Scalable manufacturing platform for the production of methemoglobin as a non-oxygen carrying control material in studies of cell-free hemoglobin solutions

Xiangming Gu; Richard Hickey; Antara Rath; Andre F. Palmer

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263782

Abstract

Methemoglobin (metHb) arises from the oxidation of ferrous hemoglobin (HbFe²⁺, Hb) to ferric hemoglobin (HbFe³⁺, metHb), which is unable to bind gaseous ligands such as oxygen (O₂) and carbon monoxide (CO), and binds to nitric oxide (NO) significantly slower compared to Hb. Therefore, metHb does not elicit vasoconstriction and systemic hypertension in vivo due to its extremely slow NO scavenging rate in comparison to cell-free Hb, but will induce oxidative tissue injury, demonstrating the potential of using metHb as a control material when studying the toxicity of cell-free Hb. Hence, the goal of this work was to develop a novel manufacturing strategy for production of metHb that is amenable to scale-up. In this study, small scale (e.g. 1 mL reaction volume) screening experiments were initially conducted to determine the optimal molar ratio of Hb to the oxidization agents hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) or sodium nitrite (NaNO₂) to achieve the highest conversion of Hb into metHb. A spectral deconvolution program was employed to determine the molar fraction of various species (hemichrome, metHb, oxyHb, metHb-, and NaNO₂) in solution during the oxidation reaction. From this analysis, either a 1:1 or 1:5 molar ratio was identified as optimal molar ratios of Hb:NaNO₂ (heme basis) that yielded the highest conversion of Hb into metHb with negligible amounts of side products. Hence in order to reduce the reaction time, a 1:5 molar ratio was chosen for large scale (i.e. 1.5 L reaction volume) synthesis of bovine metHb (metbHb) and human metHb (methHb). The biophysical properties of metHb were then characterized to elucidate the potential of using the synthesized metHb as a non-O₂ carrying control material. The haptoglobin binding kinetics of metHb were found to be similar to Hb. Additionally, the synthesized metHb was stable in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 50 mM, pH 7.4) at 4°C for approximately one week, indicating the high stability of the material.

Citation: Gu X, Hickey R, Rath A, Palmer AF (2022) Scalable manufacturing platform for the production of methemoglobin as a non-oxygen carrying control material in studies of cell-free hemoglobin solutions. PLoS ONE 17(2): e0263782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782

Editor: Robert Chapman, University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA

Received: November 23, 2021; Accepted: January 27, 2022; Published: February 16, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Gu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: AFP was awarded by NIH grant (R01HL126945, R01HL138116, R01HL156526, R01HL159862, and R01EB021926.) RH was awarded with NSF fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: DI water, Deionized water; Hb, Hemoglobin; HF, Hollow fiber; hHb, Human Hb; bHb, Bovine Hb; metbHb, Bovine methemoglobin; methHb, Human methemoglobin; Hp, Haptoglobin; MetHb, Methemoglobin; MW, Molecular weight; N, Cooperativity coefficient; NO, Nitric oxide; PB, Phosphate buffer; PBS, Phosphate buffered saline; RBC, Red blood cell; SEC, Size-exclusion chromatography; HPLC, High performance liquid chromatography; TFF, Tangential flow filtration; MAP, Mean arterial pressure

1 Introduction

In vivo exposure to cell-free hemoglobin (Hb) results in adverse side-effects [1, 2]. For experimental studies investigating the toxicity of cell-free Hb, crystalloid solutions such as lactated Ringer’s (LR) have been used as the standard control to discern the effects of Hb on physiological responses associated with vasoactivity and oxidative stress [3–5]. Unfortunately, LR is not an ideal control material when studying the toxicity of Hb, since it does not possess the same structure or equivalent half-life of cell-free Hb [6, 7]. Fortunately, Hb can be converted to methemoglobin (metHb), in which the iron atom is oxidized to the non-functional ferric state (Fe³⁺) from the functional ferrous state (Fe²⁺). Since metHb (HbFe³⁺) is an oxidized form of native Hb (HbFe²⁺), it cannot bind and release gaseous ligands such as oxygen (O₂) and carbon monoxide (CO) [8, 9]. Although metHb does bind to nitric oxide (NO), the NO binding rate of metHb is significantly slower than the reaction between NO and native Hb in vitro, which does not elicit vasoconstriction and systemic hypertension in vivo [10–12]. Additionally, metHb can be removed from the systemic circulation via haptoglobin (Hp) binding and subsequent CD163 receptor mediated endocytosis as well as via elimination through the kidneys and thus most likely possesses a similar half-life to Hb [13]. Previously, it was observed in a canine model that the infusion of metHb did not increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) in comparison to cell-free Hb, demonstrating the inability of it to participate in NO signaling pathways [14]. Unlike cell-free Hb which can scavenge NO and subsequently elicit vasoconstriction and systemic hypertension, metHb does not elicit those side-effects. Hence, metHb can function as a suitable non-oxygen carrying control material when studying the vasoactive toxicity of cell-free Hb. Very recently, metHb was used as a precursor to synthesize liposome-encapsulated metHb nanoparticles as an antidote to treat cyanide poisoning [15, 16].

MetHb is typically prepared by reacting excess potassium ferricyanide (K₃Fe(CN)₆) (on a per heme basis) with Hb [17, 18]. The reaction mixture is then separated on a desalting column to remove and from metHb. However, the chromatographic desalting process is not the best approach for bench-top or pilot scale purification of metHb due to sample dilution during the purification process.

In this study, to synthesize pure metHb, either sodium nitrite (NaNO₂) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was used to oxidize Hb, since both molecules are reported as strong oxidizing agents and are the most commonly used Hb oxidizing agents in the literature [19, 20]. Various molar ratios of Hb:oxidization agent were screened in small scale reaction volumes (1 mL) to determine the optimal type of oxidization agent and molar ratio of Hb:oxidization agent that yielded the highest conversion of Hb into metHb. To monitor the oxidation of Hb during the reaction, a spectral deconvolution program (Alchromy) was employed to determine the molar fraction of various species (hemichrome, metHb, oxyHb, metHb-, and NaNO₂) in solution based on the standard UV-visible spectra of each pure species. From this analysis, we identified an optimal molar ratio of Hb:NaNO₂ that yielded the highest conversion of Hb into metHb with negligible levels of impurities among samples oxidized with either NaNO₂ or H₂O₂ at different molar ratios.

To scale-up production of metHb, a novel synthesis and purification protocol was developed in this study. In the metHb synthesis protocol, NaNO₂ was injected into a well-mixed batch reactor containing bovine Hb (bHb) or human Hb (hHb). After the reaction went to completion, the synthesized metHb was then subject to diafiltration with LR solution until ~250 mL of the product was obtained at a total protein concentration of ~100 mg/mL and a percentage of metHb (metHb level) of 99.99%. The biophysical properties of metHb were then characterized to elucidate the potential of using it as a non-O₂ carrying control material. At the end of the tangential flow filtration (TFF) purification process, only metHb was present in solution with undetectable levels of nitrite. Each batch of metHb was characterized via spectral deconvolution analysis, Hp binding kinetics analysis, size exclusion HPLC (SEC-HPLC) analysis, and subjected to storage stability analysis.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Sodium citrate anticoagulated whole bovine blood was purchased from Quad Five (Ryegate, MT). Expired packed human red blood cell (RBC) units were obtained from Transfusion Services (Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio). NaNO₂, H₂O₂) calcium chloride (CaCl₂·2H₂O), sodium phosphate monobasic (NaH₂PO₄), sodium phosphate dibasic (Na₂HPO₄), potassium chloride (KCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium chloride (NaCl), and sodium lactate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Hollow fiber (HF) modules with 500 kDa and 50 kDa molecular weight cut off (MWCO) were procured from Repligen (Rancho Dominguez, CA). K₃Fe(CN)₆ and potassium cyanide (KCN) were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). 0.2 μm syringe filters were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

2.2 Hb purification

Bovine/human red blood cells (RBCs) were washed via centrifugation with 0.9% saline and lysed with phosphate buffer (PB) (3.75 mM, pH 7.4). Tangential flow filtration (TFF) HF modules with MWCOs of 500 kDa and 50 kDa were then used to purify and concentrate bHb/hHb as described in the literature [21].

2.3 Small scale optimization of Hb:oxidization agent stoichiometry

A small scale (1 mL) metHb synthesis study using two different types of oxidization agents was conducted to determine the optimal dose of oxidizing agent needed to fully convert Hb into metHb. In this study, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and sodium nitrite (NaNO₂) were prepared at 1:1, 1:5, and 1:10 molar ratio of Hb:oxidization agent within 1 mL UV-visible quartz cuvettes. bHb/hHb was diluted to 20 mg/mL using phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4). Stock solutions of NaNO₂ and H₂O₂ were prepared at 8.5 mg/mL and 4.2 mg/mL, respectively. To obtain the 1:1, 1:5, and 1:10 molar ratio of Hb:oxidization agent solution, 1 mL bHb/hHb solution was mixed with 10/50/100 μL of the NaNO₂/H₂O₂ stock solution, respectively. The absorbance spectra from 350−700 nm was simultaneously monitored for 21 hours at room temperature in 6 parafilm-sealed quartz cuvettes and a blank quartz cuvette with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) using an HP 8452A diode array UV-visible spectrometer (Olis, Bogart, GA).

To determine the fraction of multiple Hb species in solution, we previously developed a spectral deconvolution program (Alchromy) based on the extinction coefficients and absorbance spectra of each pure species. For the reaction between bHb/hHb and NaNO₂, the fractional composition of hemichrome, oxyHb, metHb, ferrylHb, metHb-NO₂^-, and NaNO₂ in solution was calculated at each time point during the 21 hour reaction time period using the Alchromy program. Similarly, for the reaction between bHb/hHb and H₂O₂, the fractional composition of hemichrome, oxyHb, and metHb was calculated as described above.

2.4 UV-visible spectra deconvolution analysis

Samples containing Hb were analyzed via UV-visible spectroscopy and compared to the UV-visible spectra of pure species of Hb bound to various ligands through spectral deconvolution. The open-source Python package Alchromy (www.alchromy.com) was used to interpret and analyze spectra, and leveraged a nonlinear least squares fitting function of the SciPy package to determine the fraction of various liganded forms of Hb that contribute to the final spectra of the Hb mixture [22].

2.5 Large scale metHb synthesis

Initially, 30 g of bHb/hHb was diluted in 1.5 L PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and placed into an airtight, amber-tinted reactor vessel with continuous stirring as shown in Fig 1A. The reactor vessel coupled with a recirculation loop (500 mL/min) was placed in a fume hood at room temperature. After the recirculation loop was turned on, a bolus injection of 50 mL NaNO₂ solution (0.013 mg/mL) was initiated through a 50 mL syringe attached to the sampling port at the inlet side of the reactor vessel. After two hours of reaction with constant stirring and recirculation, the metbHb/methHb solution was refrigerated at 4°C overnight.

Download:

Fig 1.

A) Schematic of reactor and fluid recirculation system used to synthesize metHb. B) Schematic of TFF system used to purify metHb.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g001

2.6 MetHb clarification and purification

As shown in Fig 1B, both metbHb and methHb were initially transferred into a 2 L polypropylene bottle and concentrated down to 300 mL via TFF on a 50 kDa HF module. The metbHb/methHb solution was then transferred into a 1 L polypropylene bottle and subject to constant volume diafiltration with reductant-free modified lactated Ringer’s solution (115 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1.4 mM CaCl₂.2H₂O, 13 mM NaOH, 27 mM sodium lactate, pH 7.4). After 6 diafiltration cycles, the final metbHb/methHb product was concentrated to 270 mL at ~100 mg/mL and stored at -80°C.

2.7 Characterization of metHb

2.7.1 Multi-species analysis during TFF.

To evaluate the composition of metbHb/methHb mixtures as a function of TFF processing time, samples were collected every hour during TFF processing. The fraction of multiple Hb species at each time point including hemichrome, oxyHb, metHb, ferrylHb, metHb-NO₂^-, and NaNO₂ was determined by spectra deconvolution using the Alchromy program.

2.7.2 Haptoglobin-binding kinetics study.

To evaluate haptoglobin (Hp) -Hb/metHb binding kinetics, a Hp mixture (0.25 μM, Hb tetramer binding basis) containing a mixture of Hp2-1 and Hp2-2 was purified from human Cohn Fraction IV [23]. The kinetics of Hp binding to Hb/metHb was measured as previously described in the literature [24]. The reaction between Hp and Hb/metHb was followed by stopped flow fluorescence spectrometry by excitation at 285 nm and monitoring the fluorescence emission at 310 nm [25, 26]. The pseudo first order Hp-Hb/metHb binding rate constant was calculated by fitting the fluorescence intensity to a monoexponential equation. The pseudo first-order rate constant was then used to determine the bimolecular rate constant via linear regression with the metHb/Hb concentration as the dependent variable.

2.7.3 Hp-binding via size exclusion HPLC (SEC-HPLC) analysis.

The molecular weight (MW) distribution of Hp-metHb mixtures was estimated via SEC-HPLC on an Acclaim SEC 1000 column (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The binding capacity of Hp to Hb/metHb was analyzed by incubating a fixed concentration of Hp with Hb/metHb samples at different concentrations (1.25 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM, and 20 μM, Hb tetramer basis). All samples were analyzed via SEC-HPLC at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min in the mobile phase (PB, 50 mM, pH 7.4). To determine the composition of Hp-metHb mixtures containing Hp-metHb complex, metHb tetramers (α₂β₂), dimers (αβ) and monomers (α/β), a deconvolution analysis was conducted based on the elution time at λ = 413 nm of each pure species.

2.7.4 Total hemoglobin (Hb) and metHb level.

The total Hb and metHb level of metbHb and methHb was measured using the cyanomethemoglobin assay as previously described in the literature [27].

2.7.5 Purity and yield.

The purity of both metbHb and methHb was defined as: , which was determined from UV-visible spectral deconvolution analysis. The total mass of Hb was calculated based on the mass of each individual species including hemichrome, metHb, oxyHb, and metHb-. The overall yield of metbHb and methHb was defined as: , which was determined by the cyanomethemoglobin assay described in section 2.7.4 [27].

2.7.6 Storage stability analysis.

The storage stability of bHb, hHb, metbHb and methHb was analyzed via analytical SEC-HPLC by incubating metHb samples at different concentrations (1.25 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM, and 20 μM, heme basis) with 0.1 M PBS solution (pH 7.4) at 4°C for one week. To determine the composition of denatured metHb mixtures containing metHb tetramers, dimers and monomers, a deconvolution analysis was performed based on the elution time of each pure species. To quantitively evaluate the dimerization equilibrium of Hb, the tetramer-dimer dissociation constant (K_d) was derived as follows: (1) (2) (3) where [H] is the initial concentration of Hb/metHb tetramer, [T] is the concentration of Hb/metHb tetramers, [D] is the concentration of Hb/metHb αβdimers and T% is defined as the ratio [T] / [H]. Thus, a plot of with respect to log₁₀[H] yielded an intercept of log₁₀(1/K_d) as shown in Eq 3 [28, 29].

2.7.7 Statistical analysis.

A t-test was performed to study the variances among different groups of data, and a p-value (< 0.05) demonstrates a significant difference. All data were reported with the standard deviation, and the R-squared (R²) value was used to evaluate the performance of the regression model.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Optimal molar ratio of Hb (heme basis) to oxidization agent

In this initial study, two different oxidization agents (NaNO₂ and H₂O₂) were tested within a 21 hour window to determine the optimal molar ratio of Hb:oxidization agent, which led to the highest yield of metHb. The optimal oxidization agent and molar ratio of Hb:oxidization agent was then used for subsequent large scale synthesis of metHb. Fig 2 shows the composition of metHb mixtures prepared by reacting three different molar ratios of Hb:oxidization agent (1:1, 1:5, and 1:10). In Fig 2A and 2C, the oxidation of both bHb/hHb at 1:1 and 1:5 molar ratios of Hb:NaNO₂ displayed rapid conversion of Hb to metHb, which is consistent with previously reported studies [20]. Approximately ~95% of oxyhemoglobin (oxyHb) was converted to metHb within the first 30 mins of the reaction with negligible formation of hemichrome, suggesting high conversion to metHb with minimal side products.

Download:

Fig 2. Oxidization of Hb at varying Hb:oxidization agent molar ratio (heme basis, 1:1, 1:5, and 1:10).

The oxidation of 60 μM Hb (heme basis) with either NaNO₂ or H₂O₂ was monitored via UV-visible spectrometry in 0.1 M PBS pH 7.4 at room temperature for 21 h. Since multiple Hb species were observed, a deconvolution program was used to determine the composition of each Hb species within the reaction mixture at each time point.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g002

For NaNO₂ oxidation of both bHb and hHb at a molar ratio of 1:5 in Fig 2A and 2C, a slightly higher fraction of hemichrome was produced in comparison to a molar ratio of 1:1, which can be attributed to the excess NaNO₂ in solution. most likely converts the high-spin metHb to low-spin hemichrome due to ligation of the distal histidine residue in the heme pocket [30–32]. At a molar ratio of 1:10, it is interesting to note that adding more NaNO₂ did not lead to substantial formation of hemichrome, but instead led to the formation of a large fraction of metHb-. This can be explained by the dramatic pH increase in solution due to excess NaNO₂, which impeded hemichrome formation and facilitated binding to metHb [33]. Oxidation at molar ratios of 1:1 and 1:5 yielded relatively high conversion of Hb to metHb (97.6% and 97.8% for bHb and hHb respectively) and negligible side products in comparison to that at a molar ratio of 1:10 (~87.8% and 70.1% for bHb and hHb respectively). For Hb:H₂O₂ molar ratios of 1:1, 1:5, and 1:10, the final concentration of metHb was found to be 6.4%, 7.9% and 10.6% for bHb (Fig 2B), respectively. In Fig 2D, relatively higher conversions (29.1%, 28.7% and 23.7%) of hHb to methHb at various Hb:H₂O₂ molar ratios (1:1, 1:5, and 1:10) were observed due to the initially higher metHb level of hHb in comparison to bHb. Unfortunately, the final yield of metHb using H₂O₂ was still significantly lower than that using NaNO₂ (t-test, p < 0.05), indicating that H₂O₂ exhibited a weaker ability to convert Hb into metHb in comparison to NaNO₂. Additionally, H₂O₂ could induce chemical modification of the Hb protein structure, which might interfere with the binding between metHb and Hp [34]. Taken together, H₂O₂ is not an ideal oxidization agent for the synthesis of metHb. Thus, in this study, NaNO₂ was used as the oxidization agent for scaleup synthesis of metHb. To further reduce the reaction time in the large scale metHb synthesis scheme, a Hb:NaNO₂ molar ratio of 1:5 was used for both metbHb and methHb synthesis.

3.2 Molecular weight

Fig 3A and 3B show the SEC-HPLC chromatogram of bovine/human oxyHb (oxybHb/oxyhHb), and freshly synthesized metHb (1 mg/mL, heme basis), which both eluted at the same time (9.29 mins). The molecular weight (MW) of oxybHb/oxyhHb and metbHb/methHb was estimated to be ~ 64 kDa, which is consistent with the theoretical MW [24]. Additionally, a single sharp peak was observed for both metbHb and methHb, indicating the high purity of the final product. The decreasing intensity of metHb compared to Hb at the same concentration was observed for both metbHb and methHb, which can be attributed to the left-shifted Soret peak of metbHb from 413 nm to 405 nm [35]. To further confirm the presence of metbHb/methHb, the full UV-visible spectra of metbHb and methHb were extracted from the SEC-HPLC chromatogram and displayed in Fig 3C and 3D. Four distinct peaks (505 nm, 540 nm, 575 nm and 629 nm) were observed, which aligns well with the literature spectra of metHb [36].

Download:

Fig 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g003

3.3 Composition of Hb species during TFF

To evaluate the composition of metbHb/methHb mixtures as a function of TFF processing time after large scale synthesis, samples were collected every hour during the TFF process. The fraction of multiple Hb species including hemichrome, oxyHb, metHb, ferrylHb, metHb-NO₂^-, and NaNO₂ was determined via spectra deconvolution using the Alchromy program. In Fig 4A, a mixture consisting of almost pure metHb can be observed at all stages during the TFF metbHb purification process, which is consistent with results from the small scale oxidization agent experiments. For TFF methHb purification in Fig 4B, the composition changed at different stages during the purification process. At the beginning of stage 0, a mixture of 93.4% metHb, 2.8% oxyHb and 3.8% metHb-NO₂^- was observed which could be due to the initially higher metHb level of hHb (~5%) in comparison to bHb (0.9%). The initially high metHb level of hHb is attributed to the fact that the hHb was purified from expired human RBCs, which possess a higher starting metHb level versus hHb derived from fresh human RBCs or RBCs used before the expiration date. At the end of stage 0, all oxyHb was converted to metHb-NO₂^- likely due to the presence of residual NaNO₂ in solution. After diafiltration was initiated (Stage 1), a dramatic decrease in the fraction of metHb-NO₂^- was observed at the end of the diafiltration process. This can be explained by the increased conversion of metHb-NO₂^- into metHb by removal of the residual NO₂^- via diafiltration on the 50 kDa HF module, demonstrating the importance of the diafiltration process using TFF in removal of excess reagents. After the last volume exchange, spectral deconvolution analysis was performed on the final material, which led to a purity of 99.7 ± 0.2% and 87.4 ± 4.2% for metbHb and methHb, respectively. It was found that the final methHb material contained a higher amount of hemichrome and metHb-NO₂^- compared to the synthesized metbHb. MethHb also possessed a lower yield (77.4 ± 3.9%) compared to methHb (89.3 ± 0.8%), which could be a consequence of the higher starting metHb level for hHb compared to bHb.

Download:

Fig 4.

A) Composition of bovine metHb (metbHb, 1.5 L reactor system) and (B) human metHb (methHb, 1.5 L reactor system) during TFF processing. Stage 0: Both metbHb and methHb were initially transferred into a 2 L polypropylene bottle and concentrated to 500 mL (total volume). Stage 1: The solution was then subject to constant volume diafiltration on a 50 kDa HF module within a 500 mL bottle. Stage 3: The solution at the end of Stage 1 was further concentrated to ~100 mg/mL and stored at -80°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g004

3.4 MetHb-Hp binding kinetics

The human Hp used in this study consisted of a mixture of phenotypes Hp2-1 and Hp2-2, which functions as a Hb scavenger to inhibit oxidation-mediated reactions elicited by the iron atom in Hb. Hp binds to Hb to form the Hp-Hb complex and removes it from the systemic circulation via CD163 receptor mediated endocytosis into macrophages and monocytes [37]. To determine the potential for metbHb to be cleared via CD163 mediated endocytosis, the ligand-binding kinetics of Hp with bHb/metbHb was monitored by rapidly mixing Hp with bHb/metbHb at various concentrations.

In Fig 5A, the kinetics of Hp-bHb/metHb binding is shown, where metbHb was found to quench a similar number of Hb-binding sites in Hp in comparison to non-oxidized bHb. To determine the pseudo first order binding rate constants, kinetic traces were fit to a monoexponential equation (Fig 5B). To calculate the 2^nd order (bHb/metbHb)-Hp binding rate constant (k_Hp-Hb), a linear fit to the data in Fig 5B to determine the slope of the pseudo first order reaction rate constant as a function of metbHb/bHb concentration. Overall, k_Hp-Hb of metbHb (0.140 ± 0.003 μM⁻¹ s⁻¹) exhibited no significant difference compared to unmodified bHb (0.147 ± 0.006 μM⁻¹ s⁻¹), methHb (0.156 ± 0.003 μM⁻¹ s⁻¹), and unmodified hHb (0.154 ± 0.003 μM⁻¹ s⁻¹).

Download:

Fig 5.

A) Pseudo first order Hp binding kinetics of Hb/metHb. Excess Hb/metHb was rapidly mixed with Hp (0.25 μM on a Hb tetramer binding basis). The normalized fluorescence changes were fit to a monoexponential equation to regress the pseudo first order Hp binding rate constant. B) Dependence of the pseudo first order Hp binding rate constant as a function of Hb/metHb concentration. The second order Hp binding rate constant was obtained by performing a linear fit of the pseudo first order Hp binding rate constant to the Hb/metHb concentration. (The error bars represent the standard deviation from 3 replicates).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g005

3.5 MetHb-Hp binding via SEC-HPLC analysis

As shown in Fig 6A and 6C, the molar fraction of Hp binding to metbHb/methHb was measured via analytical SEC-HPLC. The Hp mixture purified in our lab contained Hp 2–1 (~200 kDa) and Hp 2–2 (~400 kDa). To analyze the Hp−metHb complex, metbHb/methHb at different molar concentrations were initially mixed with excess Hp (2:1 Hp:metHb) as previously described in the literature [38]. In comparison to Hp binding of native Hb, both bHb and hHb were prepared using the same protocol. A deconvolution program was then used to determine the molar fraction of each species including Hp-metHb complexes, metHb tetramers (α₂β₂), metHb dimers (αβ), and metHb monomers (α/β globin). The elution time of Hp-metHb was found to be ∼8.02 min, which corresponds to a MW of ~400−500 kDa. It is evident that decreasing the molar concentration of metHb resulted in increased binding of Hp to metHb (from 0.78 μM to 0.87 μM), as anticipated. Hp binding facilitates dimerization of both metbHb and methHb, which led to a substantial reduction in the amount of tetrameric metbHb (from 82.4 ± 6.9% to 27.6 ± 1.3%) and methHb (from 83.2 ± 7.3% to 32.6 ± 2.0%) in solution (Fig 6A and 6C). Interestingly, both metbHb and methHb exhibited higher Hp binding capacity in comparison to bHb and hHb (Fig 6B and 6D) at relatively low concentrations (<5 μM, heme basis). This can be explained by the facilitated dimerization elicited by reducing the Hb concentration in solution.

Download:

Fig 6. SEC-HPLC of Hp-metHb/Hb complexes as a function of metHb/Hb concentration.

Normalized SEC-HPLC chromatograms of: (A) Hp-metbHb, (B) Hp-bHb, (C) Hp-methHb, and (D) Hp-hHb mixtures. Chromatograms were monitored at an absorbance of λ = 413 nm normalized against the total area under the curve. Hp (0.25 μM on a Hb tetramer binding basis) was rapidly mixed with excess metHb/Hb. Composition of: (E) Hp-metbHb, (F) Hp-bHb), (G) Hp-methHb, and (H) Hp-hHb mixtures which include the Hp-metHb/Hb complex, metHb/Hb tetramer (α₂β₂), metHb/Hb dimer (αβ) and monomer (α/β) as a function of metHb/Hb concentration. (The error bars represent the standard deviation from duplicate experiments).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g006

In Fig 6E and 6G, no significant difference (t-test, p > 0.05) was observed between the metbHb/methHb fraction at concentrations of 5 μM and 10 μM, and 10 μM and 20 μM (Hb tetramer basis), indicating that the Hp binding equilibrium was not significantly affected by molar concentrations of Hb > 5 μM. In the range 0–5 μM Hb, Hp-metHb binding was increased by lowering the metHb concentration, which was also observed for bHb/hHb in Fig 6F and 6H. Taken together, this indicates that the synthesized metHb can be potentially cleared from the systemic circulation via binding to Hp in a similar manner to Hb. The difference between the binding equilibrium of Hp-metHb and Hp-Hb can only be observed at metHb/Hb molar concentrations < 5 μM.

3.6 Storage stability

In Fig 7A and 7C, the effect of the molar concentration of metbHb/methHb on its ability to dimerize into αβ dimers was examined by analytical SEC-HPLC. In this study, a serial dilution was performed to prepare metHb solutions at molar concentrations of 1.25 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM, and 20 μM (heme basis) after incubation in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 4°C for one week. In comparison to the stability of metbHb/methHb, native bHb/hHb was prepared following the same protocol (Fig 7B and 7D). To determine the molar fraction of each metHb species including metHb tetramers (α₂β₂), metHb dimers (αβ), and metHb monomers (α/β globin), a deconvolution analysis was conducted as previously described. An increasing molar fraction of metHb dimers (from 9.5 ± 0.3% to 15.8 ± 1.7%) and monomers (from 1.2 ± 0.7% to 6.6 ± 2.2%) was observed when lowering the molar concentration of metbHb from 20 μM to 1.25 μM (heme basis). Akin to metbHb, the fraction of methHb dimers increased from 9.4 ± 0.6% to 13.7 ± 1.3%, and from 1.1 ± 0.8% to 6.7 ± 0.9% for metHb monomers, upon dilution. In comparison to metbHb/methHb, slight Hb dissociation was observed for native bHb/hHb upon dilution (Fig 7B and 7D).

Download:

Fig 7. SEC-HPLC of metHb/Hb as a function of metHb/Hb concentration to monitor metHb/Hb dissociation after 1 week of storage at 4°C.

Normalized intensity SEC-HPLC chromatograms of (A) metbHb, (B) bHb, (C) methHb, and (D) hHb. Chromatograms were monitored at an absorbance of λ = 413 nm normalized against the total area under the curve. Composition of (E) metbHb, (F) bHb, (G) methHb, and (H) hHb species including the metHb/Hb tetramer (α₂β₂), metHb/Hb dimer (αβ) and monomer (α/β) as a function of metHb/Hb concentration. (The error bars represent the standard deviation from duplicate experiments).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g007

In Fig 7E and 7G, a negative correlation was observed between the fraction of dissociated metHb species (dimers and monomers) and the molar concentration of metbHb/methHb, indicating that the metbHb/methHb dissociation process is facilitated by reducing the molar concentration of metHb in solution. Additionally, both metbHb/methHb dimers and monomers were lower than 18% even at the extremely low concentration (1.25 μM, heme basis) after storage at 4°C for one week, demonstrating the high stability of the synthesized metHb.

In Fig 7F and 7H, less variation was observed among all groups of the bHb/hHb tetramer at various concentrations in comparison to methHb/methHb, indicating that native Hb is more stable than metHb. The oxidation of heme from the ferrous state (Fe²⁺) to the ferric state (Fe³⁺) accelerates the conversion of tetrameric metHb into dimeric metHb. In general, both metbHb and methHb possessed greater than 87% of metHb tetramers at a concentration of 20 μM (heme basis). Thus, negligible tetramer dissociation can be anticipated when used in vivo at relatively high protein concentrations.

In Fig 8A and 8C, the fraction of metbHb/methHb tetramers was plotted as a function of metbHb/mehHb concentration, which yielded a hyperbolic profile. To determine the tetramer-dimer dissociation constant (K_d), a linear transformation was performed on the fraction of metbHb/methHb tetramers by using Eq 3, whose intercept yielded log(1/K_d). The K_d of metbHb (0.55 ± 0.10 μM) and methHb (0.45 ± 0.07 μM) can be further derived from the intercept value, which are comparable to previously reported values in the literature [39, 40]. In Fig 8B and 8D, it was found that native bHb and hHb possessed a K_d value of 0.50 ± 0.06 μM and 0.23 ± 0.05 μM, respectively, when incubated in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 4°C. Although the K_d of metbHb/methHb seems to be slightly higher than native bHb/hHb, it is still on the same order of magnitude as the values for native Hb. In general, these results show that the conversion of heme from the ferrous state (Fe²⁺) to ferric state (Fe³⁺) has little effect on tetramer dissociation in the concentration range 1.25–20 μM, (heme basis) in PBS solution (pH 7.40).

Download:

Fig 8.

Equilibria between dimers and tetramers of (A) metbHb, (B) bHb, (C) methHb, (D) hHb. The tetramer-dimer dissociation constant (K_d) shown in each figure inset was calculated as described in the text. All samples were incubated in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and analyzed on a Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC/HPLC system coupled with an Acclaim SEC-1000 column. Deconvolution analysis was then performed on the chromatogram of all samples to yield the fraction of Hb tetramers. (The error bars represent the standard deviation from 3 replicates; the regression performance was evaluated with the R-squared (R²) value).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.g008

4 Conclusion

In this study, we identified the optimal molar ratio of Hb:NaNO₂ to synthesize metHb with high yield and purity using a batch reactor and TFF separation train. Additionally, no significant difference was found between the second order binding rate constant of Hp to metHb/Hb. Previous studies observed that elevated levels of nitrite in blood can oxidize the Hb inside RBCs, leading to methemoglobinemia. In this study, a negligible amount of nitrite was observed within the final metHb product, indicating the potential safety of using metHb as a suitable control material in small animal models. Future work might include evaluation of the safety and stability of this material in vivo. Taken together, both the metbHb and methHb synthesized in this study were stable at 4°C in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) for at least one week. The Hp-binding kinetics and equilibria of metbHb/methHb were comparable at metHb concentrations ranging from 5–20 μM (Hb tetramer basis). The difference between the Hp-binding equilibria of metHb and Hb can only be observed at extremely low concentrations (< 5 μM, Hb tetramer basis). The biophysical properties of the metHb synthesized in this study demonstrate the potential of using it as a non-O₂ carrying control material in studies of cell-free hemoglobin solutions.

Supporting information

S1 File. Storage and kinetics study.

SEC-HPLC chromatograms, far UV CD spectra, and ligand-binding properties of bHb, hHb, metbHb, and methHb.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.s001

(DOCX)

S2 File. Minimal dataset.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263782.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Marni Grevenow (Transfusion Services, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University) for generously donating expired human RBC units for this study. We thank Quintin O’Boyle (The Ohio State University, OH) for providing haptoglobin. We thank Chintan Savla (The Ohio State University, OH) for running circular dichroism analysis.

References

1. Gladwin MT, Kanias T, Kim-Shapiro DB. Hemolysis and cell-free hemoglobin drive an intrinsic mechanism for human disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012. pmid:22446184
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Buehler PW, Humar R, Schaer DJ. Haptoglobin Therapeutics and Compartmentalization of Cell-Free Hemoglobin Toxicity. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2020. pmid:32589936
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. King DR, Cohn SM, Proctor KG, Shackford SR, Hall JR, Aikawa N, et al. Resuscitation with a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma—Inj Infect Crit Care. 2005. pmid:16361895
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Stern S, Rice J, Philbin N, McGwin G, Arnaud F, Johnson T, et al. Resuscitation with the hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier, hboc-201, in a swine model of severe uncontrolled hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury. Shock. 2009. pmid:18497706
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Martini WZ, Cortez DS, Dubick MA. Comparisons of normal saline and lactated Ringer’s resuscitation on hemodynamics, metabolic responses, and coagulation in pigs after severe hemorrhagic shock. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013. pmid:24330733
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Hahn RG, Lyons G. The half-life of infusion fluids: An educational review. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016. pmid:27058509
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Taguchi K, Yamasaki K, Maruyama T, Otagiri M. Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers. J Funct Biomater. 2017. pmid:28335469
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Van Slyke DD, Hiller A. Determination of carbon monoxide in blood and of total and active hemoglobin by carbon monoxide capacity; inactive hemoglobin and methemoglobin contents of normal human blood. J Biol Chem. 1946. pmid:20273682
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Mansouri A, Lurie AA. Methemoglobinemia. American Journal of Hematology. 1993. pmid:8416301
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Sharma VS, Isaacson RA, John ME, Waterman MR, Chevion M. Reaction of Nitric Oxide with Heme Proteins: Studies on Metmyoglobin, Opossum Methemoglobin, and Microperoxidase. Biochemistry. 1983;22: 3897–3902. pmid:6311256
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Cordone L, Cupane A, Leone M, Militello V, Vitrano E. Oxygen binding to partially oxidized hemoglobin. Analysis in terms of an allosteric model. Biophys Chem. 1990;37: 171–181. pmid:2285779
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Alayash AI, Fratantoni JC, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J, Cashon RE. Nitric Oxide Binding to Human Ferrihemoglobins Cross-Linked between Either α or β Subunits. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;303: 332–338. pmid:8512319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Lim SK, Ferraro B, Moore K, Halliwell B. Role of haptoglobin in free hemoglobin metabolism. Redox Report. 2001. pmid:11642712
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Wang D, Piknova B, Solomon SB, Cortes-Puch I, Kern SJ, Sun J, et al. In vivo reduction of cell-free methemoglobin to oxyhemoglobin results in vasoconstriction in canines. Transfusion. 2013. pmid:23488474
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Suzuki Y, Taguchi K, Kure T, Sakai H, Enoki Y, Otagiri M, et al. Liposome-encapsulated methemoglobin as an antidote against cyanide poisoning. J Control Release. 2021;337: 59–70. pmid:34273418
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Suzuki Y, Taguchi K, Kure T, Enoki Y, Otagiri M, Sakai H, et al. Long-term pharmaceutical stability of liposome-encapsulated methemoglobin as an antidote for cyanide poisoning. Int J Pharm. 2021;610: 121260. pmid:34740759
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Ford W. H. and Ainsworth S. Reactions of partially oxidised hemoglobin solutions I. Separation of intermediate compounds by CM-sephadex chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967; 1–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Tomoda A, Yoneyama Y. Analysis of intermediate hemoglobins in solutions of hemoglobin partially oxidized with ferricyanide. BBA—Protein Struct. 1979;581: 128–135. pmid:508790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Kosaka H, Imaizumi K, Imai K, Tyuma I. Stoichiometry of the reaction of oxyhemoglobin with nitrite. BBA—Protein Struct. 1979. pmid:41590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Keszler A, Piknova B, Schechter AN, Hogg N. The reaction between nitrite and oxyhemoglobin: A mechanistic study. J Biol Chem. 2008. pmid:18203719
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Palmer AF, Sun G, Harris DR. Tangential flow filtration of hemoglobin. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25: 189–199. pmid:19224583
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Pires IS, Belcher DA, Hickey R, Miller C, Badu-Tawiah AK, Baek JH, et al. Novel manufacturing method for producing apohemoglobin and its biophysical properties. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020. pmid:31612988
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Pires IS, Palmer AF. Tangential Flow Filtration of Haptoglobin. Biotechnol Prog. 2020;321: 373–380. pmid:32348635
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Meng F, Kassa T, Jana S, Wood F, Zhang X, Jia Y, et al. Comprehensive Biochemical and Biophysical Characterization of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carrier Therapeutics: All HBOCs Are Not Created Equally. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29: 1560–1575. pmid:29570272
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Gu X, Bolden-Rush C, Cuddington CT, Belcher DA, Savla C, Pires IS, et al. Comprehensive characterization of tense and relaxed quaternary state glutaraldehyde polymerized bovine hemoglobin as a function of cross-link density. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020. pmid:32472694
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Gu X, Savla C, Palmer AF. Tangential Flow Filtration Facilitated Fractionation and PEGylation of Low and High Molecular Weight Polymerized Hemoglobins and Their Biophysical Properties. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. pmid:34672363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Drabkin DL; Austin J. Spectrophotometric studies II. Preparations from washed blood cells; nitric oxide hemoglobin and sulfhemoglobin. J Biol Chem. 1935;112: 51–65. pmid:21
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Manning LR, Jenkins WT, Hess JR, Vandegriff K, Winslow RM, Manning JM. Subunit dissociations in natural and recombinant hemoglobins. Protein Sci. 2008. pmid:8845768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Sawicki CA, Gibson QH. Tetramer-dimer dissociation of carboxyhemoglobin in the absence of dithionite. Biophys J. 1981. pmid:7272439
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Schwab DE, Stamler JS, Singel DJ. EPR spectroscopy of nitrite complexes of methemoglobin. Inorg Chem. 2010. pmid:20666390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Svistunenko DA, Sharpe MA, Nicholls P, Blenkinsop C, Davies NA, Dunne J, et al. The pH dependence of naturally occurring low-spin forms of methaemoglobin and metmyoglobin: An EPR study. Biochem J. 2000.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Welbourn EM, Wilson MT, Yusof A, Metodiev M V., Cooper CE. The mechanism of formation, structure and physiological relevance of covalent hemoglobin attachment to the erythrocyte membrane. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017. pmid:28007575
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Sugawara Y, Kadono E, Suzuki A, Yukuta Y, Shibasaki Y, Nishimura N, et al. Hemichrome formation observed in human haemoglobin A under various buffer conditions. Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;179: 49–59. pmid:12940938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Vallelian F, Pimenova T, Pereira CP, Abraham B, Mikolajczyk MG, Schoedon G, et al. The reaction of hydrogen peroxide with hemoglobin induces extensive α-globin crosslinking and impairs the interaction of hemoglobin with endogenous scavenger pathways. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008. pmid:18708138
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Meng F, Alayash AI. Determination of extinction coefficients of human hemoglobin in various redox states. Anal Biochem. 2017. pmid:28069451
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Cruz-Landeira A, Bal MJ, Quintela O, López-Rivadulla M. Determination of methemoglobin and total hemoglobin in toxicological studies by derivative spectrophotometry. J Anal Toxicol. 2002. pmid:11916017
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Etzerodt A, Moestrup SK. CD163 and inflammation: Biological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2013. pp. 2352–2363. pmid:22900885
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Belcher DA, Cuddington CT, Martindale EL, Pires IS, Palmer AF. Controlled Polymerization and Ultrafiltration Increase the Consistency of Polymerized Hemoglobin for Use as an Oxygen Carrier. Bioconjug Chem. 2020. pmid:31868349
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Atha DH, Riggs A. Tetramer dimer dissociation in hemoglobin and the Bohr effect. J Biol Chem. 1976.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Griffon N, Baudin V, Dieryck W, Dumoulin A, Pagnier J, Poyart C, et al. Tetramer-dimer equilibrium of oxyhemoglobin mutants determined from auto-oxidation rates. Protein Sci. 1998. pmid:9541399
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Gladwin MT, Kanias T, Kim-Shapiro DB. Hemolysis and cell-free hemoglobin drive an intrinsic mechanism for human disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012. pmid:22446184
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Buehler PW, Humar R, Schaer DJ. Haptoglobin Therapeutics and Compartmentalization of Cell-Free Hemoglobin Toxicity. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2020. pmid:32589936
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. King DR, Cohn SM, Proctor KG, Shackford SR, Hall JR, Aikawa N, et al. Resuscitation with a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma—Inj Infect Crit Care. 2005. pmid:16361895
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Stern S, Rice J, Philbin N, McGwin G, Arnaud F, Johnson T, et al. Resuscitation with the hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier, hboc-201, in a swine model of severe uncontrolled hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury. Shock. 2009. pmid:18497706
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Martini WZ, Cortez DS, Dubick MA. Comparisons of normal saline and lactated Ringer’s resuscitation on hemodynamics, metabolic responses, and coagulation in pigs after severe hemorrhagic shock. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013. pmid:24330733
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hahn RG, Lyons G. The half-life of infusion fluids: An educational review. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016. pmid:27058509
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Taguchi K, Yamasaki K, Maruyama T, Otagiri M. Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers. J Funct Biomater. 2017. pmid:28335469
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Van Slyke DD, Hiller A. Determination of carbon monoxide in blood and of total and active hemoglobin by carbon monoxide capacity; inactive hemoglobin and methemoglobin contents of normal human blood. J Biol Chem. 1946. pmid:20273682
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Mansouri A, Lurie AA. Methemoglobinemia. American Journal of Hematology. 1993. pmid:8416301
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Sharma VS, Isaacson RA, John ME, Waterman MR, Chevion M. Reaction of Nitric Oxide with Heme Proteins: Studies on Metmyoglobin, Opossum Methemoglobin, and Microperoxidase. Biochemistry. 1983;22: 3897–3902. pmid:6311256
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Cordone L, Cupane A, Leone M, Militello V, Vitrano E. Oxygen binding to partially oxidized hemoglobin. Analysis in terms of an allosteric model. Biophys Chem. 1990;37: 171–181. pmid:2285779
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Alayash AI, Fratantoni JC, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J, Cashon RE. Nitric Oxide Binding to Human Ferrihemoglobins Cross-Linked between Either α or β Subunits. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;303: 332–338. pmid:8512319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Lim SK, Ferraro B, Moore K, Halliwell B. Role of haptoglobin in free hemoglobin metabolism. Redox Report. 2001. pmid:11642712
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wang D, Piknova B, Solomon SB, Cortes-Puch I, Kern SJ, Sun J, et al. In vivo reduction of cell-free methemoglobin to oxyhemoglobin results in vasoconstriction in canines. Transfusion. 2013. pmid:23488474
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Suzuki Y, Taguchi K, Kure T, Sakai H, Enoki Y, Otagiri M, et al. Liposome-encapsulated methemoglobin as an antidote against cyanide poisoning. J Control Release. 2021;337: 59–70. pmid:34273418
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Suzuki Y, Taguchi K, Kure T, Enoki Y, Otagiri M, Sakai H, et al. Long-term pharmaceutical stability of liposome-encapsulated methemoglobin as an antidote for cyanide poisoning. Int J Pharm. 2021;610: 121260. pmid:34740759
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Ford W. H. and Ainsworth S. Reactions of partially oxidised hemoglobin solutions I. Separation of intermediate compounds by CM-sephadex chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967; 1–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Tomoda A, Yoneyama Y. Analysis of intermediate hemoglobins in solutions of hemoglobin partially oxidized with ferricyanide. BBA—Protein Struct. 1979;581: 128–135. pmid:508790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Kosaka H, Imaizumi K, Imai K, Tyuma I. Stoichiometry of the reaction of oxyhemoglobin with nitrite. BBA—Protein Struct. 1979. pmid:41590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Keszler A, Piknova B, Schechter AN, Hogg N. The reaction between nitrite and oxyhemoglobin: A mechanistic study. J Biol Chem. 2008. pmid:18203719
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Palmer AF, Sun G, Harris DR. Tangential flow filtration of hemoglobin. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25: 189–199. pmid:19224583
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Pires IS, Belcher DA, Hickey R, Miller C, Badu-Tawiah AK, Baek JH, et al. Novel manufacturing method for producing apohemoglobin and its biophysical properties. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020. pmid:31612988
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Pires IS, Palmer AF. Tangential Flow Filtration of Haptoglobin. Biotechnol Prog. 2020;321: 373–380. pmid:32348635
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Meng F, Kassa T, Jana S, Wood F, Zhang X, Jia Y, et al. Comprehensive Biochemical and Biophysical Characterization of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carrier Therapeutics: All HBOCs Are Not Created Equally. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29: 1560–1575. pmid:29570272
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Gu X, Bolden-Rush C, Cuddington CT, Belcher DA, Savla C, Pires IS, et al. Comprehensive characterization of tense and relaxed quaternary state glutaraldehyde polymerized bovine hemoglobin as a function of cross-link density. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020. pmid:32472694
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Gu X, Savla C, Palmer AF. Tangential Flow Filtration Facilitated Fractionation and PEGylation of Low and High Molecular Weight Polymerized Hemoglobins and Their Biophysical Properties. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. pmid:34672363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Drabkin DL; Austin J. Spectrophotometric studies II. Preparations from washed blood cells; nitric oxide hemoglobin and sulfhemoglobin. J Biol Chem. 1935;112: 51–65. pmid:21
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Manning LR, Jenkins WT, Hess JR, Vandegriff K, Winslow RM, Manning JM. Subunit dissociations in natural and recombinant hemoglobins. Protein Sci. 2008. pmid:8845768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Sawicki CA, Gibson QH. Tetramer-dimer dissociation of carboxyhemoglobin in the absence of dithionite. Biophys J. 1981. pmid:7272439
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Schwab DE, Stamler JS, Singel DJ. EPR spectroscopy of nitrite complexes of methemoglobin. Inorg Chem. 2010. pmid:20666390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Svistunenko DA, Sharpe MA, Nicholls P, Blenkinsop C, Davies NA, Dunne J, et al. The pH dependence of naturally occurring low-spin forms of methaemoglobin and metmyoglobin: An EPR study. Biochem J. 2000.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Welbourn EM, Wilson MT, Yusof A, Metodiev M V., Cooper CE. The mechanism of formation, structure and physiological relevance of covalent hemoglobin attachment to the erythrocyte membrane. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017. pmid:28007575
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Sugawara Y, Kadono E, Suzuki A, Yukuta Y, Shibasaki Y, Nishimura N, et al. Hemichrome formation observed in human haemoglobin A under various buffer conditions. Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;179: 49–59. pmid:12940938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Vallelian F, Pimenova T, Pereira CP, Abraham B, Mikolajczyk MG, Schoedon G, et al. The reaction of hydrogen peroxide with hemoglobin induces extensive α-globin crosslinking and impairs the interaction of hemoglobin with endogenous scavenger pathways. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008. pmid:18708138
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Meng F, Alayash AI. Determination of extinction coefficients of human hemoglobin in various redox states. Anal Biochem. 2017. pmid:28069451
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Cruz-Landeira A, Bal MJ, Quintela O, López-Rivadulla M. Determination of methemoglobin and total hemoglobin in toxicological studies by derivative spectrophotometry. J Anal Toxicol. 2002. pmid:11916017
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Etzerodt A, Moestrup SK. CD163 and inflammation: Biological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2013. pp. 2352–2363. pmid:22900885
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Belcher DA, Cuddington CT, Martindale EL, Pires IS, Palmer AF. Controlled Polymerization and Ultrafiltration Increase the Consistency of Polymerized Hemoglobin for Use as an Oxygen Carrier. Bioconjug Chem. 2020. pmid:31868349
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Atha DH, Riggs A. Tetramer dimer dissociation in hemoglobin and the Bohr effect. J Biol Chem. 1976.
View Article
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Griffon N, Baudin V, Dieryck W, Dumoulin A, Pagnier J, Poyart C, et al. Tetramer-dimer equilibrium of oxyhemoglobin mutants determined from auto-oxidation rates. Protein Sci. 1998. pmid:9541399
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

2.2 Hb purification

2.3 Small scale optimization of Hb:oxidization agent stoichiometry

2.4 UV-visible spectra deconvolution analysis

2.5 Large scale metHb synthesis

2.6 MetHb clarification and purification

2.7 Characterization of metHb

2.7.1 Multi-species analysis during TFF.

2.7.2 Haptoglobin-binding kinetics study.

2.7.3 Hp-binding via size exclusion HPLC (SEC-HPLC) analysis.

2.7.4 Total hemoglobin (Hb) and metHb level.

2.7.5 Purity and yield.

2.7.6 Storage stability analysis.

2.7.7 Statistical analysis.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Optimal molar ratio of Hb (heme basis) to oxidization agent

3.2 Molecular weight

3.3 Composition of Hb species during TFF

3.4 MetHb-Hp binding kinetics

3.5 MetHb-Hp binding via SEC-HPLC analysis

3.6 Storage stability

4 Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 File. Storage and kinetics study.

S2 File. Minimal dataset.

Acknowledgments

References