAY genotyping (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA). MassARRAY of Agena Biosciences easily genotype tens to hundreds of SNPs with great accuracy in short span of time and readily used in mutation detection and genotyping.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24). Key variables selected for analysis were gender, age, weight, geographical area (districts from where study subjects belongs), smoking, life style, exercise, diet, occupation, and variants reported in selected genes. All variant were tested for Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using chi-square (χ2) test. The difference in distribution of Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) between diabetic patients and control volunteers were determined using χ2 test. Association between Variants×T2DM were checked using binary logistic regression. A probability value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Subject description

Details of socio-demographics and general characteristics of the study participants are given in Table 1. Prevalence of co-morbidities (i.e. hypertension, renal failure, hypercholesterolemia and retinopathy) was observed higher in diabetic cases compared to controls. Majority of the patients were physically inactive and were from urban areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Drug and diet compliance were recorded poor in study participants.

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of cases and controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281070.t001

WES results

Exome sequencing identified a total of n = 1248875 SNPs. Among these 691223 were heterozygous, 407572 homozygous, 74390 insertions and 99392 were deletions; 50280 were exonic SNPs, 7910 missense variants and 1987 variants were expressed in pancreas; A total 650 SNPs were reported pathogenic.

WES suggested T2DM associated SNPs

Exome Sequencing identified a total of n = 9 SNPs (rs1801282/PPARG, rs745975/HNF4A, rs6415788/GLIS3, rs806052/GLIS3, rs8192552/MTNR1B, rs1805097/IRS-2, rs61788900/NOTCH2, rs61788901/NOTCH2 and rs11810554/NOTCH2) in selected genes of our interest. Among these, 5 variants (rs1801282/PPARG, rs745975/HNF4A, rs806052/GLIS3, rs1805097/IRS-2 and rs8192552/MTNR1B) were suggested pathogenic and rest of 4 SNPs (rs6415788/GLIS3, rs61788900/NOTCH2, rs61788901/NOTCH2 and rs11810554/NOTCH2) were marked non-pathogenic by WES (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. WES suggested diabetogenic and non-diabetogenic SNPs in the discovery stage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281070.t002

Validation/confirmation of WES suggested diabetogenic SNPs

WES generates accurate and reliable results however possibility of false negative and false positive results exists. In order to validate and reduce chances false-negative and false-positive identification rates; all the selected WES identified (n = 9) SNPs were genotyped using MassARRAY and association analysis was performed using appropriate statistical tests. Genotyping and association analysis confirmed strong association (P<0.05) of WES suggested SNPs with T2DM in the study population. WES suggested pathogenic SNPs (n = 5) showed marked difference in the distribution of minor allele frequencies (MAFs) between T2DM patients and controls. Risk alleles burden was observed higher in T2DM patients compare to controls (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Confirmation of WES suggested diabetogenic variants in the validation stage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281070.t003

Discussion

It is hypothesized that genetic makeup of Pakistani Pashtun population is different from other sub-populations and has unique cultural practices, social values, life style and behaviours, that make this population suitable for genomic studies. No previous comprehensive genomic study as of the present exists in this ethnic group. We confirmed positive association of genetic variations in PPARG (rs1801282), HNF4A (rs745975), GLIS3 (rs806052), IRS-2 (rs1805097) and MTNR1B (rs8192552) with T2DM. Whereas genetic variants GLIS3 (rs6415788) and NOTCH2 (rs61788900, rs61788901 and rs11810554) showed no noticeable association.

The Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG) is an important transcription factors that has a key role in regulating adipocyte differentiation and controlling glucose and lipid haemostasis [43]. Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) in different ancestries reported that single nucleotide polymorphisms in several candidate genes including PPARG increases risk of developing T2DM [44, 45]. Among several T2DM associated risk variants one variant extensively studied in different epidemiological study is rs1801282/ PPARG [46]. The present study for the first time in Pakistani Pashtun population reported the association of rs1801282/PPARG (C>G) with T2DM. WES marked the variant (also known as Pro12Ala) as deleterious and damaging based on SIFT and PolyPhen (0.0 and 0.85) score; Whereas; genotyping by massARRAY confirmed positive association (P = 0.010). Our study findings were compatible with result outcomes of a number of previously genomic studies conducted in different ethnic populations [4750].

HNF4A in beta cells of pancreas regulates expression of genes involved in insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. Polymorphisms in HNF4A affects normal glucose metabolism leading to T2DM [51, 52]. The SNP rs745975 in or near HNF4A gene in the study population showed strong association (P = 0.004). In concordance to our study findings a large scale association study conducted in Japanese Population also marked rs745975 polymorphism as potential risk factor for T2DM [53]. Likewise variant rs806052/ GLIS3 showed positive association (P = 0.016) with T2DM in the study population. In contrast to our findings a study conducted in Caucasian population doesn’t detect any association of rs806052/ GLIS3 with T2DM the possible variation in results are due to population heterogeneity [54]. Similarly we confirmed the association of rs1805097/IRS-2 (P = 0.045) with T2DM in the study population. Previously a case-control study conducted in Bangladeshi population consist of total n = 231 unrelated Bangladeshi (T2DM cases n = 123 and controls n = 108) reported that the variant rs1805097 in IRS-2 has significantly associated with T2DM in particularly female patients [55]. It is hypothesized that this variant impairs glucose haemostasis leading to T2DM [56, 57]. Moreover we also reported a pathogenic, non-synonymous, heterozygous variant (rs8192552) in MTNR1B gene. A similar study case-control study as of ours in Turkish population confirmed the association of variant rs8192552/MTBR1B with obesity and related co-morbidities like Insulin Resistance and hypercholesterolemia [58] The reported variant impair normal blood glucose level causing T2DM [59]. We could not confirm association between rs6415788/GLIS3, rs61788900/NOTCH2, rs61788901/NOTCH2, and rs11810554/NOTCH2 with T2DM in the target population. Contrary to our study findings genetic alterations in GLIS3 and NOTCH2 confer risk for T2DM in Europeans [60, 61]. The conflicting results are due to population genetic differences.

Conclusion

The present two stage case-control study, using Exome Sequencing and follow-up MassARRAY genotyping of selected genes reported association of polymorphism in PPARG, HNF4A, GLIS3, MTNR1B, IRS-2, and NOTCH2 with T2DM in Pashtun ethnic population for the first time. The study identified and confirmed potential T2DM causing risk variants in the aforementioned genes. In view of growing number T2DM cases in Pashtun ethnic population it is recommended that similar studies be conducted on other risk variants for T2DM, which will ultimately help in developing risk variant panel genes for screening and identification of genetically susceptible individuals. It will help in devising life style modification and other such strategies that will reduce burden of this fatal and costly disease.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Complete list of putative non-synonymous, missense variants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281070.s001

(RAR)

S2 Table. List of selected genes, previously associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281070.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

we are thankful to control subjects (volunteers) and diabetic patients for agreeing to participate in this study. We are grateful to Dr. Johar Ali, head of Centre of Genomics, Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Hayatabad, Peshawar and Dr. Muhammad Hussain Afridi, consultant endocrinologist of Hayatabad Teaching Hospital (HMC) Peshawar for their kind collaboration and helping us in collecting patient’s demographics and blood samples. We also thank Syed Adnan Ali Haider Statistical Assistant at for at the Centre of Genomics, Rehman Medical Institute his kind efforts in bioinformatics analysis of data.

References

  1. 1. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(Supplement 1):S15–33. pmid:33298413
  2. 2. Westman EC. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pathophysiologic Perspective. Frontiers in nutrition. 2021; 1(8):1–5. pmid:34447776
  3. 3. Henquin JC, Ibrahim MM, Rahier J. Insulin, glucagon and somatostatin stores in the pancreas of subjects with type-2 diabetes and their lean and obese non-diabetic controls. Scientific reports. 2017; 7(1):1–9. pmid:28887444
  4. 4. Batista TM, Haider N, Kahn CR. Defining the underlying defect in insulin action in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2021;1–3. pmid:33730188
  5. 5. Marchetti P, Bugliani M, Lupi R, Marselli L, Masini M, Boggi U, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum in pancreatic beta cells of type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetologia. 2007; 50(12):2486–94. pmid:17906960
  6. 6. Marchetti P, Masini M. Autophagy and the pancreatic beta-cell in human type 2 diabetes. Autophagy. 2009; 5(7):1055–6. pmid:19657235
  7. 7. Mambiya M, Shang M, Wang Y, Li Q, Liu S, Yang L, et al. The play of genes and non-genetic factors on type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in public health. 2019; 7:349. pmid:31803711
  8. 8. Li Z, Ye CY, Zhao TY, Yang L. Model of genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese Han population. BMC public health. 2020; 20(1):1–2. pmid:32600448
  9. 9. Kido Y. Gene–environment interaction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetology International. 2017; 8(1):7–13. pmid:30603301
  10. 10. Song Y, Raheel TM, Jia A, Dai G, Liu L, Long X, et al. rs10865710 polymorphism in PPARG promoter is associated with the severity of type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2021; 1–5. pmid:34373341
  11. 11. Azizi SM, Sarhangi N, Afshari M, Abbasi D, Meybodi HR, Hasanzad M, et al. Association analysis of the HNF4A common genetic variants with type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine. 2019;8(Suppl1):56. pmid:32351910
  12. 12. Liu C, Li H, Qi L, Loos RJ, Qi Q, Lu L, et al. Variants in GLIS3 and CRY2 are associated with type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese Hans. PLoS One. 2011 Jun 29;6(6):e21464. pmid:21747906
  13. 13. Li YY, Wang H, Zhang YY. Melatonin receptor 1B gene rs10830963 C/G polymorphism associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated meta-analysis of 13,752 participants. Heliyon. 2022 Nov 1;8(11):e11786. pmid:36458295
  14. 14. Ijaz A, Babar S, Sarwar S, Shahid SU. The combined role of allelic variants of IRS-1 and IRS-2 genes in susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the Punjabi Pakistani subjects. Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. 2019; 11(1):1–6. pmid:31404179
  15. 15. Sharaf SA, Kantoush NA, Ayoub DF, Ibrahim AA, Abdelaal AA, Aziz RA, et al. Altered expression of WFS1 and NOTCH2 genes associated with diabetic nephropathy in T2DM patients. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018 Jun 1;140:304–13. pmid:29626590
  16. 16. Sandhu MS, Weedon MN, Fawcett KA, Wasson J, Debenham SL, Daly A, et al. Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes. Nature genetics. 2007; 39(8):951–3. pmid:17603484
  17. 17. Ma Y, Luo Y, Gong S, Zhou X, Li Y, Liu W, et al. Low-Frequency Genetic Variant in the Hepatic Glucokinase Gene Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance in Chinese Population. Diabetes. 2021; 70(3):809–16. pmid:33298402
  18. 18. Wang H, Liu L, Zhao J, Cui G, Chen C, Ding H, et al. Large scale meta-analyses of fasting plasma glucose raising variants in GCK, GCKR, MTNR1B and G6PC2 and their impacts on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. PloS one. 2013; 8(6):e67665. pmid:23840762
  19. 19. Li YY, Wang H, Zhang YY. Neuronal Differentiation 1 gene Ala45Thr polymorphism and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of 7,940 subjects. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021; 31(6):1809–21. pmid:33893004
  20. 20. Alfaifi M. Contribution of genetic variant identified in HHEX gene in the Overweight Saudi patients confirmed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021; 1(10):1–5. pmid:35197747
  21. 21. Mashal S, Khanfar M, Al-Khalayfa S, Srour L, Mustafa L, Hakooz NM, et al. SLC30A8 gene polymorphism rs13266634 associated with increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Jordanian population. Gene. 2021; 768:145279. pmid:33161057
  22. 22. Sellami N, Lamine LB, Turki A, Sarray S, Jailani M, Al-Ansari AK, et al. Association of VEGFA variants with altered VEGF secretion and type 2 diabetes: A case-control study. Cytokine. 2018; 106:29–34. pmid:29533820
  23. 23. Nam JS, Han JW, Lee SB, You JH, Kim MJ, Kang S, et al. Calpain-10 and adiponectin gene polymorphisms in Korean type 2 diabetes patients. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2018; 33(3):364–71. pmid:30229575
  24. 24. Lingvay I, Sumithran P, Cohen RV, le Roux CW. Obesity management as a primary treatment goal for type 2 diabetes: time to reframe the conversation. The Lancet. 2021; 30(2). pmid:34600604
  25. 25. Li X, Zhou T, Ma H, Liang Z, Fonseca VA, Qi L, et al. Replacement of sedentary behavior by various daily-life physical activities and structured exercises: genetic risk and incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(10):2403–10. pmid:34183430
  26. 26. Jayedi A, Soltani S, Abdolshahi A, Shab-Bidar S. Healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns and the risk of chronic disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. British Journal of Nutrition. 2020; 124(11):1133–44. pmid:32600500
  27. 27. Sun Y, Gao HY, Fan ZY, He Y, Yan YX. Metabolomics Signatures in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Integrative Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(4):dgz240. pmid:31782507
  28. 28. Beulens JW, Pinho MG, Abreu TC, den Braver NR, Lam TM, Huss A, et al. Environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes—an exposome approach. Diabetologia. 2021: 1–2. pmid:34792619
  29. 29. Lin X, Xu Y, Pan X, Xu J, Ding Y, Sun X, et al. Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1):1–1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9 pmid:32901098
  30. 30. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: 2021. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org
  31. 31. Banerjee AT, Shah B. One size does not fit all: Diabetes prevalence among immigrants of the South Asian Diaspora. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2021; 23(4):653–8. pmid:32990901
  32. 32. Narayan KV, Kondal D, Daya N, Gujral UP, Mohan D, Patel SA, et al. Incidence and pathophysiology of diabetes in South Asian adults living in India and Pakistan compared with US blacks and whites. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2021; 9(1):e001927. pmid:33771764
  33. 33. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2019; 157:107843. pmid:31518657
  34. 34. Akhtar S, Nasir JA, Abbas T, Sarwar A. Diabetes in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2019; 35(4):1173. pmid:31372163
  35. 35. Basit A, Fawwad A, Qureshi H, Shera AS. Prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and associated risk factors: second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP), 2016–2017. BMJ open. 2018; 8(8):e020961. pmid:30082350
  36. 36. Jan A, Saeed M, Afridi MH, Khuda F, Shabbir M, Khan H, et al. Association of HLA-B Gene Polymorphisms with Type 2 Diabetes in Pashtun Ethnic Population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2021; 16 (2):1–10. pmid:34258292
  37. 37. Wang J, Zou G, Zhao H. DNA pooling: methods and applications in association studies. Current topics in human genetics: Studies in complex diseases. 2007:179–208. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812790811_0008
  38. 38. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15):2114–20. pmid:24695404
  39. 39. Wright IA, Travers SA. RAMICS: trainable, high-speed and biologically relevant alignment of high-throughput sequencing reads to coding DNA. Nucleic acids research. 2014; 42(13):e106. pmid:24861618
  40. 40. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research. 2010; 20(9):1297–303. pmid:20644199
  41. 41. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(16):2078–9. pmid:19505943
  42. 42. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2010; 38(16):e164. pmid:20601685
  43. 43. Kamble PG, Pereira MJ, Gustafsson S, Lundkvist P, Castillejo-López C, Fall T, et al. Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Pro12Ala polymorphism in human adipose tissue: assessment of adipogenesis and adipocyte glucose and lipid turnover. Adipocyte. 2018; 7(4):285–96. pmid:30064293
  44. 44. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, Li Y, Duren WL, et al. A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. science. 2007; 316(5829):1341–5. pmid:17463248
  45. 45. Gouda HN, Sagoo GS, Harding AH, Yates J, Sandhu MS, Higgins JP, et al. The association between the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 (PPARG2) Pro12Ala gene variant and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. American journal of epidemiology. 2010; 171(6):645–55. pmid:20179158
  46. 46. Sarhangi N, Sharifi F, Hashemian L, Hassani Doabsari M, Heshmatzad K, Rahbaran M, et al. PPARG (Pro12Ala) genetic variant and risk of T2DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1):1–8. pmid:32728045
  47. 47. Chistiakov DA, Potapov VA, Khodirev DS, Shamkhalova MS, Shestakova MV, Nosikov VV, et al. The PPARγ Pro12Ala variant is associated with insulin sensitivity in Russian normoglycaemic and type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2010; 7(1):56–62. pmid:20368233
  48. 48. Mori H, Ikegami H, Kawaguchi Y, Seino S, Yokoi N, Takeda J, et al. The Pro12→ Ala substitution in PPAR-γ is associated with resistance to development of diabetes in the general population: possible involvement in impairment of insulin secretion in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2001; 50(4):891–4. pmid:11289058
  49. 49. Regine I, Husain RS, Aswathi RP, Reddy DR, Ahmed SS, Ramakrishnan V, et al. Association between PPARγ rs1801282 polymorphism with diabetic nephropathy and type-2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility in south India and a meta-analysis. Nefrología (English Edition). 2020; 40(3):287–98. pmid:32417009
  50. 50. Vergotine Z, Yako YY, Kengne AP, Erasmus RT, Matsha TE. Proliferator-activated receptor gamma Pro12Ala interacts with the insulin receptor substrate 1 Gly972Arg and increase the risk of insulin resistance and diabetes in the mixed ancestry population from South Africa. BMC genetics. 2014; 15(1):1–8. pmid:24447396
  51. 51. Wang H, Maechler P, Antinozzi PA, Hagenfeldt KA, Wollheim CB. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α regulates the expression of pancreatic β-cell genes implicated in glucose metabolism and nutrient-induced insulin secretion. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000; 275(46):35953–9. pmid:10967120
  52. 52. Bagwell AM, Bento JL, Mychaleckyj JC, Freedman BI, Langefeld CD, Bowden DW, et al. Genetic analysis of HNF4A polymorphisms in Caucasian-American type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005; 54 (4):1185–90. pmid:15793260
  53. 53. Yokoi N, Kanamori M, Horikawa Y, Takeda J, Sanke T, Furuta H, et al. Association studies of variants in the genes involved in pancreatic β-cell function in type 2 diabetes in Japanese subjects. Diabetes. 2006; 55(8):2379–86. pmid:16873704
  54. 54. Shakhtshneider EV, Mikhailova SV, Ivanoshchuk DE, Orlov PS, Ovsyannikova AK, Rymar OD, et al. Polymorphism of the GLIS3 gene in a Caucasian population and among individuals with carbohydrate metabolism disorders in Russia. BMC research notes. 2018; 11(1):1–5. pmid:29606121
  55. 55. Bappy HJ, Goswami A, Huda N, Hosen MI, Nabi AN. Gender specific association of missense variant rs1805097 of IRS-2 and noncoding variant rs841853 of GLUT-1 genes with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in Bangladeshi population. Gene Reports. 2020; 1;21:100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100866
  56. 56. Villuendas G, Botella-Carretero JI, Roldán B, Sancho J, Escobar-Morreale HF, Millán JL, et al. Polymorphisms in the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) gene and the insulin receptor substrate-2 (IRS-2) gene influence glucose homeostasis and body mass index in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and non-hyperandrogenic controls. Human reproduction. 2005; 20(11):3184–91. pmid:16037106
  57. 57. El Mkadem SA, Lautier C, Macari F, Molinari N, Lefebvre P, Renard E, et al. Role of allelic variants Gly972Arg of IRS-1 and Gly1057Asp of IRS-2 in moderate-to-severe insulin resistance of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes. 2001; 50(9):2164–8. pmid:11522686
  58. 58. Çöl N, Nacak M, Araz M. Association of melatonin receptor 1 B gene (rs10830963 and rs9192552) polymorphısm with adolescent obesity and related comorbidities in Turkey. Journal of International Medical Research. 2018; 46(8):3086–96. pmid:29726288
  59. 59. Müssig K, Staiger H, Machicao F, Häring HU, Fritsche A. Genetic variants in MTNR1B affecting insulin secretion. Annals of medicine. 2010; 42(6):387–93. pmid:20597807
  60. 60. Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, Saxena R, Soranzo N, Jackson AU, et al. New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nature genetics. 2010; 42(2):105–16. pmid:20081858
  61. 61. Zeggini E, Scott LJ, Saxena R, Voight BF, Marchini JL, Hu T, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature genetics. 2008; 40(5):638–45. pmid:18372903