Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Relationships of irrigation water and soil physical and chemical characteristics with yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Damask rose essential oil

  • Mansureh Ghavam

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mghavam@kashanu.ac.ir

    Affiliation Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) is an aromatic medicinal plant rich in bioactive compounds with high value in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. Knowledge of the factors affecting the quantitative and qualitative properties of the compounds in its essential oil (EO) and the bioactivity of this EO is important in optimizing Damask rose cultivation and production. This research studied, for the first time, the effects of irrigation water and soil chemical and physical characteristics on the EO yield of this important commercial species and on it chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. The results showed the significant effect of crop cultivation site on yield, chemical composition and inhibition zone diameter (IZD) at the 1% significance level. The highest EO yield (~0.0266%), which belonged to the Noushabad site (EON), resulted from the increased soil electrical conductivity (EC) and the higher sand, gypsum and lime contents and irrigation water salinity. Analysis of the chemical composition of the EOs showed that their main compounds at all three crop sites were citronellol, nonadecane, heneicosane and geraniol. The EO obtained from the Yazdel site (EOY) had the highest contents of citronellol and geraniol (~29.05% and ~6.85%) that were directly correlated with soil potassium and phosphorus contents and inversely correlated with soil acidity and EC and its lime, nitrogen, and organic carbon contents. Antimicrobial assays indicated that the EO extracted from the Sefidshahr site (EOS), which had the largest inhibition zone diameter (~14.67 mm) for Aspergillus brasiliensis (IZD~14.67 mm) and the lowest MIC (~31.25 μg/mL) for Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exhibited efficacy similar to that of rifampin, probably due to the dominance of the alkanes in it. The EOY and EOS also exhibited the strongest inhibitory and lethal activity against Candida albicans (MIC and MBC <15.63 μg/mL for EOY and MIC and MBC = 62.5 μg/mL for EOS), which were six and four times stronger than those of nystatin, respectively. Therefore, the selected EOs can act as a potentially promising strategy for fighting microbial strains.

1. Introduction

Essential oils (EOs) are the complex content of volatile organic compounds, which are synthesized in aromatic vascular plants as a defense mechanism for antifungal, antiparasitic, antiviral and antibacterial activities. Likewise, they can perform similar activities in the human body [1, 2]. They have been screened and used in pharmacology, medical microbiology and phytopathology [3] and they are considered an available source of chemical diversity to be used for a wide range of infectious diseases even against chemical-resistant strains [4, 5].

Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) is one of the most important species in the Rosaceae family [6] with high value products, and its essential oil (EO) is one of the most expensive EOs in the world markets [7, 8]. Apart from its use as an ornamental plant in parks, gardens, and houses, R. damascena is principally cultivated for the perfume, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [9].

In traditional Iranian medicine, more than a thousand years ago Avicenna (980–1037 AD) explained the therapeutic effects of Damask rose such gastrointestinal and cardiac tonic effects, elimination of the unpleasant body odor related to sweat, skin repair and healing of mucosal lesions [10]. Later, Aghili Shirazi in the 12th century AH (1688–1785 AD) described the therapeutic effects of R. damascena in his book entitled “Medicine Repository” and referred to the plant as a brain tonic and analgesic for various diseases [11]. The most important healing effects of Damask rose EO include reduction of depression, sadness, stress, and thirst, as well as wound healing and skin health improvement. Studies have shown that vapor therapy using this EO may be helpful in treating some allergies, headaches and migraines [12, 13].

Results of clinical trials have shown that R. damascena EO has tranquilizing effects without any serious complications [1416]. Various reports also demonstrated its biological activities including antioxidant [17, 18], anti-cancer [19], anti-inflammatory [20], anti-HIV [21, 22], antifungal, antibacterial, and antimicrobial [16, 2325] properties.

Alkanes, alcohols, phenols, terpenes and terpenoids are the compounds found in Damask rose EO. Its most important alkanes are nonadecane, eicosane, heneicosane, heptadecane and octadecane [2628] and its major terpene and terpenoid compounds citronellol, geraniol, neral, linalool, and farnesol [29]. Citronellol, geraniol and neral are the main constituents of Damask rose EO contributing to its quality [30], have wide applications in the perfume, cosmetic and soap industries and exhibit potent antimicrobial activity against some bacterial [31].

This plant has been cultivated in many countries including Iran, the United States, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Turkey, Japan, and India. It grows wild in many parts of the world and is widely distributed in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East [7, 32]. R. damascena has been cultivated for various purposes in Iran from ancient times, and this country has a long history of producing and exporting its EO around the world [33, 34].

Knowledge of the factors influencing its EO yield and chemical composition is very important for producers of Damask rose [35, 36] Like the other aromatic plants, its EO is affected by genetic and many environmental factors including crop location characteristics [26, 37]. Studies have shown that environmental factors (e.g., annual rainfall, temperature, humidity, light, soil, pruning, provision of nutrients and harvest time) considerably influence Damask rose EO [3843]. Soil and irrigation water characteristics are among the most important factors influencing the EOs of plants in a field. Soil characteristics are effective factors in growth and development and quantitative and qualitative yields of plants [44]. The chemical elements in the rhizosphere (such as contents of mobile phosphorus and mobile potassium) enter into the composition of the enzymes that take part in the biochemical reactions in plants. Therefore, soil chemistry can affect the composition of essential oils (such as linalool, citronellol, geraniol, eugenol, etc) and also the distribution of chemotypes [45]. Water is also one of the very important environmental factors that affect growth, quality and quantity of the EOs of cultivated medicinal plants. It is not yet clearly known why plants produce EOs; however, EOs are generally the remaining products of the major metabolic processes in plants, especially under stress conditions [46, 47]. In plants that produce EOs (complex mixtures of volatile compounds generally produced in the biosynthetic pathways of terpenoids or phenylpropanoids), interactions with the environment usually lead to changes in the compounds found in the EOs and in their contents [48]. These changes may contribute to the evolution of various plant genes that favor adaptation to the environmental conditions at crop sites thus leading to changes in the quantity and quality of the EOs (and hence in their biological activities) [49, 50]. Therefore, evaluation of genotypes collected from cultivation locations having different environmental conditions is an important step in Damask rose breeding programs prior to selection of desirable cultivars for commercial production.

The effects of irrigation water and soil characteristics on Damask rose EO have not been studied for a specific climate region in Iran. Therefore, this research aimed to: a) study and compare the yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of R. damascena EO under diverse soil and irrigation water characteristics, and b) select an ideal crop site with optimal soil and irrigation water characteristics to produce the best essential oil with respect to quantity, quality and antimicrobial activity.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Selection of cultivation area and sites

The various areas where the Damask rose species of interest was planted in Kashan were identified through field studies to select the sampling area. The Kashan plain was selected since the crop sites in it, which were at suitable distances from each other, had similar climatic and topographical conditions and different soil and irrigation water characteristics. The three selected crop sites of Sefidshahr, Yazdel and Noushabad were 15 km apart. They differed in soil and irrigation water characteristics but had identical planting, growing and harvesting conditions. The geographical characteristics of the studied sites and the climatic features of the area are shown in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Geographical characteristics of the studied crop sites in the Kashan plain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t001

2.2. Plant material sampling

When Damask rose flower buds began to open in May 2019, flowers (petals and sepals) were randomly collected from different bushes (100 bushes at each crop site) at 6 a.m. The samples were transferred to the laboratory and kept for an hour at 4°C. A complete bush was also collected from each field, identified at the herbarium of the School of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences in Kashan University, coded and stored.

2.3. Soil sample collection

At each crop site, soil samples were randomly collected from three points at the depth of 30 cm prior to planting. The samples were transferred to the soil laboratory to determine their physical and chemical characteristics. They were passed through a 2-mm sieve and then prepared for the various tests.

2.4. Irrigation water sample collection

Irrigation water samples were collected at each site and transferred to the laboratory to assess water quality characteristics including EC (Electrical Conductivity), acidity, hardness and anions and cations contents. The characteristics of the irrigation water at the three sites are presented in detail in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Irrigation water characteristics at the studied crop sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t002

2.5. Laboratory operations

2.5.1. EO extraction and separation.

To extract the EO, fresh flowers (350 g) were collected from each harvesting point at each crop site, weighed and put into a two-liter flask. The EO was extracted by distilled water using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 5 h. The extract was dehydrated using sodium sulfate, separated, and kept in the dark in a dark-colored bottle at 4°C until later use. The EO yield for each harvesting point was expressed based on weight/weight percent (% w/w) at each site. The EO yield for each site was reported as the mean± SD of three replications (harvesting points).

2.5.2. Identification of the compounds in the EOs using GC-MS.

A GC-MS instrument was employed to determine the chemical composition of the EO samples. The instrument consisted of a 6890 gas chromatograph (GC) coupled to an Agilent 5973 N mass spectrometer (MS) with a capillary column of HP-5 MS and 5% methyl phenyl of the stagnant phase (30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, the thickness of stagnant layer 0.25 μm) and the ionization energy of 70 eV.

The oven temperature program for the analysis was as follows: it was set at 60°C and raised by 3°C per minute to reach 246°C. The injector and the detector temperatures were set at 250°C. The injection volume of sample was 1μL, split mode (1.50). The helium carrier gas flow was 1.5 mL/min.

The chemical constituents of the EOs were determined based on the GC-MC analysis of each EO sample in relation to the retention indices (RI) and standard mixtures of n-alkane (C8-C20) mixtures and mass spectral data of each peak using spectral libraries (NIST-14 and Wiley-14) and comparing the obtained results with those in the literature [51].

2.5.3. Determination of antimicrobial activity.

2.5.3.1. Microbial strains. Eleven standard microbial strains were used to assess the antimicrobial activities of the EOs. These strains were four Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis CIP 81.55, S. aureus ATCC 29737, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633), five Gram-negative bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 10031, Escherichia coli ATCC 10536, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Salmonella paratyphi A serotype ATCC 5702, and Shigella dysenteriae PTCC 1188, and the two fungal strains of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 and Aspergillus brasiliensis ATCC 16404. The microorganisms were obtained from the Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST). The bacterial strains were cultured on nutrient agar and the fungal strains on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA). The plates inoculated with the bacteria and fungi cultures were incubated overnight at 37°C and 30°C, respectively.

2.5.3.2. Agar well-diffusion method. The protocol of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [52] was employed in using this method. Plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar and SDA were first prepared to culture the bacterial and fungal strains, respectively. The EO was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the concentration was raised to 300 μg/mL. The turbidity of each microbial suspension (100 μL) was adjusted to that of a 0.5 McFarland standard and the suspensions were cultured on the culture media under identical conditions. A number of wells with 6 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness were made in the culture plates and 10 μL EO (at concentration 300μg/mL) was added to each well. The plates were kept at 4°C for 2 h. The plates inoculated with the bacterial strains were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h and those incubated with the A. brasiliensis ATCC 16404 and C. albicans ATCC 10231 were incubated at 30°C for 72 and 48 hours, respectively. Gentamicin (10 μg/disc) and rifampin (5μg/disc) were used as positive controls for the bacterial strains and nystatin (100,000 units/mL) as the positive control for the fungal strains under the same conditions as those for the EO tests. IZD was measured using a ruler (that measures in millimeters) to generate the antibiogram. The test was performed in triplicate for each EO to assess reproducibility and become certain of the reliability of the results. The IZDs were reported as mean ± SD.

2.5.3.3. MIC. To determine the MICs for the bacterial and yeast strains, sterile 96-well microtiter plates and the broth microdilution method were used according to the CLSI protocol [52]. Various dilutions of the EO were prepared first. A certain volume of the EO was weighed, dissolved in the culture medium and DMSO at a suitable ratio to prepare the initial stock at a concentration of 2000 μg/mL. This stock was used to prepare the 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, and 15.63 μg/mL dilutions. Each well in the microplate was filled with 200 μL of a solution containing 95 μL of brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for bacteria or with 95 μL of SD broth for yeast, and 5 μL of the microbial suspension with the turbidity adjusted to that of a 0.5 McFarland standard and 100 μL of one of the EO dilutions were added. The wells intended as negative controls were filled with the culture medium instead of the essential oil and for the wells intended as positive controls antibiotic powders (gentamicin and rifampin) were used instead of the EO for the bacterial strains and nystatin powder for the yeast. Plates inoculated with bacterial and fungal plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and at 30°C for 48 h, respectively. MIC was determined taking into account the turbidity and the change in the color in each well of the microplate. The test was performed in triplicate for each EO sample and the mean was reported as the minimum concentration of the EO that inhibited the growth of bacteria or yeast.

The agar dilution assay was used to determine the MICs for the fungal strains based on the protocol introduced by of [53]. The suitable amounts of EO at different concentrations (2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25 and 15.63 μg/mL) were added to SDA containing 50% (v/v) Tween 20. Nystatin powder was used as the positive control, and the negative control was the plate with SDA containing 50% (v/v) Tween 20 without any EO. The culture media were spot inoculated with 4 ml of spores (104 spores /mL). The inoculated plates were incubated at 30°C for 72 h, the test was performed in triplicate for each essential oil, and the minimal concentration of the essential oil that inhibited the growth of the fungi was reported as the MIC.

2.5.3.4. MBC. The broth microdilution method based on CLSI protocol (2012) was used as described above to determine MBC. Following 24 h of incubation, the nutrient agar medium was inoculated with 5 μL of each well that exhibited no trace of bacterial growth (light well) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. MBC refers to the minimal concentration of the EO that kills 99.9% of the inoculated bacteria.

2.5.4. Soil characteristics.

Soil pH, EC and phosphorous, potassium, organic carbon, nitrogen, lime and gypsum contents and its texture components were measured using a pH meter, an EC meter, the Olson method, the ammonium acetate extraction method, the Walkley and Black method (1934), the Kjeldahl method, the acid-base titration method, the acetone method, and the hydrometric method, respectively (Zargoosh et al., 2019).

2.6. Statistical analysis

SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Data normality was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. When normality of the data was proved, one-way and univariate ANOVA were employed to determine significance of differences. Duncan’ test at the 1% significance level was used for comparison of the means. All data were expressed as mean ± SD, Pearson correlation was used to study the correlations between EO yield and the dominant compounds in EO and soil chemical characteristics.

3. Results

3.1. EO yield

R. damascena EO was pale yellow at all three crop sites. ANOVA results regarding EO yield showed the significant effect of crop site on EO yield at the 1% significance level (P≤ 0.01) (Table 3). These results are consistent with those of the study by [54]) that the effect of location on yield of Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad and Satureja rechingeri Jamzad was significant (p< 0.01). Comparison of the means at the three crop sites (Table 4) showed that EON and EOY with the mean yields of ~ 0.00266% and ~ 0.0157% had the highest and lowest EO yields, respectively. These results are consistent with those reported in the research by [55] in the Western Himalayas and by [38] in Iran on this plant. However, the highest EO yield of Damask rose in Iran (0.20%) was obtained in Gilan Province [56]. Many studies have assessed the plant-soil interaction effects and have shown the correlation between plant and soil characteristics [5760]. The present study also investigated the correlations between plant and soil characteristics.

thumbnail
Table 3. ANOVA of the effect of crop site on yield and some dominant and important compounds of R. damascena EO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparison of the means related yield of R. damascena EO at the studied crop sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t004

Table 5 shows the results related to correlations between soil characteristics and EO yield. There were direct correlations between EO yield and soil EC and percentages of its sand, gypsum and lime contents and inverse correlations between EO yield and soil silt and clay percentages. The highest values of EC (~4.817 ds/m), sand percentage (~82.000%) and gypsum content (~0.703%) belonged to EON and the highest values of clay percentage (~11.667%) and silt percentage (~18.67%) were those of EOY (Table 6). Therefore, lighter soil texture, higher EC (salinity), and higher gypsum and lime contents probably increased EO yield. The plants growing in soils with higher clay percentage must spend more energy for root growth and water and nutrient absorption and hence plant growth and yield decrease. [54] also showed lower EO yield in soils with high clay percentages. Their results are consistent with those of the present study.

thumbnail
Table 5. Correlations between soil characteristics and yield and some dominant and important compounds in R. damascena EO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Comparison of the means of soil characteristics of crop sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t006

Assessment of irrigation water characteristics showed higher concentrations of all cations and anions, water-soluble salts and consequently higher EC, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and soluble sodium percentage (SSP) at the Noushabad site, which could be among the reasons for its higher EO yield. However, [6163] showed that higher soil salinity significantly reduced EO yield in Cuminum cyminum L., Mentha canadensis L., and Melissa officinalis L., respectively. These conflicting results regarding the effect of salinity on EO yield of various species in previous research might be due to genotype differences (sensitivity to salinity and halophilism), growing conditions and cultivation techniques [64, 65]. Salinity may play an indirect role in EO accumulation via affecting net assimilation and/or through influencing allocation of assimilates [66]. Therefore, higher EO yield in plants under soil or water salinity conditions might be due to the reduction in primary metabolites under salinity stress that leads to use of intermediate compounds to synthesize secondary metabolites [67]. Comparison of water characteristics at Yazdel and Noushabad sites showed the lowest and highest concentrations of Mg2+ were recorded in Yazdel (3.82 meq/L) and Noushabad (11.04 meq/L), which might have been one of the factors influencing EO yield. Also [68] reported that, in some cases, plant vegetative growth decreased considerably in soils being irrigated with water having high magnesium concentrations, even in cases where there were no limitations on water infiltration. High magnesium concentrations in irrigation water may cause production of secondary metabolites to start thereby increasing EO yield [69].

3.2. Chemical composition of the EOs

The chemical analysis of the EOs identified 52 compounds that constituted 99.58–97.99% of them at the three crop sites (Table 7). The lowest number of compounds (27) was that of the EOS, which was significantly different from that recorded for EOY and EON (39 compounds). [38] also reported different numbers of compounds derived from Damask rose EO in various regions in Iran. Differences in the types and numbers of compounds might result from genetic variations or from environmental factors including soil chemical composition [70, 71]. Soil chemical composition affects not only the amounts of EOs but also the distribution of the chemotypes and the percentages of the compounds found in EOs because chemical elements enter into the composition of the enzymes that are involved in plant biochemical processes [45, 50]. Nonterpenoids (others) and oxygenated monoterpenes were the major constituents of the EOs at all the studied sites. These results are consistent with those of the study by [56]. The highest percentages of nonterpenoids (39.27%) and oxygenated monoterpenes (68.15%) were obtained from EOS and EOY, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 7. Diversity in chemical composition of R. damascena EO at the crop sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t007

ANOVA results showed that there were significant differences in the mean percentages of the compounds in R. damascena EO obtained from the studied sites (P≤ 0.01) (Table 7). [72] also reported differences in the relative percentages of the compounds in R. damascena EO obtained from different farms that they attributed to variations in the soils of a region that led to different biosynthesis and accumulation levels of volatile compounds. Therefore, identification of suitable conditions for the synthesis of metabolites and special compounds in plants can be effective in increasing their production [73]. The major constituents of the EOs at the studied sites were citronellol, nonadecane, heneicosane and geraniol with different percentages. These results are consistent with the findings of [74].

Citronellol and geraniol are the most important constituents of Damask rose EO and the main components responsible for its aroma quality [75]. The results showed the significant effect of crop site on citronellol percentage at the 1% significance level (Table 3). [54] also showed that crop site had no significant effect (p< 0.05) on carvacrol content in the species Satureja rechingeri Jamzad and Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad. These results are not consistent with those of the present study. The highest percentages of citronellol and geraniol belonged to the Yazdel site (~29.05% and ~6.85%). The differences in the percentages of these compounds at the sites are consistent with the results of the study by [26] in Iran but not with those in the studies by [74] in the western Himalayas (citronellol = 42.0% and geraniol = 21.4%) and [76] in Turkey (citronellol = 35.23% and geraniol = 22.19). Results related to correlation of soil characteristics with citronellol content showed that there were direct correlations between the amount of citronellol and soil potassium and phosphorus contents and inverse correlations between the quantity of citronellol and soil acidity and soil lime, nitrogen and organic carbon contents. Potassium plays a role in almost all plant metabolic processes the most important of which are its effects on growth, enzyme activation, and prevention of energy loss [77]. Potassium seems to be involved in the chemical structure and activation of the enzymes affecting biochemical pathways related to synthesis of active plant ingredients [50, 78]. Phosphorus is one of the macro nutrients and significantly contributes to plant growth and EO biosynthesis. It is involved in photosynthesis, respiration and pyruvate production (a necessary compound for EO biosynthesis), and is present in the structures of the three coenzymes adenosine triphosphate (ATP), coenzyme A and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) that take part in biosynthesis of terpenoids [79]. Soil phosphorus available to plants may be converted to calcium phosphate (unavailable to plants) under the influence of calcium carbonate in calcareous and alkaline soils of arid and semi-arid regions [78]. Therefore, reducing soil lime content can substantially help phosphorous absorption by plants. The Yazdel site had the lowest lime content. There was a direct correlation between geraniol content and soil phosphorous and silt percentage and inverse correlations between geraniol content and soil EC and soil lime and sand percentage (Table 5). Therefore, in addition to the effects of higher phosphorus and lower lime contents on the synthesis of citronellol and geraniol, lower salinity and clay texture could be among the factors that increased geraniol synthesis compared to the other sites. Also [80] showed that increased contents of the dominant compounds such as 1,8-cineole and camphor in the EO of Achillea millefolium L. subsp. millefolium were correlated with lower soil EC and higher clay percentage. Production of plant secondary metabolites is substantially influenced by environmental conditions, especially biotic and abiotic stresses. Among them, salinity greatly influences plant EO composition and their biosynthesis [81]. Production of monoterpenes is catalyzed by terpene synthesis, which is guided by stress-related programs. [62, 63, 65] determined the effects of higher salinity on the synthesis of the major compounds in the EO, especially monoterpenes, in Mentha canadensis L., Melissa officinalis L., and Mentha spicata, respectively. Their results contradict the findings of the present study. Higher concentrations of bicarbonate in the irrigation water at the Yazdel site and hence the greater inhibitory effect on primary metabolic activities [82], which leads to synthesis of secondary metabolites, could be another possible factor increasing the contents of citronellol and geraniol.

The citronellol-geraniol (C/G) ratio has been used in many studies to assess the aroma quality of Damask rose EO [83], which is dependent on the climatic and geographical origins of the plant [84]. The best aroma is produced when the C/G ratio is between 1.25 and 1.30 [85]. The C/G ratio varied at the studied sites (CG<17.65 in Noushabad, CG<15.85 in Sefidshahr and CG<4.24 in Yazdel). These values indicate the high-quality aroma of EON. [55] showed that differences in C/G ratio in Damask rose EO were caused by harvest time. Therefore, various factors such as soil, water and even harvest time can influence the C/G ratio.

Nonadecane and heneicosane alkanes were among the most abundant compounds in Damask rose EO at all three studied sites. ANOVA results showed the significant effect of crop site on nonadecane and heneicosane quantities (P≤ 0.01) (Table 3). The highest and lowest percentages of these two compounds were obtained at Sefidshahr (29.66% and 16.89%) and Yazdel (18.48 and 9.99%), respectively. [86] in southern Iran, [74] in the Western Himalayas, and [87] in China also recorded these two compounds as the major constituents of Damask rose EO. Correlations of these two compounds with soil characteristics were assessed. The results showed that there were strong and indirect correlations between the contents of these two compounds and soil phosphorous and potassium contents and strong positive correlations between their contents and soil nitrogen, lime and organic carbon contents. Soil acidity had a significant direct correlation with the quantity of nonadecane at the 5% significance level (Table 5). High organic carbon content of the soil leads to desirable water retention that enhances root growth, and the gradual release of nitrogen increases its uptake. Nitrogen increases the growing period, plant dry materials, and photosynthesis, prepares the carbon skeleton and substrate necessary for biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and hence increases the materials that form them [88, 89]. Comparison of the correlations between nonadecane and citronellol and soil characteristics showed that the same factors increasing citronellol synthesis reduced nonadecane synthesis. Moreover, soil characteristics, except for acidity, inversely affected the amounts of heneicosane and citronellol. Therefore, crop sites with suitable soil and water characteristics for the synthesis of these alkanes lack the appropriate conditions for the synthesis of the important compounds citronellol and geraniol. In fact, plants that are grown in soils with higher lime, nitrogen and organic carbon contents and lower phosphorus and potassium contents and are irrigated with water containing lower bicarbonate levels produce EO having poorer EO aroma quality and lower amounts of alkanes.

Eugenol and neral are important compounds in Damask rose EO. ANOVA results showed that crop site had a significant effect on the quantities of these two compounds (P≤ 0.01) (Table 3), and their highest amounts (1.32–2.40%) were recorded at the Yazdel site. Previous studies did not report presence of eugenol in the chemical composition of Damask rose EO in northern Iran, but [56] found a very low amount of eugenol (0.18%) in Damask rose EO extracted in that region. These results are not consistent with those of the present research, and neral was not found in the EOS. [74] in the Western Himalayas, [38] in some regions of Iran, and [86] in southern Iran did not find this compound in the chemical composition of Damask rose EO either. The highest content of this compound (9.6%) has been recorded in India) [90]. Correlations between soil characteristics and the quantities of eugenol and neral were studied. The results indicated that there was a strong and positive correlation between soil phosphorus and silt percentage and the contents of these two compounds and a negative correlation between soil lime content and sand percentage and the amounts of eugenol and neral. It seems that, except for EC, the same factors affect the synthesis of these two compounds and geraniol. The trend of changes in the amounts of eugenol and neral was similar to that of geraniol. It was mainly the Sefidshahr site that did not possess the required conditions for the synthesis of these compounds.

Phenylethyl alcohol is responsible for aroma of flowers in the Rosaceae family. It is one of the major constituents of Damask rose EO [91]. It is highly soluble in water and completely vaporizes in the distillation process. Low contents of this compound are found in rose EO [92]. There were significant differences between the studied sites in the content of this material. The highest content (1.50%) was recorded at the Noushabad site. No trace of this compound was found at the Sefidshahr site. [86] in some regions of Iran and [86] in southern Iran did not find this compound in Damask rose EO either. The highest content of this compound (0.86%) was found in northern Iran and Bulgaria (27.75%). These results are not consistent with those of the present research [56, 92]. Correlations of soil characteristics with this compound were studied. The results indicated increased synthesis of this compound with decreases in soil pH and nitrogen, organic carbon, lime, potassium, phosphorus contents and also with increases in soil potassium and phosphorous contents. These results are similar to those concerning correlations between citronellol content and soil characteristics. Synthesis of the compounds responsible for the aroma of R. damascena EO seems to strongly depend on the balance between the three macronutrients (NPK) and on soil lime content. R. damascena produces high-quality EO in soils with high phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen and lime contents. [93] showed that potassium and phosphorus increased the synthesis of α-bisabolene in Satureja hortensis EO. However, [94] reported that potassium and phosphorus reduced synthesis of caryophyllene oxide in Ocimum basilicum EO. The trend of changes in cations and anions (Ca+2, Na+, CL- and SO4-2), pH, EC, TDS, T.H, SSP and SAR in irrigation water corresponded to synthesis of this compound at the studied sites. Higher salinity and alkalinity of water seem to stimulate synthesis of this compound. [95] confirmed the effect of water salinity on synthesis of some compounds of EO derived from Ocimum basilicum cv. Keshkeni luvelou.

Methyl eugenol (ME) is another important compound in Damask rose EO that the crop site significantly influenced (P≤ 0.01) (Table 3). It is a natural carcinogenic phenylpropanoid compound [72]. Its concentration is carefully scrutinized when selecting the best option in planting Damask rose. The highest and lowest ME concentrations were found at the Noushabad (2.68%) and Yazdel (0.85%) sites. Results of correlations between soil characteristics and ME contents suggested that there were strong positive correlations between ME content and soil EC and sand and gypsum contents and strong inverse correlations between its content and soil pH and silt and clay percentages. [96] confirmed that EC increased the contents of important compounds in the EO of Melissa officinalis L. These results are consistent with those of the present research. Higher EC values pose major constraints to growth, development, productivity, and crop quality in many regions of the world through disrupting plant physiological functions, but they may stimulate production and accumulation of secondary metabolites in plants [61]. High levels of Mg+2 in irrigation water may also increase synthesis of ME.

Linalool and farnesol have important therapeutic effects, especially antimicrobial activity. Low contents of linalool and farnesol isomers in EOY are among the other advantages of this EO that are consistent with the findings of [97]. There was a strong direct correlation between silt percentage and phosphorus content and the contents of linalool and farnesol isomers (cis-farnesol, trans-farnesol and trans,trans-farnesol). Strong indirect correlations were also found between the contents of these materials and soil EC, lime content and sand percentage. These results completely match the correlations between geraniol and soil characteristics (Table 5). Therefore, heavy-textured saline soils with high lime and phosphorous contents will substantially help synthesis of this type of compounds in Damask rose EO. [45] found a negative correlation between sand percentage and linalool content and a positive correlation between soil phosphorous content and α-terpinyl acetate in Thymus pulegioides EO.

Rose oxide is also one of the effective compounds in the flavor of Damask rose EO. Even low amounts of this compound have a substantial effect on aroma and flavor of this EO. Trans-rose oxide quantities varied at the studied sites. Its highest amount (1.30%) was recorded at the Sefidshahr site, but no trace of it was found at the Yazdel site. [56] reported only low contents of rose oxide (0.1%) from northern Iran. These results were not consistent with those of the present research. There were direct correlations between rose oxide content and soil lime and organic contents and sand percentage and inverse correlations between its quantity and soil phosphorous content and silt percentage. It seems that it is necessary to increase the factors reducing the contents of the other compounds responsible for the aroma of Damask rose EO in order to increase the quantity of rose oxide in it. This will considerably influence the low quality of Damask rose EO.

3.3. Antimicrobial and antifungal activities of essential oil

Antifungal and antibacterial activities of Damask rose EO against different strains were assessed using the agar well-diffusion method (Table 8 and Fig 1). Inhibition zones (IZs) were only observed for Gram-positive Streptococcus pyogenes and Aspergillus brasiliensis. ANOVA results showed that crop site had a significant effect on IZD of Damask rose EO against Streptococcus pyogenes and Aspergillus brasiliensis (P≤ 0.01) (Table 9). [98] assessed the effect of crop site on IZs of Tagetes minuta L. EO against different microbial strains using the agar well-diffusion method. The largest IZD of rose EO against Aspergillus brasiliensis (~14.67 mm) belonged to the Sefidshahr site, that exhibited relatively potent antifungal activity (~30 mm) compared to nystatin. These results are consistent with those of the study by [99] who determined antifungal activity of Damask rose EO extracted in Isfahan against Aspergillus brasiliensis. Variations in antimicrobial activities of EOs of a species grown in different regions may result from differences in the dominant compounds found in the Eos and the presence of different chemicals in the EOs [98, 100]. Dominance of alkanes (especially nonadecane and heneicosane) in EOS can be one of the reasons for antifungal activity. Not only dominant and main compounds in EOs but also the synergistic effects of those compounds with lower percentages may contribute to their antimicrobial activity [101]. Therefore, the low contents of trans-rose oxide and sesquiterpenes (e.g., germacrene D, caryophyllene, α-guaiene, α-humulene and δ-guaiene) in EOS, which were higher compared to the other two sites, can probably be among the other factors influencing this antifungal activity. The effects of abundance of sesquiterpenes against different microbial strains were recorded by [102] who showed that antifungal activity of Eos obtained from Phlomis species. It is noteworthy that the value of MBC and MIC obtained for this fungus was 1000 μg/mL, which is much higher than that of nystatin (31.2 μg/mL) (Table 10).

thumbnail
Table 8. IZDs of R. damascene EO at the crop sites and of the antibiotics against the standard microbial strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t008

thumbnail
Table 9. ANOVA related to the effect of crop site on IZD of R. damascena EO for some standard microbial strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t009

thumbnail
Table 10. MIC, MBC, and MFC values of R. damascena EO at the crop sites and of the antibiotics against some standard microbial strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.t010

The IZDs of EOS and EOY for the Gram-positive species Streptococcus pyogenes was ~11.67 mm, which was relatively good compared to those of rifampin (~21 mm) and gentamicin (~32 mm). The findings also indicated that the MIC and MBC values of EOS and EOY for Streptococcus pyogenes were <15.63 μg/mL, which were considerably higher than those of rifampin (0.975 μg/mL) and gentamicin (0.975 μg/mL). The EOS and EOY also exhibited potent antibacterial activity against the Gram-negative species Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL) compared to rifampin (31.25 μg/mL) and relatively good activity compared to gentamicin (7.81 μg/mL). However, EON exhibited much weaker antibacterial activity (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL). [87] showed that Damask rose EO had no antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These findings are consistent with the results of the present research. Similar antibacterial activities of EOS and EOY seem to be due to their similar chemical profiles, especially with respect to sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. Caryophyllene was observed in EOS and EOY, but was not found in EON. Moreover, given the same antibacterial properties of the two Eos, we can infer that the various relative contents of the compounds in their Eos were the reason for their identical antibacterial activities. Dominance of citronellol, geraniol, neral, and eugenol the unique presence of linalool and farnesol isomers in EOY, can be the most effective factors responsible for its antimicrobial activity. Antimicrobial activities of these compounds against various microbial strains were confirmed in different studies [103, 104]. Conversely, dominance of alkanes (e.g., nonadecane and heneicosane, 1-nonadecene, and eicosane) and higher quantities of sesquiterpenes in Eos can be effective factors responsible for the antimicrobial activity of this EO. Many studies have confirmed the strong antimicrobial effects of alkanes and sesquiterpenes [50, 103, 105]. Diversity in chemical composition of EOs lead to different main activities in relation to possible antimicrobial activities of plant EOs including disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane that disrupt the driving force of protons, electron flow, active transport, and also coagulation of cell contents [106]. Although Musk rose EO from all the studied sites did not create effective inhibition zones against the bacterial and yeast strains, their various concentrations were effective in inhibiting and killing them. Their MBC and MIC values against some strains were considerable compared to those of the studied antibiotics. EOY exhibited the strongest inhibitory and lethal activity against Candida albicans (MIC and MBC <15.63 μg/mL), very considerable and significant compared to those for nystatin (125 μg / mL). It was six times more effective than nystatin. These findings are not consistent with the findings of [24] in Bulgaria. Although the MIC and MBC values for EOS (62.5 μg/mL) and EON (250 μg/mL) against C. albicans were higher than those of EOY, they were found to be more potent than nystatin. The high potency of EOY against C. albicans is probably due to the presence of citronellol, geraniol, neral, eugenol, linalool, and farnesol isomers compared to EOS and EON. Citronellol [107], geraniol [108] and farnesol [109] were found to be effective against Candida species. Lower potency of EON compared to EOY against C. albicans can be due to lower quantities or the absence of these compounds. However, the low amounts of these compounds in EOS were probably compensated for by the high quantities of alkanes and sesquiterpenes in this EO, which enabled EOS to inhibit and kill C. albicans at a lower MIC value compared to EON.

Another considerable activity of the Damask rose EOs was the antibacterial activity of EOS against the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL and MBC = 62.5 μg/mL). It was as effective against this bacterial species as rifampin (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL). This finding is not consistent with those of the research by [24] in Bulgaria (MIC = 60 μg/mL) and [87] in China (MIC = 250 μg/mL) for Musk rose EO. [87] confirmed the inhibitory and lethal effects of linalool, phenylethyl alcohol, citronellol, geraniol, farnesol, and methyl eugenol derived from Musk rose EO against Staphylococcus aureus. Farnesol showed the lowest MIC and MBC values (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL and MBC = 62.5 μg/mL). The contents of these compounds were much lower in EOS than in EON and EOY. Therefore, antibacterial activity of EOS against Staphylococcus aureus might be due to higher amounts of alkanes that compensated for lower quantities of the above-mentioned compounds whereas EON and EOY had low quantities of alkanes and hence lower antibacterial activity.

The studied EOs only exhibited identical MIC value (MIC = 125 μg/mL) against the Gram-negative species Escherichia coli, and were less potent than gentamicin. These findings are consistent with those of [87] regarding antibacterial activity of Musk rose EO against E. coli (MIC = 125 μg/mL) in China. Inhibitory effects of geraniol [110] and eugenol [111] against E. coli were confirmed in previous studies. Similarly, [87] attributed the inhibitory and lethal effects against E. coli to the presence of linalool, phenyl alcohol, β-citronellol, geraniol, eugenol, an methyl eugenol, with β-citronellol and geraniol showing the strongest antibacterial activity against this this bacterial species (MBC = 125 μg/mL and MIC = 62.5 μg/mL). Therefore, all the above compounds derived from the studied EOs, except for phenylethyl alcohol, were present at all three sites in different quantities and could be responsible for the antibacterial activity of the EOs.

EOS at low amounts exhibited antibacterial activity against the other studied strains including those of the Gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus subtilis and the Gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella paratyphi-A serotype, showing the remarkable effects of its content of alkanes in this activity. MIC values of EOS were lower than EON and EOY. EON was less potent than EOS and EOY. The MIC and MBC values of EON were only lower than those of EOS and EOY against Sh. Dysenteriae and A. brasiliensis.

In general, EOS had the strongest inhibitory and lethal effects against the various studied strains, especially against the Gram-positive bacteria. EOY showed the strongest inhibitory and lethal effects against the yeast strains and effects similar to those of EOS against some of the Gram-negative bacterial strains.

4. Conclusion

The present study showed that yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of R. damascena EO were influenced by different soil and irrigation water characteristics at the crop sites. The correlations between EO yield and soil EC and gypsum and lime contents and components of soil texture revealed that R. damascena should be planted in light-textured soil profile with high EC and gypsum and lime contents and be irrigated with high-salinity cation- and anion-rich water to produce the highest yield, that Noushabad site had the most suitable conditions for production of highest yield EO (~0.0266%). However, EOY with the highest concentrations of geraniol (~29.05%), citronellol (~6.85%), eugenol (~2.40%), neral (~1.32%), and linalool (~1.25%), and having the lowest quantities of alkanes, produced the best quality rose EO with respect to aroma and flavor. High levels of phosphorus and potassium and low EC and low soil lime and nitrogen contents and sand percentage and irrigation with water containing low quantities of magnesium cations were among the most effective factors increasing the amounts of compounds responsible for the quality of the EO. The differences in the chemical composition of the EOs led to various antimicrobial activities against the different microbial strains. In general, the EOS showed the strongest antimicrobial activity against the microbial strains due to its high contents of alkanes and sesquiterpenes, especially against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL and MBC = 62.5 μg/mL) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC = 31.25 μg/mL). Dominance of the compounds producing high-quality flavor and aroma in the EOY also led to the strongest inhibitory and lethal effects against Candida albicans (MIC and MBC <15.63 μg/mL). In all, EOY is a suitable option for aroma and flavor quality, the EON for yield, and EOS for inhibiting and killing some microbial strains a potentially promising strategy.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil of R. damascena from Sefidshar.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil of R. damascena from Yazdel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil of R. damascena from Noushabad.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249363.s003

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Elhidar N., Nafis A., Kasrati A., Goehler A., Bohnert J.A., Abbad A., et al. 2019. Chemical composition, antimicrobial activities and synergistic effects of essential oil from Senecio anteuphorbium, a Moroccan endemic plant. Ind. Crops Prod. 130, 310–315.
  2. 2. Ghavam M., Manca M.L., Manconi M., Bacchetta, 113032 G. 2020. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils obtained from leaves and flowers of Salvia hydrangea DC. ex Benth. Sci Rep 10, 15647. pmid:32973295
  3. 3. Defera DJ., Ziogas BN. & Polission MG. 2000. GC/MS analysis of essential oils from some Greek aromatic plants and their fungitoxity on Penicillum digitatum. J Agric Food Chem. 48, 2576–81. pmid:10888587
  4. 4. Andrade-Ochoa S., Nevárez-Moorillón G.V., Sánchez-Torres L.E., Villanueva-García M., Sánchez-Ramírez B.E., Rodríguez-Valdez L.M., et al. 2015. Quantitative structure-activity relationship of molecules constituent of different essential oils with antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 15, 332. pmid:26400221
  5. 5. Ghavam M., Manconi M. Manca M.L., Bacchetta G. 2021. Extraction of essential oil from Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. (Lamiaceae), identification of two active compounds and evaluation of the antimicrobial properties. J. Ethnopharm. 267, 113513.
  6. 6. Niazi M., Hashempur M.H., Taghizadeh M., Heydari M., Shariat A. 2017. Efficacy of topical Rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) oil for migraine headache: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled cross-overtrial, Complem Therap Medicine. 34, 35–41.
  7. 7. Babaei A., Tobaei-Aghdaei S.R., Khosh-Khui M., Omidbaig R., Naghavi M.R., Esselink G.D. et al. 2007. Microsatellite analysis of Damask rose accessions from various regions in Iran reveals multiple genotypes. BMC plant Bioy. 7, 12. pmid:17346330
  8. 8. Kadayifci A., Senyigit U. and Kepenek K., 2015. Water consumption of oil rose (Rosa damascene Mill.) in isparta conditions. Infrast. Eco. Rural Areas. 745–757.
  9. 9. Naquvi K. J., Ansari S. H., Ali M., Najmi A. K., 2014. Volatile oil composition of Rosa damascena Mill. (Rosaceae). J. Pharm. Phytochem 2(5), 130–134.
  10. 10. Ibn-e-sina (Avicenna). Al-Qanoon fi al-Tibb. 1st ed. Beirut, Lebanon: Alaalami Beirut library Press; 2005 567 p.
  11. 11. Shirazi A. 2009. Makhzan al-adviyah (The Storehouse of Medicaments). Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
  12. 12. Momeni T, Shahrokhi N. 1991. Essential oils and their therapeutic actions. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University. Press.
  13. 13. Zargari A. 1992. Medicinal plants. 5th ed. Tehran: Tehran University Press;.
  14. 14. Keyhanmehr A., Movahhed M., Sahranavard S., Gachkar L., Hamdieh M., Afsharpaiman S. et al. 2018. The effect of aromatherapy with Rosa damascena essential oil on sleep quality in children. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy.1, 41–46.
  15. 15. Hashempur M.H., Hashempour M.M., Mosavat S.H., Heydari M. 2017. Rhazes—his life and contributionsto the field of dermatology, JAMA dermatology. 153, 70–70. pmid:28114524
  16. 16. Boskabady M.H., Shafei M.N., Saberi Z., Amini S. 2011. Pharmacological effects of Rosa damascena,Iran J. Basic Med Sci. 14, 295.
  17. 17. Slavov A., Vasileva I., Stefanov L. Stoyanova A., 2017.Valorization of wastes from the rose oil industry, Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 16, 309–325.
  18. 18. Dadkhah A., Fatemi F., Mohammadi Malayeri M.R, Karvin Ashtiyani M.H., Kazemi Noureini S., Rasooli A. 2019. Considering the effect of Rosa damascena essential oil on oxidative stress and COX-2 geneexpression in liver of septic rats. Turk. J.Pharm. Sci. 4, 416–424.
  19. 19. Ren W., Qiao Z., Wang H., Zhu L., Zhang L., 2003. Flavonoids: promising anticancer agents. Medic Rese Revi. 4, 519–534. pmid:12710022
  20. 20. Fatemi F., Golbodagh A., Hojihosseini R., Dadkhah A., Akbarzadeh K., Dini S., et al. 2020. Anti-inflammatory effects of deuterium-depleted water plus Rosa damascene Mill. essential oil via cyclooxygenase-2 pathway in rats. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 17, 99–101.
  21. 21. Heydarirad G., Keyhanmehr AS., Mofid B., Nikfarjad H., Mosavat SH., 2019. Efficacy of aromatherapy with Rosa damascena in the improvement of sleep quality of cancer patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Complem Therap in Clini Pract. 35, 67–61. pmid:31003687
  22. 22. Mahmood N., Piacente S., Pizza C., Burke A., Khan A.I., Hay A.J., 1996. The anti- HIV activity and mechanisms of action of pure compounds isolated from Rosa damascena. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 229, 73–79. pmid:8954085
  23. 23. Zu Y., Yu H., Liang L., Fu Y., Efferth T., Liu X., et al. 2010. Activities of ten essential oils towards Propionibacterium acnes and PC-3, A-549 and MCF-7 cancer cells. Molecul.15, 3200–10. pmid:20657472
  24. 24. Jirovetz L., Eller G., Buchbauer G. 2006. Chemical composition, antimicrobial activities and odor descriptions of some essential oils with characteristic floralrosy scent and of their principal aroma compounds. Recent Res Dev Agron Hortic. 2, 1e12.
  25. 25. Shohayeb M., El-Sayed S., Abdel-Hameed. Bazaid A., Maghrabi I., 2014. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Rosa damascena MILL. Essential Oil, Different Extracts of Rose Petals. Glob J. Pharm. 1, 01–07.
  26. 26. Loghmani-Khouzani H., Fini O.S., Safari J., 2007. Essential oil composition of Rosa damascena Mill. cultivated in Central Iran. Sci. Iran. 14, 316–319.
  27. 27. Kumar N., Bhandari P., Singh B., Bari SS. 2009. Antioxidant activity and ultra-performance LCelectrosprayionization-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for phenolics-based fingerprinting of Rose species: Rosa damascena, Rosa bourboniana and Rosa brunonii. Food Chem Toxicol. 47, 361–7. pmid:19100811
  28. 28. Bayrak A., Akgul A. 1994. Volatile oil composition of Turkish rose (Rosa damascena). J Sci Food Agric; 64, 441–8.
  29. 29. Duke J. Cseke L Warber S. 2016. Natural Products From Plants, CRC press.
  30. 30. Antonova Daniela V. Antonova D.V., Medarska Y. N. Stoyanova A. S. Nenov N. S. Slavov A. M., et al. 2020. Chemical profile and sensory evaluation of Bulgarian rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) aroma products, isolated by different techniques. J. Essential Oil Resea. In Press.
  31. 31. Sefidkon F., Akbari Z., Assareh M., Bakhshi Khaniki G. 2007. Comparison of Quantity and Quality of Aromatic Compounds from Rosa damascena Mill. by Different Extraction Methods. Iran J. Medi. Arom Plants Res. 22, 351–365.
  32. 32. Al-Yasi H., Attia H., Alamer K., Hassan F., Esmat F., Elshazly S., et al. 2020. KImpact of drought on growth, photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment, and cell wall elasticity in Damask rose, Plant Phys. Biochem. 150, 133–139.
  33. 33. Guenther E., 1952. The Essential Oils, vol. 5. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company Malabar, Florida, USA. pmid:12993050
  34. 34. Rusanov K., Kovacheva N., Vosman B., Zhang L., Rajapakse S., Atanassov A., et al., 2005. Microsatellite analysis of Rosa damascena Mill. accessions reveals genetic similarity between genotypes used for rose oil production and old Damask rose varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111, 804–809. pmid:15947904
  35. 35. Ames G.R., Mathews W.S.A., 1968. The distillation of essential oils. Trop. Sci. 10, 136–148.
  36. 36. Kumar R., Sharma S., Kaundal M., Sharma S., Thakur M., 2016. Response of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) to foliar application of magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) sulphate under western Himalayas. Ind. Crops Prod. 83, 596–602.
  37. 37. Yousefi B., Tabaei-Aghdaei S.R., Darvish F., Assareh M.H., 2009. Flower yield performance and stability of various Rosa damascena Mill. landraces under different ecological conditions. Sci. Horti. 121, 333–339.
  38. 38. Yousefi B., Jaimand K., 2018. Chemical Variation in the Essential Oil of Iranian Rosa damascena Landraces under Semi-arid and Cool Conditions. Int J. Hortic Scie. Tech. 1, 81–92.
  39. 39. Sangwan N.S, Farooqi A.H.A, Shabih F., Sangwan R.S. 2001. Regulation of essential oil production in plants. Plant Grow Reg. 34, 3–21.
  40. 40. Mirali M., Aziz R., Nabulsi I. 2012. Genetic characterization of Rosa damascena species growing in different regions of Syria and its relationship to the quality of the essential oils. Inter J. Med.Arom Plants. 2, 41–52.
  41. 41. Zgheib R., Najm W., Azzi-Achkouty S., Sadaka C. Ouaini N., El Beyrouthy M. 2020. Essential Oil Chemical Composition of Rosa corymbifera Borkh., Rosa phoenicia Boiss. and Rosa damascena Mill. from Lebanon. J. Essential Oil Bear Plants. 5, 1161–1172.
  42. 42. Thakur M., Kumar R. 2020. Foliar application of plant growth regulators modulates the productivity and chemical profile of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) under mid hill conditions of the western Himalaya. Ind. Crop. Prod. 158, 113024.
  43. 43. Probir K.P, Rakesh D.S. 2013. Understanding crop-ecology and agronomy of Rosa damascena Mill. for higher productivity. AJCS. 7, 196–205.
  44. 44. Habibi H., Mazaheri D., Majnoon Hoseini N. and Chaeechi M. R. 2007. Effect of altitude on essential oil and components in wild thyme (Thymus kotschyanus Boiss.) Taleghan region. Pajouh. Saza. 73, 2–10.
  45. 45. Vaičiulytė V., Ložienė K., Taraškevičius R., Butkienė R. 2017. Variation of essential oil composition of Thymus pulegioides in relation to soil chemistry Ind. Crop. Prod. 95, 422–433.
  46. 46. Omidbeigy R., R., Fakhr Tabatabai S. M. 2005. Production and processing of Medicinal Plants. Mashhad: beh nashr.
  47. 47. Basal H., Dagdelen N., Unay A., and Yilmaz E. 2009. Effects of deficit drip irrigation ratios on Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum) yield and fiber quality. Agron. and Crop Sci. 159, 19–29.
  48. 48. Sampaio B. L., Batista D. C. F. 2017. ArticleInfluence of abiotic environmental factors on the main constituentsof the volatile oils of Tithonia diversifolia. Revista Brasil. Farmaco. 28, 1–10.
  49. 49. Tabaei-Aghdaei S.R., Babaei A., Jaimand M. K., Rezaee M.B. 2007. Assareh M.H., Naghavi M.R.Morphological and oil content variations amongst Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) landraces from different regions of Iran. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 113, 44–48.
  50. 50. Feng X., Zhang W., Wu W., Bai R., Kuang Sh., Shi B., et al. 2021. Chemical composition and diversity of the essential oils of Juniperus rigida along the elevations in Helan and Changbai Mountains and correlation with the soil characteristics. Ind. Crops Prod. 159, 113032.
  51. 51. Adams R.P. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadruple mass spectroscopy. Carol Stream IL, 804, (Allured Publishing Cropration, 2007).
  52. 52. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: Approved standard: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 29: 1–76.
  53. 53. Gul H.I., Ojanen T. and Hänninen O. 2002. Antifungal evaluation of bis Mannich bases derived from acetophenones and their corresponding piperidinols and stability studies. Bio. Pharm. Bulletin. 25, 1307–1310. pmid:12392084
  54. 54. Nooshkam A., Mumivand H., Hadian J. Alemardan A. 2017. Drug yield and essential oil and carvacrol contents of two species of Satureja (S. khuzistanica Jamzad and S. rechingeri Jamzad) cultivated in two different locations. J. App. Res. Med. Arom Plants. 6, 126–130.
  55. 55. Kumar R., Sharma S., Sood S., Agnihotri V. K. Singh B. 2013. Effect of diurnal variability and storage conditions on essential oil content and quality of damask rose (Rosa damascenaMill.) flowers in north western Himalayas. Sci.Hort. 154. 102–108.
  56. 56. Yassa N., Masoomi F., Rohani Rankouhi SE., Hadjiakhoondi A. 2009. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the extract and essential oil of Rosa damascena from Iran, population of Guilan.DARU.17, 175–80.
  57. 57. Fairchild J.A., Brotherson J.D. 2001. Microhabital relationship of six major shrubs in Navajo National Monument, Arizona. J. Rang Mana. 33, 150–156.
  58. 58. Azarnivand H., Jafari M., Moghadam M.R., Jalili A., Zare Chaohki M.A. 2003. The effects of soil characteristics and elevation on distribution of two Artemisia species. Iran J. Nat Res. 56, 93–100.
  59. 59. Jin-Tun Z. 2002. A study on the relation of vegetation, climate, and soil in Shanxi province. Plant Eco. 162, 23–31.
  60. 60. Zargoosh Z., Ghavam M., Bacchetta G., Tavili A., 2019. Effects of ecological factors on the antioxidant potential and total phenol content of Scrophularia striata Boiss. Sci Rep. 9, 16021. pmid:31690810
  61. 61. Bettaieb Rebey I., Bourgou S., Rahali F.Z., Msaada K., Ksouri R., Marzouk B., 2017. Relation between salt tolerance and biochemical changes in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seeds. J. Food Drug Anal. 25, 391–402. pmid:28911682
  62. 62. Bonacina C., Trevizan C., Stracieri J., Santos T., Gonçalves J., Gazim Z., et al. 2017. Changes in growth, oxidative metabolism and essential oil composition of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) subjected to salt stress. Austral J. Crop Sci. 11, 1665–1674.
  63. 63. Yu X., Liang C., Chen J., Qi X., Liu Y., Li W., 2015. The effects of salinity stress on-morphological characteristics, mineral nutrient accumulation and essential oil yield and composition in Mentha canadensis L. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 197, 579–583.
  64. 64. Zheljazkov V.D., Cantrell C.L., Astatkie T., Hristov A., 2010. Yield, content, and composition of peppermint and spearmints as a function of harvesting time and drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 11400–11407. pmid:20942459
  65. 65. Chrysargyris A., Loupasaki S. Petropoulos S. A. Tzortzakis N. 2019. Salinity and cation foliar application: Implications on essential oil yield and composition of hydroponically grown spearmint plants. Sci Horti. 256, 108581.
  66. 66. Rajakumar R., 2013. A study on effect of salt stress in the seed germination and biochemical parameters of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under in vitro condition. Asian Journal of Plant Sci. Res, 3, 20 25.
  67. 67. Parvaiz A., Satyawati M., 2008. Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants- a review. Plant Soil. Envi. 54, 89–99.
  68. 68. Rahman M., Saha N., Islam A.R. M., Shen Sh., Bodrud-Doza M. 2017. Evaluation of Water Quality for Sustainable Agriculture in Bangladesh. Water Air Soil Pollut. 228,385.
  69. 69. Pazoki A., Ghazi Pirkouhi M., Shirani Rad A., Bigdeli M., Habibi D., 2011. Essential oil percent and essential oil yield of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) changes affected by nitrogen, magnesium and manganese amounts. New Find. Agricul, 1, 5–16.
  70. 70. Hasani J., Nik Baher Z. 2014. Evaluation of ecological needsdifferent species of thyme in Kurdistan Habitats. Echo phyto Medi.3, 22–34.
  71. 71. Moradi H., Ghavam M. & Tavili A. 2020. Study of antioxidant activity and some herbal compounds of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. in different ages of growth. Biotech Reports. 25, e00408.
  72. 72. Rusanov K., Kovacheva N., Rusanova M., Atanassov I. 2012. Low variability of flower volatiles of Rosa damascena Mill. plants from rose plantations along the Rose Valley, Bulgaria. Ind. Crops Prod. 37, 6–10.
  73. 73. Becerro M.A., Paul V.J., 2004. Effects of depth and light on secondary metabolites production and Cyanobacterial symbionts of the sponge Dysidea granulose. Marin Ecology Progress Series. 280, 115–28.
  74. 74. Thakur M., Sharma Sh., Sharma U. and Kumar R., 2019. Study on effect of pruning time on growth, yield and quality of scented rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) varieties under acidic conditions of western Himalayas. J. Appl Rese. Med. Arom Plants. 13, 100202.
  75. 75. Farooqi AH, Abad Sharma S. 1988. Effect of growth retardants on flowering of Rosa damascena Mill. In: Sinha SK, Sane PV, Bhargava SC, Agrawal PK, Editors. proceeding of international congress of plant physiology. Society of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, New Delhi; vol. 2, pp 1369–1372.
  76. 76. Ulusoy S., Boşgelmez-Tınaz G., Seçilmiş-Canbay H., 2009. Tocopherol, Carotene, Phenolic Contents and Antibacterial Properties of Rose Essential Oil, Hydrosol and Absolute. Curr Microbiol. 59, 554. pmid:19688375
  77. 77. Huber D. M., Thompson I. A. 2007. Nitrogen and plant disease. pp. 31–44. In: Datnoff L.E., Elmer W.H. & Huber D.M. (eds.). Mineral nutrition and plant disease. APS Press, St. Paul, MN., U.S.A.
  78. 78. Arvin P. 2019. Study of Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Physiological and Morphological Parameters and Essential Oils in Savory Plant (Satureja hortensis L.). J. Plant Res. 32, 464–473.
  79. 79. Sell CS. 2003. A fragrant Introduction to Terpenoid Chemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Thomas Graham House. Science Park. Milton Road. Cambridge. UK. 410 p.
  80. 80. Azarnivand H., Ghavam Arabani M., Sefidkon F., Tavili A., 2010. The effect of ecological characteristics on quality and quantity of the essential oils of Achillea millefolium. subsp. millefolium. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 25(4), 556–571.
  81. 81. Karray-Bouraoui N., Rabhi M., Neffati B., Baldan A.,Ranieri B., Marzoukc M., et al. 2009. Salt effect on yield and composition of shootessential oil and trichome morphology and density onleavesofMenthapulegium. Ind. Crops Prod. 30, 338–343.
  82. 82. Bialczyk J., Lechowski Z., Libik A. 1994. Growth of tomato seedlings under different HCO3 concentration in the medium. J. Plant Nutr. 17, 801–816.
  83. 83. Kovats E.S.,1987.Composition of essential oils. 7. Bulgarian oil of rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). J.Chromatogr. 406, 185–222.
  84. 84. Panda H., 2006. Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) −cultivations and processing. Cultivation and Utilization of Aromatic Plants. Asia Pacific Business Press, Distributed by National Institute of Industrial Research, Delhi, India, pp. 14–34.
  85. 85. Başer K.H.C., 1992. Turkish Rose Oil. Perfum.Flavor, 17, 45–52.
  86. 86. Moein M., Ghasemi Y., Karami F., Tavallali H., 2010. Composition of the Essential Oil of Rosa damascena Mill. from South of Iran. Iranian J. Pharma Scie. 1, 59–62.
  87. 87. Yi F., Sun J., Bao X., Ma B., Sun M. 2019. Influence of molecular distillation on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rose essential oils, LWT—Food Sci. Tech. 102, 310–316.
  88. 88. El-Gohary A. E., El Gendy A. G., Hendawy S. F., El-Sherbeny S. E., Hussein M. S., and Geneva M. 2015. Herbage yield, essential oil content and composition of summer savory(Satureja hortensis L.) as affected by sowing date and foliar nutrition, Gen. Plant Phys. 5, 170–178.
  89. 89. Qranjik A., Galeshi S. 2001. Effect of nitrogen spray on yield and yield component of wheat. Agri. Natural Res. J. 8, 87–98.
  90. 90. Verma R.S., Padalia R.C., Chauhan A., Singh A., Yadav A.K., 2011. Volatile constituents of essential oil and rose water of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) cultivars from North Indian hills. Nat Prodt Res. 17, 1577–1584. pmid:21711177
  91. 91. Ueyama Y., Hashimoto S., Nii H., Furukawa K., 1990. The volatile constituents of Shi Mei (Rosa davurica Pall.) flower concrete from China. Flavour Fragr. J. 5, 115–120.
  92. 92. Nedeltcheva-Antonova D., Stoicheva P., Antonov L. 2017. Chemical profiling of Bulgarian rose absolute (Rosa damascena Mill.) using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and trimethylsilyl derivatives. Ind. Crop. Prod. 108, 36–43.
  93. 93. Alizadeh A., Khoskhui M., Javidnia K., Firuzi O., Tafalozi E., Khalighi A., 2010. Effects of fertilizer on yield essential oil composition, total phenolic contentand antioxidant activity in Satureja hortensis L. (Lamiaceae) cultivated in Iran. J. Med. Plants Res. 4, 33–40.
  94. 94. Mansoorkhani–Roghaye A., Shahriari Z., Mohaselli V., Osfoori M., Shahriari A.G. 2012. Effect of graded levels of NPK on herb oil, yield and oil composition ofbasil (Ocimum basilicum L.). GJRMI 1, 258–264.
  95. 95. Farsaraeia S., Moghaddam M., Ghasemi Pirbalouti A. 2020. Changes in growth and essential oil composition of sweet basil in response of salinity stress and superabsorbents application. Sci Horti. 271, 109465.
  96. 96. Ahmed A.M.A., Talaat I.M., Khalid K.A. 2017. Citric acid affects Melissa officinalis L. essential oil under saline soil. Asian J. Crop Sci. 9, 40–49.
  97. 97. Sadraei H., Asghari G., Emami S. 2013. Inhibitory effect of Rosa damascena Mill flower essential oil, geraniol and citronellol on rat ileum contraction. Res Pharm Sci. 8, 1e7. pmid:24459472
  98. 98. Waliaa S., Mukhiac S., Bhatte V. Kumara R., Kumara R., 2020. Variability in chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Tagetes minuta L. essential oil collected from different locations of Himalaya. Ind. Crop. Prod. 150, 112449.
  99. 99. Ghavam M., Afzali A, Manca M.L. 2021.Chemotype of Damask Rose with Oleic Acid (9 octadecenoic acid) and its antimicrobial effectiveness. Sci Rep. In Press. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-87604-1
  100. 100. Popović-Djordjević J., Cengiz M., Ozer M.S., Sarikurkcu C. 2019. Calamintha incana: essential oil composition and biological activity. Ind. Crop. Prod. 128, 162–166.
  101. 101. Naeini A., Khosravi A., Chitsaz M., Shokri H. and Kamlnejad M. 2009. Anti- Candida albicans activity of some Iranian plants used in traditional medicine. Journal mycologic medicale. 19,168–172.
  102. 102. Demirci F., Guven K., Demirci B., Dadandi M.Y., Baser K.H.C. 2008. Antibacterial activity of two Phlomis essential oils against food pathogens. Food Control 19,1159–1164.
  103. 103. Buckle J. 2015. Basic Plant Taxonomy, Basic Essential Oil Chemistry, Extraction, Biosynthesis, and Analysis.
  104. 104. Opaichenova G, Obreshkova D. 2003. Comparative studies on the activity of basil—an essential oil from Ocimum basilicum L. against multidrug resistant clinical isolates of the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus and Pseudomonas by using different test methods. J Microbiol Methods. 54,105–10. pmid:12732427
  105. 105. Konovalova O., Gergel E., Herhel V., 2013. GC-MS analysis of bioactive components of Shepherdia argentea (Pursh.) Nutt. From Ukrainian Flora. Pharma Innov. 2, 7.
  106. 106. Dannenberg G. D. S., Funck G. D., Mattei F. J., Silva W. P. D., & Fiorentini Â. M. 2016. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of essential oil from pink pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) in vitro and in cheese experimentally contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 36, 120–127.
  107. 107. Zore G., Thakre A., Jadhav S., Karuppayil S. 2011. Terpenoids inhibit Candida albicans growth by affecting membrane integrity and arrest of cell cycle. Phytomedicine. 18, 1181–1190 pmid:21596542
  108. 108. Kim E., Park Il-K. 2012. Fumigant antifungal activity of myrtaceae essential oils and constituents from Leptospermum petersonii against three Aspergillus species. Molecul. 17, 10459–10469. pmid:22945026
  109. 109. Cordeiro R., Teixerira C., Brilhante R., Casteol-Branco D., Paiva M. 2013. Minimum inhibitory con-centrations of amphotericin B, azoles and caspofungin against Candida species are reduced by farnesol. Med Mycol. 51, 53–9. pmid:22712455
  110. 110. Duarte M., Leme E., Delarmelina C., Soares A., Figueira G. 2007. Activity of essential oils from Brazilian medicinal plants on Escherichia coli. J Ethnopharmacol. 111, 197–201. pmid:17210236
  111. 111. Walsh S., Maillard J-Y., Russell A., Catrenich C., Charbonneau D. 2003. Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 94, 240–247. pmid:12534815