https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-2248
Figures
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effects of oral vitamin A supplementation on clinical outcomes in preterm infants.
Design
We conducted the meta-analysis by searching PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to 12 August 2021, including reference lists of retrieved articles. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of oral vitamin A on premature babies were included. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the GRADE approach to grade evidence quality and assess how oral vitamin A supplementation affects clinical outcomes.
Main outcomes measures
The primary outcomes were respiratory outcomes, including the length of respiratory support, the need for oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), and moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks PMA. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization time, vitamin A status, mortality, other related outcomes, and potential adverse drug-related events.
Results
We included four RCTs, with 800 patients total. In all trials, oral vitamin A treatment was compared to a placebo. Oral vitamin A supplementation did not significantly affect mechanical ventilation duration (MD, −1.07 days; 95% CI, −2.98 to 0.83 days), oxygen requirement at 36 weeks PMA (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.31), or moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.07 to 4.17). However, oral vitamin A supplementation yielded a slightly shorter noninvasive ventilation duration (MD, −0.96 days; 95% CI, −1.59 to −0.33 days).
Conclusions
Administering oral vitamin A to preterm newborns did not alter the mechanical ventilation duration, oxygen needed at 36 weeks PMA, moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA, death, or short-term benefits. However, oral vitamin A supplementation may slightly affect the duration of noninvasive respiratory support without adverse drug-related events.
Citation: Phattraprayoon N, Ungtrakul T, Soonklang K, Susantitaphong P (2022) Oral vitamin A supplementation in preterm infants to improve health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0265876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265876
Editor: Barbara Wilson Engelhardt, Monroe Carell Junior Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, UNITED STATES
Received: September 17, 2021; Accepted: March 9, 2022; Published: April 4, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Phattraprayoon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: NP received Grant from Chulabhorn Royal Academy. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
In humans, vitamin A is a vital nutrient that regulates and promotes appropriate immunological function, cellular differentiation and proliferation, respiratory epithelial cell integrity, and formation of photosensitive visual pigments in the retina [1–3]. The mechanism by which vitamin A is transported across the placenta in the third trimester is incomplete in preterm fetuses [3]; thus, preterm birth increases the risk of vitamin A insufficiency [4]. Deprivation of transplacental vitamin A due to delivering at an early gestational age, restricted hepatic storage, inadequate supply, and inadequate postnatal vitamin A intake may contribute to this insufficiency, particularly in infants with extremely low birth weights (ELBWs) and very low birth weights (VLBWs) [4].
A trial that administered 5000 IU of vitamin A intramuscularly (IM) three times weekly for 4 weeks found that this dosage reduced vitamin A deficiency and the risk of chronic lung disease (CLD) in ELBW infants [5]. Darlow et al. [3] pooled all relevant studies [5–15] on IM or oral vitamin A supplementation for a meta-analysis and revealed a slight reduction in the risk of death or oxygen requirements at 1 month of age and the risk of CLD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). These authors also found a marginal reduction in the combined results for mortality and CLD. However, administering IM injections to these newborn infants was highly invasive and painful.
Currently, little evidence exists to indicate whether oral vitamin A supplementation may benefit premature infants who are at risk of vitamin A insufficiency [3]. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to determine whether oral vitamin A supplementation benefits preterm newborns.
Methods
Data sources and searches
We conducted a comprehensive and systematic search of the PubMed/Medline (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 12 August 2021 to identify eligible articles using the terms “oral or enteral” and “vitamin A” or “vit A” and “supplementation” and “preterm” or “premature” or “neonate” or “infant” or “very low birth weight” or “extremely low birth weight”. Additional research was identified by exploring the reference lists of the resulting publications. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [16]. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273090).
Eligibility criteria
Only RCTs and human studies assessing the effectiveness of oral vitamin A supplementation in preterm newborns on clinical outcomes were included in the review, without language restrictions.
Study selection
Two researchers (N.P. and T.U.) independently screened data from the literature according to the inclusion criteria, study design, methodology, and outcome parameters. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third researcher (P.S.).
Data extraction and quality assessment
The following data and results were extracted from the included RCTs: the first author, year of publication, study design, country of origin, participant characteristics, intervention type (including dose, administration route, timing, and duration of intervention), and outcomes such as oxygen demand at 28 days of age and 36 weeks PMA. The study investigators were contacted via email for any missing data, unreported data, or additional details. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment for randomized trials [17], which determines whether a study has a low, high, or uncertain risk of bias.
Data synthesis and statistical analysis
We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for categorical variables and weighted mean differences (MDs) for continuous variables to determine the efficacy of oral vitamin A supplementation and associated outcomes. The 95% confidence interval (CI) is presented for each pooled estimate. To determine sources of heterogeneity, we performed a subgroup analysis based on intervention. The statistical heterogeneity of I2 at 25%, 50%, and 75%, as determined by the Q-statistic and I2 tests, indicated low, moderate, and high heterogeneity among studies, respectively. A funnel plot was used to investigate publication bias if at least ten papers qualified for each outcome. Statistical significance was determined at P<0.05. Review Manager 5 software (RevMan 5, 2014; http://community.cochrane.org/tools/review-production-tools/revman-5) was used to conduct all meta-analyses.
The GRADE technique [18] was used to assess the degrees of certainty of evidence for each outcome, which were classified as high, moderate, low, or very low. The GRADE technique uses five downgrading criteria: risk of bias [19], imprecision [20], inconsistency [21], indirectness [22], and publication bias [23]. The GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool was used to create tables summarizing the findings (http://gradepro.org).
Results
Search results
We identified 1272 citations via database searching and one additional record through other sources (Fig 1). After screening the titles and abstracts, we screened 47 full texts. Four studies met our inclusion criteria [15,24–26] and were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. One additional article [27] was retrieved from the reference lists, but was not of the included studies.
Study characteristics
We included four RCTs [15, 24–26], with 800 patients total, of whom, 401 received oral vitamin A supplementation, and 399 received a placebo. In each RCT, an oral vitamin A supplement was compared to a placebo. Three RCTs used higher doses of vitamin A: 5000 IU/kg/day [15], 5,000 IU/day [26], and 10,000 IU every other day [24]; one RCT used a lower dose of oral vitamin A at 1500 IU/day [25]. Table 1 summarizes the study characteristics; Supplement 1 in S1 File summarizes the maternal and infant characteristics. One investigation was conducted in India, one in China, one in the United Kingdom, and one in Australia. The included studies were published between 2001 and 2021.
Risk-of-bias assessment
Supplement 2 in S1 File summarizes the results of the risk-of-bias assessment of the included RCTs. An allocation sequence was generated in all four RCTs [15, 24–26], and three used concealed allocation [15, 24, 26]. Four studies were double-blind RCTs [15, 24–26]. Loss to follow-up and selective outcome reporting were adequate [15, 24–26].
Data analyses
Figs 2 and 3, Table 2, and Supplements 3–5 in S1 File show the effects of oral vitamin A supplementation on clinical outcomes, adverse drug-related events, and serum retinol levels in preterm infants.
(A) Duration of mechanical ventilation (days); (B) Duration of CPAP/HHFNC (days); (C) Duration of oxygen requirement (days); (D) Moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA; (E) Oxygen requirement at 36 weeks PMA; (F) Postnatal steroids needed.
(A) Death; (B) Duration of hospitalization (days); (C) Oxygen requirement at 28 days of age; (D) ROP requiring treatment; (E) Serum retinol concentration at 28 days of age (μg/dL); (F) Vomiting.
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days).
Four RCTs provided the duration of mechanical ventilation [15, 24–26]. Oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect the duration of mechanical ventilation, with low-quality evidence (MD, −1.07 days; 95% CI, −2.98 to 0.83 days). Subgroup analysis revealed no effects of higher dosages (Fig 2A, Table 2, and Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Duration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) (days) and duration of oxygen requirement (days).
Two RCTs [24, 26] evaluated the effect of oral vitamin A supplementation on the durations of CPAP or HHFNC use; the durations of using these noninvasive ventilators differed significantly between the oral vitamin A and placebo groups (MD, −0.96 days; 95% CI, −1.59 to −0.33 days) with high-quality evidence.
Three RCTs [24–26] evaluated the duration of required oxygen use; low-quality evidence showed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect this duration (MD, −7.4 days; 95% CI, −23.13 to 8.33 days). However, two RCTS found that higher vitamin A doses may reduce the time that preterm infants must remain on oxygen (MD, −1.29 days; 95% CI, −2.06 to −0.52 days) [24, 26] (Fig 2B and 2C, Table 2, and Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Oxygen requirements at 28 days of age and at 36 weeks PMA and incidence of moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks PMA.
Two [15, 24], three [15, 24–25], and two [24, 26] RCTs investigated the impact of oral vitamin A supplements on oxygen requirements at 28 days of age, at 36 weeks PMA, and with moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA, respectively. Low-quality evidence revealed no significant differences in the oxygen required during either period or in the incidence of moderate-to-severe BPD with or without oral vitamin A supplementation (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.12–2.64; RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33–1.31; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.07–4.17, respectively; Figs 2D, 2E and 3C, Table 2, and Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Postnatal steroids needed.
Two RCTs [15, 26] found no significant difference in the need for steroids when oral vitamin A supplementation was administered versus the placebo, with moderate-quality evidence (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.81–1.66; Fig 2F, Table 2, Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Hospitalization duration (days).
Three RCTs found that oral vitamin A use did not affect hospital stay lengths [24–26], with low-quality evidence (MD, −10.21 days; 95% CI, −35.99 to 15.56 days). Subgroup analysis of higher vitamin A doses showed no significant differences in these outcomes (MD, 0.93 days; 95% CI, −6.62 to 8.49 days; Fig 3B, Table 2, and Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Death.
All four RCTs [15, 24–26] found that oral vitamin A supplements did not reduce mortality, with moderate-quality evidence (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59–1.18; Fig 3A, Table 2, Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Other outcomes.
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment. Moderate-quality evidence revealed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not significantly affect the incidence of ROP requiring treatment. None of the four RCTs found a statistically significant reduction in ROP treatment requirements (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.35–1.40; Fig 3D, Table 2, Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File) [15, 24–26].
Sepsis and late-onset sepsis. Two [24, 26] and two [24, 25] RCTs provided data on sepsis and late-onset sepsis, respectively. Low-quality evidence showed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not reduce these outcomes (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62–1.26 and RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.01, respectively; Supplements 3–5 in S1 File).
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ≥ stage 2. Two RCTS [24, 26] showed no significant effect on the occurrence of NEC (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.14–3.51) but with low certainty (Supplements 3–5 in S1 File).
Serum retinol concentrations. Three RCTs [24–26] monitored serum retinol levels (μg/dL) at 28 days of age. Low-quality evidence showed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not improve serum retinol levels compared with those of the placebo group (MD, 26.56 μg/dL; 95% CI, −2.36 to 55.48 μg/dL). However, subgroup analysis revealed that administration timing affected this outcome; giving as daily dose significantly affected the vitamin A levels compared with those of the placebo group (MD, 13.98 μg/dL; 95% CI, 9.81 to 18.15 μg/dL; Fig 3E, Table 2, Supplements 3 and 4 in S1 File).
Adverse drug-related reactions.
Vomiting. Three RCTs with moderate-quality evidence found no statistically significant evidence that oral vitamin A increased vomiting (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.13–1.39) [15, 24, 25].
Increased intracranial pressure. Two RCTs found that neither group experienced increased intracranial pressure regardless of whether they received oral vitamin A supplementation [24, 25].
Discussion
Vitamin A is an essential micronutrient for preterm infants; it is crucial for proper respiratory, visual, cardiovascular, immune, and gastrointestinal functions [28] and is required for normal growth and development [4]. Extremely premature infants are born with low vitamin A stores and are at high risk of vitamin A deficiency. However, the optimal vitamin A supplementation is unknown for this population, and despite evidence of benefits, early oral vitamin A supplementation is uncommon in preterm infants [4]. Consequently, our meta-analysis mainly focused on whether oral vitamin A supplementation influences preterm outcomes.
In terms of respiratory effects, low-quality evidence with high heterogeneity (I2, 70%) revealed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect mechanical ventilation duration. Thus, we used a subgroup analysis of the higher-dosage groups, using a 2700 IU/day cutoff calculated from the weight of the smallest baby in the 3rd–5th percentile (mean body weight minus 2 standard deviations) receiving 5000 IU/kg/day of vitamin A [15]. Participants in one RCT [24] received 10,000 IU every other day; participants in another RCT received 5,000 IU every day [26]. The study’s lower-dosage group received 1500/IU of vitamin A per day [25]. The mechanical ventilation duration was not reduced regardless of oral vitamin A dosage.
Low-quality evidence revealed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect the duration of oxygen use (I2, 99%). Subgroup analysis of higher and lower dosages decreased this heterogeneity (I2, 0%), and the group that received a higher dosage had a slightly shorter duration of oxygen use. Oral vitamin A supplementation did not reduce the outcomes for oxygen use at 28 days or 36 weeks PMA and moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA, with low certainty. Moderate-quality evidence showed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not reduce the need for postnatal steroids. Respiratory results showed that oral vitamin A supplementation yielded a slightly shorter but statistically significant CPAP/HHFNC duration compared with that of the placebo group. Tyson et al. [5] assessed the efficacy of 5,000 IU IM injections three times weekly for 4 weeks and found decreases in death and BPD at 36 weeks PMA. However, that study was conducted in 1999; perinatal care has since evolved, and several modalities for improving respiratory outcomes have been established. Tolia et al. [29] found that the US nationwide shortage of injectable vitamin A did not affect the incidences of death or BPD during 2010–2012. Darlow et al. [3], Araki et al. [30], and Ding et al. [31] previously published meta-analyses that included both IM and oral vitamin A supplementation, with only one oral vitamin A supplementation study [15] in each meta-analysis. Previous meta-analyses [3, 30, 31] found that vitamin A affected BPD at 36 weeks in survivors. This discrepancy may be because our meta-analysis focused on oral vitamin A supplementation, and three of our four included studies were published between 2019 and 2021 [24–26]; in which the new BPD strategies have since been established globally. While submitting this manuscript, Rakshasbhuvankar et al. [32] published a meta-analysis on vitamin A supplementation in very preterm infants, demonstrating that oral vitamin A supplementation is as effective as other routes of administration in infants with a baseline vitamin A intake of 1500 IU/kg/day. However, because our study categorized BPD outcomes as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks PMA and moderate-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA, we found no advantage in these outcomes.
Death was another important outcome, and none of the studies included [5–13,15,27] in the previous meta-analyses [3, 30–32] for pooled effects of death showed that vitamin A administered via any route lowered mortality. Consistent with previous study and meta-analyses [3, 29–32], oral vitamin A supplementation did not significantly reduce the incidence of death. Furthermore, our study showed that oral vitamin A supplementation did not reduce hospitalization times.
Consistent with previous meta-analyses [3, 30–32], oral vitamin A supplementation did not significantly reduce the ROP requiring treatment from four RCTs [15,24–26] with moderate certainty. In our meta-analysis, oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect sepsis, late-onset sepsis, or NEC, which is consistent with the findings of Ding et al. [31].
Because total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is routinely used and considered the standard of care for preterm infants, vitamin A is included in standard TPN. When preterm infants can be fed enterally, they can receive vitamin A through breast milk, fortified breast milk, or formula, thus providing them with a basic amount of vitamin A. Furthermore, our meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in serum retinol levels at 28 days of age between infants receiving oral vitamin A supplementation vs. placebos (I2 = 99%). Subgroup analysis of the administration interval (daily or alternating days) indicated that daily administration may improve serum retinol levels (I2 = 0).
Whether additional oral vitamin A supplementation affects clinical outcomes is unknown. Our meta-analysis established that oral vitamin A supplementation may be beneficial only in slightly reducing the duration of noninvasive ventilation. However, moderate-to-severe BPD did not decrease, nor did oxygen requirements at 28 and 36 weeks PMA. Furthermore, oral vitamin A supplementation did not affect ROP requiring treatment, other associated complications, or mortality, nor did it appear to induce significant adverse drug-related reactions such as vomiting.
Meyer et al. [33] are currently conducting enteral vitamin A supplementation trials to illustrate this strategy and support its implementation.
Strengths and limitations
In this meta-analysis, we evaluated how oral vitamin A supplements affect various outcomes in preterm infants. Compared with previous meta-analyses, we included four RCTs, with the most pooled estimates. Additionally, the included RCTs were conducted across different countries and ethnic groups. However, the study had some limitations. First, vitamin A concentrations in TPN and feeding may have varied by institute. Second, some outcomes had a high degree of heterogeneity; however, the authors reduced this heterogeneity as much as possible through subgroup analysis. Third, one of the included studies was conducted 2 decades ago. Additionally, the population and number of studies included in the pooled estimate were small, and the type of oral vitamin A supplement used in some clinical trials was unknown. Thus, the effect of oral vitamin A supplementation on preterm infants requires further large-scale RCTs with a standardized, uniform protocol.
Conclusions
Oral vitamin A supplementation in preterm newborns did not affect the duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygen required at 36 weeks PMA, moderate-to-severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA, or death, or provide short-term benefits. However, oral vitamin A supplementation may have a small effect on the duration of noninvasive respiratory support without causing adverse drug-related reactions.
References
- 1.
Sommer A, West K. Vitamin A deficiency: health, survival, and vision. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 1996.
- 2. Gannon BM, Rogers LM, Tanumihardjo SA. Metabolism of neonatal vitamin A supplementation: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2020 Nov 19. nmaa137. pmid:33216111 Epub ahead of print.
- 3. Darlow BA, Graham PJ, Rojas-Reyes MX. Vitamin A supplementation to prevent mortality and short- and long-term morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22; 2016(8):CD000501. pmid:27552058.
- 4. Mactier H, Weaver LT. Vitamin A and preterm infants: what we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Mar; 90(2):F103–8. pmid:15724031.
- 5. Tyson JE, Wright LL, Oh W, Kennedy KA, Mele L, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. New England J Med. 1999;340(25):1962–1968. pmid:10379020
- 6. Ambalavanan N, Wu TJ, Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, Roane C, Carlo WA. A comparison of three vitamin A dosing regimens in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. J Ped. 2003;142(6):656–661. pmid:12838194
- 7. Bental RY, Cooper PA, Cummins RR, Sandler DL, Wainer S, Rotschild A. Vitamin A therapy–effects on the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. South African J Food Sci Nut. 1994;6(4):141–145.
- 8. Kiatchoosakun P, Jirapradittha J, Panthongviriyakul MC, Khampitak T, Yongvanit P, Boonsiri P. Vitamin A supplementation for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very-low-birth-weight premature Thai infants: a randomized trial. J Medical Association of Thailand 2014;97(Suppl 10):S82–8. pmid:25816542
- 9. Mactier H, McCulloch DL, Hamilton R, Galloway P, Bradnam MS, Young D, et al. Vitamin A supplementation improves retinal function in infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. J Ped. 2012;160(6):954–959. pmid:22284923
- 10. Papagaroufalis C, Cairis M, Pantazatou E, Meghreli CH, Xanthou M. A trial of vitamin A supplementation in infants susceptible to bronchopulmonary dysplasia [abstract]. Ped Res. 1988;23:518A.
- 11. Pearson E, Bose C, Snidow T, Ransom L, Young T, Bose G, et al. Trial of vitamin A supplementation in very low birth weight infants at risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Ped. 1992;121(3):420–427. pmid:1517921
- 12. Ravishankar C, Nafday S, Green RS, Kamenir S, Lorber R, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis M, et al. A trial of vitamin A therapy to facilitate ductal closure in premature infants. J Ped. 2003;143(5):644–648. pmid:14615738
- 13. Shenai JP, Kennedy KA, Chytil F, Stahlman MT. Clinical trial of vitamin A supplementation in infants susceptible to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Ped. 1987;111(2):269–277. pmid:3302193
- 14. Werkman SH, Peeples JM, Cooke RJ, Tolley EA, Carlson SE. Effect of vitamin A supplementation of intravenous lipids on early vitamin A intake and status of premature infants. American J Clinical Nutriton 1994;59(3):586–592. pmid:8116534
- 15. Wardle SP, Hughes A, Chen S, Shaw NJ. Randomised controlled trial of oral vitamin A supplementation in preterm infants to prevent chronic lung disease. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Ed. 2001;84(1):F9–F13. pmid:11124916
- 16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71 pmid:33782057
- 17.
Guyatt GH, Busse JW. Modification of Cochrane Tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials. Ottawa: Evidence Partners. www.evidencepartners.com/resources/methodological-resources/
- 18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926. pmid:18436948
- 19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407–415. pmid:21247734
- 20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283–1293. pmid:21839614
- 21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–1302. pmid:21803546
- 22. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303–1310. pmid:21802903
- 23. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–1282. pmid:21802904
- 24. Basu S, Khanna P, Srivastava R, Kumar A. Oral vitamin A supplementation in very low birth weight neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Aug;178(8):1255–1265. pmid:31209560 Epub 2019 Jun 17. Erratum in: Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jul 24;.
- 25. Sun H, Cheng R, Wang Z. Early vitamin A supplementation improves the outcome of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely preterm infants. Retina. 2020 Jun;40(6):1176–1184. pmid:30964778.
- 26. Rakshasbhuvankar AA, Simmer K, Patole SK, Stoecklin B, Nathan EA, Clarke MW, et al. Enteral vitamin A for reducing severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1):e2020009985. pmid:33386338 Epub 2020 Dec 18.
- 27. Tang J, Li Z, Zou Y, et al. Clinical study on the prevention of neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia with high-dose vitamin A. Health Res 2016;36:533–535.
- 28. Muehlbacher T, Bassler D, Bryant MB. Evidence for the management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. Children (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;8(4):298. pmid:33924638.
- 29. Tolia VN, Murthy K, McKinley PS, Bennett MM, Clark RH. The effect of the national shortage of vitamin A on death or chronic lung disease in extremely low-birth-weight infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Nov;168(11):1039–1044. pmid:25222512.
- 30. Araki S, Kato S, Namba F, Ota E. Vitamin A to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207730. Published 2018 Nov 29; pmid:30496228
- 31. Ding Y, Chen Z, Lu Y. Vitamin A supplementation prevents the bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(3):e23101. pmid:33545924
- 32. Rakshasbhuvankar AA, Pillow JJ, Simmer KN, Patole SK. Vitamin A supplementation in very-preterm or very-low-birth-weight infants to prevent morbidity and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;114:2084–2096. pmid:34582542
- 33. Meyer S, Gortner L; NeoVitaA Trial Investigators. Early postnatal additional high-dose oral vitamin A supplementation versus placebo for 28 days for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in extremely low birth weight infants. Neonatology. 2014;105(3):182–188. pmid:24434948 Epub 2014 Jan 14.