Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Combined impact of TiO2 nanoparticles and antibiotics on the activity and bacterial community of partial nitrification system

  • Han Xu,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China

  • Binghua Liu,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China

  • Wenyu Qi,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Shandong, China

  • Meng Xu,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China

  • Xiaoyu Cui,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China

  • Jun Liu,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Shandong, China

  • Qiang Li

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    liqiang67@lyu.edu.cn

    Affiliations College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Shandong, China

Abstract

The effects of TiO2 nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) together with antibiotics leaking into wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), especially the partial nitrification (PN) process remain unclear. To evaluate the combined impact and mechanisms of nano-TiO2 and antibiotics on PN systems, batch experiments were carried out with six bench-scale sequencing batch reactors. Nano-TiO2 at a low level had minimal effects on the PN system. In combination with tetracycline and erythromycin, the acute impact of antibiotics was enhanced. Both steps of nitrification were retarded due to the decrease of bacterial activity and abundance, while nitrite-oxidizing bacteria were more sensitive to the inhibition than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Proteobacteria at the phylum level and Nitrosospira at the genus level remained predominant under single and combined impacts. The flow cytometry analysis showed that nano-TiO2 enhanced the toxicity of antibiotics through increasing cell permeability. Our results can help clarify the risks of nano-TiO2 combined with antibiotics to PN systems and explaining the behavior of nanoparticles in WWTPs.

Introduction

In addition to traditional nitrification processes, recent studies have investigated partial nitrification (PN) as a nitrogen removal method [1]. In PN, ammonia is oxidized into nitrite by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) without further transformation into nitrate by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB), resulting in nitrite accumulation. The accumulated nitrite can be directly converted into dinitrogen gas through denitrification, such as in the single-reactor high-activity ammonia removal over nitrite process [2]. Nitrite accumulated through PN, together with ammonia, can also be converted into dinitrogen gas under anoxic conditions by anammox bacteria, such as in the oxygen-limited autotrophic nitrification-denification process [3]. In addition, PN has attracted interest because of its several advantages over traditional nitrification such as reduced energy consumption, shorter reaction time, and lower sludge production [1].

PN is sensitive to various conditions, such as acidity, low dissolved oxygen, high salinity, heavy metals, phenols, and chloramines. Previous studies have shown that all of these factors can inhibit PN and alter the bacterial community [49]. In recent years, new types of inhibitors, such as antibiotics and nano-materials are being deposited into municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).

Antibiotics, commonly used antimicrobials in human being and animal husbandry, are consumed at a rate of 200,000 tons per year worldwide. Most antibiotics are discarded without transformation or degradation, resulting in numerous environmental and health problems [10]. Tetracycline is a tetracycline antibiotic and one of the most commonly used antibiotics in animal production [11]. Erythromycin, a representative macrolide antibiotic, is widely used to treat clinical infections of soft tissue, respiratory and skin [12]. Previous reports have shown that the concentration of tetracycline and erythromycin in raw wastewater can be 25–85 mg/L [13, 14]. These two antibiotics can inhibit bacterial growth and metabolism by disturbing protein synthesis. It has been reported that these two antibiotics can repress the ammonia oxidizing activity of AOB and alter the kinetics of nitrification [15].

Nano-materials are used in coating, clothing, water treatment and as catalysts and biosensors. TiO2 nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) are among the most widely used nano-materials worldwide, with a global production of up to 10,000 tons per year [16]. The predicted concentrations of nano-TiO2 in aeration tanks of WWTPs were in the range of 0.122±0.023 to 12.297±1.707 mg/L [17]. High concentrations of nano-TiO2 can inhibit both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (including AOB) via oxidative stress, coordination effects, and DNA damage [1820].

Several studies have investigated the impact of single factors, such as antibiotics, on the bacterial community during PN [15, 21]. Inhibitors always coexist in the environment to affect the activated sludge system, exhibiting four main effects: independent, additive, synergistic, and antagonistic [22]. For instance, oxytetracycline and Cu(II) had antagonistic combined toxicity towards anammox activity caused by oxytetracycline-metal ion complexes [23]. In contrast, roxithromycin and Cu(II) presented synergistic toxicity because their target sites were independent [24]. In addition, the combined effect of chloramine and copper has also been proved to fit a non-competitive inhibition model [25].

Therefore, nano-TiO2 combined with other inhibitors should be considered as a potential risk to wastewater treatment systems, but the impacts of this multiple contamination have not been widely reported. In this study, PN batch experiments were carried out using six bench-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Nano-TiO2, tetracycline, and erythromycin were added at possible concentrations in WWTPs. Ammonia removal efficiency and nitrite accumulation rate were measured and calculated. The abundance and diversity of bacterial communities under the combined impacts were investigated by quantitative PCR and high-throughput sequencing. The flow cytometry analysis was carried out to identify the influence of nanoparticles and antibiotics on cell permeability.

Materials and methods

Activated sludge

Activated sludge was collected from Linyi College-Town Wastewater Treatment Plant in Shandong, China. The systems were operated under anaerobic–anoxic–oxic (A2/O) processes and the sludge was sampled from the aerobic tank. Samples were taken in sterile polyethylene bottles to the laboratory, and inoculate instantly.

Batch experiments

The batch experiments were carried out with six bench-scale SBRs of 2 L working volume, and the schematic diagram was shown in S1 Fig. The volumetric exchange ratio was 50% and HRT was controlled at 24 h, with 11 h for the aerobic running stage, 0.5 h for the precipitate stage, and 0.5 h for the medium-change stage, respectively. The temperature and aeration rate were controlled at 30°C and 0.2 m3/h.

Activated sludge was inoculated into the reactor with the MLSS concentration of 3500 mg/L. After inoculation, synthetic wastewater without Nano-TiO2 and antibiotics was fed into the reactors for about 20 days to attain partial nitrification with the optimal operational conditions to obtain 50% ammonium and 50% nitrite. The composition of synthetic wastewater fed to the reactor was as follow (g/L): (NH4)2SO4 4.0 g (approximately 400 mg/L), Na2CO3 1.0, NaCl 1.0, K2HPO4·3H2O 1.0, MgSO4·7H2O 0.05, CaCl2 0.1, pH 8.0 [26].

Chemical analysis and calculations

DO and pH were measured by electrode method. Ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N) were analyzed according to standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [27]. Ammonia removal efficiency (ARE) and nitrite accumulation rate (NAR) were calculated as Eqs (1) ~ (2).

(1)(2)

Preparation and addition of Nano-TiO2 and antibiotics stock solutions

Anatase nano-TiO2 with a particle size of 25±10 nm and a specific area of 20–80 m2/g were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Nanoparticles were added into ultrapure water as the concentration of 1 g/L and treated with ultrasonic wave at 33 W for 30 min to scatter it equably. The stock solutions of tetracycline and erythromycin were also made with ultrapure water as the concentration of 1 g/L and then stored at 4 °C.

After attaining partial nitrification, three kinds of Nano-TiO2, tetracycline and erythromycin stock solutions were added into influent respectively or together, to keep the initial doses as Table 1. These concentrations were selected in agreement with previous descriptions in wastewater influents [17].

thumbnail
Table 1. The concentration of Nano-TiO2 and antibiotics in the influents of each reactor.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.t001

DNA extraction from the sludge samples

The sludge samples were taken from the reactor in every phase, including the initial sludge sample written as 0. Genomic DNA was extracted in triplicate from all sludge samples using a SoilGen DNA Kit (CWBIO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA integrity was checked by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The purity and the quantity of extracted DNA were determined by UV spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. DNA extracts were stored at –20°C.

Quantitative PCR for AOB, NOB and total bacteria

Quantification of AOB, NOB and total bacteria was performed using the primers CTO189R/CTO654R, NSR-1113F/NSR-1264R and 338F/518R. All the information of the primers was listed in S1 Table. The qPCR was carried out with 25 μl volume in eight-tubes-per-strip (Axygen) and 2× Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Takara) was used. All PCR amplification used the same thermocycling steps as follows: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 60 s at 95°C, 45 s at 57°C and 45 s at 72°C, and finally 10 min at 72°C [28]. The standard DNA was diluted to 1.47×105−1.47×1010 (total bacteria 16S rDNA), 5.02×104−5.02×109 (AOB 16S rDNA), and 8.04×104−8.04×109 (NOB 16S rDNA) copies/μl, respectively. The reaction was carried out and monitored with an iCycler iQ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The threshold cycle (Ct) values were measured after amplification and the copy numbers were calculated using the standard curve [29].

High-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

The 515F with barcode and 907R primers (as S1 Table) were used to amplify the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes and the thermocycling steps were as follow: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C and 45 s at 72°C, and finally 10 min at 72°C. Amplicons were extracted from 2% agarose gels and purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified amplicons were used for sequencing on Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, USA) using standard protocols. To minimize the effects of random sequencing errors, the completeness of the barcodes and the adapters was checked and the sequences shorter than 50 bps were removed. The sequence number of each sample was normalized and the trimmed sequences for each operational taxonomic unit (OTU) with a 97% sequence identity were obtained using Usearch V7.1. The numbers of sequences and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were counted as S2 Table, which were all above 31000 and 1100 except the initial sludge. All sequences have been submitted to the National Center Biotechnology Information at accession number PRJNA749958.

Taxonomy was assigned via the RDP classifier V2.2 with the Silva databases (http://www.arb-silva.de). Rarefaction curves and Alpha-diversity analysis were generated by Mothur V1.3. Hierarchical cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and community heatmap analysis were performed to depict the similarity and difference between the communities in each sample by R packages.

Flow cytometry analysis for cell permeability

Differential centrifugation was used to obtain bacterial suspension from activated sludge samples, firstly at 4000 rpm for supernatant and then at 10000 rpm for precipitation. After washed twice with 0.85% (w/v) NaCl solution, the bacterial suspension was diluted to a cell density with an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.10±0.02 [30]. One mL of bacterial suspension was stained with 10 μl of propidium iodide (PI) (1 mg/ml, OMEGA, USA) and incubated in the dark for 8 min before measurement [31, 32]. The cell permeability was tested by flow cytometry analysis (FCM, BD FACSCalibur, USA) and PI fluorescent signal was excited by 488 nm. All data were processed with the CellQuest Pro.

Results and discussion

Achievement of partial nitrification

The batch experiments were carried out with six bench-scale SBRs. Ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate were measured and ammonia removal efficiency and nitrite accumulation rate were calculated.

After the reactors were started, the pH and concentration of ammonia nitrogen in the effluent continually decreased, demonstrating the enhancement of the ammonia oxidation reactions. The concentration of nitrate decreased after the 3rd day and nitrite accumulated. Then PN was accomplished until the 20th day in each reactor. The ammonia removal efficiency and nitrite accumulation rate reached approximately 9.58 mg/L/h and 93.2%, respectively, and the ratio between NH4+-N and NO2-N was approximately 1:1 (Fig 1a).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Ammonia nitrogen, nitrite and nitrate concentrations in all systems.

(a) Control group, (b) Nano group, (c) Tet group, (d) Ery group, (e) Nano&Tet group, (f) Nano&Ery group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.g001

Previous studies have shown that NOB is sensitive to free ammonia (FA) and 0.1–1.0 mg/L FA can inhibit NOB growth [33, 34]. AOB has exhibited a stronger tolerance to FA than NOB and can tolerate 300 mg/L FA [35]. Therefore, the system continued PN condition under high FA stress and 27.3 mg/L of FA was accumulated, which was calculated as equation (S1 in S1 Appendix) based on the concentration of ammonia nitrogen and pH value (approximately 6.0).

Combined impact of TiO2 nanoparticles and antibiotics

After achieving PN, nano-TiO2, tetracycline, and erythromycin were added to the synthetic wastewater at the concentrations shown in Table 1.

In the Nano group (Fig 1b), only nano-TiO2 was added. Ammonia removal efficiency and nitrite accumulation rate were similar to those of the control group (Fig 1a), demonstrating that a low level of nano-TiO2 did not inhibit the PN system. Previous studies have shown that nano-TiO2 levels above 20 mg/g in the soil and above 50 mg/L in activated sludge systems can negatively impact environmental bacterial communities [19, 20]. Other studies found that metal oxide nanoparticles were harmless at concentrations predicted to be environmentally relevant and did not inhibit the ammonia oxidation rate or the AOB community [36].

In the Tet group (Fig 1c), only tetracycline was added. Ammonia removal efficiency decreased to 9.09 mg/L/h and nitrite accumulation rate reached 96.4%. Both nitrification steps were completely inhibited and slowed by tetracycline. However, NOB were more sensitive to tetracycline than were AOB, and the inhibition of tetracycline to NOB was found to be stronger than that to AOB [37].

In the Ery group (Fig 1d), only erythromycin was added. Ammonia removal efficiency decreased to 7.27 mg/L/h, indicating that the metabolism of AOB was inhibited. Nitrite oxidation was completely blocked by erythromycin and a significantly low concentration of nitrate was detected in the effluent. The tolerance of AOB and NOB to erythromycin was weaker than that to tetracycline. After adding erythromycin for approximately 10 days, the activated sludge disintegrated and the reactor had to be stopped.

In the Nano&Tet and Nano&Ery groups (Fig 1e and 1f), nano-TiO2 was added to the reactors together with tetracycline and erythromycin, respectively. Ammonia removal efficiency decreased to 8.72 and 5.98 mg/L/h, respectively, which are lower than the values for the Tet and Ery groups. The nitrite accumulation rate reached 94.5% and 100%, respectively. This indicated that nano-TiO2 enhanced the acute impact of antibiotics. Both short-term exposure of nano-TiO2 at high concentration (50–100 mg/L) and long-term exposure of nano-TiO2 at low concentration (5–10 mg/L) negatively impacted the operation of activated sludge system, including inhibition of the organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, reduction of oxygen utilization, promotion of reactive oxygen species production and lactate dehydrogenase release [38, 39]. In contrast, short-term exposure of nano-TiO2 at low concentration could not significantly affect the system behavior, but it might enhance the toxicity of coexisting pollutants, such as heavy metals and natural organic matters [40, 41].

The abundance of nitrifiers and bacteria

To investigate the abundance of the bacterial community under different conditions, quantitative PCR was used to measure the abundance variations in AOB, NOB and total bacteria, and the results were shown in Fig 2.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The count of AOB, NOB and total bacteria measured by qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.g002

The abundance of AOB was 5.74 × 1011 copies/dry sludge (DS) in the initial sludge, accounting for 3.1% of total bacteria. The autotrophic and ammonia-rich environment was beneficial for the enrichment of AOB, which increased to 1.75 × 1012 copies/DS and 15.9% of total bacteria when PN was obtained. Simultaneously, the abundance of total bacteria decreased fractionally to 1.10 × 1013 copies/DS from 1.85 × 1013 copies/DS, as the abundance of autotrophic bacteria increased slowly for its low growth rate while the abundance of heterotrophic bacteria deceased fast in autotrophic system without carbon source. The ratio of AOB and NOB was enhanced to 5.37 × 105 because NOB was restrained by FA. The specific growth rate of AOB was about 6.3 fold of NOB under high FA stress (S2 Table), leading to the large gap in bacterial count between AOB and NOB.

In the Nano group, the abundances of AOB, NOB, and total bacteria were all similar to those in the control group, further demonstrating that nano-TiO2 had only a minimal impact on the PN system at the predicted concentration in WWTPs.

In the Tet group and Ery group, the presence of tetracycline or erythromycin in the synthetic wastewater had an inhibitory effect on both AOB and NOB. While NOB was more susceptible to antibiotics, so that its decrease was larger than that of AOB and the increase in growth rate between AOB and NOB became larger under antibiotics treatment. The abundances of AOB and NOB were 5.88 × 1011 and 7.62 × 104 copies/DS in the Tet group and 5.26 × 1010 and 1.16 × 104 copies/DS in the Ery group, respectively. These results demonstrated that compared to tetracycline, erythromycin inhibited nitrifiers more strongly, which is consistent with the results of Katipoglu-Yazan et al. [15]. The decrease in total bacteria was small because several types of heterotrophic bacteria exhibited antibiotic resistance.

Antibiotics combined with nano-TiO2 showed greater toxicity towards nitrifiers, reducing the abundance of AOB and NOB to 2.02×1011 and 2.28×104 copies/DS in the Nano&Tet group and 3.11×1010 and 3.88×103 copies/DS in the Nano&Ery group. The cytotoxicity and environmental risk of nano-TiO2 has been widely reported [19]. Nanoparticles could accumulate on the surface of cells when approaching bacterial communities [42]. This can lead to oxidative stress or nucleic acid damage, even if only a small quantity of nanoparticles enters the cells [43]. This damage can also be combined with the negative effects of antibiotics. Furthermore, nanoparticles adhered to the surface of bacterial cells can change the structure and properties of the cell membrane to enhance cellular permeability [44], which allows a greater amount of inhibitors to pass through the cell membrane.

The diversity of bacterial community

The Chao estimator and ACE estimator were calculated to characterize community richness, whereas the Shannon index and Simpson index were calculated to estimate community diversity (Table 2). The lowest richness and diversity of the bacterial community was observed in the initial sludge, which showed that PN could enhance both richness and diversity of bacterial community in comparison with traditional activated sludge process. After PN was obtained, the community richness and diversity showed a remarkable increase, but nano-TiO2 did not influence this richness and diversity. Compared to the control group, erythromycin shock made the community richness, diversity and evenness lower, which implied that erythromycin washed out a large number of microorganisms. In contrast, tetracycline increased the evenness, which implied that tetracycline uniformized bacterial community. This might be due that tetracycline reduced the relative proportions of the dominant species in the microbial community, which could leave niche for rare species. Similar results were also reported by previous studies [45]. Therefore, the uniformized microbial community caused by tetracycline also showed higher richness and diversity compared to the control treatment. Combined with nano-TiO2 could made the community diversity a tiny drop in both tetracycline and erythromycin groups.

thumbnail
Table 2. The alpha diversity index of each experimental group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.t002

Several phyla remained predominant in all experimental groups, including Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chlorobi (Fig 3). AOB and NOB were affiliated with Proteobacteria, the most dominant phylum accounting for 35.8–59.1% of organisms in each system. The abundance of Proteobacteria in the Tet group was higher than that in the control group. The amounts of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Chlorobi enhanced after autotrophic domestication. It has been reported that these three phyla are frequently detected in PN systems [5, 46, 47] and several members of them are identified as autotrophic bacteria [48]. In addition, the abundance of Chloroflexi, the second most dominant phylum, increased under erythromycin shock.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Relative abundance and hierarchical cluster analysis of all samples at phylum level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.g003

Although the predominant phyla remained stable, the predominant genera shifted between different experimental groups (Fig 4). Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira, the most important AOB in activated sludge, showed similar richness accounting for approximately 1.3% of bacteria in the initial sludge. After PN was achieved, Nitrosospira became one of the predominant genera at an abundance of more than 12%, but decreased under antibiotic shock, reaching the lowest value in the Nano&Ery group. Nitrosomonas showed a relative abundance of 1/5 to 1/10 lower than Nitrosospira in all PN systems, but increased under tetracycline shock. AOB has been reported to include several different species, such as the strains of Nitrosococcus sp. within Gamma-Proteobacteria, and the genera Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira within Beta-Proteobacteria [49]. In this study, both Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira were enriched, but Nitrosococcus was not detected according to phylogenetic analysis. Previous studies have shown that high nitrogen environments may be beneficial for the enrichment of Nitrosospira [50, 51].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Bacterial community heatmap analysis of all samples at genus level.

Top 30 genera were selected and the color intensity of scale indicates relative abundance of each OTU read.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.g004

Some genera, such as Sphingobium, were notably enhanced after PN, while others, such as Flavobacterium, were washed out under high ammonia nitrogen. However, none of the top 30 predominant genera in the control group were removed under antibiotics and nanoparticle shock, suggesting that combined shock has a lower impact than autotrophic domestication under high nitrogen. The alpha-diversity index (Table 2), hierarchical cluster analysis (Fig 3), and PCA (S3 Fig) revealed that initial sludge was separated from the other groups. Additionally, the antibiotics had a stronger impact on the shift in the bacterial community than nano-TiO2.

The change of cell permeability

The flow cytometry analysis was used to investigate the influence of nano-TiO2 and antibiotics on cell permeability (Fig 5). The PI uptake in the Nano group had a tiny increase compared to the control group. Although low-dose nano-TiO2 presented no harm to the community in activated sludge, it enhanced bacterial cell permeability. Some other nanoparticles also showed the same function [52, 53]. Tetracycline and erythromycin inhibited the metabolism of bacterial cells and generated a mass of dead cells by binding ribosomal subunit and disturbing protein synthesis, which significantly increased the PI uptake.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Flow cytometry analysis for bacterial cell permeability of each sludge samples.

(a) Control group, (b) Nano group, (c) Tet group, (d) Ery group, (e) Nano&Tet group, (f) Nano&Ery group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.g005

In the Nano&Tet group and the Nano&Ery group, PI uptake was much higher than that in the Tet group and the Ery group, suggesting that the combined impacts significantly decreased the antibiotic resistance of the systems [31, 32]. Bacteria can reduce intracellular availability of antibiotics by inhibiting or replacing outer membrane porins and overexpressing efflux pumps. Previous studies have proved that some kinds of nanoparticles, such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), have synergistic antimicrobial effect with antibiotics [53]. As photocatalyst, low-dose nano-TiO2 lost its antimicrobial effect in dark environment, but could raise intracellular availability of antibiotics by enhancing cell permeability. Therefore, the environmental risk of nanoparticles combined with other pollutants need more attention.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. The equations of free ammonia and specific growth rates of AOB and NOB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s001

(DOC)

S1 Fig. Schematic diagram of the SBR.

1: reaction tank; 2: storage tank; 3: pump; 4: blower; 5: air diffuser; 6: flow meter; 7: time-delay device; 8: influent; 9: effluent.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s002

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The rarefaction curve of all samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s003

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on Illumina sequencing data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. The PCR primer sequences and targets in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s005

(DOC)

S3 Table. The specific growth rates of AOB and NOB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259671.s007

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Linyi College-Town Wastewater Treatment Plant for providing activated sludge.

References

  1. 1. Wang JP, Li LZ, Liu YD, Li W. A review of partial nitrification in biological nitrogen removal processes: from development to application. Biodegradation. 2021; 32(3): 229–249. pmid:33825095
  2. 2. Shalini SS, Joseph K. Nitrogen management in landfill leachate: application of SHARON, ANAMMOX and combined SHARON-ANAMMOX process. Waste Manag. 2012; 32(12): 2385–2400. pmid:22766438
  3. 3. Vlaeminck SE, Clippeleir HD, Verstraete W. Microbial resource management of one-stage partial nitritation/anammox. Microb Biotechnol. 2012; 5(3): 433–448. pmid:22452819
  4. 4. Liang Z, Han Z, Yang S, Liang X, Du P, Liu G, et al. A control strategy of partial nitritation in a fixed bed biofilm reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102(2): 710–715. pmid:20971638
  5. 5. Sui Q, Liu C, Zhang J, Dong H, Zhu Z, Wang Y. Response of nitrite accumulation and microbial community to free ammonia and dissolved oxygen treatment of high ammonium wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016; 100(9): 4177–4187. pmid:26743659
  6. 6. Wan C, Yang X, Lee DJ, Liu X, Sun S, Chen C. Partial nitrification of wastewaters with high NaCl concentrations by aerobic granules in continuous-flow reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014; 152: 1–6. pmid:24269852
  7. 7. Aslan S, Gurbuz B. Influence of operational parameters and low nickel concentrations on partial nitrification in a submerged biofilter. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011; 165(7–8): 1543–1555. pmid:21927858
  8. 8. Zepeda A, Ben-Youssef C, Rincon S, Cuervo-López F, Gómez J. Complete and simultaneous removal of ammonium and m-cresol in a nitrifying sequencing batch reactor. Biodegradation. 2013; 24(3): 377–385. pmid:23054182
  9. 9. Gomez-Alvarez V, Schrantz KA, Pressman JG, Wahman DG. Biofilm community dynamics in bench-scale annular reactors simulating arrestment of chloraminated drinking water nitrification. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(10): 5448–5457. pmid:24754322
  10. 10. Jelic A, Gros M, Ginebreda A, Cespedes-Sánchez R, Ventura F, Petrovic M, et al. Occurrence, partition and removal of pharmaceuticals in sewage water and sludge during wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011; 45(3): 1165–1176. pmid:21167546
  11. 11. Daghrir R, Drogui P. Tetracycline antibiotics in the environment: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2013; 11(3): 209–227.
  12. 12. Liang J, Han X. Structure-Activity Relationships and Mechanism of Action of Macrolides Derived from Erythromycin as Antibacterial Agents. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013; 13(24): 3131–3164. pmid:24200358
  13. 13. Wang W, Gao M, Cao MB, Dan JM, Yang HB. Self-propagating synthesis of Zn-loaded biochar for tetracycline elimination. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 759: 143542. pmid:33190887
  14. 14. Chu LB, Wang JL, He SJ, Chen CH, Wojnárovits L, Takács E. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by ionizing radiation: Removal of antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance genes and antimicrobial activity. J Hazard Mater. 2021; 415: 125724. pmid:34088196
  15. 15. Katipoglu-Yazan T, Pala-Ozkok I, Ubay-Cokgor E, Orhon D. Acute impact of erythromycin and tetracycline on the kinetics of nitrification and organic carbon removal in mixed microbial culture. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 144: 410–419. pmid:23892149
  16. 16. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B. Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res. 2012; 14: 1109–1119.
  17. 17. Li K, Qian J, Wang PF, Wang C, Lu BH, Tian X, et al. Differential responses of encoding-amoA nitrifiers and nir denitrifiers in activated sludge to anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles: What is active functional guild in rate limiting step of nitrogen cycle? J Hazard Mater. 2020; 384: 121388. pmid:31668758
  18. 18. Dizaj SM, Lotfipour F, Barzegar-Jalali M, Zarrintan MH, Adibkia K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014; 44: 278–284. pmid:25280707
  19. 19. Ge Y, Priester JH, Van De Werfhorst LC, Schimel JP, Holden PA. Potential Mechanisms and Environmental Controls of TiO2 Nanoparticle Effects on Soil Bacterial Communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(24): 14411–14417. pmid:24256577
  20. 20. Li DP, Li B, Wang QR, Hou N, Li CY, Cheng XS. Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticle to denitrifying strain CFY1 and the impact on microbial community structures in activated sludge. Chemosphere. 2016; 144: 1334–1341. pmid:26479452
  21. 21. Gonzalez-Martinez A, Rodriguez-Sanchez A, Martinez-Toledo MV, Garcia-Ruiz MJ, Hontoria E, Osorio-Robles F, et al. Effect of ciprofloxacin antibiotic on the partial-nitritation process and bacterial community structure of a submerged biofilter. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 476–477: 276–287. pmid:24468502
  22. 22. Ding S, Wu J, Zhang M, Lu H, Mahmood Q, Zheng P. Acute toxicity assessment of ANAMMOX substrates and antibiotics by luminescent bacteria test. Chemosphere. 2015; 140: 174–183. pmid:25912634
  23. 23. Yang GF, Jin RC. The joint inhibitory effects of phenol, copper(II), oxytetracycline (OTC) and sulfide on Anammox activity. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 126: 187–192. pmid:23073107
  24. 24. Guo Q, Shi ZJ, Xu JL, Yang CC, Huang M, Shi ML, et al. Inhibition of the partial nitritation by roxithromycin and Cu(II). Bioresour Technol. 2016; 214: 253–258. pmid:27136613
  25. 25. Sarker DC, Sathasivan A, Rittmann BE. Modelling combined effect of chloramine and copper on ammonia-oxidizing microbial activity using a biostability approach. Water Res. 2015; 84: 190–197. pmid:26233658
  26. 26. Li Q, Sun SF, Guo TF, Yang C, Song CJ, Geng WT, et al. Short-cut nitrification in biological aerated filters with modified zeolite and nitrifying sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 136: 148–154. pmid:23567675
  27. 27. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twentieth ed. 1998; United Book Press, USA.
  28. 28. Okano Y, Hristova KR, Leutenegger CM, Jackson LE, Denison RF, Gebreyesus B, et al. Application of real-time PCR to study effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70: 1008–1016. pmid:14766583
  29. 29. Zhang B, Sun B, Ji M, Liu H, Liu X. Quantification and comparison of ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in MBRs treating various types of wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101(9): 3054–3059. pmid:20060290
  30. 30. Yang C, Zhang W, Liu R, Li Q, Li B, Wang S, et al. Phylogenetic diversity and metabolic potential of activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(17): 7408–7415. pmid:21780771
  31. 31. Wang Y, Lu J, Mao LK, Li J, Yuan ZG, Bond PL, et al. Antiepileptic drug carbamazepine promotes horizontal transfer of plasmid-borne multi-antibiotic resistance genes within and across bacterial genera. ISME J. 2019; 13(2): 509–522. pmid:30291330
  32. 32. Yu ZG, Wang Y, Lu J, Bond PL, Guo JH. Nonnutritive sweeteners can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance through conjugative gene transfer. ISME J. 2021; 15(7): 2117–2130. pmid:33589766
  33. 33. Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TBS, Srinath EG. Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control. 1976; 48: 835–852. pmid:948105
  34. 34. Abeling U, Seyfried CF. Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of high-strength ammonium wastewater—nitrogen removal via nitrite. Water Sci Technol. 1992; 26(5–6): 1007–1015.
  35. 35. Van Hulle SWH, Volcke EIP, Teruel JL, Donckels B, van Loosdrecht MCM, Vanrolleghem PA. Influence of temperature and pH on the kinetics of the Sharon nitritation process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2007; 82(5): 471–480.
  36. 36. Luo Z, Qiu Z, Chen Z, Du Laing G, Liu A, et al. Impact of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles at predicted environmentally relevant concentrations on ammonia-oxidizing bacteria cultures under ammonia oxidation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015; 22(4): 2891–2899.
  37. 37. Shi YJ, Xing SF, Wang XH, Wang SG. Changes of the reactor performance and the properties of granular sludge under tetracycline (TC) stress. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 139: 170–175. pmid:23660380
  38. 38. Zhang J, Dong Q, Liu YC, Zhou XH, Shi HC. Response to shock load of engineered nanoparticles in an activated sludge treatment system: Insight into microbial community succession. Chemosphere. 2016; 144: 1837–1844. pmid:26539708
  39. 39. Li ZW, Wang XJ, Ma BR, Wang S, Zheng D, She ZL, et al. Long-term impacts of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) on performance and microbial community of activated sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 238: 361–368. pmid:28456044
  40. 40. Wang DX, Wang PF, Wang C, Ao YH. Effects of interactions between humic acid and heavy metal ions on the aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles in water environment. Environ Pollut. 2019; 248: 834–844. pmid:30856499
  41. 41. Yuan BL, Wang PF, Sang LQ, Gong JH, Pan Y, Hu YH. QNAR modeling of cytotoxicity of mixing nano-TiO2 and heavy metals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 208: 111634. pmid:33396154
  42. 42. Arnaout CL, Gunsch CK. Impacts of silver nanoparticle coating on the nitrification potential of Nitrosomonas europaea. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(10): 5387–5395. pmid:22533675
  43. 43. Yu R, Fang X, Somasundaran P, Chandran K. Short-term effects of TiO2, CeO2, and ZnO nanoparticles on metabolic activities and gene expression of Nitrosomonas europaea. Chemosphere. 2015; 128: 207–215. pmid:25710320
  44. 44. May S. Theories on structural perturbations of lipid bilayers. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2000; 5(3–4): 244–249.
  45. 45. Cycoń M, Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Antibiotics in the Soil Environment-Degradation and Their Impact on Microbial Activity and Diversity. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10: 338. pmid:30906284
  46. 46. Du R, Cao S, Li B, Niu M, Wang S, Peng Y. Performance and microbial community analysis of a novel DEAMOX based on partial-denitrification and anammox treating ammonia and nitrate wastewaters. Water Res. 2017; 108: 46–56. pmid:27817892
  47. 47. Wang B, Peng Y, Guo Y, Zhao M, Wang S. Illumina MiSeq sequencing reveals the key microorganisms involved in partial nitritation followed by simultaneous sludge fermentation, denitrification and anammox process. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 207: 118–125. pmid:26874440
  48. 48. Wen X, Zhou J, Li YC, Qing XX, He Q. A novel process combining simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) with denitrifying phosphorus removal (DPR) to treat sewage. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 222: 309–316. pmid:27728833
  49. 49. Kowalchuk GA, Stephen JR, Boer WD, Prosser JI, Embley TM, Woldendorp JW. Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63: 1489–1497. pmid:9097446
  50. 50. Horz HP, Rotthauwe JH, Lukow T, Liesack W. Identification of major subgroups of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in environmental samples by T-RFLP analysis of amoA PCR products. J Microbiol Methods. 2000; 39: 197–204. pmid:10670766
  51. 51. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen JP, Winefield CS, O’Callaghan M, Bowatte S, et al. Nitrification driven by bacteria and not archaea in nitrogen-rich grassland soils. Nature Geoscience. 2009; 2: 621–624.
  52. 52. Wang X, Yang F, Zhao J, Xu Y, Mao D, Zhu X, et al. Bacterial exposure to ZnO nanoparticles facilitates horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. NanoImpact. 2018; 10: 61–67.
  53. 53. Vazquez-Muñoz R, Meza-Villezcas A, Fournier PGJ, Soria-Castro E, Juarez-Moreno K, Gallego-Hernández AL, et al. Enhancement of antibiotics antimicrobial activity due to the silver nanoparticles impact on the cell membrane. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11): e0224904. pmid:31703098