https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9137-7561
Figures
Abstract
The digestive protease chymotrypsin C (CTRC) protects the pancreas against pancreatitis by degrading potentially harmful trypsinogen. Loss-of-function genetic variants in CTRC increase risk for chronic pancreatitis (CP) with variable effect size, as judged by the reported odds ratio (OR) values. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies on four variants that alter the CTRC amino-acid sequence, are clinically relatively common (global carrier frequency in CP >1%), reproducibly showed association with CP and their loss of function phenotype was verified experimentally. We found strong enrichment of CTRC variants p.A73T, p.V235I, p.K247_R254del, and p.R245W in CP cases versus controls, yielding OR values of 6.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4–17.8), 4.5 (CI 2.2–9.1), 5.4 (CI 2.6–11.0), and 2.6 (CI 1.6–4.2), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated disease association of variants p.K247_R254del and p.R245W in alcoholic CP with similar effect sizes as seen in the overall CP group. Homozygosity or compound heterozygosity were rare and seemed to be associated with higher risk. We also identified a so far unreported linkage disequilibrium between variant p.K247_R254del and the common c.180C>T (p.G60 =) haplotype. Taken together, the results indicate that heterozygous loss-of-function CTRC variants increase the risk for CP approximately 3-7-fold. This meta-analysis confirms the clinical significance of CTRC variants and provides further justification for the genetic screening of CP patients.
Citation: Takáts A, Berke G, Gede N, Németh BC, Witt H, Głuszek S, et al. (2022) Risk of chronic pancreatitis in carriers of loss-of-function CTRC variants: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 17(5): e0268859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859
Editor: Klaus Brusgaard, Odense University Hospital, DENMARK
Received: January 20, 2022; Accepted: May 10, 2022; Published: May 20, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Takáts et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the Eötvös Loránd Research Network award 460051 to EH, a grant from the Research Fund of the University of Pécs to EH, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01 DK082412 to MST, the National Research Development and Innovation Fund grant ÚNKP-21-3-I-PTE-1081 to GB, the National Research Development and Innovation Office grant K131996 to PH, and FK124632 to BCN, the Economic Development and Innovation Operative Programme Grant GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00048 to PH, the Human Resources Development Operational Programme Grant EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006 to PH, the National Science Centre, Poland, grant 2015/19/B/NZ5/02224 to AMR and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (EKFS) 2017_A108 – EKFZ-Witt to HW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas that often develops in the background of genetic predisposition [1]. A number of susceptibility genes have been identified and many of these have been shown to influence the activation of the digestive protease precursor trypsinogen to its active form trypsin [2]. Pathological, intrapancreatic activation of trypsinogen can occur through autoactivation, a reaction in which trypsin activates trypsinogen. Defense mechanisms that protect the pancreas against trypsinogen autoactivation and trypsin activity include the serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) and chymotrypsin C (CTRC), which can readily degrade trypsinogen and thereby suppress its activation [2–4]. Gain-of-function mutations in the serine protease 1 (PRSS1) gene encoding human cationic trypsinogen and loss-of-function mutations in the SPINK1 and CTRC genes stimulate autoactivation of trypsinogen and increase the risk for CP [2]. The most common PRSS1 mutations exert their stimulatory effect on autoactivation by blocking CTRC-dependent trypsinogen degradation [2, 5]. Genetic changes can be also protective, as exemplified by the p.G191R variant in the PRSS2 gene encoding human anionic trypsinogen [6]. This variant causes autodegradation of anionic trypsinogen and thereby decreases the risk for CP. Similarly, a common inversion at the chymotrypsin B1-B2 (CTRB1-CTRB2) locus increases the expression of CTRB2, which leads to more effective degradation of anionic trypsinogen and reduced CP risk [7].
CTRC as a pancreatitis risk gene was identified in 2008 [4, 8] and studies to date have described a large number of missense mutations and a microdeletion found in CP cases [9–20, see also www.pancreasgenetics.org]. The majority of these variants were detected in a few cases only and only four variants were found to associate with CP in a statistically significant manner: Variants c.738_761del24 (p.K247_R254del) and c.760C>T (p.R254W) were found primarily in European cohorts with approximate carrier frequencies of 1–2% while variants c.217G>A (p.A73T) and c.703G>A (p.V235I) were detected in Indian cohorts with carrier frequencies of 1–5%. As judged by the odds ratio (OR) values, the effect sizes reported for these CTRC variants were variable, mostly in the range of 3-10-fold, however, a lack of effect and an OR of 19 were also described. Functional studies demonstrated that these four variants caused loss of CTRC function by various mechanisms that included reduced secretion from cells, decreased catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to degradation by trypsin [4, 21, 22]. Furthermore, variant p.A73T was shown to induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [21, 22]. Similar functional defects were observed with many of the rare CTRC variants [4, 21–23].
In addition to the low-frequency missense and microdeletion variants, a common haplotype (circa 30% carrier frequency in CP cases) consisting of the c.180C>T (p.G60 =) variant in exon 3 and the c.493+52G>A variant in intron 5, was found reproducibly to increase CP risk by about 2-fold in the heterozygous state and perhaps as much as 10-fold in homozygous carriers [7–11, 13, 17]. The functional impact and the disease-relevant variant within the haplotype remain unclear; however, reduced CTRC expression possibly due to altered pre-mRNA splicing was hypothesized [2]. Unlike the low-frequency missense and microdeletion CTRC variants, the p.G60 = haplotype variants do not alter the amino-acid sequence of CTRC and cannot cause enzyme activity changes by any of the mechanisms described for the other variants.
The aim of the present study was to determine the global effect size of missense CTRC variants on CP risk, by conducting a meta-analysis of all published genetic association studies. We focused our efforts on the four low-frequency missense and microdeletion variants, as the limited information on the rare and private missense CTRC variants precluded a formal analysis. Establishing the precise effect size of CTRC variants on CP risk has important implications for genetic testing of CP patients and counseling of CTRC variant carriers.
Methods
Study design
In this meta-analysis, we set out to evaluate the risk effect of CTRC variants that (i) alter the amino-acid sequence of CTRC, (ii) are relatively frequent (>1% carrier frequency in CP cases), (iii) showed reproducible association with CP at least in 2 independent cohorts, and (iv) were demonstrated to cause a loss of CTRC function experimentally.
Protocol registration.
The present work is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement (S1 Table) [24]. The protocol of the meta-analysis was registered in advance in the PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42018111537.
Search strategy
We performed a systematic search on April 5, 2022, in three databases (MEDLINE via PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) using the following search keys: pancreatitis AND (CTRC OR “Chymotrypsin C” OR Caldecrin OR”Elastase 4” OR ELA4 OR CLCR) AND (polymorphism OR polymorphisms OR variant OR variants OR mutation OR mutations) OR “p.A73T” OR “p.V235I” OR “p.K247_R254del” OR “p.R254W”. No filters were applied. As an additional data source, we used the www.pancreasgenetics.org database of genetic risk factors.
Study selection and data extraction
Genetic association case-control studies investigating the following low-frequency CTRC variants were included: p.A73T, p.V235I, p.K247_254del, and p.R254W. Articles identified by the initial search were imported into a reference management program (EndNoteX7.4; Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA). After removing overlaps between databases and duplicate references, the remaining records were screened by title, abstract and full text by two authors independently. Disagreements were resolved by the corresponding author. Eligible original studies were subjected to data collection onto a pre-defined Excel sheet. The following data were extracted: first author, publication year, basic demographics (ethnicity, age), type of pancreatitis, number of cases and controls, carrier frequencies of the CTRC variants analyzed in this study, and type of the genetic screening method. In cases of suspected overlap between study populations, studies with the highest number of participants were included in the final analysis. Zero event studies were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Quality assessment
A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for the quality assessment of the included case-control studies [25].
Statistical analysis
The effect of the different CTRC variants was assessed by calculating pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects model with Der-Simonian Laird estimation was applied. Heterogeneity was examined with the I2-test (p≥0.1). Sensitivity analyses (leave-one-out method) were also performed. Publication bias was ruled out by visual inspection of funnel plots and by Egger’s test. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata 15 (Stata Corp).
Results
Study design
We found four variants that met our inclusion criteria, three missense mutations and a microdeletion: p.A73T, p.V235I, p.K247_R254del, and p.R254W. We performed a comprehensive database search and retrieved all published case-control studies that included any of these variants. Fig 1 demonstrates the protocol employed for study selection, which resulted in the identification of 14 articles [4, 8–20] suitable for inclusion in this meta-analysis (Table 1).
All four CTRC variants were detected worldwide, however, with uneven geographic/ethnic distribution. Thus, variants p.A73T and p.V235I were most frequently reported in South-Asian cohorts whereas variants p.K247_R254del and p.R254W were typically found in subjects of European origin. Considering the relatively small number of studies available, we chose to perform a global meta-analysis of the selected CTRC variants without regional or ethnic subgrouping.
In our analysis, we included both alcoholic CP and non-alcoholic CP cohorts, such as idiopathic, hereditary, familial and tropical CP. If reported separately, recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) cases were pooled with CP cases, while acute pancreatitis cases were excluded. Due to the somewhat inconsistent classification and/or reporting, subgroup analysis of the various CP cohorts was feasible only for alcoholic CP. Different CP cohorts (e.g. alcoholic and non-alcoholic) from a given publication were combined if these were compared with the same control group. Alcoholic and tropical CP cohorts from certain studies were treated separately (labeled ACP and TCP in the figures) if distinct control groups were used for comparison.
Association analysis
All 4 CTRC variants analyzed were found significantly more frequently in patients with CP than in controls (Figs 2–5). The effect sizes, as judged by the OR values, were similar for the 4 variants and ranged from 2.6 to 6.5. Comparable OR values were calculated for variants p.V235I (OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.2–9.1), and p.K247_R254del (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.6–11.0) while variant p.A73T (OR 6.5, 95% CI 2.4–17.8) was associated with slightly higher and variant p.R254W (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6–4.2) with slightly lower risk. Global carrier frequencies for variants p.A73T, p.V235I, p.K247_R254del, and p.R254W in CP were 2.4%, 1.2%, 1.1% and 1.0%, whereas the highest reported carrier frequencies in CP were 5.6%, 4.9%, 5.3% and 4.6%, respectively.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
The vast majority of carriers had heterozygous CTRC variants, whereas homozygous and compound heterozygous cases were rare. When we considered all homozygous and compound heterozygous CTRC variant carriers together (n = 13) versus controls, the meta-analysis yielded an OR value of 10.8 (95% CI 2.4–49.6), indicating a higher risk effect than seen with any of the heterozygous CTRC variants (S1 Fig). However, the small event number and the arbitrary pooling of variants limits the usefulness of this estimate.
To address the role of CTRC variants in alcoholic CP, we performed a meta-analysis for variants p.K247_R254del (S2 Fig) and p.R254W (S3 Fig), which were detected in association with alcoholic CP in a handful of studies. No data were available for variants p.A73T and p.V235I. For this calculation, we compared alcoholic CP cases versus healthy controls. We confirmed disease association of variants p.K247_R254del (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4–21.5) and p.R254W (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.6) with effect sizes that were similar to those seen in the overall CP group.
Linkage disequilibrium between variant p.K247_R254del and the common c.180C>T (p.G60 =) haplotype
During our review of unpublished CTRC sequencing data from the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group, we noted that three patients carrying a heterozygous microdeletion variant were also positive for the common p.G60 = variant; including 2 homozygous cases (Table 2). To explore whether these two variants are in linkage disequilibrium, we re-analyzed genetic data of 12 subjects of German origin from Rosendahl, et al. (2008) and 11 individuals of Polish origin from Grabarczyk, et al. (2017). Two unpublished cases of Turkish and Serbian origin sequenced in Germany were also included. Taken together, from the 28 subjects evaluated, 27 carried both variants, and in 9 cases the p.G60 = variant was homozygous.
Quality assessment and publication bias
No heterogeneity was observed. Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out method) revealed no significant impact of any given study on the summary OR values (S4 Fig). Results of the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale are shown in S2 Table. With a single exception, all studies met the high-quality criteria. Funnel plots were generated for the p.V235I and p.R254W variants. Visual assessment and Egger’s test did not indicate a publication bias (S5 Fig).
Discussion
CP is a progressive fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas characterized by acinar cell atrophy with diffuse fibrosis, inflammatory cell infiltrates, regenerative pseudotubular complexes, and ductal irregularities with calcifications [1]. Progressive fibrosis is thought to be responsible for the development of the long-term clinical sequelae such as chronic pain, exocrine insufficiency and diabetes.
The aim of the present study was to obtain a formal estimate of the risk of CP in carriers of loss-of-function CTRC variants. To this end, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies that assessed the distribution of four low-frequency variants (>1%) between patients and controls. We chose these four variants, including three missense mutations and a microdeletion, because their genetic association with CP has been reproducibly documented and experimental studies confirmed the variants caused loss of CTRC function. Thus, the effect size of these variants on CP risk should be generally applicable to other rare or private CTRC missense mutations as well. The commonly occurring CTRC risk variant c.180C>T (p.G60 =) was excluded from this study and will be analyzed elsewhere, because it does not alter the CTRC amino-acid sequence, and its functional impact on CTRC has not been clarified yet.
Considering the relatively small number of publications suitable for meta-analysis, the lack of standardized cohort definitions with respect to etiology, and the variable reporting of homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers, we chose to perform a “global” analysis in which all CP cohorts were included and carrier frequencies (rather than alleles or genotypes) were considered. We note, however, that this global CP cohort mostly represents heterozygous CTRC variant carriers with non-alcoholic CP. Using this approach, the meta-analysis revealed that CTRC variants increased CP risk by about 3–7 fold, as estimated by OR values. Homozygous or compound heterozygous carriers were rare but seemed to increase risk more significantly, by about 11-fold, which we consider a lower-end estimate. Subgroup analysis of alcoholic CP cases indicated a similar risk increase as seen in the global CP cohort. Recently, Chen et al. (2021) investigated gene-alcohol interactions in CP and reported higher risk in case of the c.760C>T (p.R254W) variant in alcoholic (OR = 2.87) versus non-alcoholic CP (OR = 1.98). We believe this may be a spurious finding due to the smaller case numbers analyzed than in our study. Importantly, in the same article, the cumulative analysis of rare pathogenic CTRC variants in exons 2,3 and 7 showed no difference between the alcoholic and non-alcoholic CP groups (OR = 4.25 and 4.05, respectively), supporting the notion that CTRC variants contribute comparable risk effects to these two CP etiologies [26]. In contrast to CTRC, variants in SPINK1 have a smaller impact in alcoholic than in non-alcoholic CP while gain-of-function PRSS1 variants are almost never found in alcoholic disease [2, 26].
The functional consequences of variants p.A73T, p.V235I, p.K247_R254del, and p.R245W were previously characterized in cell culture experiments with transfected HEK 293T cells and adenovirus-transduced AR42J cells [4, 21, 23]. In addition, enzymatic activity of CTRC variants was tested using purified CTRC protein. Based on these assays, variants p.A73T and p.K247_R254del were classified as high-risk variants and variants p.V235I and p.R245W as moderate-to-low risk variants [21]. Variant p.K247_R254del was found to exhibit a complete loss of function as it had no protease activity whatsoever and trypsin rapidly degraded it. Similarly, nearly complete (80–90%) loss of function was observed with variant p.A73T, which was poorly secreted from cells. Furthermore, variant p.A73T induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress indicating that mutation-induced misfolding and intracellular retention might explain its defective secretion. It remains unclear whether ER stress would contribute to CP risk in carriers of variant p.A73T. In contrast to variants p.A73T and p.K247_R254del, we found that the functional defect in variants p.V235I and p.R245W was less conspicuous. Variant p.V235I was secreted almost as well as wild-type CTRC from HEK 293T cells and the purified protein had circa 70% enzyme activity on a small peptide substrate. However, when this variant was tested in trypsinogen degradation experiments, it exhibited only about 50% activity relative to wild-type CTRC. Variant p.R254W was secreted to reduced levels (50% of wild type) from HEK 293T cells, while secretion from AR42J cells was almost normal (80%). The purified p.R254W protein was fully active on a small peptide substrate but its trypsinogen-degrading ability has not been tested so far. Variant p.R254W was also prone to degradation by high concentrations of trypsin. Taken together, available evidence indicates that variant p.V235I causes an about 50% loss of function, while the extent of the functional impairment in variant p.R254W remains hard to define but appears relatively small.
When the OR values are compared with the functional properties of the mutants, the difference between the high-risk CTRC variants p.A73T (OR 6.5) and p.K247_R254del (OR 5.4) versus the low-risk variant p.R254W (OR 2.6) is apparent and supports the validity of the results of our meta-analysis. Curiously, variant p.V235I (OR 4.5) is an outlier in this classification, as its risk effect would suggest a stronger functional defect than experimentally documented. We note, however, that the functional analysis published to date is limited in scope and variant p.V235I may cause loss of CTRC function by other mechanisms not tested yet, e.g. by affecting mRNA expression or splicing. Despite the imperfect correlation between the risk effects and the functional loss of CTRC variants, our current study establishes a solid baseline value for the effect size of heterozygous CTRC null variants, which is around 5-6-fold increased risk of CP. As noted above, homozygous and compound heterozygous CTRC variants are expected to impart substantially higher risk, however, available data are limited.
An unexpected “bonus” observation from this study is the linkage disequilibrium between the p.K247_R254del microdeletion variant and the common p.G60 = haplotype. Even though several laboratories reported both variants in their cohorts; their association has never been described before. Genetic counselors of patients with CTRC variants need to take this new information into consideration when determining the overall risk of CP. Although the p.G60 = haplotype increases CP risk about 2-fold, this effect will be negated by the presence of the microdeletion on the same allele and the overall risk will be solely determined by the heterozygous microdeletion variant. Furthermore, in case of a heterozygous microdeletion occurring together with p.G60 = homozygosity, one should consider only one p.G60 = allele when estimating compounded disease risk.
A limitation of the present study is the global nature of the analysis, which may mask higher or lower effect sizes associated with certain etiology, geography or demographics. In this regard, it is noteworthy that variants p.A73T and p.V235I are prevalent in India, while variants p.K247_R254del and p.R254W were predominantly reported from Europe. Restricting the analysis to Indian versus European cohorts might yield higher OR values for given variants than the global approach. Similarly, the impact of CTRC variants may be higher in pediatric CP versus adult-onset CP, as suggested by a Polish study [17]. Despite these unresolved questions, our meta-analysis offers strong support for the notion that CTRC variants are relatively strong risk factors for CP and argues for routine genetic screening of patients in the clinical setting.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Forest plot showing odds ratios for pancreatitis risk in homozygous and compound heterozygous CTRC variant carriers.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Two patients were homozygous for p.A73T, eight patients and one control for p.V235I. Compound heterozygosity was confirmed in three cases (p.A73T/p.V235I; p.V235I/p.R254W; and p.V235I/p.K247_R254del, respectively).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s001
(PPTX)
S2 Fig. Forest plot showing odds ratios for pancreatitis risk in patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP) carrying the c.738_761del24 (p.K247_R254del) CTRC variant.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s002
(PPTX)
S3 Fig. Forest plot showing odds ratios for pancreatitis risk in patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP) carrying the c.760C>T (p.R254W) CTRC variant.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s003
(PPTX)
S4 Fig. Sensitivity analyses (leave-one-out) of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
A, c.217G>A (p.A73T); B, c.703G>A (p.V235I); C, c.738_761del24 (p.K247_R254del); D, c.760C>T (p.R254W). No significant impact of any given study on the summary OR values has been found.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s004
(PPTX)
S5 Fig. Funnel plots evaluating the effect of publication bias.
A, c.703G>A (p.V235I); B, c.760C>T (p.R254W). Visual assessment and Egger’s test did not indicate a publication bias.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s005
(PPTX)
S2 Table. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality assessment of the case-control studies selected for meta-analysis.
Each study was evaluated using a star system based on three broad categories; selection of study subjects (cases and controls), comparability of subjects, and ascertainment of the exposure. The maximum score of the NOS was 8 points. Studies with a score ≥ 6 points were considered high quality. With a single exception, all studies met the high-quality criteria.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268859.s007
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Kleeff J, Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, Esposito I, Lerch MM, Gress T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 3: 17060. pmid:28880010
- 2. Hegyi E, Sahin-Tóth M. Genetic risk in chronic pancreatitis: The trypsin-dependent pathway. Dig Dis Sci. 2017; 62: 1692–1701. pmid:28536777
- 3. Witt H, Luck W, Hennies HC, Classen M, Kage A, Lass U, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the serine protease inhibitor, Kazal type 1 are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2000; 25: 213–216. pmid:10835640
- 4. Rosendahl J, Witt H, Szmola R, Bhatia E, Ozsvári B, Landt O, et al. Chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variants that diminish activity or secretion are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2008; 40: 78–82. pmid:18059268
- 5. Szabó A, Sahin-Tóth M. Increased activation of hereditary pancreatitis-associated human cationic trypsinogen mutants in presence of chymotrypsin C. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 20701–20710. pmid:22539344
- 6. Witt H, Sahin-Tóth M, Landt O, Chen JM, Kähne T, Drenth JP, et al. A degradation-sensitive anionic trypsinogen (PRSS2) variant protects against chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 668–673. pmid:16699518
- 7. Rosendahl J, Kirsten H, Hegyi E, Kovacs P, Weiss FU, Laumen H, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies inversion in the CTRB1-CTRB2 locus to modify risk for alcoholic and non-alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gut. 2018; 67: 1855–1863. pmid:28754779
- 8. Masson E, Chen JM, Scotet V, Le Maréchal C, Férec C. Association of rare chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) gene variations in patients with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. Hum Genet. 2008; 123: 83–91. pmid:18172691
- 9. Derikx MH, Szmola R, te Morsche RH, Sunderasan S, Chacko A, Drenth JP. Tropical calcific pancreatitis and its association with CTRC and SPINK1 (p.N34S) variants. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 21: 889–894. pmid:19404200
- 10. Paliwal S, Bhaskar S, Mani KR, Reddy DN, Rao GV, Singh SP, et al. Comprehensive screening of chymotrypsin C (CTRC) gene in tropical calcific pancreatitis identifies novel variants. Gut. 2013; 62: 1602–1606. pmid:22580415
- 11. Masamune A, Nakano E, Kume K, Kakuta Y, Ariga H, Shimosegawa T. Identification of novel missense CTRC variants in Japanese patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gut. 2013; 62: 653–654. pmid:23135764
- 12. Schubert S, Traub F, Brakensiek K, von Kopylow K, Marohn B, Maelzer M, et al. CFTR, SPINK1, PRSS1, and CTRC mutations are not associated with pancreatic cancer in German patients. Pancreas. 2014; 43: 1078–1082. pmid:25003218
- 13. LaRusch J, Lozano-Leon A, Stello K, Moore A, Muddana V, O’Connell M, et al. The common chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) variant G60G (C.180T) increases risk of chronic pancreatitis but not recurrent acute pancreatitis in a North American population. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015; 6:e68. pmid:25569187
- 14. Koziel D, Gluszek S, Kowalik A, Chlopek M, Pieciak L. Genetic mutations in SPINK1, CFTR, CTRC genes in acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15: 70. pmid:26100556
- 15. Sofia VM, Da Sacco L, Surace C, Tomaiuolo AC, Genovese S, Grotta S, et al. Extensive molecular analysis suggested the strong genetic heterogeneity of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. Mol Med. 2016; 22: 300–309. pmid:27264265
- 16. da Costa MZ, Pires JG, Nasser PD, Ferreira Cda S, Teixeira AC, Paranaguá-Vezozzo DC, et al. Frequency of Tabagism and N34S and P55S Mutations of Serine Peptidase Inhibitor, Kazal Type 1 (SPINK1) and R254W Mutation of chymotrypsin C (CTRC) in patients with chronic pancreatitis and controls. Pancreas. 2016; 45: 1330–1335. pmid:27253233
- 17. Grabarczyk AM, Oracz G, Wertheim-Tysarowska K, Kujko AA, Wejnarska K, Kolodziejczyk E, et al. Chymotrypsinogen C genetic variants, including c.180TT, are strongly associated with chronic pancreatitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017; 65: 652–657. pmid:28968289
- 18. Phillips AE, LaRusch J, Greer P, Abberbock J, Alkaade S, Amann ST, et al. Known genetic susceptibility factors for chronic pancreatitis in patients of European ancestry are rare in patients of African ancestry. Pancreatology. 2018; 18: 528–535. pmid:29859674
- 19. Zou WB, Tang XY, Zhou DZ, Qian YY, Hu LH, Yu FF, et al. SPINK1, PRSS1, CTRC, and CFTR genotypes influence disease onset and clinical outcomes in chronic pancreatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018; 9: 204. pmid:30420730
- 20. Cichoż-Lach H, Michalak-Wojnowska M, Lis-Janczarek E, Wojcierowski J, Hydzik M. Do CTRC mutations affect the development of alcoholic chronic pancreatitis and its course among Poles: Preliminary study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019; 28: 307–312. pmid:30277669
- 21. Beer S, Zhou J, Szabó A, Keiles S, Chandak GR, Witt H, et al. Comprehensive functional analysis of chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variants reveals distinct loss-of-function mechanisms associated with pancreatitis risk. Gut. 2013; 62: 1616–1624. pmid:22942235
- 22. Szmola R, Sahin-Tóth M. Pancreatitis-associated chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) mutant elicits endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic acinar cells. Gut. 2010; 59: 365–372. pmid:19951900
- 23. Szabó A, Ludwig M, Hegyi E, Szépeová R, Witt H, Sahin-Tóth M. Mesotrypsin signature mutation in a chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variant associated with chronic pancreatitis. J Biol Chem. 2015; 290: 17282–17292. pmid:26013824
- 24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2535. pmid:19622551
- 25. Lo CK, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14: 45. pmid:24690082
- 26. Chen JM, Herzig AF, Génin E, Masson E, Cooper DN, Férec C. Scale and scope of gene-alcohol interactions in chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review. Genes (Basel). 2021; 25: 471. pmid:33806082