https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-0397
Figures
Abstract
The problem of soil degradation has accentuated over recent decades. Aspects related to soil erosion and its relation to changes in land use as well as anthropogenic influence constitute a topic of great interest. The current study is focused on a soil erosion assessment in relation to land use activities in the Pănăzii Lake catchment area. Fallout radionuclides were used to provide information on soil erosion as well as redistribution rates and patterns. Variations in the sedimentation rate of the lake were also investigated as these reflect periods in which massive erosion events occurred in the lake catchment area. The novelty of this study is the construction of a timescale with regard to the soil erosion events to better understand the relationship between soil erosion and land use activities. In this study, 10 soil profiles and one sediment core from the lake were taken. Soil parameters were determined for each sample. The activities of 210Pb, 137Cs and 226Ra were measured by gamma spectroscopy. For low 210Pb activities, measurements via 210Po using an alpha spectrometer were performed. Soil erosion rates were determined by the 137Cs method and the sedimentation rate calculated by the Constant Rate of Supply (CRS) model. A soil erosion rate of 13.5 t·ha-1·yr-1 was obtained. Three distinct periods could be observed in the evolution of the sedimentation rate. For the first period, between 1880 and 1958, the average deposition rate was 9.2 tons/year, followed by a high deposition period (1960–1991) of 29.6 tons/year and a third period, consisting of the last 30 years, during which the sedimentation rate was 15.7 tons/year. These sedimentation rates fluctuated depending on the main land use activity, which can also be seen in the soil erosion rates that had almost doubled by the time agricultural activities were performed in the area.
Citation: Begy R-C, Savin CF, Kelemen S, Veres D, Muntean O-L, Malos CV, et al. (2021) Investigation of the effect of anthropogenic land use on the Pănăzii Lake (Romania) catchment area using Cs-137 and Pb-210 radionuclides. PLoS ONE 16(6): e0251603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251603
Editor: Tim A. Mousseau, University of South Carolina, UNITED STATES
Received: February 16, 2021; Accepted: April 28, 2021; Published: June 17, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Begy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding: We acknowledge support from the projects TKP2020-IKA-07 project financed under the 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020 Thematic Excellence Program by the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary (T. Kovacs) and PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016-0814 entitled “Studies on the effects of land use changes on soil erosion and increased sedimentation using radionuclides” National Research program (R-Cs. Begy) and EEA-RO-NO-2018-0126 entitled “Cave deposits as archives of climate and environmental changes. A Center of Excellence in speleological research”, The Romanian – EEA Research Program. (R-Cs. Begy). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The investigation of the historical evolution of erosion processes, caused by different types of land management politics, and the long-term roles they play in the evolution of landscapes as well as socioeconomic dynamics is nowadays one of the main research topics in soil science worldwide [1, 2]. In Europe, in the second half of the nineteenth century, soil degradation became an accentuated and well-known problem that required the development of suitable soil management politics [3]. As a result, in 1988, the “European Society for Soil Conservation” (ESSC) was founded in Leuven (Belgium), which was comprised of scientists from ten different countries [4]. European countries are currently showing significant interest in soil erosion research with many scientific papers concerning this subject being published over recent decades [5]. The research takes into account all aspects related to soil erosion and their relation to soil properties, climatic factors, land use changes and anthropic influence [6, 7].
In Romania, the first study concerning soil erosion which was published in the international scientific literature is a report that describes the geographical characteristics of Romania in 1975 [8]. A real interest with regard to the investigation of soil erosion and management in Romania started in the 90’s. According to the study, a potential factor which can increase soil erosion is privatization because erosion may accelerate as a result of crop farming and overgrazing on steep hills with thin soils [9]. Erosion processes in sub-basins and on slopes as well as the effects of anti-erosion protection were also investigated at the time in the Valea Largă basin [10]. The amount of research and the number of publications concerning soil erosion started to grow in the year 2000.
Soil erosion can be assessed in different ways. Fallout radionuclides can be used to provide information on soil erosion and redistribution rates as well as patterns. The potential for using fallout radionuclides in soil erosion studies has been clearly demonstrated by many studies from different parts of the world [11–18] including in Romania [19, 20].
The most used radionuclides for this purpose are 137Cs (T1/2 = 30.17 y), 210Pb (T1/2 = 22.3 y) and 7Be (half-life≈53 days). 137Cs is an artificial radionuclide that originated from nuclear weapons testing and nuclear power plant accidents. 210Pb is a natural radionuclide from the 238U decay chain, in the soil surface, it has two sources of provenience. In soil, 226Ra disintegrates and produces 222Rn, a proportion of the radon produced escapes into the atmosphere and, after the disintegration of its short-lived daughter elements, yields 210Pb with a half-life of 22.3 years. This fraction of 210Pb falls back onto the soil surface and represents the excess quantity or atmospheric component of the total 210Pb. The other proportion of the 222Rn gas produced disintegrates inside the soil and produces in situ 210Pb, which is considered to be in equilibrium with its parent, 226Ra. Compared to the in-situ generated 210Pb, the airborne deposition is significantly higher. 7Be is a cosmogenic radionuclide and its global average production rates (atoms cm−2 s−1) are 0.041 (7Be) and 0.018 (10Be) in the stratosphere as well as 0.027 (7Be) and 0.018 (10Be) in the troposphere for the solar minimum [21]. By measuring the surface distribution of the mentioned radionuclides, the soil redistribution and erosion rates can be estimated. In this manner, 137Cs was used in the present study.
The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was first developed in the late 1950s by scientists from the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and Purdue University [22]. During the 1960s and 1970s, the equation was revised and updated before being renamed as the RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) by a group of scientists from different U.S. institutions and universities [23].
With advancements in the field of information technology, especially GIS (Geographic Information System), the USLE model was adapted and used in a specific GIS environment [24].
The aim of this study is to examine and place on a timescale the effects of land use (grazing, roads and agriculture) on soil erosion using 137Cs and 210Pb radionuclides. The catchment area of the natural Pănăzii Lake was chosen to be the site for the construction of a timescale for erosion process events. Variations in the sedimentation rate reflect the periods during which massive erosion took place within the catchment area of the lake. By applying the radionuclide distribution model, eroded sites and areas where soil accumulates can be revealed in the studied area.
In the current study, the USLE model was used in a GIS environment according to the methodology described by several studies [24–27].
Materials and methods
Study site
Tăul Pănăzii is situated in the western part of the Târnavelor Tableland, a subunit of the Transylvanian Depression (Fig 1). The area is dominated by pastures and arable land, the latter has gradually been abandoned over recent years, thus is converting back into pasture. As a result of land abandonment, the area covered by scrub is also increasing. There are no other major types of land use in the vicinity of the lake. Situated at an elevation of 360 m, the lake covers an area of approximately 1 ha. Drainage occurs to the north towards Pănăzii Creek. Being situated in an agricultural area, this water is consumed by livestock, e.g. sheep and cattle. The catchment area is small and the lake has no direct influx of water from streams. The catchment area of the lake, which was used for agricultural and grazing activities, is 1.2 km2 and its surface area is 0.016 km2. The position and environmental characteristics in the studied area are suitable for the modeling of anthropogenic land-use erosion processes.
To investigate the topological effects on soil erosion rates, a map was constructed to represent the gradient and length of the slope with regard to the investigated zone (Fig 2):
Soil and sediment sampling
No specific permissions were required for the soil and sediment sampling in the catchment area of Pănăzii Lake, as it is not a protected area or private property. No endangered or protected species were involved in the present study.
From the catchment area of Pănăzii Lake, 10 soil profiles and one sediment core from the lake were taken. The soil profiles contained nine short columns (50 cm in depth and sliced into segments 5 or 10 cm in length) and one large one. From the reference site, a column 70 cm in depth sliced into segments 5 cm in length was taken. The short columns are considered as bulk samples. For the study to be representative, two soil sampling lines (paths) from the western part of the catchment area were chosen. The aforementioned sampling line started from two points of the highest latitude on the western part of the catchment area and finished close to the lake at the lowest latitude. From the P1 sampling line, 4 separate columns were taken of between 30 and 50 cm in length. The distance between the sampling points in the P1 sampling line was around 50 cm. The P2 sampling line was drawn in a similar way from 5 different points and the distance between the points was approximately 80 cm (Fig 2).
The reference point was chosen to be a flat area at the highest altitude, where soil erosion is as low as possible. All soil columns were taken using a stainless steel tube with an internal diameter of 5 cm.
One sediment core was extracted from Pănăzii Lake using a gravity corer with an internal diameter of 6 cm and a length of 75 cm. The sediment column was sliced into segments 1 and 2 cm in length.
Laboratory analyses
Soil properties.
For measuring the soil pH, a calibrated pH meter was used and the measurements carried out in a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil/distilled water mixture [28]. To categorize the soil according to its organic matter content, Loss On Ignition (LOI) measurements were carried out on each soil column. The soil slices were dried in a drying oven at 105°C to eliminate the remaining water content before being incinerated at 350°C to eliminate the soil organic matter (SOM). After this procedure, only the non-organic matter (non-OM) and carbonates remained in the samples. Once these steps had been completed, the samples were weighed and the parameters calculated. The organic matter content is given by the difference between the weights of the non-organic matter and the dried soil sample [29–31]. Soil particle size analyses were made using a hydrometer analysis method [32, 33]. The particle size fractions obtained were <4 μm (clay), 4–63 μm (silt) and > 63 μm (sand).
Radionuclide measurements.
The soil and sediment samples were oven dried at 105 ˚C to a constant weight before being ground and sieved through a 2-mm mesh sieve. Each sample was packed in a plastic sample tube 50 mm in length and 10 mm in diameter before being sealed with aluminum tape to prevent the 222Rn from escaping from the sample matrix. After being stored for a month (to reach an equilibrium between 226Ra and 222Rn together with its short half-life radionuclides), the measurements were carried out by using a Well-type High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometric system (ORTEC GWL-120-15 detector with a resolution of 2.08 keV for 1.33 MeV 60Co and 1.1 keV for 122 keV 57Co gamma lines). The measurement time in all cases was in excess of 48 hours which was necessary in order to obtain good counting statistics and reach the required maximum ±10% uncertainty in two-sigma confidence intervals. The 46 keV and 661 keV gamma energies were used to determine 210Pb and 137Cs, while 226Ra was determined by using the 294 keV and 351 keV gamma energies of 214Pb. To calculate the activity, the relative method was used by keeping the same geometry and matrix between the sample and the certified reference materials (IAEA-312, 327 and 385). The detection limits for 210Pb, 137Cs and 226Ra were 7, 0.3 and 0.5 Bq/kg, respectively.
In some cases, the low activity of 210Pb can make precise measurements difficult. In the lake sediment, it was necessary to use alpha spectrometry for the determination of 210Pb because of the small quantity of the sample. The total 210Pb was determined via 210Po, these two elements reach secular equilibrium after 2 years. To 0.5g of each sample, 0.3 ml (100 mBq/ml) 209Po was added as a tracer, then each sample was treated with 2 ml HF and 5 ml HNO3. After 24 hours, boric acid was added to neutralize HF. By adding 10 ml HNO3, the acidic digestion of the samples was continued by using mineral acids (HNO3, HCl and H2O2). The volume of the resultant solution was increased to 100 ml and the pH adjusted by between 0.1 and 0.3. The 210Po source was prepared by spontaneous deposition on high nickel content stainless steel discs [34]. The 210Po sources were then measured using an ORTEC SOLOIST alpha spectrometer system with Ultra ENS-U900 detectors as well as an active surface area of 900 mm2 and a resolution greater than 29 keV. The minimum detectable activity for 210Po is 750 mBq/kg.
Calculation of soil redistribution and sediment accumulation rates.
Soil redistribution rates can be calculated using two models, namely the Point Distribution Model (PDM), which can be used for eroding points in uncultivated soil, and the Mass Balance Model (MBM) for cultivated soils. These models are based on the ratio of the measured 137Cs inventory at a specific eroding point to the value of the reference inventory, thus quantifying the relationship between 137Cs loss and soil erosion rates. For this study, the PDM was used as the study site is composed of uncultivated soil [35].
The Point Distribution Model (PDM) can be applied using the following function:
(1)
where A`denotes the amount of 137Cs above depth x (Bq m-2),
Aref stands for the reference inventory for 137Cs (Bq m-2),
x represents the depth from the soil surface (kg m-2) and
h0 refers to the coefficient describing the shape of the profile.
Based on the consideration that the depth distribution of 137Cs is independent of time and the maximum 137Cs fallout occurred in 1963, the erosion rate at a point can be calculated as:
(2)
where Y denotes the annual average soil loss (t ha-1 yr-1),
t stands for the year of sample collection (yr),
x represents the total 137Cs inventory lost with regard to the 137Cs local reference value (as a percentage),
A refers to the measured 137Cs inventory at the sampling point (Bq m-1) and
P is the particle size correction factor.
In order to calculate soil erosion rates in uncultivated soil, h0 can be estimated from the vertical distribution of 137Cs in the soil profiles at different sampling points using the following equation:
(3)
where x denotes the mass depth from the soil surface (kg m-2),
A(x) stands for the 137Cs concentration at depth (Bq kg-1) and
A(0) represents the 137Cs concentration in the surface soil (Bq kg-1).
Using the soil corer area and the depth of the analyzed core, bulk density can be calculated, which is used to convert Bq/kg in kBq/m2. For the inventory, the numerical integration of the values was applied. Various 210Pb dating models based on several assumptions related to the initial activities of 210Pb, 210Pb flux or accumulation rate [36] exist, which makes it possible to reconstruct variations in the sedimentation rate over time. The model used in this study is the Constant Rate of Supply (CRS) model (also known as the Constant Flux (CF) model). The fundamental hypothesis of the CRS model is based on an efficient transfer from the water column to the sediments and a constant 210Pbex flux at the sediment surface in the absence of diffusion over time. The chronologies are generated by comparing the overall 210Pb inventory of the core to partial inventories below depth i by integrating the supported 210Pb concentration, bulk density and thickness of each sediment layer as well as obtaining the mass sedimentation of each layer in addition to the ages at the limit of each sediment layer [37].
Using USLE software to estimate soil redistribution
In order to determine the erosion rate, the USLE model was implemented in a GIS environment. This is a straightforward process but it must be taken into consideration that the model consists of several parameters, some of which are fixed.
The USLE is as follows [22, 38]:
(4)
where
A denotes the mean annual rate of soil loss (t·ha−1·year−1),
R stands for the rainfall erosivity factor,
K represents the soil erodibility factor,
Ls refers to the slope length factor,
C is the cover management factor and
P denotes the support practice factor.
The equation and all other data processing were done using the ArcGIS 10.3.1 (Esri software) and a Raster Calculator tool.
The rainfall erosivity factor (R) was fixed considering that the study area was small. For the purpose of this study, the standard value proposed in established studies in Romania [39] of 0.12 was used.
The K factor is an expression of the erodibility of the soil or surface material at a particular site under standard conditions [40]. The values considered for this parameter are dependent on the soil type as well as texture and were introduced according to the standard values for the soil type [39].
The slope was used as the basis for the slope length factor (Ls) and was calculated using a 1-meter resolution in DEM (Digital Elevation Model). Determining the slope is straightforward using the slope function implemented in ArcGIS 10.3.1. The slope length factor was determined by using the formula proposed by Mitasova et al. in 1996 [24]. The values of this parameter ranged from 0 to 371 meters. The Cover management factor (C) was obtained by vectorising land-use types based on orthoimagery at 0.5 m resolution. The values for this parameter fell between 0.001 and 2. The support practice factor was not used as no such practices are conducted in the area.
Results and discussions
Erosional processes in the catchment area of Pănăzii Lake
The obtained results for the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil are presented in Table 1. According to the obtained values for the soil particle size, it can be assumed that the investigated soil is composed of 24.3% clay, 69.5% silt and 6.3% sand. The average concentration of organic matter of 27.6% reduces the vertical and horizontal mobility of 137Cs in the studied layers. The neutral pH value (average of 7.4) of the soil has a positive influence on 137Cs migration in the soil due to the presence of water without particle movement.
In Table 2, the relationships between the investigated parameters are shown. These relationships were determined by calculating the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC). The alpha level (α) was set at 0.05, which is the likelihood of being incorrect when it is assumed that the relationship identified in our sample reflects a relationship in the population. In order to determine if the coefficient calculated for the parameters meets this requirement, the table of critical values for the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. These critical values are dependent on the degrees of freedom (DF). The critical value when α = 0.05 and DF = 7 is 0.666, therefore, in the cases where the Pearson’s correlation coefficient exceeds 0.666 or is less than -0.666, a statistically significant relationship exists between the values. The coefficients within this interval are considered to be insignificant. The correlation found between the soil erosion rate and the 137Cs inventory is very strong, these two parameters are inversely correlated resulting in the 137Cs inventory decreasing if the soil erosion rate increases. This relationship proves the reliability of using the 137Cs method for the determination of soil erosion.
Another strong correlation is between the slope, soil erosion rates and the 137Cs inventory. An increase in the value of the slope results in an increase in the soil erosion rates as well as a decrease in the 137Cs inventory. These relationships were also validated by other studies found in the literature [41, 42]. Considering the first relationship explained above, any correlation with soil erosion rates has a direct influence and is inversely correlated to the 137Cs inventory.
The relationship between the sand content and slope can be explained by the fact that soils richer in sand are not cohesive so are easily detached and transported by runoff. Therefore, the sand content is inversely correlated and decreases as the value of the slope increases [43].
Regarding the investigation of the soil erosion rate, the first step is to select a suitable sampling point from which the core sample will be taken for the determination of the 137Cs reference inventory. This is a crucial factor for estimating soil erosion using the 137Cs method, the sampling point must be on a flat area and preferably grassland with a slope of zero where no erosion events have taken place since 1954 (the first appearance of 137Cs in the environment). For reference sampling point R1, the closest and highest hill was chosen where the erosional processes are minimal according to the topology. The 137Cs profile from the core sample proves the suitability of the sampling point. The 137Cs activity decreases exponentially, its maximum value is located in the upper part of the core sample. This fact indicates the absence of massive depositions of soil. Furthermore, the obtained value of the total 137Cs inventory is similar to the measured values from the region of Transylvania in Romania [44], which denotes the absence of material loss from the reference point. The exponential decrease in the 137Cs concentration with depth in column R1 may be due to the downward migration of this radionuclide into the soil [45]. By using the vertical distribution of 137Cs activity, which approximated to a first degree exponential function, the parameter h0 was determined and its values are presented in Fig 3:
To obtain the values of soil erosion at the investigated points as well as understand the distribution pattern of 137Cs, the samples were collected as columns with multiple subsamples and not in bulk form. The distribution patterns of 137Cs from each analyzed point are shown in Fig 4. From the vertical distribution of 137Cs, it can be observed that only one point, namely P2.3, shows accumulation of eroded soil in which the activity of 137Cs is at its maximum. At the other sampling points, the transport of soil containing 137Cs is present in the form of erosion. At points P1.1 and P1.2, the erosional processes strongly influence the first 10 cm of the soil. In the remaining core samples, the entire sediment column is affected, the depth distribution is maintained but the value of the total 137Cs inventory decreases in comparison to the reference value. The soil erosion rates are shown in Table 3, the mean soil erosion rate for the investigated area is 13.5 t·ha-1·yr-1. The distribution factor of the soil erosion rate for the analyzed area from the eastern part of the Pănăzii Lake hydrographic basin is shown in Fig 5. It can clearly be observed that the sampling points of maximum erosion are strongly correlated with the slope of the area. According to the simulations performed using the USLE program (Fig 6), the eastern part of the hydrographic basin exhibits a much higher soil erosion rate due to its slope, which is approximately twice as high as that of the western part, and human activities, mainly agriculture, performed in the area. Over the past 10 years, the land-use activity in the area has been grazing in the eastern part of the basin but in the western part, a walnut orchard was planted which will gradually reduce the erosional processes in that area.
Considering that the mean soil erosion rate obtained through the 137Cs method is representative of the whole hydrographic basin, the mass of the migrating soil is 1620 t/yr. From this value, 84 t/yr corresponds exclusively to the 137Cs investigated area, 540 t/yr to the western area of the basin and 1164 t/yr to the eastern part. For an average slope of 9.6%, the ratio between soil erosion rates from agricultural and pasture land was found to be 2:1. These results can be extrapolated to other areas for the determination of the ratio of soil erosion rates resulting from different land-use activities using the values of the slope. These values validate USLE-generated simulations.
Lake sedimentation rates
226Ra, 210Pb and 137Cs concentration in the sediment column.
Pănăzii Lake or Pănade Lake is isolated and exhibited an exponentially decreasing tendency with regard to the concentration of 210Pb from 346±23 to 45±4 Bq/kg in the first 40 cm. The 226Ra concentration was between 25±3 and 49±4 Bq/kg and its dating horizon was around 40 cm in depth (Fig 7B). According to the distribution of 137Cs in sediment from Pănăzii Lake, the maximum concentration of 920±30 Bq/kg is located in the layer situated at a depth of 17 cm (Fig 7A):
(A) represents the 137Cs distribution in the lake sediment, (B) represents the total 210Pb and 226Ra distributions in the lake sediment.
The age of the sediment core and the sedimentation rate.
The age-depth model for Pănăzii Lake is strengthened by 137Cs data, which indicates the year of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, namely 1986. The period covered is from 1880 to 2019 (Fig 8) which consists of three periods of land-management changes and the afferent sedimentation rate calculated by applying the CRS model as can be seen in Fig 9. From the sedimentation rates, the three aforementioned periods are clearly visible. Sedimentation in the lake during the investigated period starts with a relatively low sedimentation rate of 0.064±0.002 g/cm2/y on average followed by a period with a high sedimentation rate of 0.158±0.018 g/cm2/y on average. The final period, which covers the last 30 years, is described by a moderate sedimentation rate of 0.091±0.008 g/cm2/y. Since 1880, the total mass of sediment deposited is 1742 tons which was calculated by determining the total amount of material deposited from calculations using the sedimentation rates and their intervals. Between 1880 and 1972, 48% of the sediment reached the bottom of the lake (844 tons) with a mean deposition rate of 9.2 tons/year followed by a period of high deposition (1972–1991) where 562 tons of sediment was deposited at a rate of 29.6 tons/year. Over the last 30 years, the amount of sediment deposited was 457 tons with a deposition rate of 15.7 tons/year. The sedimentation rate of 10 t·ha-1·yr-1 for the final period was calculated by the CRS model, which covers 4 years of sediment deposition (Fig 9). Comparing the sedimentation rate of 10 t·ha-1·yr-1 with the average soil erosion rate of 13.5 t·ha-1·yr-1, it can clearly be seen that the values are similar and due to the surrounding vegetation of the lake, the amount of sediment that reaches the lake is less than the mass of eroded soil. As a mass balance between the total amount of eroded soil (dislocated soil, of 1620 tons/year from the entire catchment area) and the amount of deposited sediment (16 tons/year), it can be said that just a hundredth of the soil settles on the bottom of the lake. The rest of the soil is redeposited or transported by Pănăzii Creek.
The three distinct periods of sedimentation in the lake are connected to the land use politics of the hydrological basin. On this site, up until 1960, a moderate amount of grazing activity was present, but after 1960, the political regime changed and, as a consequence, the land use management changed too. A massive amount of agricultural activity started to develop on the site and the associated activities caused massive erosion which induced an elevated sedimentation rate in the lake. These significant land use politics dominated the whole of the Romanian lowlands. A new political change occurred in 1989, followed by the return of grazing activity in the area, which produced almost the same sedimentation rate in the lake as was seen from 1880 to 1960. Between 1990 and 1995, the sedimentation rate in the lake rapidly decreased to a value close to the one recorded in 1900. The gap in values of the sedimentation rate is attributed to a short period in which the study site was left as fallow land during which vegetation prevented erosion. By considering that the sedimentation rate rose during the period dominated by agriculture and comparing its value with the actual one, it can be estimated that its value doubled, reaching a soil erosion rate of 26 t·ha-1·yr-1. Similar tendencies in terms of sedimentation rates can be found in many other lakes in Romania, whose hydrographic basins suffered from massive anthropogenic impacts [46].
Conclusions
Soil degradation has become an accentuated and well-known problem over recent decades and required the development of suitable soil management policies. Aspects related to soil erosion and its connection with soil properties, climatic factors, land use change and anthropic influence constitute a topic of international interest for researchers.
The current study focuses on the assessment of soil erosion in relation to land use activities in the catchment area of Pănăzii Lake. For this purpose, fallout radionuclides were used to provide information on soil erosion and redistribution rates as well as patterns. Variations in the sedimentation rate in the lake were also investigated as these reflect periods in which massive erosion took place in the catchment area of the lake.
The novelty of this study is the construction of a timescale for the events of the erosional process in order to correlate them with the form of land use which corresponds to different periods of time. By comparing the actual soil erosion rate (13 t·ha-1·yr-1) with the one corresponding to the period from 1960–1989 (26 t·ha-1·yr-1), when agriculture was the main land use activity, it is observed that the erosion rate increases by 92% to the actual erosion rate. These values are proof of a strong correlation between soil erosion rates and land use activities performed in the area.
The USLE simulations indicate that the eastern part of the hydrographic basin exhibits a higher soil erosion rate than the western part as a result of the human activities performed in the area and the average slope of 9.6%, which is twice as high as that of the western part. The 137Cs method validates the USLE simulation and indicates that from the total mass of migrating soil (1620 t/yr), only 33% is attributed to the western part of the basin, thus the remaining 77% is caused by the erosional processes from the eastern part. The relationship between the gradient and soil erosion rate is validated by the coefficients resulting from the calculated correlations. From the average slope and the ratio between soil erosion rates on agricultural and pasture land suggested in the present work, these results can be extrapolated to other areas for the determination of this particular ratio.
It can be concluded that the determination of the events of erosional processes as well as the construction of a timescale to represent their relationship to different land use politics adopted in the past are compulsory for a thorough understanding of the aspects related to soil erosion, moreover, for the development of suitable land management policies.
References
- 1. Boardman J, Soil erosion: The challenge of assessing variation through space and time In Goudie A.S., Kalvoda J. (Eds.), Nakladatelsti P3K, Prague 2007, 205–220.
- 2. Dotterweich M, The history of human-induced soil erosion: Geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation—a global synopsis. Geomorphology, 2013, 201, 1–34.
- 3. Panagos P, Imeson A, Meusburger K, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Alewell C, Soil conservation in Europe: Wish or reality? Land Degradation & Development, 2016, 27(6), 1547–1551.
- 4. Lingala RR, Arumairaj PD, Raman SJ, Nancy DS, A Study on Erosion of Soil in Slopes Using Laboratory Slope Model, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2019, 8, 3S.
- 5. Dazzi C, Papa GL, Soil genetic erosion: New conceptual developments in soil security, in press, 2019b, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.08.001
- 6. Nearing MA, Xie Y, Liu B, Ye Y, Natural and anthropogenic rates of soilerosion, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2017, 5(2), 77–84.
- 7. Uri ND, Agriculture and the environmente the problem of soil erosion, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2000, 16(4), 71–94.
- 8. Posea G, Bucharest I.V, The socialist Republic of Romania-geographical characteristics, Geoforum, 1975, 6, 15–19.
- 9. Muica C, Zavoianu I, The ecological consequences of privatisation in Romanian agriculture, GeoJournal, 1996, 38, 207–212.
- 10. Adler M-J, Stancalie G, Dragoi E, Analysis of erosion in a catchment affected by a landslide. Human impact on erosion and sedimentation. Proc. international symposium, Rabat, Morocco, 1997, 245, 135–144.
- 11. Meliho M, Nouira A, Benmansour M, Boulmane M, Khattabi A, Mhammdi N, et al., Assessment of soil erosion rates in a Mediterranean cultivated and uncultivated soils using fallout 137Cs. J Environ Radioact. 2019, 208–209:106021. pmid:31357076
- 12. Didoné EJ, Minella JP, Schneider FJ, Londero AL, Lefèvre I, Evrard O, Quantifying the impact of no-tillage on soil redistribution in a cultivated catchment of Southern Brazil (1964–2016) with 137Cs inventory measurements, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 284 106588.
- 13. Gharibreza M, Zaman M, Porto P, Fulajtar E, Parsaei L, Eisaei H, Assessment of deforestation impact on soil erosion in loess formation using 137Cs method (case study: Golestan Province, Iran), International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.07.006.
- 14. Porto P, Waling DE, Callegari G, Using repeated 137Cs and 210Pbex measurements to establish sediment budgets for different time windows and explore the effect of connectivity on soil erosion rates in a small experimental catchment in Southern Italy Land Degrad. Dev., 2018, 29, 1819–1832.
- 15. Arata L, Meusburger K, Frenkel E, A’Campo-Neuen A, Iurian A-R, Ketterer ME, et al., Modelling Deposition and Erosion rates with RadioNuclides (MODERN)–Part 1: A new conversion model to derive soil redistribution rates from inventories of fallout radionuclides, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2016, 162–163, 45–55. pmid:27214287
- 16.
Zapata F., Nguyen M.-L., Chapter 7 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Studies Using Environmental Radionuclides, Radioactivity in the Environment, Elsevier, 2009,16, 295–322.
- 17.
Matisoff G, Whiting PJ, Measuring Soil Erosion Rates Using Natural (7Be, 210Pb) and Anthropogenic (137Cs, 239,240Pu) Radionuclides. In: Baskaran M. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry. Advances in Isotope Geochemistry, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10637-8_25.
- 18.
Walling DE, Fallout radionuclides and the study of erosion and sedimentation Meyers R.A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, Springer, 2012, 3705–3768.
- 19. Iurian AR, Mabit L, Begy R, Cosma C, Comparative assessment of erosion and deposition rates on cultivated land in the Transylvanian Plain of Romania using 137Cs and 210Pbex, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2013, 125, 40–49. pmid:23522558
- 20. Ionita I, Margineanu RM, Application of 137Cs for measuring soil erosion/deposition rates in Romania, Acta Geologica Hispanica, 2000, 35, 311–319.
- 21. Nagai H, Tada W, Kobayashi T, Production rates of 7Be and 10Be in the atmosphere, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2000, 172, 796–801.
- 22. Wischmeier WH, A Rainfall Erosion Index for a Universal Soil-Loss Equation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 1959, 23, 246–249.
- 23. Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter J, RUSLE: revised universal soil loss equation, J. Soil Water Conserv., 1991, 46 (1), 30–33.
- 24. Mitasova H, Hofierka J, Zlocha M, Iverson LR, Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1996, 10, 629–641.
- 25. St Bilaşco, Cs Horvath, Cocean P, Oncu M, Implementation of the Usle Model Using GIS Techniques. Case Study The Someş Plateau, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Science, 2009, 4 (2), 123–132.
- 26. Moore I, Wilson J, Length-slope factors for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: simplified method of estimation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1992, 47, 423–428.
- 27. Roşian G, Csaba H, Kinga R, Boţan C-N, Gavrilă IG, Assessing landslide vulnerability using bivariate statistical analysis and the frequency ratio model. Case study: Transylvanian Plain (Romania), Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 2016, 60 (4), 359–371
- 28. Dellaville NB, Handbook on Reference Methods for Soil Analysis, Council on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Georgia, 1992.
- 29. Dean WE, Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1974, 44, 242–248.
- 30. Heiri O, Lotter A.F, Lemcke G, Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results, Journal of Paleolimnology, 2001, 25, 101–110.
- 31. Somboon S, Kavasi N, Sahoo SK, Inoue K, Arae H, Tsuruoka H, et. al., Radiocesium and 40K distribution of river sediments and floodplain deposits in the Fukushima exclusion zone, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2018, 195, 40–53. pmid:30243099
- 32. Laker MC, Dupreez CC, An investigation into the accuracy of hydrometers for soil particle size determination, Agroplantae, 1982, 14. 17–22.
- 33.
Standards Association of Australia. AS 1289.C6.2–1976 Determination of the Particle Size Distribution of a Soil: An Analysis by Sieving in Combination with Hydrometer Analysis.
- 34. Begy R-Cs, Dumitru OA, Simon H, Steopoaie I, An improved procedure for the determination of 210Po by alpha spectrometry in sediments samples from Danube Delta. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 2015, 303, 2553–2557.
- 35. Wang X, Xue B, Yao S, Yang H, Gu Z, Yang B, et. al, 137Cs estimates of soil erosion rates in a small catchment on a channelized river floodplain in the lower reaches of Yangtze River, China, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2019, 208–209.
- 36. Appleby PG, Oldfield F, The calculation of lead-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena, 1978, 5, 1–8.
- 37. Mabit L, Benmansour M, Abril JM, Walling DE, Meusburger K, Iurian AR, et al., Fallout 210Pb as a soil and sediment tracer in catchment sediment budget investigations: A review, Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 138, 335–351.
- 38. Wischmeier WH, Mannering JV, Soil and Water Management and Conservation. Relation of Soil Properties to Its Erodibility. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings, 1969, 33, 131–137
- 39. Moţoc M, Sevastel M, Evaluarea factorilor care determină riscul eroziunii hidrice în suprafaţă. Editura Bren. Bucureşti, 2002.
- 40. Toy TJ, Foster GR, Guidelines for the Use of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) Version 1.06 on MIned Lands, Construction Sites, and Reclaimed Lands, 1998.
- 41. Dazzi C, Cornelis W, Costantini EAC, Dumitru M, Fullen MA, Gabriels D, et al. The contribution of the European Society for Soil Conservation (ESSC) to scientific knowledge, education and sustainability International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019a, 7, 102–107.
- 42. Poreba G, Prokop P, Estimation of soil erosion on cultivated fields on the hilly Meghalaya Plateau, North-East India, Geochronometria, 2011, 38, 77–84.
- 43. Salako FK, Susceptibility of coarse-textured soils to soil erosion by water in the tropics, 2003.
- 44. Begy R-Cs, Simon H, Kelemen S, Preoteasa L, Investigation of sedimentation rates and sediment dynamics in Danube Delta Lake System (Romania) by 210Pb dating method. Journal of Environmental radioactivity, 2018, 192. 95–104 pmid:29909226
- 45. Legarda F, Romero LM, Herranz M, Barrera M, Idoeta R, Valiño F, et al., Inventory and vertical migration of 137Cs in Spanish mainland soils, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2011, 102 (6),589–597. pmid:21507534
- 46. Simon H, Kelemen S, Begy R-Cs, Anthropic influences on the sedimentation rates of lakes situated in different geographic areas, Journal of Environmental radioactivity, 2016, 1–7. pmid:27663842