https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-6016
Figures
Abstract
Malaria is a vector born parasitic disease causing millions of deaths every year. Despite the high mortality rate, an effective vaccine against this mosquito-borne infectious disease is yet to be developed. Up to date, RTS,S/AS01 is the only vaccine available for malaria prevention; however, its efficacy is low. Among a variety of malaria antigens, merozoite surface protein-1(MSP-1) and ring-infected erythrocyte surface antigen (RESA) have been proposed as promising candidates for malaria vaccine development. We developed peptide-based Plasmodium falciparum vaccine candidates that incorporated three previously reported conserved epitopes from MSP-1 and RESA into highly effective liposomal polyleucine delivery system. Indeed, MSP-1 and RESA-derived epitopes conjugated to polyleucine and formulated into liposomes induced higher epitope specific antibody titres. However, immunized mice failed to demonstrate protection in a rodent malaria challenge study with Plasmodium yoelii. In addition, we found that the three reported P. falciparum epitopes did not to share conformational properties and high sequence similarity with P. yoelii MSP-1 and RESA proteins, despite the epitopes were reported to protect mice against P. yoelii challenge.
Citation: Islam MT, Ho M-F, Nahar UJ, Shalash AO, Koirala P, Hussein WM, et al. (2022) Investigation of liposomal self-adjuvanting peptide epitopes derived from conserved blood-stage Plasmodium antigens. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264961
Editor: Érika Martins Braga, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, BRAZIL
Received: August 24, 2021; Accepted: February 20, 2022; Published: March 11, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Islam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council (Grant ID: DP21010280), the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (Program Grant ID:1132975) and an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): M.S. and I.T. are co-inventors on a patent application entitled ‘Self assembling, self adjuvanting system for delivery of vaccines’ filed by The University of Queensland (application number AU 2020900058). The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Introduction
Malaria is the 5th leading cause of death worldwide among infectious diseases [1]. Around 229 million people were infected by the disease globally in 2019, with 409,000 of those infections resulting in death [2]. Recently, World Health Organization (WHO) has approved the first malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, despite its relatively poor protective efficacy (30–40%) [3]. Peptide-based subunit vaccines have been investigated for malaria, as they are easier to produce than traditional whole parasite-based vaccines [4], however peptide antigens suffer from poor immunogenicity. To overcome this problem, multiple epitopes (B and T-cell) can be incorporated in linear peptides to enhance the immunogenicity [5], along with an adjuvant and/or delivery system [6].
Merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) and ring-infected erythrocyte surface antigen (RESA) are the two potent antigens expressed by the blood-stages of human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. Several epitopes (both B and T-cells) from MSP-1 and RESA were found to be conserved in P. falciparum [7,8]. A multiple antigen peptide (P1, Fig 1A and 1B) derived from P. falciparum’s MSP-1 and RESA was immunogenic in mice when administered with adjuvants [9,10]. Furthermore, sera from P. yoelii infected mice recognized or cross-reacted with P1 when examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Despite the fact that, P1 peptide was derived from P. falciparum proteins, P1-immunized mice were protected when challenged with P. yoelii [10]. Five among 10 mice immunized with P1+CFA survived the malaria challenge. Surprisingly, in P1+alum mice group, eight out of ten mice survived the challenge [10], despite Alum is generally poorly effective when combined with peptides [11].
a) three-dimensional structure of MSP-1 and RESA according to molecular modelling (models were generated from I-TASSER online server, https://zhanglab.dcmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/); b) epitopes 1–3 and multiple epitope peptide P1; c) pL1, pL2, and pL3 vaccine constructs composed of epitopes 1, 2 and 3, respectively; bearing a 10-unit polyleucine tail and two lysine amino acids as a spacer.
Peptide P1 was composed of overlapping B and T-cell epitope 1 (LDNIKDNVGKMEDYIKKNKK), B-cell epitope 2 (YSLFQKEKMVL) and overlapping B and T-cell epitope 3 (EENVEHDAEENVEENV) (Fig 1B). Epitopes 1 and 2 were derived from the N-terminal conserved region of MSP-1 and epitope 3 was derived from the N-terminal conserved region of RESA (Fig 1A).
A variety of delivery systems have been investigated to improve the immunogenicity of peptide vaccines. The purpose of these delivery systems is to avoid vaccine antigen loss due to degradation in vivo and to effectively deliver vaccine constructs to immune cells [12]. Polyhydrophobic amino acids (e.g. polyleucine) conjugated to peptide epitopes (B and T-cell) demonstrated excellent capacity to enhance immunogenicity [13]. Upon coupling with peptide antigens, poly(hydrophobic amino acids) self-assembled into nanoparticles and were able to stimulate the production of high antibody titres in mice. Polyleucine conjugated vaccine constructs were found to be effective against Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria and hookworm parasites infection in challenge experiments [13–15]. Liposomal formulations are often used as biodegradable, non-toxic carriers with the ability to stimulate cellular and humoral immunity in mice and humans [16–18]. In addition, mannosylated liposomes have been used as a highly effective delivery system in the development of whole parasite blood-stage malaria and babesiosis vaccines [19–21].
Here, we aimed to develop a liposome-based vaccine carrying the previously reported epitopes 1–3 derived from P. falciparum, with improved efficacy and without the use of a toxic adjuvant (e.g., CFA). Epitopes 1, 2 and 3 from P1 were conjugated to polyleucine (Fig 1C), and incorporated into the liposomal delivery system along with mannosylated ligands. The new vaccine candidates were tested for their ability to induce antibody production in immunized mice and to protect the mice against parasite challenge (P. yoelii). The previously reported CFA-adjuvanted P1-based vaccine derived from P. falciparum protein MSP-1 and RESA were used as a control to compare our proposed vaccine constructs [10].
Materials and methods
Materials
All chemical materials used in this study were analytical grade unless stated otherwise. 1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPC), cholesterol, tween-20, dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDAB), complete freund’s adjuvant (CFA), incomplete freund’s adjuvant (IFA), and o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) tablets were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. p-methylbenzhydrylamine (MBHA). HCl resin was purchased from Novabiochem. N, N’-dimethylformamide (DMF), trifluoroacetic (TFA) acid, acetonitrile, protected (tert-butyloxycarbonyl) Boc-amino acids and 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium3-oxid hexafluorophosphate (HATU) were purchased from Mimotopes. Chloroform, methanol, skim milk powder, and other solvents were purchased obtained from Merck. Goat antimouse IgG (H+L)-HRP conjugate secondary antibody was purchased from Bio-Rad, Australia).
Analytical reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and preparative RP-HPLC were performed on a Shimadzu instrument using Vydac analytical (C4 and C18) and preparative (C4 and C18) columns. HPLC solvent A: 0.1% TFA in water and solvent B: 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile: water (90:10); flow rate: 1 mL/min for analytical RP-HPLC and 20 mL/min for preparative RP-HPLC; detection: UV absorbance at 214 nm.
Methods
Synthesis of malaria vaccine components
The malaria vaccine constructs (P1, pL1, pL2, and pL3) were synthesised on 4-methylbenzylamine.HCl resin (100–200 mesh; substitution degree: 0.59 mmol/g) by manual tert-butoxycarbonyl-solid phase peptide synthesis (Boc-SPPS) following the standard protocol [22,23]. All peptides were synthesised on a 0.2 mmol scale. Boc-protected L-amino acids (0.84 mmol, 4.2 equiv.) were activated with HATU (0.80 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) and DIPEA (1.04 mmol, 5.2 equiv.) for 5 min before being added to the resin. Coupling of amino acids was conducted for 30 min (1st coupling) and 1 h (2nd coupling), separately. The Boc-protecting group was removed by treatment with TFA for 2 x 1 min. The Boc-resin was washed with DMF between deprotection and coupling. Acetylation was performed after the first amino acid in a sequence was coupled to block the untreated groups on the resin, then again after the final amino acid to acetylate the N-terminus. The acetylation solution was composed of 5% DIPEA, 5% acetic anhydride and 90% DMF. Cleavage of the final peptide sequence from Boc resin was performed using HF (Hydrogen Fluoride) cleavage (10 mL/g of resin) and p-cresol (0.5 mL/g of resin) at -5 to 0°C for 2.5 h. After cleavage, the peptide was precipitated in diethyl ether and dissolved in 50:50 solvent, which was prepared using 50% of HPLC solvent A: (0.1% TFA/90.9% H2O) and 50% of HPLC solvent B (90% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA/9.9% H2O), then filtered through a polyethylene frit. The resulting solution was freeze-dried and purified by preparative HPLC (C4 column). Purification for preparative HPLC: 25–45% solvent B gradient over 50 min. Solvent A, H2O + 0.1% TFA; solvent B, 90% acetonitrile + 10% H2O and 0.1% TFA. The purified peptide was analysed with analytical HPLC (C4 column) and electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Analytical HPLC was conducted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with ultraviolet (UV) detection at a wavelength of 214 nm on a Vydac analytical HPLC C4 column. The molecular weight of the peptide was calculated by ChemDraw software20.0. The molecular weight of the final purified compound was checked by ESI-MS (S1–S5 Figs). Mannosylated lipid core linker (ML-1) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[carboxy(polyethylene glycol)]-mannose (DOPE-PEG-mannose, ML-2) were synthesised according to previously reported methods [24–26].
pL1: Yield: 48%; MW: 3749.0; ESI-MS: [M+3H]3+ m/z 1250.5 (calcd. 1250.6), [M+4H]4+ m/z 938.3 (calcd. 938.2); HPLC tR = 22.9 min (C4 column); purity ≥99% (S1 Fig).
pL2: Yield: 44%; MW: 2814; ESI-MS: [M+2H]2+ m/z 1408.6 (calcd. 1408.0), [M+3H]3+ m/z 939.2 (calcd. 939.0), [M+4H]4+ 705.1 (calcd. 704.5); HPLC tR = 22.8 min (C4 column); purity = 98% (S2 Fig).
pL3: Yield: 40%; MW: 3314.0; ESI-MS: [M+2H]2+ m/z 1658.1 (calcd. 1658.0), [M+3H]3+ m/z 1104.7 (calcd. 1105.6), [M+4H]4+ m/z 829.4 (calcd. 829.5); HPLC: tR = 28.5 min (C4 column); purity = 98% (S3 Fig).
P1: Yield: 51%, MW: 5902.0; ESI-MS: [M+4H]4+ m/z 1476.7 (calcd. 1476.5), [M+5H]5+ m/z 1181.4 (calcd. 1181.4); HPLC: tR = 18.3 min (C4 column); purity = 98% (S4 Fig).
ML-2: Mannose-azide (8.3 mg, 25 μmol), DOPE-PEG-alkyne (5 mg, 1.2 μmol, 1 equiv.) and 42 mg of copper wire were added to 1 mL of DMF. The air in the reaction mixture was removed by nitrogen bubbling for 30 sec. The reaction was conducted in the dark and stirred for 3 h at 50°C under nitrogen gas. The copper wires were removed, and the reaction mixture was slowly added to water (4 mL) at a rate of 0.005 mL/min to form micelles by self-assembly. The solution was dialysed in a dialysis bag (2 kDa) overnight. Pure ML-2 was obtained following lyophilisation. The molecular weight (4500) of pure ML-2 was calculated by ChemDraw, which was detected by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (S5 Fig).
Particle size analysis
The particle size distribution of the malaria vaccine components was measured using a laser particle analyser (Zeta sizer 2000E, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). The emulsion was diluted 10 times, then transferred to disposable zeta sizer cuvettes before measurement at 25°C with a 173° light scattering angle [27].
Circular dichroism (CD) and Plasmodium protein sequence analysis
Peptide secondary structures were analysed according to a previously reported procedure [28]. Peptide conformation was assessed by a Jasco J-710 circular dichroism spectropolarimeter (Jasco Corp., Japan). Polyleucine-conjugated peptides 1–3 were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL (pH 6). The solution was transferred into a specific 1 mm quartz cuvette for detection. The study was carried out in the range of λ 190–260 nm under nitrogen atmosphere. The spectra for the peptides were 5 nm bandwidth with a 50 nm/min scan rate. Peptide absorbance measures were carried out in triplicate and the data was averaged and plotted. Spectra were normalised and reported as the mean residual ellipticity (mdeg.cm2.dmol-1) versus wavelength (λ). Quantitative analysis of the secondary structure of the polyleucine compounds was measured by analysing the composition spectrum of a given compound to yield a ratio of each pure individual compound spectrum (such as pure α-helix, β-sheet, and random coil contribution) that was obtained from the polyleucine spectra according to the previously reported method [29].
MSP-1 and RESA protein sequences alignment between P. falciparum and P. yoelii were performed using ClustalW online server v2.1 (S7 and S8 Figs)
Animal study and malaria parasites
This study was performed according to the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 8th edition, 2013. All animal procedures and protocols were approved by the Griffith University Animal Ethics Committee (AEC): AEC Approval Number: GLY/07/20/AEC. Female BALB/c mice (6-8-weeks-old) were purchased from the Animal Resource Centre, Willeton, Western Australia. Animals were housed in a pathogen-free environment in the Institute for Glycomics animal facility at Griffith University for 2 weeks prior to immunization. P. yoelii 17X was initially obtained from Richard Carter (Edinburgh, UK) and was maintained by serial passaging through inbred and outbred mice.
Formulation of vaccine candidates in liposomes
Liposomes were formulated according to the method reported previously [20]. Briefly, in a 5 mL round bottom flask, a mixture of 5 mg of DPPC, 2 mg of DDAB, 1 mg of cholesterol, and 1 mg equiv. of the desired vaccine construct were dissolved in chloroform/methanol mixture at a ratio of 9:1. The solvent was slowly evaporated under reduced pressure and a thin lipid layer was formed at the base of the flask. The flask was then connected to a vacuum overnight to remove excess solvent. The liposomes were hydrated for 20 min with 1 mL sterile warm phosphate buffer solution (PBS), and vortexed at regular intervals. Independent liposome batches were prepared to include the different vaccine constructs.
Immunization of mice with the vaccine constructs
BALB/c female mice (7 mice/group) were used for the experiment. Each mouse was subcutaneously immunized with formulations containing 50 μg of peptide on day 0. Animals were given booster immunizations on days 21 and 42. P1 was emulsified in CFA at a 1:1 ratio for the first immunization and boosted with same inoculum emulsified in IFA. Blood samples were taken from tail tip of each mouse the day before immunization and two weeks after each boost.
Immunoassays and antibody titres
B cell-specific IgG antibody responses to the administered vaccine constructs in immunized mouse sera were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as reported previously [30,31]. Specifically, 96-well microtitre plates were coated with malaria peptide antigen (P1) and polyleucine-conjugated peptide antigen (pL1, pL2 and pL3), separately, with carbonate coating buffer (pH = 9.6; 5 μg of peptide per plate). To block the uncoated active sites in the well, 0.5% skim milk/PBS-tween-20 buffer solution (pH 7.2) was used. All sera were diluted (1:1000) in PBS containing 0.05% skim milk/PBS-tween-20 buffer and incubated for 90 min at 37°C. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG/goat anti-human IgG (Sigma) was used as a secondary antibody in the ELISA. o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) was used as substrate for the enzymatic reaction. After washing the plates, OPD solution (100 μL/well) was added to the wells for 20 min. The absorbance was then measured by plate reader at 450 nm. IgG titres were identified as the lowest dilution in the wells with an optical density three times greater than the standard deviation compared to the average value of the optical density of the sera collected from pre-immunized mice.
Challenge study
The malaria challenge study was conducted in mice immunized with P. falciparum-derived epitopes followed by P. yoelii infection according to the previously reported method [32]. Mice were bled from tail tip and sera collected 14 days after the second vaccine boost. On the same day, the mice were intravenously infected with an inoculum of 1×105 Plasmodium yoelii 17X infected erythrocytes (200 μL/mouse). The mice were monitored post-challenge. Daily clinical scores of 0 to 4 were assigned based on pallor, posture, activity and activity to external stimuli, fur texture and urine colour. Mice that showed signs of severe distress, according to criteria on the clinical scoresheet, or those that experienced >15% weight loss from the time of challenge, were euthanized using CO2 gas or by cervical dislocation.
The blood was collected every 2 days following challenge and the average weight and hemoglobin were measured every 4 days. Blood smears were collected from the tail tip of each mouse. Slides were air-dried, fixed in methanol and stained with Giemsa stain. Peripheral blood parasitemias were determined by counting blood smears. A Hemocue Hb 201+ Analyser was used to measure haemoglobin and a weight balance used to measure weight of each mouse separately.
Results
Synthesis and characterisation of the vaccine candidates
The new vaccine candidates were designed by conjugating polyleucine attached to the peptide epitopes 1, 2 and 3 separately and anchored into mannosylated liposomes (Figs 1C and 2). Vaccine constructs pL1, pL2 and pL3 conjugates were first synthesised by Boc-SPPS. The mannose receptor targeting moiety, ML-1, was produced as a conjugate of mannose, a short peptide linker (SSKK) and lipid (C16; 2-aminohexadecanoic acid) [20,21], while ML-2 was produced as a conjugate of mannose, PEG linker, and DOPE lipid [26]. Cationic liposomes were produced by lipid film hydration using DPPC, DDAB and cholesterol, as described previously [33]. All the polyleucine conjugated epitopes (pL1-pL3) and mannose conjugates (ML-1 and ML-2) were incorporated during the thin film formation step. As each liposomal formulation contained pL1, pL2 and pL3, a mixture of the three polyleucine-conjugated epitopes (pL) was self-assembled to serve as a control (Fig 2). Blank liposomes, BL-1, and BL-2 anchored only with mannosylated lipids (ML-1 and ML-2) were also formulated as control (Fig 2).
L-1 and L-2, bearing polyleucine conjugated epitopes (pL1-3) and ML-1 and ML-2 targeting moieties, respectively; the mixture of polyleucine-conjugated epitopes, pL; and the blank liposomes, BL-1 and BL-2.
The particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of L-1, L-2, BL-1, and BL-2 were analysed by dynamic light scattering (Table 1, S6 Fig). The size of the blank liposomes, BL-1 and BL-2 was around 140 nm and the PDI was below 0.1. After anchoring pL1-pL3 and ML-1 or ML-2 into the liposomes, size and PDI increased slightly, as expected. pL generated larger nanoparticles with very broad size distribution.
The conformation of P1, pL1, pL2 and pL3 was analysed by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy (Fig 3). A more random (78%) than α-helical (22%) conformation was observed for P1 peptides. Polyleucine-conjugated peptide pL1 formed as 72% α-helical and 27% random coil. Peptide pL2 adopted mainly a β-sheet conformation (72% β-sheet, 26% α-helical and 1% random coil). The third peptide pL3 adopted both β-sheet and α-helical conformations (45% β-sheet, 45% α-helical and 9% random coil).
The conformation of P1, pL1, pL2 and pL3 was compared with the predicted conformation structure of parent epitopes 1–3 derived from MSP-1 and RESA by I-TASSER online server (Table 2). The conformation of vaccine components (P1, pL1- pL3) did not match with the parent epitopes 1–3. Therefore, we have also investigated the conservation of epitopes between parasite species. MSP-1 and RESA protein sequences from both P.yoelii and P. falciparum species were aligned using ClustalW and resulted in overall sequence similarity score of 25% and 16% (S7 and S8 Figs).
Antibody responses
Female BALB/c mice were selected for the immunization study for congruency with the previous P1 study [10]. All mice received a single primary immunization (on day 0) and two boosts (on days 21 and 42) via the subcutaneous route. In this study, the previously reported vaccine candidate (P1+CFA) was used as a positive control, while PBS+CFA, BL-1 and BL-2 were used as negative controls. Peptides pL, L-1 and L-2 were administered as new vaccine candidates. The production of P1, pL1, pL2, and pL3-specific antibodies (IgG) was measured using an ELISA (Fig 4). Following the second boost, sera from pL, L-1 and L-2 immunized mice showed significantly higher pL1, pL2 and pL3-specific antibody titres compared to the negative control (PBS+CFA). While pL and L-1 induced significantly lower antibody titres compared to the positive control (P1+CFA), L-2-immunized mice produced similar epitope-specific IgG titres to P1/CFA. All new vaccine candidates (pL1-pL3) produced lower P1-specific IgG titres than P1+CFA immunized mice.
The mean value of each group is represented by a horizontal bar. The mean titre of each new vaccine group was compared to that of the positive (P1+CFA) and negative control (PBS+CFA) groups. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns: Not significant (p > 0.05). (n = 7 mice/group).
Malaria challenge experiment
The parasitemia, survival, clinical scores, haemoglobin level and body weight of all the immunized mice were monitored post-challenge until all mice were euthanised (Fig 5). The mice developed progressively higher parasitemias post-challenge until all immunized mice were euthanised by day 14 (Fig 5A and 5B). All immunized mice showed peak clinical scores of 3 to 4 (Fig 5C). At the time of challenge, the average hemoglobin levels were between 150–180 g/L; these gradually deceased following challenge in all groups to 30–45 g/L by day 12 (Fig 5D). Weight loss was also observed in all mice following challenge (Fig 5E).
a) parasitemia curve; b) survival percentage; c) clinical score; d) average haemoglobin; and e) average weight following injection of Plasmodium yoelii. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. N = 7 mice/group. Data is presented as mean ± SEM.
Discussion
A multiple antigen peptide, P1 composed of epitopes derived from P. falciparum MSP-1 and RESA (Fig 1A) produced high IgG titres against epitopes in mice when administered with CFA, as reported previously [9,10]. When the vaccine efficacy was investigated against P. yoelii, P1/CFA showed promising protective antimalarial efficacy [10]. However, this vaccine construct cannot be used for further preclinical vaccine development as CFA is toxic [34,35]. To overcome this problem, we designed three CFA-free vaccine candidates pL, L-1, and L-2 (Fig 2). The vaccine construct, pL contained a mixture of polyleucine-conjugated epitopes pL1-3, L-1 anchored in mannosylated liposomes carrying ML-1 and L-2 anchored in mannosylated liposomes carrying ML-2. The vaccine candidate L-2 was very effective in inducing IgG production and the produced titres against all three epitopes were equivalent to those induced by CFA-adjuvanted P1 (Fig 4). Therefore, mannosylated liposomes anchoring polyleucine-conjugated antigens were more effective than polyleucine conjugates antigens alone. However, P1-specific IgG titres induced by the new vaccine candidates, including L-2, were significantly lower than those induced by P1+CFA, suggesting that a large portion of pL, L-1 and L-2 induced antibodies do not recognise multiepitope P1.
Moreover, despite the production of high antibody titres, pL, L-1 and L-2 did not protect immunized mice against parasite challenge (Fig 5). More surprisingly, even the previously reported vaccine candidate, P1 failed to provide protection to immunized mice. The antibodies generated against epitopes 1–3 and even against P1 were completely ineffective in providing any protection against challenge with the P. yoelii 17X parasite. One possible explanation for this unexpected outcome is the conformational constraints of B cell epitopes. B cell epitopes must maintain the conformational properties of the native protein to generate effective humoral immune responses [36,37]. However, the three-dimension (3D) Xray structures of MSP-1 and RESA are unknown; therefore, we used the I-TESSER online server to predict the whole 3D structure of these proteins along with the polyleucine-conjugated epitopes derived from MSP-1 and RESA.
According to the models, epitopes 1–3 derived from MSP-1 and RESA (Fig 1A) were mostly α-helical within the native proteins (Table 2). The conformation of polyleucine-conjugated epitopes (pL1-pL3) did not fully match the conformational structure of the parent epitopes (Table 2). Generally, polyleucine enhances the helicity of conjugated epitopes [38]. However, here, conjugation with polyleucine failed to induce helicity in the peptide epitopes (Table 2). This may explain why vaccine candidates that triggered the production of high levels of epitope-specific antibodies failed to protect mice against parasite challenge. There is a possibility, the 3D computational prediction of MSP-1 and RESA structures may have been inaccurate or an amino acid other than leucine should be used to control epitope conformation. Longer peptide epitopes (> 20 amino acids) [14,28], epitopes flanked with α-helicity-inducing sequences [15] and epitope dimers [39] have previously been reported as effective solutions for the conformational demands of B-cell epitopes. However, in our study, even P1 adjuvanted with CFA failed to provide protection against P. yoelii 17X challenge in mice [10]. Thus, we investigated the conservation of the epitopes between P. falciparum epitopes and P. yoelii 17X. Surprisingly, MSP-1 and RESA alignment showed that epitopes are not conserved between the two malaria species (S7 and S8 Figs). This explains why anti-P1 antibodies did not recognize P. yoelii antigens, and did not provide protection, contrary to the previously reported data [10]. Thus, our vaccine candidates could be only examined in challenge with P. falciparum, which is incompatible with current mice model.
Conclusion
In summary, were developed several polyleucine-conjugated epitopes anchored into mannosylated liposomes as P. falciparum vaccine candidates against malaria. The vaccine candidates were efficient in triggering epitope-specific antibody production. Unfortunately, immunized mice were not protected against challenge with the rodent malaria parasite P. yoelii 17X. Surprisingly, the previously reported vaccine candidate (P1+CFA) also failed to deliver any protection in mice against P. yoelii infection. Potential serious flaws in the vaccine design based on MSP-1 and RESA were identified including conformation and sequence mismatch between proteins of different origin, and inadequacy of Plasmodium yoelii-based challenge for P. falciparum proteins derived vaccine. Thus, the developed here vaccine candidates could be only examined in challenge with P. falciparum.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 8 software was used to analyse the data. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyse the survival percentage of mice. Multiple comparisons were performed by Dunnett’s comparison test using one-way ANOVA. Data were considered significantly different at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.000; differences were non-significant at p > 0.05.
Supporting information
S6 Fig. Particle’s size (nm) of a) BL-1, b) BL-2, c) L-1, d) L-2, and e) pL.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264961.s006
(TIF)
S7 Fig. Protein sequences alignment of P. falciparum and P. yoelii ring associated surface antigen (RESA) proteins using ClustalW server v2.1, yellow highlighted sequence showing lack of similarity of BT2 epitope (within P. falciparum RESA protein) to the corresponding sequence in P. yoelii. and P. falciparum RESA protein (UniProt P13830-1) sequence is only 14.7% similar to that of P. yoelii RESA protein (UniProt Q7RH32-1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264961.s007
(TIF)
S8 Fig. Protein sequences alignment of P. falciparum and P. yoelii MSP-1 proteins using ClustalW server v2.1, yellow highlighted sequences showing lack of similarity of BT1 and B1 epitopes (within P. falciparum MSP-1 protein) to the corresponding sequence in P. yoelii. and P. falciparum MSP-1 protein (UniProt A0A024V850-1) sequence is only 24.8% similar to that of P. yoelii MSP-1 protein (UniProt P13828-1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264961.s008
(TIF)
References
- 1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22. pmid:33069326
- 2.
World malaria report 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2020.
- 3. Laurens MB. RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (Mosquirix™): an overview. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(3):480–9. pmid:31545128
- 4. Anders RF. The case for a subunit vaccine against malaria. Trends in parasitology. 2011;27(8):330–4. pmid:21592861
- 5. Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Peptide-based synthetic vaccines. Chemical science. 2016;7(2):842–54. pmid:28791117
- 6. Azmi F, Ahmad Fuaad AA, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Recent progress in adjuvant discovery for peptide-based subunit vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(3):778–96. pmid:24300669
- 7. Miura K. Progress and prospects for blood-stage malaria vaccines. Expert review of vaccines. 2016;15(6):765–81. pmid:26760062
- 8. Ellis RD, Sagara I, Doumbo O, Wu Y. Blood stage vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum: current status and the way forward. Human Vaccines. 2010;6(8):627–34. pmid:20519960
- 9. Chauhan VS, Chatterjee S, Johar PK. Synthetic peptides based on conserved Plasmodium falciparum antigens are immunogenic and protective against Plasmodium yoelii malaria. Parasite Immunol. 1993;15(4):239–42. pmid:7685076
- 10. Chatterjee S, Sharma P, Kumar S, Chauhan VS. Fine specificity of immune responses to epitopic sequences in synthetic peptides containing B and T epitopes from the conserved Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigens. Vaccine. 1995;13(15):1474–81. pmid:8578829
- 11. Azuar A, Li Z, Shibu MA, Zhao L, Luo Y, Shalash AO, et al. Poly(hydrophobic amino acid)-Based Self-Adjuvanting Nanoparticles for Group A Streptococcus Vaccine Delivery. J Med Chem. 2021;64(5):2648–58. pmid:33529034
- 12. Borgheti-Cardoso LN, San Anselmo M, Lantero E, Lancelot A, Serrano JL, Hernández-Ainsa S, et al. Promising nanomaterials in the fight against malaria. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2020;8(41):9428–48. pmid:32955067
- 13. Skwarczynski M, Zhao G, Boer JC, Ozberk V, Azuar A, Cruz JG, et al. Poly (amino acids) as a potent self-adjuvanting delivery system for peptide-based nanovaccines. Science advances. 2020;6(5):eaax2285. pmid:32064333
- 14. Bartlett S, Skwarczynski M, Xie X, Toth I, Loukas A, Eichenberger RM. Development of natural and unnatural amino acid delivery systems against hookworm infection. Precision Nanomed. 2020;3:471–82.
- 15. Azuar A, Li Z, Shibu MA, Zhao L, Luo Y, Shalash AO, et al. Poly (hydrophobic amino acid)-Based Self-Adjuvanting Nanoparticles for Group A Streptococcus Vaccine Delivery. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2021;64(5):2648–58. pmid:33529034
- 16. Ghaffar KA, Giddam AK, Zaman M, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Liposomes as nanovaccine delivery systems. Current topics in medicinal chemistry. 2014;14(9):1194–208. pmid:24678703
- 17.
Marasini N, Ghaffar K, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Liposomes as a vaccine delivery system. Micro and Nanotechnology in vaccine Development: Elsevier; 2017. p. 221–39.
- 18. Huang W-C, Deng B, Seffouh A, Ortega J, Long CA, Suresh RV, et al. Antibody response of a particle-inducing, liposome vaccine adjuvant admixed with a Pfs230 fragment. NPJ vaccines. 2020;5(1):1–9. pmid:31908850
- 19. Al-Nazal HA, Cooper E, Ho MF, Eskandari S, Majam V, Giddam AK, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of a whole-parasite vaccine to control human babesiosis. Cell Host & Microbe. 2021;29:894–903. pmid:33989514
- 20. Giddam AK, Reiman JM, Zaman M, Skwarczynski M, Toth I, Good MF. A semi-synthetic whole parasite vaccine designed to protect against blood stage malaria. Acta biomaterialia. 2016;44:295–303. pmid:27544810
- 21. Ssemaganda A, Giddam AK, Low LM, Liu XQ, Ho M-F, Zaman M, et al. Mannosylated liposomes formulated with whole parasite P. falciparum blood-stage antigens are highly immunogenic in mice. Vaccine. 2020;38(6):1494–504. pmid:31866187
- 22. Muttenthaler M, Albericio F, Dawson PE. Methods, setup and safe handling for anhydrous hydrogen fluoride cleavage in Boc solid-phase peptide synthesis. Nature Protocols. 2015;10(7):1067–83. pmid:26086408
- 23. Dai C, Khalil ZG, Hussein WM, Yang J, Wang X, Zhao L, et al. Opsonic activity of conservative versus variable regions of the group a streptococcus M protein. Vaccines. 2020;8(2):210.
- 24. Giddam AK, Reiman JM, Zaman M, Skwarczynski M, Toth I, Good MF. A semi-synthetic whole parasite vaccine designed to protect against blood stage malaria. Acta Biomater. 2016;44:295–303. pmid:27544810
- 25.
Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Lipid-core-peptide system for self-adjuvanting synthetic vaccine delivery. Bioconjugation Protocols: Springer; 2011. p. 297–308.
- 26. Hussein WM, Cheong YS, Liu C, Liu G, Begum AA, Attallah MA, et al. Peptide-based targeted polymeric nanoparticles for siRNA delivery. Nanotechnology. 2019;30(41):415604. pmid:31295734
- 27. Dai CC, Yang J, Hussein WM, Zhao L, Wang X, Khalil ZG, et al. Polyethylenimine: An Intranasal Adjuvant for Liposomal Peptide-Based Subunit Vaccine against Group A Streptococcus. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2020;6(9):2502–12. pmid:32786276
- 28. Fuaad AAA, Pearson MS, Pickering DA, Becker L, Zhao G, Loukas AC, et al. Lipopeptide nanoparticles: development of vaccines against hookworm parasite. ChemMedChem. 2015;10(10):1647–54. pmid:26269385
- 29. Greenfield NJ. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nature protocols. 2006;1(6):2876–90. pmid:17406547
- 30. Faruck MO, Koirala P, Yang J, D’Occhio MJ, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Polyacrylate-GnRH Peptide Conjugate as an Oral Contraceptive Vaccine Candidate. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(7):1081. pmid:34371772
- 31. Yang J, Firdaus F, Azuar A, Khalil ZG, Marasini N, Capon RJ, et al. Cell-Penetrating Peptides-Based Liposomal Delivery System Enhanced Immunogenicity of Peptide-Based Vaccine against Group A Streptococcus. Vaccines. 2021;9(5):499. pmid:34066099
- 32. Low LM, Ssemaganda A, Liu XQ, Ho MF, Ozberk V, Fink J, et al. Controlled Infection Immunization Using Delayed Death Drug Treatment Elicits Protective Immune Responses to Blood-Stage Malaria Parasites. Infection and immunity. 2019;87(1). pmid:30323025
- 33. Dai CC, Huang W, Yang J, Hussein WM, Wang J, Khalil ZG, et al. Polyethylenimine quantity and molecular weight influence its adjuvanting properties in liposomal peptide vaccines. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2021;40:127920. pmid:33705898
- 34. Oscherwitz J, Hankenson F, Yu F, Cease KB. Low-dose intraperitoneal Freund’s adjuvant: toxicity and immunogenicity in mice using an immunogen targeting amyloid-β peptide. Vaccine. 2006;24(15):3018–25. pmid:16307832
- 35. Powers JG, Nash PB, Rhyan JC, Yoder CA, Miller LA. Comparison of immune and adverse effects induced by AdjuVac and Freund’s complete adjuvant in New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Lab animal. 2007;36(9):51–8. pmid:17885664
- 36. Skwarczynski M, Dougall AM, Khoshnejad M, Chandrudu S, Pearson MS, Loukas A, et al. Peptide-based subunit vaccine against hookworm infection. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46870. pmid:23056500
- 37. Bartlett S, Eichenberger RM, Nevagi RJ, Ghaffar KA, Marasini N, Dai Y, et al. Lipopeptide-Based Oral Vaccine Against Hookworm Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;221(6):934–42. pmid:31621864
- 38. Malkov SN, Živković MV, Beljanski MV, Hall MB, Zarić SD. A reexamination of the propensities of amino acids towards a particular secondary structure: classification of amino acids based on their chemical structure. Journal of molecular modeling. 2008;14(8):769–75. pmid:18504624
- 39. Skwarczynski M, A Kamaruzaman K, Srinivasan S, Zaman M, Lin I, R Batzloff M, et al. M-protein-derived conformational peptide epitope vaccine candidate against Group A Streptococcus. Current drug delivery. 2013;10(1):39–45. pmid:22998043