Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mapping health behaviour related to Chagas diagnosis in a non-endemic country: Application of Andersen’s Behavioural Model

  • Laura Iglesias-Rus,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

  • María Romay-Barja,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Red de Investigación Colaborativa en Enfermedades Tropicales, RICET, Madrid, Spain

  • Teresa Boquete,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Red de Investigación Colaborativa en Enfermedades Tropicales, RICET, Madrid, Spain

  • Agustín Benito,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Red de Investigación Colaborativa en Enfermedades Tropicales, RICET, Madrid, Spain

  • Briggitte Jordan,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Fundación Mundo Sano, Madrid, Spain

  • Teresa Blasco-Hernández

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    tblasco@isciii.es

    Affiliations Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Red de Investigación Colaborativa en Enfermedades Tropicales, RICET, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Background

Chagas disease has become a challenge for non-endemic countries since population mobility has increased in recent years and it has spread to these regions. In order to prevent vertical transmission and improve the prognosis of the disease, it is important to make an early diagnosis. And to develop strategies that improve access to diagnosis, it is important to know the factors that most influence the decision of the population to know their serological status. For this reason, this study uses Andersen’s Behavioural Model and its proposed strategies to explore the health behaviours of Bolivian population.

Methods

Twenty-three interviews, two focus groups, and two triangular groups were performed with Bolivian men and women, involving a total of 39 participants. In addition, four interviews were conducted with key informants in contact with Bolivian population to delve into possible strategies to improve the Chagas diagnosis.

Results

The most relevant facts for the decision to being diagnosed pointed out by participants were having relatives who were sick or deceased from Chagas disease or, for men, having their pregnant wife with a positive result. After living in Spain more than ten years, population at risk no longer feels identified with their former rural origin and the vector. Moreover, their knowledge and awareness about diagnosis and treatment still remains low, especially in younger people. Limitations on access to healthcare professionals and services were also mentioned, and proposed strategies focused on eliminating these barriers and educating the population in preventive behaviours.

Conclusions

Based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model, the results obtained regarding the factors that most influence the decision to carry out Chagas diagnosis provide information that could help to develop strategies to improve access to health services and modify health behaviours related to Chagas screening.

Introduction

Chagas disease (CD) is a parasitic infection caused by Trypanosoma Cruzi (T. cruzi). The main route of transmission in endemic countries is through triatomine insects, although congenital transmission, solid organ transplants, and blood transfusions are also possible transmission routes both in endemic and non-endemic regions [1].

CD has an asymptomatic acute phase that lasts 4–8 weeks, during which parasitaemia levels are higher; then it enters an indeterminate chronic phase, without signs or symptoms of visceral involvement [1]. If CD remains untreated, parasites could produce gastrointestinal and/or cardiac damage, causing megaviscera or cardiomyopathy in 30%-40% of patients [1]. These complications of CD cost healthcare systems $627 million per year and lead to numerous disabilities [1].

Available treatments for CD are benznidazole and nifurtimox, both of which have side effects [1]. Current evidence shows that treating infected women before pregnancy reduces vertical transmission of T. cruzi, and the cure rate in congenitally infected new-borns is close to 100% [14]. However, treatment is less effective in patients in the indeterminate phase or with visceral involvement [1]. That is why early diagnosis helps eliminate the parasite and prevents cardiac and gastrointestinal damage [15].

CD is currently an endemic disease in 21 Latin American countries, usually in impoverished rural environments. However, migration from rural to urban areas within the same country and mobility to other non-endemic regions such as North America and Europe allows its spread to regions that were not previously affected [16]. Estimated prevalence of CD in Latin American population living in Europe is about 4.2%, where the highest burden is borne by Bolivian population (18.1%) [17]. Spain is the European region with the highest burden of CD, having an estimated 52,000 cases, and 81% of them reported; nonetheless, a cross-sectional survey carried out in Madrid about Chagas health-seeking behaviour showed that only 44% of Bolivian population living in Madrid know their serological status, which means an estimated prevalence of 27.7% [810]. However, other than ensuring safe blood transfusions and organ transplant since 2005 [11], no national strategies have been developed for screening the at-risk population that Spain receives annually from endemic regions. Despite evaluation studies pointing out Chagas screening as a cost-effective strategy in non-endemic areas [5, 6, 12, 13], few Spanish regions (Galicia, Valencia and Catalonia) developed protocols for primary care testing, and some health professionals published guidelines encouraging Chagas screening at primary care services [14].

CD is also a health problem with psycho-emotional and socio-anthropological aspects. It is frequently associated with death, misery, dirt and rural areas, and despite of its normalisation among Bolivian people it is an unease issue to talk about because of the fear of rejection and social isolation [1520]. Moreover, women are afraid of passing the disease to their children and have a sense of guilt and responsibility in relation to this fear [15, 16, 18, 21]. All these elements along with misconceptions about the symptoms and the treatment make affected individuals hide the disease and sometimes they avoid knowing their serological status [15, 17, 18]. In addition, recent studies showed mental distress in patients with CD [22].

Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Service Use allows us to understand, from a systemic perspective, in which way are health behaviours, health outcomes, and access to healthcare services influenced by patient and environmental factors [23]. This model evaluates the interaction between the characteristics of population, the healthcare environment, and external environmental factors [24]. Population characteristics include predisposing factors intrinsic to the patient such as age, sex, social structure, health beliefs, values, and cultural norms; enabling resources, which include those resources available in their closest environment (personal, family and community resources); and need, which is patient or health professional’s judgement on health status and medical care perceived. Health behaviour involves those actions being carried out to achieve health or well-being [24, 25] (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Andersen’s Behavioural Model of health service use [24].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262772.g001

Andersen’s Behavioural Model has been broadly used in studies as a guide to examine health service use in different racial or ethnic populations [26, 27]. However, no studies with this theoretical framework in relation with Chagas diagnosis in non-endemic countries have been found. Since many people living with Chagas cannot afford the benefit of being diagnosed, a thorough understanding of their perceptions on the care provided and the factors that influence the search for their health could allow the development of adapted interventions that facilitate diagnosis [1]. This study assessed factors that influence Bolivian population’s health behaviour in relation to Chagas diagnosis according to Andersen’s Behavioural Model and its proposed strategies that could influence such behaviour aiming to provide information to develop focused interventions to improve access to screening.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Spanish National Health Institute, Carlos III (reference: CEI PI 05_2015-v2). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants in order to use and publish the findings. Personal data were managed according to Spanish legislation [28].

Setting

The present study was conducted in Madrid, Spain, a non-endemic country for CD. According to the municipal census on 1 January 2017, a total of 15,951 Bolivians lived in Madrid, 6,758 of which were men, and 9,193 were women. This population is mainly distributed in the municipal districts of Usera, Carabanchel, Puente de Vallecas, and Latina [10].

The Spanish healthcare delivery system consists mainly of primary care and secondary and tertiary care, in health centres and hospitals, respectively. Health centres providing primary care in this region are distributed in seven areas of assistance from the organizational point of view, each one with its reference hospitals. However, population can be treated at any health centre or hospital due to current legislation [29].

Spain’s Health system was free of charge (public funding), but in 2012, access to public healthcare was linked to registration in the social security system, so access for undocumented migrants was limited to emergency services [30]; from 2018 onwards, it was necessary to prove a three-month stay in Spain in order to access to public healthcare [31]. Some hospitals and health centres offered the possibility of diagnosis and treatment despite of these limitations.

The most common test used for CD screening is ELISA because of its high sensitivity and specificity [1]; however, the results are known a few days later.

Study design

This is a qualitative study with a phenomenological perspective comprised of focus groups (FGs), semi-structured interviews and triangular groups (TG) as the main data collection techniques. TG are composed of fewer people, have a less structured dynamic than FGs and merge the individual and the group discourse [32, 33]. A topic guide to ensure that interviewers got the necessary data to achieve the study’s aims was designed, which also allowed deeper exploration of the emerging topics. This study was part of a project to assess access and use of healthcare services among the Bolivian population in Madrid. Factors related to knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Bolivian population regarding management of CD, care itineraries, screening, and treatment were collected through a previous questionnaire [10]. This study presents the results of FGs, interviews and triangular groups performed with Bolivian population and key informants regarding factors influencing the diagnosis of Chagas.

Participant recruitment

The sampling technique was convenience sampling according to the sampling types established by Teddlie and Yu [34]. Inclusion criteria were that the participants had to be over 18 years of age and have their residence in Madrid. The sample was stratified in Bolivian women with a positive diagnosis, Bolivian men with positive diagnosis and key informants in contact with Bolivian population resident in Madrid.

Interviewed Bolivian people were contacted in the Bolivian Consulate by the research team, and other participants were contacted through a health agent. Key informants were contacted through the network of the National Centre of Tropical Medicine. Participant recruitment was carried out until no relevant new information was obtained from additional interviews [i.e. the point of saturation was reached] [35].

Data collection

The research team reviewed the topic guide for interviews, FGs, and TGs to ensure the potential to trigger a discussion and its comprehensibility following the Kvale model [36]. This guide was modified with the transcriptions of following interviews, FGs and TGs during data collection when finding topics that needed more details or inclusion of new questions (S1 File).

The topic guide included the following core themes: 1) knowledge about CD (transmission, symptoms, and treatment); 2) attitudes towards CD; and 3) practices in relation to CD (health behaviour).

Digital recorders were used during all the techniques. Furthermore, sociodemographic variables (sex, age, region of origin, education level, employment status, public health coverage, number of children, and years living in Spain) were collected as complementary information of the participants. These data were written down on paper and entered and codified into a spreadsheet to assure confidentiality afterwards (S2 and S3 Files).

Data transcription, translation, and analysis

Audio files were transferred to a computer after recording. An external expert transcribed interviews, TGs, and FGs. Afterwards, a quality control of transcriptions was carried out by listening the recordings and correcting possible errors. Two researchers performed an inductive analysis of the topics based in Grounded Theory [37]. Initially, the transcripts were coded line by line following an inductive approach, creating emergent codes grouping the content of each sentence or paragraph. Codes and groups were further examined looking for thematic patterns in the data. The software MAXQDA 2018 (VERBI GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and Atlas.ti 7.0. Scientific Software Development 2009 (Gmbh, Berlin, Germany) were used to facilitate the coding process. Thematic analysis of FGs, TG and interviews was performed separately by the researchers involved in analysis. Joint meetings of those researchers were held to combine analysis results, and to carry out discussion about data collection and analysis procedures. Data sources and analysis triangulations were performed to provide concrete findings. All the gathered information was compared from different points of view and verified by the researchers. Table 1 shows categories and codes established in the analysis.

thumbnail
Table 1. Categories and codes established in the analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262772.t001

After reviewing the domains and associated definitions of Andersen’s behavioural model, the researchers mapped topics and subtopics to each domain.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Fifteen interviews, two TG and two FG with women were performed between the years 2015 and 2016; and eight interviews with men were performed between the years 2017 and 2018, involving a total of 39 participants. Moreover, four interviews were developed with key informants in contact with Bolivian population between the years 2017 and 2018 in order to know more deeply the most appropriate strategies to improve diagnosis in a non-endemic country. Tables 2 and 3 present sociodemographic characteristics.

Thirty women (97.8%) and seven men (87.5%) had a positive test for CD, whereas two participants did not know their serological status. Average age of participants was 40.3 years, aged between 28 and 59 years old. Most of them were women (79.5%), and 20.5% of them were men. Only two men (5.1% of interviewed Bolivian population) had no public health coverage. Regarding their level of education, most of the participants in our sample reported having completed secondary education and beyond (79.5%). Most participants reported having children (92.3%), and their average time living in Spain was of 10.3 years.

With respect to Bolivian population’s health behaviour in relation to CD, interviewed participants discussed fifteen factors that influenced CD diagnosis: six of them related to predisposing characteristics (age, work conditions, migration status, knowledge and health beliefs about CD and its treatment, stigma and shame associated with CD, and culture and health), four in relation with enabling resources (family history of CD, social and/or familiar support and advice, and accessibility to health services and knowledge about health system), three factors related to need (symptoms, attitudes, and subjective assessment about health) and two related to healthcare environment (system factors, and provider factors) (Table 4). Finally, strategies to facilitate diagnosis were also discussed.

thumbnail
Table 4. Themes and subthemes according to Andersen’s Health Behavioural Model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262772.t004

Population characteristics

Predisposing characteristics.

Predisposing characteristics are those factors intrinsic to the patient. Bolivian people interviewed identified six factors: age, work conditions, migration status, knowledge and health beliefs about CD and its treatment, stigma and shame associated with CD, and culture and health.

Among all these factors, stigma and shame were frequently mentioned by older participants with some differences between men and women. Men explained that CD is associated with poverty and rural areas, so there is a fear and reject of being identified as poor peasants, and for this reason they avoid knowing their diagnosis. On the other hand, women commented their concern about rejection of the Spanish population due to ignorance about contagion and its possible consequences, such as job loss or social isolation. Consequently, both men and women tend to talk about CD only with their relatives and their closest social environment.

Interviewed population also described Latin American people’s culture as quite careless in terms of health, so they focus on issues that they consider more important, and health care is postponed. Thus, men reported the economic maintenance of the family as a priority, whereas women add to this objective the care of the family.

Regarding age, older participants pointed out that young people are more carefree about CD, explaining that they are not concerned about health at that age and they do not feel identified with endemic environments because many of them were very young when they came to Spain, and have always resided in the city.

Regarding knowledge and health beliefs about CD, participants expressed that their knowledge is very low, and it is based on their own experiences, although women pointed out that a positive diagnosis triggered a desire for new information about it. Furthermore, interviews and groups composed by younger men and women reported having less knowledge than older participants. Interviewed people are aware that CD affects a large part of Bolivian population due to the presence of vinchucas in rural areas. In consequence, they believe that since they have been away for a long time or have had no contact with them, they are no longer possible carriers of the parasite. Moreover, participants expressed confusion about vertical transmission. They assume CD is hereditary from both parents but cannot explain why some children are born without the disease in Spain or Bolivia. Regarding symptoms, interviewed people clearly identified heart problems and sudden death in people at an older age, and they also consider the possibility of not having manifestations of the disease throughout their life. In addition, they explained that a positive diagnosis already implies that there is a disease, and this knowledge could deteriorate their health, and that is why they avoid performing the diagnostic test. Finally, participants showed doubts about the efficacy of CD treatment and were afraid of its serious side effects, so they consider that it makes no sense to know they have Chagas if they have no chance of being cured.

Both men and women also mentioned that despite having a health insurance card, their work conditions (such as schedules or impediments from their bosses) limit their attendance to medical appointments, since they fear that absence from their job or the perception of being ill may cause them to lose their job. As an alternative, men explained that using private healthcare is more compatible with their schedules. Furthermore, interviewed people reported the experiences of their social environment regarding the difficulties obtaining healthcare as immigrants; due to the bureaucracy to achieve it, their use of resources is limited to acute and emergency situations. Table 5 shows the quotes related to predisposing characteristics.

Enabling resources.

Enabling resources are tools or resources that facilitate healthcare use. Participants in this study identified four factors: family history of CD, social and/or family support and advice, accessibility to health services, and knowledge about the health system.

Family history of CD helped interviewed people with the decision of Chagas diagnosis. They explained that having a relative with a positive diagnosis and onset of symptoms or decease at certain age made them think about the possibility of getting diagnosed when reaching that age, unlike those with asymptomatic, positive relatives in good health or dead from causes other than CD. Specifically, men reported that after the positive diagnosis of their wives during pregnancy follow-up they decided to know their serological status. With respect to children, they waver between doing the study after one of the parents is diagnosed or waiting until they are adults, because they consider that until then the disease may not affect them. On the other hand, those with no family history considered that it was not necessary to know if they were bearers of Chagas.

In addition, participants pointed out that it was easier for them to make the decision to go to a health centre for the diagnostic test if a family member or a friend recommended it.

Regarding health services in Spain, women and men mentioned that the possibility to get health care is limited by geographic distance from the Tropical Medicine unit, explaining they sometimes deterred from keeping appointments because of the time spent in public transport from their workplace.

Finally, participants, especially men, referred their lack of knowledge about the Spanish health system and their rights as users, explaining that they do not always know where the test can be performed apart from the hospital units where the disease is monitored, which services they can access as users of the health system, and whether these services may change due to their administrative situation (unemployment or expiration of health insurance card).

Table 6 shows the quotes related to enabling resources.

Need. Need is the patient or professional’s judgement about the requirements of health care. Interviewed participants identified three factors: symptoms, attitudes about CD, and subjective assessment of health.

Interviewed people expressed that the lack of symptoms before diagnosis made them feel less worried about CD, and they explained that feeling well is not a reason to use health services, except for activities such as donating blood, where some of them accidentally discovered their serological status. In addition, when symptoms such as fatigue or tiredness appear, they scribe them to work, daily life, or other different illnesses. However, participants explained that once they are diagnosed or know their family history of CD if they have signs of symptoms of any kind, they think it is because of CD complications and consult a physician.

On the other hand, older men and women expressed that CD is a deadly health problem, and this makes them feel uncomfortable, fearful, and unease. They frequently think about the possibility of being ill, and leaving their family due to an early death, or being limited for work; however, they would rather not know if they are sick so they do not to have to deal with it. In addition, they explain that knowing that it is a very common disease in Bolivia gives them peace of mind.

Finally, women worry about the effect that the disease may have on their children and they decide to have them diagnosed after knowing their own serological status. However, women who were diagnosed with Chagas during pregnancy had not considered this option before. They explained that health professionals did the screening as part of the pregnancy monitoring.

Table 7 shows the quotes related to need.

Healthcare environment

System factors.

System factors include those services that are complementary to patient care.

Participants explained that the limited flexibility of attention schedules and the extended waiting times at health centres and hospitals were inadmissible, and it is frequently confronted with other family and work responsibilities. For these reasons, they are frequently forced to leave the health centre without being treated, or they do not even request health care because they consider it a waste of time.

Table 8 shows the quotes related to system factors.

Provider factors.

Interviewed population commented that trust, professional knowledge, communication, and previous experiences with care providers influenced in CD diagnosis.

Participants consider that CD is not known by all the Spanish healthcare providers, explaining that when they consulted on the diagnosis or the management of CD, most physicians in primary care centres showed little knowledge about it; in fact, both men and women commented that it would be important for them if a physician recommended being tested. However, they value positively their reception and monitoring in the Tropical Medicine Units of the hospitals, pointing out that professionals there are more familiar with the disease.

In addition, participants pointed out that they have problems communicating effectively with physicians, since the time of care in doctor visits is very short, and they feel that the health problem they are reporting is approached superficially; therefore, they prefer to change physicians or not going back. Specifically, women explained that doctors did not seem to trust them when they reported about their family or personal history of CD, and they were required to prove it through clinical reports that were not always available.

Finally, interviewed population shared different negative experiences related with the attitude and behaviours of healthcare providers that made them feel discriminated and displaced as immigrants; for these reasons they avoid making appointments with the same professionals in order to avoid feeling bad in a psychological level.

Table 9 shows the quotes related to provider factors.

Strategies to facilitate diagnosis

Interviewed participants identified few strategies that could make them want to know their Chagas diagnosis, and they were mainly oriented towards mandatory screening for the Bolivian population or specific consultations for young adults in order to reduce waiting times.

On the other hand, key informants pointed out that testimonials from people diagnosed with CD may be useful to reinforce reasons for getting tested. Moreover, with the aim of reducing waiting times and shorten distances between population and health resources, they recommended designing events in places and environments close to the population (such as their neighbourhoods or traditional festivals) providing information as well as the opportunity to be tested simultaneously.

Other possibility they mentioned was to include the serological test in routine analysis, as well as to gather all medical appointments and tests to facilitate care.

Furthermore, key informants explained the importance of using messages focused on diagnosis when there are no symptoms to prevent cardiac and/or intestinal damage, and to educate women on childbearing age in order to prevent the transmission of the parasite to their children. However, they consider that it could be harmful to carry out campaigns in high schools, because it could give rise to the stigmatization of younger children by associating the disease to people from Latin America.

Table 10 shows the quotes related to strategies to facilitate diagnosis.

thumbnail
Table 10. Quotes related to strategies to facilitate diagnosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262772.t010

Discussion

This study extends the application of Andersen’s Behavioural Model to infectious diseases, and in particular to CD, by proposing that the decision to know the diagnosis is a health behaviour influenced by various factors that exert more or less influence based on each person’s individual context. Additionally, the study adds stigma, family history, symptoms, and attitudes towards CD as additional contributions to the model. Andersen’s Behavioural Model has never been used for CD before. Previously, it has been mainly applied for HIV [38, 39].

The lack of knowledge and health beliefs about CD showed by young participants and men generates a prototypical speech in which, due to their migration, they no longer identify themselves with the profile of people who has CD (living in rural environments, being poor peasant in contact with the vector). This fact, together with the lack of knowledge about vertical transmission, is a very relevant aspect in non-endemic countries and is also very worrisome, because it could produce a feeling of invulnerability in non-endemic regions. In fact, previous studies showed a low knowledge about CD transmission, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and treatment in Bolivian population in non-endemic countries [5, 18, 19, 4042]. In addition, diagnosis and treatment hesitancy in children is also a relevant aspect because it is known that this population group has the best treatment outcomes and fewer side effects [1].

On the other hand, despite them being people who have lived in Spain for many years, their working conditions remain precarious, so they have adapted their use of the health services to their needs as workers (for example, by using private health instead of public health services) [4345]. Therefore, it seems that having a public health insurance card or having the right to health care is not the only element to take into consideration when evaluating access to CD diagnosis, since there are socioeconomic circumstances that condition equality in health [43]. In fact, Lalonde pointed out that healthcare system had less influence in health than other factors such as lifestyle or environmental factors [46].

In addition, although the administrative status of most of the participants is fairly regular, this population continues feeling rejected by Spanish society, and is very aware of their immigrant status [5, 42].

Most of participants were diagnosed as a consequence of pregnancy, blood donation and a positive diagnosis of a relative, whereas few of them decided to know their serologic status on their own. Therefore, it seems that the factors that most influence the decision to carry out the diagnosis for CD are having a relative with a positive diagnosis or deceased because of its complications, and, in the case of men, the coincidental finding of a positive diagnosis in a pregnant woman in the family [10, 47]. Furthermore, advice and support from family members and health professionals plays an important role for young people. Symptoms are not very relevant, either because of their absence or because of how they can be associated to their lifestyle.

Regarding strategies to facilitate CD diagnosis, these are mainly focused on physical access to the diagnostic test through information campaigns in key places and dates, timely screening from the usual health services, information focused on the prevention of complications, and on avoiding vertical transmission. These strategies are focused on improving factors such as population’s knowledge, accessibility to health services, and knowledge and predisposition of health providers, all of which need improving, as existing studies emphasize [5, 4750]. However, support and social, family, or professional companionship must also be considered when designing strategies, since the fear of being sick or getting worse after knowing their diagnosis, and their conception of survival to CD are factors that also influence health behaviour, and have been found in previous research [21, 51]. Primary care physicians and nurses approach health in a holistic way, considering social determinants when promoting health and preventing possible disease. This, together with their proximity to the community and its resources, could help with supporting this population and their participation in strategies to modify health behaviours according to individual characteristics [52, 53].

From this point of view, some strategies have been developed in non-endemic countries with different results. Screening sessions and treatment were offered in Bergamo (Italy) with health education and counselling through cultural mediators and the involvement of the Latin American Community, although only 30% of targeted population completed treatment due to the centralization of diagnosis and treatment to the city [54]. In Spain, the community interventions developed and evaluated in Barcelona (Catalonia) in collaboration with associations, multidisciplinary teams, communication networks and health services promoted access to diagnosis, medical attention and social integration [5557]. Social and family support and advice, subjective assessment of health and aspects linked to culture and health have been approached through promotion of paediatric awareness and active case searches of children born from pregnant women with CD, the Expert Patient Programme for Chagas Disease, workshops, community events and in situ screening [55, 57, 58].

Ideally, the design of strategies to improve the diagnosis of CD should influence each and every one of the factors identified in the model to achieve a change in the health behaviours of the Bolivian population in non-endemic regions, achieving a fluid relationship between patient, community and health system.

Being this study conducted in Madrid, these findings could not be generalizable to other contexts, although the results provide information that could improve healthcare of CD in non-endemic areas.

On the other hand, the sample is made up mostly of people with positive diagnosis, with their own experiences and those of their closest environment; therefore, it is likely that there is other population who has more difficulties with health system accessibility, whose health behaviours we do not know. Moreover, men were more reticent to participate in interviews, FGs and TGs than women, so their recruitment was difficult. There are two participants with unknown diagnosis whose testimony was included because of the information they provided about young Bolivian people and migration status. Despite these limitations, this study addresses in depth health behaviours of men and young population that provide relationships between different factors associated with the use of health services for the diagnosis of CD.

Conclusions

The most important factors that influence the decision to carry out the diagnosis for CD are having a relative with a positive diagnosis or deceased because of its complications, and a positive diagnosis in a pregnant woman in the family. Other factors such as socioeconomic conditions, knowledge and attitudes about CD, stigma and healthcare environment hinder or facilitate the decision and the access to the diagnostic test. The results obtained in the present study regarding the decision of the population to carry out the diagnosis based on the Andersen’s Behavioural Model provide information that could help to develop strategies to improve access and modify health behaviours related to Chagas disease screening.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the population and key informants who voluntarily participated in this study for the support they provided during the field work, and for sharing their expertise, time, experiences, and enthusiasm.

References

  1. 1. Pérez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018;391: 82–94. pmid:28673423
  2. 2. Fabbro DL, Danesi E, Olivera V, Codebó MO, Denner S, Heredia C, et al. Trypanocide treatment of women infected with Trypanosoma cruzi and its effect on preventing congenital Chagas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8: e3312. pmid:25411847
  3. 3. Moscatelli G, Moroni S, García-Bournissen F, Ballering G, Bisio M, Freilij H, et al. Prevention of congenital Chagas through treatment of girls and women of childbearing age. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110: 507–509. pmid:25993401
  4. 4. Murcia L, Simón M, Carrilero B, Roig M, Segovia M. Treatment of Infected Women of Childbearing Age Prevents Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi Infection by Eliminating the Parasitemia Detected by PCR. J Infect Dis. 2017;215: 1452–1458. pmid:28201741
  5. 5. Monge-Maillo B, López-Vélez R. Challenges in the management of Chagas disease in Latin-American migrants in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;23: 290–295. pmid:28428122
  6. 6. Imaz-Iglesia I, Miguel LG-S, Ayala-Morillas LE, García-Pérez L, González-Enríquez J, Blasco-Hernández T, et al. Economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening in Spain. Acta Trop. 2015;148: 77–88. pmid:25917718
  7. 7. Requena-Méndez A, Aldasoro E, de Lazzari E, Sicuri E, Brown M, Moore DAJ, et al. Prevalence of Chagas Disease in Latin-American Migrants Living in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003540. pmid:25680190
  8. 8. Basile L, Jansa JM, Carlier Y, Salamanca DD, Angheben A, Bartoloni A, et al. Chagas disease in European countries: the challenge of a surveillance system. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2011;16: 19968. pmid:21944556
  9. 9. Navarro M, Navaza B, Guionnet A, López-Vélez R. Chagas Disease in Spain: Need for Further Public Health Measures. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6: e1962. pmid:23301105
  10. 10. Romay-Barja M, Boquete T, Martinez O, González M, Álvarez-Del Arco D, Benito A, et al. Chagas screening and treatment among Bolivians living in Madrid, Spain: The need for an official protocol. PloS One. 2019;14: e0213577. pmid:30849113
  11. 11. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Real Decreto 1088/2005. BOE-A-2005-15514, Real Decreto 1088/2005 2005 pp. 31288–31304. Available: http://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/medicinaTransfusional/legislacion/docs/RD_1088-2005.pdf
  12. 12. Requena-Méndez A, Bussion S, Aldasoro E, Jackson Y, Angheben A, Moore D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Chagas disease screening in Latin American migrants at primary health-care centres in Europe: a Markov model analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5: e439–e447. pmid:28256340
  13. 13. Requena-Méndez A, Albajar-Viñas P, Angheben A, Chiodini P, Gascón J, Muñoz J. Health Policies to Control Chagas Disease Transmission in European Countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8: e3245. pmid:25357193
  14. 14. Roca Saumell C, Soriano-Arandes A, Solsona Díaz L, Gascón Brustenga J, Grupo de consenso Chagas-APS. Consensus document for the detection and management of Chagas disease in primary health care in non-endemic areas. Aten Primaria. 2015;47: 308–317. pmid:25704793
  15. 15. Avaria-Saavedra A, Gómez i Prat J. “Si tengo Chagas es mejor que me muera”: El desafío de incorporar una aproximación sociocultural a la atención de personas afectadas por la enfermedad de Chagas. Enfermedades Emerg. 2008;10: 40–45.
  16. 16. Avaria-Saavedra A. Un cuerpo vale más que mil palabras. Mujeres y hombres bolivianos en Barcelona. Corporización de la migración: cuerpo migrante, cuerpo trabajador, cuerpo enfermo. Universitat de Barcelona. 2014. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=94612
  17. 17. Sanmartino M. ¿Qué es lo primero que piensa cuando escucha la palabra “Chagas”? Rev Salud Pública. 2009;13: 74–78.
  18. 18. Blasco-Hernández T, García-San Miguel L, Navaza B, Navarro M, Benito A. Knowledge and experiences of Chagas disease in Bolivian women living in Spain: a qualitative study. Glob Health Action. 2016;9: 30201. pmid:26976265
  19. 19. Ventura-Garcia L, Roura M, Pell C, Posada E, Gascón J, Aldasoro E, et al. Socio-cultural aspects of Chagas disease: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2410. pmid:24069473
  20. 20. Briceño-León R, Méndez Galván J. The social determinants of Chagas disease and the transformations of Latin America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102 Suppl 1: 109–112. pmid:17891277
  21. 21. Minneman RM, Hennink MM, Nicholls A, Salek SS, Palomeque FS, Khawja A, et al. Barriers to Testing and Treatment for Chagas Disease among Latino Immigrants in Georgia. J Parasitol Res. 2012;2012: 295034. pmid:23326646
  22. 22. Gómez LJ, van Wijk R, van Selm L, Rivera A, Barbosa MC, Parisi S, et al. Stigma, participation restriction and mental distress in patients affected by leprosy, cutaneous leishmaniasis and Chagas disease: a pilot study in two co-endemic regions of eastern Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114: 476–482. pmid:32052043
  23. 23. Arrivillaga M, Borrero YE. Visión comprensiva y crítica de los modelos conceptuales sobre acceso a servicios de salud, 1970–2013. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32. pmid:27192027
  24. 24. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36: 1–10. pmid:7738325
  25. 25. Babitsch B, Gohl D, von Lengerke T. Re-revisiting Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. Psycho-Soc Med. 2012;9: Doc11. pmid:23133505
  26. 26. Lee HY, Yang PN, Lee DK, Ghebre R. Cervical cancer screening behavior among Hmong-American immigrant women. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39: 301–307. pmid:25741675
  27. 27. Roh S, Burnette CE, Lee KH, Lee Y-S, Goins RT. Correlates of Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Screening among American Indians in the Northern Plains. Soc Work Res. 2016;40: 95–104. pmid:27257363
  28. 28. Jefatura del Estado. Ley Orgánica 3/2018 de Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. BOE-A-2018-16673, Ley Orgánica 3/2018 2018 pp. 5–68. Available: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2018-16673
  29. 29. Comunidad de Madrid. Decreto 52/2010, de 29 de julio de la Comunidad de Madrid. Decreto 52/2010 2010 pp. 11–11. Available: http://www.madrid.org/wleg/servlet/Servidor?cdestado=P&nmnorma=6641&opcion=VerHtml
  30. 30. Jefatura del Estado. Real Decreto-ley 16/2012, de 20 de abril, de medidas urgentes para garantizar la sostenibilidad del Sistema Nacional de Salud y mejorar la calidad y seguridad de sus prestaciones. BOE-A-2012-5403, Real Decreto-ley 16/2012. Available: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id = BOE-A-2012-5403
  31. 31. Jefatura del Estado. Real Decreto-ley 7/2018, de 27 de julio, sobre el acceso universal al Sistema Nacional de Salud. Sect. 1, Real Decreto-ley 7/2018 Jul 30, 2018 pp. 76258–76264. Available: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rdl/2018/07/27/7
  32. 32. Conde F. Los grupos triangulares como “espacios transicionales” para la producción discursiva: un estudio sobre la vivienda en Huelva. Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social. 2008. Pearson Educación; pp. 155–188. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo = 2876394
  33. 33. Ruiz JR. El grupo triangular: reflexiones metodológicas en torno a dos experiencias de investigación. Empiria Rev Metodol Cienc Soc. 2012; 141–162.
  34. 34. Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1: 77–100.
  35. 35. Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13: 522–525. pmid:9023528
  36. 36. Kvale S. Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Morata; 2011.
  37. 37. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13: 3–21.
  38. 38. Anthony MN, Gardner L, Marks G, Anderson-Mahoney P, Metsch LR, Valverde EE, et al. Factors associated with use of HIV primary care among persons recently diagnosed with HIV: examination of variables from the behavioural model of health-care utilization. AIDS Care. 2007;19: 195–202. pmid:17364398
  39. 39. Holtzman CW, Shea JA, Glanz K, Jacobs LM, Gross R, Hines J, et al. Mapping patient-identified barriers and facilitators to retention in HIV care and antiretroviral therapy adherence to Andersen’s Behavioral Model. AIDS Care. 2015;27: 817–828. pmid:25671515
  40. 40. Romay-Barja M, Iglesias-Rus L, Boquete T, Benito A, Blasco-Hernández T. Key Chagas disease missing knowledge among at-risk population in Spain affecting diagnosis and treatment. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10: 55. pmid:33892808
  41. 41. Forsyth CJ, Hernandez S, Flores CA, Roman MF, Nieto JM, Marquez G, et al. “It’s Like a Phantom Disease”: Patient Perspectives on Access to Treatment for Chagas Disease in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98: 735–741. pmid:29380723
  42. 42. Navarro M, Berens-Riha N, Hohnerlein S, Seiringer P, von Saldern C, Garcia S, et al. Cross-sectional, descriptive study of Chagas disease among citizens of Bolivian origin living in Munich, Germany. BMJ Open. 2017;7: e013960. pmid:28093440
  43. 43. Llop-Gironés A, Vargas Lorenzo I, Garcia-Subirats I, Aller M-B, Vázquez Navarrete ML. Acceso a los servicios de salud de la población inmigrante en España. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2014;88: 715–734. pmid:25418563
  44. 44. Agudelo-Suárez AA, Gil-González D, Vives-Cases C, Love JG, Wimpenny P, Ronda-Pérez E. A metasynthesis of qualitative studies regarding opinions and perceptions about barriers and determinants of health services’ accessibility in economic migrants. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12: 461. pmid:23245431
  45. 45. Hirmas Adauy M, Poffald Angulo L, Jasmen Sepúlveda AM, Aguilera Sanhueza X, Delgado Becerra I, Vega Morales J. Barreras y facilitadores de acceso a la atención de salud: una revisión sistemática cualitativa. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2013;33: 223–229. pmid:23698142
  46. 46. Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians | National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health. [cited 24 Jan 2021]. Available: https://nccdh.ca/resources/entry/new-perspective-on-the-health-of-canadians
  47. 47. Romay-Barja M, Boquete T, Martinez O, Benito A, Blasco-Hernández T. Factors associated with Chagas screening among immigrants from an endemic country in Madrid, Spain. PloS One. 2020;15: e0230120. pmid:32168359
  48. 48. Iglesias-Rus L, Romay-Barja M, Boquete T, Benito A, Blasco-Hernández T. The role of the first level of health care in the approach to Chagas disease in a non-endemic country. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007937. pmid:31841503
  49. 49. Forsyth CJ, Stigler Granados P, Pacheco GJ, Betancourt JA, Meymandi SK. Current Gaps and Needs for Increasing Access to Healthcare for People with Chagas Disease in the USA. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2019;6: 13–22.
  50. 50. Pinazo M-J, Gascon J. The importance of the multidisciplinary approach to deal with the new epidemiological scenario of Chagas disease (global health). Acta Trop. 2015;151: 16–20. pmid:26187358
  51. 51. Singh P, Chokshi DA. Community health workers—a local solution to a global problem. N Engl J Med. 2013;369: 894–896. pmid:24004115
  52. 52. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Orden SAS/1729/2010, de 17 de junio, por la que se aprueba y publica el programa formativo de la especialidad de Enfermería Familiar y Comunitaria. Sect. 3, Orden SAS/1729/2010 Jun 29, 2010 pp. 57217–57250. Available: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2010/06/17/sas1729
  53. 53. Arya N, Dahlman B, Gibson C, Ponka D, Haq C, Rouleau K, et al. Developing family practice to respond to global health challenges. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63: 602–606. pmid:28807953
  54. 54. Repetto EC, Zachariah R, Kumar A, Angheben A, Gobbi F, Anselmi M, et al. Neglect of a Neglected Disease in Italy: The Challenge of Access-to-Care for Chagas Disease in Bergamo Area. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0004103. pmid:26406325
  55. 55. Gómez I Prat J, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Choque E, de Los Santos JJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona. PloS One. 2020;15: e0235466. pmid:32663211
  56. 56. Ouaarab Essadek H, Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Sulleiro E, Pastoret C, Navarro M, et al. On site-screening for Chagas disease supported by a community intervention: can it improve accessibility for diagnosis and treatment? Gac Sanit. 2017;31: 439–440. pmid:28641864
  57. 57. Soriano-Arandes A, Basile L, Ouaarab H, Clavería I, Gómez i Prat J, Cabezos J, et al. Controlling congenital and paediatric chagas disease through a community health approach with active surveillance and promotion of paediatric awareness. BMC Public Health. 2014;14: 1201. pmid:25416081
  58. 58. Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Ouaarab Essadek H, González Mestre MA, Albajar-Viñas P, Gómez i Prat J. The Catalonian Expert Patient Programme for Chagas Disease: An Approach to Comprehensive Care Involving Affected Individuals. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017;19: 80–90. pmid:26895150