Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Health care seeking patterns of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients in Harare, Zimbabwe: A prospective cohort study

  • Rebecca Tadokera,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NRF/DST Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Stella Huo,

    Roles Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America

  • Grant Theron,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NRF/DST Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Collins Timire,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Ministry of Health and Child Care, National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Zimbabwe Office, Centre for Operational Research, Harare, Zimbabwe

  • Salome Manyau-Makumbirofa ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • John Z. Metcalfe

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    John.Metcalfe@ucsf.edu

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America

Abstract

Background

Delays in seeking and accessing treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) and multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB) are major impediments to TB control in high-burden, resource-limited settings.

Method

We prospectively determined health-seeking behavioural patterns and associations with treatment outcomes and costs among 68 RR-TB patients attending conveniently selected facilities in a decentralised system in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Results

From initial symptoms to initiation of effective treatment, patients made a median number of three health care visits (IQR 2–4 visits) at a median cost of 13% (IQR 6–31%) of their total annual household income (mean cost, US$410). Cumulatively, RR-TB patients most frequently first visited private facilities, i.e., private pharmacies (30%) and other private health care providers (24%) combined. Median patient delay was 26 days (IQR 14–42 days); median health system delay was 97 days (IQR 30–215 days) and median total delay from symptom onset to initiation of effective treatment was 132 days (IQR 51–287 days). The majority of patients (88%) attributed initial delay in seeking care to “not feeling sick enough.” Total delay, total cost and number of health care visits were not associated with treatment or clinical outcomes, though our study was not adequately powered for these determinations.

Conclusions

Despite the public availability of rapid molecular TB tests, patients experienced significant delays and high costs in accessing RR-TB treatment. Active case finding, integration of private health care providers and enhanced service delivery may reduce treatment delay and TB associated costs.

Introduction

Multi-drug resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health crisis and health security threat [1]. The social and economic burden associated with TB and MDR-TB treatment [2], compounded by the HIV epidemic, places a disproportionate burden of disease on Sub-Saharan African countries [3, 4]. TB diagnosis, treatment, and prevention are strongly associated with socio-economic and behavioural factors [57]. Operational challenges related to weak, poorly resourced health systems are a barrier to TB prevention and control activities. For MDR-TB, timing delays can significantly determine treatment outcomes and are likely to increase the infectiousness and disease transmission in a community [4]. The resultant delays to diagnosis and effective treatment related to health system weaknesses are further informed by patient choices and behaviour [8]. Ultimately, such delays increase community transmission and may worsen treatment outcomes [9].

Despite the availability of free TB treatment in the public sector and the goal of universal health coverage (UHC) [10], the economic consequences for families affected by TB are often severe [11]. These include direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs and income loss (resulting from indirect or opportunity costs) [12]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines TB-associated health care expenditures above a certain proportion (typically 20%) of available annual income as “catastrophic”, though the specific threshold is expected to vary by setting and circumstances [13, 14]. Resulting impoverishment may be high in settings such as Zimbabwe, where 85% of the total workforce is employed within the informal sector [15].

RR-TB has conventionally been used as a reliable proxy for MDR-TB, particularly in resource limited settings [16]. We conducted a prospective cohort study to understand healthcare seeking behaviour, healthcare expenditures, and associations with treatment outcome (24-month survival) among RR-TB patients starting treatment in conveniently selected out-patient facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Materials and methods

Study population

RR-TB patients initially seeking health care within the Harare Metropolitan area between November 2011 and November 2012 were recruited from eight conveniently selected health facilities. Detailed enrolment and diagnosis criteria have previously been described [17]. Briefly, persons who had a history of prior TB treatment or were suspected of having drug-resistant pulmonary TB were recruited into a prospective cohort study. Presumptive drug-resistant TB patients were identified as symptomatic patients presenting with a history of > = 1 month of prior TB treatment (relapse, treatment after loss to follow up or treatment failure), contact with a person with known or possible drug-resistant TB; or with a rifampicin-resistant result on Xpert MTB/RIF. RR-TB diagnosis was confirmed by molecular TB assay and/or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. At the time our study was undertaken, a partially decentralized MDR-TB/RR-TB treatment system was in place in Harare. Patients could only be diagnosed and recommended for treatment via a central MDR-TB clinic (i.e., at Wilkins Hospital) based in Harare, but MDR-TB/RR-TB treatment could be dispensed through peripheral, local health clinics. We estimated that approximately 60% of the population base was likely included in our sample [17].

Data collection

Data were collected using a mixed methods approach via an open-ended healthcare-seeking behaviour questionnaire designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative responses through in-depth patient interviews. The open-ended questionnaire allowed respondents to provide detailed responses on their health-seeking pathways and reasons for delay in seeking care. A trained research nurse administered the questionnaire. Quantitative data included basic socio-demographic information. Health-seeking behaviour included type of facilities or health care provider from which treatment was first sought; delays in seeking health care; reasons for delays; and direct and indirect costs incurred. Additional variables included whether patients had been referred from outside Harare, HIV and antiretroviral treatment status, TB treatment history and TB symptoms. Final clinical outcome was defined as 24-month patient survival, ascertained through review of medical records and contact with next-of-kin. Data were electronically captured in Research Electronic Data Capture tools (REDCap) [18] hosted at the University of California, San Francisco.

Definitions

Patient delay was defined as the time from onset of disease-associated symptoms to first health care visit. Health system delay was defined as the time from first medical facility visit to initiation of effective RR-TB treatment. Total delay was defined as the sum of patient and health system delays and included both diagnostic delay and repeat visits before initiation of treatment. Direct costs were those directly associated with health care such as diagnostic tests, doctors’ fees or medication costs. Indirect costs included travel, lodging or food expenses indirectly associated with health care seeking. Total costs were defined as the sum of direct and indirect costs incurred by a patient accessing care. A polyclinic was defined as a patient’s local government clinic (usually the first point of contact in this setting). Informal employment was defined as engagement in an economic activity that is not taxed or formally registered. Final clinical outcome was defined as 24-month patient survival.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Version 13 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and R software (version 3.5.3). Descriptive statistics for numeric variables (such as age or income) were computed and are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Chi-square tests were used to compute associations between continuous and categorical variables. We used the Kruskal Wallis test to analyse the associations between health care facility first attended; delays (patient and total time delays) and cost (both first visit and total costs incurred) to patients. Mann Whitney tests were used to compute associations between delay and clinical outcomes. Results are reported as medians, IQRs or proportions.

Both simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between delay and explanatory variables. Potential risk factors for delay and variables associated with delay in the bivariate analysis (P ≤0.2) were included in a final multiple linear regression model. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. R software (version 3.5.3) was used to compute the visual pathways of care. Thematic analysis was used to identify and analyse patterns and trends within the qualitative data gathered from the open-ended questionnaires [19].

Ethical approval

The Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A1552), and the Institutional Review Board of Biomedical Research and Training Institute, and Human Research Protection Programme, University of California, San Francisco (USCF) provided ethical approval (10–05115). All participants gave written informed consent before enrolling in the study.

Results

Study participants

Of 139 participants with RR-TB in the main study, 73 (53%) agreed to participate in the health-seeking behaviour (HSB) survey (Fig 1). A final sample of 68 participants with follow-up data was included in the final analysis: five participants were lost to follow up during the study period and were excluded from further analysis. More than 70% (48/68) of study participants were female, mainly from the economically active age group (median 34 years, IQR 29–42 years); with more than 73%, (50/68) educated up to secondary level (Table 1). Forty-five percent (30/67) of participants were employed in the informal sector; median monthly income was US$175 (IQR US$100-$300). Two-thirds of the sample (43/68) were HIV-positive, among whom 31 (73.8%) were on antiretroviral therapy. Overall, 37 (55.2%) of participants presented with new RR-TB, while other participants had experienced from one to three prior TB episodes (29.9% and 3.0% respectively).

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of RR-TB patients, Harare, Zimbabwe.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254204.t001

Time delays and costs associated with health care visits

Patients delayed seeking care by a median of 26 days (IQR 14–42 days) from onset of TB symptoms (Table 2). Median health system delay (i.e., time from first health care visit to initiation of effective RR-TB treatment) was 97 days (IQR 30–215 days). Health system delay was longest when the first point of contact was government polyclinics (median 150 days, IQR 18–300 days), followed by private clinics (median 102 days, IQR 30–154 days) and pharmacies (median 97 days, IQR 67–210 days). Median total delay (i.e., patient plus health system delay) was 132 days (IQR 51–287 days). Total delay was longest when a polyclinic was the first health system contact (median, 221 days, IQR 45–338 days). Costs associated with first visit were highest for private clinics (median US$30, IQR $14–45 days) and lowest for polyclinics (median $US0, IQR $0–4), across facilities visited (p<0.001). Cumulative costs were highest for participants who first visited a pharmacy (median US$45, IQR $19–80) and private clinics/hospital (median US$40, IQR $15–56), but least for those first visiting government polyclinics (median US$8, IQR $5–16). Overall, a median of 13% (IQR 6–31%) of total annual household income, (equivalent to a mean cost of US$410), was spent on seeking RR-TB health care. At least 30% (23/68) households incurred TB related costs which can be considered as catastrophic i.e., above 20% of annual household income.

thumbnail
Table 2. RR-TB patients’ first visit to a health care facility, patient time delays, total delay and associated costs to begin effective MDR-TB treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254204.t002

Reasons for delays in seeking care

Most study participants (n = 59/68, 88%) who delayed seeking care for their first health care visit reported not feeling sick enough to warrant a visit to the clinic or thinking that they had a minor cough, which could be treated using over-the-counter remedies. Participants who did not first seek care at primary care facilities (polyclinics) reported anticipating longer waiting times; inadequate testing facilities or poor service at the clinic as reasons for not first seeking care at the clinic.

Pathways to care and health-seeking visits

Based on qualitative interviews conducted among patients, urban residents preferred to visit pharmacies and supermarkets for home-based and over-the-counter remedies before visiting polyclinics or primary care facilities. When the care received was inadequate or symptoms were not improving, these patients would later attend government administered clinics and be referred to TB-referral clinics. Rural patients from outside Harare had a different typical care pathway characterised by home-based care, attendance at a rural hospital or clinic, followed by referral to a RR-TB treatment facility in Harare (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Cyclic care-seeking pathways and repetitive visits followed by study participants.

Different colours correspond to the health facility where patients sought care. The different arrows represent successive care-seeking visits as shown in the figure key.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254204.g002

Healthcare facilities attended

Health-seeking behaviour among study participants was cyclic, with participants making up to six visits (median, three visits) before initiating RR-TB treatment. Repeat visits at the same health facility were more common for polyclinics and private healthcare facilities. For their first visit, most participants attended a polyclinic (37%) followed by a pharmacy (30%), and private health care providers (24%) (Fig 2). Cumulatively, for the total 215 health care visits recorded in the study, nearly half (n = 90/215, 42%) were at the polyclinic with participants making up to five polyclinic visits (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Different Health care facilities attended by study participants and the proportion (%) of participants attending each facility as a proportion of all health care visits for each health care visit (Visit 1–6).

Different colours correspond to the health facility where patients sought care while different arrows represent successive care-seeking visits. *Four patients were admitted to hospital on first contact with the health system and are not included in this figure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254204.g003

Association of total delay with clinical outcomes

We found that after adjusting for age and gender, living with HIV and being employed were associated with shorter total delay, (p = 0.11, median 98 days and p = 0.25, median 104 days respectively), and TB retreatment was likely to be associated with a longer delay (p = 0.20). We found no significant associations with mortality and median total delay or total cost incurred (Table 3). However, our sample size limited our ability to make conclusive determinations about the associations between delay and the risk factors that were assessed.

thumbnail
Table 3. Association between delay, cost and 24-month survival.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254204.t003

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that substantial delays in both seeking and accessing care for persons with confirmed RR-TB are common. Overall delay was highest among patients first attending government polyclinics, with a median of seven months (221 days) from onset of symptoms to effective treatment. Most participants first sought care at private health care facilities outside of the national TB program, citing long waiting periods, mistrust and inadequate facilities and services as barriers to accessing public sector care. Patient costs averaged approximately 13% of monthly income with at least 30% of the households incurring costs that may be considered “catastrophic”.

Our study showed community delays to effective rifampicin-resistant TB treatment despite the availability of molecular TB diagnostics such as Xpert. These findings are in agreement with studies from this era that have documented similar delays in accessing care. Total treatment delay among TB patients were shown to be 126 days in an urban study [20]; 70 days in a rural study [21] and up to 170 days in a rural study [22] in three South African TB studies. Although our study was in an urban setting and among RR-TB patients, we observed patterns of prolonged delays averaging 97 days (overall) for health system, and as high as 150 days for polyclinics. While for the South African studies delays to treatment initiation were mainly attributed to late presentation, [21, 22] in our study, delays were largely health system related. In contrast, a systematic review on 23 studies from India reported shorter average patient delays of 18.4 days and total delays of 55 days from when symptomatic patients with active TB first contacted a health care provider [23]. Differences between the Indian studies and our findings could be attributed to the health care system setting in the different countries. Across a number of other studies, delays in treatment initiation were mainly attributed to a combination of diagnostic delays and late presentation for care [2326]. Prolonged diagnostic and treatment initiation delays pose serious challenges as TB treatment may only be initiated after disease has progressed, potentially worsening prognosis and treatment outcomes [27, 28].

Indirect costs remain a deterrent to seeking health care for many patients, despite TB treatment being nominally free in government facilities in most countries [11, 29, 30]. Loss of income due to time taken when sick or to seek treatment is a major issue and an indirect expense particularly when employment is informal or seasonal. The majority of our study participants who delayed seeking treatment were informally employed with limited safety nets. It is of concern that many patients visited private health care facilities or pharmacies as their first point contact, incurring additional expenses in the process. Our findings corroborate studies in other settings where patients incurred higher costs and a circuitous path to care, [24] resulting in significant delays in accessing treatment [31]. The economic burden of TB treatment remains considerable, especially in poorer and developing countries without universal health coverage (UHC), including our study setting [5, 32]. For many, the cost of accessing care can push already poor families to the brink of poverty. Furthermore, as we have shown, repeat visits in care-seeking pathways increased cumulative costs and delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation. Studies from India, Indonesia, Thailand, South Africa and other similar settings have shown that the cost of TB can be catastrophic especially for low-income households [6, 12, 3235]. According to WHO, catastrophic costs are incurred when patients spend a considerable proportion of their annual income on both direct and indirect medical costs [34]. Other unaccounted (indirect) costs for TB may include income loss due to seeking treatment and loss of productivity due to illness or when household members assume carer roles for a bedridden TB patient. The financial burden of TB is evident from the low average income per household and proportion of costs (up to a maximum of 31% of annual household income) incurred on TB-treatment costs reported by participants in this study. Up to 30% of households reportedly spent more than 20% of annual household income on TB related costs, a threshold which has been previously described as catastrophic [12].

In 2016, the WHO issued revised guidance recommending MDR-TB treatment for all RR-TB patients regardless of confirmatory resistance testing as well as the use of line probe assays for drug sensitivity testing [36]. At the time of our study, MDR-TB diagnosis was done by culture, and drug susceptibility testing was done to confirm isoniazid resistance at a central reference laboratory (although many patients would be treated on the basis of rifampicin resistant test), increasing delays to treatment initiation. Our findings point to a need to improve public sector care services to ensure that they are the preferred first contact for TB patients and that patients access treatment promptly once they enter the care cascade. This is particularly pertinent given the protracted delay in initiating treatment by patients attending polyclinics that we report in this study. Increased case-finding and educational campaigns would assist in reducing patient-associated delays in seeking care. Furthermore, supportive social protection policies and interventions such as UHC [37] in resource-constrained settings could ensure that TB patients are not deterred from seeking care by exorbitant out-of-pocket costs which may exert financial burden on impoverished families [12, 33]. Our findings corroborate previous studies from other TB burdened settings that showed that consulting private health care providers aggravate delays in TB treatment access as they are not equipped to promptly diagnose and initiate TB treatment [24, 26, 38, 39]. Private-public health partnerships could facilitate prompt TB diagnosis, reduce high costs and reduce treatment delays among presumptive MDR-TB and TB patients as has been previously reported in other studies [4042]. Taken together, these findings point to a need for interventions including quality improvement (particularly in the public healthcare system), to reduce delays in MDR-TB and RR-TB patient diagnosis and ensure prompt treatment once patients make contact with a health care facility.

We acknowledge a few limitations in our study. First, we conducted this study within a prospective cohort of RR-TB patients who underwent extensive diagnostic testing at time of referral for RR-T testing and treatment; true programmatic delays may be longer. Second, our study was underpowered to determine associations between clinical outcomes and health-seeking behaviour-related delays. Third, female participants were over-represented in our study, [17] indicating a possible selection bias. Furthermore, data was self-reported and so may be subject to self-report bias.

In conclusion, we found significant delays in accessing TB care in this setting, particularly in the public health sector. The majority of patients preferred private care providers as their first contact, resulting in cyclical care-seeking pathways, significant delays and additional health-care costs, which did not correlate with prompt access to care. As pharmacies are the first point of contact for many patients, we recommend that pharmacists and other private health care providers should be trained in appropriate TB screening and referral of potential TB patients to hasten access to treatment and reduce the cyclic pathways evident in settings such as ours.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Harare City Health Department clinicians and staff, who have shown exceptional dedication in treating MDR-TB and RR-TB patients despite resource constraints. We would like to acknowledge all study participants and their families. We thank Morna Cornell for critically reviewing this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. Geneva2020.
  2. 2. Stracker N, Hanrahan C, Mmolawa L, Nonyane B, Tampi R, Tucker A, et al. Risk factors for catastrophic costs associated with tuberculosis in rural South Africa. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2019;23(6):756–63. pmid:31315710
  3. 3. Barter DM, Agboola SO, Murray MB, Bärnighausen T. Tuberculosis and poverty: the contribution of patient costs in sub-Saharan Africa–a systematic review. BMC public health. 2012;12(1):980. pmid:23150901
  4. 4. Cox H, Dickson-Hall L, Jassat W, Moshabela M, Kielmann K, Grant A, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: history, progress and opportunities for achieving universal access to diagnosis and effective treatment. South African Health Review. 2017;2017(1):157–67.
  5. 5. Ukwaja K, Modebe O, Igwenyi C, Alobu I. The economic burden of tuberculosis care for patients and households in Africa: a systematic review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2012;16(6):733–9. pmid:22410546
  6. 6. Russell S. The economic burden of illness for households in developing countries: a review of studies focusing on malaria, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2004;71(2_suppl):147–55. pmid:15331831
  7. 7. Foster N, Vassall A, Cleary S, Cunnama L, Churchyard G, Sinanovic E. The economic burden of TB diagnosis and treatment in South Africa. Social science & medicine. 2015;130:42–50. pmid:25681713
  8. 8. Bonadonna LV, Saunders MJ, Guio H, Zegarra R, Evans CA. Socioeconomic and behavioral factors associated with tuberculosis diagnostic delay in Lima, Peru. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2018;98(6):1614–23. pmid:29692300
  9. 9. Storla DG, Yimer S, Bjune GA. A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC public health. 2008;8(1):15. pmid:18194573
  10. 10. Bank T. Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in Africa: A Framework for Action: Main Report. The World Bank; 2016.
  11. 11. Tanimura T, Jaramillo E, Weil D, Raviglione M, Lönnroth K. Financial burden for tuberculosis patients in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. European Respiratory Journal. 2014;43(6):1763–75. pmid:24525439
  12. 12. Wingfield T, Boccia D, Tovar M, Gavino A, Zevallos K, Montoya R, et al. Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru. PLoS medicine. 2014;11(7):e1001675. pmid:25025331
  13. 13. Chuma J, Gilson L, Molyneux C. Treatment-seeking behaviour, cost burdens and coping strategies among rural and urban households in Coastal Kenya: an equity analysis. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2007;12(5):673–86. pmid:17445135
  14. 14. Fochsen G. Health care seeking among individuals with cough and tuberculosis: a population-based study from rural India. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2006;10(9):995. pmid:16964790
  15. 15. Kedem S. Zimbabwe’s informal economy demands recognition amid devastating Covid-19 response. African Business. 2020.
  16. 16. Timire C, Metcalfe JZ, Chirenda J, Scholten JN, Manyame-Murwira B, Ngwenya M, et al. Prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Zimbabwe: A health facility-based cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;87:119–25. pmid:31357057
  17. 17. Metcalfe JZ, Makumbirofa S, Makamure B, Sandy C, Bara W, Mungofa S, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis in high-risk groups, Zimbabwe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(1):135–7. pmid:24377879
  18. 18. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81. pmid:18929686
  19. 19. Clarke V, Braun V. Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The psychologist. 2013;26(2).
  20. 20. Lewis K, Stephens C, Shahidi M, Packe G. Delay in starting treatment for tuberculosis in east London. Communicable disease and public health. 2003;6(2):133–8. pmid:12889293
  21. 21. Pronyk P. Assessing health seeking behaviour among tuberculosis patients in rural South Africa. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2001;5(7):619. pmid:11467368
  22. 22. Boniface R, Moshabela M, Zulliger R, MacPherson P, Nyasulu P. Correlates of delayed diagnosis among human immunodeficiency virus-infected pulmonary tuberculosis suspects in a rural HIV clinic, South Africa. Tuberculosis research and treatment. 2012;2012.
  23. 23. Sreeramareddy CT, Qin ZZ, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Pai M. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2014;18(3):255–66. pmid:24670558
  24. 24. Skordis-Worrall J, Hanson K, Mills A. Confusion, caring and tuberculosis diagnostic delay in Cape Town, South Africa. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2010;14(2):171–80. pmid:20074408
  25. 25. Sreeramareddy CT, Panduru KV, Menten J, Van den Ende J. Time delays in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review of literature. BMC infectious diseases. 2009;9(1):1–10. pmid:19519917
  26. 26. Storla DG, Yimer S, Bjune GA. A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC public health. 2008;8(1):1–9. pmid:18194573
  27. 27. Takarinda KC, Harries AD, Nyathi B, Ngwenya M, Mutasa-Apollo T, Sandy C. Tuberculosis treatment delays and associated factors within the Zimbabwe national tuberculosis programme. BMC public health. 2015;15(1):29. pmid:25631667
  28. 28. Thorson A. Health-seeking behaviour of individuals with a cough of more than 3 weeks. The Lancet2000. p. 1823. pmid:11117921
  29. 29. Pedrazzoli D, Borghi J, Viney K, Houben R, Lönnroth K. Measuring the economic burden for TB patients in the End TB Strategy and Universal Health Coverage frameworks. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2019;23(1):5–11. pmid:30674374
  30. 30. Zeng W, Lannes L, Mutasa R. Utilization of health care and burden of out-of-pocket health expenditure in Zimbabwe: Results from a national household survey. Health Systems & Reform. 2018;4(4):300–12. pmid:30398403
  31. 31. Muttamba W, Ssengooba W, Kirenga B, Sekibira R, Walusimbi S, Katamba A, et al. Health seeking behavior among individuals presenting with chronic cough at referral hospitals in Uganda; Missed opportunity for early tuberculosis diagnosis. PloS one. 2019;14(6):e0217900. pmid:31170234
  32. 32. Laurence YV, Griffiths UK, Vassall A. Costs to health services and the patient of treating tuberculosis: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(9):939–55. pmid:25939501
  33. 33. Fuady A, Houweling TA, Mansyur M, Richardus JH. Catastrophic total costs in tuberculosis-affected households and their determinants since Indonesia’s implementation of universal health coverage. Infectious diseases of poverty. 2018;7(1):3. pmid:29325589
  34. 34. Verguet S, Riumallo-Herl C, Gomez GB, Menzies NA, Houben RM, Sumner T, et al. Catastrophic costs potentially averted by tuberculosis control in India and South Africa: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(11):e1123–e32. pmid:29025634
  35. 35. Wingfield T, Tovar MA, Huff D, Boccia D, Montoya R, Ramos E, et al. The economic effects of supporting tuberculosis-affected households in Peru. European respiratory journal. 2016;48(5):1396–410. pmid:27660507
  36. 36. World Health Organization. WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Update. Accessed on June 8, 2019 at: http://www.who.int/tb/MDRTBguidelines2016.pdf?ua=1. 2016.
  37. 37. Lönnroth K, Glaziou P, Weil D, Floyd K, Uplekar M, Raviglione M. Beyond UHC: monitoring health and social protection coverage in the context of tuberculosis care and prevention. PLoS medicine. 2014;11(9):e1001693. pmid:25243782
  38. 38. Shete P, Haguma P, Miller C, Ochom E, Ayakaka I, Davis J, et al. Pathways and costs of care for patients with tuberculosis symptoms in rural Uganda. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2015;19(8):912–7. pmid:26162356
  39. 39. Van Wyk S, Enarson D, Beyers N, Lombard C, Hesseling A. Consulting private health care providers aggravates treatment delay in urban South African tuberculosis patients. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2011;15(8):1069–76. pmid:21740670
  40. 40. Murthy K, Frieden T, Yazdani A, Hreshikesh P. Public-private partnership in tuberculosis control: experience in Hyderabad, India. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2001;5(4):354–9. pmid:11334254
  41. 41. Uplekar M. Involving private health care providers in delivery of TB care: global strategy. Tuberculosis. 2003;83(1–3):156–64. pmid:12758206
  42. 42. The Tuberculosis Coalition for Technical Assistance. Tool to estimate patients’ costs. Accessed on May 10, 2019 at: http://www.stoptb.org/wg/dots_expansion/tbandpoverty/assets/documents/Tool%20to%20estimate%20Patients’%20Costs.pdf