Altered resting state functional connectivity in youth with congenital heart disease operated during infancy

Vincente Enguix; Kaitlyn Easson; Guillaume Gilbert; Christine Saint-Martin; Charles Rohlicek; David Luck; Gregory Anton Lodygensky; Marie Brossard-Racine

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264781

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) has been associated with structural brain growth and long-term developmental impairments, including deficits in learning, memory, and executive functions. Altered functional connectivity has been shown to be altered in neonates born with CHD; however, it is unclear if these early life alterations are also present during adulthood. Therefore, this study aimed to compare resting state functional connectivity networks associated with executive function deficits between youth (16 to 24 years old) with complex CHD (mean age = 20.13; SD = 2.35) who underwent open-heart surgery during infancy and age- and sex-matched controls (mean age = 20.41; SD = 2.05). Using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function–Adult Version questionnaire, we found that participants with CHD presented with poorer performance on the inhibit, initiate, emotional control, working memory, self-monitor, and organization of materials clinical scales than healthy controls. We then compared the resting state networks theoretically corresponding to these impaired functions, namely the default mode, dorsal attention, fronto-parietal, fronto-orbital, and amygdalar networks, between the two groups. Participants with CHD presented with decreased functional connectivity between the fronto-orbital cortex and the hippocampal regions and between the amygdala and the frontal pole. Increased functional connectivity was observed within the default mode network, the dorsal attention network, and the fronto-parietal network. Overall, our results suggest that youth with CHD present with disrupted resting state functional connectivity in widespread networks and regions associated with altered executive functioning.

Citation: Enguix V, Easson K, Gilbert G, Saint-Martin C, Rohlicek C, Luck D, et al. (2022) Altered resting state functional connectivity in youth with congenital heart disease operated during infancy. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0264781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781

Editor: Sirio Cocozza, University of Naples Federico II, ITALY

Received: September 21, 2021; Accepted: February 16, 2022; Published: April 15, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Enguix et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Data may be found at Open Science Framework (OSF) DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UPMX5.

Funding: Guillaume Gilbert is an employee of Philips Healthcare who per our institutional agreement provided support during the implementation of the MRI acquisition protocol. Philips Healthcare provided support in the form of salaries for one author [G.G] but did not fund or sponsor the study and did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Guillaume Gilbert is an employee of Philips Healthcare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) refers to the presence of structural malformation(s) of the heart walls, valves, main blood vessels, and their relationships, resulting in impaired blood flow. With an incidence of 0.85% live births per year in Canada, CHD is the most common neonatal defect [1]. The standard of care practice for most complex CHD lesions is to perform open-heart surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass during infancy, resulting in a significant improvement in life expectancy [2]. Although these individuals are now expected to live well into adulthood, a large variety of neurodevelopmental impairments are reported during childhood and adolescence. Among these, difficulties with language, social cognition, and higher order cognitive abilities have been widely reported [3–6]. Moreover, the emerging literature in older children, adolescents, and adults with CHD converge in reporting specific difficulties with executive functions associated with poorer psychosocial health status and quality of life [3–5, 7, 8].

It is now well recognized that CHD impacts brain development during the antenatal and neonatal periods [9]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has contributed to our understanding of cerebral pathophysiological mechanisms in CHD. Indeed, a growing body of quantitative structural MRI studies have reported the presence of regional alterations in brain development in adolescents and young adults with complex CHD [10]. Differences reported include smaller volumes or morphometric variations in the cortical and subcortical grey matter [3, 11–13], as well as microstructural alterations predominantly in the association tracts and frontal regions [14, 15]. Moreover, previous findings have reported associations between regional structural alterations and cognitive functions; however, these relationships were generally small in magnitude [3, 13, 16].

When examining brain functional connectivity in CHD, results are scarce. Resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) is a neuroimaging technique that evaluates regional brain interactions occurring while the participant is at rest (i.e., not performing any task). This technique allows the investigation of resting state networks, which provide information about inherent brain function during normal development or following injury. Resting state fMRI uses the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal to measure spontaneous low frequency fluctuations (<0.1 Hz) in absence of a stimulus. This technique allows for the exploration of synchronous activations between different brain regions to describe networks, known as Resting State Networks, that can be reproducible across subjects [17]. Since the discovery of resting state networks, rs-fMRI studies have provided new insights into the understanding of typical and atypical brain functioning at rest when studying various pediatric and adult brain pathologies, including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease [18–20]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study to date has examined functional connectivity using rs-fMRI in individuals with CHD. The authors reported that neonates with complex CHD, prior to open-heart surgery, presented with preserved global functional network organization, but altered regional functional connectivity, when compared to healthy controls [21]. More precisely, altered functional connectivity was found in subcortical regions, including the putamen, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, and thalamus, and in various cortical regions, especially in frontal, parietal, and temporal areas. Although this first study provides valuable insight into functional network topology and regional functional connectivity, it remains unknown if these functional connectivity deficits remain present beyond the post-surgical period. Moreover, whether these connectivity alterations are associated with later-developing cognitive functions remains to be determined. The current study aimed to fill these gaps. To do so, we sought to compare functional connectivity between youth with complex CHD who had undergone open-heart surgery during infancy and healthy peers, targeting networks associated with at-risk executive functions. We hypothesized that youth with complex CHD would exhibit altered functional connectivity in networks associated with executive functioning. As a secondary objective, we also explored the direct relationships between functional network connectivity and altered executive functions. A better understanding of the neural correlates of cognitive difficulties in youth with complex CHD will provide insight into the development and implications of the disease.

Materials and methods

Participants

French- and English-speaking youth aged 16 to 24 years old born with complex CHD who underwent open-heart surgery (OHS) using cardiopulmonary bypass during the first year after birth were enrolled in this study. Participants born preterm (<37 weeks of gestation), with documented congenital infection, a known chromosomal or genetic abnormality, or multiorgan dysmorphic features were excluded. Participants with CHD were recruited from the pediatric and the adult cardiology units of the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) as previously reported [13].

A control group, matched for age and sex, was recruited from local colleges, universities, and the community through advertisements and word of mouth. Controls were considered healthy if they had no history of brain tumor or malformation, traumatic brain injury, developmental or neurologic conditions and had not received rehabilitation or special education services during childhood or adolescence. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant, or legal guardians when younger than 18 years old. The study was approved by the MUHC Pediatric Research Ethics Board.

Individual and clinical variables

All the participants underwent a single study visit at the Montreal Children’s Hospital to complete a brain MRI. Height and weight were measured before the MRI to compute body mass index (BMI). Socioeconomic status (SES) was measured using the Hollingshead Four-Factor Index questionnaire [22] and relevant clinical information, such as cardiac diagnosis, age at first surgery, and number of open-heart surgeries, was extracted from the medical records of the CHD participants.

Executive function and self-regulation

On the day of the MRI, participants completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function–Adult Scale (BRIEF-A) a norm-referenced, self-reported questionnaire that evaluates executive function and self-regulation [23]. This test is composed of nine clinical scales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, self-monitor, initiate, working memory, plan/organize, task monitor, and organization of materials, which together provide a total score for metacognition and behavioral regulation. On the BRIEF-A, higher scores represent poorer executive functioning.

MRI data acquisition

Participants underwent a single brain MRI on a 3.0 T MRI (Achieva X-series, Philips Healthcare) using a 32-channel head coil. The acquisition protocol included three-dimensional 1 mm isotropic T1-weighted images (TE = 3.7 ms, TR = 8.1 ms, TI = 1010 ms, pixel bandwidth = 191.4 Hz/pixel, FOV = 240x240 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, flip angle = 8°) and a gradient-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence (TE = 30 ms, TR = 2600ms, pixel bandwidth = 2197.48 Hz/pixel, FOV = 240x240 mm, acquisition matrix = 80x80, slice thickness = 3 mm, flip angle = 70°, 47 slices/volume, interleaved, no gap). During the resting-state sequence, participants were awake and instructed to keep their eyes closed. The anatomical images were reviewed for overt brain anomalies by an experienced neuroradiologist, who was blinded to the clinical history of the participants.

MRI data processing

Before pre-processing, T1-weighted and EPI images were visually inspected for possible artifacts (e.g., spikes, signal loss, aliasing). Spatial pre-processing of images was first performed and included the following steps: functional cross-realignment for head motion correction, slice timing correction, outlier scrubbing [24], tissue segmentation, normalization to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 152 space, and outlier detection using the Artifact Detection Tool (ART) (www.nitrc.org/projects/artifact_detect). Total grey matter masks before normalization were used to examine grey matter volume differences between the two groups. Afterwards, data were spatially smoothed with an 8 mm full-width half-maximum gaussian kernel [25].

We used a gaussian kernel of 2–3 times the voxel size, as this has been shown to be optimal to correct for truncation artifacts [26], to increase signal-to-noise ratio, and to reduce the influence of residual variability and gyral anatomy across subjects. After spatial pre-processing, realigned images in MNI space were visually inspected by overlapping the MNI structures over structural and functional data to confirm optimal realignment.

The BOLD signal of interest may be altered by macro vessel signal, mainly those located in the pial surface, as well as by some non-physiological signals, such as head motion. To correct for these nuisance variables, temporal processing was performed using a component-based noise correction method [27–29]. From the T1-weighted images, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid were segmented using SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and used in a subsequent step to remove the temporal confounding factors. Nuisance variables were based on cerebrospinal fluid signal, white matter signal, motion, and realignment parameters [28]. Potential outliers were identified from subject motion and observed global BOLD signal using ART. Volumes with framewise displacement higher than 0.5 mm and/or that presented global signal changes above 3 standard deviations were identified as outliers. The anatomical CompCor method was used for nuisance correction [27, 30], as it has been shown to be as efficient as global signal regression-based methods, but without inducing undue anti-correlations [27, 31]. Functional data were linearly detrended and band-pass filtered [0.008–0.09Hz] to adjust for low frequency fluctuations related to very slow head displacements, scanner-related drifts, and high frequency noise effects [32–35].

A quality control plot was created to detect outliers after denoising, consisting of a voxel-to-voxel correlation histogram. Before denoising, functional connectivity distribution values within the whole brain showed highly positively skewed distributions and appeared to be very different across subjects due to the influence of large-scale physiological signals and head motion effects. After having corrected for the aforementioned confounders, functional connectivity distributions appeared to be well centered and very similar across subjects, suggesting that the noise effect had been appropriately removed [S1 Fig]. To achieve the desired denoising data quality, we employed for every subject: white matter (5 components), cerebrospinal fluid (5 components), scrubbing (one per identified outlier volume), motion (6 components + 1^st order derivatives). After this step, as the degrees of freedom of every participant were still high, we decided to include the quadratic effects to the realignment component to improve motion related denoising. Finally, we used the number of degrees of freedom remaining after the denoising process as an exclusion factor, excluding subjects with less than 15 degrees of freedom. All the participants presented with centered and normalized data and enough degrees of freedom to be analyzed.

To process and analyze the resting state fMRI data, we used the CONN Toolbox 18.b (http://nitrc.org/projects/conn), based on SPM12 and running in MATLAB R2018a (MathWorks, Inc, Natick, MA, USA) on an Ubuntu 18.04 machine.

Seed selection

Seed-based functional connectivity (SBC) analysis was performed to identify differences in brain functional connectivity between the CHD and control groups. Considering the increasingly recognized functional challenges reported in adolescents and young adults with CHD, we chose to use a hypothesis-driven approach over a data-driven approach to compare functional connectivity in networks related to executive function as identified by the BRIEF-A. Seeds for each region and network were placed using the probabilistic Harvard-Oxford atlas (http://neuro.debian.net/pkgs/fsl-harvard-oxford-atlases.html). The selected seeds corresponded to brain regions or networks known to be involved in executive functions that were found to be significantly different in our group comparisons of the BRIEF-A clinical scales. In line with these findings, we analyzed the default mode network (internal modes of cognition) [36], the dorsal attention network (attentional capabilities) [37], the fronto-parietal [38] and fronto-orbital networks (high-level cognition function) [39, 40], and the amygdalar network (emotional control) [41, 42]. To assess the different networks, seeds were placed as specified in the Conn toolbox [32]. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) were chosen to assess the default mode network (DMN), the intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) and the frontal eye fields (FEF) to assess the dorsal attention network (DAN), and the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and the parietal cortex (PPC) to assess the fronto-parietal network (FPN). The fronto-orbital network was added to the analyses given its link with executive functions and the amygdalar network was added for playing an important role in emotional control, with seeds placed in the fronto-orbital cortex and in the amygdala, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Participants’ characteristics and BRIEF-A scores.

Participants’ characteristics were compared between the CHD and control groups using independent sample t-tests or chi-square tests, as appropriate. Variables that showed significant group differences were considered potential confounders and included in subsequent analyses. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were performed for each clinical scale of the BRIEF-A, using potential confounders as covariates when relevant. The only significantly different confounder between the CHD and control groups was socioeconomic status, which was included as a covariate in subsequent analyses. In all analyses, the alpha level was set at 0.05.

Resting state functional connectivity.

The average time series of each single seed was computed across each seed region in each participant, and then correlated with the time series of every other voxel in the brain. Correlation maps were calculated using the standard Pearson product-moment formula as described in Biswal et al. [43]. Correlation coefficients were normalized by Fisher’s z-transformation.

Group differences in functional connectivity between CHD and controls were assessed using ANCOVA, using socioeconomic status as a covariate. Statistical significance between groups was established as p < 0.001 (uncorrected) at the voxel level and as p < 0.05 (corrected for family wise error [FWE]) at the cluster level [44, 45].

Additionally, to explore the direct associations between network functional connectivity and executive function deficits, we performed two-tailed Pearson correlations between functional connectivity and BRIEF-A scores, focusing on the BRIEF-A scales previously identified to be significantly different between the two groups. These correlation analyses were performed separately in the control and CHD groups. The level of statistical significance as set at p < 0.05. We did not correct for multiple comparisons considering the exploratory nature of these analyses.

Results

Participants’ characteristics

In total, we collected 43 rs-fMRI acquisitions in the CHD group and 47 in the control group. Of these, five participants from the CHD group and two from the control group were excluded from the analysis for not having a complete rs-fMRI acquisition. Another CHD participant was excluded from the analysis for not passing the aforementioned quality assessment. Our final sample for analysis consisted of 37 participants with CHD (14/37 male) and 45 controls (19/45 male). Of the 37 participants with CHD, 32 (86.49%) presented with a two-ventricular cardiac physiology: dextro-transposition of the great arteries (n = 13), Tetralogy of Fallot (n = 10), total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (n = 2), ventricular and atrial septal defects (n = 5), and truncus arteriosus type I (n = 2). Only 5/37 (13.51%) presented with a univentricular physiology: double outlet right ventricle (n = 1), pulmonary atresia (n = 3), and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (n = 1). CHD participants had between one and four open-heart surgeries (median 1) at the time of the study visit. Mean age at first surgery was 68.65 days old, with a range from zero to 293 days after birth. Socioeconomic status was found to be significantly higher in the control group when compared to the CHD group and was consequently included as a covariate in subsequent analyses. No other significant group differences were found for age at MRI, sex, and BMI [Table 1].

Download:

Table 1. Participants’ characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.t001

Brain anomalies on conventional MRI likely from an acquired origin were detected in 7/37 (18.92%) CHD participants and 4/45 (8.89%) of the controls, which was not statistically different (p = 0.210) These anomalies included: One CHD participant with cystic dilation of the perivascular spaces; two CHD participants with periventricular white matter injury; two CHD participants and three controls with susceptibility artifact, likely representing blood deposition or calcification; and two CHD participants and one control with asymmetrical ventricles. Brain anomalies likely from a developmental origin were found in 6/37 (16.22%) CHD participants and 2/45 (4.44%) controls, (p = 0.123). These anomalies included: Three CHD participants and one control with grey matter heterotopia; two CHD participants and two controls with developmental venous anomalies; one CHD participant with cortical developmental anomaly; and one CHD participant with Chiari I malformation. The observed anomalies were all considered to be mild and from a remote origin, and none of the brain anomalies detected on conventional MRI overlapped with any of the connectivity networks analyzed.

Executive functions

After controlling for SES, participants with CHD demonstrated significantly poorer performance than control participants on the inhibit (F(1,76) = 7.16; p = 0.009), emotional control (F(1,76) = 7.24; p = 0.009), self-monitor (F(1,76) = 7.09; p = 0.009), initiate (F(1,76) = 4.22; p = 0.04), working memory (F(1,76) = 5.25; p = 0.025), and organization of materials (F(1,76) = 18.51; p<0.001) clinical scales of the BRIEF-A. By contrast, there were no significant differences between groups for the shift (F(1,76) = 1.21; p = 0.27), plan/organize (F(1,76) = 3.40; p = 0.07), and task monitor (F(1,76) = 3.53; p = 0.06) clinical scales. Scores for BRIEF-A scales are summarized in Table 2. Participants were classified as having a clinically significant deficit on a given clinical scale when having a score ≥ 65. On average, a greater percentage of participants with CHD had clinically significant executive function deficits as compared to controls (6–40% in CHD vs. 0–13.6% in controls) across the different clinical scales. Differences in the prevalence of clinically significant deficits were statistically significant for the inhibit (χ² = 14.23; p < 0.001), working memory (χ² = 7.1; p = 0.008), and organization of materials (χ² = 11.09; p < 0.001) clinical scales (S1 Table).

Download:

Table 2. BRIEF-A scales results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.t002

Resting state functional connectivity

We performed comparisons of seed-based functional connectivity between the two groups for the default mode, dorsal attention, fronto-parietal, fronto-orbital, and amygdalar networks. For each analysis, the threshold of statistical significance as set to p < 0.001 (uncorrected) at the voxel level and p < 0.05 (corrected for family wise error [FWE]) at the cluster level. Voxels that did not survive the threshold were not displayed.

Decreased functional connectivity.

Fronto-orbital network. Our analyses revealed lower inter-network functional connectivity in the CHD group when compared to controls between the right fronto-orbital cortex and the left hippocampus and between the left fronto-orbital cortex and bilateral hippocampi [Fig 1, Table 3].

Download:

Fig 1. Functional connectivity differences between CHD and control groups where CHD presented lower functional connectivity.

CHD: congenital heart disease, CTL: controls, F.Orb: fronto-orbital network, Amyg: amygdalar network.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.g001

Download:

Table 3. Functional connectivity differences between CHD and control groups where CHD participants presented with lower functional connectivity than controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.t003

Amygdalar network. We found significantly lower inter-network functional connectivity in the CHD group compared to controls between the left amygdala and the right frontal pole and between the left amygdala and the right cingulate and paracingulate gyrus [Fig 1, Table 3].

Increased functional connectivity

Default mode network. When compared to controls, participants with CHD presented with higher intra-network functional connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex [Fig 2, Table 4].

Download:

Fig 2. Functional connectivity differences between CHD and control groups where CHD participants presented with higher functional connectivity than controls.

CHD: congenital heart disease, CTL: controls, DMN: default mode network, DAN: dorsal attention network, FPN: fronto-parietal network.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.g002

Download:

Table 4. Functional connectivity differences between CHD and control groups where CHD participants presented with higher functional connectivity than controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.t004

Dorsal attention network. Similar to the DMN, our analyses showed significantly higher inter-network functional connectivity in participants with CHD when compared to controls between the left intraparietal sulcus (ips_l) and the bilateral hippocampal and parahippocampal regions, but also between the right intraparietal sulcus (ips_r) and the right hippocampal and parahippocampal regions [Fig 2, Table 4]. No significant differences were found for the frontal eye fields.

Fronto-parietal network. We observed significantly higher inter-network functional connectivity in the CHD group when compared to controls between the left parietal cortex (ppc_l) and the left caudate, left accumbens, and left putamen, and between the ppc_l and the right crus of the cerebellum [Fig 2, Table 4]. No significant differences were found for the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Correlations between functional connectivity and BRIEF-A scores

We observed two different sets of significant correlations between functional connectivity and BRIEF-A scores in the CHD participants and in the control participants. In the CHD group, significant correlations were found between right frontal orbital–left hippocampus functional connectivity and the inhibit scale (r = -0.36, p = 0.03), as well as between medial prefrontal cortex–posterior cingulate functional connectivity and the organization of materials scale (r = 0.35, p = 0.038). In the control group, significant correlations were observed between left intraparietal sulcus–right hippocampus functional connectivity and the emotional control scale (r = 0.36, p = 0.014), as well as between left amygdala–cingulate/paracingulate gyrus functional connectivity and the organization of materials scale (r = -0.35, p = 0.019).

Discussion

The present study investigated cerebral functional connectivity in brain networks associated with executive functioning in youth born with complex CHD who had undergone open-heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass during infancy. Our evaluation of function-specific resting state networks revealed statistically significant differences in functional connectivity in youth born with complex CHD, when compared to healthy peers, with significant alterations of functional connectivity within the fronto-orbital cortex, amygdala, default mode, dorsal attention, and fronto-parietal networks.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first resting state functional connectivity study on post-operative CHD patients. The only other previous study of resting state functional connectivity in this population was performed in neonates with complex CHD prior to open-heart surgery [21]. This prior study reported that pre-operative CHD neonates exhibited reduced rich club network organization in functional brain network connectivity when compared to healthy term-born neonates, as well as reduced sub-network connectivity, predominantly implicating the subcortical areas, such as the caudate, putamen, and thalamus, and their connections to the contralateral frontal, parietal, and temporal cortices. They also reported reduced functional connectivity within the hippocampus and other brain structures, in line with our current findings. Indeed, we found decreased functional connectivity in youth with CHD between the fronto-orbital network and the hippocampus. Taken together, these observations may suggest that alterations in hippocampal functional connectivity that are present prior to open-heart surgery likely persist during development and after cerebral hemodynamics have been restored following cardiac surgery. Our results also converge with previous findings from anatomical studies that have demonstrated smaller hippocampal volumes and morphometric differences in adolescents and young adults with CHD, associated with poorer memory and executive functioning [3, 13]. Future fMRI studies using the hippocampal structural input as a seed in network analysis could clarify the relationship between the structural alterations and functional connectivity alterations reported in youth with CHD.

Participants with complex CHD in our study also presented with decreased functional connectivity between the amygdala and frontal and cingulate regions. The amygdala’s interaction with the frontal cortex plays a crucial role in the regulation of emotion [46], known to be vulnerable in CHD survivors and found to be significantly different from controls on the associated BRIEF-A clinical scale. Elevated rates of anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and depression have been reported in adolescents and adults with complex CHD [47, 48], which could theoretically be related to amygdala dysfunction. In adolescents with major depressive disorders, studies have previously shown decreased amygdala functional connectivity [49, 50]. A recent study reported that adults with complex CHD are more likely than controls to present with some personality traits, in particular neuroticism (i.e., experiencing emotional negativity and instability) [51]. However, whether these psychiatric symptoms are present in youth with CHD and are related to altered functional amygdalar connectivity will need to be further investigated, considering that we did not specifically evaluate mental health.

An unexpected finding was the observation of increased functional connectivity of the DMN in participants with CHD when compared to controls. The DMN has been extensively studied in the healthy populations and in various psychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental conditions [36, 44, 52–54]. While decreased functional connectivity within the DMN has been widely reported in pathologies such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease [55], an increased functional connectivity between the mPFC and the PCC has been demonstrated in patients with mild cognitive impairment [53]. This is particularly of interest considering that there is emerging literature suggesting that seniors living with CHD are at greater risk of early onset dementia [56, 57]. Moreover, the DMN is engaged in self-referential (internal) thinking and is disengaged during attentional-demanding (external) processes [54]. Thus, greater activity within the DMN when individuals are at rest is thought to be reflective of difficulties in switching from internal to external thoughts [58]. In participants with CHD, this may reflect their cognitive and attentional dysfunction in daily life [59–61], as they may experience difficulties switching from internal to external stimulation. However, considering that we have not evaluated attention and hyperactivity, this hypothesis remains speculative. Similarly, altered amygdalar connectivity, combined with DMN dysfunction, may underlie in part some of the difficulties in regulating emotions or internal states that are frequently observed in individuals with CHD [52].

Participants with CHD also demonstrated increased functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network and the fronto-parietal network when compared to controls. The dorsal attention network is known to be engaged during externally directed attentional tasks and its activity is increased when individuals must focus their attention on external stimuli. Its level of activity is thought to reflect and predict attentional skills [37]. Although we did not evaluate attention specifically, participants with CHD presented with lower scores on the organization of materials scale, likely reflecting difficulty when handling more than one stimulus at the same time, which is driven in part by attentional skills. Regarding the fronto-parietal network differences, increased resting state functional connectivity was specifically observed in the CHD group between the parietal cortex and the cerebellar Crus 1 and Crus 2 regions. Theses cerebellar regions are known to be involved in executive functions, coherent with our findings [62].

When performing correlations between functional connectivity and BRIEF-A scores, we observed different modest correlations in the two groups. Interestingly, we observed a negative correlation between amygdala–cingulate/paracingulate gyrus connectivity and the organization of materials scale in the control group, while a positive correlation between the default mode intra-network functional connectivity and this scale was detected in the CHD group. Higher levels of inhibition have been shown to correlate with decreased amygdala–cingulate functional connectivity [63]. However, we could not find previous reports of a relationship of organizational cognitive tasks with amygdala–cingulate or default mode network functional connectivity. The lack of strong associations in these exploratory analyses may have been mitigated by the use of a self-reported questionnaire to measure executive functioning, which may have induced some bias. Although the BRIEF-A has been demonstrated to be valid and reliable for measuring executive function in various clinical populations [23], standardized batteries may be more objective in examining a wider range of higher-order cognitive performance.

Abnormalities in functional connectivity may reflect alterations of the structural organization of white matter tracts. Indeed, several diffusion tensor imaging studies have detected lower fractional anisotropy in adolescents with CHD [14, 15, 64–66]. These findings may reflect potential alterations to numerous facets of white matter microstructure, including alterations to myelination, axon density, axon diameter, axon orientation, or cell membrane permeability [67]. Additionally, we recently applied neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, an advanced diffusion MRI modelling technique, in this cohort of CHD survivors, detecting widespread reductions in the neurite density index, reflecting a lower density of axon packing [14]. Altered regions included frontal and limbic white matter tracts, in line with the altered functional connectivity we describe in these regions. Nevertheless, future multi-modal MRI studies combining structural and functional connectivity analyses are needed to disentangle these complex relationships.

Limitations

Our results should be considered within the context of their limitations. It is important to highlight that our sample of CHD participants included a mixed cohort of different CHD physiologies, and therefore cannot be generalized to a specific subtype. Nevertheless, the fact that we included participants with a variety of complex CHD physiologies operated during infancy is representative of the clinical diversity of this condition. Also, we recognize that the use of atlas-based seed selection may have introduced a potential bias [68]. Future studies using data driven approach such as independent component analyses may provide complementary information to the current findings. Additionally, it is important to consider that differences in brain volume and morphometry are common in individuals with CHD as compared to healthy peers [10, 13], which theoretically could have influenced our resting state fMRI results. However, considering that total grey matter volume did not differ between the groups in our sample and that we used a validated pre-processing pipeline that included non-linear registration [69] to overcome this potential effect, we believe this risk to be minimal in the current sample. Lastly, the differences found in socioeconomic status between the two groups may be a limitation of the study; however, we carefully corrected for this potential confounder in our analyses.

Conclusion

The current study provides the first evidence supporting the presence of altered functional connectivity in youth born with complex CHD. Specifically, we found atypical functional connectivity in youth with CHD in the fronto-orbital cortex, amygdala, default mode, dorsal attention, and fronto-parietal networks. In this new era of open-science, future studies using longitudinal imaging in large multi-center cohorts will strengthen our understanding of long-term altered connectivity and how to measure the risk for these alterations at an individual level, in order to better identify at-risk children and adolescents that could benefit from targeted interventions.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Functional connectivity distribution before and after denoising.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Proportion of participants who performed below clinical cut-off on the BRIEF-A.

Overall, a greater percentage of youths with CHD performed below scale’s clinical cutoff (i.e., >65) than control (5.7–40.0% in CHD vs. 0–13.6% in controls) and reaching statistical significance level for three subscales: inhibit (X² = 14.23; p< 0.001), working memory (X² = 7.1; p = 0.008) and organization of material (X² = 11.09; p< 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264781.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants and their families for their participation, and the clinicians, technologists, and research assistants for their implication in this study. At the time of the study, VE received studentship support from Québec Bio-Imaging Network, GAL held a Fonds de recherche du Québec–Santé (FRQ-S) Research Scholar Awards, and MBR a Canada Research Chair in Brain and Child Development.

References

1. Bernier P.L., et al., The challenge of congenital heart disease worldwide: epidemiologic and demographic facts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu, 2010. 13(1): p. 26–34. pmid:20307858
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Reid G.J., et al., Estimates of life expectancy by adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006. 48(2): p. 349–55. pmid:16843186
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Latal B., et al., Hippocampal volume reduction is associated with intellectual functions in adolescents with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Res, 2016. 80(4): p. 531–7. pmid:27356084
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Marelli A., et al., Brain in Congenital Heart Disease Across the Lifespan: The Cumulative Burden of Injury. Circulation, 2016. 133(20): p. 1951–62. pmid:27185022
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Tyagi M., et al., Cognitive dysfunction in adult CHD with different structural complexity. Cardiol Young, 2017. 27(5): p. 851–859. pmid:27751192
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Easson K., et al., A Comparison of Developmental Outcomes of Adolescent Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Survivors Born with a Congenital Heart Defect or Born Preterm. J Pediatr, 2019. 207: p. 34–41 e2. pmid:30528759
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Calderon J. and Bellinger D.C., Executive function deficits in congenital heart disease: why is intervention important? Cardiol Young, 2015. 25(7): p. 1238–46. pmid:26082199
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Cassidy A.R., et al., Executive Function in Children and Adolescents with Critical Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2015. 21(1): p. 34–49. pmid:25487044
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Brossard-Racine M., et al., Brain Injury in Neonates with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Predictive Value of MRI in the Fetal Period? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2016. 37(7): p. 1338–46. pmid:26988809
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Bolduc M.E., et al., Structural brain abnormalities in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart defect: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2018. 60(12): p. 1209–1224. pmid:30028505
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Fontes K., et al., Characterizing the Subcortical Structures in Youth with Congenital Heart Disease. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2020. 41(8): p. 1503–1508. pmid:32719093
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Watson C.G., et al., Altered Gray Matter in Adolescents with d-Transposition of the Great Arteries. J Pediatr, 2016. 169: p. 36–43 e1. pmid:26553098
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Fontes K., et al., Hippocampal alterations and functional correlates in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. Hum Brain Mapp, 2019. 40(12): p. 3548–3560. pmid:31070841
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Easson K., et al., Quantification of apparent axon density and orientation dispersion in the white matter of youth born with congenital heart disease. Neuroimage, 2020. 205: p. 116255. pmid:31605826
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Ehrler M., et al., Altered frontal white matter microstructure is associated with working memory impairments in adolescents with congenital heart disease: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage Clin, 2020. 25: p. 102123. pmid:31869770
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. von Rhein M., et al., Brain volumes predict neurodevelopment in adolescents after surgery for congenital heart disease. Brain, 2014. 137(Pt 1): p. 268–76. pmid:24277720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Lee M.H., Smyser C.D., and Shimony J.S., Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013. 34(10): p. 1866–72. pmid:22936095
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Figueroa C.A., et al., Aberrant default-mode network-hippocampus connectivity after sad memory-recall in remitted-depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2017. 12(11): p. 1803–1813. pmid:28981917
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Wang Y., et al., Abnormal Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Control Network, Default Mode Network, and Visual Attention Network in Internet Addiction: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Front Neurol, 2019. 10: p. 1006. pmid:31620077
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Hojjati S.H., Ebrahimzadeh A., and Babajani-Feremi A., Identification of the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Structural MRI and Resting-State fMRI. Front Neurol, 2019. 10: p. 904. pmid:31543860
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. De Asis-Cruz J., et al., Aberrant brain functional connectivity in newborns with congenital heart disease before cardiac surgery. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 17: p. 31–42. pmid:29034164
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Hollingshead A.B., Four factor index of social status. 1975, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University, Dept. of Sociology. 24, 2, 2 pages.
23. Rouel M., et al., Validation of the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in the obese with and without binge eating disorder. Eat Behav, 2016. 23: p. 58–65. pmid:27497274
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Power J.D., et al., Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage, 2012. 59(3): p. 2142–54. pmid:22019881
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Motoyama Y., et al., Resting-state brain functional connectivity in patients with chronic pain who responded to subanesthetic-dose ketamine. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 12912. pmid:31501482
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lindquist M.A. and Wager T.D., Spatial smoothing in fMRI using prolate spheroidal wave functions. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. 29(11): p. 1276–87. pmid:17979120
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Behzadi Y., et al., A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage, 2007. 37(1): p. 90–101. pmid:17560126
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Friston K.J., et al., Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med, 1996. 35(3): p. 346–55. pmid:8699946
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Power J.D., et al., Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage, 2014. 84: p. 320–41. pmid:23994314
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Muschelli J., et al., Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor. Neuroimage, 2014. 96: p. 22–35. pmid:24657780
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Murphy K., et al., The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage, 2009. 44(3): p. 893–905. pmid:18976716
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Whitfield-Gabrieli S. and Nieto-Castanon A., Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect, 2012. 2(3): p. 125–41. pmid:22642651
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Wehrle F.M., et al., Altered resting-state functional connectivity in children and adolescents born very preterm short title. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 20: p. 1148–1156. pmid:30388598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Alonazi B.K., et al., Resting-state functional brain networks in adults with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy. Brain Behav, 2019. 9(1): p. e01168. pmid:30488645
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Tomiyama H., et al., Dysfunction between dorsal caudate and salience network associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin, 2019. 24: p. 102004. pmid:31622840
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Davey C.G., Pujol J., and Harrison B.J., Mapping the self in the brain’s default mode network. Neuroimage, 2016. 132: p. 390–397. pmid:26892855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Rohr C.S., et al., Functional Connectivity of the Dorsal Attention Network Predicts Selective Attention in 4–7 year-old Girls. Cereb Cortex, 2017. 27(9): p. 4350–4360. pmid:27522072
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Figueroa-Vargas A., et al., Frontoparietal connectivity correlates with working memory performance in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 9310. pmid:32518271
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Barbey A.K., Koenigs M., and Grafman J., Orbitofrontal contributions to human working memory. Cereb Cortex, 2011. 21(4): p. 789–95. pmid:20724371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Ross R.S., et al., Role of the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex during the disambiguation of social cues in working memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2013. 13(4): p. 900–15. pmid:23640112
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. LeDoux J., The amygdala. Curr Biol, 2007. 17(20): p. R868–74. pmid:17956742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Frank D.W., et al., Emotion regulation: quantitative meta-analysis of functional activation and deactivation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014. 45: p. 202–11. pmid:24984244
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Biswal B., et al., Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med, 1995. 34(4): p. 537–41. pmid:8524021
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Zhang L., et al., Distinct BOLD variability changes in the default mode and salience networks in Alzheimer’s disease spectrum and associations with cognitive decline. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 6457. pmid:32296093
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Liu W., et al., Resting-state functional connectivity alterations in periventricular nodular heterotopia related epilepsy. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 18473. pmid:31804610
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Banks S.J., et al., Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2007. 2(4): p. 303–12. pmid:18985136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. DeMaso D.R., et al., Psychiatric Disorders in Adolescents With Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatrics, 2017. 139(3). pmid:28148729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Pike N.A., et al., Brain abnormalities in cognition, anxiety, and depression regulatory regions in adolescents with single ventricle heart disease. J Neurosci Res, 2018. 96(6): p. 1104–1118. pmid:29315714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Cullen K.R., et al., Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adolescent depression. JAMA Psychiatry, 2014. 71(10): p. 1138–47. pmid:25133665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Tang S., et al., Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adults and adolescents with major depressive disorder: A comparative meta-analysis. EBioMedicine, 2018. 36: p. 436–445. pmid:30316866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Skoczek A., et al., Personality traits of patients suffering from congenital heart defects. Wiad Lek, 2019. 72(11 cz 1): p. 2135–2144. pmid:31860861
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Bauml J.G., et al., The Default Mode Network Mediates the Impact of Infant Regulatory Problems on Adult Avoidant Personality Traits. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging, 2019. 4(4): p. 333–342. pmid:30579926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Gardini S., et al., Increased functional connectivity in the default mode network in mild cognitive impairment: a maladaptive compensatory mechanism associated with poor semantic memory performance. J Alzheimers Dis, 2015. 45(2): p. 457–70. pmid:25547636
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Sheline Y.I., et al., The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009. 106(6): p. 1942–7. pmid:19171889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Buckner R.L., Andrews-Hanna J.R., and Schacter D.L., The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008. 1124: p. 1–38. pmid:18400922
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Keir M., et al., Neurocognition in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: How to Monitor and Prevent Progressive Decline. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2019. 35(12): p. 1675–1685. pmid:31570238
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Bagge C.N., et al., Risk of Dementia in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Population-Based Cohort Study. Circulation, 2018. 137(18): p. 1912–1920. pmid:29440121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Bozhilova N.S., et al., Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2018. 92: p. 464–476. pmid:30036553
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Batra A.S., Alexander M.E., and Silka M.J., Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, stimulant therapy, and the patient with congenital heart disease: evidence and reason. Pediatr Cardiol, 2012. 33(3): p. 394–401. pmid:22298228
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Holst L.M., et al., Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children with surgically corrected Ventricular Septal Defect, Transposition of the Great Arteries, and Tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young, 2020. 30(2): p. 180–187. pmid:31928549
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Pierick A.R., et al., Treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with CHD. Cardiol Young, 2021: p. 1–4. pmid:33517944
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Gao Z., et al., The indispensable role of the cerebellum in visual divergent thinking. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 16552. pmid:33024190
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Blackford J.U., et al., Amygdala-cingulate intrinsic connectivity is associated with degree of social inhibition. Biol Psychol, 2014. 99: p. 15–25. pmid:24534162
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Brewster R.C., et al., White Matter Integrity Dissociates Verbal Memory and Auditory Attention Span in Emerging Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2015. 21(1): p. 22–33. pmid:26304056
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Rivkin M.J., et al., Adolescents with D-transposition of the great arteries repaired in early infancy demonstrate reduced white matter microstructure associated with clinical risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013. 146(3): p. 543–9 e1. pmid:23375991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
66. Watson C.G., et al., Altered White Matter Microstructure Correlates with IQ and Processing Speed in Children and Adolescents Post-Fontan. J Pediatr, 2018. 200: p. 140–149 e4. pmid:29934026
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Jones D.K., Knosche T.R., and Turner R., White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage, 2013. 73: p. 239–54. pmid:22846632
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Sheffield J.M. and Barch D.M., Cognition and resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016. 61: p. 108–20. pmid:26698018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
69. Ashburner J. and Friston K.J., Unified segmentation. Neuroimage, 2005. 26(3): p. 839–51. pmid:15955494
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Bernier P.L., et al., The challenge of congenital heart disease worldwide: epidemiologic and demographic facts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu, 2010. 13(1): p. 26–34. pmid:20307858
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Reid G.J., et al., Estimates of life expectancy by adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006. 48(2): p. 349–55. pmid:16843186
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Latal B., et al., Hippocampal volume reduction is associated with intellectual functions in adolescents with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Res, 2016. 80(4): p. 531–7. pmid:27356084
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Marelli A., et al., Brain in Congenital Heart Disease Across the Lifespan: The Cumulative Burden of Injury. Circulation, 2016. 133(20): p. 1951–62. pmid:27185022
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Tyagi M., et al., Cognitive dysfunction in adult CHD with different structural complexity. Cardiol Young, 2017. 27(5): p. 851–859. pmid:27751192
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Easson K., et al., A Comparison of Developmental Outcomes of Adolescent Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Survivors Born with a Congenital Heart Defect or Born Preterm. J Pediatr, 2019. 207: p. 34–41 e2. pmid:30528759
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Calderon J. and Bellinger D.C., Executive function deficits in congenital heart disease: why is intervention important? Cardiol Young, 2015. 25(7): p. 1238–46. pmid:26082199
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Cassidy A.R., et al., Executive Function in Children and Adolescents with Critical Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2015. 21(1): p. 34–49. pmid:25487044
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Brossard-Racine M., et al., Brain Injury in Neonates with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Predictive Value of MRI in the Fetal Period? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2016. 37(7): p. 1338–46. pmid:26988809
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Bolduc M.E., et al., Structural brain abnormalities in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart defect: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2018. 60(12): p. 1209–1224. pmid:30028505
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Fontes K., et al., Characterizing the Subcortical Structures in Youth with Congenital Heart Disease. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2020. 41(8): p. 1503–1508. pmid:32719093
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Watson C.G., et al., Altered Gray Matter in Adolescents with d-Transposition of the Great Arteries. J Pediatr, 2016. 169: p. 36–43 e1. pmid:26553098
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Fontes K., et al., Hippocampal alterations and functional correlates in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. Hum Brain Mapp, 2019. 40(12): p. 3548–3560. pmid:31070841
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Easson K., et al., Quantification of apparent axon density and orientation dispersion in the white matter of youth born with congenital heart disease. Neuroimage, 2020. 205: p. 116255. pmid:31605826
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Ehrler M., et al., Altered frontal white matter microstructure is associated with working memory impairments in adolescents with congenital heart disease: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage Clin, 2020. 25: p. 102123. pmid:31869770
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. von Rhein M., et al., Brain volumes predict neurodevelopment in adolescents after surgery for congenital heart disease. Brain, 2014. 137(Pt 1): p. 268–76. pmid:24277720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lee M.H., Smyser C.D., and Shimony J.S., Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013. 34(10): p. 1866–72. pmid:22936095
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Figueroa C.A., et al., Aberrant default-mode network-hippocampus connectivity after sad memory-recall in remitted-depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2017. 12(11): p. 1803–1813. pmid:28981917
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Wang Y., et al., Abnormal Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Control Network, Default Mode Network, and Visual Attention Network in Internet Addiction: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Front Neurol, 2019. 10: p. 1006. pmid:31620077
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Hojjati S.H., Ebrahimzadeh A., and Babajani-Feremi A., Identification of the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Structural MRI and Resting-State fMRI. Front Neurol, 2019. 10: p. 904. pmid:31543860
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. De Asis-Cruz J., et al., Aberrant brain functional connectivity in newborns with congenital heart disease before cardiac surgery. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 17: p. 31–42. pmid:29034164
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Hollingshead A.B., Four factor index of social status. 1975, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University, Dept. of Sociology. 24, 2, 2 pages.

[ref23] 23. Rouel M., et al., Validation of the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in the obese with and without binge eating disorder. Eat Behav, 2016. 23: p. 58–65. pmid:27497274
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Power J.D., et al., Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage, 2012. 59(3): p. 2142–54. pmid:22019881
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Motoyama Y., et al., Resting-state brain functional connectivity in patients with chronic pain who responded to subanesthetic-dose ketamine. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 12912. pmid:31501482
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lindquist M.A. and Wager T.D., Spatial smoothing in fMRI using prolate spheroidal wave functions. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. 29(11): p. 1276–87. pmid:17979120
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Behzadi Y., et al., A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage, 2007. 37(1): p. 90–101. pmid:17560126
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Friston K.J., et al., Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med, 1996. 35(3): p. 346–55. pmid:8699946
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Power J.D., et al., Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage, 2014. 84: p. 320–41. pmid:23994314
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Muschelli J., et al., Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor. Neuroimage, 2014. 96: p. 22–35. pmid:24657780
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Murphy K., et al., The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage, 2009. 44(3): p. 893–905. pmid:18976716
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Whitfield-Gabrieli S. and Nieto-Castanon A., Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect, 2012. 2(3): p. 125–41. pmid:22642651
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wehrle F.M., et al., Altered resting-state functional connectivity in children and adolescents born very preterm short title. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 20: p. 1148–1156. pmid:30388598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Alonazi B.K., et al., Resting-state functional brain networks in adults with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy. Brain Behav, 2019. 9(1): p. e01168. pmid:30488645
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Tomiyama H., et al., Dysfunction between dorsal caudate and salience network associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin, 2019. 24: p. 102004. pmid:31622840
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Davey C.G., Pujol J., and Harrison B.J., Mapping the self in the brain’s default mode network. Neuroimage, 2016. 132: p. 390–397. pmid:26892855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Rohr C.S., et al., Functional Connectivity of the Dorsal Attention Network Predicts Selective Attention in 4–7 year-old Girls. Cereb Cortex, 2017. 27(9): p. 4350–4360. pmid:27522072
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Figueroa-Vargas A., et al., Frontoparietal connectivity correlates with working memory performance in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 9310. pmid:32518271
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Barbey A.K., Koenigs M., and Grafman J., Orbitofrontal contributions to human working memory. Cereb Cortex, 2011. 21(4): p. 789–95. pmid:20724371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Ross R.S., et al., Role of the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex during the disambiguation of social cues in working memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2013. 13(4): p. 900–15. pmid:23640112
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. LeDoux J., The amygdala. Curr Biol, 2007. 17(20): p. R868–74. pmid:17956742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Frank D.W., et al., Emotion regulation: quantitative meta-analysis of functional activation and deactivation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014. 45: p. 202–11. pmid:24984244
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Biswal B., et al., Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med, 1995. 34(4): p. 537–41. pmid:8524021
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Zhang L., et al., Distinct BOLD variability changes in the default mode and salience networks in Alzheimer’s disease spectrum and associations with cognitive decline. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 6457. pmid:32296093
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Liu W., et al., Resting-state functional connectivity alterations in periventricular nodular heterotopia related epilepsy. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 18473. pmid:31804610
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Banks S.J., et al., Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2007. 2(4): p. 303–12. pmid:18985136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] PubMed/NCBI

[181] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. DeMaso D.R., et al., Psychiatric Disorders in Adolescents With Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatrics, 2017. 139(3). pmid:28148729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] PubMed/NCBI

[185] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Pike N.A., et al., Brain abnormalities in cognition, anxiety, and depression regulatory regions in adolescents with single ventricle heart disease. J Neurosci Res, 2018. 96(6): p. 1104–1118. pmid:29315714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] PubMed/NCBI

[189] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Cullen K.R., et al., Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adolescent depression. JAMA Psychiatry, 2014. 71(10): p. 1138–47. pmid:25133665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Tang S., et al., Abnormal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in adults and adolescents with major depressive disorder: A comparative meta-analysis. EBioMedicine, 2018. 36: p. 436–445. pmid:30316866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Skoczek A., et al., Personality traits of patients suffering from congenital heart defects. Wiad Lek, 2019. 72(11 cz 1): p. 2135–2144. pmid:31860861
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] PubMed/NCBI

[201] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bauml J.G., et al., The Default Mode Network Mediates the Impact of Infant Regulatory Problems on Adult Avoidant Personality Traits. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging, 2019. 4(4): p. 333–342. pmid:30579926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[203] View Article

[204] PubMed/NCBI

[205] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Gardini S., et al., Increased functional connectivity in the default mode network in mild cognitive impairment: a maladaptive compensatory mechanism associated with poor semantic memory performance. J Alzheimers Dis, 2015. 45(2): p. 457–70. pmid:25547636
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] PubMed/NCBI

[209] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Sheline Y.I., et al., The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009. 106(6): p. 1942–7. pmid:19171889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[211] View Article

[212] PubMed/NCBI

[213] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Buckner R.L., Andrews-Hanna J.R., and Schacter D.L., The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008. 1124: p. 1–38. pmid:18400922
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[215] View Article

[216] PubMed/NCBI

[217] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Keir M., et al., Neurocognition in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: How to Monitor and Prevent Progressive Decline. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2019. 35(12): p. 1675–1685. pmid:31570238
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] PubMed/NCBI

[221] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Bagge C.N., et al., Risk of Dementia in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Population-Based Cohort Study. Circulation, 2018. 137(18): p. 1912–1920. pmid:29440121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[223] View Article

[224] PubMed/NCBI

[225] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Bozhilova N.S., et al., Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2018. 92: p. 464–476. pmid:30036553
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[227] View Article

[228] PubMed/NCBI

[229] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Batra A.S., Alexander M.E., and Silka M.J., Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, stimulant therapy, and the patient with congenital heart disease: evidence and reason. Pediatr Cardiol, 2012. 33(3): p. 394–401. pmid:22298228
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[231] View Article

[232] PubMed/NCBI

[233] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Holst L.M., et al., Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children with surgically corrected Ventricular Septal Defect, Transposition of the Great Arteries, and Tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young, 2020. 30(2): p. 180–187. pmid:31928549
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[235] View Article

[236] PubMed/NCBI

[237] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Pierick A.R., et al., Treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with CHD. Cardiol Young, 2021: p. 1–4. pmid:33517944
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[239] View Article

[240] PubMed/NCBI

[241] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Gao Z., et al., The indispensable role of the cerebellum in visual divergent thinking. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 16552. pmid:33024190
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[243] View Article

[244] PubMed/NCBI

[245] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Blackford J.U., et al., Amygdala-cingulate intrinsic connectivity is associated with degree of social inhibition. Biol Psychol, 2014. 99: p. 15–25. pmid:24534162
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[247] View Article

[248] PubMed/NCBI

[249] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Brewster R.C., et al., White Matter Integrity Dissociates Verbal Memory and Auditory Attention Span in Emerging Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2015. 21(1): p. 22–33. pmid:26304056
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[251] View Article

[252] PubMed/NCBI

[253] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Rivkin M.J., et al., Adolescents with D-transposition of the great arteries repaired in early infancy demonstrate reduced white matter microstructure associated with clinical risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013. 146(3): p. 543–9 e1. pmid:23375991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[255] View Article

[256] PubMed/NCBI

[257] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Watson C.G., et al., Altered White Matter Microstructure Correlates with IQ and Processing Speed in Children and Adolescents Post-Fontan. J Pediatr, 2018. 200: p. 140–149 e4. pmid:29934026
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[259] View Article

[260] PubMed/NCBI

[261] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Jones D.K., Knosche T.R., and Turner R., White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage, 2013. 73: p. 239–54. pmid:22846632
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[263] View Article

[264] PubMed/NCBI

[265] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Sheffield J.M. and Barch D.M., Cognition and resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016. 61: p. 108–20. pmid:26698018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[267] View Article

[268] PubMed/NCBI

[269] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Ashburner J. and Friston K.J., Unified segmentation. Neuroimage, 2005. 26(3): p. 839–51. pmid:15955494
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[271] View Article

[272] PubMed/NCBI

[273] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Participants

Individual and clinical variables

Executive function and self-regulation

MRI data acquisition

MRI data processing

Seed selection

Statistical analysis

Participants’ characteristics and BRIEF-A scores.

Resting state functional connectivity.

Results

Participants’ characteristics

Executive functions

Resting state functional connectivity

Decreased functional connectivity.

Increased functional connectivity

Correlations between functional connectivity and BRIEF-A scores

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Functional connectivity distribution before and after denoising.

S1 Table. Proportion of participants who performed below clinical cut-off on the BRIEF-A.

Acknowledgments

References