Figures
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic gram-negative bacteria typically attributed to hospital-associated infection. It could also become multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan drug-resistant (PDR) during a short period. Although A. baumannii has been documented extensively, complete knowledge on the antibiotic-resistant mechanisms and virulence factors responsible for pathogenesis has not been entirely elucidated. This study investigated the drug resistance pattern and characterized the genomic sequence by de novo assembly of PDR A. baumannii strain VJR422, which was isolated from a catheter-sputum specimen. The results showed that the VJR422 strain was resistant to any existing antibiotics. Based on de novo assembly, whole-genome sequences showed a total genome size of 3,924,675-bp. In silico and conventional MLST analysis of sequence type (ST) of this strain was new ST by Oxford MLST scheme and designated as ST1890. Moreover, we found 10,915 genes that could be classified into 45 categories by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. There were 1,687 genes mapped to 34 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. The statistics from Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) annotation identified 3,189 genes of the VJR422 strain. Regarding the existence of virulence factors, a total of 59 virulence factors were identified in the genome of the VJR422 strain by virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria databases (VFDB). The drug-resistant genes were investigated by searching in the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD). The strain harbored antibiotic-resistant genes responsible for aminoglycoside, β-lactam-ring-containing drugs, erythromycin, and streptogramin resistance. We also identified resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) and the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) associated with the antibiotic efflux pump. Overall, this study focused on A. baumannii strain VJR422 at the genomic level data, i.e., GO, COG, and KEGG. The antibiotic-resistant genotype and phenotype as well as the presence of potential virulence associated factors were investigated.
Citation: Wongsuk T, Boonsilp S, Homkaew A, Thananon K, Oonanant W (2022) Whole genome sequence of pan drug-resistant clinical isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii ST1890. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264374
Editor: Abdelazeem Mohamed Algammal, Suez Canal University, EGYPT
Received: October 29, 2021; Accepted: February 9, 2022; Published: March 9, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Wongsuk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was funded by Navamindradhiraj University Research Fund (grant number 29/2561) to Dr. Worrapoj Oonanant.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic, gram-negative coccobacilli [1] commonly associated with hospital-acquired nosocomial infections that can cause bacteremia, pneumonia, meningitis, and urinary tract infections [2, 3]. It is also considered the most common organism in the intensive care unit (ICU) and has been recognized as an emerging cause of nosocomial outbreaks globally [3]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) reported that A. baumannii ranked in the six top for priority dangerous microorganisms [4].
With serious concern for a multidrug-resistant (MDR) crisis, multidrug-resistant A. baumannii is one of the most alarming strains in terms of treatment and control. MDR has been increased all over the world that is considered a public health threat. Several recent investigations reported the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens from different origins including humans, birds, cattle, and fish that increase the need for routine application of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing to detect the antibiotic of choice as well as the screening of the emerging MDR strains [5–15]. MDR exhibited antibiotic resistance to different antibiotic including β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides [16]. One of the major explanations for multidrug-resistant A. baumannii is the expression of resistance-nodulation-division (RND) transporters or outer membrane proteins, which actively pump drugs out of the cells [17, 18]. Treatment with colistin and tigecycline has become the only remaining active antibiotics treatment and the last resort in terms of treatment for MDR-A. baumannii [19–21]. Therefore, MDR-A. baumannii was also suggested as being extensively drug-resistant (XDR), which refers to resistance to all antibiotics except colistin and tigecycline, and an XDR-A. baumannii is a common cause of severe healthcare-associated infections worldwide [22, 23]. Recently, pan drug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii strains have also been reported to resist colistin and tigecycline [24–27]. The emergence of PDR-A. baumannii has increased mortality rates and limited treatment management because monotherapy treatment is insufficient for curing [28–30]. Several virulence factors responsible for the pathogenicity of A. baumannii have been identified, including pilus, outer membrane porins, phospholipases, proteases, lipopolysaccharides, capsular polysaccharides, protein secretion systems, and iron-chelating systems. Some strains share genes related to adherence, invasion and survival, and form biofilms on the surface [31, 32].
Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most successful pathogens responsible for hospital-acquired nosocomial infections because of the high prevalence of infections and scarcity of effective antibiotics for treatment. To overcome this problem, knowledge of the antibiotics-resistant mechanism and virulence factors responsible for pathogenesis is necessary.
Advances in whole-genome sequencing technology have facilitated bacterial whole-genome characterization, enhancing the ability to elucidate the antibiotic-resistant mechanism and pathogenesis in Acinetobacter baumannii [33, 34]. However, data concerning genome analysis on colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Thailand is currently limited in the literature [35]. To understand the antibiotics-resistant mechanism and virulence factors in A. baumannii, we described the whole genome of PDR-A. baumannii strain VJR422 by using de novo assembly with Illumina technology. The prediction of gene annotation and functional annotation employed a public database. Genome studies were also applied to predict potential antibiotics-resistant genes and virulence factors in this strain. The identification of genes involved in antibiotics resistance as well as virulence factors could be a potentially rewarding step towards a better understanding of the mechanism for antibiotics resistance in A. baumannii and could also provide foundational information for developing potential clinical management and treatment in the future.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA 009/2561). Informed consent was waived because the study and the analysis used anonymous clinical data.
Isolation and identification of Acinetobacter baumannii
In this study, we obtained A. baumannii strain VJR422 isolated from the single catheter-aspirated sputum of a patient who received care at our hospital in 2017, at the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand. The bacterial strain was cultured on 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar (commercially prepared by Clinical Diagnostics Ltd., Part, Bangkok, Thailand), followed by incubation for 18–24 hours at 35°C. Subsequently, the strain was identified using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker Microflex, Bremen, Germany).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was also performed by using a BD Phoenix NMIC-203 commercial kit (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Maryland, USA) on the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Spark, Maryland, USA). The manufacturer’s instructions were followed. Determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoint was done according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (M100, 27th Ed.) [36]. The antimicrobials tested were cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin/tazobactam, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline, and colistin. The control strains were Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 as recommended by the CLSI.
Whole-genome DNA sequencing and analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The extracted DNA was visualized for quality on 0.8% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis, quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Wilmington, DE, USA), and stored at −30°C until further use. The poly-A-tailed DNA was ligated to paired-end adaptors and PCR amplified with a 500-bp insert. A mate-pair library was constructed with an insert size of 5 kb at Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina platform with MPS (massively parallel sequencing) technology. Paired-end low-quality reads, mate-pair library, and PCR adaptor read were filtered by the quality control step using a Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology pipeline. All good-quality paired reads were assembled using SOAP de novo (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html) into several scaffolds [37, 38]. In the next step, the filter reads were processed by gap closing.
In silico Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)
In silico Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and sequence types (STs) from whole-genome sequence data was performed using the MLST 2.0 (Software version: 2.0.1 (2018-08-15), Database version: 2.0.0 (2018-07-23) on the CGE server (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org) [39–45]. The Oxford and Pasteur MLST schemes for A. baumannii were tested. After the sequences of the predicted gene were uploaded, the allelic profile and STs were generated. The goeBURST diagram was constructed by Phyloviz software (http://www.phyloviz.net/goeburst/) [46].
Conventional MLST
Genomic DNA was extracted by using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). MLST was carried out on extracted DNA using the methodology described by Bartual et al. In brief, fragments of seven housekeeping genes (gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi, and rpoD) were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The amplified PCR products were then purified using polyethylene glycol-sodium chloride (PEG-NaCl) precipitation (20% w/v of PEG, 2.5 M NaCl). Both strands of all PCR products were fully sequenced by A T G C Co; Ltd. (Pathum Thani, Thailand). The obtained sequences were assigned allele numbers by using the MLST website (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/acinetobacter-baumannii). The ST code was generated based on the combination of detected alleles for gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi, and rpoD with the Oxford scheme [40].
Genome component prediction
The coding genes were predicted using GeneMarks [47]. The tandem repeats were predicted by the TRF (Tandem repeats finder) [48], and the repetitive sequences were analyzed by the RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) [49]. The Transfer RNA (tRNA) and Ribosome RNA (rRNA) genes were predicted by the tRNAscan-SE [50] and rRNAmmer [51], respectively. Small nuclear RNAs (snRNA) were analyzed using BLAST against the Rfam database [52, 53].
Functional gene annotation
Three databases were used to predict gene function: 1. GO—The Gene Ontology database [54], 2. KEGG—The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [55–57], and 3. COG—Protein sequences can be classified into Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins [58]
Virulence factors were analyzed using the VFDB (Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria) [59] for a virulence factor search. The abundance of resistant genes was detected by using the RGI program (version 4.2.2) to identify drug resistant genes by comparison with the reference genome in the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (https://card.mcmaster.ca/) (submitted file to the online database and analyzed on 4th January 2020).
Expression levels of efflux pump genes
Total RNA was extracted using conventional hot phenol RNA extraction and converted into cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). The quality and purity of the RNA were evaluated using a Nanodrop-100 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technology Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). Real-time quantification of cDNA was carried out on a CFX96 Touch TM real-time PCR detection system (Biorad, California, USA) using the iScript SYBR green PCR master mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). The amplification cycle included initial denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute and 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds followed by annealing and extension at 62°C for 30 seconds. The primers used for amplification included adeB_RT_F: GGATTATGGCGACTGAAGGA and adeB_RT_R: AATACTGCCGCCAATACCAG for adeB [60], adeG_RT_F: CGTAACTATGCGGTGCTCAA and adeG_RT_R: ATCGCGTAGTCACCAGAACC for adeG [60], and adeJ_RT_F: CATCGGCTGAAACAGTTGAA and adeJ_RT_R: GCCTGACCATTACCAGCACT for adeJ [60]. Relative expression values were determined using the 2 –ΔΔCt method. A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as a standard strain for normalization of relative mRNA levels.
Results and discussion
Bacterial isolate, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility test
A. baumannii strain VJR422 was isolated from the catheter-aspirated sputum of a patient who admitted to Vajira hospital. Colonies on blood agar and chocolate agar were smooth, raised, and opaque with non-lactose fermenter colonies on MacConkey agar. The antimicrobial susceptibility profile of this strain was resistant to all antibiotics tested, as shown in Table 1.
Multilocus sequence typing
Firstly, we performed MLST bioinformatics analyses from whole genome sequence on the CGE server. The sequence type of A. baumannii VJR422 was ST2 (2-2-2-2-2-2-2) based on the seven housekeeping genes in the Pasteur MLST scheme (cpn60, fusA, gltA, pyrG, recA, rplB, and rpoB) [61], which belong to international Clone II (IC-II) [62]. Interestingly, the sequence type of A. baumannii VJR422 was new ST (1-3-3-2-2-202-3), which represents a new combination of existing alleles based on the seven housekeeping genes of the Oxford MLST scheme (gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi, and rpoD) [40, 63]. Therefore, we confirmed this new ST by performing wet-lab analyses of conventional MLST (Oxford MLST scheme). This new ST was submitted to the A. baumannii MLST (Oxford) database at PubMLST.org: Public databases for molecular typing (https://pubmlst.org/) and designated as ST1890 (Sender—Dr. Worrapoj Oonanant; Profile added by a curator—Dr. Paul Higgins—on February 20, 2019; 12.05). MLST data can be represented in groups and clonal complexes (CCs), including evolutionary descent patters by the goeBurst. As shown in Fig 1, we found that the new ST1890, which is the single locus variant (SLV) of ST208 (1-3-3-2-2-97-3), differs in its gpi loci and belongs to clonal complex 208 (CC208), which has also been reported in South Korea and India [64–66]. Therefore, these STs might have emerged successively by variations in gpi loci.
Two STs are linked when they differ in just one of seven loci (SLV analysis). Single STs represent singletons. goeBURST clonal cluster CC208 containing ST1890 (in red) found in this study. The putative founding and subgroup genotype are indicated in green and yellow, respectively.
Functional annotation of the genomic sequence of A. baumannii VJR422
After de novo assembly, the complete genome of VJR422 was 3,924,675 bp with a GC content of 40.01%. The general characteristics of the genome are summarized in Table 2. In the GO annotation results, the gene functions could be detected, and the statistics of GO annotation are listed in Fig 2. In the GO analysis, 10,915 genes were classified into 45 categories including 1) molecular function (10 categories), which are catalytic activity (1,365 genes), binding (1,129 genes), transporter activity (243 genes), nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity (182 genes), molecular transducer activity (94 genes), structural molecule activity (60 genes), protein binding transcription factor activity (41 genes), enzyme regulator activity (12 genes), antioxidant activity (10 genes), and channel regulator activity (2 genes), and 2) Cellular component (10 categories), which are cell part (941 genes), cell (941 genes), organelle (152 genes), macromolecule complex (151 genes), organelle part (55 genes), virion part (25 genes), virion (25 genes), membrane-enclosed lumen (16 genes), extracellular region part (16 genes), and extracellular region (16 genes), and 3) biological process (25 categories), which include the cellular process (1,493 genes), metabolic process (1,413 genes), localization (570 genes), the establishment of localization (566 genes), biological regulation (409 genes), regulation of biological process (396 genes), response to stimulus (197 genes), cellular component organization or biogenesis (116 genes), viral reproduction (18 genes), signaling (96 genes), multi-organism process (39 genes), reproductive process (19 genes), reproduction (23 genes), developmental process (21 genes), locomotion (13 genes), positive regulation of biological process (10 genes), nitrogen utilization (10 genes), biological adhesion (10 genes), multicellular organismal process (10 genes), death (4 genes), immune system process (2 genes), negative regulation of biological process (1 gene), cell proliferation (1 gene), cell killing (1 gene), and rhythmic process (1 gene). The predominance of each part is shown in S2 Table.
The horizontal axis displays the GO function class for the annotated genes. The right vertical axis is the gene number, and the left vertical axis is the percentage of gene number annotated in all the coding genes.
For analysis by the KEGG database to the related annotated gene of VJR422, a total of 1,687 genes were mapped to 35 KEGG pathways. The metabolism group comprised 1,070 genes, representing significantly more coding genes than other pathways. Those are associated with amino acid metabolism (226 genes), carbohydrate metabolism (165 genes), metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (146 genes), energy metabolism (134 genes), nucleotide metabolism (85 genes), lipid metabolism (79 genes), xenobiotic degradation and metabolism (70 genes), metabolism of other amino acids (61 genes), metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (38 genes), glycan biosynthesis and metabolism (34 genes), and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites (32 genes) (Fig 3 and S2 Table). In the cellular process group, there are 120 of the genes linked to cellular community-prokaryote (90 genes), cell growth and death (20 genes), as well as transport and catabolism (10 genes). The environmental information-processing group included 181 genes (104 genes of membrane and transport pathways and 77 genes of signal transduction pathways). Besides, 173 genes linked to the genetic information processing group, including translation (84 genes), replication and repair (44 genes), folding, sorting, and degradation (41 genes), and transcription (4 genes). Meanwhile, 106 genes linked to human diseases, including drug resistance (47 genes), infectious diseases (17 genes), cancers (17 genes), cardiovascular disease (13 genes), neurodegenerative diseases (7 genes), endocrine and metabolic diseases (3 genes), and immune diseases (2 genes). Finally, 31 genes linked to the organismal system, including endocrine system (14 genes), aging (11 genes), immune system (3 genes), excretory system (3 genes), environmental adaptation (3 genes), nervous system (2 genes), and digestive system (1 gene).
The horizontal axis is KEGG pathway type, and the vertical axis is the number of annotated genes.
The COG database is divided into 25 parts according to function. The results in Fig 4. were obtained from the statistics of COG annotation for the VJR422 strain. A total of 3,189 genes were annotated and classified into 22 functional groups. No genes were allocated to the chromatin structure and dynamics, nuclear structure, and cytoskeleton functional domains. Among the COG functional classifications, “General function prediction only” comprised the largest group (314 genes), followed by “Amino acid transport and metabolism” (294 genes), and “Transcription” (273 genes). Moreover, 179 genes were classified as “Function unknown” (Fig 4.).
The horizontal axis is COG function type, and the vertical axis is the number of annotated genes.
The COG categories in the genome of VJR422 were divided into four main domains comprising 1) Information storage and processing, 2) Cellular process and signaling, 3) Metabolism, and 4) Poorly characterized [62, 67]. All were compared with another COG toward the genome of A. baumannii DMS06669 [68] and A. baumannii XH386 [69] in Table 3. The predominance of VJR422 includes extracellular structures, annotated genes, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism-annotated genes.
Virulence factors and drug-resistance genes of A. baumannii VJR422
A total of 59 virulence factors were identified in the genome of A. baumannii VJR422, including adherence (outer membrane protein), biofilm formation (AdeFGH efflux pump/transport autoinducer, biofilm-associated protein, Csu pili, and polysaccharide poly-n-acetylglucosamine), enzyme (phospholipase C and phospholipase D), immune evasion (LPS and capsule), iron uptake (acinetobactin and heme utilization), regulation (quorum sensing and two-component system), serum resistance (PbpG), and stress adaptation (catalase) (S3 Table).
The abundance of resistant genes in the VJR422 strain was assessed by searching the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD). The CARD includes BLAST and the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) software tools for the analysis of molecular sequences, the prediction of the resistome based on homology and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) models. The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the genome of VJR422 is also shown in S4 Table. A total of 25 genes that respond to different mechanisms of drug-resistance in Acinetobacter were identified by the CARD tool. The percentage identity of the matching region with the reference sequence in the program was in a range from 98.98% to 100%. A. baumannii VJR422 was resistant to aminoglycosides (gentamycin and ciprofloxacin), and genes responsible for aminoglycoside resistance (armA, APH(6)-Id, APH(3’’)-Ib, and ANT(3’’)-IIc) were found. The 16S rRNA methylase, which confers high-level resistance on all aminoglycosides encoded by the armA gene, was initially identified in Citrobacter freundii in Poland in 2002 and has now been identified worldwide among gram-negative bacteria [70–73]. Commonly, resistance to aminoglycoside is conferred by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (acetyltransferases, nucleotidyltransferases, and phosphotransferases) [74]. The VJR422 was found to possess variants of phosphotransferases, i.e. APH(6)-Id and APH(3’’)-Ib, and ANT(3’’)-IIc, a variant of nucleotidyltransferase. Four β-lactamase-encoding genes that can hydrolyze antimicrobials containing a β-lactam ring were predicted, i.e. TEM-1, ADC-73, OXA-23, and OXA-66. The VJR422 strain was resistant to all β-lactam-ring-containing drugs (ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, and aztreonam.) TEM-1 (Temoneira-1) β-lactamase is one of the best-known drug-resistant enzymes able to hydrolyze penicillin and the first generation of cephalosporin [75]. The ADC-73 (Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase-73) β-lactamase is regarded as a chromosomally encoded class C β-lactamase that confers resistance to penicillin, cephalosporin, and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations [76]. Therefore, the VJR422 strain is also resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam. The class D carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases (OXA type), OXA-23 and OXA-66 were predicted in WGS of VJR422. OXA-23 is one of the largest groups of OXA-type carbapenemases in A. baumannii, and OXA-66 is a variant of OXA-51 classified as an OXA-51-like group of enzymes [77, 78]. Regarding the Ade pump, resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) transporter genes (adeABC, adeFGK, adeN, and adeRS) were identified in the VJR422 genome analysis. Investigation of the tigecycline resistance mechanism in the VJR422 isolate was challenging. Several point mutations in the regulatory gene adeRS were observed, resulting in overexpression of the AdeABC efflux pump system. AdeIJK and AdeFGH showed high expression compared with the susceptible strain (ATCC 19606) (Fig 5). The presence of numbers and polyspecificities of RND transporters correlate with high intrinsic and clinical resistance in gram-negative bacilli [79]. Moreover, Acinetobacter baumannii AbaF, AbaQ, and AmvA, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pump, were also identified in the VJR422 genome. MFS transporters are involved in drug efflux systems and lead to antibiotic resistance in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [80]. AbaF was identified as an efflux pump associated with fosfomycin resistance in A. baumannii [81, 82]. AbaQ is mainly involved in the extrusion of quinolone-type drugs in A. baumannii [83]. AmvA contributes resistance to erythromycin, acriflavine, benzalkonium chloride, and methyl viologen [81, 84]. Multidrug efflux pumps of the small multidrug resistance (SMR) type are made of a transport protein located in the inner membrane. AbeS, an efflux pump of the SMR type, was identified in the VJR422 genome. AbeS could decrease susceptibility in the various class of antibiotics, disinfectants, dyes, and detergents [85]. The mphE and msrE genes associated with erythromycin resistance and streptogramin resistance were identified as well [68, 86, 87].
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study identified and characterized the MDR A. baumannii strain VJR422 from a clinical specimen using the WGS analysis tool at the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University. Knowledge of this bacterial pathogen at the genomic level has not been reported previously at our hospital. We reported and updated the new ST1890 in the PubMlst Database and characterized the VJR422 in the genomic level data, i.e. GO, COG, and KEGG. The antibiotic resistance genotype and phenotype as well as the presence of potential virulence associated factors were investigated.
Supporting information
S1 Table. GO classification into three main parts in the genome of VJR422.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264374.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. KEGG classification into six main parts in the genome of VJR422.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264374.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Virulence gene predicted by the VFDB (Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264374.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the genome of VJR422.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264374.s004
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital for supporting professional English language editing by Enago and ProofRead4Sure.
We thank Assoc. Prof. Sarawut Kumphune (Biomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand) for carefully read our manuscript and gave detailed comments and suggestions.
References
- 1. Antunes LC, Visca P, Towner KJ. Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of a global pathogen. Pathog Dis. 2014;71(3):292–301. pmid:24376225
- 2. Munoz-Price LS, Weinstein RA. Acinetobacter infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1271–1281. pmid:18354105
- 3. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(3):538–582. pmid:18625687
- 4. Peterson LR. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESCAPE revisited. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(6):992–993. pmid:19694542
- 5. Enany ME, Algammal AM, Shagar GI, Hanora AM, Elfeil WK, Elshaffy NM. Molecular typing and evaluation of Sidr honey inhibitory effect on virulence genes of MRSA strains isolated from catfish in Egypt. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;31(5):1865–1870. pmid:30150182
- 6. Algammal AM, El-Kholy AW, Riad EM, Mohamed HE, Elhaig MM, Yousef SAA, et al. Genes encoding the virulence and the antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic and shiga-toxigenic E. coli isolated from diarrheic calves. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(6). pmid:32532070
- 7. Algammal AM, El-Sayed ME, Youssef FM, Saad SA, Elhaig MM, Batiha GE, et al. Prevalence, the antibiogram and the frequency of virulence genes of the most predominant bacterial pathogens incriminated in calf pneumonia. AMB Express. 2020;10(1):99. pmid:32472209
- 8. Algammal AM, Enany ME, El-Tarabili RM, Ghobashy MOI, Helmy YA. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance profiles, virulence and enterotoxins-determinant genes of MRSA isolated from subclinical bovine mastitis in Egypt. Pathogens. 2020;9(5). pmid:32397408
- 9. Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Batiha GE, Hozzein WN, El Kazzaz WM, Hashem HR, et al. Virulence-determinants and antibiotic-resistance genes of MDR-E. coli isolated from secondary infections following FMD-outbreak in cattle. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19779. pmid:33188216
- 10. Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Elkelish A, Alkhalifah DHH, Hozzein WN, Batiha GE, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): One health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:3255–3265. pmid:33061472
- 11. Algammal AM, Mabrok M, Sivaramasamy E, Youssef FM, Atwa MH, El-Kholy AW, et al. Emerging MDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa in fish commonly harbor oprL and toxA virulence genes and blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and tetA antibiotic-resistance genes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15961. pmid:32994450
- 12. Abolghait SK, Fathi AG, Youssef FM, Algammal AM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from chicken meat and giblets often produces staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in non-refrigerated raw chicken livers. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;328:108669. pmid:32497922
- 13. Algammal AM, Hashem HR, Al-Otaibi AS, Alfifi KJ, El-Dawody EM, Mahrous E, et al. Emerging MDR-Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in house-reared domestic birds as the first report in Egypt. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):237. pmid:34445951
- 14. Algammal AM, Hashem HR, Alfifi KJ, Hetta HF, Sheraba NS, Ramadan H, et al. atpD gene sequencing, multidrug resistance traits, virulence-determinants, and antimicrobial resistance genes of emerging XDR and MDR-Proteus mirabilis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9476. pmid:33947875
- 15. Makharita RR, El-Kholy I, Hetta HF, Abdelaziz MH, Hagagy FI, Ahmed AA, et al. Antibiogram and genetic characterization of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative Pathogens Incriminated in Healthcare-Associated Infections. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:3991–4002. pmid:33177849
- 16. Nikaido H. Multidrug resistance in bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:119–146. pmid:19231985
- 17. Abdi SN, Ghotaslou R, Ganbarov K, Mobed A, Tanomand A, Yousefi M, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii efflux pumps and antibiotic resistance. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:423–434. pmid:32104014
- 18. Zhang Y, Fan B, Luo Y, Tao Z, Nie Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):841. pmid:34416851
- 19. Kyriakidis I, Vasileiou E, Pana ZD, Tragiannidis A. Acinetobacter baumannii antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Pathogens. 2021;10(3). pmid:33808905
- 20. Mulani MS, Kamble EE, Kumkar SN, Tawre MS, Pardesi KR. Emerging strategies to combat ESKAPE pathogens in the Era of antimicrobial resistance: A Review. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:539. pmid:30988669
- 21. Gordon NC, Wareham DW. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms of virulence and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(3):219–226. pmid:20047818
- 22. Kengkla K, Kongpakwattana K, Saokaew S, Apisarnthanarak A, Chaiyakunapruk N. Comparative efficacy and safety of treatment options for MDR and XDR Acinetobacter baumannii infections: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(1):22–32. pmid:29069421
- 23. Liu J, Shu Y, Zhu F, Feng B, Zhang Z, Liu L, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for multiple drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;24:136–147. pmid:32889142
- 24. Rodriguez CH, Bombicino K, Granados G, Nastro M, Vay C, Famiglietti A. Selection of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in postneurosurgical meningitis in an intensive care unit with high presence of heteroresistance to colistin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65(2):188–191. pmid:19748431
- 25. Lopez-Rojas R, McConnell MJ, Jimenez-Mejias ME, Dominguez-Herrera J, Fernandez-Cuenca F, Pachon J. Colistin resistance in a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strain appearing after colistin treatment: effect on virulence and bacterial fitness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(9):4587–4589. pmid:23836165
- 26. O’Hara JA, Ambe LA, Casella LG, Townsend BM, Pelletier MR, Ernst RK, et al. Activities of vancomycin-containing regimens against colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(5):2103–2108. pmid:23422916
- 27. Cai Y, Chai D, Wang R, Liang B, Bai N. Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(7):1607–1615. pmid:22441575
- 28. Karakonstantis S, Gikas A, Astrinaki E, Kritsotakis EI. Excess mortality due to pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Infect. 2020;106(3):447–453. pmid:32927013
- 29. Karakonstantis S, Kritsotakis EI, Gikas A. Pandrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review of current epidemiology, prognosis and treatment options. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(2):271–282. pmid:31586417
- 30. Papathanakos G, Andrianopoulos I, Papathanasiou A, Koulenti D, Gartzonika K, Koulouras V. Pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii treatment: still a debatable topic with no definite solutions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(10):3081. pmid:32596722
- 31. Ambrosi C, Scribano D, Aleandri M, Zagaglia C, Di Francesco L, Putignani L, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii virulence traits: A comparative study of a novel sequence type with other Italian endemic international clones. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1977. pmid:29075243
- 32. Gentilini F, Turba ME, Pasquali F, Mion D, Romagnoli N, Zambon E, et al. Hospitalized pets as a source of carbapenem-resistance. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2872. pmid:30574124
- 33. Jalal D, Elzayat MG, Diab AA, El-Shqanqery HE, Samir O, Bakry U, et al. Deciphering multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from a pediatric cancer hospital in Egypt. mSphere. 2021:e0072521. pmid:34787450
- 34. Naha A, Vijayakumar S, Lal B, Shankar BA, Chandran S, Ramaiah S, et al. Genome sequencing and molecular characterisation of XDR Acinetobacter baumannii reveal complexities in resistance: Novel combination of sulbactam-durlobactam holds promise for therapeutic intervention. J Cell Biochem. 2021. pmid:34597421
- 35. Thadtapong N, Chaturongakul S, Soodvilai S, Dubbs P. Colistin and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Aci46 in Thailand: Genome analysis and antibiotic resistance profiling. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(9). pmid:34572636
- 36.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th ed CLSI supplement M100 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
- 37. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(5):713–714. pmid:18227114
- 38. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X, Shi Z, et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 2010;20(2):265–272. pmid:20019144
- 39. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1355–1361. pmid:22238442
- 40. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, Rodriguez-Valera F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4382–4390. pmid:16145081
- 41. Griffiths D, Fawley W, Kachrimanidou M, Bowden R, Crook DW, Fung R, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):770–778. pmid:20042623
- 42. Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Pestel-Caron M, Lemeland JF, Pons JL. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of human and animal Clostridium difficile isolates of various toxigenic types. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(6):2609–2617. pmid:15184441
- 43. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. pmid:20003500
- 44. Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, Wieler LH, et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60(5):1136–1151. pmid:16689791
- 45. Jaureguy F, Landraud L, Passet V, Diancourt L, Frapy E, Guigon G, et al. Phylogenetic and genomic diversity of human bacteremic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:560. pmid:19036134
- 46. Francisco AP, Bugalho M, Ramirez M, Carrico JA. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:152. pmid:19450271
- 47. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(12):2607–2618. pmid:11410670
- 48. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(2):573–580. pmid:9862982
- 49. Saha S, Bridges S, Magbanua ZV, Peterson DG. Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(7):2284–2294. pmid:18287116
- 50. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(5):955–964. pmid:9023104
- 51. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100–3108. pmid:17452365
- 52. Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Lindgreen S, et al. Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D136–140. pmid:18953034
- 53. Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(10):1335–1337. pmid:19307242
- 54. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29. pmid:10802651
- 55. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, et al. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D354–357. pmid:16381885
- 56. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D277–280. pmid:14681412
- 57. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30. pmid:10592173
- 58. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41. pmid:12969510
- 59. Chen L, Xiong Z, Sun L, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D641–645. pmid:22067448
- 60. Fernando D, Kumar A. Growth phase-dependent expression of RND efflux pump- and outer membrane porin-encoding genes in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):569–572. pmid:22146875
- 61. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10034. pmid:20383326
- 62. Zhang YY, Liang ZX, Li CS, Chang Y, Ma XQ, Yu L, et al. Whole-Genome Analysis of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strain XDR-BJ83: Insights into the Mechanisms of Resistance of an ST368 Strain from a Tertiary Care Hospital in China. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(9):1259–1270. pmid:29489445
- 63. Wisplinghoff H, Hippler C, Bartual SG, Haefs C, Stefanik D, Higgins PG, et al. Molecular epidemiology of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU isolates using a multilocus sequencing typing scheme. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(7):708–715. pmid:18558944
- 64. Kim DH, Jung SI, Kwon KT, Ko KS. Occurrence of diverse AbGRI1-type genomic islands in Acinetobacter baumannii global clone 2 isolates from South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(2). pmid:27895018
- 65. Vijayakumar S, Mathur P, Kapil A, Das BK, Ray P, Gautam V, et al. Molecular characterization & epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii collected across India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(2):240–246. pmid:31219089
- 66. Chung ES, Wi YM, Ko KS. Variation in formation of persister cells against colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and its relationship with treatment failure. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(7):2133–5. pmid:28379382
- 67. Wang H, Wang J, Yu P, Ge P, Jiang Y, Xu R, et al. Identification of antibiotic resistance genes in the multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain, MDR-SHH02, using whole-genome sequencing. Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(2):364–72. pmid:28035408
- 68. Si-Tuan N, Ngoc HM, Hang PTT, Nguyen C, Van PH, Huong NT. New eight genes identified at the clinical multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii DMS06669 strain in a Vietnam hospital. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):74. pmid:29137647
- 69. Fang Y, Quan J, Hua X, Feng Y, Li X, Wang J, et al. Complete genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii XH386 (ST208), a multi-drug resistant bacteria isolated from pediatric hospital in China. Genom Data. 2016;7:269–274. pmid:26981403
- 70. Golebiewski M, Kern-Zdanowicz I, Zienkiewicz M, Adamczyk M, Zylinska J, Baraniak A, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of the pCTX-M3 plasmid and its involvement in spread of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene blaCTX-M-3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(11):3789–3795. pmid:17698626
- 71. Yj Cho, Moon DC, Jin JS, Choi CH, Lee YC, Lee JC. Genetic basis of resistance to aminoglycosides in Acinetobacter spp. and spread of armA in Acinetobacter baumannii sequence group 1 in Korean hospitals. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;64(2):185–190.
- 72. Tada T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Shimada K, Shimojima M, Kirikae T. Dissemination of 16S rRNA methylase ArmA-producing acinetobacter baumannii and emergence of OXA-72 carbapenemase coproducers in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(5):2916–2920. pmid:24550340
- 73. Uechi K, Tada T, Shimada K, Nakasone I, Sonozaki T, Kirikae T, et al. Emergence of ArmA, a 16S rRNA methylase in highly aminoglycoside-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca in Okinawa, Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(1):68–70. pmid:29066218
- 74. Nie L, Lv Y, Yuan M, Hu X, Nie T, Yang X, et al. Genetic basis of high level aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii from Beijing, China. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2014;4(4):295–300. pmid:26579398
- 75. Salverda ML, De Visser JA, Barlow M. Natural evolution of TEM-1 beta-lactamase: experimental reconstruction and clinical relevance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(6):1015–1036. pmid:20412308
- 76. Caselli E, Romagnoli C, Powers RA, Taracila MA, Bouza AA, Swanson HC, et al. Inhibition of Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase: exploring the carboxylate recognition site using novel beta-lactamase inhibitors. ACS Infect Dis. 2018;4(3):337–348. pmid:29144725
- 77. Walther-Rasmussen J, Hoiby N. OXA-type carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(3):373–383. pmid:16446375
- 78. Evans BA, Hamouda A, Towner KJ, Amyes SG. OXA-51-like beta-lactamases and their association with particular epidemic lineages of Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(3):268–75. pmid:18190566
- 79. Leus IV, Weeks JW, Bonifay V, Smith L, Richardson S, Zgurskaya HI. Substrate specificities and efflux efficiencies of RND efflux pumps of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol. 2018;200(13). pmid:29661860
- 80. Pasqua M, Grossi M, Zennaro A, Fanelli G, Micheli G, Barras F, et al. The varied role of efflux pumps of the MFS family in the interplay of bacteria with animal and plant cells. Microorganisms. 2019;7(9). pmid:31443538
- 81. Lee CR, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, et al. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:55. pmid:28348979
- 82. Sharma A, Sharma R, Bhattacharyya T, Bhando T, Pathania R. Fosfomycin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by efflux through a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter-AbaF. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(1):68–74. pmid:27650185
- 83. Perez CE, Park HB, Crawford JM. Functional characterization of a condensation domain that links nonribosomal peptide and pteridine biosynthetic machineries in photorhabdus luminescens. Biochemistry. 2018;57(3):354–361. pmid:29111689
- 84. Rajamohan G, Srinivasan VB, Gebreyes WA. Molecular and functional characterization of a novel efflux pump, AmvA, mediating antimicrobial and disinfectant resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(9):1919–1925. pmid:20573661
- 85. Srinivasan VB, Rajamohan G, Gebreyes WA. Role of AbeS, a novel efflux pump of the SMR family of transporters, in resistance to antimicrobial agents in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(12):5312–5316. pmid:19770280
- 86. Bhullar K, Waglechner N, Pawlowski A, Koteva K, Banks ED, Johnston MD, et al. Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an isolated cave microbiome. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34953. pmid:22509370
- 87. Bonnin RA, Nordmann P, Carattoli A, Poirel L. Comparative genomics of IncL/M-type plasmids: evolution by acquisition of resistance genes and insertion sequences. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(1):674–676. pmid:23114767