https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3422-5836
Figures
Abstract
Preconception care is biomedical, social, and behavioural care provided for a woman or couple before conception occurs or throughout their reproductive year. In Ethiopia, it’s reported that the majority of health care providers had poor knowledge and practice of preconception care. The institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 359 obstetric care providers to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice of preconception care in West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. A stratified, simple random sampling technique selected five hospitals, 46 health centers, and study participants. Pretested and structured questionnaires were used to collect data. Data were entered into Epidata and exported to SPSS for analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were employed to identify an association between the independent predictors and the outcome variables. In this study, 173(48.2%) and 124(34.5%) of the obstetric care providers had good knowledge and practice of preconception care, respectively. Two-thirds 255(71%) of providers had a favorable attitude toward preconception care. The odds of having good knowledge were higher among Midwives’ providers [AOR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.09–3.77] and had training on HIV testing [AOR: 3.5, 95%CI: 1.9–6.4]. The presence of a library [AOR: 1.7, 95%CI: 1.04–2.85] and internet access [AOR: 3.4, 95%CI: 2.0–5.8] in working health facility had a higher odds of good knowledge about preconception. Degree and above holders [AOR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.5–6.1] also had higher odds of good preconception knowledge than diploma holders. Similarly, the odds of having good practice of preconception care were higher among health care providers: who did screening for reproductive life plans [AOR: 3.7, 95%CI:1.8–7.4], worked in maternity and child health unit [AOR:4.2,95%CI:2.0–8.6], perceive all health facilities should give preconception care services [AOR:2.3,95%CI:1.2–4.3], and perceive all health care providers should provide preconception services [AOR:3.0, 95%CI: 1.7–5.5]. This study found that more than half of obstetric care providers’ had poor knowledge, favorable attitude, and poor practice of preconception care. Provision of training, carrier development, and installation of internet and library services should be enhanced.
Citation: Abayneh H, Wakgari N, Ganfure G, Bulto GA (2022) Knowledge, attitude, and practice of preconception care and associated factors among obstetric care providers working in public health facilities of West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 17(8): e0272316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272316
Editor: Jayanta Kumar Bora, VART Consulting PVT LTD, INDIA
Received: April 6, 2022; Accepted: July 17, 2022; Published: August 1, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Abayneh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: We are grateful to Ambo University, College of Medicine and Health Science for their financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: APO, Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes; PCC, Preconception Care; OBCPs, Obstetric Care Providers; HCP, Health Care Provider; WHO, World Health Organization
Introduction
World Health Organization (WHO) defines Preconception care as “biomedical, social, and behavioural care provided for a woman or couples before conception occurs or throughout their reproductive year.” To bring a successful preconception care initiative, in 2013, the world health organization (WHO) developed preconception care packages that encompass 13 areas to be addressed by the health care providers [1]. Obstetricians and other obstetric care providers should engage each patient in supportive, respectful conversation about the women’s pregnancy intentions and provide pre-pregnancy or contraceptive counseling based on the women’s desires and preferences [2].
Study shows that in 2017 global maternal mortality ratio was 211 per 100,000 live births [3], and other evidence indicated that in 2019 the neonatal mortality rate was 17 per 1000 live births [4]. In Ethiopia, the maternal mortality ratio was 412 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, while under-five children’s, infants, and neonatal mortality rates were 67, 45 and 29 per 1000 live births, respectively [5]. Reducing maternal mortality depends on ensuring that ladies have access to quality care before, during, and after childbirth [6]. However, in low and middle-income countries, many women do not have adequate access to the prenatal care they need [7].
The likelihood of using preconception care (PCC) services is dependent on health care workers’ knowledge, attitudes, and providing information on preconception care (PCC) to their patients [8]. However, a study done in West Shoa Zone, Oromia, showed that 8.1% of women got information and counseling from the health care providers (HCPs) and 14.5% of them utilize the service [9]. This finding suggests that healthcare providers (HCPs) may have a crucial influence on couples’ use of PCC. HCPs have an obligation and take the top place to update evidence-based clinical practices associated with preconception care and have updated knowledge to give PCC [10].
In Ethiopia, some studies show that more than half of healthcare providers have poor knowledge [11–13], and more than 85% of healthcare providers are practicing poorly [14]. Moreover, previous studies have identified different factors for health care providers’ knowledge and practice on preconception care, including socio-demographic characteristics, training, attitude towards PCC, availability of policy or protocol on PCC, availability of internet access and library in the working facility [11–14]. Even though some studies were conducted in some parts of Ethiopia on the HCPs’ knowledge and practice, the studies were conducted on total health care providers rather than obstetric care providers (OBCPs) [11–15]. There is a lack of information on knowledge, attitude, and practice of preconception care among obstetric care providers in West Shoa Zone, Oromia. As a result, this study intended to assess the Knowledge, attitude, and practice of preconception care and associated factors among obstetric care providers in public health facilities of West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Methods and materials
Study design, setting and population
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in West Shoa Zone, Oromia regional state, from August 1 to September 8, 2021. West Shoa Zone is one of the zones in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Its administrative city is Ambo town, located 114 kilometers away from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. The West Shoa Zone has 9 Public Hospitals, 92 health centers, and 529 health posts. About 1,085 obstetric care providers were working in maternity and reproductive care units of the Zone. Among those 11 were Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 21 Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers (IESO), 38 General Practitioners, 426 Midwives, 467 nurses, and 222 Health Officers. About 268 OBCPs worked in hospitals during the data collection period, while 817 worked in Health Centers.
All obstetric care providers working in the public health facilities of West Shoa Zone during the study period were considered the source population. In contrast, all obstetric care providers working in West Shoa Zone’s selected public health facilities were considered the study population. In addition to this, all obstetric care providers working in public health facilities of West Shoa Zone during the data collection period were included in the study, and those OBCPs who served for less than six months were excluded from the study.
Sample size determination and sampling procedure
The sample size for the first two specific objectives: to determine knowledge and preconception care practice among obstetrics care providers, was calculated by a single population proportion formula n = (Z α/2)2 P (1-P)/d2 based on the following assumptions: the proportion (P) of knowledge and practice were 31% [11] and 19.2% [15] respectively which was taken from the previous studies, 95% confidence level of Z α/2 = 1.96, 5% of absolute precision. Thus, a 10% non-response rate gave 362 and 262, respectively, and the final sample size became 362.
The facilities were stratified into hospitals and health centers. With a simple random sampling technique, 5(N = 157) hospitals and 46(N = 401) health centers were selected. The sample was allocated to each stratum proportionally based on the number of health care providers working at the selected hospitals and health centers, 157/558*362 = 102 OBCPs from hospitals and 401/558*362 = 260 OBCPs from health centers. Then, a simple random sampling technique was used to select study participants.
Data collection tools and procedures
The data were collected using structured self-administered questionnaires. The questionnaire was adapted from a previous study conducted in Ethiopia [11] and had five sections (socio-demographic information, knowledge, attitude and practice, and associated factors of preconception care questions). The knowledge section had 15 knowledge-related questions. A 1 and 0 were given for correct and incorrect answers, respectively. Then, HCPs who scored ≥ 50th percentile were considered good knowledge of PCC.
The practice section had 34 questions with three PCC practice components measuring the frequency of practice in the last six months of the period. Each question have an option response of never = 0, rarely = 1, sometimes = 2, often = 3, and always = 4. This gives a minimum score of 34*0 = 0 to the maximum score of 34*4 = 136. In this study, those OBCPs who scored ≥ 50% were considered good PCC practice; otherwise poor.
Similarly, the OBCPs’ attitudes were assessed by their level of agreement on nine questions using the Likert scale. Those OBCPs who scored 60% and above the possible maximum score were considered OBCPs with a favorable attitude towards PCC; otherwise, they were considered OBCPs with an unfavorable attitude toward PCC. The questionnaires were disseminated to the OBCPs and facilitated by six trained graduated unemployed nurses and supervised by two senior BSc midwives.
Data quality assurance
To assure quality of the study, data collectors and supervisors were given two days of training about the study materials and data collection procedures. Before actual data collection, the study tool was pre-tested among 18 OBCPs working at Tulu Bolo hospital in South West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. The tool’s reliability was checked for its internal consistency with a Cronbach’s α test, 0.802 and 0.97 for knowledge and practice, respectively. Moreover, the completeness and consistency of the collected data were reviewed and checked by supervisors and investigators.
Operational definition.
Obstetric care providers. Certified obstetricians and gynecologists, general practitioners, integrated emergency surgical officers, nurses, midwives, and public health officers working in maternal and reproductive health care units [16].
Knowledge of PCC. Respondents who scored less than the 50th percentile of the knowledge-related items were categorized as HCPs with `poor PCC knowledge.’ In contrast, HCPs who scored ≥ 50th percentile were considered good knowledge of PCC [12].
Attitude towards PCC. Attitude was measured using nine questions with possible five-point Likert scale responses. Those OBCPs who scored 60% and above the possible maximum score [5*9 = 45] were considered OBCPs with a favorable attitude towards PCC; otherwise, they were considered OBCPs with unfavorable attitudes towards PCC.
OBCP’s PCC practice. OBCPs who scored < 50% of PCC practice items were classified as practitioners demonstrating poor PCC practice. Those OBCPs who scored ≥ 50% were considered good PCC practice [14].
Data analysis procedures
The collected data were cleaned, coded, and entered into the Epidata version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 20. Coding was reversed in negative statements. The frequency, proportion, mean, and standard deviation were performed for dependent and independent variables.
Binary logistic regression was done to identify candidate variables for multiple logistic regressions. Then those candidate variables were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression, and those variables at a p-value of < 0.05 were considered to have a statistically significant association with the outcome variables. Odds ratios with 95%CI were used to test the strength of association. Multicollinearity assumption was checked by the variance inflation factor (VIF) of < 1.2, which indicated a less likely correlation between independent variables. The models’ goodness of fit was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and it was a good fit.
Ethics statement
The ethical approval was obtained from Ambo University ethical review board. Written Informed consent was obtained from each participant. The participants were assured that participation in the study was voluntary and that they could withdraw during the study. The collected raw data was kept confidential in a secure place, and the names of the participants were not written in the study record. Participants’ rights to anonymity and confidentiality were fully protected. All of the information given by participants was recorded in a manner that did not link the respondents with the data.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
Out of the total samples, 359 obstetric care providers participated with a 99% response rate. More than half, 183(51%) of the participants were male. Of all participants, 145(40.4%) werefound between 26–30 years old. More than half, 207(57.7%) of respondents had more than five years of service experience, and 285(79.4%) had degreesand above (Table 1).
Obstetric care provider’s knowledge about preconception care
Out of the total participants, 173(48.2%) [95%CI: 43.2–53.5] of OBCPs had a good knowledge of preconception care. The knowledge score range from 1to 12. The majority, 233(64.9%), knew that the eligible clients for PCC include all adolescents and reproductive age individuals (Table 2).
Attitude toward preconception care
Two-thirds, 255(71%) of OBCPS had a favorable attitude towards PCC. Out of the total 45 scores, respondents scored a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 41, with a mean score of 28.1 with SD ± 4.96. More than half, 216(60.2%) of the respondents strongly disagreed that providing PCC is not within the scope of my professional responsibility and accountability. About one-third, 127(35.5%) of respondents strongly agreed with the idea that omission of preconception care leads to irreversible damage to the fetus (Table 3).
Preconception care practice among health care providers
Out of the total participants, 124(34.5%) of the providers had a good practice of PCC.The Obstetric care providers’ practice scores range from 1 to 136 out of the possible maximum 136 points score. Despite their differences, all participants have practised at least a single component of the PCC practice question.
Factors associated with the knowledge of obstetric care providers on preconception care
In this study, Midwives were two times more likely to have a good knowledge than nurses [AOR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.09–3.77]. The likelihood of having good knowledge of PCC was three-fold higher among degree and above holders than those diploma holders [AOR: 3.11, 95%CI: 1.57–6.15]. Those OBCPs who read PCC guidelines or protocols from any source were two times more knowledgeable than those who never read PCC guidelines or protocols which are developed by other countries [AOR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.09–3.12].OBCPs who were working in hospitals were two times more knowledgeable than those professionals who were working in health centres [AOR: 2.12, 95%CI: 1.1–3.8]. The other associated factor found in this study was, having training on HIV testing and management. Those OBCPs who had training on HIV testing and management were more than three-folds knowledgeable as those who did not have the training [AOR 3.51, 95%CI: 1.93–6.40]. OBCPs who work in a facility that had a library were two times more knowledgeable than those whose facilities had no library [AOR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.04–2.85]. Those professionals who were working in facilities that had internet access were more than three folds knowledgeable as those whose facilities had no internet access [AOR: 3.45, 95%CI: 2.05–5.81] (Table 4).
Factors associated with obstetric care providers’ practice on preconception care
Participants’ knowledge of preconception care had no significant association with their level of practice. Obstetric care providers who were working in MCH [AOR: 3.90, 95%CI: 1.94–7.82] and Gynecologic OPD [AOR: 3.74, 95%CI: 1.69–8.24] had a more likelihood of PPC practice compared to OBCPs who was working in the labour& delivery ward. The likelihood of good practice of PCC was four-fold higher among obstetric care providers who did screening for RPL plan of clients than those who didn’t screen [AOR: 3.51, 95%CI: 1.76–6.98]. In addition, those professionals who ever read preconception guidelines and protocol from any source were two times more likely to have good practice of PPC than those who never read [AOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.03–3.23].
OBCPs who was working in a health facility that had internet access were three times more likely to have good practice than those OBCPs who were working in a health facility that did nothave an internet access [AOR:3.29, 95% CI: 1.82–5.95].OBCPs who possessed a perceived expectation that PCC should be given by all health care professionals had higher odds of PCC practice than those who perceived PCC should be given by selected professionals [AOR: 3.02, 95% CI:1.69–5.41)]. The odds of good PCC practice was two times higher among OBCPs who perceived PCC should be given in all health facility than those who perceived PCC should be given in selected health facility [AOR: 2.37,95% CI:1.29–4.33]. The likelihood of good practice of PCC was two times higher among obstetric care providers who had training on RPL plan screening and counselling than those who did nothave [AOR:1.77,95%CI: 1.01–3.10] (Table 5).
Discussion
This study revealed that 48.2% [95%CI: 43.2–53.5] of OBCPs had a good knowledge of PCC. This finding is consistent with the studiesdone in Brazil (46.2%) [17], Nigeria 52.7% [18], Awi, Ethiopia 52% [12], and Wollo, Ethiopia(49.1%) [13]. However, it is higher than a study done in Hawassa(31%) [11]. This difference may be due to the concept of PCC was a new initiative at the time of the study, and the non-inclusion of PCC courses in pre-service training [19], and currently, the care was included in pre-service curricula of some programs. The present finding is lower than the studies done in TikureAnbessa Hospital Ethiopia 69.2% [15], Iran (88.3%) [20], Nepal (85.9%) [21], and South Africa (55%) [22]. This might be due to, unlike in Ethiopia PCC service existed and was implemented earlier, and also it was considered to be a part of integrated care and responsibility of providers so that this can increase the provider’s exposure to PCC in the case of Iran [23]. The possible reason for the study of Nepal and South Africa might be due to differences in sample size and sampling technique. The other possible explanation for the differences with the study of TikurAnbessa might be due to the study participants’ academic profile, being the largest teaching and referral hospital in Ethiopia and the current study was done in urban and more rural areas which intern affects the provider’s accessibility to information and updated knowledge.
This study revealed that 34.5% (95%CI: 29.5–39.6) of OBCPs had a good practice on PCC. This finding was lower than the studies done in Canada (78.4%) [24] and Netherlands 82% [25]. This difference may be due to PCC service being a new initiative that is yet to be introduced in the health care system of Ethiopia and in those countries dedicated PCC service unit was established for the provision of PCC [10]. The other reason might be, unlike those countries, Ethiopia did notyet develop PCC practice guidelines rather preconception guidance was usually contained within maternity guidelines [19]. However, the current finding was higher than the study conducted at TikurAnbessa hospital where is 19.2% of residents had a good level of preconception care practice [15]. This difference may be due to the samplesize difference.
In this study, participant’s profession was associated with obstetric care providers’ knowledge about PCC. Midwives were two times more likely to have agood knowledge of PCCcompared to nurses. This finding is in line with the study conducted in Wollo, Ethiopia [13]. The knowledge gap might be due to, unlike nurses, midwives might have chances to be exposed to preconception care during their pre-service training [26] and their working departments being linked to the components of PCC.
The likelihood of having good knowledge of PCC was three-fold higher among degree andabove holders compared to diploma holders. This finding was supported by a study conducted in Nepal [21]. This might be due to the educational curriculum differences.
Those OBCPs who read PCC guidelines or protocol from any source were two times more knowledgeable than those who never read PCC guidelines or protocol. This finding was supported by the studies done in Wollo, Ethiopia [13] and Hawassa, Ethiopia [11]. This finding is considerable in that getting access to different guidelines and procedural documents that guide PCC will enable providers to be informed and to know the components of PCC services.
OBCPs who were working in the hospitals were two times more knowledgeable than those professionals who were working in the health centre. This finding is also in line with a study done in Hawassa [11]. This might be due to the presence of different higher specialized care; they had a chance of exposure to different clinical cases than health centres.
The other factor found in this study is having training on HIV testing and management. Those OBCPs who had training on HIV testing and management were more than three-folds knowledgeable than those who did nothave the training. The finding was in line with the studies conducted in Nepal [21] and Awi, Ethiopia [12]. This is literal in that when professionals’ get in-service training they will get updated knowledge and the HIV training manuals included preconception care components [27].
OBCPs who work in an institution that had library and internet access were two times and more than three-fold knowledgeable respectively. This finding was supported by a study done in Wollo, Ethiopia [13]. This is literal in that, HCPs can access those guidelines, different medical-related books, and manuals for reading, gathering, and updating information therefore this can intern will increase their knowledge [28,29].
The likelihood of good practice of PCC was fourfold higher among obstetric care providers who did screening for RPL plan of clients than those who did notscreen; this finding was in line with a study done in Hawassa, Ethiopia [14]. This is possible in that requesting women’s RPL plan could serve as an opening wedge to initiate several evidence-based pre-pregnancy care interventions [30].
Those professionals who ever read preconception guidelines and protocol from any source were two times more likely to have agood practice than those who never read. This finding is also supported by studies done in the Netherlands and Australia [31–33]. This is possible in that knowing guidelines about PCC will serve as guidance and motivate to give effective PCC services.
OBCPs that possessed a perceived expectation that PCC should be given by all health care professionals had odds of good PCC practice by three-fold than those who perceived PCC should be given by selected professionals. This finding was in line with a study done in Hawassa [14]. This is possible in that having this opinion makes the professional himself take responsibility to give the care.
Strength and limitations of the study
This study considers all health care providers responsible for the provision of preconception care. However, it has some limitations: Firstly, this study was not supported with observational studies for the assessment of preconception care practice. Hence, we cannot validate their actual performance. Secondly, there might be the possibilities of recall and social desirability bias.
Conclusions
This study found that more than half of obstetric care providers’ had poor knowledge and practice of preconception care. Respondents’ profession, educational level, type of working institution, ever read PCC guidelines from any source, having training on HIV testing and management and institutions having library andinternet access were associated with the providers’ knowledge. On the other hand, participants working unit, training on RPL plan screening andcounselling, RPL plan screening, ever read PCC guidelines or protocol from any source, presence of internet access in working health facilities, perceived expectations on who should give PCC, and opinion on which health facility should give PCC services were associated to the providers’ good practice. Provision of training, carrier development, and installation of internet and library services in working facilities is recommended.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ambo University, College of Medicine, and Health sciences staff for their guidance and support during the data collection process. Finally, we would like to appreciate the West Shoa zone health office and respondents
References
- 1.
World Health Organization. Preconception care: Maximizing the gains for maternal and child health [Internet]. World Health Organization. Geneva- switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. 1–8 p. Available from: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/preconception_care_policy_brief.
- 2.
The American College of Obstatricians and Gynecoloists. Perinatal care. Eighth. Washingiton, DC; 2017.
- 3.
WHO. Maternal mortality: level and trends 2000 to 2017 [Internet]. Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2019. 12 p. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal-mortality-2000-2017/en/.
- 4.
UNICEF. UN IGME Child mortality report [Internet]. 2020. 52 p. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2019.pdf.
- 5.
ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016 [Internet]. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: CSA and ICF; 2017. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR328/FR328.pdf.
- 6.
World Health Organization. Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). World Health Organization; 2015 p. 1–4.
- 7.
World Health Organization. Preconception care Regional expert group consultation. NeththanjaliMapitigama, Case Study, Sri Lanka. 2013;33–5.
- 8. Goossens J, Roose M De, Hecke A Van, Goemaes R, Verhaeghe S, Beeckman D. PT. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018.
- 9. Fekene DB, Woldeyes BS, Erena MM, Demisse GA. Knowledge, uptake of preconception care and associated factors among reproductive age group women in West Shewa zone, Ethiopia, 2018. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):1–8.
- 10. Consensus G. Preconception Care to Reduce Maternal and Childhood Mortality and Morbidity.
- 11. Andargachew k, human Sarie, Gemeda Hirut. Knowledge of preconception care among healthcare providers working in public health institutions in Hawassa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204415. pmid:30273381
- 12.
Bekele MM, Gebeyehu NA, Kefale MM, Bante SA. Knowledge of Preconception Care and Associated Factors among Healthcare Providers Working in Public Health Institutions in Awi Zone, North West Ethiopia, 2019: 2020;2020:1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6978171.
- 13.
Zone NW, Region A. Knowledge and Attitude Towards Preconception Care and Associated Factors Among Health Care Providers in. 2020;
- 14.
Andargachew K. Level of Healthcare Providers ‘ Preconception Care (PCC) Practice and Factors Associated with Non-Implementation of PCC in. (4).
- 15. Seman WA, Seman WA, Waji ST. ORIGINAL ARTICLE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF PHYSICIANS AT TIKUR ANBESSA HOSPITAL ON PRECONCEPTION CARE. 2019;57(2):241–7.
- 16. Fieldwick D, Smith A, Paterson H. General practitioners and preconception weight management in New Zealand. Aust New Zeal J ObstetGynaecol. 2017;57(4):420–5. pmid:28303563
- 17. Regina H, Akiba R, Figueiredo EN. Prevention of birth defects in the pre-conception period: knowledge and practice of health care professionals (nurses and doctors) in a city of Southern Brazil. 2015;13(10):657–63.
- 18.
O AT, O KA, I OP, O AG. Awareness and perception of preconception care among health workers in Ahmadu Bello University Teaching University, Zaria. 2016;149–52.
- 19.
Andargachew Kassa. Addressing The High Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Through The Incorporation Of Preconception Care (Pcc) In The Health System Of Ethiopia. 2017.
- 20. Bayrami R, Ebrahimipour H, Ebrahimi M, Froutani MR, Najafzadeh B. Health care provider s’ knowledge, attitude and practice regarding pre-conception care in Iran. J Res Heal Soc Dev Heal Promot Res Cent [Internet]. 2013;3(4):519–26. Available from: http://jrh.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-175-en.pdf.
- 21. Campus MN, Campus MN. Knowledge on Preconception Care among Bachelor Level Nursing Students of Selected Nursing Campuses of Tribhuvan. 2019;8(5):1–6.
- 22. Ukoha W. Primary health care nursing students ‘ knowledge of and attitude towards the provision of preconception care in KwaZulu-Natal. 2014;1–8.
- 23.
Kharaghani R, Shariati M, Yunesian M, Keramat A, Moghisi A. or re ed Proo. 2016;(April).
- 24.
Best Start Resource Centre. Preconception Health: Physician Practices in Ontario. 2009.
- 25. van Voorst S, Plasschaert S, de Jong-Potjer L, Steegers E, Denktaş S. Current practice of preconception care by primary caregivers in the Netherlands. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2016;21(3):251–8. pmid:27003266
- 26. Azeb A, Kubra G, Yohannes M, TegbarYigzaw D, Mintwab G, Asselef T, et al. Ethiopian Modularly Harmonized Post Basic BSc Midwifery Curriculum. 2018.
- 27.
Participant training manual for the three interlinked patient monitoring systems for HIV care / ART, MCH / PMTCT, and TB / HIV I nter l inked P atient M onitoring S ystem. 2012;
- 28. Ajuwon GA. Internet Accessibility and Use of Online Health Information Resources by Doctors in Training Healthcare Institutions in Nigeria. 2015;
- 29. Marshall JG, Sollenberger J, Easterby-gannett S, Morgan LK, Klem M Lou, Cavanaugh SK, et al. The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study. 2013;101(January).
- 30. Liu F, Parmerter J, Straughn M. Reproductive Life Planning: 2016;51(1):55–61.
- 31. Mazza D, Chapman A, Michie S. Barriers to the implementation of preconception care guidelines as perceived by general practitioners: a qualitative study in Australia. 2013;1–8.
- 32. M’hamdi HI, van Voorst SF, Pinxten W, Hilhorst MT, Steegers EAP. Barriers in the Uptake and Delivery of Preconception Care: Exploring the Views of Care Providers in Netherlands. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(1):21–8. pmid:27423236
- 33. Poels M, Koster MPH, Franx A, Stel HF Van Healthcare providers ‘ views on the delivery of preconception care in a local community setting in the Netherlands. 2017;1–10.