Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Vegetables contamination by heavy metals and associated health risk to the population in Koka area of central Ethiopia

  • Leta Danno Bayissa ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    bayissa.leta@ambou.edu.et

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Hailu Reta Gebeyehu

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology

    Current address: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

Abstract

Contaminated soil and vegetables have continued to instigate threat to human health globally and specially in developing countries. This study was aimed to determine concentrations of certain heavy metals in soil and vegetables (cabbage and tomato) from Koka area of central Ethiopia using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrophotometer (ICP-OES). The amounts of As, Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Hg and Co detected in soil samples were found to surpass the reference values for agricultural soil. Similarly, the concentrations of As, Pb, Cd, Cr and Hg obtained in both tomato and cabbage samples have exceeded the recommended values with the mean levels generally ranging from 0.93–6.76, 1.80–7.26, 0.33–1.03, 0.86–5.16 and 3.23–4.36 mg/kg dry weight, respectively. The result obtained have signified that leafy vegetable has hoarded heavy metals more than non-leafy vegetable. The total hazard quote for As and Hg from tomato ingestion and for As, Hg and Co from cabbage ingestion were greater than unity, signifying potential health hazard to the public. The health index (HI) owing to tomato and cabbage ingesting were 5.44 and 14.21, respectively, signifying likely adversative health implication to the population from the ingestion of the vegetables. The Total Cancer Risk (TCR) analysis have uncovered the possible cancer hazard persuaded by Cd, Hg, As and Ni from the ingestion of both vegetables. From the outcomes this study, it can be concluded that the soil and vegetables from Koka areas are possibly contaminated with toxic metals and hence demand strict monitoring to safeguard the public around the study area and beyond.

Introduction

The quest for industrialization and the concern on food safety are ever increasing in both developed and developing nations all over the world. The concern about environmental pollution and food safety is growing due to the probable health danger to the population [13]. Among environmental contaminants, heavy metals due to the anthropogenic and other activities have attracted numerous attentions due to their serious health implication to humans when accrued in an preeminent concentration above body requirements [4, 5]. As evidenced by literature, vegetables demand and consumption is remarkably growing in every parts of the globe as it institutes a vital part of the human diet and nutrition [6, 7]. However, it has been documented that most of the vegetables commercially available, especially in developing nations, are often grown in urban and suburb areas of big cities [3, 810]. As a result, these vegetable are exposed to anthropogenic pollution instigated from sources including but not limited to urban and industrial wastes, mining and smelting and metallurgical industries [11, 12]. This evidently signifies that problems related to food safety and associated potential danger to the public have been a major apprehension all over the world [1, 1315].

The pollution of soil with toxic heavy metals have been regarded as a foremost source of crops and vegetables contamination and a major route of human exposure to these toxic metals [16]. As a result, heavy metals have been recognized as substantial pollutants of vegetables cultivated around urban and suburb areas worldwide [3, 4, 11, 1721]. This is a clear suggestion that vegetables being cultivated around urban and suburban areas are suggestively exposed to heavy metals contamination. It has also been signified that the contamination level and effect are more pronounced in developing nations compared with the developed one [5, 22].

Ethiopia, as a fastest growing country in sub-Saharan African countries, have attracted and being attracting many investors from all over the world. As a result, small and medium scale industries (mainly working on production of brews, fabrics, chemicals, floriculture and tanneries) are growing in a fastest rate and are generally established around urban and suburb areas and sideways of rivers [19, 23, 24]. The wastewater being released from these businesses are reportedly encompasses elevated levels of toxic metals including cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), copper (Cu) and lead (Pb) [22, 25]. These toxic metals have been long regarded as serous environmental contaminants even at smaller concentration because of their detrimental effect to public health [1, 7, 15].

The buildup of toxic heavy metals in soil, water and plants due to hasty industrial expansion have been and still continued to be a great concern owning to their detrimental health implication to the public. However, the public health complication due to toxic heavy metals contamination has been evidenced to be more pronounced in developing nations compared with the developed ones [26]. The rapid industrialization and urbanization in Ethiopia has contributed and being contributing to the major environmental concern [10, 12, 19, 27, 28]. This clearly shows that, owing to the development, the environment and food safety is in jeopardy as the industries are releasing their wastes indiscriminately to the environment without or with little treatment [23, 29]. To this regard, in developing countries like Ethiopia, the environmental problems and potential health hazard to the population is more pronounced as the environmental safety regulations are not practically in place. Hence, this study was intended to evaluate heavy metal concentrations in cabbage, tomato and soil samples from Koka (Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo) area farmlands in central Ethiopia. In addition, the probable health hazard related with the consumption of these vegetables have also been appraised through the determination of estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI) and target cancer risk (TCR) for selected heavy metals.

Methodology

Location map of the study areas

This investigation was focused on Koka areas (Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo) farmlands which are situated at about 53 mils (85 km) southeast of Addis Ababa (the capital of Ethiopia) in Oromia Regional State. The location map of the area is shown in Fig 1. The area has a grid reference 8°27.154′ latitude and 39°03.894′ longitude with an average elevation of 1630 masl. Lake Koka (commonly known as Koka reservoir) is situated in Koka area around which small to medium sized industries including leather, textile, plastic and soap factories are located. The water bodies in Koka area, including Lake Koka, are highly susceptible to contamination due to the weak practices of waste disposal and management activities by the manufacturing companies positioned in the area. It has been witnessed during sample collection that majorities of manufacturing companies in the area are directly releases the wastes they have generated to the lake and/or to the rivers feeding the lake without or with little treatment.

Vegetables and soil samples collection and preparation

The fresh cabbage (Brassica oleracea) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) were sampled using cleaned and decontaminated polyethylene bags. Both vegetables were separately sampled from five arbitrarily designated subsampling locations and mixed together to make up a 1kg each composite sample. Accordingly, a total of two cabbage and two tomato samples (one each from Koka Negewo and Koka Ejersa) were collected. All the vegetables samples were collected from carefully identified farmlands with the consent of the farmers. The collected samples were then directly taken to laboratory for subsequent handling and investigation. The sample treatment and preparation were done following similar procedure we have recently reported [19].

Soil sampling were performed from the same spots vegetable samples were collected. Generally, about 1 kg of soil samples were collected using polyethylene bags from the two sites (Koka Negewo and Koka Ejersa) exactly from the same spot vegetables were sampled (for each vegetable type separately) at depth of 0–20 cm by making use of a stainless steel auger soil sampler. Accordingly, a total of four soil samples (two soil samples on which tomato was grown and similarly two soil samples on which cabbage was grown from each site) were collected. The collected soil samples were packed with care, labeled and then taken to laboratory for treatment and examination as per the procedure we have recently reported [19].

Methods validation procedures

The method detection limit (MDL) and limit of quantification (LOQ) have been adopted from similar study we have recent reported [19] and the data is presented in S1 Table in S1 File. Similarly, the recovery analysis procedures followed to attest method precision and accuracy were also adopted from our similar study result and the data were presented in S2-S4 Tables in S1 File. From the data, the spike recovery found falls within the general suitable assortment of 80–120% for a good recovery and authenticates the accurateness and reliability of the method employed for the analysis of metal levels. The lower percentage relative standard deviation (% RSD) values (< 12%) found also showed that the method used was precise enough for the investigation of the heavy metals in the samples.

Digestion procedures and metals analysis

A microwave digestion system was employed to digest both soil and vegetable samples by employing similar procedure we have recently reported [19] with minor modification as per the optimium conditions established (S5 Table in S1 File). From the optimization procedures, a mixture of HNO3 (69%) and HCl (37%) acids at a volume ration of 9:3 mL was stablished at digestion time and temperature of 45 minutes 180 °C, respectively, to be optimum condition. These conditions were used to digest 0.5g of each soil and vegetable samples. The solutions obtained after digestion were filtered using Whatman No. 42 filter paper into 50 mL volumetric flask and its volumes were adjusted to the mark by dilute (2%) nitric acid. The levels of metals in the prepared soil and vegetables samples were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (Model: ARCOS FHS12, USA) following proper calibration and instrumental parameters setup as indicated in SM Table 6. The data obtained for each vegetable and soil samples were reported as mean ± SD from triplicate measurements.

Estimation of bioconcentration factor (BCF)

The bioconcentration factor (BCF) as defined by Liu and co-workers [30] is the ratio of concentration of metal in comestible part of the plant to the metal concentration in soil sample. It has been described that, if BCF ≤ 1, the plant can only absorb the metal but not accumulate it. However, if BCF > 1, the plant has been regarded as the likely accumulator of the metal [30, 31]. Consequently, the transfer extent of toxic metal from soil to plant was estimated by Eq (1) described by Sulaiman and Hamzah [31]. (1) where Cplant = heavy metal concentration in comestible portion of the plant; Csoil = heavy metal concentration in the soil on which the plant is grown.

Health hazard assessments

Estimated daily intake (EDI).

Founded on the average levels of metals in individual cabbage and tomato and the appraised regular ingestion of the vegetables in gram, the estimated daily intake of the heavy metals measured in this investigation were determined. The EDI of individual metal considered in the study was estimated using Eq (2) as expressed by Chen and co-workers [32] with minor amendment. (2) where Ef = exposure rate (365 day/year); ED = exposure period (65 years), equivalent to average life time [33]; FIR = average vegetable consumption (240 g/person/day for low fruit and vegetable intake [34]); CM = metal concentration (mg/kg dry weight); Cf = 0.085 (concentration conversion factor for fresh to dry vegetable weight) [35, 36]; BW = 70 kg (reference body weight for an adult) [29]; TA = average exposure time (65yrs x 365 days) and 0.001 = unit conversion factor. The complete information used for EDI estimation is presented in S6 Table in S1 File.

Target hazard quotient (THQ).

The non-cancer causing health hazard to the population around Koka area due to the ingestion of vegetables possibly polluted by toxic metals were appraised by the calculation of the target hazard quotient (THQ) using employing Eq (3) as defined by Chen and co-researchers [37]. (3) Where EDI (mg/day/kg body weight) = estimated daily metal intake of the population and RfD = oral reference dose (mg/kg/day) values for all metals determined as presented in S6 Table in S1 File. It is generally regarded as safe from the risk of noncarcinogenic effects if the value of THQ is < 1. However, it is generally presumed that there is a possibility of noncarcinogenic effects if THQ is > 1 with an increasing possibility as the value increases [32, 38].

Hazard index (HI).

From literature survey, it has been recognised that the specific health risk of the heavy metals due to consumption of contaminated vegetable are accumulative and denoted as hazard index (HI) [19, 20, 39]. Consequently, the HI of individual metals sought in this study were calculated using Eq (4). (4) where HI is hazard index and THQ is the target hazard quotient due to the intake of individual metals through vegetable consumption. It has been pointed out that, when the HI value obtained is less than one, there is no seeming health effect through the exposure to the heavy metals sought. Nevertheless, HI value of greater than one designates probable health effect implication while a serious chronic health impact has been suggested for HI greater than 10.0 [19, 36, 39].

The target cancer risk (TCR).

The cancer risk (CR) to the population owing to the intake of specific potentially cancer causing metals were appraised by employing Eq (5) following the same procedure we have recently used [19]. At the same time, the target cancer risk (TCR) ensuing from the ingestion of heavy metals such as As, Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni were estimated by employing Eq (6) as defined by Kamunda and co-investigators [40]. (5) (6) where CR denotes cancer risk over lifetime due to specific heavy metal intake, EDI = estimated daily metal ingestion of the populace in mg/day/kg body weight, CPSo = oral cancer slope factor in (mg/kg/day)-1 and n = number of heavy metals considered for cancer risk calculation. The CPSo values used for CR calculation were 1.7 for Ni [41], 0.5 for Cr [42], 1.5 for As [38], 0.0085 for Pb [43] and 0.38 for Cd [44] in (mg/kg/day)-1.

Results and discussion

Soil physicochemical properties

The physicochemical parameters of soil samples on which both vegetables (cabbage and tomato) have been grown in Koka area farmlands were determined and the data is presented in Table 1. The soil texture analysis has revealed that the soil samples from the study farmlands have had a soil texture of clay with clay, silt and sand compositions changing in the assortment of 38.94–48.41, 16.66–23.04 and 35.25–39.19%, respectively. The soil samples examined were observed to be neutral in nature with pH ranged from 7.68 to 7.82. The difference between the pH values of the soil samples were observed to be statistically significant at 95% probability level (p < 0.05).

thumbnail
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of soils samples from Koka area farmlands in Ethiopia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t001

The soil electrical conductivity (EC) of soil samples from Koka Ejersa area were ranged from 686.33–694.12 μS/cm, while the corresponding values for soil samples from Koka Negewo area were ranged between 828.66–831.01 μS/cm. The EC of the soil samples from Koka Ejersa area were statistically significantly different from the corresponding EC values of soil samples from Koka Negewo area farmlands at p < 0.05. The EC values found from this investigation were considerably lower than values we have recently reported [19], however, much greater compared with what has been reported by Alghobar and Suresha [45]. The elevated EC amounts found in the soil could be related with the soil texture, as clay texture is anticipated to possess higher EC which associates sturdily to soil particle size and suggesting higher mineral contents of the soil.

The moisture contents (MC) of soil samples from both Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo areas have ranged between 19.65 to 25.24%, while the percentage organic matter (OM) was in the range of 2.04 to 2.30%. The % MC values of the soil samples were statistically varied meaningfully from each other at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) in correspondence to the sampling location. The % OM of soil samples considered in this is found to be very comparable with what have been reported by Sharma and co-workers [46]. However, a much higher percentage organic carbon (44.9%) have been reported by Balkhair [47] for soil samples from Saudi Arabia. From the comparatively subordinate % OM found in this study, it can be articulated that there has been an extreme cultivation and soil loss in the area.

The soil samples analyzed have shown a cation exchange capacity (CEC) ranging from 37.98 to 42.09 cmol (+) /kg. The CEC value of a soil provides an understanding about the productiveness and nutrient retaining capacity of soil as explicated by Mukhopadhyay and co-researchers [48]. The high CEC values obtained from this study could signify clay texture of the soil in association with the organic matter embrace electrically charged sites which has the capacity to evoke and grip conversely charged ions as enlightened by Mukhopadhyay and co-researchers [48].

Heavy metal contents in soil and vegetable samples

Heavy metal levels in soil samples.

The concentrations of heavy metals in soil samples collected from Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo in central Ethiopia were determined and the data is as presented in Table 2. Arsenic (As) was detected in all soil samples with mean concentration ranging from 20.90 mg/kg in soil samples from Koka Negewo area on which tomato was cultivated to 31.42 mg/kg in soil samples on which cabbage was cultivated at Koka Ejersa. The concentration of As in the soil samples from the two areas were observed to exceed the acceptable limit of 20 mg/kg set by European Union and 15 mg/kg set by Japan [49]. The toxicity of arsenic (As) to the living being has been well documented despite its continued use as evidenced from the literature [50]. The elevated amounts of As found in the soil samples examined in the current investigation is a witness that this highly toxic metal is still being in use by the in industries positioned around the study location. The arsenic levels in the soil samples from the two locations were observed to statistically significantly differ at 95% probability level.

thumbnail
Table 2. Heavy metals concentration (mg/kg) in soil samples analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t002

Higher amounts of lead (Pb) (ranging from 37.30 to 48.60 mg/kg) were found in the soil samples originated from the two locations considered in the investigation. It was observed that the Pb concentrations found in the current study were observed to exceed by about four times the soil standard value of 10 mg/kg as can be seen from Table 2. However, the Pb content of soil samples investigated were found significantly lesser than Indian standard (250–500 mg/kg) as presented by Alghobar and Suresha [45]. Similarly, the levels of Cadmium (Cd) obtained in soil samples were higher than the soil reference value of 0.3 mg/kg with the mean values ranging from 4.36 mg/kg in soil samples on which tomato were cultivated at Koka Negowo to 6.43 mg/kg in soil samples on which cabbage was cultivated at Koka Ejersa. The Cd concentrations found from this investigation were also much higher than what has been quantified by Sharma and co-invesitigators [46]. Zinc (Zn) were detected in all soil samples with concentrations about four times higher than the soil reference value as can be seen from Table 2. Likewise, copper (Cu) was detected in elevated amount in all soil samples obtained from both Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo farmland with values ranging from 19.83 to 28.66 mg/kg.

The amounts of iron (Fe) detected in this study were observed to be higher in all samples with a minimum of 38430 mg/kg in tomato growing soil sample from Koka Negewo and a maximum of 53806 mg/kg is cabbage growing soil samples from Koka Ejersa. From the result, it can be clearly seen that the farmlands around the Koka area in central Ethiopia are loaded with high levels of minerals. From literature report, we came to learn that a much higher levels of iron (80000 mg/kg) have been reported by McGrath and co-researchers [54]. In contrary, a much lower levels of Fe (11.3 to 62.2 mg/kg) compared with the report of this study were described by Rattan and co-workers [55]. The concentrations of manganese (Mn) in soil samples from the two locations were ranged from 1373 mg/kg in soil samples from Koka Ejersa on which tomato was cultivated to 1756 mg/kg in soil samples from Koka Negewo on which cabbage was cultivated. These concentrations were found to be fairly below the soil standard value of 2000 mg/kg as described by Mahmood and Malik [53].

Mercury (Hg) has been regarded as extremely toxic metal to humans if exposed to it [56]. From the result of this study, it can be seen that significantly elevated concentration of Hg was obtained in soil samples examined with mean concentration ranging from 6.13 mg/kg in tomato growing soil sample from Koka Negewo area to 8.23 mg/kg in the same vegetable growing soil sample from Koka Ejersa area. The amounts of Hg obtained in this study are significantly elevated compared with the maximum limit of 0.3 mg/kg (Table 2). Similarly, an elevated amounts of cobalt (Co) were detected in all soil samples as compared with the soil standard value of 8 mg/kg described by Sharma and co-reserachers [46]. Chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) metals were also detected in all the soil samples investigated and their concentrations were ranged from 48.10 to 60.73 mg/kg for Cr and 35.00 to 50.73 mg/kg for Ni. Nevertheless, determined amounts of both Cr and Ni were lower than the soil standard values of 100 and 50 mg/kg, respectively, as indicated on the report by Sharma and co-reserachers [46] and Mahmood and Malik [53]. Generally, the data obtained from this study has clearly shown that, the soil samples from both locations considered for the investigation are evidently polluted by elevated levels of toxic heavy metals.

Heavy metals contents of vegetable samples.

Heavy metal concentrations in cabbage and tomato samples collected from Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo area farmlands were examined and the data obtained is presented in Table 3. From the data obtained, it has been witnessed that all the investigated vegetable samples were tested positive to the heavy metals measured. Accordingly, the average concentrations of arsenic (As) have ranged from 0.93 mg/kg (dry weight) in tomato samples from Koka Ejersa to 6.76 mg/kg (dry weight) in cabbage sample from Koka Negewo. The data clearly shows that an elevated level of As were noticed in the vegetable samples regardless of the area of their origin when equated with recommended value of 0.1 mg/kg. It is worth mentioning that the levels of As in cabbage samples are much higher than the values detected in tomato samples. This shows that alike to the data we have reported recently [19], leafy vegetables amass As in substantial quantity than non-leafy vegetables.

thumbnail
Table 3. Heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg, dry weight) in vegetable samples analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t003

Significantly elevated levels of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) were also detected in both cabbage and tomato samples investigated in this study having amounts ranging from 1.8 to 7.26 mg/kg for Pb and 0.33 to 1.03 mg/kg for Cd. Both metals have been observed to contain relatively higher concentration compared with the recommended values indicated in Table 3. The levels of these toxic metals have showed significant difference in respective to the type of vegetable sample at 95% probability levels (P < 0.05). Similar to As, both Pb and Cd were observed to significantly accumulate in leafy vegetable than the fruity vegetables counterparts. Compared with the data obtained from this study, a relatively lower amounts of Pb, Cd and As were reported by Chen and co-investigators [37] in tomato and cabbage samples from China.

The concentrations of other metals including Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and Co found in both cabbage and tomato were comparatively less than the recommended values as can be seen from Table 3. The obtained amounts of the metals were ranged from 17.86 to 36.26 mg/kg for Zn; 10.70 to 15.96 mg/kg for Cu; 56.06 to 455.6 mg/kg for Fe; 16.9 to 102.5 mg/kg for Mn; 0.9 to 3.06 mg/kg for Ni and 0.33 to 1.36 mg/kg for Co. The amounts of Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and Co in both vegetables were statistically significantly differ from each other at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) regardless of sample locations. This again clearly magnify that leafy vegetables are potentially accumulating higher levels of heavy metals compared with fruity vegetables. Chromium (Cr) and Mercury (Hg) on the other hands have been obtained in all the vegetable samples regardless of the sample’s origin. However, the levels of chromium in cabbage were exceeded recommended values, while the corresponding levels in tomato samples were less than the reference values. On the other hand, it has been witnessed that the levels of Hg obtained in all vegetable samples were dangerously exceeded the recommended value 0.01 mg/kg with its values ranging from 3.23 to 4.36 mg/kg. this clearly solidify that the vegetables being grown in Koka area farmlands are dangerously contaminated with an elevated amount of the highly toxic metal, Mercury.

Bioconcentration factor (BCF)

It has been regarded that transfer and deposition of toxic metals from soil to plant is the major path to the admission of possibly poisonous metals into the food chain [59]. Sharma and co-investigators [46] have pointed out that the speed of transference and buildup of the toxic metals to plants differ mainly based on aspects including types of plant types, level and kinds of toxic metals, physical and chemical behaviors of the soil itself among other.

To evaluate the transferability of the metals considered in this study from soil to vegetable samples, the bioconcentration factor (BFC) have been calculated and the data is depicted in Table 4. It can be seen from the data that Cu has shown a higher transfer factor of 0.406 in tomato sample from Koka Ejersa area followed by Hg with BCF of 0.392. Likewise, Cu has shown higher transfer capability in tomato from Koka Negewo as well with BCF = 0.550. However, Hg has showed higher transfer capability in cabbage samples from both Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo area farmlands with BCF values of 0.564 and 0.624, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 4. Toxic metals bioconcentration factor (BFC) for cabbage and tomato samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t004

From the results of the current investigation, cabbage has been witnessed to accrue Hg to larger amount, while tomato accumulated Cu. Generally, even if the bioconcentration factor data attained from this particular investigation were all less than one, it was noticed that cabbage had accrued toxic metals to larger degree when arbitrated in comparisons with tomato.

Heavy metals health risk assessments

The estimated daily intake (EDI).

The average levels of individual metals in apiece vegetable from the two sampling locations, the estimated daily intake (EDI) of metals by adult population were estimated by making use of Eq (2). The result obtained together with the maximum tolerable daily ingestion (MTDI) for individually metal is depicted in Table 5.

thumbnail
Table 5. The EDI of heavy metals in mg/day/kg body weight from consumption of polluted cabbage and tomato.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t005

The EDI of heavy metals for an adult person because of the ingestion of 240 g/day of tomato were observed to be 3.08 x 10−4, 6.95 x 10−4, 1.30 x 10−3, 2.76 x 10−4, 1.02 x 10−3, 3.50 x 10−4 and 1.24 x 10−4 mg/day/kg body weight for As, Pb, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni and Co, respectively, while the respective EDI values from consumption of same amount of cabbage were 2.06 x 10−3, 2.19 x 10−3, 3.19 x 10−4, 1.52 x 10−3, 1.18 x 10−3, 9.29 x 10−4 and 4.22 x 10−4 mg/day/kg body weight, respectively. The EDI of toxic metals calculated were observed to be less than the MTDI as can witnessed from data in Table 5.

The total estimated daily intake of all metals by an adult person from the ingestion of tomato was 0.038 mg/day/kg body weight, whereas the corresponding amount from the ingestion of cabbage was 0.177 mg/day/kg body weight. The estimated daily intake of arsenic, cadmium, lead and zinc found from this investigation were higher than the numbers described by Shaheen and co-investigators [7] for the same vegetable ingestion.

The target hazard quotient (THQ) and target cancer risk (TCR).

The noncancer causing human health risk from ingestion of vegetables polluted by toxic metals were assayed through the calculation of target hazard quotient (THQ) and the data obtained is presented in Table 6. On the other hand, the target cancer risk because of the acquaintance with heavy metals including arsenic, lead, cadmium and nickel were apprised by making use of heavy metals estimated daily intake values and oral cancer slope factor (CSPo) of each metal.

thumbnail
Table 6. THQ and TCR to toxic metals from ingestion of polluted vegetables (tomato and cabbage) originated from Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo areas.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.t006

The THQs for arsenic and mercury in tomato sample were > 1 with values of 1.025 and 3.395 for As and Hg, respectively. This is a clear signal that the ingestion of tomato originated from both Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo areas could instigate a health risk to the public in the area and beyond. Likewise, the THQ values for arsenic, mercury and cobalt were also > 1 due to cabbage ingestion. As can be observed from the data in Table 6, the TCR value as a result of revelation to toxic metals like arsenic, chromium and nickel through the consumption of tomato were greater than the maximum threshold value of 0.0001. This clearly signifies the high risk of cancer to the adult people from the ingestion of tomato. Likewise, the TCR values of arsenic, cadmium, chromium and nickel also found to exceed the threshold value of 0.0001 due to the ingestion of cabbage originated from the study areas and indicating the possible cancer hazard to the populace in the area and beyond.

Hazard index (HI).

The collective effect from the absorption of highly toxic metals from the ingestion of various vegetables were estimated through the calculation of hazard index (HI) as indicated in Table 6. Fig 2 dipicts individual metal contribution to the health index from the consumption of each individual vegetables.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Individual metals contribution (%) to the health index (HI) from the ingestion of tomato (a) and cabbage (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.g002

Generally, in agreement with the fact that leafy vegetables accrue toxic metals to larger degree than non-leafy vegetables, nearly 72% of the health index (HI) was associated with cabbage ingestion, whereas tomato ingestion was observed to be responsible for only about 28%. Similar to our recent report [19], it has been found out that the major contributors to the total health index (HI) were arsenic and mercury metals. As can be evident from Fig 3, arsenic and mercury have contributed about 40% and 38%, respectively, followed by Co, Pb and Cr which have contributed 9, 4 and 3%, respectively, to the sum of individual metals THQ (TDHQ).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Contribution share (%) of individual metals to the sum of individual metals THQ (TDHQ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254236.g003

It is important to note that the estimation of EDI, THQ and HI data were based on the projected day-to-day ingestion of vegetables (240 gram per day) for both vegetables and as a result there is a probability that the EDI and THQ values obtained are overestimated. Similarly, only cabbage and tomato were considered in this investigation for the valuation of likely noncancer causing and cancer-causing health hazards to the populace in Koka area. This means that only portion but not the entire hazard to the populace were considered and therefore, it is likely that the possible health hazards to the resident from the acquaintance to toxic metals by the ingestion of vegetables maybe misjudged.

Conclusions

In this study the amounts of toxic metals in soil and vegetable samples from Koka Ejersa and Koka Negewo areas were assessed. From the result obtained the presence of elevated amounts of toxic metals in both soil and vegetable samples have been observed. Dangerously toxic metals such as As, Pb, Cd, Cr and Hg were detected in frighteningly elevated amounts in both investigated tomato and cabbage samples. This is a clear signal that the population around the study area and beyond are at higher risk of possible health implications through the ingestion of these vegetables. From the result obtained, cabbage was observed to accumulate more toxic metals compared with its counterpart tomato. The EDI of toxic metals from ingesting of both vegetables were observed to fairly lower than the maximum tolerable daily intake of each metal. Nevertheless, it was observed that the THQ of toxic metals from the ingestion tomato were > 1 for As and Hg and for As, Hg and Co due to the ingestion of cabbage. From the HI calculation to estimate the collective noncarcinogenic effects of multiple metals, it has been found that the HI values have exceeded one from ingestion of each tomato and cabbage separately, signifying that about 72% of the consequence is accounted for the ingestion of cabbage unaided. The cancer causing effect investigation has also exposed the presence of total cancer risk (TCR) to the population from As, Cr and Ni due to the consumption of both tomato and cabbage and from Cd due to the consumption of cabbage, as evidenced from the corresponding TCR values of the indicated metals found to surpass the maximum threshold value of 0.0001. Therefore, due attention should be paid to the safety of vegetables and other food crops being grown and distributed from the area to safeguard the wellbeing of population in the area and beyond.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ambo University and Agricultural and Nutritional Research Laboratory of Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research for the laboratory facilities.

References

  1. 1. Hu W, Chen Y, Huang B, Niedermann S. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soils and Vegetables from a Typical Greenhouse Vegetable Production System in China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess An Int J. 2014;20: 1264–1280.
  2. 2. Manzoor J, Sharma M, Wani KA. Heavy metals in vegetables and their impact on the nutrient quality of vegetables: A review. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41: 1744–1763.
  3. 3. Sultana MS, Rana S, Yamazaki S, Aono T, Yoshida S. Health risk assessment for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic heavy metal exposures from vegetables and fruits of Bangladesh. Kanan S, editor. Cogent Environ Sci. 2017;3. pmid:30854410
  4. 4. Ugulu I. Determination of Heavy Metal Accumulation in Plant Samples by Spectrometric Techniques in Turkey. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2015;50: 113–151.
  5. 5. Wang L, Tao W, Smardon RC, Xu X, Lu X. Speciation, sources, and risk assessment of heavy metals in suburban vegetable garden soil in Xianyang City, Northwest China. Front Earth Sci. 2018;12: 397–407.
  6. 6. Sachdeva S, Sachdev TR, Sachdeva R. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: challenges and opportunities. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38: 192–7. pmid:24302818
  7. 7. Shaheen N, Irfan NM, Khan IN, Islam S, Islam MS, Ahmed MK. Presence of heavy metals in fruits and vegetables: Health risk implications in Bangladesh. Chemosphere. 2016;152: 431–438. pmid:27003365
  8. 8. Sangster JL, Nelson A, Bartelt-Hunt SL. THE OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SOIL AND VEGETABLES AT A COMMUNITY GARDEN IN OMAHA, NEBRASKA. Int J Serv Learn Eng Humanit Eng Soc Entrep. 2012;7: 62–68.
  9. 9. Sulaiman FR, Hamzah HA. Heavy metals accumulation in suburban roadside plants of a tropical area (Jengka, Malaysia). Ecol Process. 2018;7: 28.
  10. 10. Itanna F. Metals in leafy vegetables grown in Addis Ababa and toxicological implications. Ethiop J Heal Dev. 2002;16.
  11. 11. Kachenko AG, Singh B. Heavy Metals Contamination in Vegetables Grown in Urban and Metal Smelter Contaminated Sites in Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2006;169: 101–123.
  12. 12. Mekonnen KN, Ambushe AA, Chandravanshi BS, Redi-Abshiro M, McCrindle RI. Assessment of potentially toxic elements in Swiss chard and sediments of Akaki River, Ethiopia. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2014;96: 1501–1515.
  13. 13. Ikeda M, Zhang Z-W, Shimbo S, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Moon C-S, et al. Urban population exposure to lead and cadmium in east and south-east Asia. Sci Total Environ. 2000;249: 373–384. pmid:10813464
  14. 14. Intawongse M, Dean JR. Uptake of heavy metals by vegetable plants grown on contaminated soil and their bioavailability in the human gastrointestinal tract. Food Addit Contam. 2006;23: 36–48. pmid:16393813
  15. 15. Gizaw Z. Public health risks related to food safety issues in the food market: a systematic literature review. Environ Health Prev Med. 2019;24: 68. pmid:31785611
  16. 16. Ahmad JU, Goni MA. Heavy metal contamination in water, soil, and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;166: 347–357. pmid:19521788
  17. 17. Chabukdhara M, Munjal A, Nema AK, Gupta SK, Kaushal RK. Heavy metal contamination in vegetables grown around peri-urban and urban-industrial clusters in Ghaziabad, India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess An Int J. 2016;22: 736–752.
  18. 18. Chen T-B, Zheng Y-M, Lei M, Huang Z-C, Wu H-T, Chen H, et al. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere. 2005;60: 542–551. pmid:15950046
  19. 19. Gebeyehu HR, Bayissa LD. Levels of heavy metals in soil and vegetables and associated health risks in Mojo area, Ethiopia. Bhatnagar A, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0227883. pmid:31999756
  20. 20. Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG. Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human health. Sci Agric. 2012;69: 54–60.
  21. 21. Vázquez de la Cueva A, Marchant BP, Quintana JR, de Santiago A, Lafuente AL, Webster R. Spatial variation of trace elements in the peri-urban soil of Madrid. J Soils Sediments. 2014;14: 78–88.
  22. 22. Cai L, Xu Z, Bao P, He M, Dou L, Chen L, et al. Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and source of arsenic and heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunde, Southeast China. J Geochemical Explor. 2015;148: 189–195.
  23. 23. Weldegebriel Y, Chandravanshi BS, Wondimu T. Concentration levels of metals in vegetables grown in soils irrigated with river water in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;77: 57–63. pmid:22062152
  24. 24. Woldetsadik D, Drechsel P, Keraita B, Itanna F, Gebrekidan H. Heavy metal accumulation and health risk assessment in wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming sites of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Food Contam. 2017;4: 9.
  25. 25. Feng J, Wang Y, Zhao J, Zhu L, Bian X, Zhang W. Source attributions of heavy metals in rice plant along highway in Eastern China. J Environ Sci. 2011;23: 1158–1164. pmid:22125909
  26. 26. Chen T, Liu X, Li X, Zhao K, Zhang J, Xu J, et al. Heavy metal sources identification and sampling uncertainty analysis in a field-scale vegetable soil of Hangzhou, China. Environ Pollut. 2009;157: 1003–1010. pmid:19026475
  27. 27. Eshetie T. Ethiopia’s Manufacturing Industry Opportunities, Challenges and Way Forward: A Sectoral Overview. Nov Tech Nutr Food Sci. 2018;2.
  28. 28. Getachew B, Amde M, Danno BL. Level of selected heavy metals in surface dust collected from electronic and electrical material maintenance shops in selected Western Oromia towns, Ethiopia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26: 18593–18603. pmid:31054056
  29. 29. Woldetsadik D, Drechsel P, Keraita B, Itanna F, Erko B, Gebrekidan H. Microbiological quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) irrigated with wastewater in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and effect of green salads washing methods. Int J Food Contam. 2017;4: 3.
  30. 30. Liu W-X, Liu J-W, Wu M-Z, Li Y, Zhao Y, Li S-R. Accumulation and Translocation of Toxic Heavy Metals in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Growing in Agricultural Soil of Zhengzhou, China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;82: 343–347. pmid:18987775
  31. 31. Sulaiman FR, Hamzah HA. Heavy metals accumulation in suburban roadside plants of a tropical area (Jengka, Malaysia). Ecol Process. 2018;7: 28.
  32. 32. Chen C, Qian Y, Chen Q, Li C. Assessment of Daily Intake of Toxic Elements Due to Consumption of Vegetables, Fruits, Meat, and Seafood by Inhabitants of Xiamen, China. J Food Sci. 2011;76: T181–T188. pmid:21913923
  33. 33. Woldetsadik D, Drechsel P, Keraita B, Itanna F, Gebrekidan H. Heavy metal accumulation and health risk assessment in wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming sites of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Food Contam. 2017;4: 9.
  34. 34. WHO. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization; 2002. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42510
  35. 35. Arora M, Kiran B, Rani S, Rani A, Kaur B, Mittal N. Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources. Food Chem. 2008;111: 811–815.
  36. 36. Harmanescu M, Alda LM, Bordean DM, Gogoasa I, Gergen I. Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, Romania. Chem Cent J. 2011;5. pmid:22017878
  37. 37. Chen C, Qian Y, Chen Q, Li C. Assessment of Daily Intake of Toxic Elements Due to Consumption of Vegetables, Fruits, Meat, and Seafood by Inhabitants of Xiamen, China. J Food Sci. 2011;76. pmid:21913923
  38. 38. Antoine JMR, Fung LAH, Grant CN. Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in Jamaica. Toxicol Reports. 2017;4: 181–187. pmid:28959639
  39. 39. Esmaeilzadeh M, Jaafari J, Mohammadi AA, Panahandeh M, Javid A, Javan S. Investigation of the extent of contamination of heavy metals in agricultural soil using statistical analyses and contamination indices. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2019;25: 1125–1136.
  40. 40. Kamunda C, Mathuthu M, Madhuku M. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soils from Witwatersrand Gold Mining Basin, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13: 663. pmid:27376316
  41. 41. Javed M, Usmani N. Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment via the consumption of freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus inhabiting, thermal power plant effluent loaded canal. Springerplus. 2016;5. pmid:27386262
  42. 42. Zeng F, Wei W, Li M, Huang R, Yang F, Duan Y. Heavy metal contamination in rice-producing soils of Hunan province, China and potential health risks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12: 15584–15593. pmid:26670240
  43. 43. Kamunda C, Mathuthu M, Madhuku M. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soils from Witwatersrand Gold Mining Basin, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13. pmid:27376316
  44. 44. Yang J, Ma S, Zhou J, Song Y, Li F. Heavy metal contamination in soils and vegetables and health risk assessment of inhabitants in Daye, China. J Int Med Res. 2018;46: 3374–3387. pmid:29557292
  45. 45. Alghobar MA, Suresha S. Evaluation of metal accumulation in soil and tomatoes irrigated with sewage water from Mysore city, Karnataka, India. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2017;16: 49–59.
  46. 46. Sharma S, Nagpal AK, Kaur I. Heavy metal contamination in soil, food crops and associated health risks for residents of Ropar wetland, Punjab, India and its environs. Food Chem. 2018;255: 15–22. pmid:29571461
  47. 47. Balkhair KS, Ashraf MA. Field accumulation risks of heavy metals in soil and vegetable crop irrigated with sewage water in western region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23: S32–S44. pmid:26858563
  48. 48. Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE, Tripathi RC, Srivastava NK. Application of Soil Quality Indicators for the Phytorestoration of Mine Spoil Dumps. Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites: Market Opportunities in Sustainable Phytoremediation. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 361–388.
  49. 49. Punshon T, Jackson BP, Meharg AA, Warczack T, Scheckel K, Guerinot M Lou. Understanding arsenic dynamics in agronomic systems to predict and prevent uptake by crop plants. Sci Total Environ. 2017;581–582: 209–220. pmid:28043702
  50. 50. Bencko V, Foong FYL. The history of arsenical pesticides and health risks related to the use of Agent Blue. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24: 312–316. pmid:28664715
  51. 51. Brown JR. Soil testing: sampling, correlation, calibration, and interpretation: proceedings of a symposium. SSSA special publication series (USA). Soil Science Society of America; 1987. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US8921090
  52. 52. Chang CY, Yu HY, Chen JJ, Li FB, Zhang HH, Liu CP. Accumulation of heavy metals in leaf vegetables from agricultural soils and associated potential health risks in the Pearl River Delta, South China. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186: 1547–1560. pmid:24185814
  53. 53. Mahmood A, Malik RN. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via consumption of contaminated vegetables collected from different irrigation sources in Lahore, Pakistan. Arab J Chem. 2014;7: 91–99.
  54. 54. McGrath SP, Zhao FJ, Lombi E. Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils. Plant Soil. 2001;232: 207–214.
  55. 55. Rattan RK, Datta SP, Chhonkar PK, Suribabu K, Singh AK. Long-term impact of irrigation with sewage effluents on heavy metal content in soils, crops and groundwater—A case study. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2005;109: 310–322.
  56. 56. Agocs M, Clarkson T, Ambre J, Becker C, Borak J, Cannella J, et al. Mercury toxicity. Am Fam Physician. 1992;46: 1731–1744. pmid:1456196
  57. 57. Li X, Li Z, Lin CJ, Bi X, Liu J, Feng X, et al. Health risks of heavy metal exposure through vegetable consumption near a large-scale Pb/Zn smelter in central China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;161: 99–110. pmid:29879579
  58. 58. Liu C, Lu L, Huang T, Huang Y, Ding L, Zhao W. The distribution and health risk assessment of metals in soils in the vicinity of industrial sites in Dongguan, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13. pmid:27548198
  59. 59. Naser HM, Sultana S, Gomes R, Noor S. Heavy Metal Pollution of Soil and Vegetable Grown Near Roadside at Gazipur. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2012;37: 9–17.
  60. 60. Zheng N, Wang Q, Zhang X, Zheng D, Zhang Z, Zhang S. Population health risk due to dietary intake of heavy metals in the industrial area of Huludao city, China. Sci Total Environ. 2007;387: 96–104. pmid:17765948
  61. 61. Basha AM, Yasovardhan N, Satyanarayana S V., Reddy GVS, Vinod Kumar A. Trace metals in vegetables and fruits cultivated around the surroundings of Tummalapalle uranium mining site, Andhra Pradesh, India. Toxicol Reports. 2014;1: 505–512. pmid:28962264