https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-518X
Figures
Abstract
Stable isotope analyses, particularly of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N), are used to investigate ecological relationships among species. For marine predators, research has shown the main factors influencing their intra-specific and intra-individual isotopic variation are geographical movements and changes in the composition of diet over time. However, as the differences seen may be the result of changes in the prey items consumed, a change in feeding location or the combination of both, knowledge of the temporal and spatial consistency in the isotopic values of prey becomes crucial for making accurate inferences about predator diets. This study used an abundant marine predator, the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator), as prey sampler to investigate the annual variation in fish and squid prey isotope values over a four-year period (2012–2015) and the geographic variation between two sites with contrasting oceanographic conditions. Significant inter-annual variation was observed in δ13C and/or δ15N values of five of the eight prey species analysed. The strongest inter-annual variation in both δ13C and δ15N values occurred in 2015, which coincided with a strong El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). This may suggest a temporal fluctuation in the geographic source of prey or the origin of their nutrients. These results suggest that it is important to consider the potential significant differences in isotopic values within the prey assemblages that predators consume. This is important to improve the interpretation of marine predator isotope results when determining the influence of environmental variability on their diets.
Citation: Rodríguez-Malagón MA, Speakman CN, Sutton GJ, Angel LP, Arnould JPY (2021) Temporal and spatial isotopic variability of marine prey species in south-eastern Australia: Potential implications for predator diet studies. PLoS ONE 16(11): e0259961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259961
Editor: Vitor Hugo Rodrigues Paiva, MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, PORTUGAL
Received: February 4, 2021; Accepted: October 29, 2021; Published: November 30, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Rodríguez-Malagón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant original data files are available at the Zenodo data repository (https://zenodo.org/; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5599488).
Funding: The study was funded in part by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (https://www.ecolsoc.org.au/awards/holsworth) and Birdlife Australia (https://birdlife.org.au/who-we-are/our-organisation/awards-scholarships) awards to MAR-M (25711 and 31486, respectively). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Stable isotope analyses are powerful tools for understanding the trophic niche of animals and are widely used in ecology, providing important information for conservation [1]. In particular, the stable isotope ratios of carbon (13C/12C) and nitrogen (15N/14N) are commonly used to describe the trophic niche of species [2], to reconstruct animal diets [3, 4], and to make inferences about foraging area and temporal diet variations [5, 6]. This is possible due to the variation in δ13C values, for example between plant species with different photosynthetic pathways (i.e. C3 or C4 plants [7]) or differences in isotopic baselines between nearshore vs offshore and benthic vs pelagic in the marine environment [8, 9], that serve to determine the location of primary sources of food. Similarly, the 15N enrichment of consumers relative to their food items serves as an indicator of the consumer’s trophic position [10]. These differences are believed to be due to the fractionation of the heavier isotope (15N) from the isotopically lighter isotope (14N) during amino acid synthesis, resulting in the retention of the heavier isotope and the excretion of the lighter [11].
In recent years, the use of isotopic analysis to study predator diets has increased in response to improved statistical tools such as mixing models (which consider the isotopic composition of consumers and their foods) to make inferences about the composition of the animal’s assimilated diet [12] and knowledge associated with isotopic enrichment processes [10]. Such research has shown that the main factors influencing intra-specific and intra-individual variation in stable isotopic values are the geographical movement of predators [13, 14] and/or changes in the composition of their diet over time [15, 16]. However, without knowledge of the isotopic signatures of potential prey and how these vary spatially and temporally, interpreting intra-specific and intra-individual differences in predator isotopic values is problematic [17, 18]. For instance, isotopic differences seen in predators may be the result of changes in the prey items consumed, a change in feeding location, or a combination of both. Furthermore, prey isotopic values within the same location may change over time if the prey items on which they depend also varies as a consequence of biogeochemical processes [19, 20]. Hence, knowledge of the temporal and spatial consistency in the isotopic values of prey is crucial for making accurate inferences about predator diets [21, 22].
Within marine environments, top predators play an important role as top-down controllers of prey species, nutrient cyclers and ecosystem engineers [23]. Marine environments are complex and dynamic and their temporal and spatial variation influences the ecology of marine life [24]. At local and regional scales, physical features such as water currents, bathymetry, tide regimes and nutrient fluxes determine the structure of marine and coastal ecosystems and influence the behaviour and distribution of marine fauna [25]. Concurrently, naturally occurring stable isotopes are influenced by water temperature and phytoplankton photosynthetic pathways [13, 26], and by N2 fixation processes in the ocean surface, terrestrial runoff and atmospheric precipitation [27, 28] for δ13C and δ15N, respectively. These factors influence the isotopic values of marine plankton that could potentially produce spatial isotopic variation at the base of marine food chains [29]. In addition, particularly for δ13C values, local temporal isotopic variation has also been reported in relation to changes in currents and nutrient availability influencing primary productivity of marine food chains [22, 29, 30]. Consequently, knowledge of the temporal and spatial variation in prey isotopic values is especially important when examining marine predator diets.
In south-eastern Australia, Bass Strait is a key area of marine predator biodiversity and one of the fastest warming regions on eath. It is influenced by 3 main ocean currents, namely the warm East Australian Current (EAC) and South Australian Current (SAC) which mix with the subantarctic surface water (SASW) [31]. Previous studies have documented significant inter-annual and geographic differences in the stable isotope values of marine predators within Bass Strait (e.g. Australian fur seals Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus, little penguins Eudyptula minor and Australasian gannets Morus serrator) suggesting variation in their diets in relation to temporal and spatial factors [32–35]. However, isotopic information on the many potential prey species in Bass Strait is limited [36, 37]. In addition, there is currently no information on the temporal or spatial variation in the region’s baseline values for isotopes [13, 38]. Consequently, it is not possible to ascertain whether variations in predator isotopic values reflect changes in diet species composition, foraging areas or a combination of these. Information about the isotopic variation of regional marine predators is crucial for understanding how current oceanic variability influences their diets and predicting how their populations may respond to future ecosystem changes.
Using an abundant marine predator, the Australasian gannet, as a prey collection agent, the primary objective of the present study was to investigate the temporal and spatial variation in δ13C and δ15N isotopic values in an assemblage of common gannet prey species found in south-eastern Australia. Specifically, the aims were to: 1) determine inter-annual variation in prey isotope values over a four year period (2012–2015); and 2) assess geographic variation between two sites with contrasting oceanographic conditions.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
The Australasian gannet, a top marine predator, was used as a means of prey sample collection in northern Bass Strait. Samples were collected from individuals at the Point Danger (PD, 38° 23’ 36.09” S, 141° 38’ 55.94” E) and Pope’s Eye (PE, 38° 16’ 35.88” S, 144° 41’ 56.21” E) breeding colonies (Fig 1). During the breeding season, adult birds from PD have been shown to forage within the continental shelf, ranging up to 238 km north-west and south-east from the colony, hunting within limits of the Bonney Upwelling system [25, 32]. In contrast, birds from PE forage within the shallow (average depth < 13.6 m [39] waters of Port Phillip Bay, outside the bay within central Bass Strait, or in both habitats [32, 40]. The diet of Australasian gannets within Bass Strait has been reported to comprise at least 37 demersal/reef-associated and pelagic/oceanic species of fish and squid [41–45]. Hence, the location of these colonies, the foraging range of this predator and its broad diet allow for prey species representative of a wide range of habitats to be sampled.
The main water masses that influence Bass Strait are indicated by the arrows. The South Australian Current (SAC, winter) and East Australian Currents (EAC, winter and summer) bring warm and low nutrient waters into the marine region, while the Sub-Antarctic Surface Water (SASW, summer) drives cold and productive waters from the south. PD (green) and PE (orange) Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) foraging ranges obtained from GPS data [40]. Bathymetric contours (every 20 m) within the continental shelf are shown.
As part of concurrent studies on the foraging ecology of Australasian gannets during the 2012–2015 breeding seasons (October-March) in each of three breeding stages: incubation; early chick-rearing (chick age 0–50 d); and late chick-rearing (chick age >50 d) [46], voluntary regurgitations by birds upon handling were collected in plastic bags and stored frozen (-20° C) until analysis in the laboratory. In the laboratory, regurgitate samples were thawed and prey specimens were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level using published guides [47]. From complete prey only, standard length of individual specimens were recorded using Vernier callipers (± 0.1 mm) or metal ruler (± 1 mm) and body mass was measured on a top-loading balance (± 0.01 g, Ohaus Corporation, Parsippany USA). From incomplete samples, otoliths and squid beaks were extracted, where possible, to confirm fish and squid identification and to estimate their standard length using published regression equations [48, 49]. Depending on the size of the prey specimen, 1–4 g of muscle tissue was collected from all individual prey samples. For fish, tissue was sampled posterior to the anus, above the lateral line, on one side of the vertebral column. For squid, tissue was taken from the base of the mantle.
Stable isotope analysis
All tissue samples were oven-dried at 50° C for at least 24 h or until the dry weight remained stable. Samples were then ground into powder using a mortar and pestle and lipids were extracted by adding a 2:1 chloroform–methanol mixture to the powdered samples. Samples were then shaken using a vortex mixer and centrifuged for 10 min at 10°C (2500 rpm). The supernatant was discarded and the procedure repeated at least once or until the supernatant was clear and colourless after centrifuging [50, 51]. Samples were then dried for 24 h under a fume hood. Once dry, they were further refined into a powder and 1.0 mg of each sample was loaded into separate tin capsules. Stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen were conducted at the Farquhar laboratory of the Research School of Biology, Australian National University (Canberra, Australia). Samples were combusted in a CHN elemental analyser (CE1110, Carlo Erba) and resulting gases were analysed using an interfaced isoprime continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Micromass instruments). Quality control samples were run before and after each sequence using laboratory standards of sucrose ANU (-10.45 ‰) and BEET (-24.62 ‰) for δ13C and amino acids Alanine, Glycine and Cysteine used for δ15N; which provided replicate measurement errors of ±0.1‰ and 0.3 ‰, respectively. Stable isotope values were expressed in δ-notation as the deviation from standards in parts per mil (‰) according to the following equation:
(1)
where, X is 13C or 15N and R is the corresponding ratio of 13C/12C or 15N/14N. Rstandard values were based on international standards Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) for δ13C, and atmospheric nitrogen (N2) in air for δ15N. The mean C:N mass ratio for all samples was calculated to be 3.17 (± 0.15 SD), indicating lipid concentrations are uniformly low and no data normalization is needed [52].
Statistical analysis
All data processing and statistical analysis were conducted in R version 3.4.1 [53]. To evaluate simultaneously the effect of years (from 2012 to 2015) and colonies (PD and PE) in the prey isotopic niches, two-way ANOVA tests with interaction terms were performed considering δ13C and δ15N as response variables independently for each species. If prey were not sampled at both colonies, a one-way ANOVA test to evaluate the effect of year was performed. The assumptions of homegeniety of variance and normality were checked by visualising residual vs fitted plots and quantile plots, respectively. As sample sizes varied considerably among years and colonies for each species, an unbalanced design with Type-III sums of squares was considered when running this statistical analysis. The function Anova of the car package version 2.1–5 was used for such purposes [54]. Significant terms were tested using a posteriori multiple comparison test with the Tukey HSD function of the stats package version 3.4.1 [53].
To investigate whether habitat (benthic versus pelagic) influenced variation in stable isotope values within species, the coefficient of variation of δ13C and δ15N absolute values was calculated as a proxy for intra-species variation. The coefficients of variation were estimated by year and colonies for species with three or more samples. The equality of the estimated coefficients of variation was tested using the asymptotic_test2 function of the cvequality package for summary statistics [55]. Each prey species was classified by habitat according to its biological information available on the Fishes of Australia database (https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/).
Results
A total of 288 individual birds belonging to PD and PE colonies (143 and 145, respectively) were captured as part of a foraging behaviour study over the 2012–2015 breeding seasons. From them, 404 regurgitated samples (207 from PD and 197 from PE) were obtained (containing from 1 to 4 prey species each), from which, 1,181 individual prey items were collected (704 from PD and 477 from PE). Of these, 427 prey items were sufficiently undigested for stable isotope analysis (Table 1).
An asterisk indicates those species whose isotopic values were statistically tested for temporal and spatial differences. Habitat (pelagic, P or benthic, B) and diet for each prey species is listed (source: [56]).
A total of 18 prey species were identified. Eight prey species were exclusively collected from PE, while five species were exclusively collected from PD. The means (± SE) of the standard length and body mass for each species in each year and colony can be found in the S1 Table.
A wide range of δ13C and δ15N values were observed among the species identified (Fig 2). There was a clear distribution in the isotopic space among the prey species collected, from the species with the most depleted values in 13C, the pelagic Australian anchovy (Engraulis australis, −20.60 ± 0.42 ‰ SD), to the least depleted, the benthic blue weed-whiting (Haletta semifasciata, −15.20 ± 2.63 ‰ SD). The δ13C mean range for all species was 1.73 ± 1.28 ‰ SD. The δ15N values ranged from the velvet leatherjacket (Meuschenia scaber, 9.51 ± 0.89 ‰ SD), a mostly benthic invertebrate feeder, to the yellowfin goby (Acanthogobius flavimanus, 21.21 ‰), a crustacean and fish predator. The δ15N mean range for all species was 4.46 ± 3.88 ‰ SD.
Numbers in parentheses represent the total number of prey individuals analysed. Asterisks on species name identify benthic species, all others are considered pelagic.
Eight prey species were collected with sufficient sample sizes for investigating temporal and spatial variability. Mean δ13C values differed among three prey species, with significant temporal differences. In five cases, there were significant interannual differences. For barracouta (Thyrsites atun), 2014 values were higher compared to 2012 and 2015. In contrast, values for Redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus), Gould’s squid (Nototodarus gouldi), and king gar (Scomberesox sauri) presented higher values in 2015 than in other years. There were, however, no significant differences in prey δ13C values between colonies (Table 2, Fig 3).
A. Inter-annual comparisons with significant results: barracouta (Thyrsites atun), Gould’s squid (Nototodarus gouldi) and king gar (Scomberesox saurus) in both δ13C and δ15N values, redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus) in δ15N values only. B. Inter-annual and geographic (Point Danger = PD and Popes Eye = PE) comparison with significant results: jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis) for δ15N values only.
Significant results of the ANOVA test are shown and P-values only provided for non-significant tests. Means with the same superscript denote homogenous subset (P > 0.05). Sample sizes indicated in Table 1.
Mean δ15N values differed among five prey species, with significant temporal differences in all species. Similar to δ13C values, 2015 δ15N values were significantly different from the other years sampled. For king gar, values in 2015 were higher than in 2012 and 2014, while for barracouta, Gould’s squid and redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus) 2015 values were lower than other years sampled. Jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis) was the only prey species that had significant differences between colonies, as well as an interaction between years and colonies. For this species, however, the difference between the colonies was only detected due to the higher values of PD-2014 (Table 3, Fig 3).
Significant results of the ANOVA test are shown and P-values only provided for non-significant tests. Means with the same superscript denote homogenous subset (P > 0.05). Sample sizes indicated in Table 1.
The coefficients of variation from prey species within each year and colony ranged from 1% to 8% and from 2% to 29% for δ13C and δ15N, respectively. Samples collected at PE, particularly for benthic species, generally presented a higher relative degree of variability in both isotopes than those samples collected at PD (Fig 4). The equality test showed significant results between the species partition (D’ AD = 163.78, P <0.0001), concluding the species values are significantly more variable in benthic environments.
Asterisks on species name identify benthic species.
Discussion
The findings of the present study indicated significant inter-annual variation in both the δ13C and δ15N values of several prey species, suggesting temporal fluctuations in their geographic source or the origin of primary producers supporting prey species. This has significant implications for the interpretation of predator diets from analyses of stable isotopes in tissues. This is especially so as several of the prey species analysed (e.g. barracouta, jack mackerels, redbait and Gould’s squid) are important food items for a range of other predators in the region such as southern blue-fin tuna, Australian fur seals, little penguins and sharks [45, 57–60].
The δ13C values of lower trophic level prey species can be influenced by temporal and spatial variations in the carbon isotope composition of phytoplankton. Although small, the significant inter-annual differences in δ13C values observed in the present study for barracouta, Gould’s squid and king gar are consistent with previous studies of fish and squid that have documented similar temporal variation [61, 62]. As there was no evidence that the sampled Australasian gannets changed their foraging areas during the study [32, 40, 63, 64], this suggests the isotopic values of these prey (or their nutrients) do not necessarily reflect the area in which they were consumed. While the observed variation may be due to fluctuations in the major currents influencing the area [65, 66], previous studies [47, 67–69] have shown that barracouta, Gould’s squid and king gar are highly mobile in the south-east Australia region. Therefore, differences present in the isotopic values could also be an indication of inter-annual movement of prey within and from outside Bass Strait.
The δ15N values of species reflect their trophic position [10, 47, 67–69]. In the present study, five species displayed significant inter-annual differences in their δ15N values: king gar [47]; jack mackerel and redbait [70]; barracouta [70, 71]; and Gould’s squid [72] (diet information presented in Table 1). The observed temporal variation in the δ15N values of these species could reflect changes in their diet composition or the oceanic source of their nutrients [62]. Indeed, while jack mackerel and redbait are not considered migratory [73, 74], their abundance has been closely linked to the availability of Australian krill (Nyctiphanes australis) [75]. The abundance of this euphausiid is influenced by regional oceanography on both seasonal and inter-annual scales [76]. Variability in biogeochemical processes (e.g. N2 fixation processes in the surface ocean, terrestrial runoff or atmospheric precipitation [27, 28] may potentially result in δ15N variation. In addition, individuals occupying the same trophic niche may predate each other. Indeed, barracouta and Gould’s squid, two species sampled in the present study, have been reported to prey on each other [72] which may result in variation of δ15N values. This variation highlights the potential problem in inferring changes to the diet of higher predators from tissue stable isotope values without concurrent information on prey base values [21, 22].
Interestingly, most of the significant inter-annual variation in both δ13C and δ15N values occurred in 2015, which coincided with a strong El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event with widespread below-average rainfall and higher (≥ 2° C) SST across south-eastern Australia [77]. These extreme conditions could potentially alter the range and spawning areas of the sampled species [78–80], their growth rates [81] and their migration routes [82]. Additionally, the physical changes associated with ENSO events have been shown to influence marine primary production with subsequent impacts on secondary and tertiary consumers through changes in prey availability [83, 84]. However, the significant differences found in some species could also be related to differences in sample size between years (2012 and 2013 had smaller sample sizes than 2014 and 2015).
In contrast, five prey species did not display significant temporal or spatial variability in their δ13C values. Except for the blue-spotted goatfish, an inhabitant of the sandy sea floor of Port Phillip Bay [85], the species (Australian anchovy and sardine, jack mackerel and redbait) are pelagic and abundant in inshore and shelf waters of eastern Australia during summer and autumn [47, 60]. Similarly, the Australian anchovy and sardine, two planktivorous species, and the blue-spotted goatfish, a consumer of benthic invertebrates, showed no significant temporal or spatial variation in the δ15N values. The findings suggest that these prey species did not experience a significant diet change during the study.
There was a substantial range in the coefficients of variation of isotope values within sampling periods and sites. Samples collected at PE, most notably those of benthic species, generally displayed higher relative variation in isotope values that those collected at PD. Gannets at the PE breeding colony feed in both Port Phillip Bay, a shallow water body adjacent to the city of Melbourne with constant freshwater input from rainfall, rivers, creeks and drains [86], and in the northern Bass Strait, an area influenced by multiple currents over short time scales [31, 32]. The results of the present study suggest these features may lead to fine-scale spatial isoscape variation for the region’s fish prey species [29, 30]. In contrast, gannets from PD forage in the continental shelf area of western Bass Strait with relatively uniform oceanographic influences during the breeding season [69, 87]. Such factors should be considered when inferring diet composition from tissue stable isotope values in predators.
Stable isotope analysis is a powerful tool for qualitatively and quantitatively assessing animal diets [3, 5]. It has been shown that the isotopic differences seen in a predator diet across time may be the result of a change in diet composition (either in different prey or prey ratios) [15, 16], a change in the feeding location or the combination of both [13, 14]. As has been shown elsewhere in previous studies [22, 62, 88], the present study has demonstrated temporal variation in the isotopic values of some common marine prey species within south-eastern Australia. While the differences among the annual means of the prey isotope values were small, if these prey species constitute a large proportion of a predator’s diet, it could substantially affect interpretations of predator isotope values. Similarly, geographic variation in prey isotopic values can affect interpretations of predator diets if they occur within their foraging range [30]. For example, the predictive power of isotopic mixing models can be compromised if the isotopic values of specific prey varies substantially over temporal scales of a study or spatial scales over which the predators move [12]. Therefore, it is advisable to use isotopic data from marine preys collected within the same location and time period of the predators under study [12, 21]. In conclusion, it is important to consider the potential significant differences in prey species isotopic values within the assemblages that predators consume to interpret correctly their isotopic variability and better understand the influence of the environment on their diets.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Means (± SE) of the standard length and body mass for prey species by year and colony (where whole specimens or otoliths could be measured).
Sample sizes may vary from those used for statistical analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259961.s001
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the generous support from the Victorian Marine Science Consortium (especially to Roderick Watson, Elizabeth McGrath and Yvonne Gilbert), Parks Victoria and the Point Danger Committee of Management (Ewen Lovell and Phillip King) for facilitating the field activities required for this study. Thanks to the numerous volunteers who participated in field and laboratory activities, and special thanks to Roderick Watson and Nicole Chapple for providing aid with fish identification; and to Linda Moon, Cuong Van Huynh and Dr Hilary Stuart-Williams for their valuable help and guidance during the sample preparation and analyses.
References
- 1. Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC. On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2011;42:411–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144726.
- 2. Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, MacLeod H. Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2004;73(5):1007–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00861.x.
- 3. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1978;42(5):495–506.
- 4. Deniro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1981;45(3):341–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(81)90244-1.
- 5. Dalerum F, Angerbjörn A. Resolving temporal variation in vertebrate diets using naturally occurring stable isotopes. Oecologia. 2005;144(4):647–58. pmid:16041545
- 6. MacNeil MA, Skomal GB, Fisk AT. Stable isotopes from multiple tissues reveal diet switching in sharks. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2005;302:199–206. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps302199.
- 7. Kelly JF. Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2000;78(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-165.
- 8. Cherel Y, Hobson KA. Geographical variation in carbon stable isotope signatures of marine predators: a tool to investigate their foraging areas in the Southern Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;329:281–7. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps329281.
- 9. Hobson KA, Piatt JF, Pitocchelli J. Using stable isotopes to determine seabird trophic relationships. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1994;63(4):786–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/5256.
- 10. Vanderklift MA, Ponsard S. Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. Oecologia. 2003;136(2):169–82. pmid:12802678
- 11. Minagawa M, Wada E. Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1984;48(5):1135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90204-7.
- 12. Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, et al. Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2014;92(10):823–35. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2014-0127.
- 13. Graham BS, Koch PL, Newsome SD, McMahon KW, Aurioles D. Using isoscapes to trace the movements and foraging behavior of top predators in oceanic ecosystems. Isoscapes. Netherlands: Springer; 2010. p. 299–318.
- 14.
Hobson KA, Barnett-Johnson R, Cerling T. Using isoscapes to track animal migration. In: West JB, Bowen GJ, Dawson TE, Tu KP, editors. Isoscapes: understanding movement, pattern, and process on Earth through isotope mapping. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. p. 273–98.
- 15. Blight LK, Hobson KA, Kyser TK, Arcese P. Changing gull diet in a changing world: A 150-year stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N) record from feathers collected in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Global Change Biology. 2015;21:1497–507. pmid:25369474
- 16. Crawford K, McDonald RA, Bearhop S. Applications of stable isotope techniques to the ecology of mammals. Mammal Review. 2008;38(1):87–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2008.00120.x.
- 17. Barnes C, Jennings JTBS. Environmental correlates of large-scale spatial variation in the δ13C of marine animals. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2009;81(3):368–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.11.011.
- 18. Inger R, Bearhop S. Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis. 2008;150(3):447–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00839.x.
- 19. Goericke R, Fry B. Variations of marine plankton δ13C with latitude, temperature, and dissolved CO2 in the world ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 1994;8(1):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03272.
- 20. Lorrain A, Graham BS, Popp BN, Allain V, Olson RJ, Hunt BPV, et al. Nitrogen isotopic baselines and implications for estimating foraging habitat and trophic position of yellowfin tuna in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2015;113:188–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.02.003.
- 21. Bond AL, Jones IL. A practical introduction to stable-isotope analysis for seabird biologists: approaches, cautions and caveats. Marine Ornithology. 2009;37(183):e188.
- 22. Quillfeldt P, Ekschmitt K, Brickle P, McGill RAR, Wolters V, Dehnhard N, et al. Variability of higher trophic level stable isotope data in space and time–a case study in a marine ecosystem. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2015;29(7):667–74. pmid:26212285
- 23. Baum JK, Worm B. Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2009;78(4):699–714. pmid:19298616
- 24. Ballance LT, Pitman RL, Fiedler PC. Oceanographic influences on seabirds and cetaceans of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review. Progress in Oceanography. 2006;69(2–4):360–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.013.
- 25.
Butler A, Althaus F, Furlani D, Ridgway K. Assessment of the conservation values of the Bonney Upwelling area: a component of the Commonwealth Marine Conservation Assessment Program 2002–2004, (ed. D.o.t. Environment). Information Solution Works, Hobart, Tasmania: CSIRO Marine Research. 2002. p. 80.
- 26. Rau GH, Sweeney RE, Kaplan IR. Plankton 13C:12C ratio changes with latitude: differences between northern and southern oceans. Deep-Sea Research Part A, Oceanographic Research Papers. 1982;29(8):1035–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(82)90026-7.
- 27. Durante LM, Smith RO, Kolodzey S, McMullin RM, Salmond NH, Schlieman CD, et al. Oceanographic transport along frontal zones forms carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen isoscapes on the east coast of New Zealand: Implications for ecological studies. Continental Shelf Research. 2021;216:104368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104368.
- 28. Espinasse B, Hunt BPV, Batten SD, Pakhomov EA. Defining isoscapes in the Northeast Pacific as an index of ocean productivity. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2020;29(2):246–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13022.
- 29. Kurle CM, McWhorter JK. Spatial and temporal variability within marine isoscapes: implications for interpreting stable isotope data from marine systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2017;568:31–45. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12045.
- 30. Radabaugh KR, Hollander DJ, Peebles EB. Seasonal δ13C and δ15N isoscapes of fish populations along a continental shelf trophic gradient. Continental Shelf Research. 2013;68:112–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.08.010.
- 31. Sandery PA, Kämpf J. Winter-spring flushing of Bass Strait, south-eastern Australia: a numerical modelling study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2005;63:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.10.009.
- 32. Angel LP, Berlincourt M, Arnould JPY. Pronounced inter-colony variation in the foraging ecology of Australasian gannets: influence of habitat differences. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2016;556:261–72. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11845.
- 33. Arnould JPY, Cherel Y, Gibbens J, White JG, Littnan CL. Stable isotopes reveal inter-annual and inter-individual variation in the diet of female Australian fur seals. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011;422:291–302. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08933.
- 34. Chiaradia A, Forero MG, Hobson KA, Swearer SE, Hume F, Renwick L, et al. Diet segregation between two colonies of little penguins Eudyptula minor in southeast Australia. Austral Ecology. 2012;37(5):610–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02323.x.
- 35. Kernaléguen L, Cherel Y, Knox TC, Baylis AMM, Arnould JPY. Sexual niche segregation and gender-specific individual specialisation in a highly dimorphic marine mammal. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0133018. pmid:26244371
- 36. Chiaradia A, Forero MG, Hobson KA, Cullen JM. Changes in diet and trophic position of a top predator 10 years after a mass mortality of a key prey. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2010;67(8):1710–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq067.
- 37. Davenport SR, Bax NJ. A trophic study of a marine ecosystem off southeastern Australia using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2002;59(3):514–30. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-031.
- 38. Bowen GJ, West JB, Hoogewerff J. Isoscapes: isotope mapping and its applications. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2009;102(3):v–vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2009.05.001.
- 39. Walker SJ. Coupled hydrodynamic and transport models of Port Phillip Bay, a semi-enclosed bay in south-eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1999;50(6):469–81. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF98071.
- 40. Wells MR, Angel LP, Arnould JPY. Habitat-specific foraging strategies in Australasian gannets. Biology Open. 2016;5(7):921–7. pmid:27305927
- 41.
Barker S. Geographic variation in the foraging ecology of the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator) [Honours thesis]. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University; 2012.
- 42. Bunce A. Prey consumption of Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) breeding in Port Phillip Bay, southeast Australia, and potential overlap with commercial fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2001;58(4):904–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1083.
- 43. Bunce A, Norman FI. Changes in the diet of the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator) in response to the 1998 mortality of pilchards (Sardinops sagax). Marine and Freshwater Research. 2000;51(4):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99133.
- 44. Norman FI, Menkhorst PW. Aspects of the breeding and feeding ecology of the Australasian gannet Morus serrator in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, 1988–92. Emu. 1995;95(1):23–40. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU9950023.
- 45. Pyk TM, Bunce A, Norman FI. The influence of age on reproductive success and diet in Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) breeding at Pope’s Eye, Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Australian journal of zoology. 2007;55(5):267–74. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06088.
- 46. Wingham EJ. Breeding biology of the Australasian gannet Morus serrator (Gray) at Motu Karamarama, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. II. Breeding success and chick growth. Emu. 1982;84(4):211–24. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU9840211.
- 47.
Gomon MF, Bray DJ, Kuiter RH. Fishes of Australia’s southern coast: Reed New Holland, Sydney; 2008.
- 48.
Furlani D, Gales R, Pemberton D. Otoliths of common Australian temperate fish: a photographic guide: CSIRO publishing, Australia; 2007.
- 49.
Lu CC, Ickeringill R. Cephalopod beak identification and biomass estimation techniques: tools for dietary studies of southern Australian finfishes: Museum Victoria Melbourne, Australia; 2002.
- 50. Ehrich D, Tarroux A, Stien J, Lecomte N, Killengreen S, Berteaux D, et al. Stable isotope analysis: modelling lipid normalization for muscle and eggs from arctic mammals and birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2011;2(1):66–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00047.x.
- 51. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology. 1959;37(8):911–7. pmid:13671378
- 52. Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA, Takimoto G, Quattrochi J, Montaña CG. Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia. 2007;152(1):179–89. pmid:17225157
- 53.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. 2017.
- 54.
Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition. Sage Publications. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. 2018.
- 55.
Marwick B, Krishnamoorthy K. cvequality: Tests for the equality of coefficients of variation from multiple groups. R package, version 0.1.3. https://githubcom/benmarwick/cvequality2018.
- 56.
Bray DJ, Gomon MF. Fishes of Australia: Museums Victoria and OzFishNet; 2018 [8 Feb 2018]. Available from: http://fishesofaustralia.net.au/.
- 57. Braccini JM. Feeding ecology of two high-order predators from south-eastern Australia: the coastal broadnose and the deepwater sharpnose sevengill sharks. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008;371:273–84. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07684.
- 58. Chiaradia A, Dann P, Jessop R, Collins P. The diet of Crested Tern (Sterna bergii) chicks on Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia. Emu. 2002;102(4):367–71. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU02004.
- 59. Deagle BE, Kirkwood R, Jarman SN. Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces. Molecular Ecology. 2009;18(9):2022–38. pmid:19317847
- 60. Ward TM, McLeay LJ, Dimmlich WF, Rogers PJ, McClatchie SAM, Matthews R, et al. Pelagic ecology of a northern boundary current system: effects of upwelling on the production and distribution of sardine (Sardinops sagax), anchovy (Engraulis australis) and southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) in the Great Australian Bight. Fisheries Oceanography. 2006;15(3):191–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.2006.00353.x.
- 61. Albo-Puigserver M, Navarro J, Coll M, Layman CA, Palomera I. Trophic structure of pelagic species in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Sea Research. 2016;117:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2016.09.003.
- 62. Kurle CM, Sinclair EH, Edwards AE, Gudmundson CJ. Temporal and spatial variation in the δ15N and δ13C values of fish and squid from Alaskan waters. Marine Biology. 2011;158(11):2389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1741-4.
- 63. Angel LP, Barker S, Berlincourt M, Tew E, Warwick-Evans V, Arnould JPY. Eating locally: Australasian gannets increase their foraging effort in a restricted range. Biology open. 2015;4(10):1298–305. pmid:26369928
- 64. Rodriguez-Malagon MA, Angel LP, Speakman CN, Arnould JPY. Inter- and intra-individual variation in the diet of Australasian gannets Morus serrator. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2020;636:207–20. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13225. WOS:000521739200014.
- 65. Middleton JF, Bye JAT. A review of the shelf-slope circulation along Australia’s southern shelves: Cape Leeuwin to Portland. Progress in Oceanography. 2007;75(1):1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.07.001.
- 66. Sandery PA, Kämpf J. Transport timescales for identifying seasonal variation in Bass Strait, south-eastern Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2007;74(4):684–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.05.011.
- 67. Agüera A, Brophy D. Use of saggital otolith shape analysis to discriminate Northeast Atlantic and Western Mediterranean stocks of Atlantic saury, Scomberesox saurus saurus (Walbaum). Fisheries Research. 2011;110(3):465–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.06.003.
- 68. Blackburn M, Gartner PE. Populations of barracouta, Thyrsites atun (Euphrasen), in Australian waters. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1954;5(3):411–68. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9540411.
- 69.
Stark KE. Ecology of the Arrow Squid (Nototodarus gouldi) in southeastern Australian Waters: a multi-scale investigation of spatial and temporal variability [PhD dissertation]. Australia: University of Tasmania; 2008.
- 70. Ward TM, Goldsworthy SD, Rogers PJ, Page B, McLeay LJ, Dimmlich WF, et al. Ecological importance of small pelagic fishes in the Flinders Current System. Report to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2007/001194-1. 2008.
- 71. Bulman C, Althaus F, He X, Bax NJ, Williams A. Diets and trophic guilds of demersal fishes of the south-eastern Australian shelf. Marine and Freshwater Research. 2001;52(4):537–48. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99152.
- 72. O’Sullivan D, Cullen JM. Food of the squid (Nototodarus gouldi) in Bass Strait. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1983;34(2):261–85. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9830261.
- 73. Neira FJ, Lyle JM, Keane JP. Shelf spawning habitat of Emmelichthys nitidus in south-eastern Australia–Implications and suitability for egg-based biomass estimation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2009;81(4):521–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.12.012.
- 74. Webb BF, Grant CJ. Age and growth of Jack Mackerel (Trachurus declivis), from South-eastern Australian waters. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1979;30(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9790001.
- 75. McLeod DJ, Hobday AJ, Lyle JM, Welsford DC. A prey-related shift in the abundance of small pelagic fish in eastern Tasmania? ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2012;69(6):953–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss069.
- 76. Young JW, Jordan AR, Bobbi C, Johannes RE, Haskard K, Pullen G. Seasonal and interannual variability in krill (Nyctiphanes australis) stocks and their relationship to the fishery for jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis) off eastern Tasmania, Australia. Marine Biology. 1993;116(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00350726.
- 77. Santoso A, Hendon H, Watkins A, Power S, Dommenget D, England MH, et al. Dynamics and predictability of El Niño–Southern Oscillation: An Australian perspective on progress and challenges. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2019;100(3):403–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0057.1.
- 78. Harley CDG, Hughes AR, Hultgren KM, Miner BG, Sorte CJB, Thornber CS, et al. The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters. 2006;9(2):228–41. pmid:16958887
- 79. Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, Stephens JS. Changes in an assemblage of temperate reef fishes associated with a climate shift. Ecological Applications. 1997;7(4):1299–310. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1299:CIAAOT]2.0.CO;2.
- 80. Sugimoto T, Kimura S, Tadokoro K. Impact of El Niño events and climate regime shift on living resources in the western North Pacific. Progress in Oceanography. 2001;49(1):113–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(01)00018-0.
- 81. Hernández-Miranda E, Ojeda FP. Inter-annual variability in somatic growth rates and mortality of coastal fishes off central Chile: an ENSO driven process? Marine Biology. 2006;149(4):925–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0249-9.
- 82. Kimura S, Nakai M, Sugimoto T. Migration of albacore, Thunnus alalunga, in the North Pacific Ocean in relation to large oceanic phenomena. Fisheries Oceanography. 1997;6(2):51–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2419.1997.00029.x.
- 83. Barber RT, Chavez FP. Biological Consequences of El Niño. Science. 1983;222(4629):1203–10. pmid:17806711
- 84. Chavez FP, Messié M, Pennington JT. Marine primary production in relation to climate variability and change. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2011;3(1):227–60. pmid:21329205
- 85. Currie DR, Sorokin SJ. A preliminary evaluation of the distribution and trophodynamics of demersal fish from Spencer Gulf. Report to the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2010/000088-1. 2010.
- 86.
Gearing JN. The use of stable isotope ratios for tracing the nearshore-offshore exchange of organic matter. Coastal-offshore ecosystem interactions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1988. p. 69–101.
- 87. Lewis RK. Seasonal upwelling along the south-eastern coastline of South Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1981;32(6):843–54. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9810843.
- 88. Rumolo P, Basilone G, Fanelli E, Barra M, Calabrò M, Genovese S, et al. Linking spatial distribution and feeding behavior of Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea). Journal of Sea Research. 2017;121:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2017.01.002.