https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2959-9593
Figures
Abstract
A 65-day growth trial was conducted to investigate the dietary protein requirements for Culter mongolicus fingerlings. Isolipidic and isoenergetic diets were formulated with five dietary protein levels (32%, 37%, 42%, 47%, and 52%). Each diet was assigned to triplicate groups of 70 C. mongolicus fingerlings (0.99±0.08 g). The results indicated that weight gain and specific growth rate (SGR) increased with increasing dietary protein levels up to 47%. The activities of intestinal trypsin and lipase were the lowest in the 32% protein and 52% protein groups, while amylase activity reduced markedly in the 47% protein group. These results suggest that different dietary protein levels may cause different transformations of nutrients. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and lysozyme were not affected by varying dietary protein levels, except for those in the 32% protein group. In contrast, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with increasing dietary protein levels and reaching a maximum in the 52% protein group, suggesting that MDA accumulation depends on the protein concentration and the potential oxidative stress. Taken together, based on the broken-line analysis of SGR, we recommended the optimum dietary protein for C. mongolicus fingerlings to be 48.97%~49.31%.
Citation: Qian J, Xiao L, Feng K, Li W, Liao C, Zhang T, et al. (2022) Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings. PLoS ONE 17(2): e0263507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263507
Editor: Mahmoud A.O. Dawood, Kafrelsheikh University, EGYPT
Received: August 21, 2021; Accepted: January 20, 2022; Published: February 4, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Qian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was financially supported by the National R & D Supporting Program (2015BAD25B01), Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45), and the Shandong Provincial Agricultural Seed Engineering Project (No. 2017LZN003). The contribution of programs are as follows: The National R & D Supporting Program (2015BAD25B01) played a role in study design, the Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45) played a role in data collection and analysis, and the Shandong Provincial Agricultural Seed Engineering Project (No. 2017LZN003) played a role in experiment conduction and data analysis.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Deficiencies or excesses of the main dietary components have profound effects on the growth and survival of fish [1]. Protein accounts for 65%~75% of fish dry-weight, and protein deposition in fish appears to be the main determinant of weight gain [2]. It plays a key role in many biological functions, including structural, enzymatic, transport, immune, and cell signaling [3]. Protein is broken down into smaller molecules in the gastrointestinal tract, which secrete fluids, electrolytes, and digestive enzymes that allow the absorption and utilization of free amino acids [4]. Dietary protein deficiency results in retarded growth and poor health [5–8]. On the other hand, excessive dietary protein can promote ammonia excretion and increase utilization of energy for amino acid catabolism, leading to water pollution and retarded growth [9, 10]. Therefore, the optimum dietary protein level is a key factor for fish to reach optimum growth at a low energy cost.
The dietary protein requirements depend on fish species, and the optimum protein levels differ at different growth stages and/or body sizes [2, 11, 12]. Many studies have focused on the juvenile and broodstock stages, which are better adapted to pellets than that at the younger stages [6, 13–21]. In fact, during larval rearing, a powder-formulated diet could be added as a nutritional supplement as live prey, such as cladocera and copepods, because of the decreasing of live prey amount in pond. As larvae grow, the ingredients and particle sizes of the formulated diet can be adjusted according to the nutritional requirements and size of the fish oral gape, which is a common way to achieve weaning on artificial diets. For most fish species, their developments are far from perfect during the earlier period of domestication, and therefore the protein level of the formulated diet during this period is important for fish somatic growth and development [22, 23].
Digestive enzymes are important for nutrient digestion. Higher enzyme activity in the digestive tract enhances the digestive capability and growth performance of the host. It is widely accepted that the level of fish digestive enzyme activity is a useful comparative indicator of food utilization, digestive capacity, and growth performance of the host [24, 25]. Many factors such as the stage of life, diet, feeding management, and the sampling time after feeding affect the activity of digestive enzymes [26]. Changes in diet composition can modulate enzymatic activities and nutrient absorption capacity, leading to improve feed use and assure growth performance [27].
Immunological status is an important health indicator of an organism. Lysozyme is an important hydrolytic enzyme of the non-specific immune system, and it can disrupt b-(1, 4) glycosidic bonds between the N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine in the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls [28]. As a humoral element in the innate immune system, lysozyme levels can be elevated in response to the immunostimulants, vaccines, and probiotics [29–32]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is an important enzyme in the cellular antioxidant enzymatic system, and it can remove the internal reactive oxygen species (ROS), that are generated during the immune response and metabolic process, prevent the occurrence of fatty acid oxidation, decrease the toxic effects of ROS, and consequently protect organisms from oxidative damage [33–35]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is an indicator of endogenous oxidative damage and a final product of lipid peroxidation [36, 37].
Culter mongolicus is widely distributed in freshwater bodies including lakes, rivers, and reservoirs of East Asia [38] and is one of important commercially carnivorous species in China due to the increasing production [39]. However, its population has declined gradually in recent decades, due to water pollution, habitat destruction, and overfishing [40, 41]. This species has been stocked into natural waters such as the Yangtze River basin to conduct bio-manipulation [42–47]. Stock enhancement programs have been launched by China’s Ministry of Agriculture since the early 2000s to rehabilitate this valuable fishery resource [48]. Hatchery-reared fingerlings were released annually to build the recruitment stock. In addition, larger size fingerlings would improve the recapture rate [49]. Based on earlier research, artificial propagation of C. mongolicus was successful [50]. However, the survival rate of fingerlings was lower than 45% due to the shortage of suitable food for their small oral gape. Therefore, it is crucial to develop diets with optimum protein levels to improve the survival rate and enhance the health of C. mongolicus during fingerling stage.
To this end, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of varying dietary protein levels on the growth and the survival rate of C. mongolicus fingerlings in artificial cultivation. In addition, we measured the activities of intestinal digestive enzymes and non-specific immunological indices in the plasma to evaluate the physiological effects of different dietary protein levels.
Materials and methods
Ethic statement
C. Mongolicus is not an endangered or protected species. All experimental animal care protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. And all experimental methods were performed following the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals of China (GB/T35892 2018) [51].
Experimental diets
Five isolipidic (mean lipid percentage of 7.26%) and isoenergetic (mean 18.25 kJ/kg) experimental diets containing 32%, 37%, 42%, 47%, and 52% crude protein levels (dry basis) were formulated. The formulation and chemical composition of the diets are presented in Table 1. White fishmeal was used as an animal protein source, soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and flour were used as plant protein sources, and fish oil and soybean oil (1:1, w/w) as lipid sources. Corn starch and cellulose were added to the diets to modulate the total energy. All ingredients were passed through a 375μm sieve before mixture. Diets were prepared in a laboratory extruder (SLP-45, Fishery Mechanical Facility Research Institute, Shanghai, China) to form 1.5-mm pellets. The pellets were oven-dried at 75°C and stored at −4°C until use.
Experimental fish and feeding trial
Culter mongolicus fingerlings were obtained from the Niushan Lake Fish Farm (Wuhan, Hubei, China) and transported to the laboratory of the Institute of Hydrobiology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, Hubei, China). Prior to the experiment, all fish were acclimated to the laboratory rearing system. Similar sized fish (mean initial total length 55.08±1.49 mm; mean initial weight 0.99±0.08 g) were randomly distributed into 15 cylindrical tanks (diameter 60 cm, water depth 60 cm). Each diet was assigned to triplicate tanks at a density of 70 fish per tank. Fish were hand-fed their prescribed diets to apparent satiation twice a day at 09:00 and 16:00.
At the beginning of the experiment, the granular feeds were milled and rolled into balls with water to prevail upon fish to ingest formula feeds, and then pellets were added gradually. All fish were fed with the pellets feeds initiatively after 15 days. The uneaten feeds and feces were removed an hour after feeding. A third of the water was replaced at 19:00 daily. A photoperiod of 12 h light:12 h dark cycle was maintained (lighting-up time was 8:30~20:30). During the experiment, the averaged water temperature was 25.0°C, with a dissolved oxygen (DO) level >5.0 mg/L, pH 7~7.5, ammonia-N < 0.5 mg/L, and residual chlorine < 0.05 mg/L. The trial lasted for 65 days.
Sample collection
At the end of the feeding experiment, all fish were starved for 24 h before sampling. Total body length, weight and mortality of fish in each tank were recorded to calculate the specific growth rate of total length (SGRTL) and body weight (SGRBW), and the survival (SR). Blood samples were collected from the caudal veins (sixty specimens per tank) using heparinized syringes. After centrifugation (3500 rpm, 15 min, 4°C) (centrifuge 5417R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), plasma was separated and stored at −20°C until analysis of lysozyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations. After blood sampling, the intestine was dissected on ice, and the intestinal samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at−80°C until analysis of trypsin, lipase, and amylase activities.
Chemical analysis of feeds
The chemical composition of the experimental diets was analyzed using the following standard methods. The samples were dried to a constant weight at 105°C for 24 h to determine the dry matter content. Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method using a Kjeltec system (Kjeltec-8400, FOSS). Crude lipids were measured by Soxhlet extraction using a Soxhlet extractor (Soxtec-2055, FOSS). Crude ash content was determined by incineration in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 12 h. Gross energy was determined using an automatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr Isoperibol Calorimeter 6200, Moline, Illinois, USA).
Analysis of immunological parameters
Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were measured according to the instructions of the commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Lysozyme activity was measured as described by Parry and Ellis [52, 53], based on the lysis of Micrococcus lysodeikticus (Sigma Chemical C) with some modifications. Twenty microliters of plasma was mixed with 250 μl M. lysodeikticus suspension (0.3 mg/mL in 0.05 M PBS, pH 6.2). The mixture reacted at 25°C for 0.5 min and 4.5 min, and then the optical density (O.D.) was measured at 0.5 min and 4.5 min respectively at 490 nm (Photometer 5010, BM Co. Germany). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme causing a decrease in absorbance of 0.001 and the activity was expressed as U/min/mL plasma.
Quantification of digestive enzymes
Intestinal trypsin, lipase, and amylase were extracted, and their activities were measured according to the instructions of the commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). According to the kits instructions, frozen intestinal samples were homogenized in a specific solvent at a propotion of 1:9, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing trypsin activities; frozen intestinal samples homogenized in ice-cold 0.68% saltwater at a proportion of 1:4, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing lipase activities; and frozen intestinal samples homogenized in ice-cold 0.68% saltwater at a proportion of 1:9, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing amylase activities.
Statistical analysis
All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS, IL, USA), after checking for the normality and homogeneity, followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison analysis to conduct pairwise comparisons. The optimum dietary protein requirement based on the total length and weight-specific growth rate was estimated using broken-line regression analysis (y = L − U × (R − x), y means specific growth rate, x means protein content) [17, 54] in Excel 2016. The data were expressed as mean ± SE (standard error).
Results
Growth performance
There was no mortality in C. mongolicus fingerlings during the feeding trial. The body weight and total length increased with the increasing dietary protein and then significantly decreased at 57% dietary protein. Similarly, SGRTL and SGRBW increased significantly (p < 0.05) when dietary protein levels increased from 32% to 47% and then a decreasing trend was observed in the 52% protein group. Based on broken-line regression analysis of SGRTL and SGRBW against dietary protein levels, the optimum dietary protein levels for maximal growth of the fish were 49.31% and 48.97% (Fig 1).
Digestive enzyme activities
The intestinal digestive enzyme activities in intestine of fish are shown in Fig 2. The activities of intestinal trypsin in fish fed on 37%, 42%, and 47% protein diets were not significantly different (p > 0.05), but were significantly higher than those of fish fed on 32% and 52% protein diets (p < 0.05). The intestinal lipase activities were significantly lower in the 32% and 52% protein groups than in the other three groups (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed among those three groups. The intestinal amylase activity in the 47% protein group was the lowest among the test groups (p < 0.05), and no significant difference was observed among the other four groups.
Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of bars mean significantly different (p < 0.05).
Immunological parameters
The results of immunological parameters in plasma are shown in Fig 3. The lysozyme activity of fish that were fed the 32% protein diet was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference among the other groups. MDA content increased with the increasing dietary protein levels (p < 0.05). SOD activity did not show any significant difference among the experimental groups (p > 0.05).
Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of same shape bars means significantly different (p < 0.05).
Discussion
Growth performance
The results of this study showed that the 100% survival of C. mongolicus fingerlings, indicating an adaptation to a wide range of dietary protein levels. These findings are similar to these of previous studies on Brazilian sardine [8], Rhamdia quelen [13], Nibea diacanthus juveniles [17], Dabry’s sturgeon juveniles [54], bluegill sunfish juveniles [55], and juvenile marbled spinefoot rabbit fish [56]. These results suggest that dietary protein levels may not be a determinant factor of the mortality.
The growth of C. mongolicus was profoundly affected by the different dietary protein levels. The values of SGRTL and SGRBW revealed high dietary protein requirements for the growth of C. mongolicus. However, excessive protein content may have no further benefits for individual growth and may even induce growth retardation due to the higher energy cost of extra protein metabolism [3, 57, 58]. Similar tendencies were found in several other fish species, such as the Brazilian sardine [8], juvenile bluegill sunfish [55], and juvenile red spotted grouper [59]. The optimum dietary protein requirement for C. mongolicus is about 49%. This value was higher than the values reported for the fingerlings of similar sizes, such as those of Sardinella brasiliensis, 36.77% [8], Horabagrus brachysoma, 39.10% [60] and Lepomis macrochirus, 41.51%~42.37% [55]. However, it is similar to the dietary protein requirements for some commonly cultured carnivorous species, viz., Salmo salar (48%) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (48%) [3]. The possible reason for this is may be that most herbivorous and omnivorous fish need 250~350 g/kg of protein in their diets, while carnivorous species require a higher dietary protein contents ranging from 400~550 g/kg [1]. Moreover, the dietary protein requirements generally decrease with fish growth, a phenomenon reported in many fish species at different life stages [3].
Responses of digestive enzyme activities to dietary protein levels
Several studies have shown that dietary protein levels influence protease activity directly, but the protease activity varies among species. Protease activity in the digestive tract of Labeo rohita fingerlings was significantly lower than the optimum level when fed with either insufficient or excessive protein diets [61]. In contrast, the protease activity in Dentex dentex [62], Cyprinus carpio [63], and Anarhichas minor [64] was higher for diets with less protein and/or more carbohydrates. On the other hand, the protease activity was found to be unresponsive to varying dietary protein levels in Cherax quadricarinatus [65]. Trypsin activity was not affected by different protein levels diets in Dicentrarchus labrax larvae [66]. In the present study, trypsin activity increased with an increase in dietary protein levels. However, trypsin activity began to decrease when the dietary protein levels exceeded 47%. This can be explained by the fact that dietary protein insufficiency results in a reduction in the number amino acids that are responsible for the synthesis and secretion of trypsin and lipase. Carnivorous fish have higher protein requirements than omnivorous and herbivorous fish. Abundant dietary protein stimulates the synthesis and secretion of trypsin. In contrast, excessive protein cannot be fully digested and causes the accumulation of toxic nitrogen in the body, which restrains the activity of trypsin [67, 68]. Various studies have reported that lipase activity was the same across different dietary protein treatments because of the constant lipid content in the diet of some species, such as Pseudoplatystoma corruscans [69], Labeo rohita fingerlings [61], and Sardinella brasiliensis [8]. In the present study, we found that lipase activity showed a similar trend of variability to that of trypsin. This is in line with the result reported in Puntius gonionotus fingerlings [70]. Excess protein in the diet can be used for lipid deposition, but not for protein deposition [6, 55]. Excessive dietary protein may convert into massive lipids, thereby restraining the lipase activity. Similarly, an increase in dietary protein can induce an increase in amylase activity in fish [8, 67, 69]. Nevertheless, this is in contrast to the results of a study on Puntius gonionotus fingerlings [57]. Moreover, previous studies on Dentex dentex [62] and Labeo rohita fingerlings [61] indicated that dietary protein did not influence amylase activity. The present results suggest that amylase activity was significantly lower in the 47% protein group, while amylase activity in other treatments did not change. Amylase activity has been reported to decrease with a decrease in dietary carbohydrate content [4, 71]. The content of corn starch in our feed formula increases with decreasing protein to prepare isoenergetic diets. This may be the reason for the reduction in amylase activity when the protein level increased to 47%. On the other hand, according to a study on Colossoma macropomum [67], adaptation to the use of carbohydrate sources was also dependent on the lipid concentrations, an increase in dietary lipids reduced the amylase activity. Given the trends in trypsin and lipase activities, we presume that energy is derived from both carbohydrates and lipids. When there were abundant lipids transformed from proteins, the energy source was ample. Therefore, the demand for carbohydrates decreased, and the activity of amylase receded.
Immunological effects of dietary protein levels
In a recent study, Li et al. (2018) found that serum lysozyme activity in juvenile sturgeon increased with the increasing dietary protein levels but declined when fish were fed excessive protein [54]. In a similar study on grass carp, the optimal dietary protein levels increased the lysozyme activity, but decreased the MDA concentration [72]. In the present study, the maximum plasma lysozyme activity of C. mongolicus appeared in the group fed with 32% protein content, and the maximum MDA concentration observed in the group fed with 52% protein content. Interestingly, the lysozyme activity and the MDA concentration did not vary significantly in the other groups. Organisms have antioxidant defense mechanisms to bate oxidative stress and defend biological systems from free radical toxicity [73, 74]. Excessive dietary protein may have promoted the accumulation of incomplete metabolites and ammonia excretion, leading to increased stress. In addition, we found that SOD activity in this study was not significantly different among the groups with different dietary protein levels. Many factors, such as fish species, feeding duration, age, and environmental factors, could explain the variability in the results of similar studies [75]. Thus, further studies are necessary to clarify the effects of dietary proteins on antioxidant enzymes.
Conclusion
In summary, this study found that C. mongolicus fingerlings reached maximum growth when the dietary protein level was 48.97% to 49.31%. Excessive protein led to retarded growth of C. mongolicus, reduced intestinal trypsin and lipase activity, and higher plasma MDA production. Dietary protein levels may have complex effects on the immune system of fish, which requires further research. The present results provide a basis for optimization of artificial culture of C. mongolicus, and lay the foundation for further investigation of the nutritional requirements of this species in aquaculture.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to postgraduate students Mantang Xiong, Zhan Mai, and Puze Wang, from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences for their assistance for sampling. We appreciate the suggestions from Professor Xiaoming Zhu and Dong Han, and Ms. Yunxia Yang. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their valuable comments and suggestions.
References
- 1. Lall SP, Tibbetts SM. Nutrition, feeding and behavior of fish. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 2009; 12: 361–372. pmid:19341962
- 2.
Wilson RP. Amino Acids and Protein. In Fish Nutrition, 3nd ed.; Halver J.E., Hardy R.W., Eds.; Academic Publisher: San Diego, USA, 2002; pp. 144–175.
- 3.
NRC (National Research Council). Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp. Washington, DC, National Academies Press; 2011.
- 4. Buddington RK, Krogdahl A. Hormonal regulation of the fish gastrointestinal tract. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2004; 139: 261–271. pmid:15556381
- 5. De Carvalho CVA, Bianchini A, Tesser MB, Sampaio LA. The effect of protein levels on growth, postprandial excretion and tryptic activity of juvenile mullet Mugil platanus (Günther). Aquac. Res. 2010; 41: 511–518.
- 6. Tu YQ, Xie SQ, Han D, Yang YX, Jin JY Liu HK, et al. Growth performance, digestive enzyme, transaminase and GH-IGF-I axis gene responsiveness to different dietary protein levels in broodstock allogenogyneticgibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) CAS III. Aquaculture. 2015; 446: 290–297.
- 7. Coutinho F, Peres H, Castro C, Pérez-Jiménez A, Magalhães R, Pousão-Ferreira P, et al. Dietary protein requirement of zebra sea bream (Diplodus cervinus, Lowe 1838) juveniles. Aquac. Nutr. 2016; 22: 465–471.
- 8. Sterzelecki FC, Sugai JK, Baloi M, Passini G, De Carvalho CVA, Fracalossi DM, et al. Effects of increasing protein level on the performance, enzyme activity and body composition of the Brazilian sardine, Sardinella brasiliensis (Steindachner, 1879). Aquac. Nutr. 2018; 24: 366–374.
- 9. McGoogan BB, Gatlin III DM. Dietary manipulations affecting growth and nitrogenous waste production of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus I. Effects of dietary protein and energy levels. Aquaculture. 1999; 178: 333–348.
- 10. Velazco-Vargas J, Tomás-Vidal A, Hamdan M, Moyano López FJ, Jover Cerda M, Martínez-Llorens S. Influence of digestible protein levels on growth and feed utilization of juvenile meagre Argyrosomus regius. Aquac. Nutr. 2014; 20: 520–531.
- 11. Abdel-Tawwab M, Ahmad MH, Khattab YAE, Shalaby AME. Effect of dietary protein level, initial body weight, and their interaction on the growth, feed utilization, and physiological alterations of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture. 2010; 298: 267–274.
- 12. Arnason J, Bjornsdottir R, Arnarsson I, Arnadottir GS, Thorarensen H. Protein requirements of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L. Aquac. Res. 2010; 41: 385–393.
- 13. Bibiano Melo JF, Lundstedt LM, Metón I, Baanante IV, Moraes G. Effects of dietary levels of protein on nitrogenous metabolism of Rhamdia quelen (Teleostei: Pimelodidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2006; 145: 181–187. pmid:16877019
- 14. Kim SS, Lee KJ. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile tiger puffer (Takifugu rubripes). Aquaculture. 2009; 287: 219–222.
- 15. Coutinho F, Peres H, Guerreiro I, Pousão-Ferreira P, Oliva-Teles A. Dietary protein requirement of sharpsnout sea bream (Diplodus puntazzo, Cetti 1777) juveniles. Aquaculture. 2012; 356–357: 391–397.
- 16. Sa R, Gavilán M, Rioseco MJ, Llancabure A, Vargas-Chacoff L, Augsburger A, et al. Dietary protein requirement of Patagonian blennie (Eleginops maclovinus Cuvier 1830) juveniles. Aquaculture. 2014; 428–429: 125–134.
- 17. Li WJ, Wen XB, Zhao J, Li SK, Zhu DS. Effects of dietary protein levels on growth, feed utilization, body composition and ammonia–nitrogen excretion in juvenile Nibea diacanthus. Fish. Sci. 2016; 82: 137–146.
- 18. Gunasekera RM, Shim K, Lam TJ. Effect of dietary protein level on puberty, oocyte growth and egg chemical composition in the tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture. 1995; 134: 169–183.
- 19. Gunasekera RM, Lam TJ. Influence of dietary protein level on ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture. 1997; 149: 57–69.
- 20. El-Sayed A-FM, Mansour CR, Ezzat AA. Effects of dietary protein level on spawning performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodstock reared at different water salinities. Aquaculture. 2003; 220: 619–632.
- 21. Chong ASC, Ishak SD, Osman Z, Hashim R. Effect of dietary protein level on the reproductive performance of female swordtails Xiphophorus helleri (Poeciliidae). Aquaculture. 2004; 234: 381–392.
- 22.
Xie CX. Ichthyology. Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2009, pp: 331–349. (In Chinese).
- 23.
Li JL. Culture of fish in pond. Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2011, pp:116–219. (In Chinese).
- 24. Ling J, Feng L, Liu Y, Jiang J, Jiang WD, Hu K, et al. Effect of dietary iron levels on growth, body composition and intestinal enzyme activities of juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian). Aquac. Nutr. 2010; 16: 616–624.
- 25. Suzer C, Çoban D, Kamaci HO, Saka Ş, Firat K, Otgucuoğlu Ö, et al. Lactobacillus spp. bacteria as probiotics in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) larvae: effects on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Aquaculture. 2008; 280: 140–145.
- 26. García-Meilán I, Ordóñez-Grande B, Valentín JM, Hernández MD, García B, Fontanillas R, et al. Modulation of digestive and absorptive processes with age and/or after a dietary change in gilthead sea bream. Aquaculture. 2016; 459: 54–64.
- 27. García-Meilán I, Valentín JM, Fontanillas R, Gallardo MA. Different protein to energy ratio diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): Effects on digestive and absorptive processes. Aquaculture. 2013; 412–413: 1–7.
- 28. Callewaert L, Michiels CW. Lysozymes in the animal kingdom. J. Biosci. 2010; 35: 127–160. pmid:20413917
- 29. Montero D, Mathlouthi F, Tort L, Afonso JM, Torrecillas S, Fernandez- Vaquero A, et al. Replacement of dietary fish oil by vegetable oils affects humoral immunity and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines genes in gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010; 29: 1073–1081. pmid:20817101
- 30. Siwicki AK, Anderson DP, Rumsey GL. Dietary intake of immunostimulants by rainbow trout affects non-specific immunity and protection against furunculosis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994; 41: 125–139. pmid:8066989
- 31. Kim DH, Austin B. Innate immune responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) induced by probiotics. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006; 21: 513–524. pmid:16631379
- 32. Hanif A, Bakopoulos V, Leonardos I, Dimitriadis GJ. The effect of sea bream (Sparus aurata) broodstock and larval vaccination on the susceptibility by Photobacterium damsela subsp. piscicida and on the humoral immune parameters. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005; 19: 345–361. pmid:15863015
- 33. Zahran E, Risha E, Abdelhamid F, Mahgoub HA, Ibrahim T. Effects of dietary Astragalus polysaccharides (APS) on growth performance, immunological parameters, digestive enzymes, and intestinal morphology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014; 38: 149–157. pmid:24657260
- 34. Campa-Cordova AI, Hernandez-Saavedra NY, De Philippis R, Ascencio F. Generation of superoxide anion and SOD activity in haemocytes and muscle of American white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) as a response to β-glucan and sulphated polysaccharide. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2002; 12: 353–366. pmid:12049170
- 35. Hermes-Lima M, Storey JM, Storey KB. Antioxidant defenses and metabolic depression. The hypothesis of preparation for oxidative stress in land snails. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B-Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1998; 120: 437–448. pmid:9787804
- 36. Ding ZL, Zhang YX, Ye JY, Du ZY, Kong YQ. An evaluation of replacing fish meal with fermented soybean meal in the diet of Macrobrachium nipponense: Growth, nonspecific immunity, and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015; 44: 295–301. pmid:25707598
- 37. Liu F, Shi HZ, Guo QS, Yu YB, Wang AM, Lv F, et al. Effects of astaxanthin and emodin on the growth, stress resistance and disease resistance of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016; 51: 125–135. pmid:26899124
- 38.
Chen YX, Chu Y, Luo H, Liu M, He W, Chen P, et al. Fauna Sinica, Osteichthyes: Cypriniformes. Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998.(In Chinese).
- 39.
CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences). Fishes of the Yangtze River. CAS, Department of Ichthyology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Science Press: Beijing, China, 1976. (In Chinese).
- 40.
Zhang TL. Life-history strategies, trophic patterns and community structure in the fishes of Lake Biandantang. Doctoral dissertation. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 2005. (In Chinese).
- 41.
Ye SW. Studies on fish communities and trophic network model of shall lakes along the medium reach of the Yangtze Rivers. Doctoral dissertation. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 2007. (In Chinese).
- 42. Chiang I-Kuei. On the biology of mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi of Liangtze Lake. Acta Hydrobiology Sinica. 1959; 0: 375–385. (In Chinese).
- 43. Zhu JH. The biology of Culter mongolicus in Liangzi Lake. Acta Hydrobiology Sinica. 1962; 0: 14–21. (In Chinese).
- 44. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Berg S. Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool .2. Effects on lower trophic levels in Lake Lyng, Denmark. Hydrobiologia. 1997; 342: 319–325.
- 45. Skov C, Perrow MR, Berg S, Skovgaard H. Changes in the fish community and water quality during seven years of stocking piscivorous fish in a shallow lake. Freshw. Biol. 2002; 47: 2388–2400.
- 46. Lin ML, Li ZJ, Liu JS, Gozlan RE, Lek S, Zhang TL, et al. Maintaining economic value of ecosystem services whilst reducing environmental cost: a way to achieve freshwater restoration in China. Plos One. 2015; 10: e0120298. pmid:25803696
- 47. Li W, Hicks BJ, Lin ML, Guo CB, Zhang TL, Liu JS, et al. Impacts of hatchery-reared mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi stocking on wild fish community and water quality in a shallow Yangtze lake. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 11481. pmid:30065279
- 48. Lin ML, Xia YG, Murphy BR, Li ZJ, Liu JS, Zhang TL, et al. Size-Dependent Effects of Coded Wire Tags on Mortality and Tag Retention in Redtail Culter Culter mongolicus. North Am. J. Fish Manage. 2012; 32: 5, 968–973.
- 49. Lin ML, Chen SB, Ren P, Li W, Ye SW, Zhang TL, et al. Stock enhancement of Culter mongolicus: assessment of growth, recapture and releasing size in the Yangtze lakes. Fish. Sci. 2021; 234: 105809.
- 50. Jiang HF, Geng LW, Tong GX, Li CY, Wang SZ, XU W. Artificial propagation and observation of embryonic and postembryonic development in pond-farmed Mongolian Culter Erythroculter mongolicus collected from Jingpo Lake. Fisheries Sci. 2016; 35: 130–135. 006 (In Chinese with English abstract).
- 51.
GB/T 35892–2018. Laboratory animal-Guideline for ethical review of animal welfare. Retrieved from http://www.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=9BA619057D5C13103622A10FF4BA5D14.
- 52. Parry RM, Chandan JR, Shahani KM. A rapid and sensitive assay of Muramidase. Exp. Biol. Med. 1965; 119: 384–386. pmid:14328897
- 53.
Ellis AE. Lysozyme assays. In Techniques in Fish Immunology, Stolen J.S., Fletcher T.C., Anderson D.P., Roberson B.S., Van Muiswinkel W.B., Eds.; Fair Haven: SOS Publications, 1990; pp.101–103.
- 54. Li QF, Lu XB, Liang HO, Ai QH, Mai KS. Effects of dietary levels of protein on growth, feed utilization and physiological parameters for juvenile Dabry’s sturgeon, Acipenser dabryanus. Aquac. Res. 2018; 49: 2099–2107.
- 55. Yang M, Wang JT, Han T, Yang YX, Li XY, Jiang YD. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Aquaculture. 2016; 459: 191–197.
- 56. El-Dakar AY, Shalaby SM, Saoud IP. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile marbled spinefoot rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus. Aquac. Res. 2011; 42: 1050–1055.
- 57. Mohanta KN, Mohanty SN, Jena JK, Sahu NP. Protein requirement of silver barb, Puntius gonionotus fingerlings. Aquac. Nutr. 2008; 14: 143–152.
- 58. Cornélio FHG, da Cunha DA, Silveira J, Alexandre D, Silva CP, Fracalossi DM. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile cachara catfish, pseudoplatystoma reticulatum. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2014; 45: 45–54.
- 59. Wang JT, Jiang YD, Li XY, Han T, Yang YX, Hu SX, et al. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile red spotted grouper (Epinephelus akaara). Aquaculture. 2016; 450: 289–294.
- 60. Giri SS, Sahoo SK, Paul BN, Mohanty SN, Sahu Ak. Effect of dietary protein levels on growth, feed utilization and carcass composition of endangered bagrid catfish Horabagrus brachysoma (Gunther 1864) fingerlings. Aquac. Nutr. 2011; 17: 332–337.
- 61. Debnath D, Pal AK, Sahu NP, Yengkokpam S, Baruah K, Choudhury D, et al. Digestive enzymes and metabolic profile of Labeo rohita fingerlings fed diets with different crude protein levels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2007; 146: 107–114. pmid:17112756
- 62. Pérez-Jiménez A, Cardenete G, Morales AE, García-Alcázar A, Abellán E, Hidalgo MC. Digestive enzymatic profile of Dentex dentex and response to different dietary formulations. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009; 154: 157–164. pmid:19501667
- 63. Keshavanath P, Manjappa K, Gangadhara B. Evaluation of carbohydrate rich diets through common carp culture in manured tanks. Aquac. Nutr. 2002; 8: 169–174.
- 64. Papoutsoglou ES, Lyndon AR. Digestive enzymes of Anarhichas minor and the effect of diet composition on their performance. J. Fish Biol. 2006; 69: 446–460.
- 65. Lopez-Lopez S, Nolasco H, Villarreal-Colmenares H, Civera-Cerecedo R. Digestive enzyme response to supplemental ingredients in practical diets for juvenile freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Aquac. Nutr. 2005; 11: 79–85.
- 66. Cahu CL, Zambonino Infante JL. Early weaning of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae with a compound diet: effect on digestive enzymes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 1994; 109: 213–222.
- 67. De Almeida LC, Lundstedt LM, Moraes G. Digestive enzyme responses of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) fed on different levels of protein and lipid. Aquac. Nutr. 2006; 12: 443–450.
- 68. Liang P, Qin ZQ, Lin JB, Wu GF, Zhu QG, Qiu ML. Effect of Feed Protein Levels on Growth Performance and Digestive Enzyme Activity of Juvenile Acrossocheilius hemispinus. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2018; 34: 136–140. (In Chinese with English abstract)
- 69. Lundstedt LM, Bibiano Melo JF, Moraes G. Digestive enzymes and metabolic profile of Pseudoplatystoma corruscans (Teleostei: Siluriformes) in response to diet composition. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B-Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004; 137: 331–339. pmid:15050520
- 70. Mohanta KN, Mohanty SN, Jena JK, Sahu NP. Optimal dietary lipid level of silver barb, Puntius gonionotus fingerlings in relation to growth, nutrient retention and digestibility, muscle nucleic acid content and digestive enzyme activity. Aquac. Nutr. 2008; 14: 350–359.
- 71. Krogdahl A, Sundby A, Olli JJ. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbowtrout (Oncorhynchusmy kiss) digest and metabolize nutrients differently. Effects of water salinity and dietary starch level. Aquaculture. 2004; 229: 335–360.
- 72. Jiang WD, Xu J, Zhou XQ, Wu P, Liu Y, Jiang J, et al. Dietary protein levels regulated antibacterial activity, inflammatory response and structural integrity in the head kidney, spleen and skin of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) after challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2017; 68: 154–172. pmid:28698127
- 73. Nordberg J, Arnér ESJ. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, and the mammalian thioredoxin system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001; 31: 1287–1312. pmid:11728801
- 74. Yang ZY, Zhao Y, Yang L, Yu PL, Wang H, Ji XS. Characterization of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin 3 and 4 in common carp and the immune response against bacterial infection. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B-Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018; 217: 60–69. pmid:29277606
- 75. Han B, Long WQ, He JY, Liu YJ, Si YQ, Tian LX. Effects of dietary Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, immunological parameters, intestinal morphology and resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015; 46: 225–231. pmid:26108035