Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Inducible degradation of the Drosophila Mediator subunit Med19 reveals its role in regulating developmental but not constitutively-expressed genes

Abstract

The multi-subunit Mediator complex plays a critical role in gene expression by bridging enhancer-bound transcription factors and the RNA polymerase II machinery. Although experimental case studies suggest differential roles of Mediator subunits, a comprehensive view of the specific set of genes regulated by individual subunits in a developing tissue is still missing. Here we address this fundamental question by focusing on the Med19 subunit and using the Drosophila wing imaginal disc as a developmental model. By coupling auxin-inducible degradation of endogenous Med19 in vivo with RNA-seq, we got access to the early consequences of Med19 elimination on gene expression. Differential gene expression analysis reveals that Med19 is not globally required for mRNA transcription but specifically regulates positively or negatively less than a quarter of the expressed genes. By crossing our transcriptomic data with those of Drosophila gene expression profile database, we found that Med19-dependent genes are highly enriched with spatially-regulated genes while the expression of most constitutively expressed genes is not affected upon Med19 loss. Whereas globally downregulation does not exceed upregulation, we identified a functional class of genes encoding spatially-regulated transcription factors, and more generally developmental regulators, responding unidirectionally to Med19 loss with an expression collapse. Moreover, we show in vivo that the Notch-responsive wingless and the E(spl)-C genes require Med19 for their expression. Combined with experimental evidences suggesting that Med19 could function as a direct transcriptional effector of Notch signaling, our data support a model in which Med19 plays a critical role in the transcriptional activation of developmental genes in response to cell signaling pathways.

Citation: Jullien D, Guillou E, Bernat-Fabre S, Payet A, Bourbon H-MG, Boube M (2022) Inducible degradation of the Drosophila Mediator subunit Med19 reveals its role in regulating developmental but not constitutively-expressed genes. PLoS ONE 17(11): e0275613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613

Editor: Edward Giniger, National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES

Received: June 28, 2022; Accepted: September 20, 2022; Published: November 29, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Jullien et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC PJA 20141201932- to MB ), the Agence Nationale de Recherche (ANR-16 CE12-0021-01 to MB and HMB), and institutional basic support from the Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Toulouse III University. AP obtained a PhD fellowship from the French « Ligue Nationale contre le cancer. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Introduction

Mediator is an eukaryotic multisubunit complex [1,2] that plays multiple functions in the regulation of RNA Polymerase II (RNA PolII) [3,4]. In metazoans, it comprises 30 different subunits together acting as functional bridge between enhancer-bound transcription factors (TFs) and the RNA PolII machinery associated with core promoter elements [5]. A current challenge in understanding the Mediator functions is to unravel the role of its individual subunits. Indeed, although the complex has been shown to behave globally as an essential RNA PolII cofactor [6–8], several Mediator subunits have been shown to carry out specific functions as revealed by genetic data [9]. This notion is exemplified by a differential requirement for cell viability as observed in genetic studies made in Drosophila [10,11], as well as in mammalian cells [6]. Yet the precise nature of the genes regulated by each Mediator subunit remains poorly characterized, particularly in the context of the development where fine tuning of gene expression is critical and during which genetic studies show that most of the Mediator subunits play an essential role. This lack of data is partly due to the fact that assessing the direct consequences on gene expression of depleting a given Mediator subunit in a developing tissue is hampered first by the difficulty to obtain such tissue due to deleterious effects of losing the function of a Mediator component, and second by the problem of secondary transcriptional cascade effects produced by extended loss of function periods. Recent studies have shown the great interest of conditional protein degradation systems [12], where induction of fast degradation of a Mediator subunit allows to access the primary consequences on gene expression [6–8,13].

Here we addressed the fundamental question of the early consequences of losing the function of a Mediator component on gene expression using the Drosophila larval wing imaginal disc as a developmental model. We focused on Med19, a key Mediator subunit previously shown to interact with several TFs (GATA, HOX and REST) [14–16] and the RNA PolII but whose transcriptional landscape it regulates still remains to be characterized. We introduced the sequence encoding the Auxin Induced Degron (AID) [17] into the Drosophila Med19 gene generating an allele encoding a degradable version of the protein that achieved inducible, fast, and full depletion in the animal. By combining this unique tool with RNA sequencing of the transcripts of the wing imaginal disc, we observed that less than 25% of the genes expressed in the wing disc were deregulated early on after Med19 depletion. Strikingly, among the genes whose expression was not affected were most of the constitutively expressed genes. Conversely, we found that the genes deregulated following Med19 degradation were highly enriched in those exhibiting specific spatio-temporal expression patterns. Moreover, the finding that the transcription of nearly all spatially-regulated transcription factors, and notably key Notch responsive genes, requires Med19 function points to the idea that Med19 plays a specialized role in promoting the expression of developmental regulators.

Materials and methods

DNA constructs cloning

The DNA sequence of the guide RNA–CTTATGTCGCAGTTTTAGGC–obtained by annealing two complementary DNA oligonucleotides: M19gRNA Fw and M19gRNA Rv, was cloned to the BbsI site of the pCFD3 vector [18], according to the protocol provided by CRISPRfly design (http://www.crisprflydesign.org), resulting in the pCFD3 M19gRNA plasmid. The donor construct (Fig 1B), carried in a pUC19 backbone, was generated by the assembly of 5 DNA fragments using the NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly cloning kit (New England Biolabs). These DNA fragments, namely pUC19, the 5’ homology arm, AID, GFP, and the 3’ homology arm were produced by PCR (Phusion DNA polymerase, New England Biolabs). The 5’ and 3’ homology arm DNA fragments were amplified from genomic DNA prepared from vasa-Cas9 flies. The source of the AID degron DNA sequence was the pAID-AsiSI plasmid provided by the G. Legube lab (CBI, Toulouse, France). The sequence of the primers used for constructs cloning are available in S1 Table.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. K-in of the Auxin Induced Degron (AID) for fast and deep depletion of Med19 in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc.

(A) Principle of auxin-dependent degradation of Med19AID in Drosophila. The Med19 endogenous gene located on the third chromosome has been engineered using CRISPR-Cas9 system in order to generate Med19 fusion protein with AID and GFP tags. The expression of the auxin-dependent and AID-specific F-box protein TIR1 is controlled by the UAS/Gal4 system. The Gal4 driver is located in the second chromosome, and the UAS-TIR1 construct in the third chromosome. The F-box TIR1 incorporates the endogenous SCF (Skip1 Cul1 F-box) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Auxin (added to the fly food) triggers poly-ubiquitination of Med19AID by the SCF-TIR1 targeting the Mediator subunit to degradation by the proteasome. (B) PCR genotyping for the insertion of the AID-GFP coding sequence in the Med19 locus using the primers couple indicated in (A) with genomic DNA extracted from WT control (Med19+ left lane), Med19+/Med19AID heterozygous (middle lane), or Med19AID homozygous (right lane) adult flies. WT and Med19AID alleles theoretically produce a 270 and 1200 pb PCR product, respectively. (C) Ubiquitous Auxin-dependent degradation of Med19AID in the wing imaginal disc. Images showing DAPI and GFP (detection of Med19AID) signals from ub>TIR1; Med19AID wing discs dissected from larvae not exposed to auxin (no aux.), or fed with auxin for 1 hour (1H), or 4 hours (4H). (D) GFP signal quantification (Arbitrary Unit), as measurement of Med19AID depletion, in ub>TIR1; Med19AID wing imaginal discs (images shown in (C)) obtained from larvae not exposed to auxin (no Aux., n = 9), or fed with auxin during 1 hour (1H, n = 11), or 4 hours (4H, n = 12). (E) Auxin dependent degradation results in loss of both C-terminal GFP and N-terminal Med19 moieties of Med19AID. Images showing en>TIR1 Med19AID wing discs, in which auxin-induced degradation in the posterior compartment was performed for 4 hours, co-immunostained using anti-GFP and Med19 antibodies. (F) Auxin dependent degradation of Med19AID does not affect Med12 expression. Wing discs from en>TIR1 Med19AID larvae not exposed to auxin (no auxin- upper panel.), or fed with auxin (auxin -bottom panels). Co-immunostaining as in (E) except antibodies against Med12 were used.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g001

CRISPR/Cas9 mediated Knock-in of AID-GFP to the Med19 locus

Four hundred Vasa-Cas9 (BDSC #51323) embryos were injected with a mixture of the donor plasmid and the pCFD3 M19gRNA. The resulting mosaic adults were crossed with double balanced TM3/TM6B flies. The F1 progeny was individually crossed to TM3/TM6B flies before being PCR-genotyped for the insertion of the AID-GFP cassette using the M19genotFw and M19genotRv primer couple (S1 Table). The progeny of a fly that came out positive from the genotyping were crossed together to produce a homozygous stock for the degradable Med19-AID-GFP allele (referred as to Med19AID).

Drosophila stocks and crosses

Flies were raised at 25°C on standard yeast agar wheatmeal medium. Vasa-Cas9, UAS-TIR1 (#76123), the following Gal4 drivers (annotated with “>”) located on the 2nd chromosome: ubiquitin (#32551), engrailed (#30564), apterous (#3041) were obtained from Bloomington BDSC. To associate the Med19AID allele with the expression of the F-box protein TIR1 under the control of a Gal4 driver, Med19AID and UAS-TIR1 were recombined. The recombined 3rd chromosome was then genetically associated with a 2nd chromosome bearing either ubiquitin (ub>), engrailed (en>) or apterous (ap>) Gal4 driver. The lines thus generated ub>/CyO; Med19AID UAS-TIR1, en>; Med19AID UAS-TIR1, ap>/CyO; Med19AID UAS-TIR1 were used to degrade Med19AID in all the cells, the posterior compartment, the dorsal domain of the wing disc, respectively.

To trigger Med19AID degradation, see detailed protocol at https://protocols.io/view/auxin-induced-aid-protein-degradation-in-drosophil-cge4ttgw. In brief, L3 larvae were transferred to a 30 mm dish filled with 10 ml of a solid medium containing 0.8% bacteriological agar, 4% sucrose, and 2.5 mM of the auxin analog NAA (1-Naphtaleneacetic acid, Sigma N0640). The dish was then sealed with a piece of parafilm. To ensure gas exchange, small holes were made to the seal with a needle, and the dish was incubated at 25°C for required amount of time.

RNA-seq differential gene expression analysis

80 wing discs were hand-dissected from female ub>Med19AID L3 larvae either fed with food containing NAA for a duration of 4 hours (UbAux), or kept in the same food devoid of NAA (Ub). RNA extraction was performed using TRIzol reagent (Thermofisher). The process was repeated as biological triplicate. Poly-A+ RNA was purified and paired end sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina). The bioinformatic analysis was performed using locally installed Galaxy instance (http://sigenae-workbench.toulouse.inra.fr). The quality control of sequences was done with FastQC (v0.11.4), then reads were aligned using TopHat2 (v2.0) on the Drosophila melanogaster dm6 genome assembly. Paired reads were counted by gene using htseq (v1.0). These counts were used to perform differential gene expression analyses using DESeq2 (1.26.0) in R comparing UbAux with Ub. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (biological process) of the genes exhibiting an expression Log2FC <-1 or >1 was performed using ShinyGO [19] http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/.

Gene expression profile analyses

Expression scores in 58 different Drosophila tissues and developmental stages (detailed S2 Table) of each genes found significantly expressed in the wing imaginal disc were extracted from the modENCODE Drosophila RNA expression profiling project using DGET tool [20] https://www.flyrnai.org/tools/dget/web/. The HK* and SR* gene lists (S4 Table) analyzed in the Fig 3C–3F were generated as followed. To select for constitutively expressed genes–the HK* genes–using the expression scores matrix, those containing any of 0, 1, 2, 3 score (null or very low expression) in their expression profile were excluded. For SR* genes, the selection criteria were 0 score occurrence ≥ 7 and sum of occurrence of 0, 1, and 2 scores ≤ 52. Heat maps, box plots, violin plots, and statistical analysis were made using Prism9 (Graphpad). The maximal expression value in the color range of the heat maps was set to 10 for a better visualization of the difference of expression profile.

RNA quantification by RT-qPCR

RNA, trizol extracted from wing discs of L3 larvae, were reverse transcribed using SuperScriptTM II Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cDNA were quantified by real-Time qPCR (CFX Bio-Rad) with specific oligonucleotides (S1 Table). Absolute quantification of each mRNA was normalized to the mean expression of Actin 42A mRNA in the same sample. mRNA measured in tissue from female ub> Med19AID L3 larvae fed without NAA (ub), was set at 100% to compare with the ones fed 4h with NAA (ub+auxin).

Immunostainings

L3 wing imaginal discs attached to inverted larvae were fixed in PBS 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes, and permeabilized by incubation in PBS 0.1% Triton X100 for 30 minutes. Primary antibodies diluted in PBS 1% BSA were applied overnight at 4°C. Incubation with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies was carried out at 22°C for 2 hours, and DNA was stained with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) while washing the secondaries. Wing discs were then manually dissociated from carcasses, and mounted in Vectashield mounting medium. The following antibodies were used: guinea pig anti-Med19 1:1000 [14], mouse anti-wingless 1:100 (4D4; DSHB), mouse anti-achaete (1:100, DSHB), rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000). Images were acquired using Zeiss LSM710 (20X PL APO ON 0,8; 40x PL APO oil DIC ON 1,3), or Leica SP8 (20x multi immersion PL APO ON 0,75; 40x HC PL APO oil ON 1,30) confocal microscopes and were analyzed and quantified using Fiji/ImageJ.

smiFISH

For RNA FISH, smiFISH [21] was performed according to the Drosophila wing discs protocol available from https://www.biosearchtech.com/support/resources/stellaris-protocols with the following modifications. Dissection and fixation were carried out as for the immunostaining except that the fixation time was 26 minutes, after what fixed material was washed 3 times in PBS to remove the paraformaldehyde, and then kept in 70% ethanol at 4°C for up to one week. DNA oligonucleotide primary probes targeting introns for wingless and achaete, the coding sequence for–intronless genes–E(spl)m3 and E(spl)mbeta were designed using the online Stellaris probe designer tool (https://www.biosearchtech.com/stellaris-designer). Primary probes were labeled using a Cy3 conjugated FlapX DNA oligonucleotide. All the DNA oligonucleotides used in smiFISH were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies.

In vitro protein binding assays

GST (produced from empty pGex4T) and GST::Med19 proteins were expressed in BL21 AI E. coli (37°C, 1 H, with 500μM IPTG in LB media), from which soluble forms were purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare). Recombinant C-terminally HA tagged Su(H) was produced using in vitro coupled transcription/translation (TNT with rabbit reticulocyte extracts; Promega Inc.) from DNA matrices generated by PCR using Su(H)-HA forward and reverse primers combined with the Su(H) cDNA (obtained from the Drosophila Genomic Resource Center (DGRC) Gold Collection) as template. GST pulldown was performed as previously described [22]. The following antibodies were used for western blotting: mouse anti-HA (1:1,000; Covance). Secondary HRP conjugated antibodies were Goat anti mouse-HRP (1:10000).

Results

Inducible degradation of the Mediator subunit Med19 in Drosophila larvae

In order to achieve an inducible and fast depletion of Med19 in vivo in Drosophila wing imaginal disc upstream of RNA-seq transcriptional profiling, we turned to the Auxin Induced Degron (AID) [17] conditional protein degradation system that has been shown to be particularly well suited to this model organism (Fig 1A) [23–25]. We inserted the coding sequence of the AID fused to GFP into the endogenous Med19 locus, using CRISPR-cas9 genome editing (S1 Fig), C-terminally tagging Med19. Proper insertion of the AID-GFP cassette was validated by PCR genotyping (Fig 1B). Importantly, flies homozygous for this degradable and fluorescent Med19 allele, hereafter referred to as Med19AID, were viable, fertile and did not exhibit any visible phenotype, indicating that the addition of the AID-GFP moiety does not affect Med19 function. We next generated a genetic setup in which UAS/Gal4-based expression of the AID cofactor TIR1 controls ubiquitous or regionalized degradation of Med19AID depending on the type of Gal4 driver used (Fig 1A). This degradation is monitored through direct GFP fluorescence (Fig 1C–1F) and/or via immunodetection experiments with anti Med19 antibody (Fig 1E). Central to the feasibility of our study was the possibility to carry out efficient auxin-dependent depletion of Med19AID in all the cells of the wing imaginal disc. We found this could be achieved using the ubiquitin driver (ub>), as feeding ub>TIR1 Med19AID larvae with auxin (Fig 2A) resulted in fast degradation of MED19AID, with less than 10% remnant GFP levels after one hour, and almost complete disappearance in nearly all the nuclei of the wing disc after four hours (Fig 1C and 1D). Similar auxin-induced degradation speed and depth was observed with the en>TIR1 Med19AID setup in which engrailedGal4 drives depletion in the posterior compartment of the wing disc (see GFP signal in S2 Fig). Using this regionalized degradation, we confirmed that the Med19 moiety of the MED19AID fusion protein was actually degraded along with the C-terminal GFP by immunostaining using antibodies against Med19 (Fig 1E). Note that Med19 expression is also slightly diminished in the en>TIR1 Med19AID “no auxin” control (Fig 1F upper middle panel) due to low basal degradation shown to be induced by strong T1R1 expression [26]. We observed that the level of Med12, another Mediator subunit, was not affected upon MED19AID degradation (Fig 1F right panels) providing additional evidence for the specificity of the depletion. These data therefore demonstrate that we developed an AID-based Med19 degradation system performing fast and efficient depletion of this Mediator subunit in vivo, thereby opening the possibility of investigating the early consequence of Med19 loss in gene expression in the developing wing disc.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Med19AID removal results in the deregulation a limited part of the wing imaginal disc transcriptome.

(A) Scheme depicting the experimental setup used to produce wing imaginal discs from ub>TIR1 Med19AID larvae in which Med19AID degradation has been triggered, or not (no Auxin control- see GFP signal), upstream of the RNA-seq analysis. (B) Differential gene expression analysis volcano plot showing the expression fold change after Med19AID degradation and associated adjusted p-values. 8753 genes found expressed in the wing imaginal disc are depicted. Genes with significative fold change (adjusted p-value <0,05) are shown in blue for the down-regulated (log2FC <-0,5) and in red for the up-regulated (log2FC >0,5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g002

Med19 removal results in the deregulation of only a subset of the genes expressed in the wing imaginal disc

Having setup an unprecedented tool to trigger Med19 depletion in the wing imaginal disc, we next proceeded to the analysis of the early consequences of losing Med19 function on the transcriptome. We prepared RNA samples from wing discs dissected from ub>TIR1 Med19AID larvae that were fed for four hours with a medium containing or not auxin (Fig 2A), proceeded to their sequencing, and analyzed the data for differential gene expression (DGE). Globally, we found that the expression of most Drosophila genes (78%) was unaffected upon Med19AID degradation. Among the 1863 genes showing significant changes in expression (adjusted p-value <0.05), we found a similar proportion of genes downregulated or upregulated (Fig 2B). Although the Mediator complex is commonly seen as indispensable for RNA PolII-dependent transcription, these data suggested that the Drosophila Med19 subunit is instead specifically required for the proper activation or repression of a limited number of genes. Consistent with this observation, we previously showed that the loss of Med19 is not strictly required for cell viability [14] implicating that expression of the housekeeping genes does not depend on Med19. Indeed, we found upon a preliminary survey of the DGE data that the expression of several families of canonical housekeeping (HK) genes (e.g., encoding ribosomal proteins, Mediator subunits, general transcription factors (GTFs) or RNA PolII subunits, list in S3 Table) was largely unchanged after Med19AID removal (S3 Fig). These results raised the idea that Med19 could be more generally dispensable for the expression of constitutively expressed genes and prompted us to examine whether constitutive or highly regulated expression mode determine the sensitivity of the transcription of a gene to Med19 removal.

Med19 depletion affects the expression of spatially restricted but not constitutively expressed genes

We looked for a link between the expression change upon Med19AID loss and the expression mode (constitutive versus highly regulated). We extracted from the modENCODE Drosophila gene expression database the expression profiles of each gene we found expressed in the wing imaginal disc, compiling expression scores in 58 different developmental stages and tissues (Fig 3A left panel and S2 Table for details) [27]. We next used the resulting expression scores matrix to generate heat maps in which the expression profile of each gene (columns in the heat maps shown in Fig 3) was sorted as a function of the value of the expression fold change (horizontal axis Fig 3A). Strikingly, comparing the expression profile heat maps of the genes whose expression is the most affected (Log2FC>1 and <-1) with that of those the less impacted (-0.03<Log2FC<0.03) revealed that while the expression patterns of the up- and down-regulated Med19 target genes are similar, those of the unaffected genes are clearly different from the two others. Specifically, in down- and up-regulated genes, null expression occurrence (dark blue color code) appeared frequently (Fig 3A left and right heat maps), whereas it was clearly much sparse in genes whose expression showed little variation (Fig 3A Log2FC around 0, middle panel). We statistically validated this bias by counting the number of null expression score occurrences in the expression profile of each gene affected (|Log2FC|>1) and unaffected (-0.1<Log2FC<0.1) in Med19AID loss. This analysis revealed a significant difference between the count means (P<0.0001), the number of null expression count in non-deregulated genes being much lower than in those deregulated (Fig 3B). By definition genes spatially and temporally regulated–further called spatially restricted genes (SR)—contain in their developmental and tissue expression profile null expression occurrences when conversely absence of null expression is a hallmark of ubiquitously expressed HK genes. Therefore, these results indicated that SR genes were enriched among those affected by Med19 depletion.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Spatially and temporally regulated genes are more prone to expression change than constitutively expressed genes upon Med19AID depletion.

(A) Heat map depicting the spatio temporal expression profiles (modENCODE) of genes belonging to three different ranges of expression fold change (L2FC specified above the horizontal axis) in our transcriptomic analysis. Each column contains the color-coded expression score (modENCODE) of a gene in 58 different tissues and developmental stages (left panel and S2 Table for details) extracted from the modENCODE Drosophila gene expression database the expression profiles of each gene we found expressed in the wing imaginal disc, compiling expression scores in 58 different developmental stages and tissues. (B) Box plot analyzing the count of the number of null expression (0 and 1 expression score occurrences) among the 58 expression values for the genes belonging to |L2FC|>1 (n = 1185) or -0.1<L2FC<0.1 (n = 1704) range. Median significantly different P<0.0001 two-tailed non-parametric Mann Whitney test. (C) Gene expression profile heat maps as in (A) comparing the expression profiles of published sets of housekeeping genes (HK, n = 767) and spatially regulated genes (SR, n = 724); lists in S4 Table. (D) Heat maps as in (C) showing the expression profiles of the HK* and SR* sets of genes obtained by selecting HK and SR-like expression profiles from the modENCODE expression scores matrix (see materials and methods, lists in S4 Table). (E) Box plot comparing the Log2FC absolute values of the sets of genes specified on the x axis, and whose expression profile is shown above. ****: Median significantly different P<0.0001 two-tailed non-parametric Mann Whitney test. The red dashed line marks |Log2FC| = 0.5. (F) Violin plot showing the distribution of the expression Log2FC values of the sets of genes mentioned on the vertical axis (analyzed in the Fig 2E). The percentage of genes in the -0.5<Log2FC<0.5 range, delimited by the two red dashed vertical lines, is indicated below the violin plot.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g003

To further explore this notion, we performed the reverse approach by examining the expression fold change values upon Med19 depletion in lists of HK and SR genes obtained either from published studies or that we established from the expression profile matrix of the genes transcribed in the wing imaginal disc. The published sets of genes (S4 Table) consist of 767 HK genes identified in a large-scale in situ hybridization project as ubiquitously expressed throughout Drosophila embryogenesis [28,29], and a list of 724 SR genes derived from a single-cell RNA-seq study made in the wing imaginal disc [30]. In addition, we sought to expand our analysis to other sets of HK and SR genes obtained by an independent approach. By applying simple selection criteria to the modENCODE gene expression matrix, based on the presence or absence of null expression score (selection details in the Material and Methods), we generated large sets of genes (total of 3538 genes) exhibiting either HK- or SR-like expression profile (Fig 3, Heat maps in C to be compared with D) hereafter referred to as HK* and SR* (S4 Table). Of note, almost half of the HK and SR genes were contained in the larger HK* and SR* gene lists, respectively (S4 Fig), validating the mode of selection of the latter. Comparing the values of the expression fold change upon Med19AID depletion between HK and SR as well as between HK* and SR* genes revealed that this indicator was significantly higher in spatially restricted genes than in the housekeeping genes in both selection modes (Fig 3E). In addition, examination of the distribution of the Log2FC values showed that 88% of the HK genes and 91% of the HK* genes fell in the FC range (-0.5<Log2FC<0.5) where gene expression is considered not to be affected by Med19AID depletion while this proportion dropped to 38% and 36% with the SR and the SR* genes, respectively (Fig 3F). Therefore, the analysis of a significant part of the HK and SR genes expressed in the wing imaginal disc (1884 and 1822 genes, respectively) indicates that most of the HK genes are not affected by Med19 depletion, whereas the expression of an important proportion of the SR genes, but not all of them, depends on Med19 activity. In conclusion, the fact that Med19 loss of function disrupt or not the expression of a gene seems to depend on its mode of expression. Yet this simple binary model is likely an oversimplification of the reality given that about a third of the SR genes appears insensitive to Med19 degradation.

After investigating the relationship between the mode of expression and the deregulation of the expression, we next focused on the function of the genes affected by Med19 loss of function.

Med19 promotes the expression of developmental regulators

Transcription factors (TFs) whose expression is highly regulated spatio-temporally are functionally associated with development, and are commonly considered as developmental regulators. We analyzed the distribution of the value of the expression FC of the TF-encoding genes expressed in the wing imaginal disc (Fig 4A), and focused on those with a documented evidence [30] for a spatially-restricted (SR) expression pattern (Fig 4A, purple colored) in the wing disc (SR TFs). Unexpectedly, we found a strong bias to the downregulation regarding their distribution (Fig 4A). More precisely, plotting the proportion of SR TFs in each category of expression change (Fig 4B) shows that 85% of the SR TFs are deregulated upon Med19AID degradation, in line with our previous conclusion concerning the SR genes. However, contrary to the general behavior in which an equal distribution between down and up regulation is seen (Fig 2B), the vast majority (91%) of the SR TFs deregulated upon Med19AID loss fall in the group of the downregulated. We experimentally validated this finding by measuring using RT-qPCR the transcripts level of three developmental TFs (encoding by cut, salm and E(spl)m8) in ub>TIR1 Med19AID-GFP larvae fed with auxin (Fig 4C) and imaging the expression of the TF-encoding achaete (ac) gene following wing disc immunostaining of ap>TIR1 Med19AID-GFP larvae (S5A Fig). In agreement with our conclusions, we observed that the expression of these four developmental TFs in the wing imaginal disc relies on Med19 activity (Figs 4C and S5A), whereas the transcripts level of two HK genes (eEF1, and myosin) do not significantly change after Med19AID depletion Fig 4C). We next sought to expand our analysis to a developmental gene whose product is not a TF: wingless (wg) encoding the ligand of the Wnt signaling, known to be a key regulator of wing development. RT-qPCR from ub> Med19AID wing disc and immunostaining from en> Med19AID wing discs both indicated a reduction in wg expression upon Med19AID removal (Figs 4C and S5B). To examine whether the effect of Med19AID depletion on wg expression is transcriptional, the short lived unspliced wg pre-mRNAs were visualized by RNA FISH using intronic probes. Using this approach, we observed that the level of wg pre-messengers was markedly reduced specifically in the wing disc posterior territory where Med19AID depletion occurred (Fig 4D), indicating that Med19 is required for wg transcription. Moreover, the fact that wg expression is already affected one hour after Med19AID degradation initiation (Fig 4D) suggests a direct coupling between Med19 function and wg transcription. Therefore, our results revealed the existence of sets of SR genes, functionally related to the development, for which, strikingly, Med19 acts exclusively as a positive transcriptional factor. To further explore this idea with a more global approach, we analyzed the Gene Ontology enrichments of the genes down-regulated after Med19AID loss. Among the 30 top biological processes identified, excluding GO involved in transcription or cell cycle regulation all the remaining items were directly associated with the development (Fig 4E) confirming the strong downregulation bias in the expression of developmental genes initially observed with the analysis of the SR TFs.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Med19 promotes the expression of the spatially regulated developmental genes.

(A) Scatter plot depicting the distribution of the Log2FC values of the 573 transcription factors found significantly expressed in the wing imaginal disc from the RNAseq data. The transcription factors with a demonstrated spatial transcriptional regulation (SR TFs) in the wing imaginal disc are shown in purple (n = 122). (B) Dot plot 10x10 showing the proportion of the non-regulated (dark grey), upregulated (red), or downregulated (blue) genes among the 122 SR transcription factors. (C) Bar graph made from RT-qPCR data showing the relative level of transcripts of 6 genes known to be spatially regulated (wg, cut, E(Spl)m8, sal or ubiquitous (Myosin, E2F1) in the wing discs of ub>; Med19AID-GFP larvae after Med19AID depletion was carried out for 4 hours in all the disc cells (percentage of the control in which Med19AID degradation was not triggered). The graph shows the mean and standard deviation of 3 independent experiments. (D) Confocal images of the wing pouch region of dissected en>; Med19AID wing discs that were subjected to Med19AID degradation (en> 3H Aux), or not (control: No Gal4 driver, and en> no Aux), and in which wingless (wg) pre-mRNA were visualized by smiFISH using intronic probes and Med19 degradation by direct GFP fluorescence. top images:Med19AID GFP signal. bottom images: wg smiFISH signal. (E) Wing disc D/V boundary posterior to anterior wg smiFISH signal ratio established in en>; Med19AID wing discs: No auxin control (no Aux. n = 5), 1H auxin (n = 6), and 3H auxin (n = 6). ****: P value <0.0001 (Unpaired t test). (F) Hierarchical clustering tree of the 30 best FDR of the GO terms associated with the downregulated genes. The size of the solid circles is proportional to the enrichment False Discovery Rate (FDR). GO clusters appear related to development (purple), nucleic acid synthesis (blue), and cell cycle regulation (yellow).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g004

Regulated expression of Notch responsive E(spl)-C genes requires Med19 activity

The spatio-temporal control of the developmental gene expression is achieved through the action of multiple signaling pathways, among which Notch. Wg expression at the wing D/V boundary is a well-established marker of Notch (N) activity [31], raising the idea that Med19 could function as a transcriptional effector of the Notch signaling pathway, an hypothesis we further addressed experimentally. Notch, a key player in the control of wing development, regulates the expression of a large number of genes in the wing imaginal disc, among which the eleven genes of the Enhancer of Split complex (E(spl)-C) that are directly activated by the Notch intracellular-Domain (NICD) / Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H) CSL in mammals) complex [32]. Remarkably, the RNA-seq DGE analysis indicated that the majority of the E(spl)-C genes were downregulated upon Med19AID degradation (Fig 5A). RT-qPCR analysis confirmed that the expression of E(spl)m8 is compromised after Med19AID removal in the wing imaginal discs of ub> Med19AID wing discs (Fig 4C). In addition, wing disc in situ hybridization was performed to follow the expression of two other genes of the E(spl)-C, m3 and mβ, which display well-characterized expression patterns in the wing pouch [33]. RNA FISH revealed that the transcription of both E(spl) genes was severely reduced specifically in the dorsal region of the disc where the depletion of Med19AID was specified using the apGAL4 driver (Fig 5B and 5C) therefore confirming the RNA-seq data. The fact that the expression of the known transcriptional regulators of the E(spl)-C (including Su(H)) are not affected after Med19AID depletion (Fig 5A), and that the Mediator Complex and Su(H) have been previously reported to physically interact [34] raised the possibility that Med19 could function as a cofactor of Su(H) in the expression of E(spl)-C genes. We experimentally addressed this idea by examining whether Med19 and Su(H) could directly interact in vitro. We found that bacterially produced GST-Med19 specifically pulled down Su(H) molecules synthetized in vitro (Fig 5D), providing evidence that both proteins associate with each other.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Med19 is required for the expression of Notch responsive genes in the wing imaginal disc.

(A) Scatter plot and median of the expression fold change (Log2FC), obtained from the Med19AID RNAseq DGE analysis, of the 11 Enhancer of Split complex (E(spl)-C) genes, and genes encoding TFs involved in the transcriptional regulation of the E(spl)-C genes, namely Suppressor of Hairless Su(H), Hairless (H), Groucho (Gro), Mastermind (Mam), Notch (N), and CtBP. The red dotted lines delineate the -0.5<Log2FC<0.5 expression fold change zone.(B, C) Maximum projection confocal microscopy images of Med19AID GFP signal and transcripts detection using smiFISH probes in the pouch of wing imaginal discs in which Med19AID has been regionally degraded, or not. Driving the degradation of Med19AID for 3 hours in the dorsal domain of the wing disc using the ap>; Med19AID genetic set-up severely affects the level of E(spl)m3 (B), and E(spl)mbeta (C) transcripts specifically in the area where Med19 is depleted. (D) Western blot analysis of a GST pull-down experiment showing that in vitro translated HA-tagged Su(H)–detected using an anti-HA antibody–physically interacts with GST-Med19, but not with GST. Input: 5% of the starting material.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g005

Taken together, these data support a mechanistic model where Med19 promotes the expression of the Notch responsive E(spl)-C genes through a direct interaction with the transcription factor Su(H).

Discussion

The role of the Mediator subunit Med19 on gene expression remains poorly documented due to the limited number of studies that analyzed the consequences of its loss of function on the transcriptome [6,35,36]. The present study addresses this question in a comprehensive way, in the context of the development using the Drosophila wing imaginal disc as an in vivo developmental model. Our project to identify the genes directly controlled by Med19 in this developing tissue faced the issue of the deleterious effect of losing Med19 function over long period of time. The problem was that conventional loss-of-function strategies such as the use of a null allele or RNA interference, provide poor temporal control and would have severely compromised the obtention of wing imaginal discs in which complete depletion of Med19 in all the cells of the tissue occurred. On top of that, prolonged depletion causes distortion of the gene expression profiling data due to transcriptional cascade effects and stress responses, jeopardizing the recognition of the genes directly regulated by Med19 activity. In this context, the strength of our study is the use of the AID targeted protein degradation technology to generate genetically modified flies in which rapid proteolysis of the endogenous Med19 can be triggered in the tissues of the living animal upon request. This unique tool enabled to establish the gene expression profiling in wing imaginal discs in which Med19 ablation occurred for a defined short period of time, and therefore we have been able to get access to the early consequences of losing Med19 function on gene expression.

Overall, the analysis of the expression change data reveals that Med19 up and down-regulates less than a quarter of the genes expressed in the wing imaginal disc, therefore supporting the notion that this Mediator subunit carries out specific functions. The group of Dr R.Casellas has reported that CRISPR-induced MED19 gene deletion of in a murine B cell line is associated with ~2,000 genes being differentially regulated without affecting cell viability [6]. Although this study of mouse Med19 KO reflects late consequences of Med19 loss, the restricted and bidirectional nature of the gene deregulation are consistent with our data and strengthens our conclusion about Med19 functional specificity, and beyond Med19, this trait appears to be a common phenotype associated with the loss of function of several Mediator subunits.

It is currently established that the transcription of the vast majority of the RNA PolII-dependent genes requires the Mediator complex. Therefore, the fact that the expression of a large number of genes is not affected, or even upregulated after Med19 depletion implies that the Mediator complex devoid of Med19 keeps most of its functionality. This conclusion is supported by the fact that in yeast, a Mediator complex missing Med19 can be biochemically isolated [37] and that such incomplete, but still structured, complex has been visualized by cryo-electron microscopy [38].

By crossing our expression change results with expression profile data, we discovered the existence of a link between the dependence of a gene on Med19 for its expression and its mode of expression: constitutive versus highly regulated (see Fig 6). More precisely, we found that Med19 is primarily involved in the control of the expression of dynamically regulated genes (referred here to as SR genes). However, the most unexpected result of this study is the fact that the vast majority of the constitutively expressed genes (referred here to as HK genes), among which the housekeeping genes, do not rely on Med19 for their expression. At least, this finding is in agreement with the fact that Med19 is not strictly required for cell viability as shown by studies made in Drosophila and Mammalian cells [6,14], and supports the notion that this Mediator component does not exert essential functions in the non-regulated–constitutive–mode of expression, which represents about half of the expressed genes.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Model, derived from the analysis of the nature of the genes deregulated or not after Med19AID degradation, showing how Med19 may function.

(A) Med19 acts as a critical cofactor of transcription factors whose activity is regulated by signaling pathways, in negative or positive control of transcription. (B) Med19 is not a Mediator subunit required for the expression of the constitutively expressed genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.g006

It is likely that our observations are the reflect of the fact that SR and HK use separate mechanisms of expression. Indeed, it is established that SR and HK genes differ in their genomic organization [39], their enhancer and core promoter structure and composition, and each class of genes exhibit mutually exclusive enhancer-core promoter functional relationships [40,41]. In line with our findings pointing to a specific role of Med19 in the regulated, but not in the constitutive mode of gene expression, it has been recently shown that some Mediator subunits display a marked functional preference for the core promoter of genes expressed highly variably and having developmental functions, but are unable to function with core promoters of HK genes [42]. Furthermore, genome-wide binding studies revealed that the Mediator complex appears preferentially concentrated to a special type of chromatin functioning as transcriptional regulatory hubs, referred to as super enhancers in mammals, controlling the expression of dynamically regulated genes [43,44].

In a context where the expression change after Med19 loss is globally bidirectional, we have been able to identify a functional class of genes, the spatially regulated transcription factors, and more generally the developmental genes as revealed by the gene ontology analysis, whose expression requires Med19. Although the existence of super enhancers has not been formally proven in Drosophila, this observation could be related to the finding that in mammalian cells the Mediator plays a critical role at this special class of enhancers to promote the expression of lineage-specifying genes, and especially those encoding the transcription factors responsible for the cell identity [7].

More investigations will be required to understand the reasons of the involvement of Med19 in promoting expression of the developmental genes. Specifically, approaches allowing to quantitatively map the interaction between Mediator and RNA PolII subunits and the genome, such as ChIP-seq, may provide clues to key questions like whether the Mediator complex is still associated to the enhancers of developmental genes after Med19 ablation, the expression collapse is linked to a defect in the pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation, or the problem arises from a defect in the transcriptional pausing release.

We experimentally confirmed the finding, made from the RNA-seq analysis, that Med19 is important for the transcriptional activation of highly regulated developmental genes by showing in situ that some canonic target genes of the Notch pathway in the wing imaginal disc need Med19 activity for their expression. In particular, the visualization of the drop in the level of wg pre-mRNA shortly after Med19 degradation demonstrates the existence of consequences at the level of the transcription, therefore excluding the possibility that our observations are exclusively linked to a post-transcriptional effect such as transcripts degradation. We and others have shown that Med19 acts as a cofactor of transcription factors with which it interacts, these including in Drosophila the HOX [14], GATAs [16], and the corepressor Brakeless [45]. Although further work is needed to characterize the interaction between Med19 and the transcriptional regulator Su(H), we propose that Med19 works in combination with Su(H) in the transcriptional activation of the Notch target genes.

In conclusion, this work points the idea that finely regulated modes of transcription that use complex molecular mechanisms may require the functionality of all the subunits of the Mediator complex whereas mechanistically simpler constitutive expression may only rely on a subset of the Mediator components. To get insight into this notion, the experimental approach we developed could be extended to each of the 30 Mediator subunits. Such a comprehensive study will enable to know to which extent the majority of the Mediator subunits, like Med19, specifically operate regulated genes. Critically, the knowledge of the transcriptional landscape regulated by each of the Mediator components in a given biological context will be essential to our understanding of how the Mediator operates.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Scheme depicting the CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy used to generate Med19AID, a Med19 degradable and fluorescent allele.

The donner construct (middle) highlights the nature of the homology arms used to introduce the AID-GFP cassette by homologous recombination. Position of the PCR primers used to characterize the wt vs 19AID allele is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Degradation of Med19AID in the posterior compartment of the wing imaginal disc using the engrailed driver (en>).

(A) Confocal images of wing discs dissected from en>TIR1 Med19AID larvae either fed for one hour with NAA (1H), or mock treated (no auxin). (B) Box plot showing the Med19AID depletion level calculated as the posterior to anterior GFP intensity ratio in the wing pouch of en>TIR1; Med19AID wing imaginal discs (n = 5) obtained and imaged as in (A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The expression of most of canonical housekeeping (HK) genes is not affected by Med19AID depletion.

Scatter plot analysis of the expression fold change (Log2FC) of genes belonging to several families of housekeeping functions (x axis, list detailed in S3 Table). The red dashed lines mark Log2FC = +/ - 0.5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Venn diagram showing the overlap between HK—HK* (top), and SR—SR*(bottom) lists of genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. The expression of achaete (ac) and wingless (wg) is impaired specifically in the domain of the wing imaginal disc where Med19AID is degraded.

(A) Confocal images of ap>TIR1; Med19AID wing imaginal disc immunostained for Ac and GFP (Med19AID detection). Upper row: Control wing disc in which Med19AID degradation did not occur (no driver). Bottom row: Wing disc in which Med19 degradation was induced for 3 hours in the dorsal compartment, using an apterous driver. Right column: Magnification in the anterior wing pouch Ac staining pattern emphasizing the loss of Ac expression in the dorsal row of cells of the anterior wing margin when Med19AID degradation is triggered in the dorsal compartment of the wing disc. (B) en>TIR1; Med19AID wing imaginal discs immunostained for Wg and GFP (Med19AID), in which the degradation of Med19AID was operated with the en> driver for 3 hours (bottom row), or not triggered (control, upper row).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Original uncropped and unadjusted images for blots or gels from Figs 1A and 5D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s006

(TIF)

S1 Table. Spreadsheet of the sequence of all the DNA oligonucleotides used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s007

(TIF)

S2 Table. List of the 58 Drosophila tissues and developmental stages (modENCODE project) used to establish the RNA expression profile of the genes expressed in the wing imaginal disc.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s008

(TIF)

S3 Table. List of canonical housekeeping genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s009

(TIF)

S4 Table. Origin of HK, HK*, SR and SR* lists of genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s010

(TIF)

S5 Table. 30 best GO terms of the down-regulated genes sorted by FDR enrichment obtained on ShinyGO web site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275613.s011

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the genotoul bioinformatics platform Toulouse Midi-Pyrenees and Sigenae group for providing help and storage resources on the local Galaxy instance http://sigenae-workbench.toulouse.inra.fr. We thank M. Aguirrebengoa from the big-A facility of CBI and Alexandra Manchego for their help in bioinformatics and statistical analyses, J. Favier for the CBI Drosophila genome edition facility, F. Payre, and A. Vincent for critical reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for providing transgenic flies. Lastly, we thank the Toulouse RIO Imaging platform.

References

  1. 1. Boube M, Joulia L, Cribbs DL, Bourbon HM. Evidence for a Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation conserved from yeast to man. Cell. Elsevier B.V.; 2002. pp. 143–151.
  2. 2. Bourbon HM, Aguilera A, Ansari AZ, Asturias FJ, Berk AJ, Bjorklund S, et al. A unified nomenclature for protein subunits of mediator complexes linking transcriptional regulators to RNA polymerase II. Molecular Cell. Elsevier; 2004. pp. 553–557. pmid:15175151
  3. 3. Jeronimo C, Robert F. The Mediator Complex: At the Nexus of RNA Polymerase II Transcription. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27: 765–783. pmid:28778422
  4. 4. Soutourina J. Transcription regulation by the Mediator complex. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Publishing Group; 2018. pp. 262–274. pmid:29209056
  5. 5. Soutourina J. Mammalian Mediator as a Functional Link between Enhancers and Promoters. Cell. 2019;178: 1036–1038. pmid:31442397
  6. 6. El Khattabi L, Zhao H, Kalchschmidt J, Young N, Jung S, Van Blerkom P, et al. A Pliable Mediator Acts as a Functional Rather Than an Architectural Bridge between Promoters and Enhancers. Cell. 2019;178: 1145–1158.e20. pmid:31402173
  7. 7. Jaeger MG, Schwalb B, Mackowiak SD, Velychko T, Hanzl A, Imrichova H, et al. Selective Mediator dependence of cell-type-specifying transcription. Nat Genet. 2020;52: 719–727. pmid:32483291
  8. 8. Tourigny JP, Schumacher K, Saleh MM, Devys D, Zentner GE. Architectural Mediator subunits are differentially essential for global transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2021;217. pmid:33789343
  9. 9. Yin JW, Wang G. The Mediator complex: A master coordinator of transcription and cell lineage development. Dev. 2014;141: 977–987. pmid:24550107
  10. 10. Boube M, Faucher C, Joulia L, Cribbs DL, Bourbon HM. Drosophila homologs of transcriptional mediator complex subunits are required for adult cell and segment identity specification. Genes Dev. 2000;14: 2906–2917. pmid:11090137
  11. 11. Loncle N, Boube M, Joulia L, Boschiero C, Werner M, Cribbs DL, et al. Distinct roles for Mediator Cdk8 module subunits in Drosophila development. EMBO J. 2007;26: 1045–1054. pmid:17290221
  12. 12. Röth S, Fulcher LJ, Sapkota GP. Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. Birkhauser Verlag AG; 2019. pp. 2761–2777. pmid:31030225
  13. 13. Warfield L, Ramachandran S, Baptista T, Devys D, Tora L, Hahn S. Transcription of Nearly All Yeast RNA Polymerase II-Transcribed Genes Is Dependent on Transcription Factor TFIID. Mol Cell. 2017;68: 118–129.e5. pmid:28918900
  14. 14. Boube M, Hudry B, Immarigeon C, Carrier Y, Bernat-Fabre S, Merabet S, et al. Drosophila melanogaster Hox Transcription Factors Access the RNA Polymerase II Machinery through Direct Homeodomain Binding to a Conserved Motif of Mediator Subunit Med19. Copenhaver GP, editor. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004303. pmid:24786462
  15. 15. Ding N, Tomomori-Sato C, Sato S, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Boyer TG. MED19 and MED26 Are Synergistic Functional Targets of the RE1 Silencing Transcription Factor in Epigenetic Silencing of Neuronal Gene Expression *. J Biol Chem. 2009;284: 2648–2656. pmid:19049968
  16. 16. Immarigeon C, Bernat-Fabre S, Guillou E, Verger A, Prince E, Benmedjahed MA, et al. Mediator complex subunit Med19 binds directly GATA transcription factors and is required with Med1 for GATA-driven gene regulation in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2020;295: 13617–13629. pmid:32737196
  17. 17. Nishimura K, Fukagawa T, Takisawa H, Kakimoto T, Kanemaki M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat Methods. 2009;6: 917–922. pmid:19915560
  18. 18. Port F, Chen HM, Lee T, Bullock SL. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: E2967–E2976. pmid:25002478
  19. 19. Ge SX, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Valencia A, editor. Bioinformatics. 2020;36: 2628–2629. pmid:31882993
  20. 20. Hu Y, Comjean A, Perrimon N, Mohr SE. The Drosophila Gene Expression Tool (DGET) for expression analyses. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18: 98. pmid:28187709
  21. 21. Tsanov N, Samacoits A, Chouaib R, Traboulsi AM, Gostan T, Weber C, et al. SmiFISH and FISH-quant—A flexible single RNA detection approach with super-resolution capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44: 165. pmid:27599845
  22. 22. Immarigeon C, Bernat-Fabre S, Augé B, Faucher C, Gobert V, Haenlin M, et al. Drosophila Mediator Subunit Med1 Is Required for GATA-Dependent Developmental Processes: Divergent Binding Interfaces for Conserved Coactivator Functions. Mol Cell Biol. 2019;39: 477–495. pmid:30670567
  23. 23. Trost M, Blattner AC, Lehner CF. Regulated protein depletion by the auxin-inducible degradation system in Drosophila melanogaster. Fly (Austin). 2016;10: 35–46. pmid:27010248
  24. 24. Chen W, Werdann M, Zhang Y. The auxin‐inducible degradation system enables conditional PERIOD protein depletion in the nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. FEBS J. 2018;285: 4378–4393. pmid:30321477
  25. 25. Bence M, Jankovics F, Lukácsovich T, Erdélyi M. Combining the auxin-inducible degradation system with CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for the conditional depletion of endogenous Drosophila melanogaster proteins. FEBS Journal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2017. pp. 1056–1069. pmid:28207183
  26. 26. Li S, Prasanna X, Salo VT, Vattulainen I, Ikonen E. An efficient auxin-inducible degron system with low basal degradation in human cells. Nat Methods. 2019;16: 866–869. pmid:31451765
  27. 27. Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, Duff MO, Landolin JM, Yang L, et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2011;471: 473–479. pmid:21179090
  28. 28. Weiszmann R, Hammonds AS, Celniker SE. Determination of gene expression patterns using high-throughput RNA in situ hybridization to whole-mount drosophila embryos. Nat Protoc. 2009;4: 605–618. pmid:19360017
  29. 29. Hammonds AS, Bristow CA, Fisher WW, Weiszmann R, Wu S, Hartenstein V, et al. Spatial expression of transcription factors in Drosophila embryonic organ development. Genome Biol. 2013;14. pmid:24359758
  30. 30. Bageritz J, Willnow P, Valentini E, Leible S, Boutros M, Teleman AA. Gene expression atlas of a developing tissue by single cell expression correlation analysis. Nat Methods. 2019;16: 750–756. pmid:31363221
  31. 31. Zacharioudaki E, Bray SJ. Tools and methods for studying Notch signaling in Drosophila melanogaster. Methods. 2014;68: 173–182. pmid:24704358
  32. 32. Bray SJ. Notch signalling: A simple pathway becomes complex. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Publishing Group; 2006. pp. 678–689. pmid:16921404
  33. 33. Couturier L, Mazouni K, Corson F, Schweisguth F. Regulation of Notch output dynamics via specific E(spl)-HLH factors during bristle patterning in Drosophila. Nat Commun. 2019;10: 1–13. pmid:31375669
  34. 34. Janody F, Treisman JE. Requirements for mediator complex subunits distinguish three classes of notch target genes at the Drosophila wing margin. Dev Dyn. 2011;240: 2051–2059. pmid:21793099
  35. 35. Van De Peppel J, Kettelarij N, Van Bakel H, Kockelkorn TTJP, Van Leenen D, Holstege FCP. Mediator expression profiling epistasis reveals a signal transduction pathway with antagonistic submodules and highly specific downstream targets. Mol Cell. 2005;19: 511–522. pmid:16109375
  36. 36. Dean JM, He A, Tan M, Wang J, Lu D, Razani B, et al. MED19 Regulates Adipogenesis and Maintenance of White Adipose Tissue Mass by Mediating PPARγ-Dependent Gene Expression. Cell Rep. 2020;33. pmid:33027649
  37. 37. Baidoobonso SM, Guidi BW, Myers LC. Med19(Rox3) Regulates Intermodule Interactions in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mediator Complex *. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 5551–5559. pmid:17192271
  38. 38. Tsai KL, Tomomori-Sato C, Sato S, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Asturias FJ. Subunit architecture and functional modular rearrangements of the transcriptional mediator complex. Cell. 2014;157: 1430–1444. pmid:24882805
  39. 39. Corrales M, Rosado A, Cortini R, Van Arensbergen J, Van Steensel B, Filion GJ. Clustering of Drosophila housekeeping promoters facilitates their expression. Genome Res. 2017;27: 1153–1161. pmid:28420691
  40. 40. Haberle V, Stark A. Eukaryotic core promoters and the functional basis of transcription initiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018 1910. 2018;19: 621–637. pmid:29946135
  41. 41. Zabidi MA, Arnold CD, Schernhuber K, Pagani M, Rath M, Frank O, et al. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature. 2015;518: 556–559. pmid:25517091
  42. 42. Haberle V, Arnold CD, Pagani M, Rath M, Schernhuber K, Stark A. Transcriptional cofactors display specificity for distinct types of core promoters. Nature. 2019;570: 122–126. pmid:31092928
  43. 43. Whyte WA, Orlando DA, Hnisz D, Abraham BJ, Lin CY, Kagey MH, et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell. 2013;153: 307–319. pmid:23582322
  44. 44. Filion GJ, van Bemmel JG, Braunschweig U, Talhout W, Kind J, Ward LD, et al. Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells. Cell. 2010;143: 212–224. pmid:20888037
  45. 45. Crona F, Holmqvist PH, Tang M, Singla B, Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg H, Fantur K, et al. The Brakeless co-regulator can directly activate and repress transcription in early Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 2015;407: 173–181. pmid:26260775