Correction
31 Jul 2024: Hou CY, Rutherford R, Chang H, Chang FC, Shumei L, et al. (2024) Correction: Children’s mobile-gaming preferences, online risks, and mental health. PLOS ONE 19(7): e0308315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308315 View correction
Figures
Abstract
This study examined the relationships between children’s mobile gaming preferences, online risks, and mental health. Data were obtained from a sample of 2,702 third and fourth grade students from 16 elementary schools in Taiwan and 9 schools in China. A self-administered questionnaire was used. The mental state of the children who participated in the study was assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), while mobile gaming addiction was assessed using the short form of the Internet Gaming Disorders Scale (IGDS9-SF). The results showed that about 54% of children played mobile games with others (multi-player), while 31% played mobile games alone, and 15% did not play mobile games. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that behaviors such as participating in multi-player games, playing violent games, a poor parent-child relationship, and living in a rural area were associated with a greater risk of mobile gaming addiction. Involvement in multi-player games, playing violent games, mobile gaming addiction, and exposure to mobile violence/pornography were associated with greater risks of cyber aggression/victimization. Multiple regression results showed that being a multi-player, playing violent games, mobile gaming addiction, exposure to violence/pornography, exposure to cyber aggression/victimization, and having a poor parent-child relationship were associated with emotional and behavioral problems.
Citation: Hou C-Y, Rutherford R, Chang H, Chang F-C, Shumei L, Chiu C-H, et al. (2022) Children’s mobile-gaming preferences, online risks, and mental health. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0278290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278290
Editor: Taro Matsuki, Hiroshima International University: Hiroshima Kokusai Daigaku, JAPAN
Received: October 16, 2021; Accepted: November 15, 2022; Published: December 1, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Hou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from Dryad. https://datadryad.org/stash/share/qbLwwLn9xHBm6HUvRc6zFQkkVQkM9Q3oEXr5zwvt4nI.
Funding: This work was supported by a research grant (106-2511-S-003-051-MY2) from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
With the proliferation of mobile devices, online gaming has become a part of children’s daily lives, and the average duration of their online sessions has increased. A 2019 UK national survey showed that two-thirds of 8–11 y/o children play online games [1]. As the usage of these electronic devices has increased, so has both the incidence and the scope of adverse effects [2]. Previous studies have associated an adolescent’s online gaming behaviors with online risks such as Internet gaming addiction [3], exposure to violence/pornography [4], and cyber aggression/victimization [5]. Children and adolescents with an Internet gaming addiction were more likely to experience poorer sleep quality [6], depression [7], social anxiety [8], somatic disorders [9], a poorer quality of life [10], and lower school performance [11].
The American Psychiatric Association included Internet Gaming Disorders in Section III (disorders requiring further investigation) of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in 2013, while the World Health Organization included Gaming Disorders in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) in 2018 [12]. These publications used "internet gaming disorder," "online gaming addiction," and "problem gaming" as interchangeable terms. Asia has some of the world’s largest concentrations of populations and has a high and rising prevalence of Internet and smartphone use disorders [13]. Studies have estimated that the prevalence of Internet Gaming Disorders among children and adolescents averages 1–9% [14], and that the prevalence of online gaming addiction among adolescents in Asian countries (10–15%) is higher than that in Western countries (1–10%) [15]. In Taiwan, about one-fifth of children and adolescents engage in problematic mobile gaming [16]. In addition, studies have indicated that game genres such as massive multi-player online role-playing games [17], fighting games [18], and multi-player online battle arenas [19] were associated with Internet gaming addiction among both children and adolescents.
Physical aggression and cyber aggression/victimization among children and adolescents represents an emerging public health problem that is becoming prevalent among Asian adolescents [20, 21]. In Australia, the prevalence of traditional bullying victimization among adolescents was 25% and perpetration was 12%, while cyberbullying victimization and perpetration were 7 and 3%, respectively [22]. In Hong Kong, Mainland China, and Taiwan, 33.0, 23.8, and 31.7% of adolescents, respectively, reported experiencing cyberbullying in the past semester, while 20.4, 7.7, and 20.6% of adolescents reported engaging in cyberbullying against others [21]. A review study found that exposure to violent video games was a causal risk factor for increases in aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, and aggressive affects with decreases in empathy and prosocial behaviors [23]. Studies associated exposure to violent online games with cyberbullying [5] and physical aggression [24], and children who spent more time playing games were more likely to be involved in cyberbullying [25, 26]. Adolescents who had cyber aggression/victimization experiences were more likely to have emotional and psychosomatic problems, and tended to have difficulties with social adjustment [27–29].
As children spend greater amounts of time playing mobile games, parents and experts worry that children might develop mobile gaming addictions and encounter online risks that could cause psychological distress [1, 14]. China has the world’s largest population, and China’s one-child policy and culturally inflected social control experiences could have had an impact on children’s internet use and online risks [30]. Prior studies conducted in China and Taiwan have indicated that children and adolescents who reside in rural areas spend more time playing online games and are more vulnerable to online risks such as cyber victimization compared with their urban counterparts [31, 32]. Despite studies have associated young adult and adolescent problematic gaming behaviors and internet addictions with online risks and psychological distress [33–35], only a limited amount of research has explored the relationships between children’s gaming preferences and online risks, and exploring the links to the possible psychological impact. Despite existing evidence of the links between problematic gaming behaviors, Internet addictions, online risks, and psychological distress among adolescents and young adults [33–35], only a limited amount of research has explored the relationships between children’s gaming preferences and online risks, and exploring the links to the possible psychological impact. Unlike previous studies that mainly recruited adolescents, this study involved third- and fourth-grade children between 9–11 years of age. In addition, this study compared children participants from urban and rural areas in Taiwan and China to examine urban-rural differences in different socio-economic backgrounds and explore relationships between children’s gaming preferences (multi-player games, single-player games, and non-players), online risks (mobile gaming addiction, mobile violence/pornography exposure, and cyber aggression/victimization experiences), and mental health.
Methods
Participants
The participants were third- and fourth-grade primary school students from the Taipei area and Pingtung County in Taiwan and the Shouguang urban and rural areas in Shandong Province, China. The rural/urban classification is based on the population size, population density, and degree of urbanization of a given country [36–38]. In 2018, the number of primary schools in Taipei City and Pingtung County in Taiwan was 153 and 168, respectively, according to data from the Taiwan Ministry of Education, while the number of primary schools in the Shouguang urban and rural areas in Shandong Province, China, was 7 and 92, respectively, according to data from the Shouguang Ministry of Education. Based on the sampling frame, a probability-proportionate-to-size sampling method was used to systematically draw a random sample of schools. Three-to-four school classes were randomly selected from each school. This study invited 30 sample schools, and only 5 sample schools refused to participate in the survey. Of the 25 sample schools that participated in this study, 9 are in the Taipei area (urban), 7 reside in Pingtung County (rural), Taiwan, 3 are located in urban Shouguang, and 6 are in rural Shouguang, Shandong Province, China. In addition, this study sent letters to 2,910 parents requesting their consent to have their primary school children participate in the survey. About 95% of parents agreed that their children could participate. In 2018, there were 2,702 third- and fourth-grade students aged 9–11 years who completed the questionnaire. The questionnaires were delivered to students in their classrooms by trained interviewers. Students were assured that their information would be protected and anonymous. When a student had any questions during the survey, the trained interviewers answered the questions and provided assistance. The study was reviewed by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan Normal University (REC No. 201802HS004).
Measures
Mobile gaming preferences.
Mobile gaming preferences were measured with two items. Children were asked the following: (1) Do you play games on mobile phones or tablets? The response option for each item was either “no” or “yes”. If children answered “no” for playing games on mobile phones or tablets, then they were categorized as a “non-player”. If children answered “yes”, then they were asked a further question: (2) Do you play games alone or with other players on mobile phones or tablets? The response options included “playing games alone” and “playing games with other players”. If children answered “playing games alone” then they were categorized as a “single-player”. If children answered “playing games with other players”, then they were categorized as “multi-players”.
Mobile gaming time.
Mobile gaming time was computed using children’s reports of hours per week spent playing games on smartphones and tablets. The weekly use time of mobile gaming was calculated based on the following two questions: (1) During the past week, how much time did you spend playing games on smartphones or tablets per weekday (Monday to Friday)?; and, (2) During the past week, how much time did you spend playing games on smartphones or tablets per weekend day (Saturday and Sunday)?
Mobile gaming addiction.
Mobile gaming addiction was measured with 9 items adapted from the short form of the Internet Gaming Disorders Scale (IGDS9-SF), [39] which was developed according to 9 criteria of Internet Gaming Disorder, as suggested by the American Psychiatric Association. A review study found that the IGDS9-SF has great psychometric properties across different language versions [40]. Sample questions were as follows: “Do you feel more irritability, anxiety or even sadness when you try to either reduce or stop your gaming activity?”; “Do you feel the need to spend increasing amounts of time engaged in gaming in order to achieve satisfaction or pleasure?”; and, “Have you continued your gaming activity despite knowing it was causing problems between you and other people?”. The response option was either “yes” or “no”. As suggested by the DSM-5 the provision of the IGD diagnosis required at least five out of nine criteria [41]. If students reported “yes” for five items or more, they were categorized as having mobile gaming addiction.
Mobile violent game playing.
Mobile violent game playing was measured with one item. Children were asked the degree of violent content in the mobile games they played frequently. The response options included “no violence”, “moderate violence”, and “severe violence”. If children answered “moderate violence” or “severe violence”, they were coded as playing violent mobile games.
Mobile violence/pornography exposure.
Mobile violence and pornography exposure was assessed with two items. Children were asked the following questions: (1) In the past year have you seen violent messages or images on smartphones or tablets?; and, (2) In the past year have you seen pornographic messages or images on smartphones or tablets? The response options for each item included “never”, “sometimes”, and “always”. If children answered “sometimes” or “always”, they were coded as having mobile violence/pornography exposure.
Cyber aggression/victimization.
Children’s cyber victimization was measured with four items from the past year to which children responded with either yes or no: (1) someone made rude comments about me online; (2) someone posted embarrassing or nude photos of me online; (3) someone spread rumors to hurt me online; and, (4) I was bullied by my classmates or friends online. If children answered “yes” for each item, they were coded as cyber victimization. In addition, children’s cyber aggression was measured with three items from the past year to which children responded with either yes or no: (1) I made rude comments to someone online; (2) I spread rumors about someone online; and, (3) I bullied other peers online. If children answered “yes” for each item, they were coded as cyber aggression.
Parent-child relationship.
Parent-child relationships were measured using 2 items. Children were asked the following questions: “How did you get along with your mother?” and, “How did you get along with your father?” Response options included “not good” (scoring 1), “general” (scoring 2), and “good” (scoring 3).
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
The SDQ is a widely used and validated instrument to measure psychological adjustment among children and adolescents [42]. The Chinese version of SDQ [43] has demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity and was used in this study. The SDQ consists of five subscales with five items each: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity-inattention, peer problems, and prosocial behaviors. Each item was rated on a 3-point scale: not true (scoring 0), somewhat true (scoring 1), and certainly true (scoring 2). The total difficulties score refers to the sum of the scores on four subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity-inattention, and peer problems. The Cronbach’s alpha of the total difficulties scale for the sample was 0.74, while the Cronbach’s alpha of the prosocial behaviors scale was 0.75.
Statistical analysis
SAS software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Percentages and means were calculated for all variables. A series of multiple logistic regressions were conducted to examine relationships between children’s demographic background, mobile gaming preferences, and online risks (mobile gaming addiction, mobile violence/pornography exposure, and cyber aggression/victimization). In addition, multiple regression analyses were performed to examine relationships between children’s mobile gaming preferences, online risks, and psychosocial adjustment (SDQ attributes). This study included children who did not play mobile games (15%) as a reference group of mobile gaming preferences in the analysis.
Results
Children’s mobile gaming preferences and online risks
Children who participated in this research included 1,284 boys (47.5%) and 1,418 girls (52.5%). Of the participants, 1,534 students (56.6%) were from Taiwan, while 1,177 (43.4%) were from China. In addition, 1,135 students (41.9%) lived in urban areas, while 1,576 (58.1%) lived in rural areas. There were no significant differences between urban and rural areas in Taiwan and in China with respect to participants’ gender and grade (Table 1).
A total of 1,446 children (53.5%) played online games with other players on smartphones or tablets (multiple-player), while 841 children (31.1%) played games alone on smartphones or tablets (single-player) and 415 children (15.4%) didn’t play games (non-players) (Table 3). Children who were mobile gaming multi-players spent 8.82 hours playing games per week, while children who were single-players spent 5.17 hours playing games per week (Table 4).
About 12.2% of children had mobile gaming addiction. In addition, 27.4% of children had been exposed to violence on smartphones or tablets, while 16.6% of children had been exposed to pornography on smartphones or tablets. Moreover, 10.9% of children had experienced cyber victimization and 4.3% reported cyber aggression (Table 3).
Children’s online risks by regions and urban/rural areas
When comparing children’s online risks by region, children from Taiwan spent 6.74 hours playing games per week, while children from China spent 4.66 hours playing games per week (Table 2). Children from Taiwan had a higher proportion of multi-player use (55%) than children from China (51.4%) (X2 (2, N = 2711) = 31.11, p < .001), while children from Taiwan also had a higher proportion of mobile gaming addictions (16.9%) than children from China (6.1%) (X2 (1, N = 2754) = 72.66, p < .001). Children from Taiwan had a higher proportion of mobile violent game playing (24.6%) than children from China (21%) (X2 (1, N = 2754) = 4.79, p = 0.0286), while children from Taiwan also had a higher proportion of exposure to mobile pornography (18.2%) than children from China (15.2%) (X2 (1, N = 2754) = 72.66, p < .001). In addition, children from China had a higher proportion of exposure to mobile violence (35.6%) than children from Taiwan (24.5%) (X2 (2, N = 2747) = 40.44, p < .001), while children from China also had a higher proportion of cyber victimization (14.2%) than children from Taiwan (8.2%) (X2 (1, N = 2748) = 25.49, p < .001) (Table 1).
When comparing children’s online risks between urban and rural areas in Taiwan, children from rural area had a higher proportion of multi-player use (59.4%) than children from urban areas (51.7%) (X2 (2, N = 1534) = 8.99, p = 0.011), while children from rural areas also had a higher proportion of mobile gaming addictions (20.6%) than children from urban areas (14.1%) (X2 (1, N = 1564) = 11.67, p < .001). Children from rural areas in Taiwan had a higher proportion of mobile violent game playing (27.4%) than children from urban areas (22.4%) (X2 (1, N = 1564) = 5.23, p = .002), while children from rural areas also had a higher proportion of exposure to mobile violence (27.4%) than children from urban areas (21.9%) (X2 (1, N = 1560) = 7.28, p = .007). In addition, children from rural areas in Taiwan had a higher proportion of cyber victimization (9.8%) than children from urban areas (7%) (X2 (1, N = 1561) = 3.93, p = .047), while children from rural areas also had a higher proportion of cyber aggression (5.5%) than children from urban areas (2.3%) (X2 (1, N = 1563) = 11.38, p = .007). In addition, there were no significantly differences in online risks between children from rural and urban areas in China (Table 1).
Children’s SDQ attributes by regions and urban/rural areas
Comparing children’s SDQ attributes by region, children from China had greater prosocial behaviors score than children from Taiwan. Comparing children’s SDQ attributes between urban and rural areas in Taiwan, children from rural areas had higher total difficulties scores than children from urban areas, while children from urban areas had higher prosocial behaviors score than children from rural areas. In China, children from rural areas had slightly better parent-child relationship than children from urban areas, while there were no significant differences in SDQ attributes between children from rural and urban areas (Table 2).
Children’s online risks by mobile gaming preferences
When comparing children’s online risks by gaming preferences, multi-players had a higher proportion of mobile gaming addictions (17.5%) than single-players (9.0%) and non-players (0%) (X2 (2, N = 2711) = 104.75, p < .001). Multi-players had a higher proportion of exposure to mobile violence (35.7%) than single-players (24.4%) and non-players (17.1%) (X2 (2, N = 2706) = 68.36, p < .001), while multi-players also had a higher proportion of exposure to mobile pornography (19.9%) than single-players (16.3%) and non-players (8.2%) (X2 (2, N = 2701) = 31.70, p < .001). In addition, multi-players had a higher proportion of cyber victimization (15.3%) than single-players (7.1%) and non-players (3.4%) (X2 (2, N = 2708) = 65.30, p < .001), while multi-players also had a higher proportion of cyber aggression (6.4%) than single-players (2.6%) and non-players (0.2%) (X2 (2, N = 2709) = 38.61, p < .001) (Table 3).
Children’s SDQ attributes by mobile gaming preferences
Comparing children’s SDQ attributes by their preferences of gaming, multi-players had higher total difficulties score (Mean = 12.15) than single-players (Mean = 11.12) and non-players (Mean = 10.11). In contrast, non-players had higher scores for prosocial behaviors than multi-players (Table 4).
Factors related to children’s online risks
Multiple logistic regression results revealed that factors related to children’s mobile gaming addictions included being a multi-player, playing violent games, having a poor parent-child relationship, and rural residence in Taiwan. In addition, factors related to children’s mobile violence exposure included being in the 4th grade, being a multi-player, playing violent games, having mobile gaming addictions, and urban residence in China, while factors related to children’s mobile pornography exposure included being a multi-player, playing violent games, a poor parent-child relationship, and having mobile gaming addictions (Table 5).
Multiple logistic regression results indicated that factors related to children’s cyber victimization included being male, being involved in multi-player gaming, playing violent games, having mobile gaming addictions, mobile violence/pornography exposure, and residence in China. In addition, factors related to children’s cyber aggression included multi-player gaming, playing violent games, mobile gaming addictions, mobile violence/pornography exposure, a poor parent-child relationship, and residence in China (Table 5).
Relationships of children’s gaming preferences, online risks and SDQ attributes
Multiple regression results indicated that a greater total difficulties score was associated with the following characteristics: a 3rd grade level, multi-player gaming, mobile gaming addictions, mobile violence/pornography exposure, cyber aggression/victimization, a poor parent-child relationship, and being a resident of China. In contrast, the following characteristics were associated with a greater prosocial behaviors score: a 4th grade level, female, no mobile gaming addictions, a better parent-child relationship, and residing in an urban area of China (Table 6).
Discussion
This study showed that multi-players spent more time playing mobile games and had a higher proportion of mobile gaming addictions than single-players. These results were compatible with those of previous studies [44, 45], which have established a higher risk of addiction for online multi-player games as well as increased difficulties for players to quit due to characteristics such as competitiveness and cooperativeness that are characteristic of online multi-player games. Prior studies also found that adolescents playing some game genres such as online shooting games and multi-player online role-playing games that involve massive numbers of players were positively associated with Internet game addictions [19, 46–48]. During the past few decades, online gaming marketing has increased dramatically, and more children have had problems with gaming. A cohort prior study found that exposure to online gaming during preschool years was associated with IGD risks in adolescence [49]. Governments could regulate online gaming marketing and implement age-restriction policies to protect children from playing online games at younger ages and developing gaming addictions.
In addition, the present study found that compared with non-players and single-players, multi-players encounter a greater number of online risks and problematic SDQ behaviors. One of the possible reasons could be the high potential risk for addiction and problematic behaviors for online multi-players. This study was consistent with prior studies that found adolescents who had an Internet gaming addiction were more likely to have emotional and psychosocial problems [8, 47, 50]. Studies also found that children’s and adolescents’ Internet gaming addiction could be associated with hyperactivity-inattention [3, 51, 52]. Another study found that the risk for problematic gaming was associated with a younger age of gaming initiation and suggested ways for parents to actively prevent this [53]. Parents could cautiously consider which age to allow children to play online games and own smartphones, while parents could also set rules about what games children can play and whether they can play games with others.
Another important result gleaned from this study was the risk of mobile violence/pornography exposure. This study showed that more than one-fourth of children reported mobile violence exposure and one-seventh reported exposure to mobile pornography. Since online game advertisements are compulsorily broadcasted under the current cyber environment, it is not difficult to imagine how frequent an advertisement could be viewed unintentionally through the Internet, particularly when these advertisements contain violence and/or pornographic messages, which could adversely affect children who are still developing both physically and mentally. It is reasonable to predict that the exposure frequency and amount of violence and pornography encountered by multi-players would be remarkably higher than that seen by single-players. Although exposure to violence was known to increase the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [54, 55], this study showed that “online” violence exposure and playing violent games could be as harmful as “actual” violent experiences for school-aged children who develop ADHD. Since children can easily declare adult age online to play violent games, governments could develop strategies to prevent children’s exposure to violent games.
In addition, this study found that more than one-tenth of children had cyber aggression/victimization experiences. Children who reported playing violent mobile games, having mobile gaming addictions, and being exposed to violence/pornography were more likely to experience cyber aggression/victimization, and these factors were positively associated with emotional and behavioral problems. Prior research has revealed that violent media exposure causes an increase in aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, physiologic arousal, hostile appraisals, and aggressive behavior [4]. Children’s exposure to online violence appeared to increase the risk of aggression [56]. Prior studies also found children’s and adolescent’s Internet gaming addictions were related to cyber aggression/victimization [57]. Since children’s school bullying often extended from cyberbullying, school bullying prevention programs could include cyberbullying prevention strategies to enhance children’s digital competence. Parents and teachers could also try to understand children’s online activities and persons they contact online. A study [58] found that increasing student engagement in schools could be a strategy to reduce students’ school bullying and cyberbullying victimization.
This study found that multi-players had higher total difficulties score. Previous studies [59, 60] have claimed a close association between conduct disorders and both bullying and bully victimization. Multi-players were at high risk for mobile gaming addictions, which increased the frequency of exposure to mobile violence and pornography and often was the cause of a pathological formation of conduct disorders and cyber aggression/victimization. Prior studies [61, 62] have indicated that conduct disorders were considered a precursor of anti-social behavior in adulthood, which underscores the importance of catching the early signs of online gaming addiction among children.
Moreover, this study associated a poor parent-child relationship with children’s mobile gaming addiction, mobile pornography exposure, cyber aggression, and emotional and behavioral problems. Prior studies also associated a poor parent-child relationship with Internet gaming addiction [63, 64], while low levels of family affection were associated with greater emotional and behavioral problems in children [65]. Parents could develop good relationships with children and understand their mobile gaming behaviors in order to mediate their online gaming time, content, and gaming preferences. The American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended that parents become involved with their child’s use of media and must ensure that their children have ample media-free time and access to nongaming play [14].
In addition, this study found that children in Taiwan spent more time playing mobile games and have higher levels of mobile gaming addiction, while children in China reported higher levels of exposure to violence, and cyberbullying experiences. These differences might reflect different cultures, media regulation, Internet policies, education and child policies between Taiwan and China. In China, obsessive online gaming behavior among youth is viewed as a national issue of public health and social control [30], while gaming addiction is commonly addressed as an individual syndrome of self-control in Taiwan [66]. Future studies could further explore whether access to different mobile devices, Internet resources, gaming patterns, digital literacy, educational pressure, one-child policies, and parental mediation in different regions might influence children’s online activities, online risks, and psychological distress. Since massive multiplayer online role-playing games were the most addictive [17, 67], more studies are needed to examine the causes and impact within different cultural contexts.
Moreover, this study found that children who reside in rural areas spend more time playing mobile games and experience more online risks than children who reside in urban areas in Taiwan. These results were consistent with prior study [31] that showed children who reside in rural areas spend more time online and are more vulnerable to online risks. However, this study found no differences between urban and rural areas in China, which is a result that differs from that of prior study [32]. The reason may be due to the sample schools in China being located in the same province and possibly having similar living resources. How to balance digital opportunities and risks for children, particularly in rural areas, becomes challenging. The Taiwan government has established broadband in rural areas to expand Internet access and enhance digital opportunities. However, children from rural areas who usually have lower levels of parental mediation and less educational arrangements are more likely to spend more time online and engaged in online risks. Governments could provide resources for schools and communities to enhance the digital literacy of both parents and children and increase media-free educational opportunities for children to prevent online risks.
Limitations
This study had some limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study, which limits the information that can be used to infer causality. Second, because of the children’s young ages and the differences in their regional backgrounds, they could have perceived different meanings for the SDQ attributes in the questionnaire. This could explain the low reliability of SDQ subscales in this study, while studies [68–70] also found low reliability for some SDQ subscales and interpretation of the subscales difficult for certain ethnic groups. Thus, we did not present the results of SDQ subscales. Third, many words in pornographic messages might not be understood by third- and fourth-grade school children and may have a different impact. Fourth, in the present study we focused on exploring children’s mobile gaming addictions, while there could be a discrepancy between mobile gaming addictions and online gaming additions. However, our study found that most children reported using smartphones to go online instead of computers. Fifth, this study compared urban and rural factors based on official data from Taiwan and China, while the definition of urban and rural areas might differ in different regions. Thus, we conducted an urban/rural comparison in each region and controlled for the urban/rural area and region variables in the multivariate analysis. Finally, the instrument of mobile gaming addiction was adapted from IGD-SF9. The pilot test indicated that 3rd and 4th grade school children had difficulties in answering the 5 point-Likert scale, thus we dichotomized the response. According to DSM-5 suggestion we chose the cut-off point of 5 out of 9 criteria to estimate the prevalence of IGD, while a review study found that there remained problems regarding using some instruments with different cut-off points to compare IGD prevalence across different culture regions and across different demographic background participants [71]. Future studies could develop a more appropriate instrument to assess children’s Internet gaming disorders and employed models and analysis of the causal inferences of explored relationships. A related approach could be longitudinal examinations to better understand the longitudinal and/or reciprocal relationships of mobile gaming preferences, online risks, and psychological/behavioral problems while exploring the transitional effects of mobile gaming on the psychosocial adjustment of children and adolescents.
Implications
This study found that children who were multi-players, played violent games, had a mobile gaming addiction, and had exposure to mobile violence/pornography were more likely to be involved in cyber aggression/victimization and to have emotional and behavioral problems. To prevent online risks and psychological distress, it is suggested that parents could understand children’s online activities and have discussions with children regarding what games they can play, when they can play, whether they can play games online, whether they can play games with other players. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, studies have indicated that school children were more likely to have psychological distress, spend more time online, and engage in problematic internet-related activities [72, 73]. Studies have encouraged parents and teachers to educate children about using smartphones and social media safely [74], to understand and monitor children’s internet using habits and activities [75], to incorporate social support into cyberbullying intervention [29], and to facilitate positive activities to prevent psychological distress among schoolchildren particular during COVID-19 [72].
Conclusions
The findings of the present study indicated that more than half of the children surveyed played mobile games with other players. Children who were multi-players had a higher proportion of online risk such as mobile gaming addiction and exposure to mobile violence/pornography and cyber aggression/victimization compared with single-players and non-players. In addition, children who were multi-players were more likely to have mobile gaming addictions, have mobile violence exposure, experience cyber aggression/victimization, and suffer from emotional and behavioral problems. Children’s mobile gaming addictions were associated with greater risks of exposure to mobile violence/pornography, cyber aggression/victimization, and emotional and behavioral problems. Multi-players, playing violent games, mobile gaming addictions, mobile violence/pornography, cyber aggression/victimization, and poor parent-child relationships were associated with emotional and behavioral problems.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge editors and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Many thanks go to the participating schools and students.
References
- 1.
Ofcom. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 20192020.
- 2.
Felt LJ, Robb MB. Technology addiction: Concern, controversy, and finding balance. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media. 2016.
- 3. Jeong H, Yim HW, Lee SY, Lee HK, Potenza MN, Lee H. Factors associated with severity, incidence or persistence of internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a 2-year longitudinal study. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2020. Epub 2020/12/08. pmid:33283397.
- 4. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ, Bartholow BD, Cantor J, Christakis D, Coyne SM, et al. Screen Violence and Youth Behavior. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Suppl 2):S142–s7. Epub 2017/11/03. pmid:29093050.
- 5. Lam LT, Cheng Z, Liu X. Violent online games exposure and cyberbullying/victimization among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2013;16(3):159–65. Epub 2012/12/21. pmid:23253205.
- 6. Lin CY, Potenza MN, Broström A, Pakpour AH. Internet gaming disorder, psychological distress, and insomnia in adolescent students and their siblings: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Addictive behaviors reports. 2021;13:100332. Epub 2021/01/14. pmid:33437860; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7786042.
- 7. Jeong H, Yim HW, Lee SY, Lee HK, Potenza MN, Jo SJ, et al. Reciprocal relationship between depression and Internet gaming disorder in children: A 12-month follow-up of the iCURE study using cross-lagged path analysis. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2019;8(4):725–32. Epub 2020/05/04. pmid:32359239; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7044588.
- 8. Wang JL, Sheng JR, Wang HZ. The Association Between Mobile Game Addiction and Depression, Social Anxiety, and Loneliness. Frontiers in public health. 2019;7:247. Epub 2019/09/26. pmid:31552213; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6743417.
- 9. Torres-Rodríguez A, Griffiths MD, Carbonell X, Oberst U. Internet gaming disorder in adolescence: Psychological characteristics of a clinical sample. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2018;7(3):707–18. Epub 2018/09/29. pmid:30264606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6426364.
- 10. Beranuy M, Machimbarrena JM, Vega-Osés MA, Carbonell X, Griffiths MD, Pontes HM, et al. Spanish Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Prevalence and Relationship with Online Gambling and Quality of Life. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(5). Epub 2020/03/04. pmid:32121280; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7084394.
- 11. van den Eijnden R, Koning I, Doornwaard S, van Gurp F, Ter Bogt T. The impact of heavy and disordered use of games and social media on adolescents’ psychological, social, and school functioning. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2018;7(3):697–706. Epub 2018/09/29. pmid:30264607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6426368.
- 12. Jo YS, Bhang SY, Choi JS, Lee HK, Lee SY, Kweon YS. Clinical Characteristics of Diagnosis for Internet Gaming Disorder: Comparison of DSM-5 IGD and ICD-11 GD Diagnosis. Journal of clinical medicine. 2019;8(7). Epub 2019/07/03. pmid:31261841; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6678371.
- 13. Montag C, Becker B. Internet and smartphone use disorder in Asia. Addictive Behaviors. 2020;107:106380. pmid:32220564
- 14. Gentile DA, Bailey K, Bavelier D, Brockmyer JF, Cash H, Coyne SM, et al. Internet Gaming Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Suppl 2):S81–s5. Epub 2017/11/03. pmid:29093038.
- 15. Saunders JB, Hao W, Long J, King DL, Mann K, Fauth-Bühler M, et al. Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2017;6(3):271–9. Epub 2017/08/18. pmid:28816494; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5700714.
- 16. Pan YC, Chiu YC, Lin YH. Development of the Problematic Mobile Gaming Questionnaire and Prevalence of Mobile Gaming Addiction Among Adolescents in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2019;22(10):662–9. Epub 2019/10/16. pmid:31613156.
- 17. Chen A, Mari S, Grech S, Levitt J. What We Know About Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games. Harvard review of psychiatry. 2020;28(2):107–12. Epub 2020/03/07. pmid:32134835.
- 18. Nogueira M, Faria H, Vitorino A, Silva FG, Serrão Neto A. Addictive Video Game Use: An Emerging Pediatric Problem? Acta medica portuguesa. 2019;32(3):183–8. Epub 2019/04/05. pmid:30946788.
- 19. Han H, Jeong H, Jo SJ, Son HJ, Yim HW. Relationship between the experience of online game genre and high risk of Internet gaming disorder in Korean adolescents. Epidemiology and health. 2020;42:e2020016. Epub 2020/04/10. pmid:32272007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7285446.
- 20. Chen J-K, Chang C-W, Wang Z, Wang L-C, Wei H-S. Cyber deviance among adolescents in Taiwan: Prevalence and correlates. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;126:106042.
- 21. Chen J-K, Chen L-M. Cyberbullying among adolescents in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mainland China: a cross-national study in Chinese societies. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. 2020;30(3):227–41.
- 22. Jadambaa A, Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Graves N, Brain D, Pacella R. Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 2019;53(9):878–88. Epub 2019/05/10. pmid:31067987.
- 23. Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N, Swing EL, Bushman BJ, Sakamoto A, et al. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin. 2010;136(2):151–73. Epub 2010/03/03. pmid:20192553.
- 24. Prescott AT, Sargent JD, Hull JG. Metaanalysis of the relationship between violent video game play and physical aggression over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;115(40):9882–8. Epub 2018/10/03. pmid:30275306; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6176643.
- 25. Shin N, Ahn H. Factors Affecting Adolescents’ Involvement in Cyberbullying: What Divides the 20% from the 80%? Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2015;18(7):393–9. Epub 2015/07/15. pmid:26167838.
- 26. Chang FC, Chiu CH, Miao NF, Chen PH, Lee CM, Huang TF, et al. Online gaming and risks predict cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in adolescents. International journal of public health. 2015;60(2):257–66. Epub 2015/01/01. pmid:25549613.
- 27. Bottino SM, Bottino CM, Regina CG, Correia AV, Ribeiro WS. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cadernos de saude publica. 2015;31(3):463–75. Epub 2015/04/11. pmid:25859714.
- 28. DeSmet A, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Walrave M, Vandebosch H. Associations Between Bystander Reactions to Cyberbullying and Victims’ Emotional Experiences and Mental Health. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2019;22(10):648–56. Epub 2019/10/01. pmid:31566447.
- 29. Chen J-K. Cyber victimisation, social support, and psychological distress among junior high school students in Taiwan and Mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. 2020;30(3):150–63.
- 30. Rao Y. From Confucianism to psychology: Rebooting Internet addicts in China. History of psychology. 2019;22(4):328–50. Epub 2019/07/30. pmid:31355662.
- 31. Chang F-C, Miao N-F, Chiu C-H, Chen P-H, Lee C-M, Chiang J-T, et al. Urban–rural differences in parental Internet mediation and adolescents’ Internet risks in Taiwan. Health, Risk & Society. 2016;18(3–4):188–204.
- 32. Hansstein FV, Hong Y, Di C. The relationship between new media exposure and fast food consumption among Chinese children and adolescents in school: a rural-urban comparison. Global health promotion. 2017;24(3):40–8. Epub 2016/02/24. pmid:26903170.
- 33. Oluwole L, Obadeji A, Dada M. Surfing over masked distress: Internet addiction and psychological well-being among a population of medical students. 2021;4(2):56–61.
- 34. Ranjan L, Gupta P, Srivastava M, Gujar N. Problematic internet use and its association with anxiety among undergraduate students. 2021;4(4):137–41.
- 35. Fung XC, Kwok C, Leung P, Poon K. The effects of internet gaming and social media use on physical activity, sleep, quality of life, and academic performance among university students in Hong Kong: A preliminary study. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior. 2021;4(1):36.
- 36. Liu CY, Hung YT, Chuang YL, Chen YJ, Weng WS, Liu JS, et al. Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. J Health Management. 2006;4(1):1–22.
- 37.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. Shouguang2019. Available from: https://baike.baidu.com/reference/268662/a691YGFRJUaCE7IrRw8bF35Gxe0UAKbf04hEf3i8ippek-SG0NdJij5dG_LAFTrURze3hWgaM5XayqPg5iK6W3PVviEFLe8kzyY907Dri1LYQNLFG8bq2Hh0Ls-p4eUWVpfyWA.
- 38.
National Statistics Taiwan. The definition of metropolitan area2019. Available from: https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=955&ctNode=1313.
- 39. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;45:137–43.
- 40. Poon LYJ, Tsang HWH, Chan TYJ, Man SWT, Ng LY, Wong YLE, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF): Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(10):e26821. Epub 2021/10/19. pmid:34661543; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8561410.
- 41.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 h ed.)2013.
- 42. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. pmid:11699809.
- 43. Liu SK, Chien YL, Shang CY, Lin CH, Liu YC, Gau SS. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2013;54(6):720–30. Epub 2013/02/26. pmid:23433222.
- 44. Oflu A, Yalcin SS. Video game use among secondary school students and associated factors. Archivos argentinos de pediatria. 2019;117(6):e584–e91. Epub 2019/11/24. pmid:31758885.
- 45. Smohai M, Urbán R, Griffiths MD, Király O, Mirnics Z, Vargha A, et al. Online and offline video game use in adolescents: measurement invariance and problem severity. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. 2017;43(1):111–6. Epub 2016/11/04. pmid:27808562.
- 46. Männikkö N, Ruotsalainen H, Demetrovics Z, Lopez-Fernandez O, Myllymäki L, Miettunen J, et al. Problematic Gaming Behavior Among Finnish Junior High School Students: Relation to Socio-Demographics and Gaming Behavior Characteristics. Behavioral medicine (Washington, DC). 2018;44(4):324–34. Epub 2017/09/15. pmid:28910584.
- 47. Buiza-Aguado C, Alonso-Canovas A, Conde-Mateos C, Buiza-Navarrete JJ, Gentile D. Problematic Video Gaming in a Young Spanish Population: Association with Psychosocial Health. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2018;21(6):388–94. Epub 2018/05/25. pmid:29792521.
- 48. Lemmens JS, Hendriks SJ. Addictive Online Games: Examining the Relationship Between Game Genres and Internet Gaming Disorder. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2016;19(4):270–6. Epub 2016/03/10. pmid:26959285.
- 49. Jeong H, Yim HW, Lee SY, Lee HK, Potenza MN, Shin Y. Preschool Exposure to Online Games and Internet Gaming Disorder in Adolescents: A Cohort Study. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2021;9:760348. Epub 2021/12/11. pmid:34888270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8650316.
- 50. Wichstrøm L, Stenseng F, Belsky J, von Soest T, Hygen BW. Symptoms of Internet Gaming Disorder in Youth: Predictors and Comorbidity. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2019;47(1):71–83. Epub 2018/04/07. pmid:29623484; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6329732.
- 51. Mathews CL, Morrell HER, Molle JE. Video game addiction, ADHD symptomatology, and video game reinforcement. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. 2019;45(1):67–76. Epub 2018/06/07. pmid:29874473.
- 52. Wartberg L, Kriston L, Kramer M, Schwedler A, Lincoln TM, Kammerl R. Internet gaming disorder in early adolescence: Associations with parental and adolescent mental health. European psychiatry: the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists. 2017;43:14–8. Epub 2017/04/04. pmid:28365463.
- 53. Nakayama H, Matsuzaki T, Mihara S, Kitayuguchi T, Higuchi S. Relationship between problematic gaming and age at the onset of habitual gaming. Pediatrics international: official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. 2020;62(11):1275–81. Epub 2020/05/08. pmid:32379947.
- 54. Stickley A, Koposov R, Koyanagi A, Inoue Y, Ruchkin V. ADHD and depressive symptoms in adolescents: the role of community violence exposure. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2019;54(6):683–91. Epub 2019/02/02. pmid:30706080.
- 55. Lewis T, Schwebel DC, Elliott MN, Visser SN, Toomey SL, McLaughlin KA, et al. The association between youth violence exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in a sample of fifth-graders. The American journal of orthopsychiatry. 2015;85(5):504–13. Epub 2015/10/16. pmid:26460708; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4636211.
- 56. Chiang JT, Chang FC, Lee KW. Transitions in aggression among children: Effects of gender and exposure to online violence. Aggressive behavior. 2021;47(3):310–9. Epub 2021/02/12. pmid:33570759.
- 57. Yang X, Jiang X, Mo PK, Cai Y, Ma L, Lau JT. Prevalence and Interpersonal Correlates of Internet Gaming Disorders among Chinese Adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(2). Epub 2020/01/23. pmid:31963197; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7013587.
- 58. Chen J-K, Wu C, Wang L-CJSMH. Longitudinal Associations Between School Engagement and Bullying Victimization in School and Cyberspace in Hong Kong: Latent Variables and an Autoregressive Cross-Lagged Panel Study. 2021:1–11.
- 59. Zablotsky B, Bradshaw CP, Anderson C, Law PA. The association between bullying and the psychological functioning of children with autism spectrum disorders. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(1):1–8. Epub 2013/01/01. pmid:23275052.
- 60. Kokkinos CM, Panayiotou G. Predicting bullying and victimization among early adolescents: Associations with disruptive behavior disorders. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression. 2004;30(6):520–33.
- 61. Junewicz A, Billick SB. Conduct Disorder: Biology and Developmental Trajectories. The Psychiatric quarterly. 2020;91(1):77–90. Epub 2019/11/27. pmid:31768912.
- 62. Pisano S, Muratori P, Gorga C, Levantini V, Iuliano R, Catone G, et al. Conduct disorders and psychopathy in children and adolescents: aetiology, clinical presentation and treatment strategies of callous-unemotional traits. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2017;43(1):84. Epub 2017/09/22. pmid:28931400; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5607565.
- 63. Schneider LA, King DL, Delfabbro PH. Family factors in adolescent problematic Internet gaming: A systematic review. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2017;6(3):321–33. Epub 2017/08/02. pmid:28762279; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5700711.
- 64. Wong IL, Lam MP. Gaming behavior and addiction among Hong Kong adolescents. Asian journal of gambling issues and public health. 2016;6(1):6. Epub 2016/09/16. pmid:27630813; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4998166.
- 65. León-Del-Barco B, Fajardo-Bullón F, Mendo-Lázaro S, Rasskin-Gutman I, Iglesias-Gallego D. Impact of the Familiar Environment in 11⁻14-Year-Old Minors’ Mental Health. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(7):1314. pmid:29937491.
- 66. Chang E, Kim B. School and individual factors on game addiction: A multilevel analysis. International journal of psychology: Journal international de psychologie. 2020;55(5):822–31. Epub 2019/12/27. pmid:31875984.
- 67. Na E, Choi I, Lee TH, Lee H, Rho MJ, Cho H, et al. The influence of game genre on Internet gaming disorder. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2017;6(2):1–8. Epub 2017/07/01. pmid:28658960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5520129.
- 68. Theunissen MH, Vogels AG, de Wolff MS, Reijneveld SA. Characteristics of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in preschool children. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e446–54. Epub 2013/01/09. pmid:23296429.
- 69. Du Y, Kou J, Coghill D. The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health. 2008;2(1):8. Epub 2008/05/01. pmid:18445259; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2409296.
- 70. Mieloo CL, Bevaart F, Donker MC, van Oort FV, Raat H, Jansen W. Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. European journal of public health. 2014;24(1):26–32. Epub 2013/07/23. pmid:23867561.
- 71. Carlisle K. Utility of DSM-5 Criteria for Internet Gaming Disorder. Psychological reports. 2021;124(6):2613–32. Epub 2020/10/23. pmid:33086986.
- 72. Chen CY, Chen IH, Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Griffiths MD. Internet-Related Behaviors and Psychological Distress Among Schoolchildren During the COVID-19 School Hiatus. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2021;24(10):654–63. Epub 2021/04/21. pmid:33877905.
- 73. Chen IH, Chen CY, Pakpour AH, Griffiths MD, Lin CY, Li XD, et al. Problematic internet-related behaviors mediate the associations between levels of internet engagement and distress among schoolchildren during COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal structural equation modeling study. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2021;10(1):135–48. Epub 2021/02/12. pmid:33570506.
- 74. Fung XCC, Siu AMH, Potenza MN, O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Chen CY, et al. Problematic Use of Internet-Related Activities and Perceived Weight Stigma in Schoolchildren: A Longitudinal Study Across Different Epidemic Periods of COVID-19 in China. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2021;12:675839. Epub 2021/06/11. pmid:34108898; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8183469.
- 75. Chen IH, Chen CY, Liu CH, Ahorsu DK, Griffiths MD, Chen YP, et al. Internet addiction and psychological distress among Chinese schoolchildren before and during the COVID-19 outbreak: A latent class analysis. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2021;10(3):731–46. Epub 2021/09/17. pmid:34529588.