Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: The effect of cognitive effort on the sense of agency

  • Eva Van den Bussche,
  • Maryna Alves,
  • Yannick P. J. Murray,
  • Gethin Hughes

The images for Figs 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 3, and the image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 2. The figure captions appear in the correct order.

Additionally, the images for Figs 5 and 6 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 6, and the image that appears as Fig 6 should be Fig 5. The figure captions appear in the correct order.

Please see the figures with the correct captions below.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Intentional binding (left panel), RTs (middle panel) and error rates (right panel) of Experiment 1 as a function of previous congruency and current congruency.

Dots represent mean RTs for each participant in each condition (thus, each participant is depicted four times on this graph, once for each Previous × Current Congruency condition). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269055.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Intentional binding (left panel), RTs (middle panel) and error rates (right panel) of Experiment 1 as a function of Block and current congruency.

Dots represent mean RTs for each participant in each condition (thus, each participant is depicted four times on this graph, once for each Block × Current Congruency condition). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269055.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Sense of agency ratings (left panel), RTs (middle panel) and error rates (right panel) of Experiment 2 as a function of previous congruency and current congruency.

Dots represent mean RTs for each participant in each condition (thus, each participant is depicted four times on this graph, once for each Previous × Current Congruency condition). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269055.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Sense of agency ratings (left panel), RTs (middle panel) and error rates (right panel) of Experiment 2 as a function of Block and current congruency.

Dots represent mean RTs for each participant in each condition (thus, each participant is depicted four times on this graph, once for each Block × Current Congruency condition). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269055.g004

Reference

  1. 1. Van den Bussche E, Alves M, Murray YPJ, Hughes G (2020) The effect of cognitive effort on the sense of agency. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0236809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236809 pmid:32785237

Citation: Bussche EVd, Alves M, Murray YPJ, Hughes G (2022) Correction: The effect of cognitive effort on the sense of agency. PLoS ONE 17(5): e0269055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269055

Published: May 23, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Bussche et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.