Long-term outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using an antimicrobial silver-based coated plate in dogs

Geoffrey Pagès; Meike Hammer; Jean-Guillaume Grand; Iban Irubetagoyena

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272555

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate long-term outcome using the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease (CrCLd) treated by tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO).

Study design

Retrospective case study.

Animals

Dogs (n = 323, 337 stifles).

Methods

Medical records were searched for dogs presented with CrCLd and treated by TPLO with the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate for 3.5 mm screws between March 2018 and December 2020. Tibial plateau angles (TPA) were measured on preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographs. Changes in TPA between postoperative and follow-up radiographs (ModTPA) were calculated. Radiographic bone healing was scored. Complications were evaluated. Surgical site infections (SSI) were compared to a control group of dogs treated with the Synthes™ TPLO plate between January and December 2017. Owners of both groups were contacted by telephone at least 1 year postoperatively.

Results

The BioMedtrix™ group was composed of 237 dogs (248 stifles), the control group was composed of 86 dogs (89 stifles). In the BioMedtrix™ group, radiographic follow-up was performed at a median of 48 days. Average ModTPA was 1.2°. Bone healing was graded as complete, good, poor, and none in 18%, 62%, 20%, and 0%, respectively. At a median of 786 days postoperatively, minor and major postoperative complications were observed in 6 (2.4%) and 32 (12.9%) cases in this group, respectively. During the first year following the surgery, 23 (9.3%) and 12 (13.5%) cases suffered a SSI, of which 12 (4.8%) and 7 (7.9%) had their implant explanted in the BioMedtrix™ group and the control group, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups for SSI and implant explantations (p = 0.31 and p = 0.29, respectively).

Conclusion

The BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate provided a reliable fixation system for osteotomy healing after TPLO. Bone healing and long-term complication rates were similar to previous studies using other implants. SSI rates were similar between the BioMedtrix™ group and the control group. The antimicrobial HyProtect^® coating of the plate did not reduce SSI in this study.

Clinical significance

The BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate can be safely used for TPLO. The value of the antimicrobial HyProtect^® coating of the plate may be questioned, as SSI rate was not lower in this study compared to the control group or previous reports.

Citation: Pagès G, Hammer M, Grand J-G, Irubetagoyena I (2022) Long-term outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using an antimicrobial silver-based coated plate in dogs. PLoS ONE 17(8): e0272555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555

Editor: Ashraf M. Abu-Seida, Cairo University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, EGYPT

Received: April 18, 2022; Accepted: July 21, 2022; Published: August 12, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Pagès et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Data relevant to this study are available from figshare at 10.6084/m9.figshare.20379918 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20379918.v1) and 10.6084/m9.figshare.20379921 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20379921.v1).

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Cranial Cruciate Ligament disease (CrCLd) is one of the most common orthopedic conditions in dogs [1].

CrCLd is described as a multifactorial degenerative disease, involving genetics, morphology (tibial plateau angle (TPA), distal femoral anatomy), chemical factors, and immunity [2].

Surgical management is the recommended treatment option. Currently, the tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) described by Slocum in 1993 offers a reliable outcome and is one of the most practiced techniques to treat CrCLd in dogs [3,4].

TPLO was initially described using non-locking plates [3]. Several modifications have been implemented to improve fixation, screw orientation, and plate fit to the proximal tibial anatomy. Studies comparing TPLO plates concluded that there is improved osteotomy site stability using locking plates [5–8]. In previous studies, TPA modification between postoperative and follow-up radiographs (ModTPA) or bone healing grading have been used to assess the construct stability [7–9].

Reported complication rates after TPLO have been reduced over the past decades, due to improvements in surgical technique and implant refinements. In recent large-scale studies, postoperative complication rates ranged from 11.4% to 14.8% [10,11]. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication, ranging from 3.6% to 16.5% [9–12]. Several modifications to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative antibiotic treatment, or postoperative wound dressings have been proposed in an effort to reduce SSI [13–15].

A new TPLO plate was recently released by BioMedtrix™, designed for improved fit to conform to the shape of the proximal tibia. It further includes a polyaxial locking system, using a system-specific drill guide which allows screw angulation of up to 12.5° to reduce the incidence of intra-articular screw placement. Finally, the plate incorporates an antimicrobial silver-based coating (HyProtect™), described by the manufacturer as providing protection from local infection for at least 100 days.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome (radiographic evaluation and long-term complications) of dogs treated with the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate, which has never been published to the authors’ knowledge. The second objective of this study was to focus on SSI rate during the first year after surgery. We hypothesized that at the time of radiographic follow-up: (1) the ModTPA and (2) bone healing rates would be similar to previous reports. We also hypothesized that (3) long-term postoperative complications, and particularly, (4) SSI rates would be lower compared to a control group and previous studies reporting the use of non-coated implants.

Materials and methods

Study design

This study followed international guidelines for humane animal treatment and complied with legislation (EU Convention on the protection of animals revised directive 86/609/EEC).

Dogs were included in the study group (BioMedtrix™ group) if CrCLd was diagnosed and treated by TPLO using the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate for 3.5 mm screws, between March 2018 and December 2020, by two surgeons (Dipl. ECVS) of a single referral center, and if the recheck and follow-up radiographic examination was performed by the primary surgeon. A control group was formed with dogs treated by TPLO using the Synthes™ TPLO plate for 3.5 mm screws, between January and December 2017, by the same two surgeons. Follow-up radiographic examination wasn’t an inclusion criteria for this group.

Dogs with a history of stifle surgery on the affected limb, presented with potential infectious condition (local or generalized dermatitis, prostatitis…), or requiring an additional stifle joint procedure (patellar stabilization…) were excluded. Additional procedures due to complications (septic arthritis, implant explantation, late meniscal tear…) were not cause for exclusion.

Data obtained from the medical records included signalment (breed, age, gender, weight), preoperative radiographs, side of the lesion, type of cruciate ligaments lesions, and type of implant used. For the BioMedtrix™ group, data obtained also included postoperative radiographs, recheck radiographs, and complications. For the control group, additional data only consisted of the occurrence of a SSI and potentially associated implant explantation.

Surgical procedure

Pre-anesthetic blood tests were performed depending on the animal’s condition. The anesthetic protocol was established at the surgeon’s discretion. Premedication included either diazepam (Valium; Roche™, Boulogne-Billancourt, France), 0.25 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or acepromazine (Calmivet; Vetoquinol™, Lure, France), 0.05 mg/kg intramuscularly (IM) and morphine (Morphine; Lavoisier™, Paris, France), 0.2 mg/kg IV. Induction was performed with propofol (PropoVet; Zoetis™, Malakoff, France) 4 mg/kg IV, to effect. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (Isoflurin; Axience™, Pantin, France), 1.5–2.5%, in 100% oxygen. Preoperative orthogonal radiographs of the affected stifle were performed under general anesthesia. Antibiotic therapy consisted of cefazolin (Cefazoline; Mylan™, Saint-Priest, France), 22 mg/kg IV 30 minutes before incision, and was repeated every 90 minutes until skin closure. Articular exploration was performed by either arthroscopy or medial « mini-arthrotomy » [16], and meniscal tears were treated by partial meniscectomy, hemimeniscectomy, or total meniscectomy as indicated. Approach to the proximal tibial metaphysis and TPLO were performed as described by Slocum [3,17]. The plate was placed as proximally as possible. Contouring of the plate was done at the discretion of the surgeon. To avoid intra-articular screw placement in some cases, the most proximal screw was angled in a medio-proximal to latero-distal direction using the specially designed conic threaded drill guide. All proximal screws were locking screws and all distal screws were standard cortical screws. Compression of the osteotomy was achieved, first, using bone holding forceps and, second, by placing the first and third distal screws in compression. Finally, tightness of all screws, range of movement, limb alignment, patellar stability, and tibial compression test were assessed. The incision was closed routinely using polydioxanone (Monotime; Péters Surgical™, Bobigny, France), and polyamide monofilament (Filapeau; Péters Surgical™, Bobigny, France). A sterile wound dressing was applied to the wound (Hydrofilm Plus; Hartmann™, Châtenois, France). Postoperative orthogonal radiographs were performed under general anesthesia. A modified Robert Jones bandage was applied for 24 hours to limit wound swelling at the surgeon’s discretion. Postoperatively, dogs were medicated with morphine (Morphine; Lavoisier™, Paris, France), 0.2 mg/kg subcutaneously every 4 hours, and cefalexin (Rilexine; Virbac™, Carros, France), 20 mg/kg orally twice daily, until discharge. Local cryotherapy was applied every 8 hours during hospitalization. Dogs were discharged 24 to 48 hours after surgery with cefalexin (Rilexine; Virbac™, Carros, France), 20 mg/kg orally twice daily for 5 days, and meloxicam (Metacam; Boehringer Ingelheim™, Reims, France), 0.1 mg/kg orally once daily for 10 days. Sutures were removed 15 days after surgery.

Short leash walks were the only recommended activity 3 to 4 times daily until radiographic recheck.

Radiographic evaluation

Two observers (1 Dipl. ECVS and 1 ECVS resident) assessed the anonymized radiographs on a DICOM viewer (Horos™ v3.3.6, horosproject.org). All observers were experienced in TPA measurement (more than 3 years) [3]. Preoperative TPA (PreTPA), postoperative TPA (PostTPA) and TPA at recheck (ReTPA) were measured as previously described [18]. ReTPA minus PostTPA (ModTPA) was then calculated. Bone healing was graded using a scale developed by Oxley and modified to allow numerical grading (Table 1) [12]. Owners of dogs presenting insufficient bone healing (grades 0 and 1) were asked for a recheck after 4 to 6 weeks to ensure sufficient bone healing (grades 2 or 3).

Download:

Table 1. Radiographic bone healing scale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555.t001

Complications evaluation

Complications were categorized as minor, major, and catastrophic, as previously described by Cook et al. [19]:

Catastrophic: complication or associated morbidity that causes permanent unacceptable function, is directly related to death, or is cause for euthanasia,
Major: complication or associated morbidity that requires further treatment based on current standards of care:
- Requires surgical treatment to resolve based on current standard of care,
- Requires medical treatment to resolve based on current standard of care.
Minor: not requiring additional surgical or medical treatment to resolve (eg, bruising, seroma, minor incision problems, etc.).

Specifically, SSI were diagnosed if at least one of the following abnormalities was observed [20]:

Purulent drainage from the incision, with or without laboratory confirmation,
Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the incision,
An abscess or other evidence of infection involving the incision found on direct examination, during reoperation, or by histopathologic or radiologic examination,
Diagnosis of a SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.

Beyond the first postoperative year, medical records were searched for long-term complications, particularly any information related to a SSI, and the owners were contacted by telephone and questioned about complications during the first postoperative year.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using a statistical software (R 4.0.2, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical analysis for categorical data used either Chi-squared (breeds) or Fisher’s exact (sex, CrCL side, type of CrCL lesion, SSI, implant explantations) tests. For continuous data, after normality evaluation using Shapiro-Wilk test, analysis used either Student’s t (age, weight, PreTPA) or Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (ModTPA, bone healing) tests. Interobserver variability was estimated by the standard deviation of the observer’s mean measurements of TPA per dog. Post hoc power analysis was performed to evaluate potential differences between groups for SSI and implant explantation rates, using α = 0.05. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Descriptive analysis

Out of 415 dogs initially identified, 323 dogs (337 stifles) met all inclusion criteria The BioMedtrix™ group was composed of 237 dogs (248 stifles), the control group was composed of 86 dogs (89 stifles).

In the BioMedtrix™ group, the most commonly represented breeds included Labrador Retriever (n = 43), Golden Retriever (n = 27), Cane Corso (n = 21), German Shepherd (n = 13), and Boxer (n = 12). The median age was 5 years and 5 months old (0.5–12 years old). There were 137 (55.2%) females (73.7% of which were spayed) and 111 (44.8%) males (35.1% of which were neutered). The median weight was 34.2 kg (16.4–80 kg). One hundred and thirty-six left and 112 right stifles were included. One hundred and sixty-three (66.0%) cases presented a complete CrCL rupture, and 84 (34.0%) cases presented a partial CrCL tear. Fifteen (6.1%) cases presented a caudal cruciate ligament partial tear. Median radiographic follow-up was 48 days (±12 days, 30–104 days). The long-term follow-up via telephone was available for 192 (77.4%) cases, at a median of 786 days after the surgery (±90 days, 642–923 days).

In the control group (Synthes™ group), the most commonly represented breeds included Labrador Retriever (n = 19), Golden Retriever (n = 12), Boxer (n = 8), Cane Corso (n = 7), and German Shepherd (n = 6). The median age was 5 years and 1 month old (1.5–11 years old). There were 46 (51.7%) females (82.6% of which were spayed) and 43 (48.3%) males (41.9% of which were neutered). The median weight was 32.4 kg (18.1–56 kg). Forty-two left and 47 right stifles were included. Type of CrCL lesion was known for 78 cases, including 65 (83.3%) cases presenting a complete CrCL rupture, and 13 (16.7%) cases presenting a partial CrCL tear. Caudal cruciate ligament status was known for 53 cases. Five (9.4%) cases presented a caudal cruciate ligament partial tear. The long-term follow-up via telephone was available for 67 (75.3%) dogs at a median of 1145 days after the surgery (±102 days, 995–1293 days).

Breeds, age, gender, body weight, and CrCL side were similar between the BioMedtrix™ group and the control group (p = 0.87, p = 0.77, p = 0.62, p = 0.65, and p = 0.22, respectively). The type of CrCL lesion was significantly different between groups (p = 0.004).

Radiographic evaluation

Mean PreTPA was 25.5° (±4.1°, 14.2–40.5°). Mean PostTPA was 3.7° (±3.1°, -8.7–13.7°). Mean ReTPA was 4.5° (±3.3°, -7-14°). Mean ModTPA was 1.2° (±1.1°, 0.0–9.4°). Measured PreTPA (mean, SD) were significantly different (p = 0.028) between observer 1 (24.8°, ±4.42°) and observer 2 (26.3°, ±4.6°) (Fig 1). Measured PostTPA, ReTPA, and ModTPA (Fig 2) were not significantly different between observers (p = 0.51, p = 0.95, p = 0.065, respectively).

Download:

Fig 1. PreTPA differences in radiographic measurements between observers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555.g001

Download:

Fig 2. ModTPA differences in radiographic measurements between observers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555.g002

Mean bone healing was graded as complete (grade 3), good (grade 2), poor (grade 1), and none (grade 0) in 18%, 62%, 20%, and 0% cases, respectively (Fig 3). Measured bone healing was not significantly different between observers (p = 0.92).

Download:

Fig 3. Differences in bone healing grade measurements between observers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555.g003

Intraoperative complications

Fifteen (6.0%) intraoperative complications were reported, including 6 (2.4%) minor, 9 (3.6%) major, and no catastrophic complications.

All minor intraoperative complications were fibular fractures, which developed during tibial plateau rotation.

All major intraoperative complications were hemorrhage of the cranial tibial artery. Hemorrhages were controlled with either direct pressure over the bleeding site with sterile gauze or application of vascular clips through the osteotomy gap, as described by Matres-Lorenzo [21].

No catastrophic intraoperative complication was reported. In particular, no intra-articular screw placement was reported.

Postoperative complications

Thirty-eight (15.3%) postoperative complications were reported, including 6 (2.4%) minor, 32 (12.9%) major and no catastrophic complication (Table 2). In total, 37 (14.9%) dogs suffered postoperative complications.

Download:

Table 2. Postoperative complications.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272555.t002

Minor postoperative complications included clinical patellar tendinitis with associated discomfort on palpation (n = 2), fibular fracture (n = 1), implant failure (n = 1), patellar fracture (n = 1), and tibial crest fracture (n = 1). Both patellar tendinitis were judged mild, and no further treatment was advised. The implant failure was associated with an average 8.5° increase of the TPA (PostTPA = -0.1° to ReTPA = 8.4°). Subsequent clinical and radiographic follow-up revealed a good outcome. No further treatment was needed for any of these complications. Similarly, the fibular fracture, the patellar fracture, and the tibial crest fracture were incidental findings at radiographic follow-up and no further treatment was needed.

Major postoperative complications included SSI (n = 23) most frequently requiring implant explantation (n = 12), patellar tendinitis (n = 3), late meniscal tear (n = 2), septic arthritis (n = 2), pectineus muscle strain (n = 1), and tibial fracture due to osteomyelitis after implant explantation (n = 1). SSI were treated empirically with antibiotics for 3 to 6 weeks. In case of persistent clinical signs or recurrence, implant explantation was performed, when sufficient bone healing was evident. A sample for bacteriological analysis was performed for each implant explantation. Antibiotics were then adjusted depending on antibiogram results for positive tests. Isolated bacterias were Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (n = 4), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1), and Proteus mirabilis (n = 1). One case presented further complications, including a proximal metaphyseal tibial fracture caused by osteomyelitis due to multi-resistant (only susceptible to gentamycin) Proteus mirabilis. Fracture healing was achieved by open reduction and internal fixation in this case. Most SSI that did not require implant explantation were treated empirically with antibiotics for 1 to 3 weeks. Patellar tendinitis and pectineus muscle strain were treated with cage rest and meloxicam (Metacam; Boehringer Ingelheim™, Reims, France) 0.1 mg/kg orally once daily for 15 days. Late meniscal tears were treated by hemimeniscectomy under arthroscopy. One of these dogs had concurrent implant explantation, which was associated with a sterile bacterial culture. All dogs achieved a good outcome.

In total, 9.3% cases suffered SSI, and 4.8% cases had their implant explanted. SSI were initially suspected at a median of 28 days (±27 days, 7–112 days).

In the control group, 12 (13.5%) cases suffered a SSI, of which 7 (7.9%) had their implant explanted during the first year after the surgery. Bacterial culture was performed in all cases and was positive in 5 cases. Isolated bacterias were Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (n = 3), Enterobacter aerogenes (n = 1), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1).

There was no significant difference between the BioMedtrix™ group and the control group for SSI and implant explantation rates (p = 0.31, and p = 0.29, respectively). However, the power of these results is very low (18%). Based on the implant explantation rates (4.8% in the BioMedtrix™ group, 7.9% in the Synthes™ group), a prospective study including 970 patients in each group would have been required to achieve an ideal statistical power of 80%.

Discussion

In this study, the average ModTPA (1.2°) and bone healing grade (80% grade 2 or grade 3) were comparable to previous studies using TPLO plates with proximal locking screws (2.4°, 0.15°, 1.5°) [8,9,12]. This supports the mechanical stability of the implant and validated our first and second hypotheses.

Postoperative complications were found in 15.3% of cases. Minor complications represented 2.4% cases, major complications 12.9% cases, and no catastrophic complications were reported, which is comparable to previous recent studies, particularly concerning SSI [7–11]. Also, SSI and implant explantation rates were similar to the control group (p = 0.31 and p = 0.29, respectively). This rejects our third and fourth hypotheses.

To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to describe the clinical use of the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate and the associated long-term outcome.

Changes in postoperative TPA and assessment of bone healing were judged as reliable tools for comparing the mechanical stability of the implant to previous studies [8,9,12]. While ModTPA comparisons were straightforward, different radiographic bone healing assessment methods were used in these studies, making direct comparisons challenging. To overcome this, a modification of the bone healing scale described by Oxley was made to allow numerical grading [12]. In this scale, bone healing grades 2 and 3 correspond to clinical union and bony union, respectively, as previously described [22]. Both grades are considered sufficient for ending exercise restrictions postoperatively. Also, those reports have longer follow-up timeframes (60 to 75 days postoperatively) compared to this study (48 days). As a result, since bone healing grades obtained in this study were comparable to studies with longer mean timeframes, the authors conclude the non-inferiority of the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate.

Comparisons were also made for perioperative complications, despite the inconstant use, in previous reports, of the consensual classification developed by Cook et al. in 2010 [19]. While the overall intraoperative and postoperative complication rates in this study (6.0% and 15.3%, respectively) were similar to previous recent studies, minor and major complication rates differed [7–11]. This was due to differences in complications classification. Most studies used to classify a complication as minor if a surgical revision wasn’t required. In particular, complications treated with medications such as antibiotics were classified as minor, which differs from the consensual classification. After adaptation to classifications used in those studies, minor and major postoperative complication rates in this study were also similar to previous recent studies, with 8.8% and 6.5%, respectively.

Reported intraoperative complications included 6 fibular fractures or osteotomies. This complication has been reported in cases with tibiofibular synostosis or when the proximal fibula is relatively thick [23]. However, Zuckerman et al. reported a significant loss of rotation (mean 5.4°), suggesting an important role of the fibula in mechanical stability. An additional fixation with a caudal plate has been recommended to reduce the loss of rotation [23]. In this study, the authors felt that the shape of the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate may have interfered with the caudal placement of a second plate due to its curvature, which could be a potential disadvantage of the plate. Also, no additional stabilization was judged necessary by the surgeons in concerned cases. ModTPA for cases with fibular fracture or osteotomy were 3.7° (case n°17), 1.7° (case n°22), 0° (case n°35), 3.5° (case n°111), 0.2° (case n°216), and 2.5° (case n°239). This questions the need for additional fixation when using the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate.

The main postoperative complication was SSI. This happened in 9.3% cases, requiring implant explantation in 4.8% cases. SSI were initially suspected at a median of 28 days postoperatively, when the HyProtect™ coating of the BioMedtrix TPLO Curve^® plate is still active. Only one dog suffered a SSI suspected after 100 days postoperatively (at day 112). This may question the evidence of efficacy of the plate coating to prevent local infection during this period. Also, a potentially important limitation of this implant system is the absence of coating on the screws. This may significantly impact the antimicrobial effect of the implant system, as infection may develop against screws and away from the coating effect of the plate, for example, due to iatrogenic or hematogenous contaminations. Silver-based coated implants have already been described in human and veterinary medicine, with conflicting results [24–28]. The clinical efficacy of their antimicrobial effect is still debated, mainly because of the lack of well-structured clinical trials, standardization in coating manufacturing, and lack of evidence [27,28]. However, silver, and more precisely its ionic form (Ag⁺) is known to be an intrinsically antimicrobial material. The mechanism of its bactericidal activity is not completely understood, but inactivation of critical enzymes of the respiration chain by metal binding to thiol groups, and induction of hydroxyl radicals, seems to be an important part of the mechanism [27]. Then, the antimicrobial effect may be limited to tissue in contact with the coated material, and may be ineffective in reducing superficial SSI or SSI located on non-coated screws. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the range of the antimicrobial effect of the coating, and the influence of screw coating when used with a coated plate have not been investigated and warrant further investigation.

In this study, SSI and implant explantation rates (9.3% and 4.8%, respectively) were comparable to previous reports using non-coated implants (6.6% and 2.0%, respectively) [7–11]. However, direct comparison to previous reports to evaluate the effect of the HyProtect™ coating of the BioMedtrix TPLO Curve^® plate may be controversial, as SSI may also be influenced by many parameters, including surgical technique, implant (including coating), perioperative care, and antibiotherapy, sometimes with conflicting results [13–15,29–31]. This was mitigated with the inclusion of the control group, formed by a comparable population. The only statistically significant difference between groups was CrCL lesion type (partial or complete rupture), which is not reported to be a risk factor in SSI development [32]. Between groups, patients management was unchanged between January 2017 and December 2020. In particular, the same surgeons performed the procedures, using similar anesthetic and antibiotic protocols. Comparison to the control group provided similar conclusions for SSI and implant explantation rates. Based on these implant explantation rates (4.8% in the BioMedtrix™ group, 7.9% in the Synthes™ group), a prospective study including 970 patients in each group would have been required to achieve an ideal statistical power demonstrating a 5% difference in implant explantation rates (using α = 0.05 and β = 0.8). This was not achievable in our practice conditions. This lack of statistical power is an important limitation of this study. Similarly, due to the relatively small population presenting SSI, potential risk factors such as breed (German Shepherds) or sex (males) not analyzed [32].

Other limitations are due to the retrospective nature of this study. As such, complications may have been underestimated. In particular, no minor postoperative complication such as superficial wound inflammation or seroma was reported. These complications were reported in previous studies in 3.6% to 16.5% of cases [7–11,33]. Superficial wound inflammations, seroma, or infection that spontaneously resolved may have been underreported because the initial follow-up and stitches removal was mostly performed by the referring veterinarian. This is a limitation in comparison to other previous studies.

In this study, two observers assessed the radiographs. Interobserver variability was evaluated for TPA measurements, and compared to previous studies to evaluate for quality [34–36]. Statistically significant differences were found between observers only for PreTPA measurements (p = 0.028). However, mean interobserver variation (2.10°) was similar to those studies, ranging from 0.31° to 2.4°, and may be considered clinically not significant [37]. No other significant difference was found between observers. Intraobserver variability evaluations were beyond the scope of this study.

Breed variation of the proximal tibial morphology has been reported [38]. Contouring of the plate may be necessary during the procedure, even with anatomically contoured plates [9]. However, this contouring may increase the risk of intra-articular screw placement [7–9,33]. Otherwise, contouring of the plate with a fixed-angle locking system may require conversion to an unicortical screw or a distally angled bicortical non-locking screw potentially reducing mechanical stability [9]. Placing the plate more distally has also been proposed, but this procedure might necessitate the use of a larger saw blade or the modification of the centering of the osteotomy. Both modifications may lead to complications such as tibial tuberosity fracture or instability at the osteotomy site [39–42]. The BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate features polyaxial locking plate holes, allowing up to 12.5° of screw angulation while maintaining stability. This allows to angle the screw away from the joint. This degree of angulation allowed the use of a bicortical locking screw possible in every case in this study, as we didn’t report the implantation of an intra-articular or unicortical screw. The curved shape of the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate subjectively allowed a more proximal-caudal implantation on the proximal tibial fragment [33]. This seemed to allow a better bone purchase for screw implantation. Reduction of the oscillating saw diameter and thus the fragment size was also subjectively possible while keeping an appropriate centering of the osteotomy [40–42]. As a result, the tibial tuberosity may present a smaller tibial tuberosity height/tibial width ratio, thus minimizing the risk of tibial tuberosity fracture [39]. Biomechanical studies are necessary to confirm these hypotheses.

Conclusion

In this study, the BioMedtrix™ TPLO Curve^® plate provided a reliable fixation system for osteotomy healing after TPLO procedures in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs, as ModTPA and radiographic bone healing were similar to previous studies. However, SSI and implant explantation rates were similar to the control group. Complication rates, including SSI rate, were also similar to previous studies. The HyProtect™ coating of the BioMedtrix TPLO Curve^® plate, therefore, did not reduce the occurrence of SSI in this study. Further studies are required to evaluate the potential advantages of the antimicrobial effect of the HyProtect^® coating.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Marc-Antoine RAPPART (Master 2: Modeling and computing of the living, Faculty of Lyon, France) and for his help in analyzing the data.

References

1. Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz LG, et al: Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:1818–24. pmid:18598150
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Muir P: Etiopathogenesis of Cruciate Ligament Rupture. In: Advances in the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament, Second Ed. Muir P. Ames, USA, Wiley-Blackwell 2017;45.
3. Slocum B, Slocum TD: Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993;23:777–795. pmid:8337790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Von Pfeil DJ, Kowaleski MP, Glassman M et al: Results of a survey of Veterinary Orthopedic Society members on the preferred method for treating cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs weighing more than 15 kilograms (33 pounds). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018;253:586–97. pmid:30110219
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Leitner M, Pearce SG, Windolf M, et al: Comparison of locking and conventional screws for maintenance of tibial plateau positioning and biomechanical stability after locking tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plate fixation. Vet Surg 2008;37:357–365. pmid:18564260
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Kloc PA, Kowaleski MP, Litsky AS, et al: Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2009;38:40–48. pmid:19152616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Conkling AL, Fagin B, Daye RM: Comparison of tibial plateau angle changes after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy fixation with conventional or locking screw technology. Vet Surg 2010;39:475–481. pmid:20345527
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Krotscheck U, Thompson MS, Ryan KK et al: Comparison of TPA, Bone Healing, and Intra-articular Screw Placement using Conventional Nonlocked Application of Surgeon-Contoured versus Locked Application of Precontoured TPLO Plates in Dogs. Vet Surg 2012;41:931–7. pmid:23163286
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ, Beale BS: Radiographic Outcome and Complications of Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy Stabilized With an Anatomically Contoured Locking Bone Plate. Vet Surg 2013;42:847–52. pmid:24033720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA: Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010;39:460–474. pmid:20345526
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Coletti TJ, Anderson M, Gorse MJ et al: Complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A retrospective of 1519 procedures. Can Vet J 2014;55:249–54. pmid:24587508
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Oxley B, Gemmill TJ, Renwick AR et al: Comparison of Complication Rates and Clinical Outcome Between Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and a Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy for Treatment of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs. Vet Surg 2013;42:739–50. pmid:23889810
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Stine SL, Odum SM, Mertens WD: Protocol changes to reduce implant-associated infection rate after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: 703 dogs, 811 TPLO (2006–2014). Vet Surg 2018;47:481–9. pmid:29878479
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Gianetto J, Aktay SA: Prospective Evaluation of Surgical Wound Dressings and the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Dogs Undergoing a Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019;32:18–25. pmid:30646408
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Spencer DD, Daye RM: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study on postoperative antibiotherapy in 150 arthroscopy- assisted tibial plateau leveling osteotomies in dogs. Vet Surg 2018;47:79–87. pmid:30267441
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Rogatko CP, Warnock JJ, Bobe G et al: Comparison of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury in canine stifle arthroscopy versus medial parapatellar mini-arthrotomy in a cadaveric model. Vet Surg 2018;47:6–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Piermattei DL, Johnson KA: Approach to the proximal tibia through a medial incision. in Piermattei DL, Johnson KA (eds): An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat (ed 4) Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2004, pp 366–369.
18. Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB et al: Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008;37:300–5. pmid:18394079
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG et al: Proposed Definitions and Criteria for Reporting Time Frame, Outcome, and Complications For Clinical Orthopedic Studies in Veterinary Medicine. Vet Surg 2010;39:905–8. pmid:21133952
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al: Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132. pmid:10196487
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Matres-Lorenzo L, McAlinden A, Bernardé A et al: Control of hemorrhage through the osteotomy gap during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: 9 cases. Vet Surg 2018;47:60–5. pmid:29144538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Guiot LP, Déjardin LM: Prospective Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in 36 Nonarticular Tibial Fractures in Dogs and Cats. Vet Surg 2011;40:171–82. pmid:21223316
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Zuckerman JS, Dyce J, Arruda AG et al: Fibular osteotomy to facilitate proximal tibial rotation during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2018;47:923–31. pmid:30239027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Hardes J, Von Eiff C, Streitbuerger A et al: Reduction of Periprosthetic Infection With Silver-Coated Megaprostheses in Patients With Bone Sarcoma. J Surg Onc 2010;101:389–95. pmid:20119985
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Shafreen RB, Seema S, Ahamed AP et al: Inhibitory Effect of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Extract of Nitzschia palea Against Curli-Mediated Biofilm of Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2017;183(4):1351–61. pmid:28573605
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Azab M, Allen MJ, Daniels JB: Evaluation of a silver-impregnated coating to inhibit colonization of orthopaedic implants by biofilm forming methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus pseudintermedius. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016;29:347–50. pmid:27102292
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR: A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces. Biomaterials 2013;34:8533–54. pmid:23953781
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Eckhardt S, Brunetto PS, Gagnon J et al: Nanobio Silver: Its Interactions with Peptides and Bacteria, and Its Uses in Medicine. Chem Rev 2013;113:4708–54. pmid:23488929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Clark AC, Greco JJ, Bergman PJ: Influence of administration of antimicrobial medications after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on surgical site infections: A retrospective study of 308 dogs. Vet Surg 2020;49:106–13. pmid:31664725
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Hagen CR, Singh A, Weese JS et al: Contributing factors to surgical site infection after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A follow-up retrospective study. Vet Surg 2020;49:930–9. pmid:32359005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Budsberg SC, Torres BT, Sandberg GS: Efficacy of postoperative antibiotic use after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs: A systematic review. Vet Surg 2021;50:729–39. pmid:33709459
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. McDougall RA, Spector DI, Hart RC et al: Timing of and risk factors for deep surgical site infection requiring implant removal following canine tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2021;50:999–1008. pmid:33826172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Bergh MS, Peirone B: Complications of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012;25:349–58. pmid:22534675
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Headrick J, Cook J, Helphrey M et al: A novel radiographic method to facilitate measurement of the tibial plateau angle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007;20:24–8. pmid:17364092
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ et al: Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Variability and Repeatability of Tibial Plateau Angle Measurements with Digital Radiography Using a Novel Digital Radiographic Program. Vet Surg 2010;39:187–94. pmid:20210966
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Glassman M, Hofmeister E, Weh JM et al: Radiographic Quantitative Assessment of Caudal Proximal Tibial Angulation in 100 Dogs with Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture. Vet Surg 2011;40:830–8. pmid:21906096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Robinson DA, Mason DR, Evans R et al: The Effect of Tibial Plateau Angle on Ground Reaction Forces 4–17 Months After Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2006;35:294–9. pmid:16635011
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Vedrine B, Guillemot A, Fontaine D et al: Comparative anatomy of the proximal tibia in healthy Labrador Retrievers and Yorkshire Terriers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013;26:266–70. pmid:23613016
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Mehrkens LR, Hudson CC, Cole GL: Factors associated with early tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2018;47:634–9. pmid:30129067
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Kowaleski MP, McCarthy RJ: Geometric analysis evaluating the effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy position on postoperative tibial plateau slope. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004;17:30–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Kowaleski MP, Apelt D, Mattoon JS et al: The Effect of Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy Position on Cranial Tibial Subluxation: An In Vitro Study. Vet Surg 2005;34:332–6. pmid:16212587
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Windolf M, Leitner M, Schwieger K et al: Accuracy of Fragment Positioning after TPLO and Effect on Biomechanical Stability. Vet Surg 2008;37:366–73. pmid:18564261
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz LG, et al: Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:1818–24. pmid:18598150
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Muir P: Etiopathogenesis of Cruciate Ligament Rupture. In: Advances in the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament, Second Ed. Muir P. Ames, USA, Wiley-Blackwell 2017;45.

[ref3] 3. Slocum B, Slocum TD: Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993;23:777–795. pmid:8337790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Von Pfeil DJ, Kowaleski MP, Glassman M et al: Results of a survey of Veterinary Orthopedic Society members on the preferred method for treating cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs weighing more than 15 kilograms (33 pounds). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018;253:586–97. pmid:30110219
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Leitner M, Pearce SG, Windolf M, et al: Comparison of locking and conventional screws for maintenance of tibial plateau positioning and biomechanical stability after locking tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plate fixation. Vet Surg 2008;37:357–365. pmid:18564260
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Kloc PA, Kowaleski MP, Litsky AS, et al: Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2009;38:40–48. pmid:19152616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Conkling AL, Fagin B, Daye RM: Comparison of tibial plateau angle changes after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy fixation with conventional or locking screw technology. Vet Surg 2010;39:475–481. pmid:20345527
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Krotscheck U, Thompson MS, Ryan KK et al: Comparison of TPA, Bone Healing, and Intra-articular Screw Placement using Conventional Nonlocked Application of Surgeon-Contoured versus Locked Application of Precontoured TPLO Plates in Dogs. Vet Surg 2012;41:931–7. pmid:23163286
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ, Beale BS: Radiographic Outcome and Complications of Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy Stabilized With an Anatomically Contoured Locking Bone Plate. Vet Surg 2013;42:847–52. pmid:24033720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA: Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010;39:460–474. pmid:20345526
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Coletti TJ, Anderson M, Gorse MJ et al: Complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A retrospective of 1519 procedures. Can Vet J 2014;55:249–54. pmid:24587508
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Oxley B, Gemmill TJ, Renwick AR et al: Comparison of Complication Rates and Clinical Outcome Between Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and a Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy for Treatment of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs. Vet Surg 2013;42:739–50. pmid:23889810
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Stine SL, Odum SM, Mertens WD: Protocol changes to reduce implant-associated infection rate after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: 703 dogs, 811 TPLO (2006–2014). Vet Surg 2018;47:481–9. pmid:29878479
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Gianetto J, Aktay SA: Prospective Evaluation of Surgical Wound Dressings and the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Dogs Undergoing a Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019;32:18–25. pmid:30646408
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Spencer DD, Daye RM: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study on postoperative antibiotherapy in 150 arthroscopy- assisted tibial plateau leveling osteotomies in dogs. Vet Surg 2018;47:79–87. pmid:30267441
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Rogatko CP, Warnock JJ, Bobe G et al: Comparison of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury in canine stifle arthroscopy versus medial parapatellar mini-arthrotomy in a cadaveric model. Vet Surg 2018;47:6–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Piermattei DL, Johnson KA: Approach to the proximal tibia through a medial incision. in Piermattei DL, Johnson KA (eds): An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat (ed 4) Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2004, pp 366–369.

[ref18] 18. Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB et al: Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008;37:300–5. pmid:18394079
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG et al: Proposed Definitions and Criteria for Reporting Time Frame, Outcome, and Complications For Clinical Orthopedic Studies in Veterinary Medicine. Vet Surg 2010;39:905–8. pmid:21133952
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al: Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132. pmid:10196487
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Matres-Lorenzo L, McAlinden A, Bernardé A et al: Control of hemorrhage through the osteotomy gap during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: 9 cases. Vet Surg 2018;47:60–5. pmid:29144538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Guiot LP, Déjardin LM: Prospective Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in 36 Nonarticular Tibial Fractures in Dogs and Cats. Vet Surg 2011;40:171–82. pmid:21223316
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Zuckerman JS, Dyce J, Arruda AG et al: Fibular osteotomy to facilitate proximal tibial rotation during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2018;47:923–31. pmid:30239027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hardes J, Von Eiff C, Streitbuerger A et al: Reduction of Periprosthetic Infection With Silver-Coated Megaprostheses in Patients With Bone Sarcoma. J Surg Onc 2010;101:389–95. pmid:20119985
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Shafreen RB, Seema S, Ahamed AP et al: Inhibitory Effect of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Extract of Nitzschia palea Against Curli-Mediated Biofilm of Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2017;183(4):1351–61. pmid:28573605
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Azab M, Allen MJ, Daniels JB: Evaluation of a silver-impregnated coating to inhibit colonization of orthopaedic implants by biofilm forming methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus pseudintermedius. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016;29:347–50. pmid:27102292
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR: A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces. Biomaterials 2013;34:8533–54. pmid:23953781
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Eckhardt S, Brunetto PS, Gagnon J et al: Nanobio Silver: Its Interactions with Peptides and Bacteria, and Its Uses in Medicine. Chem Rev 2013;113:4708–54. pmid:23488929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Clark AC, Greco JJ, Bergman PJ: Influence of administration of antimicrobial medications after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on surgical site infections: A retrospective study of 308 dogs. Vet Surg 2020;49:106–13. pmid:31664725
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Hagen CR, Singh A, Weese JS et al: Contributing factors to surgical site infection after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A follow-up retrospective study. Vet Surg 2020;49:930–9. pmid:32359005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Budsberg SC, Torres BT, Sandberg GS: Efficacy of postoperative antibiotic use after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs: A systematic review. Vet Surg 2021;50:729–39. pmid:33709459
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. McDougall RA, Spector DI, Hart RC et al: Timing of and risk factors for deep surgical site infection requiring implant removal following canine tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2021;50:999–1008. pmid:33826172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Bergh MS, Peirone B: Complications of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012;25:349–58. pmid:22534675
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Headrick J, Cook J, Helphrey M et al: A novel radiographic method to facilitate measurement of the tibial plateau angle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007;20:24–8. pmid:17364092
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ et al: Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Variability and Repeatability of Tibial Plateau Angle Measurements with Digital Radiography Using a Novel Digital Radiographic Program. Vet Surg 2010;39:187–94. pmid:20210966
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Glassman M, Hofmeister E, Weh JM et al: Radiographic Quantitative Assessment of Caudal Proximal Tibial Angulation in 100 Dogs with Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture. Vet Surg 2011;40:830–8. pmid:21906096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Robinson DA, Mason DR, Evans R et al: The Effect of Tibial Plateau Angle on Ground Reaction Forces 4–17 Months After Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2006;35:294–9. pmid:16635011
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Vedrine B, Guillemot A, Fontaine D et al: Comparative anatomy of the proximal tibia in healthy Labrador Retrievers and Yorkshire Terriers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013;26:266–70. pmid:23613016
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Mehrkens LR, Hudson CC, Cole GL: Factors associated with early tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2018;47:634–9. pmid:30129067
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Kowaleski MP, McCarthy RJ: Geometric analysis evaluating the effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy position on postoperative tibial plateau slope. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004;17:30–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kowaleski MP, Apelt D, Mattoon JS et al: The Effect of Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy Position on Cranial Tibial Subluxation: An In Vitro Study. Vet Surg 2005;34:332–6. pmid:16212587
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Windolf M, Leitner M, Schwieger K et al: Accuracy of Fragment Positioning after TPLO and Effect on Biomechanical Stability. Vet Surg 2008;37:366–73. pmid:18564261
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Objectives

Study design

Animals

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical significance

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study design

Surgical procedure

Radiographic evaluation

Complications evaluation

Data analysis

Results

Descriptive analysis

Radiographic evaluation

Intraoperative complications

Postoperative complications

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgments

References