Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Risk of peripheral artery occlusive disease in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments: A population cohort study

  • Pin-Keng Shih,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations School of medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Jian-Xun Chen,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliations School of medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Mei-Chen Lin,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliations School of medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Shih-Chi Wu

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    rw114@mail.cmuh.org.tw

    Affiliations School of medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Abstract

Background

The risk of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) in patients with lower leg fracture who underwent fixation procedures is not yet completely understood. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the risk of subsequent PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments.

Methods

We included 6538 patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment and a matched cohort comprising 26152 patients who received fixation treatment from the National Health Insurance Database. Patients were frequency matched according to age, sex, and index year. The incidence and risk of PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments were evaluated via the stratification of different characteristics and comorbidities.

Results

Non-fixation treatment, male sex, older age (≥ 50 years old), diabetes mellitus, and gout were associated with a significantly higher risk of lower extremity PAOD compare to each comparison group, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between fixation treatment and a lower risk of lower extremity PAOD in women (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38–0.90), women aged > 50 years (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38–0.96), and patients with coronary artery disease (aHR = 0.43, 95% CI = (0.23–0.81). Further, patients with fixation treatment had a significantly lower risk of lower extremity PAOD within 2 years after trauma (aHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34–0.97). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence of PAOD was significantly higher in the non-fixation treatment group than in the fixation treatment group at the end of the 10-year follow-up period (log-rank test: P = 0.022).

Conclusion

Patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment had a significantly higher risk of PAOD than those who received fixation treatment. Moreover, the risk of PAOD was higher in women aged > 50 years, as well as in coronary artery disease patients who received non-fixation treatment than in those who received fixation treatment. Therefore, regular assessment of vessel patency are recommended for these patients. Nevertheless, further studies must be conducted to validate the results of our study.

Introduction

The prevalence of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) is about 10% in the population aged > 60 years. The risk factors may include smoking, physical inactivity, overweight, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia [1]. The signs and symptoms are intermittent claudication, ischemic pain at rest, skin ulcer, and gangrene [2]. In addition to open or endovascular revascularization, the current treatments include antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy [3].

Lower leg fracture is managed with fixation and non-fixation procedures. In patients with stable tibial fractures and well-aligned tibial component, fracture can be successfully treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization as well as cautious maintenance of alignment during follow-up [4]. In patients with comminuted tibial fracture who present with component instability or misalignment, open reduction with internal or external fixation is commonly indicated to restore alignment. Moreover, it may be associated with a shorter hospital stay, faster pain relief, and lower risk of complications [5].

A previous study showed that 1.04% of patients with lower extremity blunt fracture present with acute artery injury [6]. Further, patients with open tibial fracture commonly develop chronic PAOD [7]. Hence, emerging evidence has shown that PAOD is associated with lower leg fracture [6, 7]. Although the mechanism underlying PAOD is not fully elucidated, it might be caused by mechanical or biochemical factors [8]. Some case studies have revealed that patients with comminuted fracture have a greater risk of PAOD, which might be attributed to a high energy impact and vessel damage [8, 9].

Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the risk of subsequent PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments.

Materials and methods

Data source

Taiwan established the National Health Insurance Program, which enrolled nearly 99% of residents. Since 1995, comprehensive health claimed data have been stored in the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). This database contains information about prescription, treatment, medical costs, and other medical services for both inpatients and outpatients. The current research used data from the population-based hospitalization database. To protect the privacy of each participant, the identification numbers were already encrypted before data were released by the government. The diagnoses in the Taiwan NHI are defined according to the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). This study was approved by the research ethics committee of China Medical University and Hospital in Taiwan [CMUH-104-REC2-115-CR6].

Definition of fixation treatment

Fixation treatment was defined as internal or external fixation and non-fixation treatment as short leg casting.

Study population

To validate the association between fixation treatment and the risk of arterial embolism and thrombosis in the lower extremity (lower extremity PAOD) in patients with tibial and fibula fracture, we identified patients with newly diagnosed tibial and fibula fracture (ICD-9-CM: 823) from 2000 to 2012 who received internal or external fixation treatment (ICD-9-OP: 78.17, 78.57, 79.16, and 79.36). These patients were then assigned to the fixation treatment group, and those who did not receive internal or external fixation treatment to the non-fixation treatment group (ICD-9-OP: 79.06, and 79.26). The index date was set as the fixation date. Patients diagnosed with lower extremity PAOD (ICD-9-CM: 444.22) before the index date or those aged < 18 years (calculated until the index date) were excluded from the study.

Baseline comorbidity and outcome

Comorbidities were important confounding factors, and those observed before the index date included diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250) [10], hypertension (ICD-9-CM: 401–405) [11], gout (ICD-9-CM: 274) [12], hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM: 272) [13], mental disorder (ICD-9-CM: 290, 294–298, 311) [14], stroke (ICD-9-CM: 430–438) [15], Parkinson disease (ICD-9-CM: 332) [16], coronary artery disease (ICD-9-CM: 410–414) [17], heart failure (ICD-9-CM: 428) [17], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (ICD-9-CM: 491, 492, 496) [18], liver disease (ICD-9-CM: 571, 572) [19], and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (ICD-9-CM: 585) [20]

All participants were followed-up until the occurrence of lower extremity PAOD, death, and withdrawal from the NHIRD program or until December 31, 2013.

Statistical analysis

We performed propensity score matching. Then, to assess probabilities, which were used to assign four fixation-treated patients to each non-treated participant, the propensity score was calculated via a logistic regression analysis. The matched variables included sex, age, index year of fixation treatment, diabetes, hypertension, and gout.

The baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities were identified. The difference between the two cohorts was assessed using standardized mean difference (SMD). Results showed a negligible difference, with a SMD of ≤ 0.1 [21]. The incidence of lower extremity PAOD was calculated as the number of newly occurred lower extremity PAOD divided by the following period (per 10,000 person-year). The Kaplan–Meier method was applied to calculate the cumulative incidence of lower extremity PAOD, and the difference between two survival curves were assessed using the log-rank test. Furthermore, the potential risk factors of lower extremity PAOD were assessed, and stratified analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results were presented as hazard ratio, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (for demographic factors and comorbidities), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The cumulative incidence curve was plotted using the R software. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In total, 32690 participants with lower leg fracture, including 26152 with fixation treatment and 6538 with non-fixation treatment, were enrolled in this study.

In the fixation group, there were 10913 (41.7%) women and 15239 (58.3%) men. Moreover, 4736 (18.1%) patients were aged 20–29 years; 3732 (14.3%) patients were aged 30–39 years; 4644 (17.8%) patients were aged 40–49 years; 4747 (18.2%) patients were aged 50–59 years; 3944 (15.1%) patients were aged 60–69 years; 3230 (12.4%) patients were aged 70–79 years, and 1119 (4.3%) ≥ 80 years.

In the non-fixation group, there were 2770 (42.4%) women and 3768 (57.6%) men. Further, 1175 (18.0%) patients were aged 20–29 years; 948 (14.5%) patients were aged 30–39 years; 1196 (18.3%) patients were aged 40–49 years; 1157 (17.7%) patients were aged 50–59 years; 941 (14.4%) patients were aged 60–69 years; 744 (11.4%) patients were aged 70–79 years, and 377 (5.8%) ≥ 80 years.

There were no significant differences in terms of sex, age, and baseline comorbidities between the two groups (SMD of < 0.1) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities of patients newly diagnosed fracture of tibia and fibula in Taiwan during 2000–2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272068.t001

Table 2 depicts the incidence and risk factors of lower extremity PAOD. After adjusting for age, sex, and all comorbidities, male sex (aHR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14–1.96), older age (≥50 years, aHR = 4.03, 95% CI = 2.73–5.95), diabetes mellitus (aHR = 4.06, 95% CI = (2.95–5.59), gout (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI = (1.25–3.46), coronary artery disease (aHR = 1.63, 95% CI = (1.10–2.40), and ESRD (aHR = 4.88, 95% CI = (2.39–10.00) were found to be associated with a significantly higher risk of lower extremity PAOD compare to each comparison group, respectively. The fixation treatment group (aHR = 0.71, 95% CI = (0.53–0.95) had a significantly lower risk of PAOD than the non-fixation treatment group.

thumbnail
Table 2. Cox model measured hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of arterial embolism and thrombosis of lower extremity associated with and without internal or external fixation among Fracture of tibia and fibula patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272068.t002

Table 3 shows the findings of the univariate and multivariate stratified analyses. Results showed a significant association between fixation treatment and a reduced risk of lower extremity PAOD among women (aHR = 0.58, 95% CI = (0.38–0.90) and women aged > 50 years (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI = (0.38–0.96), and patients with coronary artery disease (aHR = 0.43, 95% CI = (0.23–0.81).

thumbnail
Table 3. Incidence rates, hazard ratio and confidence intervals of arterial embolism and thrombosis of lower extremity in different stratification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272068.t003

After stratifying follow-up years into < 2, 2–5, and > 5 years, patients with fixation treatment had a significantly lower risk of lower extremity PAOD in the 2-year follow-up (aHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34–0.97) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Incidence rates, hazard ratio and confidence intervals of arterial embolism and thrombosis of lower extremity in different follow-up stratification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272068.t004

Fig 1 shows that the fixation treatment group had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of lower extremity PAOD than the non-fixation treatment group in the 10-year follow-up (log-rank test, P = 0.022).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Cumulative incidence curves of peripheral artery disease in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation treatment and those who did not.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272068.g001

Discussion

Our study showed that female patients aged > 50 years who received fixation treatment had a significantly lower risk of PAOD than those who received non-fixation treatment. However, there was no significant difference among male patients (Table 3).

After stratification according to different follow-up periods, patients with fixation treatment had a significantly lower risk of lower extremity PAOD within 2 years after trauma than those with non-fixation treatment.

Previous studies have shown that patients with hip trauma are at risk of PAOD [22, 23]. To prevent misinterpretation, patients with hip fracture (ICD codes: 835, 9240, and 9280) were excluded from this research. Therefore, the term lower leg fracture refers to tibial, fibular, or tibiofibular fracture.

It is rational to conclude that patients with fixation treatment had a higher risk of PAOD than those without due to a more severe tissue damage. Nevertheless, our results showed that the non-fixation treatment group had a higher risk of PAOD than the fixation treatment group (Table 2). This could be explained by the fact that patients with lower leg fracture who did not undergo fixation surgery commonly had cast immobilization, which may increase the risk of PAOD. By contrast, some studies have revealed that prolonged lower leg immobilization after fracture was associated with venous thrombosis formation [24, 25]. However, whether this finding is true for artery compromise such as that in PAOD patients with lower leg fracture must be further investigated. Taken together, we believe that a high energy impact in lower leg comminuted fracture can not only damage bone alignment but also affect vessel patency [26, 27]. Hence, patients with this condition should receive fixation treatment [28]. Since only few studies have focused on the association between PAOD and immobilization after lower leg fracture, further investigations should be performed.

Women aged > 50 years who received non-fixation treatment had a higher risk of PAOD than those who received fixation treatment (Table 3). Moreover, they often present with menopause, which is associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis and fracture [29]. Therefore, osteoporosis can enhance the need for a longer immobilization after fracture in aging women with non-fixation treatment, thereby resulting in a higher risk for PAOD. Although osteoporosis may increase the risk of lower leg fracture, fixation may decrease the need for immobilization, which can reduce the incidence of PAOD in older female patients who underwent surgery (Table 3).

There was a significant association between fixation treatment and a reduced risk of lower extremity PAOD in patients with coronary artery disease (Table 3). It has been reported that there are close relations between coronary artery disease and PAOD [17, 30, 31]. Yet, due to limited patient number, further studies are required to identify whether coronary artery disease patients with lower leg fracture are proposed to receive fixation treatment.

Some studies have shown that chronic artery insufficiency presents as nonunion of fracture during the 2-year follow-up in patients with lower leg fracture [7, 32, 33]. In this study, compared with the fixation group, the non-fixation treatment group had a higher risk of PAOD within 2 years after trauma, and there were no differences in terms of risk after 2 years (Table 4). A time period of 2 years might be required to progressively establish collateral blood circulation after trauma. However, further studies must be performed to validate this result.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study with a long-term follow-up about the subsequent risk of PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments. In the current series, the cumulative incidence of PAOD was significantly higher in the non-fixation treatment group than in the fixation treatment group (Fig 1). In addition, women aged > 50 years, as well as coronary artery disease patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment had a higher risk of PAOD than those who received fixation treatment (Table 3). Therefore, regular assessment of vessel patency via ultrasonography and treatment with prophylactic anticoagulation drugs are recommended for these patients.

Limitations

With reliable diagnoses and a high rate of follow-up, the assessment of PAOD risk in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments is strengthened by the inclusion of a large number of patients and as well as longitudinal assessments and subgroup analyses. However, the current research had several limitations. First, data about lifestyles factors, such as smoking, dietary habits, drinking, and socioeconomic status, and genetic factors were not obtained for the adjustment of PAOD risk. Moreover, a stratified analysis of patients with simple and compound (comminuted) lower leg fracture was not performed because of databank limitation. Second, PAOD was diagnosed based on admission diagnoses and codes. Thus, an extremely accurate analysis was not performed, and there was no accessible information regarding fracture severity/grade. Similarly, owing to database limitation, it would be very difficult to differentiate and analyze the fixation methods separately for internal and external fixation, as well as measure the proportion of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis among the internal fixations population. Third, because all data were anonymized, relevant clinical variables, such as surgical findings, imaging results, and laboratory data, were not available. Fourth, biases could have existed due to the retrospective nature of the study. Nevertheless, data regarding lower leg fracture, surgery, and PAOD diagnosis were highly reliable.

Conclusion

Patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment had a significantly higher risk of PAOD than those who received fixation treatment. Moreover, the risk of PAOD was higher in women aged > 50 years, as well as in coronary artery disease patients who received non-fixation treatment than in those who received fixation treatment. Nevertheless, further studies should be conducted to validate our results.

References

  1. 1. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Peripheral arterial disease—diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. Stockholm 2008. SBU Yellow Report No. 187.
  2. 2. Lawall H, Huppert P, Espinola-Klein C, Rümenapf G. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial vascular disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(43):729–36. pmid:27866570
  3. 3. Singh P, Harper Y, Oliphant CS, Morsy M, Skelton M, Askari R, et al. Peripheral interventions and antiplatelet therapy: role in current practice. World J Cardiol. 2017;9(7):583–93. pmid:28824788
  4. 4. Born CT, Gil JA, Johnson JP. Periprosthetic tibial fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(8):e167–72. pmid:29528870
  5. 5. Vierhout BP, Sleeboom C, Aronson DC, Van Walsum AD, Zijp G, Heij HA. Long-term outcome of elastic stable intramedullary fixation (ESIF) of femoral fractures in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;16(6):432–7. pmid:17211794
  6. 6. Coleman JJ, Tavoosi S, Zarzaur BL, Brewer BL, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV. Arterial injuries associated with blunt fractures in the lower extremity. Am Surg. 2016;82(9):820–4. pmid:27670570
  7. 7. Dickson K, Katzman S, Delgado E, Contreras D. Delayed unions and nonunions of open tibial fractures. Correlation with arteriography results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302(302):189–93. pmid:8168299
  8. 8. Guled U, Gopinathan NR, Goni VG, Rhh A, John R, Behera P. Proximal tibial and fibular physeal fracture causing popliteal artery injury and peroneal nerve injury: A case report and review of literature. Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(4):238–40. pmid:26764548
  9. 9. Vestergaard V, Pedersen AB, Tengberg PT, Troelsen A, Schrøder HM. 20-year trends of distal femoral, patellar, and proximal tibial fractures: a Danish nationwide cohort study of 60,823 patients. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(1):109–14. pmid:31795876
  10. 10. Firnhaber JM, Powell CS. Lower extremity peripheral artery disease: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2019;99(6):362–9. pmid:30874413
  11. 11. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9901):1329–40. pmid:23915883
  12. 12. Bardin T, Richette P. Impact of comorbidities on gout and hyperuricaemia: an update on prevalence and treatment options. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):123. pmid:28669352
  13. 13. Aday AW, Everett BM. Dyslipidemia Profiles in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Apr 22;21(6):42. pmid:31011836
  14. 14. Thomas M, Patel KK, Gosch K, Labrosciano C, Mena-Hurtado C, Fitridge R, et al. Mental health concerns in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: Insights from the PORTRAIT registry. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Feb 11;131:109963. pmid:32065970
  15. 15. Kolls BJ, Sapp S, Rockhold FW, Jordan JD, Dombrowski KE, Fowkes FGR, et al. Stroke in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease. Stroke. 2019 Jun;50(6):1356–1363. pmid:31092165
  16. 16. Hong CT, Hu HH, Chan L, Bai CH. Prevalent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease in people with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 4;10:1147–1154. pmid:30233249
  17. 17. Criqui MH, Aboyans V. Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1509–26. pmid:25908725
  18. 18. Liao KM, Kuo LT, Lu HY. Increased risk of peripheral arterial occlusive diseases in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide study in Taiwan. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jul 4;14:1455–1464. pmid:31308650
  19. 19. Zhu W, Deng CJ, Xuan LP, Dai HJ, Zhao ZY, Wang TG, et al. Peripheral Artery Disease and Risk of Fibrosis Deterioration in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Prospective Investigation. Biomed Environ Sci. 2020 Apr 20;33(4):217–226. pmid:32438959
  20. 20. Peripheral Artery Occlusive Disease Risk Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(28):e1164.
  21. 21. Liu CY, Hung YT, Chuang YL, Chen YJ, Weng WS, Liu JS. Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. J Health Manag. 2006;14:1–22.
  22. 22. Ungprasert P, Wijarnpreecha K, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W. Peripheral arterial disease and risk of hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Postgrad Med. 2018;64(4):220–5. pmid:30004038
  23. 23. Collins TC, Ewing SK, Diem SJ, Taylor BC, Orwoll ES, Cummings SR, et al. Peripheral arterial disease is associated with higher rates of hip bone loss and increased fracture risk in older men. Circulation. 2009;119(17):2305–12. pmid:19380619
  24. 24. Nemeth B, Timp JF, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC. High risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with lower-leg cast immobilization. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16(11):2218–22. pmid:30160361
  25. 25. Lassen MR, Borris LC, Nakov RL. Use of the low-molecular-weight heparin reviparin to prevent deep-vein thrombosis after leg injury requiring immobilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(10):726–30. pmid:12213943
  26. 26. Brinker MR, Bailey DE Jr. Fracture healing in tibia fractures with an associated vascular injury. J Trauma. 1997;42(1):11–9. pmid:9003252
  27. 27. Nemati M, Nosratinia H, Goldust M, Raghifar R. Arterial injuries in extremities trauma, angiographic findings. Pak J Biol Sci. 2013;16(3):145–7. pmid:24171277
  28. 28. Beale B, McCally R. Minimally invasive fracture repair of the tibia and fibula. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020;50(1):183–206. pmid:31733670
  29. 29. Peng K, Yao P, Kartsonaki C, Yang L, Bennett D, Tian M, et al., China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group. Menopause and risk of hip fracture in middle-aged Chinese women: a 10-year follow-up of China Kadoorie biobank. Menopause. 2020;27(3):311–8.
  30. 30. Bauersachs R, Zeymer U, Brière JB, et al. Burden of Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease: A Literature Review. Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Nov 26;2019:8295054. pmid:32099582
  31. 31. Narula N, Olin JW, Narula N. Pathologic Disparities Between Peripheral Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Sep;40(9):1982–1989. pmid:32673526
  32. 32. Kalyan JP, Kordzadeh A, Hanif MA, Griffiths M, Lyall H, Prionidis I. Nonunion of the tibial facture as a consequence of posterior tibial artery pseudoaneurysm. J Surg Case Rep. 2015;2015(11). pmid:26521160
  33. 33. Dickson KF, Katzman S, Paiement G. The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures. Contemp Orthop. 1995;30(6):489–93. pmid:10150380