Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparison of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease and controls

  • Jun Yong Chow ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mae-lynn@ppukm.ukm.edu.my (MLCB); derrick-chow@hotmail.com (JYC)

    Affiliations Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Ministry of Health, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

  • Poh Fong She,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliations Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Ministry of Health, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

  • Xu Kent Pee,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Umum Sarawak, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

  • Wan Norliza Wan Muda,

    Roles Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Ministry of Health, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

  • Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    mae-lynn@ppukm.ukm.edu.my (MLCB); derrick-chow@hotmail.com (JYC)

    Affiliation Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and macular thickness (MT) between patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (NDCKD) and controls, as well as between different stages of NDCKD. We also evaluated the correlation between pRNFL thickness and MT with duration of NDCKD.

Methods

This was a comparative cross-sectional study. Subjects were divided into NDCKD and control groups. Both pRNFL thickness and MT, including center subfield thickness (CST), average MT as well as average ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) were measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. One-way ANCOVA test was used to compare the differences in pRNFL and MT between NDCKD and controls, as well as between the different stages of NDCKD. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients were employed to determine the effects of NDCKD duration on pRNFL thickness and MT.

Results

A total of 132 subjects were recruited, 66 with NDCKD and 66 controls. There was a statistically significant difference in superior (110.74 ± 23.35 vs 117.36 ± 16.17 μm, p = 0.022), nasal (65.97 ± 12.90 vs 69.35 ± 10.17 μm, p = 0.006), inferior quadrant (117.44 ± 23.98 vs 126.15 ± 14.75 μm, p = 0.006), average pRNFL (90.36 ± 14.93 vs 95.42 ± 9.87 μm, p = 0.005), CST (231.89 ± 26.72 vs 243.30 ± 21.05 μm, p = 0.006), average MT (268.88 ± 20.21 vs 274.92 ± 12.79 μm, p = 0.020) and average GC-IPL (75.48 ± 12.44 vs 81.56 ± 6.48, p = 0.001) values between the NDCKD group and controls. The superior quadrant (p = 0.007), nasal quadrant (p = 0.030), inferior quadrant (p = 0.047), average pRNFL (p = 0.006), average MT (p = 0.001) and average GC-IPL (p = 0.001) differed significantly between different stages of NDCKD. There was no correlation between pRNFL thickness and MT with duration of NDCKD.

Conclusion

CST, average MT, average GC-IPL thickness, average pRNFL and all quadrants of pRNFL except the temporal quadrant were significantly thinner in NDCKD patients compared to controls. These changes were associated with the severity of CKD, but not its duration.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rapidly emerging as a global public health problem, with a global prevalence rate of 9.1% [1]. This rate marks an increase of almost 30% over the past three decades, reflecting the demographics of an ageing population worldwide [2]. The morbidity of CKD stems not only from the decreased productivity and increased costs associated with the need for regular dialysis, particularly in resource-limited settings, but also from the increase in cardiovascular disease-related mortality among these patients [3].

CKD is defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 present for more than three months, with or without evidence of kidney damage [4]. Although renal microvascular changes can only be assessed reliably via renal biopsy, the retina shares many features in common with the kidney, and the status of the retinal microcirculation is often used as a proxy for that of the renal vasculature [57]. CKD has been associated with narrowing of the retinal vessel calibers [7, 8]. A reduction in retinal vessel calibers is associated with reduced peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, as evaluated non-invasively via optical coherence tomography (OCT) [9, 10]. This may confound ophthalmological evaluation among patients with CKD [11], who may experience a spectrum of eye complaints including tear film instability, calcium deposits in the conjunctiva and cornea, cataract, retinopathy, glaucoma, and optic neuropathy [1217].

Unfortunately, data on pRNFL and macular thickness (MT) changes in non-diabetic CKD (NDCKD) remains scarce. This study thus aimed to compare the pRNFL and MT between patients with NDCKD and controls, as well as between different stages of NDCKD. We also aimed to evaluate the correlation of pRNFL and MT with the duration of NDCKD.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a comparative, cross-sectional observational study. The study period was from January 2020 to July 2021. Subjects were recruited using convenience sampling from the nephrology clinic, medical clinic, hemodialysis center, ophthalmology clinic and hospital staff. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (JEP-2020-069) and the Medical Research and Ethics Committee (MREC), Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR-19-3630-52263). The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Malaysian Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Participants

The inclusion criteria for both NDCKD and control groups was an age between 18 to 65 years and subjects with underlying hypertension. All subjects underwent calculation of their eGFR based on the 2009 CKD-epidemiology (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation [18]. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 guideline described 5 stages of eGFR categories, measured in ml/min/1.73 m2; G1 (eGFR ≥90); G2 (eGFR 60–89); G3a (eGFR 45–59); G3b (eGFR 30–44); G4 (eGFR 15–29) and G5 (eGFR < 15), also known as end-stage renal failure [19]. Those with an eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were included in the NDCKD group. The NDCKD group were further subdivided into three categories based on their latest eGFR (G3, G4 and G5). The control group was hypertensive patients without CKD.

We excluded patients with diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative disease, bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease and obstructive sleep apnea, and intracranial pathology. Other exclusion criteria included high refractive error (±5.0 diopters spherical or ±2 diopters cylinder), optic disc abnormalities, optic neuropathy, glaucoma, ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure above 21 mmHg), glaucoma suspect (vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratio above 0.6, or asymmetry above 0.2 between the eyes), media opacity leading to poor signal strength (less than seven in OCT), inability to fixate, orbital disease, previous posterior segment surgery and any retinal disease such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, macula hole, and epiretinal membrane.

Blood pressure measurement

Blood pressure was measured using an automated digital sphygmomanometer (Collin Press-mate BP-8800, Colin Corporation, Japan) with an appropriate-sized cuff after 5 minutes of rest. The average systolic and diastolic blood pressure was based on two readings. A third reading was obtained if the discrepancy in systolic blood pressure between the first two readings was greater than 10 mm Hg or if the difference in diastolic blood pressure between the readings was more than 5 mm Hg.

Ocular examination and OCT measurements

A comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including monocular distance visual acuity using a Snellen chart (Reichert; NY) at six meters, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination, measurement of intraocular pressure using a Goldmann tonometer and dilated funduscopic examination was performed on the same day of recruitment. The examination and OCT measurements were done on a non-dialysis day or prior to hemodialysis (HD) to avoid any parameter changes due to the effects of HD [20, 21]. pRNFL thickness and MT were measured using Spectral Domain Cirrus OCT Model 4000 (Carl Zeiss Meditech, InC., Dublin, USA).

With regard to pRNFL thickness measurements, 3-dimensional (3D) cube OCT data were obtained using the “Optic Disc Cube 200 x 200 Scan” pattern in a 6 x 6mm square centred on the optic nerve head. The pRNFL thickness evaluated was the overall average pRNFL thickness and pRNFL thickness in four quadrants; superior (46°–135°), nasal (136°–225°), inferior (226°–315°) and temporal (316°–45°) [22]. MT was captured by a 6x6mm square area macular cube with 512x128 scan according to the ETDRS protocol, divided into nine subfields [23]. Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the average thickness of the macula in the central 1 mm ETDRS grid [24]. Average macular thickness was calculated by Cirrus OCT device based on the mean thickness of the nine subfields [25]. An automated ganglion cell analysis algorithm was used to segment and measure ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness inside a 14.13 mm2 elliptical annulus area centered on the fovea [26]. The GC-IPL thickness, average MT and CST were taken in this study. OCT measurements were repeated three times and the most reliable result was taken. OCT images without segmentation error and a signal strength of 7 or greater were accepted. OCT image of retinal parameters were shown in Figs 1 and 2. If both eyes were eligible for the study, only the right eye was selected for statistical analysis.

thumbnail
Fig 1. OCT image of pRNFL thickness measurement for controls and NDCKD group.

(A) Control group (B) NDCKD group. Abbreviation: pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; NDCKD = non-diabetic chronic kidney disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. OCT image of macular thickness analysis with cross-sectional retinal layer according to position and size of the ETDRS grid for controls and NDCKD group.

(A) Control group (B) NDCKD group. Abbreviation: ETDRS = early treatment diabetic retinopathy study; NDCKD = non-diabetic chronic kidney disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.g002

Statistical analyses

Power and sample size program was used for the calculation of sample size [27]. The sample size of 132 subjects was based on a minimum clinically relevant difference of 5μm in RNFL thickness [28] and 10μm in macular thickness [29] at a 5% level of significance and 80% power. Based on G*power analysis program [30] and partial eta-squared of 0.3 for medium effect size (basic rules of thumb) [31], a total number of 27 subjects are required to determine the difference of pRNFL thickness and MT in each stage of NDCKD patients at 80% power. Besides, 47 subjects were required to determine the correlation between pRNFL thickness and MT with the duration of CKD according to r value of 0.4 is used in sample size calculator [32]. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software version 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Visual judgment based on a histogram and shapiro-wilk test were used to verify normal distribution of the data. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency (n) and percentage (%), while numerical data was presented as mean values with standard deviation (SD). Independent sample T-test, chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare demographic data between groups while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were performed in comparison of baseline characteristics among NDCKD stages. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test was used to compare the differences in pRNFL and MT between NDCKD and controls, as well as between the different stages of NDCKD, with adjustment for confounders such as age, gender, blood pressure, number of antihypertensive medications, refractive error, systemic comorbidities and duration of disease. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient was used to determine the effect of duration of NDCKD and eGFR on pRNFL thickness and MT. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 144 subjects were recruited but 12 subjects were excluded due to low quality image. There were 66 NDCKD patients and 66 controls. The NDCKD group had significantly more males (p = 0.015) and a significantly younger mean age (p = 0.001) than the control group. The mean number of antihypertensive medications used (p = 0.022) and others systemic diseases (p = 0.000) were significantly different between the two groups. The data was summarized in Table 1. The baseline characteristic of each stage of NDCKD was shown in Table 2. Age and duration of chronic kidney disease were found to have statistically significant different among the NDCKD stages.

The causes of NDCKD are summarized in Table 3. The most common etiology of NDCKD was hypertension followed by systemic lupus erythematosus, obstructive uropathy and glomerulonephritis. Other causes included gout, lgA nephropathy, polycystic kidney disease, drug-induced nephropathy, and renal carcinoma.

The average pRNFL and all RNFL quadrants except the temporal quadrant were significantly thinner in the NDCKD group than controls (Table 4). Likewise, CST, average MT and GCL-IPL thickness were significantly thinner in the NDCKD group than the control group. The value of pRNFL thickness appear to have higher variability for all the quadrants in the NDCKD group in comparison to the control group as there have broader range of eGFR value, different stages and wider range of age groups among NDCKD subjects.

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparison of mean pRNFL, CST, MT and GC-IPL thickness measurement between NDCKD and control groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.t004

Within the NDCKD group, each group (stage 3, stage 4 and stage 5) had 22 patients. Average pRNFL thickness, average MT, average GC-IPL thickness and all pRNFL quadrants except temporal differed significantly among CKD stages (Table 5). Bonferroni correction revealed significant differences in superior quadrant pRNFL thickness, nasal quadrant pRNFL thickness, average pRNFL thickness, average MT and average GC-IPL thickness between CKD stage 3 and 5 while similar results between CKD stage 4 and 5 except nasal quadrant of pRNFL is not significantly different (Table 6).

thumbnail
Table 5. Comparison of mean of pRNFL, CST, MT and GC-IPL thickness among stage 3, stage 4 and stage 5 NDCKD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Post hoc Bonferroni test for differences in pRNFL, CST, MT and GC-IPL thickness between NDCKD stages.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.t006

We observed no statistically significant correlation between pRNFL thickness, CST, MT and GC-IPL with the duration of NDCKD (Fig 3). In a subanalysis, we found that superior, inferior, average pRNFL, CST, average MT and GC-IPL have significant positive correlation with eGFR (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 3. The relationship between pRNFL, CST, MT and GC-IPL thickness with the duration of CKD.

The p-value was calculated by using spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. * p < 0.05 is statistically significant. Abbreviation: pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; MT = macular thickness; CST = central subfield thickness; NDCKD = non-diabetic chronic kidney disease; GC-IPL = ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer; r = spearman correlation coefficient.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. The relationship between pRNFL, CST, MT and GC-IPL thickness with the eGFR.

The p-value was calculated by using spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. * p < 0.05 is statistically significant. Abbreviation: pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; MT = macular thickness; CST = central subfield thickness; GC-IPL = ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer; r = spearman correlation coefficient.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266607.g004

Discussion

CKD has been linked with specific optic neuropathies such as uremic optic neuropathy, ischemic optic neuropathy and glaucoma, as well as macular thinning [3335]. pRNFL and macular thickness parameters may act as early biomarkers for risk stratification in CKD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the differences in pRNFL thickness and MT between patients with different stages of NDCKD as well as the correlation between pRNFL thickness and MT with the duration of NDCKD.

We observed that the pRNFL thickness was significantly thinner in the NDCKD group than the control group in all quadrants except the temporal quadrant. This is in keeping with the literature. Demir et al. noted a statistically significant thinning in all quadrants and average RNFL thickness among non-diabetic patients with ESRF on regular HD [11] while Atilgan et al. reported a statistically significant thinning in the inferior, temporal, and average RNFL values among a similar group [36]. The superior, nasal, and inferior quadrants and average RNFL thickness were greater in the non-diabetic non-CKD group than the chronic renal failure group as stated by Gadelha et al [37]. These studies were all conducted among patients with end stage renal failure. Our study adds to the literature by demonstrating that even prior to the onset of dependence on dialysis, the pRNFL is thinner in patients with CKD than controls. Postulated reasons for a thinner pRNFL in these patients include subclinical uremic optic neuropathy and chronic vascular insufficiency related to CKD-induced complications such as anemia, hypertension, or atherosclerosis [12, 38].

In general, we observed that the NDCKD group had a thinner CST, average MT and average GC-IPL thickness than controls. A 10% reduction in retinal thickness and macular volume has been found in all stages of NDCKD [39]. In contrast, Pahor et al. observed fovea-sparing reduction in retinal thickness among ESRF patients [40]. Thinning of the macula region including CST among those with NDCKD may be due to subclinical ischemic retinopathy [36]. Microvascular injury and choroidal thinning in CKD patients may compromise the blood supply to the retinal neural tissue resulting in retinal atrophy [39, 41, 42]. This is supported by observations of decreased retinal vessel density, parafoveal retinal thickness and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness among patients with CKD [4345].

We found significant differences in average pRNFL thickness, average MT, average GC-IPL thickness and all pRNFL quadrants except temporal between different stages of CKD. As expected, those with end stage renal failure had the thinnest PRNFL and macular thickness. In our subanalysis, pRNFL thickenss of superior quadrant, inferior quadrant, average pRNFL, CST, average macular thickness and GC-IPL showed significant positive correlation with eGFR. Renal dysfunction has also been correlated with decreased choroidal thickness [39] and pRNFL thickness [4648]. This may partly be attributed to the sympathetic nervous system overactivation which is characteristic of CKD [49]. As the outer retinal layers are supplied by choriocapillaries, changes in choriocapillary function may indirectly affect the retinal thickness. While Paterson et al. showed that retinal microvascular changes in advanced CKD (stages 4 & 5) causing inner retinal thinning [50]. We found that there were no statistically significant correlations between pRNFL thickness and MT and the duration of NDCKD. This is in keeping with the results of Pahor et al. [40]. Atilgan et al. reported that pRNFL thickness and MT were not significantly related to the duration of HD treatment except in the superior pRNFL quadrant [36]. Therefore, the thinner retinal parameter in OCT might indicate more advanced stage of NDCKD rather than the disease duration.

The strengths of our study are its objective and reliable assessment of pRNFL thickness with validated instruments and its use of statistical tests that adjust for the effect of confounders such as age, gender [51], blood pressure and number of antihypertensive medications [52], refractive error and systemic comorbidities [53]. However, the pRNFL is affected by multiple factors, so although we excluded major causes of retinopathy such as diabetes [54, 55], adjustment for all potential factors affecting the pRNFL may be impossible. Additionally, hemodialysis has been associated with pRNFL and macular thinning [36, 56], possibly due to its effect on retrobulbar recirculation [57]. However, the literature on this is controversial, with other studies reporting no effect on pRNFL [58, 59] and central retinal thickness [60]. As all patients with end stage renal disease were on hemodialysis, the effect of the latter may have an additive effect on pRNFL and MT thinning. The different demographic data between NDCKD and control groups are still one of the limitations of this study although they were adjusted for statistical analysis. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of our study limits inferences of a temporal nature. Longitudinal studies may provide greater information about the RNFL changes which occur in CKD.

OCT monitoring of pRNFL and macular thickness may provide non-invasive risk stratification of patients with CKD prior to visual compromise, thus allowing disease optimization prior to onset of irreversible blinding complications. In addition, the thinner pRNFL observed in NDCKD patients may complicate the interpretation of structural changes in CKD patients undergoing glaucoma evaluation.

Conclusion

CST, average MT, average GC-IPL thickness, average pRNFL thickness, and all pRNFL quadrants except the temporal were significantly thinner in NDCKD patients than controls. These parameter changes were associated with the severity but not the duration of CKD.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for his permission to publish this article. We would also like to acknowledge Associate Professor Dr. Norshamsiah Md Din and Ms. Lim Bee Chiu (statistician) for their input on some of the statistics as well as Dr Evelyn Li Min Tai for the manuscript editting.

References

  1. 1. Collaboration GBDCKD. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020; 395(10225):709–33. pmid:32061315
  2. 2. Carney EF. The impact of chronic kidney disease on global health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020; 16(5):251. pmid:32144399
  3. 3. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet. 2017; 389(10075):1238–52. pmid:27887750
  4. 4. Hua CC. Clinical practice guidelines on management of chronic kidney disease. Second ed. Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS); 2018.
  5. 5. Wong CW, Wong TY, Cheng CY, Sabanayagam C. Kidney and eye diseases: common risk factors, etiological mechanisms, and pathways. Kidney Int. 2014; 85(6):1290–302. pmid:24336029
  6. 6. Baumann M, Burkhardt K, Heemann U. Microcirculatory marker for the prediction of renal end points: a prospective cohort study in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 2 to 4. Hypertension. 2014; 64(2):338–46. pmid:24866146
  7. 7. Wong TY, Coresh J, Klein R, Muntner P, Couper DJ, Sharrett AR, et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and renal dysfunction: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15(9):2469–76. pmid:15339997
  8. 8. Sabanayagam C, Shankar A, Koh D, Chia KS, Saw SM, Lim SC, et al. Retinal microvascular caliber and chronic kidney disease in an Asian population. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 169(5):625–32. pmid:19092170
  9. 9. Arnould L, Guillemin M, Seydou A, Gabrielle PH, Bourredjem A, Kawasaki R, et al. Association between the retinal vascular network and retinal nerve fiber layer in the elderly: The Montrachet study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241055. pmid:33085730
  10. 10. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146(4):496–500. pmid:18639219
  11. 11. Demir MN, Eksioglu U, Altay M, Tok O, Yilmaz FG, Acar MA, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in chronic renal failure without diabetes mellitus. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19(6):1034–8. pmid:19882571
  12. 12. Haider S, Astbury NJ, Hamilton DV. Optic neuropathy in uraemic patients on dialysis. Eye (Lond). 1993; 7 (Pt 1):148–51. pmid:8325406
  13. 13. Korzets Z, Zeltzer E, Rathaus M, Manor R, Bernheim J. Uremic optic neuropathy. A uremic manifestation mandating dialysis. Am J Nephrol. 1998; 18(3):240–2. pmid:9627042
  14. 14. Niutta A, Spicci D, Barcaroli I. Fluoroangiographic findings in hemodialyzed patients. Ann Ophthalmol. 1993; 25(10):375–80. pmid:8304689
  15. 15. Porter R, Crombie AL. Corneal and conjunctival calcification in chronic renal failure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973; 57(5):339–43. pmid:4576906
  16. 16. Saini JS, Jain IS, Dhar S, Mohan K. Uremic optic neuropathy. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1989; 9(2):131–3; discussion 4–5. pmid:2526159
  17. 17. Tomazzoli L, De Natale R, Lupo A, Parolini B. Visual acuity disturbances in chronic renal failure. Ophthalmologica. 2000; 214(6):403–5. pmid:11054000
  18. 18. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150(9):604–12. pmid:19414839
  19. 19. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, Coresh J, De Francisco AL, De Jong PE, et al. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements. 2013; 3(1):1–150.
  20. 20. Costagliola C, Mastropasqua L. The influence of hemodialysis on intraocular pressure: III. Aqueous humor dynamics and tissue hydration. Ann Ophthalmol. 1991; 23(1):31–4. pmid:2012372
  21. 21. Olsen T, Schmitz O, Hansen HE. Influence of hemodialysis on corneal thickness and intraocular pressure. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1982; 181(1):25–6. pmid:7120867
  22. 22. Leite MT, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, et al. Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 151(1):85–92 e1. pmid:20970108
  23. 23. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research G. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(5 Suppl):786–806. pmid:2062513
  24. 24. Sull AC, Vuong LN, Price LL, Srinivasan VJ, Gorczynska I, Fujimoto JG, et al. Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness. Retina. 2010; 30(2):235–45. pmid:19952997
  25. 25. Pokharel A, Shrestha GS, Shrestha JB. Macular thickness and macular volume measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal Nepalese eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:511–9. pmid:27041990
  26. 26. Koh VT, Tham YC, Cheung CY, Wong WL, Baskaran M, Saw SM, et al. Determinants of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(9):5853–9. pmid:22836772
  27. 27. Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990; 11(2):116–28. pmid:2161310
  28. 28. Ho H, Tham YC, Chee ML, Shi Y, Tan NYQ, Wong KH, et al. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in a Multiethnic Normal Asian Population: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. Ophthalmology. 2019; 126(5):702–11. pmid:30529130
  29. 29. Wong KH, Tham YC, Nguyen DQ, Dai W, Tan NYQ, Mathijia S, et al. Racial differences and determinants of macular thickness profiles in multiethnic Asian population: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103(7):894–9. pmid:30097432
  30. 30. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175–91. pmid:17695343
  31. 31. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. second ed. New York: Routledge; 1988.
  32. 32. Hulley S, Cummings S, Browner W, Grady D, Newman T. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  33. 33. Winkelmayer WC, Eigner M, Berger O, Grisold W, Leithner C. Optic neuropathy in uremia: an interdisciplinary emergency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37(3):E23. pmid:11228200
  34. 34. Shim SH, Sung KC, Kim JM, Lee MY, Won YS, Kim JH, et al. Association between Renal Function and Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2011. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(9):1981–8. pmid:27432204
  35. 35. Vadala M, Castellucci M, Guarrasi G, Terrasi M, La Blasca T, Mule G. Retinal and choroidal vasculature changes associated with chronic kidney disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 257(8):1687–98. pmid:31147842
  36. 36. Atilgan CU, Guven D, Akarsu OP, Sakaci T, Sendul SY, Baydar Y, et al. Effects of hemodialysis on macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in non-diabetic patients with end stage renal failure. Saudi Med J. 2016; 37(6):641–7. pmid:27279510
  37. 37. Gadelha DNB, Gadelha NC, Vieira O, Campos SDB, Brandt C. Retinal Never Fiber Layer Thickness In Chronic Renal Failure: Analysis By Optical Coherence Tomography. Int Arch Med. 2018; 11.
  38. 38. Sahin OZ, Sahin SB, Ayaz T, Karadag Z, Turkyilmaz K, Aktas E, et al. The impact of hypertension on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and its association with carotid intima media thickness. Blood Press. 2015; 24(3):178–84. pmid:25658169
  39. 39. Balmforth C, van Bragt JJ, Ruijs T, Cameron JR, Kimmitt R, Moorhouse R, et al. Chorioretinal thinning in chronic kidney disease links to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. JCI Insight. 2016; 1(20):e89173. pmid:27942587
  40. 40. Pahor D, Gracner B, Gracner T, Hojs R. Optical coherence tomography findings in hemodialysis patients. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008; 225(8):713–7. pmid:18712656
  41. 41. Chang IB, Lee JH, Kim JS. Changes in Choroidal Thickness in and Outside the Macula after Hemodialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. Retina. 2017; 37(5):896–905. pmid:27557086
  42. 42. Yang SJ, Han YH, Song GI, Lee CH, Sohn SW. Changes of choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure and other optical coherence tomographic parameters after haemodialysis. Clin Exp Optom. 2013; 96(5):494–9. pmid:23638771
  43. 43. Zhuang X, Cao D, Zeng Y, Yang D, Yao J, Kuang J, et al. Associations between retinal microvasculature/microstructure and renal function in type 2 diabetes patients with early chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 168:108373. pmid:32827591
  44. 44. Wu IW, Sun CC, Lee CC, Liu CF, Wong TY, Chen SY, et al. Retinal neurovascular changes in chronic kidney disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020; 98(7):e848–e55. pmid:32190993
  45. 45. Zeng X, Hu Y, Chen Y, Lin Z, Liang Y, Liu B, et al. Retinal neurovascular impairment in non-diabetic and non-dialytic chronic kidney disease patients. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:703898. pmid:34867144
  46. 46. Srivastav K, Saxena S, Mahdi AA, Kruzliak P, Khanna VK. Increased serum urea and creatinine levels correlate with decreased retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in diabetic retinopathy. Biomarkers. 2015; 20(6–7):470–3. pmid:26474118
  47. 47. Liu S, Wang W, Tan Y, He M, Wang L, Li Y, et al. Correlation between Renal Function and Peripapillary Choroidal Thickness in Treatment-Naive Diabetic Eyes Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. Curr Eye Res. 2020; 45(12):1526–33. pmid:32255371
  48. 48. Rauscher FG, Wang M, Francke M, Wirkner K, Tonjes A, Engel C, et al. Renal function and lipid metabolism are major predictors of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness-the LIFE-Adult Study. BMC Med. 2021; 19(1):202. pmid:34488766
  49. 49. Grassi G, Biffi A, Seravalle G, Bertoli S, Airoldi F, Corrao G, et al. Sympathetic nerve traffic overactivity in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2021; 39(3):408–16. pmid:33031182
  50. 50. Paterson EN, Ravindran ML, Griffiths K, Le Velly CA, Cardwell CC, McCarter RV, et al. Association of reduced inner retinal thicknesses with chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2020; 21(1):37. pmid:32005180
  51. 51. Chua J, Tham YC, Tan B, Devarajan K, Schwarzhans F, Gan A, et al. Age-related changes of individual macular retinal layers among Asians. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):20352. pmid:31889143
  52. 52. Chong RS, Chee ML, Tham YC, Majithia S, Thakur S, Teo ZL, et al. Association of Antihypertensive Medication with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness. Ophthalmology. 2021; 128(3):393–400. pmid:32739337
  53. 53. Patel PJ, Foster PJ, Grossi CM, Keane PA, Ko F, Lotery A, et al. Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in 67 321 Adults: Associations with Macular Thickness in the UK Biobank Study. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(4):829–40. pmid:26746598
  54. 54. Lonneville YH, Ozdek SC, Onol M, Yetkin I, Gurelik G, Hasanreisoglu B. The effect of blood glucose regulation on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diabetic patients. Ophthalmologica. 2003; 217(5):347–50. pmid:12913325
  55. 55. Lattanzio R, Brancato R, Pierro L, Bandello F, Iaccher B, Fiore T, et al. Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in diabetic patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002; 12(6):482–7. pmid:12510717
  56. 56. Jung JW, Yoon MH, Lee SW, Chin HS. Effect of hemodialysis (HD) on intraocular pressure, ocular surface, and macular change in patients with chronic renal failure. Effect of hemodialysis on the ophthalmologic findings. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013; 251(1):153–62. pmid:22552572
  57. 57. Tosun O, Davutluoglu B, Arda K, Boran M, Yarangumeli A, Kurt A, et al. Determination of the effect of a single hemodialysis session on retrobulbar blood hemodynamics by color Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48(7):763–7. pmid:17729008
  58. 58. Dinc UA, Ozdek S, Aktas Z, Guz G, Onol M. Changes in intraocular pressure, and corneal and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during hemodialysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2010; 30(4):337–40. pmid:20069444
  59. 59. Ulas F, Dogan U, Keles A, Ertilav M, Tekce H, Celebi S. Evaluation of choroidal and retinal thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in non-diabetic haemodialysis patients. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 33(5):533–9. pmid:23456509
  60. 60. Chelala E, Dirani A, Fadlallah A, Slim E, Abdelmassih Y, Fakhoury H, et al. Effect of hemodialysis on visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and macular thickness in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:109–14. pmid:25657575