Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Temporal, spatial and gender-based dietary differences in middle period San Pedro de Atacama, Chile: A model-based approach

  • William J. Pestle ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    w.pestle@miami.edu

    Affiliation Department of Anthropology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America

  • Mark Hubbe,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, Instituto de Arqueología y Antropología, Universidad Católica del Norte, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile

  • Christina Torres-Rouff,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Instituto de Arqueología y Antropología, Universidad Católica del Norte, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, Department of Anthropology and Heritage Studies, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America

  • Gonzalo Pimentel

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Fundación Patrimonio Desierto de Atacama, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile

Abstract

To explore the possible emergence and lived consequences of social inequality in the Atacama, we analyzed a large set (n = 288) of incredibly well preserved and contextualized human skeletons from the broad Middle Period (AD 500–1000) of the San Pedro de Atacama (Chile) oases. In this work, we explore model-based paleodietary reconstruction of the results of stable isotope analysis of human bone collagen and hydroxyapatite. The results of this modeling are used to explore local phenomena, the nature of the Middle Period, and the interaction between local situations and the larger world in which the oases were enmeshed by identifying the temporal, spatial, and biocultural correlates and dimensions of dietary difference. Our analyses revealed that: 1) over the 600-year period represented by our sample, there were significant changes in consumption patterns that may evince broad diachronic changes in the structure of Atacameño society, and 2) at/near 600 calAD, there was a possible episode of social discontinuity that manifested in significant changes in consumption practices. Additionally, while there were some differences in the level of internal dietary variability among the ayllus, once time was fully considered, none of the ayllus stood out for having a more (or less) clearly internally differentiated cuisine. Finally, sex does not appear to have been a particularly salient driver of observed dietary differences here. While we do not see any de facto evidence for complete dietary differentiation (as there is always overlap in consumption among individuals, ayllus, and time periods, and as isotopic analysis is not capable of pinpointing different foods items or preparations), there are broad aspects of dietary composition changing over time that are potentially linked to status, and foreignness. Ultimately, these stand as the clearest example of what has been termed “gastro-politics,” potentially tied to the emergence of social inequality in the San Pedro oases.

Introduction

San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, lies at the northern end of the Atacama salt flat, where the San Pedro and Vilama Rivers supply a series of small oases in the otherwise inhospitable expanse of the Atacama Desert, the driest non-polar desert in the world (Fig 1). These oases, occupied since at least the Formative Period (ca. 1200 BC), saw a florescence of human activity in the Middle Period (AD 500–1000), a time that is often described as one of unparalleled regional prosperity and peace. Many of this period’s benefits have been ascribed to the incorporation of local societies within the sphere of influence of Tiwanaku—an expansive polity that arose in modern-day Bolivia—and the growing role of Atacama societies in a system of regional exchange and mobility. However, such a broad telling of the Middle Horizon likely masks an unequal distribution of the benefits of the age and could similarly obscure social inequality within and among the different Atacama oases. Indeed inequality has been noted to be particularly pronounced in those instances where aspirant leaders are acquiring power and access to the exotic is increasing [18], as seems to have been the case during the Andean Middle Period.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map of San Pedro de Atacama, with locations referenced in texts noted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g001

To explore the possible emergence and lived consequences of social inequality in the Atacama, we recently completed intensive bioarchaeological and biogeochemical analysis of a large set (over 600 individuals) of incredibly well preserved and contextualized human skeletons recovered from a series of cemeteries dated to the Middle Period of the San Pedro oases. In the present work, we explore one subset of our data in detail, the model-based paleodietary reconstruction accomplished through stable isotope analysis of human bone collagen and hydroxyapatite. We use this to explore local phenomena as well as the nature of the Middle Period, stressing the importance of the indigenous responses, as well as the interaction between local situations and the larger world in which the oases were enmeshed. Given that the distribution of, and access to, varied kinds or quantities of food is a common mechanism and/or consequence of intra-societal differentiation [9, 10], knowledge of how patterns of consumption may have differed over time, among oases, and between various subsets of the population under study (e.g., males and females) offers unique insights into past processes of inequality. Combining these data with a rigorous program of radiocarbon dating and detailed analysis of grave contents, among other sources of information, has the potential to reveal how resource access may have varied along multiple axes of difference in the oases. Importantly, we argue that this integrative approach comes with a precision unobtainable by other archaeological means and allows us to explore in far greater detail the complex shifts occurring in local prehistory.

Geographical and archaeological background

The Atacama Desert comprises over 100,000 km2 of northern Chile and southern Peru between ca. 18° and 30° South latitude. The Pacific Ocean and the Andes, which flank the Atacama on the west and east, respectively, both contribute to the desert’s hyperarid conditions. Among the world’s deserts, the Atacama receives a classification of “Ea23” [11], denoting extreme aridity, a lack of seasonal precipitation, and temperatures between 10° and 30° C. Instrumental data indicate 1–6 mm/yr of rainfall at weather stations across the region [12], multi-year studies are consistent with measurable rain only on a decadal scale [13], and the region’s aridity seems to have been a persistent feature for millennia [14], if not millions of years [15, 16]. Indeed, a recent review of paleoclimatic conditions in the region suggests that aridity equal to, if not exceeding, that seen in the present prevailed throughout the Holocene [17]. The exception to this hyperaridity was the existence of a somewhat wetter time between 1000–2000 years ago, encompassing the period examined here. As discussed below, this may have facilitated the spread of agriculture and the permanent settlements that characterize the Middle Period.

Within this arid landscape, the oases of San Pedro de Atacama offer access to stable conditions for the long-term settlement of humans and have sustained agropastoral societies for millennia. The oases are located at the northern edge of the Atacama salt flat, in the alluvial delta formed by the San Pedro and Vilama Rivers, before they drain into the subsurface water table that forms the salt flat. This flatter region concentrates humidity that allows the development of natural oases which have been managed and even expanded by humans in the past. The oases have been continuously occupied for over 4000 years as populations moved down from the surrounding Puna (the cold arid plateaus of the high Andes; [1822]). With the adoption of horticulture as well as arboriculture and silvopastoralism in the oases, populations aggregated into larger settlements, taking advantage of the rivers and arable land [20, 23, 24]. From the Formative Period (~1200 BC) onwards, there is strong evidence of aggregated settlements, large and small habitation sites, as well as substantial cemeteries that document the long-term occupation of the oases (e.g., [20, 2426]).

Settlement pattern analyses have revealed a substantive concentration of sites, both cemetery and habitation, in the central and northern oases during and just before the Middle Period (AD 500–1000) [20, 27]. Agüero [27] argues that this demonstrates the considerable growth and ultimate stability of local villages during the Middle Period. This time also witnessed the widespread integration of the Atacama oases into the interregional networks of the southern Andes. Núñez [21] has argued that this time also sees the earliest evidence for the production of surplus, a phenomenon that facilitates the growing caravan trade and is a key factor in the rise of persistent inequality. This is bolstered by a surge in population as well as incipient craft specialization, evidenced in new metallurgy practices, the growth of agriculture, and individuals who focused their energies on the caravan trade [21, 2832].

In the San Pedro de Atacama oases, this rise in complexity and affluence appears to have manifested in different fashions across the oases and ayllus. The ayllu is the traditional Andean form of kin-based social organization that can also denote territorial boundaries (ascriptive descent groups [3335]). Interestingly, Goldstein [36] has argued for the ayllu as an ethnic community that, while based on kin, is bounded territorially by huacas or ancestral shrines. For example, in 1642, an idol (“ydolo”) or huaca was identified as belonging to Sequitur (today’s ayllu of Sequitor); it consisted of a black stone that was worshipped by the ayllu’s residents and was hidden in a type of vault. Similarly, in the ayllu of Contituques Cantal Acapana (today’s Conde Duque or San Pedro) was an idol called Tocol, which was buried in the courtyard of the ayllu’s church, having been previously burned in the public square [35]. Locally, ayllus have typically been interpreted as naturally differentiated oases (e.g., Solor, Tulor, or Coyo) as well as the divisions of the major oasis into internal sectors marked by territorial features and contemporary boundaries (Fig 1).

Food and intra-societal differences

Anthropologists have expended countless pages on the ways in which dietary differences can mirror, reinforce, or even establish social inequalities. Arnold [37] asserts that “food was, and continues to be, power in a most basic, tangible and inescapable form.” The collusion of the basic sustaining power of food, its necessity for life, and the demands of systems of social inequality, means that “variation in what people eat reflects substantive variation in status and power and characterizes societies that are internally stratified into rich and poor, sick and healthy, developed and underdeveloped, overfed and undernourished” [38]. In this way, the consumption of, or access to, particular foodstuffs has come to mark membership in empowered or subjugated intra-societal groups, and/or as an indicator of internal social schisms.

In spite of the inherent tendency of food to homogenize difference and bring people closer together [9], many stratified societies have developed means by which this innate homogenizing effect of food is overridden through a process of semantic inversion and serves as a tool that, in Appadurai’s words, can “serve to regulate rank, reify roles, and signify privileges,” and which can, “sustain relations characterized by rank, distance, or segmentation,” [9]. Goody [10] maintained that differential control of, and access to, food can play a central role in the creation and maintenance of multiple intra- and inter-societal hierarchies. While food may have a central social role in even the least stratified society, increasing social stratification offers the opportunity (and perhaps establishes the demand) for even more intense uses of food in the negotiation of relations of power [39]. In such societies, the power of food as a symbol or code for status differentiation can be fully exploited as a means of establishing and furthering inequality. In, perhaps, the purest expression of the furtherance of social inequality through food, elite individuals will sometimes go so far as to effectively monopolize certain foodstuffs, especially if that food is already an established symbol of their position in society, for example, the supposedly exclusive consumption of freshwater fish and wildfowl by the nobility of 15th century England [40]. This monopolization gives rise to an internally differentiated cuisine, a food system in which not all people have equal access to all foodstuffs, as a consequence of differences in social status [10]. The specifics of the consumption of restricted foods: who can, and cannot, have access, when, how much, and under what circumstances, are the means by which elite individuals can attempt to build and maintain their higher status position within a given society. It is this use of food, as de-facto ammunition in internal conflicts over cultural, economic, or political resources, that Appadurai aptly labels “gastro-politics” [9].

That not all societies stratify their food is undoubtedly a reflection of the fact that there are many possible paths by which a society may become stratified [2], and that it is not obligatory that dietary practices follow broader patterns of social stratification, especially in societies without formal stratification. Nevertheless, it is quite often the case that stratified societies do possess some form of differentiated cuisine and the development of this differentiation seems often to be coeval with the development of early stratified societies [41].

Research questions

Building on this exploration of social differentiation and diet, our research into the paleodietary practices of the Middle Period inhabitants of San Pedro de Atacama was guided by a series of questions that sought to identify the temporal, spatial, and biocultural correlates and dimensions of dietary difference.

Time.

As the individuals included in this analysis represent nearly a millennium of the occupation of the San Pedro oases, our initial interrogation of the dietary data was diachronic in nature. Specifically, using the corpus of individuals for whom we possess both isotopic and radiometric data (n = 167), we sought to determine if there were any coherent temporal trends (correlations) in the consumption of any of the modeled food groupings that might have resulted from diachronic changes in resource availability/access. Such changes in access or consumption may, in turn, be connected to the establishment, institutionalization, or intensification of social inequality in the San Pedro oases over time.

Furthermore, in the temporal realm, we sought to test the dietary dimensions of a hypothesis advanced in Pestle and colleagues [42], which proposes a disjuncture between what we term the early/incipient (pre-600 calAD) and late/established (post-600 calAD) Middle Period. As above, the large corpus of dated individuals allows for a specific examination of whether there existed dietary correlates of this proposed inflection point in San Pedro’s history.

Space.

In our previous examination of the chronology of the six ayllus under consideration here [42], we noted the apparent independence of the use-life patterns of different ayllus. Based on this, we contend that the dynamics of human activity in each ayllu would appear to have been particularly sensitive to local socio-cultural and environmental dynamics, a conclusion that reinforces previous archaeological and bioarchaeological findings of significant differences among ayllus during the Middle Period [4346]. Here, we attempt to quantify any differences in dietary practices among the ayllus through comparison of modeled dietary contributions. This line of inquiry flows from the notion that differences in access to different foodstuffs among ayllus could be a consequence of different positioning vis-à-vis the inter-regional exchange systems of the period, or indeed of differences in positions in the status hierarchy of the ayllus. As the different ayllus sometimes belong to different portions of the Middle Period, we augmented our comparisons of the “raw” modeled foodstuff proportions with a second comparison of the residuals of modeled contributions after regression against calibrated radiocarbon dates (derived from the Inter-Ayllu date model of [42]). These time-corrected dietary differences should allow us greater insights into the mechanics of life in the various ayllus after the variable of time is fully accounted for.

Sex.

Finally, working from the complementary theories that: 1) differences in diet are often associated with, or pattern on, sex and understandings of gender, and 2) that inequality (broadly construed) is experienced differently by men and women, we next examined the relationship between biological sex (as determined osteologically) and diet. First, at the coarsest level, we compared modeled diet between all males and females in the study sample (grouping all individuals from all ayllus together). Next, in light of the aforementioned differences among the ayllus, we compared male and female diet from each of the four ayllus for which we possessed sufficiently large samples of sexed individuals. This comparison was made on both raw modeled foodstuff estimates and with the date-regressed residuals of foodstuff values to control for time (see above). Finally, in an attempt to integrate considerations of both social/spatial (ayllu-based) and sex-based dimensions of dietary difference simultaneously, we compared the modeled diets of males and females from each of the four best-represented ayllus with each other. As above, this comparison was made on raw modeled foodstuff estimates and with the date-regressed residuals of foodstuff values.

The three vectors of difference explored here are not meant to be an exhaustive list of the possible ways that inequality may have been partitioned in the San Pedro societies. However, they are the ones where the information available in the bioarchaeological record allow us to explore the differentiation on this spatial scale with a high degree of confidence. For instance, another important vector of social differentiation in many human societies is age, but this is an aspect that we are unable to explore with the current available skeletal record, since 1) the study sample included less than 6% subadult individuals, and 2) most of the individuals included in our study were represented by cranial remains alone, rendering precise age determinations too unreliable to be useful in statistical models.

Of relevance to the three aforementioned vectors of difference, in the present work, we examine diet as a proxy for underlying social, cultural, and political dynamics, remaining conscious that the observed changes in consumption are likely reflections of changes within society. Put differently, when confronted with diachronic changes in consumption, we are aware that time itself is not changing diet, but rather that something integral to the arrangement of Atacameño society is changing with time, which, in turn, is affecting diet. While such proxy evidence can be challenging given that it is not a direct measure of the phenomenon of interest (social change), the accumulated decades of anthropological work on the linkages between consumption and social structure add support to the validity of our investigation along these three lines.

Isotopic basics

Stable isotope analysis remains the best means available to archaeologists for the estimation of the diet of ancient individuals. Indeed, nearly fifty years of the application of this method in archaeology has built a corpus of experimentally validated methods that permit accurate estimation of broad aspects of human paleodiet (see [47, 48] for general reviews of the method). Assuming sufficient preservation of target biomolecules (bone collagen and hydroxyapatite) and accurate knowledge of the local foodweb and fractionation (the offsets between, for instance, consumed foods and consumer tissues), stable isotope analysis can be used to estimate broad aspects of individual paleodiet (C3 vs. C4 plants, marine vs. terrestrial protein) with a high degree of accuracy. The basics of this method have remained effectively unaltered since the earliest archaeological applications of the technique [49, 50], and the real power of the method remains in the scalability of the data it generates, which permits inference of everything from individual diets to the consumption practices of broad subsets of a past society. Given the incredible preservation of skeletal biomolecules in the Atacama Desert, and the relative simplicity of the local foodweb (which lacks marine or freshwater foods), stable isotope analysis is particularly well suited for paleodietary reconstruction in the region.

Classical applications of stable isotope analysis to archaeological questions of diet have tended to proceed as follows. Collagen (and sometimes hydroxyapatite) are extracted from human bone samples, and mass spectrometry is used to generate estimates of stable isotope ratios (expressed using the delta (δ) notation, a ratio of heavier to lighter isotope relative to an international standard) of carbon (13C/12C) and nitrogen (15N/14N) for the extracted biomolecules. These consumer values are then compared, typically on an ad hoc basis, with measured or stipulated values of potential food groups as to generate bounding (more than/less than), ordering, or rough proportional estimates of past consumption. Only rarely are the effects of fractionation, disparate macronutrient composition of different foodstuffs, and the effects of differential routing of different food fractions to different consumer tissues accounted for systematically and sufficiently.

Fortunately, recent decades have witnessed the development of powerful new tools for the interpretation of isotopic data, in particular mixing models, which permits probabilistic quantification of source contribution. Such models greatly improved the explanatory power of isotopic estimation of paleodiet because these approaches use a complex suite of user-stipulated inputs to model bounded source contributions to a given consumer’s diet, rather than relying on basic visual comparisons of plotted source and consumer data, or making simplistic assumptions (for example, that hydroxyapatite isotope values reflect plant diet). While the earliest mixing models [51, 52] could only solve for a limited number (n+1) of food sources, later developments [5355] expanded calculations to non-determined systems, and provided means for dealing with uncertainty and incorporating priors based on a Bayesian approach.

Most recently, models such as FRUITS [56] have been built to accommodate the input of consumer, foodweb, macronutrient composition, and routing parameters, as well as user-specified priors, to determine, probabilistically, bounded source contributions while accounting for uncertainty in all input data. These recent Bayesian approaches “offer a powerful means to interpret data because they can incorporate prior information, integrate across sources of uncertainty and explicitly compare the strength of support for competing models or parameter values” [53]. The substantial potential of these methods for addressing questions of significant paleodietary interest has consequently resulted in their increased use in the South-Central Andes (e.g., [5762]).

Methods and materials

Skeletal collections

The skeletal sample included in this study represent individuals excavated from 13 cemeteries dated to the Middle Period. The sites were excavated over several decades by different researchers, including the amateur archaeologist Father Gustavo LePaige, who recovered most of the skeletal collections in the region. A detailed review of the history of research and the preservation status of the collections can be found in [24, 63]. The chronological contextualization of the cemeteries has been detailed in [42].

The accumulated body of archaeological work on the region suggests that the cemeteries were not precincts reserved for specific classes of individuals, as there is not systematic bias in sex representation in the sites [63], and as individuals of all ages are found in the burial spaces [28, 64]. Therefore, they are assumed to be representative of local societies. However, the different archaeological recovery practices employed over time have resulted in a skeletal collection that is very biased towards adult individuals (which is reflected in our data), and most of the collections are represented only by human skulls, as LePaige, in particular, did not save postcranial remains from his excavations [63]. Moreover, during the military government in Chile, the skeletal collections were separated from their funerary context, resulting in the loss of individual context information for most of the collections excavated by LePaige. Therefore, detailed archaeological information and complete skeletons are available only in cemeteries excavated more recently, such as Solcor 3, Coyo 3, Quitor 6 Tardío, and Casa Parroquial. For these reasons, the analysis of vectors of inequality within cemeteries is not possible across all of our samples.

Demographic characteristics of the individuals included in this study (age at death and sex) were estimated based on the analysis of skulls and pelvis, following traditional bioarchaeological methods of analysis [65]. However, as mentioned before, for most of the samples only skulls are available, which makes the estimates of age at death unreliable [66, 67]. For this reason, the age distribution of the local populations cannot be estimated properly, and this demographic aspect was not explored in the current study.

The cemeteries were grouped inside ayllus, as they represent long-standing geo-political units in the Atacama oases (see above), far predating the colonial period. Cemeteries are included in each Ayllu based on their geographic location within their boundaries (Fig 1), given that these boundaries have been stable since at least the beginning of colonial period [68], if not far earlier. In total the cemeteries represent the human presence of six ayllus, as detailed in Table 1 and Fig 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Archaeological, bioarchaeological, chemical, isotopic, and FRUITS modeled foodstuff data for all 257 well-preserved San Pedro individuals included in the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t001

Sampling.

Sampling for isotopic analysis took place in the Museo Gustavo Le Paige in San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. We selected samples from a total of 288 individuals representing six ayllus (Conde Duque, Coyo, Larache, Quitor, Solcor, and Tchecar). The selection criteria for the individuals attempted to generate representative samples from each the cemeteries and the sexes, while at the same time minimizing the damage to complete bones. For this reason, whenever possible, samples were collected from fragmented skeletal remains. The sample composition is heavily biased towards adults, as subadults are not common in the collections excavated by LePaige. While chemical preservation reduces the sample under consideration to 257 individuals (89.2%), this still represents an enormous study sample by isotopic standards. In all cases, ~1.0 g (target weight) samples of dense cortical bone were removed from available skeletal elements using a diamond cut-off wheel (Dremel #545) mounted on a handheld Dremel Rotary Tool. The rotational speed of the cutoff wheel was kept at a minimum effective speed as to avoid causing any thermal degradation of bone collagen, and wheels were sterilized between individuals to avoid cross-contamination. The element and location of sampling varied from ayllu to ayllu, and on an individual level, based on completeness and the state of preservation. All sampling was performed in consultation with museum curatorial and conservation staff. Following extraction, samples were bagged in pre-labeled sterile sample bags. Permits for sample export were granted by the Chilean Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales (Permits 3682/12, 3219/15, 4276/16, and 5084/17).

Extraction and analysis.

The extraction of collagen and hydroxyapatite from human bone samples was performed at the Archaeological Stable Isotope Laboratory at the University of Miami. Initially, each sample was ground by hand using a sterilized ceramic mortar and pestle and separated, using geological screens, into different size fractions, which were stored in sterilized scintillation vials until extraction.

Collagen extraction followed the protocol of Longin [69], as modified by Pestle [70]. Briefly, 0.5 g of the 0.5–1.0 mm size fraction was weighed and placed in a 50 ml centrifuge tube. Samples first were demineralized in 30 mL of 0.2 M HCL on a constantly spinning rotator for 24 h, at which time those samples that had achieved neutral buoyancy were then rinsed to neutral pH through a repeated process of centrifugation, decanting, and the addition of distilled water. Samples that had not yet been completely demineralized after 24 h had their acid changed and were returned to the rotator for a further 24 h period. Humic treatment consisted of adding 30 mL of 0.0625 M NaOH to each sample for a period of 20 h. After this time elapsed, the samples were again rinsed to neutral pH by the repeated application of distilled water, centrifugation, and decanting. The remaining “collagen” was then gelatinized in 10−3 M HCL at 90° C, and filtered using single-use 40 μm Millipore Steriflip® vacuum filters, condensed, frozen, and freeze dried. Start and end weights were recorded (to the nearest 0.1 mg) and were used to calculate collagen yield (wt%) for each sample.

Hydroxyapatite extraction followed a protocol first established in Lee-Thorp [71] and Krueger [72] and modified by Pestle [70]. Approximately 0.1 g (weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg) of the 0.125–0.25 mm fraction was placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. After weighing, each sample underwent a 24 h oxidation of organics using 30 mL of 50% bleach (~2.5% NaOCl). The bleach treatment was then repeated, with fresh bleach solution, for an additional 24 h period, for a total of 48 h of treatment. Samples then were rinsed to neutral pH through a repeated process of centrifugation, decanting, and addition of distilled water. Next, labile carbonates were removed by the addition of 30 mL of 0.1 M acetic acid to each centrifuge tube for a total of four hours, with a 5 min vacuum treatment after 2 h. After the acid treatment, each sample was rinsed to neutral pH before being placed in a 50°C oven overnight to dry the resulting product. Start and end weights were recorded for all hydroxyapatite samples (weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg) and used to calculate the hydroxyapatite yield (wt%).

Collagen and hydroxyapatite isotopic analysis was performed in the Marine Geology and Geophysics Stable Isotope Laboratory at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami. Collagen samples were packed into tin capsules and analyzed using a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer interfaced to a PDZ Europa 20–20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). This analytical process yields information on elemental carbon and nitrogen composition as well as relative abundance of the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen, data which are used in the generation of δ13Cco and δ15Nco. Hydroxyapatite samples were analyzed using a Kiel-IV Carbonate Device coupled to a Thermo Finnigan DeltaPlus IRMA, providing δ13Cap values. Collagen results were calibrated using acetanilide and glycine, and an OCC (optically clear calcite) standard calibrated to NBS-19 was used for hydroxyapatite. Standards were analyzed in every sample set at the beginning and end of the run, as well as in-between the analyzed samples to ensure instrumental stability. Check samples of all three standards were also run as unknowns in every run to verify measurement accuracy [73]. Precision (as determined by replicate analysis of samples included in the present study) averaged 0.1‰ for δ13Cco, 0.2‰ for δ15Nco, and 0.1‰ for δ13Cap.

As all samples considered herein were extracted and analyzed using the same protocols and instruments, the issue of inter-laboratory differences in resulting stable isotope signatures [7476] are not of concern.

Foodweb sampling.

Paleodietary reconstruction requires knowledge of the isotopic composition of both consumers and potential foodstuffs. Thus, in addition to human bone samples, we also built a representative sample of the plants and animals that make up the local foodweb. To make the foodweb appropriate for the reconstruction of ancient dietary practices in San Pedro de Atacama we targeted, inasmuch as possible, archaeological flora and fauna from sites in the region, which would better represent the local foodweb available to the human consumers of interest here. As necessary, however, the archaeological foodweb was augmented through the collection of modern floral and faunal samples, again restricted to the immediate environs of San Pedro de Atacama. Ultimately, this foodweb comprised sixty-two samples representing four distinct groupings: beans, C3 plants, C4/CAM plants, and terrestrial fauna. Unpublished values for six camelid samples, analyzed and graciously provided by Francisca Santana Sagredo were included in the average values for the terrestrial faunal grouping, but are not detailed individually here. As with human bone samples, permits for foodweb sample export were granted by the Chilean Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales (see permit numbers above).

Modeling.

The Bayesian model known as FRUITS (Food Reconstruction Using Isotopic Transferred Signals; [56]) was used to quantify individual dietary composition. This multi-source mixture modeling technique is one of several developed with the goal of better bounding estimates of food source contribution and, as such, offers clear advantages over both classical approaches to paleodietary reconstruction and other model-based approaches. While such an approach offers notable advantages (in that it permits statistical testing of multiple hypotheses, does not rely on ad hoc explanations of observed dietary differences, and fully accounts for the many sources of error in paleodietary reconstruction) it is far from a panacea. Indeed, such models require user stipulation of a large number of parameters, many of which can be difficult to obtain/estimate. Model outputs are only as good as the data upon which any model iteration is provided built, and while such models generate mathematically viable solutions, any model is invariably specific to the assumptions informing it, while their reliability to broader scenarios are frequently not straightforward or easy to assess. As such, their use requires detailed knowledge of both model mechanics and the many parameters needed for their generation. Therefore it is central to the defense of any model that the specifics parameters used are detailed, and the following paragraphs present the parameters used for the present application.

Only well-preserved consumer samples (human bone; collagen yield >0.5 wt%, carbon yield >4.5 wt%, nitrogen yield >0.9 wt%, atomic C/N ratio between 2.9–3.6) were included in FRUITS modelling. The consumer data for the model were based on the isotope ratios generated by IRMS. To account for fractionation, we first determined the consumer-foodstuff offset (and error) for δ13Cco using the method of [77], which takes into account both the measured δ13Cco and the spacing value (Δ13Cap-co). Fractionation of δ13Cap was stipulated as 10.1±0.4‰, following Fernandes et al. [78]. Finally, for δ15Nco we employed a trophic fractionation value of 3.6±1.2‰, as recommended by several experimental studies of omnivorous animals [7984].

Foodweb isotope values comprised the edible portions of the sixty-two samples discussed above. Any modern data included in this reference sample had δ13C values corrected by +1.5‰ to account for recent fossil fuel burning [85]. Furthermore, the δ13C value of bone samples were adjusted by -2.0‰ to account for bone collagen-edible tissue offset [86, 87]. Macronutrient (protein, carbohydrate, lipid) composition of each food group was determined by reference to the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference [88]. Elemental composition (particularly %C) of each foodstuff/macronutrient group was based on formulae provided in Morrison and colleagues [89], and differences in digestibility were accounted for following Hopkins [90].

To account for differential routing, all nitrogen in bone collagen was stipulated as coming from dietary protein, the carbon in hydroxyapatite was stipulated as reflecting all dietary carbon, and the carbon composition of bone collagen was set as reflecting a 3:1 ratio of dietary protein to energy [78]. Carbon isotope offsets between measured bulk food isotope values and the isotopic values of a foodstuff’s fats (bulk δ13C-6‰) and carbohydrates (bulk δ13C+0.5‰) were based on data from Tieszen [91]. The carbon isotope signature of a measured bulk foodstuff’s protein was determined using a mass-balance equation, such that a proportional/weighted average of the δ13C of protein and energy (fats and carbohydrates) would equal the measured δ13C bulk value (corrected for the concentration of carbon in each macronutrient and foodstuff-appropriate macronutrient concentration).

For purposes of this analysis, we divided the available foodstuffs into four groups reflecting taxonomy and photosynthetic pathway (beans, C3 plants, C4/CAM plants [which, in spite of photosynthetic differences, are inseparable isotopically], and terrestrial fauna). Some of the local C3 plants, in particular leguminous trees of the family Fabaceae (which includes key local taxa such as algarrobo [Prosopis spp.] and chañar [Geoffroea decorticans]) but also the Cyperaceae, can exhibit nitrogen-fixing behaviors resulting in very low δ15N values. Given, however, that these N-fixing behaviors would appear to be related to the age of the tree(s) in question (at least for Fabaceae), with more mature trees yielding much higher δ15N values [92, 93], and as we see a huge range in δ15N values in our samples of these taxa (from 1.1–15.1‰), we have chosen to include such taxa with the other C3 plants, leaving beans proper (frijoles/porotos, with high protein content and very low δ15N values) in a distinct category.

Consumption of protein was limited to between 10 and 50% of protein as energy (using the FRUITS a priori data option), reflecting the lower and upper limit of possible human protein intake [94]. All FRUITS simulations were performed using 10,000 iterations, as recommended by the program’s developers.

Given differences in foodweb composition, we note that the results of the modeling presented here are different from, and not directly comparable to, previous dietary modeling we have presented for the region (e.g., [60, 61]).

Dating.

Temporal control was obtained through a rigorous program of direct radiocarbon dating of bone collagen. Selection and collection of samples for dating were performed concurrently with osteological assessment of remains and the collection of samples for stable isotope analyses. AMS dating for the majority of these samples was performed at the National Science Foundation-Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at the University of Arizona (n = 145), with the remaining twenty-nine samples dated by Beta Analytic of Miami, Florida, USA. All told, our sample included 167 individuals (65%) for whom we possessed both isotope values and direct AMS dates. The temporal structure of the dates used in our statistical considerations below are based on Bayesian modeling of available dates conducted at two scales (all ayllus and inter-ayllu), as fully detailed in [42].

Statistical analysis.

All statistical analyses were performed in R [95], and, unless otherwise noted, nonparametric methods were employed. An alpha of 0.05 was employed for all analyses.

Correlations were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ), the nonparametric equivalent of Pearson’s r, which has the added capability of assessing the strength of non-linear bivariate correlations. Bootstrapped Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed using an R function (UncertaintyCorrelations) to address uncertainty in the calculation of correlations. The function was written by one of the authors (MH) and the script is provided in S1 File. The use of a bootstrapping approach allows for full accounting of uncertainty in both dates and modeled foodstuff contributions, a step that is not taken often enough in such diachronic analyses. Two-sample comparisons of variances were made using Levene’s test for the equality of variance, and we tested paired differences using the Wilcoxon signed-rank method, the nonparametric version of the more familiar Student’s t-test. Comparisons of multiple group means was accomplished using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way test of variance instead of ANOVA, with post-hoc pairwise comparisons made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

In several instances, it was judged appropriate to remove the possibly confounding effect of temporal differences among individuals and groups such that dietary effects of differences in ayllu and/or sex could be assessed independently of time. In those cases, we regressed (linearly) the variables of interest (dietary contributions by food group) against median modeled calibrated dates and captured the residuals (by food group) for subsequent analysis. Both the original food group contributions and these residual values were visualized using Metric Multidimensional Scaling [96] (using the function cmdscale from R(stats)), which permitted us to envision the similarities among groups as “distances” in Cartesian space [97].

Results

The results of our analyses are presented in five parts. We begin by considering the quality of preservation of the samples under analysis. Next, we present a summary of the human (consumer) isotopic values, which is followed by a rendering of the isoscape of the local foodweb. Subsequently, we discuss the workings of the model by means of analysis of the relationship of model inputs and outputs. Finally, we turn to the primary focus of this analysis, the results of the FRUITS dietary modeling, with considerations of differences and trends on diachronic, all ayllu, inter-ayllu, and intra-ayllu scales. For the reasons stipulated above, we believe that these modeled results are significantly more useful and meaningful than raw isotope (delta) values.

Quality control

Of the 288 human bones samples analyzed, 257 (89.2%) had sample quality values above accepted cut-offs or within acceptable ranges (collagen yield >0.5 wt%, carbon yield >4.5 wt%, nitrogen yield >0.9 wt%, atomic C/N ratio between 2.9–3.6) commonly employed in archaeological studies [98100]. It should be noted that for two samples (I-32 and I-62), the elemental analyzer failed to generate elemental yields, and that, lacking those data, atomic C:N ratios also could not be calculated. Based on the high collagen yields of these individuals, they were nonetheless included in later analysis and discussion. Individual data are to be found in Table 1. The summary of the sample quality data is presented in Table 2 and only the 257 samples meeting these stringent quality standards are considered/discussed henceforth. On the whole, the hyperarid conditions of the Atacama lend themselves to excellent preservation of buried organic materials (human skeletons included), and the integrity of the samples in this case is consistent with this. As has been previously observed [60, 101], the only notable exception to this pristine preservation are those individuals from cemeteries located very close to water sources (e.g., Quitor 8), which seem to have been subject to frequent inundation.

thumbnail
Table 2. Summary of sample preservation data for samples included in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t002

Examination of the relationship between sample age and the state of preservation produced heartening results, as the negative consequences of differential preservation would seem to be minimal. As seen in Fig 2, for those 167 individuals for whom we possess both radiocarbon dates and isotopic data, there were no statistically significant correlations between the modeled median calibrated radiocarbon dates and collagen yield, apatite yield, carbon or nitrogen concentration, or atomic C:N ratio. Furthermore, as seen in Fig 3, there are no significant correlations among any of the sample quality variables (collagen yield, apatite yield, wt% C, wt% N, and atomic C:N) and the primary isotopic values of the samples (δ13Cco, δ15Nco, and δ13Cap).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Correlation matrix of radiocarbon dates and sample quality metrics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Correlation matrix of sample quality metrics and measured isotope values.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g003

While there are weak, but still significant, correlations between collagen yield and Δ13Cap-co, on the one hand (ρ = -0.14, p = 0.03, n = 257), and Δ13Cap-co and atomic C:N on the other (ρ = -0.15, p = 0.02, n = 256), as Δ13Cap-co is a value derived from two primary isotope values (δ13Cco and δ13Cap), these correlations are more likely a consequence of systematic relationships between δ13Cco and δ13Cap than any real effect of preservation. The ultimate implication of these findings is that the diachronic trends in isotopic and modeled foodstuff values detailed below are not the consequence of differential preservation due to sample age, or the effects of differences in preservation on isotope values, but rather stem from bona fide differences in practices of consumption.

The remaining correlations presented in these matrices are as expected in terms of directionality and strength. For instance, concerning Fig 2, collagen and apatite yields are significantly negatively correlated (ρ = -0.6, p<0.01, n = 257) and wt% C and wt% N are significantly positively correlated (ρ = 0.94, p<0.01, n = 255). Similarly, as seen in Fig 3, the strong positive correlations between δ13Cap and δ13Cco (ρ = 0.88, p<0.01, n = 257) or δ13Cco and δ15Nco (ρ = 0.5, p<0.01, n = 257) are in line with a priori understandings of isotope systematics and the nature of the local foodweb (see below). As such, none of these correlations present any cause for concern.

Isotopes

While the primary focus of the present work is the FRUITS modeling of dietary makeup, rather than raw isotopic values, we briefly discuss those raw isotopic data below. All individual data for the three primary (δ13Cco, δ15Nco, and δ13Cap) and one derived (Δ13Cap-co) isotope systems are presented in Table 1, and summary data for the 257 well-preserved individuals included in the present study are presented in Table 3. The fact that all of the primary isotope systems show ranges in excess of 8‰ speaks to substantial variability in dietary practices across time and space, variability that we contend patterns with a number of temporal, spatial, and bio-cultural differences.

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary of isotopic data for bone collagen and hydroxyapatite for n = 257 individuals in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t003

As shown in Fig 3, δ13Cco, δ15Nco, and δ13Cap are all significantly positively correlated with one-another, as are δ13Cap and Δ13Cap-co. Given the positively (but not significantly) correlated δ13C and δ15N values of the overall foodweb (see below), and the fact that both collagen and hydroxyapatite derive much of their carbon from shared sources, none of these relationships are particularly surprising.

Foodweb

Summary stable isotope data for the sixty-two samples included in the local foodweb are presented in Table 4 and Fig 4, with individual values for fifty-six of the samples found in Table 5 (see note above in Methods and Materials). Macronutrient concentrations and tissue-specific isotope data for these food groups are found in Table 6. Importantly, we note that the δ13C and δ15N values of the Atacama foodweb overall are not significantly correlated with one another (ρ = 0.19, p = 0.14, n = 62).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Scatterplot of δ13C and δ15N of foodgroups used in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g004

thumbnail
Table 4. Summary of measured δ13C and δ15N of foodgroups used in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Details of measured δ13C and δ15N of foodweb samples used in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Macronutrient composition and macronutrient-adjusted δ13C and δ15N values of foodgroups used in FRUITS paleodietary modeling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t006

There is exclusivity in the δ13C signatures of the two energy-rich plant food groups (C3 plants averaging -23.7±2.0‰ for δ13C versus -11.2±1.6‰ among C4/CAM plants), and in the δ15N values of the two foods likely to have accounted for the majority of dietary protein (terrestrial animals, which have an average δ15N of 9.5±1.8‰, and beans, which average 0.7±3.0‰). Such exclusivity, even if it occurs in only one isotope system, is highly useful in attempts to determine the proportional contribution of these food groups to consumer diets. And while the overlapping isotopic values of certain groupings (e.g., beans and C3 plants, which have almost completely overlapping δ13C values, with some greater separation in δ15N) may appear troubling for resolving foodstuff contributions, the inclusion of macronutrient composition in the FRUITS model nonetheless permits source differentiation. Indeed, in this example, the roughly 1:3 ratio of protein to energy in beans, which is effectively the inverse of that of the animal flesh (which has an approximately 3:1 protein to energy ratio) renders their respective dietary contributions resolvable in spite of their isotopic similarities.

Model mechanics

Finally, before presenting the results of our modeling, we briefly discuss the relationship between the isotope data used as model inputs and the modeled outputs, in an attempt to better understand and convey the functioning of these iterations of the model.

As seen in Fig 5, if we consider isotope-modeled food relationships on a foodstuff-by-foodstuff basis, several evident patterns emerge. In terms of the consumption of carbohydrate/energy-rich plant foods (C3 and C4/CAM plants), there are strong correlations with the two primary carbon isotope values (δ13Cco and δ13Cap). Specifically, modeled C3 plant consumption is significantly negatively correlated with both δ13Cco and δ13Cap, whereas modeled C4/CAM consumption is significantly positively correlated with both of those isotopic values. Weaker, but still significant, relationships exist for both of these plant groupings and δ15Nco (which is negatively correlated with consumption of C3 plants and positively correlated with the proportion of C4/CAM plants), reflecting the far higher δ15N values of the C4/CAM grouping. Δ13Cap-co follows similar patterns of relationships with the modeled consumption of these two plant food groups, being negatively correlated with modeled consumption of C3 plants and positively correlated with the proportion of C4/CAM plants.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Correlation matrix of measured isotope values and individual modeled foodgroup contributions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g005

Turning to the more protein rich food groups, beans and terrestrial animal meat, there is a rather straightforward set of relationships that would seem to govern the model outputs. Given their 13C and 15N depleted signatures, it is not surprising that modeled bean consumption is strongly negatively correlated with all three of the primary isotopic values. In contrast, all three of these values are moderately, but still significantly, positively correlated with the modeled consumption of terrestrial meat, a finding that is in line with what we know of the isotope values of that food group.

In the briefest possible terms, the model is performing as one would expect a priori, given the isotopic makeup of the locally available foods. Deviations from 1:1 correlations between isotopic inputs and modeled foodstuff contributions can be attributed to the effects of differential routing and the distinct macronutrient composition of the different food groups employed. As mentioned previously, one of the strengths of this model-based approach is that all these effects are fully and honestly accounted for.

Modeling

In light of the research questions outlined above, we consider the results of the FRUITS modeling along three main potential vectors of difference (time, geography/space, and sex).

Overall.

As seen in Fig 6, the average modeled contribution of the four food groupings for all 257 individuals included in the present study hover around 25% each. In spite of this apparent similarity, these values nonetheless differ significantly, both in the aggregate (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 18.2, df = 3, p<0.01), and with pairwise comparisons showing that C3 plant consumption differs significantly from all three other groups. Moreover, these average values obscure an enormous amount of individual-level variability in the consumption of each food (3 to 9 times, depending on the food group). Indeed, for beans, mean modeled individual contributions ranged from 9.8–46.8%, for C3 plants 8.2–46.6%, for C4/CAM plants 6.5–56.2%, and for terrestrial meat 9.7–35.6%. It is this broad individual level variation that we ultimately return to in our discussions below.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Boxplot of average mean modeled contribution, by foodgroup.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g006

Time.

As seen in Fig 7, based on a correlation analysis of all 167 individuals for whom we possess AMS dates and isotope values, there are statistically significant temporal trends in the consumption of all four food groups. For C3 plants and beans, there are significant decreases over time, whereas for C4/CAM plants and terrestrial meat, modeled consumption increases significantly over time. While we used the median dates of the modeled calibrated ranges for these analyses, given the nearly 1:1 correlation between unmodeled and modeled dates (Fig 8), little changes if the unmodeled median values are used instead.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Scatterplot matrix of modeled median calibrated radiocarbon dates and mean modeled contribution, by foodgroup.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. Scatterplot of unmodeled and modeled median calibrated radiocarbon dates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g008

Given that there are associated uncertainties in the estimates of both radiocarbon dates and modeled foodstuff contribution values, we also performed a bootstrapped analysis of the observed correlations. As seen in Table 7, at their respective 95% confidence limits, the observed positive correlation between radiocarbon dates and C4/CAM plants still holds (as the 2.5% and 97.5% ρ values are still positive), as does the negative correlation between date and beans. In the case of C3 plants, the previously observed negative correlation with radiocarbon dates is not fully supported, as, at the upper end of the 95% confidence interval, the bootstrapped correlation values extend just beyond/above zero (ρ = 0.01). The same is true with terrestrial meat, as the previously observed positive temporal correlation extends just slightly into negative values (ρ = -0.02) at the lower limits of the 95% confidence interval. However, given that the overwhelming majority of the bootstrapped values for both C3 plants and terrestrial meat support the initial/original correlations, we are inclined to subscribe to their reality, although we must acknowledge that such a conclusion is not supported at a 95% confidence level.

thumbnail
Table 7. Bootstrapped Spearman’s rho correlations of radiocarbon dates and modeled foodstuff contributions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t007

Comparisons of modeled diet were next made between those individuals who had modeled median calibrated AMS dates that preceded and postdated 600 calAD. As seen in Fig 9, this analysis found significant differences (using Wilcoxon rank sum tests) for all four of the modeled food groupings. Pre-600 calAD individuals consumed an average of 33.4±4.7% C3 plants versus just 26.1±6.4% for the Post-600 calAD individuals. For C4/CAM plants, pre-600 calAD consumption averaged 10.7±2.3%, which more than doubled to an average of 25.6±8.9% in the post-600 calAD individuals. Bean consumption fell from 36.9±6.7% among the pre-600 calAD individuals to 24.1±6.0% after 600 calAD. Correspondingly, terrestrial meat consumption increased from an average of 19±3.2% before 600 calAD to 24.2± 3.9% after that date. These results generally support the argument for behavioral disjuncture at/around 600 calAD.

thumbnail
Fig 9. Violin plot matrix comparing pre- and post-600 calAD mean modeled foodstuff contributions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g009

Inter-ayllu.

Comparison of modeled diet on an inter-ayllu basis found significant differences at an aggregate level for all four modeled food categories, although pairwise comparisons found a somewhat inconsistent pattern of differences, as displayed in Table 8 above the diagonal.

thumbnail
Table 8. Pairwise comparisons of modeled foodstuff contributions by ayllu, with raw values above the diagonal and radiocarbon date-regressed residuals below the diagonal.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t008

In summary, For C3 plants, the Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant overall differences (χ2 = 11.6, df = 5, and p = 0.04), and significant pairwise differences (Wilcoxon rank sum test) were found between five of fifteen pairings. In the case of C4/CAM plants, aggregate differences among the six ayllus were significant (χ2 = 15.1, df = 5, and p = 0.01), and significant pairwise differences were found for seven of fifteen pairs. For beans, there was a larger aggregate difference in consumption (χ2 = 16.6, df = 5, and p<0.01), and there were accompanying significant pairwise differences among five of fifteen pairings. Finally, for terrestrial meat, we found the largest aggregate difference (χ2 = 22.3, df = 5, and p<0.01), and significant differences for seven of fifteen pairs.

A graphical summation of these differences is presented in Fig 10, in which we present the results of a multidimensional scaling analysis of all four food groups by ayllu. The relative similarity of Tchecar and Solcor is striking, as is the degree of difference between Conde Duque and Larache.

thumbnail
Fig 10. MDS plot of FRUITS modeled foodgroup contributions, by ayllu.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g010

A final consideration of the “raw” modeled foodstuff values relates to the patterns of internal variance in consumption within the different ayllus. As seen in Table 9, there were significant differences in variance (assessed using Levene’s test for equality of variance) among the ayllus for three of the four modeled food groups: C3 plants (F = 3.6, p<0.01), C4/CAM plants (F = 5.2, p<0.01), and beans (F = 5.7, p<0.01). Terrestrial meat, on the other hand, did not exhibit significantly different variances among these six ayllus (F = 1.4, p = 0.22). The consistent pattern that emerged from this analysis is that Larache and Quitor show the greatest degree of individual-level variability in consumption across the food groupings, whereas Conde Duque, Coyo, and Tchecar show far greater internal consistency in consumption practices.

thumbnail
Table 9. Variance of FRUITS modeled dietary contribution by ayllu with results of Levene’s test for equality of variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t009

As the different ayllus belong to different portions of the Middle Period, we augmented this comparison of the “raw” modeled foodstuff proportions with a second level of analysis considering the residuals of modeled contributions after regression against Inter-Ayllu modeled calibrated radiocarbon dates [42]. Even after accounting for time, some significant differences in modeled consumption remained, as seen in Fig 11 and with pairwise comparisons shown in in Table 8 below the diagonal.

thumbnail
Fig 11. Violin plot matrix of radiocarbon date-regressed modeled foodgroup contributions by ayllu.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g011

For C3 plant residuals, the Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant differences overall (χ2 = 20.7, df = 5, and p<0.01), and significant pairwise differences (Wilcoxon rank sum test) were found for five of fifteen pairings. In the case of C4/CAM plant residuals, aggregate differences among the six ayllus were significant (χ2 = 25.7, df = 5, and p<0.01), and significant pairwise differences were found for six pairs. For bean residuals, there was only a borderline significant aggregate difference (χ2 = 11.0, df = 5, and p = 0.05), and there were only three accompanying significant pairwise differences. Finally, for terrestrial meat, there was no significant overall difference (χ2 = 5.3, df = 5, and p = 0.38), and only one significant pairwise difference. Having thus controlled for time, it would appear that inter-ayllu differences persist, at least for plant consumption and, potentially, for beans as well, although other differences (e.g., Conde Duque’s distinctiveness) moderate once time is accounted for.

These differences are presented in graphical form in Fig 12, which shows the results of a multidimensional scaling analysis of all four food group residuals by ayllu. While the pattern, after accounting for time, differs somewhat from the raw value MDS plot by ayllu presented above, the overall structure is not markedly different. The relative proximity of Tchecar and Solcor remains a striking feature, as does the continued dissimilarity of Conde Duque versus Larache.

thumbnail
Fig 12. MDS plot of radiocarbon date-regressed modeled foodgroup contributions by ayllu.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g012

A comparison of the variances of the residuals among the six ayllus under consideration found no significant differences for any of the four modeled food groupings once differences in time were fully accounted for by regression. These results are presented in Table 10. Despite the lack of significant differences, the general pattern observed in the raw data holds true, as the individuals from Larache and Quitor show the greatest degree of individual-level variability in consumption across the food groupings, whereas Conde Duque and Tchecar show more internal consistency in dietary makeup. Having controlled for time, however, these differences are not significant.

thumbnail
Table 10. Variance of FRUITS radiocarbon date-regressed residuals by ayllu with results of Levene’s test for equality of variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t010

Sex.

The first level of comparison of sex-based differences in modeled consumption was made at the level of all sexed individuals (n = 179) across all ayllus. As the temporal structure of sexed and dated individuals (n = 112) does not differ significantly (Fig 13), this seemed an appropriate first comparison. As seen in Fig 14, in spite of a working presumption that female and male diets might differ significantly, statistically significant difference was only observed for one of the four modeled food groups (beans). Indeed, for C3 plants, C4/CAM plants, and terrestrial meat, there was substantial overlap in male and female consumption and insignificant sex-based differences in the modeled outcomes. On the other hand, females appear to have consumed significantly more beans (26.3±6.2%) than did their male counterparts (23.2±7.3%). This difference was not exclusive, however, as is evident in the Fig 14, which shows the substantial overlap between the proportion of beans consumed by females and males.

thumbnail
Fig 13. Violin plot of modeled median calibrated radiocarbon dates by sex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g013

thumbnail
Fig 14. Violin plot matrix of FRUITS mean modeled foodstuff contributions by sex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g014

Acknowledging that substantial variability in sex-based difference might have been obscured at the previous scale of analysis by temporal differences among the ayllus, the next level of analysis was conducted on an intra-ayllu scale, with male and female modeled diet from each ayllu compared with one-another. A sufficient number of sexed individuals were available from only four ayllus: Coyo, Larache, Quitor, and Solcor (Table 11). Conde Duque was excluded from this analysis as it comprised just seven individuals for whom we could determine sex, while Tchecar, which had fifteen sexed individuals, only included five males. We chose to include Larache in this analysis because, while the sample size was smaller-than-preferred (n = 18), that number did include an equal number of females and males, and Larache is a cemetery with a number of intriguing contextual elements, upon which many arguments about the Middle Period in San Pedro have been built [102104].

For three of these four ayllus, there were no significant differences in modeled consumption between females and males. Among the Coyo individuals (n = 54), the p-values for comparisons (Wilcoxon rank sum tests) of male and female diet ranged from 0.22–0.66. For Quitor (n = 31), p-values for food group comparisons ranged from 0.07–0.21. Finally, for Solcor (n = 54), the p-values were similarly unimpressive, ranging from 0.43–0.58.

It was only at Larache (which has a relatively small sample size, n = 18) that any significant sex-based differences were observed. In this cemetery, apart from terrestrial meat (W = 22, p = 0.11), consumption of the other three food groups differed significantly between females and males. Specifically, females consumed a significantly greater amount (26.4±6.8% vs. 14.9±7.7%) of C3 plants than males (W = 68, p = 0.01), whereas males consumed significantly more C4/CAM plants than females (44.1±14.1% vs. 25.7±6.7%; W = 14, p = 0.02). Finally, females at Larache consumed significantly more beans than did their male counterparts (26.1±7.6% vs. 15.4±6.7%; W = 70, p<0.01).

The final iteration of this sex-based analysis combined ayllu and sex, forming twelve groups, as to determine the effects of sex on diet across ayllus. Ayllu/sex pairs with significant differences are noted in Table 12 above the diagonal. For C3 plants, the Kruskal-Wallis test found an overall significant difference among these twelve groups (χ2 = 21.2, df = 11, and p = 0.03), and significant pairwise differences (Wilcoxon rank sum test) for nine of the sixty-six pairwise comparisons, all involving males from Larache. In the case of C4/CAM plants, aggregate differences among the twelve groups were significant (χ2 = 20.3, df = 11, and p = 0.04), and pairwise comparison found significant differences for the same nine pairings as the C3 plant analysis (Larache males being significantly different from the same eight other subgroups).

thumbnail
Table 12. Pairwise comparisons of modeled foodstuff contributions by ayllu and sex, with raw values above the diagonal and radiocarbon date-regressed residuals below the diagonal.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.t012

For beans, the comparison of the twelve groups again found an aggregate significant difference (χ2 = 23.2, df = 11, and p = 0.02), and thirteen significant pairwise differences of the possible sixty-six, as noted in Table 12 above the diagonal. Finally, for terrestrial meat, we again found a significant aggregate difference (χ2 = 22.3, df = 11, and p = 0.02), and significant differences for ten of the sixty-six pairs.

A graphical summation of these differences is presented in Fig 15, in which we present the results of a multidimensional scaling analysis of the twelve ayllu-sex groups that accounts for all four modeled food groups. As presaged by the analysis presented above, there are some differences between the Quitor females and Conde Duque males, with the Larache males appearing most distinctive of all.

thumbnail
Fig 15. MDS plot of FRUITS modeled foodgroup contributions, by ayllu and sex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g015

As before, given that the different ayllus belong to different portions of the Middle Period, we augmented this comparison of the “raw” modeled foodstuff proportions with a second level of analysis considering the residuals of modeled contributions for the ayllu-sex groups after regression against Inter-ayllu modeled calibrated radiocarbon dates. It should be noted that, for this level of analysis, the total number of groups decreased to eleven, as there were no dated males from Tchecar. In spite of accounting for time, some significant differences remained at this level of the analysis. Ayllu/sex pairs with significant differences in residual values are noted in Table 12 below the diagonal.

For C3 plant residuals, the Kruskal-Wallis test did not find an overall significant difference among the eleven ayllu-sex groups (χ2 = 17.8, df = 10, and p = 0.06). Nonetheless, there were significant pairwise differences for seven of fifty-five pairs. Similarly, for terrestrial meat, the aggregate differences among the eleven groups was not significant (χ2 = 6.8, df = 10, and p = 0.74), and there was only one pairwise difference. For beans, however, the comparison of the ayllu-sex groups did find an aggregate significant difference (χ2 = 22.6, df = 10, and p = 0.01), and twelve significant pairwise differences of a possible fifty-five. Likewise, for C4/CAM plants, a significant aggregate difference was again found (χ2 = 23.6, df = 10, and p<0.01), and significant differences were found for fourteen of the fifty-five possible pairs, as noted below the diagonal in Table 12.

A graphical summation of these differences is presented in Fig 16, in which we present the results of a multidimensional scaling analysis of the eleven ayllu-sex groups that accounts for the residuals of all four modeled food groups. As above, the Larache males stand out as the most notably distinct subgroup, followed by the Conde Duque males. Additionally, it is noteworthy, as seen in Fig 17, that the females from the various ayllus form a rough “cluster” and the males from the ayllus exhibit greater variety. This suggests a greater homogeneity of time-controlled diet among females and a broader range of dietary practices among males.

thumbnail
Fig 16. MDS plot of radiocarbon date-regressed modeled foodgroup contributions by ayllu and sex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g016

thumbnail
Fig 17. MDS plot of radiocarbon date-regressed modeled foodgroup contributions by ayllu and sex with “cluster” of female values and greater dispersion of male values noted by ellipses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.g017

Discussion

In this work, we have used diet as a proxy for underlying social dynamics, acknowledging that any observed changes in consumption likely flow from, or reflect changes in, the structures of the societies under study (and, conversely, that food could have been used to affect certain social changes). In our consideration of the three research axes structuring this work (time, space, and sex), we highlight how the gastro-political lens of the study of paleodiet suggests new insights into the social dynamics of the Middle Period societies of San Pedro de Atacama.

Beginning with the considerations of time, our analysis revealed that: 1) over the 600-year period represented by our sample, there were significant changes in consumption patterns that may evince broad diachronic changes in the structure of Atacameño society, and 2) at/near 600 calAD, there probably was an episode of social discontinuity that manifested in significant changes in consumption practices.

Changes over time have been at the core of the archaeological discussion of the occupation of the San Pedro de Atacama oases [19, 20, 24, 25, 68, 105112], given the long-term dynamics of local human occupation and their connections to neighboring regions. Despite this focus on changing social and biological aspects of life in the past, there has been a strong tendency to define local prehistory through discrete (non-overlapping) periods. In that context, much of the previous discussion about diet and health among past Atacameños has focused on comparisons between such periods [43, 44, 113, 114]. In recent years, however, there has been an important shift away from typological views of the past, with archaeological [115120] and bioarchaeological work [42, 46, 60, 61, 120122], which has highlighted both synchronic variability and gradual historical processes that were products of intrinsic social developments, like population growth, emerging social complexity, and local cultural developments, as well as the exchange of people, resources, and ideas from other regions.

This new lens on the local past presents a more detailed and nuanced view of local prehistory, allocating agency to local actors, and situating the oases as important nodes inside the social network (or meshwork) that organized and influenced the South-Central Andes (rather than just a peripheral society within the sphere of influence of larger polities). While there is a long-term engagement in the scholarly literature with the important networks and polities of the Middle Period, our data reveals the import of local traditions and resources in shaping the human experience in the San Pedro de Atacama oases. In other words, this type of work creates a space where the discussion of the past can be seen as the result of the interplay between local and regional. The results we observe in diet over time in the Middle Period fit well within this discussion, as they show a gradual change in diet in the oases, stressing the variation that existed internal to this period.

As pertains to the observed long-term diachronic changes, the increased consumption of C4/CAM plants and terrestrial meat over time could both be argued to reflect a broad increase in the status and/or wealth of individuals across the oases. It is noteworthy that these classes of food have been associated with certain categories of power/privilege. While likely holding a variety of economic, ritual, political, military, and social functions throughout Andean prehistory, in later periods (in particular the Inka and colonial ages), chicha (a maize beer) is imbued with particular social and political power [123126]. Interestingly, some of the higher C4 values in our analyses come from Larache, where some of these individuals are interred with gold keros, the name given to a type of waisted drinking vessel. Keros are found in both the Middle Period Tiwanaku polity and the later Inca and are frequently understood as chicha drinking vessels [127]. While we cannot say with certainty that the observed increase in C4/CAM consumption is the result of the wider availability or distribution of chicha—indeed it could simply represent an increase in cultivation of C4 plants/maize in the oases over the period of study—the possibility cannot be discounted, especially given the importance that chicha has as a ritual beverage across the Andes.

Similarly, there is a broad anthropological literature (from non-human primates [128] to complex human societies [129]) that associates greater meat consumption with higher status. The increasing role that both of these classes of (potentially) high-status food played over the centuries in Atacameño diet could appear to confirm the long-held narrative that describes the Middle Period as one of unparalleled prosperity [19, 43, 44, 130] from which all or many of the inhabitants of the oases benefitted. The change in diet may reflect the impact of the growing networks of interregional exchange (e.g., [43, 120122, 131]), bringing not only wealth, but different dietary practices to the oases. As we have previously argued [60], incorporation into these exchange networks likely served to accelerate or accentuate intra-societal dietary variability.

This notion of significant change over the course of the Middle Period itself has and should continue to be explored via the material culture and settlement patterns of the area. In that vein, the observed dietary disjunction at/near 600 calAD would appear to have correlates in other categories of archaeological material. Both Stovel [132] and Gallardo and colleagues [133] have identified significant coeval shifts in patterns of ceramic production and decoration at/near this time that should be further explored in other forms of material culture. These parallel findings illuminate new foci for future research; it would be interesting to examine, for instance, whether 600 calAD represents an inflection point in the intensity, level, or mechanism of foreign presence in, or interactions with, the people of the San Pedro de Atacama oases.

Turning to socio-spatial considerations, our analysis of dietary makeup by ayllu revealed several interesting phenomena. First, while dietary variability was greater at Larache and Quitor and lower at Conde Duque, Coyo, and Tchecar, differences in internal variability among the ayllus decreased to insignificance once temporal differences were accounted for. Put differently, while there were some differences in the level of internal dietary variability among the ayllus, once time was fully considered, none of the ayllus stood out for having a more (or less) clearly internally differentiated cuisine. This could be a consequence of limitations of diet variability at any given time in what is, after all, an ecologically constrained environment. However, the lack of internal dietary variability (a truly internally differentiated cuisine) could also be a feature of emergent, rather than established systems of inequality. Thus, a true internally differentiated internal cuisine might only be expected in locales/cultures with established social hierarchies, such as at Moundville [41], Cahokia [134], Classic Period Oaxaca [135], or during the height of the Inca Empire [136]. Or, as Goody [10] noted to be possible, it could be the case that internally differentiated cuisine failed to appear in spite of the existence of bona fide institutionalized inequality, the former not always requiring the latter.

In contrast, at the level of both raw foodstuff contribution values and date-regressed residuals, the inhabitants of Larache (and to a lesser degree Conde Duque) stand apart from the individuals from the other four ayllus. Larache’s distinctiveness in terms of dietary practice is, perhaps, attributable to the greater presence of non-local individuals among those people interred there. Previous strontium isotope studies [104, 137], have identified Larache as an ayllu with a high percentage of non-local persons, with five of eighteen analyzed individuals possessing strontium signatures indicative of birth/youth spent outside of the San Pedro oases. That four of the five presumptively “foreign” individuals interred at Larache were male, and that the diet of the Larache males is the most distinctive of any ayllu-combination, supports this notion that it is the place of origin and/or continuing maintenance of non-local dietary traditions among a subset of Larache individuals that is driving the observed ayllu-based difference(s).

Larache’s distinctiveness has long been noted, and it was once considered the site of a colony of elite Tiwanaku settlers in the Atacama [102, 138]. While this speaks to an earlier perspective that gave primacy to the role of Tiwanaku in shaping the Atacama oases, our bioarchaeological data more clearly support Larache as “the burial place for a diverse yet culturally integrated and potentially elite and well-connected segment of the Atacameño population” [104], and not a space and people inherently tied to Tiwanaku. Given the interesting results seen in the modeling data, it is perhaps worth considering Martínez’s [139] idea of interdigitated populations instead of assuming a pattern of ethnic enclaving. Using data from the Revisita de Atacama of 1683, Martínez details the interdigitated relationships between Atacama, Lípez, Tucumán, and Chicha regions, noting the significant movement between, and occasionally the permanent settlement of, members of these different groups in each of the other areas [35, 139, 140]. In some cases, the Revisita records over 40% of a population being from outside a given region. While the patterns we note in both strontium and carbon and nitrogen data from San Pedro de Atacama are not so pronounced, the data from Larache do add credibility to the idea that there was an interdigitation of the Atacama oases with neighboring areas long before the colonial incursion. Similarly, it supports the argument that important cultural interactions were not limited to a monolithic engagement with the Tiwanaku polity, but rather with numerous groups scattered across the highlands. If we were to consider the idea of interdigitation more systematically, we might be able to explore hypotheses grounded in dietary and morphological variability and diversity. This cursory consideration of our paleodietary data bear this out with evidence of variety internal to local diet, and more specifically, a varied diet at Larache.

In reference to our third structuring question, sex does not appear to have been a particularly salient driver of observed dietary differences among the Middle Period inhabitants of San Pedro de Atacama. This finding contradicts earlier studies that suggested important differences in access to resources according to sex during the Middle Period [43, 44]. The lack of observed sex-based differences is surprising given that reconstructions of human movement in this period are tied to interregional exchange driven by llama caravans which have been understood, based on ethnographic and ethnohistoric evidence, to be primarily led by male kin [141143], which would lead one to predict that the diets of males should show greater variability (see below). The lack of definitive sex-based differences raises the possibility that diet on these excursions was closely related to diet in the oases, at least as visible isotopically. This is especially true given that most exchange seems to have been focused on other highland communities and not on the more dietarily variable coast.

Importantly, our data suggest that diet—or at least access to particular foodstuffs as we cannot explore differences in quantities of foods—was not necessarily inherently differentiated by sex, notwithstanding our understanding of the breadth of Andean prehistory, which suggests the importance of duality in Andean cosmology. Our data suggest that males and females were not counterpointed in terms of their access to dietary resources in these Atacama populations despite some established sex differences in other practices and material culture distributions [121, 144, 145]. We would, however, note that our results do not entirely preclude the possibility of sex-linked dietary differences on a broader scale, in that females show greater homogeneity of dietary residuals across different ayllus, with their male counterparts exhibiting greater variety and consequently a possible range of different dietary practices (see Fig 17). As concerns this, our analyses are noteworthy, in that only Larache has significant male-female differences in modeled dietary contributions (observed in three of four food groups). Given the foreign origins of many of that ayllu’s males, it is not clear whether the observed modeled differences are a consequence of dietary practices tied to sex or they speak more clearly to distinctions based on place of origin.

Conclusion

In closing, we return to Appadurai’s [9] notion of gastro-politics, and ask whether any of these results could be taken as revealing the dietary dimensions of the construction or maintenance of meaningful institutional social difference within the Middle Period societies of San Pedro de Atacama. While we do not see any de facto evidence for complete dietary differentiation (as there is always overlap in consumption between/among individuals, ayllus, and time periods, and as isotopic analysis is not capable of pinpointing specifically different foods or preparations), there are broad, potentially status-linked, changes in diet over time, with foreignness (and perhaps male-ness) playing a role in determining dietary composition.

The three levels of analysis presented here contribute directly to the recent archaeological and bioarchaeological debates about social organization in San Pedro de Atacama populations during the Middle Period. On a larger level, the analyses across ayllu show a clear diachronic trend in consumption (more C4/CAM plants and more terrestrial meat with time), suggesting a rather uniform increase in status-linked diet, if the literature regarding the sumptuary dimensions of these foods are to be believed. This pattern fits well with the traditional view of the Middle Period in San Pedro de Atacama as a time of increasing social complexity [19, 29, 68], highlighting the regional commonalities among the different ayllus. This temporal shift in diet militates against the existence of a form of zero-sum gastro-politics, in that all diets are improving, irrespective of the inequalities that exist within local societies.

The more focused levels of analysis presented here, however, demonstrate the complexities of trying to define the impact that the emergent local social complexity had on dietary composition. Across all the ayllus, the results do not support a clear pattern of sexual differentiation of diet composition, with a suggestion that male diet may have been more diverse, contrasting with some previous studies of specific cemeteries [43, 60, 61]. Nevertheless, there are exceptions to this on an ayllu by ayllu basis, which adds support to recent discussions about the importance of local identity between ayllus and larger regional heterogeneities [46, 117, 120, 121].

Along this line, in the males of Larache we see potential evidence for the intersection of a sex and origin-based difference in diet given that males, who were more often non-local in origin, consumed more C4/CAM plants and terrestrial meat. Again, if the literature on these classes of foods is to be believed, the distinctiveness of the Larache male diet could be seen as a testament to their higher status/access to prestige resources. That these were non-local individuals, who presumably had more direct access to the long-distance exchange networks for which the Middle Period is known, speaks to their differentiation being a possible manifestation of a network based strategy (a la Blanton et al. [2]), whereby status gained through network connections beyond the local conferred status upon aspirant leaders, who signified/reinforced their positioning through the consumption of different kinds/combinations of food. The richness of the material assemblage from a number of Larache burials (which includes gold keros and other rarities), provides a confirmation of the uniqueness and prestige of this subset of individuals. This may stand as the clearest example of the kinds of “gastro-politics” we set out to identify.

Supporting information

S1 File. R Script for calculation of bivariate correlations when either/both variables have associated uncertainties.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252051.s001

(R)

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without the continued support of the staff of the Instituto de Arqueología y Antropología and the Museo Arqueológico Le Paige of the Universidad Católica del Norte, in particular, M. Arturo Torres and Jimena Cruz. We thank Mariana Ugarte for the design and execution of Fig 1. Finally, the authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of our colleague Sarah Schrader as well as our thoughtful and hard-working student research assistants: Cameron Beason, Brianne Herrera, Rocío López-Barrales, Eva Mann, Evan Mann, Camila Morales-Zuñiga, and Erin K. Smith.

References

  1. 1. Bandy MS. Trade and Social Power in the Southern Titicaca Basin Formative. In: Vaughn KJ, Ogburn DE, Conlee CA, editors. Foundations of Power in the Prehispanic Andes (Archeological Papers, No 14). Washington D.C.: American Anthropological Association; 2004. p. 91–111.
  2. 2. Blanton RE, Feinman GM, Kowalewski SA, Peregrine PN. A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology. 1996;37(1):1–14.
  3. 3. Earle TK. Positioning exchange in the evolution of human society. In: T.G. B, Ericson JE, editors. Prehistoric exchange systems in North America. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. p. 419–37.
  4. 4. Feinman GM. The Emergence of Inequality: A Focus on Strategies and Processes. In: Price TD, Feinman GM, editors. Foundations of Social Inequality. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p. 255–79.
  5. 5. Helms M. Long-distance Contacts, Elite Aspirations, and the Age of Discovery in Cosmological Context. In: Schortman EM, Urban PA, editors. Resources, Power, and Interregional Interaction. New York: Plenum Press; 1992. p. 157–74.
  6. 6. Helms M. Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade and Power. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1993.
  7. 7. Stein GJ. Economy, Ritual, and Power in ‘Ubaid Mesopotamia.’ In: Stein GJ, Rothman MS, editors. Chiefdoms and Early States in the Near East: The Organizational Dynamics of Complexity. Madison, WI: Preshistory Press; 1994. p. 35–46.
  8. 8. Vaughn KJ, Eerkens JW, Kantner J. The Evolution of leadership: Transitions in decision making from small-scale to middle-range societies: School for Advanced Research Press; 2010.
  9. 9. Appadurai A. Gastro-Politics in Hindu South Asia. American Ethnologist. 1981;8(3):494–511.
  10. 10. Goody J. Cooking, Cuisine and Class: A Study in Comparative Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. viii, 253 p. p.
  11. 11. McGinnies WG, Goldman BJ, Paylore P. Deserts of the World. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press; 1968.
  12. 12. Chile DMd. 2019 [Accessed April 23, 2019]. Available from: http://www.meteochile.cl/PortalDMC-web/index.xhtml.
  13. 13. McKay CP, Friedmann EI, Gómez-Silva B, Cáceres-Villanueva L, Andersen DT, Landheim R. Temperature and moisture conditions for life in the extreme arid region of the Atacama Desert: four years of observations including the El Nino of 1997–1998. Astrobiology. 2003;3(2):393–406. pmid:14577886
  14. 14. Moreno A, Santoro CM, Latorre C. Climate change and human occupation in the northernmost Chilean Altiplano over the last ca. 11 500 cal. a BP. Journal of Quaternary Science. 2009;24(4):373–82.
  15. 15. Clarke JD. Antiquity of aridity in the Chilean Atacama Desert. Geomorphology. 2006;73(1–2):101–14.
  16. 16. Dunai T, González G, Juez-Larré J. Oligocene–Miocene age of aridity in the Atacama Desert revealed by exposure dating of erosion-sensitive landforms. Geology. 2005;33(4):321–4.
  17. 17. Maldonado A, de Porra ME, Zamora A, Rivadeneira M, Abarzúa AM. El escenario geográfico y paleoambiental de Chile. In: Falabella F, Uribe M, Sanhueza L, Aldunate C, Hidalgo J, editors. Prehistoria en Chile: Desde sus Primeros Habitantes Hasta Los Incas. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria; 2016. p. 23–70.
  18. 18. Agüero C, Uribe M. Las sociedades Formativas de San Pedro de Atacama: Asentamiento, cronología y proceso. Estudios atacameños. 2011;(42):53–78.
  19. 19. Llagostera A. Los Antiguos Habitantes del Salar de Atacama: Prehistoria Atacameña. Santiago de Chile: Pehuen; 2004.
  20. 20. Llagostera A, Costa Junqueira MA. Patrones de asentamiento en la época agroalfarera de San Pedro de Atacama (norte de Chile). Estudios Atacameños (En línea). 1999;(17):175–206.
  21. 21. Núñez L. Cultura y conflicto en los oasis de San Pedro de Atacama. Santiago de Chile: Ed. Universitaria; 1992.
  22. 22. Núñez L, Grosjean M, Cartajena I. Ocupaciones Humanas y Paleoambientes en la Puna de Atacama. San Pedro de Atacama: Universidad Católica del Norte; 2005.
  23. 23. McRostie V. Arboricultura y silvopastoralismo en el período Formativo (1.400 aC-500 dC) de la cuenca del Salar de Atacama. Chungará (Arica). 2014;46(4):543–57.
  24. 24. Torres-Rouff C, Hubbe M. The sequence of human occupation in the Atacama Oases, Chile: a radiocarbon chronology based on human skeletal remains. Latin American Antiquity. 2013:330–44.
  25. 25. Berenguer J, Román A, Deza A, Llagostera A. Testing a cultural sequence for the Atacama Desert. Current Anthropology. 1988;29(2):341–6.
  26. 26. Le Paige G. El precerámico en la cordillera atacameña y los cementerios del período agro-alfarero de San Pedro de Atacama. Anales de la Universidad del Norte. 1964;3:5–275.
  27. 27. Agüero C. Aproximación al asentamiento humano temprano en los oasis de San Pedro de Atacama. Estudios atacameños. 2005;(30):29–60.
  28. 28. Bravo L, Llagostera A. Solcor 3: Un aporte al conocimiento de la cultura San Pedro. Período 500 al 900 d.C. Chungara: Revista de Antropología Chilena. 1986;(16/17):323–32.
  29. 29. Castro V, Berenguer J, Gallardo F, Llagostera A, Salazar D. Vertiente Occidental Circumpuñena. Desde las sociedades posarcaicas hasta las preincas (ca. 1.500 años a.C. a 1.470 años d.C.). In: Falabella F, Uribe M, Sanhueza L, Aldunate C, Hidalgo J, editors. Prehistoria en Chile: Desde sus Primeros Habitantes Hasta Los Incas. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria; 2016. p. 239–83.
  30. 30. Lechtman HN, Macfarlane AW. La metalurgia del bronce en los Andes sur centrales: Tiwanaku y San Pedro de Atacama. Estudios atacameños. 2005;(30):7–27.
  31. 31. Pimentel G, Montt I, Blanco J, Reyes A, Nielsen A, Rivolta M, et al. Infraestructura y prácticas de movilidad en una ruta que conectó el altiplano boliviano con San Pedro de Atacama (II Región, Chile). Producción y circulación prehispánicas de bienes en el sur andino. 2007.
  32. 32. Salazar D, Figueroa V, Morata D, Milleiv B, Manríquez G, Cifuentes A. Metalurgia en San Pedro de Atacama durante el Período Medio: nuevos datos, nuevas preguntas. 2011.
  33. 33. Abercrombie T. Pathways of memory and power: Ethnography and history among an Andean people. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin; 1998.
  34. 34. Cock G. El ayllu en la sociedad andina: alcances y perspectivas. Etnohistoria y antropología andina. 1981;17:231–53.
  35. 35. Hidalgo Lehuedé J. Redes eclesiáticas, procesos de extirpación de idolatrías y cultos andinos coloniales en Atacama. Siglos XVII y XVIII. Estudios Atacameños. 2011;42:113–51.
  36. 36. Goldstein P. Communities without Borders. The vertical archipelago and diaspora communities in the southern Andes. In: Canuto M, Yaeger J, editors. In Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective,. New York, NY: Routledge; 2000. p. 182–209.
  37. 37. Arnold D. Famine: Social Crisis and Historical Change. New York: Basil Blackwell; 1988.
  38. 38. Ross EB. An Overview of Trends in Dietary Variation from Hunter-Gatherer to Modern Capitalist Societies. In: Harris M, Ross EB, editors. Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1987. p. 7–55.
  39. 39. Gumerman G. Food and Complex Societies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1997;4(2):105–39.
  40. 40. Woolgar C. Fast and feast: conspicuous consumption and the diet of the nobility in the fifteenth century. In: Hicks M, editor. Revolution and Consumption in Late Medieval England. Rochester: Boydell Press,; 2001. p. 7–25.
  41. 41. Jackson HE, Scott SL. Patterns of Elite Faunal Utilization at Moundville, Alabama. American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):552–73.
  42. 42. Pestle WJ, Torres-Rouff C, Pimentel G, Hubbe M. Bounding Middle Period Cemetery Use in San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. Radiocarbon. 2020.
  43. 43. Hubbe M, Torres‐Rouff C, Neves WA, King LM, Da‐Gloria P, Costa MA. Dental health in Northern Chile’s Atacama oases: Evaluating the Middle Horizon (AD 500–1000) impact on local diet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2012;148(1):62–72. pmid:22411074
  44. 44. Neves WA, Costa Junqueira MA. Adult stature and standard of living in the prehistoric Atacama Desert. Current Anthropology. 1998;39:278–81.
  45. 45. Torres‐Rouff C. Hiding inequality beneath prosperity: patterns of cranial injury in Middle Period San Pedro de Atacama, Northern Chile. American journal of physical anthropology. 2011;146(1):28–37. pmid:21710657
  46. 46. Torres‐Rouff C, Hubbe M, Pestle WJ. Wearing the marks of violence: Unusual trauma patterning at Coyo Oriental, Northern Chile. American journal of physical anthropology. 2018;167(1):32–45. pmid:29719045
  47. 47. Ambrose SH. Isotopic Analysis of Paleodiets: Methodological and Interpretive Considerations. In: Sanford MK, editor. Investigation of Ancient Human Tissue Chemical Analyses in Anthropology. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach; 1993. p. 59–130.
  48. 48. Lee-Thorp JA. On Isotopes and Old Bones. Archaeometry. 2008;50(6):925–50.
  49. 49. Hall RL. Those Late Corn Dates: Isotopic Fractionation as a Source of Error in Carbon-14 Dates. Michigan Archaeologist. 1967;13(4):171–80.
  50. 50. van der Merwe NJ, Vogel JC. 13C content of human collagen as a measure of prehistoric diet in woodland North America. Nature. 1978;276:815–6. pmid:364321
  51. 51. Phillips DL. Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique. Oecologia. 2001;127(2):166–70. pmid:24577645
  52. 52. Phillips DL, Gregg JW. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia. 2003;136(2):261–9. pmid:12759813
  53. 53. Moore JW, Semmens BX. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:470–80. pmid:18294213
  54. 54. Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PloS one. 2010;5(3):e9672. pmid:20300637
  55. 55. Parnell AC, Phillips DL, Bearhop S, Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Moore JW, et al. Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. Environmetrics. 2013;24:387–99.
  56. 56. Fernandes R, Millard AR, Brabec M, Nadeau M-J, Grootes P. Food Reconstruction Using Isotopic Transferred Signals (FRUITS): A Bayesian Model for Dietary Reconstruction. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87436. pmid:24551057
  57. 57. Andrade P, Fernandes R, Codjambassis K, Urrea J, Olguín L, Rebolledo S, et al. Subsistence continuity linked to consumption of marine protein in the formative period in the Interfluvic coast of northern Chile: re-assessing contacts with agropastoral groups from highlands. Radiocarbon. 2015;57(4):679–88.
  58. 58. Galván VAK. Models for paleodietary research: Three case-studies from arid and semi-arid environments in Northwest Argentina. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2018;18:608–16.
  59. 59. Pestle WJ, Torres-Rouff C, Gallardo F, Cabello G, Smith EK, Clarot A. The interior frontier: Exchange and interculturation in the Formative period (1000 B.C.-A.D. 400) of Quillagua, Antofagasta region, northern Chile. Quaternary International. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.03.014.
  60. 60. Pestle WJ, Torres-Rouff C, Hubbe M. Modeling Diet in Times of Change: The Case of Quitor, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2016;7:82–93.
  61. 61. Pestle WJ, Torres-Rouff C, Hubbe M, Smith EK. Eating in or Dining out: Modeling Diverse Dietary Strategies in Middle Period San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2017;9(7):1363–77. pmid:28792934
  62. 62. Pinder DM, Gallardo F, Cabello G, Torres‐Rouff C, Pestle WJ. An isotopic study of dietary diversity in formative period Ancachi/Quillagua, Atacama Desert, northern Chile. American journal of physical anthropology. 2019;170(4):613–21. pmid:31429068
  63. 63. Hubbe M, Oviedo M, Torres-Rouff C. El estado de conservación de la colección osteológica Gustavo Le Paige y su contextualización cronológica. Estudios Atacameños. 2011;41:29–44.
  64. 64. Junqueira MAC. Reconstitución física y cultural de la población tardía del cementerio de Quitor-6 (San Pedro de Atacama). Estudios atacameños. 1988;(9):99–126.
  65. 65. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas archaeological survey. Research Series. 1994;(44).
  66. 66. Milner GR, Boldsen JL. Transition analysis: A validation study with known‐age modern American skeletons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2012;148(1):98–110. pmid:22419394
  67. 67. Simon A, Hubbe M. The Accuracy of Age Estimation Using Transition Analysis in the Hamann-Todd Collection. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. In Press.
  68. 68. Núñez L. Vida y Cultura en el oasis de San Pedro de Atacama. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria; 2007.
  69. 69. Longin R. New Method of Collagen Extraction for Radiocarbon Dating. Nature. 1971;230:241–2. pmid:4926713
  70. 70. Pestle WJ. Diet and Society in Prehistoric Puerto Rico, An Isotopic Approach [Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation]: University of Illinois at Chicago; 2010.
  71. 71. Lee-Thorp JA. Stable Carbon Isotopes in Deep Time: The Diets of Fossil Fauna and Hominids. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town; 1989.
  72. 72. Krueger HW. Exchange of Carbon with Biological Apatite. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1991;18:355–61.
  73. 73. Szpak P, Metcalfe JZ, Macdonald RA. Best practices for calibrating and reporting stable isotope measurements in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2017;13:609–16.
  74. 74. Moloughney V, Pinder D, Pestle WJ. Particle Size Matters: The Effect of Particle Size on Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Composition of Bone Hydroxyapatite. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2020;171:718–24. pmid:31943129
  75. 75. Pestle WJ, Crowley BE, Weirauch MT. Quantifying inter-laboratory variability in stable isotope analysis of ancient skeletal remains. PLoS one. 2014;9(7):e102844. pmid:25061843
  76. 76. Pestle WJ, Szpak P. Interlaboratory Error in Archaeological Stable Isotope Analysis. In: Hamilton D, Knudson KJ, Bocherens H, editors. The Routledge Handbook of Bioarchaeology and Isotopes: Routledge; In Press.
  77. 77. Pestle WJ, Hubbe M, Smith EK, Stevenson JM. A Linear Model for Predicting δ13Cprotein. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2015;157(4):694–703. pmid:25820232
  78. 78. Fernandes R, Nadeau M-J, Grootes PM. Macronutrient-based model for dietary carbon routing in bone collagen and bioapatite. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2012;4:291–301.
  79. 79. Ambrose SH. Controlled Diet and Climate Experiments on Nitrogen Isotope Ratios of Rats. In: Ambrose SH, Katzenberg MA, editors. Biogeochemical Approaches to Paleodietary Analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2000. p. 243–59.
  80. 80. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of Diet on the Distribution of Nitrogen Isotopes in Animals. Geochimica et Chosmochimica Acta. 1981;45:341–51.
  81. 81. Hare PE, Fogel ML, Stafford TW, Mitchell AD, Hoering TC. The isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen in individual amino acids isolated from modern and fossil proteins. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1991;18(3):277–92.
  82. 82. Howland MR, Corr LT, Young SMM, Jones V, Jim S, Van Der Merwe NJ, et al. Expression of the dietary isotope signal in the compound-specific 13C values of pig bone lipids and amino acids. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2003;13:54–65.
  83. 83. Sponheimer M, Robinson T, Ayliffe L, Roeder B, Hammer J, Passey B, et al. Nitrogen Isotopes in Mammalian Herbivores: Hair δ15 N Values from a Controlled Feeding Study. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2003;13(1–2):80–7.
  84. 84. Warinner C, Tuross N. Alkaline Cooking and Stable Isotope Tissue-Diet Spacing in Swine: Archaeological Implications. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009;36:1690–7.
  85. 85. Keeling CD, Mook WG, Tans PP. Recent Trends in the 13C/12C Ratio of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Nature. 1979;277:121–3.
  86. 86. Krueger HW, Sullivan CH. Models for Carbon Isotope Fractionation between Diet and Bone. In: Turnlund J, Johnson PE, editors. Stable Isotopes in Nutrition. ACS Symposium Series. 258. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1984. p. 205–22.
  87. 87. Lee-Thorp JA, Sealy JC, van der Merwe NJ. Stable Carbon Isotope Ratio Differences between Bone Collagen and Bone Apatite, and their Relationship to Diet. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1989;16:585–99.
  88. 88. Agriculture USDo. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 27 2013 [cited 2015 October 11]. Available from: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=8964.
  89. 89. Morrison DJ, Dodson B, Slater C, Preston T. 13C natural abundance in the British diet: Implications for 13C breathe tests. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2000;14:1312–24.
  90. 90. Hopkins DT. Effects of variations in protein digestibility. In: Bodwell CE, Adkins JS, Hopkins DT, editors. Protein quality in humans: assessment and in vitro estimation. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing; 1981. p. 178–81.
  91. 91. Tieszen LL. Natural Variation in the Carbon Isotope Values of Plants: Implications for Archaeology, Ecology, and Paleoecology. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1981;18:227–48.
  92. 92. Geesing D, Felker P, Bingham RL. Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development: Implications for global carbon sequestration. Journal of Arid Environments. 2000;46(2):157–80.
  93. 93. Villagra GML, Felker P. Influence of understory removal, thinning and P fertilization on N2 fixation in a mature mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa) stand. Journal of Arid Environments. 1997;36(4):591–610.
  94. 94. Organization WH. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition. Geneva: WHO Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2007.03.009 pmid:17507200
  95. 95. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
  96. 96. Gower JC. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 1966;53(3–4):325–38.
  97. 97. Mead A. Review of the development of multidimensional scaling methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician). 1992;41(1):27–39.
  98. 98. Ambrose SH. Preparation and Characterization of Bone and Tooth Collagen for Isotopic Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1990;17(4):431–51.
  99. 99. Pestle WJ, Colvard M. Bone collagen preservation in the tropics: a case study from ancient Puerto Rico. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2012;39(7):2079–90.
  100. 100. van Klinken GJ. Bone Collagen Quality Indicators for Palaeodietary and Radiocarbon Measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1999;26(6):687–95.
  101. 101. Santana‐Sagredo F, Lee‐Thorp JA, Schulting R, Uribe M. Isotopic evidence for divergent diets and mobility patterns in the Atacama Desert, northern Chile, during the Late Intermediate Period (AD 900–1450). American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2015;156(3):374–87. pmid:25385676
  102. 102. Barón AM. Excavación del Cementerio Larache, Conde Duque en San Pedro de Atacama. In: Rivera M, Kolata A, editors. Tiwanaku: Aproximaciones a sus contextos históricos y sociales. Santiago: Colección Estudios Regionales; 2004. p. 67–98.
  103. 103. Tamblay J. El cementerio Larache, los metales y la estratificación social durante el horizonte Tiwanaku en San Pedro de Atacama. In: Rivera M, Kolata A, editors. Tiwanaku: Aproximaciones a sus contextos históricos y sociales. Santiago: Colección Estudios Regionales; 2004. p. 31–66.
  104. 104. Torres‐Rouff C, Knudson KJ, Pestle WJ, Stovel EM. Tiwanaku influence and social inequality: A bioarchaeological, biogeochemical, and contextual analysis of the Larache cemetery, San Pedro de Atacama, Northern Chile. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2015;158(4):592–606. pmid:26265393
  105. 105. Berenguer J, Deza A, Román A, Llagostera A. La secuencia de Myriam Tarragó para San Pedro de Atacama: Un test por termoluminiscencia. Revista Chilena de Antropologia. 1986;5:17–54.
  106. 106. Le Paige G. Nuevas fechas radiocarbónicas de la zona de San Pedro de Atacama. Estudios Atacameños. 1976;4:145.
  107. 107. Niemeyer H, editor. Congreso Internacional de Arqueología de San Pedro de Atacama 1963.
  108. 108. Núñez L. Recientes fechados radiocarbónicos del norte de Chile. Boletín de la Universidad de Chile [Santiago]. 1966;50(51–56).
  109. 109. Núñez L. Registro regional de fechas radiocarbónicas en el norte de Chile. Estudios Atacameños 1976;4:74–123.
  110. 110. Orellana M. Problemas de la arqueología de San Pedro de Atacama y sus alrededores. Congreso Internacional de Arqueología San Pedro de Atacama. In: Niemeyer H, editor. Congreso Internacional de Arqueología de San Pedro de Atacama/Anales de la Universidad del Norte. 21963. p. 29–45.
  111. 111. Orellana M. Acerca de la cronología del complejo cultural San Pedro de Atacama. Antropología, Universidad de Chile [Santiago]. 1964;2:96–104.
  112. 112. Tarragó M. Contribución al conocimiento arqueológico de las poblaciones de los oasis de San Pedro de Atacama en relación con los otros pueblos puneños, en especial, el sector septentrional del Valle Calchaquí. Rosario, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Rosario; 1989.
  113. 113. Costa Junqueira MA, Alves Neves W, Hubbe M. Influencia de Tiwanaku en la calidad de vida biológica de la población prehistórica de San Pedro de Atacama. Estudios Atacameños. 2004;27:103–16.
  114. 114. Totora Da-Gloria PJ, Alves Neves W, Costa Junqueira MA, Bartolomucci R. Nonspecific Infectious Diseases in Prehistoric San Pedro de Atacama, Northern Chile. Chungará (Arica). 2011;43(1):135–46.
  115. 115. Agüero C. Componente Tiwanaku vs. componente local en los oasis de San Pedro de Atacama. In: Solanilla V, editor. Textiles Andinos: Pasado, Presente y Futuro. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; 2004. p. 180–98.
  116. 116. Agüero C, Uribe M, editors. Rethinking the Tiwanaku phenomenon in San Pedro de Atacama through the study of the textiles of Solcor 3 and their associated contexts (400–1000 AD). Textile Society of America Symposium 2014 Proceedings; 2014; Los Angeles, CA.
  117. 117. Salazar D, Niemeyer H, Horta H, Figueroa V, Manríquez H. Interaction, social identity, agency and change during Middle Horizon San Pedro de Atacama (northern Chile): A multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2014;35:135–52.
  118. 118. Uribe M, Agüero C. Alfarería, textiles y la integración del Norte Grande de Chile a Tiwanaku. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP. 2001;5:397–426.
  119. 119. Uribe M, Agüero C. Iconografía, alfarería y textilería Tiwanaku: elementos para una revisión del período Medio en el Norte Grande de Chile. Chungara Revista de Antropología Chilena. 2004;36:1055–68.
  120. 120. Uribe M, Santana-Sagredo F, Maturana A, Sergio Flores C, Agüero C. San Pedro de Atacama y la Cuestión Tiwanaku en el Norte de Chile: Impresiones a Partir de un Clásico Estudio Cerámico y la Evidencia Bioarqueológica Actual (400–1.000 D.C.). Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena. 2016;48(2):173–98.
  121. 121. Torres-Rouff C, Knudson KJ. Integrating Identities: An Innovative Bioarchaeological and Biogeochemical Approach to Analyzing the Multiplicity of Identities in the Mortuary Record. Current Anthropology. 2017;58(3):381–409.
  122. 122. Torres‐Rouff C, Knudson KJ, Hubbe M. Issues of affinity: Exploring population structure in the middle and regional developments periods of San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2013;152:370–82. pmid:24104607
  123. 123. Bray TL. The Commensal Politics of Early States and Empires. In: Bray TL, editor. The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003. p. 1–13.
  124. 124. Duke GS. Continuity, cultural dynamics, and alcohol: The reinterpretation of identity through chicha in the andes. Identity Crisis: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Identity. 2011:263–72.
  125. 125. Hastorf CA, Johannessen S. Pre-Hispanic Political Change and the Role of Maize in the Central Andes of Peru. American Anthropologist. 1993;95(1):115–38.
  126. 126. Jennings J. La chichera y el patrón: Chicha and the energetics of feasting in the prehistoric Andes. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 2004;14(1):241–59.
  127. 127. Cummins T. Toasts with the Inca. Andean Abstraction and Colonial Images on Quero Vessels. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press; 2002.
  128. 128. McGrew WC. Dominance Status, Food Sharing, and Reproductive Success in Chimpanzees. In: Wiessner P, Schiefenhövel W, editors. Food and the Status Quest: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Providence: Berghahn; 1996. p. 39–46.
  129. 129. DeFrance SD. Zooarchaeology in complex societies: political economy, status, and ideology. Journal of archaeological research. 2009;17(2):105–68.
  130. 130. Berenguer J, Dauelsberg P. El norte grande en la órbita de Tiwanaku (400 a 1200 dC). In: Hidalgo J, Schiappacasse V, Niemeyer H, Aldunate C, Solimano I, editors. Culturas de Chile Prehistoria: Desde sus orígenes hasta los albores de la Conquista. Santiago: Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología / Editorial Andrés Bello; 1989. p. 129–80.
  131. 131. Stovel EM. Patrones funerarios de San Pedro de Atacama y el problema de la presencia de los contextos Tiwanaku. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP. 2001;5:375–95.
  132. 132. Stovel E. Prehistoric Atacameño ceramic styles and chronology reassessed. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena. 2013;45(3):371–85.
  133. 133. Gallardo F, Correa I, Pimentel G, Blanco JF. Consumption consumes: circulation, exchange, and value of San Pedro de Atacama black polished ceramics. Latin American Antiquity. 2017;28(2):252–68.
  134. 134. Ambrose SH, Buikstra JE, Krueger HW. Status and Gender Differences in Diet at Mound 72, Cahokia, Revealed by Isotopic Analysis of Bone. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2003;22(3):217–26.
  135. 135. Haller MJ, Feinman GM, Nicholas LM. Socioeconomic inequality and differential access to faunal resources at El Palmillo, Oaxaca, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica. 2006:39–55.
  136. 136. Cuéllar AM. The archaeology of food and social inequality in the Andes. Journal of Archaeological Research. 2013;21(2):123–74.
  137. 137. Knudson KJ, Torres-Rouff C. Cultural diversity and paleomobility in the Andean Middle Horizon: radiogenic strontium isotope analyses in the San Pedro de Atacama oases of Northern Chile. Latin American Antiquity. 2014:170–88.
  138. 138. Benavente Aninat MA, Massone Mezzano C, Thomas Winter C. Larrache, evidencias atipicas. Tiahuanaco En San Pedro de Atacama?. Chungará (Arica). 1986;16/17:67–73.
  139. 139. Martínez JL. Pueblos del chañar y el algarrobo: Los atacamas en el siglo XVII. Santiago: Dibam; 1998.
  140. 140. Hidalgo Lehuedé J. COMPLEMENTARIDAD ECOLOGICA Y TRIBUTO EN ATACAMA, 1683–1792. Estudios Atacameños. 1984;7:422–42.
  141. 141. Capriles J, Tripcevich N, editors. The Archaeology of Andean Pastoralism. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 2016.
  142. 142. Nielsen A. Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives on Caravan Trade in the South-Central Andes. In: Kuznar L, editor. Ethnoarchaeology of Andean South America: Contributions to Archaeological Method and Theory,. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2001. p. 163–201.
  143. 143. Pimentel G, Rees C, de Souza P, Arancibia L. Viajeros costeros y caravaneros. Dos estrategias de movilidad en el Período Formativo del Desierto de Atacama, Chile. In: Núñez Atencio L, Nielsen A, editors. En Ruta Arqueología, Historia y Etnografía del Tráfico Sur Andino. Córdoba: Encuentro Grupo Editor; 2011. p. 43–81.
  144. 144. Barón AM. Estudio de una población. Chungará (Arica). 1982;9:174–90.
  145. 145. Llagostera A, Torres CM, Costa Junqueira MA. El complejo psicotrópico en Solcor-3 (San Pedro de Atacama). Estudios Atacameños. 1988;9:61–98.