Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Lab Protocol

Collecting and preserving bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae & Platypodinae)

  • Jiri Hulcr ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    hulcr@ufl.edu

    Affiliation School of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Demian F. Gomez,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Texas A&M Forest Service, Austin, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Andrew J. Johnson

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

This protocol describes the different methods to collect and preserve bark and ambrosia beetles, detailing collecting tools, recording relevant data, and optimizing step-by-step methods to extract beetles from twigs, branches, bark, and trunks. It elaborates on trapping techniques, tools, lures, baits, and beetle preservation. The main rule of manual collecting is to not attempt to pry the insect out of the wood or bark, but instead, remove the wood/bark away from the beetle: gently and systematically. The main rule of trapping is that there is no general attractant; instead, attractants and traps should reflect the ecology of the targeted beetle taxa.

Citation: Hulcr J, Gomez DF, Johnson AJ (2022) Collecting and preserving bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae & Platypodinae). PLoS ONE 17(4): e0265910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265910

Editor: Łukasz Kajtoch, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of Sciences, POLAND

Received: January 10, 2022; Accepted: March 9, 2022; Published: April 15, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Hulcr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The protocol does not contain data.

Funding: JH was supported by the following organizations: the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture. DG was supported by the Texas A&M Forest Service. The funders had and will have no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Insect sampling and insect collections are some of the most important components of entomological research and teaching. However, certain taxa, particularly small wood borers, are challenging to sample. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) are some of the smallest and most common insects in natural, urban, and commercial forests. While the vast majority breed in dead or dying tissues and are harmless, some species have caused devastating damage across within both native and introduced range. Just in the last decades, more than 300 million redbay trees have been killed by laurel wilt [1], millions of ha of pine trees have been killed by the mountain pine beetle [2], and the Euwallacea fornicatus species complex has caused significant impacts to orchards and natural forests around the world [3–5].

Bark beetle sampling is an essential part of integrated management programs, including beetle surveillance and monitoring by government agencies. For example, the Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) by the USDA APHIS, which conducts national and state surveys, together with the Forest Service’s Early Detection and Rapid Response program (EDRR), are responsible for post-introduction detection of pests [6]. However, these efforts focus on traps and a few selected lures, leaving the majority of the bark and ambrosia beetle diversity unsampled.

Contemporary biobanks are increasingly focused on collecting and storing the specimen with its context [7]. In the case of wood borers, this may include a sample of the hosts tree, the associated fungi, or the microbiome. In bark and ambrosia beetles, a special emphasis should be placed on sampling the fungal symbionts, given the major economic and ecological significance of some of them [1, 8–11]. The symbiotic fungi that these beetles carry have become the focus of a renewed research interest in the recent decade [12].

Bark and ambrosia beetle species are distinguished by small and subtle morphological differences [13–15]. Therefore, to reliably identify species, quality samples must retain all morphological structures. This requires dexterity and a specialized sequence of steps in retrieving the specimens from wood.

Also of increasing importance has been the collecting of high quality samples for DNA studies. Advancements in molecular biology techniques have benefited numerous research fields related to forest health, including phylogenetics and systematics, invasion ecology, and forest pest diagnostics [16, 17]. Molecular identification is now the standard when studying the symbiotic relationships between the beetles and vectored fungi [12]. Despite some limitations of the DNA barcoding approach, some molecular markers have shown to be effective for identification and delimitation of scolytines, particularly when coupled with morphological evidence in a phylogenetic/systematic framework [14, 18].

Despite extensive treatment of wood boring insects in literature on collecting and preserving insects, little is mentioned regarding manual extraction from wood samples [19]. Successful collection of bark and ambrosia beetle needs to be guided by the targeted beetle species, with different tools and trapping systems needed depending on feeding ecology (i.e., phloeophagous vs. xylomycetophagous species), beetle size, and chemical ecology. Box cutters, hand saws, chisels, and pruning clippers, are used for different parts of the tree, depending on where the target beetle occurs: twigs, branches, trunk, or bark. The main principle we recommend for extracting high-quality specimen of bark and ambrosia beetles is to not try to remove the beetle from the wood or bark; instead, to remove the wood/bark away from the beetle: carefully and systematically. In terms of lure choice, we suggest that, despite of the many attempts to use a “generic” lure for all bark and ambrosia beetles (such as ethanol), no such lure has been devised yet. Instead, each lure attracts species whose ecology it reflects [20–22].

Here we present a protocol to collect bark and ambrosia beetles, with step-by-step guidelines to obtain high quality samples. It describes the different methods to collect and preserve bark ambrosia beetles, detailing collecting tools, relevant data, and optimized methods to extract beetles from twigs, branches, bark, and trunks. Moreover, it elaborates on trapping techniques, tools, lures, baits, and beetle preservation.

This protocol is part of a repository hosted on Protocols.io, as part of the public workspace ‘Bark Beetle Mycobiome (BBM) research coordination network’ (https://www.protocols.io/workspaces/protocols-bark-beetle-mycobiome). Bark Beetle Mycobiome is a global research community reinvigorating the science of bark beetle-fungus symbiosis [12].

Materials and methods

The protocol described in this peer-reviewed article is published on protocols.io, dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bpjdmki6 and is included for printing S1 File with this article. This publication provides context for the Protocol. For the actual beetle sampling, the Protocol should be followed.

Expected results

Although studies with bark and ambrosia beetles have been increasing in the last decades, few resources provide detailed methods to collect high quality samples. Our method based, based on taking the wood away from the beetle and not the beetle out of wood, will provide collectors with the methodology needed to collect wood borers.

The collecting methods proposed here have shown to be highly effective for several studies across the world, including pre-invasion assessments of potential invasive threats [23, 24], biodiversity studies [25, 26], and citizen science projects.

Supporting information

S1 File. The protocol described in this peer-reviewed article is published on protocols.io, dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bpjdmki6.

The protocol is also available as a Supplementary Information for this publication.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265910.s001

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Hughes MA, Riggins JJ, Koch FH, Cognato AI, Anderson C, Formby JP, et al. No rest for the laurels: symbiotic invaders cause unprecedented damage to southern USA forests. Biological Invasions. 2017;19(7):2143–57.
  2. 2. Ramsfield TD, Bentz BJ, Faccoli M, Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. Forest health in a changing world: Effects of globalization and climate change on forest insect and pathogen impacts. Forestry [Internet]. 2016;89(3):245–52. Available from: http://forestry.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/forestry/cpw018
  3. 3. Oliveira LSS, Beer ZW de, Barnes I. Euwallacea perbrevis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), a confirmed pest on Acacia crassicarpa in Riau, Indonesia, and a new fungal symbiont; Fusarium rekanum sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;
  4. 4. Eskalen A, Stouthamer R, Lynch SC, Rugman-Jones PF, Twizeyimana M, Gonzalez A, et al. Host Range of Fusarium Dieback and Its Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) Vector in Southern California. Plant Dis. 2013;97(7):938–51. pmid:30722538
  5. 5. Paap T, de Beer ZW, Migliorini D, Nel WJ, Wingfield MJ. The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: a new invasion in South Africa. Australasian Plant Pathology. 2018;47(2):231–7.
  6. 6. Rabaglia R, Duerr D, Acciavatti R, Ragenovich I. Early Detection and Rapid Response for Non-Native Bark and Ambrosia Beetles. US Departament of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Health Protection [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2014 Sep 2];(May):1–12. Available from: http://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090116003524/http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/EDRRProjectReport.pdf
    • 7. Schindel DE, Cook JA. The next generation of natural history collections. PLoS Biology. 2018;16(7):1–8. pmid:30011273
    • 8. Biedermann PHW, Vega FE. Ecology and Evolution of Insect–Fungus Mutualisms. Annual Review of Entomology. 2020;65:22.1–22.25. pmid:31610133
    • 9. Mayers CG, Harrington TC, Mcnew DL, Roeper RA, Biedermann PHW, Masuya H, et al. Four mycangium types and four genera of ambrosia fungi suggest a complex history of fungus farming in the ambrosia beetle tribe Xyloterini. Mycologia [Internet]. 2020;00(00):1–34. Available from: pmid:32552515
    • 10. Kostovcik M, Bateman CC, Kolarik M, Stelinski LL, Jordal BH, Hulcr J. The ambrosia symbiosis is specific in some species and promiscuous in others: evidence from community pyrosequencing. The ISME Journal [Internet]. 2015;9(1):126–38. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25083930%5Cnhttp://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ismej.2014.115 pmid:25083930
    • 11. Kolařík M, Freeland E, Utley C, Tisserat N. Geosmithia morbida sp. nov., a new phytopathogenic species living in symbiosis with the walnut twig beetle (Pityophthorus juglandis) on Juglans in USA. Mycologia. 2011 Mar;103(2):325–32. pmid:20943528
    • 12. Hulcr J, Barnes I, de Beer ZW, Duong TA, Gazis R, Johnson AJ, et al. Bark beetle mycobiome: collaboratively defined research priorities on a widespread insect-fungus symbiosis. Vol. 81, Symbiosis. Symbiosis; 2020. p. 101–13.
      • 13. Hoebeke ER, Rabaglia RJ, Knížek M, Weaver JS. First records of Cyclorhipidion fukiense (Eggers) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini), an ambrosia beetle native to Asia, in North America. Vol. 4394, Zootaxa. 2018. p. 243–50.
        • 14. Gomez DF, Skelton J, Steininger MS, Stouthamer R, Rugman-jones P, Sittichaya W, et al. Species Delineation Within the Euwallacea fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Complex Revealed by Morphometric and Phylogenetic Analyses. Insect Systematics and Diversity. 2018;2(6):1–11.
        • 15. Smith SM, Gomez DF, Beaver RA, Hulcr J, Cognato AI. Reassessment of the Species in the Euwallacea Fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Complex after the Rediscovery of the “Lost” Type Specimen. Insects. 2019;10(261):1–11.
        • 16. Wingfield MJ, Brockerhoff EG, Wingfield BD, Slippers B. Planted forest health: The need for a global strategy. Vol. 349, Science. 2015. p. 832–6. pmid:26293956
        • 17. Havill NP, Cognato AI, del-Val E, Rabaglia RJ, Garrick RC. New Molecular Tools for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Reveal an East–West Genetic Subdivision of Early Pleistocene Origin. Insect Systematics and Diversity [Internet]. 2019;3(2). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/isd/article/doi/10.1093/isd/ixz002/5475941
        • 18. Cognato AI, Sari G, Smith SM, Beaver RA, Li Y, Hulcr J, et al. The Essential Role of Taxonomic Expertise in the Creation of DNA Databases for the Identification and Delimitation of Southeast Asian Ambrosia Beetle Species (Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini). Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2020;8(27):1–17.
        • 19. Schauff ME. Collecting And Preserving Insects And Mites Techniques And Tools. Vol. 1443. 2001. 68.
        • 20. Rabaglia RJ, Cognato AI, Hoebeke ER, Johnson CW, Labonte JR, Carter ME, et al. Early Detection and Rapid Response: A 10-Year Summary of the USDA Forest Service Program of Surveillance for Non-Native Bark and Ambrosia Beetles. American Entomologist. 2019;65(1):29–42.
        • 21. Hartshorn JA, Coyle DR, Rabaglia RJ. Responses of Native and Non-native Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Different Chemical Attractants: Insights From the USDA Forest Service Early Detection and Rapid Response Program Data Analysis. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2021;(XX):1–8. pmid:33459780
        • 22. Hanks LM, Millar JG. Field bioassays of cerambycid pheromones reveal widespread parsimony of pheromone structures, enhancement by host plant volatiles, and antagonism by components from heterospecifics. Chemoecology [Internet]. 2013;23(1):21–44. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00049-012-0116-8
        • 23. Li Y, Bateman C, Skelton J, Wang B, Black A, Huang Y. Pre-invasion assessment of exotic bark beetle-vectored fungi to detect tree- killing pathogens. 2021;1–63.
        • 24. Gomez DF, Johnson AJ, de Grammont PC, Alfonso-Simonetti J, Montaigne J, Elizondo AI, et al. New Records of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) from Cuba with Description of a New Species. Florida Entomologist. 2019;102(4):717.
        • 25. Hulcr J, Mogia M, Isua B, Novotny V. Host specificity of ambrosia and bark beetles (Col., Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a New Guinea rainforest. Ecological Entomology [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2014 Sep 2];32(6):762–72. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00939.x/full
        • 26. Hulcr J, Cognato AI. Three new genera of oriental Xyleborina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Zootaxa [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Feb 27];36(2204):19–36. Available from: www.scolytid.msu.edu/PNG_xyleborina/index.html.