Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Predictors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Even though the lives of millions have been saved in the past decades, the mortality rate in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis is still high. Different factors are associated with this mortality. However, there is no comprehensive global report addressing these risk factors. This study aimed to determine the predictors of mortality using data generated at the global level.

Methods

We systematically searched five electronic major databases (PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science), and other sources (Google Scholar, Google). We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools to assess the quality of included articles. Heterogeneity assessment was conducted using the forest plot and I2 heterogeneity test. Data were analyzed using STATA Version 15. The pooled hazard ratio, risk ratio, and odd’s ratio were estimated along with their 95% CIs.

Result

After reviewing 640 articles, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The predictors of mortality were; being male (HR = 1.25,95%CI;1.08,1.41,I2;30.5%), older age (HR = 2.13, 95%CI;1.64,2.62,I2;59.0%,RR = 1.40,95%CI; 1.26, 1.53, I2; 48.4%) including a 1 year increase in age (HR = 1.01, 95%CI;1.00,1.03,I2;73.0%), undernutrition (HR = 1.62,95%CI;1.28,1.97,I2;87.2%, RR = 3.13, 95% CI; 2.17,4.09, I2;0.0%), presence of any type of co-morbidity (HR = 1.92,95%CI;1.50–2.33,I2;61.4%, RR = 1.61, 95%CI;1.29, 1.93,I2;0.0%), having diabetes (HR = 1.74, 95%CI; 1.24,2.24, I2;37.3%, RR = 1.60, 95%CI;1.13,2.07, I2;0.0%), HIV co-infection (HR = 2.15, 95%CI;1.69,2.61, I2; 48.2%, RR = 1.49, 95%CI;1.27,1.72, I2;19.5%), TB history (HR = 1.30,95%CI;1.06,1.54, I2;64.6%), previous second-line anti-TB treatment (HR = 2.52, 95% CI;2.15,2.88, I2;0.0%), being smear positive at the baseline (HR = 1.45, 95%CI;1.14,1.76, I2;49.2%, RR = 1.58,95%CI;1.46,1.69, I2;48.7%), having XDR-TB (HR = 2.01, 95%CI;1.50,2.52, I2;60.8%, RR = 2.44, 95%CI;2.16,2.73,I2;46.1%), and any type of clinical complication (HR = 2.98, 95%CI; 2.32, 3.64, I2; 69.9%). There are differences and overlaps of predictors of mortality across different drug-resistance categories. The common predictors of mortality among different drug-resistance categories include; older age, presence of any type of co-morbidity, and undernutrition.

Conclusion

Different patient-related demographic (male sex, older age), and clinical factors (undernutrition, HIV co-infection, co-morbidity, diabetes, clinical complications, TB history, previous second-line anti-TB treatment, smear-positive TB, and XDR-TB) were the predictors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. The findings would be an important input to the global community to take important measures.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is the top cause of mortality from a single infectious disease [1]. In addition to the low detection rate, poor treatment outcome is becoming a major challenge of TB [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) identified and introduced a directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS) strategy to improve the treatment cure rate of TB [3, 4]. The treatment usually takes six to eight months: however, it takes a longer time if drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is diagnosed [4]. Drug-resistant tuberculosis is caused by Mycobacterium bacteria that are resistant to at least one first-line anti-TB drug [5]. Nowadays, the emergence of DR-TB has become a major public health challenge globally, notably in resources limited settings, and it is commonly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes [6]. When the bacteria become resistant to more anti-TB drugs such as MDR-TB and XDR-TB, the treatment outcome worsens [7]. According to the 2019 WHO estimate, the global treatment success rate of MDR/RR-TB was 56% and XDR-TB was 39% [1].

A high mortality rate was observed among patients with DR-TB globally. Different patient and programmatic related factors are contributing to this high mortality rate [813]. Patient-related determinants include demographic characteristics (age and sex), behavioral factors (smoking, alcohol use, and substance addiction), and clinical factors (comorbidities, HIV, undernutrition, anemia, clinical complications, adverse effects, and type of drug resistance). Programmatic management of drug-resistant TB is important to limit TB, prevent the emergence of DR-TB, and have a successful treatment outcome [5]. Though the mortality rate among DR-TB patients is high, it highly varies across countries and settings. Different predictors contribute to this unacceptable high level of mortality. Even though there are previously conducted systematic reviews regarding the poor treatment outcome of DR-TB and its predictors, most of the studies are geographically restricted or restricted to a certain study group [1416]. For example, our team performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the poor treatment outcome and its predictors among DR-TB patients in Ethiopia. The study estimate revealed that the proportion and incidence density rate of mortality among DR-TB patients in Ethiopia was 15.13% and 9.28/1000 person-months respectively. Besides, the study revealed that the predictors of poor treatment outcome include; older age undernutrition, clinical complications, lower body weight, HIV positivity, anemia, non-HIV comorbidities, treatment delay, and extrapulmonary involvement [14]. However, there is limited information that specifically addressed the predictors of mortality among DR-TB patients at the global level. Thus, our systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to assess the predictors of mortality among patients with DR-TB based on available studies globally.

Methods

Search strategy and study selection

This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist [17, 18] (S1 Table). We systematically searched five major databases; PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. We also searched Google Scholar and Google for gray literature. The search was conducted from the 5th to the 20th of June 2020. We used the following keywords: Predictors, Indicators, Mortality, Drug-resistant, Tuberculosis. The keywords were searched in combination with the Boolean words AND/OR. The search string applied for the Ovid Embase database was (‘predictors’/exp OR predictors OR ‘indicators’/exp OR indicators) AND (‘mortality’/exp OR mortality) AND ‘drug resistant’ AND (tuberculosis’/exp OR tuberculosis). Two authors (AA1, TW) independently searched articles published in English under the guidance of a senior librarian working at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Haramaya University College of Health Science without the time and boundary restrictions (S2 Table). Original studies assessing the predictors of mortality in patients with DR-TB during anti-TB treatment were included. Drug-resistant tuberculosis, defined as when someone is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is resistant to at least one first-line anti-TB drug. The laboratory diagnostic methods to rule out DR-TB could be conventional phenotypic drug-susceptibility tests or molecular methods like Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Line Probe Assay (MTBDRplus, MTBDRsl). Excluded were case reports and studies that included a mixed population (both DR-TB and drug-susceptible TB) (Fig 1) (S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart diagram describing a selection of studies for the systematic review and meta-analysis on the predictors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g001

Based on the study questions and inclusion criteria, in the first stage, we screened articles for titles and abstracts. In the second stage, articles were assessed for full-text review. Two authors (ZWB and AA1) independently performed the study eligibility assessment. The inconsistencies were resolved through discussion, and PICOS (participants, interventions, comparison, outcome, and study setting) criteria were used to review the articles. Data were extracted from the included articles by two authors (AA1 and ZWB). The exacted data were; author, publication year, study period, study population, country, study setting, study design, sample size, number of deaths, and total follow-up period (Table 1). Also, we extracted data for different predictors of mortality using crude HR, RR, and OR along with the 95% CI (Table 2). The extracted data were stored in Microsoft Excel 2016.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of individual studies on the predictors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis, included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. The summary of the pooled estimates of the HR, RR, and OR per predicting factors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.t002

PICOS criteria

Participants: Patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Interventions: Anti-tuberculosis treatment.

Comparators: Alive in the treatment period.

Outcomes: Death from any cause during the treatment period among DR-TB patients.

Study type: Cohort and case-control studies.

Study setting: Any country in the globe.

Quality assessment

We evaluated the quality of eligible articles using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal (JBI) tools designed for case-control and cohort studies [62]. The cohort checklist consists of 11 indicators and the case-control checklist consists of 10 indicators. These indicators were turned into 100% and the quality score was graded as high if >80%, a medium between 60–80%, and low <60%. Two authors (AA1 and DFG) conducted the quality assessment, and the third author TW managed the inconsistencies (S4 Table).

Outcomes

Mortality from any cause in patients with DR-TB during their anti-TB treatment course was the primary outcome. Predictors of mortality were the second outcome. The pooled HR, RR, and OR along with their 95% CIs were estimated to assess these predictors of mortality in patients with DR-TB.

Data analysis

Data extracted in Microsoft excel 2016 were imported into STATA Version 15 for analysis. We estimated the proportion, incidence, and predictors of mortality in patients with DR-TB. The proportion was estimated by dividing the number of deaths by the total sample size, while the incidence rate was described per 10,000 person-days of follow-up. To assess the predictors, the pooled HR, RR, and OR with 95% CI were estimated by assuming the true effect size varies between studies. For studies that did not present the measures of association, we analyzed the estimates along with 95% CI. We presented the meta-analysis results using a forest plot. Also, we assessed the heterogeneity among the studies using the forest plot and I2 heterogeneity test [63]. We used a fixed-effects model for I2< 50% and a random-effects model for I2>50% to perform the analysis [64]. Besides, publication bias was explored using visual inspection of the funnel plot, and Egger’s regression test was carried out to check the statistical symmetry of the funnel plot.

Role of the funding source

No fund was obtained to execute this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results

Study characteristics

From the whole search, we assessed 640 articles for eligibility. After 203 studies were removed by duplication, 437 articles were screened by title and abstract. Then, 351 articles were excluded and full-text screening was conducted on 86. Accordingly, 41 studies were excluded from the study due to mixed study groups (12), overlapped studies (10), did not have specific outcomes (9), and incomplete records (9). Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, 49 studies [813, 1961] were included in the final analysis (Fig 1). These 49 individual studies were conducted in 25 different countries located in four continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, and South America). More than half (25, 51%) of the included studies were from Africa. The remaining 15 studies were from Asia; four from South America, three from Europe, and two from multi-center studies. South Africa (11 studies) and Ethiopia (8 studies) contributed to the large proportion of individual studies included in the current study followed by India (4 studies) and South Korea (4 studies). The majority of the primary studies were based on data collected from patients enrolled in hospitals for treatment. Data were collected either directly from patient registries or the health information system (national or regional database) or the prospective cohort research project database. Most (45, 91.8%) of the studies used a retrospective cohort study design: however, some studies also used either a case-control or prospective cohort study design. The study period ranged from 1999 to 2017. Besides, most of the studies were conducted on all age groups (Table 1). Based on the results found through the JBI quality assessment tool, the indicators were turned in to 100% and graded as high if >80%, medium between 60–80%, and low <60%. Accordingly, the majority of the studies (47 out of 49) were graded to have high quality, and only two studies were categorized under medium quality (S4 Table).

Proportion and incidence of death

The smallest sample size was 67 in a study done by Bei et al., 2018 [12], while the largest sample size was 10,763 in a study done by Schnippel et al., 2015 [50]. We estimated the pooled proportion of mortality and the incidence of mortality in patients with DR-TB based on 48 study results and 17 studies respectively. The proportion of death ranged from 6.74% [42] to 79.86% [25], while the incidence of mortality ranged from 1.07 per 10,000 person-days [56] to 10.44 per 10,000 person-days [60]. Based on the random-effects model, the proportion of death and the incidence of mortality in patients with DR-TB during their treatment follow-up period were 25.62% (95%CI; 20.91, 30.33, I2; 99.31%) (Fig 2), and 3.75 per 10,000 person-days (95%CI; 2.65, 4.86, I2; 97.61%), respectively (Fig 3). We evaluated the publication bias using the visual inspection of the funnel plot and Egger’s test. Accordingly, the funnel plot revealed that there was no publication bias, and the symmetry of the funnel plot was confirmed by a non-significant Egger’s test result (death incidence, p = 0.465) (Fig 4), (death incidence density rate, p = 0.051) (Fig 5). The sensitivity analysis was done for the pooled incidence of death, and it was found that no single study affected the pooled death incidence. In this study, we separately analyzed the mortality incidence for MDR-TB patients and XDR-TB patients. Accordingly, the proportion of death in patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB during their treatment follow-up period was 20.21% (95%CI; 16.45, 23.97, I2; 98.76%) (Fig 6), and 43.53% (95%CI; 35.08, 51.97, I2; 96.29%) respectively (Fig 7). Besides, the funnel plot revealed that there was no publication bias both for MDR-TB (Fig 8) and for XDR-TB (Fig 9).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Forest plot for pooled incidence of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Forest plot for pooled incidence density rate of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Funnel plot showing publication bias among studies used to compute the incidence of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Funnel plot showing publication bias among studies used to compute the incidence density rate of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. Forest plot for pooled incidence of mortality in patients with multi drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. Forest plot for pooled incidence of mortality in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. Funnel plot showing publication bias among studies used to compute the incidence of mortality in patients with multi drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g008

thumbnail
Fig 9. Funnel plot showing publication bias among studies used to compute the incidence of mortality in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g009

Predictors of mortality

We assessed the pooled estimate for different predictors. The predictors included demographic (sex and age), behavioral (alcohol use, smoking and substance addiction) and clinical (adverse effect, anemia, undernutrition, comorbidities, diabetes, EPTB involvement, HIV sero-status, cavitation, previous TB history, previous SLD treatment, clinical complication, treatment delay, smear positive TB and drug resistance pattern) characteristics. Based on the pooled analysis of the hazards ratio and risk ratio, under nutrition (HR = 1.62,95%CI;1.28,1.97, I2;87.2%, RR = 3.13, 95% CI;2.17,4.09 I2; 0.0%), presence of any type of co-morbidity (HR = 1.92,95%CI;1.50–2.33,I2;61.4%, RR = 1.61, 95% CI; 1.29,1.93, I2; 0.0%), having diabetes (HR = 1.74, 95%CI; 1.24,2.24, I2;37.3%, RR = 1.60, 95%CI; 1.13, 2.07, I2; 0.0%), HIV co-infection (HR = 2.15, 95%CI;1.69,2.61, I2; 48.2%, RR = 1.49, 95%CI;1.27, 1.72, I2; 19.5%), male sex (HR = 1.25,95%CI;1.08,1.41,I2;30.5%), older age (HR = 2.13, 95%CI;1.64,2.62,I2;59.0%,RR = 1.40,95%CI; 1.26, 1.53, I2; 48.4%) including a 1 year increase in (HR = 1.01, 95%CI;1.00,1.03,I2;73.0%), previous TB history (HR = 1.30,95%CI;1.06,1.54, I2;64.6%), previous second line anti-TB treatment (HR = 2.52, 95%CI; 2.15,2.88, I2; 0.0%), being smear positive at the baseline (HR = 1.45, 95%CI;1.14,1.76, I2;49.2%, RR = 1.58,95%CI;1.46,1.69, I2;48.7%), having XDR-TB (HR = 2.01, 95%CI;1.50, 2.52, I2; 60.8%,RR = 2.44, 95% CI;2.16, 2.73, 46.1%), and any type of clinical complication (HR = 2.98,95%CI; 2.32, 3.64, I2; 69.9%) were the predictors of mortality in patients with DR-TB (Fig 10). Also, our pooled analysis of the odds ratio showed that any cause of mortality in patients with DR-TB is associated with the presence of any type of comorbidity (OR = 1.58, 95%CI;1.09,2.06, I2; 0.0%), HIV co-infection (OR = 1.62, 95%CI;1.41, 1.84, I2; 0.0%), being smear positive at the baseline (OR = 5.33, 95%CI;1.31, 9.36 I2; 0.0%), and having XDR-TB (OR = 2.21, 95%CI = 1.05, 3.37, I2; 51.2%) (Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 10. Forest plot for predictors of mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

A. Male sex B. Older age C. For every age D. Undernutrition E. Presence of any co-morbidity F. Diabetes G. HIV co-infection H. TB history I. Previous second-line treatment J. Smear positive K. XDR-TB L. Presence of clinical complication.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.g010

However, statistically significant differences or associations was not observed for alcohol consumption (HR = 1.19, 95% CI; 0.65,1.73, I2; 60.5%RR = 1.87,95%CI;0.98,2.76, I2; 73.6%), presence of any grade of anemia (HR = 1.79,95%CI = 0.98,2.59, I2;84.3%), presence of cavitation (HR = 1.16%CI; 0.88–1.44, I2;61.6%, RR = 1.04, 95%CI;0.72,1.36, I2; 51.3%), extrapulmonary involvement (HR = 1.52, 95%CI;0.96,2.08, I2;66.0%,RR = 0.96, 95%CI;0.47–1.46, I2; 90.7%), smoking (HR = 1.14, 95%CI; 0.70,1.59, I2;51.6%, RR = 1.29, 95% CI;0.61, 1.97, I2; 81.1%), addiction to substances (HR = 1.44, 95%CI;0.57, 2.32, I2; 80.8%), and treatment delay (HR = 1.57, 95%CI;-0.39, 3.53, I2; 37.7%, RR = 1.12, 95%CI; 0.65,1.59, I2; 62.9%) (Table 2).

Predictors of mortality per drug-resistant tuberculosis categories

In the current study, we performed a sub-group analysis to assess the predictors of mortality based on the drug-resistance category of TB. As per the presentation in the studies included in this study, the resistance category is classified as; 1) RR/MDR 2) mixed MDR and XDR 3) XDR 4) DR-TB. However, the fourth category (DR-TB) is not specified due to the mix-up of different resistance included in the individual studies. Thus, we presented based on the data available in the specific studies; A) DR-TB; Poly DR, RR, MDR, XDR B) DR-TB; Poly DR, MDR, XDR C) DR-TB; RIF/INH-mono resistant, MDR, XDR D) DR-TB; mono resistance, poly resistance, MDR E) DR-TB; mono resistance, poly resistance, MDR, XDR.

Specific to the type of DR-TB, the predictors of mortality among RR/MDR patients includes; older age (HR = 1.72, 95%CI;1.15, 2.29, I2; 31.5%), one year increase in age (HR = 1.01, 95%CI;1.00, 1.02, I2; 73.7%), presence of any type of co-morbidity (HR = 2.39, 95%CI;1.57, 3.21, I2; 72.2%), having diabetes (HR = 2.05, 95%CI;1.40,2.70, I2;0.00%), HIV co-infection (HR = 2.35, 95%CI;1.68,2.82, I2;24.1%), previous TB history (HR = 1.46, 95%CI;1.19, 1.72, I2;0.00%), being smear-positive at the baseline (HR = 3.05, 95%CI; 2.17, 4.29), and any type of clinical complication (HR = 2.80, 95%CI; 1.86, 3.74, I2; 62.1%). While, the predictors of mortality among mixed MDR and XDR-TB patients includes; being male (HR = 1.52, 95%CI;1.30, 1.73, I2; 0.00%), older age (HR = 2.39, 95%CI;1.75, 3.03, I2; 61.3%), one year increase in age (HR = 1.02, 95%CI;1.01, 1.04, I2; 0.00%), undernutrition (HR = 2.33, 95%CI;1.19, 3.47, I2; 94.1%), presence of any type of co-morbidity (HR = 1.87, 95%CI;1.36, 2.37, I2; 33.8%), previous second-line anti-TB treatment (HR = 2.50, 95%CI;2.13,2.87, I2;0.00%), and being smear-positive at the baseline (HR = 1.35, 95%CI; 1.16, 1.53, I2; 0.00%). Among XDR-TB patients the predictors of mortality were; older age (HR = 2.82, 95%CI; 1.08, 7.35, single study), undernutrition (HR = 4.30, 95%CI; 1.26, 14.72), presence of any type of co-morbidity (HR = 5.16, 95%CI; 2.05, 13.00), and previous second-line anti-TB treatment (HR = 3.73, 95%CI; 1.69, 8.22). Besides, among DR-TB patients with a mix of different resistance categories, the predictors of mortality were as follows. Among DR-TB patients with a mix of mono drug-resistant, poly drug-resistant, and MDR-TB, older age is a predictor of mortality (HR = 5.29, 95%CI; 1.02, 27.29). While among DR-TB patients with a mix of RIF/INH-mono drug-resistant, MDR, and XDR-TB, a one-year increase in age (HR = 1.02, 95%CI; 1.01, 2.20), and undernutrition (HR = 1.96, 95%CI; 1.15, 3.35) were the predictors of mortality. The presence of any type of co-morbidity is a predictor of mortality among DR-TB patients with a mix of poly drug-resistant, RR, MDR, and XDR-TB (HR = 1.34, 95%CI; 1.03, 1.74), and among DR-TB patients with a mix of mono drug-resistant, poly drug-resistant, and MDR-TB (HR = 8.44, 95%CI; 3.04, 23.44) (Fig 10).

Discussion

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the pooled data to assess the predictors of mortality in patients with DR-TB based on studies conducted in different countries and settings at the global level. The case definition for drug-resistant TB in this study was according to the WHO definition such that any TB case caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to at least one anti-TB drug. Based on the pooled estimates, the predictors of mortality include: male sex, older age, undernutrition, HIV co-infection, presence of any type of co-morbidity, having diabetes, any type of clinical complication, previous TB history, previous second-line anti-TB treatment, smear-positive at the baseline, and having XDR-TB.

The results of this study revealed that patient demographic characteristics such as male sex and older age are important predictors of mortality. Likewise, this meta-analysis revealed that male patients are more likely to die in the early TB treatment as compared to female patients. A previous study also confirmed that TB disapropriately affects males than females [65]. This could be possibly due to different factors. Males are more likely to practice smoking and alcohol drinking that might worsen the treatment outcome [66]. Additionally, evidence suggested that men are more likely to default from TB treatment, which might result in poor treatment outcomes [67]. The other demographic factor significantly associated with mortality is the age group. Oder age is operationalized in the current study as the highest age category in the individual studies and most of the studies it is above 60 years. Our pooled analysis revealed that older individuals are at a higher risk of death. As age increases in one unit, the incidence of death increases by 1%. The impaired immune status in this age group could be one factor, and older people are more likely to have other comorbidities/chronic illnesses/ that might increase the risk of mortality [68].

Another finding of this study revealed that clinical factors or patient conditions are important predictors of mortality. Those patients with any type of comorbidities were at a higher risk of death. The hazard of death in DR-TB patients with any type of comorbidities was two times as compared to their counterparts. The risk of death in comorbid DR-TB patients was 1.61 times compared with their counterparts. Among the co-morbidities, we generated a pooled estimate of DM and HIV co-infections. The risk of death increased by 92% among HIV-positive patients with DR-TB. Also, the risk of death in DM co-infected DR-TB patients was increased by 74%. Collaborative efforts are needed to decrease the impact of this synergy. Besides, the presence of any type of clinical complication is associated with mortality. The prognosis of DR-TB patients who developed clinical complications in their follow-up period was poor. Along with these predicting factors, undernutrition (BMI<18.5 kg/m2) is one predicting factor. The risk of death in undernourished DR-TB patients was 3.13 times. Undernutrition is associated with drug toxicity that can contribute to default and could finally result in death, as described in previous studies [6972].

The result of the current study also revealed that patients with smear-positive DR-TB at the baseline had a higher risk of death. The hazard of death among patients with smear-positive DR-TB at the baseline was 1.45 times higher as compared to smear-negative DR-TB patients. Smear-positive patients have a higher bacterial load in their sputum that reflects the infectiousness and severity of the diseases that might be associated with mortality. Also, history of TB infection and history of treatment with second-line anti-TB drugs increased the risk of death. Besides, the risk of death doubled in patients with XDR-TB. This could be due to the toxic effects of the drugs [7].

In the current study, we also performed a sub-group analysis to assess the predictors of mortality across different resistance categories; 1) RR/MDR 2) mixed MDR and XDR 3) XDR 4) DR-TB. Among RR/MDR-TB patients, older age, a one-year increase in age, presence of any type of co-morbidity, having diabetes, HIV co-infection, previous TB history, being smear-positive at the baseline, and any type of clinical complications were estimated to be predictors of mortality. In the second category that is on studies that reported mortality among mixed MDR and XDR cases, the predictors of mortality include being male, older age, one year increase in age, undernutrition, presence of any type of co-morbidity, previous second-line anti-TB treatment, and smear-positive at the baseline. The predictors of mortality among XDR-TB patients include; older age, undernutrition, presence of any type of co-morbidity, and previous second-line anti-TB treatment. The fourth category is among different combinations of DR-TB including mono-resistance, poly-resistance, MDR and XDR-TB, older age, a one-year increase in age, undernutrition, and presence of any co-morbidity. Some predictors of mortality are specific to a certain group. For example, DM co-infection, HIV co-infection, and clinical complication were found to be predictors of mortality in the first group (RR/MDR-TB) and male sex is a predictor of mortality only in the second category (mixed MDR-TB and XDR-TB). Also, being smear-positive at the baseline, and a one-year increase in age were the predictors of mortality in the first (RR/MDR-TB), and second (mixed MDR-TB and XDR-TB) categories. Previous treatment with second-line anti-TB treatment is a predictor in the second (mixed MDR-TB and XDR-TB) and third XDR-TB) categories. Thus, considering the risk factors of mortality to each drug-resistance category during anti-TB treatment would help to improve the treatment outcome. Generally, the common predictors of mortality among different drug-resistance categories identified based on the pooled estimates in the current study include; older age, presence of any type of co-morbidity, and undernutrition. Therefore, the elders need special attention during DR-TB management. Also, supportive intervention such as nutritional supplementations to DR-TB patients would improve the treatment outcome. Besides, it would be important to give special attention to DR-TB patients with underlying co-morbidities to improve the treatment outcome.

In the end, in the current study, the quality assessment revealed that the majority of the studies (44 out of 46) were graded to have high quality, and only two studies were categorized under medium quality. Also, the sensitivity analysis revealed that no single study affected the pooled incidence of mortality in drug-resistant TB patients. This implies that the quality of the studies might not affect the results in the current systematic review and meta-analysis.

Limitation of the study

Finally, this study has some limitations. First, this study was based on studies published only in the English language. Besides, the risk factors were not separately assessed based on the place where the individual studies were conducted.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings of this study revealed that different patient-related factors increased early mortality in patients with DR-TB. The presence of different co-morbidities and developing clinical complications worsen the treatment outcome in addition to the gender and age differences. Special considerations and personalized treatment and follow-up of patients with other co-morbidities, the elder ones, those who develop clinical complications, and those with previous anti-TB treatments could be essential to have a good prognosis.

Supporting information

S3 Table. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Quality assessment for the included studies in meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253848.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the authors of the primary studies. Our acknowledgment also goes to the Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Haramaya University College of Health Science for non-financial supports including access to internet searching.

References

  1. 1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019.
  2. 2. Chuang CU, Van Weezennbeek C, Mori T, Enaeso DA. Challenges to the global control of tuberculosis. Respirology. 2013; 18: 596–604. pmid:23551328
  3. 3. Dye C, Garnett GP, Sleeman K, Williams BG. Prospects for worldwide tuberculosis control under the WHO DOTS strategy. The Lancet. 1998; 352(9144):1886–91. pmid:9863786
  4. 4. WHO. What is DOTS? A Guide to Understanding the WHO-recommended TB Control Strategy Known as DOTS. World Health Organization; 1999.
  5. 5. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
  6. 6. Kliiman K, Altraja A. Predictors of poor treatment outcome in multi- and extensively drug-resistant pulmonary TB. The European respiratory journal. 2009; 33(5):1085–94. pmid:19164345
  7. 7. Alene KA, Yi H, Viney K, McBryde ES, Yang K, Bai L, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug resistant tuberculosis in Hunan Province, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1):573. pmid:28814276
  8. 8. Girum T, Tariku Y, Dessu S. Survival status and treatment outcome of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) among patients treated in treatment initiation centers (TIC) in South Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2017; 7(5).
  9. 9. Kanwal S, Akhtar AM, Ahmed A. Factors associated with mortality to drug-resistant tuberculosis and their programmatic management in treatment centres of Punjab, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017; 67(6). pmid:28585582
  10. 10. Bajehson M, Musa BM, Gidado M, Nsa B, Sani U, Habibu AT, et al. Determinants of mortality among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in northern Nigeria. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225165. pmid:31743358
  11. 11. Balabanova Y, Ignatyeva O, Fiebig L, Riekstina V, Danilovits M, Jaama K, et al. Survival of patients with multidrug-resistant TB in Eastern Europe: what makes a difference? Thorax. 2016; 71(9):854–61. pmid:27012887
  12. 12. Bei C, Fu M, Zhang Y, Xie H, Yin K, Liu Y, et al. Mortality and associated factors of patients with extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis: an emerging public health crisis in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1):261. pmid:29879908
  13. 13. Chingonzoh R, Manesen MR, Madlavu MJ, Sopiseka N, Nokwe M, Emwerem M, et al. Risk factors for mortality among adults registered on the routine drug resistant tuberculosis reporting database in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, 2011 to 2013. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0202469. pmid:30133504
  14. 14. Alemu A, Bitew ZW, Worku T. Poor treatment outcome and its predictors among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:420–39. pmid:32645375
  15. 15. Samuels JP, Sood A, Campbell JR, Ahmad Khan F, Johnston JC. Comorbidities and treatment outcomes in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4980. pmid:29563561
  16. 16. Bisson GP, Bastos M, Campbell JR, Bang D, Brust JC, Isaakidis P, et al. Mortality in adults with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV by antiretroviral therapy and tuberculosis drug use: an individual patient data meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2020;396(10248):402–11. pmid:32771107
  17. 17. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Annals of internal medicine. 2015; 162(11):777–84. pmid:26030634
  18. 18. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011; 39(2):91–2. pmid:21145753
  19. 19. Bhering M, Duarte R, Kritski A. Predictive factors for unfavourable treatment in MDR-TB and XDR-TB patients in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, 2000–2016. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0218299. pmid:31747405
  20. 20. Brust JCM, Shah NS, Mlisana K, Moodley P, Allana S, Campbell A, et al. Improved Survival and Cure Rates With Concurrent Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection in South Africa. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2018; 66(8):1246–53. pmid:29293906
  21. 21. Chung-Delgado K, Guillen-Bravo S, Revilla-Montag A, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Mortality among MDR-TB cases: comparison with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and associated factors. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0119332. pmid:25790076
  22. 22. Dheda K, Shean K, Zumla A, Badri M, Streicher EM, Shipp LP, et al. Early treatment outcomes and HIV status of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010; 375: 1798–807. pmid:20488525
  23. 23. Fantaw D, Feyissa M, Hamid Shibeshi W. Assessment of the Survival Status and Risk Factors for the Mortality among Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients at Adama and Bishoftu General Hospitals, Oromia, Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety. 2018; 7(1).
  24. 24. Farley JE, Ram M, Pan W, Waldman S, Cassell GH, Chaisson RE, et al. Outcomes of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) among a cohort of South African patients with high HIV prevalence. PLoS One. 2011; 6(7):e20436. pmid:21799728
  25. 25. Gandhi NR, Andrews JR, Brust JC, Montreuil R, Weissman D, Heo M, et al. Risk factors for mortality among MDR- and XDR-TB patients in a high HIV prevalence setting. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2012; 16(1):90–7.
  26. 26. Gayoso R, Dalcolmo M, Braga JU, Barreira D. Predictors of mortality in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients from Brazilian reference centers, 2005 to 2012. The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases: an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. 2018; 22(4):305–10. pmid:30086258
  27. 27. Gebre T, Hordofa MA, Birhanu MY, Siferih M, Leshargie CT. Time to death and its predictors among adult with drug-resistance tuberculosis patients, in Eastern and East-Central Ethiopia, 2012–2018: A retrospective cohort study. Accessed from; https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6596/v1.
  28. 28. Getachew T, Bayray A, Weldearegay B. Survival and predictors of mortality among patients under multi-drug resistant tuberculosis treatment in Ethiopia: St. Peter’s specialized tuberculosis hospital, Ethiopia. IJPSR 2013; 4 (2): 776–87.
  29. 29. Janmeja AK, Aggarwal D, Dhillon R. Factors Predicting Mortality in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Patients Treated under Programmatic Conditions. The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases & Allied Sciences. 2018; 60: 227–232.
  30. 30. Jeon DS, Shin DO, Park SK, Seo JE, Seo HS, Cho YS, et al. Treatment outcome and mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in tuberculosis hospitals of the public sector. Journal of Korean medical science. 2011; 26(1):33–41. pmid:21218027
  31. 31. Kang YA, Kim SY, Jo KW, Kim HJ, Park SK, Kim TH, et al. Impact of diabetes on treatment outcomes and long-term survival in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Respiration. 2013; 86(6):472–8. pmid:23689646
  32. 32. Kassa GM, Tadesse A, Gelaw YA, Alemayehu TT, Tsegaye AT, Tamirat KS, et al. Predictors of mortality among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in central Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study. Epidemiology and Infection. 2020; 148. pmid:33054897
  33. 33. Kashongwe MI, Mbulula L, Umba P, Lepira FB, Kaswa M, Kashongwe ZM. Factors Associated with Mortality among Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis MDR/RR-TB Patients in Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Tuberculosis Research. 2017; 05(04):276–91.
  34. 34. Kim DH, Kim HJ, Park SK, Kong SJ, Kim YS, Kim TH, et al. Treatment outcomes and survival based on drug resistance patterns in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182(1):113–9. pmid:20224066
  35. 35. Kizito E, Musaazi J, Mutesasira K, Twinomugisha F, Namwanje H, Kiyemba T, et al. Risk factors for mortality among patients diagnosed with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Uganda- a case-control study. BMC infectious diseases. 2021;21(1):292. pmid:33752637
  36. 36. Kurbatova EV, Taylor A, Gammino VM, Bayona J, Becerra M, Danilovitz M, et al. Predictors of poor outcomes among patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at DOTS-plus projects. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2012; 92(5):397–403. pmid:22789497
  37. 37. Makhmudova M, Maxsumova Z, Rajabzoda A, Makhmadov A, van den Hof S, Mirtskhulava V. Risk factors for unfavourable treatment outcomes among rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients in Tajikistan. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2019; 23(3):331–6. pmid:30871664
  38. 38. Manda SO, Masenyetse LJ, Lancaster JL, van der Walt ML. Risk of Death among HIV Co-Infected Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients, Compared to Mortality in the General Population of South Africa. Journal of AIDS & clinical research. 2013; Suppl 3:7.
  39. 39. Milanov V, Falzon D, Zamfirova M, Varleva T, Bachiyska E, Koleva A, et al. Factors associated with treatment success and death in cases with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Bulgaria, 2009–2010. International journal of mycobacteriology. 2015; 4(2):131–7. pmid:26972881
  40. 40. Mitnick CD, Franke MF, Rich ML, Alcantara Viru FA, Appleton SC, Atwood SS, et al. Aggressive regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis decrease all-cause mortality. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58664. pmid:23516529
  41. 41. Molalign S, Wencheko E. Risk factors of mortality in patients with multi-drug resistant TB. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2015;29(2).
  42. 42. Mollel EW, Chilongola JO. Predictors for Mortality among Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Tanzania. J Trop Med. 2017; 9241238. pmid:28808447
  43. 43. O’Donnell MR, Padayatchi N, Kvasnovsky C, Werner L, Master I, Horsburgh CR Jr. Treatment outcomes for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV co-infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(3):416–24. pmid:23622055
  44. 44. Olaleye AO, Beke AK. Survival of smear-positive multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Witbank, South Africa: A retrospective cohort study. Infectious diseases (London, England). 2016; 48(6):422–7. pmid:26954520
  45. 45. Park JK, Koh W-J, Kim DK, Kim EK, Kim YI, Kim HJ, et al. Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Korean Private Hospitals. Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. 2010; 69(2):95.
  46. 46. Pradipta IS, van’t Boveneind-Vrubleuskaya N, Akkerman OW, Alffenaar J-WC, Hak E. Treatment outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Netherlands, 2005–2015. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2019; 8(1). pmid:31338162
  47. 47. Prajapati K, Mishra V, Desai M, Solanki R, Naik P. Treatment outcome of patients having extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Gujarat, India. International journal of mycobacteriology. 2017; 6(3):289–95. pmid:28776529
  48. 48. Rusisiro B, Nyirazinyoye L. Factors associated with mortality among Drug Resistant Tuberculosis patients in Rwanda: A Retrospective study. University of Rwanda/ College of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2019.
  49. 49. Samali A, Leyna GH. Predictors of mortality among multidrug resistance tuberculosis patients admitted at Kibong’oto hospital from 2009–2016. Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences. 2017.
  50. 50. Schnippel K, Shearer K, Evans D, Berhanu R, Dlamini S, Ndjeka N. Predictors of mortality and treatment success during treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis within the South African National TB Programme, 2009 to 2011: a cohort analysis of the national case register. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2015; 39: 89–94. pmid:26358856
  51. 51. Seifert M, Georghiou SB, Garfein RS, Catanzaro D, Rodwell TC. Impact of Fluoroquinolone Use on Mortality among a Cohort of Patients with Suspected Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2017; 65(5):772–8. pmid:28475735
  52. 52. Seung KJ, Omatayo DB, Keshavjee S, Furin JJ, Farmer PE, Satti H. Early outcomes of MDR-TB treatment in a high HIV-prevalence setting in Southern Africa. PLoS One. 2009; 4(9):e7186. pmid:19779624
  53. 53. Mohd Shariff N, Shah SA, Kamaludin F. Predictors of death among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2013. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016; 6:102–7. pmid:27530850
  54. 54. Shenoi SV, Brooks RP, Barbour R, Altice FL, Zelterman D, Moll AP, et al. Survival from XDR-TB is associated with modifiable clinical characteristics in rural South Africa. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e31786. pmid:22412840
  55. 55. Shimbre MS, Degaga TS, Hebo SH, Zerdo Z, Girum T, Teshome T. Survival and predictors of mortality from multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) among patients treated at MDR-TB Referral Hospitals in Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2020;12(1):13–21.
  56. 56. Sun Y, Harley D, Vally H, Sleigh A. Comparison of characteristics and mortality in multidrug resistant (MDR) and non-MDR tuberculosis patients in China. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:1027. pmid:26444417
  57. 57. Suryawanshi SL, Shewade HD, Nagaraja SB, Nair SA, Parmar M. Unfavourable outcomes among patients with MDR-TB on the standard 24-month regimen in Maharashtra, India. Public Health Action. 2017; 7(2):116–22. pmid:28695084
  58. 58. Wai PP, Shewade HD, Kyaw NTT, Kyaw KWY, Thein S, Si Thu A, et al. Patients with MDR-TB on domiciliary care in programmatic settings in Myanmar: Effect of a support package on preventing early deaths. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0187223. pmid:29261669
  59. 59. Wang JJ, Zhou ML, Chen C, Wu G, Zuo YP, Ren X, et al. Survival time and influencing factors in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Wuhan, 2006–2014. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2019; 40(11):1409–13. pmid:31838813
  60. 60. Wang J, Zhou M, Chen Z, Chen C, Wu G, Zuo Y, et al. Survival of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Central China: a retrospective cohort study. Epidemiol Infect. 2020;148:e50. pmid:32070443
  61. 61. Woya AA, Tekile AK, Basha GW. Spatial Frailty Survival Model for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Mortality in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Tuberculosis research and treatment. 2019; Article ID 8742363. pmid:30693105
  62. 62. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
  63. 63. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(10):1046–55. pmid:11576817
  64. 64. Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deek JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ.2011; 342:dS49. pmid:21310794
  65. 65. Horton KC, MacPherson P, Houben RM, White RG, Corbett EL. Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Burden and Notifications in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2016;13(9):e1002119. pmid:27598345
  66. 66. UNDP, Discussion Paper: Gender and TB: United Nations Development Programme. December 2015.
  67. 67. Jimenez-Corona ME, Garcia-Garcia L, DeRiemer K, Ferreyra-Reyes L, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Cano-Arellano B, et al. Gender differentials of pulmonary tuberculosis transmission and reactivation in an endemic area. Thorax. 2006;61(4):348–53. pmid:16449260
  68. 68. Ketema DB, Alene M, Assemie MA, Yismaw L, Merid MW. Risk factors for mortality among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients registered for drug-resistant treatment in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a historical cohort study. Archives of Public Health. 2020;78(1). pmid:32760587
  69. 69. Seid G, Ayele M. Undernutrition and Mortality among Adult Tuberculosis Patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Advances in preventive medicine. 2020;2020:1–9. pmid:32802521
  70. 70. Zachariah R, Spielmann M P, Harries A D, Salaniponi F M L. Moderate to severe malnutrition in patients with tuberculosis is a risk factor associated with early death. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 96(3):291–4. pmid:12174782
  71. 71. Podewils LJ, Holtz T, Riekstina V, Skripconoka V, Zarovska E, Kirvelaite G, et al. Impact of malnutrition on clinical presentation, clinical course, and mortality in MDR-TB patients. Epidemiology and infection. 2011;139(1):113–20. pmid:20429966
  72. 72. Padmapriyadarsini C, Shobana M, Lakshmi M, Beena T, Swaminathan S. Undernutrition & tuberculosis in India: Situation analysis & the way forward. The Indian journal of medical research. 2016;144(1):11–20. pmid:27834321