Figures
Abstract
Background
Verrucous carcinoma (VC) is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma. Although VC is considered radioresistant, concrete evidence for this is absent.
Methods
We obtained data on VC treated with surgery or radiation from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Treatment selection bias was reduced by propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Five-year OS rates in the radiation and surgery groups were 72.7% and 72.0%, respectively (P = 0.111); five-year DSS rates in the same were 86.7% and 88.4%, respectively (P = 0.234). HRs of radiation compared with surgery were 1.68 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96–2.95) for OS and 1.95 (95% CI, 0.69–5.53) for DSS.
Citation: Takenaka Y, Uno A, Tanaka H, Takemoto N, Nozaki K, Inohara H (2022) Radiation vs surgery for early-stage laryngeal verrucous carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matched-study. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0275271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275271
Editor: Panagiotis Balermpas, University Hospital Zurich, SWITZERLAND
Received: May 26, 2022; Accepted: September 13, 2022; Published: October 31, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Takenaka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K09868. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Verrucous carcinoma (VC) is a well-differentiated variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that was first reported by Ackerman et al. in 1948 [1]. The larynx is the second most common site for VC in the upper aerodigestive tract, following the oral cavity [2]. Laryngeal VC accounts for 0.9% of laryngeal malignancies [3] and 1.25% of early-stage laryngeal SCC cases. Early-stage laryngeal SCC is usually treated with radiotherapy (RT) or surgical monotherapy. However, VC tends to be treated with surgery rather than RT. One reason for this is the possibility of anaplastic transformation caused by RT, which was reported in early studies [4,5]. Another reason is the radioresistant nature of VC [4]. Thus, RT for VC should be avoided, whenever possible.
In 1993, Hagen et al. reported a local failure rate of 51% and anaplastic transformation rate of 11% in 37 patients with laryngeal VC treated with RT [4]. In contrast, Huang et al. (2009) found no cases of anaplastic transformation following RT in a retrospective case series of 62 patients [6]. Thus, recent studies have negated the possibility of radiation-induced anaplastic transformation despite earlier studies. However, the radioresistance of VC has not yet been properly assessed. A population-based study by Dubal [3] demonstrated a statistically significant difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) among different treatment modalities in patients with laryngeal VC. However, stratification or adjustment for possible confounding factors was not performed.
A randomized controlled trial is the best method for comparing treatment results between different treatment modalities. However, conducting such trials for laryngeal VC is almost impossible because of its rarity. The propensity score matching method has been increasingly used in quasi-experimental designs. This method can control for known confounding factors and compare the results of different treatments in cohort studies. In the present study, we collected data on laryngeal VC from a population-based database and investigated the prognosis of patients with laryngeal VC according to the treatment modality. Our study aimed to investigate whether RT could be the treatment of choice for early-stage laryngeal VC.
Patients and methods
Approval from the institutional review board of Osaka University Hospital was waived because the analyzed data were publicly available and kept anonymous.
Data retrieval
Individual patient data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Research Plus Data, 18 registries, and November 2020 Sub using SEER Stat software, version 8. 3. 9. 2 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) laryngeal cancer (Site recode ICD-O-3/WHO 20008, “larynx”) (2) histologically confirmed VC (ICD-O-3 Hist/behav, 8051/3) (3) stage I or II according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, sixth edition (stage for cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2003 was determined using EOD 10 code), (4) types of reporting source were ’Hospital inpatient/outpatient or clinic’, ’Radiation treatment or medical oncology center (2006+)’, ’Laboratory only (hospital or private)’, ’Physician’s office/private medical practitioner (LMD)’, ’Nursing/convalescent home/hospice’, ’Other hospital outpatient unit or surgery center (2006+)’, (5) treated with external RT (coded as “beam radiation”) or surgery (surgery code, 10–90) monotherapy, and (6) diagnosed between 2000 and 2015.
The exclusion criteria were (1) patients receiving chemotherapy and (2) subsites coded as “larynx, NOS” or “overlapping lesions”.
Statistical analysis
One-to-two propensity score matching was carried out using the nearest matching method with a caliper of 0.20. Covariates for matching were age, marital status, race, sex, stage, subsite, and year of diagnosis. Matching one RT case to two surgery cases was used to increase precision [7].
After matching, patient characteristics were compared using the chi-square test for the association between categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for the associations between categorical and continuous variables. DSS and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and subsequently compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. The cumulative incidence of death was calculated using non-parametric cumulative incidence functions and compared using Gray’s test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR [8] (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoints were disease-specific survival and the cumulative incidence of death due to other causes.
Results
Patient characteristics
The SEER database contains 162 cases of VC that met the inclusion criteria. After excluding 14 cases that met the exclusion criteria, 148 patients were included. The number of RT and surgery cases was 38 and 110, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded 33 patients treated with RT and 66 treated with surgery (Table 1). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. During the follow-up period, 15, 36, and 2 patients died from disease, other causes, and unknown causes, respectively. The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 136 months.
Overall survival
Fig 1A shows the OS according to the treatment modality. The five-year OS rates were 72.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54.1–84.8)) for the RT group and 72.0% (95% CI 59.3–81.4)) for the surgery group (P = 0.111). Table 2 shows the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for OS. The treatment modality was not a prognostic factor for OS. The adjusted HR for RT compared with surgery was 1.68 (95% CI, 0.96–2.95). Age was the only independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04–1.09)).
A, overall survival. B, disease-specific survival.
Disease-specific survival
Fig 1B shows the DSS according to the treatment modality. The five-year DSS rates were 86.7% (95% CI, 68.3–94.8)) for the RT group and 88.4% (95% CI 75.9–94.6)) for the surgery group (P = 0.234). Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted HRs for DSS. Treatment modality did not affect DSS. The adjusted HR for RT compared with surgery was 1.95 (95% CI, 0.69–5.53). Age was the only independent prognostic factor for DSS (HR 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01–1.11)).
Cumulative incidence of death
The cumulative incidence of death due to VC and other causes is shown in Fig 2A and 2B, respectively. The mortality rates due to VC at five years were 12.1% in the RT group and 9.8% in the surgery group (P = 0.285). The mortality rates due to other causes were 15.2% and 19.1% in the RT and surgery groups, respectively (P = 0.391).
A, death due to cancer. B, death due to other cause.
Discussion
In this study, we compared the results of RT and surgery in patients with laryngeal VC using a quasi-experimental design. We demonstrated that the prognosis was comparable between the two modalities.
Several rare variants of SCC arise in the upper aerodigestive tract, including VC, lymphoepithelial carcinoma, papillary, spindle, and adenosquamous SCCs [9]. These variants have different prognoses and sensitivities to specific treatments for conventional SCC. VC and papillary SCC have a better prognosis than other laryngeal malignancies [10,11], whereas adenosquamous SCC has a worse prognosis [12]. In addition, radiosensitivity varies among SCC variants. VC is considered radioresistant [5], while lymphoepithelial carcinoma shows a good response to RT [9]. Therefore, surgery is preferred to RT for laryngeal VC. A recent population-based study showed that 18.2% of patients with early-stage laryngeal VC were treated with RT alone, in contrast to 49.9% of patients with conventional SCC. Despite the predilection for surgery, some patients undergo RT because of intolerance to general anesthesia, aversion to surgery, and low voice quality after surgery. Huang et al. reported a case series of 62 patients with laryngeal VC treated with RT [6]. No anaplastic transformation was observed during the median follow-up period of 11 years. The local control rate, excluding the effect of salvage surgery, in all stages of VC was 66% at five years, and the larynx was preserved in 81% of patients when salvage larynx preservation surgery was included. Their study included advanced-stage disease and older patients treated with outdated RT methods. The present study investigated only patients with early-stage disease who were diagnosed after 2000. We found no significant difference in survival between patients treated with RT and those treated surgically. The five-year DSS for patients with laryngeal VC treated with RT was 86.7%, similar to 83.9% in patients with early-stage laryngeal conventional SCC treated with RT [13]. Therefore, RT may be an option for early-stage laryngeal VC.
Our study has several strengths. First, using a population-based database, we analyzed 99 cases of early-stage laryngeal VC over a 15-year period. Considering the rarity of VC, such a number of cases could not be collected with from a single institute. Second, we used propensity score-matching. We were able to control for several confounding factors that could affect treatment selection. Finally, we conducted competing mortality analysis. Surgically treated patients may experience postoperative complications; aspiration can be a problem after larynx-preserving surgery; radiation can also cause secondary primary malignancies. These conditions often lead to non-laryngeal cancer death. Thus, a comparison of other causes of death should be considered when selecting treatment.
The limitations of this study are as follows. First, SEER data do not contain information that can affect prognosis and treatment decisions. The major etiologic causes of laryngeal cancer are habitual drinking and smoking, which can cause comorbidities including secondary primary malignancies, heart disease, and pulmonary diseases. Patients with severe pulmonary disease may not tolerate general anesthesia. Patients with other malignancies may undergo simultaneous surgeries. Therefore, these comorbidities significantly influenced the selection between RT and surgery. However, data on comorbidities were lacking, resulting in insufficient control of the confounding factors. The location and extent of the tumor also affect treatment decisions. SEER data provides tumor subsites as supraglottis, glottis, and subglottis, and neither offers more detail on the location nor extent of the tumor. Because of the lack of this information, we could not offer recommendations regarding which patients are suitable for RT. Second, details of RT, including total dose, duration, and methods, are not elaborated in the database. Recent technical advances in RT, specifically hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation, have improved local control of laryngeal cancer [14]. Well-differentiated tumors benefit more from reducing the overall treatment time than their dedifferentiated counterparts [15]. Therefore, VC, a well-differentiated variant of SCC, is a promising candidate for accelerated fractionation. If we analyze only cases treated with accelerated faction, the prognosis would be better than that in the present study. Finally, we only evaluated survival. Local control failure of RT can be salvaged with surgery. In a case series of laryngeal VC treated with RT, local recurrence was observed in 26% of T1 and 31% of T2 cases, respectively [6]. Local recurrence has been reported to be successfully treated in most cases. Therefore, a good prognosis in patients treated with RT may be spurious because of salvage surgery.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that laryngeal VC patients treated with RT had a prognosis similar to that of surgically treated cases. Therefore, RT can be considered as an option for early-stage laryngeal VC. Whether RT is the primary choice of treatment has not yet been elucidated. Given the rarity of laryngeal VC, prospective studies are not feasible. Therefore, well-designed multicenter retrospective studies are required.
References
- 1. ACKERMAN LV. Verrucous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Surgery 1948; 23:670–678. pmid:18907508
- 2.
Cardesa A, Gale N, Nadal A, Zidar N. Hypopharynx, larynx and trachea. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARCPress; 2005. p 107–162.
- 3. Dubal PM, Svider PF, Kam D, Dutta R, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Laryngeal Verrucous Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153:799–805. pmid:26124268
- 4. Hagen P, Lyons GD, Haindel C. Verrucous carcinoma of the larynx: role of human papillomavirus, radiation, and surgery. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:253–257. pmid:8382761
- 5. Echanique KA, Desai SV, Marchiano E, Spinazzi EF, Strojan P, Baredes S, et al. Laryngeal Verrucous Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156:38–45. pmid:27484231
- 6. Huang SH, Lockwood G, Irish J, Ringash J, Cummings B, Waldron J, et al. Truths and myths about radiotherapy for verrucous carcinoma of larynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73:1110–1115. pmid:18707828
- 7. Rassen JA, Shelat AA, Myers J, Glynn RJ, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 21 Suppl 2012; 2:69–80. pmid:22552982
- 8. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ’EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48:452–458. pmid:23208313
- 9. Chan JY, Wong EW, Ng SK, Vlantis AC. Non-nasopharyngeal head and neck lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma in the United States: A population-based study. Head Neck 38 Suppl 2016; 1: E1294–1300. pmid:26316257
- 10. Orvidas LJ, Olsen KD, Lewis JE, Suman VJ. Verrucous carcinoma of the larynx: a review of 53 patients. Head Neck 1998; 20:197–203. pmid:9570624
- 11. Dutta R, Husain Q, Kam D, Dubal PM, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Laryngeal Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis of Incidence and Survival. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153:54–59. pmid:25917664
- 12. Dubal PM, Unsal AA, Echanique KA, Vazquez A, Reder LS, Baredes S, et al. Laryngeal adenosquamous carcinoma: A population-based perspective. Laryngoscope 2016; 126:858–863. pmid:26452061
- 13. Zhan C, Yang X, Song X, Yan L. Radiotherapy vs surgery for T1-2N0M0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based and propensity score matching study. Cancer Med 2018; 7:2837–2847. pmid:29733513
- 14. Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Konishi K, Teshima T, et al. Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer-technical aspects and alternate fractionation. J Radiat Res 2017; 58:495–508. pmid:28898958
- 15. Hansen O, Overgaard J, Hansen HS, Overgaard M, Höyer M, Jörgensen KE, et al. Importance of overall treatment time for the outcome of radiotherapy of advanced head and neck carcinoma: dependency on tumor differentiation. Radiother Oncol 1997; 43:47–51. pmid:9165136