https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-2353
Figures
Abstract
Purpose
To explore the impact of gender mismatch on corneal allograft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
Methods
A retrospective cohort was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Patients with repeat PK and follow-up period of at least 6 months were recruited. Demographic data, pre-operative ocular findings and donor information were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to gender mismatch between donor and recipient (male to female vs others). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between risk factors and the outcomes of graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
Of 68 patients with repeat PK, 26 patients (38.2%) were gender mismatched. There was no difference in 3-year rejection-free survival and graft survival between patients with gender mismatch and others (p = 0.698 and p = 0.402, respectively). Younger recipients (< 40 years) showed a significantly higher rejection rate compared to older recipients (hazard ratio; HR = 3.14, 95% confidence interval; CI 1.15 to 8.58), while patients with multiple PK (> 2 times) were found to be significantly associated with higher rejection-related graft failure compared to patients with 2 times or less PK (HR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.21). After multivariate analysis, only younger recipients demonstrated a statistical significance on graft rejection (adjusted HR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.84).
Citation: Chuckpaiwong V, Jongkhajornpong P, Rajsirisongsri P, Sontichai V, Nijvipakul S, Lekhanont K (2022) Impact of gender mismatch on corneal graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in repeat penetrating keratoplasty. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0276043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276043
Editor: Timo Eppig, Saarland University, GERMANY
Received: November 4, 2021; Accepted: September 28, 2022; Published: October 31, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Chuckpaiwong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within a Supporting Information file.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Corneal transplantation is the most common and successful procedure among all tissue and organ transplantation [1]. The main mechanisms of immune privilege in normal cornea include the absence of blood and lymphatic vessels, low expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and the ability to induce anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID), which all contribute to the lower rate of tissue rejection compared to solid organ transplantation [2]. However, this protective system becomes compromised in eyes with history of previous corneal transplantation because of presensitization, immune memory, inflamed and vascular surroundings from previous surgeries [3]. Graft failure was reported as one of the leading indications of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in several countries, ranging from 17% - 27% [4–7]. This substantial proportion of eyes with repeat PK are inevitably prone to develop corneal allograft rejection, which potentially leads to irreversible graft failure. Data from The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCTS) showed that the rate of rejection-related graft failure significantly increased from 8%, with no previous grafts, to approximately 40% in eyes with repeat PK [8].
Several measures for donor and recipient matching to reduce the occurrence of graft rejection in high-risk eyes have been proposed [3]. Currently, the standard guideline of tissue matching for corneal transplantation has yet to be established. Since there is no expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alloantigen and very low expression of MHC class II molecules on corneal graft, minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs) may possibly play a dominant role than MHC on corneal allograft rejection [9,10]. A few studies in animals demonstrated that MHC class II molecule-specific CD4+ T cells played a major part in acute and subacute corneal graft rejection [11–13], however, a recent clinical trial in humans has failed to show the effect of HLA class II matching on corneal graft rejection [14]. H-Y antigens are a group of minor mHAs encoded on the Y chromosome and expressed on various cell types and tissues including cornea, therefore, they potentially serve as important immunogenic targets in gender-mismatched transplantation [15]. H-Y mismatched (male to female) organ transplantation transfers these immune targets from male donor to female recipient and consequently contributes to allograft rejection. A large study based on big data from National Health Service Blood and Transplant in UK demonstrated that H-Y mismatched corneas had greater risk of graft rejection or failure compared to matched corneas [16]. However, this finding was not consistently demonstrated in later studies from Italy and Korea [17,18]. Furthermore, the effect of gender mismatch in high-risk eyes, especially in eyes with repeat PK, has not been completely explored.
This study aimed to investigate the role of gender mismatch between corneal donors and recipients on corneal allograft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat PK. Our results can assist in the allocation of donor corneal grafts to recipient eyes with history of previous PK to reduce corneal graft rejection, increase corneal graft survival and improve overall clinical outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of patients with repeat PK was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ramathibodi Hospital (MURA2018/350). Consecutive patients who underwent repeat PK at our hospital from January 2010 to December 2017 and were followed up for at least 6 months were included. Patients’ characteristics including gender, age, both underlying systemic and ocular diseases, primary diagnosis, number of PK, ocular findings (peripheral anterior synechiae; PAS and deep stromal neovascularization; NV) were collected from electronic medical records. Donors’ information (i.e. endothelial cell density; ECD, time to preservation; TTP, and donor size) and source (domestic or US eye banks) were also obtained. The information of the first graft was also collected whenever available. Patients with incomplete information of both donors and recipients of repeat graft were excluded.
Experienced cornea surgeons performed PK using the same technique with 16 interrupted sutures. The standard postoperative regimen in our center included prednisolone acetate 1% every 2 hours and levofloxacin 4 times a day for 2–4 weeks, followed by prednisolone acetate 1% only, slowly tapered until 1 drop daily at 6 months after surgery. Immunosuppressive medication, apart from topical steroid, was individually prescribed according to patient health and socioeconomic status. Patients were admitted and followed-up daily until corneal epithelial defect was closed, generally within 10 days. Then, patients were evaluated at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months up to 1 year after surgery, and then examined every 3–6 months for patient lifetime. Corneal graft rejection was defined as new onset of anterior chamber inflammation and corneal edema with or without endothelial rejection line [19]. Corneal graft failure was defined as cloudy cornea with loss of central graft clarity for a minimum of 3 consecutive months [20].
Statistical analysis
Only one eye of each patient was analyzed and only the latest graft received by an individual patient during the study period was considered in the analysis. Mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and range; and counts with percentage were used to describe continuous and categorical data, respectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to gender mismatch (male donor to female recipient) and others (i.e., male donor to male recipient, female donor to male recipient, and female donor to female recipient). The associations between factors of interest (i.e., gender mismatch, recipient factors, and donor factors) and the presence of corneal graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Cox proportional hazards regression. Significant factors from univariate analysis with a p-value < 0.2 were included and selected into the final model using the backward selection method. The effects of gender mismatch of the first graft on rejection and rejection-related graft failure were also evaluated in 43 patients with available information. Survival rate and hazard ratio (HR) were estimated and presented with 95% confidence interval (CI). P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using STATA version 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Sixty-eight patients with repeat PK were included in the analysis. Half of the patients (35 patients, 51.5%) were female with the mean age of 63.7 (SD 15.2) years. Glaucoma was found in 46 patients (67.7%). Of these patients, most underwent PK twice (56 patients, 82.3%) and one patient underwent PK 6 times. Most corneal donors (51 patients, 75%) were from a domestic eye bank (Thai Red Cross Society) and the rest were imported from the US. Twenty-six patients (38.2%) were gender mismatched. Recipient and donor information between gender mismatch and others were compared and are presented in Table 1. No statistically significant factor was observed between both groups.
Of 68 patients with repeat PK, 29 (42.6%) patients developed corneal graft rejection and 21 (30.9%) patients consequently turned to graft failure. The median follow-up time in our study was 3 years (ranged 7 months to 9 years). The overall rejection free survival rates estimated at 1, 3 and 5 years were 85.2% (95% CI 74.2%, 91.7%), 64.3% (95% CI 50.7%, 75.0%), and 47.9% (95% CI 32.8%, 61.5%), respectively. The overall rejection-related graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.4% (95% CI 86.4%, 98.5%), 79.6% (95% CI 65.8%, 88.3%), and 52.3% (95% CI 34.7%, 67.3%), respectively.
Factors associated with graft rejection
Gender mismatch did not have a statistically significant association with graft rejection (p-value 0.698). Only young recipients (< 40 years) had a significantly increased risk of graft rejection. The Kaplan-Meier rejection-free survival estimated at 3 years was lower in young patients (17.9%; 95% CI 0.8%, 53.8%) compared to patients aged ≥ 40 years (69.7%; 95% CI 55.6%, 80.1%) as shown in Fig 1. Young recipients had a significantly increased risk for graft rejection with the HR of 3.14 (95% CI 1.15, 8.58). Other factors including glaucoma, PAS, corneal stromal NV, number of penetrating keratoplasty, donor source, ECD, time to preservation, donor size were not significantly associated with graft rejection in patients with repeat PK (Table 2).
After multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model, the effect of gender mismatch was still unchanged after adjusted with age group and number of PK. Young recipients remained the only significant factor associated with higher rate of graft rejection (adjusted HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.04, 7.84), see Table 2.
Factors associated with rejection-related graft failure
Gender mismatch had no statistically significant association with rejection-related graft failure (p-value 0.402). Only number of PK was significantly associated with higher risk of rejection-related graft failure (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.03, 7.21). The Kaplan-Meier graft survival estimated at 3 years was lower in patients with multiple PK (52.1%; 95% CI 19.8%, 76.9%) compared to patients who underwent PK twice (86.9%; 95% CI 72.8%, 94.0%) as shown in Fig 2. Young recipients showed a borderline significance for rejection-related graft failure in univariate analysis (HR 3.50, 95% CI 0.97, 12.63). Other factors were not significantly associated with rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat PK (Table 3). After multivariate analysis, no significant factor was found to be associated with rejection-related graft failure (Table 3).
Subgroup analysis of patients with available data of the first graft
There were 43 patients with available gender information of the first graft. Gender mismatch was found in 5 patients (11.6%). Of 43 patients, graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure developed in 20 patients (2 patients with gender mismatch) and 13 patients (1 patient with gender mismatch), respectively. Gender mismatch of the first graft was found to have no statistically significant association with graft rejection (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.26–4.93, p-value 0.865) and rejection-related graft failure (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.16–9.93, p-value 0.837) in patients with repeat PK.
Discussion
Results of the effect of gender mismatch on corneal allograft rejection remains controversial. Our study found that gender mismatch was not significantly associated with the risk of graft rejection in patients with repeat PK. Previous evidence from Bohringer et al. showed that HLA-A1-restricted Y-antigen on chromosome Y in male donors may have a role in inducing graft rejection when they are transplanted in female recipients [21]. However, the prevalence of HLA class I varies among different ethnicities, implying that the effect of gender mismatch might differ across nations. Kim et al. conducted a study in Korea and found that gender matching did not have any influence on graft rejection and failure in patients with primary PK [18]. On the other hand, a retrospective study based on big data from NHS Blood and Transplant in the UK found that gender mismatch was a significant risk factor for graft rejection or failure in patients with Fuch’s endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) who underwent all types corneal transplantation [16]. However, this significant effect was not consistently observed in other corneal diseases (e.g. keratoconus and infection) or specific type of corneal transplantation (i.e. PK and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty) [16]. Additionally, the authors did not take into account the different types of keratoplasty (i.e. PK, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; DMEK and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DALK) and repeat transplantation. Therefore, the effect of donor-recipient gender matching on high-risk patients with repeat PK could not be over-claimed. Similar to our results, the recent prospective multicenter cohort study in Italy, considering type of transplantation and previous failed graft, observed no significant differences between gender matched and unmatched patients for both incidence of graft rejection and failures [17]. These conflicting results might be explained by the difference of HLA-A1 allele frequencies among different countries (approximately 21% in England, 10–15% in Italy, 3% in Thailand, and 2% in Korea) [22].
We found a significant increase in graft rejection rate in young patients. Recipients aged below 40 years were approximately 3 times more likely to develop graft rejection after repeat PK compared to recipients aged 40 years or older. Our finding was similar to results from previous studies that demonstrated a higher risk of corneal graft rejection in young recipients [8,14,23–25]. This phenomenon has been observed in other solid organ transplantations and could be explained by a more intense immune system found during adolescence and in young adults compared to those with advanced age [26].
Regraft is considered as one risk factor for graft rejection and failure [27]. This might be caused from presensitization, immune memory, and inflamed and vascular surroundings occurred after previous PK [3]. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCTS) research group showed an increase risk of graft rejection in regraft, especially when 2 or more grafts failed [8]. We also found that patients with multiple PK (> 2 times) had 2.7 times higher risk for rejection-related graft failure compared to patients who underwent PK 2 times. We found that approximately 40% of our patients developed corneal graft rejection. This finding differed from a previous study which was conducted in repeat PK patients [28]. The authors showed that only 5.2% of patients in the series developed graft rejection after surgery and a higher frequency of regraft was not significantly associated with graft failure [28]. This discrepancy of the results could be caused from a difference in patient characteristics and immunosuppressives used during operative period. The previous study used an intensive systemic steroid during the operative period (125 mg of methylprednisolone at immediately before surgery and 4 mg of betamethasone for 2 days postoperatively followed by 1 mg of betamethasone for 5 days) to minimize allograft rejection [28]. Unfortunately, only 7 (10.1%) of the 69 patients in our study received systemic immunosuppressive drugs (5 patients with cyclosporine A and 2 patients with mycophenolate mofetil) postoperatively.
This study did have some limitations due to the nature of the retrospective study design. The effect of HLA matching or ABO compatibility between donor and recipient on graft rejection in patients with repeat PK could not be evaluated and adjusted in the analysis because corneal tissue matching was not included in the criteria for donor allocation of the national eye bank in our country. Our study has a small sample size due to the strict inclusion criteria of regraft. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only study focusing on the effect of gender mismatch in patients with repeat PK and demonstrated no significant association between gender mismatch and poor survival outcome of repeat PK. We also performed a subgroup analysis in patients with available data of the first graft and found no significant association between gender mismatch of the first graft and graft rejection or rejection-related graft failure in repeat grafts. Therefore, the effect of gender mismatch of the first graft is unlikely to be masked by other risks associated with repeat PK.
Conclusion
In summary, we did not observe the effect of gender mismatch on corneal graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat PK. Young recipients and multiple PK were significantly associated with higher risk of graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure, respectively. Our results support previous evidence [17,18] that found that gender matching might not be compulsory for PK including patients with history of graft failure. Further prospective studies with a larger sample size are required to establish the benefit of gender matching between donor and recipient for high-risk corneal transplantation including those patients with repeat PK.
References
- 1. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):167–73. pmid:26633035
- 2. Streilein JW. Ocular immune privilege: therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(11):879–89. pmid:14668804
- 3. Di Zazzo A, Kheirkhah A, Abud TB, Goyal S, Dana R. Management of high-risk corneal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(6):816–27. pmid:28012874
- 4. Dorrepaal SJ, Cao KY, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary referral centre in Canada, 1996–2004. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(2):244–50. pmid:17392847
- 5. Pluzsik MT, Seitz B, Flockerzi FA, Langenbucher A, Tóth G, Bohle RM, et al. Changing Trends in Penetrating Keratoplasty Indications between 2011 and 2018—Histopathology of 2123 Corneal Buttons in a Single Center in Germany. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(10):1199–204. pmid:32114836
- 6. Ghosheh FR, Cremona F, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, Cohen EJ, Raber IM, et al. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 2001–2005. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(4):211–4. pmid:18787428
- 7. Tan JC, Holland SP, Dubord PJ, Moloney G, McCarthy M, Yeung SN. Evolving indications for and trends in keratoplasty in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011: a 10-year review. Cornea. 2014;33(3):252–6. pmid:24457452
- 8. Maguire MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Fink NE, et al. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(9):1536–47. pmid:8090456
- 9. Streilein JW, Toews GB, Bergstresser PR. Corneal allografts fail to express Ia antigens. Nature. 1979;282(5736):326–7. pmid:388232
- 10. Whitsett CF, Stulting RD. The distribution of HLA antigens on human corneal tissue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25(5):519–24. pmid:6370904
- 11. He YG, Ross J, Niederkorn JY. Promotion of murine orthotopic corneal allograft survival by systemic administration of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(10):2723–8. pmid:1680112
- 12. Ayliffe W, Alam Y, Bell EB, McLeod D, Hutchinson IV. Prolongation of rat corneal graft survival by treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(10):602–6. pmid:1358194
- 13. Yamada J, Kurimoto I, Streilein JW. Role of CD4+ T cells in immunobiology of orthotopic corneal transplants in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(11):2614–21. pmid:10509657
- 14. Armitage WJ, Winton HL, Jones MNA, Crewe JM, Rogers CA, Tole DM, et al. Corneal transplant follow-up study II (CTFS II): a prospective clinical trial to determine the influence of HLA class II matching on corneal transplant rejection: baseline donor and recipient characteristics. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(1):132–6. pmid:29567793
- 15. Dierselhuis M, Goulmy E. The relevance of minor histocompatibility antigens in solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009;14(4):419–25. pmid:19444105
- 16. Hopkinson CL, Romano V, Kaye RA, Steger B, Stewart RM, Tsagkataki M, et al. The Influence of Donor and Recipient Gender Incompatibility on Corneal Transplant Rejection and Failure. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(1):210–7. pmid:27412098
- 17. Fasolo A, Gallon P, Frigo AC, Birattari F, Monterosso C, Rapizzi E, et al. Gender medicine in corneal transplantation: influence of sex mismatch on rejection episodes and graft survival in a prospective cohort of patients. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021;22(1):47–56. pmid:32935191
- 18. Kim MJ, Kim JH, Jeon HS, Wee WR, Hyon JY. Effect of Histocompatibility Y Antigen Matching on Graft Survival in Primary Penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37(1):33–8. pmid:29211700
- 19. Kharod-Dholakia B, Randleman JB, Bromley JG, Stulting RD. Prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection: current practice patterns of the Cornea Society (2011). Cornea. 2015;34(6):609–14. pmid:25811719
- 20. The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(10):1392–403.
- 21. Böhringer D, Spierings E, Enczmann J, Böhringer S, Sundmacher R, Goulmy E, et al. Matching of the minor histocompatibility antigen HLA-A1/H-Y may improve prognosis in corneal transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82(8):1037–41. pmid:17060851
- 22.
New allele frequency database: http://www.allelefrequencies.net" [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2 October 2021].
- 23. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA, Armitate WJ. Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(1):41–9. pmid:8628559
- 24. Stulting RD, Lass JH, Terry MA, Benetz BA, Cohen NJ, Ayala AR, et al. Factors Associated With Graft Rejection in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;196:197–207. pmid:30308200
- 25. Wajnsztajn D, Hopkinson CL, Larkin DFP. Keratoplasty for Keratoconus in Young Patients: Demographics, Clinical Features, and Post-transplant Outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:68–75. pmid:33577788
- 26. Simon AK, Hollander GA, McMichael A. Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282(1821):20143085. pmid:26702035
- 27. Yang YF HY, Wang LQ, Yin DF, Zhang K. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in penetrating keratoplasty. 2008;(3):253–6.
- 28. Kitazawa K, Wakimasu K, Kayukawa K, Yokota I, Inatomi T, Hieda O, et al. Moderately Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeat Penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37(10):1255–9. pmid:30052560