https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-1065
Figures
Abstract
Background
The features of hepatitis C virus patients with a sustained virologic response (SVR) who developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy are unclear.
Methods
The study population included 1494 DAA-SVR patients without a history of HCC. The cumulative carcinogenesis rate after the end of treatment (EOT) and factors related to HCC were analyzed.
Results
Sixty (4.0%) patients developed HCC during a median observation period of 47.6 months. At four years, the cumulative carcinogenesis rate was 4.7%. A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that age ≥73 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.148), male sex (HR: 3.060), hyaluronic acid (HA) ≥75 ng/mL (HR: 3.996), alpha-fetoprotein at EOT (EOT-AFP) ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 4.773), and albumin at EOT (EOT-Alb) <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.305) were associated with HCC development. Especially, EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL was associated with HCC development after 3 years from EOT (HR: 6.237). Among patients who developed HCC, AFP did not increase in patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL at the onset of HCC. Of these 5 factors, EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL was scored as 2 points; the others were scored as 1 point. The 4-year cumulative carcinogenesis rate for patients with total scores of 0–2, 3–4, and 5–6 points were 0.6%, 11.9%, and 27.1%, respectively (p<0.001).
Citation: Mawatari S, Kumagai K, Oda K, Tabu K, Ijuin S, Fujisaki K, et al. (2022) Features of patients who developed hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C Virus. PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262267
Editor: Birke Bartosch, Inserm U0152, UMR 5286, FRANCE
Received: September 5, 2021; Accepted: December 21, 2021; Published: January 12, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Mawatari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files (S1 File).
Funding: This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (grant number: 18K15821). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AI received honoraria for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., MSD Co., Ltd., Gilead Sciences Co., Ltd., and Abbvie Inc., and received research funding from Eisai Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd, MSD Co., Ltd., and Abbvie Inc. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 71 million people worldwide and approximately 399,000 people die each year from hepatitis C-related liver disease [1, 2]. In Japan, approximately 30,000 people died of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2016. In 2007, the major etiology was persistent HCV infection, which accounted for 65% of all HCC deaths [3]. In 2011, it is estimated that the population of people with HCV infection in Japan was 0.98–1.6 million [3].
One of the goals of therapy is to cure HCV infection in order to prevent the complications of HCV-related liver diseases, including hepatic necroinflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, HCC, and death [1].
In recent years, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been approved, and IFN-free therapy with DAAs has achieved very high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of ≥95% [2]. DAA treatment has been frequently administered to elderly or cirrhotic patients, and achieved high SVR rates [4–7]. However, the characteristics of patients who develop HCC during long-term observation are unclear. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the features of patients who developed HCC after a DAA-SVR.
Materials and methods
Study population
This was a prospective observational study conducted at 21 facilities belonging to the Kagoshima Liver Study Group in Japan. Study population enrollment is shown in Fig 1. In brief, a total of 1521 patients with chronic HCV infection and no history of HCC therapy were treated with DAAs, and achieved an SVR between October 2014 and December 2019, and was observed until July 2021. We excluded patients who had HBV co-infection, those who were confirmed to have tumors in the liver or other organs, and those who developed HCC during DAA treatment. Liver tumors included hypovascular tumors, such as dysplastic nodules or well-differentiated HCC diagnosed by contrast-enhanced (CE) computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before therapy. Ultimately, 1494 patients were analyzed in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the enrolled patients. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Kagoshima University Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee and the research ethics committee of each participating facility (approval numbers: 150138, 170199, 190297).
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct acting antiviral.
The HCV RNA concentration was measured by TaqMan PCR, which has a lower quantitation limit of 1.2 log IU/mL. The Fib-4 index, a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis, was calculated based on the methods of previous studies [8]. Liver cirrhosis was comprehensively judged by hepatologists at each institution according to the platelet count, imaging, fibrosis markers, transient elastography, or varices formation.
Treatment protocol
Patients were treated with daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) for 24 weeks, sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) for 12 weeks, ombitasvir (OBV) and paritaprevir (PTV) and ritonavir (r) for 12 weeks, SOF and ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks, elbasvir (EBR) and grazoprevir (GZR) for 12 weeks, DCV and ASV and beclabuvir (BCV) for 12 weeks, and glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB) for 8 or 12 weeks. All patients were treated according to Japanese guidelines for chronic HCV infection [9]. The initiation of the observation period was defined as the end of treatment (EOT) with DAAs.
Surveillance of HCC
The Japanese guidelines state that cirrhotic patients have an extremely high risk of developing HCC and should be monitored every 3–4 months, and that non-cirrhotic patients have a high risk of developing HCC and be monitored every 6 months by ultrasonography (US), CT or MRI [10]. HCC was diagnosed when typical vascular findings were observed by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, which showed hyper-enhancement in the arterial phase and a washout pattern in the portal, or delayed phases. Abdominal US, CE-CT or CE-MRI were performed at 3–6-month intervals.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software program (version 26 IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical data were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Kaplan–Meier method and log rank test were used to analyze the cumulative rates of HCC development. Correlation coefficients were obtained using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Factors associated with HCC development were determined using a Cox proportional hazards analysis with forward selection using p<0.10 as a cutoff for inclusion in the model. For the categorical data, we determined the cut-off values at which the optimal sensitivity and specificity were achieved using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
Baseline characteristics
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients. The average age was 67.1 years, 603 of patients were men (40.4%), 357 patients had cirrhosis (23.9%), 644 patients had a Fib-4 index of ≥3.25, which suggested advanced fibrosis (23.9%) [8], and 59 patients had a history of DAA treatment for HCV (3.9%). The median observation period was 47.6 months.
Comparison of the baseline characteristics between the patients who developed HCC and non-HCC patients
Sixty (4.0%) of 1494 patients developed HCC (Table 1). The cumulative rates of HCC development were 1.1% at 1 year, 1.8% at 2 years, 3.5% at 3 years, 4.7% at 4 years, and 5.6% at 5 years (Fig 2). The comparison of the baseline characteristics between patients who developed HCC and non-HCC revealed that the patients who developed HCC were older, were more frequently male, and had a higher incidence of cirrhosis in comparison to the non-HCC patients (Table 1). Regarding the blood test results of the HCC patients, the total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), hyaluronic acid (HA), Fib-4 index, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) values were significantly higher, and the albumin level, and platelet count were significantly lower (Table 1). In addition, the AFP level at the EOT (EOT-AFP) was significantly as higher, and albumin at the EOT (EOT-Alb) were significantly lower (Table 1). However, the des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) level did not differ to a statistically significant extent.
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; SVR, sustained virologic response.
Setting the cut-off values for continuous variables associated with hepatocarcinogenesis
For the categorical data, we determined the cut-off values at which the optimal sensitivity and specificity were achieved using ROC curves (Table 2). The EOT-AFP had the higher area under ROC and positive likelihood ratio (Table 2).
Factors associated with the development of HCC in DAA-treated patients who achieved an SVR
The Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the following factors were associated with the development of HCC: age ≥73 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.148), male sex (HR: 3.060), HA ≥75 ng/mL (HR: 3.996), EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 4.773), and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.305) (Table 3). In the analysis of 564 patients with Fib-4 index ≥3.25 which suggested advanced fibrosis [8], 45 patients developed HCC, and male sex (HR: 2.986), EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 8.352), and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.803) were associated with the development of HCC (Table 3). In the analysis of 1245 patients who did not develop HCC within 6 months and who were observed for more than 6 months, 51 patients developed HCC, and age ≥73 years (HR: 1.782), male sex (HR: 2.835), HA ≥75 ng/mL (HR: 3.481), EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 4.257), and Alb <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.084) were associated with the development of HCC (Table 4). In the analysis of 1195 patients who did not develop HCC within 1 year and who were observed for more than 1 year, 43 patients developed HCC, and male sex (HR: 3.088), HA ≥75 ng/mL (HR: 3.300), EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 3.288), and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.289) were associated with the development of HCC (Table 4).
Similarly, in the analysis of 1031 patients who did not develop HCC within 2 years and who were observed for more than 2 years, 34 patients developed HCC, and male sex (HR: 2.326), HA ≥75 ng/mL (HR: 4.085), EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 4.272), and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL (HR: 2.352) were associated with HCC development (Table 5). In addition, in the analysis of 814 patients who did not develop HCC within 3 years and who were observed for more than 3 years, 16 patients developed HCC, and cirrhosis (HR: 5.775) and EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (HR: 6.237) were associated with the development of HCC (Table 5).
Comparison of the cumulative rates of HCC development
The cumulative rates of HCC development according to each cutoff value were compared. The cumulative rates of HCC development of patients who were ≥73 and <73 years of age were 2.2% and 0.5%, respectively, at one year, 3.9% and 0.7% at two years, 6.1% and 2.1% at three years, 7.6% and 3.3% at four years (Fig 3A). The cumulative rates of HCC development in male and female patients were 1.7% and 0.7%, respectively, at one year, 3.2% and 0.9% at two years, 6.2% and 1.7% at three years, and 7.2% and 3.2% at four years (Fig 3B). The cumulative rates of HCC development in patients with cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis were 3.2% and 0.5%, respectively, at one year, 4.4% and 1.0% at two years, 6.8% and 2.5% at three years, and 10.6% and 2.9% at four years (Fig 4A). The cumulative rates of HCC development in patients with HA ≥75 and <75 ng/mL were 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively, at one year, 3.1% and 0.5% at two years, 6.3% and 0.7% at three years, and 8.1% and 1.2% at four years (Fig 4B). The cumulative rates of HCC development in patients with EOT-Alb <3.9 and ≥3.9 g/dL were 3.1% and 0.5%, respectively, at one year, 4.7% and 1.0% at two years, 9.3% and 1.8% at three years, and 11.9% and 2.7% at four years (Fig 5A). Finally, the cumulative rates of HCC development in patients with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 and <5.3 ng/mL were 4.3% and 0.2%, respectively, at one year, 5.2% and 0.9% at two years, 9.4% and 1.9% at three years, and 12.8% and 2.4% at four years (Fig 5B).
The comparison of the cumulative rates of HCC development (a) between ≥73 years of age and <73 years of age, (b) between male and female. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct-acting antiviral.
(a) between cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis, (b) between HA ≥75 ng/mL and <75 ng/mL. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; LC, liver cirrhosis; HA, hyaluronic acid.
(a) between EOT-Alb ≥3.9 g/dL and <3.9g/dL, (b) between EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL and <5.3 ng/mL. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; EOT, end of treatment; Alb, albumin; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein.
Relationship between changes in AFP and the development of HCC
Since EOT-AFP was strongly related to the development of HCC, we investigated the relationship between the transition of AFP and HCC development. The patients were classified into four groups according to their AFP before treatment and at the EOT, and the cumulative rates of HCC development were examined in each group. The four groups according to the AFP levels were as follows, (a) <5.3 ng/mL before treatment and <5.3 ng/mL at the EOT, (b) ≥5.3 ng/mL, <5.3 ng/mL, (c) <5.3 ng/mL, ≥ 5.3 ng/mL, and (d) ≥5.3 ng/mL, ≥5.3 ng/mL. The cumulative rates of HCC development at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were as follows: (a) 0.2%, 1.0%, 1.7%, 2.1%, (b) 0%, 0.5%, 2.7%, 3.5%, (c) 3.8%, 8.0%, 18.8%, 30.6%, (d) 4.3%, 5.0%, 8.6%, 11.8%, respectively (Fig 6). There were statistically significant differences in the rates of HCC development between groups (a) and (c), (a) and (d), (b) and (c), and (b) and (d) (p<0.001); however, there were no significant differences between groups (a) and (b), or (c) and (d) (Fig 6).
AFP was classified into 4 groups before treatment and at the EOT: (a) <5.3 ng/mL before treatment, and <5.3 ng/mL at the EOT, (b) ≥5.3 ng/mL, <5.3 ng/mL, (c) <5.3 ng/mL, ≥5.3 ng/mL, and (d) ≥5.3 ng/mL, ≥5.3 ng/mL. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; EOT, end of treatment; AFP, α-fetoprotein.
Collinearity between hyaluronic acid and cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis
HA was related to the development of HCC. We therefore investigated the relationship between HA and cirrhosis, or advanced fibrosis. Patients with liver cirrhosis or severe fibrosis had significantly higher HA values than non-cirrhotic patients or patients with non-severe fibrosis (p<0.001, respectively, Fig 7A and 7B). Patients of >73 years of age had significantly higher HA values than who were <73 years of age (p<0.001, Fig 7C). However, there was no sex difference in the HA values (p = 0.649) (Fig 7D). HA showed a significant positive correlation with the Fib-4 index (correlation coefficient [rs] = 0.615, p<0.001) (Fig 8).
(a) Comparison of HA in patients with and without cirrhosis. (b) Comparison of HA in patients with Fib4-index values of ≥3.25 and <3.25, (c) Comparison of HA in patients of ≥73 years of age and <73 years of age, (d) Comparison of HA in males and females. HA, hyaluronic acid.
rs, correlation coefficient.
Development of HCC stratified by the score combining EOT-AFP, age, sex, hyaluronic acid, and EOT-Alb
A scoring system was developed based on the results of the multivariate analysis that included the EOT-AFP, age, sex, HA, and EOT-Alb. Of these five factors, EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL was associated with the development of HCC from 3 years after the EOT; thus, EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL was scored as 2 points, and others, such as age ≥73 years, male sex, HA ≥75 ng/mL, and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL were scored as 1 point. When the cutoff value of the new score was 2, the area under ROC, positive likelihood ratio, and odds ratio all increased (Table 2). The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the sum of these scores, as follows: 0–2 points (low-risk), 3–4 points (moderate-risk), and 5–6 points (high-risk). The cumulative carcinogenesis rate of each group was examined. The cumulative rates of HCC development in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 0%, 1.5%, and 12.4% respectively, at one year, 0.3%, 3.3%, and 15.0% at two years, 0.4%, 7.8% and 25.3% at three years, and 0.6%, 11.9% and 27.2% at four years (Fig 9). There were statistically significant differences between the groups in the rate of HCC development (p<0.001).
EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL was scored as 2 points; the others (i.e., age ≥73 years, male sex, HA ≥75 ng/mL, and EOT-Alb <3.9 g/dL) were scored as 1 point. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups according to the sum of these scores: of 0–2 points (low-risk), 3–4 points (moderate-risk), and 5–6 points (high-risk). HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; EOT, end of treatment; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HA, hyaluronic acid; Alb, albumin.
Alpha-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin levels at the onset of HCC
AFP and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) are tumor markers for HCC. In 60 patients who developed HCC, we confirmed the AFP and DCP levels at the onset of HCC. The details are summarized in Table 6. The median tumor size and median number of tumors was 1.8 cm and 1 nodule, respectively, 93.1% of patients developed HCC with vascularity. The comparison of the characteristics between patients with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL and <5.3 ng/mL revealed that there was no significant difference in tumor size, number, or vascularity, the patients with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL were more frequently male, and higher AFP and DCP levels. Especially, twenty-three patients (38.3%) had AFP levels above the upper limit (10 ng/mL), and 27 patients (45.8%) had DCP levels above the upper limit (40 mAU/mL). Twenty-two of 39 patients (56.4%) with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL had levels above the upper limit at the onset of HCC. However, only 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL had a level above the upper limit (p<0.001). Similarly, AFP increased more than 30% at the onset of HCC in 19 of 39 patients (48.7%) with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL, but only increased in two of 21 patients (9.5%) with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL (p<0.001). On the other hand, among patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL, the percentage of patients with DCP levels above the upper limit at the onset of HCC was similar to that of patients with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (p = 0.477). In addition, 22 patients (37.3%) had AFP and DCP levels within the normal limits at the onset of HCC. Among patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL, a significantly higher percentage of patients had normal limits of AFP and DCP in comparison to those with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL at the onset of HCC (p = 0.020).
Discussion
In the present study, we revealed that age, sex, HA, EOT-AFP, and EOT-Alb were useful markers for predicting the development of HCC in patients who achieved an SVR with DAA treatment for HCV. By combining these factors, the risk of developing HCC could be significantly stratified (Fig 9). The median observation period was 47.6 months, with approximately 60% patients observed for more than 3 years. The advantage of our study is that the predictors were derived from a long observation period.
Since the EOT-AFP was associated with the development of HCC from 3 years after the EOT (Table 5), we investigated the relationship between the transition of AFP and the development of HCC. First, we focused on the transition of AFP before treatment and at the EOT. We revealed that there was no significant difference in the rate of HCC development between patients in whom AFP decreased to <5.3 ng/mL and those in whom AFP remained <5.3 ng/mL at the EOT (Fig 6). Next, we focused on the transition of AFP in patients who developed HCC. In the present study, 56.4% of patients who developed HCC with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL had AFP levels above the upper limits at the onset of HCC (Table 6). However, among patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL, the percentage of patients with levels above the upper limit or with a >30% increase in AFP at the onset of HCC were lower in comparison to patients with EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL (Table 6). In other words, in patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL, AFP did not increase, even if they developed HCC; thus the measurement of AFP after an SVR is unlikely to predict the development of HCC. In fact, 35% of patients who developed HCC had EOT-AFP values of <5.3 ng/mL. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to tumor size, number and vascularity. In these cases, by combining HA, EOT-Alb, sex, and age, it is possible to identify patients with a high risk of HCC development (Fig 9). To the best of our knowledge, no other studies have focused on the relationship between the AFP transition and carcinogenesis. In addition, in 40.9% of patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL, DCP is above the upper limit at the onset of HCC (Table 6). The comparison of the baseline characteristics of patients who developed HCC and patients who did not develop HCC revealed was no significant difference in the DCP level; thus, it is considered useful to measure DCP in the clinical course. However, it should be noted that in 37.3% of patients who developed HCC, the AFP and DCP values were both within the normal limits (Table 6). It seems difficult to predict carcinogenesis in patients who have achieved a DAA-SVR from tumor markers alone.
AFP is a glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 67 kDa, which was found in human fetal serum by Bergstrand in 1956 [11]. AFP is not only a tumor marker of HCC, but also a marker of the induction of hepatic progenitor cells [12–14]. In addition, the serum AFP level reflects the function of the liver stem or progenitor cells in patients with acute liver failure [15]. as well as inflammation and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B [16]. In the present study, the AFP level before DAA therapy was not associated with the development of HCC. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the rate of HCC development between decrease to AFP <5.3 ng/mL and remain AFP <5.3 ng/mL at the EOT (Fig 6). The AFP levels before treatment may reflect liver regeneration, inflammation, and fibrosis, as well as microscopic HCC. DAA treatment may reduce inflammation and may reveal tumor-derived AFP. Alternatively, the proliferative activity of hepatocytes may cause hepatocarcinogenesis [17].
HA is an acidic mucopolysaccharide that is widely distributed in the connective tissue of the body, and is produced in the liver by activated hepatic stellate cells. During chronic liver inflammation, there is continuous hepatic stellate cell activation and therefore increased HA synthesis [18]. HA is related to liver fibrosis. It is a part of many non-invasive algorithms that are used to asses liver fibrosis (e.g., ELF score [19] and Hepascore [20]). In this study, the HA levels of patients with liver cirrhosis were higher than those of non-cirrhotic patients and showed a positive correlation with the Fib-4 index (Fig 8). A previous report showed that the initiation of liver cancer requires the inhibition of p53 by CD44 (a receptor of HA)-enhanced growth factor signaling [21]. HA can be a predictive marker for the development of HCC after DAA-SVR.
Several reports have shown that the elimination of the HCV by interferon (IFN)-based therapy suppresses the development of HCC; the cumulative rate of carcinogenesis after an SVR is reported to be 2.3–8.8% at 5 years and 3.1–11.1% at 10 years, depending on patient characteristics [22]. As is observed with IFN-based therapy, the elimination of HCV induced by DAA treatment reduces the risk of HCC and mortality [23–28]. On the other hand, some reports have indicated that DAA treatment promotes the development of HCC [29–31]. In the present study, the cumulative rates or HCC development were 4.7% at 4 years, with a median observation period of 47.6 months (Fig 2), and 10.6% at 4 years in cirrhotic patients (Fig 4A). In addition, risk factors for hepatocarcinogenesis after an SVR in patients who receive IFN-based therapy include older age, advanced liver fibrosis, male sex, the AFP level after treatment, glucose metabolism disorders, lipid metabolism disorders and alcohol intake, and other factors [17, 22, 32]. Similar risk factors are expected with DAA treatment [33–35]. Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein (M2BPGi), a marker of liver fibrosis, predicts the early occurrence of HCC after an SVR in DAA-treated patients [36, 37]. In the present study, EOT-AFP and HA had a high predictive ability for HCC development. Even if EOT-AFP was <5.3 ng/mL, it is possible to identify patients with a high risk of HCC development with the combination of HA, EOT-Alb, sex, and age (Fig 9). Actually, new score system according to the sum of these risk factors showed the higher area under ROC, positive likelihood ratio, and odds ratio (Table 2). When the patients were divided into the low-risk (0–2 points), moderate-risk (3–4 points), and high-risk (5–6 points) groups, in comparison to the low-risk group, the 4-year cumulative carcinogenesis rate was 45.3 times higher in the high-risk group and 19.8 times higher in the moderate-risk group (Fig 9). Only 5 patients in the low-risk group developed HCC, there was only one patient with 0 points, while 4 patients who had 2 points. The factors were as follows: age and HA, male and HA, age and male, and EOT-AFP (n = 1 each). In the future, long-term follow-up is necessary for patients with these 5 risk factors, and the usefulness of these cut-off values will need to be validated in other cohorts.
This study performed HCC screening based on the Japanese guidelines. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) [38], The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) [39], and The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) [40] guidelines recommend ultrasound screening every 6 months. In particular, the AASLD guideline shows that the risk of HCC is significantly lower in patients without cirrhosis in comparison to those with cirrhosis, and surveillance is not recommended for these patients [38]. However, in this study, out of 60 patients who developed HCC, 27 patients (45%) were non-cirrhotic and 15 (25%) had a Fib-4 index of <3.25 (Table 1); thus, HCC surveillance after DAA-SVR should be considered important, even for non-cirrhotic patients. The EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines show that non-cirrhotic F3 patients, regardless of etiology, may be considered for surveillance based on an individual risk assessment, and in patients who were treated viral chronic hepatitis, there was no evidence for a timing or stiffness threshold to stop surveillance in patients who were included in surveillance programs [39]. In this study, a few patients in the low and moderate-risk groups developed HCC. In the future, it will be necessary to consider the cases in which surveillance can be stopped after DAA-SVR.
An early high incidence of HCC was observed in DAA-treated patients with hypovascular tumors, such as dysplastic nodules [41–43]. We also reported that hypovascular tumors developed into hepatocellular carcinoma at a high rate despite the elimination of HCV by DAA treatment [44]. In the present study, we examined the occurrence of de novo HCC, and therefore excluded patients with hypovascular tumors diagnosed by CT or MRI before treatment. However, the doubling time of HCC is reported to be 100 days, and it theoretically takes approximately 9 years for a 10-μm HCC to become a 10-mm lesion that can be detected by diagnostic imaging [45]. In other words, the involvement of AFP in hepatocarcinogenesis several years later may indicate the presence of microscopic HCC.
HIV seropositivity accelerates the progression of fibrosis related to chronic hepatitis C [46]. A nationwide survey in Japan revealed that nearly one-fifth of HIV-positive patients are co-infected with HCV. The determination of HCV genotypes revealed that genotype 3 or 4, which is rarely seen in HCV mono-infected patients in Japan, was found in a substantial fraction of HIV-infected patients [47]. In this cohort, there were no patients who received the therapy for HIV, and with HCV genotype 3 or 4. We therefore considered that there were no HIV-HCV co-infected patients in this cohort.
HCC occurs as a result of hepatic inflammation and/or changes in the tumor microenvironment. HCV clearance can suppress fibrosis and reduces the incidence of HCC [48]. It is assumed that microRNAs (e.g., miRNA-122) and inflammatory cytokines (e.g., transforming growth factor [TGF]-beta, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], and interleukin-6) are involved in this inflammation, and microRNAs are involved in HCV clearance and HCC development [49–51]. HCV clearance limits fibrosis and reduces the incidence of HCC by switching TGF-beta signaling from fibro-carcinogenesis to tumor suppression [52]. Otherwise, the administration of DAAs induces an early increase in serum VEGF and a change in the inflammatory pattern, which coincides with HCV clearance [53]. In this study, we have not been able to investigate the onset of HCC with microRNAs and inflammatory cytokines; however, we consider this to be an issue for future study.
The present study was associated with several limitations. First, various factors (alcohol intake, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and aspirin use, etc.) were not examined after treatment. Second, we could not diagnose fibrosis by histological or non-invasive methods, such as transient elastography; thus, cirrhosis was likely to have been underdiagnosed. Therefore, we adopted fibrosis markers, such as the Fib-4 index and HA before DAA treatments. Third, other fibrosis markers, such as type IV collagen or M2BPGi, could not be measured.
In conclusion, EOT-AFP ≥5.3 ng/mL is a useful marker for predicting the development of HCC after an SVR; however, the AFP level did not increase in patients with EOT-AFP <5.3 ng/mL at the onset of HCC. The combination of EOT-AFP, age, sex, HA, and EOT-Alb is important for predicting carcinogenesis.
Supporting information
S1 File. Analysis data set.
All patients’ data sets were included in the following file.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262267.s001
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
The present study was carried out in the following 21 facilities (Kagoshima Liver Study Group): Kagoshima University Hospital, Kirishima Medical Center, Miyazaki Medical Center Hospital, Kagoshima Kouseiren Hospital, Kagoshima City Hospital, Saiseikai Sendai Hospital, Kohshinkai Ogura Hospital, Ikeda Hospital, Izumi General Medical Center, Oshima Hospital, Ibusuki Medical Center, Kagoshima medical center, Hirono Clinic, Kagoshima Teishin Hospital, Satsunan Hospital, Nagaki Clinic, Dr. NAKANISHI’s office, Southern Region Hospital, Tanegashima Medical Center, Fujimoto General Hospital, and Nakayama Clinic. We thank the following investigators: Yasushi Imamura (Kagoshima Kouseiren Hospital), Dai Imanaka (Ikeda Hospital), Toshihiro Fujita (Oshima Hospital), Kengo Tsuneyoshi (Oshima Hospital), Akihiko Oshige (Ibusuki Medical Center), Shuichi Hirono (Hirono Clinic), Masahito Nagaki (Nagaki Clinic), Chihiro Nakanishi (Dr. NAKANISHI’s office), and Toshihiro Nakayama (Nakayama Clinic). We also thank Ms. Hiromi Eguchi, Ms. Yuko Morinaga, and Ms. Eriko Koreeda for their technical assistance and data management (belonging to Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Department of Human and Environmental Sciences, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences).
References
- 1. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):461–511. Epub 2018/04/14. pmid:29650333.
- 2. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C fact Sheet World Health Organization 2019 [cited 2020 April 4]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c.
- 3. Tanaka J, Akita T, Ko K, Miura Y, Satake M. Countermeasures against viral hepatitis B and C in Japan: An epidemiological point of view. Hepatol Res. 2019;49(9):990–1002. Epub 2019/08/01. pmid:31364248; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6852166.
- 4. Charlton M, Everson GT, Flamm SL, Kumar P, Landis C, Brown RS Jr., et al. Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of HCV Infection in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):649–59. Epub 2015/05/20. pmid:25985734.
- 5. Forns X, Lee SS, Valdes J, Lens S, Ghalib R, Aguilar H, et al. Glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection in adults with compensated cirrhosis (EXPEDITION-1): a single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(10):1062–8. Epub 2017/08/19. pmid:28818546.
- 6. Ioannou GN, Beste LA, Chang MF, Green PK, Lowy E, Tsui JI, et al. Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, or Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir Regimens for Treatment of Patients With Hepatitis C in the Veterans Affairs National Health Care System. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(3):457–71. Epub 2016/06/09. pmid:27267053; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5341745.
- 7. Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Shimada N, Takaguchi K, Senoh T, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of an IFN-free regimen with DCV/ASV for elderly patients infected with HCV genotype 1B. J Hepatol. 2017;66(3):521–7. Epub 2016/11/29. pmid:27890790.
- 8. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1317–25. Epub 2006/05/27. pmid:16729309.
- 9. Guidelines for the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Available from: http://www.jsh.or.jp/medical/guidelines/jsh_guidlines/hepatitis_c.
- 10. Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Akahane M, Igaki H, Izumi N, Ichida T, et al. Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2013 update (3rd JSH-HCC Guidelines). Hepatol Res. 2015;45(2):123–7. Epub 2015/01/28. pmid:25625806.
- 11. Bergstrand CG, Czar B. Demonstration of a new protein fraction in serum from the human fetus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1956;8(2):174. Epub 1956/01/01. pmid:13351554.
- 12. Nakano Y, Nakao S, Sumiyoshi H, Mikami K, Tanno Y, Sueoka M, et al. Identification of a novel alpha-fetoprotein-expressing cell population induced by the Jagged1/Notch2 signal in murine fibrotic liver. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1(3):215–29. Epub 2018/02/07. pmid:29404455; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5721449.
- 13. Kuhlmann WD, Peschke P. Hepatic progenitor cells, stem cells, and AFP expression in models of liver injury. Int J Exp Pathol. 2006;87(5):343–59. Epub 2006/09/13. pmid:16965562; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2517380.
- 14. Taketa K. Alpha-fetoprotein: reevaluation in hepatology. Hepatology. 1990;12(6):1420–32. Epub 1990/12/01. pmid:1701754
- 15. Kakisaka K, Kataoka K, Onodera M, Suzuki A, Endo K, Tatemichi Y, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein: A biomarker for the recruitment of progenitor cells in the liver in patients with acute liver injury or failure. Hepatol Res. 2015;45(10):E12–20. Epub 2014/11/08. pmid:25376981.
- 16. Liu YR, Lin BB, Zeng DW, Zhu YY, Chen J, Zheng Q, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein level as a biomarker of liver fibrosis status: a cross-sectional study of 619 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:145. Epub 2014/08/17. pmid:25128299; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4139492.
- 17. Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Nishimura T, Muraoka M, Suzuki Y, Tamaki N, et al. alpha-fetoprotein levels after interferon therapy and risk of hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1253–62. Epub 2013/04/09. pmid:23564522.
- 18. Hansen JF, Christiansen KM, Staugaard B, Moessner BK, Lillevang S, Krag A, et al. Combining liver stiffness with hyaluronic acid provides superior prognostic performance in chronic hepatitis C. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212036. Epub 2019/02/12. pmid:30742668; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6370278.
- 19. Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, et al. Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1704–13. Epub 2004/12/04. pmid:15578508.
- 20. Adams LA, Bulsara M, Rossi E, DeBoer B, Speers D, George J, et al. Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Chem. 2005;51(10):1867–73. Epub 2005/08/02. pmid:16055434.
- 21. Dhar D, Antonucci L, Nakagawa H, Kim JY, Glitzner E, Caruso S, et al. Liver Cancer Initiation Requires p53 Inhibition by CD44-Enhanced Growth Factor Signaling. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(6):1061–77.e6. Epub 2018/06/13. pmid:29894692; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6005359.
- 22. Hiramatsu N, Oze T, Takehara T. Suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma development in hepatitis C patients given interferon-based antiviral therapy. Hepatol Res. 2015;45(2):152–61. Epub 2014/07/24. pmid:25052449.
- 23. Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch SM, Chayanupatkul M, Cao Y, El-Serag HB. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in HCV Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(4):996–1005. Epub 2017/06/24. pmid:28642197.
- 24. Waziry R, Hajarizadeh B, Grebely J, Amin J, Law M, Danta M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma risk following direct-acting antiviral HCV therapy: A systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression. J Hepatol. 2017;67(6):1204–12. Epub 2017/08/15. pmid:28802876.
- 25. Ioannou GN, Green PK, Berry K. HCV eradication induced by direct-acting antiviral agents reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. 2018;68(1):25–32.
- 26. Ide T, Koga H, Nakano M, Hashimoto S, Yatsuhashi H, Higuchi N, et al. Direct-acting antiviral agents do not increase the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma development: a prospective, multicenter study. Hepatology international. 2019;13(3):293–301. Epub 2019/03/02. pmid:30820753.
- 27. Backus LI, Belperio PS, Shahoumian TA, Mole LA. Direct-acting antiviral sustained virologic response: Impact on mortality in patients without advanced liver disease. Hepatology. 2018;68(3):827–38. Epub 2018/01/30. pmid:29377196.
- 28. Heffernan A, Cooke GS, Nayagam S, Thursz M, Hallett TB. Scaling up prevention and treatment towards the elimination of hepatitis C: a global mathematical model. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1319–29. Epub 2019/02/02. pmid:30704789; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6484702.
- 29. Reig M, Marino Z, Perello C, Inarrairaegui M, Ribeiro A, Lens S, et al. Unexpected high rate of early tumor recurrence in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing interferon-free therapy. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):719–26. Epub 2016/04/17. pmid:27084592.
- 30. Nakao Y, Hashimoto S, Abiru S, Komori A, Yamasaki K, Nagaoka S, et al. Rapidly growing, moderately differentiated HCC: A clinicopathological characteristic of HCC occurrence after IFN-free DAA therapy? J Hepatol. 2017;68:840–66. Epub 2017/11/18. pmid:29223370.
- 31. Conti F, Buonfiglioli F, Scuteri A, Crespi C, Bolondi L, Caraceni P, et al. Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):727–33. Epub 2016/06/29. pmid:27349488.
- 32. Yamada R, Hiramatsu N, Oze T, Urabe A, Tahata Y, Morishita N, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma change over time in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who achieved sustained virologic response. Hepatol Res. 2019;49(5):570–8. Epub 2019/01/10. pmid:30623521.
- 33. Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Asch SM, Cao Y, Li L, El-Serag HB. Long-Term Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Patients Treated With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents. Hepatology. 2020;71(1):44–55. Epub 2019/06/22. pmid:31222774.
- 34. Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Nomura H, Dohmen K, Higashi N, Takahashi K, et al. Short-term risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis C virus eradication following direct-acting anti-viral treatment. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;47(1):104–13. Epub 2017/10/17. pmid:29035002.
- 35. Watanabe T, Tokumoto Y, Joko K, Michitaka K, Horiike N, Tanaka Y, et al. Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence after direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatol Res. 2019;49(2):136–46. Epub 2018/10/20. pmid:30335208.
- 36. Nagata H, Nakagawa M, Asahina Y, Sato A, Asano Y, Tsunoda T, et al. Effect of interferon-based and -free therapy on early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2017;67(5):933–9. Epub 2017/06/20. pmid:28627363.
- 37. Yasui Y, Kurosaki M, Komiyama Y, Takada H, Tamaki N, Watakabe K, et al. Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein predicts early occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virologic response by direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus. Hepatol Res. 2018;48(13):1131–9. Epub 2018/07/22. pmid:30030872.
- 38. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723–50. pmid:29624699
- 39. Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul J-L, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. 2018;69(1):182–236. pmid:29628281
- 40. Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatology international. 2017;11(4):317–70. Epub 2017/06/18. pmid:28620797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5491694.
- 41. Ooka Y, Miho K, Shuntaro O, Nakamura M, Ogasawara S, Suzuki E, et al. Prediction of the very early occurrence of HCC right after DAA therapy for HCV infection. Hepatology international. 2018;12(6):523–30. Epub 2018/09/23. pmid:30242733.
- 42. Marino Z, Darnell A, Lens S, Sapena V, Diaz A, Belmonte E, et al. Time association between hepatitis C therapy and hepatocellular carcinoma emergence in cirrhosis: Relevance of non-characterized nodules. J Hepatol. 2019;70(5):874–84. Epub 2019/01/27. pmid:30684506.
- 43. Sangiovanni A, Alimenti E, Gattai R, Filomia R, Parente E, Valenti L, et al. Undefined/non-malignant hepatic nodules are associated with early occurrence of HCC in DAA-treated patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):593–602. Epub 2020/04/04. pmid:32243959.
- 44. Tabu K, Mawatari S, Oda K, Kumagai K, Inada Y, Uto H, et al. Hypovascular tumors developed into hepatocellular carcinoma at a high rate despite the elimination of hepatitis C virus by direct-acting antivirals. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237475. Epub 2020/08/14. pmid:32790728; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7425876.
- 45. Cucchetti A, Garuti F, Pinna AD, Trevisani F. Length time bias in surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid it. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(12):1275–80. Epub 2016/02/18. pmid:26879882.
- 46. Benhamou Y, Bochet M, Di Martino V, Charlotte F, Azria F, Coutellier A, et al. Liver fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus coinfected patients. The Multivirc Group. Hepatology. 1999;30(4):1054–8. Epub 1999/09/25. pmid:10498659.
- 47. Yotsuyanagi H, Kikuchi Y, Tsukada K, Nishida K, Kato M, Sakai H, et al. Chronic hepatitis C in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus in Japan: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Hepatol Res. 2009;39(7):657–63. Epub 2009/05/29. pmid:19473427.
- 48. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1450–62. Epub 2019/04/11. pmid:30970190.
- 49. Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, Zeuzem S, Rodriguez-Torres M, Patel K, et al. Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(18):1685–94. Epub 2013/03/29. pmid:23534542.
- 50. Itami-Matsumoto S, Hayakawa M, Uchida-Kobayashi S, Enomoto M, Tamori A, Mizuno K, et al. Circulating Exosomal miRNA Profiles Predict the Occurrence and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Direct-Acting Antiviral-Induced Sustained Viral Response. Biomedicines. 2019;7(4). Epub 2019/11/07. pmid:31684167; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6966514.
- 51. Tamori A, Murakami Y, Kubo S, Itami S, Uchida-Kobayashi S, Morikawa H, et al. MicroRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma after the eradication of chronic hepatitis virus C infection using interferon therapy. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(3):E26–35. Epub 2015/03/20. pmid:25788219.
- 52. Yamaguchi T, Matsuzaki K, Inokuchi R, Kawamura R, Yoshida K, Murata M, et al. Phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 signaling: Shifting between tumor suppression and fibro-carcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(12):1327–42. Epub 2013/03/06. pmid:23458062.
- 53. Villani R, Facciorusso A, Bellanti F, Tamborra R, Piscazzi A, Landriscina M, et al. DAAs Rapidly Reduce Inflammation but Increase Serum VEGF Level: A Rationale for Tumor Risk during Anti-HCV Treatment. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167934. Epub 2016/12/21. pmid:27997563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5172554.