Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Correction: Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study

  • Marko Zdravkovic,
  • Joana Berger-Estilita,
  • Bogdan Zdravkovic,
  • David Berger
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

In the Results subsection of the Abstract, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: The 155 COVID-19 publications were 18-fold more likely to be of lower evidence (95% confidence interval [CI] for odds ratio, 7.0–47; P <0.001).

In the Results subsection of the Abstract, there is also an error in the fourth sentence. The correct sentence is: There was a significant difference in the early citation rate of the original articles that favored the COVID-19 original articles (median [interquartile range], 149 [79–512] vs. 3 [1.3–7] citations; P <0.001).

Reference

  1. 1. Zdravkovic M, Berger-Estilita J, Zdravkovic B, Berger D (2020) Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study. PLOS ONE 15(11): e0241826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241826 pmid:33152034