Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparison of clinical and radiographic signs of hip osteoarthritis in contralateral hip joints of fifty working dogs

  • J. C. Alves ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    alves.jca@gnr.pt

    Affiliations Divisão de Medicina Veterinária, Guarda Nacional Republicana (GNR), Lisbon, Portugal, MED–Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal

  • Ana Santos,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Divisão de Medicina Veterinária, Guarda Nacional Republicana (GNR), Lisbon, Portugal

  • Patrícia Jorge,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Divisão de Medicina Veterinária, Guarda Nacional Republicana (GNR), Lisbon, Portugal

  • Catarina Lavrador,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation MED–Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal

  • L. Miguel Carreira

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon (FMV/ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal, Interdisciplinary Centre for Research in Animal Health (CIISA), University of Lisbon, (FMV/ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal, Anjos of Assis Veterinary Medicine Centre (CMVAA), Barreiro, Portugal

Expression of Concern

After publication of this article [1], concerns were raised about possible overlap or re-use of datasets and potential data discrepancies across a group of closely related publications [16]. The studies reported previously in [24] and [6] were not cited and discussed in [1]. In following up on these issues, the following was noted with regard to the datasets reported in these studies:

  • The three articles [13] each report a sample of 30 male and 20 female working dogs with the same overall aggregate weight and age data. The weight and age data for the 50-animal sample in Table 1 of article [1] are the same as in Table 1 of article [2] but there are minor differences in weight and age data reported by breed and sex in Table 1 of article [1] compared to Table 1 of article [3].
  • Table 1 in article [1] and Table 1 in article [3] also report individual stance analysis, thigh girth and range of motion (extension and flexion) measurements by breed and sex; in article [1] the left and right pelvic limb data are presented separately, in article [3] the left and right pelvic limb data are presented together.
  • Table 2 of article [1] and Table 2 of article [3] report broadly similar findings in radiographic evaluations; in article [1] the radiographic findings are presented by left and right pelvic limbs, whereas in article [3] the data are not separated by limb.

The corresponding author stated that these articles are part of a larger project which was run with a specific population of police working dogs, a relatively homogenous sample in terms of breeds, size, and conformation, and that article [3] is a descriptive study, where clinical and diagnostic imaging findings of this group of animals with bilateral hip osteoarthritis have different characteristics to companion dogs, while article [1] follows an experimental and more academic approach which looked at each joint individually to determine if there is a level of symmetry in animals with bilateral hip OA.

The corresponding author has also indicated that because of legal restrictions, the authors are unable to provide the PLOS ONE Editors with the underlying individual level data for this study. The published route for requesting access to the underlying data does not seem to be functional at the time of publication of this notice.

Where differences are observed between the datasets, it has not been possible to confirm the accuracy of the data reported in this PLOS ONE article [1].

In light of the unresolved questions about the datasets, the PLOS ONE Editors issue this Expression of Concern.

7 Oct 2022: The PLOS ONE Editors (2022) Expression of Concern: Comparison of clinical and radiographic signs of hip osteoarthritis in contralateral hip joints of fifty working dogs. PLOS ONE 17(10): e0276122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276122 View expression of concern

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the symmetry of clinical and radiographic signs of right and left pelvic limbs of dogs with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) and evaluate the association of physical findings and radiographic abnormalities.

Patients and methods

One hundred pelvic limbs of police working dogs with bilateral hip OA were evaluated, following a screening program. Weight distribution, joint range of motion at flexion and extension, thigh girth, and radiographic signs were recorded and compared with the results of the contralateral limb and by breed, age, and sex with the Paired Samples T-Test and Pearson correlation coefficient, with p<0.05.

Results

The sample mean age was 6.5±2.2 years, and the bodyweight of 26.7±5.3kg. No significant differences were observed when comparing weight distribution, joint range of motion, and thigh girth of left and right limbs. Weight distribution and age showed a statistically significant correlation with joint extension. The right limbs showed a significantly higher frequency of circumferential femoral head osteophyte (CFHO) regarding radiographic signs. Limbs with CFHO or caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte had significantly larger joint flexion angle (p = 0.02) and smaller extension angle (p<0.01), respectively, compared to those that did not. Age showed a significant correlation with the presence of several radiographic findings, as did different breeds.

Conclusion

Clinical and radiographic signs occur symmetrically in naturally occurring hip OA in police working dogs. Several correlations were observed between the evaluations performed and differences between breeds, which can be useful in assessing and early diagnosis of hip OA.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) poses significant welfare challenges and concerns, as it affects the quality of life, performance and implies a considerable cost in terms of healthcare [1, 2]. It is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disease in the dog and is estimated to affect around 200 000 dogs annually in the United Kingdom [3]. At least 80% of lameness cases and joint disease in companion animals are classified as OA, with 20% of middle-aged and 90% of older dogs having OA in one or more joints [47]. Risk factors include breed, neutered, higher bodyweight, and older than eight years [3]. Sporting and working animals are at increased risk, being exposed to repetitive loading and chronic fatigue injuries, leading to tissue damage, wear, tear, and ultimate tissue failure, resulting in clinical signs [8]. Chronic fatigue injuries are a critical predisposing condition for hip OA development, a disease commonly diagnosed in dogs, with various degrees of severity [9, 10].

Imaging plays a key role alongside the clinical review of patients with joint disease and can be done repeatedly and safely within recognized limits, which is important for the follow up of chronic conditions [11, 12]. The most common radiographic view for evaluating the hip is the ventrodorsal (VD) hip extended view, for which sedation is required for most dogs [1315]. Main radiographic changes include femoral periarticular osteophyte formation, subchondral sclerosis of the craniodorsal acetabulum, osteophytes on the cranial/caudal acetabular margin, remodeling of the cranial and caudal acetabulum, flattening of the femoral head, and irregular widening of the femoral neck [16, 17]. The features that have been deemed of significant importance are the circumferential femoral head osteophyte (CFHO), caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte (CCO), and subchondral bone sclerosis, early radiographic signs that predict the development of the clinical signs of hip OA [1821]. The ventrodorsal flexed view (also called frog-legged view, FL) enhances the visibility of the cranial and caudal aspects of the femoral head and neck, helping in the assessment of CFHO and CCO [21].

Weight distribution and off-loading, or limb favoring at the stance, is a commonly used subjective assessment during the orthopedic examination, but the subtle changes in posture or weight-bearing may occur in the early stage of the disease process can be easily missed with visual assessment only [2225]. Stance analysis and weight-bearing distribution have been reported as sensitive for detecting lameness in dogs, with better results in large breed dogs [26]. Muscular atrophy is a consistent finding in OA patients and may be evident within a few weeks [10, 14, 16, 27]. The evaluation of the joint range of motion (ROM) can also be performed, including flexion and extension [10]. The evaluation of asymmetry, assessment of muscle atrophy, measurement of static weight-bearing, and ROM measurement have been described as the most valid and sensitive physiotherapeutic evaluation methods [28, 29].

This study aimed to compare the symmetry of clinical and radiographic signs of right and left pelvic limbs of police working dogs with bilateral hip osteoarthritis, and evaluate the association of physical findings and radiographic abnormalities, at the time of diagnosis. We hypothesize that multiple asymmetries are present in several of the evaluation parameters.

Materials and methods

The study protocol was approved by the ethical review committee of the University of Évora (Órgão Responsável pelo Bem-estar dos Animais da Universidade de Évora, approval n° GD/32055/2018/P1, September 25th, 2018) and comply with ARRIVE guidelines. Written, informed consent was obtained from the Institution responsible for the animals.

This study’s sample constituted a convenience sample, similar in size to previously published reports on this topic [3032]. The sample comprised 100 hips of 50 police working dogs with bilateral hip OA, from the population of police working dogs of the Guarda Nacional Republicana (Portuguese Gendarmerie Canine Unit), scheduled to undergo treatment of hip OA. Patients were active police working dogs, selected after screening of the Portuguese Gendarmerie Canine Unit, based on history (difficulty rising, jumping and maintaining obedience positions, stiffness and decreased overall performance), physical (pain during joint mobilization, stiffness, and reduced range of motion), orthopedic, neurological and radiographic (OFA hip scores of mild, moderate or severe) examinations compatible with bilateral hip OA.

All patients underwent medical evaluation before acquisition from multiple breeders and trainers, and starting active training to become police working dogs. Additional inclusion criteria comprised a bodyweight ≥15kg, age over 1 year should not have received any medication nor nutritional supplements for six weeks or more. Animals that did not tolerate the data collection procedures, which had any other suspected or diagnosed neurological/musculoskeletal disorder, had a diagnosis of suspected concomitant disease (ruled out through physical examination, complete blood count, and serum chemistry profile), were excluded. Subsequent treatment was randomly determined, as the animals took part in a study evaluating intra-articular therapies for OA. Two-hundred and eighty-one dogs were screened, and 231 were excluded. Sixty-three due to suspected or documented orthopedic, neurological, or concomitant disease, 50 due to having a bodyweight <20kg, 25 for having received medication in <6 weeks, and 13 for not being tolerant of data collection, and 80 due to an inability to maintain medical follow-up throughout the study, for work-related reasons.

Radiographic studies were conducted under light sedation, using a combination of medetomidine (0.01mg/kg) and buthorphanol (0.1mg/kg), given intravenously. A VD extended legs view and an FL view were obtained. In the VD view, the presence of the following radiographic hip OA findings was recorded [21]: irregular wear on the femoral head, making it misshapen and with a loss of its rounded appearance; flattened or shallow acetabulum, with irregular outline; CCO; new bone formation on the acetabulum and on femoral head and neck; acetabular rim wear; subchondral bone sclerosis along the cranial acetabular edge; CFHO. In the FL view, the presence of CCO and CFHO was recorded. An example of CCO and CFHO, in VD and FL views, are presented in Figs 1 and 2, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 1.

An example of a hip with caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte (arrow) on a ventrodorsal (left) and frog leg right (views).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248767.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2.

An example of a hip with circumferential femoral head osteophyte (arrow) on a ventrodorsal (left) and frog leg (right) views.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248767.g002

Stance analysis was conducted with a weight distribution platform (Companion Stance Analyzer; LiteCure LLC, Newark, Delaware, United States). The equipment was placed in the center of an observation room, at least 1-meter feet from the walls. Complying with the manufacturer’s guidelines, the platform was calibrated at the beginning of each testing day and zeroed before each data collection. After an acclimatization period, animals were then encouraged to stand on to the weight distribution platform. To secure a correct position, the patient’s trainer helped ensure it placed one foot on each quadrant of the platform while maintaining a natural stance with its center of gravity and stability (measured by the platform) near the platform’s middle. When required, gentle restraint was used to maintain the patient’s head in a natural, forward-facing position. Normal pelvic limb evaluation is considered 20% of the total weight [33]. A Gulick II measuring tape was used to determine thigh girth. Measurements were made at a distance of 70% thigh length, measured from the greater trochanter’s tip, with the leg in an extended position. Animals were placed in lateral recumbency in a relaxed position [34]. ROM of the hip joints was obtained with a goniometer at extension and flexion with a flexed stifle [35].

Statistical analysis

Normality was assessed with a Shapiro-Wilk test, and each measured parameter was compared with the contralateral limb with a Paired Samples T-Test. Measured parameters by breed and sex were compared with an Independent Samples T-Test. Evaluation of the results of radiographic imaging, digital thermography, and physical examinations were conducted without knowledge of the results of the remaining evaluations. Correlation between parameters was assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient. All results were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 20, and a significance level of p<0.05 was set.

Results

A sample of 50 police working dogs, of both genders (30 males and 20 females), with a mean age of 6.5±2.2 years and bodyweight of 26.7±5.3kg, were analyzed. Four breeds were represented: German Shepherd Dogs (GSD, n = 17), Belgian Malinois Shepherd Dogs (BM, n = 15), Labrador Retriever (LR, n = 10), and Dutch Shepherd Dog (DSD, n = 8). They were used for four different purposes: Use of force (n = 20), drug detection (n = 14), search and rescue (n = 7), explosives detection (n = 5), and tactical intervention (n = 4). Considering OFA grading of hip joints, 35 animals were classified as mild (70%), 10 as moderate (20%), and 5 as severe (10%).

Measured age and weight values, individual limb weight distribution, thigh girth, and joint range of motion are presented in Table 1. No significant differences were observed when comparing overall measurements of left and right limbs. Significant differences were observed in weight and thigh girth in both right and left pelvic limbs (p<0.01) when comparing males to females, with male dogs having higher values. Comparing breeds, LR were significantly older than other animals (p<0.01), and GSD were significantly heavier than BM (p<0.01) and LR (p<0.01). GSD also had a significantly higher left thigh girth than BM (p<0.01), LR (p<0.01) and DSD (p = 0.04), and right thigh girth than BM (p<0.04) and LR (p<0.01). DSD had higher left joint flexion than BM and GSD (p = 0.04), while LR had a larger joint flexion angle (p = 0.05). Sex showed a correlation with weight (r = 0.5, p<0.01). Breed showed a moderate correlation with thigh girth (r = 0.4, p<0.01 for the left pelvic limb and r = 0.3, p = 0.04 for the right pelvic limb), as did sex (r = 0.5, p<0.01 for both limbs) and high correlation with weight (r = 0.8, p<0.01 for both limbs). A correlation was observed between joint extension and age (r = -0.4, p<0.04 for the left pelvic limb and r = 0.3, p<0.02 for the right pelvic limb) and weight distribution (r = 0.5, p<0.01 for the left pelvic limb).

thumbnail
Table 1. Mean scores (±standard deviation) of overall weight and age, individual stance analysis, thigh girth and range of motion (extension and flexion) measurements, and by breed and sex, of left and right pelvic limbs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248767.t001

Regarding radiographic findings, absolute frequencies and percentages in the VD and FL views of the left and right pelvic limbs are presented in Table 2. Breed variations in Orthopedic Foundation for Animals hip scores are shown in Table 3. Comparing contralateral limbs, only the presence of CFHO, observed in the VD view, was significantly different (p = 0.03). DSD had significant differences in the frequency of CFHO in the VD view compared to GSD (p = 0.03) and BM (p = 0.04) (left and right pelvic limbs, respectively). On the FL view, differences were observed in the frequency of CFHO of BM and GSD (p = 0.02) and DSD (p = 0.04), both on the left pelvic limb.

thumbnail
Table 2. Absolute frequencies and percentages of radiographic findings in the ventrodorsal and frog-leg views of the left and right pelvic limbs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248767.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Breed variations in Orthopedic Foundation for Animals hip scores.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248767.t003

A difference in the frequency of the presence of a worn cranial effective acetabular rim angle was observed in the right pelvic limb of GSD and LR (p = 0.04). Breed showed a moderate correlation with the presence of CFHO in the VD view (r = 0.302, p<0.05 for the left pelvic limb). A moderate correlation was observed between age and the presence of CCO on the FL view (r = -0.408, p<0.01 for both pelvic limbs), an irregular, misshapen femoral head (r = 0.302, p = 0.02 for the left pelvic limb), and new bone formation on the acetabulum and femoral head and neck (r = 0.312, p = 0.03 for the right pelvic limb). The joint extension was high or moderate correlated with the presence of CCO in an FL view (r = -0.506, p = 0.01 for the left pelvic limb and r = -0.439, p<0.01 for the right pelvic limb) and on the VD view(r = -0.315, p<0.04 for the right pelvic limb). Joint flexion was moderate correlated with the presence of CFHO in the VD view on both limbs (r = -0.312, p = 0.02 for the left pelvic limb and r = -0.304, p<0.04 for the right pelvic limb).

Considering animals that did or did not present CCO or CFHO on the left pelvic limb, significant differences were observed in joint extension when CCO was present in both the VD and FL views (p<0.01 for both) and joint flexion when CFHO was present in a VD view (p = 0.02). On the right pelvic limb, a significant difference was observed in joint extension when CCO was present, in both the VD and FL views, compared to when it was absent (p<0.01).

Discussion

Hip OA is common in large breeds such as German Shepherd Dogs and Labrador, amongst others [36]. This study describes and compares several clinical and radiographic findings of different individuals in each individual and between breeds with hip OA. It also describes as, in these animals, disease derived changes occur in similar degree in both limbs since no significant differences were observed when comparing contralateral limbs. The reason for this finding is unclear and may be associated with the natural progression of the disease or with a relatively early diagnosis, the effect of a possible unilateral, or even intermittent overloading is still not noticeable.

Most hip OA signs are observed in the older population, usually in animals over 8 years, with the disease now at a chronic stage [3]. The mean age of animals included in this study was lower (6.5) years, except for LR. This result is not in line with published studies and may be associated with the fact that these animals are active working dogs, where complaints due to musculoskeletal disease are noticed early on, from its toll on gait and performance [37]. The difference in age of LR is less apparent and may be due to breed conformation, leading to a better disease tolerance, as hip OA seems to be better tolerated by animals than OA in different joints [10]. Additional reasons may be related to a less physically demanding mission of these dogs (most were product detection dogs) than the remaining animals included in the sample (mostly in search and rescue and Use of force activities).

Some of the other registered differences could be expected. GSD were significantly heavier than other breeds (BM and LR) and with higher thigh girth. Male dogs also heavier than females and with higher thigh girth. This may account for a positive correlation between thigh girth, weight, sex, and breed. The effect of weight and growth rate has been studied concerning hip dysplasia from an early stage, with heavier dogs showing a higher incidence of OA at maturity and an earlier age [38, 39]. This can partially account for the higher number of males included in this sample since they tend to be heavier and, therefore, possibly more prone to develop OA. Measuring thigh girth is also be a useful measurement, not only in the initial assessment but also as an outcome measure [34]. We have presented thigh girth measurements in dogs with hip OA, but further studies should include a control group with disease-free dogs to compare both groups’ values. Coxofemoral ROM may also be diminished, particularly during extension, although this is not a universal finding [14, 40]. Normal ROM of the hip joint in military working German Shepherd Dogs are described as 44°±6 at flexion and 155°±6 at extension [41]. In Labrador Retrievers, normal ROM been described as 50°±2 at flexion and 162°±3 at extension in one report, and 49° at flexion and 159° at extension in another [35, 42]. We have measured lower values in GSD and LR, which could be expected due to OA. Exercise has been described as having a positive effect on the severity of lameness in LR with hip dysplasia, which increased with longer exercise duration [43]. Since the animals included in the sample are all active working dogs, this inverse relationship can be present. The joint extension was one of the measurements made with higher dispersion, which may confirm the fact that ROM changes are not a consistent finding. It showed a correlation with age, which may be attributed to disease progression, as joint extension appears to be limited by the joint capsule fibrosis. This reduction in joint extension in older dogs has been described before [43]. On the other hand, hip joint flexion seems to be related to muscle mass and could increase in dogs with OA due to a loss in muscle masses [44]. As the patients in our sample did not exhibit a high degree of muscle atrophy, this increase was not observed.

Normal weight distribution for the stance analyzer is the same as for a pressure-sensitive walkway—30/30/20/20 (left thoracic limb/right thoracic limb/ left pelvic limb/right pelvic limb) [45, 46]. It has been proposed that bodyweight distribution at a stance may be an equivalent or superior measurement of pain associated with hip OA than both VI and PVF [33, 47], and dogs presenting with the disease often have slightly abducted pelvic limbs, easily noticeable when the animal is standing, increasing acetabular coverage [10]. Overall weight distribution values per limb recorded in this study were lower than the described 20% expected level. When analyzing weight distribution in individual breeds, the exception was registered in the left pelvic limb of GSD, but this may be a compensation mechanism. No significant variations were observed between breeds. This measurement’s value, particularly in response to treatment, should be the subject of further research since it was the measured parameter that recorded the least breed associated variations.

It is well established that radiographic signs’ development occurs later than the structural changes associated with OA, and symptoms must be severe before being observed on the X-ray [14, 48]. CFHO is a marked radiopaque line encircling the junction between the femoral neck and the epiphysis, along with the insertion of the joint capsule [49]. When comparing radiographic findings between contralateral limbs, only the frequency of CFHO on the VD view was significantly different. Since this is one of the radiographic predictors of future OA development [21], and these animals were only now being diagnosed, future studies will have to address whether further asymmetries between limbs develop if it was only an incidental finding. Since CFHO is usually better observed on an FL view, and the same asymmetry was not observed on the FL, this might be the case. CFHO also correlated with joint flexion, which can be explained by the changes that occur in the joint capsule during OA progression, making it less flexible. GSD also had significantly higher frequencies of this finding than BM and DSD. Interestingly, no correlation was found between weight and any of the radiographic findings considered, as could be expected, and they may rather be linked to breed variations.

CCO arises at the femoral neck’s caudodorsal part due to traction on the hip joint capsule, and it manifests as a radiopaque line. It correlates with hip subluxation and, therefore, represents a risk factor for OA development at a later stage in life [15]. A correlation between CCO and age of an irregular femoral head and new bone formation was observed and can further attest to the relationship between CCO and OA signs’ development. It also correlated with joint extension and, as seen with CFHO, may be due to the changes that occur in the joint capsule. This possibility is also reflected when considering the animals that presented CFHO or CCO and comparing them with those that did not, with significant differences in ROM evaluation, flexion, and extension.

This study presents some limitations. Ideally, a control group with non-lame dogs should be included. The interest of each of the findings in the prognosis or treatment monitoring of OA could not be determined since data was collected in a single evaluation moment. Future studies are required to evaluate these points. Additionally, the sample included a majority of dogs with mild OA. For that reason, further studies should include a larger number of dogs with moderate and severe OA to determine if similar results are obtained.

Conclusions

The present study showed that clinical and radiographic signs occur symmetrically in naturally occurring hip OA in police working dogs. It also describes the correlation between the evaluations performed, which can be useful in evaluating and early diagnosing hip OA, as differences between the most commonly used working dogs breeds.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Manuel Pereira for the assistance with the statistical analysis of the data, Companion, LiteCure LLC, and Concessus, S.A. for providing the Stance Analyzer used in this study.

References

  1. 1. van Weeren PR. General Anatomy and Physiology of Joints. Joint Disease in the Horse. 2015. pp. 1–24.
  2. 2. Cuervo B, Chicharro D, Del Romero A, Damia E, Carrillo J, Sopena J, et al. Objective and subjective evaluation of plasma rich in growth factors therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2019;27: S482.
  3. 3. Anderson KL, O’Neill DG, Brodbelt DC, Church DB, Meeson RL, Sargan D, et al. Prevalence, duration and risk factors for appendicular osteoarthritis in a UK dog population under primary veterinary care. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 5641. pmid:29618832
  4. 4. Bliss S. Musculoskeletal Structure and Physiology. 2nd ed. In: Zink C, Van Dyke J, editors. Canine Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2018. pp. 32–59.
  5. 5. Lees P. Pharmacology of drugs used to treat osteoarthritis in veterinary practice. Inflammopharmacology. 2003;11: 385–399. pmid:15035792
  6. 6. Venable RO, Stoker AM, Cook CR, Cockrell MK, Cook JL. Examination of synovial fluid hyaluronan quantity and quality in stifle joints of dogs with osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69: 1569–1573. pmid:19046002
  7. 7. Johnston SA. Osteoarthritis. Joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1997;27: 699–723. pmid:9243777
  8. 8. Kawcak C. Pathologic Manifestations of Joint Disease. 2nd ed. Joint Disease in the Horse. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 49–56.
  9. 9. King MD. Etiopathogenesis of canine hip dysplasia, prevalence, and genetics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2017;47: 753–767. pmid:28460694
  10. 10. Wilson L, Smith B. Canine lameness. 2nd ed. In: McGowan CM, Goff L, editors. Animal Physiotherapy: Assessment, Treatment and Rehabilitation of Animals. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2016. pp. 112–126.
  11. 11. Turmezei TD, Treece GM, Gee AH, Houlden R, Poole KES. A new quantitative 3D approach to imaging of structural joint disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 1–13. pmid:29311619
  12. 12. Lafeber FPJG, van Spil WE. Osteoarthritis year 2013 in review: Biomarkers; reflecting before moving forward, one step at a time. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21: 1452–1464. pmid:23954702
  13. 13. Tips Armbrust L. & techniques for pelvic radiography. Clin Br. 2009; 51–54.
  14. 14. Smith G, Karbe G, Agnello K, McDonald-Lynch M. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and control of canine hip dysplasia. 1st ed. In: Tobias K, Johnston S, editors. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 1st ed. Saunders; 2011. pp. 824–848.
  15. 15. Fortrie RR, Verhoeven G, Broeckx B, Duchateau L, Janssens L, Samoy Y, et al. Intra- and interobserver agreement on radiographic phenotype in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Surg. 2015;44: 467–473. pmid:25414132
  16. 16. Witte P, Scott H. Investigation of lameness in dogs: 2. Hindlimb. In Pract. 2011;33: 58–66.
  17. 17. Morgan JP, Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T, Haessig M, Montavon PM. Correlation of radiographic changes after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate-deficient stifles with functional outcome. Vet Surg. 2010;39: 425–432. pmid:20345533
  18. 18. Powers MY, Biery DN, Lawler DE, Evans RH, Shofer FS, Mayhew P, et al. Use of the caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte as an early marker for future development of osteoarthritis associated with hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004;225: 233–7. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15323379 pmid:15323379
  19. 19. Mayhew PD, McKelvie PJ, Biery DN, Shofer FS, Smith GK. Evaluation of a radiographic caudolateral curvilinear osteophyte on the femoral neck and its relationship to degenerative joint disease and distraction index in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220: 472–6. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11860241 pmid:11860241
  20. 20. Tôrres RCS, Ferreira PM, Araújo RB, Martins AS. Presença de “Linha Morgan” como indicador de displasia coxofemoral em cães da raça Pastor-Alemão. Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec. 1999;51: 157–158.
  21. 21. Puckler K, Tellhelm B, Kirberger R. The hip joint and pelvis. In: Kirberger R, McEvoy F, editors. BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Imaging. Wiley; 2016. pp. 212–231.
  22. 22. Meijer E, Bertholle CP, Oosterlinck M, van der Staay FJ, Back W, van Nes A. Pressure mat analysis of the longitudinal development of pig locomotion in growing pigs after weaning. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10: 1–11. pmid:24383544
  23. 23. Wanstrath AW, Hettlich BF, Su L, Smith A, Zekas LJ, Allen MJ, et al. Evaluation of a single intra-articular injection of autologous protein solution for treatment of osteoarthritis in a canine population. Vet Surg. 2016;45: 764–774. pmid:27391909
  24. 24. Lane DM, Hill SA, Huntingford JL, Lafuente P, Wall R, Jones KA. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Vet J. 2015;5: 158–65. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26623383 pmid:26623383
  25. 25. Lascelles BDX, Roe SC, Smith E, Reynolds L, Markham J, Marcellin-Little D, et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67: 277–282. pmid:16454633
  26. 26. Clough W, Canapp S. Assessing clinical relevance of weight distribution as measured on a stance analyzer through comparison with lameness determined on a pressure sensitive walkway and clinical diagnosis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2018;31: A1–A25. pmid:30060271
  27. 27. Lotsikas P, Lotsikas F, D. H, Dyce J, Ridge P. Disorders of the Pelvic Limb: Diagnosis and Treatment. 2nd ed. In: Zink C, J. van D, editors. Canine Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2016. pp. 353–388.
  28. 28. Hyytiäinen HK, Mölsä SH, Junnila JT, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM, Hielm-Björkman AK. Ranking of physiotherapeutic evaluation methods as outcome measures of stifle functionality in dogs. Acta Vet Scand. 2013;55: 29. pmid:23566355
  29. 29. Henderson AL, Hecht S, Millis DL. Lumbar paraspinal muscle transverse area and symmetry in dogs with and without degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. J Small Anim Pract. 2015;56: 618–622. pmid:26310387
  30. 30. Yun S, Ku S-K, Kwon Y-S. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma synergistically ameliorate the surgical-induced osteoarthritis in Beagle dogs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11: 9. pmid:26768536
  31. 31. Scott RM, Evans R, Conzemius MG. Efficacy of an oral nutraceutical for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2017;30: 318–323. pmid:28763523
  32. 32. Pashuck TD, Kuroki K, Cook CR, Stoker AM, Cook JL. Hyaluronic acid versus saline intra-articular injections for amelioration of chronic knee osteoarthritis: A canine model. J Orthop Res. 2016;34: 1772–1779. pmid:26867692
  33. 33. Clough W, Canapp S, Taboada L, Dycus D, Leasure C. Sensitivity and specificity of a weight distribution platform for the detection of objective lameness and orthopaedic disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2018;31: 391–395. pmid:30300913
  34. 34. McCarthy DA, Millis DL, Levine D, Weigel JP. Variables affecting thigh girth measurement and observer reliability in dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5. pmid:30214905
  35. 35. Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res. 2002;63: 979–986. pmid:12118679
  36. 36. Comhaire FH, Snaps F. Comparison of two canine registry databases on the prevalence of hip dysplasia by breed and the relationship of dysplasia with body weight and height. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69: 330–333. pmid:18312130
  37. 37. Alves JC, Santos A, Fernandes Â. Evaluation of the effect of mesotherapy in the management of back pain in police working dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018;45: 123–128. pmid:29222031
  38. 38. Riser WH, Cohen D, Lindqvist S, Mansson J, Chen S. Influence of early rapid growth and weight gain on hip dysplasia in the German Shepherd Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1964;145: 661–8. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5896436 pmid:5896436
  39. 39. Kealy RD, Lawler DF, Ballam JM, Mantz SL, Biery DN, Greeley EH, et al. Effects of diet restriction on life span and age-related changes in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220: 1315–20. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11991408 pmid:11991408
  40. 40. Walton B, Cox T, Innes J. ’How do I know my animal got better?’–measuring outcomes in small animal orthopaedics. In Pract. 2018;40: 42–50.
  41. 41. Thomas TM, Marcellin-Little DJ, Roe SC, Lascelles BDX, Brosey BP. Comparison of measurements obtained by Use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67: 1974–1979. pmid:17144796
  42. 42. Laura LH, Geoffrey TF, J MW. Comparison of range of motion in Labrador Retrievers and Border Collies. J Vet Med Anim Heal. 2015;7: 122–127.
  43. 43. Greene LM, Marcellin-Little DJ, Lascelles BDX. Associations among exercise duration, lameness severity, and hip joint range of motion in Labrador Retrievers with hip dysplasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013;242: 1528–1533. pmid:23683017
  44. 44. Levine D, Millis DL, Marcellin-Little DJ. Introduction to Veterinary Physical Rehabilitation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2005;35: 1247–1254. pmid:16260312
  45. 45. Bosscher G, Tomas A, Roe S, Marcellin-Little D, Lascelles BD. Repeatability and accuracy testing of a weight distribution platform and comparison to a pressure sensitive walkway to assess static weight distribution. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2017;30: 160–164. pmid:28094423
  46. 46. Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR, Ritter MJ. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2003;16: 153–157.
  47. 47. Lascelles B, Freire M, Roe S, DePuy V, Smith E, Marcellin-Little D. Evaluation of functional outcome after BFX total hip replacement using a pressure sensitive walkway. Vet Surg. 2010;39: 71–77. pmid:20210948
  48. 48. Burton-Wurster N, Farese J., Todhunter R., Lust G. Site-specific variation in femoral head cartilage composition in dogs at high and low risk for development of osteoarthritis: insights into cartilage degeneration. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1999;7: 486–497. pmid:10489322
  49. 49. Szabo SD, Biery DN, Lawler DF, Shofer FS, Powers MY, Kealy RD, et al. Evaluation of a circumferential femoral head osteophyte as an early indicator of osteoarthritis characteristic of canine hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231: 889–892. pmid:17867972