Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptome analysis of Kentucky bluegrass subject to drought and ethephon treatment

  • Jiahang Zhang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Yanan Gao,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Lixin Xu ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    lixinxu@bjfu.edu.cn (LX); hanliebao@163.com (LH)

    Affiliation College of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Liebao Han

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision

    lixinxu@bjfu.edu.cn (LX); hanliebao@163.com (LH)

    Affiliation College of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) is an excellent cool-season turfgrass utilized widely in Northern China. However, turf quality of Kentucky bluegrass declines significantly due to drought. Ethephon seeds-soaking treatment has been proved to effectively improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass seedlings. In order to investigate the effect of ethephon leaf-spraying method on drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass and understand the underlying mechanism, Kentucky bluegrass plants sprayed with and without ethephon are subjected to either drought or well watered treatments. The relative water content and malondialdehyde conent were measured. Meanwhile, samples were sequenced through Illumina. Results showed that ethephon could improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by elevating relative water content and decreasing malondialdehyde content under drought. Transcriptome analysis showed that 58.43% transcripts (254,331 out of 435,250) were detected as unigenes. A total of 9.69% (24,643 out of 254,331) unigenes were identified as differentially expressed genes in one or more of the pairwise comparisons. Differentially expressed genes due to drought stress with or without ethephon pre-treatment showed that ethephon application affected genes associated with plant hormone, signal transduction pathway and plant defense, protein degradation and stabilization, transportation and osmosis, antioxidant system and the glyoxalase pathway, cell wall and cuticular wax, fatty acid unsaturation and photosynthesis. This study provides a theoretical basis for revealing the mechanism for how ethephon regulates drought response and improves drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass.

1. Introduction

Environmental factors (such as light, temperature, water, soil, etc.) are very important to the growth and survival of plants, because slight changes of these environmental factors may make plants suffer from stress, thus affecting their normal growth and survival [1]. Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting plant growth and crop productivity in many areas [2]. It reduces the turf quality of Kentucky bluegrass by influencing the shoot density, texture, uniformity, color, growth habit and recuperative capacity [3, 4]. The common responses of plants to drought stress include the expression changes of many genes, such as genes related to signal transduction, and the transcription and regulation of thousands of functional proteins, which are involved in the molecular regulation of drought resistance [5].

The phytohormone ethylene is a key signaling molecule in plants for regulating multiple developmental processes and stress responses [6, 7]. As an ethylene releasing reagent, ethephon can overcome the disadvantage of inconvenient application of gaseous ethylene and has great potential in practice for various reasons [8, 9]. For example, researches on Maize (Zea myus) [10], rice (Oryza sativa) [11] and Arabidopsis thaliana [12] have revealed that ethephon could improve plants drought tolerance. Few studies focused on the potential of ethephon application in turfgrass species for water saving reasons. Zhang et al. [13] found that ethephon seeds treatment improved drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass seedlings by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and soluble protein content under PEG-induced drought conditions. Han [14] found that specific concentration of ethephon could effectively improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass. However, it is still unclear how ethephon affect the response mechanism of Kentucky bluegrass under drought.

At present, a large number of studies have revealed the mechanism for plants drought tolerance through transcriptome sequencing [1518]. Illumina sequencing technology has been used in the study of turfgrass genome such as Lolium temulentum L. [19], orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) [20] and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) [21]. For species without genome information, transcriptome sequencing can effectively characterize and identify the biosynthesis pathway of secondary metabolites in plants, reveal the growth, development, physiological adaptability of plants, and explore the gene sequence and expression level [2224]. Zhang et al. [25] compared the transcriptome of drought resistant and sensitive plants collections of Qinghai wild Poa pratensis under drought, and found that genes involved in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathways, and bHLH, AP2/EREPB and C2H2 zinc finger family transcription factors played important roles in drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass. Leng et al. [26] revealed that genes encoding protein kinase, protein phosphatase, genes involved in carbon metabolism and ABA synthesis and transduction are crucial in Kentucky bluegrass ’Nuglade’ drought defense responses. Gene expression changes on a whole transcriptome level associated with ethephon pre-treatment under drought stress of Kentucky bluegrass have not been well-studied yet.

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of ethephon on drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass and to understand the underlying mechanism by analyzing and identifying genes involved in ethephon mediated drought tolerance improvement.

2. Materials and method

2.1 Plant materials and treatment

Seeds of Kentucky bluegrass (cv. Nuglade) were from Beijing Top Green Company. All materials were planted in the greenhouse of Turfgrass Reasearch Station of Beijing Forestry University, Bajia nursery, Beijing, China. The plants were grown in plastic pots (diameter: 20 cm, depth: 18 cm) filled with a mixture of peat, vermiculite and perlite (2:1:1). Plants were watered every 2 days to keep the soil moisture conditions at field capacity. Drought stress was imposed by withdrawing water for 13 days until soil moisture drop to 4% (portable time domain reflectometry)(TZS-I, Zhejiang TOP Instrument Co., Ltd, China). Ethephon solution (200 mg/L) was foliar-sprayed 7 days ahead of drought treatment. After 15 days of drought treatment, the upper 3–5 leaves were sampled from well-watered control plants without ethephon application (CK), drought treated plants without ethphon application (Drought), and droughttreated plants with ethephon pre-treatment (ETH_D) for RNA sequencing and real-time PCR analysis (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Schematic overview of the experimental design for well-watered control plants without ethephon application (CK), drought control plants without ehtphon application (Drought), and drought control plants with ethephon pre-treatment (ETH_D).

CK means well-watered control plants without ethephon application. Drought means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ETH_D means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g001

2.2 Relative water content and malondialdehyde content

The relative water content (RWC) of leaves was determined by drying method [27]. The content of malondialdehyde (MDA) (μmol·g-1) was determined by thiobarbituric acid method [28].

2.3 RNA isolation and library preparation

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was treated with DNaseI. RNA purity was checked using the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, CA, USA); RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). RNA integrity number for the RNA samples are in the range from 6.3 to 7.2.

The cDNA library was prepared by pooling RNA from the leaf samples of CK, Drought, ETH_D. Three biological replicates for each treatment were used for RNA sequencing and real-time PCR analysis.

A total amount of 3 μg RNA per sample was used as input material for the RNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. Briefly, mRNA was purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. Fragmentation was carried out using divalent cations under elevated temperature in NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer (5X). First strand cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primer and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (RNase H-). Second strand cDNA synthesis was subsequently performed using DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. Remaining overhangs were converted into blunt ends via exonuclease/polymerase activities. After adenylation of 3’ ends of DNA fragments, NEBNext Adaptor with hairpin loop structure were ligated to prepare for hybridization. In order to select cDNA fragments of preferentially 150~200 bp in length, the library fragments were purified with AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA). Then 3 μl USER Enzyme (NEB, USA) was used with size-selected, adaptor-ligated cDNA at 37°C for 15 min followed by 5 min at 95°C before PCR. Then PCR was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase, Universal PCR primers and Index (X) Primer. At last, PCR products were purified (AMPure XP system) and library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system.

2.4 Sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Sequencing, assembly, and annotation were performed by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co. Ltd (https://www.novogene.com/). The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq platform and paired-end reads were generated.

The raw reads were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform. After the raw reads containing adapter sequences, reads containing ploy-N (≥10%) and low quality reads had been removed, the clean reads were assembled de novo using the Trinity (http://trinityrnaseq.github.io) as previous described [22]. It was a K-mer length of 25 and a minimum assembly length at 200bp that default parameters were set for fast and efficient transcript assembly. The longest transcript of each gene is used as a representative of the gene, called Unigene, for subsequent analysis. Taxonomic and functional annotation of all spliced sequences was obtained by comparing with seven databases which were the NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (NR) database, NCBI nucleotide sequences (NT) database, protein family (PFAM) database, eukaryotic ortholog groups (KOG) database, Swiss-Prot database, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database and Gene Ontology (GO) database. Based on the protein annotation result of NR and PFAM, analysis of the Gene Ontology (GO) term was conducted for functional annotations (E-values<10−6). The KAAS software was used to blast the gene sequences in the unigene and the KEGG gene database.

2.5 Identification of differentially expressed genes

The transcriptome obtained by Trinity splicing were the reference sequence, and the clean reads of each sample were mapped directly to the reference transcriptome libraries using the RSEM (v1.2.15) software [29] with default parameters. Readcount for each gene was obtained from the mapping results. Differential expression analysis of three treatments was performed using the DESeq R package [30]. The resulting P values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling the false discovery rate [31]. Genes with an adjusted P-value <0.05 found by DESeq were assigned as differentially expressed.

GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed by GOseq method [32] based on Wallenius non-central hyper-geometric distribution. The analysis first mapped all the differentially expressed genes to each term of the Gene Ontology database, calculated the number of genes for each term, and then found the significant enrichment in the differentially expressed genes compared to the entire genome background. Simultaneously, up regulated and down regulated genes was performed separately for enrichment analysis in order to better study the function of differential genes.

2.6 Validation of differential expression genes by qRT-PCR

Eight differentially expressed genes were randomly selected for qRT-PCR analysis, and high-through put data were validated (the prime pairs of these eight genes were listed in S1 Data). Total RNA was extracted respectively from the leaves of each sample as previous described. Complementary DNA from total RNA was prepared using HiScript® II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR kit (with the gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers were designed for qRT-PCR and the Actin gene was used as the internal reference gene. The qRT-PCR was carried out using the Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR system. The relative quantitative data were calculated using the 2-ΔΔ CT method [33].

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Relative water content and malondialdehyde content

Relative water content (RWC) can be used as an index to measure the internal water loss and water holding capacity of plants. Higher RWC under drought stressed conditions means better drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass [2, 34]. The value of RWC in Kentucky bluegrass leaves decreased significantly by drought. Ethephon pre-treated plants maintained a higher level of RWC under drought stress relative to non-ethephon treated control plants (Fig 2A). Therefore, ethephon could improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is a final product of plant cell membrane lipid peroxidation and is widely used as a biomarker of oxidative stress in plants [35]. Under drought stress, lower MDA content is associated with better stress tolerance of turfgrasses [36]. MDA content in Kentucky bluegrass leaves increased significantly by drought, ethephon pre-treatment lowered the level of MDA under drought (Fig 2B). These results together confirmed that ethephon could improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by combining the photos of ethephon and drought treatment (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2.

A. Relative water content of each samples B. Malondialdehyde content of each treatment. CK means well-watered control plants without ethephon application. Drought means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ETH_D means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Effects of ethephon on Kentucky bluegrass under drought.

CK means well-watered control plants without ethephon application. Drought means drought-stressed plants without ethephon pre-treatment. ETH_D means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g003

3.2 Sequence assembly

A set of 435,250 transcripts was produced using Trinity. We selected 254,331 sequences (58.43% of the total transcripts) as unigenes, with a mean length of 581 bp and an N50 of 818 bp (see S2S4 Data for data used to summarize the quality of sequencing, assembly and alignment). The Kentucky bluegrass 254,331 assembled unigenes were queried against seven protein databases, results showed that among the NR BLASTx best hits, Kentucky bluegrass unigenes were significantly similar to Brachypodium distachyon proteins (14,815, 19.1%), followed by Aegilops tauschii (14,710, 18.9%), Hordeum vulgare (10,517, 13.5%), Triticum urartu (7,283, 9.4%) and Oryza sativa (5,988, 7.7%) (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Summary and taxonomic source of BLASTx matches for Kentucky bluegrass unigenes.

Percentage of unique best BLASTx matches of unigenes grouped by genus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g004

3.3 Differential expression and gene ontology

A total of 24,643 transcripts were identified as DEGs in one or more of the pairwise comparisons (Fig 5A). A large change of the transcriptome occurred in Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress (Fig 5A). A relative smaller change of transcriptome occurred in Kentucky blue grass in response to drought due to ETH pre-treatment (Fig 5A). The heatmap also indicates the overall effect of drought stress on transcription and allows for visualization of how ETH moderated the effects of drought stress on the transcriptome (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 5.

A. Venn diagram for all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Kentucky bluegrass B. Venn diagram for up-regulated genes in Kentucky bluegrass C. Venn diagram for down-regulated genes in Kentucky bluegrass. ‘CK’ means well-watered control plants without ethephon pre-treatment. ‘Drought’ means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ‘ETH_D’ means drought stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment. DEGs were quantified at false discovery rate threshold (FDR) of 0.001 and log2 (fold change) larger than 2. Total DEGs for each comparison are shown in parenthesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. Heat map of all differentially expressed genes in Kentucky bluegrass.

‘CK’ means well-watered control plants without ethephon pre-treatment. ‘Drought’ means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ‘ETH_D’ means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g006

A total of 24,465 genes were either up- or down-regulated when comparing drought stressed to well-watered control plants (Fig 5A). Gene ontology (GO) and enrichment analysis identified 2877 biological processes, 1422 molecular functions, and 622 cellular components (Fig 7A). A total of 3,890 genes were either up- or down-regulated when comparing ETH primed drought stressed to well-watered control plants (Fig 5A). Gene ontology (GO) and enrichment analysis identified 1892 biological processes, 863 molecular functions, and 404 cellular components (Fig 7B).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Enriched GO terms.

A. Drought vs CK; B. ETH_D vs CK. ‘CK’ means well-watered control plants without ethephon pre-treatment. ‘Drought’ means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ‘ETH_D’ means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g007

It seemed that ETH treatment help plants dealing with drought by regulating muchlesser genes (3,890 vs 24,465) (Fig 5A). Therefore, only the genes most relevant to drought stress and ETH application are focused on the discussion part.

3.4 qRT-PCR validation of RNA-Seq results

Eight differentially expressed genes were randomly selected, including four genes from CK. (c111268_g1, c145507_g1, c117236_g1, c119413_g2) and four genes from ETH_D (c145664_g1, c128115_g1, c135104_g1, c93924_g1). Results showed that these genes used for qRT-PCR were all consistent with the RNA-Seq results (Pearson’s r = 0.98, P <0.001, Fig 8) (see S5 Data for data used to calculate the qRT-PCR validation of RNA-Seq).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Validation of DEGs data by qRT-PCR.

‘CK’ means well-watered control plants without ethephon pre-treatment. ‘Drought’ means drought-stressed plants without ethephon application. ‘ETH_D’ means drought-stressed plants with ethephon pre-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g008

3.5 Differentially expressed genes due to drought and ETH

Drought caused extensive gene expression changes while drought and ETH caused less gene expression changes in Kentucky bluegrass plants, which indicated that ETH help plants coping with drought by mediating the regulation of fewer genes in response to drought. Therefore, in order to find the genes only regulated by ETH under drought stress, DEGs of these two comparisons [(ETH_D vs CK) vs (Drought vs CK)] were compared. Results showed 5.8% (123 out of 2105) of the transcripts were up-regulated (Fig 5B) and 2.5% (44 out of 1785) were down-regulated (Fig 5C) (DEGs up-regulated and down-regulated of [(ETH_D vs CK) vs (Drought vs CK)] were listed in S6 and S7 Data respectively). The mechanism of ethephon on drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass was analyzed by identifying DEGs involved in [(ETH_D vs CK) vs (Drought vs CK)] (Fig 9).

thumbnail
Fig 9. The mechanism for how ethephon regulates drought response and improves drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass.

The gene in red indicates that the gene is up-regulated and the gene in green indicates that the gene is down-regulated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.g009

3.5.1 Plant hormone, signal transduction and plant defense.

Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) family are conservatively widespread in the plant kingdom. Although the original acronym ERF, Ethylene-responsive transcription factor, has been maintained, responsiveness to the growth regulator ethylene is not a universal feature of this protein superfamily [37]. Two ERF genes were up regulated by ETH under drought in our study, ERF113 (2.3 fold) and ERF115 (2.4 fold). ERF113, also known as RELATED TO APETALA2.6L (RAP2.6L) in Arabidopsis, is induced by salt stress and drought [38, 39]. Additionally, ERF113 transcription is responsive to JA, salicylic acid, ABA and ethylene [39]. Correspondingly, ERF113 overexpression confers resistance to stresses that activate these hormones. For instance, overexpression of ERF113 triggers stomatal closure and enhances waterlogging tolerance [40]. In addition to the response to hormonal cues, ERF113 activity can further be linked to developmental processes, such as shoot regeneration from root explants and ovule development [41]. ERF113 also has a role in promoting cell division that is induced by wounding [38, 42]. ERF115 drives the quiescent center (QC) cell division in a brassinosteroid-dependent way but is restrained through proteolysis by ubiquitin ligase. The QC plays an essential role during root development by creating a microenvironment that preserves the stem cell fate of its surrounding cells. Maintaining a stem cell subpopulation that is used to replace damaged stem cells might represent a general mechanism to maintain a functional stem cell niche under stress conditions [43].

It is well known that phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) plays important roles not only as a precursor lipid for generating second messengers but also as a regulator of cytoskeletal re-organization [44]. Recent examples of ion channel regulation by PI(4,5)P2 have been recently reported in plants. Since PI(4,5)P2 is mostly found in the plasma membrane, PI(4,5)P2 dependence is thought to restrict channel/transporter activity into this compartment and is important for stomatal opening [45]. As for the metabolizing pathways of PI(4,5)P2, there are three possible routes. One is conversion to PI(3,4,5)P3 by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Second is hydrolysis to I(1,4,5)P3 and diacylglycerol by phospholipase C (PLC). Third is hydrolysis by PI(4,5)P2 phosphatase to PI(4)P [46]. Thus, PI(4,5)P2 levels are regulated by a balance of these metabolizing enzymes and synthesizing enzymes [47]. Type II PI(4,5)P2 phosphatase (Transmembrane protein 55A, 4.7 fold) is involved in the third PI(4,5)P2 metabolizing route: dephosphorylating the D4 position of PI(4,5)P2. Therefore, up regulation of this gene might decreased content of PI(4,5)P2 which may assist plant drought adaptation through stomata closure, ion channels activity and other transduction pathways involving second messengers derived from PI(4,5)P2 [48].

Transcript of a remorin gene (c103095_g1, Inf) was only detected in drought-stressed plants with ETH pre-treatment. This protein was named remorin due to its hydrophilic profile and its ability to attach to plasma membrane [49]. They probably facilitate cellular signal transduction by direct interaction with signaling proteins such as receptor-like kinases and may dynamically modulate their lateral segregation within plasma membranes [50]. The diverse and precise biological roles of different remorins remain to be investigated. However, the absence of remorins in algae, but their presence in mosses, ferns, and higher plants, suggests that the emergence of remorins coincided with the colonization of land and dealing with adverse drought and other osmotic stressed conditions [51, 52]. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressed heterologous remorin gene from mulberry [53] or foxtail millet (Setaria italica) [49] showed improved tolerance to abiotic stress including dehydration and salinity. How ETH treatment regulated remorin gene in response to drought is not clear. Yue et al. [49] reported that there is an DRE core elements in the promoter region of foxtail millet remorin gene 6 (SiREM6). One ABA responsive DREB transcription factor can bind to the DRE core elements. These results together suggest that ETH treatment might promote gene expression of remorin gene during drought stress in an ABA dependent signal transduction pathway.

Plant defensin (c126749_g1) gene is up regulated in ETH pre-treated Kentucky bluegrass plants under drought stressed conditions (2.7 fold). Plant defensins are small, highly stable, cysteine-rich peptides and they constitute an important part of the innate immune system primarily against fungal pathogens [54, 55]. In addition to their role in biotic response, plant defensin also has potential in inducing abiotic stress tolerance. Many reports revealed that plant defensin is also up regulated by salicylic acid, abscisic acid, ethephon and wounding [5658]. Therefore, under drought stress conditions ethephon may up-regulate defensin expression to induce drought tolerance.

3.5.2 Protein degradation and stabilization.

A few genes associated with protein degradation and stabilization were up-regulated by ETH and drought treatment. For instance, a gene encoding chaperone protein ClpD1 (3.7 fold) was up-regulated in ETH treated plants under drought. ClpD1 may interact with a ClpP-like protease involved in degradation of denatured proteins in the chloroplast [59]. Previous studies revealed that ClpD1 plays a positive role during dehydration and salt stress [59, 60]. Ubiquitin (1.7817 fold) was also up-regulated by ETH under drought. The major function of ubiquitin is to facilitate protein degradation as an important component of the ubiquitin 26S proteasome system (UPS) in plant responses to abiotic stresses [61]. Proteasome activator pa28 beta subunit gene (1.8587 fold) was up regulated by ETH under drought. PA28 are activators that bind to proteasomes and stimulate the hydrolysis of peptides [62, 63]. Proteins of these up-regulated genes might perform an important role of removing potentially toxic proteins and misfolded or oxidized proteins that may accumulate as a result of exposure to drought stress. However, a cysteine proteinase inhibitor gene (1.74 fold) was up-regulated by ETH under drought. Cysteine proteases play an essential role in plant growth and development but also in senescence and programmed cell death [64]. They are among the plant proteases and are increased in their activity following stress [65, 66]. If the activity of the cysteine proteinases is too high, proteins required for metabolic processes degraded rapidly due to proteolysis [67]. It is therefore of great importance that the activity of the cysteine proteinases are accurately controlled in order to cope with drought. This is achieved, possibly through up regulation of cysteine proteinase inhibitor. Previous transgenic studies confirmed that cysteine proteinase inhibitor played active role in response to stress including drought [6769].

3.5.3 Transportation and osmosis.

ARFs confers tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plant species [70]. Overexpression of an adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation factor gene from the halophytic grass Spartina alterniflora confers salinity and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [71]. Ectopic expression of ADP ribosylation factor 1 (SaARF1) from smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora Loisel) confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic rice and Arabidopsis [72]. ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein (ARL) (Inf) (If the normalized readcounts of one particular gene in one sample is 0 and not 0 in another sample, fold change would be Inf or -Inf) belong to Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins (GTPases). ARLs were identified on the basis of their sequence similarity with ARFs. GTP-binding has been shown for most ARL proteins, but all ARLs are essentially devoid of GTPase activity and activities described for ARF isotypes. Some ARLs appear to be involved in the regulation of protein and/or vesicle transport between cell organelles (ARL1, ARL4) or in the regulation of enzymatic activities controlling these processes (Arfrp1). In potato (Solanum tuberosum), six clones of ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein were up-regulated by salt treatment [73]. Gene expression induction of ARL in ETH treated plants under drought might facilitate the plants for higher exchange rates of ions, proteins and other molecules by protein and/or vesicle transport pathway.

Amino acids are essential components of plant metabolism, not only as constituents of proteins, but also as precursors of important secondary metabolites and as carriers of organic nitrogen between the organs of the plant. Transport across intracellular membranes and translocation of amino acids within the plant are mediated by membrane amino acid transporters. However, the substrate selectivity and affinity of membrane amino acid transporters are generally different. Amino acid transport also plays a key role in leaf senescence and seed germination. Clearly, amino acid transport is a fundamental activity in plant growth [74]. A putative amino acid permease (AAP, 4.6 fold) was identified in ETH treated drought stressed plants. AAP is a family of amino acid transporters that preferentially transport glutamine, asparagine, glutamate, and neutral amino acids into plant cells [75]. GABA is a key regulator of ion channels in plants and animals [76]. Abiotic stresses including salt, anoxia, hypoxia, heat, mechanical damages, drought, cold, and waterlogging drive GABA accumulation in plants [77]. Vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) belongs to solute carrier family 32 (vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter) [78]. We identified a VGAT like protein (5.3 fold) regulated by ETH and drought in Kentucky bluegrass. The VGAT is known as the amino acid/auxin permease superfamily [79]. Two genes with low similarity to a vesicular GABA transporter, potentially functioning in cellular transport processes were also found to be commonly up-regulated in response to cellular water deficit in Arabidopsis [80]. It is possible that up-regulation of these amino acid transporters might be involved in amino acid-based osmotic regulation under drought in response to ETH treatment.

Sulfur plays a pivotal role in plant metabolism and development. Evidence is emerging that a number of non-protein and protein thiols, together with a network of sulphur-containing molecules and related compounds, also fundamentally contribute to plant stress tolerance [81]. A serine acetyltransferase like protein (SERAT like, 4.6 fold) and a probable thiol methyltransferase 2 (2.6 fold) were up regulated by ETH and drought. Cysteine (Cys), as the first organic-reduced sulfur compound, contributes not only to life as building blocks in proteins, but it also serves as a precursor for the synthesis of Methionine (Met), glutathione (GSH), cofactors, essential vitamins, sulfur esters, and other sulfur derivatives. Cys synthesis is catalyzed by the sequential action of SERAT and O-acetylserine (thiol)lyase (OASTL), links Ser metabolism to Cys biosynthesis [82]. Overexpressing of bacterial SERAT in transgenic tobacco plants lead to increased resistance to oxidative stress [83]. Sulfite exporter TauE/SafE family gene (2.5 fold) were involved in regulation of plant-type hypersensitive response and they were defense-related and enriched with clock regulatory elements [84]. The proteins are involved in the transport of anions across the cytoplasmic membrane during taurine metabolism as an exporter of sulfoacetate [85]. Sulfite exporter TauE/SafE gene was also up-regulated in drought-stressed P. euphratica leaves [86].

Biopterin transporter (BT1 family, transmembrane protein, 4.1 fold, PFAM ID PF03092) belongs to the folate-biopterin transporter (FBT) family [87]. Folates take part in virtually every aspect of plant physiology. They play a role of donors and acceptors of one-carbon groups in one-carbon transfer reactions that take part in formation of numerous important biomolecules, such as nucleic acids, panthothenate (vitamin B5), amino acids [88]. The role of folates in plant stress response are also important. Folate supplementation was demonstrated to improve plant biotic stress resistance. Moreover, folate metabolism was shown to be differentially regulated in response to various abiotic stress conditions that pointed out its importance and possible specific adjustment in response to different stresses. Altogether these findings indicate that physiological roles and regulation of folate metabolism during development and stress response are important elements to be considered in the pursuit of crops with better productivity and improved stress tolerance [88]. Folate/biopterin transporter gene was induced by 48-h rehydration and inhibited by drought stress in shoot and panicle of rice (Oryza sativa) [89]. BT1 is also induced by Nitro-Linolenic Acid which plays strong signaling role in the defense mechanism against different abiotic-stress situations in Arabidopsis [90].

3.5.4 Antioxidant system and the glyoxalase pathway.

Oxidative stress is one of the common consequences of abiotic stress including drought in plants, which is caused by excess generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). SRG1 protein (c127636_g2, 2.3 fold), senescence-related gene, is a new member of the Fe(II)/ascorbate oxidase superfamily and SRG1 protein detoxify reactive oxygen produced during the oxidative stress induced by drought. It is revealed that SRG1 homolog gene in potato putatively contributes to potato drought tolerance [91]. SRG1 is regulated by WRKY transcription factors and involved in defense signaling pathways in Arabidopsis [92]. Therefore, up regulation of SRG1 protein by ETH might help improving ROS scavenging ability of Kentucky bluegrass under drought.

In line with ROS, plants also produce a high amount of methylglyoxal (MG) in response to various abiotic stresses, which is highly reactive and cytotoxic. MG and ROS accumulation results in an imbalance in different cellular metabolic processes. The glyoxalase pathway acts to control excessive accumulation of MG and ROS in the system, either directly or in cooperation with other pathways involved in stress response [93, 94]. In addition, transgenic approaches in various plant models also have demonstrated the ability of glyoxalases in imparting abiotic stress tolerance [95, 96]. Therefore, we propose that up regulation of glyoxalase (c124305_g1, 3.8 fold) by ETH might help Kentucky bluegrass plants detoxify MG and improve plants performance under drought.

Two proline dehydrogenase unigene (-2.3 and -2.6) catalyzes the first step in proline degradation and it is the rate-limiting enzyme in proline degradation [97]. Down regulation of proline dehydrogenase gene could lead to slower degradation of proline which would be an advantage [98].

3.5.5 Cell wall and cuticular wax.

During drought, it is important for plants that the cell wall is rigid enough to resist internal turgor pressure. The plant invertase/pectin methyl esterase inhibitor (PMEI, c133760_g1, 2.1 fold) inhibits demethylesterification of pectins by inhibition of endogenous PME, which keeps up highly methylated pectin [99]. Pectin, one of major components of the plant cell wall, has been shown to play a key role in modulating cell wall structure in response to drought stress [100, 101]. Degree of methylesterification of pectins related to interaction of PME and PMEI could affect mechanical properties of cell wall such as plasticity, extensibility, fluidity and thickening and those properties could enable adaptation and/or resistance to abiotic stress [102, 103]. In addition, pectin may play important roles in drought adaptation through modulating stomata movement [99, 104]. Our study suggested that inductions of PMEI expression provide beneficial effects in plants drought responses and this result was consistent with other studies [86, 105]. A reduced amount of pectin, coincided with an increase in firmness. Putative galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT, c121058_g1, -2.8 fold) are required for the synthesis of pectin [106, 107]. Expansins are cell wall proteins that are implicated in the control of cell extension via the disruption of hydrogen bonds between cellulose and matrix glucans. Since they function as cell wall-loosening proteins [108], down regulation of expansin (EXPB2, c139601_g1,-1.9 fold) by ETH may improve cell wall plasticity of plants during prolonged drought.

Cuticular wax has been implicated in defense mechanisms against biotic and abiotic stress including drought [109111], possibly because the waterproof cuticular wax can counteract non-stomatal water loss during periodic drying and drought stress [112]. Two genes contributing to cuticular wax synthesis were identified in ETH and drought treated Kentucky bluegrass plants, ECERIFERUM3 (CER3, c90612_g1, 2.5 fold) and WAX2 (c135869_g1, Inf). CER3 is important for cuticular wax synthesis [113]. WAX2 is involved in synthesis of leaf cuticular wax and also cutin composition [114, 115]. One plant non-specific lipid-transfer protein (nsLTP, c120612_g1, 2.6 fold) was also up regulated by ETH in Kentucky bluegrass under drought. Plant non-specific lipid-transfer protein form a protein family of small, basic proteins ubiquitously distributed throughout the plant kingdom [116]. The members of this family are located extracellularly, usually associated with plant cell walls, and possess a broad lipid-binding specificity [117]. Plenty of studies reported that nsLTP genes played important roles in plants’ drought responses. For example, three nsLTPs genes are drought inducible in tomato [118] and one sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid complex) NsLTPs gene was up-regulated by PEG-simulated drought [119]. Over expression of nsLTP gene from Setaria italic in tobacco resulted in higher levels drought tolerance compared to wild type plants [120]. Similarly, enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic potato plants over-expressing non-specific lipid transfer protein-1 (STnsLTP1) was also observed [121]. While the mechanisms remain elucidated, one possible role of LTP in elevating drought tolerance is to promote cuticle deposition [117, 122].

3.5.6 Fatty acid unsaturation.

Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT, 2.9 fold) catalyzes the transfer of an acyl group from an acyl donor to the sn-1 position of glycerol 3-phosphate. There are three types of GPAT in plant cells; they are localized in plastids (including chloroplasts), in the cytoplasm, and in mitochondria, respectively. Genetic engineering of the unsaturation of fatty acids has been achieved by manipulation of the cDNA for the GPAT found in chloroplasts and has allowed modification of the ability of tobacco to tolerate chilling temperatures [123]. Introduction of the cDNA for shape Arabidopsis glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) confers unsaturation of fatty acids and chilling tolerance of photosynthesis on rice [124]. Xu et al. [125] suggest that leaf dehydration tolerance and post-drought recovery in Kentucky bluegrass was associated with their ability to maintain relative higher proportion and level of unsaturated fatty acids. These studies together with ours suggested that higher expression of GPAT by ETH may lead to higher level of unsaturated fatty acids and therefore increased drought performance of ETH treated Kentucky bluegrass.

3.5.7 Photosynthesis.

Photosynthesis is one of the key processes to be affected by water deficits [126]. RbcS gene was down regulated under both drought (-5.5 fold) and ETH treated drought (-3.2 fold) conditions while down regulation of RbcL (-3.1 fold) was only detected in drought treated plants. This indicates CO2 assimilation in ETH treated plant might be less inhibited by drought. Proton-transporting ATP synthase complex, coupling factor F0 (-3.2068 fold) was only down regulated in ETH treated plants under drought. ATP synthase activity is strictly related to photosynthesis because it transfers protons through the thylakoid membrane. Decrease expression of ATP synthase complex coupling factor F0 may protect the photosynthetic apparatus from photo-damage by mediating non-photochemical quenching [127]. In addition, decreased ATP under low RWC impairs protein synthesis, through inadequate energy supply, but may increase some types of proteins, e.g. molecular chaperones, because their production is regulated in different ways.

Three up-regulated DEGs (ETH_D vs Drought) related to Photosystem II and electron transport were found in our study, cytochrome b559, plastocyanin like protein and Photosystem II reaction centre N protein (PsbN). Cytochrome b559 [alpha (gene psbE) and beta (gene psbF) subunits (2.9 fold)] is an essential component of photosystem II, catalyzing photosynthetic oxygen evolution [128]. Cytochrome b559 also plays a significant protective role for Photosystem II against photo inhibition during drought stress [129132]. Plastocyanin like protein (3.1 fold) is involved in electron transport and it is responsive to drought both in barley and cassava [133, 134]. PsbN (2.8 fold) is required for hetero-dimerization of PSII reaction center in the stroma lamellae, and is required for early PSII assembly and repair [135, 136]. In summary, ETH pre-treatment might help plants maintain higher O2 evolution rate under drought and protect photosystem from photo-damages.

4. Conclusion

Ethephon could improve the drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by elevating RWC and decreasing MDA under drought. On a whole transcriptome level, ethephon application affected genes associated with plant hormone, signal transduction pathway, plant defense, protein degradation and stabilization, transportation, osmosis, antioxidant system, the glyoxalase pathway, cell wall, cuticular wax, fatty acid unsaturation and photosynthesis of Kentucky bluegrass under drought stress. Genes mentioned in the discussion may be beneficial to better understand the mechanism of ethephon affecting plants stress responses.

Supporting information

S2 Data. Summary of sequencing data quality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.s002

(XLS)

S3 Data. Frequency distribution of splicing transcript length.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.s003

(XLSX)

S5 Data. qRT-PCR validation of RNA-Seq results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.s005

(XLSX)

S6 Data. Up-regulated DEGs annotation of (ETH_D vs CK) vs (Drought vs CK).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.s006

(XLS)

S7 Data. Down-regulated DEGs annotation of (ETH_D vs CK) vs (Drought vs CK).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261472.s007

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors wanted to express thanks to Yinan Sun working at Beijing Forestry University for drawing the Kentucky bluegrass in Fig 9.

References

  1. 1. Rao DE, Chaitanya KV. Photosynthesis and antioxidative defense mechanisms in deciphering drought stress tolerance of crop plants. Biol Plant. 2016;60:201–218.
  2. 2. Xu L, Yu J, Han L, Huang B. Photosynthetic enzyme activities and gene expression associated with drought tolerance and post-drought recovery in Kentucky bluegrass. Environ Exp Bot. 2013;89:28–35.
  3. 3. Saud S, Yajun C, Fahad S, Hussain S, Na L, Xin L, et al. Silicate application increases the photosynthesis and its associated metabolic activities in Kentucky bluegrass under drought stress and post-drought recovery. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:17647–17655. pmid:27236444
  4. 4. Saud S, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang L, Fahad S, Hussain S, et al. Silicon application increases drought tolerance of kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morphophysiological functions. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:368694. pmid:25054178
  5. 5. Fang Y, Xiong L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:673–89. pmid:25336153
  6. 6. Alonso JM, Hirayama T, Roman G, Nourizadeh S, Ecker JR. EIN2, a Bifunctional Transducer of Ethylene and Stress Responses in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;284:2148–52. pmid:10381874
  7. 7. Yang L, Zu Y, Tang Z. Ethylene improves Arabidopsis salt tolerance mainly via retaining K + in shoots and roots rather than decreasing tissue Na + content. Environ Exp Bot. 2013;86: 60–69.
  8. 8. Maruthasalam S, Shiu LY, Loganathan M, Lien WC, Liu YL, Sun CM, et al. Forced flowering of pineapple (Ananas comosus cv. Tainon 17) in response to cold stress, ethephon and calcium carbide with or without activated charcoal. Plant Growth Regul. 2010;60:83–90.
  9. 9. Han L, Han L, Xu L. Effects of Ethephon Treatment on Plant Drought Tolerance. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2013;21:631–636.
  10. 10. Yu H, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Wang Y, Duan L, Zhang M, et al. Ethephon improved drought tolerance in maize seedlings by modulating cuticular wax biosynthesis and membrane stability. J Plant Physiol. 2017;214:123–133. pmid:28482333
  11. 11. Wan L, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Quan R, Zhou S, et al. Transcriptional activation of OsDERF1 in OsERF3 and OsAP2-39 negatively modulates ethylene synthesis and drought tolerance in rice. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25216. pmid:21966459
  12. 12. Cui M, Lin Y, Zu Y, Efferth T, Li D, Tang Z. Ethylene increases accumulation of compatible solutes and decreases oxidative stress to improve plant tolerance to water stress in Arabidopsis. J Plant Biol. 2015;58:193–201.
  13. 13. Zhang N, Han L, Xu L, Zhang X. Ethephon Seed Treatment Impacts on Drought Tolerance of Kentucky Bluegrass Seedlings. Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2018;28:319–326.
  14. 14. Han L. Effects of ethephon treatment on drought resistance of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), scholarly journal. M,Sc. Thesi, Beijing Forestry University. 2014. https://kreader.cnki.net/Kreader/CatalogViewPage.aspx?dbCode=CMFD&filename=1014327631.nh&tablename=CMFD201402&compose=&first=1&uid=.
  15. 15. Zhou J, Chen S, Shi W, David-Schwartz R, Li S, Yang F, et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals the effects of drought tolerance in Giant Juncao. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:2. pmid:33390157
  16. 16. Moon KB, Ahn DJ, Park JS, Jung WY, Cho HS, Kim HR, et al. Transcriptome Profiling and Characterization of Drought-Tolerant Potato Plant (Solanum tuberosum L.). Mol Cells. 2018;41:979–992. pmid:30396236
  17. 17. Yao T, Zhang J, Xie M, Yuan G, Tschaplinski TJ, Muchero W, et al. Transcriptional Regulation of Drought Response in Arabidopsis and Woody Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:572137. pmid:33488639
  18. 18. Dong Y, Fan G, Zhao Z, Deng M. Transcriptome expression profiling in response to drought stress in Paulownia australis. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:4583–607. pmid:24642880
  19. 19. Dombrowski JE, Kronmiller BA, Hollenbeck VG, Rhodes AC, Henning JA, Martin RC. Transcriptome analysis of the model grass Lolium temulentum exposed to green leaf volatiles. BMC Surg. 2019;19:222–238. pmid:31138172
  20. 20. Qiao D, Zhang Y, Xiong X, Li M, Cai K, Luo H, et al. Transcriptome analysis on responses of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) leaves to a short term flooding. Hereditas. 2020;157:20–35. pmid:32418541
  21. 21. Ma Y, Shukla V, Merewitz EB. Transcriptome analysis of creeping bentgrass exposed to drought stress and polyamine treatment. PLoS One. 2017;12:e175848. pmid:28445484
  22. 22. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52. pmid:21572440
  23. 23. Ha J, Kang YG, Lee T, Kim M, Yoon MY, Lee E, et al. Comprehensive RNA sequencing and co-expression network analysis to complete the biosynthetic pathway of coumestrol, a phytoestrogen. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:1934. pmid:30760815
  24. 24. Xu Z, Peters R, Weirather J, Luo H, Liao B, Xin Zhang, et al. Full-length transcriptome sequences and splice variants obtained by a combination of sequencing platforms applied to different root tissues of Salvia miltiorrhiza and tanshinone biosynthesis. The Plant Journal. 2015;82: 951–961. pmid:25912611
  25. 25. Zhang R, Ma X, Zhu R, Niu K, Zhao C, Ma H. Metabolic Pathway and Transcriptional Regulation of Qinghai Wild Poa pratensis in Response to Drought Stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2020;28:1508–1518.
  26. 26. Leng N, Liu X, Zhang N, Xu L. Differential gene analysis of Poa pratensis in response to drought stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica. 2017;26:128–137.
  27. 27. DaCosta M, Huang B. Changes in Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and Lipid Peroxidation for Bentgrass Species in Response to Drought Stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2007;132:319–326.
  28. 28. Kuk YI, Shin JS, Burgos NR, Hwang TE, Han O, Cho BO, et al. Antioxidative enzymes offer protection from chilling damage in rice plants. Crop Sci. 2003;43: 2109–2117.
  29. 29. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. pmid:21816040
  30. 30. Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:136–8. pmid:19855105
  31. 31. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
  32. 32. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14. pmid:20132535
  33. 33. Rao X, Huang X, Zhou Z, Lin X. An improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat Bioinforma Biomath. 2013;3:71–85. pmid:25558171
  34. 34. Hu L, Wang Z, Huang B. Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors associated with inhibition and recovery of photosynthesis from drought stress in a C3 perennial grass species. Physiol Plant. 2010;139:93–106. pmid:20070869
  35. 35. Han H, Bai L, Su J, Zhang J, Song L, Gao A, et al. Genetic rearrangements of six wheat—agropyron cristatum 6P addition lines revealed by molecular markers. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e91066. pmid:24595330
  36. 36. Fu J, Huang B. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2001;45:105–114. pmid:11275219
  37. 37. Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P. APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013;199:639–49. pmid:24010138
  38. 38. Heyman J, Canher B, Bisht A, Christiaens F, De Veylder L. Emerging role of the plant ERF transcription factors in coordinating wound defense responses and repair. J Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs208215. pmid:29242229.
  39. 39. Krishnaswamy S, Verma S, Rahman MH, Kav NNV. Functional characterization of four APETALA2-family genes (RAP2.6, RAP2.6L, DREB19 and DREB26) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 2011;75:107–127. pmid:21069430
  40. 40. Liu P, Sun F, Gao R, Dong H. RAP2.6L overexpression delays waterlogging induced premature senescence by increasing stomatal closure more than antioxidant enzyme activity. Plant Mol Biol. 2012;79:609–22. pmid:22661072
  41. 41. Che P, Lall S, Nettleton D, Howell SH. Gene Expression Programs during Shoot, Root, and Callus Development in Arabidopsis Tissue Culture. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:620–637. pmid:16648215
  42. 42. Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Rymen B, Lambolez A, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, et al. Wounding Triggers Callus Formation via Dynamic Hormonal and Transcriptional Changes. Plant Physiol. 2017;175:1158–1174. pmid:28904073
  43. 43. Heyman J, Cools T, Vandenbussche F, Heyndrickx KS, Van Leene J, Vercauteren I, et al. ERF115 controls root quiescent center cell division and stem cell replenishment. Science. 2013;342:860–3. pmid:24158907
  44. 44. Ungewickell A, Hugge C, Kisseleva M, Chang SC, Zou J, Feng Y, et al. The identification and characterization of two phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 4-phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:18854–9. pmid:16365287
  45. 45. Delage E, Puyaubert J, Zachowski A, Ruelland E. Signal transduction pathways involving phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate: convergences and divergences among eukaryotic kingdoms. Prog Lipid Res. 2013;52:1–14. pmid:22981911
  46. 46. Clarke JH, Wang M, Irvine RF. Localization, regulation and function of type II phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinases. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2010;50:12–18. pmid:19896968
  47. 47. Takenawa T, Itoh T, Fukami K. Regulation of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels and its roles in cytoskeletal re-organization and malignant transformation. Chem Phys Lipids. 1999;98:13–22. pmid:10358924
  48. 48. Alonso A, Nunes-Xavier CE, Bayón Y, Pulido R. The Extended Family of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases. In: Pulido R. (eds) Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases. Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana Press, New York, NY. 2016;1447:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3746-2_1 pmid:27514797
  49. 49. Yue J, Li C, Liu Y, Yu J. A remorin gene SiREM6, the target gene of SiARDP, from foxtail millet (Setaria italica) promotes high salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100772. pmid:24967625
  50. 50. Marín M, Ott T. Phosphorylation of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Remorin Proteins. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:86. pmid:22639670
  51. 51. Jarsch IK, Ott T. Perspectives on remorin proteins, membrane rafts, and their role during plant-microbe interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24: 7–12. pmid:21138374
  52. 52. Raffaele S, Mongrand S, Gamas P, Niebel A, Ott T. Genome-Wide Annotation of Remorins, a Plant-Specific Protein Family: Evolutionary and Functional Perspectives. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:593–600. pmid:17984200
  53. 53. Checker VG, Khurana P. Molecular and functional characterization of mulberry EST encoding remorin (MiREM) involved in abiotic stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2013;32:1729–41. pmid:23942844
  54. 54. Parisi K, Shafee TMA, Quimbar P, van der Weerden NL, Bleackley MR, Anderson MA. The evolution, function and mechanisms of action for plant defensins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;88:107–118. pmid:29432955
  55. 55. Shafee TMA, Lay FT, Phan TK, Anderson MA, Hulett MD. Convergent evolution of defensin sequence, structure and function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:663–682. pmid:27557668
  56. 56. George S, Manoharan D, Li J, Britton M, Parida A. Drought and salt stress in Macrotyloma uniflorum leads to common and specific transcriptomic responses and reveals importance of raffinose family oligosaccharides in stress tolerance. Gene Rep. 2018;10:7–16.
  57. 57. Do H, Lee SC, Jung HW, Sohn KH, Hwang B. Differential expression and in situ localization of a pepper defensin (CADEF1) gene in response to pathogen infection, abiotic elicitors and environmental stresses in Capsicum annuum. Plant Sci. 2004;166:1297–1305.
  58. 58. Swathi AT, Jami SK, Kirti PB. A Defensin Gene of Indian Mustard is Stress Induced. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;18:221–224.
  59. 59. Mishra RC, Richa Grover A. Constitutive over-expression of rice ClpD1 protein enhances tolerance to salt and desiccation stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Sci. 2016;250:69–78. pmid:27457985
  60. 60. Wu Y, Mirzaei M, Pascovici D, Chick JM, Atwell BJ, Haynes PA. Quantitative proteomic analysis of two different rice varieties reveals that drought tolerance is correlated with reduced abundance of photosynthetic machinery and increased abundance of ClpD1 protease. J Proteomics. 2016;143:73–82. pmid:27195813
  61. 61. Lyzenga WJ, Stone SL. Abiotic stress tolerance mediated by protein ubiquitination. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:599–616. pmid:22016431
  62. 62. Li J, Powell SR, Wang X. Enhancement of proteasome function by PA28α overexpression protects against oxidative stress. FASEB J, 2010;25:883–893. pmid:21098724
  63. 63. Rechsteiner M, Hill CP. Mobilizing the proteolytic machine: cell biological roles of proteasome activators and inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:27–33. pmid:15653075
  64. 64. Solomon M, Belenghi B, Delledonne M, Menachem E, Levine A. The involvement of cysteine proteases and protease inhibitor genes in the regulation of programmed cell death in plants. Plant Cell. 1999;11:431–444. pmid:10072402
  65. 65. Grudkowska M, Zagdanska B. Multifunctional role of plant cysteine proteinases. Acta Biochim Pol 2004;51:609–24. pmid:15448724
  66. 66. Khanna-Chopra R, Srivalli B, Ahlawat YS. Drought induces many forms of cysteine proteases not observed during natural senescence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;255:324–7. pmid:10049707
  67. 67. Zhang X, Liu S, Takano T. Two cysteine proteinase inhibitors from Arabidopsis thaliana, AtCYSa and AtCYSb, increasing the salt, drought, oxidation and cold tolerance. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;68:131–43. pmid:18523728
  68. 68. Gutierrez-Campos R, Torres-Acosta JA, Saucedo-Arias LJ, Gomez-Lim MA. The use of cysteine proteinase inhibitors to engineer resistance against potyviruses in transgenic tobacco plants. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1223–6. pmid:10585723
  69. 69. Li R, Wang W, Wang W, Li F, Wang Q, Xu Y, et al. Overexpression of a cysteine proteinase inhibitor gene from Jatropha curcas confers enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2015;18:368–375.
  70. 70. Muthamilarasan M, Mangu VR, Zandkarimi H, Prasad M, Baisakh N. Structure, organization and evolution of ADP-ribosylation factors in rice and foxtail millet, and their expression in rice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24008. pmid:27097755
  71. 71. Karan R, Subudhi PK. Overexpression of an adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation factor gene from the halophytic grass Spartina alterniflora confers salinity and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:373–84. pmid:24247851
  72. 72. Joshi R, Ramanarao MV, Lee S, Kato N, Baisakh N. Ectopic expression of ADP ribosylation factor 1 (SaARF1) from smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora Loisel) confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2014;117: 17–30
  73. 73. Kim DY, Lee HE., Yi KW, Han SE, Kwon HB, Go SJ, et al. Expression pattern of potato (Solanum tuberosum) genes under cold stress by using cDNA microarray. KOREAN J GENETIC. 2003;25:345–352.
  74. 74. Pratelli R, Pilot G. Regulation of amino acid metabolic enzymes and transporters in plants. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5535–5556. pmid:25114014
  75. 75. Tegeder M. Transporters for amino acids in plant cells: some functions and many unknowns. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15:315–21. pmid:22366488
  76. 76. Ramesh SA, Tyerman SD, Gilliham M, Xu B. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:1577–1603. pmid:27838745
  77. 77. Shelp BJ, Bozzo GG, Trobacher CP, Zarei A, Deyman KL, Brikis CJ. Hypothesis/review: contribution of putrescine to 4-aminobutyrate (GABA) production in response to abiotic stress. Plant Sci. 2012;193–194:130–135. pmid:22794926
  78. 78. Sundberg BE, Wååg E, Jacobsson JA, Stephansson O, Rumaks J, Svirskis S, et al. The evolutionary history and tissue mapping of amino acid transporters belonging to solute carrier families SLC32, SLC36, and SLC38. J Mol Neurosci. 2008;35:179–93. pmid:18418736
  79. 79. Gasnier B. The SLC32 transporter, a key protein for the synaptic release of inhibitory amino acids. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:756–759. pmid:12750892
  80. 80. Bray EA. Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:2331–2341. pmid:15448178
  81. 81. Zagorchev L, Seal CE, Kranner I, Odjakova M. A Central Role for Thiols in Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:7405–7432. pmid:23549272
  82. 82. Watanabe M, Mochida K, Kato T, Tabata S, Yoshimoto N, Noji M, et al. Comparative genomics and reverse genetics analysis reveal indispensable functions of the serine acetyltransferase gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2484–96. pmid:18776059
  83. 83. Blaszczyk A, Brodzik R, Sirko A. Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing bacterial serine acetyltransferase. Plant J. 1999;20:237–43. pmid:10571883
  84. 84. Sharma M, Bhatt D. The circadian clock and defence signalling in plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16:210–8. pmid:25081907
  85. 85. Weinitschke S, Denger K, Cook AM, Smits THM. The DUF81 protein TauE in Cupriavidus necator H16, a sulfite exporter in the metabolism of C2 sulfonates. Microbiology (Reading). 2007;153:3055–3060. pmid:17768248
  86. 86. Tang S, Liang H, Yan D, Zhao Y, Han X, Carlson JE, et al. Populus euphratica: the transcriptomic response to drought stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;83:539–57. pmid:23857471
  87. 87. Klaus SM, Kunji ER, Bozzo GG, Noiriel A, de la Garza RD, Basset GJ, et al. Higher plant plastids and cyanobacteria have folate carriers related to those of trypanosomatids. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:38457–38463. pmid:16162503
  88. 88. Gorelova V, Ambach L, Rébeillé F, Stove C, Van Der Straeten D. Folates in Plants: Research Advances and Progress in Crop Biofortification. Front Chem. 2017;5:21. pmid:28424769
  89. 89. Zhou J, Wang X, Jiao Y, Qin Y, Liu X, He K, et al. Global genome expression analysis of rice in response to drought and high-salinity stresses in shoot, flag leaf, and panicle. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;63:591–608. pmid:17225073
  90. 90. Mata-Pérez C, Sánchez-Calvo B, Padilla MN, Begara-Morales JC, Luque F, Melguizo M, et al. Nitro-Fatty Acids in Plant Signaling: Nitro-Linolenic Acid Induces the Molecular Chaperone Network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016;170:686–701. pmid:26628746
  91. 91. Schafleitner R, Gutierrez Rosales RO, Gaudin A, Alvarado Aliaga CA, Martinez GN, Tincopa Marca LR, et al. Capturing candidate drought tolerance traits in two native Andean potato clones by transcription profiling of field grown plants under water stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2007;45:673–90. pmid:17764965
  92. 92. Ulker B, Shahid Mukhtar M, Somssich IE. The WRKY70 transcription factor of Arabidopsis influences both the plant senescence and defense signaling pathways. Planta. 2007;226:125–37. pmid:17310369
  93. 93. Hasan MR, Ghosh A, Kaur C, Pareek A, Singla-Pareek SL. Glyoxalase Pathway and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. In: Hossain M., Wani S., Bhattacharjee S., Burritt D., Tran LS. (eds) Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; 2016. pp. 379–399.
  94. 94. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Hossain MS, Mahmud JA, Rahman A, Inafuku M, et al. Coordinated Actions of Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems in Conferring Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:200. pmid:28117669
  95. 95. Gupta BK, Sahoo KK, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, Anwar K, Das P, et al. Manipulation of glyoxalase pathway confers tolerance to multiple stresses in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:1186–1200. pmid:28425127
  96. 96. Sankaranarayanan S, Jamshed M, Kumar A, Skori L, Scandola S, Wang T, et al. Glyoxalase Goes Green: The Expanding Roles of Glyoxalase in Plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:898. pmid:28441779
  97. 97. Funck D, Eckard S, Müller G. Non-redundant functions of two proline dehydrogenase isoforms in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:70. pmid:20403182
  98. 98. Cecchini NM, Monteoliva MI, Alvarez ME. Proline dehydrogenase contributes to pathogen defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2011;155:1947–1959. pmid:21311034
  99. 99. Huang Y, Wu H, Wang Y, Liu C, Lin C, Luo D, et al. PECTIN METHYLESTERASE34 contributes to Heat tolerance through its role in promoting stomatal movement. Plant Physiology. 2017;174:748–763. pmid:28381503
  100. 100. Cosgrove DJ. Plant cell wall extensibility: connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall-modifying enzymes. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:463–76. pmid:26608646
  101. 101. Willats WG, McCartney L, Mackie W, Knox JP. Pectin: cell biology and prospects for functional analysis. Plant Mol Biol. 2001;47:9–27. pmid:11554482
  102. 102. Le Gall H, Philippe F, Domon JM, Gillet F, Pelloux J, Rayon C. Cell Wall Metabolism in Response to Abiotic Stress. Plants (Basel). 2015;4:112–166. pmid:27135320
  103. 103. Tenhaken R. Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:771. pmid:25709610
  104. 104. Daszkowska-Golec A, Szarejko I. Open or close the gate—stomata action under the control of phytohormones in drought stress conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:138. pmid:23717320
  105. 105. An SH, Sohn KH, Choi HW, Hwang IS, Lee SC, Hwang BK. Pepper pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein CaPMEI1 is required for antifungal activity, basal disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Planta. 2008;228:61–78. pmid:18327607
  106. 106. Atmodjo MA, Sakuragi Y, Zhu X, Burrell AJ, Mohanty SS, Atwood JA 3rd, et al. Galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT)1 and GAUT7 are the core of a plant cell wall pectin biosynthetic homogalacturonan:galacturonosyltransferase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:20225–30. pmid:22135470
  107. 107. Sterling JD, Atmodjo MA, Inwood SE, Kumar Kolli VS, Quigley HF, Hahn MG, et al. Functional identification of an Arabidopsis pectin biosynthetic homogalacturonan galacturonosyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5236–41. pmid:16540543
  108. 108. Leucci MR, Lenucci MS, Piro G, Dalessandro G. Water stress and cell wall polysaccharides in the apical root zone of wheat cultivars varying in drought tolerance. J Plant Physiol. 2008;165:1168–1180. pmid:18155804
  109. 109. Karaba Aarati, Pereira Andy. Improvement of Water Use Efficiency in Rice and Tomato using Arabidopsis Wax Biosynthetic Genes and Transcription Factors, 2007.
  110. 110. Wang W, Liu X, Gai X, Ren J, Liu X, Cai Y, et al. Cucumis sativus L. WAX2 Plays a Pivotal Role in Wax Biosynthesis, Influencing Pollen Fertility and Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:1339–54. pmid:26023108
  111. 111. Xue D, Zhang X, Lu X, Chen G, Chen ZH. Molecular and Evolutionary Mechanisms of Cuticular Wax for Plant Drought Tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:621. pmid:28503179
  112. 112. Cameron KD, Teece MA, Smart LB. Increased Accumulation of Cuticular Wax and Expression of Lipid Transfer Protein in Response to Periodic Drying Events in Leaves of Tree Tobacco. Plant physiol. 2006;140:176–83. pmid:16361524
  113. 113. Rowland OR, Lee R, Franke R, Schreiber L, Kunst L. The CER3 wax biosynthetic gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is allelic to WAX2/YRE/FLP1. FEBS letters. 2007;581:3538–44. pmid:17624331
  114. 114. Chen X, Goodwin SM, Boroff VL, Liu X, Jenks MA. Cloning and characterization of the WAX2 gene of Arabidopsis involved in cuticle membrane and wax production. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1170–85. pmid:12724542
  115. 115. Mao B, Cheng Z, Lei C, Xu F, Gao S, Ren Y, et al. Wax crystal-sparse leaf2, a rice homologue of WAX2/GL1, is involved in synthesis of leaf cuticular wax. Planta, 2011;235: 39–52. pmid:21809091
  116. 116. Wei K, Zhong X. Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:281. pmid:25348423
  117. 117. Salcedo G, Sánchez-Monge R, Barber D, Díaz-Perales A. Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins: an interface between plant defence and human allergy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1771:781–91. pmid:17349819
  118. 118. Trevino MB, OConnell MA. Three drought-responsive members of the nonspecific lipid-transfer protein gene family in Lycopersicon pennellii show different developmental patterns of expression. Plant Physiol. 1998;116:1461–1468. pmid:9536064
  119. 119. Chen Y, Ma J, Zhang X, Yang Y, Zhou D, Yu Q, et al. A Novel Non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein Gene from Sugarcane (NsLTPs), Obviously Responded to Abiotic Stresses and Signaling Molecules of SA and MeJA. Sugar Tech. 2017;19:17–25.
  120. 120. Pan Y, Li J, Jiao L, Li C, Zhu D, Yu J. A Non-specific Setaria italica Lipid Transfer Protein Gene Plays a Critical Role under Abiotic Stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1752. pmid:27933075
  121. 121. Gangadhar BH, Sajeesh K, Venkatesh J, Baskar V, Abhinandan K, Yu JW, et al. Enhanced Tolerance of Transgenic Potato Plants Over-Expressing Non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein-1 (StnsLTP1) against Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1228. pmid:27597854
  122. 122. Pyee J, Yu H, Kolattukudy PE. Identification of a lipid transfer protein as the major protein in the surface wax of broccoli (Brassica oleracea) leaves. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;311:460–8. pmid:8203911
  123. 123. Murata N, Tasaka Y. Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1348:10–6. pmid:9370311
  124. 124. Yokoi S, Higashi SI, Kishitani S, Murata N, Toriyama K. Introduction of the cDNA for shape Arabidopsis glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) confers unsaturation of fatty acids and chilling tolerance of photosynthesis on rice. Molecular Breeding. 1998;4:269–275.
  125. 125. Xu L, Han L, Huang B. Membrane Fatty Acid Composition and Saturation Levels Associated with Leaf Dehydration Tolerance and Post-Drought Rehydration in Kentucky Bluegrass. Crop Sci. 2011;51:273–281.
  126. 126. Pinheiro C, Chaves MM. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J Exp Bot. 2011;62:869–82. pmid:21172816
  127. 127. Tamburino R, Vitale M, Ruggiero A, Sassi M, Sannino L, Arena S, et al. Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17:40. pmid:28183294
  128. 128. Pakrasi HB, Williams JG, Arntzen CJ. Targeted mutagenesis of the psbE and psbF genes blocks photosynthetic electron transport: evidence for a functional role of cytochrome b559 in photosystem II. EMBO J. 1988;7:325–332. pmid:3130246
  129. 129. Chu HA, Chiu YF. The Roles of Cytochrome b 559 in Assembly and Photoprotection of Photosystem II Revealed by Site-Directed Mutagenesis Studies. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1261. pmid:26793230
  130. 130. Gu W, Huan L, Yu R, Pan G, Wang G. Enhancement of Cytochrome b 559 Indicates Its Possible Involvement in Long-Term High Light Stress Tolerance in Intertidal Macroalgae. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2015;33:1918–1927.
  131. 131. Kaminskaya O, Renger G, Shuvalov VA. Effect of dehydration on light-induced reactions in photosystem II: photoreactions of cytochrome b559. Biochemistry. 2003;42(27):8119–32. pmid:12846561
  132. 132. Poulson M, Samson G, Whitmarsh J. Evidence that cytochrome b559 protects photosystem II against photoinhibition. Biochemistry. 1995;34:10932–10938. pmid:7662674
  133. 133. Diab AA, Teulat-Merah B, This D, Ozturk NZ, Benscher D, Sorrells ME. Identification of drought-inducible genes and differentially expressed sequence tags in barley. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1417–1425. pmid:15517148
  134. 134. Lokko Y, Anderson JV, Rudd S, Raji A, Horvath D, Mikel MA, et al. Characterization of an 18,166 EST dataset for cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) enriched for drought-responsive genes. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:1605–18. pmid:17541599
  135. 135. Plöchinger M, Schwenkert S, von Sydow L, Schröder WP, Meurer J. Functional Update of the Auxiliary Proteins PsbW, PsbY, HCF136, PsbN, TerC and ALB3 in Maintenance and Assembly of PSII. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:423. pmid:27092151
  136. 136. Torabi S, Umate P, Manavski N, Plöchinger M, Kleinknecht L, Bogireddi H, et al. PsbN is required for assembly of the photosystem II reaction center in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Cell. 2014;26:1183–1199. pmid:24619613