https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9355
Figures
Abstract
Background
Age-friendly neighbourhoods seem to promote physical activity among older individuals. Physical activity is especially important for chronically ill individuals. In the Netherlands, older Surinamese individuals are more likely to have chronic diseases than are their native Dutch counterparts. This study examined relationships of neighbourhood characteristics with physical activity among older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Methods
Of 2749 potential participants, 697 (25%) community-dwelling older (age ≥ 70 years) Surinamese individuals living in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, completed a questionnaire on personal and neighbourhood characteristics between March and June 2020. Correlation and multilevel regression analyses were performed to identify associations between missing neighbourhood characteristics for ageing in place and physical activity.
Results
Scores for the neighbourhood domains communication and information (r = -0.099, p ≤ 0.05), community support and health services (r = -0.139, p ≤ 0.001), and respect and social inclusion (r = -0.141, p ≤ 0.001), correlated negatively with participants’ PA. In the multilevel analysis, overall missing neighbourhood characteristics to age in place scores were associated negatively with physical activity (p ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion
This study showed the importance of age-friendly neighbourhoods for physical activity among older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that the neighbourhood plays an important role in supporting older individuals’ leading of physically active lifestyles. Further research is needed to support the development of interventions to create age-friendly neighbourhoods.
Citation: Jagroep W, Cramm JM, Denktaș S, Nieboer AP (2022) Age-friendly neighbourhoods and physical activity of older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 17(1): e0261998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998
Editor: James Mockridge, PLOS: Public Library of Science, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: November 10, 2020; Accepted: December 15, 2021; Published: January 27, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Jagroep et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the Supporting information.
Funding: This study is financed by the Erasmus University Rotterdam as part of the Vital Cities and Citizens Initiative program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: All co-authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The health of older Surinamese individuals in the Netherlands is worse than that of the native Dutch population. These individuals are more likely to have (multiple) chronic diseases (e.g. hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus) [1–5] and to experience psychological distress [6] than are native Dutch individuals. Additionally, older Surinamese individuals have a greater risk of death from these chronic diseases than do their native counterparts with the same socio-economic backgrounds or educational levels [1–4]. Physical activity (PA) plays a significant role in the prevention of many chronic diseases, including hypertension and type 2 diabetes [7–10]. PA involves all movements including actively commuting (walking, cycling), household activities, and leisure-time activities (sports, walking, gardening, cycling) [11]. Despite current knowledge about the importance of PA, a decline in the average activity level with age [12, 13] and a low PA level among Surinamese individuals in the Netherlands [14] have been observed.
Neighbourhood characteristics provide potential opportunities and barriers to engagement in physically active lifestyles [15]. It becomes more important as people age, likely because older individuals spend more time in their neighbourhoods than do their younger counterparts [16–18]. This makes them more dependent on the social and physical infrastructure of the neighbourhood. Thus, the investigation of associations between neighbourhood characteristics and PA among older individuals is of particular relevance. In addition, declining physical and mental health and increased fragility reduce older individuals’ ability to cope with environmental demands [19–21], and these qualities are more prevalent among older Surinamese individuals than among older individuals born in the Netherlands [22, 23].
Rotterdam is the second largest city in the Netherlands, and it hosts 19% of older individuals who migrated from non-Western countries, of which Surinamese individuals form the largest group [24]. On average, Rotterdam has a lower socio-economic status than the Netherlands in general [25]. Health deprivation and worse perceived health are also more prevalent in this city than in other Dutch cities [26]. Individuals who migrated from non-Western countries are concentrated highly in large cities and often live in deprived neighbourhoods [27, 28], which may entail low levels of greenness [29], poor services provision and a lack of social cohesion [30], in turn impairing physically active lifestyles.
The World Health Organization (WHO) identified eight domains for the description of neighbourhood characteristics in ‘age-friendly’ cities [31]: 1) outdoor spaces and buildings, 2) housing, 3) transportation, 4) communication and information, 5) community support and health services, 6) respect and social inclusion, 7) social participation, and 8) civic participation and employment. These domains are likely to be associated with the PA levels of older individuals and are discussed individually below [32].
Research aim
Age-friendly neighbourhood characteristics seem to be associated with the PA of older individuals. However, the current literature lacks studies of the effects of neighbourhood characteristics on diverse societal subgroups [33]. As older Surinamese individuals are more likely to develop chronic conditions, compared to native Dutch individuals, that can be prevented by regular PA, the aim of this study was to examine associations of neighbourhood characteristics with PA levels among older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. We hypothesised that physical activity would be associated negatively with missing neighbourhood characteristics among older Surinamese individuals.
Outdoor spaces and buildings
Older individuals have emphasised the importance of walkability (e.g. the presence of walking surfaces, sidewalks, bike lanes) for the performance of PA in their neighbourhoods [34–36]. Neighbourhood infrastructure seems to be important for the improvement and/or maintenance of individuals’ PA levels. For example, greater street connectivity [37, 38], (perceived) traffic safety [39, 40], distances to destinations such as parks and stores [38, 41, 42] and access to these destinations [35] have been associated with more walking and bicycling. These factors might be especially important for older individuals due to, for example, mobility limitations resulting in the use of a walker or wheelchair. Terrain features such as steps and uneven surfaces [43] might be barriers for neighbourhood PA. Conversely, traffic lights [44], street lighting [44–47] and facilities such as benches and toilets are important facilitators [45, 48]. For example, the timing of traffic lights at pedestrian crossings must consider the walking speed of crossing users, and research has indicated that older individuals become delayed as the traffic volume increases [49]. Furthermore, attractive and green open spaces lead to more PA [36, 38].
Housing
Indoor aspects also play important roles in the activity levels of older individuals. Suitable housing is an important facilitator of older individuals’ PA [50]. For example, wide doors and non-slippery floors enable older individuals, including those who use walkers and wheelchairs, to move about in their homes. Even floors make it easier for older individuals to go outside (e.g. for grocery shopping or a walk) and to be physically active. The availability of home modification programmes might also be essential for older individuals without limitations. For example, research, has indicated that older individuals with home modifications (e.g. railings, bathroom modifications) are less likely to experience declines in physical functioning and falls [51]. In addition, home modification has been shown to improve the activities of daily living of older individuals with and without limitations [52, 53], making them less dependent on others and more likely to be active on their own.
Transportation
Transportation involves movement from place to place, for example by car, public transportation, walking or cycling. Regardless of cultural and policy differences, the car is the most commonly used mode of transport by older populations worldwide [54–56]. Various health conditions associated with ageing (e.g. visual impairment, dementia, Parkinson’s disease) may negatively impact driving performance [57–59]. However, the largest proportion of older drivers is considered to be healthy [60]. Driving-related facilities might facilitate PA among older individuals. For example, the presence of parking lots (e.g. at shopping malls or parks) has been associated positively with walking in this population [61], and thus might increase PA.
Access to public transportation (including stops and vehicle features such as priority seating, low steps and non-slippery floors) might be another significant contributor to PA among older individuals [62, 63]. It seems to be associated with older individuals’ walking in their neighbourhoods [34, 64]. Older individuals have emphasised the importance of the proximity of public transportation stops [65], stops at key destinations (e.g. health care and shopping centres) and well-connected routes [31] to their use of public transportation. The availability of information such as clear time tables, routes and signage in public vehicles also seems to be an important factor [31].
Walking and cycling are common forms of neighbourhood transportation. The distance to a given destination seems to be an important contributor to individuals’ decision to walk or cycle [66, 67]. Neighbourhoods with greater residential density, mixed land use and grid-like street patterns with short blocks have been shown to enhance the use of walking and cycling for transportation [68]. In addition, perceptions about traffic and busy roads seem to be associated with walking for a particular purpose [35].
Communication and information
Informing older individuals about neighbourhood services and programmes is important to make them aware of these opportunities [69, 70], and might increase their participation, for example, in PA programmes [71]. However, the location and source of information provision must be considered. For example, older individuals appreciate the availability of information at locations that they frequent; information provision by individuals in close, regular contact with older individuals, such as health care providers, is also essential [72–74]. Older individuals have emphasised the importance of knowing where to look for information [75]. In addition, the format and design of materials (e.g. use of large font and understandable language, sound quality) are important to make information accessible for older individuals [31]; appropriate designs contribute to their healthy behaviours, including PA [76].
Community support and health services
Community and health services provide formal support, such as in general practitioner (GP) practices and pharmacies, and informal support, such as that of neighbours and volunteers. These services are vital to the maintenance of older individuals’ health and independence [31], and eventually might have impacts on their PA, which takes place most often in community settings. Neighbours can be important facilitators of PA among older individuals [47], who prefer and respond best to face-to-face social support and peer coaching [77–80]. Such individualised support seems to engage older individuals in PA, as it provides them with advice and information from non-professionals with common backgrounds (e.g. similar life experiences, shared characteristics) who help them to reach shared goals [78, 80, 81]. Thus, the provision of PA sessions that involve face-to-face social support and/or peer coaching in the community might encourage older individuals to be physically active.
Research suggests that GPs can effectively promote PA with simple positive-reinforcement messages and the provision of specific plans for fitness-related activities, known as ‘PA prescriptions’ [82, 83]. In addition, GPs seem to play an important role in the provision of information (e.g. about community PA programmes and groups) to older and chronically ill individuals, thereby facilitating participation in neighbourhood activities [84].
Respect and social inclusion
The attitudes, behaviour and messages of individuals in the community toward older individuals should convey respect and social inclusion. The degree to which this is true affects the range of opportunities offered to older individuals for social participation, entertainment and/or employment. Greater neighbourhood social cohesion has been shown to facilitate older individuals’ participation in community-based activities overall, and specifically to increase their engagement in PA [85–89]. In addition, a sense of belonging has been found to be important for older individuals’ participation in activities [90]. Community belonging is associated with healthy behaviours such as walking [91], and it encourages networking [92]. Finally, (perceived) neighbourhood safety and fear of violence influence individuals’ activity levels [39, 93].
Social participation
Participation creates opportunities for older individuals to be physically active and to broaden their networks [94]. Conversely, older individuals with limited social participation are less likely to be physically active [95]. Thus, the creation of opportunities for older individuals to participate socially and to create networks might eventually increase their PA.
Civic participation and employment
Civic participation and employment (paid or unpaid), such as (flexible) job opportunities, job training, volunteer work and involvement in decision-making bodies, provide opportunities for older individuals to exercise citizenship. Older individuals who volunteer might also be more physically active [96]. However, volunteer opportunities need to be accessible and tailored to older individuals’ capabilities and interests [31, 97]; visual impairment, for example, has been found to reduce the community participation of older individuals [98]. The promotion of volunteer work, which has been found to be a successful predictor of older individuals’ social connectedness [99], might eventually lead to older individuals’ engagement in PA.
Methods
Population
In the Netherlands, Surinamese individuals form one of the largest groups with non- Western migration backgrounds. Surinam is a former Dutch colony that obtained independence in 1975. Surinamese individuals migrated to the Netherlands in two main waves, seeking higher education and work and due to political unrest, respectively [100]. The population of Surinam is heterogeneous in terms of culture and geographic origin, including Javanese, Surinamese Chinese, Surinamese Creole (of West African descent), and Surinamese Hindustani (of Indian descent) groups [101]; the population in the Netherlands is comprised mainly of individuals with the latter two backgrounds. Individuals with comparable Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani backgrounds can also be found in other European countries, such as United Kingdom. In general, most Surinamese individuals speak Dutch well, as Dutch is an official language in Surinam and is used in education, government and the media; this characteristic distinguishes this group from other older individuals who migrated to the Netherlands with limited Dutch language proficiency. Community-dwelling Surinamese individuals aged 70 years and older and living in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, participated in this research.
Recruitment and questionnaire administration
Potential participants were identified using Rotterdam’s municipal register and asked to participate in this study between March and June 2020. In total 2749 potential participants were contacted, nested in 55 neighbourhoods. Neighbourhoods were classified using four-digit postal codes assigned by the Dutch government. Questionnaires and self-addressed envelopes were distributed via post, followed by a postal reminder. An informational leaflet explaining the aim of the study and its anonymous and voluntary nature was provided to the respondents. Informed consent (written) was obtained from all participants. The first author’s contact information was provided in case potential participants had additional questions. No (financial) incentive was provided. The Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus University Rotterdam approved this study (application no. 19–048) and determined that the rules imposed by the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act did not apply.
Of 2749 older Surinamese individuals contacted, 34 were found to be ineligible due to medical conditions (e.g. dementia, rehabilitation), nursing home residence, change of address or death. Thus, the number of eligible participants was 2715. Of them, 697 individuals filled in the questionnaire (25% response rate).
Measures
Missing neighbourhood characteristics to age in place.
Neighbourhood characteristics were evaluated using an instrument developed and utilised in previous research [102–104], applying the WHO framework for age-friendly cities (2007) and additional research [31, 105] (S1 Appendix).
As the questionnaire was developed among the general population of older individuals in the Netherlands [102], we assessed its suitability for the older Surinamese population with four 70-year-old Surinamese individuals in the Netherlands in December 2019–January 2020. As a result, we added two items to the questionnaire; ‘A neighbourhood where individuals help me, for example with a chore or to bring me somewhere’ (community support and health services) and ‘A neighbourhood where social activities are organized specially for Surinamese older individuals’ (social participation). Participants were asked to indicate whether they missed neighbourhood components using a five-point scale ranging from 0 (‘not at all’) to 4 (‘extremely’). Twenty-six items representing the eight age-friendly city domains recognized by the WHO were assessed. Examples by domain are ‘Public buildings with elevators that are easily accessible for wheelchairs and walkers’ (outdoor spaces and buildings, 4 items), ‘Suitable housing for older individuals’ (housing, 2 items); ‘Good public transport’ (transportation, 2 items), ‘Local newspaper with information about what’s going on in the neighbourhood’ (communication and information, 2 items), ‘A neighbourhood with the GP and pharmacy at walking distance’ (community support and health services, 6 items), ‘A neighbourhood where individuals have respect for older individuals’ (respect and social inclusion, 5 items), ‘Affordable activities for older individuals’ (social participation, 3 items) and ‘A neighbourhood where older individuals are involved, for example concerning changes in the neighbourhood’ (civic participation and employment, 2 items). Mean total and domain scores were calculated; higher scores represented more missed neighbourhood characteristics. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the mean total was 0.894, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach’s alpha value for the subscales ranged from 0.531 to 0.869. We also checked if deleting items resulted in a better Cronbach’s alpha, which was only the case for one item (‘A neighbourhood with people of the same ethnic background as me’). Previous research, however, showed that this item was important for the general older Dutch population [102, 103]. Therefore, we decided to keep this item which allowed us to examine the importance of this item among older Surinamese people.
Physical activity.
PA was assessed by asking respondents on how many days per week they were physically active for at least 30 minutes. The questionnaire items covered active commuting (walking, cycling), household activities and leisure-time activities (sports, walking, gardening, cycling). We assessed physical activity by asking participants on how many days per week they were physically active. This question is from the validated and reliable short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) [106, 107]. Government agencies use this instrument to monitor the PA of the Dutch population [108]. Scores ranged from 0 (not physically active for 30 minutes on any day during the week) to 7 (physically active every day of the week). PA scores were dichotomised as meeting (1; 30 minutes PA per day on at least 5 days of the week) and not meeting (0) the Dutch standard for healthy physical activity [109].
Number of chronic diseases.
A questionnaire was used to identify the presence of chronic diseases and inquired the following question: “Have you had any of the following diseases or conditions in the previous 12 months?” (0 = no, 1 = yes). A list of 10 chronic conditions (i.e. cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, lung diseases) adopted from O’Halloran et al. [109] was provided. Participants were also asked to report unlisted conditions, which resulted in the reporting of 51 additional conditions, including kidney failure and limited vision. These conditions (denoted ‘other chronic diseases’) were taken into account when we counted chronic diseases. We allocated participant-reported conditions already listed on the questionnaire to the appropriate listed options. Participants also reported risk factors for chronic diseases, such as high cholesterol and high blood pressure, which we did not include in the analysis. Simple count was used in the analyses.
Socio-demographic variables.
The questionnaire solicited information on respondents’ age, gender (male or female) and marital status (living alone/widowed/divorced or married/living with a partner). Respondents were asked to report the highest educational level completed in the Netherlands or abroad, with the option to write unlisted forms of schooling. This variable was dichotomised as low (completion of elementary school or less) and high (more than elementary school). Income levels were determined based on respondents’ reported monthly household incomes, including social benefits, pensions and alimony. Response options ranged from ‘less than €1000 a month’ (1) to ‘€3050 or more a month’ (4), with a fifth ‘do not know/ do not want to tell’ option provided. This variable was dichotomised as low (less than €1350 a month) and high (€1350 or more a month).
Statistical analyses
The SPSS software (version 26; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyse the data. Descriptive statistics (means, minimums, maximums, standard deviations and/or percentages) were calculated for all variables. Assessment for multicollinearity yielded tolerance values > 0.3 and variance inflation factors < 3, indicating no sign of multicollinearity. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to identify associations of background characteristics and missed neighbourhood characteristics with PA. Two-sided p values ≤ 0.05 were considered to be significant. We found that the neighbourhood level significantly affected PA by comparing the –2 log likelihoods of the regression models containing PA only and containing PA and the neighbourhood level (S2 Appendix). We thus employed multilevel regression analyses to account for the clustering of our data; older Surinamese individuals (level 1) were nested in 55 neighbourhoods (level 2). Unaggregated individual data were used for all analyses. In the multilevel model, besides a random intercept on neighbourhood level, we evaluated the necessity of adding random slopes for the different covariates (age, sex, marital status, education, income, and number of chronic diseases). This evaluation was performed with likelihood ratio tests. Furthermore, because age is the only covariate with a non-meaningful zero, the centred value of age was used in the multilevel modelling. All multilevel analyses were performed with the mixed procedure in STATA (version 17) using maximum likelihood. The regression coefficients in the mixed procedure were tested with the z-test.
Results
Table 1 displays the characteristics of the 697 study participants; 54.2% were women, 67.4% were unpartnered, 38.5% had low educational levels and 49.6% had low incomes. The mean age was 76.2 ± 4.9 (range 70–100) years and the mean number of chronic diseases was 1.6 ± 1.4 (range 0–8). The missing neighbourhood characteristic scores ranged from 0.90 ± 0.90 to 1.4 ± 1.3 (range 0–4), suggesting that the respondents found their neighbourhoods to be moderately to highly age friendly. On average participants were physically active on 3.7 days per week; 39.8% of the participants met the PA standard.
Table 2 displays the results of the correlation analyses. Age (p ≤ 0.01), unpartnered status (p ≤ 0.01), low educational level (p ≤ 0.01), low income (p ≤ 0.001), and number of chronic diseases (p ≤ 0.001) were associated negatively with PA. In addition, we found negative correlations of PA with the domains communication and information, community support and health services, respect and social inclusion and overall missing neighbourhood characteristics to age in place scores (r = -0.099 to -0.141, all p < 0.05).
The results of the multilevel analyses are presented in Table 3. Regarding the random slopes, we found that a random slope for education significantly improved the model. Adding random slopes for the other covariates did not significantly improve the model. So, the final multilevel model contained a random intercept and a random slope for education (see appendix for the final multilevel model; S2 Appendix).
After controlling for background characteristics age (p < 0.01) and unpartnered status (p = 0.02) were significantly associated negatively with PA (Table 3). In addition, the overall missing neighbourhood characteristics to age in place score was associated negatively with PA (p = 0.005). Unlike the correlation analysis, the multilevel regression analysis revealed no significant association of PA with low educational level (p = 0.11), low income level (p = 0.56) or number of chronic diseases level (p = 0.06).
Discussion
This study demonstrated the importance of neighbourhood characteristics for older Surinamese individuals’ PA. On average, participants considered their neighbourhoods to be moderately to highly age friendly, perhaps because Rotterdam has implemented programmes to develop supportive neighbourhoods for older individuals (e.g. Let’s Talk [Even Buurten], NEW ROADS) for decades [110, 111].
Although similar findings have been obtained for the general older population [32, 112], this study is the first to show associations between neighbourhood characteristics and PA among older Surinamese individuals, although the effect sizes were small. As human behaviour responds to neighbourhood characteristics, facilitative changes in the environment are likely to support PA and improve subsequent health outcomes. The crucial role of local governments in providing age-friendly neighbourhoods is acknowledged [105, 113]. Our findings have implications for policy makers and service providers aiming to build and maintain age-friendly communities that support older individuals’ PA, in turn benefitting health and potentially reducing care costs [114, 115].
In particular, this study showed a weak association between outdoor spaces and buildings and PA levels among older Surinamese individuals. In line with previous literature, our research suggests that attention should be given to features such as walkability (e.g. sidewalks, safe crosswalks), infrastructure (e.g. greater street connectivity, traffic safety) and the provision of attractive and green open spaces [34, 64, 116, 117]. Walkability has been found to promote walking as a form of transportation [118]. Thus, the presence of nearby destinations (e.g. grocery stores) in walkable neighbourhoods might increase PA among older individuals. In addition, public building accessibility seems to be essential for PA. The involvement of various actors (e.g. architects, contractors, customers) in designing public spaces is important to achieve optimal accessibility [119].
The communication and information domain was also correlated with PA among older Surinamese individuals. Native and non-native older individuals have emphasised the importance of knowing where to look for information, which is not always easy [75]. Older individuals, for example, often struggle with finding information about neighbourhood activities and social- and health-related matters. Previous research has indicated that health services contexts (e.g. health care sites and health-related events) are essential places at which such information is provided [120]. However, the consideration of channels that reach older migrants, such as local newspapers and the post, is also important [120]. Older migrants prefer to receive information via printed materials or directly from other people [121, 122]. Efforts to promote access to information, including the implementation of effective communication systems that reach migrant older individuals and a focus on accessible (oral and printed) forms of communication, seem to be essential for the promotion of PA [123].
Our findings support that the domain community support and health services is associated with PA among older Surinamese individuals. The social element of activities is an important motivator of native and non-native older individuals’ participation in PA and maintenance of physically active lifestyles [80, 123–127]. Older individuals have emphasised that making new friends, socialising and encouraging other participants during group activities motivate them to be physically active [124]. The provision of social support in the community setting has been shown to effectively increase PA [128]. The creation of environments that facilitate social interaction and the formation of new friendships, which eventually become sources of social support, may motivate older individuals to engage in PA [129–131]. For example, the sharing of food and drink after a PA session creates an opportunity to socialise in addition to being physically active. Such approaches may be especially important for older migrants, who sometimes lack PA-related social support [131]. Thus, community-based PA promotion may enhance PA levels among older Surinamese individuals.
In line with our findings, previous research has demonstrated the potential of PA promotion via neighbourhood health services [132–137]. PA counselling programmes implemented through primary health care, for example, have been shown to be feasible and cost-effective strategies for the promotion of PA [132–135, 138]. Thus, health care professionals’ guidance, such as the provision of verbal advice about PA or the mailing of pamphlets on exercise, is important to encourage PA among older Surinamese individuals [136].
Next, the domain respect and social inclusion was correlated with PA among older Surinamese individuals. The feeling that one is respected and socially included is known to be related to PA among community-dwelling older individuals [137, 139]. Accordingly, persistent disrespectful attitudes and ageism have been recognised as important barriers to the development of effective public healthy-ageing policies [140, 141]. Therefore, the ways in which ageing and older individuals are represented should be considered during the development of health interventions.
These findings are particularly relevant for policy makers, as they aid the targeting of neighbourhood characteristics for the development of supportive environments that encourage PA among older individuals. Neighbourhood interventions that promote PA among older individuals have been shown to yield significant results in improving health [142]. Although the WHO framework for age-friendly cities was developed for the older population, it might also benefit the general population [143]. Other factors (e.g. gender, income level, ethnicity, health status) also must be considered when developing interventions to promote PA, as these factors have been associated with behaviour changes and PA levels [144]. In addition, individuals’ capabilities should be considered, as neighbourhood characteristics have stronger effects on the behaviour of individuals with than of those without functional limitations [145].
We did not find a significant relationship between the domains social participation and civic participation and employment with PA among Surinamese older individuals. A study conducted with individuals aged ≥ 55 years in Ireland showed that community participation was related to a greater frequency of meeting friends socially with PA [32]. However, research on the relationship between social participation and PA among older migrants remains scare [146]. For older Surinamese individuals, a supportive environment (as reflected by community support and health services, as well as respect and social inclusion) seems to be more important than actual participation in given social activities for PA engagement. Given the age of our population (70 years and older), civic participation and employment are expected to be less relevant to PA.
Although previous research has indicated that housing has been associated with PA among older individuals, our study did no find an association between housing and PA among Surinamese older individuals [147]. Older individuals move mainly to better-quality housing in the same neighbourhood [148, 149], maintaining the advantage of a supportive home without the loss of social connections, outdoor routines and emotional bonding to a familiar place [150]. Participants in this study may not have been thinking about their possible future housing needs, or whether their neighbourhoods accommodated them (or whether they would have to move farther away to meet those needs). Another explanation might be that from an international perspective, homes in the Netherlands are of high quality [151]. More specifically, Rotterdam provides residents with many opportunities for home modification, such as the installation of grab bars, rails and raised toilet seats, resulting in fewer home hazards and improvement in activities of daily living (e.g. dressing) and instrumental activities of daily living (e.g. preparing meals, housekeeping activities) [152, 153]. Thus, study participants’ homes may have already supported their capabilities, explaining the lack of association with PA.
Finally, we found no association between the domain transportation and PA. In Rotterdam, older individuals (age ≥ 65 years) are qualified to use public transportation for free. In addition, neighbourhood buses are available for individuals aged ≥ 55 years and those with disabilities. For individuals aged 75 years, the municipality of Rotterdam provides an opportunity to travel by bus after 7 pm under supervision. Individuals with disabilities (condition duration ≥ 6 months, no full recovery possible, not able to walk more than 100 meters without a break) are able to request a European parking card, which permits them to park for free in spots reserved for disabled individuals (marked with a wheelchair symbol) at busy destinations, such as shopping malls and health care centres. The card also qualifies holders for a private parking space on their license plates to park near their home. The existence of these transportation privileges and facilities may explain the lack of association with PA. In neighbourhoods without such facilities for older individuals, findings are likely to differ.
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting our findings. Given that the data collection took place during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a separate analysis was performed to determine whether PA levels differed between participants who filled in the questionnaire before and after COVID-19 measures (S3 Appendix) proposed by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment which were taken in the Netherlands (S4 Appendix). Reported PA levels were low initially and did not decrease after the introduction of the COVID-19 measures. Next, given the heterogeneity of the Surinamese population in the Netherlands, additional analyses were performed to determine whether ethnicity (Javanese, Surinamese Chinese, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani) significantly affected PA (S5 Appendix). No significant difference in PA was found among ethnic groups. Additionally, the cross-sectional design of this study prevented us from determining the causality of relationships. However, our results showed significant association between neighbourhood characteristics and PA, which is an essential step that prompts further studies to analyze directionality. A longitudinal study design is needed to investigate the relationship between ageing in place and PA over time. Furthermore, this study was conducted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands; research in other regions is needed to understand differences among municipalities and their effects on older individuals’ PA. Although some facilities and privileges (e.g. European parking card) are regulated nationally, neighbourhood characteristics such as community support, respect and social inclusion are expected to show regional differences. Thus, future research should involve comparison among municipalities and/or countries. Finally, the effect sizes in this study were small, indicating that the relationships between neighbourhood characteristics and PA were weak [154].
Conclusion
This study showed that the absence of neighbourhood characteristics for ageing in place is associated negatively with PA among older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam. The findings represent a first step toward the development of interventions and policies contributing to the age-friendliness of neighbourhoods for these older individuals, including support of PA. A longitudinal follow-up study conducted in a variety of settings is needed to examine potential causal pathways and to identify differences among municipalities and their effects on older individuals’ PA over time.
Supporting information
S1 Appendix. Instrument to assess missing neighbourhood characteristics to age in place.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Appendix. Multilevel model on missing neighbourhood characteristics for ageing in place and physical activity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Appendix. Physical activity before and after implementation of COVID-19 measures.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Appendix. COVID-19 measures taken in the Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Appendix. Physical activity of Creole, Hindustani and Other Surinamese.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s005
(DOCX)
S6 Appendix. Dataset—Physical activity among older Surinamese adults (SPSS).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s006
(SAV)
S7 Appendix. Dataset—Physical activity among older Surinamese adults (STATA).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261998.s007
(DTA)
References
- 1. Stirbu I, Kunst AE, Bos V, Mackenbach JP. Differences in avoidable mortality between migrants and the native Dutch in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):78. pmid:16566833
- 2. Bindraban NR, van Valkengoed IGM, Mairuhu G, Holleman F, Hoekstra JBL, Michels BPJ, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and the performance of a risk score among Hindustani Surinamese, African Surinamese and ethnic Dutch: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:271. pmid:18673544
- 3. van Laer SD, Snijder MB, Agyemang C, Peters RJ, van den Born B-JH. Ethnic differences in hypertension prevalence and contributing determinants–the HELIUS study. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2018;25(18):1914–22. pmid:30296837
- 4. Agyemang C, van Oeffelen AA, Norredam M, Kappelle LJ, Klijn CJ, Bots ML, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in stroke incidence among migrant groups: analysis of nationwide data. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2397–403. pmid:24938846
- 5. Verest WJ, Galenkamp H, Spek B, Snijder MB, Stronks K, van Valkengoed IG. Do ethnic inequalities in multimorbidity reflect ethnic differences in socioeconomic status? The HELIUS study. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29(4):687–93. pmid:30768174
- 6. Erdem Ö, Riva E, Prins RG, Burdorf A, Van der Doef M. Health-related behaviours mediate the relation between ethnicity and (mental) health in the Netherlands. Ethn Health. 2019;24(3):287–300. pmid:28678531
- 7. Misra A, Alappan NK, Vikram NK, Goel K, Gupta N, Mittal K, et al. Effect of supervised progressive resistance-exercise training protocol on insulin sensitivity, glycemia, lipids, and body composition in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1282–7. pmid:18316394
- 8. Dowse GK, Zimmet PZ, Gareeboo H, Alberti KGM, Tuomilehto J, Finch CF, et al. Abdominal obesity and physical inactivity as risk factors for NIDDM and impaired glucose tolerance in Indian, Creole, and Chinese Mauritians. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(4):271–82. pmid:2060430
- 9. Hayes L, White M, Unwin N, Bhopal R, Fischbacher C, Harland J, et al. Patterns of physical activity and relationship with risk markers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and European adults in a UK population. Journal of Public Health. 2002;24(3):170–8.
- 10. Hegde SM, Solomon SD. Influence of physical activity on hypertension and cardiac structure and function. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(10):77. pmid:26277725
- 11.
Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
- 12. Westerterp KR. Daily physical activity and ageing. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2000;3(6):485–8. pmid:11085835
- 13. Sun F, Norman IJ, While AE. Physical activity in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):449. pmid:23648225
- 14.
Dool Rvd, & Tiessen-Raaphorst, A. Verschillen in gedrag en opvattingen over bewegen tussen etnische groepen [Differences in behavior and views on movement between ethnic groups]. Trendrapport Bewegen en Gezondheid 2010/2011 [Trend report Exercise and Health 2010/2011]. Leiden: TNO; 2013. p. 71–82.
- 15. Sugiyama T, Thompson CW. Older people’s health, outdoor activity and supportiveness of neighbourhood environments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007;83(2–3):168–75.
- 16. Buffel T, Verté D, De Donder L, De Witte N, Dury S, Vanwing T, et al. Theorising the relationship between older people and their immediate social living environment. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2012;31(1):13–32.
- 17. Buffel T, Phillipson C, Scharf T. Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’cities. Critical Social Policy. 2012;32(4):597–617.
- 18. Peace S, Wahl H-W, Mollenkopf H, Oswald F. Environment and ageing. Ageing in society. 2007:209–34.
- 19. Glass TA, Balfour JL. Neighborhoods, aging, and functional limitations. Neighborhoods and health. 2003;1:303–34.
- 20. Yen IH, Michael YL, Perdue L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(5):455–63. pmid:19840702
- 21. Clarke P, Nieuwenhuijsen ER. Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review. Maturitas. 2009;64(1):14–9. pmid:19695800
- 22. Franse CB, van Grieken A, Qin L, Melis RJ, Rietjens JA, Raat H. Ethnic differences in frailty: a cross-sectional study of pooled data from community-dwelling older persons in the Netherlands. BMJ open. 2018;8(8):e022241. pmid:30093521
- 23. Ikram UZ, Kunst AE, Lamkaddem M, Stronks K. The disease burden across different ethnic groups in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2011–2030. The European Journal of Public Health. 2014;24(4):600–5. pmid:24043131
- 24.
Bevolking per 1 januari 2020—Rotterdam [Population as of January 1, 2020—Rotterdam] Rotterdam: Onderzoek 010 2020 [August 14, 2020]. https://onderzoek010.nl/jive].
- 25.
Sociaaleconomische status → Regionaal & Internationaal → Regionaal [Socio-economic status → Regional & International → Regional]: Volksgezondheid en zorg [Public health and care]; 2017 [August 14, 2020]. https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/sociaaleconomische-status/regionaal-internationaal/regionaal#!node-sociaaleconomische-status.
- 26.
Gezonde stad—Kadernota Gezondheidsbeleid Rotterdam 2011–2014 [Healthy city—Framework Document on Health Policy Rotterdam 2011–2014]. Rotterdam: GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond.; 2011. p. 50.
- 27. Bolt G, Van Kempen R, Van Ham M. Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: Spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy. Urban studies. 2008;45(7):1359–84.
- 28.
Nitsche B, Suijker F. Allochtone ouderen en wonen [Older Migrants and Housing]. Utrecht: FORUM, Instituut voor Multiculturele Ontwikkeling/NIZW, Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn, 2003.
- 29. Halonen JI, Pulakka A, Pentti J, Kallio M, Koskela S, Kivimäki M, et al. Cross-sectional associations of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and greenness with accelerometer-measured leisure-time physical activity in a cohort of ageing workers. BMJ open. 2020;10(8):e038673. pmid:32801206
- 30. Atkinson R, Kintrea K. ‘Opportunities and Despair, it’s all in there’ Practitioner Experiences and Explanations of Area Effects and Life Chances. Sociology. 2004;38(3):437–55.
- 31.
Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
- 32. Ward M, Gibney S, O’Callaghan D, Shannon S. Age-Friendly Environments, Active Lives? Associations Between the Local Physical and Social Environment and Physical Activity Among Adults Aged 55 and Older in Ireland. J Aging Phys Act. 2020;28(1):140–8. pmid:31629358
- 33. Smith M, Hosking J, Woodward A, Witten K, MacMillan A, Field A, et al. Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport–an update and new findings on health equity. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2017;14(1):1–27. pmid:29145884
- 34. Barnett DW, Barnett A, Nathan A, Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):103. pmid:28784183
- 35. Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(1):67–76. pmid:15212778
- 36. Sugiyama T, Thompson CW. Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people’s walking. Urban forestry & urban greening. 2008;7(1):41–51.
- 37. Joseph A, Zimring C. Where active older adults walk: Understanding the factors related to path choice for walking among active retirement community residents. Environ Behav. 2007;39(1):75–105.
- 38. Rosso AL, Auchincloss AH, Michael YL. The urban built environment and mobility in older adults: a comprehensive review. J Aging Res. 2011 (2011):10. pmid:21766033
- 39. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(3):188–99. pmid:11897464
- 40. Li F, Fisher KJ, Brownson RC, Bosworth M. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(7):558–64. pmid:15965138
- 41. Mowen AJ, Confer JJ. The Relationship Between Perceptions, Distance, And Socio-demographic Characteristics Upon Public Use Of An Urban Park "In-Fill". Journal of Park & Recreation Administration. 2003;21(3):58–74.
- 42. Mowen A, Orsega-Smith E, Payne L, Ainsworth B, Godbey G. The role of park proximity and social support in shaping park visitation, physical activity, and perceived health among older adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2007;4(2):167–79.
- 43. Brookfield K, Ward Thompson C, Scott I. The uncommon impact of common environmental details on walking in older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(2):190. pmid:28216597
- 44. Heath GW, Brownson RC, Kruger J, Miles R, Powell KE, Ramsey LT. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of physical activity and health. 2006;3(s1):S55–S76. pmid:28834525
- 45. Lee C, Moudon AV. Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research & Information. 2008;36(5):395–411.
- 46. Wang Z, Lee C. Site and neighborhood environments for walking among older adults. Health & Place. 2010;16(6):1268–79. pmid:20843727
- 47. Addy CL, Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Sharpe P, Kimsey D. Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):440–3. pmid:14998810
- 48. Aspinall PA, Thompson CW, Alves S, Sugiyama T, Brice R, Vickers A. Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighbourhood open space in older people. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design. 2010;37(6):1022–39.
- 49. Langlois JA, Keyl PM, Guralnik JM, Foley DJ, Marottoli RA, Wallace RB. Characteristics of older pedestrians who have difficulty crossing the street. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(3):393–7. pmid:9096539
- 50. Carr K, Weir PL, Azar D, Azar NR. Universal design: A step toward successful aging. J Aging Res. 2013;(2013):8. pmid:23431446
- 51. Chase CA, Mann K, Wasek S, Arbesman M. Systematic review of the effect of home modification and fall prevention programs on falls and the performance of community-dwelling older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(3):284–91. pmid:22549593
- 52. Petersson I, Lilja M, Hammel J, Kottorp A. Impact of home modification services on ability in everyday life for people ageing with disabilities. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(4):253–60. pmid:18382820
- 53. Gitlin LN, Swenson Miller K, Boyce A. Bathroom modifications for frail elderly renters: Outcomes of a community-based program. Technology and Disability. 1999;10(3):141–9.
- 54. Luiu C, Tight M, Burrow M. Factors preventing the use of alternative transport modes to the car in later life. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1982.
- 55.
Ageing and transport: Mobility needs and safety issues: OECD Publishing; 2001.
- 56.
Rosenbloom S. The mobility needs of older Americans: Taking the high road. A transportation agenda of strengthening metropolitan areas. Washington, DC.: The Brookings Insitution 2004.
- 57. Uc EY, Rizzo M, Anderson SW, Sparks J, Rodnitzky RL, Dawson JD. Impaired visual search in drivers with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(4):407–13. pmid:16969860
- 58. Rizzo M, McGehee DV, Dawson JD, Anderson SN. Simulated car crashes at intersections in drivers with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001;15(1):10–20. pmid:11236820
- 59. Devos H, Vandenberghe W, Nieuwboer A, Tant M, De Weerdt W, Dawson JD, et al. Validation of a screening battery to predict driving fitness in people with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28(5):671–4. pmid:23436270
- 60. Castellucci H, Bravo G, Arezes P, Lavallière M. Are interventions effective at improving driving in older drivers?: A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:1–25. pmid:32245367
- 61. Christman ZJ, Wilson-Genderson M, Heid A, Pruchno R. The Effects of Neighborhood Built Environment on Walking for Leisure and for Purpose Among Older People. The Gerontologist. 2020;60(4):651–60. pmid:31513712
- 62. Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A. Physical activity associated with public transport use—a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(7):2454–78. pmid:22851954
- 63. Davis MG, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Coulson JC, Sharp DJ, Stathi A, et al. Getting out and about in older adults: the nature of daily trips and their association with objectively assessed physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;8(1):116. pmid:22018626
- 64. Van Cauwenberg J, Nathan A, Barnett A, Barnett DW, Cerin E. Relationships between neighbourhood physical environmental attributes and older adults’ leisure-time physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(7):1635–60. pmid:29721838
- 65. Barnett A, Cerin E, Zhang CJ, Sit CH, Johnston JM, Cheung MM, et al. Associations between the neighbourhood environment characteristics and physical activity in older adults with specific types of chronic conditions: the ALECS cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2016;13(1):53. pmid:27105954
- 66. Michael YL, Green MK, Farquhar SA. Neighborhood design and active aging. Health & place. 2006;12(4):734–40. pmid:16159710
- 67. Gao J, Kamphuis CB, Dijst M, Helbich M. The role of the natural and built environment in cycling duration in the Netherlands. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2018;15(1):82. pmid:30157889
- 68. Boakye-Dankwa E, Nathan A, Barnett A, Busija L, Lee RS, Pachana N, et al. Walking behaviour and patterns of perceived access to neighbourhood destinations in older adults from a low-density (Brisbane, Australia) and an ultra-dense city (Hong Kong, China). Cities. 2019;84:23–33.
- 69. Menec VH, Means R, Keating N, Parkhurst G, Eales J. Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2011;30(3):479–93. pmid:21745427
- 70. Denton M, Ploeg J, Tindale J, Hutchison B, Brazil K, Akhtar-Danesh N, et al. Where would you turn for help? Older adults’ awareness of community support services. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2008;27(4):359–70. pmid:19416797
- 71. Hanson D, Emlet CA. Assessing a community’s elder friendliness: a case example of The AdvantAge Initiative. Fam Community Health. 2006;29(4):266–78. pmid:16980802
- 72. Barrett J. Support and information needs of older and disabled older people in the UK. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(2):177–83. pmid:15694071
- 73. Cawthra L. Older people’s health information needs. Health Libr Rev. 1999;16(2):97–105. pmid:10538802
- 74. Pettigrew KE. Lay information provision in community settings: How community health nurses disseminate human services information to the elderly. The Library Quarterly. 2000;70(1):47–85.
- 75. O’Driscoll T, Banting LK, Borkoles E, Eime R, Polman R. A systematic literature review of sport and physical activity participation in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) migrant populations. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2014;16(3):515–30. pmid:23771744
- 76. Plouffe L, Kalache A. Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging. J Urban Health. 2010;87(5):733–9. pmid:20549569
- 77. Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ. Individual characteristics associated with physical activity intervention delivery mode preferences among adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2014;11(1):25. pmid:24568611
- 78. Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med. 1997;26(1):131–7. pmid:9010908
- 79. Burton NW, Khan A, Brown WJ. How, where and with whom? Physical activity context preferences of three adult groups at risk of inactivity. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(16):1125–31. pmid:22267568
- 80. van de Vijver PL, Wielens H, Slaets JPJ, van Bodegom D. Vitality club: a proof-of-principle of peer coaching for daily physical activity by older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(2):204–11. pmid:29325113
- 81. Ginis KAM, Nigg CR, Smith AL. Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: an overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):434–43. pmid:24294332
- 82. Geerling R, Browne JL, Holmes-Truscott E, Furler J, Speight J, Mosely K. Positive reinforcement by general practitioners is associated with greater physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2019;7(1):10. pmid:31803479
- 83. Smith BJ, Owen AJ, Liew D, Kelly DJ, Reid CM. Prescription of physical activity in the management of high blood pressure in Australian general practices. J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33(1):50–6. pmid:30181658
- 84. Oedekoven M, Herrmann WJ, Ernsting C, Schnitzer S, Kanzler M, Kuhlmey A, et al. Patients’ health literacy in relation to the preference for a general practitioner as the source of health information. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):94. pmid:31279348
- 85. Annear MJ, Cushman G, Gidlow B. Leisure time physical activity differences among older adults from diverse socioeconomic neighborhoods. Health & place. 2009;15(2):482–90. pmid:19038571
- 86. Fisher KJ, Li F, Michael Y, Cleveland M. Neighborhood-level influences on physical activity among older adults: a multilevel analysis. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;12(1):45–63. pmid:15211020
- 87. King D. Neighborhood and individual factors in activity in older adults: results from the neighborhood and senior health study. J Aging Phys Act. 2008;16(2):144–70. pmid:18483439
- 88. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Hallgren M, Veronese N, Mugisha J, Probst M, et al. Correlates of physical activity among community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years or older with anxiety in six low-and middle-income countries. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;30(5):705–14. pmid:29113616
- 89. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Veronese N, Mugisha J, Swinnen N, Koyanagi A. Correlates of physical activity among depressed older people in six low-income and middle-income countries: A community-based cross-sectional study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(2):e314–e22. pmid:28994143
- 90. Evans JM, Connelly J, Jepson R, Gray C, Shepherd A, Mackison D. A physical activity intervention in a Bingo club: Significance of the setting. Health Educ J. 2018;77(3):377–84.
- 91. Wood L, Frank LD, Giles-Corti B. Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1381–90. pmid:20189699
- 92. Carpiano RM, Hystad PW. “Sense of community belonging” in health surveys: what social capital is it measuring? Health & place. 2011;17(2):606–17. pmid:21296607
- 93. Piro FN, Nœss Ø, Claussen B. Physical activity among elderly people in a city population: the influence of neighbourhood level violence and self perceived safety. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(7):626–32. pmid:16790836
- 94. Alley D, Liebig P, Pynoos J, Banerjee T, Choi IH. Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2007;49(1–2):1–18. pmid:17804357
- 95. Kwan RY, Cheung DS, Lo SK, Ho LY, Katigbak C, Chao Y-Y, et al. Frailty and its association with the Mediterranean diet, life-space, and social participation in community-dwelling older people. Geriatric Nursing. 2019;40(3):320–6. pmid:30777380
- 96. Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman M, Frick KD, Glass TA, Hill J, et al. A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health. 2004;81(1):64–78. pmid:15047786
- 97. Yoshida Y, Hiratsuka Y, Kawachi I, Murakami A, Kondo K, Aida J. Association between visual status and social participation in older Japanese: The JAGES cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2020:112959. pmid:32259723
- 98. Kirchner CE, Gerber EG, Smith BC. Designed to deter: community barriers to physical activity for people with visual or motor impairments. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(4):349–52. pmid:18374250
- 99. Toepoel V. Ageing, Leisure, and Social Connectedness: How could Leisure Help Reduce Social Isolation of Older People? Social Indicators Research. 2013;113(1):355–72. pmid:23874058
- 100.
van Huis M, Nicolaas H, Croes M. Migration of the four largest cities in the Netherlands. Voorburg: CBS: Statistics Netherlands Department of population; 2004.
- 101.
Oudhof K, Harmsen C, Loozen S, Choenn C. Omvang en spreiding van Surinaamse bevolkingsgroepen in Nederland [Size and distribution of Surinamese population groups in the Netherlands]. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2011.
- 102. Van Dijk HM, Cramm JM, Van Exel J, Nieboer AP. The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing and Society. 2015;35(8):1771.
- 103. Nieboer AP, Cramm JM. Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2018;19(8):2405–20.
- 104. Cramm JM, van Dijk HM, Nieboer AP. The creation of age-friendly environments is especially important to frail older people. Ageing and Society. 2018;38(4):700.
- 105. Lui CW, Everingham JA, Warburton J, Cuthill M, Bartlett H. What makes a community age‐friendly: A review of international literature. Australas J Ageing. 2009;28(3):116–21. pmid:19845650
- 106. Wendel-Vos GW, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, Kromhout D. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1163–9. pmid:14680666
- 107. Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I, Groothoff JW, Zijlstra W, Bulstra SK, Kootstra JW, et al. Reliability and validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) in patients after total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9(1):141. pmid:18928545
- 108. Kemper H, Ooijendijk W, Stiggelbout M. Consensus over de Nederlandse norm voor gezond bewegen [Consensus about the Dutch standard for healthy exercise]. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidwetenschappen 2000;3(78):180–3.
- 109. O’Halloran J, Miller GC, Britt H. Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):381–6. pmid:15249526
- 110. van Dijk HM, Cramm JM, Birnie E, Nieboer AP. Effects of an integrated neighborhood approach on older people’s (health-related) quality of life and well-being. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):1–10. pmid:27663659
- 111.
Prins RG. NEW.ROADS—Werkblad beschrijving interventie [NEW.ROADS—Worksheet description intervention]. Utrecht: Actief en Gezond Leven 2019.
- 112. Bonaccorsi G, Manzi F, Del Riccio M, Setola N, Naldi E, Milani C, et al. Impact of the built environment and the neighborhood in promoting the physical activity and the healthy aging in older people: an umbrella review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6127.
- 113.
Kelly J-F, Breadon P, Davis C, Hunter A, Mares P, Mullerworth D, et al. Social cities. Melbourne: Grattan Institute Melbourne; 2012.
- 114. Su C-L, Wang L, Ho C-C, Nfor ON, Hsu S-Y, Lee C-T, et al. Physical activity is associated with lower health care costs among Taiwanese individuals with diabetes mellitus. Medicine. 2020;99(14):e19613. pmid:32243386
- 115. Codogno JS, Monteiro HL, Turi-Lynch BC, Fernandes RA, Pokhrel S, Anokye N. Sports Participation and Health Care Costs in Older Adults Aged 50 Years or Older. J Aging Phys Act. 2020;1(aop):1–7. pmid:32053793
- 116. Kärmeniemi M, Lankila T, Ikäheimo T, Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Korpelainen R. The built environment as a determinant of physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(3):239–51. pmid:29538664
- 117. Gharaveis A. A systematic framework for understanding environmental design influences on physical activity in the elderly population. Facilities 2020;38:625–49.
- 118. Van Holle V, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults’ physical activity: results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2014;11(1):110.
- 119.
Blijham N. Factsheet Zorg & Technologie voor bestuurders en managers in de zorg: Eentoegankelijke omgeving voor iedereen [Factsheet Healthcare & Technology for administrators and managers in healthcare: An accessible environment for everyone]. Vilans, 2008.
- 120.
Leach C. Aging Centered Outreach: Best practices for getting information to older adults. Wayne State University—Institute of Gerontology, 2019.
- 121. Goodall K, Newman L, Ward P. Improving access to health information for older migrants by using grounded theory and social network analysis to understand their information behaviour and digital technology use. European journal of cancer care. 2014;23(6):728–38. pmid:25250535
- 122. Goodall K, Ward P, Newman L. Use of information and communication technology to provide health information: what do older migrants know, and what do they need to know? Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(1):27–32. pmid:20359410
- 123. Devereux-Fitzgerald A, Powell R, Dewhurst A, French DP. The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Soc Sci Med. 2016;158:14–23. pmid:27104307
- 124. Killingback C, Tsofliou F, Clark C. Older people’s adherence to community-based group exercise programmes: a multiple-case study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):115. pmid:28122532
- 125. Mathews AE, Laditka SB, Laditka JN, Wilcox S, Corwin SJ, Liu R, et al. Older adults’ perceived physical activity enablers and barriers: a multicultural perspective. J Aging Phys Act. 2010;18(2):119–40. pmid:20440026
- 126. Belza B, Walwick J, Shiu-Thornton S, Schwartz S, Taylor M, LoGerfo J. Older adult perspectives on physical activity and exercise: voices from multiple cultures. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004;1(4):A09–A. pmid:15670441
- 127. Hartley SE, Yeowell G. Older adults’ perceptions of adherence to community physical activity groups. Ageing and Society. 2015;35(8):1635–56.
- 128. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4):73–107. pmid:11985936
- 129. Hardy S, Grogan S. Preventing disability through exercise: investigating older adults’ influences and motivations to engage in physical activity. J Health Psychol. 2009;14(7):1036–46. pmid:19786530
- 130. Sales M, Polman R, Hill K, Levinger P. Older adults’ perceptions of a novel outdoor exercise initiative: A qualitative analysis. The Journal of Aging and Social Change. 2018;8(1):61–78.
- 131. Caperchione CM, Kolt GS, Mummery WK. Physical activity in culturally and linguistically diverse migrant groups to Western Society. Sports Med. 2009;39(3):167–77. pmid:19290674
- 132. Eakin EG, Brown WJ, Marshall AL, Mummery K, Larsen E. Physical activity promotion in primary care: bridging the gap between research and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):297–303. pmid:15488359
- 133. Grandes G, Sanchez A, Sanchez-Pinilla RO, Torcal J, Montoya I, Lizarraga K, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity advice and prescription by physicians in routine primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(7):694–701. pmid:19364999
- 134. Hinrichs T, Bucchi C, Brach M, Wilm S, Endres HG, Burghaus I, et al. Feasibility of a multidimensional home-based exercise programme for the elderly with structured support given by the general practitioner’s surgery: study protocol of a single arm trial preparing an RCT BMC Geriatr. 2009;9(1):1–14. pmid:19686587
- 135. Hirvensalo M, Heikkinen E, Lintunen T, Rantanen T. The effect of advice by health care professionals on increasing physical activity of older people. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):231–6. pmid:12859605
- 136. Bull FC, Jamrozik K. Advice on exercise from a family physician can help sedentary patients to become active. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(2):85–94. pmid:9713663
- 137. Kitchen P, Williams A, Chowhan J. Sense of community belonging and health in Canada: A regional analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2012;107(1):103–26.
- 138. Elley C, Kerse N, Arroll B, Swinburn B, Ashton T, Robinson E. Cost-effectiveness of physical activity counselling in general practice. N Z Med J. 2004;117(1207):1–15. pmid:15608809
- 139. Bailey M, McLaren S. Physical activity alone and with others as predictors of sense of belonging and mental health in retirees. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9(1):82–90. pmid:15841835
- 140. Officer A, Schneiders ML, Wu D, Nash P, Thiyagarajan JA, Beard JR. Valuing older people: time for a global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016;94(10):710. pmid:27843156
- 141.
Swift H, Steeden B. Exploring Representations of Old Age and Ageing: Literature Review. Center for Ageing Better, 2020.
- 142. Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Millstein RA, Bolling K, Crist K, Takemoto M, et al. Cluster randomized controlled trial of a multilevel physical activity intervention for older adults. international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2018;15(1):1–9. pmid:29609594
- 143. Levy-Storms L, Chen L, Loukaitou-Sideris A. Older adults’ needs and preferences for open space and physical activity in and near parks: A systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(4):682–96. pmid:29252072
- 144. Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC. Promoting physical activity for older adults: the challenges for changing behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(3):172–83. pmid:14552942
- 145. Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Lee B, Schmitz KH. The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? Transportation research part D: transport and environment. 2009;14(1):42–9.
- 146. Cyril S, Smith BJ, Possamai-Inesedy A, Renzaho AM. Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Global health action. 2015;8(1):29842. pmid:26689460
- 147. Harrison EL, Fisher KL, Lawson JA, Chad KE, Sheppard MS, Reeder BA, et al. Exploring the role of housing type on physical activity and health status in community-dwelling older adults. Act Adapt Aging. 2010;34(2):98–114.
- 148.
Kleinhans R, Veldboer L, Jansen S, Van Ham M. Ageing in a Long-term Regeneration Neighbourhood: A Disruptive Experience or Successful Ageing in Place? Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2014.
- 149. Wu Y-T, Prina AM, Barnes LE, Matthews FE, Brayne C. Relocation at older age: results from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Journal of Public Health. 2015;37(3):480–7. pmid:25922369
- 150.
Oswald F, Rowles GD. Beyond the Relocation Trauma in Old Age: New Trends in Elders’ Residential Decisions. New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives. Amityville, New York: Routledge; 2006. p. 127–52.
- 151.
Housing—Netherlands—Key findings: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—Better Life Index; [cited 2020]. https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/housing/.
- 152. Gitlin LN, Winter L, Dennis MP, Corcoran M, Schinfeld S, Hauck WW. A randomized trial of a multicomponent home intervention to reduce functional difficulties in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):809–16. pmid:16696748
- 153.
Wonen-leven—Woningaanpassing [Housing-living—Housing adaptation] Rotterdam: Municipality of Rotterdam; 2020 [August 14, 2020]. https://www.rotterdam.nl/wonen-leven/woningaanpassing/.
- 154. Tomczak M, Tomczak E. The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences. 2014;21(1).