Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

In silico approaches for drug repurposing in oncology: Protocol for a scoping review of existing evidence

  • Bruno Raphael Ribeiro Cavalcante ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Bruno Raphael Ribeiro Cavalcante, Raíza Dias Freitas

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IGM-FIOCRUZ/BA), Salvador, Brazil, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil

  • Raíza Dias Freitas ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Bruno Raphael Ribeiro Cavalcante, Raíza Dias Freitas

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Leonardo de Oliveira Siquara da Rocha,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IGM-FIOCRUZ/BA), Salvador, Brazil, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil

  • Gisele Vieira Rocha,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliations Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IGM-FIOCRUZ/BA), Salvador, Brazil, D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil

  • Túlio Cosme de Carvalho Pachêco,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Brazil

  • Pablo Ivan Pereira Ramos,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision

    Affiliations Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IGM-FIOCRUZ/BA), Salvador, Brazil, Center of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Salvador, Brazil

  • Clarissa Araújo Gurgel Rocha

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    clarissa.gurgel@fiocruz.br, gurgel.clarissa@gmail.com

    Affiliations Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IGM-FIOCRUZ/BA), Salvador, Brazil, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil, D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil, Department of Propaedeutics, School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil

Abstract

Drug repurposing has been applied in the biomedical field to optimize the use of existing drugs, leading to a more efficient allocation of research resources. In oncology, this approach is particularly interesting, considering the high cost related to the discovery of new drugs with therapeutic potential. Computational methods have been applied to predict associations between drugs and their targets. However, drug repurposing has not always been promising and its efficiency has yet to be proven. Therefore, the present scoping review protocol was developed to screen the literature on how in silico strategies can be implemented in drug repurposing in oncology. The scoping review will be conducted according to the Arksey and O’Malley framework (2005) and the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. We will search the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as the grey literature. We will include peer-reviewed research articles involving in silico strategies applied to drug repurposing in oncology, published between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2021. Data will be charted and findings described according to review questions. We will report the scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review guidelines (PRISMA-ScR).

Introduction

A variety of diseases have been part of human history, and although many of them have already been eradicated or have effective treatment, we still face the persistence of those that are still currently present. Medicines played a pivotal role in this process in which drug formulations were used to refrain disease progression at a molecular and physiological level. In this context, cancer, a set of diseases defined by an uncontrolled abnormal cell growth, defies new medicine and keeps demanding action as the lack of approved drugs continues to be a challenge and further requires the discovery of new therapeutic molecules.

It is noteworthy that the cost of new drug development has been increasing over the years. Indeed, the process of medicinal formulation from invention to the pharmacy shelves ranged from $1.1 billion in 2003 to $2.8 billion in 2013 [1]. Also, this is a time-consuming and high-risk process, as the research and development take about 10–15 years for a single new drug to be commercially available, with a success rate of developing a new molecular entity being only 2.01% [2, 3]. This current scenario has forced drug developers to become more innovative in finding new therapeutic applications for existing drugs that are outside the scope of their original medical indication, a strategy known as drug repurposing (also called drug repositioning, reprofiling or re‑tasking) [4]. Therefore, repurposing existing drugs for new therapeutic assignments is considered a better approach and serves as an important way to hasten drug discovery, especially in cancer therapy.

Identifying alternative purposes for known drugs is important for the pharmaceutical industry as well as for patients. However, this is not an easy journey: exploring the large collection of data commonly seen in the Big Data era requires additional efforts related to data extraction and, most importantly, data analyses. In this sense, the emergence of Computational methods has revolutionized life science studies, especially in terms of repositioning drugs, as they aim to identify the relationship network between target and drugs. In fact, many computational methods, including artificial intelligence techniques, have been proposed for predicting unknown associations between drugs and target proteins associated with diseases, in an attempt to tackle the traditional limitations of bulky information [3]. Succinctly, in silico approaches help in screening large compound libraries at once, can be applied to drug-target and toxicity predictions, and, most importantly, relieve the pressure concerning the costs of laboratory works and animal sacrifices [5].

In practical terms, the gap between what can be found through computational strategies and the lacking knowledge concerning drug repurposing in oncology is yet to be completely demonstrated. Although many reports show promising results, application of these strategies in drug repurposing does not always succeed, indicating a possible misleading and failed use in several cases so far, mostly due to the questionable chosen input data, poor data quality and debatable analysis methods. Besides, patent considerations, regulatory concerns and organizational hurdles contribute to delay to-be-repurposed drugs from reaching clinical practice [6]. Hence, we designed the present scoping review protocol to unravel how the in silico strategies can be implemented in drug repurposing in oncology, surpassing all current caveats.

Materials and methods

Study design and registration

This scoping review protocol was developed according to the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley [7], and complies with the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute for elaborating scoping reviews [8]. The protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) [9] (S1 Checklist). Moreover, it was registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/yx7kp).

Review questions

Considering the review aim, we intend to answer the following research questions:

  1. How can in silico strategies be implemented in drug repurposing in the oncology field?
  2. Which in silico strategies are mostly used for drug repurposing in oncology?
  3. What are the regulatory barriers to drug repurposing when using in silico strategies in cancer research?

Search strategy

The PubMed/Medline search strategy was developed and adapted for the other databases (Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science). Furthermore, we will search for grey literature in Grey Literature in Europe (Open Grey). Our search strategy combines Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, their relevant synonyms, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”. Three concept clusters were included: (1) in silico approach, (2) drug repurposing, and (3) oncology. The description of the search strategies which will be used in each database can be found in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Search strategies according to the electronic databases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271002.t001

We will perform the search on each database and export the results in Comma-Separated Values (CSV) format to Microsoft Excel. Subsequently, duplicates will be removed using their PubMed ID and title, and reviewers will proceed with the inclusion and exclusion of the studies.

Study selection

Inclusion criteria.

In addition to the parameters of the search strategy “Table 1”, studies will be included if they meet the following criterion:

  • Peer-reviewed research articles, published between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2021
  • Studies that have implemented in silico strategies for drug repurposing in oncology

Exclusion criteria.

Studies will be excluded if they meet the following criterion:

  • Narrative or systematic reviews, book chapters, author’s opinion/comments, editorials, erratum, meeting abstracts, conference abstracts and study protocols
  • Studies that used in silico strategies for other objectives rather than drug repurposing
  • Studies where no abstract is available or where full-text articles cannot be obtained
  • Studies not written in English
  • Studies on drug repurposing in oncology intended for animal use

Two independent reviewers (B.R.R.C. and L.O.S.R.) will perform the studies’ screening and selection and inter-rater agreement will be assessed through Cohen’s κ at the abstract review stage. The reviewers are PhD students from the Pathology postgraduate program at the Gonçalo Moniz Institute (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation) who have been involved in research applying in silico methods in oncology. All disagreements will be discussed with a third reviewer with deep experience on in silico methods. Firstly, the reviewers will evaluate the studies’ titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria, indicating the relevant studies to be included. Subsequently, the reviewers will assess the studies through their full-text according to the exclusion criteria.

Data charting

Data charting will be a descriptive summary of the results, and qualitative data synthesis will be performed according to our review questions. Data charting will be piloted by two reviewers and adjustments will be made as required. We will extract the following data: (1) title, (2) date of the publication, (3) authors, (4) country, (5) study aim, (6) study design, (7) type of cancer, (8) in silico method implemented, (9) study outcome, (10) whether regulatory aspects are mentioned, (11) whether drug rescue or repurposing was performed. The in silico method implemented in the study will be charted as described by the authors. Data charting will be performed and stored using Microsoft Excel by the reviewers. Prior to data extraction, the spreadsheet containing 11 columns with the abovementioned topics will be tested on 10 randomly selected studies and corrections will be made whether needed. Disagreements between the reviewers will be amended by a third reviewer. Authors of the included papers will be contacted in case of missing information.

Data summary

We intend to present our results in a narrative form and with the use of tables containing the topics detailed in the previous section. Findings will be described according to the review questions objectively and the results section content may be further adjusted after reviewing the studies. We will use the PRISMA-ScR checklist to report the scoping review.

Changes to the protocol

Changes to the study protocol will only be made if needed and will be reported accordingly.

Discussion

In silico methods have been widely used for drug repurposing in the biomedical field. However, their significance, efficiency and merit have yet to be fully appraised. In order to overcome the challenges in the research of drug repositioning, the results from this scoping review will be the first step on mapping how successful these methods have been since most of them are hypothesis-driven approaches that takes advantage of the use of Big data. This will be achieved by showing evidence on which strategies have reached a clinical application or are prone to be used in oncology research. Additionally, to circumvent the issues related to the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of drugs, the integration of multi-source information regarding drugs and their side effects and interactions of drugs and cancer will be addressed.

We intend to provide valuable information for researchers from diverse areas in understanding the favourable in silico methods used in oncology, and how they may be incorporated alone or in association with other methods in the process of drug repositioning. Thus, we aim to contribute to the future application of the in silico methods in drug repurposing based on the best evidence available.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271002.s001

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Wouters OJ, McKee M, Luyten J. Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009–2018. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc 2020;323:844–53. pmid:32125404
  2. 2. Xue H, Li J, Xie H, et al. Review of drug repositioning approaches and resources. Int J Biol Sci 2018;14:1232–44. pmid:30123072
  3. 3. Yeu Y, Yoon Y, Park S. Protein localization vector propagation: a method for improving the accuracy of drug repositioning. Mol Biosyst 2015;11:2096–102. pmid:25998487
  4. 4. Ashburn TT, Thor KB. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. 2004;3.
  5. 5. Moradi M, Golmohammadi R, Najafi A, Moosazadeh Moghaddam M, Fasihi-Ramandi M, Mirnejad R. A contemporary review on the important role of in silico approaches for managing different aspects of COVID-19 crisis. Inform Med Unlocked. 2022;28:100862. pmid:35079621
  6. 6. Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, et al. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2018;1:41–58. pmid:30310233
  7. 7. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract 2005;8:19–32.
  8. 8. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:141–6. pmid:26134548
  9. 9. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. pmid:25554246