Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and nares of Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis demonstrate high level of clonal diversity

  • Lorrayne Cardoso Guimarães,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Departamento de Microbiologia Médica, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Maria Isabella de Menezes Macedo Assunção,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Departamento de Microbiologia Médica, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Tamara Lopes Rocha de Oliveira,

    Roles Investigation, Validation

    Affiliation Departamento de Microbiologia Médica, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Fernanda Sampaio Cavalcante,

    Roles Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Departamento de Clínica Médica, Instituto de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Campus Macaé, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Simone Saintive,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Ambulatório de Dermatologia Pediátrica, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Eliane de Dios Abad,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Ambulatório de Dermatologia Pediátrica, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Ekaterini Simoes Goudouris,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Ambulatório de Alergia Pediátrica, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Evandro Alves do Prado,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Ambulatório de Alergia Pediátrica, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Dennis de Carvalho Ferreira,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Departamento de Fundamentos de Enfermagem, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Kátia Regina Netto dos Santos

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    santoskrn@micro.ufrj.br

    Affiliation Departamento de Microbiologia Médica, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily affects the pediatric population, which is highly colonized by S. aureus. However, little is known about the genetic features of this microorganism and other staphylococcal species that colonize AD patients.

Objective

This study aimed to characterize Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the nares and skin (with and without lesion) of 30 AD and 12 non-AD Brazilian children.

Methods

Skin and nasal swabs were cultured onto mannitol salt agar, and bacterial colonies were counted and identified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by phenotypic and genotypic tests. In S. aureus isolates, Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes were detected by PCR, and their clonality was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing.

Results

S. aureus was more prevalent in the nares (P = 0.005) and lesional skin (P = 0.0002) of children with AD, while S. hominis was more frequent in the skin of non-AD children (P < 0.0001). All children in the study, except one from each group, were colonized by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and 24% by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Despite the great clonal diversity of S. aureus (18 sequence types identified), most AD children (74.1%) were colonized by the same genotype in both niches.

Conclusion

High colonization by polyclonal S. aureus isolates was found among children with AD, while S. hominis was more frequent among non-AD children. The high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal isolates highlights the importance of continued surveillance, especially when considering empiric antibiotic therapy for the treatment of skin infections in these patients.

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory condition that primarily affects the pediatric population. Clinical signs and symptoms include eczema, sleep disorders, food allergies, and others. Genetic, immunological, environmental, and microbiological factors are associated with AD pathogenesis [1]. In this regard, a high abundance of Staphylococcus spp., especially S. aureus, is observed in the skin of patients with AD compared to individuals without the disease [2].

The contribution of S. aureus to AD pathogenesis is complex, as dysfunction of the epithelial barrier and immune system favors its growth, and the presence of this pathogen in the skin, in turn, favors the dysfunction of the epithelial barrier and the immune system [3]. The presence of virulence and toxin genes has been reported among staphylococcal isolates from AD, which may be associated with triggering, sustaining, and amplifying the inflammatory process [4]. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), for instance, is associated with necrotic skin infections and necrotizing pneumonia, and it was detected in 75% of S. aureus isolates from nares and infected skin of AD children in a study conducted by our group [5]. In addition, colonization by community methicillin-resistant lineages associated with high virulent potential has been reported, such as from the clonal complexes (CC) 1 and 30, carrying SCCmec IV, PVL, and other virulence genes [5, 6].

Unlike studies regarding S. aureus, those addressing the role of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) in AD are still scarce. In a prospective birth cohort study, it was observed that the prevalence of S. hominis in infants who developed AD was lower than in those that did not develop the disease [7]. Nakatsuji et al. (2017) reported that a group of American adults with AD had a lower colonization rate by CoNS isolates capable of inhibiting S. aureus growth than adults without AD [8]. It has been also reported a high expression of a protease produced by S. epidermidis, associated with skin damage in AD patients, which could exacerbate the disease [9]. Thus, the exact role of CoNS in the altered AD skin is not yet known.

Although S. aureus highly colonizes the skin and nares of AD children, there is a lack of studies evaluating colonization by other Staphylococcus species. Furthermore, little is known about methicillin-resistance and clonal lineages of S. aureus isolated from these individuals, even though antimicrobial resistance is of concern as these patients tend to have recurrent infections, and some clonal lineages are associated with more virulent traits [4, 5]. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate colonization by staphylococcal species on the nares and skin of AD and non-AD Brazilian children and to characterize their methicillin resistance. Aspects associated with virulence and clonality were also evaluated for S. aureus isolates. The relevance of this study is due to the fact that it is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to describe differences in the cutaneous and nasal staphylococcal community, colonization by diverse clonal lineages of S. aureus, and high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Brazilian AD children.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval and study design

This was a cross-sectional, comparative, and clinical-laboratorial study conducted in a pediatric dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between June 2018 and November 2019. It was approved by the ethics committee of the Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira (IPPMG) (N°3493662).

The research included 42 children aged 2 to 10 years: 30 diagnosed with AD according to the Hanifin & Rajka (1980) criteria [10] and 12 siblings of AD children without the disease. Disease severity was determined using the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index [11] assessed on the day of sample collection. Only AD children with an AD lesion in at least one side of the antecubital fossa were included in the study. Exclusion criteria for both groups were: presentation of any other dermatological or infectious condition; being hospitalized in the past 6 months; use of systemic immunosuppressors in the past 2 months; and use of topical or oral antimicrobials 7 days prior to sample collection. Both groups were instructed to avoid washing their arms as well as using moisturizers or topical products 8 h prior to sample collection. All the legal guardians and/or patients provided a written informed consent and/or assent form to participate in this study.

Sample collection and bacterial identification

Sterile swabs pre-moistened in saline solution were carefully rubbed against the antecubital fossa skin of the AD and non-AD children in a delimited area of 9 cm2 for 30 s. This procedure was repeated 2 cm above the AD lesion (healthy skin region). We were unable to collect a swab from the non-lesional skin of one AD child. A pre-moistened swab was also rubbed against each of the anterior nares in both groups. All the swabs were suspended in 1 ml 1X phosphate-buffered saline (Laborclin; Pinhais, PN, Brazil) with 0.1% TritonX-100 (Sigma Chemical Company; Saint Louis, MO, USA) and processed within 4 h of collection. The swabs were vigorously vortexed, and the suspension contents were inoculated on mannitol salt agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company; Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated at 35 °C for 48 h. Mannitol fermenting (MSA+) and non-fermenting (MSA-) colonies were counted and those with distinct traits were selected from the plates of each clinical specimen. Bacterial identification was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) (Bruker Daltonics; Germany) using MALDI Biotyper software version 7.0 (Bruker Daltonics) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (S1 Table) [1216] for those with a score <2.0 (probable genus identification). All isolates were stored at -20 °C in trypticase soy broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company; Sparks, MD, USA) with 20% glycerol (Proquimios Comercio e Indústria; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil).

Screening for antimicrobial resistance

Methicillin susceptibility was determined using cefoxitin disk-diffusion test (Oxoid; Cambrigde, UK) for all Staphylococcus isolates according to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) recommendations [17]. For S. aureus isolates, the susceptibility to mupirocin, clindamycin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT) (Oxoid; Cambrigde, UK) was also evaluated. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin and vancomycin (Sigma Chemical Company, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were carried out by the broth microdilution method for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates [17].

Detection of PVL and mecA genes, SCCmec typing

DNA was extracted according to Pitcher, Sauders & Owen (1989) [18]. PCR was conducted to detect the mecA gene in all Staphylococcus isolates [19] and the PVL genes in S. aureus isolates [20]. MRSA isolates had their SCCmec typed by multiplex-PCR [21].

Clonality assessment by PFGE and MLST

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to determine the clonal lineage of S. aureus isolated from lesional skin in the AD group, healthy skin in the non-AD group, and nares in both groups using the restriction enzyme SmaI (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, England) [22]. The restriction enzymes SmaI and ApaI (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, England) were used for isolates that were not cut by SmaI alone. PFGE fingerprints were analyzed with BioNumerics 7.6.3 software (Applied Maths, Biomérieux; Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Isolates that had a similarity coefficient > 80% were assigned as the same genotype [23]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was also performed for representative isolates of each genotype [24, 25].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software version 8.01 (Prism, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess whether the colony count had a normal distribution. The Kruskal-Wallis’s test followed by Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons were used to evaluate the colony count. The Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were performed for the other analysis. Results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the groups

The children in the AD group had a mean age of six years, the majority was female (19; 63%). On the other hand, the non-AD group had a mean age of 4.75 years, with an equal distribution of male and female individuals. Most AD children presented moderate SCORAD (20; 67%), followed by mild (6; 20%) and severe (4; 13%) cases.

Nasal and skin colonization by Staphylococcus spp

MSA+, possibly S. aureus, and MSA- colonies were counted for skin specimens. MSA+ count from the lesional AD skin was significantly higher than the MSA+ count from skin without lesion (adjusted P value = 0.035), the MSA- count from the skin without lesion (adjusted P value = 0.0006) and both MSA+ and MSA- from the skin of non-AD children (adjusted P values = 0.0001 and 0.023, respectively) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Mannitol fermenting and non-fermenting colony count from skin sites of children with and without atopic dermatitis.

AD- Atopic dermatitis; CFU/cm2- Colony forming units per square centimeter; MSA- Mannitol salt agar; MSA+- Mannitol fermenting colonies; MSA- Mannitol non-fermenting colonies; n- Number. The horizontal bars indicate the median count for each group. The symbols * and *** indicate, respectively: P < 0.05 and P < 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.g001

All 30 (100%) AD children presented S. aureus on the lesional skin, while 24 (82.7%) had this species on the skin without lesion (P = 0.024) (Fig 2a). Only one AD child was not a nasal carrier of S. aureus, but this microorganism was detected in both skin sites (S2 Table). In contrast, in the group without AD, there was a lower prevalence of S. aureus colonization, both in the skin, 50% (P = 0.052 when compared to the AD non-lesional skin; P = 0.0002 when compared to the AD lesional skin) and in the nostrils, 58.3% (P = 0.005) (Fig 2a and 2b, Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Skin and nasal colonization by Staphylococcus spp. in 30 children with atopic dermatitis and 12 without the disease.

a) Skin colonization; b) Nasal colonization. AD- Atopic dermatitis. Collection of a non-lesional skin swab was not performed on a child in the atopic dermatitis group, and therefore the calculation of the percentage of this isolation site was performed for 29 children. The symbols *, **, and **** indicate, respectively: P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Distribution of the staphylococcal isolates according to the species, isolation sites, and methicillin susceptibility.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.t001

In both groups, S. aureus and S. epidermidis were the most frequently isolated species from nares (Table 1). These species were also the most frequently found in skin from AD children, while S. epidermidis and S. hominis were the prevalent species detected in this niche in the non-AD group. Colonization by S. hominis in the group without AD was significantly higher than in the AD group in both skin with (P < 0.0001) and without lesion (P = 0.006) and nares (P = 0.004) (Fig 2a and 2b). Nasal colonization by S. saprophyticus was also more frequent in children without AD (P = 0.004) (Fig 2b).

Staphylococcus aureus alone was more frequently detected in lesional skin than in AD non-lesional skin (P = 0.030) (Tables 1 and 2 and S2 Table). In fact, in three (10%) AD children, with moderate SCORAD, only S. aureus was recovered from both skin sites, whereas in eight (26.7%) this occurred only for lesional skin (S2 Table). In addition, three of the four children with severe AD only had S. aureus detected in the lesional skin. In general, most children with and without AD were colonized by three staphylococcal species in each investigated site (Table 2 and S2 Table). Furthermore, colonization by CoNS on the skin without lesion was higher than on the lesional skin among AD children (P = 0.030).

thumbnail
Table 2. Major staphylococcal species associations identified colonizing the skin of children with and without atopic dermatitis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.t002

Antimicrobial susceptibility and PVL genes

Ninety-six S. aureus isolates were evaluated (83 from the AD group and 13 from the non-AD group) (Table 1). Methicillin resistance was detected in 22.9% of S. aureus isolates colonizing 30% of AD children and 8% of non-AD children (P = 0.233). All MRSA isolates presented SCCmec IV, and oxacillin and vancomycin MICs ranged from 16 to 128 mg/L and 0.5 to 2 mg/L, respectively. All isolates were sensitive to mupirocin and clindamycin. Five (5.2%) isolates with reduced susceptibility to SXT (one intermediate resistant and four resistant) were detected in the AD group, colonizing three children.

One hundred eighty CoNS isolates were evaluated for methicillin susceptibility (120 from the AD group and 60 from the non-AD children), mainly S. epidermidis (46.1%) and S. hominis (21.1%) (Table 1). About 60% of the CoNS isolates were methicillin-resistant in both AD and non-AD groups, with more than 20% of isolates per species being resistant to methicillin (excepting S. capitis, which was sensitive). All children in the study, except one from each group, were colonized by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MR-CoNS).

Nineteen (22.9%) S. aureus isolates were PVL+, colonizing nine (30%) AD children and three (25%) non-AD children.

Clonal profiles of S. aureus isolates from skin and nares

There was a high diversity of clonal lineages colonizing children with and without AD, including 12 genotypes from A to L and 18 distinct sequence types (STs) from nine CCs (ST1/CC1, 188/1, 7618/1, 5/5, 1635/5, 8/8, 72/8, 1813/8, 15/15, 333/15, 2104/25, 30/30, 7743/30, 508/45, 7744/45, 97/97, 398/398 e 7742/398) (Figs 3 and 4). Four novel STs, single locus variant (SLV) from other STs, were identified: ST7618/CC1 that differs from ST188/CC1 by an alteration in the aroE allele; 7742 that differs from ST398 by an alteration in the aroE allele; 7743/CC30 that differs from ST30/CC30 by an alteration in the aroE allele; and 7744/CC45 that differs from ST45/CC45 by an alteration in the pta allele. Most of the S. aureus isolates belonged to CCs 30 (18.6%), 1 (15.7%), 5 (14.3%), and 398 (12.8%). Among MRSA isolates, the majority was related to STs/CCs 30/30 (50%) and 5/5 (31.2%).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Dendrogram of the clonal profiles obtained after digestion with the restriction enzyme SmaI, and general characteristics of 61 S. aureus isolates from nasal and skin colonization of children with and without AD.

CC- Clonal complex; MRSA/IV- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus presenting SCCmec IV; MSSA- Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; na- Not applicable; PVL- Panton-Valentine leukocidin; SDA- Child without atopic dermatitis; ST- Sequence-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Dendrogram of the clonal profiles obtained after digestion with the restriction enzymes ApaI and SmaI, and general characteristics of nine S. aureus isolates from nasal and skin colonization of children with and without AD.

MSSA- Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; na- Not applicable; PVL- Panton-Valentine leukocidin; SDA- Child without atopic dermatitis; ST- Sequence-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.g004

Isolates of CCs 30 and 5 were not found in the children without AD, while 13 (44.8%) AD children were colonized by these lineages in the nares (P = 0.034) and 14 (46.7%) in the lesional skin (P = 0.062). In general, the same genotype was detected in the skin and nares (Figs 3 and 4). Most of the PVL-positive isolates belonged to the genotype C/CC30 (40%). It is also noteworthy that one of the four children with severe AD (child 2), who only had S. aureus detected in lesional skin, presented PVL-positive MRSA strains at all isolation sites, with those in the skin lesion and nostrils of ST30. For two isolates without PFGE analysis (151ad from the lesional skin of AD child 5 and 645ad from nares of AD child 22), the STs described were ST7742 (SLV of ST398) and 7744 (SLV of ST45/45), respectively.

Discussion

Atopic dermatitis has been associated with cutaneous dysbiosis, and S. aureus is the predominant pathogen in this niche, especially in lesional skin [2]. Despite the importance of S. aureus colonization in AD, few studies evaluate its clonal lineages and colonization by CoNS, including its susceptibility to methicillin. Here, Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the nares and skin of 30 AD and 12 non-AD Brazilian children were characterized. We found a high colonization rate by polyclonal MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates, as well as a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolates among AD children.

In this study, colonization by only S. aureus on lesional skin was higher than on non-lesional skin of children with AD, data that agree with our findings on the mannitol fermenting colony count (suggestive of S. aureus), which was also high on lesional skin. Similarly, other groups have reported a high S. aureus count in skin with lesion when compared to skin without lesion and skin from individuals without the disease [8, 26]. In the present study, three of the four children with severe AD were colonized with S. aureus alone on lesional skin. It is known that S. aureus is associated with inflammatory events that can exacerbate AD symptoms [2, 3, 2729]. Thus, the abundance of this microorganism in the skin, especially when it is alone, may be related to the disease severity [2, 26]. In fact, Blanchet-Réthoré et al. (2017) found a reduction of S. aureus in the skin of AD patients correlated with a reduction in SCORAD when evaluating the effect of applying a lotion containing a probiotic [30].

In turn, the high prevalence of S. aureus in children without AD in the present study (50%) could be explained by close contact with patients presenting the disease. The similarity between S. aureus isolates from AD patients and their relatives [3133], as well as the similarity of S. aureus isolates found in different colonization sites of the same patient is also reported [31, 3436]. Indeed, 20 (74.1%) children with AD were colonized by S. aureus of the same genotype in the lesional skin and nares, as well as all non-AD children who presented S. aureus at both sites evaluated. Thus, control measures for the eradication of S. aureus in AD patients, such as use of topical probiotics or bleach baths, should take into consideration different niches and close contacts, since they may serve as a focus for a new colonization episode or to keep the pathogen circulating in the environment. However, we emphasize that we do not advise the use of topical mupirocin in cases of colonization, even though a low prevalence of isolates with high levels of resistance was detected in this study, due to the possibility of emergence of antimicrobial resistance [37].

As previously demonstrated [4, 5, 32], S. aureus isolates colonizing the skin and nares of children with and without AD showed great clonal diversity. Here, we found at least 18 STs, and as in those studies [4, 5, 32], most isolates were of STs 30, 5, and 1, from the CC 30, 5 and 1, respectively. These are major lineages associated with community settings and are also detected in Brazilian studies colonizing and infecting hospitalized patients [3842]. In addition, four STs that have never been described before were detected (STs 7618, 7742, 7743 and 7744). Similar to this study, Cavalcante and colleagues (2015) also found an MSSA isolate of a novel ST described as a SLV of ST188 in a child with AD [5]. It is also worth noting that nine isolates were not cut by the restriction enzyme SmaI on PFGE with representatives of the ST398 clustered among them, which are reported presenting this feature [4345]. Although this lineage was initially described in livestock-associated MRSA isolates [43], it has been increasingly detected worldwide colonizing and infecting humans without animal exposure [46], including among AD patients [4, 47, 48]. The new STs detected in the present study, as well as the sporadic lineages, reinforce the diversity of S. aureus isolates colonizing AD children and the need to understand their role in disease severity. Moreover, the distribution of clonal lineages observed in AD individuals seems to resemble the epidemiology of the place where the studies are conducted.

A high diversity of S. aureus identified in our study could be also explained by the amount of MSSA isolates investigated, since SCCmec acquisition is reported to be restricted to certain clonal lineages [49]. Of note is the fact that the MRSA isolates characterized in the present study were mainly from STs 30 and 5, which were only found among isolates from AD children. It was previously reported that most MRSA isolates from infected skin of Brazilian pediatric patients with AD were USA1100/ST30 and USA800/ST5, and both carried different virulence genes, including the PVL genes [4]. Even though some studies have not observed a clear relationship between S. aureus clonal lineages colonizing AD patients and disease severity [34, 50], it is known that certain lineages are associated with specific characteristics, such as presence of virulence genes, biofilm formation, acquisition of resistance mechanisms, among others [4, 49, 51, 52]. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring colonization by resistant isolates in this group, especially of virulent lineages, since colonization by MRSA may be associated with reduced microbial diversity of the skin [53] and presentation of more severe forms of the disease [37].

Studies evaluating the methicillin susceptibility profile in S. aureus isolated from AD patients show different rates (ranging between 0 and 25%) of MRSA isolates [48, 5358], without a clear correlation as to whether patients with AD are more colonized by MRSA than individuals without the disease [54, 55]. The prevalence of MRSA colonization may vary according to epidemiological aspects of where studies are conducted [5, 5359], and there are also reports of individuals who face worse socioeconomic conditions tend to be colonized by MRSA more frequently [37, 60]. While some authors did not find any AD patients in the southern region of Brazil colonized by MRSA [57, 59], Cavalcante and colleagues (2015) found that 23% of pediatric AD patients attending a dermatology unit in Rio de Janeiro were colonized by MRSA in the nares and/or infected skin, with most of these isolates carrying SCCmec IV [5]. Similarly, in this study, 30% of AD patients presented MRSA/SCCmec IV in at least one of the sites evaluated, and both AD patients and those without the disease presented colonization by MRSA isolates.

Although S. aureus is arguably a relevant pathogen in AD, the role of other staphylococcal species in AD is still poorly understood. In this study, at least one staphylococcal species was detected in all investigated sites, and, in most of them, more than one species was isolated at each investigated site. In fact, studies evaluating the skin microbiome of people with and without AD have detected the presence of different staphylococcal species in association [2, 8, 26]. In our study, the most isolated species from skin in the AD group were S. aureus and S. epidermidis, as previously shown by another study from Soares and colleagues (2013) [61]. Unlike our results, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus were the most frequently detected CoNS species colonizing the skin of adult AD patients in a Polish study [62]. In general, studies assessing Staphylococcus spp. colonization in people with and without AD point to a varied colonization by CoNS in these individuals [7, 26, 53, 63, 64]. Colonization by S. capitis was correlated with greater AD severity in studies conducted in Denmark and South Africa [26, 65]. Similar to the present work, a lower prevalence of S. hominis in people with AD and a negative association between its abundance and AD severity is reported [7, 26, 53, 64]. Therefore, it is possible that colonization by certain bacterial species might contribute to the worsening of the disease, while other species, such as S. hominis, play a protective role in AD.

Despite their reported beneficial role, it is worth noting that CoNS are notorious for their antimicrobial resistance and are considered reservoirs of transferable resistance genes, such as SCCmec [66]. Most of the isolates evaluated in our study were methicillin-resistant, mainly S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and S. hominis. Only one child from each group colonized by SCN did not present resistant isolates in at least one of the investigated sites. A high prevalence of MR-CoNS from nasal colonization had already been reported by our group in neonates in an intensive care unit, in which 90.3% of S. haemolyticus and 87.5% of S. epidermidis isolates showed this characteristic [67]. Byrd et al. (2017) also reported a predominance of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis colonizing patients with AD [2]. However, only 1.2% of the CoNS isolates colonizing the lesional skin from South Korean AD patients presented resistance to methicillin [50]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a high prevalence of MR-CoNS of different species colonizing the skin and nares of AD patients, highlighting the importance of resistance monitoring in this population that is frequently subjected to antimicrobial therapy due to recurrent bacterial infections.

Our results should be evaluated with caution since the sample size was small for both groups and a culture-dependent method was used, which may not have favored the identification of less abundant species. Furthermore, due to the inclusion criteria of the study which required a skin lesion in the antecubital fossa and the lack of use of systemic immunosuppressors, most of the patients presented moderate AD, which impaired the establishment of relationship between the results and disease severity.

Conclusion

High colonization by polyclonal S. aureus isolates was found among children with AD, while S. hominis was more frequent among non-AD children, reinforcing that dysbiosis is an important aspect of this disease. The high number of methicillin-resistant isolates demonstrates the need for continued monitoring of this population who are at increased risk for recurrent infections, especially when considering empirical antibiotic therapy for the treatment of skin infections in patients with AD.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Description of the PCR conditions used to confirm staphylococcal identification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.s001

(DOC)

S2 Table. General characteristics of the 42 children included in the study.

Light grey- Absent; Dark grey- Present; SDA- Child without atopic dermatitis; SCORAD- Scoring atopic dermatitis; SCORAD 1- Mild; SCORAD 2- Moderate; SCORAD 3- Severe; na- Not applicable; F- Female; M- Male; Sa- S. aureus; Sc- S. capitis; Se- S. epidermidis; Sh- S. haemolyticus; Sn- S. hominis; Ss- S. saprophyticus; O(s)- Another coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.; MRSA- Methicillin-resistant S. aureus; Sa PVL+- S. aureus presenting the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes; MR-CoNS- Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; Child 27*- Child with atopic dermatitis without a swab from non-lesional skin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276960.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank the children and the research team that participated in this study.

References

  1. 1. Weidinger S, Beck LA, Bieber T, Kabashima K, Irvine AD. Atopic dermatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Jun 21;4(1):1. pmid:29930242
  2. 2. Byrd AL, Deming C, Cassidy SKB, Harrison OJ, Ng WI, Conlan S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strain diversity underlying pediatric atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 5;9(397):eaal4651. pmid:28679656
  3. 3. Williams MR, Costa SK, Zaramela LS, Khalil S, Todd DA, Winter HL, et al. Quorum sensing between bacterial species on the skin protects against epidermal injury in atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2019 May 1;11(490):eaat8329. pmid:31043573
  4. 4. Cavalcante FS, Saintive S, Carvalho Ferreira D, Rocha Silva AB, Guimarães LC, Braga BS, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from infected skin lesions present several virulence genes and are associated with the CC30 in Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis. Virulence. 2021 Dec;12(1):260–269. pmid:33356835
  5. 5. Cavalcante FS, Abad ED, Lyra YC, Saintive SB, Ribeiro M, Ferreira DC, et al. High prevalence of methicillin resistance and PVL genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the nares and skin lesions of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Jul;48(7):588–94. pmid:25992644
  6. 6. Fleury OM, McAleer MA, Feuillie C, Formosa-Dague C, Sansevere E, Bennett DE, et al. Clumping factor B promotes adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to corneocytes in atopic dermatitis. Infect Immun. 2017 May 23;85(6):e00994–16. pmid:28373353
  7. 7. Meylan P, Lang C, Mermoud S, Johannsen A, Norrenberg S, Hohl D, et al. Skin colonization by Staphylococcus aureus precedes the clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in infancy. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Dec;137(12):2497–2504. pmid:28842320
  8. 8. Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Narala S, Chun KA, Two AM, Yun T, et al. Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2017 Feb 22;9(378):eaah4680. pmid:28228596
  9. 9. Cau L, Williams MR, Butcher AM, Nakatsuji T, Kavanaugh JS, Cheng JY, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis protease EcpA can be a deleterious component of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Mar;147(3):955–966.e16. pmid:32634452
  10. 10. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermatovener (Stockholm). 1980; Suppl. 92:44–47.
  11. 11. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology. 1993; 186:23e31. pmid:8435513
  12. 12. Martineau F, Picard FJ, Ke D, Paradis S, Roy PH, Ouellette M, et al. Development of a PCR assay for identification of staphylococci at genus and species levels. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jul;39(7):2541–7. pmid:11427566
  13. 13. Iorio NL, Azevedo MB, Frazão VH, Barcellos AG, Barros EM, Pereira EM, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis carrying biofilm formation genes: detection of clinical isolates by multiplex PCR. Int Microbiol. 2011 Mar;14(1):13–7. pmid:22015697
  14. 14. Schuenck RP, Pereira EM, Iorio NL, Dos Santos KR. Multiplex PCR assay to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr;52(3):431–5. pmid:18294192
  15. 15. Hirotaki S, Sasaki T, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hiramatsu K. Rapid and accurate identification of human-associated staphylococci by use of multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Oct;49(10):3627–31. pmid:21832022
  16. 16. Paiva-Santos W, Barros EM, Sousa VS, Laport MS, Giambiagi-deMarval M. Identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus saprophyticus by polymerase chain reaction based on the heat-shock repressor encoding hrcA gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;86(3):253–256. pmid:27601383
  17. 17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI document M100. 30th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.
  18. 18. Pitcher DG, Sauders NA, Owenm RJ. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1989;151–156.
  19. 19. Del Vecchio VG, Petroziello JM, Gress MJ, McCleskey FK, Melcher GP, Crouch HK, et al. Molecular genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via fluorophore-enhanced repetitive-sequence PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2141–4.
  20. 20. Lina G, Piémont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, Gauduchon V, et al. Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;29(5):1128–32. pmid:10524952
  21. 21. Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Sep;51(9):3374–7. Erratum in: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Dec;51(12):4537. pmid:17576837
  22. 22. Vivoni AM, Diep BA, de Gouveia Magalhães AC, Santos KR, Riley LW, Sensabaugh GF, et al. Clonal composition of Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Brazilian university hospital: identification of international circulating lineages. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 May;44(5):1686–91.
  23. 23. van Belkum A, Verkaik NJ, de Vogel CP, Boelens HA, Verveer J, Nouwen JL, et al. Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types. J Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 15;199(12):1820–6. pmid:19419332
  24. 24. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1008–15.
  25. 25. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Sep 24;3:124. pmid:30345391
  26. 26. Edslev SM, Olesen CM, Nørreslet LB, Ingham AC, Iversen S, Lilje B, et al. Staphylococcal communities on skin are associated with atopic dermatitis and disease severity. Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 19;9(2):432. pmid:33669791
  27. 27. Damour A, Robin B, Deroche L, Broutin L, Bellin N, Verdon J, et al. Phenol-soluble modulins α are major virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus secretome promoting inflammatory response in human epidermis. Virulence. 2021 Dec;12(1):2474–2492. pmid:34516337
  28. 28. Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Two AM, Chun KA, Narala S, Geha RS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus exploits epidermal barrier defects in atopic dermatitis to trigger cytokine expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Nov;136(11):2192–2200. pmid:27381887
  29. 29. Williams MR, Nakatsuji T, Sanford JA, Vrbanac AF, Gallo RL. Staphylococcus aureus induces increased serine protease activity in keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Feb;137(2):377–384. pmid:27765722
  30. 30. Blanchet-Réthoré S, Bourdès V, Mercenier A, Haddar CH, Verhoeven PO, Andres P. Effect of a lotion containing the heat-treated probiotic strain Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 on Staphylococcus aureus colonization in atopic dermatitis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017 Jul 3;10:249–257. pmid:28721083
  31. 31. Pascolini C, Sinagra J, Pecetta S, Bordignon V, De Santis A, Cilli L, et al. Molecular and immunological characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in pediatric atopic dermatitis: implications for prophylaxis and clinical management. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:718708. pmid:22110527
  32. 32. Cavalcante FS, Alvarenga CVDCG, Saintive S, Dios Abad E, Carvalho Ferreira D, Netto Dos Santos KR. Staphylococcus aureus nasal isolates may have the same genetic profile in atopic dermatitis paediatric patients and their close contacts. J Med Microbiol. 2020 Jun;69(6):850–853. pmid:32430095
  33. 33. Chia M, Naim ANM, Tay ASL, Lim K, Chew KL, Yow SJ, et al. Shared signatures and divergence in skin microbiomes of children with atopic dermatitis and their caregivers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar 19:S0091–6749(22)00345-1. pmid:35318044
  34. 34. Clausen ML, Edslev SM, Andersen PS, Clemmensen K, Krogfelt KA, Agner T. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in atopic eczema and its association with filaggrin gene mutations. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1394–1400. pmid:28317091
  35. 35. Harkins CP, Pettigrew KA, Oravcová K, Gardner J, Hearn RMR, Rice D, et al. The microevolution and epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus colonization during atopic eczema disease flare. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Feb;138(2):336–343. pmid:28951239
  36. 36. Masiuk H, Wcisłek A, Jursa-Kulesza J. Determination of nasal carriage and skin colonization, antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic relatedness of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with atopic dermatitis in Szczecin, Poland. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):701. pmid:34294061
  37. 37. Abad ED, Ferreira DC, Cavalcante FS, Saintive S, Goudouris E, Prado EA, et al. High incidence of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis and associated risk factors. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Oct;53(5):724–730. pmid:30956127
  38. 38. Silveira AC, Cunha GR, Caierão J, Cordova CM, d’Azevedo PA. MRSA from Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil: intriguing epidemiological differences compared to other Brazilian regions. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):384–9. pmid:26119853
  39. 39. Andrade-Figueiredo M, Leal-Balbino TC. Clonal diversity and epidemiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus: high prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with clinical isolates in Brazil. BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jun 21;16(1):115. pmid:27325108
  40. 40. Vieira MA, Minamisava R, Pessoa-Júnior V, Lamaro-Cardoso J, Ternes YM, Andre MC, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in neonates and children attending a pediatric outpatient clinics in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):42–7. pmid:24076111
  41. 41. Damasco AP, Costa TMD, Morgado PGM, Guimarães LC, Cavalcante FS, Nouér SA, et al. Daptomycin and vancomycin non-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineages from bloodstream infection in a Brazilian teaching hospital. Braz J Infect Dis. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):139–142. pmid:31028723
  42. 42. Neto EDA, Guerrero J, Snyder RE, Pereira RFA, de Fátima Nogueira de Freitas M, Silva-Santana G, et al. Genotypic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus colonizing children and adolescents in daycare centers, an outpatient clinic, and hospitals in a major Brazilian urban setting. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;97(3):115058. pmid:32380359
  43. 43. van Loo I, Huijsdens X, Tiemersma E, de Neeling A, van de Sande-Bruinsma N, Beaujean D, et al. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1834–9. pmid:18258032
  44. 44. Camoez M, Sierra JM, Pujol M, Hornero A, Martin R, Domínguez MA. Prevalence and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 resistant to tetracycline at a Spanish hospital over 12 years. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e72828. pmid:24039806
  45. 45. Kashif A, McClure JA, Lakhundi S, Pham M, Chen S, Conly JM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus ST398 virulence is associated with factors carried on prophage ϕSa3. Front Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;10:2219. pmid:31608039
  46. 46. Becker K, Ballhausen B, Kahl BC, Köck R. The clinical impact of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the clonal complex 398 for humans. Vet Microbiol. 2017 Feb;200:33–38. pmid:26644311
  47. 47. Yeung M, Balma-Mena A, Shear N, Simor A, Pope E, Walsh S, et al. Identification of major clonal complexes and toxin producing strains among Staphylococcus aureus associated with atopic dermatitis. Microbes Infect. 2011 Feb;13(2):189–97. pmid:21093604
  48. 48. Benito D, Aspiroz C, Gilaberte Y, Sanmartín R, Hernández-Martin Á, Alonso M, et al. Genetic lineages and antimicrobial resistance genotypes in Staphylococcus aureus from children with atopic dermatitis: detection of clonal complexes CC1, CC97 and CC398. J Chemother. 2016 Oct;28(5):359–66. pmid:26027683
  49. 49. Planet PJ, Narechania A, Chen L, Mathema B, Boundy S, Archer G, et al. Architecture of a species: phylogenomics of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2017 Feb;25(2):153–166. pmid:27751626
  50. 50. Kim DW, Park JY, Park KD, Kim TH, Lee WJ, Lee SJ, et al. Are there predominant strains and toxins of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis patients? Genotypic characterization and toxin determination of S. aureus isolated in adolescent and adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2009 Feb;36(2):75–81. pmid:19284449
  51. 51. de Oliveira TLR, Cavalcante FS, Chamon RC, Ferreira RBR, Dos Santos KRN. Genetic mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region are related to changes in the epidemiological profile of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Dec;19:236–240. pmid:31176072
  52. 52. Cardoso Guimarães L, Marques de Souza B, de Oliveira Whitaker C, Abreu F, Barreto Rocha Ferreira R, Dos Santos KRN. Increased biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates on surfaces covered with plasma proteins. J Med Microbiol. 2021 Aug;70(8). pmid:34338626
  53. 53. Shi B, Leung DYM, Taylor PA, Li H. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization is associated with decreased skin commensal bacteria in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Jul;138(7):1668–1671. pmid:29410379
  54. 54. Lo WT, Wang SR, Tseng MH, Huang CF, Chen SJ, Wang CC. Comparative molecular analysis of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from children with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects in Taiwan. Br J Dermatol. 2010 May;162(5):1110–6. pmid:20132206
  55. 55. Matiz C, Tom WL, Eichenfield LF, Pong A, Friedlander SF. Children with atopic dermatitis appear less likely to be infected with community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the San Diego experience. Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Jan-Feb;28(1):6–11. pmid:21070347
  56. 56. Jagadeesan S, Kurien G, Divakaran MV, Sadanandan SM, Sobhanakumari K, Sarin A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease severity in atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study from South India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2014 May-Jun;80(3):229–34. pmid:24823400
  57. 57. Petry V, Lipnharski C, Bessa GR, Silveira VB, Weber MB, Bonamigo RR, et al. Prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic resistance in patients with atopic dermatitis in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Int J Dermatol. 2014 Jun;53(6):731–5. pmid:24168078
  58. 58. Jung MY, Chung JY, Lee HY, Park J, Lee DY, Yang JM. Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis: current prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea and treatment strategies. Ann Dermatol. 2015 Aug;27(4):398–403. pmid:26273155
  59. 59. Bessa GR, Quinto VP, Machado DC, Lipnharski C, Weber MB, Bonamigo RR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus resistance to topical antimicrobials in atopic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;91(5):604–610. pmid:27828633
  60. 60. Neves FPG, Marlow MA, Rezende-Pereira G, Pinheiro MG, Dos Santos AFM, de Fátima Nogueira de Freitas M, et al. Differences in gram-positive bacterial colonization and antimicrobial resistance among children in a high income inequality setting. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 29;19(1):478. pmid:31142269
  61. 61. Soares J, Lopes C, Tavaria F, Delgado L, Pintado M. A diversity profile from the staphylococcal community on atopic dermatitis skin: a molecular approach. J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Dec;115(6):1411–9. pmid:23910049
  62. 62. Blicharz L, Usarek P, Młynarczyk G, Skowroński K, Rudnicka L, Samochocki Z. Nasal colonization by staphylococci and severity of atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):215–222. pmid:32209872
  63. 63. Tay ASL, Li C, Nandi T, Chng KR, Andiappan AK, Mettu VS, et al. Atopic dermatitis microbiomes stratify into ecologic dermotypes enabling microbial virulence and disease severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr;147(4):1329–1340. pmid:33039480
  64. 64. Khadka VD, Key FM, Romo-González C, Martínez-Gayosso A, Campos-Cabrera BL, Gerónimo-Gallegos A, et al. The skin microbiome of patients with atopic dermatitis normalizes gradually during treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 24;11:720674. pmid:34631601
  65. 65. Ndhlovu GON, Dube FS, Moonsamy RT, Mankahla A, Hlela C, Levin ME, et al. Skin and nasal colonization of coagulase-negative staphylococci are associated with atopic dermatitis among South African toddlers. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265326. pmid:35298533
  66. 66. Smith JT, Andam CP. Extensive horizontal gene transfer within and between species of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Sep 1;13(9):evab206. pmid:34498042
  67. 67. Salgueiro VC, Seixas MDL, Guimarães LC, Ferreira DC, Da Cunha DC, Nouér SA, et al. High rate of neonates colonized by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species in an Intensive Care Unit. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Sep 30;13(9):810–816. pmid:32074090