Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Overexpression of p-4EBP1 associates with p-eIF4E and predicts poor prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with resection

  • Yaoxiang Tang,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Jiadi Luo,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Yang Yang,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Sile Liu,

    Roles Data curation, Software

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Hongmei Zheng,

    Roles Software

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Yuting Zhan,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Songqing Fan,

    Roles Funding acquisition

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯
  • Qiuyuan Wen

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    wenqiuyuan@csu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    ⨯

Abstract

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and its phosphorylated form (p-eIF4E) play a crucial role in the protein synthesis, both are under regulation of eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-interacting kinases (MNKs). This study aims to explore the potential prognostic significance of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E in NSCLC patients. The expression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E in NSCLC patients was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 354 NSCLC and 53 non-cancerous lung tissues (Non-CLT). The overexpression percentage of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) was significantly higher than that of Non-CLT. P-4EBP1 expression in patients with advanced clinical stage was higher than that in early stage. Expression of p-4EBP1 had a positive relationship with p-eIF4E expression both in lung SCC and ADC. NSCLC patients with high expression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E alone or in combination had a lower survival rate than that of other phenotypes. For NSCLC patients, p-4EBP1 is an independent poor prognostic factor as well as clinical stage, LNM and pathological grade. Overexpression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E might be novel prognostic marker for NSCLC, who possesses potential application value for NSCLC targeted therapy.

Citation: Tang Y, Luo J, Yang Y, Liu S, Zheng H, Zhan Y, et al. (2022) Overexpression of p-4EBP1 associates with p-eIF4E and predicts poor prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with resection. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0265465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465

Editor: Johannes Haybaeck, Medical University Graz, AUSTRIA

Received: April 16, 2021; Accepted: March 1, 2022; Published: June 23, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper, and the minimal data set generated during the current study are available in the figshare repository, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19344524.v1.

Funding: The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81703009) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (grant No. 2017JJ3457). The funder is Qiuyuan Wen, who conceived and designed the study and reviewed and edited the manuscript. The work was also supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81773218 and 81972838). The funder is Songqing Fan, who conceived and designed the study. The work was also supported, in part, by Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate (grant No. CX20210373), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (grant No. 2021zzts1045). The funder is Yaoxiang Tang, who performed the experiments and wrote the paper.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Globally, lung cancer is still the chief reason of cancer morbidity and mortality, its incidence and caused deaths continue to rise, accounting for nearly 20% of cancer deaths [1]. About 85% of lung cancer patients were diagnosed as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which is a main type of lung cancer [2]. NSCLC can be further divided into two predominant histological subtypes: lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), accounting for more than 70% [2,3]. Clinically, more than 60% of NSCLC patients have advanced disease or metastatic lesions at the primary diagnosis [4]. Although significant progress has been made in NSCLC treatment, its five-year survival rate is still not satisfactory [5]. Therefore, it is urgent to identify new molecular biomarkers to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients and develop novel molecular targeted therapy.

Cancers are characterized by rapid growth and metabolism and require a high level of protein synthesis (or mRNA translation) [6]. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) mediated recognition of 5’ cap structure of mRNA is considered as a rate-limiting factor in translation initiation [7,8] by regulating the synthesis of several carcinogenic proteins such as survivin, c-myc, and cyclin D1 [9]. In a mouse model, although reduction of eIF4E expression does not affect the development, it significantly impedes oncogenic transformation [10]. EIF4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), as a substrate of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, is the main regulator of eIF4E availability [11]. In hypo-phosphorylated state, 4EBP1 competes with eIF4G for binding to eIF4E, thus resulting in the inhibition of translation initiation complex formation [12]. When it is phosphorylated by upstream signals, mainly mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), eIF4E will be released and drive the synthesis of diverse proteins, including carcinogenic proteins [9,13]. Some researchers have pointed out that high phosphorylated 4EBP1 (p-4EBP1) expression was related with poor prognosis in many major types of cancers, such as renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and small cell lung cancer [14–16]. In addition, eIF4E can be phosphorylated through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-interacting kinases (MNKs) pathway [17]. Phosphorylated eIF4E (p-eIF4E) has been proved to be overexpressed in many cancers, and be of vital importance in the cancer cell migration/invasion and tumor progression, though its specific mechanism is still elucidated [17,18].

To date, although increasing evidences have demonstrated that p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E play a critical role in cancer, there are limited data evaluating their importance to NSCLC. To get more insight on the biological significance of these two proteins, we have investigated their expression pattern in tissue microarray (TMAs) including NSCLC specimens and non-cancerous lung tissues (Non-CLT) via immunohistochemistry (IHC), and discussed the internal relationship between p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E and clinical/pathological/prognostic features in NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Patient information and tumor samples

Investigation of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E expression in NSCLC was carried out on TMAs including 354 NSCLC cases and 53 cases of Non-CLT received surgical treatment in the Second Xiangya Hospital in Changsha between 2003 and 2013. No patients accepted chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. All tumor specimens and 53 samples of Non-CLT acquire from the Pathology Department, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Patients in the study had definite histological diagnosis on the basis of 2015 WHO Classification of lung cancer, and were comprehensively staged as per the Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification [19]. Clinical information obtained as part of the study included patient age, gender, lymph node metastasis (LNM), clinical stage, histological type, and pathological grade (Table 1). In addition, samples obtained informed consent and approval of all protocols were obtained from the Institutional Human Experiment and Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (approval No. S039/2011).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Clinicopathological features of patients with NSCLC and non-cancerous lung tissues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.t001

Construction of the tissue microarrays

High-throughput NSCLC TMAs were constructed as described previously [20]. The perforation diameter of each sample was 0.6 mm. Each NSCLC case included three tumor cores in TMAs and three normal lung cores per case was included in TMAs of Non-CLT.

Immunohistochemistry

Slides from TMAs were stained with anti-p-4EBP1 and anti-p-eIF4E antibodies. The condition of each antibody staining was adjusted as has been shown before [21]. Primary antibodies applied in this study are: rabbit anti-p-4EBP1 (Catalog: #2855, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:800 dilution) and rabbit anti-p-eIF4E (Catalog: #9274, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:500 dilution). The positive control slide and negative control slide were included in each experiment. The IgG isotype-matched antibody was applied as negative contrast to confirm the antibody specificity.

IHC staining was scored independently under x200 magnification light microscopy by two pathologists (Qiuyuan Wen and Songqing Fan). The percentage of positive stained cells were scored as 0~4 according to the following standard: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (76–100%). The staining intensity of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E was divided into four grades: negative, mild, moderate and strong, with scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The total score was based upon semi-quantitative approach, as described below: total score = percentage score + intensity score. According to the overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients, the best cutoff levels for p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E expression are 3 and 4 respectively. P-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E were considered to be highly expressed when their total scores were over 3 and 4 respectively, whereas conversely, they were considered to be low expression. Agreement between the two assessors is 95%, and all the differences in scores are solved through discussion.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 24.0 (IBM, USA) for Windows was used for statistical analyses. Specifically speaking, chi-square (χ2) test was used for expression pattern of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E between Non-CLT and NSCLC and their association with clinicopathological features (except pathological grade). The association between these two proteins and pathological grade were analyzed via Fisher-exact test. The relationship between p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E was assessed via spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. In addition, survival rate curves were appraised by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and comparisons were analyzed via log-rank test. Furthermore, cox proportional-hazards model was performed for determining independent prognostic markers. P < 0.05 (Two-sided) indicates that the result is statistically significant.

Results

P-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E were over expressed remarkably in NSCLC

In order to find out whether the level of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins in NSCLC is different from that in Non-CLT, we detected the protein expression pattern and cellular localization of them in Non-CLT and NSCLC tissues. Both proteins mainly existed in cell cytoplasm and were positive in lung SCC and ADC (Fig 1A, 1B, 1D and 1E), but negative in Non-CLT (Fig 1C and 1F). According to the histologic subtypes, the percentage of high expressed p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins was 50.3% (80/159) and 42.1% (67/159) in lung SCC, 43.6% (85/195) and 61.5% (120/195) in lung ADC, respectively. For Non-CLT, both p-4EBP1 protein and p-eIF4E protein showed the same 15.1% positive rate (8/53). As shown in Fig 2, p-4EBP1 proteins in lung SCC and ADC tissues were significantly upregulated, as well as p-eIF4E protein (both P < 0.001).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Expression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E in lung ADC, lung SCC and Non-CLT were detected by IHC.

Strong positive staining of p-4EBP1 (A), p-eIF4E (D) was found in cell cytoplasm of lung SCC cells. Strong positive staining of p-4EBP1 (B), p-eIF4E (E) was also showed in cell cytoplasm of lung ADC cells. Negative staining of p-4EBP1 (C), p-eIF4E (F) was found in Non-CLT (200×, IHC, DAB staining).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. The comparison of expression of p-4EBP1, p-eIF4E in lung SCC and lung ADC compared to the Non-CLT.

The expression of p-4EBP1, p-eIF4E in lung SCC and lung ADC was significantly higher than those in Non-CLT (all P < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.g002

Relationship between p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E and the clinical/pathological features of NSCLC patients

We make further efforts to investigate the relationship between overexpressed p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E and clinical and pathological features. Table 2 showed a positively correlated relationship between overexpression of p-4EBP1 and clinical stages in NSCLC. Compared with clinical stage I and II, the expression of p-4EBP1 in stage III was higher (P = 0.040). Lung ADC patients had significantly overexpressed p-eIF4E than lung SCC patients (P = 0.002). Furthermore, OS rate in patients with individual or combined high expressed p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins was lower than patients with other phenotypes of them (all P < 0.01). No difference was found between p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E and other clinical/pathological characteristics, such as gender, age, pathological grades and LNM status of patients (all P > 0.05).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Analysis of the association between expression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E and clinicopathological features of NSCLC (n = 354).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.t002

Correlation analysis of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins expression in NSCLC

Table 3 showed the correlation between increased p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins in NSCLC. It suggested that overexpression of p-4EBP1 was strong positively associated with p-eIF4E protein both in lung SCC and ADC (r = 0.288, P < 0.001; r = 0.397, P < 0.001, respectively).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. The pairwise association between expression of p-4EBP1, and p-eIF4E in lung SCC and ADC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.t003

p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E expression affect prognosis of NSCLC patients

The survival curve of NSCLC patients was described via Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons of OS rate were performed via log-rank test in the univariate survival analysis. According to the Fig 3, the survival rate of NSCLC patients with low expressed p-4EBP1 (P < 0.001, Fig 3A & Table 4) and p-eIF4E (P = 0.037, Fig 3B & Table 4) was higher than patients with high level of above proteins respectively. NSCLC patients with high expressed p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E proteins had shorter survival time than that of other patterns (P = 0.003, Fig 3C). We gone a step further and analyzed the relationship between OS rate and clinical and pathological characteristics. The survival rate of NSCLC patients with clinical stage III was lower compared to stage I and II (P < 0.001, Fig 3D & Table 4), and patients without LNM had higher survival rate (P < 0.001, Fig 3E & Table 4). As for NSCLC patients, the higher the pathological grade was, the lower the survival rate (P = 0.001, Fig 3F & Table 4). In addition, there was no statistical significance between prognosis and age, gender, and histological type (Table 4).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier cures for overall survival of lung SCC and ADC patients with expression of p-4EBP1, p-eIF4E.

(A) NSCLC patients with high expression of p-4EBP1 showed worse overall survival rates compared to patients with low p-4EBP1 expression (P = 0.001, two sided). (B) NSCLC patients with high p-eIF4E expression showed worse overall survival rates compared to patients with low p-eIF4E expression (P = 0.037, two sided). (C) NSCLC patients with combined high expression of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E had worse overall survival rates than these with others (P = 0.003, two sided). (D) NSCLC patients with stage III owned poorer prognosis compared with that with stage I-II(P < 0.001, two sided). (E) NSCLC patients with LNM had lower overall survival rate than those without LNM (P < 0.001, two sided). (F) NSCLC patients with well and moderate differentiation had higher overall survival rate than those with poor differentiation (P = 0.001, two sided).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Summary of univariate/multivariate analysis for overall survival in patients with NSCLC (n = 354).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265465.t004

We further investigated whether the overexpression of p-4EBP1 and/or p-eIF4E could be independent prognosis factors for NSCLC patients via multivariate analysis using cox regression method. Table 4 showed that expression of p-4EBP1 (P = 0.013), as well as clinical stage (P < 0.001), LNM (P = 0.031) and pathological grade (P = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for NSCLC patients.

Discussion

In this study, we found that p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E expression in lung SCC and ADC patients were increased significantly compared to Non-CLT. Whether in lung SCC or ADC, p-4EBP1 had a positive relationship with p-eIF4E, and higher p-4EBP1 expression appeared in advanced clinical stage. Our analysis showed that NSCLC patients with high expressed p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E alone or in combination had a lower survival rate than other expression patterns. Taking together, these data suggest high expressed p-eIF4E and p-4EBP1 could be new prognostic marker for NSCLC. Several research pointed out that overexpression of p-4EBP1 has been found in a range of other tumors, including ovarian cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer, which confirmed their important role in various cancers [14,22,23]. In addition, 4EBP1 is associated with prognosis of patients in several kinds of cancers, such as renal cell cancer and small cell lung cancer [15,16]. Our data showed that the survival time of patients with high p-4EBP1 is shorter than patients with low expressed p-4EBP1, and p-4EBP1 could be used as an independent prognostic indicator of NSCLC, regardless of clinical stage, LNM, and pathological grade. These results suggest that p-4EBP1 might be a potential prognostic indicator.

Eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) consisting of eIF4E, eIF2, eIF6 and so on are the main regulators in the initial stage of mRNA translation, whose abnormal expression has been confirmed to be involved in tumor progression, including proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and metastasis [24]. Our results showed that the phosphorylation level of eIF4E was significantly increased in lung SCC and ADC, especially ADC, and high expression of p-eIF4E was associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients, which is consistent with other researches founded in astrocytoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma [25,26]. Besides eIF4E, other eIFs such as eIF2β [27], eIF3b [28], eIF3m [29], eIF4G1 [30] and eIF6 [31] are also validated abnormal activity in NSCLC. For instance, eIF2β is significantly up-regulated in NSCLC tissue and has a poor prognosis in patients with lung ADC. Knockdown of eIF2β inhibits the growth of lung ADC cells by inducing G1 cell cycle arrest [27]. EIF6 blocks the binding of large and small ribosomal subunits and prepares for ribosome binding to mRNA [24]. Gantenbein et al found that the expression of eIF6 protein in NSCLC was higher than that in healthy lung tissue, which was positively correlated with poor prognosis. The deletion of eIF6 can lead to cell proliferation inhibition, caspase 3-mediated apoptosis, and ribosomal 60s maturation defects [31]. These confirm the importance of eIFs in tumorigenesis and development of NSCLC, and prove the value and targeted therapy strategies of p-eIF4E in NSCLC management.

Our data also showed a positively association between p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E in lung SCC, as well as ADC. Moreover, patients with high p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E expression had a lower OS rate compared to other expression patterns of the two proteins. The results suggest that there might be a crosslink between mTORC1 and MNKs pathways. Since eIF4G bring MNKs and eIF4E together to enhance MNK-mediated phosphorylation of eIF4E, eIF4E phosphorylation can be promoted by the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 which prevent eIF4E from binding with eIF4G [32,33]. Indeed, extracellular-regulated kinase (Erk) is a common upstream regulator for both MNKs and mTORC1 pathways [34]. Besides activating MNKs to enhance eIF4E phosphorylation, Erk also mediate the activation of mTORC1 pathway through phosphorylation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) on multiple sites to promote phosphorylation of 4EBP1 [34]. Erk is known to be involved in development of numerous cancers including NSCLC [35–37]. In addition, there are several clues suggesting MNKs might cooperate with mTORC1 pathway. One study has shown that inhibition of MNKs by CGP57380 can enhance the inhibitory effect of rapalog on 4EBP1 phosphorylation [38]. The elucidation of additional pathway(s) linking mTORC1 and MNKs pathways could provide a new idea for the targeted treatment of NSCLC.

Cancer requires elevated protein synthesis to meet the increased metabolic demand. P-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E are downstream regulators of mTORC1 pathway and MNKs pathway of which the convergence node is eIF4E [11,17]. The research on mice with loss of eIF4E gene function shows that 50% reduction of eIF4E is compatible with normal development of the body and has a significant inhibitory effect on KRas driven lung cancer initiation [10]. In addition, mice lacking MNKs are reported to be viable and p-eIF4E is not essential for growth and development [39,40]. These findings suggest that inhibiting production of p-eIF4E and p-4EBP1 is a safe option for cancer treatment. Up to now, there are many mTOR inhibitors and MNKs inhibitors applied in cancer therapy, but the anticancer efficacy is not very ideal [41,42]. Although several studies have shown that mTOR inhibitors can suppress the production of p-4EBP1, it enhances eIF4E phosphorylation and leads to drug resistance. Moreover, combination of MNKs inhibitors can significantly reduce eIF4E phosphorylation induced by mTOR inhibitors [43]. Therefore, we infer that the interplay between mTORC1 pathway and MNKs pathway maybe a possible cause [44,45], which suggests that combined inhibition of p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E could be a better regimen than single inhibition. Of course, combination therapy is still a growing field and its application and internal mechanism in NSCLC still need further study.

Conclusion

In summary, p-4EBP1 and p-eIF4E might be novel prognostic markers for NSCLC, who possess potential application value for NSCLC targeted therapy.

References

  1. 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. pmid:30207593
  2. 2. Duma N, Santana-Davila R, Molina JR. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(8):1623–40. pmid:31378236
  3. 3. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(9):1243–60. pmid:26291008
  4. 4. Osmani L, Askin F, Gabrielson E, Li QK. Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): Moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52(Pt 1):103–9. pmid:29183778
  5. 5. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2018;553(7689):446–54. pmid:29364287
  6. 6. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. pmid:21376230
  7. 7. Gingras AC, Raught B, Sonenberg N. eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:913–63. pmid:10872469
  8. 8. Hiremath LS, Webb NR, Rhoads RE. Immunological detection of the messenger RNA cap-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(13):7843–9. pmid:3891747
  9. 9. De Benedetti A, Graff JR. eIF-4E expression and its role in malignancies and metastases. Oncogene. 2004;23(18):3189–99. pmid:15094768
  10. 10. Truitt ML, Conn CS, Shi Z, Pang X, Tokuyasu T, Coady AM, et al. Differential Requirements for eIF4E Dose in Normal Development and Cancer. Cell. 2015;162(1):59–71. pmid:26095252
  11. 11. Musa J, Orth MF, Dallmayer M, Baldauf M, Pardo C, Rotblat B, et al. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1): a master regulator of mRNA translation involved in tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2016;35(36):4675–88. pmid:26829052
  12. 12. Haghighat A, Mader S, Pause A, Sonenberg N. Repression of cap-dependent translation by 4E-binding protein 1: competition with p220 for binding to eukaryotic initiation factor-4E. EMBO J. 1995;14(22):5701–9. pmid:8521827
  13. 13. Qin X, Jiang B, Zhang Y. 4E-BP1, a multifactor regulated multifunctional protein. Cell Cycle. 2016;15(6):781–6. pmid:26901143
  14. 14. Alabdullah ML, Ahmad DA, Moseley P, Madhusudan S, Chan S, Rakha E. The mTOR downstream regulator (p-4EBP1) is a novel independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(4):522–8. pmid:30712414
  15. 15. Qu Y, Zhao R, Wang H, Chang K, Yang X, Zhou X, et al. Phosphorylated 4EBP1 is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23594. pmid:27026382
  16. 16. Roh MS, Lee JH, Kang KW, Nam HY, Jung SB, Kim K, et al. Phosphorylated 4E-binding protein 1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in small-cell lung cancer. Virchows Arch. 2015;467(6):667–73. pmid:26445970
  17. 17. Proud CG. Mnks, eIF4E phosphorylation and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849(7):766–73. pmid:25450520
  18. 18. Fan S, Ramalingam SS, Kauh J, Xu Z, Khuri FR, Sun SY. Phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 (eIF4E) is elevated in human cancer tissues. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(15):1463–9. pmid:19483468
  19. 19. Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Kim AW, Tanoue LT. The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification. Chest. 2017;151(1):193–203. pmid:27780786
  20. 20. Fan SQ, Ma J, Zhou J, Xiong W, Xiao BY, Zhang WL, et al. Differential expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA and several tumor-related genes in various types of nasopharyngeal epithelial lesions and nasopharyngeal carcinoma using tissue microarray analysis. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(5):593–605. pmid:16647958
  21. 21. Wen Q, Li J, Wang W, Xie G, Xu L, Luo J, et al. Increased expression of flotillin-2 protein as a novel biomarker for lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101676. pmid:25014228
  22. 22. Rojo F, Najera L, Lirola J, Jimenez J, Guzman M, Sabadell MD, et al. 4E-binding protein 1, a cell signaling hallmark in breast cancer that correlates with pathologic grade and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(1):81–9. pmid:17200342
  23. 23. Lin X, Huang Y, Sun Y, Tan X, Ouyang J, Zhao B, et al. 4E-BP1(Thr46) Phosphorylation Association with Poor Prognosis in Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Revealed that 4E-BP1Thr46 Phosphorylation is Associated with Poor Prognosis in HCC. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:103–15. pmid:32021427
  24. 24. Hao P, Yu J, Ward R, Liu Y, Hao Q, An S, et al. Eukaryotic translation initiation factors as promising targets in cancer therapy. Cell Commun Signal. 2020;18(1):175. pmid:33148274
  25. 25. Zheng J, Li J, Xu L, Xie G, Wen Q, Luo J, et al. Phosphorylated Mnk1 and eIF4E are associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89220. pmid:24551240
  26. 26. Fan W, Wang W, Mao X, Chu S, Feng J, Xiao D, et al. Elevated levels of p-Mnk1, p-eIF4E and p-p70S6K proteins are associated with tumor recurrence and poor prognosis in astrocytomas. J Neurooncol. 2017;131(3):485–93. pmid:27900644
  27. 27. Tanaka I, Sato M, Kato T, Goto D, Kakumu T, Miyazawa A, et al. eIF2beta, a subunit of translation-initiation factor EIF2, is a potential therapeutic target for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(6):1843–52. pmid:29624814
  28. 28. Liu C, Li X, Tian J, Zhang S, Liu Y, Zhai X, et al. The expression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3B and its correlation with tumor characteristics as well as prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study. J BUON. 2020;25(5):2350–7. pmid:33277855
  29. 29. Liu X, Xiang D, Xu C, Chai R. EIF3m promotes the malignant phenotype of lung adenocarcinoma by the up-regulation of oncogene CAPRIN1. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11(3):979–96. pmid:33791168
  30. 30. Lu Y, Yu S, Wang G, Ma Z, Fu X, Cao Y, et al. Elevation of EIF4G1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by activating mTOR signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(6):2994–3005. pmid:33523588
  31. 31. Gantenbein N, Bernhart E, Anders I, Golob-Schwarzl N, Krassnig S, Wodlej C, et al. Influence of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 on non-small cell lung cancer development and progression. Eur J Cancer. 2018;101:165–80. pmid:30077122
  32. 32. Muller D, Lasfargues C, El Khawand S, Alard A, Schneider RJ, Bousquet C, et al. 4E-BP restrains eIF4E phosphorylation. Translation (Austin). 2013;1(2):e25819. pmid:26824022
  33. 33. Pyronnet S, Imataka H, Gingras AC, Fukunaga R, Hunter T, Sonenberg N. Human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) recruits mnk1 to phosphorylate eIF4E. EMBO J. 1999;18(1):270–9. pmid:9878069
  34. 34. Huang J, Manning BD. The TSC1-TSC2 complex: a molecular switchboard controlling cell growth. Biochem J. 2008;412(2):179–90. pmid:18466115
  35. 35. Burotto M, Chiou VL, Lee JM, Kohn EC. The MAPK pathway across different malignancies: a new perspective. Cancer. 2014;120(22):3446–56. pmid:24948110
  36. 36. Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, Kolch W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26(22):3279–90. pmid:17496922
  37. 37. Zhao S, Qiu ZX, Zhang L, Li WM. Prognostic values of ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 expressions for poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(6):4143–50. pmid:25596700
  38. 38. Grzmil M, Huber RM, Hess D, Frank S, Hynx D, Moncayo G, et al. MNK1 pathway activity maintains protein synthesis in rapalog-treated gliomas. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(2):742–54. pmid:24401275
  39. 39. Furic L, Rong L, Larsson O, Koumakpayi IH, Yoshida K, Brueschke A, et al. eIF4E phosphorylation promotes tumorigenesis and is associated with prostate cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14134–9. pmid:20679199
  40. 40. Ueda T, Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Fukuyama H, Nagata S, Fukunaga R. Mnk2 and Mnk1 are essential for constitutive and inducible phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E but not for cell growth or development. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(15):6539–49. pmid:15254222
  41. 41. Lu C, Makala L, Wu D, Cai Y. Targeting translation: eIF4E as an emerging anticancer drug target. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2016;18:e2. pmid:26775675
  42. 42. Xie J, Merrett JE, Jensen KB, Proud CG. The MAP kinase-interacting kinases (MNKs) as targets in oncology. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2019;23(3):187–99. pmid:30650992
  43. 43. Wen Q, Wang W, Luo J, Chu S, Chen L, Xu L, et al. CGP57380 enhances efficacy of RAD001 in non-small cell lung cancer through abrogating mTOR inhibition-induced phosphorylation of eIF4E and activating mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. OncoTarget. 2016;7(19):27787–801. pmid:27050281
  44. 44. Sun S-Y, Rosenberg LM, Wang X, Zhou Z, Yue P, Fu H, et al. Activation of Akt and eIF4E Survival Pathways by Rapamycin-Mediated Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibition. Cancer Res. 2005;65(16):7052–8. pmid:16103051
  45. 45. Wang X, Yue P, Chan C-B, Ye K, Ueda T, Watanabe-Fukunaga R, et al. Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Induces Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Dependent and Mnk-Mediated Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(21):7405–13. pmid:17724079