Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

  • Adam V. Wisnewski ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adam V. Wisnewski, Julian Campillo Luna

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    adam.wisnewski@yale.edu

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Julian Campillo Luna ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adam V. Wisnewski, Julian Campillo Luna

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Carrie A. Redlich

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America

Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

  • Adam V. Wisnewski, 
  • Julian Campillo Luna, 
  • Carrie A. Redlich
PLOS
x

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen-specific IgG and IgA elicited by infection mediate viral neutralization and are likely an important component of natural immunity, however, limited information exists on vaccine induced responses. We measured COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced IgG and IgA in serum serially, up to 145 days post vaccination in 4 subjects. Spike antigen-specific IgG levels rose exponentially and plateaued 21 days after the initial vaccine dose. After the second vaccine dose IgG levels increased further, reaching a maximum approximately 7–10 days later, and remained elevated (average of 58% peak levels) during the additional >100 day follow up period. COVID-19 mRNA vaccination elicited spike antigen-specific IgA with similar kinetics of induction and time to peak levels, but more rapid decline in serum levels following both the 1st and 2nd vaccine doses (<18% peak levels within 100 days of the 2nd shot). The data demonstrate COVID-19 mRNA vaccines effectively induce spike antigen specific IgG and IgA and highlight marked differences in their persistence in serum.

Introduction

Humoral responses are key components of adaptive immunity to viral infection [1]. Both alpha and gamma immunoglobulins (Ig) from COVID-19 patients mediate viral neutralization and may play distinct roles in immunity during different phases of infection and at specific anatomical sites [25]. IgA is the most abundantly produced Ig in humans (66 gm/kg/day) and the most abundant isotype at mucosal sites while IgG is major isotype in blood and most tissues [6,7].

IgA’s anatomical distribution at mucosal surfaces exposed to infectious agents makes it uniquely positioned to intervene in transmission. Multiple studies have found IgA possesses superior anti-viral properties vs. IgG for influenza and for SARS-CoV-2 [811]. Sterlin et. al [11] recently suggested IgA dominates the early neutralizing response to SARS-CoV-2 based on multiple findings; serum IgA is 7-fold more potent than serum IgG in viral neutralization, temporal changes in circulating IgA+ plasmablasts with mucosal homing receptors, and the presence of neutralizing IgA in airway fluid and saliva.

The major SARS-CoV-2 antigenic target of human IgG and IgA is the spike protein, which is encoded by the mRNA of vaccines currently in use under EUA from the FDA [1215]. The time course of mRNA vaccine-induced IgG responses observed during vaccine trials have recently been published [13,14]. However, limited information exists on mRNA vaccine induced IgA responses [16]. The present study measures SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen specific serum IgA and IgG longitudinally in healthy individuals without prior COVID-19 who were among the first vaccine recipients outside of clinical trials due to their occupation as health care workers. Data from up to 80 days after the first mRNA vaccine dose are presented.

Materials and methods

Human subjects: This study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board. All subjects provided written informed consent to participate. Volunteers from an ongoing serology study of health care workers were recruited to have their SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen-specific antibody levels followed over time after vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA. Subjects provided 3cc of blood by venipuncture using vacutainer tubes, serum was separated and stored frozen at -80°C until tested by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The studies were reviewed by the Yale University Human Investigation Committee and ethical approval was given by the Yale university Institutional Review Board, protocol # 2000027749.

ELISA methods: ELISAs were performed as previously described with minor modifications [17,18]. In short, Triton X-100 and RNase A were added to serum samples at final concentrations of 0.5% and 0.5mg/ml respectively and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes before use to reduce risk from any potential virus in serum. 96-well MaxiSorp plates (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) were coated with 50 μL/well of recombinant SARS Cov-2 S1 or nucleocapsid protein (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at a concentration of 1 μg/ml in NaCO3 buffer pH 9.6 and incubated overnight at 4°C. The coating buffer was removed, and plates were incubated for 1h at RT with 200 μl of blocking solution (PBS with 3% milk powder). Serum was diluted 1:100 in dilution solution (PBS with 0.05% Tween20, 1% milk powder) and 100 μl of diluted serum was added for one hours at RT. Plates were washed three times with PBS-T (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) and 50 μL of HRP anti-Human IgG Antibody (Parmingen/BD Biosiences, San Jose, CA) or HRP anti-human IgA (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) were added at 1:2000-fold dilution. After 1 h of incubation at RT, plates were washed three times with PBS-T. Plates were developed with 100 μL of TMB Substrate Reagent Set (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and the reaction was stopped when an internal pooled serum positive control sample reaches an OD of 1.0 at 650 nm, by the addition of 2 N sulfuric acid. Plates were then read at a wavelength of 450 nm with reference wavelength calibration (650nm).

Statistical analysis: GraphPad Prism (v8) was used for statistical analyses. Differences in rates of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen-specific IgG and IgA decreases (slopes fitted by exponential decay curves) and time to peak levels were assessed with Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results & discussion

Serum levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (S1 subunit)-specific IgG and IgA were measured by ELISA over time in N = 4 health care workers that received COVID-19 mRNA vaccine between December 2020 and February 2021 (Table 1). The subjects had no prior history of COVID-19 and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen and spike antigen at baseline. Additional information on average ELISA OD values is provided in supporting information S1 Table.

thumbnail
Table 1. Study subjects that received COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249499.t001

As shown in Fig 1, vaccine-induced serum levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG rose exponentially and reached a plateau approximately 18–21 days after the 1st mRNA vaccine dose. After the 2nd vaccine dose, SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific serum IgG increased further, peaking approximately 7 days later, and remaining elevated (58% of peak values) during the additional >100 day follow-up period.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Time course of spike antigen-specific IgG response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

ELISAs were performed on serum from 4 subjects described in Table 1, at different time points after vaccination (X-axis, days). Serum IgG levels are proportional to ELISA optical density values (Y-axis). Each symbol represents average ELISA data for a single subject at a single time point. Scatter plots were fitted with a moving average trend line. Note 2nd vaccine dose was at day 28 for subjects 1–3, and day 21 for subject 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249499.g001

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine also elicited spike antigen-specific IgA with similar kinetics of induction and time to maximal levels after the 1st and 2nd vaccine dose (Fig 2). However, the levels of spike antigen-specific IgA decreased significantly (p <0.002) faster than IgG levels. Spike-specific IgA decreased to an average of 50% peak levels between the 1st and 2nd vaccine shots, and fell to 18% of peak levels within the >100 day follow-up period after the 2nd shot.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Time course of spike antigen-specific IgA response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

ELISAs were performed on serum from 4 subjects described in Table 1, at different time points after vaccination (X-axis, days). Serum IgA levels are proportional to ELISA optical density values (Y-axis). Each symbol represents average ELISA data for a single subject at a single time point. Scatter plots were fitted with a moving average trend line. Note 2nd vaccine dose was at day 28 for subjects 1–3, and day 21 for subject 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249499.g002

The induction and decay of antigen specific IgG and IgA in response to the novel COVID-19 mRNA vaccine are consistent with the known serum ½ lives of the different immunoglobulin isotypes; 21–28 days for gamma and 5–6 days for alpha [1921]. The rapid decay in serum IgA levels is also consistent with that observed in natural disease among health care workers in a Spanish hospital after 3 months of follow-up [22]. Recent studies document that while SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific serum IgA levels decline quickly after infection, local concentrations at mucosal surfaces persist longer and include dimeric isoforms with potent neutralizing capacity, 15X greater than monomeric IgA [10,11].

This study focused on serum IgA which has been shown to be clonally related to mucosal IgA, but did not measure vaccine-induced, antigen-specific mucosal IgA levels. Serum IgA may reach mucosal surfaces by transduction or via recirculating IgA secreting plasmablasts with a mucosal homing profile [2325]. However, “local” B-cells may also undergo isotype class switching in the mucosal microenvironment and secrete IgA with distinct kinetics [26]. The present data underscore the current knowledge gap surrounding COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-induced IgA production and distribution at mucosal sites.

The major weakness of the present study is the limited number of subjects analyzed. Additional studies on a larger group of vaccinated individuals over a longer time period will be necessary to determine if the data are reflective of the general population, or if differences exist due to genetics and/or environment. The present study subjects were SARS-CoV-2 naïve, and it will be important to understand potential differences in vaccine responses of prior COVID-19 subjects.

Conclusions

In summary, longitudinal serology of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine recipients highlights important issues related to immunity and monitoring of vaccine responses. The persistence of spike antigen-specific serum IgG following vaccination is hopefully a positive indicator of effective long-lived immunity, and clinical indicator of vaccine responsiveness [27]. In addition to IgG, the data demonstrate COVID-19 mRNA vaccines also elicit antigen-specific IgA, which may be important in preventing transmission as well as infection [28,29]. Spike-specific serum IgA levels decay significantly (p < 0.002) faster than spike-specific IgG, however, the “recall” response for both IgG and IgA (time to peak serum levels following the 2nd / booster dose) is significantly (p < 0.03) shorter than the primary response.

Supporting information

S1 Table. ELISA OD values of participants at different time points after COV ID-19 vaccine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249499.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the dedicated efforts of the Yale Occupational Medicine Fellows, Residents and Students for their participation in the present vaccine surveillance efforts.

References

  1. 1. Dörner T, Radbruch A. Antibodies and B cell memory in viral immunity. Immunity. 2007;27(3):384–92. Epub 2007/09/26. pmid:17892847.
  2. 2. Wang Z, Lorenzi JCC, Muecksch F, Finkin S, Viant C, Gaebler C, et al. Enhanced SARS-CoV-2 neutralization by dimeric IgA. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(577). Epub 2020/12/09. pmid:33288661
  3. 3. Klingler J, Weiss S, Itri V, Liu X, Oguntuyo KY, Stevens C, et al. Role of IgM and IgA Antibodies in the Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. J Infect Dis. 2020. Epub 2020/12/29. pmid:33173891
  4. 4. Maeda K, Higashi-Kuwata N, Kinoshita N, Kutsuna S, Tsuchiya K, Hattori SI, et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 with IgG from COVID-19-convalescent plasma. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5563. Epub 2021/03/12. pmid:33692457
  5. 5. Salazar E, Kuchipudi SV, Christensen PA, Eagar T, Yi X, Zhao P, et al. Convalescent plasma anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ectodomain and receptor-binding domain IgG correlate with virus neutralization. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(12):6728–38. Epub 2020/09/11. pmid:32910806
  6. 6. Underdown BJ. IgA. In: Delves PJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Immunology (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 1998. p. 1196–9.
  7. 7. Vidarsson G, Dekkers G, Rispens T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Frontiers in immunology. 2014;5:520-. pmid:25368619.
  8. 8. Muramatsu M, Yoshida R, Yokoyama A, Miyamoto H, Kajihara M, Maruyama J, et al. Comparison of antiviral activity between IgA and IgG specific to influenza virus hemagglutinin: increased potential of IgA for heterosubtypic immunity. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85582. Epub 2014/01/28. pmid:24465606
  9. 9. Liew FY, Russell SM, Appleyard G, Brand CM, Beale J. Cross-protection in mice infected with influenza A virus by the respiratory route is correlated with local IgA antibody rather than serum antibody or cytotoxic T cell reactivity. Eur J Immunol. 1984;14(4):350–6. Epub 1984/04/01. pmid:6609824.
  10. 10. Wang Z, Lorenzi JCC, Muecksch F, Finkin S, Viant C, Gaebler C, et al. Enhanced SARS-CoV-2 neutralization by dimeric IgA. Science Translational Medicine. 2021;13(577):eabf1555. pmid:33288661
  11. 11. Sterlin D, Mathian A, Miyara M, Mohr A, Anna F, Claër L, et al. IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Science Translational Medicine. 2021;13(577):eabd2223. pmid:33288662
  12. 12. Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Widge AT, Jackson LA, Roberts PC, Makhene M, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2427–38. Epub 2020/09/30. pmid:32991794
  13. 13. Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Roberts PC, Makhene M, Coler RN, et al. An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1920–31. Epub 2020/07/15. pmid:32663912
  14. 14. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–15. Epub 2020/12/11. pmid:33301246
  15. 15. Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr., Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2439–50. Epub 2020/10/15. pmid:33053279
  16. 16. Jackson LA, Roberts PC, Graham BS. A SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine—Preliminary Report. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(12):1191–2. Epub 2020/08/20. pmid:32813942.
  17. 17. Mahajan S, Redlich CA, Wisnewski AV, Fazen LE, Rao LV, Kuppusamy K, et al. Performance of Abbott Architect, Ortho Vitros, and Euroimmun Assays in Detecting Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection. medRxiv. 2020:2020.07.29.20164343.
  18. 18. Amanat F, Stadlbauer D, Strohmeier S, Nguyen THO, Chromikova V, McMahon M, et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nature Medicine. 2020;26(7):1033–6. pmid:32398876
  19. 19. Curtis J, Bourne FJ. Half-lives of immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM in the serum of new-born pigs. Immunology. 1973;24(1):147–55. Epub 1973/01/01. pmid:4685369
  20. 20. Mankarious S, Lee M, Fischer S, Pyun KH, Ochs HD, Oxelius VA, et al. The half-lives of IgG subclasses and specific antibodies in patients with primary immunodeficiency who are receiving intravenously administered immunoglobulin. J Lab Clin Med. 1988;112(5):634–40. Epub 1988/11/01. pmid:3183495.
  21. 21. Salonen EM, Hovi T, Meurman O, Vesikari T, Vaheri A. Kinetics of specific IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM antibody responses in rubella. J Med Virol. 1985;16(1):1–9. Epub 1985/05/01. pmid:3900285.
  22. 22. Moncunill G, Mayor A, Santano R, Jimenez A, Vidal M, Tortajada M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Kinetics Among Health Care Workers in a Spanish Hospital After 3 Months of Follow-up. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(1):62–71. Epub 2020/11/12. pmid:33175145
  23. 23. Burnett D. Immunoglobulins in the lung. Thorax. 1986;41(5):337–44. Epub 1986/05/01. pmid:3750240
  24. 24. Stockley RA, Mistry M, Bradwell AR, Burnett D. A study of plasma proteins in the sol phase of sputum from patients with chronic bronchitis. Thorax. 1979;34(6):777–82. Epub 1979/12/01. pmid:542918
  25. 25. Xiong N, Fu Y, Hu S, Xia M, Yang J. CCR10 and its ligands in regulation of epithelial immunity and diseases. Protein Cell. 2012;3(8):571–80. Epub 2012/06/12. pmid:22684736
  26. 26. Lin M, Du L, Brandtzaeg P, Pan-Hammarstrom Q. IgA subclass switch recombination in human mucosal and systemic immune compartments. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(3):511–20. Epub 2013/09/26. pmid:24064668.
  27. 27. Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Kennedy RB. SARS-CoV-2 immunity: review and applications to phase 3 vaccine candidates. Lancet. 2020;396(10262):1595–606. Epub 2020/10/17. pmid:33065034
  28. 28. Russell MW, Moldoveanu Z, Ogra PL, Mestecky J. Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11(3221). pmid:33329607
  29. 29. Bleier BS, Ramanathan M Jr., Lane AP. COVID-19 Vaccines May Not Prevent Nasal SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Asymptomatic Transmission. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(2):305–7. Epub 2020/12/16. pmid:33320052.