Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a life threatening disease and leading cause of opportunistic fungal-related mortality in HIV/AIDS. Most CM infections are caused by C. neoformans species complexes but the prevalence of Cryptococcus gattii species complexes in Uganda is unknown however, it is known in a few other parts of Africa. We estimated the prevalence of C. gattii in patients living with HIV and a diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda.
Methods
Cryptococcus isolates (n = 200) obtained from cerebrospinal fluid of patients with CM recruited at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda, were tested by phenotypic methods. The Cryptococcus isolates were sub-cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar plates for 48 hours. The yeast colonies were examined by India ink stain, urea hydrolysis, and C. gattii was identified by blue pigmentation on CGB agar. The results were analyzed for frequency of C. gattii. Patient demographic characteristics were collected from the case record forms.
Results
From the 200 patients’ case record forms, 87 (43.5%) were female and 113 (56.5%) were male. The median age was 35 (19–64) years. Most patients, 93% (187/200) were from Central Uganda in the districts of Kampala and Wakiso. 97.51% (157/161) of the patients had absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 200 cells per cubic millimeter; 1.86% (3/161) 200–350 cells per cubic millimeter and 0.62% (1/161) above 500 cells per cubic millimeter. 45.4% (74/163) were not yet on HAART and 54.6% (89/163) were on HAART. 66.7% (58/87) had poor adherence to HAART treatment and 33.3% (29/87) had reported good adherence to HAART treatment. A total of 200 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus isolates were tested. No (0% (0/200) C. gattii was identified among the Cryptococcus isolates.
Citation: Wembabazi A, Nassozi DR, Akot E, Ochola TI, Kweka PT, Katamu NT, et al. (2022) Prevalence of Cryptococcus gattii in Ugandan HIV-infected patients presenting with cryptococcal meningitis. PLoS ONE 17(7): e0270597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270597
Editor: Yong-Sun Bahn, Yonsei University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Received: November 16, 2021; Accepted: June 14, 2022; Published: July 15, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Wembabazi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of State’s Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy (S/GAC), and President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) under Award Number 1R25TW011213 awarded to A.W, D.R.N, E.A, T.I.O, P.T.W, N.T.K., and D.M and, additional funding from NURTURE (NIH/ International Fogarty Centre) under the NIH grant D43TW010132, EU EDCTP (TMA2018CDF-2371) and Makerere University Research and Innovation Fund awarded by the Government of the Republic of Uganda (MAKRIF) awarded to B.A. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
Competing interests: NO authors have competing interests.
Introduction
Globally, almost 1 million people succumb to HIV/AIDS associated infections every year [1]. Of the 38 million people living with HIV/AIDS globally, 69% live in sub-Saharan Africa [2].
Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a life threatening disease and leading cause of opportunistic fungal-related mortality in HIV/AIDS. Approximately 223,100 infections are documented annually, 70% of which occur in sub-Saharan Africa [3]. It is estimated that CM accounts for 60% of life-threatening meningitis among people living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda [4]. With no treatment, the two-week mortality rate associated with acute CM is almost always 100% [3]. CM is caused by two closely related species complexes of Cryptococcus. The C. neoformans and C. gattii species complexes that belong to the phylum Basidiomycota [5]. The taxonomy of C. gattii/C. neoformans species complexes has had a lot of debate from fungal taxonomists. However, advances in phylogenetic and genotypic studies now identify them as separate species complexes; C. neoformans previously known as C. neoformans var. neoformans and C. gattii formerly known as C. neofarmans var. gattii [6]. These species complexes differ from other pathogenic yeasts such as Candida species by the presence of a polysaccharide capsule, formation of melanin, and urease activity, which all function as virulence determinant factors [5].
C. neoformans is globally distributed and causes CM in immunocompromised individuals for example, in patients with cancer, solid organ transplant, and HIV/AIDS [7] The sibling species Cryptococcus gattii has traditionally shown a geographic restriction to tropical and subtropical regions [8, 9], ecological localization to the red gum trees, Eucalyptus species [10–12] and pathogenicity in immunocompetent individuals [13–16].
However, recent literature showed an outbreak of C. gattii in the temperate Vancouver island [17] and, in tropical Africa, it was isolated from other tree types in Zambia [18]. The prevalence of C. gattii is unknown in Uganda. To our knowledge, there is no related study about C. gattii infections done up to date in Uganda. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence of C. gattii in patients with cryptococcal meningitis at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI), Kampala, Uganda.
Materials and methods
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the School of Biomedical Sciences’ Higher Degrees’ Research and Ethics Committee (SBS-HDREC), College of Health Sciences, Makerere University (Reference number SBS-REC 839). Waiver of consent was granted to use the Cryptococcus isolates already available. The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, UNCST registration numbers of the parent studies, HS213ES, HS2317, and HS2351 are included. Additional administrative permissions were sought from the Clinical Microbiology and Mycology laboratories, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University.
Study design and duration
The retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to August 2021 inclusive.
Study site
The study was conducted at the Clinical Microbiology, and Mycology laboratories at the College of Health Sciences (MakCHS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Target population
Cryptococcus clinical isolates from the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with cryptococcal meningitis recruited at IDI, Kampala, Uganda.
Inclusion criteria
Cryptococcus clinical isolates from the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with cryptococcal meningitis recruited at IDI, Kampala Uganda, stored between 2018 to 2021.
Sample size
A total of two hundred (n = 200) clinical Cryptococcus isolates were obtained from the cerebrospinal fluid of CM patients from the Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda. A positive control for C. neoformans was included however; we did not have a positive control for C. gattii. The sample size was determined using Kish and Leslie formula (Kish et al., 1965), using an estimated environmental prevalence of C. gattii of 15% from Zambia [18] and standard deviation at 95% Confidence Interval (1.960).
Sampling technique
Consecutive sampling was performed until the sample size of 200 Cryptococcus isolates was achieved. The isolates were selected from those stored as follows; 16 isolates from 2018, 65 isolates from 2019, 89 isolates from 2020 and 30 from 2021.
Data collection procedures
Laboratory methods.
Stored isolates of Cryptococcus were used for this study. The Cryptococcus isolates in the glycerol stocks were retrieved from the—80°C freezers, sub-cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar plate. After 48 hours, the yeast colonies were identified phenotypically. Briefly, the colonies were stained with India ink and examined by x40 objective. The colonies were further inoculated onto urea agar for 48 hours. Lastly, pure, single colonies isolates were streaked on CGB agar plate using a loop. CGB agar plate preparation was done as described here [19].
Case record forms.
Case record forms (CRF) were used for data associated with the host factors of the persons from where the isolates were obtained. The CRF include demographic data, HIV status, absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts, initiation and adherence to Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and CM diagnosis.
Results
From the 200 corresponding case record forms, 87 (43.5%) were female and 113 (56.5%) were male. The median age was 35 (interquartile range, 19–64) years. Most participants were from central Uganda, 93.5% (187) in the districts of Kampala and Wakiso. Most patients had absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 200 cells per cubic millimeter (97.51%; 157/161), 1.86% (3/161) had absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts in range of 200–350 cells per cubic millimeter and 0.62% (1/161) had absolute CD4 lymphocyte counts of above 500 cells per cubic millimeter. HIV viral loads for six patients were captured, and the median viral load was 56,522 cells per milliliter (range 5,015–198,700 cells per milliliter). 45.4% (74/163) were not yet on HAART and 54.6% (89/163) were on HAART. The HAART combinations included NRTI such as 3TC, ABC, TDF and AZT among others. 66.7% (58/87) had poor adherence to HAART treatment and 33.3% (29/87) had reported good adherence to HAART treatment (Table 1).
A total of two hundred (n = 200) Cryptococcus isolates were tested to identify C. gattii. No positive controls for C. gattii strains were included in the study. All the isolates grew on Sabouraud Dextrose agar plates producing white colonies. All the colonies were positive when examined by India ink stain by exhibiting a halo around the cell against the black background using x40 objective. Additionally, all isolates were urease positive by turning the agar from yellow to pink after incubation. However, all isolates had a negative reaction on the CGB agar as there was no color change in the medium. Therefore, there was no Cryptococcus gattii strains among the Cryptococcal isolates tested.
Discussion
We found no Cryptococcus gattii among the clinical isolates sampled from the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with cryptococcal meningitis at the IDI, suggesting that the great majority, if not all infections causing cryptococcal meningitis result from Cryptococcus neoformans and not Cryptococcus gattii in this population.
However, some studies have reported clinical cases of C. gattii infections in the recent past both from seronegative and seropositive HIV patients. In South Africa, 5/276 (1.8%) prevalence was reported inclusive of one HIV seronegative patient [20]. Other studies included one case from a leukemic patient in Congo [21], 4/70 (5.7%) from HIV seropositive patients in Kenya [22], 8/499 (1.6%) from HIV seropositive in Rwanda [23], 11/66 (16.7%) from HIV seropositive patients in Zimbabwe [24].
Our negative findings could be attributed to: the low diagnostic accuracy of phenotypic based tests used such as the CGB agar as suggested by some studies that reported some false positives in identification of C. gattii [25]. However, due to limited resources within the scope of this project, CGB agar remained the option because of some of its strengths like being reliable, affordable and easy to work with as indicated by some studies [19, 26]. Secondly, late presentation of our patients in advanced clinical HIV stage 4 with CM at CD4 cell count <200 indicates severe immunosuppression [27], yet C. gattii infections are more prevalent in immune competent persons [13, 14, 16]. Therefore, we believe that our study population which was comprised mostly of immune compromised individuals was not appropriate for isolating C. gattii and likely CM infections in our patients are due to C. neoformans. Lastly, lack of clinical and environmental information on C. gattii incidences in Uganda could have affected the precision of our results. To our knowledge, there is no related study about C. gattii done up to date.
Our study limitation included a small sample size, which may not represent the entire geographical locations where C. gattii could be found in Uganda. We recommend environmental sampling for C. gattii to further determine its presence in Uganda.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the staff and management of Clinical Microbiology and Mycology laboratories, Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University and Infectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda for their support, permission and assistance in samples collection and laboratory work. We thank Dr. Laura Nsangi for assisting with the study data, Mr. Tonny Luggya for technical guidance in the laboratory work and Dr. Henry Kajumbula for leadership support.
References
- 1.
Max Roser and Hannah Ritchie (2018)—"HIV / AIDS". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: ’https://ourworldindata.org/hiv-aids’ [Online Resource].
- 2.
UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics—2020 fact sheet. Available: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet.
- 3. Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, Chiller TM, et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;17(8):873–81. pmid:28483415
- 4. Longley N, Muzoora C, Taseera K, Mwesigye J, Rwebembera J, Chakera A, et al. Dose Response Effect of High‐Dose Fluconazole for HIV‐Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis in Southwestern Uganda. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;47(12):1556–61. pmid:18990067
- 5. Kwon-Chung KJ, Fraser JA, Doering TL, Wang Z, Janbon G, Idnurm A, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Jul 1;4(7):a019760. pmid:24985132; PMCID: PMC4066639.
- 6. Hagen F, Khayhan K, Theelen B, Kolecka A, Polacheck I, Sionov E, et al., Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015 May;78:16–48. Epub 2015 Feb 23. pmid:25721988.
- 7. Bratton EW, El Husseini N, Chastain CA, Lee MS, Poole C, Stürmer T, et al., Comparison and temporal trends of three groups with cryptococcosis: HIV-infected, solid organ transplant, and HIV-negative/non-transplant. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43582. Epub 2012 Aug 24. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2012;7(10). doi: 10.1371/annotation/a94bc542-6682-4579-a315-57019cef7e0e. PMID: 22937064; PMCID: PMC3427358.
- 8. Springer DJ, Chaturvedi V. Projecting global occurrence of Cryptococcus gattii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):14–20. pmid:20031037; PMCID: PMC2874352.
- 9. Harris J, Lockhart S, Chiller T. Cryptococcus gattii: where do we go from here? Med Mycol., 2012 Feb;50(2):113–29. Epub 2011 Sep 22. pmid:21939343.
- 10. Chen SC, Currie BJ, Campbell HM, Fisher DA, Pfeiffer TJ, Ellis DH, et al., Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii infection in northern Australia: existence of an environmental source other than known host eucalypts. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Sep-Oct;91(5):547–50. pmid:9463664.
- 11. Ellis DH, Pfeiffer TJ. Natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1642–4. pmid:2199524; PMCID: PMC 268004.
- 12. Pfeiffer TJ, Ellis DH. Environmental isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii from Eucalyptus tereticornis. J Med Vet Mycol. 1992;30(5):407–8. pmid:1469544.
- 13. Chen S, Sorrell T, Nimmo G, Speed B, Currie B, Ellis D, et al. Epidemiology and host- and variety-dependent characteristics of infection due to Cryptococcus neoformans in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Cryptococcal Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):499–508. Epub 2000 Sep 7. pmid:10987712.
- 14. Speed B, Dunt D. Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jul;21(1):28–34; discussion 35–6. pmid:7578756.
- 15. Colom MF, Frasés S, Ferrer C, Jover A, Andreu M, Reus S, et al. First case of human cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jul;43(7):3548–50. pmid:16000503; PMCID: PMC1169187.
- 16. Nielsen K, Cox GM, Litvintseva AP, Mylonakis E, Malliaris SD, Benjamin DK Jr, et al., Cryptococcus neoformans {alpha} strains preferentially disseminate to the central nervous system during coinfection. Infect Immun. 2005 Aug;73(8):4922–33. pmid:16041006; PMCID: PMC1201212.
- 17. Kidd SE, Hagen F, Tscharke RL, Huynh M, Bartlett KH, Fyfe M, et al. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7;101(49):17258–63. Epub 2004 Nov 30. pmid:15572442; PMCID: PMC535360.
- 18. Vanhove M, Beale MA, Rhodes J, Chanda D, Lakhi S, Kwenda G, et al. Genomic epidemiology of Cryptococcus yeasts identifies adaptation to environmental niches underpinning infection across an African HIV/AIDS cohort. Mol Ecol. 2017 Apr;26(7):1991–2005. Epub 2016 Nov 8. pmid:27862555; PMCID: PMC5412878.
- 19. Kwon-Chung KJ, Polacheck I, Bennett JE. Improved diagnostic medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii (serotypes B and C). J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):535–7. pmid:7042750; PMCID: PMC272134.
- 20. Karstaedt AS, Crewe-Brown HH, Dromer F. Cryptococcal meningitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii, serotype C, in AIDS patients in Soweto, South Africa. Med Mycol. 2002 Feb;40(1):7–11. pmid:11860015.
- 21. Boekhout T, Theelen B, Diaz M, Fell JW, Hop WCJ, Abeln ECA, et al. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology (Reading). 2001 Apr;147(4):891–907. pmid:11283285.
- 22. Kangogo M, Bader O, Boga H, Wanyoike W, Folba C, Worasilchai N, et al. Molecular types of Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex from clinical and environmental sources in Nairobi, Kenya. Mycoses. 2015 Nov;58(11):665–70. Epub 2015 Sep 25. pmid:26404188.
- 23. Bogaerts J, Rouvroy D, Taelman H, Kagame A, Aziz MA, Swinne D, et al. AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis in Rwanda (1983–1992): epidemiologic and diagnostic features. J Infect. 1999 Jul;39(1):32–7. pmid:10468126.
- 24. Nyazika TK, Hagen F, Meis JF, Robertson VJ. Cryptococcus tetragattii as a major cause of cryptococcal meningitis among HIV-infected individuals in Harare, Zimbabwe. J Infect. 2016 Jun;72(6):745–752. Epub 2016 Mar 30. pmid:27038502.
- 25. Klein KR, Hall L, Deml SM, Rysavy JM, Wohlfiel SL, Wengenack NL. Identification of Cryptococcus gattii by use of L-canavanine glycine bromothymol blue medium and DNA sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3669–72. Epub 2009 Sep 30. pmid:19794048; PMCID: PMC2772631.
- 26. Figueiredo TP, Lucas RC, Cazzaniga RA, França CN, Segato F, Taglialegna R, et al. Antifungal susceptibility testing and genotyping characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans and gattii isolates from hiv-infected patients of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016 Sep 22;58:69. pmid:27680174; PMCID: PMC5048640.
- 27.
World Health Organization. (2007). WHO case definitions of HIV for surveillance and revised clinical staging and immunological classification of HIV-related disease in adults and children. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43699.