Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Sexual and developmental variations of ecto-parasitism in damselflies

  • Shatabdi Paul ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    shatabdi2011bmb@gmail.com

    Affiliations Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh, Department of Biological Science, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia

    ⨯
  • Md Kawsar Khan ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ MKK and MEH are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliations Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh, Department of Biological Science, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia

    ⨯
  • Marie E. Herberstein

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ MKK and MEH are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Biological Science, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia

    ⨯

Abstract

The prevalence and intensity of parasitism can have different fitness costs between sexes, and across species and developmental stages. This variation could arise because of species specific sexual and developmental differences in body condition, immunity, and resistance. Theory predicts that the prevalence of parasitism will be greater in individuals with poor body condition and the intensity of parasitism will be greater in individuals with larger body size. These predictions have been tested and verified in vertebrates. In insects, however, contradictory evidence has been found in different taxa. Here, we tested these predictions on two species of Agriocnemis (Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea) damselflies, which are parasitized by Arrenurus water mite ectoparasites. We measured body weight, total body length, abdomen area and thorax area of non-parasitized damselflies and found body condition varied between males and females, between immature females and mature females and between A. femina and A. pygmaea. Then, we calculated the parasite prevalence, i.e., the absence or presence of parasites and intensity, i.e., the number of parasites per infected damselfly in eleven natural populations of both species. In line to our predictions, we observed greater prevalence in immature females than mature females but found no difference in parasite prevalence between males and females. Furthermore, we found that parasite intensity was higher in females than males and in immature females than mature females. Our result also showed that the frequency and intensity of parasitism varied between the two studied species, being higher in A. pygmaea than A. femina. Our study provides evidence that parasitism impacts sexes, developmental stages and species differentially and suggests that variation may occur due to sex, developmental stage, and species-specific resistance and tolerance mechanism.

Citation: Paul S, Khan MK, Herberstein ME (2022) Sexual and developmental variations of ecto-parasitism in damselflies. PLoS ONE 17(7): e0261540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540

Editor: Kleber Del-Claro, Universidade Federal de Uberlandia - Campus Umuarama, BRAZIL

Received: November 30, 2021; Accepted: June 20, 2022; Published: July 8, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Paul et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The data are deposited in Figshare. Paul, Shatabdi; Khan, Kawsar; Herberstein, Mariella (2022): Sexual and developmental variation of ecto-parasitism in damselflies. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20128388.v1.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

According to sexual selection and resource allocation theory, individual differences in allocating resources to reproduction, immunity, and survivability may explain the variation of parasitism between sexes [1–3]. Males under strong sexual selection may invest more resources in mating related traits such as conspicuous color, elaborated mating display, and less towards immunity which increases their susceptibility to parasite infection [1, 2, 4]. On the other hand, fecundity driven selection on females may result in greater allocation of energy to fecundity related traits thereby maintaining larger body size, and higher fat content [5–9] and less to immunity and resistance. This could increase the chance of being infected, and can provide more nutrition reservoir and larger surface area for a greater number of parasites in females [10–14]. Furthermore, sex specific behaviour, such as habitat use, time spend in search of mates, sex specific life history traits such as developmental rate, and variation in stress levels imposed by mating system may also contributes to the variation in parasitism between the sexes [5, 13–18].

Physiology, immunity and behavior can also vary across populations, developmental stages, and among different species which may contribute to inter- and intraspecific variation of parasitism as well as variation between immature and mature individuals [9, 19–23]. For example, intraspecific variations of parasitism were studied in Dineutus nigrior beetles, Paratrichocladius rufiventris midges, Clinocerinae flies, and Ranatra chinensis water scorpions where larger individuals, and individuals with lower immunity were shown to be more susceptible to parasites [7, 13, 24–27]. On the other hand, juvenile individuals typically have a smaller body size and may have an underdeveloped immune system, which might contribute to a greater susceptibility of parasitism during immature stages. For instance, in Appasus japonicus bugs, juveniles showed higher parasite loads than adults [26]. However, parasite prevalence was not different between developmental stages [26].

Odonates (dragonflies and damselflies) are frequently parasitized by protozoan endoparasites and Arrenurus mite ectoparasites [28, 29]. The frequency and intensity of parasitism has been shown to vary among species, across populations, developmental stages, and between sexes [3, 9, 26, 30]. Individual differences in physiology (immune resistance and tolerance), habitat use and behavior accounted for the interspecific variation of parasitism in Nehalennia irene, Calopteryx maculata, Enallagma chromatallagma, Ischnura posita and Lestes forcipatus damselflies [31–36]. The impact of host sex on the likelihood of being parasitized is contested. Some studies found higher parasite infections in males than female [3, 12, 37–39, see also 40, 41]; whereas others found the opposite with a female bias in parasite prevalence and intensity [20, 30, 38, 42–45, see also 40, 41]. Whereas, no sex differences in parasite prevalence and intensities were found in C. eponina and P. longipennis damselflies [45–49]. The conflicting evidence in different species suggests that variation of parasitism between sexes maybe species specific.

There is evidence that the frequency and intensity of parasite infections varies among different developmental stages of damselflies [48]. Hecker et al. (2002) reported that larval damselflies had a higher gregarine prevalence and intensity than newly emerged damselflies [20]. Conversely, final instar damselfly larva of Lestes forcipatus damselfly emerging earlier in the sample collection period carried more water mites than final instar larvae emerging late in that time period [12]. Rates of parasitism are expected to vary between sexually immature and mature stages of damselflies [9, 20, 22]. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have explored the variation of parasitism between sexually immature and mature damselflies.

Here we aim to determine variation in parasite prevalence and intensity between sexes, and developmental stages in Agriocnemis femina and A. pygmaea damselflies. The rate and extent of parasitism is likely to depend on the sex specific condition of damselflies with a larger surface area and higher nutrition providing more space and resources for parasites. To test this idea, we conducted morphometric measurements including body weight, total body length, abdomen area and thorax area of non-parasitized damselflies to determine whether body condition varies with sex, developmental stages and species. We found female damselflies were heavier and had greater surface area compared to males. Moreover, immature females are smaller and lighter than mature females. Finally, A. femina were larger and heavier compared to A. pygmaea. Based on these morphometrics, we predicted that (1) parasite numbers would be higher in female damselflies than males, because females are larger and had greater surface area, (2) sexually mature females would have greater parasite loads because of their larger surface area and greater resource indicated by heavier body weight and (3) A. femina would be parasitized more frequently and with a larger number of parasites than A. pygmaea because of their larger body size and body weight. Our data also address alternative hypotheses that might support the sex and developmental dependent immune performance. Accordingly, male damselflies would be more parasitized than females, because females tend to have better immunity than males [11], immature females would have greater parasite prevalence because of their underdeveloped immune system compared to adults. We calculated frequency of parasitism and intensity of parasitism across 11 natural populations to test our predictions.

Materials and methods

Study systems

Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea are small damselflies (wing size 10.5–11.00 mm, and wing size 9.75–11.5 mm respectively) of the Coenagrionidae family [49, 50; Fig 1A and 1B]. These species are widely distributed in South Asia, South East Asia, and Australia [50–52]. They are commonly found in grasslands associated with ponds, lakes, marshes and in paddy fields, and cohabit with Ceriagrion coromandelianum, A. kalinga, A. lacteola, and Orhterum sabina [49]. The males of A. femina are differentiated from other sympatric species by the size and shape of anal appendages (Epiproct larger than cerci) [50; Fig 1C]. Agriocnemis pygmaea males are distinguished by their smaller size, green ante-humeral stripes, orange abdomen tip, and larger cerci than epiproct [50; Fig 1F]. Agriocnemis femina females are recognized by their protruded ridge on the prothorax [50; Fig 1A and 1B] whereas A. pygmaea females are identified by the pink ante-humeral stripe in juveniles and green ante-humeral stripes in adults (Fig 1D and 1E). Females of both species exhibit ontogenetic colour change from red to green which signals sexual maturity and reduce pre-reproductive male mating harassment [49]. Males on the other hand, do not undergo such conspicuous changes therefore, sexually immature and mature males cannot be identified accurately in the field.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Photographs of females, males, immature and mature females of Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea respectively.

(a) Photograph of an immature female Agriocnemis femina. (b) Photograph of a mature female Agriocnemis femina. (c) Photograph of a male Agriocnemis femina. (d) Photograph of an immature female Agriocnemis pygmaea. (e) Photograph of a mature female Agriocnemis pygmaea. (f) Photograph of a male Agriocnemis pygmaea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.g001

Study sites

Agriocnemis femina is a common damselfly in the northeastern region of Bangladesh [53, 54], while A. pygmaea is commonly found in central and southwestern region of Bangladesh [49, 55]. Agriocnemis femina is seen in flight throughout the year, although the number of individuals peaks between April to July [50]. The flight period of A. pygmaea is all year round, but the population level peaks between June to August [50]. We conducted field studies for A. femina in six different sites in the northeastern region of Bangladesh between March 2021 to June 2021 (Table 1). Agriocnemis pygmaea were studied in five field sites in the central and southwestern region of Bangladesh between May 2017 to June 2017 (Table 1). No permission was required to collect specimens because none of the two species are endangered in Bangladesh and field sites were not located in protected areas.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Study sites, locations and number of total and parasitized Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea captured to calculate parasite prevalence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.t001

Ectoparasite mite

Water mites of Arrenuridae family are the most common ectoparasites of damselflies [29, 56, 57]. The water mites infect damselflies when the adult emerges from the larval stage or in a later life stage when the adults visits waterbodies for foraging or ovipositing [8, 57]. The ectoparasite mites attach themselves to the exocuticle of the host damselflies and form a feeding tube to extract body fluids of the host [56–59]. Water mites depend on host damselfly nutritional resources for their growth and development [60].

Morphometric analysis

We collected damselflies from the field using an insect sweep net and placed them individually in insect carrying bags. We placed all damselflies in a mesh cage and transported them back to the laboratory within two hours for morphometrics analysis. We stored damselflies in 95% ethanol and then measured body weight, total body length, abdomen area and thorax area of damselflies. First, we placed the damselflies on an absorbent paper for exactly two minutes to evaporate the ethanol [49] and then weighed them on a balance (Shimadzu ATY 224 electronic balance, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Next, we positioned the damselflies laterally along with a scale and took photographs [49]. We measured total body length, and abdomen length, width of the fifth abdominal segment, length and width of thorax of the damselflies from the digital photographs using the ImageJ software [61]. Later, we calculated abdominal and thoracic surface area using equation (surface area = 2 × π × ½ width × length).

Frequency and intensity of parasitism

We captured damselflies with an insect sweep net while walking along the edge of ponds and submerged grasslands by following previously established method [62]. We recorded the sex (male or female) for every captured individual and developmental stage of the females (immature or mature). Males and females were distinguished by the shape of the caudal appendages [49]. We distinguished immature females from mature females by their body color (Fig 1). Immature females’ abdomen and thorax are red which changes to green upon reaching sexually maturity [49]. Thorax color of Agriocnemis males are green which pruinose with age and appears blue in human eye. Both pruinose and non-pruinose males sexually mature, and have nearly similar body weight and length. Therefore, immature and mature males cannot be accurately differentiated under field condition. We, therefore, only considered mature and immature females to determine the impact of developmental stages on the frequency and intensity of parasitism. We visually inspected the captured damselflies for the presence of parasites. We also checked damselflies for past mite attachment by inspecting scars left on their body [63]. For parasitized individuals, we counted the number of parasites and recorded the presence of scars. Parasite count was always done by a single observer for consistent counting (SP counted parasites in A. femina and MKK counted parasites in A. pygmaea), however, we acknowledge that this way of counting still might cause observer’s bias. After inspection, we marked the damselflies on their wings with a permanent marker and released them into their natural population. This marking procedure avoids the recounting of the of the same individual [64, 65]. We calculated the frequency of parasitism, i.e., the proportion of individuals parasitized, and the intensity of parasitism, i.e., the number of parasites present for each parasitized individual. We conducted the fieldwork between 08:00 and 10:00 hours when the species are mostly active, mating occurs, and condition are favorable for field work (MKK and SP personal observations).

Statistical analyses

We applied linear mixed effects models (LMMs) to determine whether body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area varies between non-parasitized males and females, immature and mature female damselflies. We fitted LMMs with body condition using sex and developmental stage as fixed factors and species as random factor. We used r.squaredGLMM function of the R package “MuMIn” to determine the effect size of the models [66]. We further applied Mann-Whitney U test to determine whether body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area varies between A. femina and A. pygmaea.

We used generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with binomial distributions to determine whether males are more frequently parasitized than females. We fitted GLMMs with parasite infection status (parasitized or non-parasitized) as a response variable, sex and species as fixed effects, and study site as a random factor (model: glmer (cbind (parasitized, total-parasitized) ~ sex + species + (1|study site), family = binomial)). To determine whether immature females are parasitized more frequently than mature females, we fitted GLMM with parasite frequency as a response variable, developmental stage as a fixed effect, and study site as a random effect (model: glmer (cbind (parasitized, total-parasitized) ~ developmental stage + (1|study site), family = binomial)).

We applied generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with a poisson distribution to test whether parasite intensity differs between sexes, and the two study species. We fitted GLMM with parasite intensity as a response variable, sex and species as fixed factors, and study site as a random effect (model: glmer (parasite number ~ sex + species + (1|study site), family = poisson)). We further applied GLMM to determine whether parasite intensity varies between immature and mature female developmental stages in parasite intensity (model: glmer (parasite number ~ developmental stage + (1|study_site), family = poisson)). We used the r.squaredGLMM function of the “MuMIn” R package to determine the effect size of the models [67]. We analyzed all the data in the R version 4.0.3 using the ‘lme 4’ [68] and ‘MuMIn’ [67] packages. All values are estimate ± standard error.

Results

Morphometric analysis

Females and males differ significantly in their body weight, total length, and body surface area where females had significantly higher body weight, total body length, abdomen area and thorax area than males (all P < 0.0001; Fig 2, S1 Table). Body weight, total length and body surface area were also different between the developmental stages. Immature females had significantly lower body weight, body size, and abdomen area compared to mature females (all P < 0.005; Fig 2; S2 Table) but did not have any significant variation in thorax area (P = 0.6982; Fig 2; S2 Table). Agriocnemis femina had greater body weight, body size and thorax area than A. pygmaea (all P < 0.0001; Fig 2; S3 Table) but did not have significant variation in abdomen area (P = 0.9382; Fig 2; S3 Table).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Morphometric measurements of non-parasitized females, males, immature and mature females of Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea respectively.

(a) Body weight of females and males; immature and mature females; Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea. (b) Total length of females and males; immature and mature females; femina and A. pygmaea. (c) Abdomen area of females and males; immature and mature females; A. femina and A. pygmaea. (d) Thorax area of females and males; immature and mature females; A. femina and A. pygmaea. The boxplots indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles. The error bars extend downward from the first quartile to the minimum and upward from the third quartile to the maximum data points. Data points which are 1.5 times greater than the interquartile range are excluded. * symbolizes significant variation between studied groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.g002

Frequency and intensity of parasitism

A total of 3673 individuals were inspected (N = 2258 A. femina and N = 1415 A. pygmaea) of which 16.33% were parasitized (4.52% of A. femina and 28.14% of A. pygmaea (Table 1). Parasite prevalence did not differ significantly between males (N = 2164) and females (N = 1509) (GLMM: estimate = -0.1373 ± 0.1039, Z = -1.322, P = 0.186; R2 = 0.986; Fig 3A). Parasite prevalence was significantly higher in immature females (N = 921) than in mature females (N = 588) (GLMM: estimate = -0.7328± 0.1669, Z = -4.391, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.967; Fig 3B). Furthermore, parasite prevalence was significantly higher in A. pygmaea compared to A. femina (GLMM: estimate = 2.1815 ± 0.27, Z = 7.924, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.986; Fig 3C).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Parasite prevalence in females, males, immature and mature females of Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea respectively.

(a) Parasite prevalence in females and males. (b) Parasite prevalence in immature and mature females (c) Parasite prevalence in Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea. The bold lines within boxes depict the median. The bottom and top borders of the boxes indicate 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers include all data points excluding the data that are beyond 1.5 times the interquartile range. Circle indicates parasite prevalence at each study site. * denotes p <0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.g003

Parasite number varies from 1 to 14 in infected individuals with a mean of 3.429 ± 0.0959. Parasite intensity was significantly lower in male damselflies than females (GLM: estimate = -0.18542 ± 0.04323, Z = -4.289, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.139; Fig 4A). Moreover, parasite intensity was significantly lower in mature females than immature females (GLM: estimate = -0.32078 ± 0.07787, Z = -4.119, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.1967; Fig 4B). Parasite intensity was greater in. A. pygmaea than A. femina (GLM: estimate = 0.58565 ± 0.09055, Z = 6.468, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.139; Fig 4C).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Parasite intensity in females, males, immature and mature females of Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea respectively.

(a) Parasite intensity in females and males. (b) Parasite intensity in immature and mature females. (c) Parasite intensity in Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea. The boxplots represent the median, 25th and 75th percentiles. The error bars extend downward from the first quartile to the minimum and upward from the third quartile to the maximum data points. Data points beyond the error bars are 1.5 times greater than the interquartile range and excluded. * indicates significant variation (p <0.001) between studied groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.g004

Discussion

Parasite frequency and intensity may vary between males and females, and developmental stages of a species because of differences in morphology, physiology, behavior, and immunity. Here, we determined sexual and developmental variation of morphological traits and intensity and frequency of parasitism in two damselfly species. We found that females were larger, heavier and had greater surface area than males. Mature females also had a larger body size, more body weight, and greater surface area than immature females. During ontogenesis, females may grow larger by increasing their volume to accommodate eggs. Immature females, on the other hand, usually do not have eggs in their ovaries. Therefore, the presence of eggs in the ovary of mature females could contribute to the increased body sizes of mature females than immature females. In support of our findings, Khan (2020) showed that immature and mature females of Agriocnemis differ in their body sizes. Our results showed that, parasite prevalence did not vary between sexes, but females had significantly higher parasite intensity compared to males. We further showed that parasite prevalence and parasite intensity were greater in immature females than mature females. Finally, we also found interspecific variation of parasitism between the two studied species, A. pygmaea had higher frequency and intensity of parasitism than A. femina.

Contrary to our prediction, we did not find a significant difference in parasitism between males and females. Behavioral and life history trait differences can contribute to distinct risks of parasitism for males and females. For example, in species where eggs are oviposited directly into the water or on vegetation on or in the water, females spend more time in or near water than males [69]. During ovipositing, females suffer increased exposure to ectoparasites and consequently increased risk of parasitism. Accordingly, female biased parasite prevalence was observed in Lestes sponsa, Coenagrion pulchellum, and Ischnura verticalis were ovipositing requires contact with water [8, 29, 30]. By contrast, A. pygmaea and A. femina females oviposit on grasses 20–30 cm above the water line (MKK personal observation; Fig 1B and 1E), which reduces contact with water during oviposition and might subsequently result in lower parasite exposure. This might explain the lack of female biased parasitism. Furthermore, immunity and resistance against parasites might not vary between males and females [29]. Further studies are required to understand the impact of sex specific immunity on parasitism in A. pygmaea and A. femina.

The lack of any sexual bias in the prevalence of parasitism in our study species concords with previous studies in damselflies i.e., Lestes disjunctus, I. verticalis, Nehalennia Irene, and other arthropod hosts (e.g. crustaceans, coleopterans, dipterans) that did not find differences in parasitism between males and females [5, 70–76]. These results suggest that unlike vertebrates, sex differences in parasitism might not be the norm in invertebrates [5].

We showed that parasite intensity was greater in females than males. Female biased sexual size dimorphism and better condition in females in A. pygmaea and A. femina most likely contributed to the increased parasite intensity in females [49]. The higher body mass of females could provide greater resources to parasites therefore could harbor more parasites [77]. Larger body size can also provide greater surface area for parasite accumulation [71]. The larger body size in Agriocnemis females and greater thoracic and abdominal area therefore probably accounts for the greater parasite intensity. Furthermore, due to selection on fecundity, females may invest more resources to the quality and quantity of eggs, and less in immunity [1, 3, 10, 78]. Thus, higher parasite load in females could be the result of a trade-off between fecundity and immunity investment [9]. In accordance to our findings, higher parasite intensity in females have been shown in other damselflies Ischnura elegans, Coenagrion pulchellum, Lestes disjunctus, and in Dineutus nigrior whirligig beetle [9, 13, 29, 56, 79].

Physiology and behavior of damselflies vary between different development stages, consequently, immature and mature individuals may differ in parasite prevalence and intensity [80, 81]. We found significantly higher prevalence and intensity in immature females compared to mature females. While immature female damselflies are less active than mature females [22, 82], they spend longer periods of time at water-side vegetation after emergence as shown in Enallagma boreale, E. ebrium, E. aspersum, Ischnura elegans, Xanthocnemis zealandica, and in Lestes disjunctus [19, 20, 39, 40, 45, 79]. Whether these behavioural differences contribute to higher parasite frequency in immature Agriocnemis is unclear.

Furthermore, immunological variation can also contribute to the observed variation of parasitism between developmental stages. For example, less pronounced immunity in immature individuals of Enallagma ebrium, Coenagrion hastulatum, and Ischnura elegans have been found to increase parasitism [9, 10, 45, 83].Whether behavioral, nutritional, or immunological variation, or a combination of these contribute to the variation of parasitism between immature and mature females in Agriocnemis damselflies is an exciting question of further studies.

Our results showed that, in parasitized individuals, the intensity was higher in immature females than mature females. Females may allocate resources to fecundity traits such fat storage during ontogenesis. Agriocnemis females, like other damselflies, acquire body mass, increase body size, and accumulate more fat and protein throughout their development [49, 84]. The smaller body sizes and lower body weight of immature Agriocnemis females may indicate their poor nutritional condition compared to mature males. Because of imitated resource immature females are more likely to invest less in immunity. The less pronounced immune system of immature females most likely contributes to the higher parasite load in immature females compared with mature females. The microhabitat differences between immature and mature damselflies might also be responsible for higher parasite intensity in immature females. Because higher parasite load in individuals is likely to result in greater mortality, immature damselflies parasitized with high parasite load may succumb to death during development. As a result, when we sampled the immature damselflies, those with fewer parasites may have been over-represented.

Interspecific difference in physiology such as body size, and weight can contribute to the species-specific variation of parasitism where larger species are more likely to be heavily parasitized. In contrast, we found higher parasite prevalence and intensity in the smaller and less heavy A. pygmaea compared to A. femina. In support of this, larger and heavier individuals within a species, have better immunity than smaller and lighter individuals [85, 86]. Accordingly, larger species might be able to invest more into immunity compared to smaller species, which could explain why A. femina had lower parasite frequency. Alternatively, the variation of microhabitat and environmental factors might contribute to the variation of parasitism between the two study species. The study species were not sympatric; A. pygmaea were sampled from the central and southern region whereas A. femina were studied in the northern region of Bangladesh. It is possible that the southern and central region provides favorable condition for the ectoparasites thereby causing higher parasitism in A. pygmaea. Moreover, Agriocnemis femina and A. pygmaea may differ in the time they spend for oviposition which might account for the observed variation in parasitism.

Conclusion

Our study provides new insights into the variation of parasite infection in Agriocnemis damselflies indicating that sex and developmental stage bias parasitism. It also offers a comparison of variations in infection among different species of damselflies. This study provides the basis for future work to identify the causes of variation and understand damselflies’ defense mechanism against parasitism.

Statement of diversity and inclusion

We strongly support equity, diversity and inclusion in science. The authors come from different countries (Bangladesh, Austria and Australia) and represent different career stages (Masters student, Early career researcher, & Professor). One or more of the authors self-identifies as a member of the LGBTQI+ community. One or more authors underrepresented ethnic minority in science. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we actively worked to promote gender balance in our reference list.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Linear mixed effects models (LMMs) for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between non-parasitized males and female damselflies.

Results from linear mixed effects models (LMMs) for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between non-parasitized males and female damselflies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Linear mixed effects models (LMMs) for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between non-parasitized immature and mature female damselflies.

Results from linear mixed effects models (LMMs) for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between non-parasitized immature and mature female damselflies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Mann-Whitney U-test for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between non-parasitized Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea.

Results of Mann-Whitney U-test for differences in body weight, total length, abdomen area and thorax area between Agriocnemis femina and Agriocnemis pygmaea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261540.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Wallumattagal clan of the Dharug nation as the traditional custodians of the Macquarie University land. We thank Prof. Dr. Swapan Kumar Sarker for proving logistical support, Mostakim Rayhan for helping with the field work, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology for providing lab access. Authors thanks their families for their support.

References

  1. 1. Stoehr AM, Kokko H. Sexual dimorphism in immunocompetence: what does life-history theory predict? Behav Ecol. 2006;17(5):751–6.
  2. 2. Zuk M. The sicker sex. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(1):e1000267. pmid:19180235
  3. 3. Cordoba-Aguilar A, Munguia-Steyer R. The sicker sex: understanding male biases in parasitic infection, resource allocation and fitness. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76246. pmid:24194830
  4. 4. Zuk M, Stoehr AM. Immune defense and host life history. Am Nat. 2002;160(S4):S9–22. pmid:18707455
  5. 5. Sheridan LA, Poulin R, Ward DF, Zuk M. Sex differences in parasitic infections among arthropod hosts: is there a male bias? Oikos. 2000;88(2):327–34.
  6. 6. Siva–Jothy MT. A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000;267(1461):2523–7.
  7. 7. Moore SL, Wilson K. Parasites as a viability cost of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Science. 2002;297(5589):2015–8. pmid:12242433
  8. 8. Hughes M, Kaunisto KM, Suhonen J. Large males have fewer water mites (Arrenurus sp.) on the variable bluet (Coenagrion pulchellum) damselfly. Can J Zool. 2016;94(5):339–43.
  9. 9. Willink B, Svensson EI. Intra-and intersexual differences in parasite resistance and female fitness tolerance in a polymorphic insect. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017;284(1847):20162407.
  10. 10. Rolff J. Effects of age and gender on immune function of dragonflies (Odonata, Lestidae) from a wild population. Can J Zool. 2001;79(12):2176–80.
  11. 11. McKean KA, Nunney L. Bateman’s principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences. Evolution. 2005;59(7):1510–7. pmid:16153036
  12. 12. Robb T, Forbes MR. On understanding seasonal increases in damselfly defence and resistance against ectoparasitic mites. Ecol Entomol. 2005;30(3):334–41.
  13. 13. Fairn ER, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Alarie Y. Water mite parasitism is associated with body condition and sex of the whirligig beetle Dineutus nigrior (Coleoptera: Gyrinidae). Ecoscience. 2008;15(3):327–31.
  14. 14. Bacelar FS, White A, Boots M. Life history and mating systems select for male biased parasitism mediated through natural selection and ecological feedbacks. J Theor Biol. 2011;269(1):131–7. pmid:20946902
  15. 15. McCurdy DG, Shutler D, Mullie A, Forbes MR. Sex-biased parasitism of avian hosts: relations to blood parasite taxon and mating system. Oikos. 1998;303–12.
  16. 16. Rolff J. Bateman’s principle and immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;269(1493):867–72. pmid:11958720
  17. 17. Edwards DD, Smith HG. Host sex preferences and transmission success by the water mite Unionicola foili (Acari: Unionicolidae) parasitic on the midge Chironomus tentans (Diptera: Chironomidae). J Parasitol. 2003;89(4):681–5. pmid:14533673
  18. 18. Krasnov BR, Morand S, Hawlena H, Khokhlova IS, Shenbrot GI. Sex-biased parasitism, seasonality and sexual size dimorphism in desert rodents. Oecologia. 2005;146(2):209–17. pmid:16025350
  19. 19. Pierce CL, Crowley PH, Johnson DM. Behavior and ecological interactions of larval Odonata. Ecology. 1985;66(5):1504–12.
  20. 20. Hecker K, Forbes M, Leonard N. Parasitism of damselflies (Enallagma boreale) by gregarines: sex biases and relations to adult survivorship. Can J Zool. 2002;80(1):162–8.
  21. 21. Dmitriew C, Cooray M, Rowe L. Effects of early resource-limiting conditions on patterns of growth, growth efficiency, and immune function at emergence in a damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Can J Zool. 2007;85(3):310–8.
  22. 22. Müller T, Müller C. Behavioural phenotypes over the lifetime of a holometabolous insect. Front Zool. 2015;12(1):1–10.
  23. 23. de Resende BO, Ferreira VRS, Brasil LS, Calvão LB, Mendes TP, de Carvalho FG, et al. Impact of environmental changes on the behavioral diversity of the Odonata (Insecta) in the Amazon. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–12.
  24. 24. McLachlan A. Parasites promote mating success: the case of a midge and a mite. Anim Behav. 1999;57(6):1199–205. pmid:10373252
  25. 25. Fairn ER, Alarie Y, Schulte-Hostedde AI. Sexual size and shape dimorphism in Dineutus nigrior (Coleoptera: Gyrinidae). Coleopt Bull. 2007;61(1):113–20.
  26. 26. Abé H, Ohtsuka Y, Ohba S. Water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidiae) parasitic on aquatic hemipterans in Japan, with reference to host preferences and selection sites. Int J Acarol. 2015;41(6):494–506.
  27. 27. Słowińska I, Zawal A, Stryjecki R, Michoński G. First detailed records of water mite larvae (Hydrachnidia: Hydrovolzidae, Hydryphantidae) parasitizing empidid flies (Diptera: Empididae: Clinocerinae). Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020;12:165–71. pmid:32577376
  28. 28. Ilvonen JJ, Kaunisto KM, Suhonen J. Odonates, gregarines and water mites: why are the same host species infected by both parasites? Ecol Entomol. 2018;43(5):591–600.
  29. 29. Ilvonen JJ, Kaunisto KM, Suhonen J. Are sexes equally parasitized in damselflies and dragonflies? Oikos. 2016;125(3):315–25.
  30. 30. Bunker BE, Janovy J Jr, Tracey E, Barnes A, Duba A, Shuman M, et al. Macroparasite population dynamics among geographical localities and host life cycle stages: Eugregarines in Ischnura verticalis. J Parasitol. 2013;99(3):403–9. pmid:23301824
  31. 31. Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B. Parasite-mediated competition: some predictions and tests. Am Nat. 1988;131(4):544–55.
  32. 32. Arneberg P, Skorping A, Grenfell B, Read AF. Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998;265(1403):1283–9.
  33. 33. Krasnov B, Khokhlova I, Shenbrot G. The effect of host density on ectoparasite distribution: an example of a rodent parasitized by fleas. Ecology. 2002;83(1):164–75.
  34. 34. Ilvonen S, Ilvonen JJ, Kaunisto KM, Krams I, Suhonen J. Can infection by eugregarine parasites mediate species coexistence in Calopteryx damselflies? Ecol Entomol. 2011;36(5):582–7.
  35. 35. Kamiya T, O’Dwyer K, Nakagawa S, Poulin R. What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta‐analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts. Biol Rev. 2014;89(1):123–34. pmid:23782597
  36. 36. Mlynarek JJ, Knee W, Forbes MR. Host phenology, geographic range size and regional occurrence explain interspecific variation in damselfly–water mite associations. Ecography. 2015;38(7):670–80.
  37. 37. Lajeunesse M J., Forbes M R., Smith B P. Species and sex biases in ectoparasitism of dragonflies by mites. Oikos. 2004;106(3):501–8.
  38. 38. Locklin JL, Vodopich DS. Patterns of gregarine parasitism in dragonflies: host, habitat, and seasonality. Parasitol Res. 2010;107(1):75–87. pmid:20376487
  39. 39. Mckee D, Harvey I, Thomas M, Sherratt TN. Mite infestation of Xanthocnemis zealandica in a Christchurch pond. N Z J Zool. 2003;30(1):17–20.
  40. 40. Sánchez-Guillén R, Martínez-Zamilpa S, Jiménez-Cortés J, Forbes M, Córdoba-Aguilar A. Maintenance of polymorphic females: do parasites play a role? Oecologia. 2013;171(1):105–13. pmid:22710614
  41. 41. Córdoba-Aguilar A., Contreras-Garduño J., Peralta-Vázquez H., Luna-Gonzalez A., Campa-Córdova A., Ascencio F., 2006. Sexual comparisons in immune ability, survival and parasite intensity in two damselfly species. J Insect Physiol 52, 861–869. pmid:16843483
  42. 42. Zawal A, Dyatlova ES. Parasitizing on damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) by water mite (Acari: Hydrachnidia) larvae from Odessa province (Southwestern Ukraine). Nat Montenegrina. 2008;7:453–62.
  43. 43. Hassall C, Lowe CD, Harvey IF, Watts PC, Thompson DJ. Phenology determines seasonal variation in ectoparasite loads in a natural insect population. Ecol Entomol. 2010;35(4):514–22.
  44. 44. Andrew R, Thaokar N, Verma P. Ectoparasitism of anisopteran dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) by water mite larvae of Arrenurus spp.(Arachnida: Hydrachnida: Arrenuridae) in Central India. Acarina. 2012;20(2):194–8.
  45. 45. Lajeunesse MJ. Ectoparasitism of damselflies by water mites in Central Florida. Fla Entomol. 2007;90(4):643–9.
  46. 46. Yourth CP, Forbes MR, Smith BP. Immune expression in a damselfly is related to time of season, not to fluctuating asymmetry or host size. Ecol Entomol. 2002;27(1):123–8.
  47. 47. Mlynarek JJ, Iserbyt A, Nagel L, Forbes MR. Differential water mite parasitism, phenoloxidase activity, and resistance to mites are unrelated across pairs of related damselfly species. PloS One. 2015;10(2):e0115539. pmid:25658982
  48. 48. Forbes MR, Baker RL. Susceptibility to parasitism: experiments with the damselfly Enallagma ebrium (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) and larval water mites, Arrenurus spp.(Acari: Arrenuridae). Oikos. 1990;61–6.
  49. 49. Khan MK. Female pre-reproductive colouration reduces mating harassment in damselflies. Evolution. 2020;70(10):2293–303.
  50. 50. Shah MNA, Khan MK. OdoBD: An online database for the dragonflies and damselflies of Bangladesh. PloS One. 2020;15(4):e0231727. pmid:32324748
  51. 51. Theischinger G, Hawking J. The Complete Field Guide to Dragonflies of Australia. 3rd ed. CSIRO Publishing, Victoria; 2016.
    • 52. Kalkman VJ, Babu R, Bedjanič M, Conniff K, Gyeltshen T, Khan MK, et al. Checklist of the dragonflies and damselflies of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Zootaxa. 2020.
    • 53. Khan MK. Odonata of eastern Bangladesh with three new records for the country. J Threat Taxa. 2018 Nov 26;10(13):12821–7.
    • 54. Khan MK. Dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of the northeastern region of Bangladesh with five new additions to the Odonata fauna of Bangladesh. J Threat Taxa. 2015 Sep 26;7(11):7795–804.
    • 55. Tuhin MSH, Khan MK. An updated list of Odonata of southwestern Bangladesh. J Threat Taxa. 2018;10(15):12995–3001.
    • 56. Smith BP. Host-parasite interaction and impact of larval water mites on insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1988;33(1):487–507.
    • 57. Smith IM, Cook DR, Smith BP. Water mites (Hydrachnidiae) and other arachnids. In: Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Elsevier; 2010. p. 485–586.
      • 58. Robb T, Forbes M. Success of ectoparasites: how important is timing of host contact? Biol Lett. 2005;1(2):118–20. pmid:17148143
      • 59. Åbro A. Attachment and Feeding Devices of Water‐Mite Larvae (Arrenurus spp.) Parasitic on Damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera). Zool Scr. 1979;8(1‐4):221–34.
      • 60. Åbro A. The impact of parasites in adult populations of Zygoptera. Odonatologica. 1990;19(3):223–33.
      • 61. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5. pmid:22930834
      • 62. Khan MK, Herberstein ME. Sexually dimorphic blue bands are intra-sexual aposematic signals in non-territorial damselflies. Anim Behav. 2019;156(10):21–9.
      • 63. Forbes MR, Muma KE, Smith BP. Parasitism of Sympetrum dragonflies by Arrenurus planus mites: maintenance of resistance particular to one species. Int J Parasitol. 1999;29(7):991–999. pmid:10501609
      • 64. Khan MK, Herberstein ME. Ontogenetic habitat shifts reduce costly male–male interactions. Evol Ecol. 2020 Oct 1;34(5):735–43.
      • 65. Khan MK, Herberstein ME. Ontogenetic colour change signals sexual maturity in a non- territorial damselfly. Ethology. 2020;126(1):51–8.
      • 66. Johnson PC. Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5(9):944–6. pmid:25810896
      • 67. Bartoń K. (2020). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
        • 68. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48.
        • 69. Corbet PS. Dragonflies: Behaviour and ecology of odonata. USA: Cornell University Press; 1999.
          • 70. Matushkina N, Gorb S. A checklist of substrates for endophytic oviposition of some European dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). Kharkov Entomol Soc Gaz. 2002;10:108–18.
          • 71. Nagel L, Zanuttig M, Forbes M. Selection on mite engorgement size affects mite spacing, host damselfly flight, and host resistance. Evol Ecol Res. 2010;12(5):653–65.
          • 72. Mlynarek JJ, Bert DG, Peralta-Vázquez GH, James JA, Forbes MR. Relationships between gregarine infection in damselflies, wetland type, and landscape characteristics. Can Entomol. 2011;143(5):460–9.
          • 73. Mlynarek JJ, Hassall C, Forbes MR. Higher gregarine parasitism often in sibling species of host damselflies with smaller geographical distributions. Ecol Entomol. 2012;37(5):419–25.
          • 74. Forbes MR, Mlynarek JJ, Allison J, Hecker KR. Seasonality of gregarine parasitism in the damselfly, Nehalennia irene: understanding unimodal patterns. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(1):245–50. pmid:21633843
          • 75. Rebora M, Piersanti S, Dell’Otto A, Gaino E. The gustatory sensilla on the endophytic ovipositor of Odonata. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2013;42(2):127–34. pmid:23137612
          • 76. Harabiš F, Rusková T, Dolný A. Different Oviposition Strategies of Closely Related Damselfly Species as an Effective Defense against Parasitoids. Insects. 2019;10(1):26. pmid:30634623
          • 77. Céspedes V, Stoks R, Green AJ, Sánchez MI. Eco-immunology of native and invasive water bugs in response to water mite parasites: insights from phenoloxidase activity. Biol Invasions. 2019;21(7):2431–45.
          • 78. Richardson JM, Baker RL. Effect of body size and feeding on fecundity in the damselfly Ischnura verticalis (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Oikos. 1997;477–83.
          • 79. Robb T, Forbes MR. Sex biases in parasitism of newly emerged damselflies. Ecoscience. 2006;13(1):1–4.
          • 80. Truman JW, Riddiford LM. Endocrine insights into the evolution of metamorphosis in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47(1):467–500. pmid:11729082
          • 81. Sachser N, Kaiser S, Hennessy MB. Behavioural profiles are shaped by social experience: when, how and why. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1618):20120344.
          • 82. Dangles O, Pierre D, Christides J, Casas J. Escape performance decreases during ontogeny in wild crickets. J Exp Biol. 2007;210(18):3165–70. pmid:17766293
          • 83. Kaunisto KM, Suhonen J. Parasite burden and the insect immune response: interpopulation comparison. Parasitology. 2013;140(1):87. pmid:22932032
          • 84. Khan MK, Herberstein ME. Male–male interactions select for conspicuous male coloration in damselflies. Anim Behav. 2021 Jun 1;176:157–66.
          • 85. Rolff J. Invited review Evolutionary Ecology of water mite-insect interactions: a critical appraisal. Arch Für Hydrobiol. 2001;353–68.
          • 86. Ilvonen JJ, Suhonen J. Phylogeny affects host’s weight, immune response and parasitism in damselflies and dragonflies. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3(11):160421. pmid:28018621