https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-7337
Figures
Abstract
Background
Sarcopenia is an age-related muscular disease manifesting as a loss of muscle function and mass–leads to detrimental consequences at both individual and community levels. Modifiable lifestyle factors (such as physical behaviors and nutritional habits) may be involved in sarcopenia etiology. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Population (EWGOSP2) established a cut-off point for sarcopenia diagnosis based on the European population and they recommend the use of a regional normative population. However, no sufficient data on sarcopenia prevalence is presently available in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this project aims to define appropriate reference values from healthy Saudi young adults (Phase I) and to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in Saudi Arabia (Phase II) and examine selected modifiable lifestyle correlates of sarcopenia (Phase I, II).
Methods
The project will involve two phases. Phase I will include 1532 healthy Saudi young adults aged between 20–40 years. While, Phase II will include 1532 Saudi older adults aged ≥50 years. The study will measure vital signs, anthropometrics, muscle mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, muscle strength using handgrip strength and maximal isometric strength, physical function using short physical performance battery, and 6-minute walk test to measure aerobic endurance. To explore the associations between lifestyle behaviors with sarcopenia indices, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep will be evaluated subjectively using Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and objectively via ActivPAL accelerometers. A three-day dietary food record will also be used to evaluate dietary intake. Additionally, EuroQOL five-dimension questionnaire will be utilized to assess health-related quality of life.
Citation: Alghannam AF, Almasud AA, Alghnam SA, Alharbi DS, Aljubairi MS, Altalhi AS, et al. (2022) Prevalence of sarcopenia among Saudis and its association with lifestyle behaviors: Protocol for cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 17(8): e0271672. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271672
Editor: Jeremy P. Loenneke, University of Mississippi, UNITED STATES
Received: December 6, 2021; Accepted: July 5, 2022; Published: August 2, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Alghannam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.
Funding: This research project is funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R309), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The investigators declare that they have no competing interests.
Introduction
Aging populations are a global phenomenon in the past few decades [1]. In Saudi Arabia, the 2019 census indicated that the elderly population ratio showed an increase by 59% compared to 2007 census [2]. Longer life expectancy is associated with an increased likelihood of morbidity and disability which might affect functional independence and quality of life [3]. Sarcopenia–defined as the age-related progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and associated diminished muscular strength and functional capacity [4, 5]–poses a major challenge in the 21st century [6]. Sarcopenia is officially recognized as a muscle disease with an ICD-10-MC diagnosis code [7]. The widely used definitions of sarcopenia is established by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Population (EWGSOP) and Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGS) [8, 9]. In 2018 and after exploring many aspects of sarcopenia, EWGSOP revised the original definition [10]. The sarcopenia diagnosis algorithm established by EWGSOP2 includes low muscle strength as a fundamental factor for sarcopenia diagnosis and it is confirmed by the presence of low muscle mass. The presence of low functional performance in addition to low muscle strength and mass is indicative of severe sarcopenia [10].
Sarcopenia has a high health and economic impact on both the individual and community levels. The presence of sarcopenia leads to several detrimental effects in terms of human health, including increased risk of falls and fractures [11], high level of dependence and long-term care usage [12, 13] and higher mortality rate [14], and decreased physical and cognitive capacities [15–17]. At the economic level, sarcopenia is significantly associated with higher health care cost and hospitalization; older adults with sarcopenia who are hospitalized have 5-fold higher health care cost than non-sarcopenic older adults [18]. A study in hospitalized patients reports that sarcopenia increases hospitalization by €1,240 (59% confidence interval (CI): €596–1,887) for patients aged 65 years and €721 (95% CI: €13–1,429) for patients aged ⩾65 years [19]. The aforementioned knowledge, therefore, clearly affirms the importance of global efforts in identifying, treating and preventing sarcopenia.
Sarcopenia appears to manifest earlier in life [20]. Noticeable reductions in skeletal muscle mass are apparent during the third decade of life and becomes more prominent by the late 50s [21]. While muscle strength reaches its peak in the 4th decade and begins declining thereafter with aging [22]. Although an age-related disease, multiple other factors can trigger the development of sarcopenia, including modifiable lifestyle factors such as physical behaviors and nutrition [23, 24]. Many studies showed the positive effect of exercise and nutrition on sarcopenia [25–27]. These findings confirm the importance of early intervention to prevent or treat sarcopenia.
The prevalence of sarcopenia varies depending on the definition used, diagnostic criteria, cut-off points, and selection of assessment tool. Conservative estimates are ranged between 10% to12.9% in both males and females [28, 29]. However, the prevalence of sarcopenia in Saudi Arabia remains elusive. EWGOSP2 established a cut-off point for sarcopenia diagnosis based on the European population and they used healthy young adults from the same population as a normative reference (2 SD below the mean of reference value) and they recommend the use of a regional normative population as the age related muscle mass reduction significantly influenced by ethnicity [10, 30]. Only one study was conducted in Saudi Arabia to determine the reference values of sarcopenia in young Saudi men, however, this was not based on the current EWGOSP2 sarcopenia definition, in addition, no physical performance (functional) cut-off point was established [31]. To date, no cut-off points related to muscle mass, muscle function (strength and physical performance) are available for young Saudi females. Therefore, the present study aims to define appropriate reference values from healthy Saudi young adults (Phase I) and to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in Saudi Arabia (Phase II) and examine selected modifiable lifestyle correlates with sarcopenia (Phase I, II), as these influences may have a role in the development of sarcopenia much earlier in life than previously thought [5, 20].
Methods
Research aims and objectives
The objectives of this study will be differentiated based on the age group targeted into two phases. Phase I will include a sample with an age group range between 20 and 40 years old to obtain reference values for sarcopenia indices among Saudis. Phase II will include a sample with an age group ≥50 to determine sarcopenia prevalence in Saudi Arabia. The main objectives for both phases are described in (Table 1).
Study design and setting
This analytic cross-sectional study will be conducted at Lifestyle and Health Research Center, Health Sciences Research Center at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Riyadh City. This study will be conducted over a period of 24 months, from May 2021 to May 2023 (both phases).
Recruitment
A simple random sampling method will be used for recruitment, in which participants will be recruited from the local community via word-of-mouth and advertisement (including social media, announcement boards, events at primary care clinics, and associations related to the elderly). Upon contacting researchers assigned to the study, participants will be provided with a participant information sheet detailing the study aims and requirements. Participants who express their interest in the study will be assessed for eligibility and provide an opportunity to discuss any details or requirements related to the study’s procedures through telephone-based interviews. Medical health and socio-demographics sheets will be sent electronically via research electronic data capture software (REDCap) [32, 33]. If a participant meets the study inclusion criteria, he/she will be invited to take part in the study. Phase I and II of the study will have a similar methodology except for the inclusion/exclusion criteria (detailed below).
Selection criteria
The eligibility criteria for participants in both phases are presented in (Table 2).
Assessment of sarcopenia
EWGSOP2 definition of sarcopenia will be applied for this study. The cut-off values for determining sarcopenia will be based on EWGSOP2 criteria (Table 3) [10]. While in Phase II the cut-off values will be based on the normative data obtained from Phase I. Bland and Altman plots will be used to determine absolute bias between DXA and BIA using 95% limits of agreement.
Study protocol
On visiting day, each participant will arrive at the laboratory at 09:00±1 h following an overnight fast (≥10h), wearing comfortable outfit without any metal accessories. Participants will be required to bring their medication if they are on any type of medication. Upon arrival and after filling the consent form, participants will undergo a brief medical health and medication questionnaires, then post-void body mass, standing height, waist and hip circumference, and blood pressure will be measured. Next, participants will undergo body composition assessment using BIA and DXA, respectively. Thereafter, a snack will be given while they complete subjective questionnaires relating to their physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep and quality of life. Thereafter, ActivPAL wearing and a three-day food record filling instruction will be given to the participants. 30 minutes after a snack, blood glucose will be measured. Handgrip strength will then be assessed, followed by maximal isometric knee extensions to assess upper and lower limb strength, respectively. This will be followed by a functional test (SPPB). Lastly, participants will undergo a 6-minute walk test. Week after, ActivPAL and 3-days food record will be returned. Ambient temperature and humidity will be monitored and recorded at 60-minute intervals during each laboratory visit. Study protocol process is described in sequence in (Fig 1).
BIA, Bioelectrical impedance analysis; DXA, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; GPAQ, Global Physical Activity Questionnaire; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; EQ-5D, EuroQOL five-dimension questionnaire. * activity monitor small device worn that uses information about static and dynamic acceleration. A healthy snack will be given to the participants while they fill the questionnaires.
Outcome measures
Sociodemographic data.
Age, sex, marital status, educational level, employment status and position, phone number, and another contact number in case of emergency will be taken from participants.
Vital signs.
Blood pressure will be measured before the beginning of testing, while glucose level will be assessed after a snack. Blood pressure will be measured via (Connex® Spot Monitor, Welch Allyn, USA), participants will rest on a chair for at least 5 minutes before measurement. Further, blood glucose level will be measured via a finger stick using a glucometer (ACCU-CHEK PERFORMA, Roche, Germany). Participants with uncontrolled hypertension (>190/100 mmHg) and/or glucose level below 70 mg/dL or above 300 mg/dL will be excluded from the study to maintain their safety during physical function testing.
Anthropometric measures.
Height to the nearest 0.5 cm and post-void body mass to the nearest 0.1 kg will be taken from participants with minimal clothing and without shoes via (Seca274, Seca, Germany). Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg·m2) will be measured based on height and weight. Further, waist circumference to the nearest 0.1 cm at the umbilicus will be measured using non-stretchable measuring tape. From standing, participants will be instructed to exhale while the examiner takes the measurements. Then, hip circumference to the nearest 0.1 cm at widest gluteal girth will be measured from standing using non-stretchable measuring tape. Body Shape Index (BSI) will also be calculated as BSI = Waist circumference / ((BMI 2/3) x (height 1/2)) [34].
Body composition measures.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis. BIA model (mBCA 515, Seca, Germany) with a constant high frequency current 100 mA at a frequency of 50 kHz and an electrode system will be designed to measure the body composition in segmental parts from the whole body, including arms, legs, and the trunk area. Therefore, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), the predicted muscle mass of the appendicular fractions, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), could be estimated by the sum of each segment except for the ‘‘trunk part” as previously reported [31]. From these measures (ASM/height2), (ASM/ weight) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) will be calculated. Prior to the test, the participants will be asked to remove shoes and metals and ensure they have dry hands and feet. Then, they will be asked to stand in the middle of the weighting platform with feet on marked circles and hold the handles of the machine appropriate to their height (upper extremity not touching body). After that, measurement will be taken and the results will be printed directly at the end of the test.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. DXA is a feasible, accurate, safe instrument for measuring muscle mass [35]. Body composition (lean mass and fat mass) will be assessed using DXA (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, USA) scan through enCORE software platform. Daily prior to test or if room temperature changed more than 5°C quality assurance procedure will be done using phantom block to assess functionality assurance and precision of the densitometer. The coefficient of variation for DXA scan lower than 2% will be accepted. A total-body DXA scan will be done to all participants by a single trained technician, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (GE Healthcare, USA). The test will be performed to all participants in the same time and in fasting status to ensure similar hydration level. However, hydration status will not be measured objectively. Before starting the test, subjects will be requested to remove all metal accessories such as (jewelry, belt) and will be asked to put the phone on a silent mode. Then, they will lie in the middle of the table bed in a natural position all body parts must be included in the scanning spectrum. Upper extremity beside but not touching the body, knees and ankles are close together and stabilized by velcro straps. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) will be calculated as the sum of lean mass from arms and legs. Fat mass, lean mass, and ALM are going to be presented as absolute values (in kg) and as a percentage of body weight. ALM adjusted for height is going to be calculated as lean mass divided by squared height (kg/m2). The result will be printed directly at the end of test.
Lifestyle behaviors measurements.
Physical activity and sedentary behavior. Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) will be assessed subjectively and objectively for all participants. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) developed in 2002 by the World Health Organization (WHO) [36] will be used to subjectively estimate an individual’s PA level. The Arabic version of the questionnaire had been tested for its validity and reliability [37]. It is a self-reported questionnaire that collects information on participant PA frequency (time/week), duration (min), and intensity (light, moderate, and vigorous) during a typical day [38]. GPAQ consists of 16 questions designed into 3 main domains (work, transport, and leisure time) and one additional question related to SB asking about the total time spent sitting per day. Total PA is then calculated by the sum of the total metabolic equivalents (MET) minutes of activity computed for each domain [38]. Additionally, participants will be classified to have low, moderate, or high level of PA.
Objective assessment will be obtained using ActivPAL monitor (PAL Technologies Ltd., UK).
ActivPAL monitor is a small device worn on the thigh (one third of the way between hip and knee as manufacture instructions) that uses information about static and dynamic acceleration to identify body postures as lying, sitting, standing or stepping and estimate energy expenditure as metabolic equivalents [39]. Using ActivPAL software takes the recorded signal from the thigh sensor and analyse it via algorithms to produce a record of the activity events. Participants will be asked to wear the ActivPAL monitor for 7 consecutive days, removing the monitor only when they are fully dipped in water and record non-wear time in recording sheet. In addition, participants will be asked to record their sleep in a sleep diary to account for sleeping time. For the daily data to be included in the analysis, participants need to wear the ActivPAL for at least 10-hours of waking hours on at least four out of seven days.
Sleep assessment. Sleep quality will be assessed by completing the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). It is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances in a one-month time interval. The Arabic version of the questionnaire had been tested for its validity and reliability [40]. It consists of 19 items creating seven components (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction). The global score (range between 0–21) obtained from the sum of scores for these seven components; Poor sleepers have ≥ 5 scores as a cut-off global score [41]. Further, sleep duration will be assessed both objectively and subjectively using the above-mentioned ActivPAL monitor and sleep diary.
Quality of life assessment. EuroQOL five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) will be used to assess quality of life. It is a comprehensive multidimensional self-reported questionnaire that integrates physical, cognitive and social well-being [42]. It consists of two parts, the first part (descriptive system) assesses health in five domains: self-care, mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of which has three level of response (no problems, some problems, and extreme problems/unable). The second part consists of visual analogues scale (VAS) in which participant rate his perceived health form 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health) [43]. Valid and reliable Arabic version for this instrument will be used in this study [44, 45].
Nutrition assessment. Usual food intake will be assessed using three days of dietary food record; a self-reported record has been shown to be valid and reliable to assess nutrition [46]. With clear instructions, participants will be asked to record their normal dietary habits and supplements (two weekdays and one weekend day) in the week after laboratory visit. After that, the record will be reviewed by a trained interviewer through a phone call. Data will then be analyzed using nutrition analysis software (Nutritics LTD, Ireland). The average intake of the three days will be used as the usual food intake. Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) will be calculated using GI values from Foster-Powell 2002 and Atkinson 2008 [47, 48]. The GI will be calculated by multiplying GI value of each food item by the amount of carbohydrates in that food item (g) divided by the total carbohydrates (g) [49]. The GL will be calculated by multiplying GI value of each food item by the amount of carbohydrates in that food item (g) divided by 100. The GI and GL values of each participant’s diet will be calculated as the sum of the GI and GL for each food item. Diets with GI values of ≥70, between 69–54, and ≤55 are classified as high, medium, and low GI, respectively [47, 48]. Diets with GL values of ≥120, between 80–119, and <80 are classified as high, medium, and low GL, respectively [50, 51].
Muscle strength measurements.
Handgrip strength. Handgrip strength (HGS) will be measured using a digital hand dynamometer (Digital grip strength dynamometer, T.K.K 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Japan) to assess muscle strength. Absolute HGS (kg) and relative (HGS (kg)/body mass (kg)), will be recorded for each participant. The test will be performed in a standing position with the forearm away from the body at the level of the thigh. After size adjustment, participants will be asked to exert maximum grip strength three times with both dominant and non-dominant hands, allowing at least 30-seconds of resting interval as previously reported [52].
Maximal isometric strength. Maximal isometric strength will be measured using Humac NORM dynamometer (CSMi, Stoughton, USA) to assess muscle strength in knee extensors and flexors [53]. Prior to the test, participants will perform a five-minute warm-up on a bicycle ergometer (Ergomedic 828E, Monark, Sweden), at an intensity of 40 watts. Participants will be seated in the testing chair with a hip flexion angle of 110°. The back of the knee joint will be placed on the edge of the seat with an angle of -60° from anatomical zero (180°), which has been established to be the angle of maximal isometric force generation [54]. Velcro strap will be used to attach the distal shin pad of the dynamometer 4-5cm above the medial malleolus. A four-point belt and Velcro straps will be used to reduce extraneous movement during contractions of the chest, pelvis and thigh. The lateral femoral condyle will be aligned with the dynamometer rotational axis. Participants will be instructed to perform three maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) of the knee extensor separated by one minute of stationary rest with unbaled gravity. After receiving a 5-second count down, they will be instructed to steadily produce their maximal force rapidly and maintaining that force for 3–4 seconds. Thereafter, participants will receive 2–3 minutes of stationary rest to prepare the set-up of the protocol to measure MVC of the knee flexors. The distal shin pad will be replaced along the posterior portion of the triceps surae; 4-5cm above the medial malleolus. Participants will then be instructed to repeat the same procedure whilst kicking back (flexion) in the sagittal plane. Visual feedback on a computer screen of the immediate dynamometer torque will be displayed to participants to illustrate the type of contraction required and provide encouragement. MVC will be analysed for peak torque using Humac Norm Isokinetic Software System. The analysis tool will be used to place the cursor at the beginning of the first visible rise in the torque time trace and moved across until it met a horizontal phase of contraction. The software will then show both times to peak torque in seconds (s) as well as peak torque in newton meters (N·m). At the end of the test result will be printed.
Physical performance measurements.
Short physical performance battery. Short physical performance battery will be used to assess physical function, due to its high validity, reliability, cost-effectiveness and ability to detect changes over time [55, 56]. The test evaluates lower extremity function consists of three sub-scales to evaluate balance (side by side stand, semi-tandem stand and tandem stand), speed (gait speed) and force (chair stand test) [57]. Each sub-scale is allocated a score between 0–4 with 0 being “unable to complete the task” and 4 being the “highest level of functional performance”. With safety consideration and under supervision of the examiner, the participant will be asked to stand with feet close to each other (side by side stand), then they will stand with one heel against side of big toe of the other foot, followed by standing with the heel of one foot against the toes of other foot (holding 10 sec for each position). Thereafter, the participants will be asked to walk 4-m (using their walking aids if available) with normal speed two times and the highest record out of two repetitions will be taken. The last test will be performed by 5 times sit to stand with arm crossed the body at fastest speed. Scores from each sub-scale are then added to create a global score between 0–12. A cut-off point of <8 points is used to identify poor physical function [58, 59].
Aerobic endurance. Participants’ aerobic endurance capacity will be measured via a 6-minute walk test (6MWT)–a commonly used, valid and reliable test to assess cardiovascular endurance in different populations [60]. A 32-m hallway with a smooth surface and chair at one end will be prepared prior to test. At the beginning the participant will be sitting in a chair near the starting point. Once timing is started, participant will walk with normal speed (back and forth) for 6-minutes and the assessor will walk behind them for safety and to count laps. They can use walking aid (the type of walking device and/or bracing must be documented). If they require assistance, only the minimum amount of assistance required for completing the task will be provided, level of physical assistance will be documented using an ordinal (1–7) point scale where, 1 means “total assistance needed” and 7 means “totally independent”. Distance covered in six minutes will be calculated by multiplying number of total laps by 32-m.
Statistical analysis
Sample size calculation.
Sample size calculated using the following formula: n = Z2P(1−P)d2; Where n is the sample size, Z is corresponding to level of confidence, P is expected prevalence and d is precision [61]. A Priori sample size was conducted based on a sample proportion within 0.5 (i.e., proportion that yields maximal possible sample size required) of the population proportion with a 95% confidence level. Assuming type I error of 1% and a precision of 5% the sample size required for each phase will be 1332 participants. Therefore, 1532 male and female participants will be recruited to account for an anticipated 15% non-completion rate.
Data analysis.
Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize the demographics and measured variables of the participants. Normality will be assessed for continuous variables using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The prevalence of sarcopenia will be calculated. Parametric data will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or a non-parametric equivalent (e.g., median and inter-quartile range) data deemed non-normally distributed. Comparisons between two means will be analyzed by an independent t-test or a non-parametric equivalent (i.e., Mann-Whitney U test) to compare medians.
Multivariate logistic regression will be used to examine the association between sarcopenia and lifestyle-related factors (physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep and nutrition) with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A separate analysis will also be performed with low muscle mass, low grip strength and low functional performance as dependent variables. Age and BMI will be included in the regression analysis, because of their established associations with grip strength and muscle mass [62]. The primary outcome measures will be sarcopenia indices: skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength and functional performance. Missing data will be evaluated and addressed using appropriate statistical methods, such as multiple imputation. Statistical procedures will be performed formed using commercially available software (Prism 9.0, GraphPad, USA) and significance will be set at an alpha level of ≤ 0.05.
Data management and monitoring.
Data will be entered on and stored at a secure, password-protected computer. As part of the data protection and confidentiality, all participants will be assigned unique coding identities. The database will be managed by the investigators and access will be limited to individuals deemed appropriate.
Discussion
Knowledge of sarcopenia prevalence in Saudi Arabia will help in addressing its regional impact on human health and health care cost through: (1) defining Saudi reference values fundamental in diagnosing, treating and preventing sarcopenia; (2) determining cut-off points related to muscle mass, strength and physical performance and thus guiding future studies in Saudi Arabia; (3) understanding the modifiable lifestyle factors in a young age group and therefore assisting in future studies aiming to prevent or delay sarcopenia. Ultimately, this research project addresses a global health topic of utmost importance, with an unmet medical need in Saudi Arabia.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Professor Hazzaa M. Al-Hazzaa and Professor Nasser Al-Daghri for their valuable input and support.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval has been received from the institutional review board (IRB) at the Health Sciences Research Center (HSRC) at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) for both phases (IRB# 20–0358; January 13, 2021, 21–0102; March 1, 2021). All percipients who agree to participate will sign up an informed consent before participation with clear knowledge about the study aim and process and will be able to withdraw from the study at any time without any penalty. There are no known safety risks associated with any aspect of the study. A medical health questionnaire will be used to screen for possible risk factors. The participant will be excluded from the study if any risk factor is present. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Also, short findings report will be given to the study participants.
References
- 1.
UN. United Nations report on World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. New York: 2019 Contract No.: (ST/ESA/SER.A/423).
- 2.
General Authority for Statistics SA. Population estimates February 07, 2017 [cited 2021 February 15]. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/ar/43.
- 3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2001;56(3):M146–M57. pmid:11253156
- 4. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2011;27(3):337–9. pmid:21824550
- 5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2636–46. Epub 2019/06/07. pmid:31171417.
- 6. Duque G. Editorial: Osteosarcopenia: A Geriatric Giant of the XXI Century. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(6):716–9. Epub 2021/06/29. pmid:34179922.
- 7.
M62.84 I—CDC. 10 2018 [cited 2021 February 15]. Available from: http://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M60-M63/M62-/M62.84.
- 8. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosisReport of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older PeopleA. J. Cruz-Gentoft et al. Age and ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.
- 9. Chen L-K, Liu L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T-W, Bahyah KS, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2014;15(2):95–101. pmid:24461239
- 10. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age and ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. pmid:30312372
- 11. Schaap LA, Van Schoor NM, Lips P, Visser M. Associations of sarcopenia definitions, and their components, with the incidence of recurrent falling and fractures: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2018;73(9):1199–204.
- 12. Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0169548. pmid:28095426
- 13. Akune T, Muraki S, Oka H, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Tokimura F, et al. Incidence of certified need of care in the long‐term care insurance system and its risk factors in the elderly of J apanese population‐based cohorts: The ROAD study. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2014;14(3):695–701.
- 14. De Buyser SL, Petrovic M, Taes YE, Toye KR, Kaufman J-M, Lapauw B, et al. Validation of the FNIH sarcopenia criteria and SOF frailty index as predictors of long-term mortality in ambulatory older men. Age and ageing. 2016;45(5):602–8. pmid:27126327
- 15. Morley JE, Abbatecola AM, Argiles JM, Baracos V, Bauer J, Bhasin S, et al. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2011;12(6):403–9. pmid:21640657
- 16. Chang K-V, Hsu T-H, Wu W-T, Huang K-C, Han D-S. Association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016;17(12):1164. e7–. e15. pmid:27816484
- 17. Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Morley JE. SARC‐F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2016;7(1):28–36. pmid:27066316
- 18. Antunes AC, Araújo DA, Veríssimo MT, Amaral TF. Sarcopenia and hospitalisation costs in older adults: a cross‐sectional study. Nutrition & dietetics. 2017;74(1):46–50. pmid:28731551
- 19. Sousa A, Guerra R, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Ferreira S, Amaral T. Financial impact of sarcopenia on hospitalization costs. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;70(9):1046–51. pmid:27167668
- 20. Sayer AA, Syddall H, Martin H, Patel H, Baylis D, Cooper C. The developmental origins of sarcopenia. The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging. 2008;12(7):427–32.
- 21. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. Journal of applied physiology. 2000. pmid:10904038
- 22. Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e113637. pmid:25474696
- 23. Nascimento C, Ingles M, Salvador-Pascual A, Cominetti M, Gomez-Cabrera M, Viña J. Sarcopenia, frailty and their prevention by exercise. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2019;132:42–9. pmid:30176345
- 24. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Kiesswetter E, Drey M, Sieber CC. Nutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2017;29(1):43–8. pmid:28155181
- 25. Kim H, Suzuki T, Saito K, Yoshida H, Kojima N, Kim M, et al. Effects of exercise and tea catechins on muscle mass, strength and walking ability in community‐dwelling elderly Japanese sarcopenic women: a randomized controlled trial. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2013;13(2):458–65. pmid:22935006
- 26. Rondanelli M, Klersy C, Terracol G, Talluri J, Maugeri R, Guido D, et al. Whey protein, amino acids, and vitamin D supplementation with physical activity increases fat-free mass and strength, functionality, and quality of life and decreases inflammation in sarcopenic elderly. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;103(3):830–40. pmid:26864356
- 27. Maltais ML, Ladouceur JP, Dionne IJ. The effect of resistance training and different sources of postexercise protein supplementation on muscle mass and physical capacity in sarcopenic elderly men. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2016;30(6):1680–7. pmid:26562709
- 28. Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A, Ahadi Z, Larijani B, Heshmat R. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of general population studies. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2017;16(1):1–10.
- 29. Mayhew A, Amog K, Phillips S, Parise G, McNicholas P, De Souza R, et al. The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Age and ageing. 2019;48(1):48–56. pmid:30052707
- 30. Silva AM, Shen W, Heo M, Gallagher D, Wang Z, Sardinha LB, et al. Ethnicity‐related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association. 2010;22(1):76–82. pmid:19533617
- 31. Alkahtani SA. A cross-sectional study on sarcopenia using different methods: reference values for healthy Saudi young men. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017;18(1):1–8.
- 32. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81. pmid:18929686
- 33. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2019;95:103208. pmid:31078660
- 34. Krakauer NY, Krakauer JC. A new body shape index predicts mortality hazard independently of body mass index. PloS one. 2012;7(7):e39504. pmid:22815707
- 35. Buckinx F, Landi F, Cesari M, Fielding RA, Visser M, Engelke K, et al. Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2018;9(2):269–78. pmid:29349935
- 36. de Courten M. Developing a simple global physical activity questionnaire for population studies. Australasian Epidemiologist. 2002;9(2):6–9.
- 37. Doyle C, Khan A, Burton N. Reliability and validity of a self-administered Arabic version of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ-A). The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2018;59(7):1221–8. pmid:30317842
- 38. Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the world health organization global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). Journal of Public Health. 2006;14(2):66–70.
- 39. Lyden K, Keadle SK, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. The activPAL™ accurately classifies activity intensity categories in healthy adults. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2017;49(5):1022. pmid:28410327
- 40. Suleiman KH, Yates BC, Berger AM, Pozehl B, Meza J. Translating the Pittsburgh sleep quality index into Arabic. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2010;32(2):250–68. pmid:19915205
- 41. Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry research. 1989;28(2):193–213. pmid:2748771
- 42.
Prevention CfDCa. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) October 31, 2018 [cited 2021 February 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/.
- 43. Group TE. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy. 1990;16(3):199–208. pmid:10109801
- 44. Bekairy AM, Bustami RT, Almotairi M, Jarab A, Katheri AM, Aldebasi TM, et al. Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the the EuroQOL (EQ-5D). A study from Saudi Arabia. International journal of health sciences. 2018;12(2):16. pmid:29599689
- 45. Dent E, Morley J, Cruz-Jentoft A, Arai H, Kritchevsky S, Guralnik J, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for sarcopenia (ICFSR): screening, diagnosis and management. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2018;22(10):1148–61. pmid:30498820
- 46. Lührmann P, Herbert B, Gaster C, Neuhäuser-Berthold M. Validation of a self-administered 3-day estimated dietary record for use in the elderly. European journal of nutrition. 1999;38(5):235–40. pmid:10654160
- 47. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes care. 2008;31(12):2281–3. pmid:18835944
- 48. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2002;76(1):5–56. pmid:12081815
- 49. Jenkins D, Wolever T, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1981;34(3):362–6. pmid:6259925
- 50. Mager DR, Iñiguez IR, Gilmour S, Yap J. The effect of a low fructose and low glycemic index/load (FRAGILE) dietary intervention on indices of liver function, cardiometabolic risk factors, and body composition in children and adolescents with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2015;39(1):73–84. pmid:23976771
- 51. Alzaben AS, Turner J, Shirton L, Samuel TM, Persad R, Mager D. Assessing nutritional quality and adherence to the gluten-free diet in children and adolescents with celiac disease. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research. 2015;76(2):56–63. pmid:26067413
- 52. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age and ageing. 2011;40(4):423–9. pmid:21624928
- 53. Francis P, Toomey C, Mc Cormack W, Lyons M, Jakeman P. Measurement of maximal isometric torque and muscle quality of the knee extensors and flexors in healthy 50‐to 70‐year‐old women. Clinical physiology and functional imaging. 2017;37(4):448–55. pmid:26749301
- 54. Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles. Journal of applied physiology. 1976;40(1):12–6. pmid:1248977
- 55. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2000;55(4):M221–M31.
- 56. Freiberger E, de Vreede P, Schoene D, Rydwik E, Mueller V, Frändin K, et al. Performance-based physical function in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of instruments. Age and ageing. 2012;41(6):712–21. Epub 2012/08/14. pmid:22885845.
- 57. Lauretani F, Ticinesi A, Gionti L, Prati B, Nouvenne A, Tana C, et al. Short-Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score is associated with falls in older outpatients. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2019;31(10):1435–42. pmid:30515724
- 58. Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, Guralnik JM, Zunzunegui MV. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. Journal of aging and health. 2012;24(5):863–78. pmid:22422762
- 59. da Câmara SMA, Alvarado BE, Guralnik JM, Guerra RO, Maciel ÁCC. Using the Short Physical Performance Battery to screen for frailty in young‐old adults with distinct socioeconomic conditions. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2013;13(2):421–8. pmid:22882512
- 60. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Physical therapy. 2002;82(2):128–37. pmid:11856064
- 61. Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from bed to bench. 2013;6(1):14. pmid:24834239
- 62. McLean RR, Shardell MD, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, Fragala MS, Harris TB, et al. Criteria for clinically relevant weakness and low lean mass and their longitudinal association with incident mobility impairment and mortality: the foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) sarcopenia project. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2014;69(5):576–83. pmid:24737560