https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4548-7532
Figures
Abstract
Background
Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) need costly medical care and adequate therapy with expensive medicinal products. Tigerase® is the first biosimilar of dornase alfa, developed by the lead Russian biotechnology company GENERIUM. The aim of the manuscript to present post hoc sub-analysis of patients’ data with cystic fibrosis and severe pulmonary impairment of a larger comparative study (phase III open label, prospective, multi-centre, randomized study (NCT04468100)) of a generic version of recombinant human DNase Tigerase® to the only comparable drug, Pulmozyme®
Methods
In the analyses included subgroup of 46 severe pulmonary impairment patients with baseline FEV1 level 40–60% of predicted (23 patients in each treatment group) out of 100 patients registered in the study phase III open label, prospective, multi-center, randomized study (NCT04468100), and compared efficacy endpoints (FEV1, FVC, number and time of exacerbations, body weight, St.George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) as well as safety parameters (AEs, SAEs, anti-drug antibody) within 24 treatment weeks.
Citation: Amelina EL, Krasovsky SA, Akhtyamova-Givirovskaya NE, Kashirskaya NY, Abdulganieva DI, Asherova IK, et al. (2021) Comparison of biosimilar Tigerase and Pulmozyme in long-term symptomatic therapy of patients with cystic fibrosis and severe pulmonary impairment (subgroup analysis of a Phase III randomized open-label clinical trial (NCT04468100)). PLoS ONE 16(12): e0261410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261410
Editor: Davor Plavec, Srebrnjak Children’s Hospital, CROATIA
Received: May 26, 2021; Accepted: October 13, 2021; Published: December 23, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Amelina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.
Funding: The study was initiated and supported by the GENERIUM JSC. GENERIUM JSC had role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. Elena L. Amelina, Stanislav A. Krasovsky, Nataliya Yu. Kashirskaya, Diana I. Abdulganieva, Irina K. Asherova, Ilya E. Zilber, Liliya S. Kozyreva, Lubov M. Kudelya, Natalya D. Ponomareva, Nataliya P. Revel-Muroz, Elena M. Reutskaya, Tatiana A. Stepanenko, Gulnara N. Seitova, Olga P. Ukhanova, Olga V. Magnitskaya received payment for the above-mentioned clinical trial from the sponsor (GENERIUM JSC).
Competing interests: Elena L. Amelina, Stanislav A. Krasovsky, Nataliya Yu. Kashirskaya, Diana I. Abdulganieva, Irina K. Asherova, Ilya E. Zilber, Liliya S. Kozyreva, Lubov M. Kudelya, Natalya D. Ponomareva, Nataliya P. Revel-Muroz, Elena M. Reutskaya, Tatiana A. Stepanenko, Gulnara N. Seitova, Olga P. Ukhanova, Olga V. Magnitskaya received payment for the above-mentioned clinical trial. Dmitry A. Kudlay, Nina E. Akhtyamova-Givirovskaya, Oksana A. Markova, Elena V. Gapchenko are the employees of JSC GENERIUM. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Abbreviations: ADA, anti-drug antibody; AE, adverse event; AR, adverse reaction; CF, cystic fibrosis; FAS, full analyses set; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; NCI CTCAE, The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; PP, per protocol; SAE, serious adverse event; W, week
1. Introduction
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease that affects over 90,000 people worldwide [1]. According to the Research Centre for Medical Genetics and neonatal screening, the frequency of CF in Russia is 1:8,000–12,000 newborns with significant differences by regions [2–5]. The Russian CF Patients Registry, created to assess the prevalence, genetic and clinical polymorphism, approaches to the treatment of the disease, included data of 3,142 patients by 2018 (mean age is 12.8±9.6 years, median age is 10.4 (12.4) years, proportion of patients aged ≥ 18 years is 24.7%) [6, 7]. Since 2011 the Registry patients’ number increased from 1,026 in 2011 to 3,142 in 2018. In 2018 171 patients have been diagnosed CF for the first time (162 patients aged < 18 and 9 patients aged ≥18). 124 patients have been diagnosed CF with the neonatal screening, which was 72.9% of all revealed CF cases in 2018. 94.3% of patients were performed genetic analysis. Mean FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) and FVC (forced vital capacity) were 77.6 ± 26.1% and 84.6 ± 21.8% of predicted, respectively. The median life expectancy for patients born in 2014–2018 was 33.8 years [6].
CF patients need costly medical care including the comprehensive highly specialized medical services and adequate expensive medicinal products therapy.
Up until recently, only two medicinal products (recombinant human DNase and hypertonic saline) were proved the positive effects on mucous membrane clearance in CF patients [8–11]. Dornase alfa is one of the most used medicinal products in CF patients [12, 13]. According to the Russian CF Patients Registry, in 2018 95.7% of CF patients were administered dornase alfa [6].
The efficacy and safety of dornase alfa have been established through numerous original product Pulmozyme® trials that support its use as an effective treatment option in young CF patients with moderate pulmonary involvement, as well as in adult patients with severe pulmonary impairment. Daily inhalations slow down the pulmonary function impairment and reduce the frequency of the respiratory disease exacerbations. The most patients tolerate medicinal product well irrespective of the lung damage severity [14–23].
Pulmozyme® is widely used in Russia. Pulmozyme® effective alternative search initiated the domestic equivalent development. Tigerase® biosimilarity (dornase alfa produced by GENERIUM JSC, Russia) to the reference product Pulmozyme® has been proved in the main quality parameters both non-clinical studies and Phase I clinical study in healthy volunteers. The conducted studies displayed good tolerability and a favourable safety profile of the investigational medicinal product [24].
2. Material and methods
2.1. Study design
The phase III (NCT04468100) clinical trial was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Tigerase® vs Pulmozyme® as a treatment component in CF patients.
This phase III open-label, prospective, multi-center, randomized study (NCT04468100) was conducted at 15 clinical sites in the Russian Federation from August 2017 to May 2018 in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration, and ICH GCP. The approval of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation and the ethics committee approval were got before recruiting the first participant in a study that meets Russian Federation requirements of clinical trial conducting. Clinical trial approval number of the Ministry of Health of Russia № 348 eff date 23.06.2017. The Ethics Council of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation approval dated May 16, 2017. Clinical trial registration on the https://clinicaltrials.gov is not obligatory requirement in Russian Federation. The trial was registered on the site as completed study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04468100). The authors confirm that all ongoing and related trials for this drug are registered.
At all 15 centers the clinical study was approved by the independent ethical committees of healthcare facilities. Each study patient signed an informed consent before undergoing any study procedure.
The manuscript describes post hoc sub-analysis of patients’ data with cystic fibrosis and severe pulmonary impairment of the phase III clinical study (NCT04468100) of a generic version of recombinant human DNase Tigerase® to the only comparable drug, Pulmozyme®.
2.2. Participants
The clinical study was conducted at 15 clinical centers of the Russian Federation. Patients were only included in the study if they had signed an informed consent form, completed all screening procedures, and met all the inclusion / exclusion criteria. The study included male and female Caucasian patients. Patients of both genders aged 18 and older with a confirmed diagnosis of CF and FEV1 ≥ 40% of predicted were enrolled. The diagnosis was defined as the presence of the disease clinical evidence along with a positive sweat test and/or detection of 2 clinically significant abnormal CFTR gene an exacerbation of the chronic pulmonary disease for 4 weeks prior to and at screening, a condition after lung transplantation, the lung transplantation scheduled for the study period.
During the study, the patients inhaled Tigerase® or reference product Pulmozyme® 2.5 mg once daily with jet nebuliser PARI Compact.
Of the 104 screened patients, totally 100 patients of the main phase III clinical study (NCT04468100) met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to either control or experimental group with a 1:1 allocation as per a computer-generated randomisation schedule stratified by the FEV1 baseline into two groups (FAS- population): Group I (Tigerase®)– 50 patients and Group II (Pulmozyme®)– 50 patients. Before randomization, the patients were stratified by the FEV1 baseline: each study group included 23 severe pulmonary impairment (FEV1 ≥40%—≤60% of predicted) patients (46.0%) and 27 normal—to—moderate pulmonary function (FEV1 >60%—≤100%) patients (54.0%). Four patients terminated the study early, 11 patients had significant protocol deviations related to treatment compliance that could affect the study results. Thus, 85 patients (85.0%) completed the study without protocol significant deviations and were included in the per-protocol (PP) population.
The findings only for the patients with severe pulmonary impairment (baseline FEV1 ≥40%—≤60% of predicted) based on the main randomized clinical trial were analyzed in the manuscript: each study group included 23 severe pulmonary impairment (FEV1 ≥40%—≤60% of predicted) patients. The total population study findings were published earlier in the journal of Pulmonology in Russian (2019) [25].
2.3. Study endpoints
2.3.1. Efficacy.
As a primary endpoint the FEV1 change (absolute %) was assessed at study week 24 (W24) compared to the baseline. The secondary efficacy endpoints included the comparison of the following parameters between the treatment groups:
- FVC change (absolute %) at W24 compared to baseline,
- the number of chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations for 24 weeks,
- the time to a chronic pulmonary disease exacerbation over the 24 weeks,
- body weight change at W24 compared to baseline,
- changes in the mean score on the subscales “Symptoms”, “Activity”, “Impacts”, and the mean total score of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, version 2.2, [26] at W24 compared to baseline.
2.3.2 Safety.
The safety analysis included the following parameters:
- the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study period based on subjective complaints, physical examinations, assessment of vital signs, ECG, laboratory and instrumental tests, and patient diaries;
- the anti-drug antibody (ADA) to dornase alfa formation rate within 24 treatment weeks.
AEs was registered from the time the patient signs an informed consent and until the last visit or procedure related to the study. AE severity has been graded according to The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, (NCI CTCAE), v. 4.03 [27].
2.4. Statistical analysis
The main randomized phase III (NCT04468100) clinical trial was planned to test the null hypothesis of the equal efficacy of two medicinal products at W24 versus baseline in the compared groups. The sample size of 100 patients (the number of patients who could have been enrolled based on the feasibility result) was determined to allow to detect the difference (δ) of 5% or more in ΔFEV1 between the groups with the expected standard deviation (σ) of 10%, the power of 80% (Zβ = 0.84) and two-sided α = 0.05.
The manuscript reports a post hoc sub-analysis of the group (23 per group) of patients within a larger study had the lowest levels of FEV1.
The trial data were analyzed in three patient populations: 1) all patients included in the study (FAS population, full analyzes set); this population was also used as a baseline in the analysis of performance parameters; 2) all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in the analysis of safety; the safety population was found to be identical to the FAS population; 3) additionally, the efficacy parameters were analyzed in all patients who completed the study without significant deviations from the Protocol (PP-population, Per protocol). Descriptive statistics are given for each studied parameter. The two-sided t-test was used to analyze between-group differences for the primary efficacy endpoint in the intent-to treat population, in addition, a 95% confidence interval was provided.
The t-test was used for FVC analysis at W24 versus the baseline level. The number of chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations within 24 therapy weeks was analyzed with Poisson regression. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the number and proportion of patients with one, two, three or more exacerbations generally and according to FEV1 baseline stratification between two groups. The time to chronic pulmonary disease exacerbation was analyzed both with the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox regression model. ‘Gender’, ‘Patient’s age’, ‘Number of concomitant diseases’ and ‘Treatment group’ were considered as covariates. The changes of the mean score on ‘Symptoms’, ‘Activity’ and ‘Impacts’ subscales and mean total score of the Questionnaire at W24 compared to baseline were estimated through paired t-test for intra-group comparison and t-test for group-to-group comparison.
Adverse events were coded by the current Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Group-to-group comparison of categorical parameters was performed by χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test. The Friedman test was used to assess the quantitative parameters changes at W24 compared to baseline. In the case of statistically significant differences, the post-hoc paired comparison was conducted using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon test depending on the data distribution type. Data on the ADA level of to dornase alfa in both groups were presented through descriptive statistics.
The statistical analysis was performed with the Stata application software (StataCorp, USA) version 14 [28].
3. Results
3.1. Study population
100 screened patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of 100 randomized 1:1 into two groups patients, 46 ones (23 patients in each treatment group) composed the severe pulmonary impairment (FEV1 ≥40%—≤60% predicted) strata. 41 patients (89.1%) of the strata completed the study without significant protocol deviations and were included in the PP population (Fig 1). Safety population includes all the patients, received at least one dose of study medications.
The study included Caucasian male and female subjects. The treatment groups were comparable in the baseline characteristics, demographic parameters and baseline FEV1 (Table 1).
All the enrolled patients received dornase alfa inhalations at a dose of 2.5 mg previously. Before the previous most frequently administered medicinal products for pulmonary disease were bronchodilators, antibiotics and glucocorticosteroids. Also, patients underwent non-medical therapy: kinesitherapy (therapeutic chest massage, physical training, breathing exercises, and postural drainage). Additionally, as part of prior therapy patients took pancreatic enzymes, ursodeoxycholic acid preparations, proton pump inhibitors, anticholinergic agents.
FAS population data analysis has shown that the most common concomitant diseases in both groups were respiratory and gastrointestinal system disorders and infections. The total disorders number in Group I was 178 in 23 (100%) patients, and 192 in 23 (100%) patients in Group II. The various comorbidities incidence was comparable in the studied groups.
At screening the groups were comparable in preexisting immunogenicity profile. The immunogenicity testing revealed preexisting ADA to dornase alfa (IgG) in 1 patient (4.4%) in the Tigerase® group and in 1 patient (4.4%) in the Pulmozyme® group, and IgM ADA were also revealed in 1 patient (4.4%) in each group. Neutralising ADA to dornase alfa were found in 1 patient of Group I, with the titer 5, and in 1 patient of Group II, with the titer 20.
No clinically significant abnormalities in physical examinations and electrocardiogram (ECG) were found in both groups at Screening.
Throughout the study, a high level of treatment compliance assessed during the patient’s interview at the planned visits, as well as according to the patient’s diary was noted. By the middle of the study, the treatment compliance level reached 97.8±6.1% in Group I (Tigerase®) and 98.5±4.0% in Group II (Pulmozyme®) and remained high until the final visit: 94.6±19.1% and 97.8±4.2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found at any of the visits (p>0.05).
3.2. Efficacy outcomes
3.2.1. FEV1 and FVC changes.
Both treatment groups displayed similar changes in the mean FEV1 values at W24 compared to the baseline: the FAS population mean FEV1 value was 48.8±7.4 abs. % (95% CI (45.56; 52.08)) and 48.4±10.0 abs. % (95% CI (44.12; 52.77)) in Group I and II respectively. The findings do not allow the null hypothesis of the equal efficacy of Tigerase® and Pulmozyme® in terms of the FEV1 change during 24 therapy weeks in severe impairment of pulmonary function patients to be rejected.
The PP population similar FEV1 values assessment at W24 also showed comparability between the treatment groups on this parameter (Table 2).
The between-group differences in FEV1 changes at W24 vs. baseline was 1.4 abs.% (95% CI (-3.3; 6.0), p = 0.566 in the FAS population and 0.9 abs.% (95% CI (-3.8; 5.7)), p = 0.701 in the PP population. Thus, in both populations the between-group differences for FEV1 change did not exceed 6%.
No statistically significant between-group difference in the mean FVC values at W24 was revealed in the FAS and PP populations. The FAS population mean FVC level was 74.7±14.8 abs. % (95% CI (68.14; 81.23)) and 70.1±14.7 abs. % (95% of CI (63.77; 76.44)), p = 0.303 in Group I and II respectively; in the PP population– 73.5±15.3 abs. % (95% of CI (66.18; 80.91)) and 69.2±14.3 abs. % (95% of CI (62.85; 75.52)), p = 0.351 in Group I and II respectively.
Thereby the FVC changes analysis (absolute %) at W24 vs. baseline in the FAS and PP populations revealed no statistically significant between-group differences (Table 2). The mean FVC change value in the FAS population at Week 24±1 was -1.6±9.6% in Group I and -3.8±12.5% in Group II. The between-group differences in the FVC change (Group I–Group II) at W24 vs. baseline was 2.2% (95% CI (-4.5; 8.9)), p = 0.515. The mean FVC changes value in the PP population by W24 was -2.4±10.1% in Group I and -4.2±12.5% in Group II. The between-group differences at W24 vs. baseline was 1.9% (95% CI (-5.4; 9.1)), p = 0.606.
3.2.2. Chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations.
The chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations number during 24 therapy weeks was assessed by the Poisson’s regression with the included in the model following covariates: ’Group’ (Tigerase® / Pulmozyme®), ’Patient’s gender’ (male/female), ’Age’, ’Number of concomitant diseases’. The chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations incidence rate ratio (IRR) is given in the Table 3.
Group-to-group comparison of the patients’ proportion with a different number of chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations for 24 weeks showed no statistically significant differences in both FAS and PP populations (Table 4).
3.2.3. Time to a chronic pulmonary disease exacerbation.
Comparison of Kaplan–Meier curves through the log-rank test revealed no statistically significant between-group differences in terms of time to the first chronic pulmonary disease exacerbation for the both FAS (p = 0.609) and PP (p = 0.786) populations (Fig 2).
The data analysis of the time to the first chronic pulmonary disease exacerbation through Cox regression showed ’Drug Group’, ’Gender’ or ’Age’ as a non-statistically significant factor for the model (p>0.05). Meanwhile the ’Number of concomitant disorders’ factor was statistically significant for the both FAS (p = 0.002) and PP (p = 0.007) population. Hazard ratio for the number of concomitant disorders was 1.27 (95% CI (1.09; 1.48)) in the FAS population (p = 0.002), and 1.23 (95% CI (1.06; 1.44)) in the PP population (p = 0.007).
3.2.4. Body weight changes.
The body weight analysis demonstrated the similar changes in mean body weight at W24 in both treatment groups: 1.3±2.5 kg (95% CI (0.18; 2.44)) vs. 0.4±1.8 kg (95% CI (-0.42; 1.15)) in FAS population (p = 0.159) and 1.5±2.7 kg (95% CI (0.22; 2.81)) vs. 0.4±1.9 kg (95% CI (-0.44; 1.21)) in PP population (p = 0.121), in Group I and II respectively.
Between-group differences in the body weight changes at W24 vs. baseline was 0.9 kg (95% CI -0.4; 2.3) for the FAS population (р = 0.159) and 1.1 kg (95% CI -0.3; 2.6) for the PP population (р = 0.121).
3.2.5. St. George’s respiratory questionnaire.
The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scoring showed no statistically significant differences in the total score and in the subscales ’Symptoms’, ’Activity’, ’Impacts’ in both FAS and PP population (Table 5).
3.3. Safety outcomes
46 patients of the two study groups represented the safety dataset. The medicinal product Tigerase® founded the safety profile similar to Pulmozyme®.
3.3.1. Incidence of AEs.
In total, the subgroup of severe pulmonary disfunction patients experienced 126 AEs in 34 patients (73.9%): 64 AEs (50.8%) in 15 patients (65.2%) of Tigerase® group and 62 AEs (49.2%) in 19 patients (85.6%) of Pulmozyme® group. The AE rate comparison through Fisher’s exact test showed not statistically significant between-group differences.
The most common AEs were infections and infestations (11 patients (47.8%) in each group), investigations (8 patients (34.8%) in Group I; 11 patients (47.8%) in Group II), respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (9 patients (39.1%) in Group I; 7 patients (30.4%) in Group II), gastrointestinal disorders (3 patients (12%) in Group I; 2 patients (8.7%) in Group II).
Six AEs in 6 patients (3 in each group) were the maximum AE severity (grade 3), 36 AEs were grade 2 and 84 –grade 1.
Of 126 registered AEs, 92 (73.1%) were resolved with recovery. By the end of the study 8 AEs (6.4%) were resolved with consequences, 23 AEs (18.3%) were not resolved and the outcome of 3 AEs (2.4%) was unknown.
3.3.2. Incidence of Ars.
Overall, 4 patients experienced 6 adverse reactions (ARs) with ’definite’ or ’possible’ relationship with the study product: 2 patients in Group I (8,8%)—one with FEV1 reduction (’possible’ relationship, grade 2) and one with dysphonia (’definite’ relationship, grade 1); and 2 patients in Group II (8,8%)–one with sputum increase, which can be considered as a positive therapy effect (’definite’ relationship, grade 1), one patient with 3 AR (shortness of breath, itchy throat, dysphonia), in which the relationship was ’definite’, grade 1. No statistically significant between-group differences in patients’ number or ARs number were observed. All ARs were resolved with recovery, except for the FEV1 reduction, which was not resolved by the end of the study.
3.3.3. Incidence of SAEs.
Five patients experienced 5 serious adverse events (SAEs) (3 patients in Group I and 2 patients in Group II) that required hospitalization or its prolongation. The following SAEs were in Group I: a pulmonary disease exacerbation in 1 patient (4.4%), a pneumothorax in 1 patient (4.4%) and a pneumonia in 1 patient (4.4%). 2 patients (8.7%) in Group II experienced severe pulmonary disease exacerbation. All the SAEs were resolved with recovery.
3.3.4. Immunogenicity.
During the study, new IgG ADA formation was detected in 4 patients (17,4%) in Group I and in 3 patients (13,1%) in Group II, new formation of IgM ADA were detected in 5 patients (21,7%) in Group I and in 2 patients (8,7%) in Group II. The neutralizing activity of detected ADA was revealed in one patient in each group without any clinical impact.
3.3.5. Fatality. No deaths were reported in the study.
4. Discussion
This manuscript describes the post hoc sub-analysis of a larger comparative study of a generic version of recombinant human DNase Tigerase® (Generium JSC, Russia) to the current market dominant and only comparable product Pulmozyme® (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland). The full randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04468100) recruited around 100 patients [25]. The full trial protocol can be accessed https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04468100.
The primary analysis for the full randomized trial was based population of 100. In the manuscript, we present the analyses on the subpopulation of 46 patients having FEV1 40–60%. Considering the small number of subgroups patients, we have checked the assumptions, they were met both for full population and subpopulation, no serious violations have been identified. In general, the estimations of the model could be unstable due to the small sample size. However, as we also used the same approach on the sample of 100, we are more confident in the results obtained. Still, rather a small sample size to be considered as one of the limitations of these analyses.
The results of the efficacy and safety of dornase alpha only in the subgroup of 46 patients with cystic fibrosis and severe pulmonary impairment with baseline FEV1 level 40–60% of predicted have not been published in an earlier publication. We suppose the findings of CF patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction (a baseline FEV1 level ≥40%—≤60% predicted) might be more demonstrative and as well confirm the comparability of the proposed biosimilar Tigerase® (Generium JSC, Russia) to the reference Pulmozyme® (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland) taken as part of combined therapy as the results of the full randomized trial.
The equivalence in efficacy between two dornase alfa products was demonstrated based on the FEV1 changes at W24 vs. baseline. FEV1 is considered to be an appropriate outcome for CF studies since low FEV1 values are strongly associated with increased mortality, decreased quality of life [29, 30] as well as greater risk of pulmonary exacerbation and hospitalizations [31].
According to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society the within-subject changes of FEV1 for normal subjects are within 12% (relative change) in less than one year term [32]. The meaningful changes in FEV1 from 5 or 10% have been reported in CF trials with about 5% in dornase alfa trials. These thresholds are well within the inherent variability of the test [33]. Thus, the detected differences in FEV1 changes between groups of 1.4 abs.% (95% CI (-3.3; 6.0), and 0.9 abs.% (95% CI (-3.8; 5.7)) in the FAS and PP populations are well within the intra-subject variability.
All the secondary efficacy endpoints were also comparable among the Tigerase® and Pulmozyme® groups. The chronic pulmonary disease exacerbations rate during 24±1 therapy weeks were not dependent on the treatment group or any other factors except the ’Number of concomitant disorders’ which tends to impact and reflects the CF patient’s comorbidity. The ’Number of concomitant disorders’ factor was also statistically significant for the time to the first exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease in both treatment groups.
The inclusion of the covariates such as patient’s gender, age, number of concomitant diseases in the analysis model was as priory before database lock. The rationale for the inclusion was to reveal the impact of different covariates on the dependent variable and to estimate the adjusted effect of the primary interest.
In both groups all outcomes were comparable among the FAS and PP populations, which indicates the reliability of the study conclusions regarding alternative patient populations selected for the analysis and the sensitivity of the efficacy assessment of the medicinal products to the assumptions underlying the FAS and PP populations. The study results are consistent with the literature data showing dornase alfa efficacy in patients with progressive lung disease. Thus, according to McCoy K. et al. (1996) a 12-week study of the inhaled drug dornase alfa in a group of 320 CF patients with progressive lung disease (FEV1<40%) showed that patients administered dornase alfa had statistically greater FEV1 improvement than the placebo group, with a tendency to decrease general hospitalisation rate [16].
Tigerase® was well tolerated. The safety profile of the proposed biosimilar was favorable and comparable to the reference product. Only AEs such as dysphonia, shortness of breath, itching in the throat, increased sputum were associated with the medicinal product intake and were identical to those reported in patients receiving placebo in a controlled trial of the reference drug Pulmozyme® [34–38].
Both Tigerase® and Pilmozyme® showed low immunogenicity. The newly neutralizing ADA formation to dornase alfa was found in low titer in one patient in Tigerase® group, while the neutralizing ADA were revealed at the Screening Visit and remained throughout the study in one patient received Pulmozyme®. Considering that dornase alfa is used in inhalations, the possibility of a significant decrease in the activity of the medicinal product when neutralising antibodies are detected in plasma is doubtful. The systemic effects of inhaled dornase alfa are known to be negligible [22, 23, 34]. In Phase I study of Tigerase® vs Pulmozyme® were observed only the very low serum concentrations of DNAase [23].
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the data from this randomized, open, prospective multicenter clinical study correspond to the aim that allows the researchers to fulfill their tasks: administration of Tigerase ® (JSC Generium, Russia) as part of a combined long-term therapy of CF patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction is comparable to Pulmozyme® (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland) in terms of the efficacy and safety parameters studied.
Supporting information
S1 Checklist. CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomised trial*.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261410.s001
(DOC)
References
- 1. Rajan S. and Saiman L., Pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis, Semin Respir Infect., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2002. pmid:11891518
- 2.
Kapranov N. and Kashirskaya N., Cystic Fibrosis, Moscow: Medpraktika-M, 2014, p. 672 (in Russian).
- 3. Koledaeva E., Berseneva A., Kharinova и S D. Potekhina, Analysis of the clinical and genetic features and incidence of genetic diseases in Kirov and the Kirov Region, Vyatka Medical Bulletin, т. 1, № 61, pp. 54–59, 2019 (in Russian).
- 4. Andreev D., Bashlakova E., Khachanova и M N. Davydovskaya, Cystic fibrosis patient registries: national and foreign practice, Paediatric Pharmacology, т. 14, № 2, p. 115–126, 2017 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v14i2.1726
- 5.
Clinical Guidelines Cystic Fibrosis in Children, Russian Paediatric Association, 2016. Available: http://www.pediatr-russia.ru/sites/default/files/file/kr_mv.pdf. [Дата обращения: 15 Jan 2020] (in Russian).
- 6.
Amelina E., Kashirskaya N., Kondratieva E., Krasovsky S., Starinova и A M. Voronkova, Registry of Cystic Fibrosis Patient in the Russian Federation 2018, Moscow: Medpraktika-M, 2020 (in Russian).
- 7. Kondratieva E., Sherman V., Amelina E., Voronkova A., Krasovsky S., Kashirskaya и N N. Petrova, Clinical and genetic characteristics and outcomes of meconium ileus in cystic fibrosis, Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics, т. 61, № 6, pp. 77–81, 2016 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2016-61-6-77-81
- 8. Robinson M., Hemming A. and Regnis J., Effect of increasing doses of hypertonic saline on mucociliary clearance in patients with cystic fibrosis, Thorax, no. 52, p. 900–903, 1997. pmid:9404379
- 9. Houtmeyers E., Gosselink R., Gayan-Ramirez G. and Decramer M., Effects of drugs on mucus clearance, Eur Respir J, no. 14, p. 452–467, 1999. pmid:10515429
- 10. Ratjen F., Paul K., van Koningsbruggen S., Вreitenstein S., Rietschel E. and Nikolaizik W., DNA concentrations in BAL fluid of cystic fibrosis patients with early lung disease: Influence of treatment with dornase alpha, Pediatr Pulmonol, no. 39, pp. 1–4, 2005. pmid:15532079
- 11. Pressler Т., Review of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) in the management of patients with cystic fibrosis, Biologics, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 611–617, 2008. pmid:19707442
- 12. Wagener J. and Kupfer O., Dornase alfa (Pulmozyme), Curr Opin Pulm Med, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 609–614, 2012. pmid:22990660
- 13. Voronkova E. K. A., Dornasum alfa in treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis, Pediatria, p. 111–117, 98 (6) 2019 (in Russian).
- 14. Yang и M C. Montgomery, Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, № 9, p. CD001127, 2018.
- 15. Dentice R. and Elkins M., Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 11, p. CD007923, 2018. pmid:30480755
- 16. McCoy K., Hamilton S. and Johnson C., Effects of 12-week administration of dornase alfa in patients with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease. Pulmozyme Study Group, Chest, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 889–895, 1996. pmid:8874241
- 17. Quan J., Tiddens H., Sy J., McKenzie S., Montgomery M., Robinson P. et al. A two-year randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dornase alfa in young patients with cystic fibrosis with mild lung function abnormalities, J Pediatr, vol. 139, no. 6, pp. 813–820, 2001. pmid:11743506
- 18. VanDevanter D., Craib M., Pasta D., Millar S., organ W., Konstan M. et al. Cystic fibrosis clinical characteristics associated with dornase alfa treatment regimen change, Pediatr Pulmonol, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2018. pmid:29064184
- 19. Sawicki G., Chou W., Raimundo K., Trzaskoma B. and Konstan M., Randomized trial of efficacy and safety of dornase alfa delivered by eRapid nebulizer in cystic fibrosis patients, J Cyst Fibros, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 777–783, 2015. pmid:25921451
- 20. Bryson H. and Sorkin E., alfa Dornase. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in cystic fibrosis, Drugs, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 894–906, 1994. pmid:7533697
- 21. Cramer G. and Bosso J., The role of dornase alfa in the treatment of cystic fibrosis, Ann Pharmacother, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 656–661, 1996. pmid:8792953
- 22. Hubbard R., McElvaney N., Birrer P., Shak S., Robinson W., Jolley C., et al A preliminary study of aerosolized recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I in the treatment of cystic fibrosis, N Engl J Med, vol. 326, no. 12, pp. 812–815, 1992. pmid:1538726
- 23.
Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Product monograph "Pulmozyme®", 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.rochecanada.com/PMs/Pulmozyme/Pulmozyme_PM_E.pdf. [Accessed 15 Jan 2020].
- 24.
Protocol KI-39/14, Single-centre, open-label, randomized study to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of Tigerase (GENERIUM JSC, Russia) in comparison with Pulmozyme® (F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Switzerland) following repeated dose inhalation, 2016 (in Russian).
- 25. Amelina E., Krasovskiy S., Abdulganieva D., Asherova I., Zilber I., Trishina S., et al, Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar medicinal product Tigerase® (dornase alfa) in long-term symptomatic treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis: results of a phase III clinical trial, Pulmonology, т. 29, № 6, p. 695–706, 2019 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2019-29-6-695-706.
- 26.
St. George’s London University, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, [Online]. Available: http://www.healthstatus.sgul.ac.uk/sgrq. [Accessed 23 Jan 2020].
- 27.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), National Cancer Institute, [Online]. Available: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. [Accessed 03 09 2020].
- 28.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP, College Station, 2015.
- 29. Kerem E., Reisman J., Corey M., Canny G. and Levison H., Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis, N Engl J Med, vol. 326, no. 18, p. 1187–91, 1992. pmid:1285737
- 30. Dill E., Dawson R., Sellers D., Robinson W. and Sawicki G., Longitudinal trends in health-related quality of life in adults with cystic fibrosis, Chest, vol. 144, no. 3, p. 981–9, 2013. pmid:23670667
- 31. Sanders D., Bittner R., Rosenfeld M., Hoffman L., Redding G. and Goss C., Failure to recover to baseline pulmonary function after cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 182, no. 5, p. 627–32, 2010. pmid:20463179
- 32. Pellegrino R., Viegi G., Brusasco V., Crapo R., Burgos F. and Casaburi R., Interpretative strategies for lung function tests, Eur Respir J, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 948–68, 2005. pmid:16264058
- 33. Stanojevic S. and Ratjen F., Physiologic endpoints for clinical studies for cystic fibrosis, Journal of Cystic fibrosis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 416–23, 2016. pmid:27316663
- 34. Aitken M., Burke W., McDonald G., Shak S., Montgomery A. and Smith A., Recombinant human DNase inhalation in normal subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis. A phase 1 study., JAMA, no. 267, p. 1947–1951, 1992. pmid:1548827
- 35. Ramsey B., Astley S., Aitken M., Burke W., Colin A., Dorkin H. et al, Efficacy and safety of short-term administration of aerosolized recombinant human deoxyribonuclease in patients with cystic fibrosis., Am Rev Respir Dis, no. 148, p. 145–151, 1993. pmid:8317790
- 36. Ranasinha C., Assoufi B., Shak S., Christiansen D., Fuchs H., Empey D., et al, Efficacy and safety of short-term administration of aerosolised recombinant human DNase I in adults with stable stage cystic fibrosis, Lancet, no. 342, p. 199–202, 1993. pmid:8100928
- 37. Fuchs H., Borowitz D., Christiansen D., Morris E., Nash M., Ramsey B., et al B., Effect of aerosolized recombinant human DNase on exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmozyme Study Group, N Engl J Med, no. 331, p. 637–642, 1994. pmid:7503821
- 38. Eisenberg J., Aitken M., Dorkin H., H. I.R, Ramsey B., Schidlow D., Wilmott R., et al, Safety of repeated intermittent courses of aerosolized recombinant human deoxyribonuclease in patients with cystic fibrosis, J Pediatr, no. 131, pp. 118–124, 1997. pmid:9255202