Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The effect of counseling, antiretroviral therapy and relationship on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among adult HIV patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Melaku Yalew ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology

    meleya7@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive and Family Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Bezawit Adane,

    Roles Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Bereket Kefale,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive and Family Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Yitayish Damtie,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive and Family Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Sisay Eshete Tadesse,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Asressie Molla

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is continued as a major public health problem, especially in developing countries. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the effect of counseling, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and relationship on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among adult HIV patients in Ethiopia.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) was used during this review. The study included both published and unpublished studies which were conducted in Ethiopia until the end of 2019. Different electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, CINAHL, Global Health, HINARI and Google scholar) were searched. Data were extracted in Microsoft Excel sheet and STATA/SE 14 was used to meta-analysis. I2 and Egger test statistics were used to test heterogeneity and publication bias respectively.

Results

Twenty-two articles with 8,873 adult HIV infected peoples were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled magnitude of disclosing HIV status to sexual partner was 74.63% [95% CI: (67.79, 81.47)]. Counseled [AOR = 4.96, 95% CI: (2.87, 8.55)], ART initiated [AOR = 4.78, 95% CI: (3.84, 5.94)] and who had a smooth relationship before HIV testing [AOR = 6.82, 95% CI: (3.49, 13.33)] were significantly associated with disclosing HIV status to sexual partner.

Conclusions

Disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner in Ethiopia was low as the government invested in partner notification. Counseling, ART initiation and smooth relationship before HIV testing were significantly associated with disclosing HIV status to sexual partner. The government needs to strengthen pre and post HIV test counseling even after treatment started to increase disclosing status.

Registration

The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO with a specific registration number: CRD42020161276; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Introduction

Globally, an estimated 36.8 million people were living with HIV, of which the burden was high in Sub-Saharan Africa [1,2]. Disclosure of HIV-positive status is a willingness to reveal seropositive status to others or it is communicating potentially stigmatizing information that had previously been kept hidden in order to increase one’s psychological well-being and to preserve the quality of relationships [3]. Although disclosure has several benefits, deciding to disclose even to sexual partner was a big challenge for individuals infected with HIV [4].

Several studies have revealed that individuals diagnosed with HIV infection continue to have unprotected sex without informing their sexual partners, who may be of negative or unknown serostatus [5]. The magnitude of disclosing HIV positive status was ranged from 16.7 to 86% in developing countries [6]. Disclosing HIV status is an important component of HIV prevention as it may motivate partners to know their HIV status. Disclosure has been shown to result in better adherence to therapy, less anxiety and good CD4 recovery following antiretroviral therapy (ART). A recent study showed that serostatus disclosure reduced the risk of HIV transmission by 17.9% to 40.6% [7,8]. Not only this but also, non-disclosure significantly associated to develop depression [9].

Factors that determine disclosure or non-disclosure of HIV status were socio-demographic factors [1012], psycho-social, cognitive and behavioral factors [9,1318]. The Sustainable Development Goal aims to end the epidemics of AIDS by the end of the year 2030 [19,20]. There are different strategies (Voluntary Counseling and Testing and Provider initiated testing and counseling) tried so far to prevent HIV transmission in Ethiopia. Within these programs, the emphasis is placed on the importance of disclosing HIV status among HIV-infected clients, particularly to their sexual partners [21].

Disclosing HIV status to sexual partner was somewhat investigated in a different parts of Ethiopia [2233]. Even, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted [34]. But, it was restricted to two factors (knowing a partner’s HIV status and History of discussion on HIV related issues) was considered as a predictor. In addition, the study only considered twelve studies in systematic review and meta-analysis. As each study brought inconsistent and inconclusive findings and there is no single national representative figure about the effect of counseling, ART and relationship on disclosing HIV positive status [35,36], this study will generate very crucial evidence that may require urgent action for program planners or policymakers. So, this study aimed to estimate the effect of counseling, antiretroviral therapy and relationship on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among adult HIV patients in Ethiopia.

Methods

Search strategy and registration

The study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2009) (S1 File) [37]. The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO, international prospective register of systematic reviews with specific registration number: CRD42020161276. The study included both published and unpublished articles which were conducted until the end of December 31, 2019 from different databases: (PubMed, Cochrane library, CINAHL, Global Health, HINARI and Google scholar). All potential articles were searched by using a combination of keywords/indices like; “prevalence”, “magnitude”, “proportion”, “determinants”, "determinant factors", "risk factors", “risks”, "factors associated", "associated factors", “predictors”, “disclosure”, “disclosing”, “expose”, "truth disclosure", "self-disclosing", "self-disclosure", "HIV infected", "HIV patients", "AIDS patients", “spouse”, "sexual partner", “friends” which were developed according to Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). These all key terms were searched by a combination of Boolean operators “AND” or “OR” as appropriate and the search was done by two authors independently (MY and BK).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria.

  • Population: Studies conducted among adult HIV positive patients in Ethiopia.
  • Setting: Conducted at either facility or community based.
  • Outcome: Studies conducted disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner.
  • Publication: Either published in peer-reviewed journals or unpublished studies.
  • Time frame: All studies irrespective of data collection and publication year until the end of 2019.
  • Language: Studies published only in English language were included in this review.

Exclusion criteria.

  • Studies in which the outcome did not clearly reported
  • Studies repeatedly published
  • Studies which were pure qualitative were excluded from systematic review and meta-analysis.

Outcome measurement

The outcome variable (disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner) was measured using “YES” or “NO” questions. It was measured as “YES” if a participant disclosed his/her HIV positive status to his/her most recent sexual partner and “NO” if didn’t.

Study quality appraisal and data extraction

Articles identified in all databases were exported to Endnote X8 and duplicate files were excluded. The remaining articles were independently screened by two groups (SET and AM) for inclusion in the full-text appraisal. The differences between reviewers were managed through discussion and further disagreement was handled by the third group reviewer (YD). The quality of articles was assessed using Joana Brigg’s Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist [38,39]. Two independent authors (BA and MY) assessed the quality of the articles and the differences in the scales result was settled by taking the average result of both reviewers.

Data were extracted using Microsoft excel 2010 sheet and it was conducted in two steps for primary and secondary objective. The data extraction sheet contained the following list of variables for the first objective: authors name followed by initials, year of study, year of publication, study setting, study design, sample size, response rate, quality score, sex of participants, region, study finding (magnitude of disclosing HIV status). For the second objective, first, those studies who reported at least one of those factors as predictors were identified. For each predictor (to calculate the odds ratio), the data were extracted from the primary studies in the form of two by two tables sequentially labeled as A, B, C, D representing the four cells. Two authors (MY and BA) extract the data for both objectives and any disagreements between the two reviewers were solved through discussion.

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

The descriptive characteristics of the included studies were presented in table and the finding of the overall (pooled) result was synthesized and summarized by using a forest plot. The data extracted in the Microsoft Excel sheet format was exported into the STATA/SE14 version statistical software for further analysis. Before estimating the pooled magnitude of disclosing HIV positive status, the heterogeneity among the selected study results was statistically estimated by using the I2 test. The pooled effect of the point estimate of disclosing HIV positive status in Ethiopia was calculated by DerSimonian & Liard’s method of random effect model at P-value less than 0.05 [40]. Statistical significance for heterogeneity with I2 tests greater than 75% was taken as high heterogeneity and it was subjected to sub-group and sensitivity analysis. Finally, publication bias was assessed by using Egger’s weighted regression test method and a p value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant publication bias [41].

Results

Study selection

Several databases: PubMed, CINAHL, HINARI, Cochrane Library, Global Health and Google Scholar were used to search articles. The review found a total of 981 articles and nine hundred twenty-one of them were excluded (90 due to duplication and 831 records by title and abstract). Again 25 of them were critically appraised for eligibility based on the JBI checklist. Three of them were excluded due to reasons and a total of 22 full-text articles were included in systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram of determinants of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among adult HIV patients in Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g001

Descriptive characteristics of included studies

All included articles were health facility-based cross-sectional studies conducted among adult HIV positive peoples in Ethiopia. The minimum and the maximum sample size were 107 and 705 participants in a study conducted in Addis Ababa and Jimma, Oromia respectively [23,42]. In this analysis, a total of 8, 873 adult HIV infected peoples were included. More than one-third (40.91%) of the studies were conducted in the Oromia region [23,2630,4345] and 54.55% of the studies were conducted only in the hospital [2233]. Equal numbers of studies (four studies in each) were included in Addis Ababa [22,4648] and Amhara region [33,4951]. Whereas, only three articles conducted in Tigray region were included in the analysis [24,32,52] (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.t001

Magnitude of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner

The magnitude of disclosing HIV serostatus to sexual partner was a range between 33.33 to 98.6% in previous individual studies [30,49]. The I2 test result showed that there was high heterogeneity (I2 99.0%, P < 0.001). Using the random effect analysis, the pooled magnitude of disclosing seropositive status to sexual partner among adult HIV peoples was 74.63% [95% CI: (67.79, 81.47)] (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Forest plot of the pooled magnitude of disclosing HIV status to sexual partner using the random effect model, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g002

Even though the funnel plot seems asymmetric (Fig 3), the Egger test revealed that there was no statistical evidence of publication bias (P = 0.629).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Funnel plot showing publication bias of magnitude of disclosing HIV status among adult HIV infected peoples, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g003

The sensitivity analysis also indicated that there was no single influential estimate that could be attributed to the source of heterogeneity.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis was done by region, sex of participants, study setting, sample size, year of study, quality score and response rate to deal the possible sources of heterogeneity. The analysis indicated that heterogeneity still exists in the subgroup analysis of all the parameters mentioned above. The highest and the lowest magnitude of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner was observed in Amhara [84.70%, 95% CI: (71.75, 97.65)] and Tigray [54.33%, 95% CI: (41.33, 67.32)] respectively (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Forest plot of subgroup analysis by region among adult HIV infected peoples using the random effect model, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g004

Factors associated with disclosing HIV status to sexual partner

The analysis indicated that counseling, relationship before HIV testing and ART initiation was significantly associated with disclosing HIV to sexual partner. In the random effect model, the pooled odds of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among counseled HIV infected adult individuals were increased by 5 as compared to counterparts [AOR = 4.96, 95% CI: (2.87, 8.55)]. As it is illustrated in the figure, all studies were contributed almost the same weight in effect size estimation. There was also considerable heterogeneity in those studies used to measure the pooled effect size (I2 = 80.8%, p < 0.001) (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Forest plot of the pooled estimate of the effect of counseling on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g005

The Egger test indicated that there was no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.550). As there was no evidence of heterogeneity, the fixed-effect model was used in determining the effect of relationship on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner. The pooled odds of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among individuals who had a smooth relationship prior to HIV diagnosis were increased by 5 as compared counterparts [AOR = 4.78, 95% CI: (3.84, 5.94)]. There was a moderate level of heterogeneity (I2 = 73.5%) (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Forest plot of the pooled estimate of the effect of smooth relationship on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g006

Similar to that of counseling, there was no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.963). In the random effect model, the pooled odds of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among adult who had initiated ART were increased by 7 as compared to not initiated [AOR = 6.82, 95% CI: (3.49, 13.33)]. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 82.0%, P = 0.000) (Fig 7) and the Egger test statistics also witnessed that there was no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.649).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Forest plot of the pooled estimate of the effect of ART initiation on disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.g007

Discussion

The result of meta-analysis showed that the pooled magnitude of disclosing HIV status to sexual partner was 74.63% [95% CI: (67.79, 81.47)]. ART initiation, counseling and type relationship before HIV diagnosis were significantly associated with disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner. The pooled magnitude of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner was in line with a study conducted in Ethiopia (73%) [34]. It was also similar to studies conducted in Kenya (67.8%) and South Africa (74.4%) [8,53]. However, it was higher than studies conducted in Nigeria (50.9%), Uganda (57%) and South Africa (67%) [11,54,55]. Similarly, the finding was higher than a systematic review conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (63.9%) [56]. The possible reason for this discrepancy may be due to time variation and the involvement of different governmental and non-governmental organizations in HIV prevention and control and thereby increase self-disclosure. Moreover, partner notification was one of the key emphasis for those organizations and still, it was under consideration for further HIV prevention [21]. Whereas, the finding was lower than another study conducted in Nigeria (87%) China (83.6%) and America (97%) [5759]. The possible source of variation might be a difference in context and cultural practices as it was compared to studies conducted in developed countries.

The likelihood of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner was more among counseled adult HIV infected peoples than not. The report of a study conducted in Namibia showed that ever had HIV counseling positively associated with HIV disclosure [60]. It was also in agreement with a study conducted in Uganda [61]. The finding of systematic review in high and low-income countries also support this result which stated that those counseled were more likely to disclose their HIV status to sexual partner [62]. This association may be due to the fact that the counselor raises different issues and they may understand as there is a possibility of transmitting it to sexual partner even without intercourse.

The odds of disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner among individuals who had smooth relationships prior to HIV diagnosis were increased as compared counterparts. A similar report was also documented in a study conducted in China [63]. The possible reason for this association might be due to lack of open discussion and honest and disguised practices seems enabled them to continue as sexual partner.

Those adult HIV infected peoples who had initiated ART were more likely to disclose HIV positive status to sexual partner as compared to pre-ART. It was in agreement with a study conducted in Uganda [64]. A study conducted in 6 countries of America witnessed that being in ART was positively associated with disclosing HIV positive status [65]. But, it was contrary to a study conducted in Namibia and Uganda [14,58]. The discrepancy may be due to the difference in socio-cultural practices and beliefs. The association could be due to observed improvement in their quality of life after treatment initiation and the health provider usually advised them to have one treatment supporter who would collect the drug in case of emergency and the clients may prefer their sexual partner as treatment collector instead of others.

As a limitation, the study was restricted to articles published in the English language and it may not be representative to articles published in a language other than English. The other demerit was as all the studies included in meta-analysis were cross-sectional; the pooled estimate may be influenced by study design. Lastly, even if subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis was done to deal the source of heterogeneity, it was not resolved.

Conclusions

Disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner in Ethiopia was much low as effort were done on partner notification. Counseling, ART initiation and smooth relationship before HIV testing were significantly associated with disclosing HIV positive status to sexual partner. So, the government needs to strengthen pre and post HIV test counseling as well as continue it after treatment started. The universal test and treat strategy which was started recently should also another focus area of policymakers and planners to increase HIV disclosure. The last option falls on health care providers and HIV patients to advocate the role of trust and smooth relationships between partners through informed decision making.

Supporting information

S1 File. PRISMA checklist used in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.s001

(DOC)

S2 File. The datasets used/analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249887.s002

(DTA)

Acknowledgments

We would like to say thanks to all public health staff for their help when needed.

References

  1. 1. Ortblad KF, Lozano R, Murray CJL: The burden of HIV: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. AIDS (London, England) 2013, 27(13):2003–2017. pmid:23660576
  2. 2. Frank TD, Carter A, Jahagirdar D, Biehl MH, Douwes-Schultz D, Larson SL, et al: Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2017, and forecasts to 2030, for 195 countries and territories: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017. The Lancet HIV 2019, 6(12):e831–e859. pmid:31439534
  3. 3. Adeoye-Agboola D, Evans H, Hewson D, Pappas Y: Factors influencing HIV disclosure among people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: a systematic review using narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Public health 2016, 136:13–28. pmid:27059370
  4. 4. Paiva V, Segurado AC, Filipe EMV: Self-disclosure of HIV diagnosis to sexual partners by heterosexual and bisexual men: a challenge for HIV/AIDS care and prevention. Cadernos de saude publica 2011, 27:1699–1710. pmid:21986598
  5. 5. Ciccarone DH, Kanouse DE, Collins RL, Miu A, Chen JL, Morton SC, et al: Sex without disclosure of positive HIV serostatus in a US probability sample of persons receiving medical care for HIV infection. American Journal of Public Health 2003, 93(6):949–954. pmid:12773361
  6. 6. Medley A, Garcia-Moreno C, McGill S, Maman S: Rates, barriers and outcomes of HIV serostatus disclosure among women in developing countries: implications for prevention of mother-to-child transmission programmes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004, 82:299–307. pmid:15259260
  7. 7. Hallberg D, Kimario TD, Mtuya C, Msuya M, Björling G: Factors affecting HIV disclosure among partners in Morongo, Tanzania. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences 2019, 10:49–54.
  8. 8. Adeniyi OV, Ajayi AI, Selanto-Chairman N, Ter Goon D, Boon G, Fuentes YO, et al: Demographic, clinical and behavioural determinants of HIV serostatus non-disclosure to sex partners among HIV-infected pregnant women in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. PloS one 2017, 12(8). pmid:28837563
  9. 9. Rodkjaer L, Chesney M, Lomborg K, Ostergaard L, Laursen T, Sodemann M: HIV-infected individuals with high coping self-efficacy are less likely to report depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study from Denmark. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2014, 22:67–72. pmid:24657129
  10. 10. Ramlagan S, Matseke G, Rodriguez VJ, Jones DL, Peltzer K, Ruiter RA, et al: Determinants of disclosure and non-disclosure of HIV-positive status, by pregnant women in rural South Africa. SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS 2018, 15(1). pmid:30324859
  11. 11. Amoran O: Predictors of disclosure of sero-status to sexual partners among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ogun State, Nigeria. Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2012, 15(4):385–390. pmid:23238184
  12. 12. Tshisuyi ET: Disclosure of HIV positive status to sexual partners among pregnant women in a health district Botswana. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 2014.
  13. 13. Nöstlinger C, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Buyze J, Loos J, Buvé A: Factors influencing social self-disclosure among adolescents living with HIV in Eastern Africa. AIDS care 2015, 27(sup1):36–46. pmid:26616124
  14. 14. Osinde MO, Kakaire O, Kaye DK: Factors associated with disclosure of HIV serostatus to sexual partners of patients receiving HIV care in Kabale, Uganda. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2012, 118(1):61–64. pmid:22507263
  15. 15. Mburu G, Hodgson I, Kalibala S, Haamujompa C, Cataldo F, Lowenthal ED, et al: Adolescent HIV disclosure in Zambia: barriers, facilitators and outcomes. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2014, 17(1):18866. pmid:24629845
  16. 16. Mlambo M, Peltzer K: HIV sero-status disclosure and sexual behaviour among HIV positive patients who are on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology 2011, 35(1):29–41.
  17. 17. Shushtari ZJ, Sajjadi H, Forouzan AS, Salimi Y, Dejman M: Disclosure of HIV status and social support among people living with HIV. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2014, 16(8).
  18. 18. Loukid M, Abadie A, Henry E, Hilali MK, Fugon L, Rafif N, et al: Factors associated with HIV status disclosure to one’s steady sexual partner in PLHIV in Morocco. Journal of Community Health 2014, 39(1):50–59. pmid:23913104
  19. 19. Lee BX, Kjaerulf F, Turner S, Cohen L, Donnelly PD, Muggah R, et al: Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of public health policy 2016, 37(1):13–31. pmid:27638240
  20. 20. Desa U: Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2016.
  21. 21. Organization WH: Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification: supplement to consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services: World Health Organization; 2016.
  22. 22. Dessalegn NG, Hailemichael RG, Shewa-amare A, Sawleshwarkar S, Lodebo B, Amberbir A, et al: HIV Disclosure: HIV-positive status disclosure to sexual partners among individuals receiving HIV care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PloS one 2019, 14(2). pmid:30768642
  23. 23. Deribe K, Woldemichael K, Wondafrash M, Haile A, Amberbir A: Disclosure experience and associated factors among HIV positive men and women clinical service users in southwest Ethiopia. BMC Public health 2008, 8(1):81. pmid:18312653
  24. 24. Genet M, Sebsibie G, Gultie T: Disclosure of HIV seropositive status to sexual partners and its associated factors among patients attending antiretroviral treatment clinic follow up at Mekelle Hospital, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC research notes 2015, 8(1):109. pmid:25889779
  25. 25. Gari T, Habte D, Markos E: HIV positive status disclosure to sexual partner among women attending ART clinic at Hawassa University Referral Hospital, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 2010, 24(1).
  26. 26. Gadisa T, Tymejczyk O, Kulkarni SG, Hoffman S, Lahuerta M, Remien RH, et al: Disclosure history among persons initiating antiretroviral treatment at Six HIV clinics in Oromia, Ethiopia, 2012–2013. AIDS and behavior 2017, 21(1):70–81. pmid:26781869
  27. 27. Reda AA, Biadgilign S, Deribe K, Deribew A: HIV-positive status disclosure among men and women receiving antiretroviral treatment in eastern Ethiopia. AIDS care 2013, 25(8):956–960. pmid:23244574
  28. 28. Natae S, Negawo M: Factors affecting HIV positive status disclosure among people living with HIV in west Showa zone, Oromia, Ethiopia; 2013. Abnorm Behav Psychol 2016, 2(114):2.
  29. 29. Geremew TD, Nuri RA, Esmael JK: Sero Status Disclosure to Sexual Partner and Associated Factors among Adult HIV Positive Patients in Bale Zone Hospitals, Oromia Region, Ethiopia: Institution Based Cross-Sectional Study. Open Journal of Epidemiology 2018, 8(2):43–53.
  30. 30. Tesfaye T, Darega J, Belachew T, Abera A: HIV positive sero-status disclosure and its determinants among people living with HIV/AIDS following ART clinic in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study. Archives of Public Health 2018, 76(1):1. pmid:29372055
  31. 31. Deribe B, Ebrahim J, Bush L: Outcomes and Factors Affecting HIV Status Disclosure to Regular Sexual Partner among Women Attending Antiretroviral Treatment Clinic. J AIDS Clin Res 2018, 9(760):2.
  32. 32. Alemayehu M, Aregay A, Kalayu A, Yebyo H: HIV disclosure to sexual partner and associated factors among women attending ART clinic at Mekelle hospital, Northern Ethiopia. BMC public health 2014, 14(1):746.
  33. 33. Erku TA, Megabiaw B, Wubshet M: Predictors of HIV status disclosure to sexual partners among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J 2012, 13:87. pmid:23396625
  34. 34. Mekonnen FA, Lakew AM, Muchie KF, Teshome DF: Sero-positive HIV result disclosure to sexual partner in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2019, 19(1):1–9. pmid:30606151
  35. 35. Dessalegn NG, Hailemichael RG, Shewa-Amare A, Sawleshwarkar S: HIV Disclosure: HIV-positive status disclosure to sexual partners among individuals receiving HIV care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14(2):e0211967. pmid:30768642
  36. 36. Mohammed S, Belaynew W, Mengesha A: Disclosure of HIV positive result to a sexual partner among adult clinical service users in Kemissie district, northeast Ethiopia. African Journal of Reproductive Health 2012, 16(1):97–104. pmid:22783673
  37. 37. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews 2015, 4(1):1. pmid:25554246
  38. 38. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al: Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual The Joanna Briggs Institute 2017:2019–2005.
  39. 39. Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C: Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. International journal of evidence-based healthcare 2015, 13(3):147–153. pmid:26317388
  40. 40. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemporary clinical trials 2015, 45:139–145. pmid:26343745
  41. 41. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj 1997, 315(7109):629–634. pmid:9310563
  42. 42. Sendo EG, Cherie A, Erku TA: Disclosure experience to partner and its effect on intention to utilize prevention of mother to child transmission service among HIV positive pregnant women attending antenatal care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(765):(17 August 2013).
  43. 43. Kassahun G, Tenaw Z, Belachew T, Sinaga M: Determinants and Status of HIV Disclosure among Reproductive Age Women on Antiretroviral Therapy at Three Health Facilities in Jimma Town, Ethiopia, 2017. Health Science Journal 2018, 12(2).
  44. 44. Hailu F, Mesfin A, Habtamu M: Sero status disclosure and condom use among PLWHAs on art in Assela town health facilities, Oromiya Region. Journal of AIDS and Clinical Research 2015, 6(1). pmid:26052470
  45. 45. Fituma S: HIV Positive Status Disclosure and Highly Active Antiretroviral therapy Adherence among People living with HIV in Ambo Hospital, West Shewa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Addis Abeba Universty; 2012.
  46. 46. Sendo EG, Cherie A, Erku TA: Disclosure experience to partner and its effect on intention to utilize prevention of mother to child transmission service among HIV positive pregnant women attending antenatal care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC public health 2013, 13(1):765.
  47. 47. Koyira A: Assessment of Magnitude, Barriers and outcomes Related with HIV Serostatus Disclosure among art users, in Addis Ababa art providing Health Facilities. Addis Abeba Universty; 2009.
  48. 48. Meseret Y, Dulla D, Nega B: Prevalence and factors affecting disclosure of HIV status among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Addis Ababa public health centres: a cross sectional survey. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2019, 10(4):317–324.
  49. 49. Seid M, Wasie B, Admassu M: Disclosure of HIV positive result to a sexual partner among adult clinical service users in Kemissie district, northeast Ethiopia. African Journal of reproductive health 2012, 16(1). pmid:22783673
  50. 50. Shiferaw MB: Human Immune Virus positive status disclosure to a sexual partner and associated factors among adult clients in Debre Markos town, 2019. 2020.
  51. 51. Alemayehu D, Tadesse S, Adefris M, Birhanu Z: HIV serostatus disclosure and associated factors among HIV positive pregnant women attending antenatal care services in northwest Ethiopia. International Journal of Infection Control 2014, 10(4):10.3396.
  52. 52. Alema HB, Misgina KH, Weldu MG: Determinant factors of HIV positive status disclosure among adults in Axum Health Facilities, Nothern Ethiopia: Implication on treatment adherence. Journal of AIDS and HIV Research 2017, 9(3):52–59.
  53. 53. Ngigi P, Othero M, Odero O: Prevalence of serostatus disclosure to sexual partners among HIV infected women in Kisii District, Western Kenya. East African Medical Journal 2011, 88(3):80–85.
  54. 54. Ngonzi J, Godfrey M, Kivunike M, Julius M, Salongo W: Predictors and patterns of HIV status disclosure among HIV positive pregnant women at mbarara regional referral hospital, South-Western Uganda. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2017, 6:10.15406.
  55. 55. Makin JD, Forsyth BW, Visser MJ, Sikkema KJ, Neufeld S, Jeffery B: Factors affecting disclosure in South African HIV-positive pregnant women. AIDS patient care and STDs 2008, 22(11):907–916. pmid:19025485
  56. 56. Tam M, Amzel A, Phelps BR: Disclosure of HIV serostatus among pregnant and postpartum women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. AIDS care 2015, 27(4):436–450. pmid:25636060
  57. 57. Yin Y, Yang H, Xie X, Wang H, Nie A, Chen H: Status and associated characteristics of HIV disclosure among people living with HIV/AIDS in Liangshan, China: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 2019, 98(31). pmid:31374050
  58. 58. Adefemi S, Abayomi M, Adekanye A, Mohammed Y: Prevalence, pattern and predictors of disclosure among HIV positive clients of FMC Bida art clinic. J Med Sci 2018, 18:172–179.
  59. 59. Shacham E, Small E, Onen N, Stamm K, Overton ET: Serostatus disclosure among adults with HIV in the era of HIV therapy. AIDS Patient Care and STDs 2012, 26(1):29–35. pmid:22107039
  60. 60. Dzinamarira T, Hatutale MN, Ndadi HN, Mashora MC, Shatumbu SP: HIV Status Disclosure to Sexual Partner (s) and Associated Factors Among Young Adults, A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science 2019, 5(1):47.
  61. 61. Kadowa I, Nuwaha F: Factors influencing disclosure of HIV positive status in Mityana district of Uganda. African health sciences 2009, 9(1):26–33. pmid:20842239
  62. 62. Obermeyer CM, Baijal P, Pegurri E: Facilitating HIV disclosure across diverse settings: a review. American journal of public health 2011, 101(6):1011–1023. pmid:21493947
  63. 63. Qiao S, Li X, Zhou Y, Shen Z, Tang Z: AIDS impact special issue 2015: interpersonal factors associated with HIV partner disclosure among HIV-infected people in China. AIDS care 2016, 28(sup1):37–43. pmid:26899370
  64. 64. Kadowa I, Nuwaha F: Factors influencing disclosure of HIV positive status in Mityana district of Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2009, 9(1):26–33. pmid:20842239
  65. 65. Obermeyer CM, Baijal P, Pegurri E: Facilitating HIV disclosure across diverse settings: a review. Am J Public Health 2011, 101(6):1011–1023. pmid:21493947