Figures
Abstract
Green methods have become vital for sustainable development of the scientific and commercial sphere; however, they can bring new challenges, including the need for detailed characterization and elucidation of efficacy of their products. In this study, green method of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) production was employed using an extract from grapevine canes. The aim of the study was to contribute to the knowledge about biosynthesized AgNPs by focusing on elucidation of their antifungal efficiency based on their size and/or hypothesized synergy with bioactive substances from Vitis vinifera cane extract. The antifungal activity of AgNPs capped and stabilized with bioactive compounds was tested against the opportunistic pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Two dispersions of nanoparticles with different morphology (characterized by SEM-in-STEM, DLS, UV-Vis, XRD, and AAS) were prepared by modification of reaction conditions suitable for economical production and their long-term stability monitored for six months was confirmed. The aims of the study included the comparison of the antifungal effect against suspension cells and biofilm of small monodisperse AgNPs with narrow size distribution and large polydisperse AgNPs. The hypothesis of synergistic interaction of biologically active molecules from V. vinifera extracts and AgNPs against both cell forms were tested. The interactions of all AgNPs dispersions with the cell surface and changes in cell morphology were imaged using SEM. All variants of AgNPs dispersions were found to be active against suspension and biofilm cells of C. albicans; nevertheless, surprisingly, larger polydisperse AgNPs were found to be more effective. Synergistic action of nanoparticles with biologically active extract compounds was proven for biofilm cells (MBIC80 20 mg/L of polydisperse AgNPs in extract), while isolated nanoparticles suspended in water were more active against suspension cells (MIC 20 mg/L of polydisperse AgNPs dispersed in water). Our results bring new insight into the economical production of AgNPs with defined characteristics, which were proven to target a specific mode of growth of significant pathogen C. albicans.
Citation: Miškovská A, Rabochová M, Michailidu J, Masák J, Čejková A, Lorinčík J, et al. (2022) Antibiofilm activity of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using viticultural waste. PLoS ONE 17(8): e0272844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272844
Editor: Majed Ahmed M. Al-Shaeri, King Abdulaziz University, SAUDI ARABIA
Received: May 26, 2022; Accepted: July 27, 2022; Published: August 10, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Miškovská et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the article and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This work was supported from the grant of Specific university research – grant No. A2_FPBT_2022_018 (UCT Prague), and from the Institutional Support by the Ministry of Industry and Trade. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Funder specifications: Specific university research of University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, grant recipient: A.M., grant number: A2_FPBT_2022_018, full name of funder: Internal Grant Agency, URL of funder: https://www.vscht.cz/research/internal-grant-agency. Institutional Support by the Ministry of Industry and Trade, grant recipient: J.L., grant specifications: Internal project of the Research Centre Řež within the Institutional support from the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Czech Republic, full name of funder: Ministry of Industry and Trade, Czech Republic, URL of the funder: https://www.mpo.cz/.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The green approach to the synthesis of metal nanoparticles (NPs) is a current topic in modern nanobiotechnology. It responds to the need to develop sustainable methods for the synthesis and production of nanomaterials on an industrial scale. Unlike traditional methods of NPs preparation (chemical and physical), green methods mediate the synthesis of NPs using compounds of natural origin, such as proteins, alkaloids, flavonoids, reducing carbohydrates, polyphenols, and others, which act as both reducing and stabilizing agents [1]. In particular, whole living plants, plant extracts (aqueous, ethanolic, methanolic), microbial cells, cell-free extracts of microorganisms (supernatants, filtrates), or, for example, residual media after cell cultivation are most often the source of these biomolecules. Green methods are generally environmentally friendly, do not use organic solvents or toxic substances, and are inexpensive [2, 3]. Although green synthesis undoubtedly reduces the environmental impact of NPs production, the rational use, recycling and disposal of NPs is also important [4].
Phytosynthesis using plant extracts is gaining more and more attention, thanks to the many advantages of this procedure, including a wide variety of materials that could be used for extract preparation, simplicity of the whole process, use of the gentle reaction conditions (atmospheric pressure, room temperature, gentle pH values) and easy scale-up of the whole process [4]. Extracts of various plants (Hibiscus rosa sinensis, Eucalyptus globulus, Azadirachta indica or black tea), plant parts (root, leaf, fruit, stem, flower, bark, and bud) or waste after industrial processing of plants (Brassica oleracea waste leaves) could be used in plant-extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) [5–7]. The use of complex plant extracts leads to the rapid synthesis (even in a few minutes) of biocompatible and very stable nanoparticles. Another advantage of using plant extracts is the flexibility of reaction conditions setting, which is broader compared to microbial biosynthesis, where manipulation, e.g. with reaction temperature or pH, is considerably limited due to the presence of microorganisms [8]. The reaction conditions are very important in terms of the desired properties of NPs [9]. By their manipulation, the physicochemical properties of NPs, such as size, polydispersity, shape, and surface functionalization, could be significantly affected. For example, the pH of the reaction mixture is an important parameter in the biosynthesis of NPs mediated by plant extracts and many studies have confirmed that it affects the reaction rate, morphology and stability of the resulting nanoparticles [10]. This is due to the increased formation of nucleation centers along with an increase in pH. At the same time, pH affects the activity of biomolecules involved in the reduction and stabilization of nanoparticles [11].
It has already been found that the physicochemical properties of NPs significantly affect their antimicrobial activity [9, 12]. This is particularly interesting in connection with AgNPs, which are known for their antimicrobial effects. Among the main advantages of using silver nanoparticles over conventional antimicrobials is mainly the low risk of development of resistance, due to the wide range of mechanisms of NPs action [13]. The excellent antimicrobial activity of AgNPs has already been described against many pathogenic bacteria (gram positive Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and gram negative Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella choleraesuis), yeasts (Candida sp.) and fungi (Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp. Fusarium sp., Pythium sp.) [14–17]. The attractiveness of biogenic NPs lies in their functionalization, capping and stabilization by biomolecules, which themselves might possess antimicrobial properties and also allow NPs to bind to the cell surface [12]. Since the extracts are prepared exclusively from non-toxic plants and often have beneficial effects on their own, the use of a combination of two active substances (NPs and plant extract) is an interesting approach. The combination could have synergistic effects and thus allow to reduce the effective concentrations of the individual agents, as described, for example, in a study where AgNPs with essential oils were applied against several pathogenic bacterial species and fungi and significant synergistic inhibitory effects were observed [18]. The potential of biosynthesized nanoparticles in medicine is aimed mostly at applications, where they could present a defence barrier to prevent infection. Specifically, they could replace traditionally prepared AgNPs in applications such as wound dressings or AgNPs-coated implants.
The present study deals with the green synthesis of AgNPs using viticultural waste, Vitis vinifera canes. Most current studies focused on the synthesis of silver nanoparticles by V. vinifera use whole fruits or fruit skin extracts of this plant [19–21]. In contrast, this study focuses on the use of canes as they are a waste product of vine growing without other applied use and represent a stable (in storage) and very rich source of bioactive substances that can contribute to the synthesis of stable nanoparticles of various properties, as demonstrated by our results. By adjustment of the reaction conditions, AgNPs of different size and polydispersity were biosynthesized, and their antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against the opportunistic pathogenic yeast Candida albicans was studied. The aim was to describe the antifungal effects of AgNPs of different physicochemical properties (size and polydispersity) and simultaneously investigate whether the combination of the extract remaining after synthesis in the NPs colloid will improve the resulting antimicrobial effect. In addition, the interaction of nanoparticles with the surface of treated cells was studied by SEM imaging, to better understand the mechanism of NPs action.
Materials and methods
Plant material and preparation of extract
Grape canes from both white and red varieties of Vitis vinifera (Pinot gris, Pinot noir and Rheinriesling) were collected from Grébovka vineyard (Prague, Czech Republic, wine region Bohemia) during the dormancy period in January 2017. The extraction method was modified according to Rollová, Gharwalova [22]. Plant material was dried and crushed using high-speed mixer. To prepare the ethanolic extract of Vitis vinifera canes, the obtained powder was mixed with 40% (v/v) ethanol (1:4 (w/v)) (Penta, Czech Republic). The mixture was extracted for 24 hours at room temperature in the dark. After that, the extract was filtered through a laboratory filter and subsequently through a microfilter with porosity 0.22 μm. For further use, the liquid extract had been stored at 4 °C in the dark.
Synthesis of AgNPs and their isolation
AgNPs were synthesized combining the ethanolic extract of V. vinifera canes (obtained as described above) with AgNO3 (final concentration 1 mM, purchased from VWR, USA).
The AgNPs with different morphology were prepared under distinct reaction conditions, that were selected based on initial experiments where different AgNO3 molarities, extract volume, order of reagent addition, pH, and light exposure were studied with the aim of identifying key variables influencing the NPs morphology. To prepare monodisperse nanoparticles (mAgNPs), 8 ml of the extract was added to a 72 ml of AgNO3 aqueous solution (distilled water) to obtain final concentration 1 mM. The pH of obtained mixture was immediately adjusted to 7.5 by adding 1% (w/v) NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and the mixture was placed on an orbital shaker (150 rpm) in the dark for 72 hours. To prepare polydisperse nanoparticles (pAgNPs), 4 ml of ethanolic V. vinifera extract was mixed with 36 ml of AgNO3 (final concentration 1 mM) and the mixture was left in daylight for 12 hours in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flask and then was placed in the dark to another 60 hours (without stirring). Additionally, biosynthesized NPs were isolated into ultrapure water to allow for a comparison of NPs antimicrobial activity with the Vitis vinifera extract remaining from the reaction (mAgNPs/e, pAgNPs/e) and isolated nanoparticles (mAgNPs/w, pAgNPs/w). For that, biosynthesized nanoparticles were isolated from the extract by centrifugation at 49,054 × g for 30 min (Sorvall Evolution RC, Kendro, Denmark), and the pellet of nanoparticles was resuspended in ultrapure water (Type 1, obtained by Direct-Q® Water Purification System, Merck, Germany). Isolation of the NPs was verified by UV-Vis spectra analysis of the resulting supernatant. For further use, nanoparticles were stored at 4 °C in the dark.
Characterization of AgNPs by UV-Vis
The formation of AgNPs was at first indicated by color change of the solutions and confirmed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The UV-Vis absorption spectra in the range 300–700 nm were analyzed using a Reader Infinite M900Pro (TECAN MTP, Switzerland). UV-Vis spectroscopy was also used for monitoring the stability of AgNPs for 6 months. For this purpose, nanoparticles were stored in the dark at 4 °C and their spectra were monitored in time intervals: 1 week; 1, 2, 4, and 6 months.
Characterization of AgNPs by STEM-in-SEM
The imaging of the synthesized NPs was performed using a scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) detector integrated in a Focused Ion Beam–Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM) instrument LYRA3 (TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, a.s., Czech Republic). The samples were analyzed at an electron beam energy of 30 keV with the STEM detector in a bright field (BF) mode. The BF mode provided high contrast images of nanoparticles, which were used for the determination of nanoparticle morphology (particle size and shape distributions).
Image analysis was performed in ImageJ [23]. Every image was calibrated prior to image analysis operations. The primary parameters obtained for every particle from the image processing were area A in units of nm2 and perimeter P in units of nm. Particle area A is defined as the projection of a particle shape onto a plane of the electron beam in focus. Based on those two parameters, equivalent circular area diameter dECD and circularity fCIRC of every particle were calculated. The dECD is defined as the diameter of a circle that has the same area as that of a particle, . The fCIRC is defined as the ratio of the area of a particle to the area of a circle with the same perimeter, fCIRC = 4 ⋅ π ⋅ A/P2. The circularity value of a perfect circle is 1.0, lower circularity value indicates larger deviation of a given particle from a perfect circle. Subsequently, histograms of the size dECD and shape fCIRC distribution of biosynthesized nanoparticles using V. vinifera cane extract were prepared. Average values and standard deviations were calculated. The counts (n) of analyzed nanoparticles were as follows: n(mAgNPs/e) = 1157; n(mAgNPs/w) = 480; n(pAgNPs/e) = 708; n(pAgNPs/w) = 558.
Characterization of AgNPs by DLS
The hydrodynamic diameter together with zeta potential were determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS). DLS analysis was performed using Zetasizer Pro (Malvern Panalytical, United Kingdom). The data were processed using ZS Xplorer software v1.50 (Malvern Panalytical, United Kingdom).
Characterization of AgNPs by XRD
The crystalline structure of biosynthesized AgNPs was investigated by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) crystallography using PANanalytical X´Pert PRO diffractometer (PANanalytical, Netherlands) with a CuKα radiation (generator operations U = 40 kV, I = 30 mA). For this purpose, nanoparticles were washed three times in ultrapure water and centrifuged, the obtained pellet of NPs was lyophilized using Heteo PowerDry LL 3000 Freeze Dryer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA).
Determination of mass concentration of AgNPs by AAS
The mass of silver in the particles was determined using atomic absorption spectrometer Agilent 280FS AA (Agilent, USA). For that, nanoparticles were first isolated by centrifugation (30 min, 49,054 × g). Supernatant was used for AAS analysis, and the mass concentration together with the yield of the synthesis were calculated from these results using the known initial concentration of silver ions at the start of the synthesis.
Microorganisms, growth media and conditions
Model clinical isolate strain Candida albicans ATCC 10231 originated from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The inoculum was pre-cultured before each experiment by adding the cryopreserved microorganism (stored at -70 °C) to a fresh yeast extract peptone dextrose broth medium (YPD–Yeast extract 10 g/L; Peptone 20 g/L; Dextrose 20 g/L; all Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and incubating for 24 h, at 37 °C, 150 rpm in an orbital shaker. The antifungal experiments were carried out in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI-1640) with L-glutamine, without sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
Antifungal activity of AgNPs against planktonic cells
The activity of AgNPs against planktonic cells was determined by the microdilution method. The cultivation of yeasts was carried out in microtiter plates using Bioscreen C analyzer (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Finland). AgNPs were added in concentration range 2.5–40.0 mg/L (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0 mg/L; dilution in phosphate buffered saline solution, PBS, pH = 7.4). Aliquots of 162 μl of fresh RPMI-1640 medium (used for the antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida sp. according to CLSI) were added into each well. Finally, wells were filled up to a final volume 320 μl by adding 30 μl of standard yeast inoculum (OD600 nm = 0.100 ± 0.010) prepared to a fresh RPMI-1640 medium, followed by incubation for 24 h at 37 °C. Nanoparticles-free control was filled with 130 μl of PBS, 162 μl of fresh RPMI-1640 medium and 30 μl of standard yeast inoculum. The activity of V. vinifera extract alone (in 10% aliquots of corresponding nanoparticle volume) was also monitored. Each experiment was performed in three independent replicates, 10 parallels each. Minimum concentration required to inhibit 80% of cell growth (MIC80) and 100% of cell growth (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration that causes at least 80% resp. 100% decrease in growth after a 24 h incubation, according to the definition by Serra, Hidalgo-Bastida [24].
SEM visualization of Candida albicans planktonic cells after treatment with AgNPs
Samples were gathered from control (nanoparticles-free) and treated cell cultures. The cell suspension was centrifuged (10 min, 9,000 × g) and washed twice with sterile saline solution, once with distilled water. Subsequently, an aliquot of 10 μl of washed cell culture (OD600 nm = 0.3 ± 0.050) was dropped at silicon wafer (Sil’tronix Silicon Technologies, France) and samples were air-dried. The LYRA3 microscope (TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, a.s., Czech Republic) was used for SEM imaging at an electron beam voltage of 10 kV.
Antibiofilm activity of AgNPs
The pre-cultured inoculum (see section Microorganisms, growth media and conditions) was centrifuged (10 min, 9,000 × g) and resuspended in fresh RPMI-1640 medium. The biofilm experiments were carried out in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (TPP, Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Various concentrations of AgNPs ranging from 2.5–20 mg/L (two-fold dilution in PBS) were added to wells. Each well was topped up to 280 μl of final volume with 210 μl of standard yeast suspension (OD600 nm = 0.800 ± 0.010) and incubated at orbital shaker for 24 h, at 37 °C. Afterwards, the wells were washed twice with sterile saline to remove non-adhered cells. The metabolic activity of adhered cells was observed using resazurin viability assay according to Vaňková, Kašparová [25]. An aliquot of 25 μl of resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) stock solution (0.15 g/L in sterile PBS), 25 μl of glucose (Penta, Czech Republic) (180 g/L in sterile PBS) together with 100 μl of sterile saline were added to each well and the plate was incubated for 30 min (at 37 °C in darkness). After incubation, the fluorescence intensity of resorufin was determined using Reader Infinite M900Pro at excitation and emission wavelengths 545 resp. 575 nm. Nanoparticles-free control was filled with 70 μl of PBS, and 210 μl of standard yeast inoculum. Each experiment was performed in 8 parallels in three independent replicates. The activity of V. vinifera extract on metabolic activity of the biofilm cells (in 10% aliquots of pipetted nanoparticle volume) was also monitored. The resulting effect of AgNPs on biofilm is expressed as % of the metabolic activity of the cells relative to the nanoparticle-free control, which was assigned to be 100%.
Statistical analysis
For the evaluation of microbial growth (see section Antifungal activity of AgNPs against planktonic cells) or biofilm assays (see section Antibiofilm activity of AgNPs) data, we used Dixon’s Q test to exclude outlying values. Arithmetic means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for each experiment and all results were expressed in relative percentages (control samples were 100%).
Results and discussion
The aim of our work was to identify and implement conditions enabling synthesis of AgNPs of different morphology and size distribution with different properties, which would also enable easy large-scale production. The properties studied included the comparison of their biological activity against opportunistic pathogenic yeast C. albicans. Size and circularity of biosynthesized AgNPs was determined by analysis of STEM-in-SEM images and the NPs were further characterized by UV-Vis, DLS and XRD. In addition to studying the effect of size and polydispersity on antifungal and antibiofilm activities of NPs, the effect of dispersing medium (ethanolic extract of V. vinifera / ultrapure water) was also studied to reveal possible synergistic activity of AgNPs and plant extract. Therefore, four NPs dispersions were obtained and studied: monodisperse AgNPs with V. vinifera extract remaining from the reaction (mAgNPs/e), isolated monodisperse AgNPs resuspended into ultrapure water (mAgNPs/w), polydisperse AgNPs with V. vinifera extract remaining from the reaction (pAgNPs/e), and polydisperse AgNPs resuspended into ultrapure water (pAgNPs/w).
Synthesis and characterization of AgNPs by UV-Vis
The biosynthesis of the AgNPs of different morphology was achieved by their formation under different reaction conditions using extract of V. vinifera canes with silver nitrate. Varied reaction conditions were tested (change of pH, temperature, exposure to light) maintaining constant input concentrations of the extract and silver nitrate. Two procedures were then selected from a set of experiments with regard to the size distribution and morphology of the resulting nanoparticles as well as the effectiveness of the whole synthesis with respect to potential scale-up and large-scale technology requirements. The aim was to synthesize NPs of different size distribution–monodisperse AgNPs (mAgNPs) and polydisperse AgNPs (pAgNPs).
To allow for a comparison of NPs antimicrobial activity with the Vitis vinifera extract remaining from the reaction, second set of NPs dispersions was obtained by including an isolation step. Isolation of the NPs was verified by UV-Vis spectra analysis of the resulting supernatant (see S1 Fig). Therefore, four NPs dispersions were obtained and studied mAgNPs/e, mAgNPs/w, pAgNPs/e, and pAgNPs/w.
The formation of nanoparticles was indicated primarily visually by colour change which occurs when nanoparticles are formed [26]. This change occurred immediately after reaction beginning in monodisperse AgNPs, resp. after 4 hours in polydisperse AgNPs. The colour of monodisperse nanoparticles changed from the original light brown to deep yellow, in contrast, the final colour of polydisperse AgNPs was dark red orange (Fig 1A). Both these colours are typical for silver colloids and occur due to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR). While yellow colour is characteristic for small spherical nanoparticles, the orange and red are typical for larger particles [27]. These conclusions were supported by follow-up characterization techniques such as UV-Vis, STEM-in-SEM and DLS of the NPs.
A–The colour of individual solutions–silver nitrate, Vitis vinifera cane extract, biologically synthesized monodisperse AgNPs (mAgNPs), biologically synthesized polydisperse AgNPs (pAgNPs); B–UV-Vis absorption spectra of controls and AgNPs.
The results of UV-Vis analysis are shown in Fig 1B. The observed absorbance band at 340–600 nm is typical for the formation of AgNPs [28]. UV-Vis spectroscopy, in addition to confirming the formation of nanoparticles, also provides information about the size of AgNPs. The wavelength corresponding to the absorbance peak (λmax) reflects the size of the NPs, typically, small particles exhibit unique absorbance peaks at lower wavelengths and large vice versa [29]. The wavelengths corresponding to the peaks of the absorption bands were 420 nm for monodisperse AgNPs and 440 nm for polydisperse AgNPs, which is in agreement with following methods confirming that the mAgNPs were smaller than the pAgNPs (see sections Characterization of biosynthesized AgNPs by DLS and Characterization of biosynthesized AgNPs by STEM-in-SEM).
Characterization of biosynthesized AgNPs by DLS
DLS measurements were employed to observe the hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential (ζ) of the synthesized NPs (Table 1). The DLS data confirmed the successful biosynthesis of silver NPs of two different sizes–smaller mAgNPs with Z-average ~35 nm and bigger pAgNPs with Z-average ~102 nm. Hydrodynamic diameter was measured in both NPs–NPs in extract remaining after synthesis (AgNPs/e), and NPs isolated in ultrapure water (AgNPs/w), and it was confirmed that the hydrodynamic diameter did not change significantly after isolation. The measured zeta potential of mAgNPs was lower than –25 mV, which indicates high stability of the colloid [30]. Zeta potential of pAgNPs was higher than ζ of mAgNPs, however subsequent stability monitoring with UV-Vis did not confirm that either pAgNPs or mAgNPs aggregated in a time period of 6 months (see section Monitoring the stability of AgNPs over time using UV-Vis). The negative surface charge of the obtained AgNPs is attributed to the biomolecules present in the V. vinifera cane extract, which adsorbed to the NPs surface and stabilized the NPs.
(mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs); pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; e–V. vinifera extract; w–ultrapure water as medium).
Characterization of biosynthesized AgNPs by STEM-in-SEM
The imaging of biosynthesized NPs was performed using STEM-in-SEM. Fig 2 shows all samples of AgNPs. Monodisperse NPs (Fig 2A and 2B) were confirmed to contain smaller particles without aggregates with a narrow size distribution. The polydisperse NPs were found to be more diverse in size and shape (Fig 2C and 2D).
A–monodisperse AgNPs in extract as medium; B–monodisperse AgNPs in water as medium; C–polydisperse AgNPs in extract as medium; D–polydisperse AgNPs in water as medium; scale = 200 nm.
Detailed characterization of NPs was done using images from STEM-in-SEM. Using image analysis, the diameter and circularity of nanoparticles were determined, and subsequently analyzed as the distribution of nanoparticles in circularity intervals.
The average diameter and circularity of biosynthesized silver NPs are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The results of the image analysis are consistent with the findings from the UV-Vis and DLS measurements. The mAgNPs contained small particles with a narrow size range and uniform in shape (almost 90% of mAgNPs lies in the circularity interval 0.85–1.0). On the other hand, pAgNPs were larger, and 30% of the pAgNPs fell into a circularity range lower than 0.85 (corresponding to various shapes, distinct from circular form). The results shown in Table 2 also provide information about the diameter and shape stability of AgNPs after isolation into ultrapure water, when both parameters remain unchanged. The high stability of our biosynthesized AgNPs after resuspension in ultrapure water is consistent with previous studies that confirm that water is an ideal medium for the long-term storing of AgNPs [31].
(mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium).
AgNPs have been stored in the form of a colloidal solution that does not tend to separate because the submicron particles sediment so slowly that the effect is eliminated by the mixing tendencies of diffusion and convection [32]. The liquid storage is mostly preferred upon dry storage of AgNPs, that is usually difficult to disperse.
Subsequently, histograms of the particle size distribution of biosynthesized nanoparticles using V. vinifera cane extract are shown in Fig 3.
(mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium).
Characterization of silver NPs by XRD
The crystalline structure of AgNPs was confirmed by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) crystallography. The presence of face-centered cubic (fcc) structure of metallic silver was confirmed in both, mAgNPs and pAgNPs, by finding the characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 38.1114, 44.1933, 64.5215, 77.4042, 81.5175 (for mAgNPs), and 38.1166, 44.2196, 64.4865, 77.4269, 81.4545 (for pAgNPs) indexed to Bragg reflections of the (111), (200), (220), (311), (222) planes.
Determination of mass concentration of AgNPs by AAS
The reaction yield and the determination of the Ag concentration present in the form of nanoparticles was conducted by AAS. While the initial concentration of silver ions in both reaction mixtures was identic, as expected, the yield of the individual methods of synthesis differed. The yield of the reaction leading to the formation of monodisperse AgNPs was very high (98%) and the concentration of silver in NPs was found to be 105.4 ± 0.1 mg/L. In comparison, the yield of the reaction leading to the formation of polydisperse nanoparticles was lower (91%) and the concentration was found to be 97.9 ± 7.2 mg/L.
Monitoring the stability of AgNPs over time using UV-Vis
Apart from the characterization of the AgNPs, UV-Vis spectroscopy is commonly used to study the stability of AgNPs over time. In unstable colloids, the plasmon resonance peak shifts to longer wavelengths and broadens due to aggregation of NPs [33]. By monitoring the stability of the prepared nanoparticles, it was found that the wavelength corresponding to the absorbance peak (λmax) of all AgNPs remain unchanged in the observed time period (6 months). The results indicate high stability with no aggregation of both, mAgNPs and pAgNPs, regardless of the dispersing medium (V. vinifera extract/ultrapure water) (Table 4).
Monitored by UV-Vis (storage conditions: 4 °C, dark), (mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium).
Antifungal activity of AgNPs against planktonic cells of Candida albicans and SEM visualization cell-AgNPs interactions
AgNPs exhibit promising antimicrobial activity against many human pathogens (eg. C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata), making them attractive to several fields, such as biomedicine, textile industry, food packaging or cosmetics [34, 35]. The antimicrobial effects of nanoparticles are influenced by their physicochemical properties, such as their size, shape, specific surface area, surface energy, charge, zeta potential, surface morphology, crystal structure or ligands [12]. Therefore, we have decided to study the antifungal activity of two different biosynthesized AgNPs dispersions–small monodisperse AgNPs (mAgNPs) and larger polydisperse AgNPs (pAgNPs), both prepared using Vitis vinifera cane extract. Moreover, the possibility of exploiting the synergistic activity of the plant extract (resulting from the biosynthesis process) and NPs was studied. For this purpose, AgNPs were isolated from original colloid by centrifugation and the pellet was resuspended into ultrapure water. The activity of AgNPs in V. vinifera extract remaining after synthesis (AgNPs/e) as well as the activity of isolated nanoparticles (AgNPs/w) was tested.
The antifungal activity of the biosynthesized AgNPs was investigated against planktonic cells of C. albicans ATCC 10231 in various concentrations (0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, and 40.0 mg/L). It was found that the extract of V. vinifera canes alone did not inhibit the growth of the planktonic cells. On the contrary, at maximal tested concentration of the V. vinifera extract, an increase up to 130 rel. % of cell culture was observed.
Both biosynthesized silver NPs displayed significant inhibition activity against C. albicans. Monodisperse nanoparticles significantly inhibited the growth of the microorganism at concentration 20 mg/L and higher (Fig 4). Using mAgNPs, MIC80 (20 mg/L) was observed only using mAgNPs in water as medium. Polydisperse AgNPs showed higher antifungal activity and even 10 mg/L of pNPs inhibited the growth of the microorganism by more than 80 rel. %, in both media. Polydisperse AgNPs were effective even using 10 mg/L (inhibition at least 96 rel. %), while using 20 mg/L of pAgNPs/w completely inhibited the growth of yeast (MIC). Wypij, Czarnecka [36] reported even higher MIC (32 mg/L) than in our study. The authors tested activity of polydisperse biogenic AgNPs (size interval 5–20 nm). A similar effect was observed in Jain, Arora [37] where spherical AgNPs in the size range 7–20 nm showed MIC of yeast C. albicans 25 mg/L.
(mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium).
Our results indicate that the presence of the V. vinifera extract decreases the antimicrobial activity of the NPs which correlates with our observation that V. vinifera cane extract enhances the growth of Candida planktonic cells and thus our hypothesis of synergistic interactions was not confirmed against planktonic cells of C. albicans. Increased activity of isolated AgNPs was observed in both nanoparticle morphologies, even though the reaction yield was up to 91–98% and therefore the extract-containing dispersions of AgNPs (AgNPs/e) contained minor amount of unreacted silver ions. However, the activity of free Ag+ ions is known to immediately decrease due to reduction by the presence of chlorides in the media or buffer.
Regarding the antimicrobial efficiency of nanoparticles with different morphology, the results clearly showed that polydisperse AgNPs showed higher activity, even though the smaller particles contained in monodisperse AgNPs are usually reported to have higher antimicrobial activity [38, 39]. This finding confirms that the size of the nanoparticles is not the only factor that affects the antimicrobial effect. We could explain the higher activity of polydisperse nanoparticles by a broader spectrum of possible mechanisms of different sizes and shapes of NPs in comparison with a sample containing NPs of high circularity and a narrow size range. Morphology-dependent antimicrobial activity of metal nanoparticles has been already recorded. As the main cause of different activity of NPs of different shapes and sizes is considered the rate of silver ions release from the surface of nanoparticles [40, 41].
Interactions of NPs and C. albicans cells were visualized by SEM (images of untreated, monodisperse AgNPs treated and polydisperse AgNPs treated cells of C. albicans are shown in Figs 5–7, respectively). The mechanism of action of silver NPs includes the release of metal ions, oxidative stress associated with ROS production, and various nonoxidative mechanisms, including direct interactions with the cell wall (and/or cell membrane) or intracellular penetration [12]. The adsorption of NPs to the cell wall of the microorganism can lead to its disruption, which affects the integrity and permeability of the membrane [12, 36]. The cell wall and cell membrane maintain cell integrity and stability and play a crucial role in the pathogenicity and virulence of pathogenic fungi [42]. The degradation of the cell wall allows the NPs and silver ions to enter the cell interior and cause subsequent damage such as inhibition of ATP production and DNA replication [43]. In the present study, the interaction of nanoparticles with the C. albicans cell surface was studied at concentration of 5 mg/L of AgNPs (the lowest concentration at which the first significant decrease in planktonic cell was observed: specifically using pAgNPs/e, see Fig 4). The applications of both mAgNPs and pAgNPs resulted in visible interactions with the cell wall of the microorganism. While untreated cells (Fig 5) had a smooth and regular surface and retained their typical oval shape, visible damage of the cell surface was observed for treated cells and NPs were found directly adhered to cells in all cases (Figs 6 and 7).
(A) scale 20 μm; (B) scale 2 μm.
(A and B) cells treated with mAgNPs in extract; (C and D) cells treated with mAgNPs in ultrapure water.
(A and B) cells treated with pAgNPs in extract; (C and D) cells treated with pAgNPs in ultrapure water.
Cells after treatment with mAgNPs/e had NPs visibly adhered to the surface (Fig 6), but the morphology of their surface was not as fundamentally affected as the use of mAgNPs isolated in water and polydisperse AgNPs. This is correlated with the limited inhibition of cell growth when 5 mg/L of mAgNPs/e did not inhibit the cell growth at all, unlike other samples of NPs. The treated cells were found to change the typical oval shape and to shrink. Although the treated cells were clearly disrupted (eg. Fig 7A), the sample obviously contained cells with a smooth surface resembling untreated cell. This indicates that after the adhesion of the nanoparticles to the cell surface, a lot of viable cells remained in the sample, so the effect of the NPs in used concentration is only fungistatic.
Our observations are in agreement with previous studies of C. albicans cell-NPs biointerface. Radhakrishnan, Mudiam [44] reported the activity of chemically synthesized spherical silver NPs (10–30 nm) against C. albicans. They found MIC90 (minimum concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms) 40 mg/L of NPs and subsequently studied how this concentration of NPs affects the cell envelopes. Similar as in the present study, obvious changes in cell wall surface were detected, even that the AgNPs concentration used for cell treatment was eightfold higher.
Antibiofilm activity of AgNPs
Biofilm formation provides the pathogenic microorganism with an extraordinary ability to invade the host, adapt and modify its immediate environment. Thus, the microbial population in a biofilm can withstand adverse environmental conditions and demonstrate dramatically reduced susceptibility to antibiotics, detergents, and host immune responses [45]. Biofilm prevents the action of antibacterial agents in a number of ways, such as difficult diffusion of antimicrobials through the extracellular matrix, altered phenotype, slow cell growth, or the presence of persistent cells [46]. Consequently, a large part of antimicrobial research is focused on antibiofilm approaches. Silver or copper NPs were found to be able to prevent biofilm formation, and are therefore proposed as advantageous as coatings for implants to fight implant-associated infections [47]. Recently, AgNPs have proven its efficacy against C. albicans biofilms [48, 49].
In the present study, the antibiofilm potential of biosynthesized silver NPs (0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mg/L) of two different morphologies was studied. The metabolic activity of treated and untreated C. albicans biofilm cells was monitored using a resazurin assay.
V. vinifera cane extract has been found to inhibit the metabolic activity of biofilm cells, which differs from our observation of the effects on planktonic cells. The highest concentration of the extract (2% (v/v)) inhibited the metabolic activity by 32 rel. % in comparison to control. Our results are in agreement with the results of Rollová, Gharwalova [22], where the inhibitory effects of V. vinifera extract on the metabolic activity of E. coli and Citrobacter freundii biofilms were demonstrated. Interestingly, the nanoparticles had an increased inhibitory effect in combination with V. vinifera extract as a medium (compared to those isolated in ultrapure water), therefore confirming our hypothesis of synergistic activity of NPs and plant extract for C. albicans biofilm cells (Fig 8).
(mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium); measured using resazurin assay.
Polydisperse AgNPs were more effective in inhibiting the activity of biofilm cells, similarly to their effect on planktonic cells. The highest decrease in metabolic activity (80 rel. %) was observed at concentration 20 mg/L pAgNPs/e. The monodisperse AgNPs (20 mg/L) decreased the metabolic activity of biofilm cells by less than 50 rel. %.
Conclusion
In this work, we have achieved biosynthesis of stable AgNPs of different morphologies and subsequent different antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties in a controlled manner. The results confirm the differences in antifungal and antibiofilm activity of AgNPs of various dispersity (mono- and polydisperse). Larger, polydisperse AgNPs showed to be more effective against both planktonic and biofilm cells, than smaller monodisperse AgNPs. The hypothesis of synergistic interaction of biologically active molecules from V. vinifera extracts and AgNPs was proved for the antibiofilm assays.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. UV-Vis confirmation of successful isolation of biosynthesized AgNPs into ultrapure water.
A–isolation of monodisperse AgNPs; B–isolation of polydisperse AgNPs (mAgNPs–monodisperse AgNPs; pAgNPs–polydisperse AgNPs; /e–V. vinifera extract; /w–ultrapure water as medium).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272844.s001
(TIF)
References
- 1. Dikshit PK, Kumar J, Das AK, Sadhu S, Sharma S, Singh S, et al. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: Applications and limitations. Catalysts. 2021;11(8):902.
- 2. Gour A, Jain NK. Advances in green synthesis of nanoparticles. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2019;47(1):844–51. pmid:30879351
- 3. Kolouchova I, Melzoch K, Šmidrkal J, Filip V. The content of resveratrol in vegetables and fruit. Chemické listy. 2005;99(7).
- 4. Dauthal P, Mukhopadhyay M. Noble metal nanoparticles: plant-mediated synthesis, mechanistic aspects of synthesis, and applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016;55(36):9557–77.
- 5.
Rajput H, Kedia A, Shah D, Gamit HA, Amaresan N. Sustainable synthesis of silver nanoparticles using fruit waste and its antibacterial activity. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022, in press.
- 6. Rani P, Ahmed B, Singh J, Kaur J, Rawat M, Kaur N, et al. Silver nanostructures prepared via novel green approach as an effective platform for biological and environmental applications. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2022;29(6):103296. pmid:35574283
- 7. Ali K, Ahmed B, Dwivedi S, Saquib Q, Al-Khedhairy AA, Musarrat J. Microwave accelerated green synthesis of stable silver nanoparticles with Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract and their antibacterial and antibiofilm activity on clinical isolates. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0131178. pmid:26132199
- 8. Makarov V, Love A, Sinitsyna O, Makarova S, Yaminsky I, Taliansky M, et al. “Green” nanotechnologies: synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Acta Naturae. 2014;6(1 (20)):35–44. pmid:24772325
- 9. Al-Otibi F, Alfuzan SA, Alharbi RI, Al-Askar AA, Al-Otaibi RM, Al Subaie HF, et al. Comparative study of antifungal activity of two preparations of green silver nanoparticles from Portulaca oleracea extract. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;29(4):2772–81. pmid:35531187
- 10. Borase HP, Salunke BK, Salunkhe RB, Patil CD, Hallsworth JE, Kim BS, et al. Plant extract: a promising biomatrix for ecofriendly, controlled synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology. 2014;173(1):1–29. pmid:24622849
- 11. Vijayaraghavan K, Ashokkumar T. Plant-mediated biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles: a review of literature, factors affecting synthesis, characterization techniques and applications. Journal of environmental chemical engineering. 2017;5(5):4866–83.
- 12. Maťátková O, Michailidu J, Miškovská A, Kolouchová I, Masák J, Čejková A. Antimicrobial properties and applications of metal nanoparticles biosynthesized by green methods. Biotechnology advances. 2022:107905. pmid:35031394
- 13. Khan A, Ameen F, Khan F, Al-Arfaj A, Ahmed B. Fabrication and antibacterial activity of nanoenhanced conjugate of silver (I) oxide with graphene oxide. Materials Today Communications. 2020;25:101667.
- 14. Deshmukh SP, Patil S, Mullani S, Delekar S. Silver nanoparticles as an effective disinfectant: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;97:954–65. pmid:30678983
- 15. Haroon M, Zaidi A, Ahmed B, Rizvi A, Khan MS, Musarrat J. Effective inhibition of phytopathogenic microbes by eco-friendly leaf extract mediated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Indian journal of microbiology. 2019;59(3):273–87. pmid:31388204
- 16. Ahmed B, Hashmi A, Khan MS, Musarrat J. ROS mediated destruction of cell membrane, growth and biofilms of human bacterial pathogens by stable metallic AgNPs functionalized from bell pepper extract and quercetin. Advanced Powder Technology. 2018;29(7):1601–16.
- 17. Owaid MN, Rabeea MA, Aziz AA, Jameel MS, Dheyab MA. Mycogenic fabrication of silver nanoparticles using Picoa, Pezizales, characterization and their antifungal activity. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 2022;17:100612.
- 18. Begum T, Follett PA, Mahmud J, Moskovchenko L, Salmieri S, Allahdad Z, et al. Silver nanoparticles-essential oils combined treatments to enhance the antibacterial and antifungal properties against foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2022;164:105411. pmid:35066069
- 19. Varadharajan V, Ramaswamy A, Shanmugham S. Silver nanoparticle synthesis using grape (Vitis vinifera L.) skin extract and its application as anticancerous agent. Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine. 2016;8(8):626–34.
- 20. Hashim N, Paramasivam M, Tan JS, Kernain D, Hussin MH, Brosse N, et al. Green mode synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Vitis vinifera’s tannin and screening its antimicrobial activity/apoptotic potential versus cancer cells. Materials Today Communications. 2020;25:101511.
- 21. Gnanajobitha G, Paulkumar K, Vanaja M, Rajeshkumar S, Malarkodi C, Annadurai G, et al. Fruit-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Vitis vinifera and evaluation of their antimicrobial efficacy. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry. 2013;3(1):1–6.
- 22. Rollová M, Gharwalova L, Krmela A, Schulzová V, Hajšlová J, Jaroš P, et al. Grapevine extracts and their effect on selected gut-associated microbiota: In vitro study. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2020;38(3):137–43.
- 23.
ImageJ. 1.53g - FIJI, Java 1.8.0_66 (64-bit). Property rights: Wayne Rasband and contributors, National Institutes of Health, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij.
- 24. Serra E, Hidalgo-Bastida LA, Verran J, Williams D, Malic S. Antifungal activity of commercial essential oils and biocides against Candida albicans. Pathogens. 2018;7(1):15. pmid:29370147
- 25. Vaňková E, Kašparová P, Dulíčková N, Čeřovský V. Combined effect of lasioglossin LL-III derivative with azoles against Candida albicans virulence factors: biofilm formation, phospholipases, proteases and hemolytic activity. FEMS yeast research. 2020;20(3):foaa020. pmid:32324227
- 26. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian journal of chemistry. 2019;12(7):908–31.
- 27.
www.nanocomposix.com. Silver Nanoparticles: Optical Properties 2014 [cited 2021. https://nanocomposix.com/pages/silver-nanoparticles-optical-properties#toc. (accessed Nov 01, 2021).
- 28. Alsammarraie FK, Wang W, Zhou P, Mustapha A, Lin M. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using turmeric extracts and investigation of their antibacterial activities. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2018;171:398–405. pmid:30071481
- 29. Mukherji S, Bharti S, Shukla G, Mukherji S. 1. Synthesis and characterization of size-and shape-controlled silver nanoparticles. Metallic Nanomaterials (Part B). 2018:1–116.
- 30.
Shnoudeh AJ, Hamad I, Abdo RW, Qadumii L, Jaber AY, Surchi HS, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and applications of metal nanoparticles. Biomaterials and bionanotechnology: Elsevier; 2019. p. 527–612.
- 31.
Forbes NA, Yuan TT, DeSilva MN. Silver Nanoparticle Storage Stability in Aqueous and Biological Media. Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam, Houston United States 2015.
- 32. Abdelwahed W, Degobert G, Stainmesse S, Fessi H. Freeze-drying of nanoparticles: formulation, process and storage considerations. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2006;58(15):1688–713. pmid:17118485
- 33. Mukherji S, Bharti S, Shukla G, Mukherji S. Synthesis and characterization of size-and shape-controlled silver nanoparticles. Physical Sciences Reviews. 2019;4(1).
- 34. Gherasim O, Puiu RA, Bîrcă AC, Burdușel A-C, Grumezescu AM. An updated review on silver nanoparticles in biomedicine. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(11):2318. pmid:33238486
- 35. Choi JS, Lee JW, Shin UC, Lee MW, Kim DJ, Kim SW. Inhibitory activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Lycopersicon esculentum against biofilm formation in Candida species. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(11):1512. pmid:31652836
- 36. Wypij M, Czarnecka J, Świecimska M, Dahm H, Rai M, Golinska P. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of biogenic silver nanoparticles synthesized from Streptomyces xinghaiensis OF1 strain. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;34(2):1–13. pmid:29305718
- 37. Jain J, Arora S, Rajwade JM, Omray P, Khandelwal S, Paknikar KM. Silver nanoparticles in therapeutics: development of an antimicrobial gel formulation for topical use. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2009;6(5):1388–401. pmid:19473014
- 38. Zhang L, Wu L, Si Y, Shu K. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to Azotobacter vinelandii: Growth inhibition, cell injury, oxidative stress and internalization. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209020. pmid:30566461
- 39. Nisar P, Ali N, Rahman L, Ali M, Shinwari ZK. Antimicrobial activities of biologically synthesized metal nanoparticles: an insight into the mechanism of action. JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry. 2019;24(7):929–41. pmid:31515623
- 40. Wang X, Wu H-F, Kuang Q, Huang R-B, Xie Z-X, Zheng L-S. Shape-dependent antibacterial activities of Ag2O polyhedral particles. Langmuir. 2010;26(4):2774–8. pmid:20141212
- 41. Cheon JY, Kim SJ, Rhee YH, Kwon OH, Park WH. Shape-dependent antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles. International journal of nanomedicine. 2019;14:2773. pmid:31118610
- 42. Chaffin WL, López-Ribot JL, Casanova M, Gozalbo D, Martínez JP. Cell wall and secreted proteins of Candida albicans: identification, function, and expression. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1998;62(1):130–80. pmid:9529890
- 43. Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H. Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2017;15(1):1–20.
- 44. Radhakrishnan VS, Mudiam MKR, Kumar M, Dwivedi SP, Singh SP, Prasad T. Silver nanoparticles induced alterations in multiple cellular targets, which are critical for drug susceptibilities and pathogenicity in fungal pathogen (Candida albicans). International journal of nanomedicine. 2018;13:2647. pmid:29760548
- 45. Santos ALSd, Galdino ACM, Mello TPd, Ramos LdS, Branquinha MH, Bolognese AM, et al. What are the advantages of living in a community? A microbial biofilm perspective! Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(9).
- 46. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. The lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–8. pmid:11463434
- 47. Van Hengel I, Tierolf M, Valerio V, Minneboo M, Fluit A, Fratila-Apachitei L, et al. Self-defending additively manufactured bone implants bearing silver and copper nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2020;8(8):1589–602. pmid:31848564
- 48. Ansari MA, Kalam A, Al-Sehemi AG, Alomary MN, AlYahya S, Aziz MK, et al. Counteraction of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Potential of Terminalia catappa Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles against Candida albicans and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria. Antibiotics. 2021;10(6):725. pmid:34208591
- 49. Lara HH, Romero-Urbina DG, Pierce C, Lopez-Ribot JL, Arellano-Jiménez MJ, Jose-Yacaman M. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Candida albicans biofilms: an ultrastructural study. Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2015;13(1):1–12.