Figures
Abstract
This study was aimed at exploring whether latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) contributes to the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in a TB endemic setting. We screened 198 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with tuberculin skin test (TST) and studied 61 (median DAS28-ESR = 6.3) who were positive. Whole blood T cell proliferative responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) membrane (MtM) antigens, including the latency-induced protein alpha crystallin (Acr), were determined by flow cytometry using Ki67 expression as the marker for nuclear proliferation. Serum antibody levels were determined by ELISA. Follow-up investigations (at 3–6, 9–12 and 15–18 months after baseline) were performed in 41 patients who were classified empirically as ‘high’ (HR-T/HR-B) or ‘low’ (LR-T/LR-B) responders based on their dynamic T cell or antibody responses. Significant correlations were seen between baseline T cell responses to MtM and Acr, and between IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses to MtM. However, no correlation was seen between T and B cell responses. At all time points during the follow-up, T cell responses to both antigens (except for MtM at one point) were significantly higher in HR-T (n = 25) than LR-T (n = 16) patients. Levels of IgA and IgM (but not IgG) antibodies to MtM were also significantly higher in HR-B (n = 13) than LR-B (n = 28) at all time points. Importantly, HR-T patients exhibited significantly higher baseline and follow-up DAS28 scores than LR-T. Ten (of 61) patients had a history of TB and developed RA 6 years (median) after contracting TB. Three new TB cases (1 from TST-positive and 2 from TST-negative groups) emerged during the follow-up. Our results suggest that persistently elevated T cell responses to Mtb antigens may contribute to disease activity in RA.
Citation: Kumar SK, Arya S, Singh A, Misra R, Aggarwal A, Sinha S (2021) Patterns of T and B cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane-associated antigens and their relationship with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with latent tuberculosis infection. PLoS ONE 16(8): e0255639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255639
Editor: Leonardo A. Sechi, Universita degli Studi di Sassari, ITALY
Received: May 30, 2021; Accepted: July 20, 2021; Published: August 2, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) caused by interplay of genetic and environmental factors that dysregulate the immune system [1]. Treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) acting as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) blockers makes IMID patients susceptible to TB [2] due mainly to reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI), defined as ‘a state of persistent immune responsiveness to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens without clinically manifested TB’ [3]. In some population-based studies [4, 5] history of TB was found associated with RA suggesting that Mtb could also play a role in pathogenesis of RA which, like TB, may begin in the airways and lungs [6]. In early RA disease, germinal centre-like structures are seen in the lungs wherein activated B cells produce antibodies to citrullinated protein antigens (ACPAs). Seropositive RA patients harbour citrullinated proteins in their bronchial tissue and this abnormality was not associated with smoking [7, 8]. Pulmonary TB patients also show seropositivity for ACPA and rheumatoid factor (RF) [9] suggesting that Mtb could trigger the production of these antibodies which are otherwise considered as hallmarks of RA.
Several studies have indicated that immune-inflammatory responses to Mtb, as well as non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), can drive the pathogenesis of IMIDs and signaling via toll-like receptors (TLRs) plays an important role in this process [10, 11]. Cell membrane-associated glycolipids and lipoproteins of Mtb serve as microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) recognized by the pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs, including TLRs) of innate immune cells [11]. The pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by these cells, besides orchestrating innate immunity against the invading microbe, can trigger pathogenesis of RA and other IMIDs [6]. Antigenic constituents of Mtb membrane (MtM) are also potent inducers of adaptive immunity which, in turn, may contribute to the pool of pro-inflammatory cytokines [10, 12]. Mtb ‘immunoproteome’ is rich in membrane-associated and secreted proteins [13] and certain MtM-associated proteins identified by us [14] and others [15] were found capable of inducing strong T cell responses in persons with LTBI. In addition, MtM antigens are also strong inducers of B cell responses leading to production of high titres of antibodies [16–18]. The MtM-associated stress protein alpha crystallin (Acr, Rv2031c) sustains Mtb during its latent phase [19]. Its overproduction by the dormant bacilli and occurrence within ‘Mtb complex’ make Acr an important latency-associated antigen [20]. As shown by us [17] and others [21], it induces strong T- and B cell responses in persons with LTBI. Acr was also shown to induce T cell responses in RA patients harbouring LTBI [22].
Immune responses to Mtb are dynamic in nature. T cell responses vary according to the bacterial load and decline with treatment [23, 24]. Specificity and isotypes of antibodies produced by B cells also vary according to the state of infection. While persons with LTBI preferentially produce antibodies to MtM-associated antigens, those with active TB do so against ‘secreted’ antigen of Mtb [13, 25]. In a longitudinal study [26], TB patients showed higher IgA levels against Acr than subjects with LTBI. In another study [27], consistently elevated levels of IgA against Mtb antigens were considered a risk factor for progression to active TB disease. However, despite the apparent similarities in their dynamic trends, T and B cell responses to Mtb may not go hand in hand. A cohort of household contacts from TB endemic area was shown to harbour antibodies to Acr and other MtM-associated antigens while remaining negative for T cell responses determined by tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) [28].
India is home to over a quarter of TB patients diagnosed worldwide [29] and majority of apparently healthy Indians harbour LTBI [30, 31]. Further, the dynamic nature of host’s immunity is believed to determine whether LTBI will progress to active TB disease or regress to a ‘self-limiting’ state [32]. Against this backdrop, and the indications that Mtb could serve as an environmental trigger for IMIDs, we undertook this study aimed at exploring whether the RA patients harbouring LTBI exhibit distinct T and B cell response patterns against MtM-associated antigens and whether such patterns have any relationship with their disease activity.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The study protocol was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of SGPGIMS (IEC code: 2016-149-IMP-EXP). All participants provided a written informed consent.
Study group
One hundred ninety eight RA patients attending the Rheumatology clinic at our hospital were examined for fulfilment of the following inclusion criteria: Adults with active disease [33], taking ≤10 mg prednisolone/day, no sign or symptom of TB or any other co-morbidity, and a positive TST. Sixty one (30.8%) patients met these criteria and were recruited for the study.
Tuberculin skin test
TST was performed as per recommendations of IUATLD and WHO [34]. Accordingly, 5 tuberculin units (TU) of PPD (Arkray Healthcare, Surat, India) were injected intradermally on the left forearm. After 48–72 hours, mean diameter of induration was measured using a calliper. TST was considered as positive if the induration was 10 mm or more.
Blood samples
At the baseline and follow-up intervals, 1 ml venous blood was collected in heparin tubes (for T cell assays) and 3 ml was collected in plain tubes (to get sera for antibody assays).
Mtb antigens
Mtb cell-membrane (MtM) was isolated by using a previously described protocol [17]. Briefly, 3–4 week old culture of Mtb (strain H37Ra, ATCC25177) was harvested and sonicated. Cell lysate was differentially centrifuged to obtain membrane as sediment and cytosol as supernatant. Protein was estimated by the modified Lowry’s method [17] and aliquots were stored at -80°C. Identity of Mtb was ascertained by immune-chromatographic detection of MPT64 [17] using a kit (‘SD Bioline TB Ag MPT64 Rapid’, Abbott, USA). Recombinant Acr protein (LRP-0019C) was purchased from Lionex GmbH, Germany.
T cell proliferation assay
A previously described protocol [17] was used with some modifications. In brief, blood samples (diluted 1:10) were dispensed (1 ml/well) in 24-well culture plates and incubated with test antigens (MtM or Acr, 5μg/ml) or controls (culture medium as negative and PHA as positive control) for 5 days in a CO2 incubator. Harvested cells were stained with fluorescent anti-CD3 antibody and RBCs were lysed. Leukocytes were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilised with 0.2% Triton-X100. Washed cells were stained with fluorescent anti-Ki67 antibody. Cells were finally washed and suspended in PBS. Data on 105 cells in lymphocyte gate was acquired on a flow cytometer (BD FACS Canto-II) and analysed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). Percent responder cells (CD3+Ki67+) for antigens or mitogen (PHA) were determined by subtracting corresponding values for culture medium. Gating strategy is shown in S1 Fig in S1 File and representative flow plots are shown in S2 Fig in S1 File.
ELISA
A previously described protocol [17] was used. In brief, ELISA plates were coated with antigens (10 μg/ml MtM or 1 μg/ml Acr) or coating-buffer and blocked with 2% skimmed milk powder in tris-buffered saline containing 0·05% Tween 20 (TBS-T). Diluted test sera (1:500 for MtM or 1:100 for Acr) were dispensed in antigen and buffer-coated wells and incubated. Washed plates were re-incubated with peroxidase-conjugated antibodies to human IgG, IgA or IgM. Plates were finally washed and incubated with the substrate (o-phenylene diamine). Reaction was stopped with 7% H2SO4 and optical densities (ODs) were read at 492 nm. For each serum, mean OD with buffer was subtracted from mean OD with antigen and expressed as ΔOD.
Classification of patients as ‘high’ or ‘low’ responders for Mtb antigens
Forty one patients (out of 61 recruited) returned for at least one of the 3 follow-up investigations scheduled at 3–6, 9–12 and 15–18 months after baseline. They were classified as ‘high’ or ‘low’ responders for T cell or antibody responses based on the following empirical criteria: For T cell responses, patients showing >2 fold increase (from baseline) in response to either or both antigens (MtM/Acr), at one or more time points, were classified as high responders (HR-T). Conversely, low responders (LR-T) were those who showed ≤2 fold increase in response to both the antigens at all time points. For antibody responses, patients showing >2 fold increase in the level of any antibody isotype (IgG, IgA or IgM), at one or more time points, were classified as high responders (HR-B). Low responders (LR-B) were those who showed ≤2 fold increase in all antibody isotypes at all time points.
Statistical analysis
Non-parametric statistical methods were applied. Correlation between two variables was assessed by Spearman’s rho. Difference between two proportions was assessed by Fisher’s exact test. Differences between paired datasets were assessed by Wilcoxon test and those between unpaired datasets were assessed by Mann-Whitney test. P values <0.05 were considered as significant. All calculations were performed using Graphpad Prism software.
Results
Baseline characteristics of study subjects
Most (78.7%) of the 61 TST-positive RA patients enrolled for the study were females and about half of them were on low-dose (≤10 mg/day) prednisolone (Table 1).
TST responses were not affected by BCG
Out of 198 patients who were screened for inclusion in this study, BCG scar was present in 55.7% (34/61) of TST-positive and 45.3% (62/137) of TST-negative patients. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.2179) suggesting that BCG vaccination at birth (as practised in India) did not affect TST results in the adults.
MtM induced higher T and B cell responses than Acr
Baseline T cell proliferative responses to PHA (median, IQR; 72, 40 to 86), MtM (0.78, 0.45 to 1.8) and Acr (0.33, 0.12 to 0.72) in 58 study subjects (samples from 3 had technical issue) are shown in Fig 1A. The responses to MtM were significantly higher than to Acr. Even so, a strong correlation (r = 0.69) was seen between the two responses (Fig 1B) suggesting that MtM could provide a more sensitive alternative to Acr for monitoring the T cell responses to Mtb.
Panel A shows percent responder T cells (CD3+Ki67+) against the mitogen (PHA) and Mtb antigens (MtM and Acr). Though the responses to Acr were significantly lower than to MtM, a significant correlation was seen between the two (Panel B). P (Mann-Whitney) and r (Spearman’s) values are shown in the panels.
Baseline antibody responses to MtM and Acr are shown in Fig 2A. Anti-MtM IgG levels (median ΔOD, IQR; 0.28, 0.14 to 0.5) were significantly higher than IgA (0.11, 0.08 to 0.2) and IgM (0.2, 0.1 to 0.33) and IgM levels were also significantly higher than IgA. Despite these differences, significant correlations were seen between all 3 isotypes (Fig 2B–2D) indicating that they could broadly be targeting the same set of antigens. Acr did not elicit any appreciable antibody response (0, -0.01 to 0.03 for IgG; 0, -0.02 to 0.02 for IgA and -0.01, -0.04 to -0.54 for IgM) which suggested that MtM could work as a more sensitive alternative to Acr for monitoring of anti-Mtb antibody responses also. In view of these results, further analyses of antibody responses were based on anti-MtM antibodies alone.
Levels (ΔOD = mean OD of antigen-coated minus mean OD of buffer-coated wells) of anti-MtM IgG antibodies were highest followed by IgM and IgA (Panel A). Despite the significant differences, levels of all 3 antibody isotypes correlated with each other (Panels B-D). Acr did not produce any appreciable antibody response. P (Mann-Whitney) and r (Spearman’s) values are shown in the panels.
We did not observe any correlation between baseline T cell and antibody responses against MtM (S3 Fig in S1 File) suggesting that the antigenic determinants eliciting these responses could, at least partly, be non-overlapping.
Patients showed distinct immune response profiles against Mtb antigens According to the applied criteria (see Materials and Methods), 25 patients (out of 41 who were followed-up) were categorised as ‘high’ responders (HR-T) and the remaining 16 as ‘low’ responders (LR-T) for T cell responses to the Mtb antigens (MtM and Acr). Likewise, 13 patients were high responders (HR-B) and 28 were low responders (LR-B) for B cell (antibody) responses to MtM. Consistent with the observed lack of correlation between baseline T and B cell responses, no association (P = 0.5134) was seen between HR-T and HR-B, or LR-T and LR-B patient categories (S1 Table in S1 File).
Sequential T cell responses (log2 fold-change from baseline responses) of HR-T and LR-T patients against MtM and Acr are displayed in Fig 3A. Both antigens showed comparable response profiles, consistent with the observed correlation between two responses at the baseline. At all 3 time points of follow-up, responses to both the antigens (except for MtM at 15–18 months) in HR-T were significantly higher than LR-T patients. Interestingly, a progressively rising trend was seen in the responses, particularly of LR-T patients who showed a significant rise in response to Acr between 3–6 and 15–18 months.
Dotted lines denote two-fold (log2 = 1) higher response from the baseline (0). Significant differences between high (HR-T, n = 25) and low (LR-T, n = 16) T cell responders were seen for Acr at all 3 and for MtM at 2 follow-up intervals. Responses in LR-T were mostly below baseline but showed a rising trend which attained statistical significance in case of Acr (Panel A). Significant differences were also seen between high (HR-B, n = 13) and low (LR-B, n = 28) B cell responders, for anti-MtM IgA and IgM (but not IgG) antibodies at all time points (Panel B). P values for observed differences (Mann-Whitney test for inter-group and Wilcoxon test for intra-group comparisons) are shown on top of the selected columns.
Sequential antibody responses to MtM (Fig 3B) were distinctly different from the corresponding T cell responses. A significantly higher (P = 0.0143) proportion of patients fell under the LR-B (68%) compared with LR-T (39%) category, suggesting that RA patients with LTBI were able to mount relatively weak antibody responses. Moreover, unlike T cell responses, antibody levels (log2 fold-change from the baseline) of HR-B as well as LR-B patients remained almost stable throughout the follow-up period. Interestingly, though statistically significant differences were seen in IgA and IgM levels of HR-B and LR-B patients at all time points, IgG levels did not differ at any point.
Altogether, these results suggest that the RA patients with LTBI may fall into distinct categories with respect to their longitudinal immune responses against Mtb antigens. They also underscore the role played by immunoglobulin isotypes in shaping the overall antibody response.
Prescribed treatment did not affect the T or B cell response profiles
During the follow-up, patients were treated with prednisolone (up to 10 mg/day) along with methotrexate (up to 25 mg/week). In addition, some patients also received hydroxychloroquine (up to 400 mg/day). The proportions of HR and LR patients (for T as well as B cell responses) receiving these drugs were comparable (S4 Fig in S1 File), suggesting that the administered treatment did not have any remarkable effect on the observed immune response profiles.
Patients with persistently high T cell responses to Mtb antigens also showed high disease activity
DAS28-ESR scores of HR-T and LR-T patients at the baseline and at two follow-up intervals are shown in Fig 4A. As expected, disease activity in all patients declined with treatment. However, at all time points, disease activity scores in HR-T remained significantly higher than LR-T patients. In addition, the duration of disease was significantly shorter in HR-T patients (Fig 4B). These results suggested that RA patients with persistently high T cell response to Mtb antigens could also exhibit high disease activity which could be attained shortly after disease onset.
Disease activity scores (DAS28-ESR) of patients who were high responders for T cells (HR-T) were significantly higher than those of low responders (LR-T) at the baseline (BL) and also at 2 follow-up intervals (F1 and F2, Panel A). Additionally, disease duration (years) was significantly shorter in HR-T than LR-T patients (Panel B). DAS28-ESR scores of high and low responders for B cells (HR-B and LR-B) at the baseline as well as follow-up intervals did not show any significant difference (Panel C). Disease duration also showed no difference (Panel D). P values (Mann-Whitney) are shown on top of the selected columns.
Unlike T cell responses, antibody responses did not show any association with disease activity or duration (Fig 4C, 4D) suggesting that antibodies to Mtb antigens may have a relatively lesser relevance for the pathogenesis of RA.
Association between TB and RA
Out of 61 patients recruited for the study, 10 (16.4%) had a history of cured TB, of whom 7 had suffered from pulmonary TB. The median time taken for the onset of clinically active RA after contracting TB was 6 years (Table 2).
All 198 patients (82% females) who were screened for inclusion in the study were monitored for development of TB over the study period. One new TB case emerged in the TST-positive (n = 61) and 2 new cases emerged in TST-negative (n = 137) patient groups. Thus the proportions of incident cases in both groups were comparable.
Discussion
In absence of a ‘gold standard’ method for detection of LTBI, we chose TST for several reasons. As comparisons of TST and IGRA in the same population have not provided evidence that one test is superior to the other, WHO has recommended that both are equivalent options, with TST being the method of choice in resource-constrained settings [3]. The choice of 10 mm reaction as cut-off for positivity was aimed at detecting those patients who may have a greater propensity to develop TB. In a large TST trial from south India [35], reactions >10 mm showed a higher association with TB development than those <10 mm. A TBNET study [36] has also shown that TST cut-off of 10 mm is most appropriate for the diagnosis of LTBI in RA patients since loss in sensitivity by increasing the cut-off from 5 to 10 mm is marginal while there is substantial gain in specificity. The rate of TST positivity in our patients (30.8%) was comparable to that (30%) in another study on RA patients from India, despite the authors choosing to use a double strength (10 TU) of PPD [37].
BCG vaccination at birth (as recommended by WHO and practised in India) did not affect the TST responses, which is consistent with another study on RA patients [38] and our earlier study on health care workers (HCWs) [31]. Apprehensions that TST could be confounded by BCG have not found support in a meta-analysis of 24 studies comprising 240,203 subjects [39]. The study concluded that BCG given in infancy had minimal effect on TST, particularly after 10 years of vaccination. The same meta-analysis also included 18 studies comprising 1,169,105 subjects to conclude that false positive TST due to NTM infection was minimal (up to 2.3%) and reached the upper limit only in areas of high NTM and low TB prevalence (e.g., USA and Europe). This and other similar observations have prompted WHO to recommend that BCG vaccination should not be a determining factor in selecting a test (TST or IGRA) [3]. Nearly half (55.7%) of our study subjects were on low-dose (≤10 mg) prednisolone suggesting that their treatment status did not affect TST responses. Several prior studies have also shown that corticosteroids (up to 15 mg/day) or DMARDs do not affect TST responses [38, 40, 41].
Baseline T and B cell responses to MtM were significantly higher than to Acr which was expected since MtM comprises, besides Acr, several putative antigens of Mtb [14, 16]. We had also shown that MtM induces comparable and apparently mycobacterium-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses [14, 31]. Despite the difference in intensities, a strong correlation was seen between T cell responses to MtM and Acr, similar to that reported by us in HCWs [17]. The serum IgG levels against MtM were significantly higher than IgA and IgM. Even so, levels of all 3 antibody isotypes correlated with each other indicating that they could broadly be targeting the same set of antigens. Contrary to responses induced by it in HCWs and TB patients [17, 26], Acr did not induce any remarkable antibody response in RA patients owing, most probably, to their dysregulated immune system [1]. Overall, these results indicated that MtM could serve as a more sensitive alternative to Acr for monitoring the T as well as B cell responses to Mtb [17]. Lack of correlation between T and B cell responses was another notable observation suggesting that they could be directed at non-overlapping antigenic determinants. This discordance was also flagged in a recent study [28] wherein a group of household contacts who were negative for TST and IGRA had shown antibodies to MtM-associated antigens. In related studies [42, 43], RA patients had also shown antibodies to mycobacterial proteins PknG, PtpA and MAP_4027. Though the authors had sourced these proteins from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), they are also present in Mtb.
The patients classified as ‘high’ T cell responders (HR-T) showed significantly higher responses to MtM and Acr than ‘low’ responders (LR-T) at all 3 time points (except for MtM at one point) of the follow-up. Since T cell responses to Mtb decline with reduction in bacterial load [23, 24], HR-T patients could be considered as having a higher load of infection. A progressive rise in T cell responses, as seen by us, could further indicate an ongoing or persistent infection [32]. Sequential antibody (IgA and IgM, though not IgG) responses to MtM were also significantly higher in HR-B than LR-B patients at all time points. Antibodies to Mtb may perpetuate LTBI by restricting the spread of infection [16, 18]. The respiratory mucosa contains an abundance of IgA and a lower level of IgM, both of which can protect mucosal epithelium from invasion by Mtb. In RA patients also, a prominent IgA response precedes the joint inflammation [6]. Unlike the rising trends seen in T cell responses, antibody responses in either category of patients remained almost stable throughout the follow-up, suggesting that they may have reached a plateau even before baseline investigations. This finding resonates with the fact that RA-associated antibodies can be present in blood several years prior to disease onset [1, 6]. Compared with HR-T, significantly lesser proportion of patients fell in the HR-B category, suggesting that their B cell responses may be relatively subdued. No associations were seen between HR-T and HR-B or LR-T and LR-B categories of patients which reflected the lack of correlation between T and B cell responses at the baseline. We did also not observe any effect of treatment on the T or B cell responses which is consistent with the reports showing that corticosteroids and DMARDs, at the doses administered by us, did not affect TST responses [38, 40, 41].
An important observation of this study was significantly higher disease activity scores (DAS28) in HR-T than LR-T patients at baseline as well as during the follow-up. RA patients characteristically express HLA-DR4 [44] which points to a critical role of T cell responses in disease development. Analysis of T cell responses in RA has mostly remained focused on autoantigens identified by autoantibodies and candidate peptides for the selected autoantigens (e.g., citrullinated proteins) are defined by their binding to HLA-DR alleles associated with seropositive RA [45]. However, a major limitation of this approach is its inability to look for other antigens which could cause T cell activation particularly when one third of RA patients are seronegative [6]. A major study has shown that T cell responses to Mtb antigens are also executed through HLA-DR4 and suggested that this could drive the pathogenesis of RA [46]. In addition, cloned T cells from synovial fluid of RA patients have shown reactivity to Mtb antigens [47]. The antibody responses against Mtb, on the other hand, did not show any association with disease activity. In an earlier study also, antibodies to the Mtb antigens PknG and PtpA did not show such an association [42] suggesting that the anti-Mtb antibodies may not play a significant role in RA pathogenesis.
The fact that 16% of our enrolled patients had a history of TB also points to Mtb as a possible ‘environmental’ factor for RA. A recent study from Taiwan has found evidence of past TB, detected by chest x-ray, in a similar proportion of IMID patients, mostly of RA [48]. In another large Taiwanese cohort, 2.38% RA patients presented a history of TB whereas TB prevalence in the control population was 1.36% [5]. Our patients developed RA 6 years (median) after contracting TB whereas in Taiwanese cohort [5] the median time to develop RA was 3.61 years. These differences could be reconciled with the differences in cohort sizes or demography.
We followed all 198 patients who were screened for selection of study subjects for the development of TB. Three new TB cases (1 in TST-positive and 2 in TST-negative patients) emerged during the study period. As lifetime risk of conversion of LTBI to active TB is 5–10% [3], this period could be considered as grossly inadequate. However, another plausible reason for lower than expected TB incidence in our patients could the fact that most (82%) of them were females. In a large trial in south India [35], risk of culture positive TB in males (5%) was 3 fold higher than females (1.6%) over a follow-up period of 15 years. Comparable incidences of TB in TST-positive and TST-negative groups raise concerns about sensitivity of the methods in use for the detection of LTBI. In an earlier study, also from India, comparable proportions of TB cases emerged from TB contacts who were either positive or negative for TST or IGRA [49]. Sensitivity of these assays is also being debated on a wider scale [3, 48] and the need for more sensitive assays for a reliable detection of LTBI cannot be overemphasised [28, 31].
Mycobacteria can drive IMIDs in many ways. While the persistently high T cell responses to Mtb antigens seen by us in a subset of RA patients with high disease activity signify an adaptive immune response, part of it could also have resulted from the ‘bystander’ activation of T cells [12]. Activation of PRRs on innate immune cells by the pathogens can lead to bystander activation of autoreactive TH1 or TH17 cells through production of T cell promoting cytokines [50]. Moreover, T cells also express TLRs and corresponding agonists (e.g., mycobacterial antigens) can induce the proliferation of effector as well as regulatory T cells [51]. Molecular mimicry between mycobacterial and host antigens is another important pathogenic mechanism. An Mtb-specific arthritogenic T cell clone was found to react with cartilage proteoglycan [52]. Likewise, the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat-shock protein has shown cross-reactivity with synovial tissue [53]. RA patients harbour antibodies to a peptide epitope of MAP_4027 (this antigen is also present in Mtb) which cross-reacts with interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5). This structural mimicry could contribute to the pathogenesis of IMIDs by dysregulating the signalling by IRF5 which is a central regulator of inflammatory responses [43, 54]. The regions of low TB prevalence (e.g., USA, Canada and Europe) show a high prevalence of MAP which could substitute for Mtb as an environmental trigger for IMIDs [55].
A major limitation of this study was less than desirable compliance of patients to the follow-up schedules. Ours is a tertiary care referral hospital where patients come from distant places. Typically, they are given medicines for 3 months and asked to return for next round of consultations. However, patients also have the option of a telephonic consultation. To partially offset this limitation, and also of a small sample size, we chose to apply a stringent cut-off (>2 fold increase over baseline) for classification of a patient as high responder.
To conclude, our study suggests that RA patients with LTBI may fall into distinct categories showing a persistently high or persistently low T cell response to Mtb antigens; and those showing a high response may also exhibit higher disease activity. The precise mechanisms by which preclinical RA is transformed into a clinically classifiable disease are not yet known [1, 6] and the possibility that Mtb may play a role in this transition is very much alive [56]. This possibility needs to be considered and explored, particularly in patients who are residents of a highly TB endemic area such as India. Since RA develops gradually through preclinical stages, it can be targeted much before the joint inflammation or damage sets in. There are instances when the use of anti-TB drugs has improved the outcome in RA patients [57].
Acknowledgments
SKK was Senior Research Fellow and SS was Emeritus Scientist of Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi. Excellent technical assistance was provided by Komal Singh. The work received intramural support from the host Institute (SGPGIMS).
References
- 1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2016; 388:2023–38. pmid:27156434
- 2. Lortholary O, Fernandez-Ruiz M, Baddley JW, Manuel O, Mariette X, Winthrop KL. Infectious complications of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during targeted and biological therapies: a viewpoint in 2020. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:1532–43 pmid:32963049
- 3. World Health Organization. Latent TB infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management 2018.
- 4. Baronnet L, Barnetche T, Kahn V, Lacoin C, Richez C, Schaeverbeke T. Incidence of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic literature review. Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78:279–84. pmid:21273108
- 5. Shen TC, Lin CL, Wei CC, Chen CH, Tu CY, Hsia TC, et al. Previous history of tuberculosis is associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015; 19:1401–5. pmid:26467595
- 6. Malmström V, Catrina A, Klareskog L. The immunopathogenesis of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: from triggering to targeting. Nat Rev Immunol 2017; 17:60–75. pmid:27916980
- 7. Reynisdottir G, Karimi R, Joshua V, Olsen H, Hensvold AH, Harju A, et al. Structural changes and antibody enrichment in the lungs are early features of anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66:31–9. pmid:24449573
- 8. Reynisdottir G, Olsen H, Joshua V, Engstrӧm M, Forsslund H, Karimi R, et al. Signs of immune activation and local inflammation are present in the bronchial tissue of patients with untreated early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:1722–7. pmid:26530319
- 9. Elkayam O, Segal R, Lidgi M, Caspi D. Positive anti-cyclic citrullinated proteins and rheumatoid factor during active lung tuberculosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65:1110–12. pmid:16361276
- 10. Bo M, Jasemi S, Uras G, Erre GL, Passiu G, Sechi LA. Role of Infections in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Focus on Mycobacteria. Microorganisms 2020; 8:1459. pmid:32977590
- 11. Harding CV, Boom WH. Regulation of antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a role for Toll-like receptors. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8:296–07. pmid:20234378
- 12. Mills KH. TLR-dependent T cell activation in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11:807–22. pmid:22094985
- 13. Kunnath-Velayudhan S, Salamon H, Wang HY, Davidow AL, Molina DM, Huynh VT, et al. Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:14703–08. pmid:20668240
- 14. Sinha S, Kosalai K, Arora S, Namane A, Sharma P, Gaikwad AN, et al. Immunogenic membrane-associated proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed by proteomics. Microbiology 2005; 151:2411–19. pmid:16000731
- 15. Li H, Liu L, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zheng J, Li L, et al. Analysis of the Antigenic properties of membrane proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:3042. pmid:30816178
- 16. Kumar SK, Singh P, Sinha S. Naturally produced opsonizing antibodies restrict the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages by augmenting phagosome maturation. Open Biol 2015; 5:150171. pmid:26674415
- 17. Kumar SK, Arya S, Aggarwal A, Kapoor P, Nath A, Misra R, et al. Immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane associated antigens including alpha crystallin can potentially discriminate between latent infection and active tuberculosis disease. PLoS ONE 2020; 15:e0228359. pmid:32004357
- 18. Zimmermann N, Thormann V, Hu B, Köhler AB, Imai-Matsushima A, Locht C, et al. Human isotype-dependent inhibitory antibodies responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. EMBO Mol Med 2016; 8:1325–39. pmid:27729388
- 19. Hu Y, Movahedzadeh F, Stoker NG, Coates AR. Deletion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis alpha-crystallin-Like hspX gene causes increased bacterial growth in vivo. Infect Immun 2006; 74:861–8. pmid:16428728
- 20. Geluk A, Lin MY, van Meijgaarden KE, Leyten EM, Franken KL, Ottenhoff TH, et al. T-cell recognition of the HspX protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis correlates with latent M. tuberculosis infection but not with M. bovis BCG vaccination. Infect Immun 2007; 75:2914–21. pmid:17387166
- 21. Wilkinson RJ, Wilkinson KA, De Smet KAL, Haslov K, Pasvol G, Singh M, et al. Human T and B-Cell Reactivity to the 16 kDa a-Crystallin Protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scand J Immunol 1998; 48:403–409. pmid:9790311
- 22. Silva BDS, Tannus-Silva DGS, Rabahi MF, Kipnis A, Junqueira-Kipnis AP. The use of Mycobacterium tuberculosis HspX and GlcB proteins to identify latent tuberculosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2014; 109:29–37. pmid:24626307
- 23. Feruglio SL, Tonby K, Kvale D, Dyrhol-Riise AM. Early dynamics of T helper cell cytokines and T regulatory cells in response to treatment of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015; 179:454–65. pmid:25313008
- 24. Mattos AM, Almeida Cde S, Franken KL, Alves CC, Abramo C, de Souza MA, et al. Increased IgG1, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and IL-6 responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in patients with tuberculosis are lower after chemotherapy. Int Immunol. 2010; 22:775–82. pmid:20624776
- 25. Gaikwad AN, Sinha S. Determinants of natural immunity against tuberculosis in an endemic setting: factors operating at the level of macrophage- Mycobacterium tuberculosis interaction. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008; 151:414–422. pmid:18234054
- 26. Abebe F, Belay M, Legesse M, Franken KLMC, Ottenhoff THM. IgA and IgG against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2031 discriminate between pulmonary tuberculosis patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected and non-infected individuals. PLoS ONE 2018; 13:e0190989. pmid:29373577
- 27. Baumann R, Kaempfer S, Chegou NN, Oehlmann W, Spallek R, Loxton AG, et al. A subgroup of latently Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected individuals is characterized by consistently elevated IgA responses to several mycobacterial antigens. Mediators Inflamm. 2015:364758. pmid:26347586
- 28. Lu LL, Smith MT, Yu KKQ, Luedemann C, Suscovich TJ, Grace PS, et al. IFN-γ-independent immune markers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure. Nature Med 2019; 25:977–987. pmid:31110348
- 29. World Health Organization. 2020. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020.
- 30. Lalvani A, Nagvenkar P, Udwadia Z, Pathan AA, Wilkinson KA, Shastri JS, et al. Enumeration of T cells specific for RD1-encoded antigens suggests a high prevalence of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in healthy urban Indians. J Infect Dis 2001; 183:469–77. pmid:11133379
- 31. Arya S, Kumar SK, Nath A, Kapoor P, Aggarwal A, Misra R, et al. Synergy between tuberculin skin test and proliferative T cell responses to PPD or cell-membrane antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for detection of latent TB infection in a high disease-burden setting. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204429. pmid:30248144
- 32. O’Garra A, Redford PS, McNab FW, Bloom CI, Wilkinson RJ, Berry MP. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol 2013; 31:475–527. pmid:23516984
- 33. Anderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J, Robbins ML, Neogi T, Michaud T, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64,640–7. pmid:22473918
- 34. Rieder HL, Chadha VK, Nagelkerke NJD, van Leth F, van der Werf MJ. Guidelines for conducting skin test surveys in high-prevalence countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2011; 15:S1–S25. pmid:21276325
- 35. Radhakrishna S, Frieden TR, Subramani R; Tuberculosis Research Centre (ICMR). Association of initial tuberculin sensitivity, age and sex with the incidence of tuberculosis in south India: a 15-year follow-up. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7:1083–91. pmid:14598969
- 36. Solovic I, Sester M, Gomez-Reino JJ, Rieder HL, Ehlers S, Milburn HJ, et al. The risk of tuberculosis related to tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapies: a TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2010; 36:1185–206. pmid:20530046
- 37. Malaviya AN, Aggarwal VK, Rawat R, Baghel S, Thakran R, Zaheer Q, et al. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in India, a high-burden TB country: The importance of Mantoux and Quantiferon-TB Gold tests. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018; 21:1563–1571. pmid:29345081
- 38. Lee KH, Jung SY, Ha YJ, Lee SK, Park YB. Tuberculin reaction is not attenuated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis living in a region with intermediate burden of tuberculosis. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32:1421–4. pmid:21442172
- 39. Farhat M, Greenaway C, Pai M, Menzies D. False-positive tuberculin skin tests: what is the absolute effect of BCG and non-tuberculous mycobacteria? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006; 10:1192–204. pmid:17131776
- 40. Schatz M, Patterson R, Kloner R, Falk J. The prevalence of tuberculosis and positive tuberculin skin tests in a steroid-treated asthmatic population. Ann Internal Med 1976; 84:261–265.
- 41. Yamamoto S, Nagatani K, Sato T, Iwamoto M, Takatori S, Minota S. Unaffected reaction level in tuberculin skin test by long-term therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis.2017; 20:584–588. pmid:28524434
- 42. Bo M, Erre GL, Bach H, Slavin YN, Manchia PA, Passiu G, et al. PtpA and PknG proteins secreted by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis are recognized by sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A case-control study. J Inflammation Res 2019; 12:301–308. pmid:31819587
- 43. Bo M, Niegowska M, Eames HL, Almuttaqi H, Arru G, Erre GL, et al. Antibody response to homologous epitopes of Epstein-Barr virus, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and IRF5 in patients with different connective tissue diseases and in mouse model of antigen-induced arthritis. J Transl Autoimmun 2020; 3:100048. pmid:32743529
- 44. Panayi GS, Wooley PH, Batchelor JR. Genetic basis of rheumatoid arthritis: HLA antigens, disease manifestations and toxic reactions to drugs. Br Med J 1978;ii:1326–28. pmid:719380
- 45. Scally SW, Patersen J, Law SC, Dudek NL, Nel HJ, Loh KL, et al. A molecular basis for the association of the HLA-DRB1 locus, citrullination, and rheumatoid arthritis. J Exp Med 2013; 210:2569–82. pmid:24190431
- 46. Ottenhoff TH, Torres P, de las Aguas JT, Fernandez R, van Eden W, de Vries RR, et al. Evidence for an HLA-DR4-associated immune-response gene for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A clue to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis? Lancet 1986; 2:310–3. pmid:2426542
- 47. Holoshitz J, Klajman A, Drucker I, Lapidot Z, Yaretzky A, Frenkel A, et al. T-lymphocytes of rheumatoid arthritis patients show augmented reactivity to a fraction of mycobacteria crossreactive with cartilage. Lancet 1986; 2:305–09. pmid:2874329
- 48. Wang PH, Lin CH, Chang TH, Wu CS. Chest roentgenography is complementary to interferon-gamma release assay in latent tuberculosis infection screening of rheumatic patients. BMC Pulm Med 2020; 20:232. pmid:32867745
- 49. Sharma SK, Vashishtha R, Chauhan LS, Sreenivas V, Seth D. Comparison of TST and IGRA in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a High TB-Burden Setting. PLoS ONE 2017; 12:e0169539. pmid:28060926
- 50. Evans HG, Suddason T, Jackson I, Taams LS, Lord GM. Optimal induction of T helper 17 cells in humans requires T cell receptor ligation in the context of Toll-like receptor-activated monocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:17034–9. pmid:17942669
- 51. Liu H, Komai-Koma M, Xu D, Liew FY. Toll-like receptor 2 signaling modulates the functions of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:7048–53. pmid:16632602
- 52. van Eden W, Holoshitz J, Nevo Z, Frenkel A, Klajman A, Cohen I. R. Arthritis induced by a T-lymphocyte clone that responds to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and to cartilage proteoglycans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985; 82:5117–5120. pmid:3927297
- 53. de Graeff-Meeder ER, Voorhorst M, van Eden W, Schuurman HJ, Huber J, Barkley D, et al. Antibodies to the mycobacterial 65-kd heat-shock protein are reactive with synovial tissue of adjuvant arthritic rats and patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Am J Pathol 1990; 137:1013–7. pmid:1700613
- 54. Bo M, Erre GL, Niegowska M, Piras M, Taras L, Longu MG, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 5 is a potential target of autoimmune response triggered by Epstein-barr virus and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in rheumatoid arthritis: investigating a mechanism of molecular mimicry. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018; 36:376–381. pmid:29352853
- 55. Winthrop KL, Iseman M. Bedfellows: mycobacteria and rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013; 9:524–31. pmid:23797309
- 56. Keat A. TB or not TB?: That is the question (Editorial). Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32:769–73. pmid:8369885
- 57. McConkey B, Situnayake RD. Effects of rifampicin with and without isoniazid in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15:46–50. pmid:3351840