https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5202-195X
Figures
Abstract
Background
There is little research on how financial incentives and penalties impact national cesarean section rates. In January 2018, Georgia introduced a national cesarean section reduction policy, which imposes a financial penalty on hospitals that do not meet their reduction targets. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this policy on cesarean section rates, subgroups of women, and selected perinatal outcomes.
Methods
We included women who gave birth from 2017 to 2019 registered in the Georgian Birth Registry (n = 150 534, nearly 100% of all births in the country during this time). We then divided the time period into pre-policy (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) and post-policy (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019). An interrupted time series analysis was used to compare the cesarean section rates (both overall and stratified by parity), neonatal intensive care unit transfer rates, and perinatal mortality rates in the two time periods. Descriptive statistics were used to assess differences in maternal socio-demographic characteristics.
Results
The mean cesarean section rate in Georgia decreased from 44.7% in the pre-policy period to 40.8% in the post-policy period, mainly among primiparous women. The largest decrease in cesarean section births was found among women <25 years of age and those with higher education. There were no significant differences in the neonatal intensive care unit transfer rate or the perinatal mortality rate between vaginal and cesarean section births in the post-policy period.
Conclusion
The cesarean section rate in Georgia decreased during the 2-year post-policy period. The reduction mainly took place among primiparous women. The policy had no impact on the neonatal intensive care unit transfer rate or the perinatal mortality rate. The impact of the national cesarean section reduction policy on other outcomes is not known.
Citation: Nedberg IH, Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Blix E, Skjeldestad FE, Anda EE (2022) Changes in cesarean section rates after introduction of a punitive financial policy in Georgia: A population-based registry study 2017–2019. PLoS ONE 17(7): e0271491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271491
Editor: Lucky Singh, ICMR National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), INDIA
Received: October 5, 2021; Accepted: July 4, 2022; Published: July 19, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Nedberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data set used for this article has been obtained with permission from the ethical review board of the National Center of Public Health and Disease Control (NCDC) in Georgia. Even though the data were anonymized before analyses, we do not have legal permission to publish them. The data are available for researchers who meet the criteria for data access according to the NCDC ethical review board and may be obtained by request to the NCDC institutional review board: irb.ncdc@gmail.com.
Funding: IHN received a PhD grant from UiT The Arctic University of Norway (www.uit.no) to carry out the study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
In an attempt to explain the observed rapid increase in cesarean section [CS] rates worldwide in the last decades, studies have found that both clinical, cultural, psychosocial, organizational and financial factors play a role [1]. The World Health Organization [WHO] does not recommend national CS rates higher than 10% because it does not contribute to reductions in maternal and newborn mortality [2]. Several countries currently have rates exceeding 50% [1]. The complexity contributing to the high CS rates means that trying to reverse an already high rate is difficult. Few have succeeded and those that did were at facility or regional levels [3–5].
WHO has recognized financial incentives (i.e., the added revenue hospitals can make from CS births) as a major driver of increasing CS rates [6] and attempts have been made to implement financial interventions to reduce CS rates (Taiwan and Brazil), but they failed to achieve a reduction [7,8]. A scoping review from 2020 concluded that the evidence on whether financial and regulatory strategies reduce CS rates is in inconclusive, due to the low quality and heterogeneity of the included studies [9]. Specifically, research is lacking on the impact of setting goals for CS rates at facility, regional, or national level, and how such goals affect maternal and neonatal outcomes [6].
After gaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, the republic of Georgia privatized their health system, a process complete by 2012. As a result, 80% of medical expenses were paid by the patients themselves [10]. To compensate for the high out-of-pocket payment, a package of state-funded health care covering 90% of the population was introduced in 2013, whereby hospitals are reimbursed for basic and emergency health care at fixed rates [11]. Notably, the ratio of reimbursement for a CS birth was set at 1.6 compared to a vaginal birth.
Georgian guidelines for labour and delivery do not recommend performing CS without a medical indication, yet the national CS rate has increased from 9% in 2000 to 44.7% in 2017 [12,13]. National health authorities have acknowledged the high CS rate as a problem, and in 2013, they set a goal to reduce the overall proportion of CS to 31% by 2020 and 27% by 2030 [14]. In January 2018, the Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Health, Labour, and Social Affairs of Georgia introduced a national CS reduction policy, with set target rates for each hospital based on the CS rate from the previous year. Hospitals are evaluated annually, and those not meeting their reduction targets must pay a financial penalty. To our knowledge, the Georgian approach has not been tried anywhere else in the world. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the Georgian national CS reduction policy on CS rates, subgroups of women, and selected perinatal outcomes.
Materials and methods
The Georgian Birth Registry (GBR) is a national, digital birth registry that was implemented on January 1, 2016, and made mandatory by law the same year. The GBR contains information from antenatal care visits (ANC), hospitalisations during pregnancy, labour, delivery, and the postpartum stay for both mothers and newborns. Details on the implementation of the GBR have been reported previously [13]. Each birth registered in the GBR is validated through the Vital Registration System, administrated by the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health and the Ministry of Justice. This study is reported as per the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (S1 Checklist) [15].
Setting
The perinatal regionalisation reform was initiated by the Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Health, Labour, and Social Affairs of Georgia in 2015. The reform separated birth facilities into three levels: level 1 hospitals care for low-risk women and can perform emergency CS if necessary, level 2 hospitals constitute most facilities and care for both low-risk women and women with certain risk factors, while level 3 hospitals care for patients in need of intensive care and have access to blood banks in addition to other specialist services. The aim of the reform is to create a geographically structured system to select women to the appropriate level of care, securing that each region could provide tertiary care [11].
The national CS reduction policy was introduced on January 1, 2018, as part of the perinatal regionalisation reform. It directs hospitals to reduce their CS rate by 1% point if CS births were 31–35% the previous year, 3% points if CS births were 36–40%, 5% points if CS births were 41–45%, 7% points if CS births were 46–50%, 9% points if CS births were 51–55%, 12% points if CS births were 56–60% and 15% points if CS births were >60% the previous year. No clinical providers, hospital directors nor the media engaged in the lead up to the implementation of the policy. Although the policy is directed primarily toward Level 2 hospitals, it is a national policy; thus, we included hospitals of all levels in our analysis.
Study design and study population
This population-based registry study includes all women registered in the GBR who gave birth between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, at gestational age (GA)>22+0 weeks. Births with missing information on parity were excluded (n = 38), resulting in an analytical sample of 150 534 women, of whom 52 601 gave birth during the pre-policy period (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) and 97 933 during the post-policy period (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019).
Variables
The intervention of interest was the introduction of the national CS reduction policy on January 1, 2018. The main outcome of the study is overall CS rate. In addition, we hypothesized that rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) transfer and perinatal mortality (PM) could be affected by the policy. These outcomes have been validated by merging data from the hospitalisation registry and the Vital Registration System and have been shown to be complete.
We extracted data from the GBR on delivery outcome (spontaneous vaginal, operative vaginal delivery (vacuum or forceps), CS) and recoded them as a binary variable (CS yes/no). Data on NICU transfers were obtained from the GBR and recorded as a binary variable. For PM, data on stillbirths (fetal death at GA ≥22 weeks or birthweight >500 g if GA is unknown) [16] and early neonatal deaths were extracted from the GBR and the Vital Registration System, respectively. All explanatory variables were extracted from the GBR, including maternal age (13–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, ≥35 years), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥3), maternal education (primary, secondary, technical, higher education, unknown), GA at birth (22–31, 32–36, 37–38, 39–40, 41–43 weeks), and fetal presentation (cephalic, non-cephalic, other). Induction of labour, operative vaginal delivery, previous CS, ANC attendance, and multiple births were extracted as binary variables.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics of maternal and newborn characteristics are presented as mean values with standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables, and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. To study the impact of the national CS reduction policy on rates of CS, NICU transfers, and PM, we used interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to calculate the baseline mean rate (i.e., rate in January 2017), monthly trends in the pre-policy period, change in rate in the month following the policy change (i.e., in January 2018), and monthly trends in the post-policy period. Dependent variables were monthly rates of CS, NICU transfers, and PM. For CS, single-group ITSA was performed for CS overall, in addition to a multi-group analysis of nulliparous versus multiparous women. Multi-group ITSA was used to compare NICU transfer rates and PM rates among CS births and vaginal births. For these analyses, newborns, not births, were used as the denominator.
The ITSA relies on ordinary least square regression. We applied the Newey-West model to handle auto-correlation, which we assessed by a Cumby-Huizinga test. The key assumptions for ITSA models are that, without the intervention, the pre-intervention trend will continue into the post-intervention period, and that any time-varying confounding factors change slowly over time and will therefore not interfere when assessing the impact of a single policy implemented at a particular time point. The results from the ITSA models are presented graphically, and the regression parameters have also been tabulated.
Statistical analyses were performed using Stata/SE version 16.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) using the ITSA-package [17].
Ethical considerations
The GBR prepared an anonymised data set for this study. The National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Institutional Review Board, Georgia, approved the study protocol (IRB # 2017–010 31.03.2017), and the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of Northern Norway (REC North) approved the use of data from the GBR (2017/404/REC North). Informed consent was not relevant for this study as registration in the GBR is mandatory by law.
Results
The baseline mean CS rate in January 2017 was 44.47% and the trend was stable in the pre-policy period (Fig 1 & Table 1).
A) Cesarean section rates overall B) Cesarean sections rates by parity.
In the month following the policy change, there was a statistically non-significant change in the CS rate of -1.43% points. Moreover, there was a reduction of 0.24% points in the monthly trend in the post-policy relative to the pre-policy period. The monthly trend decreased by 0.22% points in the post-policy period. The cumulative effect 2 years after the policy change was a total CS rate reduction of 5.28% points. When stratified by parity, the baseline mean CS rate was 44.65% for primiparous and 44.40% for multiparous women. The monthly trend was stable for both groups in the pre-policy period. In the month following the policy change, there was a sharp and statistically significant drop in the CS rate among primiparous women (-5.33% points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -10.31 to -0.35, p = 0.036), while it remained stable for multiparous women. Relative to the monthly CS trend in the pre-policy period, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the post-policy period for both groups. The trend in the post-policy period showed a statistically significant decrease for both primiparous and multiparous women, but it was larger for primiparous women. The cumulative effect 2 years after the policy change was a reduction in the CS rate of 8.16% points among primiparous women and 2.88% points among multiparous women.
The mean CS rate in the pre-policy period was 44.6%, which decreased to 40.8% in the post-policy period (Table 2).
Cesarean sections in % of total number of births in each category.
The CS rate decreased in all maternal age categories, but most notably in the youngest age groups (<25 years). For primiparous women, the mean CS rate decreased from 44.7% in the pre-policy period to 35.2% in the post-policy period, while there was minor change among multiparous women. There was also a decrease in the CS rate in all levels of maternal education, with the largest decrease taking place among women with higher education (from 47.9% to 42.4%). All categories of GA also displayed a decrease in CS rates, most notably in the early-term group (GA 37–38 weeks, from 59.0% to 52.4%) and in the post-term group (GA 41–43 weeks, from 26.2% to 21.5%). The CS rate among births with cephalic presentation decreased among those with cephalic presentation (39.1% to 35.8%). Induction of labour increased from 0.6% to 2.2%, while operative vaginal delivery increased from 0.5% to 0.8% in the post-policy period. The CS rate among women with a previous CS remained unchanged at 99.9%. CS rates decreased both for women who did and did not attend ANC visits, in addition to women with multiple births.
The baseline mean NICU transfer rate was 7.12% for CS births and 3.20% for vaginal births, with a statistically significant increase for both types of birth in the pre-policy period (Fig 2 and Table 3).
A) Transfer to NICU %, B) PM %. CS: Cesarean section; NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit; PM: Perinatal mortality.
In the month following the policy change, there was a significant increase in the NICU transfer rate among vaginal births (1.03% points, 95% CI: 0.10 to 1.97, p = 0.031), but not for CS births. Although both CS births and vaginal births showed a statistically significant decreasing trend in the post-policy versus the pre-policy period, the reduction was higher in the CS group (-0.48% points, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.32, p<0.001). The observed increase in the monthly trend in the pre-policy period flattened in the post-policy period for both types of birth, with no significant difference between the two groups (-0.03% points, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.10, p = 0.66) (not shown in table). Two years after the policy change, the cumulative effect on the NICU transfer rate was a decrease of 0.48% points for CS births and an increase of 0.24% points for vaginal births.
The baseline mean PM rate was 1.27% for CS births and 1.61% for vaginal births. There was a statistically significant decrease in the monthly trend in the pre-policy period for CS births (-0.04% points, 95% CI: -0.05 to -0.02, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant change in PM rates for either CS births or vaginal births in the month following the policy change. The change in the post-policy versus the pre-policy trend was statistically significant for CS births (0.04% points, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.06, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the post-policy period (0.02% points, 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.04, p = 0.06, not shown in the table). Two years after the policy change, there was a cumulative increase in the PM rate of 0.24% points among CS births and a cumulative decrease of 0.24% points among vaginal births.
Discussion
The 2018 national CS reduction policy led to a reduction in the national CS rate from 44.7% in the pre-policy group to 40.8% in the post-policy group. The largest decrease was observed among primiparous women across all age groups. The decrease was also notable in women with higher education and in early- and post-term births. There was no significant difference in rates of NICU or PM between vaginal and CS births in the post-policy period.
Existing literature on financial interventions to reduce high CS rates is characterized by large variations in interventions, duration of assessment and methodology, making comparisons difficult [9,18]. To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies that assess a national CS reduction policy using population-based data in a middle-income country. Georgia chose to implement a single policy to reduce CS births, where no maternal health providers engaged in its development or implementation. Such a strategy is not recommended due to the substantial risk of failure by not considering the complexity of factors contributing to high CS rates [18]. Taiwan is an example, where raising, and thereby equalizing the reimbursement of vaginal births and CS births, yielded little or no results in reducing the national CS rate [8,19]. Our findings are in direct contrast with these results, but one could argue that, with the high baseline CS rate of 44.7% in Georgia, the reduction in CS births observed two years after the policy change could be classified as “low-hanging fruit”. Another difference is that Taiwan, together with other countries which has introduced financial measures, employed an incentive-based approach by increasing reimbursement for vaginal births [8,19–22]. Georgia instead implemented a punitive measure, where hospitals both are reimbursed less since they must perform fewer CS, and they are fined if they do not meet the set reduction targets. This type of financial penalty can have unintended consequences, such as clinicians performing more complicated vaginal deliveries that should be managed by CS. Our findings did not find a significant difference between vaginal and CS birth for NICU transfer and PM rates in the post-policy period, but this does not mean the policy has not impacted other outcomes not assessed in this study. Unfortunately, there are no other studies on financial or regulatory strategies to reduce CS rates that included perinatal outcomes. The generalizability of our results should be applied with caution, but financial interventions could represent a reduction strategy in countries with high CS rates and a similar reimbursement system, although the long-term implications of such a policy are unknown.
Studies from regions of Brazil and China, two countries with some of the highest CS rates in the world, show examples of successful, multi-intervention strategies that reduced high CS rates [5,23]. These interventions included both maternal health education on the benefits of vaginal delivery, public campaigns, introduction of indicators of normal birth, education of health care providers, training in complicated vaginal deliveries, and creation of a culture that encourages natural childbirth. This kind of multi-faceted approach that aims to change obstetric culture and practice over time could be a useful avenue of exploration for Georgian authorities and other countries interested in reducing high CS rates, including scaling up the use of, promoting the role of, and affording more autonomy to midwives during pregnancy and childbirth [24,25]. Such approaches should also include a better understanding of pregnant women’s preferred mode of delivery and a focus on woman-centred care. The challenge for Georgia will therefore be to make the change sustainable and progressive, without compromising maternal and newborn health.
The observed reduction in CS rates in primiparous women is not surprising, since Georgia maintained a CS rate of 99.9% for women with a previous CS throughout the study period. This reduction among primiparous women will probably lead to a reduction in the CS rate among multiparous women in the following years, since the risk of CS after a first vaginal delivery is low. The largest decreases in CS rates were seen in the youngest age groups. This finding agrees with the largest reduction observed among primiparous women, but we did observe a decrease in the oldest age group as well. For maternal education, the largest decrease was seen among women with higher education. This finding resonates with other studies from low- and middle-income countries, which have shown that overuse of CS is strongly associated with high maternal education [26–29]. Attempts to reduce CS without a medical indication will therefore be apparent in this group. The proportion of CS in the non-cephalic group remained high and stable both in the pre- and post-policy periods. This is to be expected, since Georgia practices elective CS for breech presentation. Interestingly, the CS rate decreased in all GA groups, most notably in the post-term group and the early-term group. Compared to 17 European countries and the United States [30], the CS rates in Georgia for GA 32–36 and 37–38 weeks were much higher both in the pre- and post-policy periods, indicating that factors other than medical emergency are responsible for the observed high rate. There was a slight increase in the rates of operative vaginal delivery and induction of labour, but it is too early to say if this is an indication that clinicians are considering these procedures as an alternative to elective or emergency CS. Lack of experience and confidence in performing operational vaginal delivery among obstetricians have been found to be associated with an increased use of CS [31].
Strengths and limitations
A strength of the study is the large and comprehensive study sample, and the use of data from a national birth registry with close to 100% coverage. Another strength is that the perinatal outcomes were validated. A weakness of the study is that we could not differentiate between elective and emergency CS in the study due to suspected misclassification of CS in the GBR [32]. CS performed without a medical indication is reimbursed as if it were a vaginal birth, meaning a loss of revenue for the hospital in question. Thus, there are no incentives to classify a CS as a non-medically indicated intervention. The ability to distinguish between medically indicated and non-medically indicated CS would have been important to evaluate the effect of the Georgian national CS reduction policy on maternal and newborn outcomes. Although the assessment of maternal outcomes would have provided a more comprehensive picture of the impact of the policy, we did not include them because these outcomes have not been properly validated. The outcome PM is relatively rare, and proportions presented are subject to random fluctuations. Subsequently, changes in these proportions (or even lack thereof) should be interpreted with caution. Another weakness is the short follow-up period after the introduction of the CS policy. On the other hand, if no change had been detected after 2 years, the policy would have been deemed a failure. Although a prerequisite of ITSA is that no other intervention is introduced at the same time as the intervention under study, Georgia changed the number of recommended ANC visits from four to eight in January 2018. However, we do not believe that this impacted our perinatal outcomes, as a previous study found that this increase in visits did not change the proportion of NICU admissions or PM [33].
Conclusion
Georgia has managed to reduce their national CS rate following the introduction of a punitive financial policy. Our findings indicate that CS rate reduction strategies may not increase PM. The results of this single-intervention policy indicate that financial policies do have a role to play in reducing high CS rates internationally, but they need to be closely monitored to avoid possible unintended consequences that could affect maternal and newborn outcomes. Georgia should consider multi-intervention strategies to reduce their high CS rate, such as strengthening the role of midwives and incorporate the views of pregnant women.
Supporting information
S1 Checklist. STROBE checklist strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271491.s001
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nils Daulaire for reading the manuscript and providing valuable comments.
References
- 1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. pmid:34130991
- 2.
World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]; 2015 [cited 2022 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/.
- 3. Kozhimannil KB, Graves AJ, Ecklund AM, Shah N, Aggarwal R, Snowden JM. Cesarean Delivery Rates and Costs of Childbirth in a State Medicaid Program After Implementation of a Blended Payment Policy. Med care. 2018;56(8):658–64. pmid:29912840
- 4. Snowden JM, Muoto I, Darney BG, Quigley B, Tomlinson MW, Neilson D, et al. Oregon’s Hard-Stop Policy Limiting Elective Early-Term Deliveries: Association With Obstetric Procedure Use and Health Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1389–96. pmid:27824748
- 5. Yu Y, Zhang X, Sun C, Zhou H, Zhang Q, Chen C. Reducing the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request through institutional and policy interventions in Wenzhou, China. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186304. pmid:29155824
- 6.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
- 7. Victora CG, Aquino EM, do Carmo Leal M, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1863–76. pmid:21561656
- 8. Lo JC. Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan. Health policy. 2008;88(1):121–9. pmid:18436331
- 9. Opiyo N, Young C, Requejo JH, Erdman J, Bales S, Betrán AP. Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):133. pmid:32867791
- 10. Gotsadze G, Zoidze A, Rukhadze N. Household catastrophic health expenditure: evidence from Georgia and its policy implications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):69. pmid:19400939
- 11.
World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health, Systems, Policies, Richardson E, Berdzuli N. Georgia: health system review. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2017.
- 12. Katikireddi SV, Gorman DR, Leyland AH. A comparison of trends in caesarean section rates in former communist (transition) countries and other European countries. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):381–3. pmid:23204216
- 13. Anda EE, Nedberg IH, Rylander C, Gamkrelidze A, Turdziladze A, Skjeldestad FE, et al. Implementing a birth registry in a developing country—experiences from Georgia. Tidsskr Nor Laegefor. 2017;138(2).
- 14.
Government of Georgia. Universal healthcare state programs—Ordinance N36. Ministry of Health. Tbilisi, Georgia; 2013.
- 15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. pmid:18313558
- 16. Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Kazakhashvili N, Anda EE. Incidence and Causes of Perinatal Mortality in Georgia. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;9(3):163–8. pmid:31529933
- 17. Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal. 2015;15(2):480–500.
- 18. Yu Y, Lin F, Dong W, Li H, Zhang X, Chen C. The effectiveness of financial intervention strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1080. pmid:31399068
- 19. Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen B, Lin CL. The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section. So Sci Med. 2014;101:47–51. pmid:24560223
- 20. Keeler EB, Fok T. Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53(4):465–71. pmid:10162961
- 21. Karami Matin B, Hajizadeh M, Najafi F, Homaie Rad E, Piroozi B, Rezaei S. The impact of health sector evolution plan on hospitalization and cesarean section rates in Iran: an interrupted time series analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;30(1):75–9.
- 22. Liu TC, Chen CS, Tsai YW, Lin HC. Taiwan’s high rate of cesarean births: impacts of national health insurance and fetal gender preference. Birth. 2007;34(2):115–22. pmid:17542815
- 23. Borem P, de Cássia Sanchez R, Torres J, Delgado P, Petenate AJ, Peres D, et al. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):415–25. pmid:31923054
- 24. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2016;4:Cd004667. pmid:27121907
- 25.
World Health Organization. Strengthening quality midwifery for all mothers and newborns. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]; 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/strengthening-quality-midwifery-for-all-mothers-and-newborns.
- 26. Yisma E, Smithers LG, Lynch JW, Mol BW. Cesarean section in Ethiopia: prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics. Journal MaternalFetal Neonatal Med. 2017:1–6. pmid:29103331
- 27. Hernández-Vásquez A, Chacón-Torrico H, Bendezu-Quispe G. Differences in the prevalence of cesarean section and associated factors in private and public healthcare systems in Peru. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;26:100570. pmid:33130536
- 28. Bhatia M, Banerjee K, Dixit P, Dwivedi LK. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2015022–e. pmid:32857148
- 29. Acharya K, Paudel YR. Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006–2016. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:8888267. pmid:33997044
- 30. Delnord M, Blondel B, Drewniak N, Klungsoyr K, Bolumar F, Mohangoo A, et al. Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: an international comparison. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:321. pmid:25217979
- 31. Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1358–68. pmid:30322586
- 32. Nedberg IH, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Blix E, Ugulava T, Anda EE. Factors Associated with Cesarean Section among Primiparous Women in Georgia: A Registry-based Study. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(4):337–43. pmid:33009731
- 33. Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Kazakhashvili N, Anda EE. The impact of antenatal care utilization on admissions to neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality in Georgia. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0242991. pmid:33264324