The Drosophila melanogaster attP40 docking site and derivatives are insertion mutations of msp-300

Kevin van der Graaf; Saurabh Srivastav; Pratibha Singh; James A. McNew; Michael Stern

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278598

Abstract

The ɸC31 integrase system is widely used in Drosophila melanogaster to allow transgene targeting to specific loci. Over the years, flies bearing any of more than 100 attP docking sites have been constructed. One popular docking site, termed attP40, is located close to the Nesprin-1 orthologue msp-300 and lies upstream of certain msp-300 isoforms and within the first intron of others. Here we show that attP40 causes larval muscle nuclear clustering, which is a phenotype also conferred by msp-300 mutations. We also show that flies bearing insertions within attP40 can exhibit decreased msp-300 transcript levels in third instar larvae. Finally, chromosomes carrying certain “transgenic RNAi project” (TRiP) insertions into attP40 can confer pupal or adult inviability or infertility, or dominant nuclear clustering effects in certain genetic backgrounds. These phenotypes do not require transcription from the insertions within attP40. These results demonstrate that attP40 and insertion derivatives act as msp-300 insertional mutations. These findings should be considered when interpreting data from attP40-bearing flies.

Citation: van der Graaf K, Srivastav S, Singh P, McNew JA, Stern M (2022) The Drosophila melanogaster attP40 docking site and derivatives are insertion mutations of msp-300. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0278598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598

Editor: Efthimios M. C. Skoulakis, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, GREECE

Received: September 30, 2022; Accepted: November 19, 2022; Published: December 14, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 van der Graaf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper. Fly stocks are available upon request by contacting researchdata@rice.edu.

Funding: The study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grants R01 NS102676 and R21 NS111340) to both MS and JAM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

For several years, Drosophila melanogaster investigators have used a genome integration method based on the site-specific ɸC31 integrase [1] to target transgenes to specific loci [2]. With this method, ɸC31 integrase catalyzes sequence-directed recombination between a phage attachment site (attP, present within each of >100 attP “docking sites” in Drosophila melanogaster) and a bacterial attachment site (attB, present within the integrating plasmid) [3–7]. By allowing transgene insertion into specific, defined, docking site sequences, the ɸC31 integrase method increases the reproducibility and decreases the variability of transgene expression observed with the random transgene integration utilized by P elements.

Two docking sites, attP2, located at position 68A4 on chromosome III and attP40, located at position 25C on chromosome II, are widely used docking sites for LexA drivers and Gal4-driven Transgenic RNAi Project (TRiP) insertions [8]. These two attP docking sites are favorable because they express inserted transgenes at high levels while maintaining low basal expression [9]. In fact, the Drosophila melanogaster stock center at Bloomington, IN, reports possessing 16,503 Drosophila melanogaster lines carrying attP40 and 14,970 lines carrying attP2; most lines carry TRiP insertions or the activation domains or DNA binding domains from the Janelia split-Gal4 collection (Annette Parks, personal communication). Although originally reported to be located in an intergenic region, between CG14035 and msp-300 [10], attP40 lies within the first intron of certain msp-300 isoforms ([11] FlyBase FB2022_02). This observation raises the possibility that attP40 might act as an insertional mutation for msp-300. Indeed, it was previously reported that certain insertions into attP40 could cause spreading of the H3K27me3 mark over the large msp-300 exon [12]. Thus, transgenes inserted within the attP40 docking site might affect expression of at least a subset of msp-300 isoforms.

MSP-300 (Muscle-specific protein 300 kDa) is a nuclear-associated Nesprin1 orthologue and a component of the Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complex [13, 14]. The C-terminal domain contains a Klarsicht/Anc1/Syne Homology (KASH) domain that interacts with Sad1p/UNC-84 (SUN)- domain-containing proteins, connecting the outer and inner nuclear membranes [15, 16]. In Drosophila melanogaster larvae, msp-300 transcription has been reported in muscle (Volk, 1992) and fat body [17]. In larval muscle, msp-300 forms striated F-actin-based filaments that lie between muscle nuclei and postsynaptic sites at the neuromuscular junction. MSP-300 also wraps around immature boutons in response to electrical activity and is required for postsynaptic RNA localization and synaptic maturation [18]. MSP-300 is also required for normal nuclear localization in muscle cells and for integrity of muscle cell insertion sites into the cuticle [14, 19, 20]. MSP-300 isoforms lacking the KASH domain confer deficits in larval locomotion, localization of the excitatory neurotransmitter receptor GluRIIA at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), and proper NMJ functioning, independently of its role in muscle nuclear positioning [21]. Non-muscle deficits conferred by msp-300 mutations include defects in oocyte development and female fertility [22]. In humans, mutations in the Nesprin family are associated with several musculoskeletal disorders, including bipolar disorder, autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 (ARCA1), X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD) and are risk factors for schizophrenia and autism [23].

Here, we show that flies carrying attP40 exhibits a nuclear clustering phenotype in larval muscle, which suggests that attP40 is an msp-300 insertional mutation. Further, we show that inserting transgenes into attP40 can increase severity of this phenotype. We use quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR) to show that insertions within attP40 decrease msp-300 transcript levels in 3^rd instar larvae. Finally, we show that chromosomes carrying certain TRiP insertions constructed from the Valium 20 vector [9] into attP40 confer recessive lethality or sterility. Because of the variable effects of different transgene insertions into attP40, investigators should use caution in interpreting data collected from Drosophila melanogaster carrying these insertions.

Materials and methods

Drosophila melanogaster stocks

All fly stocks were maintained on standard cornmeal/agar Drosophila melanogaster media: 69.1 g/l corn syrup, 9.6 g/l soy flour, 16.7 g/l yeast, 5.6 g/l agar, 70.4 g/l cornmeal, 4.6 ml/l propionic acid and 3.3 gm/l nipagin. Flies carrying attP2 and attP40 lacking insertions were retrieved as white-eyed progeny from transgene insertions carried out at GenetiVision (Houston, TX). The Drosophila Stock Center at Bloomington, Indiana provided TRiP JNK (#57035), TRiP spatacsin (spat) (#64868), TRiP Rop (#51925), TRiP Spartin (#37499), TRiP atlastin (atl) (#36736), TRiP Mcu (#42580), 13XLexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP (#32210), LexA::Mef2 (#61543), CyO-TbA (#36335), LexA::nSyb (#52817), nSyb-Gal4 (#51635) UAS-atlRNAi [24, 25]. All experiments were performed on Drosophila melanogaster that had been reared and maintained at room temperature (22°C) with a 12h: 12h light:dark cycle unless otherwise indicated.

Immunocytochemistry

All larvae were dissected in HL3.1 [26] in a magnetic chamber, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, then washed in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X (PBS-T) and blocked for 30 minutes in PBS-T with 1% BSA. Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody, washed thoroughly with PBS-T and then incubated for 2.5 hours at room temperature with secondary antibody. Samples were then washed with PBS-T and mounted in VectaShield Antifade Mounting Medium containing DAPI (Vector laboratories; H-1200-10).

Alexa Fluor® 647 phalloidin (1:200) was used to visualize F-actin. All images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM800 with an Airyscan confocal microscope.

Nuclear clustering analysis

Third instar larval body wall muscle 6 was chosen for all nuclear clustering analysis. Images were opened in ImageJ and nuclei clusters in muscle 6 were counted. We defined a “cluster” as two or more nuclei in which the distance between two nuclear borders was less than five microns. We analyzed six larvae from hemisegments A2-A4 (18 hemisegments total) for each genotype.

Microsoft excel was used to import all nuclear clustering data. “Normal” muscles contained no clusters. For muscles that contained cluster(s), we determined cluster number and nuclei number per cluster. Cluster sizes for each genotype were plotted on a frequency histogram. The percentage of normal hemisegments for each genotype was plotted on a column graph. For each hemisegment we calculated the percentage of nuclei in clusters using the following calculation: number of nuclei within clusters divided by total number of nuclei in muscle 6 multiplied by 100. Then, the average of three hemisegments per larva was calculated and plotted on a column graph. Data was visualized and analyzed using GraphPad Prism v9.3.1 or Synergy Software KaleidaGraph v4.5.2.

Quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR)

Primers were designed with PrimerBLAST software according to the published sequence of msp-300. We amplified and analyzed two msp-300 regions: first, the 3’ end region, which amplifies transcripts RD, RG, RH, RI, RJ, RK, RL and RM (transcripts that contain the KASH domain), and second, the middle region, which amplifies transcripts RB and RF (B/F) (transcripts that lack the KASH domain) (Fig 1). For the 3’ end region, we used the forward primer sequence 5’-TCAACCTCTTCCAATGCAGGC-3’, and the reverse primer sequence 5’-CGCCAGAACCGTGGTATTGA-3’. The B/F forward primer sequence was 5’-CACGTACTTGCCGCACGAT-3’, and B/F reverse primer sequence was 5’-ATTTTTGACACGTTCCCGGC-3’. For amplification of Rp49, chosen as the housekeeping gene, the forward primer sequence was 5’-TGTCCTTCCAGCTTCAAGATGACCATC-3’ and the reverse primer sequence was 5’-CTTGGGCTTGCGCCATTTGTG-3’. Total RNA (500 ng) was extracted from frozen whole larvae and larval fillets with Direct-zol^TM RNA MicroPrep (Zymo Research) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The yield of RNA was estimated with the Nanodrop2000 (ThermoFisher). The A₂₆₀:A₂₈₀ ratio was between 1.8–2.1. Superscript^TM III First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher) was used to generate cDNA according to manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcribed cDNA was then amplified in a 20 μl PCR reaction by the ABI Prism 7000 system (Applied Biosystems) with the universal conditions: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles (15s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C). Each sample contained 10 whole larvae. Three separate biological samples were collected from each genotype, and triplicate measures of each sample were conducted for amplification consistency. Data were analyzed with the relative 2^{- ΔΔCt} method to ensure consistency [27].

Download:

Fig 1. Overview of msp-300 transcripts and nuclear clustering measurements.

A) Overview of the 11 annotated msp-300 transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster. Arrowhead/dotted line indicates location of the attP40 docking site. Predicted exons shown with blue bars (translated regions) or gray bars (5’ UTR or 3’ UTR), introns with thin lines. Location of the KASH domain is indicated by red arrow. B) Schematic representation of nuclear clustering in larval body wall muscle 6. If borders between two nuclei are less than 5 μm apart it is counted as a cluster (dotted red lines). Dotted gray line outlines muscle 6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g001

Pupal size measurements

We measured length and width in pupae homozygous for each of six TRiP lines and the attP40 parent chromosome. Pupal length was determined from top to bottom, excluding the anterior and posterior spiracles. Pupal width was determined by measurement at the midpoint along the pupal anterior/posterior axis.

Viability measurements

Each of six TRiP lines were placed in combination with balancer “CyO-TbA” [28], which carries the Tb¹ dominant “Tubby” marker and enabled us to unambiguously genotype balancer-containing from balancer-lacking larvae, pupae and adults. Each of these six TRiP lines were then brother-sister mated and F1 progeny reared in uncrowded vials. The number of Tubby and non-Tubby pupae were counted. Non-Tubby pupae were removed and placed into fresh vials. After seven days, the number of successful eclosions was counted. To monitor viability in the control attP40 line, pupae reared in uncrowded vials were collected and after seven days the number of successful eclosions was counted.

Fertility measurements

We measured male and female fertility in adults homozygous for each of six TRiP lines and the attP40 parent chromosome. To measure male fertility, single males were placed in vials with two phenotypically wildtype and fertile virgin females, and ability to generate larval progeny was measured. To measure female fertility, single females were placed in vials with two phenotypically wildtype and fertile males, and ability to generate larval progeny was measured.

Construction of Aop-atlRNAi

We chemically synthesized the reported sequence of the TRiP atl short hairpin with Xho1 and Xba1 sites added to the left and right ends, respectively. (TCGAGAGTCTGGTATAGGTCATTAGTTTAtagttatattcaagcataTAAACTAATGACCTATACCAGGCT–lower case letters indicate the loop sequence). This construct was introduced into the Xho1-Xba1 sites of pJFRC19-13XlexAop2 (Addgene, Inc) and introduced into embryos at the attP40 site using with ɸC31-mediated recombination (GenetiVision, Houston TX). Insert-containing flies were recognized by eye color.

Statistical analysis

For percentage of nuclei in clusters analysis, a One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test was performed. For pupa length and width analysis, a One-way ANOVA with Bunnett post hoc test was performed. All statistical tests were performed in GraphPad Prism v9.3.1.

Results

The attP40 docking site is located within or upstream of msp-300, depending on the isoform

attP2 and attP40 are two widely used attP docking sites in Drosophila melanogaster for insertions of LexA drivers, Gal4-driven TRiP insertions, and other constructs. Both docking sites provide high levels of induced transgene expression while maintaining low basal expression. As of February 2022, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (Bloomington, IN) provides 16,503 stocks carrying attP40 and 14,941 stocks carrying attP2 (Annette Parks, personal communication). The attP40 chromosomal location is closest to msp-300, which expresses 11 different isoforms. attP40 lies within intron 1 for transcripts RH, RI, RJ and RK and upstream of transcripts RB, RD, RE, RF, RG, RL and RM (Fig 1A). These results raise the possibility that attP40 could affect msp-300 transcript levels. Indeed, De et al. [12] reported that certain transgene insertions into attP40 alter the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark over at least a part of msp-300. Similarly, in a Ph.D. thesis, Cypranowska showed that attP40 decreased msp-300 transcription in certain genetic backgrounds and conferred synaptic phenotypes at the larval neuromuscular junction consistent with decreased msp-300 activity [29].

Given previous reports that msp-300 variants alter muscle myonuclear spacing [14, 30], we hypothesized that effects of attP40 on msp-300 expression might alter larval muscle nuclear clustering. To address this hypothesis, we first defined a “cluster” as two or more nuclei in which the distance between two nuclear borders was less than 5 μm (Fig 1B). Then, for every nucleus in a larval body wall muscle, we measured the distance to its nearest neighbor, using larval body wall muscle 6 as assay platform. Using this approach, we observed abnormalities in nuclear positioning in larvae homozygous for attP40 vs. control larvae (homozygous for attP2) or larvae heterozygous for attP40 and attP2 (Fig 2A–2C). In particular, larvae homozygous for attP40 (Fig 2D, middle panel) exhibited more nuclear clusters and clusters of greater size than control (Fig 2D, top panel) or heterozygous larvae (Fig 2D, bottom panel), and a significantly greater number of nuclei within clusters (Fig 2E). As a result, larvae homozygous for attP40 exhibited fewer hemisegments with a normal nuclear distribution than control or heterozygous larvae (Fig 2F). We conclude that attP40 causes a recessive muscle nuclear clustering phenotype.

Download:

Fig 2. Muscle nuclei clustering phenotype observed in attP40 larvae.

A-C) Representative images of nuclei positioning within muscle 6 for larvae carrying attP2 (A), attP40 (B) and attP40/+; attP2/+ (C). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue), and muscle actin is labeled with phalloidin (magenta). Muscles are outlined with white lines. D) Frequency distribution of the number of nuclei within each cluster within muscle 6 for each genotype shown in upper right. Lines in upper right depict the genotype of each homologue; green pentagons indicate the attP2 docking site, blue pentagon depicts attP40 docking site E) Percentage of nuclei found within clusters for each genotype. Means +/- SEMs are shown. The following calculation was used: ((number of nuclei within clusters / total number of nuclei) x 100). F) Percentage of hemisegments with normal nuclear distribution within muscle 6. attP2 is represented in green, attP40 in blue and attP40/+; attP2/+ in half green/half blue for panels D-F. For each genotype 3 hemisegments per larvae for 6 larvae total were analyzed. One way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test was used for statistical analyses. Scale bar = 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g002

Effects of inserting transgenes into attP40 on phenotypic severity

To determine if insertions into attP40 could affect nuclear clustering, we used the functionally neutral LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP reporter introduced into attP40 and crossed these flies with attP2, attP40, lexA::Mef2 or lexA::nSyb. Representative images of nuclei clustering in body wall muscle 6 for each genotype is shown in Fig 3A–3D. First, we found that LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/+ larvae (only one copy of attP40) showed only 6.18% of nuclei in clusters and a mostly normal nuclear distribution (Fig 3E top panel, 3F and 3G), indicating that LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP, like “empty” attP40 (attP40 lacking an insertion), is recessive. However, when LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP was in combination with empty attP40, we found extremely large nuclear clusters (containing up to 12 nuclei; Fig 3E, lower panel in blue), which were not observed in larvae homozygous for attP40 (Fig 2D). In addition, 46.4% of nuclei were in clusters compared to 36.7% in larvae homozygous for attP40 homozygous (Figs 3F and 2E). Thus, transgene insertion into one attP40 site increases nuclear clustering severity. To determine if inserting transgenes into both attP40 sites would affect nuclear clustering, we examined nuclear clustering in LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::nSyb larvae and found nuclear clustering similar to larvae homozygous for empty attP40 (Figs 3E bottom panel and 2D). These results suggest that inserting transgenes into a second attP40 site has little additional effect on nuclear clustering.

Download:

Fig 3. Effects of inserting AOP/LexA transgenes into attP40 on nuclear clustering severity.

A-D) Representative images of nuclei position within muscle 6 for LexAop-IVS-myr::GFP in combination with attP2 (A), attP40 (B), LexA::Mef2 (C) and LexA::nSyb (D). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Muscles are outlined with solid white lines. E) Frequency distribution of the number of nuclei within each cluster within muscle 6 for each genotype indicated in upper right. Lines in upper right show genotype of each chromosome II homologue (in top right histogram, both chromosome II and chromosome III are shown). Green pentagon represents attP2, blue pentagons represent attP40, red/blue composite pentagons represent attP40 carrying indicated insertion. Brown rectangle represents insertion. F) Percentage of nuclei found within clusters for each genotype. Means +/- SEMs are shown. The following calculation was used: ((number of nuclei within clusters / total number of nuclei) x 100). G) Percentage of hemisegments with normal nuclear distribution within muscle 6. In panels E-G, each genotype is represented with a different color as follows: LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/attP2 (green), LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/attP40 (blue), LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::Mef2 (light blue) and LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::nSyb (red). For each genotype 3 hemisegments per larvae for 6 larvae total were analyzed. One way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test was used for statistical analyses. Scale bar = 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g003

In the experiments described above, the insertions in attP40 were not transcribed in muscle. Given the previous report [12] that certain transgene insertions into attP40 could generate epigenetic marks that spread into msp-300, potentially altering msp-300 expression, we determined if expressing the insertions in muscle would affect nuclear clustering. Thus, we created LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::Mef2 larvae, in which the insertions in each attP40 site would be expressed in muscle. We found that these larvae exhibited a more severe nuclear clustering phenotype even than LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/empty attP40 (Fig 3E lower panel in cyan, 3F and 3G), and was the only genotype tested in which every muscle exhibited some nuclear clustering (Fig 3G). These observations suggest that transcribing insertions in attP40 might further increase the severity of nuclear clustering phenotype.

To determine if Gal4-regulated insertions, like LexA-regulated insertions, would also induce nuclear clustering, we investigated properties of one Gal4-driven shRNA construct (targeting spatacsin (spat) (CG13531)), created by the transgenic RNAi project (TRiP) [9], as our example. We chose a TRiP insertion for this study because these insertions are widely used in the community and TRiP insertions represent more than half (8,884) of attP40 insertions maintained at the Drosophila stock center in Bloomington, IN. Representative images are shown in Fig 4A–4C. We found that TRiP spat/+;attP2/+ larvae exhibited wildtype nuclear positioning (Fig 4D, top panel, 4E and 4F), but both TRiP spat/empty attP40 or homozygous TRiP spat exhibited a strong nuclear clustering phenotype (Fig 4D middle and bottom panel, 4E and 4F)–in fact, larvae homozygous for TRiP spat exhibited clusters up to 15 nuclei in size (Fig 4D). Thus, TRiP spat confers a recessive clustering phenotype, which indicates that this Gal4-driven transgene insertion behaves in a manner similar to the LexA insertions described above.

Download:

Fig 4. Effects on nuclei clustering of inserting Gal4-regulated TRiP spatacsin (spat) into attP40.

A-C) Representative images of nuclear position within muscle 6 for TRiP spat/+; attP2/+ (A), TRiP spat/attP40 (B) and TRiP spat (C). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Muscles are outlined with solid white lines. D) Frequency distribution of the number of nuclei within each cluster within muscle 6 for each genotype indicated in upper right. Lines in upper right show genotype of each chromosome II homologue (in top right histogram, both chromosome II and chromosome III are shown). Green pentagon represents attP2, blue pentagons represent attP40, red/blue composite pentagons represent attP40 carrying indicated insertion. Brown rectangle represents insertion. E) Percentage of nuclei found within clusters for each genotype. Means +/- SEMs are shown. The following calculation was used: ((number of nuclei within clusters / total number of nuclei) x 100). F) Percentage of hemisegments with normal nuclear distribution within muscle 6. Each genotype is represented with a different color in panels D-F with TRiP spat/+; attP2/+ (green), TRiP spat/attP40 (blue) and TRiP spat (red). For each genotype 3 hemisegments per larvae for 6 larvae total were analyzed. ANOVA with Tukey was used for statistical analyses. Scale bar = 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g004

Effects of attP40 and derivatives on msp-300 transcript levels

We hypothesized that nuclei clustering in larvae homozygous for attP40 and derivatives reflected altered expression of at least some of the eleven msp-300 isoforms (Fig 1). To test this hypothesis, we prepared RNA from whole third instar larvae and performed quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR) using primers from two regions of the msp-300 transcription unit; first, the far 3’ end of msp-300, which includes the KASH domain and accounts for eight of eleven annotated transcripts [16], see Fig 5A, and second, an internal region that is predicted to amplify the RB and RF transcripts, which lack the KASH domain. Thus, these primers enable analysis of 10 of 11 annotated transcripts (Fig 5A).

Download:

Fig 5. Effect of attP40 and derivatives on msp-300 transcript levels.

A) Schematic overview of the primer set used in this analysis (green arrowheads for mid region primers, red arrowheads for 3’ primers). Grey inset enhances the mid to 3’end region of transcripts RB and RD. The (light color) inset shows the primer locations used to analyze transcripts RB and RF. The (dark color) inset show the primer locations used to analyze transcripts RD, RG, RH, RI, RJ, RK, RL and RM (KASH-containing transcripts). Annotated transcripts as shown in Fig 1. B) Quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR) was used to measure msp-300 KASH-containing transcript levels, normalized to attP2, from whole third instar larvae of the indicated genotypes. C) Q-PCR was used to measure msp-300 KASH-containing transcript levels, normalized to attP2, from 3^rd instar larval fillets of the indicated genotypes. D) Q-PCR was used to measure msp-300 transcripts B and F, normalized to attP2, from whole third instar larvae of the indicated genotypes. Red bars represent transcript levels measured with msp-300 KASH-containing primers and green bars represent transcript levels measured with transcripts B and F primers. Mean +/- SEM was determined from at least three separate biological samples collected from each genotype, and triplicate measures of each sample. The 2^-ΔΔCt was employed for this measurement. Each sample contained a mix of 10 whole larvae for (B) and (D) or a mix of 5 larval fillets (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g005

We found using the 3’ end primers that msp-300 transcript levels were decreased about two-fold in larvae homozygous for attP40 and that contained an insertion in at least one of the attP40 sites (Fig 5B). These results support the possibility that attP40 derivatives cause nuclei clustering by decreasing msp-300 transcript levels. These effects on transcript levels, like effects on nuclear clustering, were recessive, as msp-300 transcript levels in LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/+ or TRiP spat/+ larvae were not distinguishable from those from the attP2 control.

We were surprised to find that larvae homozygous for empty attP40 exhibited wildtype msp-300 transcript levels, despite exhibiting a strong nuclear clustering phenotype. However we note that msp-300 is transcribed in larval fat bodies as well as muscle [17]; thus our whole larva RNA preparations might not capture attP40 transcriptional effects specifically in muscle. To address this possibility, we performed Q-PCR on RNA prepared from larval fillets, in which the fat body as well as all other internal organs were removed, leaving only the body wall muscles, underlying epidermis, and cuticle. We found that with this semi-purified muscle tissue as RNA source, empty attP40 fillets as well as LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::Mef2 fillets exhibited a ~two-fold decrease in msp-300 transcript levels (Fig 5C), similar to what we observed in whole larvae carrying attP40 insertions (Fig 5B). Thus, muscle msp-300 transcript levels match muscle msp-300 phenotypes in attP40 and derivatives. These results also raise the possibility that empty attP40 might increase levels of certain msp-300 isoforms in non-muscle tissues.

The primers used in Fig 5B enable amplification of KASH domain isoforms. To analyze transcript levels of the two annotated non-KASH domain isoforms, transcripts RB and RF, we used the internal primers described above to amplify RNA from whole larvae. We found that unlike the case with the KASH domain transcripts, non-KASH domain transcripts were increased in both empty attP40 and LexAop2-IVS-myr::GFP/LexA::Mef2 larvae (Fig 5D). Phenotypic consequences of these altered transcript levels are not clear. Thus, attP40 can have distinct effects on transcript levels of different isoforms.

Effects of TRiP insertions into attP40 on viability and fertility

Many transgenes introduced into attP40 are RNAi short hairpin sequences from the “TRiP” project cloned into the Valium20 vector. We noticed some unexpected viability phenotypes, even in the absence of expression, when working with some of these insertions, so we wanted to characterize TRiP insertion viability systematically. However, monitoring TRiP insertions for recessive viability and fertility was problematic for two reasons. First, many TRiP insertions into attP40 are balanced with CyO; this is problematic because the Cy¹ “Curly” dominant marker on the CyO balancer is unreliable. The Curly wing phenotype is easily suppressed by genetic modifiers as well as the environmental conditions of low temperature and larval crowding [31]; indeed, the FlyBase allele report for Cy¹ states that Cy¹ “frequently overlaps [wildtype] at 19°C……….. some balanced Cy chromosomes pick up suppressors of Cy in stock” (http://flybase.org/reports/FBal0002196.html). Second, the y⁺ and v⁺ markers used for the TRiP insertions are each fully dominant, unlike the semi-dominant mini-white marker used on other transgenes. Because of these two features, it is difficult to accurately distinguish flies carrying CyO from flies without CyO by simple visual inspection.

To address these difficulties, we placed several TRiP insertions in combination with a modified CyO balancer upon which the dominant Tb¹ “Tubby” transgene had been introduced by P-element mediated transformation [28]. This CyO-TbA balancer also carries the dominant Star marker, which confers “Rough eyes” [32]. Both Tb¹ and Star are completely penetrant. Thus, the use of CyO-TbA to balance TRiP insertions enabled us to unambiguously distinguish flies heterozygous from homozygous for each TRiP insertion at the larval, pupal, and adult stages.

From six TRiP insertions tested when homozygous, we found a wide variety of viability and fertility deficits (Tables 1 and 2). The mostly strongly affected insertions, TRiP atl and TRiP spat, permitted no homozygous viable adults, although a few pupae homozygous for TRiP spat were observed. Flies bearing the TRiP rop and TRiP Mcu insertions were less strongly affected. Pupae homozygous for either insertion were observed, albeit at a lower frequency than expected, and most (~80%) failed to eclose. Escaper adults exhibited greatly decreased fertility (Table 2). In particular, none of the males homozygous for TRiP rop, and only 2 of 10 males from TRiP Mcu, were fertile. Likewise, most females homozygous for TRiP rop and TRiP Mcu were infertile, and the rare fertile females produced very few progeny. Flies bearing the TRiP JNK insertion were even less strongly affected. Adults homozygous for TRiP JNK were plentiful (Table 1), and the females displayed wildtype fertility (Table 2). However, males homozygous for TRiP JNK appeared to be completely sterile (Table 2). All phenotypes of flies homozygous for TRiP spartin appeared similar to wildtype. TRiP spartin was the only one of the six TRiP lines tested for which we were able to construct and maintain a homozygous stock.

Download:

Table 1. Homozygous viability in TRiP lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.t001

Download:

Table 2. Adult fertility in TRiP lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.t002

Pupae homozygous for TRiP insertions showed body size defects as well as viability or fertility defects. We did not notice any visible defects in the pupa case and posterior/anterior spiracles in four of our TRiP lines (Fig 6A). Pupae homozygous for spat usually failed to evert their anterior spiracles (Fig 6B), a phenotype previously observed in mutants defective in ecdysone production [33] or larval muscle function [34]. Although pupal length in these homozygous pupae was not significantly different from the control (pupae homozygous for empty attP40), pupal width in these homozygous pupae was significantly decreased (Fig 6C and 6D). The TRiP Mcu insertion had the strongest effect on pupal width.

Download:

Fig 6. Effects of homozygous TRiP insertions on pupal length and width.

A) Visual representation of pupae homozygous for attP40 and TRiP JNK, Mcu, Rop and Spartin. B) Visual representation of an early pupa homozygous for TRiP spat. C) Pupal length measurements for the genotypes shown in (A). D) Pupal width measurements for the genotypes shown in (A). For pupa length and width analysis, a One-way ANOVA with Bunnett post hoc test was performed. Scale bar = 1 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g006

In an attempt to separate the recessive lethality of the TRiP atl chromosome from the attP40 insertion, we performed two rounds of free recombination between TRiP atl and another stock with no lethal mutations on chromosome II. However, we were unable to separate the lethality from the TRiP atl insertion, indicating that the lethal allele of TRiP atl is at or close to the insertion site.

We also tested the viability and fertility of the flies carrying the identical hairpin sequence found in TRiP atl but introduced into attP40 via a different vector. In particular, we introduced the TRiP atl hairpin sequence into pJFRC19-13XlexAop2, and then introduced this plasmid into attP40 with ɸC31-mediated recombination. We found that flies bearing this Aop-atlRNAi insertion were fully viable and fertile. Therefore, the phenotype conferred by the hairpin sequence from TRiP atl is affected by genetic context.

Dominance and recessiveness of attP40 and derivatives

Data shown in Figs 2–5 indicate that attP40 and derivatives are recessive for nuclear clustering and msp-300 transcription phenotypes. However, in certain genetic backgrounds, we have found that attP40 and derivatives can have dominant effects on clustering. In particular, we introduced the pan-neuronal Gal4 driver nSyb-Gal4 into flies heterozygous for either empty attP40, or the TRiP atl insertion into attP40. Note that nSyb-Gal4 is not inserted into attP40 and the stock does not contain attP40. We found that the nSyb-Gal4 background did not have a significant effect on larval muscle nuclear clustering in empty attP40/+ (Fig 7A, 7D top panel, 7E and 7F); however, TRiP atl/+ larvae carrying nSyb-Gal4 displayed nuclear clustering that was significantly increased compared to both empty attP40/+ and empty attP40/+; nSyb-Gal4 (Fig 7B, 7D middle panel, 7E and 7F). This phenotype is not a consequence of atl knockdown in neurons; when we used nSyb-Gal4 to drive expression of an atlRNAi that was not inserted into attP40, we observed no increase in nuclear clustering (Fig 7C, 7D bottom panel, 7E and 7F). Therefore, attP40 derivatives can confer dominant effects in certain genetic backgrounds. In addition, these results support the conclusion that the TRiP atl insertion into attP40 confers a stronger MSP-300 phenotype than empty attP40.

Download:

Fig 7. TRiP atl can have dominant effects on nuclear clustering in some genetic backgrounds.

A-C) Representative images of nuclei position within muscle 6 for attP40/+; nSyb-Gal4/+ (A), TRiP atl/+; nSyb-Gal4/+ (B) and nSyb>Dcr, atlRNAi (C). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Muscles are outlined with solid white lines. D) Frequency distribution of the number of nuclei within each cluster within muscle 6 for each genotype indicated in upper right. Lines in upper right show genotype of each chromosome II homologue. Blue pentagons represent attP40, red/blue composite pentagons represent attP40 carrying indicated insertion. Brown rectangle represents insertion. E) Percentage of nuclei found within clusters for each genotype. Means +/- SEMs are shown. The following calculation was used: ((number of nuclei within clusters / total number of nuclei) x 100). F) Percentage of hemisegments with normal nuclear distribution within muscle 6. Each genotype is represented with a different color in panels D-F with attP40/+; attP2/+ (grey), attP40/+; nSyb-Gal4/+ (blue), TRiP atl/+; nSyb-Gal4/+ (red) and nSyb>Dcr, atlRNAi (green). For each genotype 3 hemisegments per larvae for 6 larvae total were analyzed. ANOVA with Tukey was used for statistical analyses. Scale bar = 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278598.g007

Discussion

Effects of the attP40 docking site and derivatives on msp-300-mediated phenotypes

The attP40 docking site for Drosophila melanogaster transgene integration is widely used for ɸC31-mediated transgene integration. attP40 lies within the transcription unit of msp-300, which encodes the Drosophila melanogaster orthologue of Nesprin-1; this observation raises the possibility that attP40 is an msp-300 insertional mutation. Here we show that attP40, either alone or containing any of several specific transgene insertions, causes phenotypes similar to msp-300 mutations, such as larval muscle nuclear clustering and viability deficits. In addition, attP40-containing larvae exhibit an approximately two-fold decrease in msp-300 transcript levels of certain isoforms. The effect on nuclear clustering and viability varies depending on the precise transgene introduced into attP40. We conclude that attP40 is an insertional mutation for msp-300.

Additional msp-300-dependent and independent phenotypes conferred by attP40

Reports from other investigators are now appearing in which phenotypic consequences of attP40-bearing flies are described. In a Ph.D. thesis, Cypranowska (2020) reported that attP40 decreases msp-300 transcription and also confers abnormal synapse function at the larval neuromuscular junction [29]. Many of these phenotypes are similar to those conferred by loss of the muscle glutamate receptor gluRIIA; this observation is significant because it was previously reported that gluRIIA localization is affected by msp-300 [21]. These observations raise the possibility that attP40 regulates synaptic transmission via msp-300-dependent effects on gluRIIA.

Other investigators have reported other attP40-dependent phenotypes. For example, Groen et al. reported that attP40 decreases transcription of ND-13A, the gene immediately centromere-distal from attP40 and which encodes a component of mitochondrial complex I [35]. Further, they suggest that this decreased ND-13A transcription might mediate the resistance to the chemotherapy agent cisplatin observed in attP40 flies [35]. More recently, Duan et al. reported that attP40 alters neuronal architecture of the olfactory glomerulus, a phenotype that appears to be msp-300-independent [36]. Taken together, these results indicate that attP40 can confer a variety of phenotypes in a variety of tissues by affecting transcription of at least two genes.

attP40 phenotypes can be dominant or recessive depending on genetic background

We tested if attP40 and derivatives containing insertions into attP40 were dominant or recessive for the nuclear clustering and msp-300 transcription phenotypes. We found that in most cases, the effects of attP40 and derivatives were recessive. For example, the neutral reporter LexA-myr-GFP or the TRiP spat insertion within attP40 each conferred severe nuclear clustering and decreased msp-300 transcription when homozygous or in combination with empty attP40, but not when attP40 was absent, from the other homologue. These observations indicate that attP40-dependent phenotypes are recessive. However, in other genetic backgrounds, we detected dominant effects of attP40 derivatives. In particular, the TRiP atl insertion within attP40 conferred a dominant nuclear clustering phenotype in a genetic background containing the neuronal Gal4 driver nSyb-Gal4. Similarly, Cypranowska reported that attP40 conferred a dominant 2.7-fold decrease in msp-300 transcript levels in the presence of the motor neuron Gal4 driver OK6 [29]. We conclude that the phenotypes of attP40 and derivatives can be dominant or recessive depending on genetic background.

Effects of specific transgene insertions into attP40 on mutant phenotypes

We tested if the nucleotide sequence of specific transgenes inserted into attP40 would affect mutant phenotypes. First, we found that transgenes from either the LexA or the Gal4 regulatory systems were capable of enhancing the nuclear positioning phenotype and msp-300 transcript phenotypes to moderate degrees. Second, we tested if transcription of inserted transgenes in muscle would affect mutant phenotypes. In particular, we compared nuclear positioning in larvae expressing LexA-myr-GFP in neurons vs. muscle and found that muscle expression modestly increased severity of the nuclear clustering phenotype but did not affect msp-300 transcript levels. These results indicate that muscle transcription of inserted transgenes is not necessary for mutant phenotype, but we are unable to rule out the possibility muscle transcription could contribute to severity of mutant phenotype.

TRiP insertions into attP40: extremely variable degrees of recessive lethality and sterility

Of the 16,503 lines carrying attP40 maintained at the Drosophila stock center (Bloomington, IN), 8,884 contain TRiP (short hairpin sequences for RNAi) insertions, mostly in the Valium 20 vector. In studies of six of these lines, we observed a range of recessive phenotypes, from full lethality to full (or partial) sterility to ~wildtype. This extreme variability in phenotypes among the TRiP lines was unexpected, as each lines contains inserts with identical sequences, with the exception of the sequence of the short hairpin itself. These results suggest either that phenotypic strength is affected unexpectedly strongly by the precise nucleotide sequence of the hairpin, or alternatively, that these TRiP lines have accumulated genetic modifiers at an unusually high rate, and that these modifiers have variable effects on phenotype. These two possibilities are not mutually exclusive.

Because of the wide variety of phenotypes exhibited by flies carrying distinct TRiP insertions, we wondered if we could predict phenotypes conferred by specific TRiP lines from information presented at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC, https://bdsc.indiana.edu). We noticed that in the description of the six TRiP lines tested, five (TRiP atl, TRiP spat, TRiP rop, TRiP Mcu, and TRiP JNK) contained the phrase “May be segregating CyO”, or a related phrase. These five lines are the same ones for which we were unable to maintain a homozygous line. The sixth line (TRiP spartin), for which we were able to maintain a homozygous line, lacked this phrase. This correspondence raises the possibility that researchers might be able to distinguish homozygous viable and fertile TRiP lines from others by the absence/presence of this phrase. As of the most recent report (from 2019), the BDSC reports that 31.46% of the 8884 TRiP lines in attP40 (2795 total) are listed as homozygous, with the rest as “CyO”, “CyO fl” or “CyO mix”.

Conclusions

We have shown attP40 and derivatives containing insertions confer msp-300 mutant phenotypes and can decrease msp-300 transcript levels. Regardless of the mechanism underlying the variety of phenotypes conferred by various TRiP insertions within attP40, investigators should be aware that these insertions might confer phenotypes that are difficult to predict and might manifest in a variety of ways. Going forward, investigators should use caution when interpreting data resulting from flies containing attP40, especially in muscle tissues.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Bloomington Stock Center (BDSC) for providing all the fly lines used in this study. We are grateful to Annette Parks (BDSC) for communicating information on BDSC fly stock holdings and to Alekhya Gurram for assistance with Q-PCR experiments. This work was done in part using resources of the Rice University Shared Equipment Authority (https://research.rice.edu/sea/). We thank Budi Utama for help with light microscopy and image quantitation.

References

1. Thorpe HM, Smith MCM. In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998 May 12;95(10):5505–10. pmid:9576912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Groth AC. Construction of Transgenic Drosophila by Using the Site-Specific Integrase From Phage C31. Genetics. 2004 Apr 1;166(4):1775–82. pmid:15126397
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Groth AC, Calos MP. Phage Integrases: Biology and Applications. J Mol Biol. 2004 Jan;335(3):667–78. pmid:14687564
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Bateman JR, Lee AM, Wu C. Site-Specific Transformation of Drosophila via ϕC31 Integrase-Mediated Cassette Exchange. Genetics. 2006 Jun 1;173(2):769–77. pmid:16547094
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Venken KJT, He Y, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ. P[acman]: A BAC Transgenic Platform for Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments in D. melanogaster. Science (80-). 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1747–51. pmid:17138868
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific C31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3312–7. pmid:17360644
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Thorpe HM, Wilson SE, Smith MCM. Control of directionality in the site-specific recombination system of the Streptomyces phage phiC31. Mol Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(2):232–41. pmid:11069650
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Zirin J, Hu Y, Liu L, Yang-Zhou D, Colbeth R, Yan D, et al. Large-Scale Transgenic Drosophila Resource Collections for Loss- and Gain-of-Function Studies. Genetics. 2020 Apr;214(4):755–67. pmid:32071193
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Perkins LA, Holderbaum L, Tao R, Hu Y, Sopko R, McCall K, et al. The Transgenic RNAi Project at Harvard Medical School: Resources and Validation. Genetics. 2015 Nov 1;201(3):843–52. pmid:26320097
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Markstein M, Pitsouli C, Villalta C, Celniker SE, Perrimon N. Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat Genet. 2008 Apr 2;40(4):476–83. pmid:18311141
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Larkin A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, dos Santos G, Garapati P V, et al. FlyBase: updates to the Drosophila melanogaster knowledge base. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D899–907. pmid:33219682
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. De S, Cheng Y, Sun M, Gehred ND, Kassis JA. Structure and function of an ectopic Polycomb chromatin domain. Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):eaau9739. pmid:30662949
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Kim DI, Birendra KC, Roux KJ. Making the LINC: SUN and KASH protein interactions. Biol Chem. 2015 Apr;396(4):295–310. pmid:25720065
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Volk T. A new member of the spectrin superfamily may participate in the formation of embryonic muscle attachments in Drosophila. Development. 1992 Nov;116(3):721–30. pmid:1289062
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. McGee MD, Rillo R, Anderson AS, Starr DA. UNC-83 Is a KASH Protein Required for Nuclear Migration and Is Recruited to the Outer Nuclear Membrane by a Physical Interaction with the SUN Protein UNC-84. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Apr;17(4):1790–801. pmid:16481402
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Xie X, Fischer JA. On the roles of the Drosophila KASH domain proteins Msp-300 and Klarsicht. Fly (Austin). 2008;2(2):74–81. pmid:18820482
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Zheng Y, Buchwalter RA, Zheng C, Wight EM, Chen J V, Megraw TL. A perinuclear microtubule-organizing centre controls nuclear positioning and basement membrane secretion. Nat Cell Biol. 2020 Mar;22(3):297–309. pmid:32066907
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Packard M, Jokhi V, Ding B, Ruiz-Cañada C, Ashley J, Budnik V. Nucleus to Synapse Nesprin1 Railroad Tracks Direct Synapse Maturation through RNA Localization. Neuron. 2015 May;86(4):1015–28. pmid:25959729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Volk T. Positioning nuclei within the cytoplasm of striated muscle fiber. Nucleus. 2013 Jan 28;4(1):18–22. pmid:23211643
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Zhang J, Felder A, Liu Y, Guo LT, Lange S, Dalton ND, et al. Nesprin 1 is critical for nuclear positioning and anchorage. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jan;19(2):329–41. pmid:19864491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Morel V, Lepicard S, Rey AN, Parmentier M-L, Schaeffer L. Drosophila Nesprin-1 controls glutamate receptor density at neuromuscular junctions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Sep;71(17):3363–79. pmid:24492984
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Yu J, Starr DA, Wu X, Parkhurst SM, Zhuang Y, Xu T, et al. The KASH domain protein MSP-300 plays an essential role in nuclear anchoring during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006 Jan;289(2):336–45. pmid:16337624
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Rajgor D, Shanahan CM. Nesprins: from the nuclear envelope and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013 Jul 5;15:e5. pmid:23830188
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Summerville JB, Faust JF, Fan E, Pendin D, Daga A, Formella J, et al. The effects of ER morphology on synaptic structure and function in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci. 2016 Apr 15;129(8):1635–48. pmid:26906425
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Orso G, Pendin D, Liu S, Tosetto J, Moss TJ, Faust JE, et al. Homotypic fusion of ER membranes requires the dynamin-like GTPase atlastin. Nature. 2009 Aug;460(7258):978–83. pmid:19633650
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Feng Y, Ueda A, Wu C-F. A modified minimal hemolymph-like solution, HL3.1, for physiological recordings at the neuromuscular junctions of normal and mutant Drosophila larvae. J Neurogenet. 2004;18(2):377–402. pmid:15763995
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402–8. pmid:11846609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Lattao R, Bonaccorsi S, Guan X, Wasserman SA, Gatti M. Tubby-tagged balancers for the Drosophila X and second chromosomes. Fly (Austin). 2011;5(4):369–70. pmid:21785267
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Cypranowska C. Transcriptional Correlates of Homeostatic Plasticity and Neuronal Diversity at the Neuromuscular Junction. Ph.D. thesis. University of California; 2020.
30. Elhanany-Tamir H, Yu Y V., Shnayder M, Jain A, Welte M, Volk T. Organelle positioning in muscles requires cooperation between two KASH proteins and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 2012 Sep 3;198(5):833–46. pmid:22927463
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Nozawa K. The effects of the environmental conditions on Curly expressivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Japanese J Genet. 1956;31(6):163–71.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Kolodkin AL, Pickup AT, Lin DM, Goodman CS, Banerjee U. Characterization of Star and its interactions with sevenless and EGF receptor during photoreceptor cell development in Drosophila. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):1731–45. pmid:7924981
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Mirth C, Truman JW, Riddiford LM. The role of the prothoracic gland in determining critical weight for metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol. 2005 Oct;15(20):1796–807. pmid:16182527
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. van der Graaf K, Jindrich K, Mitchell R, White-Cooper H. Roles for RNA export factor, Nxt1, in ensuring muscle integrity and normal RNA expression in Drosophila. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 2021 Jan 1;11(1):jkaa046. pmid:33561245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Groen CM, Podratz JL, Pathoulas J, Staff N, Windebank AJ. Genetic Reduction of Mitochondria Complex I Subunits is Protective against Cisplatin-Induced Neurotoxicity in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 2;42(5):922 LP– 937. pmid:34893548
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Duan Q, Estrella R, Carson A, Chen Y, Volkan PC. Drosophila attP40 background alters glomerular organization of the olfactory receptor neuron terminals. bioRxiv. 2022 Jan 1;2022.06.16.496338.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Thorpe HM, Smith MCM. In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998 May 12;95(10):5505–10. pmid:9576912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Groth AC. Construction of Transgenic Drosophila by Using the Site-Specific Integrase From Phage C31. Genetics. 2004 Apr 1;166(4):1775–82. pmid:15126397
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Groth AC, Calos MP. Phage Integrases: Biology and Applications. J Mol Biol. 2004 Jan;335(3):667–78. pmid:14687564
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Bateman JR, Lee AM, Wu C. Site-Specific Transformation of Drosophila via ϕC31 Integrase-Mediated Cassette Exchange. Genetics. 2006 Jun 1;173(2):769–77. pmid:16547094
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Venken KJT, He Y, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ. P[acman]: A BAC Transgenic Platform for Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments in D. melanogaster. Science (80-). 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1747–51. pmid:17138868
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific C31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3312–7. pmid:17360644
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Thorpe HM, Wilson SE, Smith MCM. Control of directionality in the site-specific recombination system of the Streptomyces phage phiC31. Mol Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(2):232–41. pmid:11069650
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Zirin J, Hu Y, Liu L, Yang-Zhou D, Colbeth R, Yan D, et al. Large-Scale Transgenic Drosophila Resource Collections for Loss- and Gain-of-Function Studies. Genetics. 2020 Apr;214(4):755–67. pmid:32071193
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Perkins LA, Holderbaum L, Tao R, Hu Y, Sopko R, McCall K, et al. The Transgenic RNAi Project at Harvard Medical School: Resources and Validation. Genetics. 2015 Nov 1;201(3):843–52. pmid:26320097
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Markstein M, Pitsouli C, Villalta C, Celniker SE, Perrimon N. Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat Genet. 2008 Apr 2;40(4):476–83. pmid:18311141
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Larkin A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, dos Santos G, Garapati P V, et al. FlyBase: updates to the Drosophila melanogaster knowledge base. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D899–907. pmid:33219682
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. De S, Cheng Y, Sun M, Gehred ND, Kassis JA. Structure and function of an ectopic Polycomb chromatin domain. Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):eaau9739. pmid:30662949
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Kim DI, Birendra KC, Roux KJ. Making the LINC: SUN and KASH protein interactions. Biol Chem. 2015 Apr;396(4):295–310. pmid:25720065
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Volk T. A new member of the spectrin superfamily may participate in the formation of embryonic muscle attachments in Drosophila. Development. 1992 Nov;116(3):721–30. pmid:1289062
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. McGee MD, Rillo R, Anderson AS, Starr DA. UNC-83 Is a KASH Protein Required for Nuclear Migration and Is Recruited to the Outer Nuclear Membrane by a Physical Interaction with the SUN Protein UNC-84. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Apr;17(4):1790–801. pmid:16481402
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Xie X, Fischer JA. On the roles of the Drosophila KASH domain proteins Msp-300 and Klarsicht. Fly (Austin). 2008;2(2):74–81. pmid:18820482
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Zheng Y, Buchwalter RA, Zheng C, Wight EM, Chen J V, Megraw TL. A perinuclear microtubule-organizing centre controls nuclear positioning and basement membrane secretion. Nat Cell Biol. 2020 Mar;22(3):297–309. pmid:32066907
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Packard M, Jokhi V, Ding B, Ruiz-Cañada C, Ashley J, Budnik V. Nucleus to Synapse Nesprin1 Railroad Tracks Direct Synapse Maturation through RNA Localization. Neuron. 2015 May;86(4):1015–28. pmid:25959729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Volk T. Positioning nuclei within the cytoplasm of striated muscle fiber. Nucleus. 2013 Jan 28;4(1):18–22. pmid:23211643
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Zhang J, Felder A, Liu Y, Guo LT, Lange S, Dalton ND, et al. Nesprin 1 is critical for nuclear positioning and anchorage. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jan;19(2):329–41. pmid:19864491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Morel V, Lepicard S, Rey AN, Parmentier M-L, Schaeffer L. Drosophila Nesprin-1 controls glutamate receptor density at neuromuscular junctions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Sep;71(17):3363–79. pmid:24492984
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Yu J, Starr DA, Wu X, Parkhurst SM, Zhuang Y, Xu T, et al. The KASH domain protein MSP-300 plays an essential role in nuclear anchoring during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006 Jan;289(2):336–45. pmid:16337624
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Rajgor D, Shanahan CM. Nesprins: from the nuclear envelope and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013 Jul 5;15:e5. pmid:23830188
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Summerville JB, Faust JF, Fan E, Pendin D, Daga A, Formella J, et al. The effects of ER morphology on synaptic structure and function in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci. 2016 Apr 15;129(8):1635–48. pmid:26906425
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Orso G, Pendin D, Liu S, Tosetto J, Moss TJ, Faust JE, et al. Homotypic fusion of ER membranes requires the dynamin-like GTPase atlastin. Nature. 2009 Aug;460(7258):978–83. pmid:19633650
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Feng Y, Ueda A, Wu C-F. A modified minimal hemolymph-like solution, HL3.1, for physiological recordings at the neuromuscular junctions of normal and mutant Drosophila larvae. J Neurogenet. 2004;18(2):377–402. pmid:15763995
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402–8. pmid:11846609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Lattao R, Bonaccorsi S, Guan X, Wasserman SA, Gatti M. Tubby-tagged balancers for the Drosophila X and second chromosomes. Fly (Austin). 2011;5(4):369–70. pmid:21785267
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Cypranowska C. Transcriptional Correlates of Homeostatic Plasticity and Neuronal Diversity at the Neuromuscular Junction. Ph.D. thesis. University of California; 2020.

[ref30] 30. Elhanany-Tamir H, Yu Y V., Shnayder M, Jain A, Welte M, Volk T. Organelle positioning in muscles requires cooperation between two KASH proteins and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 2012 Sep 3;198(5):833–46. pmid:22927463
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Nozawa K. The effects of the environmental conditions on Curly expressivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Japanese J Genet. 1956;31(6):163–71.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kolodkin AL, Pickup AT, Lin DM, Goodman CS, Banerjee U. Characterization of Star and its interactions with sevenless and EGF receptor during photoreceptor cell development in Drosophila. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):1731–45. pmid:7924981
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Mirth C, Truman JW, Riddiford LM. The role of the prothoracic gland in determining critical weight for metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol. 2005 Oct;15(20):1796–807. pmid:16182527
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. van der Graaf K, Jindrich K, Mitchell R, White-Cooper H. Roles for RNA export factor, Nxt1, in ensuring muscle integrity and normal RNA expression in Drosophila. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 2021 Jan 1;11(1):jkaa046. pmid:33561245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Groen CM, Podratz JL, Pathoulas J, Staff N, Windebank AJ. Genetic Reduction of Mitochondria Complex I Subunits is Protective against Cisplatin-Induced Neurotoxicity in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 2;42(5):922 LP– 937. pmid:34893548
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Duan Q, Estrella R, Carson A, Chen Y, Volkan PC. Drosophila attP40 background alters glomerular organization of the olfactory receptor neuron terminals. bioRxiv. 2022 Jan 1;2022.06.16.496338.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Drosophila melanogaster stocks

Immunocytochemistry

Nuclear clustering analysis

Quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR)

Pupal size measurements

Viability measurements

Fertility measurements

Construction of Aop-atlRNAi

Statistical analysis

Results

The attP40 docking site is located within or upstream of msp-300, depending on the isoform

Effects of inserting transgenes into attP40 on phenotypic severity

Effects of attP40 and derivatives on msp-300 transcript levels

Effects of TRiP insertions into attP40 on viability and fertility

Dominance and recessiveness of attP40 and derivatives

Discussion

Effects of the attP40 docking site and derivatives on msp-300-mediated phenotypes

Additional msp-300-dependent and independent phenotypes conferred by attP40

attP40 phenotypes can be dominant or recessive depending on genetic background

Effects of specific transgene insertions into attP40 on mutant phenotypes

TRiP insertions into attP40: extremely variable degrees of recessive lethality and sterility

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References