Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Exposure of pelagic seabirds to Toxoplasma gondii in the Western Indian Ocean points to an open sea dispersal of this terrestrial parasite

  • Marie-Lazarine Poulle ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    marie-lazarine.poulle@univ-reims.fr

    Affiliations Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France, CERFE, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Boult-aux-Bois, France

  • Matthieu Le Corre,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation UMR Ecologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien (ENTROPIE), CNRS IRD, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Université de la Réunion, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France

  • Matthieu Bastien,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France, UMR Ecologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien (ENTROPIE), CNRS IRD, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Université de la Réunion, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France, Université de La Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical (PIMIT), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France

  • Elsa Gedda,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France

  • Chris Feare,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation WildWings Bird Management, Haslemere, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Audrey Jaeger,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation UMR Ecologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien (ENTROPIE), CNRS IRD, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Université de la Réunion, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France

  • Christine Larose,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation WildWings Bird Management, Haslemere, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Nirmal Shah,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Center for Environment and Education, Nature Seychelles, Roche Caïman, Mahé, Seychelles

  • Nina Voogt,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Cousine Island, Seychelles

  • Byron Göpper,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Cousine Island, Seychelles

  • Erwan Lagadec,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Université de La Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical (PIMIT), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France

  • Gérard Rocamora,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre, University of Seychelles, Anse Royale, Seychelles, Island Conservation Society, Mahé, Seychelles

  • Régine Geers,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliations Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Centre de Ressources Biologiques Toxoplasma, CHU Reims, Reims, France

  • Dominique Aubert,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Centre de Ressources Biologiques Toxoplasma, CHU Reims, Reims, France

  • Isabelle Villena,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Epidémio-Surveillance et Circulation des Parasites dans les Environnements (ESCAPE), EA 7510, CAP SANTE, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Centre de Ressources Biologiques Toxoplasma, CHU Reims, Reims, France

  •  [ ... ],
  • Camille Lebarbenchon

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Université de La Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical (PIMIT), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan parasite that uses felids as definitive hosts and warm-blooded animals as intermediate hosts. While the dispersal of T. gondii infectious oocysts from land to coastal waters has been well documented, transmission routes to pelagic species remain puzzling. We used the modified agglutination test (MAT titre ≥ 10) to detect antibodies against T. gondii in sera collected from 1014 pelagic seabirds belonging to 10 species. Sampling was carried out on eight islands of the Western Indian Ocean: Reunion and Juan de Nova (colonized by cats), Cousin, Cousine, Aride, Bird, Europa and Tromelin islands (cat-free). Antibodies against T. gondii were found in all islands and all species but the great frigatebird. The overall seroprevalence was 16.8% [95% CI: 14.5%-19.1%] but significantly varied according to species, islands and age-classes. The low antibody levels (MAT titres = 10 or 25) detected in one shearwater and three red-footed booby chicks most likely resulted from maternal antibody transfer. In adults, exposure to soils contaminated by locally deposited oocysts may explain the detection of antibodies in both wedge-tailed shearwaters on Reunion Island and sooty terns on Juan de Nova. However, 144 adults breeding on cat-free islands also tested positive. In the Seychelles, there was a significant decrease in T. gondii prevalence associated with greater distances to cat populations for species that sometimes rest on the shore, i.e. terns and noddies. This suggests that oocysts carried by marine currents could be deposited on shore tens of kilometres from their initial deposition point and that the number of deposited oocysts decreases with distance from the nearest cat population. The consumption of fishes from the families Mullidae, Carangidae, Clupeidae and Engraulidae, previously described as T. gondii oocyst-carriers (i.e. paratenic hosts), could also explain the exposure of terns, noddies, boobies and tropicbirds to T. gondii. Our detection of antibodies against T. gondii in seabirds that fish in the high sea, have no contact with locally contaminated soils but frequent the shores and/or consume paratenic hosts supports the hypothesis of an open-sea dispersal of T. gondii oocysts by oceanic currents and/or fish.

Introduction

The land-to-sea transport of the free infective forms of zoonotic protozoa (oocysts or cyst), dispersed with the faeces of humans, pets and farm animals has a growing negative impact on public health and marine life [1, 2]. While several studies have been carried out on faecal contamination of the coastal environment with Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Toxoplasma [35], less attention has been paid to the open ocean, resulting in a critical lack of information on the transmission routes of protozoan parasites to pelagic species. This gap is particularly problematic for Toxoplasma gondii because this apicomplexan parasite is currently emerging as an important pathogen in aquatic systems [68]. Toxoplasma gondii is responsible for toxoplasmosis, one of the most common parasitic infections of warm-blooded animals, including humans [9]. The finding of acute toxoplasmosis and the detection of antibodies against T. gondii in marine mammals in the Eastern, Central and Western Pacific [10], the Canadian Arctic [11], the Northeastern and Western Atlantic [10, 12], the Philippine archipelago [13] and the Mediterranean Sea [14] suggests a worldwide contamination of marine habitats.

The environmental contamination with T. gondii necessarily comes from felids since domestic cat, Felis catus, and wild felids are the only known definitive hosts in which the sexual multiplication of T. gondii occurs, resulting in the faecal shedding of oocysts into the environment [15]. These oocysts are highly resistant and can remain infective in soils for months [1618]. All warm-blooded animals can be intermediate host for T. gondii [9]. Once the oocysts have been ingested by a mammal or a bird, the development of T. gondii continues until the formation of infecting tissue cysts [19]. These cysts can persist lifelong in the host and IgG antibodies probably do the same [9, 20]. The prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii is therefore generally higher in adult than in juvenile populations, both in wild birds [21] and in wild and domestic mammals [22, 23] due to a longer period of exposure which increases the likelihood of infection.

Acute toxoplasmosis is rarely reported in terrestrial birds and mammals that have co-evolved with felids and their parasites, but wildlife species recently exposed to T. gondii can be severely affected [24, 25]. Fatal toxoplasmosis is notably reported in marsupials and native terrestrial birds in Australia [26, 27] and Hawaii [28] where T. gondii was absent until the introduction of the domestic cat. Meningoencephalitis associated with T. gondii also results in morbidity and mortality in free-ranging sea otters, Enhydra lutris [29], sea lions, Zalophus californianus [30] and dolphins [14], especially when associated with poly-parasitism or environmental pollutants [31, 32]. As a result, T. gondii is considered a pathogen of concern for several marine mammal species [33].

Recent molecular epidemiology studies provide evidence that freshwater can carry T. gondii oocysts from terrestrial to marine coastal habitats [3436]. The dilution of oocysts to a low concentration in the marine environment is compensated by their ability to survive and to remain infectious for several months in seawater [37], by their filtration and bio-accumulation in marine bivalves [38, 39] and their capture by planktonic animals that are a major source of food for fish and invertebrates [7, 40]. Oocysts can also adhere to kelp grazed by marine snails, resulting in a high concentration of oocysts in their faecal pellets [41, 42]. In addition, infectious oocysts can be transported in the digestive tract of migratory filter feeding fish [43]. The consumption of marine fishes and invertebrates that carry T. gondii oocysts (i.e. paratenic hosts) may therefore be considered as responsible for the contamination of coastal marine predators like sea otters [34, 44, 45], coastal dolphins foraging in Atlantic Ocean bays and Mediterranean coasts [46, 47] or beluga whales and seals from the St. Lawrence stream, Canada [48, 49]. Antibodies against T. gondii have also been detected far away from potential contamination sources by cats as in Weddell seals, Leptonychotes weddellii, and elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, sampled in the Antarctic Peninsula [50, 51], or in pelagic dolphins [14, 46], as well as in pelagic seabirds breeding on felid-free islands [5254]. In all these cases, the transport of infectious oocysts by marine currents or by fish have been mentioned as the two likely routes of transmission of T. gondii to pelagic species but without evidence of the involvement of one and/or the other in the exposure of the species studied.

The present study aims at exploring the variability in exposure to T. gondii in ten pelagic seabird species breeding in the Western Indian Ocean in order to elucidate the routes of transmission of this protozoan to “offshore” species. Pelagic seabirds are good models for assessing the relative importance of T. gondii transmission routes in pelagic environments since they spend most of their time far at sea, rarely venturing close to land except to breed, and obtain their food and most of their drinking water from fish, squids and other marine invertebrates [55]. Serum samples were obtained from seabirds breeding on eight islands, two of which are colonized by cats and six are felid-free. Based on this sampling, we tested whether the prevalence of T. gondii in seabirds varied according to age-class, species, islands and nesting habits. In particular, we expected a lower prevalence on cat-free islands than on islands where birds are exposed to oocysts dispersed by resident cats, and a higher prevalence in ground nesters than in tree-nesters as the latter are assumed to be less exposed to oocyst-contaminated soil. For species that frequent the coastline (i.e. terns and noddies), we expected a higher prevalence on islands close to cat populations than on remote islands, as the latter are assumed to receive lower numbers of oocysts on their shores. Finally, based on the literature on seabird diet, we discussed the relationship between the prevalence of T. gondii in seabirds and their consumption of paratenic-host fish.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

Procedures were evaluated and approved by an ethic committee (agreement # A974 001, Comité d’éthique du CYROI # 114; Cyclotron Réunion Océan Indien, Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France), and authorized by The French Ministry of Education and Research (reference number APAFIS#3719-2016012110233597v2). Sample collection on Reunion Island, Europa, Juan de Nova and Tromelin was conducted under the approval of the Direction de l’Environnement, de l’Aménagement et du Logement de la Réunion and the Terres Australes and Antarctiques Françaises. Fieldwork and collection of biological material in the Seychelles were approved by the Seychelles Bureau of Standards and the Seychelles Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change.

Study sites and sample collection

Sampling was conducted on eight oceanic islands of the Western Indian Ocean (Fig 1): Reunion Island is part of the Mascarenes Archipelago; Aride, Bird, Cousin and Cousine are part of the Seychelles Archipelago; Tromelin lies between the Mascarenes Archipelago and the Seychelles Archipelago; Juan de Nova and Europa are in the Mozambique Channel.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Location of the eight Western Indian Ocean islands where seabird populations were sampled for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies between 2011 and 2015.

The orange lozenges correspond to islands inhabited by cats, the green dots to islands free of cats. Blue arrows indicated surface marine currents. SEC = South Equatorial Current, NEMC = North-East Madagascar Current, SEMC = South-East Madagascar Current, EACC = East African Coastal Current, SECC = South Equatorial Counter Current. Dashed arrow in the Mozambique Channel shows eddy circulation. Source: Schott et al. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000245 [56].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.g001

The sampled islands have different histories regarding the presence of cats (Table 1). Cats were likely introduced to Reunion Island in the 17th century and now occupy all habitats on the island [57]. Cats were introduced on Juan de Nova in the 20th century and their population was significantly reduced between 2006 and 2011, but not eradicated at that time [58]. In the Seychelles Archipelago, cats used to be present on Bird [59, 60], Aride [61] and Cousine but were eradicated several decades ago [62]. Cousin, Europa and Tromelin have always been free of cats [62, 63]. In addition, Cousin, Cousine, Aride and Bird are approximately 2 km, 5 km, 9 km and 80 km from Praslin, the nearest cat-inhabited island of the Seychelles archipelago, while Europa and Tromelin are approximatively 300 km and 430 km away from the closest feline population (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Information on the 1014 seabirds sampled in the Western Indian Ocean between 2011 and 2015 whose sera were tested for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (MAT ≥ 10).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.t001

In total, 1014 individuals belonging to ten seabird species were included in this study (Table 1 and S1 Table). Most samples were collected between 2011 and 2013 as part of a previous study [64] except on Cousin and Cousine where samples were collected in 2015. The sampling strategy was designed to include a maximum number of species on each island. This sampling was adjusted in relation to local geographic, safety and ethical constraints that restrict access to bird colonies, such as in highly mountainous regions (e.g. Reunion Island) or for species highly sensitive to human disturbance (e.g. great frigatebird, Fregata minor). Birds were captured with bare hands or hand nets. Individual birds were categorized as chicks (non-flying birds fully dependent on parental feeding), juveniles (sexually immature flying birds), or adults (sexually mature birds, breeding or non-breeding). Whole blood (maximum of 1.0% of body weight) was collected from the medial metatarsal or basilic veins, as appropriate for each species. In the field, blood samples were collected in 2 ml micro-tubes placed in a cooler with ice packs and centrifuged within 12 hours after collection. Sera were transferred in cryogenic tubes and stored at -20°C. Samples were shipped to the laboratory in Reunion Island within a week and held at -20°C until tested.

Serological assay

Sera were examined by the Modified agglutination test (MAT) described by Dubey and Desmonts [65]. This serological assay is the most sensitive, specific and used for the detection of IgG antibodies against T. gondii in birds [66, 67]. MAT antigen consisted of formalinized tachyzoïtes produced at the Laboratory of Parasitology, National Centre on Toxoplasmosis, Reims, France. Sera were first screened using 1:6, 1:10 and 1:25 dilutions in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS, pH 7.2). Those agglutinating the antigen at one (or more) of these screening dilutions were further tested in a serial 2-fold dilution, to a maximum dilution of 1:12800. Serum samples with agglutination at MAT titre ≥10 (i.e. serum dilution ≥ 1:25) were considered positive for the presence of T. gondii antibodies [67, 68]. Samples showing agglutination at further dilution were also mentioned to allow comparisons with literature data based on different dilution thresholds.

Statistical analyses

Pearson Chi square test (χ2) were used to investigate the effect of the bird species, island, bird age-class (adult versus chick), and nest type (tree-nesting vs ground-nesting, S1 Table) on the probability of successful detection of T. gondii antibodies. Juveniles (N = 14) were excluded from the analysis because of the very low number of sampled birds as compared to chicks (N = 159) and adults (N = 841). Analyses were conducted in R 3.6.3 [69].

Results

Antibodies against T. gondii were detected on all islands and all species, except the great frigatebird (Table 1). The overall seroprevalence was 16.8% [95% CI: 14.5%-19.1%]. MAT titres for the 170 seropositive birds ranged from 10 to 400 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Number of samples tested positive for Toxoplasma gondii antibodies per species, age-class and titre of the Modified Agglutination Test (MAT).

In brackets: corresponding dilution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.t002

The prevalence of T. gondii antibodies varied according to bird species (χ2 = 69, df = 990, p < 0.001), islands (χ2 = 17, df = 992, p < 0.05) and bird age class (χ2 = 36, df = 998, p < 0.001). However, differences between bird age classes should be interpreted cautiously because of the low number of chicks as compared to adults, and of the uneven distribution of the sampled chicks for each species (Table 1). The probability of detection of T. gondii antibodies varied between bird species in both chicks (χ2 = 10.3, df = 155, p < 0.05) and adults (χ2 = 66, df = 831, p < 0.001; Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii per species in the adult seabirds sampled in the Western Indian Ocean (sample size and percentage with 95% confidence intervals).

Colours indicate bird orders (blue: Charadriiformes, red: Phaethontiformes, yellow: Suliformes, green: Procellariformes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.g002

In adults, T. gondii prevalence was 5.3% ± 4.1% in wedge-tailed shearwater, 5.8% ± 7.9% in red-tailed tropicbird, 6.7% ± 5.6% in lesser noddy, 6.8% ± 7.4% in red-footed booby, 24.4% ± 4.4% in sooty tern, 27.7% ± 8.4% in brown noddy, 40% ± 43% in masked booby, and 52.9% ± 23.7% in bridled tern. Prevalence of T. gondii in adults was significantly lower in tree-nesting than ground-nesting species (6% ± 4% versus 21% ± 3%, χ2 = 21, df = 839, p < 0.001). The probability of detection of T. gondii antibodies in adults varied significantly between islands (χ2 = 16, df = 833, p < 0.05; Fig 3) but prevalence on islands inhabited by cats (Reunion and Juan de Nova) did not significantly differ from prevalence on cat-free islands (χ2 = 0.38, df = 839, p < 0.53).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii per islands in the adult seabirds sampled in the Western Indian Ocean (sample size and percentage with 95% confidence intervals).

Reunion and Juan de Nova are the only islands inhabited by cats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.g003

Differences in the prevalence of T. gondii in adults were also detected between populations (i.e. islands) of the same species (Fig 4) in brown noddy (χ2 = 6.7, df = 105, p < 0.05), sooty tern (χ2 = 16, df = 365, p < 0.001), lesser noddy (χ2 = 7.1, df = 72, p < 0.05) and white-tailed tropicbird (χ2 = 8.2, df = 59, p < 0.05) but not in red-footed booby (χ2 = 1.3, df = 42, p = 0.26) and wedge-tailed shearwater (χ2 = 5.6, df = 109, p = 0.14).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii per species and island in the adult seabirds sampled in the Western Indian Ocean (sample size and percentage with 95% confidence intervals).

Sample sizes are indicated above bars. Colours indicate bird orders (blue: Charadriiformes, red: Phaethontiformes, yellow: Suliformes, green: Procellariformes). Juan de Nova and Reunion are inhabited by cats; Aride, Cousin and Cousine are less than 10 km away from the nearest island inhabited by cats; Bird, Europa and Tromelin are 80 km to 430 km away from the nearest feline population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.g004

Discussion

Based on the analysis of 1014 seabirds belonging to ten species sampled in the Western Indian Ocean, we found an overall prevalence of 16.8% of seabirds carrying antibodies against T. gondii. This prevalence was higher than the one reported with the same threshold in the masked booby, the brown booby (Sula leucogaster) and the red-billed tropicbird (Phaethon aethereus) sampled in the Abrolhos archipelago, the south of Bahia State (Brazil) in the Atlantic Ocean (5.8% at MAT titre ≥ 10) [53]. If we had considered only MAT titres ≥ 25, T. gondii prevalence would have been of 9.17% (93/1014), thus also higher than prevalence reported for other seabird species such as the Galapagos penguin (Spheniscus mendiculus) and the flightless cormorant (Phalacrocorax harrisi), both sampled in the Galapagos Archipelago (Ecuador) in the Pacific Ocean (2.3% at MAT titre ≥ 25) [54]. In birds, clinical signs associated with toxoplasmosis include anorexia, diarrhoea and respiratory distress, and may occasionally result in death [24, 25, 66]. Fatal toxoplasmosis has notably been reported in captive penguins [70, 71] and in a free-ranging red-footed booby died of disseminated toxoplasmosis on a Hawaiian island [72]. The relatively high exposure to T. gondii in the Western Indian Ocean therefore raises questions about the risk of induced mortality in seabird populations, although all birds sampled in this study were apparently healthy. Further investigations could be performed to detect clinical toxoplasmosis on these populations from necropsies and molecular analysis conducted on freshly dead birds, in particular in colonies with high T. gondii prevalence and/or in species susceptible to this infection, such as the red-footed booby.

As expected, the prevalence of T. gondii in seabirds sampled in the Western Indian Ocean varied significantly by age class, species and island, and was higher in ground nesting birds than tree-nesting birds confirming that ground-contact is a risk factor for seabirds to T. gondii. Of the species we sampled, the wedge-tailed shearwater has the most contact with the ground as it nests in a burrow [73]. On Reunion Island, wedge-tailed shearwaters burrow in cliffs frequented by cats. Those that tested positive for T. gondii antibodies had most likely ingested oocysts while preening their feathers stained with oocyst-contaminated soil. For sooty terns, the prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies was higher on Aride (where cats were eradicated several decades ago) than on Juan de Nova (where cats were present at the time of our sampling) raising the question of how long T. gondii oocysts can persist in the environment after cat eradication. Experimentally, the proportion of oocysts surviving in soil after 100 days is around 7% under dry conditions and 44% under damp conditions [17]. In Baja California, Mexico, the rate of recent human exposure to T. gondii (estimated via IgM detection) was 12–26% on five islands inhabited by cats and only 1.8% on the island where cats were eradicated seven years earlier [74]. The persistence of infectious oocysts for decades after eradication of the cats on Aride therefore seems unlikely. This implies that seabirds testing positive for T. gondii antibodies on Aride as well as Cousine and Bird (where cats were also eradicated several decades ago) were necessarily exposed to oocysts that were not produced locally and therefore dispersed from their shedding site. The medium to long-range dispersal of oocysts from land or islands inhabited by felids may also explain why we did not find a higher prevalence of T. gondii in seabirds on islands inhabited by cats than on cat-free islands.

Our data broadly suggest that birds visiting the shore are the most exposed to T. gondii. Indeed, the highest seroprevalence was observed in bridled terns, sooty terns and brown noddies (Charadriiformes) which nest close to the sea. In New Caledonia, bridled terns nest at less than five meters above the high tide level and at less than eight meters away from the water mark [75]. In the Seychelles, sooty terns nest on open sand or on sand with scattered low vegetation above the high tide level [76, 77]. Similarly, brown noddies nest both on the ground and in trees and often rest and collect nest material on the ground and on shores. Lesser noddies only nest in trees but spend time on the ground and shore, sunbathing during the day and collecting soil-borne materials for nesting (e.g. sticks and leaves) as well as material floating on the sea. In the Seychelles, the prevalence of T. gondii in sooty tern and noddy populations decreased with distance from the nearest cat population: for brown and lesser noddies, it was significantly higher on Cousin and Cousine islands (2 km and 5 km from Praslin) than on Bird island (80 km from Praslin); For sooty tern, it was higher on Aride island (9 km from Praslin) than on Bird. This pattern of T. gondii prevalence decrease with distance to cat populations was not observed for the white-tailed tropicbird, a more inland species than sooty tern and noddies. Taken together, these observations advise that T. gondii oocysts produced on cat-inhabited land could be transported by oceanic currents and deposited on distant shorelines, thereby contributing to the exposure of birds exploiting these habitats, such as terns and noddies. Shapiro et al. [40] suggested that the attachment of T. gondii oocysts to marine aggregates may significantly influence the water transport of this terrestrial parasite. This association of oocysts with marine aggregates may also presumably facilitate their transport from islands colonised by cats. On arrival at distant shores, oocysts may be retained by high-water mark since they adhere to kelp [78]. The habit of noddies to collect seaweed for incorporation into their nests could prolong their exposure to T. gondii.

However, the detection of T. gondii antibodies in species that usually do not spend time in coastal habitats (tropicbirds, shearwater and boobies) suggests that a third source of contamination could also be involved in the transmission route of T. gondii to pelagic seabirds. Infectious T. gondii oocysts and/or T. gondii DNA have been detected in the intestines or tissues of Mullidae (goatfish), Carangidae (trevally, mackerel), Engraulidae (anchovies) and Clupeidae (herrings, shads, sardines) [43, 79]. Clupidae, Carangidae and Clupidae fishes are preyed by Tursiop truncatus and Delphinus delphis [80, 81] which are the two dolphin species most exposed to T. gondii in the Mediterranean Sea [46]. In the Seychelles, Carangidae and Engraulidae fishes are the secondary prey of white-tailed tropicbirds [82]. Similarly, on Europa, the red-tailed tropicbird and the red-footed booby occasionally take Carangidae and/or Mullidae fish [83, 84]. Therefore, the few white-tailed tropicbirds that tested positive on Bird and Europa, as well as the red-tailed tropicbirds and red-footed boobies that tested positive on Europa, may have been exposed to T. gondii by feeding on Carangidae or Mullidae fish carrying infectious oocysts. In the same way, the high T. gondii prevalence in sooty terns and brown noddies sampled in the Seychelles and the Mozambique Channel may not only result from their use of the shore but also to the significance of Mullidae and Carangidae in their diet, which also occasionally includes Clupeidae and Engraulidae [82, 83, 85]. Interestingly, comparable prevalence of T. gondii were detected in the Aride and Europa sooty tern populations (36.4% and 32.6%) which also have major similarities in diet composition [86]. Taken together, these observations suggest that Mullidae and Carangidae, and possibly Clupeidae and Engraulidae, may serve as biotic carriers for T. gondii in the Western Indian Ocean.

As expected, prevalence of T. gondii antibodies was lower in chicks than on adults in sooty tern (Juan de Nova: 0% versus 20.4%; Europa: 0% versus 32.6%) and in wedge-tailed shearwaters (Reunion: 4.3% versus 10%). However, prevalence of T. gondii was higher in chicks than in adults in red-footed boobies sampled on Europa (11.8% versus 8.3%) and Tromelin (1/1 positive versus 0/8). This unexpected result can be due to the persistence of maternal antibodies transferred via egg yolk [87, 88]. In long-lived birds such as wedge-tailed shearwater or red-footed boobies, specific maternal antibodies can have an estimated half-life of 25 days post-hatching [89, 90]. The low antibody levels detected in one shearwater and three red-footed booby chicks (MAT titres = 10 or 25) most likely resulted from maternal antibody transfer since antibody level might have been higher if chicks had produced antibodies in response to a recent environmental exposure to T. gondii. In contrast, the high antibody levels detected in nine juvenile masked boobies (MAT titres = 50, 100 or 200) from Tromelin, located 430 km away from the closest feline population, as well as in adult red-footed and masked boobies on Europa and Tromelin (300 km and 430 km away from the closest feline population) likely resulted of an environmental exposure to T. gondii. This result is intriguing because adult masked and red-footed boobies have a foraging range limited to the 150 km surrounding Europa and Tromelin [9193]. The detection of antibodies to T. gondii in boobies from these islands could a result of the long-distance movements that juvenile boobies sometimes make before breeding [9496] and/or the transport of oocysts across the ocean for hundreds of kilometres.

To conclude, this study clearly demonstrates that T. gondii has efficiently colonized the marine realm of the tropical Indian Ocean. Three non-exclusive routes of contamination could be involved: (i) by the ingestion of oocysts locally deposited on islands colonised by cats; (ii) by the ingestion of oocysts transported by currents and deposited on the shore of distant islands; (iii) by the ingestion of oocysts carried by Mullidae, Carangidae, Clupeidae or Engraulidae fish. It is interesting to note that the only species for which no seropositive bird was found—i.e. great frigatebird breeding on Europa—was also the least exposed to these routes of contamination. Indeed, on the cat-free island of Europa, great frigatebirds nest and roost in trees and bushes and have a diet essentially composed of flying-fish and Ommastrephid squids [55, 97]. Further investigations are needed to confirm that T. gondii oocysts could be transported over tens or hundreds of kilometres across the ocean and to better identify the ecological processes allowing the pathway of this protozoa in the tropical seabird community.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Information on seabirds sampled in the western Indian Ocean for the detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in their sera.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255664.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the Savy family for their warm hospitality and support for the fieldwork on Bird Island. We are also grateful to Mr F. Keeley for the opportunity and support to work on Cousine Island. We thank the Island Conservation Society and Nature Seychelles for organizing transportation and providing fieldwork support from their teams (both staff and volunteers) on Aride and Cousin Islands, respectively. We also thank Eric Buffard, Sophie Bureau, Licia Calabrese, Jacques Fayan, Tom Hiney, Laurence Hoareau, Sébastien Lefort, Aurélien Prudor, David Ringler, Bernard Rota and Julie Tourmetz for their assistance in the field. Léon Biscornet, Graham Govinden and Brigitte Pool are also thanked for providing support for sample conservation at the Victoria Hospital, Mahé, Seychelles.

References

  1. 1. Appelbee AJ, Thompson RCA, Olson ME. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in mammalian wildlife–current status and future needs. Trends Parasitol. 2005; 21: 370–376. pmid:15982929
  2. 2. Fayer R., Dubey JP, Lindsay DS. Zoonotic protozoa: from land to sea. Trends Parasitol. 2004; 20, 531–536. pmid:15471705
  3. 3. Oates SC, Miller MA, Hardin D, Conrad PA, Melli A, Jessup DA, et al. Prevalence, environmental loading, and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from domestic and wild animals along the central California coast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78, 8762–8772. pmid:23042185
  4. 4. Srisuphanunt M, Karanis P, Charoenca N, Boonkhao N, Ongerth JE. Cryptosporidium and Giardia detection in environmental waters of southwest coastal areas of Thailand. Parasitol Res. 2010; 106, 1299–1306. pmid:20232084
  5. 5. Miller M, Miller W, Conrad P, James E, Melli A, Leutenegger C, et al. Type X Toxoplasma gondii in a wild mussel and terrestrial carnivores from coastal California: New linkages between terrestrial mammals, runoff and toxoplasmosis of sea otters. Int J Parasitol. 2008; 38, 1319–1328. pmid:18452923
  6. 6. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis–a waterborne zoonosis. Vet Parasitol. 2004; 126, 57–72. pmid:15567579
  7. 7. Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E, et al. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019; 15: e00049. pmid:32095620
  8. 8. VanWormer E, Carpenter TE, Singh P, Shapiro K, Wallender WW, Conrad PA, et al. Coastal development and precipitation drive pathogen flow from land to sea: evidence from a Toxoplasma gondii and felid host system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 29252. pmid:27456911
  9. 9. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol. 2000; 30: 1217–1258. pmid:11113252
  10. 10. Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Grigg ME. Recent epidemiologic and clinical importance of Toxoplasma gondii infections in marine mammals: 2009–2020. Vet Parasitol. 2020; 288: 109296. pmid:33271425
  11. 11. Simon A, Chambellant M, Ward BJ, Simard M, Proulx JF, Levesque B, et al. Spatio-temporal variations and age effect on Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in seals from the Canadian Arctic. Parasitology. 2011; 138, 1362–1368. pmid:21813043
  12. 12. Forman D, West N, Francis J, Guy E. The sero-prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in British marine mammals. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009; 104: 296–298. pmid:19430656
  13. 13. Obusan MC, Villanueva RME, Siringan MA, Rivera WL, Aragones LV. Leptospira spp. and Toxoplasma gondii in stranded representatives of wild cetaceans in the Philippines. BMC Vet Res. 2019; 15:372. pmid:31655601
  14. 14. Di Guardo G, Proietto U, Di Francesco CE, Marsilio F, Zaccaroni A, Scaravelli D, et al. Cerebral toxoplasmosis in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded along the Ligurian sea coast of Italy. Vet Pathol. 2010; 47: 245–253. pmid:20118319
  15. 15. Schares G, Vrhovec MG, Pantchev N, Herrmann DC, Conraths FJ. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia hammondi oocysts in the faeces of cats from Germany and other European countries. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 152: 34–45. pmid:18226453
  16. 16. Frenkel JK, Ruiz A, Chinchilla M. Soil survival of Toxoplasma oocysts in Kansas and Costa Rica. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975; 24: 439–443. pmid:1098494
  17. 17. Lélu M, Villena I, Dardé M-L, Aubert D, Geers R, Dupuis E, et al. Quantitative Estimation of the Viability of Toxoplasma gondii Oocysts in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78, 5127–5132. pmid:22582074
  18. 18. Yilmaz SM, Hopkins SH. Effects of different conditions on duration of infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. J Parasitol. 1972; 58: 938–939 pmid:5078600
  19. 19. Dubey JP, Frenkel JK. Feline toxoplasmosis from acutely infected mice and the development of Toxoplasma cysts. J Protozool.1976; 23: 537–546. pmid:1003342
  20. 20. Dubey JP, Cerqueira-Cezara CK, Murataa FHA, Kwoka OCH, Yangb YR, Su C. All about toxoplasmosis in cats: the last decade. Vet Parasitol. 2020b; 283: 109145. pmid:32645556
  21. 21. Cabezón O, García-Bocanegra I, Molina-López R, Marco I, Blanco JM, Höfle U, et al. 2011. Seropositivity and risk factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild birds from Spain. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e29549. pmid:22216311
  22. 22. Lopes AP, Sargo R, Rodrigues M, Cardoso L. High seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in wild animals from Portugal. Parasitol Res. 2011; 108: 1163–1169. pmid:21104273
  23. 23. Olsen A, Berg R, Tagel M, Must K, Deksne G, Enemark HL, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic pigs, sheep, cattle, wild boars, and moose in the Nordic-Baltic region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2019; 5, e00100. pmid:30906889
  24. 24. Campbell K. An investigation of an infection with a protozoan parasite causing mortalities in Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) on Penguin Island, Western Australia. Master of science thesis, Murdoch University 2015. Available: https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/28175/
  25. 25. Last RD, Shivaprasad HL. An outbreak of toxoplasmosis in an aviary collection of Nicobar pigeons (Caloenas nicobaria). Jl S.Afr.vet.Ass. 2008; 79(3): 149–152
  26. 26. Hollings T, Jones M, Mooney N, McCallum H. Wildlife disease ecology in changing landscapes: mesopredator release and toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013; 2: 110–118. pmid:24533323
  27. 27. Hartley WJ, Dubey JP. Fatal Toxoplasmosis in Some Native Australian Birds. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1991; 3: 167–169. pmid:1892936
  28. 28. Work TM, Massey JG, Rideout BA, Gardiner CH, Ledig DB, Kwok OCH, et al. Fatal toxoplasmosis in free-ranging endangered ‘Alala from Hawaii. J Wildl Dis. 2000; 36: 205–212. pmid:10813600
  29. 29. Miller MA, Grigg ME, Kreuder C, James ER, Melli AC, Crosbie PR, et al. An unusual genotype of Toxoplasma gondii is common in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) and is a cause of mortality. Int J Parasitol. 2004; 34, 275–284. pmid:15003489
  30. 30. Carlson-Bremer D, Colegrove KM, Gulland FMD, Conrad PA, Mazet JAK, Johnson CK. Epidemiology and pathology of Toxoplasma gondii in free-ranging California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). J Wildl Dis. 2015; 51: 362–373. pmid:25588007
  31. 31. Bressem MFV, Raga JA, Guardo GD, Jepson PD, Duignan PJ, Siebert U, et al. Emerging infectious diseases in cetaceans worldwide and the possible role of environmental stressors. Dis Aquat Org. 2009; 86: 143–157. pmid:19902843
  32. 32. Gibson AK, Raverty S, Lambourn DM, Huggins J, Magargal SL, Grigg ME. Polyparasitism is associated with increased disease severity in Toxoplasma gondii-infected marine sentinel species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5: e1142. pmid:21629726
  33. 33. Lauriano G, Di Guardo G, Marsili L, Maltese S, Fossi MC. Biological threats and environmental pollutants, a lethal mixture for Mediterranean cetaceans? J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 2014; 94: 1221–1225.
  34. 34. Conrad PA, Miller MA, Kreuder C, James ER, Mazet J, Dabritz H, et al. Transmission of Toxoplasma: Clues from the study of sea otters as sentinels of Toxoplasma gondii flow into the marine environment. Int J Parasitol. 2005; 35: 1155–1168 pmid:16157341
  35. 35. Shapiro K, VanWormer E, Aguilar B, Conrad PA. Surveillance for Toxoplasma gondii in California mussels (Mytilus californianus) reveals transmission of atypical genotypes from land to sea. Environ Microbiol. 2015; 17: 4177–4188. pmid:25367256
  36. 36. VanWormer E, Miller MA, Conrad PA, Grigg ME, Rejmanek D, Carpenter TE, et al. Using molecular epidemiology to track Toxoplasma gondii from terrestrial carnivores to marine hosts: implications for public health and conservation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8: e2852. pmid:24874796
  37. 37. Lindsay DS, Dubey JP. Long-term survival of Toxoplasma gondii sporulated oocysts in seawater. J Parasitol. 2009; 95: 1019–1020. pmid:20050010
  38. 38. Arkush KD, Miller MA, Leutenegger CM, Gardner IA, Packham AE, Heckeroth AR, et al. Molecular and bioassay-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocyst uptake by mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Int J Parasitol. 2003; 33: 1087–1097. pmid:13129531
  39. 39. Esmerini PO, Gennari SM, Pena HFJ. Analysis of marine bivalve shellfish from the fish market in Santos city, São Paulo state, Brazil, for Toxoplasma gondii. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 170: 8–13. pmid:20197214
  40. 40. Shapiro K, Silver MW, Largier JL, Conrad PA, Mazet JAK. Association of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts with fresh, estuarine, and marine macroaggregates. Limnol Oceanogr. 2012; 57: 449–456.
  41. 41. Krusor C, Smith WA, Tinker MT, Silver M, Conrad PA, Shapiro K. Concentration and retention of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by marine snails demonstrate a novel mechanism for transmission of terrestrial zoonotic pathogens in coastal ecosystems. Environ Microbiol. 2015; 17: 4527–4537. pmid:26033089
  42. 42. Mazzillo FFM, Shapiro K, Silver MW. A new pathogen transmission mechanism in the ocean: the case of sea otter exposure to the land-parasite Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e82477. pmid:24386100
  43. 43. Massie GN, Ware MW, Villegas EN, Black MW., 2010. Uptake and transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by migratory, filter-feeding fish. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 169: 296–303. pmid:20097009
  44. 44. Lafferty KD. Sea otter health: Challenging a pet hypothesis. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015; 4: 291–294. pmid:26155464
  45. 45. Miller MA, Gardner IA, Kreuder C, Paradies DM, Worcester KR, Jessup DA, et al. Coastal freshwater runoff is a risk factor for Toxoplasma gondii infection of Southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Int J Parasitol. 2002; 32: 997–1006. pmid:12076629
  46. 46. Cabezón O, Resendes AR, Domingo M, Raga JA, Agustí C, Alegre F, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild dolphins from the Spanish Mediterranean coast. J Parasitol. 2004; 90: 643–644. pmid:15270114
  47. 47. Gonzales-Viera O, Marigo J, Ruoppolo V, Rosas FCW, Kanamura CT, Takakura C, et al. Toxoplasmosis in a Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis) from Paraná, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2013; 191: 358–362. pmid:23063774
  48. 48. Mikaelian I, Boisclair J, Dubey JP, Kennedy S, Martineau D. Toxoplasmosis in beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) from the St Lawrence estuary: two case reports and a serological survey. J Comp Pathol. 2000; 122: 73–76. pmid:10627393
  49. 49. Measures LN, Dubey JP, Labelle P, Martineau D. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Canadian pinnipeds. J Wildl Dis.2004; 40: 294–300. pmid:15362830
  50. 50. Jensen S-K, Nymo IH, Forcada J, Godfroid J, Hall A. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in pinnipeds from Antarctica. Vet Rec. 2012; 171: 249.2–249. pmid:22798344
  51. 51. Rengifo-Herrera C, Ortega-Mora LM, Álvarez-García G, Gómez-Bautista M, García-Párraga D, García-Peña FJ, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in Antarctic pinnipeds. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 190: 259–262. pmid:22726387
  52. 52. Acosta ICL, Souza-Filho AF, Muñoz-Leal S, Soares HS, Heinemann MB, Moreno L, et al. Evaluation of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Leptospira spp. in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) on Magdalena Island, Chile. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2019; 16: 100282. pmid:31027597
  53. 53. Gennari SM, Niemeyer C, Soares HS, Musso CM, Siqueira GCC, Catão-Dias JL, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in seabirds from Abrolhos Archipelago, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2016; 226: 50–52. pmid:27514883
  54. 54. Deem SL, Merkel J, Ballweber L, Vargas FH. Cruz MB, Parker PG. Exposure to Toxoplasma gondii in Galapagos Penguins (Spheniscus mendiculus) and Flightless Cormorants (Phalacrocorax harrisi) in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. J Wildl Dis. 2010; 46: 1005–1011. pmid:20688714
  55. 55. Schreiber EA, Burger J. Biology of marine birds, CRC marine biology series. Boca Raton, Fla, CRC Press; 2002.
  56. 56. Schott FA, Xie S-P, McCreary JP Jr. Indian Ocean circulation and climate variability. Rev Geophys. 2009, 47, RG1002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000245.
  57. 57. Faulquier L, Fontaine R, Vidal E, Salamolard M, Le Corre M. Feral Cats Felis catus threaten the endangered endemic Barau’s petrel Pterodroma baraui at Reunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Waterbirds. 2009; 32(2):330–336.
  58. 58. Ringler D, Russell JC, Le Corre M. Trophic roles of black rats and seabird impacts on tropical islands: Mesopredator release or hyperpredation? Biol Conserv. 2015; 185: 75–84.
  59. 59. Feare CJ. Ecology of Bird Island, Seychelles. Atoll Res Bull. 1979; 226: 1–29.
  60. 60. Stoddart DR, Fosberg FR. Bird and Denis Islands, Seychelles. Atoll Res Bull. 1981; 252: 1–50.
  61. 61. Warman S, Dodd D. A biological survey of Aride Island nature reserve, Seychelles. Biol Conserv. 1984; 28: 51–71.
  62. 62. Rocamora G, Henriette E. Invasive Alien Species in Seychelles. Why and how to eliminate them? Identification and management of priority species. Island Biodiversity & Conservation centre, University of Seychelles. Biotope Editions, Mèze, MNHM Paris [Inventaires & Biodiversité series]; 2015.
  63. 63. Russell JC, Le Corre M. Introduced mammal impacts on seabirds in the Iles Eparses, Western Indian Ocean. Mar. Ornithol. 2009; 37: 121–128.
  64. 64. Lebarbenchon C, Jaeger A, Feare C, Bastien M, Dietrich M, Larose C, et al. Influenza A virus on oceanic islands: host and viral diversity in seabirds in the Western Indian Ocean. PLoS Pathog. 2015; 11: e1004925. pmid:25996394
  65. 65. Dubey JP, Desmonts G. Serological responses of equids fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Equine Vet J. 1987; 19: 337–339. pmid:3622463
  66. 66. Dubey JP. A review of toxoplasmosis in wild birds. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 106: 121–153. pmid:12031816
  67. 67. Dubey JP, Laurin E, Kwowk OCH. Validation of the modified agglutination test for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in free-range chickens by using cat and mouse bioassay. Parasitology. 2016; 143: 314–319. pmid:26625933
  68. 68. Dubey JP, Felix TA, Kwok OCH. Serological and parasitological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wild birds from Colorado. J Parasitol. 2010; 96: 937–939. pmid:20950101
  69. 69. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna A, editor. Vienna; 2015.
  70. 70. Mason RW, Hartley WJ, Dubey JP. Lethal toxoplasmosis in a little penguin (Eudyptula minor) from Tasmania. J Parasitol. 1991; 77(2): 328. pmid:2010870
  71. 71. Ploeg M, Ultee T, Kik M. Disseminated toxoplasmosis in Black-footed penguins (Spheniscus demersus). Avian Dis. 2011; 55(4): 701–703. pmid:22312996
  72. 72. Work TM, Massey JG, Lindsay DS, Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis in three species of native and introduced Hawaiian birds. J Parasitol. 2002; 88: 1040–1042. pmid:12435157
  73. 73. Bancroft WJ, Hill D, Roberts JD, 2004. A new method for calculating volume of excavated burrows: the geomorphic impact of Wedge-Tailed Shearwater burrows on Rottnest Island. Funct Ecol. 2004; 18: 752–759.
  74. 74. de Wit LA, Croll DA, Tershy B, Correa D, Luna-Pasten H, Quadri P, et al. Potential public health benefits from cat eradications on islands. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019. 13: e0007040. pmid:30763304
  75. 75. Villard P, Bretagnolle V. Breeding biology of the bridled tern (Sterna anaethetus) in New Caledonia. Waterbirds 2010; 33: 246–250.
  76. 76. Feare CJ, Gill EL, Carty P, Carty HE, Ayrton VJ. Habitat use by Seychelles sooty terns Sterna fuscata and implications for colony management. Biol. Conserv. 1997; 81: 69–76.
  77. 77. Vesey-Fitzgerald D. XXIX. Further contributions to the ornithology of the Seychelles islands. Ibis 1941; 83: 518–531.
  78. 78. Shapiro K, Krusor C, Mazzillo FFM, Conrad PA, Largier JL, Mazet JAK, et al. Aquatic polymers can drive pathogen transmission in coastal ecosystems. Proc R Soc B. 2014; 281: 20141287. pmid:25297861
  79. 79. Marino AMF, Giunta RP, Salvaggio A, Castello A, Alfonzetti T, Barbagallo A, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in edible fishes captured in the Mediterranean basin. Zoonoses Public Health 2019; 66: 826–834. pmid:31278858
  80. 80. Blanco C, Salomón O, Raga JA. Diet of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the western Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2001; 81, 1053–1058.
  81. 81. Silva MA. Diet of common dolphins, Delphinus delphis, off the Portuguese continental coast. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 1999; 79: 531–540.
  82. 82. Catry T, Ramos J, Jaquemet S, Faulquier L, Berlincourt M, Hauselmann A, et al. Comparative foraging ecology of a tropical seabird community of the Seychelles, western Indian Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009; 374: 259–272.
  83. 83. Cherel Y, Le Corre M, Jaquemet S, Ménard F, Richard P, Weimerskirch H. Resource partitioning within a tropical seabird community: new information from stable isotopes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2008; 366: 281–291.
  84. 84. Le Corre M, Cherel Y, Lagarde F, Lormée H, Jouventin P. Seasonal and inter-annual variation in the feeding ecology of a tropical oceanic seabird, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003; 255: 289–301.
  85. 85. Feare C.J. The breeding of the sooty tern Sterna fuscata L. in the Seychelles, and the effect of experimental removal of its eggs. J. Zool. Lond. 1976, 179: 317–360.
  86. 86. Jaquemet S, Potier M, Cherel Y, Kojadinovic J, Bustamante P, Richard P, et al. Comparative foraging ecology and ecological niche of a superabundant tropical seabird: the sooty tern Sterna fuscata in the southwest Indian Ocean. Mar Biol. 2008; 155: 505–520
  87. 87. Boulinier T, Staszewski V. Maternal transfer of antibodies: raising immuno-ecology issues. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23: 282–288. pmid:18375011
  88. 88. Hasselquist D, Nilsson J-Å. Maternal transfer of antibodies in vertebrates: trans-generational effects on offspring immunity. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009; 364: 51–60. pmid:18926976
  89. 89. Garnier R, Ramos R, Staszewski V, Militão T, Lobato E, González-Solís J, et al. Maternal antibody persistence: a neglected life-history trait with implications from albatross conservation to comparative immunology. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012; 279: 2033–2041. pmid:22189405
  90. 90. Ramos R, Garnier R, González-Solís J, Boulinier T. Long antibody persistence and transgenerational transfer of immunity in a long-lived vertebrate. Am Nat. 2014; 184: 764–776. pmid:25438176
  91. 91. Kappes M, Weimerskirch H, Pinaud D, Le Corre M. Variability of resource partitioning in sympatric tropical boobies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011; 441: 281–294.
  92. 92. Mendez L, Cotté C, Prudor A, Weimerskirch H. Variability in foraging behaviour of red-footed boobies nesting on Europa Island. Acta Oecologica. 2016; 72: 87–97.
  93. 93. Weimerskirch H, Le Corre M, Jaquemet S, Marsac F. Foraging strategy of a tropical seabird, the red-footed booby, in a dynamic marine environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005; 288: 251–261.
  94. 94. Kohno H, 2000. Visits of Immature Blue-faced and Red-footed Boobies to Nakanokamishima, South Ryukyus, Japan. Bull Inst Oceanic Res & Develop Tokai Univ. 2000; 21: 111–117.
  95. 95. O’Brien RM, Davies J. A new subspecies of masked booby Sula dactylatra from Lord Howe, Norfolk and Kermadec Islands. Mar Ornithol. 1990; 18: 1–7.
  96. 96. O’Neill P, Heatwole H, Preker M, Jones M. Populations, movements, and site fidelity of brown and masked boobies on the Swain Reefs, Great Barrier Reef, as shown by banding recoveries. CRC Reef Research Centre Technical Report No. 11 Townsville; 1996.
  97. 97. Weimerskirch H, Le Corre M, Jaquemet S, Potier M, Marsac F. Foraging strategy of a top predator in tropical waters: great frigatebirds in the Mozambique Channel. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004, 275: 297–308.