https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-5540
Figures
Abstract
Plantation forestry of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis supplies high-quality raw material for pulp, paper, wood, and energy and thereby reduces the pressures on native forests and their associated biodiversity. Nevertheless, owing to the heterozygosity of the E. urophylla × E. grandis genetic background, germplasm improvement by crossbreeding tends to be inefficient. As an alternative approach, genetic engineering of Eucalyptus can be used to effectively improve germplasm resources. From a strategic standpoint, increasing the plantation productivity and wood quality by transgenic technology has become increasingly important for forest industry. In this study, we established a fluorescence labelling method using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to obtain positive transformed progenies. The positive transformed progenies were easily obtained from the genetically modified population via fluorescence screening. This system can be used as a plant genome site-specific editing tool and may be useful for improving Eucalyptus genetic resources.
Citation: Wang Z, Li L, Ouyang L (2021) Efficient genetic transformation method for Eucalyptus genome editing. PLoS ONE 16(5): e0252011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252011
Editor: Jen-Tsung Chen, National University of Kaohsiung, TAIWAN
Received: July 5, 2020; Accepted: May 8, 2021; Published: May 24, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071780), the Key Project of Basic Research and Applied Research of Guangdong Province (2018KZDXM047), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030307017; 2019A1515010709), the Science and Technology Tackle Key Problem of Guangdong Province (mmkj2020035), and College Students’ innovation and entrepreneurship training program of Guangdong Province (733163: 733164; 733317).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Eucalyptus is a fast growing genus, with high economic value, that is frequently planted over large areas worldwide (over 20 million hm2) [1]. Eucalyptus was introduced in China over 120 years ago. It remains a frequently-planted tree in 17 provinces (regions) of China, with a yearly timber yield of over 40 million m3. In addition, Eucalyptus provides more than 50% of the raw materials for pulpwood in China, making it an important afforestation tree species for maintaining timber safety in this country [2,3]. In addition, Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis, a hybrid species characterized by rapid growth and strong stress resistance, covers the largest cultivated area in China.
Over the recent years, as man-made Eucalyptus forests continue to expand, insect pests and plant diseases have been identified as leading factors limiting the development of man-made Eucalyptus forests [4]. The conventional chemical control has considerable side effects on the environment and ecological safety [5]. Eucalyptus breeding using modern biotechnologies such as transgenic technology can compensate for the shortcomings of conventional breeding technologies, shorten breeding cycles, and accelerate the breeding process in high-quality and highly resistant new cultivar [6]. In particular, investigating the functions of Eucalyptus-associated genes using CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9) technology is very important for improving and studying the functional genes in Eucalyptus [7]. One prerequisite for successful genetic engineering in Eucalyptus is establishing an efficient genetic transformation system. Genetic transformation of Eucalyptus usually uses non-single-cell calli as the explants, most of which are chimeras after transformation. The common method for screening resistance buds using antibiotics is extremely inefficient, and its accuracy is low. Currently, only a few studies have focused on finding an efficient genetic transformation system for Eucalyptus [4,8,9].
Successful A. tumefaciens- mediated transformation in most plants depends on the effectiveness of appropriate selection conditions. mCherry is a red fluorescent protein extracted from mushroom coral. mCherry is usually used to label and trace molecules and cellular components. Gao et al. [10] cloned mCherry close to the At2S3 promoter expressed in the T0 seed coat of Arabidopsis to screen for positively transformed progenies, implementing efficient screening of transformants at an early stage of T0 plant transformation, thereby greatly improving work efficiency. This study used the efficient transformation system of E. urophylla × E. grandis established in our previous studies [4,11] to optimize parameters for genetic transformation of E. urophylla × E. grandis by orthogonal experiments [12]. mCherry was used as the fluorescence screening marker to examine positively transformed progenies, which laid a foundation for genetic improvement of CRISPR/Cas9 technology and studying relevant gene functions of E. urophylla × E. grandis. The selectable marker mCherry screening transformation method that can be used for future genome editing programs in Eucalyptus.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
E.urophylla × E. grandis DH32-29 aseptic seedlings were provided by the Eucalyptus Research and Development Center of the National Forestry Bureau.
Strains and plasmids
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3102 and competent cells of Escherichia coli DH5α were purchased from Guangzhou Dingguo Biology. pHDE-mCherry and pHDE-Cas9 plasmids were a kind gift from Professor Zhao, University of California, San Diego.
Primer design and synthesis
Primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 software based on the 35S and mCherry genetic sequences of the pHDE-mCherry template plasmid, and the sequences were analyzed using DNAStar software. All the primers were synthesized by Shengon Biotech (Shanghai) (Table 1).
Construction of the recombinant plasmid pHDE/Cas9-35S-mCherry
Plasmid pHDE-mCherry [13] containing 35S or mCherry was used as the template to amplify 35S or the fluorescence screening marker mCherry gene, respectively. PCR conditions was predenaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 45 s), total extension at 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products of 35S and mCherry were used as the templates to perform fusion PCR amplification using the forward primer 35S-F of promoter 35S and reverse primer mCherry-R of mCherry; thus, a full-length segment of 35S + mCherry was obtained. The obtained segment was tested by electrophoresis, then recollected from the gel (DNA gel extraction kit from Tiangen Biochemistry Company, Beijing). Homologous recombination was performed for this segment and the restriction endonuclease EcoRI-digested (Shengon Biotech, Shanghai) pHDE-Cas9 plasmid to form a recombinant plasmid pHDE/Cas9-35S-mCherry, and competent cells of E. coli DH5αwere transformed. The E. coli transformation protocol was according to the instructions of the kit (Shengon Biotech, Shanghai). After PCR verification of the recombinant plasmids, samples of positive recombinant plasmids were sent for sequencing. PCR conditions was predenaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 45 s), total extension at 72°C for 2 min. The components for vector construction are shown in Fig 1.
U6-26P and U6-29P are the promoters of two gRNAs, respectively. 35S is the promoters of Cas9, and 35S is the promoters driving of mCherry gene.
Preparation and transformation of engineering bacterial solution
The recombinant cloning vector pHDE/Cas9-35S-mCherry was transferred into A. tumefaciens using the freeze-thaw method. When the concentration of bacterial solution OD600 was about 0.6, 1 mL bacterial solution was transferred into 50 mL fresh liquid culture medium without antibiotics and incubated at 28°C for 3~5 h. When OD600 of bacterial solution reached 0.3~0.6, the bacterial solution was transferred to a 2 mL centrifuge tube for centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 1 min. The bacteria at the bottom of the centrifuge tube were re-suspended using 1 mL of MS [14] liquid medium. The re-suspended bacterial solution was diluted 20 times with suspension culture medium—the same engineering bacterial solution used in the transformation.
Orthogonal experimental design of the genetic transformation system
Five parameters affecting the transformation efficiency were determined based on a literature report [15], including pre-culture days (d), concentration of bacterial solution, pH value of infection solution, infection time, and co-culture days (d). The L16 (45) orthogonal design (Table 2) was applied. There were 16 treatments with five duplicate culture dishes in each treatment, and 20 explants (stem segments (4–8 mm) were excised from aseptic seedlings) in each culture dish. The experiment was conducted based on the data in the Table 2. Pre-culturing, co-culturing, and selective induction of adventitious buds were performed for 30 d, then the induction rate of adventitious buds was calculated using the following formula: Induction rate of adventitious buds = (number of explants with bud differentiation/ number of total explants) ×100%.
The co-cultured explants were then transferred to 200 mg·L-1 of cephalosporins (Cef) selective differentiation medium, and the culture medium was replaced every 7~10 d. After transferring 2~3 times, Cef concentration in the culture medium was gradually reduced, and the buds that were growing poorly were eliminated. Adventitious buds with good growth were inoculated to the elongated medium. Adventitious buds that had elongated to 2~3 cm were cut off and planted in rooting medium to induce adventitious roots. Acclimatization and transplantation were performed when the seedlings had 5~10 stout adventitious roots about 5 cm long. The composition of the medium in each stage was referred to Ouyang [4].
Visual screening of the transformed progenies
A fluorescence microscope was used to examine transformed progenies carrying mCherry (Excitation wavelength is 587 nm). The adventitious buds with red fluorescence were screened, isolated, and cultured separately for subsequent molecular identification.
Detection of transgenic plants
Leaf DNA from E. urophylla × E. grandis intended for transformation was extracted using the CTAB method [16]. Cas9 identification primers were designed using Cas9 genetic sequences in the transformed plasmids. PCR identification of Cas9 was performed using the forward primer Cas9-F and reverse primer Cas9-R on plants with positive progenies identified during morphological screening (the adventitious buds with red fluorescence). PCR conditions was predenaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 45 s), total extension at 72°C for 2 min.
Statistical analysis
The experimental design was completely randomized with five replicates of twenty explants. The values used for statistical analysis were the means obtained for each treatment. The treatment effects were analysed by ANOVA and means were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test (α = 0.05). All percentage data were subjected to arc-sine transformation prior to run ANOVA with SAS/STAT® software [17].
Results
Construction of recombinant pHDE/Cas9-35S-mCherry
mCherry (200 bp) and 35S promoter gene (450 bp) were amplified by PCR using pHDE-mCherry plasmid as the template (Fig 2A). The PCR products in the first cycle were recollected from the gel, then used as templates for overlapping PCR. Electrophoresis of the PCR products yielded a single band 500–750 bp long (Fig 2B), which is consistent with the size of “35S+mCherry”.
A. PCR product of mCherry and 35S segment. B. Amplification of the “35S+mCherry” target. C. PCR product of recombinant plasmid pHDE-35S-mCherry. M: 2000bp DNA marker; 1–8: PCR of the recombinant plasmids; 9: Negative control; 10: Positive control.
Consequently, amplified target segment “35S+mCherry” and EcoRI-digested pHDE-Cas9 plasmid were used to transform the competent cells after homologous recombination, which were then incubated in adventitious buds induction medium for transformation screening. Consequently, eight single colonies were randomly selected for liquid culturing. PCR detection of the bacterial solution was performed with the cultured bacterial solution as the template; 35S-F and mCherry-R were used as primers. The results showed 100% positive amplification (Fig 2C). The positive recombinant plasmids were then sent to Sangon Biotech (Guangzhou) for sequencing. The sequencing results were analyzed using DNAStar software. The results revealed that there were no abnormalities in the sequences corresponding to the peak, and no mutations at any base, which were consistent with the expected sequences. Therefore, recombinant vector pHDE-35S-mcherry was successfully constructed.
Induction of calli after transformation
Table 3 shows that the following factors were significantly different: the viability of the calli formed by treatment with different pre-culture time, OD values of the bacterial solution, pH values of the infection solution, infection time, and co-culture time. Among these, the viability was high when using combinations 1 (A1B1C1D1E1), 7 (A2B3C4D1E2), and 8 (A2B4C3D2E1). Moreover, the viability of the calli affected the induction rate of adventitious buds to some extent. Therefore, preliminary analysis of the induction rate for the calli was conducive to subsequent experiments.
Induction of adventitious buds after transformation
Intuitive analysis of data (Table 4) showed that the differentiation rates of adventitious buds varied when applying different treatment conditions (different pre-culture time, OD values of the bacterial solution, pH values of the infection solution, infection time and co-culture time). Among them, combination 10 (A3B2C4D3E1) was the best combination, and the differentiation rate of the adventitious rate was 64.36%. The positive rate in fluorescence identification (proportion of fluorescent buds to all adventitious buds) was 54.7% Among the range analysis results, the effects of the five factors on the transformation results were co-culture time (d), infection time (h), concentration of bacterial solution (OD600), pre-culture time (d), and pH value of infection solution in descending order. The following combination of buds transformed the quickest: A3B1C4D3E1 with a pre-culture time of 6 d, concentration of bacterial solution (OD600) of 0.3, infection solution with pH 5.8, infection time of 2.0 h, and co-culture time of 2 d.
Analysis of variance for the orthogonal experiments
Analysis of variance (Table 5) revealed that the pre-culture time, OD value of the bacterial solution, pH value of the injection solution, infection time, and co-culture time had significant impact on the differential induction of adventitious buds after genetic transformation; nevertheless, the effects of co-culture time were the greatest.
Results of fluorescence identification for adventitious buds
The induced adventitious buds that grew on the explants were screened using a fluorescence microscope. Significant red fluorescence was visible in some adventitious buds under the excitation light at a wavelength of 580 nm (Fig 3A), while no fluorescence was detected in control adventitious buds that were not transformed (Fig 3D). The percentages of adventitious buds with fluorescence were counted (Table 4).
(A-C) Transgenic adventitious buds; D: Non-transgenic control; Panels A-C show the red fluorescence of the transformant plant tissues and Panel D shows the non-transformed buds.
Detection of Cas9 gene in transgenic plants.
Amplification results for the Cas9 gene in the plants intended for transformation are shown in Fig 4. The genome of randomly selected plants intended for transformation showed that the Cas9 gene could be amplified to a length of about 1100 bp, but the same segment in non-transgenic plants could not, which is consistent with previous adventitious buds fluorescence results (Fig 3A).
M: DL2000bp DNA Marker; Electrophoresis lanes 1–12: Plants to be transformed; 13: Template of positive plasmids; 14: Non-transgenic plants.
Discussion
Factors affecting genetic transformation of E. urophylla × E. grandis
Transgenic technology is a common method for improving the quality of Eucalyptus. Nevertheless, the key to a successful Eucalyptus transgenesis is to establish a relevant tissue culture and regeneration system, as well as a genetic transformation system. We previously established an efficient regeneration system for E. urophylla × E. grandis [18,19]. So far, only a few studies have examined the genetic transformation system of E. urophylla × E. grandis [4]. Thus, it is very important to establish optimized a genetic transformation system based on the factors affecting the genetic transformation of plant explants.
Numerous factors may affect the genetic transformation rate of plant explants, including plant type and physiological state, explant genotype, genetic transformation methods, type of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, culturing conditions, and screening concentration of resistance factors [18]. In addition, the transformation of plant cells using A. tumefaciens involves a series of complex processes, including the adhesion of A. tumefaciens to the plant cells; activating the signaling molecules released by the plant cells on the A. tumefaciens vir gene; and transfer, integrate, and express T-DNA in the nuclear genome of plant cells [20,21]. This study used orthogonal experiments to optimize the following parameters for genetic transformation: pre-culture time, OD value of bacterial solution, pH value of infection solution, infection time, and co-culture time. Moreover, a genetic transformation system in E. urophylla × E. grandis was establishedwith the positive rate of fluorescence identification of up to about 42%.
In our study, the transformation parameters were optimized using orthogonal experiments. Different explants were obtained after 6 d of pre-culture, and embryogenic calli were formed. Meanwhile, A. tumefaciens easily binds to the dividing cells, improving the transformation efficiency. After 6 d of pre-culture, explant wounds healed and bell-like protrusions on both ends formed, thus reducing the damage from A. tumefaciens and browning deaths on the explants; this, in turn, facilitated the differentiation of resistant buds. Previous studies have demonstrated that pre-culturing can promote cell division during the A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation of plant explants by exogenous genes. In addition, it is easier for cells with vigorous division to integrate exogenous DNA, thus improving the transformation rate of exogenous genes [4]. Mezghani et al. [22] observed cell division and tissue differentiation within the wound of the explants 4 d after pre-culture, which is the time when the ability of cells to accept exogenous DNA is the strongest. Furthermore, studies have shown that pre-culture can enhance the tolerance of explants to infection by A. tumefaciens, and reduce the damage of explants by A. tumefaciens during the transformation process [23,24].
The effects of time needed for co-culture is also important for the transformation. Co-culture can prevent A. tumefaciens from affecting explant vitality due to excessive growth, and reduce the degree of damage on the explants due to long-time contacting of A. tumefaciens. In addition, a suitable amount of co-culture time can also avoid reduction in transformation rate due to insufficient contact between A. tumefaciens and the explants [11]. In this study, a co-culture was performed for 2 d during the process of genetic transformation of E. urophylla × E. grandis. This was long enough for A. tumefaciens to fully integrate into the differentiated cells of the explants, which further reduced the percentage of false positive plants, thus improving the transformation rate. Infection time and concentration of bacterial solution also had certain effects on the transformation. Suitable infection time and concentration of bacterial solution can avoid the toxic effects of A. tumefaciens on the plant cells, and also implement sufficient contact between bacterial solution and the explants, thus increasing the transformation rate. In the present study, the induction rate of resistant adventitious buds was highest after 2 h of infection when the concentration of the A. tumefaciens solution (OD600) was 0.3.
Application of screening marker genes in the efficient transformation system of Eucalyptus
Successful A. tumefaciens- mediated transformation in most plants depends on the effectiveness of appropriate selection conditions. The antibiotic is widely used as a selectable marker; therefore, its sensitivity should be determined at the initial stages of the development of a plant transformation system in which a antibiotic resistance gene is used [25]. But antibiotic screening is easy to produce false positive. So, antibiotic screening is less efficient. mCherry is a monomeric red fluorescent protein that absorbs light between 540–590 nm and emits light at 550–650 nm. mCherry is tolerant to photobleaching, and its fluorescence is very stable. mCherry is usually used to label and trace molecules and cellular components. Compared to other fluorescent proteins, mCherry has excellent photostability, which is why it has been extensively applied in biological studies and preclinical work [26]. In this study, we cloned the mCherry close to promoter 35S (a strong promoter commonly used in plant transformation) to examine the gene transformation efficiency.
Our data revealed different positive rates of fluorescence identification under different transformation conditions, and the positive rate showed a positive linear relationship with the percentage of resistance buds. Studies have shown that the occurrence of embryoid bodies is usually caused by a single cell. Therefore, fewer chimeras are obtained through transformation in the transgenic plants. So, selectable marker mCherry screening is efficient. There is no previous article on this method of screening markers. This system can be used as a plant genome site-specific editing tool and may be useful for improving Eucalyptus genetic resources. The transformation rate can greatly improve, and the percentage of chimeras can be reduced if an embryogenic transformation system is established. Regenerated plants can be obtained via the regeneration way of the embryoid bodies in future studies.
Acknowledgments
Lejun Ouyang was responsible for the experimental design, Zechen Wang and Limei Li were in charge of the experiment. Lejun Ouyang finished writing the manuscript.
References
- 1. Francisco D. L. T, Rodríguez Ruth, Jorge G., Villar B., Álvarez-Otero Rosa, Grima-Pettenati J., et al. Genetic transformation of eucalyptus globulus using the vascular-specific egccr as an alternative to the constitutive camv35s promoter. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 2014. 117(1): 77–84.
- 2. Sh Chen, Zheng J, Liu X. A hundred years of developmental history and cultivation technology for Chinese eucalyptus [J]. World Forestry Research, 2018, (1):37–45.
- 3. Huang ZH, Li LR, Zhong ZQ, Shen JL, Li H. Transcriptional characteristics of the 8 man-made promoters in the leaf tissues of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2019, 47(4): 21–23.
- 4. Ouyang LJ, Li LM. Effects of an inducible aiiA gene on disease resistance in Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis. Transgenic Research, 2016, 25(8):441–452. pmid:26905275
- 5. Li LM, Ouyang LJ, Gan SM. Towards an Efficient Regeneration Protoctl for Eucalyptus Urophylla[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2015, 27(3): 289–297.
- 6. Giri C.C., Shyamkumar B., Anjaneyulu C. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology to trees: an overview [J]. Trees, 2004, 18:115–135.
- 7. Liu HH, Zhang YA, Wang YZ, Zeng BS, Liu Q, Zhang Z. Genomic editing of the Wnt-1 gene of the American white moth [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(3): 119–127.
- 8. Sha Y E, Ouyang L J, Peng Sh, Huang Zh, Chen X B, Zeng F H. Advances in research on regeneration and genetic transformation of eucalyptus embryoid bodies[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2012, 48 (4): 325–332.
- 9. Ouyang LJ, Wang ZC, Li LM, Chen BL. Physiological parameters and differential expression analysis of N-phenyl-N′-[6-(2-chlorobenzothiazol) -yl]urea-induced callus of Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis[J], Peer J, 2020.3.13: pmid:32206452
- 10. Gao X., Chen J., Dai X., Zhang D., Zhao Y. An effective strategy for reliably isolating heritable and Cas9-free Arabidopsis mutants generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing[J]. Plant Physiology, 2016, 171(3): 1794–1800. pmid:27208253
- 11. Ouyang L. J, He WH, Huang ZC, Zhao LY. Introduction of the Rs-AFP2 gene into Eucalyptus urophylla for resistance to Phytophthora capsici[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2012, 24: 198–208.
- 12. Kuo HC, Wu JL. A new approach with orthogonal array for global optimization in design of experiments[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2009, 44: 563–578.
- 13. Li LM, Zhang T., Ouyang LJ, Chen ZY, Chen KZ, Liu YL, et al. Construction of CRISPR vector of Eucalyptus grandis CTX gene family by pHDE-Cas9. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(3), 411–417.
- 14. Murashige T. and Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologa Plantarum, 1962,15:473–497.
- 15. Bassler Bonnie L., Wright Miriam, Silverman Michael R. Multiple signaling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway[J]. Mol Microbial, 1994,13: 273–286. pmid:7984107
- 16. Guertler Patrick, Harwardt Andrea, Eichelinger Adelina, Muschler Paul, Goerlich Ottmar, Busch Ulrich, Development of a CTAB buffer-based automated gDNA extraction method for the surveillance of GMO in seed[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2013, 236 (4):599–606.
- 17.
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STATÒ User’s Guide. Version 6.0, Ed. 4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. 1997.
- 18. Ouyang LJ, Huang Z C, Sha Y E, Zhao L Y. Regeneration of Eucalyptus urophylla ×Eucalyptus grandis from clonal material stem segments[J]. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2012, 55(3): 329–334.
- 19. Ouyang LJ, Y, Sha YE, Huang Zh, Zeng F H. Study on embryoid induction and callus difference of Eucalyptus urophylla ×Eucalyptus grandis[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 1345–1351.
- 20.
Wang G, Fang H. Plant Genetic Engineering (Second Edition) [M]. 2002, Beijing: Science Press.
- 21. Kong H, Guo A, Guo Y, Liu E P. Establishment of U6 genetic transformation and regeneration system of Eucalyptus urophylla ×Eucalyptus grandis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2008, 29(4): 424–429.
- 22. Mezghani N., Jemmali A., Elloumi N., Gargouri-Bouzid R., Kintzios S. Morpho-histological study on shoot bud regeneration in cotyledon cultures of pepper (Capsicum annuum L) [J]. Biologia Bratislava, 2007, 62(6): 704–710.
- 23. Prakash MG, Gurumurthi K, Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants from precultured cotyledon and hypocotyl explants of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. In Vitro- Cell Dev Biol Plant, 2009,45:429–434.
- 24. Silva ALL, Oliveira Y, Costa JL, Mudry CS, Procopiuk M, Scheidt GN, et al. Preliminary results for genetic transformation of shoot tip of Eucalyptus saligna Sm. via Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. J Biotecnol Biodivers, 2011, 2:1–6.
- 25. Escandon AS, Hahne G. Genotype and composition of culture medium are factors important in the selection for transformed sunflower (Helianthus annuus) callus. Physiol Plant, 1991, 81:367–376.
- 26. Yu Y, Liu JX, Zhou MQ, Zhao LF, Wang C. Construction and localized expression of mCherry expression vector for plant genetic research [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017 (2): 35–38.