https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-4660
Figures
Abstract
The objective of the study is to analyze the impact of violence on women’s health and the feelings generated during the period of exposure to violence. This is a qualitative study with an interpretative phenomenological design in which 16 women participated—4 through interviews and 12 through stories. The data obtained were analyzed using the Colaizzi approach. The results were structured into 3 themes according to how the women interpreted their experiences. The themes were physical consequences: visible traces; psychological consequences: stormy days and sunny days; and social consequences: from loneliness to a new world. In conclusion, the women in this study considered all those (very diverse) physical pathologies to be important. They encompassed a series of psychological disorders that lasted over time, causing considerable suffering and complicating the participants’ ability to relate to the rest of society, especially men. Similarly, the participants identified a series of positive consequences when they left the traumatic situation empowered after overcoming gender-based violence.
Citation: García-Montes R, Fares-Medina S, Diaz-Caro I, Corral-Liria I, García-Gómez-Heras S (2022) The impact of violence on women’s health. The present as a reflection of the past: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 17(9): e0273973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273973
Editor: Tim Schultz, Flinders University School of Medicine: Flinders University Medicine, AUSTRALIA
Received: November 5, 2021; Accepted: August 19, 2022; Published: September 9, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 García-Montes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Gender-based violence (GBV), or violence against women, as the WHO has designated it, is one of the most important social health problems in Spain, and the WHO has considered it a public health problem. GBV is defined by many as any act of physical or psychological violence, including assaults on sexual freedom, threats, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, in both the public and private spheres, by someone who is or has been linked to the woman through an emotional relationship, even if the perpetrator and the woman do not live together [1–3].
In Europe, the prevalence of these events exceeds 25%. Likewise, in Spain, in 2020, more than 150,000 complaints were filed for gender violence, 9,004 electronic surveillance devices were activated and almost 36,000 restraining orders were enacted. With these data, gender violence has become one of the most important social problems in Spain, whit the deaths of 45 women, without any previous disease attributable to GBV [4, 5].
Regarding the consequences, 78.2% of women who experienced any type of violence reported that it affected their physical or mental health, without specifying the type of effects. In addition, women identify a great variety of feelings—impotence, sadness, fear, anguish, shame, guilt and aggression—when they recall the abuse that they suffered [5].
The impact of violence on women’s health is significant. The main physical and sexual and/or reproductive consequences of violence are chronic pain syndromes, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome and other gastrointestinal disorders, lacerations and abrasions of the skin, eye damage, disability, infertility, complications with pregnancy and/or abortion, sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancy and even death. The main psychological effects are anxiety, and abuse of power and control, insomnia, chronic fatigue, chronic disorders, such as post-traumatic stress or depression; and negative feelings [6–11].
Consequently, investigating the impact of these consequences on women who have suffered GBV, is essential since very little research is currently available, and adequately training psychosocial professionals would be highly beneficial. By pointing out the needs and/or shortcomings that women who have experienced this type of violence identify, it is possible to reinforce and deepen these aspects, and therefore improve and implement training that benefits women who are victims of abuse. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of violence on the health of women and to describe the feelings generated by exposure to violence.
Materials and methods
Design
This is a qualitative phenomenological interpretive study based on the principles of Heidegger [12–16].
The sample was chosen through intentional and snowball sampling of women who had suffered GBV. Access to the sample was gained through the mediation of the Miriadas of Huelva Association, via email, which, since its creation in 2002, has been dedicated to caring for women who are victims of abuse and their minor children by providing emergency care by telephone 24 hours per day, accompanying and monitoring them in the process of leaving violent situations and offering weekly training and therapeutic workshops [17]. A sample of 16 women was obtained, and data saturation was achieved in the course of the analysis [18].
The inclusion criteria a) were majority age (18 years), according to Royal Decree-Law 33/1978 of November 16 in Spain; b) residence in Spain, where the study was carried out; c) being separated from their aggressors and having had no contact with them for 1 or more years, because despite the absence of a specific time in which gender violence is overcome, a year or more separated from the partner can be indicative of a firm commitment to overcome the abuse; d) actively working or seeking work, since this is already part of the “plan” initiated by a woman to restart her life; e) and volunteering to participate in the study.
Women were excluded if talking about their experience of GBV generated physical and/or psychological suffering or if they lived in short- and medium-stay residential institutions, such as shelters, because women who still live in these types of housing do not do so independently, and these women will need to be independent in the future.
Data collection
The data were collected from 4 of the participants through semi-structured interviews carried out during personal meetings lasting 1,5 hours, which were recorded; the other 12 participants preferred to participate by sharing their stories, by postal mail using the same questions that were used in the interviews. The data were collected on the laptop of the investigators. The questions asked are included in Table 1.
Data analysis
The Colaizzi approach described by Northall [19] was selected for the data analysis, since it is one of the accepted data analysis methods used in qualitative interpretive research in the field of Nursing [20, 21]. This approach consists of 7 points:
- Reading the women’s descriptions.
- Obtaining relevant statements for each description and coding them.
- Providing a detailed explanation of the meaning of each relevant statement to formulate meanings and facilitate further coding.
- Organizing the formulated meanings into thematic groups.
- Comparing the thematic groups with the original statements to validate them and resolve discrepancies.
- Providing an exhaustive description of the phenomenon with the results obtained in the previous steps.
- Consulting with the participants to validate the original data.
The 4 principles of bioethics governed this study. The principle of beneficence was upheld by using the data extracted from the women’s interviews to help women who are currently victims of abuse and by caring for and respecting the participants of the study. The principle of nonmaleficence was upheld by ensuring that none of the participants was intentionally harmed. The principle of autonomy was upheld by accepting and respecting the decisions of the women, who voluntarily participated in the study, were able to leave it at any time and signed their informed consent (IC) [22]; furthermore, the study adhered to Organic Law 3/2018 of December 5 regarding the protection of personal data and the guarantee of digital rights [23]. Finally, the principle of justice guided the study, since the goal of applying the results obtained is to improve the care provided by professionals who treat women who have survived gender violence based on real experiences. In addition, the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid [24], and was governed by the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) [25].
The quality of the results of the study was controlled according to the quality principles of Guba and Lincoln descrited by Forero et al. [26] Credibility is present when data are collected through interviews and stories; confirmability is present when the characteristics of the women are described and their contributions are transcribed verbatim; and transferability is present when the findings obtained can be transferred to other similar studies [27].
Results
The final sample of the study consisted of 14 women, aged between 21 and 64 years, who had a relationship with their aggressors for between 1,5 and 40 years, and did not have contact with him for between 1 and 15 years. The considerable variability in both the ages of the participants and the lengths of time in the relationship and separated from the aggressor up to the day of the study increases the richness of the results in terms of varied experiences. (See Table 2).
Three main themes emerged from the data: physical consequences: visible traces; psychological consequences: stormy days and sunny days; and social consequences: from loneliness to a new world. (See Table 3).
Physical consequences: Visible traces
The physical consequences were considered the most visible since they could be observed by the rest of society. Consequently, the women granted them relatively high importance since they were a physical burden that they saw and felt every day and that, on many occasions, followed them throughout their lives. These consequences were very diverse, affecting various areas of the body, including the digestive system, the mouth, the genitals and the musculoskeletal system.
- “Physical consequences: whiplash” (6)
- “Physical consequence: fibromyalgia” (1)
- “I still have physical consequence: a tooth.” (7)
One of the most frequently recurring health problems was sleep disorders, either as a bodily response to the psychological stress the women suffered or as a result of nightmares about their aggressor. In either case, sleep was considered an important vital aspect since allowed the body and mind to rest and renewed the women’s energy on a day-to-day basis, and its absence added a daily burden to their ongoing struggle.
- “I do not sleep well, […] and many things are coming out, and the nightmares.” (3)
- “[…] and my body reacts by sweating a lot, sleeping little, whit diarrea, vomiting, panic attacks and anxiety.” (8)
Physical consequences: Stormy days and sunny days
Regarding psychological consequences, the women identified them as mostly negative and related their traumatic events to the psychological problems they experienced. Many of the participants reported having disorders such as anxiety, which they felt was a result of the abuse since it was something they could not control that paralyzed them, made them remember the anguish they felt during episodes in which they did not know what to do, and the suffering that all this caused.
- “I have anxiety, specifically; I suffer from everything.” (5)
- “I felt control, insecurity, loneliness and a desire to end the situation, but I did not feel capable.” (8)
- “I felt bad for putting up with it, but I was aware that I had an emotional dependence.” (7)
Another consequences of the abuse was the continuous intrusion of memories prompted by day-to-day circumstances. The majority of the participants agreed that their experience could never be forgotten; in fact, some admitted that they still did not feel capable of talking openly about the abuse since they still felt sadness, shame or pity for themselves and even felt confused when the recognized themselves as victims of GBV.
- “I am still afraid to this day, and sometimes I feel like I want the same things that I had with him with my current partner” (14)
- “I still keep many things reserved.” (3)
- “Remembering causes me anger, sadness, but at the same time, relief.” (11)
- “Then, also when you realize that yes, that you are just one more, that when they talk about who knows how many victims of GBV abuse, well, you realize that you are one more, that you had suffered that, it kicks you a thousand times, because that is not just you. That happens to others.” (14)
- “The feeling that reminds me of it is one of sorrow—sorrow for having allowed it and not having finished with all this sooner” (7)
- “[…] but I never believed myself to be the victim of anything, but rather I felt that we were both in a loop in which we were self-destructing, and I did not feel like a victim of anything.” (14)
On the other hand, the personal growth that some of the participants experienced when they emerged from this undesirable life situation stronger, with improved self-esteem and proof to themselves of what they were capable of doing was inevitably something to highlight. These women did not hesitate to express that they felt liberated and relieved, that they had been reborn stronger and with greater confidence in themselves.
- “I do not sleep well, […] and many things are coming out, and the nightmares.” (4)
- “I felt relieved and with the strength to give myself a chance without him.” (7)
- “I am stronger, more aware of what gender violence is and what I never want to experience again.” (8)
- “I, alone, I throw myself forward; I don’t need anyone, and I can do it.” (14)
It was possible to see that the participants recognized an incipient feeling of feminism from the abuse, which could be interpreted as a desire or need for union between equals to defend themselves, decrease their feelings of doubt and hopelessness and increase feelings of security, pride and improvement.
- “Let’s see; I have a hypersensitivity to any topic related to women, from macho language to any subtle commentary of the micromachismo type. I am hypersensitive.” (14)
- “I don’t think I’m over it yet.” (2)
- “I will never forget what I experienced.” (1)
- “I have forgiven him; I feel nothing for him.” (5)
- “So to say, ‘Well, you did great; that is, you thought of yourself from within the self-destructive loop you were in’ because when I look at it from a distance, I say, ‘So, good for me, because the truth is that I caught it in time.’ That is what they told me—that I caught it in time.” (14)
Social consequences: From loneliness to a new world
The social repercussions for the participants were important, since one of the most common feelings during violence was loneliness. They were greatly affected by society’s attitudes towards them, especially the approach of blaming the woman, which the participants themselves even started to internalize, and social indifference, which made them even more vulnerable.
- “I was alone.” (2)
- “Their behavior was ambivalent; they support you, but at the same time, they distrust you.” (10)
- “I felt disbelief, guilt.” (10)
- “I started running even more, and he followed me out and tried to hit me, he almost caught me… and I didn’t know what to do or anything. I started shouting, ‘Please help!’, and I was crying a lot, and nobody, nobody came out to see what was happening, why I was screaming… nothing.” (14)
- “I am not afraid of failing, but I am afraid of letting them do the same to me again.” (7)
On the other hand, psychologically, some of the women came out of this experience stronger, with a new network of people they could trust and from whom they received support and affection, and feeling grateful and happy for this. Similarly, some women who felt completely tied to the aggressor by their contempt became reinserted into working life, returning to their previous jobs or training for new ones, thereby becoming independent.
- “I started to work, to relate to people and to lose my fear little by little, although that is never completely gone.” (3)
- “I am good, thanks to so many years at Miriadas; they made me a woman again, stronger, more positive.” (9)
- “I am completely or almost recovered; I am happy, and I have inner peace within myself (…).” (4)
- “I felt bad for putting up with it, but I was aware that I had an emotional dependence.” (7)
- “I felt invalidated.” (2)
- “Once I got out, I realized that I was alone and that I did not have to depend on him as I thought I had.” (12)
Regarding the way the women related others after GBV, some of them confessed having difficulties due to their distrust and the negative interpretations of accepted social gestures. For this reason, they developed a sharp rejection of the male gender caused by the fear they suffered and the anger they felt toward their aggressor.
- “Currently, I do not have any physical consequences, but it has caused me a lot of insecurity and fear of starting a new relationship.” (7)
- “I still have a general fear of the male sex, his clothing, his way of walking…” (13)
- “Fear that he might be capable of doing something very bad to his own daughters.” (6)
- “I felt hatred.” (9)
Discussion
Similar to the findings of the present study, Hegarty [28], the Panamerican Health Organization [29], Aguilar-Palacio [30] and Bolaños [31] in theirs studies on the impact of GBV on women’s health, revealed that pathologies such as gastrointestinal disorders, specifically irritable colon, were related to sexual assaults; fibromyalgia, chronic pain, sleeping problems and gynecological diseases were the most frequently described physical conditions, and most of these conditions were mentioned by the participants of this study, who were able to identify them clearly. On the other hand, these studies described a significant number of traumatic injuries, which were not part of the experience of the participants in the present study; which may suggest that these injuries were implied in the physical aggressions that they experienced or that the participants in the present study did not experience traumatic injuries.
Tiruye [32] and Karakurt [33] spoke of accentuated psychopathological symptoms, which they indicated were the most frequently reported impacts for women who experienced GBV. Among these symptoms were anxiety, which included panic attacks in some reports which the women in this study describing profuse sweating, nervousness, stress or worry about small things that should not matter in additions to phobias, which the women in this study described as fear of everything related to the male gender. Notably, some feelings, specifically guilt and shame, were identified as consequences of abuse, and the women in this study identified these feelings both during the abuse phase and as they overcame it.
Authors such as Lutgendorf [34] and Sugg [35] did not include the social consequences and their impact on women’s health; instead, they focused only on physical, mental and/or psychological, sexual and reproductive health. In contrast, the present study observed the ways that abuse involves changes at the social level that affect women’s health and should not be ignored.
The results of the present study mostly support the existing literature, but some consequences that had not been mentioned before were discovered, along with the feelings that women experienced in each stage, which brings us closer to understanding the experiences of women who have survived GBV. These revelations can help social and mental professionals ensure that they are meeting most of the needs that women have when overcoming abuse. However, the lack of research on the impact of gender violence on the health of women indicates that further efforts are needed to expand knowledge about the experiences of these women.
One of the greatest limitations of this study, which may explain the limited research on this topic, is difficult access to participants, as not very many women feel prepared to share this experience or are able to share without being harmed, in addition to the fact that socially, they are very protected by the associations where they find extensive biopsychosocial help.
Conclusion
The women in this study considered all of these varied physical pathologies important and described a series of psychological disorders that lasted over time, burdening them with enormous suffering that made it difficult to relate to the rest of society, especially men. Similarly, they identified a series of positive outcomes when they left this traumatic situation empowered after overcoming GBV.
These women also emphasized that their way of relating to other people and their entire social environment had changed considerably as a result of their experience with GBV.
Acknowledgments
We must thank and recognize the courage of the women who shared their experiences with this cruel social scourge.
We also thank Alex Cuenca Díaz for his collaboration in working on the LaTex transcription.
References
- 1. Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C. Global, regional and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. Lancet. 2022; 399: 803–13. pmid:35182472
- 2.
Official State Gazette. Organic Law 1/2004, December 28, on comprehensive protection measures against gender-based violence, Spain. Head of State BOE. 2004; 313. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctvk8vzh8.3. (Accessed Jul 18, 2021).
- 3.
World Health Organization (WHO). Violence against women. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women. (Accessed Jun 20, 2021].
- 4. Silove D, Baker JR, Mohsin M, Teesson M, Creamer M, O’Donnell M, et al. The contribution of gender-based violence and network trauma to gender differences in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Plos One. 2017; 12(2): e0171879. pmid:28207775
- 5.
Sub-Directorate-General for Awareness-raising, Prevention and Studies of Gender-based Violence. Ministry of Equality. Violence Against Women Macro-Survey. 2019. Available from: https://n9.cl/p6k0. (Accessed Oct 18, 2020).
- 6. Darj E, Wijewardena K, Lindmark G, Axemo P. “Even though a man takes the major role, he has no right to abuse”: future male leaders’ views on gender-based violence in Sri Lanka. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1): 1348692. pmid:28753081
- 7. Stewart DE, MacMilla H, Kimber M. Recognizing and responding to intimate partner violence: An update. The Canadian Psychiatric Association. 2020; 66(1): 74–109. pmid:32777936
- 8. Brown SJ, Conway LJ, FitzPatrick KM, Hegarty K, Mensah FK, Papadopoullos S et al. Physical and mental health of women exposed to intimate partner violence in the 10 years after having their first child: an Australian prospective cohort study of first- time mothers. BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e040891. pmid:33371030
- 9. Yakubovich AR, Stöckl H, Murray J, Melendez-Torres GJ, Melendez-Torres GJ, Steinert JI et al. Risk and Protective Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Prospective–Longitudinal Studies. AJPH. 2018; e1–e11. pmid:29771615
- 10. Stubbs A, Szoeke C. The Effect of Intimate Partner Violence on the Physical Health and Health-Related Behaviors of Women: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. February 2021; 5. pmid:33541243
- 11. Sanz-Barbero B, Barón N, Vives-Cases C. Prevalence, associated factors and health impact of intimate partner violence against women in different life stages. Plos One. 2019; 14(10): e0221049. pmid:31596869
- 12. Damsgaard JB. Phenomenology and hermeneutics as a basis for sensitivity within health care. Nurs Philos. 2021; 22(1): e12338. pmid:33170532
- 13. De Carvalho Mesquita Ayres JR. Hermeneutics, nursing and a pedagogy of the encounter. Nurs Philos. 2019; 20(3):e12258. pmid:31136061
- 14. Mendieta-Izquierdo G, Ramírez-Rodríguez JC, Fuerte JA. Phenomenology from Heidegger’s hermeneutic perspective: a methodological proposal for public health. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2015;33(3).
- 15. Sarieddine M. Violence against Women: A Phenomenological Perspective. Clin Exp Psychol. 2018; 04(01):1–5.
- 16. Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 56:29–34. pmid:28651100
- 17.
Association of Women Victims of Gender-Based Violence Miriadas. Huelva City Council. 2009. Available from: https://rb.gy/3etaaz. (Accessed Feb 23, 2020)
- 18. Cypress B. Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Focus. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2018;37(6):302–309. pmid:30273215
- 19. Northall T, Chang E, Hatcher D, Nicholls D. The application and tailoring of Colaizzi’s phenomenological approach in a hospital setting. Nurse Res [Internet]. 2020 Jun 17 [cited 2022 May 16];28(2):20–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32309916/
- 20. Sulistyaningsih DR, Nurachmah E, Yetti K, Hastono SP. Nurses’ experience in improving adherence to fluid intake and diet in hemodialysis patients. Clinic Nursing. 2021;31:S20–S23.
- 21. Zhou S, Wei L, Hua W, He X, Chen J. A qualitative study of phenomenology of perspectives of student nurses: experience of death in clinical practice. BMC Nursing. 2022; 21: 74–86. pmid:35351123
- 22. Mohammadi MMD, Sheikhasadi H, Mahani SA, Teheri A, Sheikhbardsiri H; Abdi K. The effect of bio ethical principles education on ethical attitude of prehospital paramedix personnel. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021; 10: 289–293. pmid:34667789
- 23.
Official Gazette. Organic Law 3/2018, December 5, on the Protection of personal data and the guarantee of digital rights. 2018. Available from: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2018/12/05/3. (Accessed Aug 20, 2021).
- 24. Bratz JKA, Sandoval-Ramirez M. Ethical competences for the development of nursing care. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(4):1810–1814. pmid:30088658
- 25. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007; 19 (6): 349–357. pmid:17872937
- 26. Forero R, Nahidi S, De Costa J, Mohsin M, Fitzgerald G, Gibson N, et al. Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 120–131. pmid:29454350
- 27. Magaly D, Cadenas R. Rigour in Qualitative Research: Techniques of Analysis, Credibility, Transferability and Confirmability. Sinop Educ Rev Venez Investig. 2016;7(1):17–26.
- 28. Hegarty KL, O’Doherty LJ, Chondros P, Valpied J, Taft AJ, Astbury J, et al. Effect of Type and Severity of Intimate Partner Violence on Women’s Health and Service Use: Findings From a Primary Care Trial of Women Afraid of Their Partners. J Interpers. 2013; 28(2):273–94. pmid:22929341
- 29.
Panamerican Health Organization. Understanding and addressing violence against women Intimate partner violence. Pan Am Heal Organ. 2013;1:1–12. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/9881627. (Accessed Oct 14, 2020)
- 30. Aguilar-Palacio I, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Sánchez-Recio R, Alonso JP, Rabanaque MJ. Recession, employment and self-rated health: a study on the gender gap. Public Health. 2018 Jan 1;154:44–50. pmid:29197685
- 31.
Bolaños-Gallardo E, Fernández-Alonso MC, Menéndez-Suárez M, San José Díaz A Calvo Martínez TR, Herrero Velázquez. The impact of gender-based violence on women’s health in Castilla y León: a qualitative study. Comunidad SemFYC. 2018;1–7. Available from: https://comunidad.semfyc.es/impacto-de-la-violencia-de-genero-en-la-salud-de-las-mujeres-de-castilla-y-leon/ (Accessed May 15, 2020).
- 32. Tiruye TY, Harris ML, Chojenta C, Holliday E, Loxton D. Determinants of intimate partner violence against women in Ethiopia: A multi-level analysis. Plos One. 2020; 15(4):e0232217. pmid:32330193
- 33. Karakurt G, Smith D, Whiting J. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Women’s Mental Health. J Fam Violence. 2014; 29(7):693–702. pmid:25313269
- 34. Lutgendorf MA. Intimate Partner Violence and Women’s Health. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(3):470–80. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003326. (Accessed Sept 25, 2020)
- 35. Sugg N. Intimate Partner Violence. Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99(3):629–49. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025712515000279. (Accessed Nov 22, 2020). pmid:25841604